NC0089630_Application_20160606

CHARLOTTE
•
•
W(OTER
May 31, 2016
Tom Belnick
NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: NPDES Permit Application
Long Creek Regional WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Dear NPDES Unit:
RECEIVED/NCDEWWR
JUN 0 6 2%
Water Quality
Permitting Section
Please find the enclosed application for the initial NPDES permit for the Long Creek Regional WWTP. The
application includes Attachments #1—#7. Part G, Combined Sewer Systems is not applicable. The
following is a summary of the attachments submitted with the application:
1. Attachment #1— NCDWR's Return of NPDES Permit Application Letter and Charlotte
Water's narrative response along with History of Long Creek Regional Plant Narrative
2. Attachment #2 — NCDWR's Speculative Effluent Limits Letter
3. Attachment #3 - Topographical maps required in Part B.2. and Part B.3.
4. Attachment #4 - Nutrient and Land Purchase Agreement from ReVenture (Clariant)
5. Attachment #5 - MOA between City of Mount and City of Charlotte, MOA between City of
Belmont and City of Charlotte, and the Proposed permit modifications for Belmont and Mt.
Holly for nutrient re -allocation of purchased nutrients
6. Attachment #6 — Executed Nutrient Purchase Agreement between City of Belmont and City of
Charlotte (exercised if Long Creek Regional WWTP is not built)
7. Attachment #7 - Environmental Impact Statement — hard copy with CDROM
Please let us know if you have any questions, or if you need any further information. If you do, please call
Shannon Sypolt, Water Quality Program Administrator, at 704/336-4581 or me at 7041391-5181. Thank you
for your assistance with the application process.
Respectfully,
Jacqueline A. Jarrell, P E.
Operations Chief, Environmental Management Division
Charlotte Water
Cc: S. Coffman
S. Sypolt
Charlotte Water 4222 Westmont Drive, Charlotte, NC 28217 charlottewater.org
; Operated by the City or Charlotte

CHARLOTTE
W4J E R •
May 31, 2016
Tom Belnick
NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: NPDES Permit Application
Long Creek Regional WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Dear NPDES Unit:
Please find the enclosed application for the initial NPDES permit for the Long Creek Regional WWTP. The
application includes Attachments#1 —V. Part G,Combined Sewer Systems is not applicable. The
following is a summary of the attachments submitted with the application: •
1. Attachment#1 —NCDWR's Return of NPDES Permit Application Letter and Charlotte
Water's narrative response along with History of Long Creek Regional Plant Narrative
2. Attachment#2—NCDWR's Speculative Effluent Limits Letter
3. Attachment#3-Topographical maps required in Part B.2. and Part B.3.
4. Attachment#4- Nutrient and Land Purchase Agreement from ReVenture(Clariant)
5. Attachment#5-MOA between City of Mount and City of Charlotte, MOA between City of
Belmont and City of Charlotte,and the Proposed permit modifications for Belmont and Mt.
Holly for nutrient re-allocation of purchased nutrients
6. Attachment#6—Executed Nutrient Purchase Agreement between City of Belmont and City of
Charlotte(exercised if Long Creek Regional WWTP is not built)
7. Attachment#7-Environmental Impact Statement—hard copy with CDROM
Please let us know if you have any questions,or if you need any further information. If you do, please call
Shannon Sypolt,Water Quality Program Administrator, at 704/3364581 or me at 704/391-5181. Thank you
for your assistance with the application process.
Respectfully,
aU
Jacqueline A.Jar�11E.
Operations Chief, Environmental Management Division
Charlotte Water
Cc: S. Coffman •
S.Sypolt
Charlotte Water 4222 Westmont Drive,Charlotte,NC 28217 charlottewater.org
16 operated by the City of Charlotte

•
r 1
L
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP, Initial Permit Catawba
FORM _ �....
2A A APPLICATION OV ZVIEW .
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A,6. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow z 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions 8.1 through B.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRAICERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRAICERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional VWVfP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet
A.I. Facility Information.
Facility Name Lona Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
Mailing Address 5100 Brookshire BLVD.
Chadotte, NC 28216
Contact Person Jacqueline A. Jarrell PE
Jsje Operations Chief
Telephone Number ( 704 ) 634-5430
Facility Address 800 Hawfield Rd. Charlotte, NC 26214 (Long Creek Pump Station Access)
(not P.O. Box)
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Charlotte Water
Mailing Address 5100 Brookshire Blvd,
Chadotte, NC 28216
Contact Person Jacqueline A. Jarrell PE
Title Operations Chief
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
X owner X operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility orthe applicant.
❑ facility X applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits, Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been Issued to the treatment works
(include state -Issued permits).
NPDES NA PSD NA
UIC NA Other NA
RCRA NA Other NA
AA. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Chadotte, NC 60,000 Separate Sanitary Sewer Charlotte Water
Total population served 60,000 (EIS)
11
•
C1
J
EPA Farm 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550-22. Page 2 of 22

•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP, I Initial Perrr I Catawba
A.S. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes X No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian County or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian County?
❑ Yes X No
A.B. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treat rent plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plats was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the le month of 'this year' occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 12.0 f 25.0 mgtl
Two Years Aoo
b. Annual average daily flow rate WA
WA
Last Year
This Year
C. Maximum daily flow rate WA WA WA
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
X Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
❑ Combined stone and sanitary sewer %
A.S. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? X Yes ❑ No
If yes, list taw many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
I. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
III. Combined sewer overflow points
N. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
V. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface Impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
C. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application ate:
Location:
Number of acres:
• Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
pips 001
X No
mgd
❑ Yes X No
mgd
❑ Yes X No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA Ions 7550-6 B 7550-22.
Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP
Initial Permit
Catawba
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g.. tank tuck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility.
mgd
e. Does the treabnent works discharge or dispose of Its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.B. through A.8.d above (e.g.. underground percolation, well injection): ❑ Yes
X No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) g applicable):
Annual daft' volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
•
•
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 6 7550-22. Page 4 of 22

•
•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP, Initial Permit Catawba
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
N you answered Wes" to aungon A.&a. complete aesstloes A.9 through A.12 once for each oulfall (Including bypass points) through
which effluent Is discharged. Do not Include Information on combined sewer overflows in this section. N you answered "No" to auestion
A.9.s. go to Part B. "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Groater Man or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.B. Description of Outlall.
a. Outiall number pipe 001
b. Location
(CRY or town, R applicable)
(County)
(Latitude)
C. Distance from shore (0 applicable)
d. Depth below surface (R applicable)
e. Average daily flow rate
I. Does this outfall have either an Intermittent or a periodic discharge?
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge o=rs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
Months in which discharge oaurs:
g. Is oulfall equipped with a difuser?
A.10. Description of Receiving Water
(Zip Code)
(State)
(Lengkude)
R.
ft.
> .50 mgd
❑ Yee X No (go to A.9.g.)
mgd
❑ Yes ❑ No
a. Name of receiving water Catawba River
b. Name of watershed (R known) Catawba
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known): Unknown
C. Name of State ManagementlRiver Basin ('d known): Catawba
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known): HUC 03050103
d. Cd0cal low flow of receiving stream (0 applicable)
acute 7Q10 Flow is 95 cis chronic Unknown ds
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (d applicable): Unknown mgll of CeCOa
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-8 8 7550-22. Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
X Primary X Secondary
X Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CB005 removal %
Design SS removal %
Design P removal %
Design N removal %
Other %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Ultraviolet Disinfection is Proposed
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ❑ Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QAIQC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
s.u.
pH (Ma)imum)
8.11.
Flow Rate
Temperature (Winter)
Temperature (Summer)
' For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
METHOD
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
DEMAND (Report one)
CB005
FECAL COLIFORM
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
0
0
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-5 $ 7550-22. Page 6 of 22

•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional W1lVTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate 2 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
BA. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
N/A gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize Inflow and infiltration.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following Information. (You may submit more than one map If one map does not show the entire
area.) Please see Attachment 03
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include ouffalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within % mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. OperationfMaintenance Performed by Contmctor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: {
Responsibilities of Contractor.
B.S. Scheduled Improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several Improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the ouffall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 6 7550-22.
Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
C. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes.' briefly describe, including new maximum daily Inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For Improvements planned Independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MMIDD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction I l l I
- End Construction /
- Begin Discharge / / / /
- Attain Operational Level / / I I
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Describe bdefly:
B.G. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the Indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include Information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number.
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
OTHER
I
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
•
•
•
EPA Foos 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 8 of 22

0
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
B S CSAPPL•ICA^ Q 1 FORM9T,ION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who Is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained In the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Forth 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
X Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
❑ Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
❑ Part E (roxicity Testing: Biomonflortng Data)
❑ Part F (industrial User Discharges and RCRAICERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
MC. •,
JaLLAPPLICANTS MUST COMP • O C F O .
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the Information, the Information Is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false Information, Including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title 114C.0 U 6 W N t(,t� Fl • lsp YUuloLl. C7P lLRilatiJ6 e N t E F
`�'C"ti��--+�-�^' "`r✓�-'�
Signature
Telephone number 17 cq) (D Zq - S ti 3 0
Date signed b - 2 - 1 6
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or Identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Forth 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WW-FP, Initial Permit Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION!
PART_D .-EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING.DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design Flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permtding authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA)QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA1QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
'
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML)MDL
Conc:Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide Information on other metals requested by the permit writer
•
•
•
EPA Form 3510-00k (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 & 7550-22. Page 10 of 22

•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Outfall number (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units ;
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
ETHYLSENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYLCHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
EPA Form 3510-20k (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22,
Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
W Long Creek Regional WTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM -DAILY DISCHARGE
:-�^ AVERAGE-DAILYDISGHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
-Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
1,1,1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NrrROPHENOL
PENTACHLORCPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
`J
CI
•
EPA Form 3610-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 12 of 22

11
•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional VVVVTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL)ETHER
BIS (2-LTiYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYLETHER
BUTYL SENZYL
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYLETHER
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1.99). Replaces EPA forms 7650-6 & 7550-22.
Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional VVV\TP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Outfall number: (Complete once for each cutlall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/INDL
Conc.
Units
Mau
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO.
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NfrROBENZENE
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
1,2,4
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide Informallon on other pollutants (e.g., pestMides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
•
•
11
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 755M & 7550-22. Page t4 of 22

•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP
Initial Permit
Catawba
;S _,PLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
JP tTXS17IY(i6y►TA
00,
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analyles not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, If one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using aitemate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the forth to
complete.
E.I. Required Testa.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
❑ chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number: Test number: Test number:
a. Test Information.
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Four composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 75W22.
Page 15 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RNER BASIN:
Catawba
Test number: Test number: Test number.
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the lest was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity,
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type: If receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
I. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify 'natural' or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k, Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
PH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%
LCW
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
•
•
•
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.5 d 7550.22- Page 16 of 22

•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
ICH
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MWDD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe:
E.I. Summary of Submitted Btomonitoring Teat Information. If you have submitted biomonttoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION, OVERVIEW (PAGEA) TO•DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 17 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWfP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment progrem. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
❑ Yes ❑ No
F2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of ClUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through i and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name:
Mailing Address.
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
F.6. Principal Product(s) and Raw Materlal(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s):
Raw material(s):
F.B. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of processwastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or Intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU Is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
•
•
EPA Form 3510-7A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 22

a
•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, Describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amoum nits
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Ramedlation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that It will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLAIRCRAIor other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency).
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-8 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WV\fTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
ORMATIO14
,SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
�.PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS W av
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G.
G.I. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a_ All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g.. beaches;, drinking water supplies. shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
C. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by GSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
a. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through GA once for each CSO dischRM2-Loint
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
(City or town, ff applicable) (Zip Code)
(County) (State)
(Latitude) (Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable)
d. Depth below surface (if applicable)
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
❑ Rainfall 0 CSO pollutant concentrations [I CSO frequency
❑ CSO flow volume [I Rem" water quality
I. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
GA. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events ([I actual or [I approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (EI actual or [] approx.)
0
� IL
Li
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1 -99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-8 & 7650-22. Page 20 of 22

i
0
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
W Long Creek Regional WTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
C. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
G.6. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water:
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United Stale Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management/River Basin:
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
G.B. CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
END OF PART G.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS -
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-6 & 75W22.
Page 21 of 22

Additional information, d provided, will appear on the following pages.
0
•
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

RECEIVEDINCDEUDbVVR
JUN Q 6 2616
Water Quality
Permitting Section
Attachment # 1

PAT MCCRORY
Gommor
WaterResources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
March 28, 2016
Ms. Jacqueline Jarrell, P.E.
Operations Chief, Environmental Management Division
Charlotte Water
5100 Brookshire Blvd
Charlotte, North Carolina 28216
Dear Ms Jarrell:
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
sr<.a-Y
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Direclor
RECEIVEDINCDEWWR
JUN 0 6 2016
Water Quality
Permitting Section
Subject: Return of NPDES Application
Long Creek Regional W WTP
Mecklenburg County
The Division is returning your application for a new NPDES wastewater discharge permit as
incomplete for the following reasons:
1. Application Fee. The application package must include a non-refundable application fee
of $3,440. Please make this check payable to NC Department of Environmental Quality.
2. Flow Justification/Alternatives Analysis. Please include the entire Alternatives Analysis
in Attachment #2. It appears the first 4 pages are missing, which appear to include an
Alternative 1. Also, if these missing pages do not include information on flow
justification, please provide additional documentation for the projected flow of 25 MGD
by 2034. It is not apparent from Table 4-2 whether the buildout flow is based on
projected population growth, consolidation within the service area, or a combination. If
population projections were used to arrive at the buildout flow, please detail in text or
include additional documentation from the Draft EIS. Finally, describe the anticipated
wastewater flows that will be directed to the Regional WWTP during each phase (e.g., it
appears that Belmont flows will initially be pumped to McAlpine W WTP during Phase 1,
and rerouted to the Regional W WTP following Phase 2 buildout).
3. May of Outfall Location. Please indicate the proposed location of Outfall pipe 001 to
Catawba River on a USGS Topo map, 1:24,000 scale.
4. Nutrient Allocations. Please include an additional Attachment to the application
summarizing the current nutrient allocation status. Please detail the TN/TP allocations
purchased by the City of Charlotte to date, and any proposed tend/lease of these
allocations while the Regional WWTP is being constructed. Please include relevant
documentation including contracts and agreements. Concurrent with this new
application, the Division is also working on permit renewals for Clariant, Belmont, and
State of North Carolina I Enviranmental Quality I Wafer Resources
1617 Mad Service center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 707 9000

Responses to March 28 letter from Tom Belnick:
Item 2: Wastewater Flow Directions— During Phase 1 of the Long Creek WWTP the plant will treat flows
from the Charlotte system that currently flow through the Long Creek Uftstation and flows from Mt
Holly. Flows from Belmont will be pumped to the Paw Creek Liftstation which pumps to the McAlpine
WWTP. See attached graphic.
The proposed discharge permit to meet the TMDL utilizes the nitrogen and phosphorus allocation from
the old Clariant WWTP and the allocation from the Belmont and Mt Holly WWTP s. Both EIS and the
agreements with both towns are set up such that activating Phase 1 of the Long Creek WWTP requires
Belmont and Mt Holly to shut down their plants and transfer wastewater to Charlotte.
It is presumed that Phase 1 of the plant would be 12 mgd.
Phase 2 of the Long Creek WWTP is a proposed expansion to 25 mgd and the timing of that expansion
would be triggered by one of two events. The first possibility is that more capacity is required to serve
Mt Holly or to serve areas which are upstream of the Long Creek WWTP (i.e. —the Long Creek basin or
Mt Holly service area). Under this scenario the Paw Creek Liftstation would not necessarily be
redirected to the Long Creek WWTP at this time.
The second possible trigger is that the Charlotte system south of Long Creek, which could be either the
Paw Creek collection system or the Irwin or McAlpine WWTP's, needs additional capacity. Under this
(• scenario the Paw Creek liftstation forcemain would be rerouted up to the Long Creek WWTP as a part of
the plant expansion.
4. Charlotte Water has purchased 90%of the nitrogen (286.65 Ibs) and phosphorus (36 Ibs) allocations
from the Clariant NPDES permit (Purchase contract attached). Currently that allocation is stored in the
Clariant permit but needs to be transferred to the Belmont and Mt Holly permits (proposed Permit
Modification language attached). I know there has been some conversations as to whether some
modification to the proposed allocation split needs to occur but after looking at it with Belmont and Mt
Holly we need to stick with the same allocation split we've been proposing all along. We don't have the
detailed agreements fully ironed out yet but I've attached the MCA's that were approved by both
boards, although non -binding, and the nutrient purchase agreement with Belmont whereby they will
purchase the entire nutrient allocation from us if we don't build the Long Creek agreement for some
reason. That agreement is a binding contract.
The proposed permit modification language for Belmont and Mt Holly also includes language to address
what is to happen with the Long Creek WWTP is constructed.
5. Schedule - Yes, both the Belmont and Mt Holly discharges are required to eliminated as a part of the
�, Long Creek W WTP startup if not before. There is the option to construct the liftstation and forcemain

from the Belmont or Mt Holly system to the Charlotte system prior to the construction of the long Creek
W WTP but the most likely scenario for that would be to construct the Mt Holly liftstation as an interim
step to address short term capacity needs.
0

• Long Creek Regional Wastewater Plant Project Summary
May, 2016
Overall Project Goal
The goal of this project is to accommodate projected growth in western Mecklenburg and eastern Gaston
counties while implementing the 1995 Lake Wylie TMDL by consolidating an industrial and 2 existing municipal
wastewater treatment plants and eliminating extensive wastewater collection system pumping currently in use.
This will be accomplished through the construction of a regional wastewater treatment plant capable of meeting
the desired water quality and TMDL nutrient removal goals.
Background
In 2007 Charlotte Water completed a wastewater master plan for the service area draining to the McAlpine,
Sugar, and Irwin Creek Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP). The study included all of these drainage basins
and plants since they are currently interconnected with the ability to bypass flow from the Sugar Creek and Irwin
Creek plants to the McAlpine Creek plant. The map below is a schematic of the drainage basins and plant
• interconnects.
Service Area and WWTP Interconnects
•

• At the conclusion of the master plan it was determined that the best option was to pursue a new treatment
plant at the Long Creek Pump station location rather than continuing to pump wastewater such long distances.
The option of continued pumping would also require replacing most of the gravity sewer lines between the Paw
Creek Wastewater Pump station and the McAlpine or Irwin Creek WWTP with a cost that was similar to that of a
new plant.
Project Initiation
The kickoff for this project had two primary focuses: 1. To work with NC DEQ on the water quality modeling for a
new wastewater treatment plant; and 2. To engage a large stakeholder group on the concept of a new
wastewater plant in this area.
In the process of working with North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ) on the water
quality modeling for a NPDES speculative limit request it was determined that this section of Lake Wylie was
under an EPA TMDL for phosphorus and nitrogen developed in 1995 and that the TMDL did not provide nutrient
allocations for new discharges (see TMDL excerpt below).
New Discharges
It is recommended that no new discharges should be allowed to the lake mainstem or its
tributaries, unless an evaluation of engineering alternatives shows that it is the most
• environmentally sound alternative. For any new discharges that meet this requirement it is
recommended that advanced treatment technology be required. It is further recommended that
any new facility with a permitted design flow of greater than or equal to 1 MOD should be
required to meet monthly average limits of 1.0 mSA total phosphorus (TP) and 6.0 m d total
nitrogen (TN), (nitro;en limits to apply for the months April through October only). For new
facilities with a permitted design flow of less than 1 MOD but greater than 0.05 MGD (50,000
gallons per day) it is recommended that they mat a total phosphorus limit of 2.0 mgA.
All industrial discharges will be handled on a case -by -case basis because attainable advanced
removal technology cannot be clearly defined for them as a group. The Division will require
the industries in the management area to control TP and IN to best available technology levels
applicable to their industrial type.
Existing Discharges
Existing discharges to the lake mainstem and tributaries should be encouraged to be removed
when alternatives become available. Programs such as the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility
Department (CMUD) sewer line extension project should continue to be supported.
Upon expansion or major modification. it is recommended that all existing discharges should
be rec)uired to apply advanced nutrient removal technology. For all expanding facilities with a
permitted design flowgra ter than or equal to 1 MGD, recommended monthly average timits
are as follows: I,0 mg/1 TP and 6.0 mg/1 TN, (nitrogen limits to apply for the months of April
through October only). For ex ding facilities with a permitted design flow less than I MOD
but greater than or equal to 0.05 MGD, the recommended TIP limit is 2.0 mg/l. No expansion
should be allowed that increases the total nutrient load from the facility unless an evaluation of
engincering alternatives shows that it is the most environmentally sound alternative.
Lake Wylie TMDL 1995 — Page 6
• However the general location of the proposed plant contains 3 significant NPDES permits for existing
wastewater treatment plants (City of Belmont, City of Mt Holly, and Clariant Corporation) and all are in close

• proximity to the proposed Long Creek regional plant and/or to Charlotte Water's existing Paw Creek Wastewater
Pump station as shown in the aerial photos below.
•
As noted above, a comprehensive stakeholder process was completed to ensure adequate review and discussion
on the concept of a new regional wastewater treatment plant. The stakeholder group determined that the new
plant provided several key environmental improvements to the area:
1. Allowed the discharges of 3 older wastewater treatment plants eliminated and consolidated into one
• new plant.

• 2. Provided for meeting the TMDL and additional growth in the regional without the need to
upgrade/expand 3 existing plants (City of Belmont, City of Mt Holly, and Charlotte Water). (It should be
noted that only Clariant had any nutrient limits at that time but NC DEQ was proposing them for
Belmont and Mt Holly.)
3. Moves a significant volume of water currently being treated and discharged back to the stream near the
South Carolina line back up in the Catawba River basin closer to the withdrawal point.
Lake Wylie TMDL Implementation Plan
The TMDL for this section of Lake Wylie provided for maximum nutrient loadings for Phosphorus and Nitrogen.
The diagrams below are an excerpt from the TMDL plan showing the distribution of nutrient loadings among
existing dischargers at that time (Figure 6.1) and the future allocations upon TMDL implementation (Figure 6.2).
J/ Catawba
Me.
Island Rive r
Lake Oars Mt. Holy
4.0 MGD
1v - 11 o b✓d
•
- 304 TN TN04H
1W/d
(9.1 mg/I)
Nutrient 40 Belmont
5A MGD
801 bs/d 7-mo
7346 b✓e (8mg .3 /)
60% TM - 6z4 be/d
%(15
mg )
\
LAKE V UE
• Major NPDES Discharger loeatbrn %ith facility nark and predicted avg. defy nutrient bads for total nitroy0a
(TN) and phosphorus (W) based on permitted flow and recommended nutrient concentration.
r I Nutrient sensitive lake areas.
L
Note: Dilly nutrient ioadngs in the 4 lake arms are based on 89.90 measured background levels plus actual
avenge 9"4 loadings from discharger, Nutrient loading in the main lake Is bned on percentages of the
lake arm loadings that are thought to reach the lake based on a ildd-calibrated IMda nutient transport
model.
Figure 6.1 Schematic Diagram of Lake Wylie Showing Nutrient Loadings and Predicted
Chlorophyll -a Concentrations in the 4 Major Anus and the Mairtstcm of the Lake
Under the 1995 Lake Wylie Nutrient Management Strategy
0

•
,W —T Catawba
htt. hdand
River
Lake Derr
Mt. Holly
6.0 MGD
TP-solw/d
(1.0 nvM
Tw - 900 ba/d
(&0 nvm
Nutrient
Laid=
Belmont
TP-455 be/d
7.0 MGD
TN-7068 b✓d
TP - 5e m/d
(1.0 md0
60%
TM- 3SO be/d
\
LAKE I IE
� tbier wore Obdwryarbatire wMfadty nwrw satl wdaed..a did Mdwv teai brteW dvoa.r
_ (Tt9 eM ohe.phme (Try bawd an Ywiura now oral remwmdb rMhm mwman4w.
rl tMrfeltewafw bka wr.
Nola D* nuuk a leadnp h Ow 4 Hw ame w bead m $940 nwsead buk vural MvW pun aetud
evvape erg/ t a*W f m drdw e , wad x',edre in tM neh bbe b btrd a pasmLapea of the
lake arm IM&W tlwt w tho gM to reed tlr Hw breed m e 9ddebrt d b.tdta rw.a trenpal
meld.
Flgtme 62 Sch®ade of lake Wylie Showing Nutrient Loadings and Predicted
Chlorophyll.& Concentrations In the 4 Moor Mm9 and the Mabomm of the Lake
Under the 1995 fake Wylie Nutrient Management Strategy w4th Mt Holly and Belmont
Expanded by 20 MOD
The project proposes that Belmont and Mt Holly would close their wastewater plants and their nutrient
allocations would be merged into the NPDES permit for the regional facility.
As noted in the TMDL, all industrial permits would be handled on a case by case basis and no nutrient allocation
was given in the document. Based on the NPDES permit for Clariant, it was determined that their permit had a
nitrogen allocation of 318.5 Ibs/day and a phosphorus allocation of 40 Ibs/day. Charlotte Water negotiated an
agreement to purchase 90% of the nutrient allocation (287 Ibs/day nitrogen and 36 Ibs/day phosphorus) initially.
This would allow Clariant to continue to provide some level of sanitary sewer service to their industrial site and
continue with the groundwater remediation that has been ongoing for a number of years at the site.
Charlotte Water made a request for Speculative Limits from NC DEQ in 2013 for a new regional W WTP on Lake
• Wylie based on the plan to consolidate the 3 three discharges/permits described above and to accommodate
the flows from the Charlotte Water Long Creek basin that are currently being pumped to the McAlpine Creek

• WWTP. The speculative limits for the regional plant were proposed by NC DEQ to meet the allocations within
the TMDL as noted in the Speculative Limit letter excerpt below (NC DEQ Speculative Limit letter attached).
•
Nuhiente. 11 a nutrient Loading for the three partner dischargers was cowed to
determine the total nutrient Wkxxtion for the proposed CMU Regio<ul WWTP. The ensue
allocation for Mount Holly and Belmont wf be included in the Regional facrdq While the
C2ariant facility has a total nitrogen, (PM allomtion of 3185 lb/day, only 90 % or 287lb/day
wM be allocated to the CMU Regional WWTP. The same percentage of total phosphorus
(TP) will be allocated,; therefore 361b/day of total phosphorus of 401b/day will be allocated.
The zmWe nt limitations are eozaimba at with the Lake Wylie nutrient TMDL aBocations and
the contriihuted nutrient allocatim for the three dischargers is below:
Dlecilimmer
TN Allocation
TP Allocation
Basis
Mount Hofly
30016
50lb/day
TMDL
Belmont
3501b
58lb day
TMDL
Clariant
297lb/day
361b/day
TMDI.
Total -
937
I" lb/day
200,5M IV#ummer
MUN
14W 1
NC DEQ Letter, Tom Belnick, June 2013
Charlotte Water has completed the purchase of 90% of the nitrogen (287 Ibs) and phosphorus (36 Ibs)
allocations from the Clariant NPDES permit. Currently that allocation is stored in the Clariant permit but it is
being proposed to be transferred to the Belmont and Mt Holly permits temporarily since Clariant has ceased
most of its operations producing the wastewater volumes seen in the past years. With the addition of these
nutrient allocations to their permits, Belmont will be able to continue meeting the TMDL requirements and Mt
Holly will begin meeting them until such time as the Long Creek WWTP is constructed and their plants taken
offline.
The proposed permit modification language for Belmont and Mt Holly would also include language to address
the transfer of the nutrient allocation to the Long Creek Regional WWTP NPDES permit once the plant is
completed.
Schedule and Phasing of the Long Creek Regional WWTP
The original master plan for the project indicated additional wastewater treatment capacity would be needed to
meet growth projections before 2016 but with the economic recession that schedule has been delayed. A
review of the current growth trends with the improved economy and wastewater flows and loadings at the
•existing treatment plants indicates that the construction for the treatment plant will likely need to be initiated in
the next few years.

• Phase 1 of the Long Creek WWTP the plant will treat flows from the Charlotte system that currently flow
through the Long Creek Pump station and wastewater flows from Mt Holly. Wastewater flows from Belmont
will be pumped to the Paw Creek Pump station which will pump to the Irwin Creek WWTP. The Paw Creek
Pump station currently pumps to the McAlpine Creek WWTP but has the option of pumping some flow to the
Irwin Creek WWTP. Capital projects are currently underway for anew forcemain and gravity sewer line to move
the primary flow to the Irwin Creek WWTP. It is presumed that Phase 1 of the plant would be 12 mgd.
•
Phase 1
Condition
(Includes
rerouting flow
horn McAlp ne
to Irwin(
WWTP 9llu t
Phase 2 of the Long Creek WWTP is a proposed expansion to 25 mgd with the timing of that expansion being
triggered by one of two scenarios. The first scenario is that more capacity is required to serve Mt Holly or to
serve areas which are upstream of the Long Creek WWTP (i.e. —the Long Creek basin) in Mecklenburg County.
Under this scenario the Long Creek WWTP would be expanded but no changes would be made to the collection
system layout.
The second scenario is that the Charlotte system downstream of the Long Creek WWTP, which could be either
the Paw Creek collection system and/or the Irwin or McAlpine WWTP, needs additional capacity. Under this
scenario the Paw Creek Pump Station force main would be rerouted up to the Long Creek WWTP as a part of the
plant expansion project.
0 The graphic below depicts this second scenario.

0
Phase 2
Condition
from Paw Crmk
Litstation to
Long Creek
W WTP with
e"mkm)
WWTP e'flu t
i
Proiect Status
As of May, 2016 the following key items have been completed:
1. Memorandums of Agreement approved and executed with City of Belmont and City of Mt Holly
(attached)
2. Purchase agreement for the treatment plant site and NPDES permit nutrient allocation completed with
ReVenture (Clariant Corporation) —(attached).
3. Record of Decision for the Environmental Impact Statement issued for the overall project including the
Long Creek Regional WWTP, Belmont Pump station and Force main, and Mt Holly Pump station and
Force main (attached).
Next steps for the project are:
1. The completion of the application and review for an NPDES permit, for which this report was created.
2. Completion of the detailed agreements with the City of Belmont and the City of Mt Holly.
3. The initiation of a Preliminary Engineering Report on the planning and design of the proposed facilities.
4. Completion of the NPDES permit modifications for Belmont and Mt Holly transferring the Clariant
nutrient allocation (Proposed modification language attached).

CABARRUS
Current
Condition
WWTP Effluent

Phase 1
Condition
(includes
rerouting flow
from McAlpine
to Irwin)
WWTP Effluent

Phase 2
Condition
(includes
rerouting flow
from McAlpine
to Irwin and
Paw Creek to
Long Creek)
WWTP Effluent

Attachment # 2
•
•

AA.
CCDEEIR
(01 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
Mr. Barry Shearin, Chief Engineer
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities
5100 Brookshire Blvd.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28216
June 28, 2013
Subject: Speculative Effluent Limits
Proposed CMU Regional WWTP
Mecklenburg County
This letter is in response to .your request for revised speculative effluent limits for the
proposed Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities (CMU) Regional WWTP. Speculative limits In
September 2009 included the City of Mount Holly Wastewater Treatment Plant in
partnership with CMU for the proposed CMU Regional WWTP at the wasteflows of 17
MGD and 25 MGD. In January 2010, speculative limits included Mount Holly and Clariant
WWTP in partnership for the proposed CMU Regional Plant at 17 MGD and 25 MGD.
This latest speculative limits request now includes the City of Belmont, the City of Mount Holly,
and Clariant as partners in the CMU Regional WWTP. Limits are requested for wasteflows of
12 MGD and 25 MGD. It should be understood by all entities that these speculative limits are
only applicable if the nutrient allocations from Belmont; Mount Holly, and Clariant are
included in the proposed project There is no capacity in Lake Wylie for a Charlotte
Mecklenburg Utilities discharge facility on its own based on the EPA approved 1996 Lake
Wylie nutrient total •nwainum daily load (TMDL) allocation In addition, Mount Holly,
Belmont, and Clariant must all submit formal permit modifications to confirm the transfers of
flow and nutrient loading to the proposed CMU Regional WWTP. Please recognize that
speculative limits may change based on future water quality initiatives, and it is highly
recommended that the applicant verify the speculative limits with the Division's NPDES
Unit prior to any engineering design work.
Receiving Stream Lake Wylie has a stream classification of WS-IV CA. Waters with this
designation are a source of drinking water supply, culinary or food processing purposes in
ZAML1617 Meal Service Center Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617
Intemet wm.nowalawallty om
An Equal OpporWMy n AfBrmallve Aden Empbyer
1V6 a Carofina
Naturally

Mr. Barry Shearin
June 28, 2013
Page 3 of 5
0 TABLE 1. Speculative Limits for CMU Regional WWrP, Proposed flow of 12.0 MGD
limitations
0
.... ...
verage
Dail y
Flow
IZO MGD
CBOD5, Summer
4.2 mg/L
6.3 mg/L
CBOD5, Winter
8.3 mg/l,
12.5 mg/L
JISS
30 mg/l,
45 mg/l,
N113 as N
1.0 mg/L
3.0 mg/L
Dissolved Oxygen
(minimum)
7.0 mg/L
Total Residual Chlorine
17ug/L
Fecal coliform
mean
200/100 ml,
400/100 mL
Total Nitrogen (summer
200,518 lbs/summer
Total Nitrogen (wmter)l
141AS7 lbs/winter
Total Phosphorus2
52,560 N/yeaT
Chronic Toxicity
Pass Fail (Quarterly test)
90%
1. The total nitrogen limit is equivalent to a 9.4 mg/L annual average.
2. The total phosphorus limit is equivalent to a 1.4 mg/L annual average.
TABLE 2. Speculative Limits for CMU Regional WIV17P, Proposed flow of 25.0 MGD
.. ... . .. e.
aily
Maximum. m.
Flow
25.0 MGD
CBOD5, Summer
4.2 mg/l,
6.3 nWL
CBOD5, Winter
83 mg/L
12.5 ing/L
73S
30 L
45 mg/L
NH3 as N
1.0 mg/L
3.0 mg/L
Dissolved Oxygen
(minimum)
7.0mg/L
Total Residual Chlorine
17 ug/L
Fecal coliform, (geometric
mean)
200/100 mL
400/100 mL
Total Nitrogen (summer
200,518lbs/summer
Total Nitrogen (winter
141A871bs/winter
Total Fhosphorus2
52,5W lbs/year
Chronic Toxicity
Pass Fail (Quarterly test)
90%
1. The total nitrogen limit is equivalent to a 4.5 mg/l, annual average.

Mr. Barry Shearin
June 28, 2013
Page 5 of 5
Should you have any questions about these speculative limits or NPDES permitting
requirements, please feel free to contact Jackie Nowell at (919) 807- 6386.
Respectfully,
l�
om Belnick
Supervisor, Complex Pemtitting Unit
Attachment: EAA Guidance Document
Hardmpy:
Central Files
NPDES Permit File
Barry Gullet, CMUD Direcbor 5100 Brookshire Blvd. Charlotte NC 28216
Brent M. Reuss/ Black & Veatch 8520 Cliff Cameron Drive Suite 210 Charlotte, N.C. 28269
JefDebewonet/SmHBC 260DBnIl9heetCohimbjk&C.29W1
Electronic copy:
NC WRC, Inland Fisheries, [e-mail]
US Fish and Wildlife Service, Sara_Ward®fws.gov
DWQ/SWPS Mooresville Regional Office
DWQ/SBPA Hannah Headrick
DWQ/Modelmg TMDL Unit, Kathy Stecker
DWQ/Badnwide Planning, Jeff Manning
NPDES Server>Specs

•
Attachment # 3
•
0

( .n.
ur/
_�. O ba .% •L•'"w r�r t , _l (. ,�\t \ t., u` l V /?r j f � � ..,; � C ,;
XS
aoo R� •` _ ` q J `-1 _ g. 4 : r l r j -vim", n: tt
\" '' r � 1 Rllj'au / � rat. .•. � ., C� l ..
G /1 �-��r.�yt �� 1� • t � Y
\'•"-. .". - � ore � „.{w \r . }
a{� r
T na✓ .(/ -
,
/. •�{�f•-" !r w µ_i �t L-. dkP aNd,?/� , .,'71��
4
r
� %/� `��`� � ,. . /y. � /. ,� ✓ Ire' /, � +k� ,•
Ut,, 'li p�>
/ t
a,
l
l �
• �e
`.CA
ky
a I( 1 �; � i � (��r \\ far `�� � ,• . ' �
\Ap
;.9.
.1 `� � - . � ram• J
H Charlotte Water / CHARLOTTE
City of Mount Holly / City of Belmont W`TE R
Long Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant OtBe�
41000
Feet Outfall Location MOUNT CJ �o�
J� 'f
1 inch = 2,000 feet LEGEND HOI,L,Y o�e'°'
1:24,000 Long Creek Regional WWTP with Cutfall _rh Caro`
Area of Interest BLACK & VEATCH
w layer Credits: Copyright:0 2023 National Geographic Sodety, i-cubed 0.Building a World of difference.°
Mf Hoify-BelmontWWlP OuKall April 1$2076

ACCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
June 28, 2013
Mr. Barry Shearin, Chief Engineer
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities
5100 Brookshire Blvd.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28216
Subject: Speculative Effluent Limits
Proposed CMU Regional W WTP
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Shearin:
This letter is in response to your request for revised speculative effluent limits for the
proposed Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities (CMU) Regional WWTP. Speculative limits in
September 2009 included the City of Mount Holly Wastewater Treatment Plant in
partnership with CMU for the proposed CMU Regional WWTP at the wasteflows of 17
MGD and 25 MGD. In January 2010, speculative limits included Mount Holly and Clariant
WWTP in partnership for the proposed CMU Regional Plant at 17 MGD and 25 MGD.
This latest speculative limits request now includes the City of Belmont, the City of Mount Holly,
and Clariant as partners in the CMU Regional WWTP. Limits are requested for wasteflows of
12 MGD and 25 MGD. It should be understood by all entities that these speculative limits are
only applicable if the nutrient allocations from Belmont, Mount Holly, and Clariant are
included in the proposed project. There is no capacity in Lake Wylie for a Charlotte
Mecklenburg Utilities discharge facility on its own, based on the EPA approved 1996 Lake
Wylie nutrient total maximum daily load (TMDL) allocation. hi addition, Mount Holly,
Belmont, and Clariant must all submit formal permit modifications to confirm the transfers of
flow and nutrient loading to the proposed CMU Regional WWTP. Please recognize that
speculative limits may change based on future water quality initiatives, and it is highly
recommended that the applicant verify the speculative limits with the Divisions NPDES
Unit prior to any engineering design work.
ReceivingS,tream Lake Wylie has a stream classification of WS-IV CA. Waters with this
designation are a source of drinking water supply, culinary or food processing purposes in
Location:512 N.
Intamet www.navatemualitv.ora
An Equal Opporlui* IAlflmiallveAclbn Employer
Noo Caro a.
, mratty

Mr. Barry Shearin
June 28, 2013
Page 2 of 5
addition to the standard uses for waters with a C. classification This segment of the •
Catawba River (Lake Wylie) is listed on the North Carolina 2012 Impaired Streams list for
low pH.
Based upon a review of information available from the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program Online Map Viewer, there are not any Federally Listed threatened or endangered
aquatic species identified within a 5 mile radius of the discharge location If there are any
identified threatened/endangered species, it is recommended that the applicant discuss the
proposed project with the US Fish and Wildlife Service to determine whether the proposed
discharge might impact such species.
Speculative Limits. The speculative limits were developed based on Division staff
recommendation and consideration of the Lake Wylie TMDL allocation Based on available
information, speculative effluent limits for the proposed discharge of 12 and 25 MGD to
Lake Wylie are presented in Tables 1 and 2. A complete evaluation of these limits and
monitoring requirements for metals and other toxicants will be addressed upon receipt of a
formal NPDFS permit application
CBOD5/NH3 Limits. The limits for CBOD5 and NH3 are based on best professional
judgment for the protection of instream dissolved oxygen through the assignment of tertiary
treatment limits. The CBOD limits of 4.2 mg/L in the summer and 8.3 mg/L in the winter
are effectively equivalent to BOD5 limits of 5 mg/L (.summer) and 10 mg/L (winter). The
year-round NH3 limit of 1 mg/L is assigned based on instream protection against ammonia •
toxicity.
Dissolved Oxygen. The dissolved oxygen (D.O.) effluent limit of 7 mg/L was based on the
minimum D.O. level used as model input to predict acceptable downstream D.O. levels.
Nutrients. The nutrient loading for the three partner dischargers was combined to
determine the total nutrient allocation for the proposed CMU Regional W WTP. The entire
allocation for Mount Holly and Belmont will be included in the Regional facility. While the
Clariant facility has a total nitrogen (TN) allocation of 318.5 lb/day, only 90 % or 287lb/day
will be allocated to the CMU Regional WWTP. The same percentage of total phosphorus
(TP) will be allocated, therefore 36 lb/day of total phosphorus of 40lb/ day will be allocated.
The nutrient limitations are consistent with the Lake Wylie nutrient TMDL allocations and
the contributed nutrient allocation for the three dischargers is below:
Discharger
TN Allocation
TP Allocation
Basis
Mount Holly
300 Ib/day
50lb/day
TMDL
Belmont
350 lb/day
58lb/day
TMDL
Clariant
2871b/day
361b/day
TMD4(Norwo• BAT
Total -
937 lWday
144lb/day
200,518 lb summer
SZS60 Iblyear
141,487 lb/winter
0

Mr. Barry Shearin
June 28, 2013
Page 3 of 5
0 TABLE 1. Speculative Limits for CMU Regional W W';'P, Proposed flow of 12.0 MGD
B#E(tupnt'.. •,
Crha uctenshe :;' : ;;: ;
,.,3:.:.>:;,.;;.;,::,::.<.:.i;i<.::',;
•,,::.:,.�::..;..:,::,..:.::::,:?:;�lulerxt°Limitations
'• . , . .
Average ,..,
Day ,
Maximum
Flow
12.0 MGD
CBOD5, Summer
4.2 L
6.3 m L
CBOD5, Winter
8.3 m L
12.5 /L
TSS
30 L
45 L
NH3 as N
1.0 L
3.0 L
Dissolved Oxygen
minimum
7.0 mg/L
Total Residual Chlorine
17 u L
Fecal coliform�geometric
mean
200/100 mL
400/100 mL
Total Nitro (summer)1
200,518 lbs/summer
Total Nitro (winter)1
141,487lbs winter
Total Phosphorus2
52,560 lbs/ ear
Chronic Toxicity
Pass Fail(Quarterly test
90%
1. The total nitrogen limit is equivalent to a 9.4 mg/L annual average.
2. The total phosphorus limit is equivalent to a 14 mg/L annual average.
TABLE 2. Speculative Limits for CMU Regional W WTP, Proposed flow of 25.0 MGD
,�
�Q
::,, ::::.;:':;:' ::,:::.;•.;-`.
:'Avg e::.
.Ma�amu„+,
Flow
25.0 MGD
CBOD5, Summer
4.2 /L
6.3 m L
CBOD5, Winter
8.3 L
12.5.m L
7%
30 L
45 L
N113asN
1.0 L
3.0m L
Dissolved Oxygen
minima
7.0 mg/L '
Total Residual Chlorine
17 u L
Fecal coliform (geometric
mean
200/100 mL
400/100 mL
Total Nitro(summer)1
200,518lbs summer
Total Nitrogen (whiter)1
141,4871bs winter
Total Fh horus2
52,5601bs/. ear
Chronic Toxicity
Pass Fail(Quarterly test
90%
1. The total nitrogen limit is equivalent to a 4.5 mg/L annual average.

Mr. Barry Shearin
June 28,2013
Page 4 of 5
Monitoring in Lake Wylie will also be required to ensure that the water quality model •
predictions were accurate, and to ensure the discharge does not create adverse conditions in
the Lake in the future. CMU will be required to monitor upstream and downstream of the
outfall. The following parameters should be included in sampling: dissolved oxygen,
temperature, conductivity, pH, total phosphorus, total nitrogen and chlorophyll a. Instream
monitoring will be required three times per week during the months of June, July, August
and September and once per week during the rest of the year.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (E M Please note that the Division cannot guarantee
that an NPDES permit for discharge of up to 25.0 MGD will be issued with these speculative
limits. Final decisions can only be made after the Division receives and evaluates a formal
permit application for the proposed discharge. In accordance with the North Carolina
General Statutes, the practicable wastewater treatment and disposal alternative with the
least adverse impact on the environment is required to be implemented.
Therefore, as a component of all NPDES permit applications for new or expanding flow, a
detailed engineering alternatives analysis (EAA) must be prepared. The EAA must justify
requested flows, and provide an analysis of potential wastewater treatment alternatives.
Alternatives to a surface water discharge, such as a spray/drip irrigation or wastewater
reuse are considered to be environmentally preferable. A copy of the EAA requirements is .
attached to this letter. Permit applications for new or expanding flow will be returned if all
EAA requirements are not adequately addressed. •
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) EAMS Requirements. A SEPA EA/EIS document
must be prepared for all projects that: 1) need a permit; 2) use public money or affect public
lands; and 3) might have a potential to significantly impact the environment For new
wastewater discharges, significant impact is defined as a proposed discharge of >500,000
gpd or producing an instream waste concentration of > 33% based on summer 7Q10
streamflow conditions. Since CMU's facility is proposing a discharge of >50 ,000 gpd flow,
the CMU facility must prepare a SEPA document that evaluates the potential for impacting
the quality of the environment The NPDES Unit will not accept an NPDES permit
application for the proposed discharge until the Division has approved the SEPA
document and sent a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to the State
Clearinghouse for review and comment.
A SEPA Environmental Assessment (EA) should contain a clear justification for the
proposed project. If the SEPA EA demonstrates that the project may result in a significant
adverse effect on the quality of the environment, you must then prepare a SEPA EIS
(Environmental Impact Statement). Since your proposed discharge is subject to SEPA, the
EAA requirements discussed above will need to be folded into the SEPA document The
SEPA process will be delayed if a l EAA requirements are not adequately addressed. If you
have any questions regarding SEPA EA/EIS requirements, please contact Hannah Headrick
with the DWQ Planning Branch at [phone].
0

Mr. Barry Shearin
June 28, 2013
Page 5 of 5
Should you have any questions about these speculative limits or NPDES permitting
requirements, please feel free to contact Jackie Nowell at (919) 807- 6386.
Respectfully, % Q
om Remick
Supervisor, Complex Pemutting Unit
Attachment: BAA Guidance Document
Hardcopy:
Central Piles
NPDES Permit File
Barry Gullet, CMUD Director 5100 Brookshire Blvd. Charlotte NC 28216
Brent M. Reuss/ Black & Veatch 8520 Cliff Cameron Drive Suite 210 Charlotte, N.C. 28269
JefDebesscrwt/SCDHEC 2600BallSt<eetCohimb4SC29201
Electronic Copy:
NC WRC, Inland Fisheries, shannondeaton®ncwildhfe.org
US Fish and Wildlife Service, Sara [e-mail]
DWQ/SWPS Mooresville Regional Office
DWQ/SEPA, Hannah Headrick
DWQ/Modelmg TMDL Unit, Kathy Stecker
DWQ/Basmwide Planning, Jeff Manning
NPDES Server>Specs

•
•
•
CHARLOTTE
W4JER
May 31, 2016
Tom Belnick
NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: NPDESPermit Application
Long Creek Regional WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Dear NPDES Unit:
RECEIVED/NCDEWWR
JUN 0 6 2016
Water Quality
Permitting section
Please find the enclosed application for the initial NPDES permit for the Long Creek Regional WWTP. The
application includes Attachments #1— V. Part G, Combined Sewer Systems is not applicable. The
following is a summary of the attachments submitted with the application:
1. Attachment #1— NCDWR's Return of NPDES Permit Application Letter and Charlotte
Water's narrative response along with History of Long Creek Regional Plant Narrative
2. Attachment #2 — NCDWR's Speculative Effluent Limits Letter
3. Attachment #3 - Topographical maps required in Part B.2. and Part B.3.
4. Attachment #4 - Nutrient and Land Purchase Agreement from ReVenture (Clariant)
5. Attachment #5 - MOA between City of Mount and City of Charlotte, MOA between City of
Belmont and City of Charlotte, and the Proposed permit modifications for Belmont and Mt.
Holly for nutrient re -allocation of purchased nutrients
6. Attachment #6 — Executed Nutrient Purchase Agreement between City of Belmont and City of
Charlotte (exercised if Long Creek Regional WWTP is not built)
7. Attachment #7 - Environmental Impact Statement — hard copy with CDROM
Please let us know if you have any questions, or if you need any further information. If you do, please call
Shannon Sypolt, Water Quality Program Administrator, at 704/336-4581 or me at 704/391-5181. Thank you
for your assistance with the application process.
Respectfully, A
Jacque'Inl a A. Ja�IE.
Operations Chief, Environmental Management Division
Charlotte Water
Cc: S. Coffman
S. Sypolt
Charlotte Water 4222 Westmont Drive, Charlotte, NC 28217 tharlottewater.org
�! operated by the City of Charlotte

CHARLOTTE
W(4TER
May 31, 2016
Tom Belnick
NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
Water Quality Permitting Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: NPDES Permit Application
Long Creek Regional WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Dear NPDES Unit:
•
Please find the enclosed application for the initial NPDES permit for the Long Creek Regional WWTP. The
application includes Attachments #1—#7. Part G, Combined Sewer Systems is not applicable. The
following is a summary of the attachments submitted with the application: •
1. Attachment #1 — NCDWR's Return of NPDES Permit Application Letter and Charlotte
Water's narrative response along with History of Long Creek Regional Plant Narrative
2. Attachment #2 — NCDWR's Speculative Effluent Limits Letter
3. Attachment #3 - Topographical maps required in Part B.2. and Part B.3.
4. Attachment #4 - Nutrient and Land Purchase Agreement from ReVenture (Clariant)
5. Attachment #5 - MOA between City of Mount and City of Charlotte, MOA between City of
Belmont and City of Charlotte, and the Proposed permit modifications for Belmont and Mt.
Holly for nutrient re -allocation of purchased nutrients
6. Attachment #6 — Executed Nutrient Purchase Agreement between City of Belmont and City of
Charlotte (exercised if Long Creek Regional WWTP is not built)
7. Attachment #7 - Environmental Impact Statement— hard copy with CDROM
Please let us know if you have any questions, or if you need any further information. If you do, please call
Shannon Sypolt, Water Quality Program Administrator, at 704/3364581 or me at 704/391-5181. Thank you
for your assistance with the application process.
Respectfully, Q
Jacqueline A. Jar�11E.
Operations Chief, Environmental Management Division
Charlotte Water
Cc: S. Coffman •
S. Sypolt
Charlotte Water 4222 Westmont Drive, Charlotte, NC 28217 chariottewater.org
a® Operated by the City of Charlotte

•
•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP, Initial Permit Catawba
FORM
2A NPDES FORM 2A APPLICATION OVERVIEW
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Infonnadon for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.B. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow 2 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRAICERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRAICERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS: WE
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet
A.I. Facility Information.
Facility Name Long Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
Mailing Address 5100 Brookshire BLVD.
Chadotte, NC 28216
Contact Person Jacgueline A. Jarrell PE
Jufie Operations Chief
Telephone Number ( 704 ) 634-5430
Facility Address 800 Hawfield Rd. Chadotte, NC 28214 (Lorca Creek Pump Station Access)
(not P.O. Box)
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Charlotte Water
Mailing Address 5100 Brookshire Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28216
Contact Person Jacqueline A. Jarrell PE
Title Operations Chief
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
X owner X operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
❑ facility X applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state4ssued permits).
NPDES NA PSD NA
UIC NA Other NA
RCRA NA Other NA
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Charlotte, NC 60,000 Separate Sanitary Sewer Charlotte Water
Total population served 60.000 (EIS)
•
CJ
J
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-8 & 7550-22. Page 2 of 22

•
A
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWfP, I Initial Pear I Catawba
A.& Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes X No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Canby?
❑ Yes X No
A.S. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the I month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 12,0 f 25.0 mgd
Two Years Aso
b. Annual average daily flow rate
WA
Last Year
WA
This Year
C. Maximum daily flow rate WA WA WA
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the "(a) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
X Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer %
A.S. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? X Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the iol wing types of discharge points the treatment works trace:
I. Discharges of treated effluent
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
III. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
V. other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge ❑ Continuous or ❑ intermittent?
C. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
• Annual average daily volume applied to she:
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
X No
mgd
❑ Yes X No
mgd
❑ Yes X No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1.99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 755022.
Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWfP I
Initial Permit
Catawba
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works Is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number t 1
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works Into the receiving facility.
mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not Included
in A.B. through A.S.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection): ❑ Yes
X No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of she(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
•
•
•
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-8 8 7550-22. Page 4 of 22

•
•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP, I Initial Perrr I Catawba
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A. complete questions A.9 through Al2 once for each outtell (Including hype" points) through
which effluent Is discharged. Do not Include information on combined rower overflows In this section. N you a a, red "No" to question
AJ& go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A9. Description of Outfall.
a. Oulfall number pipe 001
b. Location
(city ortown, 9appiirade)
(County)
(Latitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable)
d. Depth below surface (if applicable)
e. Average daily flow rate
I. Does this ouffall have either an Intermittent or a periodic discharge?
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outiall equipped with a diffuser?
(rep code)
(Sate)
(Longitude)
ft.
R
> .50 mgd
❑ Yes X No (goto A.9.g.)
mgd
❑ Yes ❑ No
A10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water Catawba River
b. Name of watershed (if known) Catawba
United States Soil Conservation Service 14digit watershed code (it known): Unknown
C. Name of State ManagemenVRNer Basin (it known): Catawba
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (d known): HUC 03050103
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute 7010 Flow is 95 cis chronic Unknown cis
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): Unknown mg0 of CaCO3
EPA Form 351 a2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-8 8 7550.22.
Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
AA1. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
X Primary X Secondary
X Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal %
Design SS removal %
Design P removal %
Design N removal %
Other %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outiall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Ultraviolet Disinfection is Pr000sed
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this oulfall? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Ai 2. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to water of the US must provide effluent testing dab for the following
paremeters. Provide time Indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authortly for sash outbll through which effluent b
discharged. Do not Include Info mudlon on combined sewer overflows In this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addlfion, this data must comply with QAIQC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QAIQC requirements for standard methods for ana" not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at bast three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number. 001
MAXIMUMDAILYVALUE ,.
AVERAGEDAILYVALUE
PARAMETER
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
SM.
PH (Maximum)
S.U.
Flow Rate
Temperature (Winter)
Temperature (Summer)
• For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
METHOD
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
DEMAND (Report one)
CBOD5
FECAL COLIFORM
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
•
•
•
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Pape 6 of 22

•
•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR.
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,SO0 gallons per day)
All applicants with a design flow rate 2 0.1 mgd must answer questions BA through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
WA gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following Information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.) Please see Attschmerd Ki
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, Including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, If applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within % mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that Is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy In the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, Including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
8.4. Operatlonnaalntsnance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractors responsibilities (attach additional
pages If necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number. ( 1
Responsibilities of Contractor.
B.S. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different Implementation schedules or is planning several Improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
C. If the answer to B.5.b is Wes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned Independently of local, State, or Federal agendas, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MMIDD/YYYY MMIDD/YYYY
- Begin Construction I l l I
- End Construction I / I /
- Begin Discharge I l I l
-Attain Operational Level I
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly:
B.S. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the Indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent Is dlacharaed. Do not Include Information
on combine armor overflows In this section. All Information reported must be based on date collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this date must comply with QAfQC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for anslytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minhnum efguerd testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number:
MAXIMU AILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
POLLUTANT
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Cone.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
OTHER
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
•
•
•
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1.99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-8 & 7550-22. Page 8 of 22

•
0
lJ
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained In the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application Is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
X Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
❑ Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
❑ Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonhoring Data)
❑ Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the Information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, We,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, Including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title 1 fic O U r t r N t Fl • 3� YL2�1 L C7P ElLfallOh)r� e N l 6 F
Signature
Telephone number (7 cA)
Date signed rb - :z - l (o
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-ZA (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WVtffP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
UPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
ART D..EXPANQEP 'E FLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or Is required
to haws) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing Information and any other Information required by the permitting authority for each oulfall through which
effluent is discharoed. Do not include Information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All Information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 130 methods. In addition, time data must comply with QAIQC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QAIQC requirements for atandard methods for anaytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rove provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least flee pollutant
saris and must be no more than four and one-haMyears old.
Outfall number. (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
.:r
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
A METHOD L
MU/MDL S
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
o f
'S,amples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
HARDNESS (as C&CO3)
Use tlds space (or a separate sheet) to provide Information on other metals requested by the permit writer
•
•
•
EPA Form 3510-7A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 755" a 7550-22. Page 10 of 22

•
•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Outfall number. (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
_.. 'RGE
AVERA E 11' -ffir6iAhGE
.,,
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
.
ML/MOL
A
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Cone.
Units
Mass
Unitslwan-
Number
of
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
1,143ICHLOROETHIINE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANSI,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
E HYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
EPA Form 3510.20k (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forma 7550$ & 7550-22.
Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Outfall number (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
1,1,1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
24-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other add -extractable compounds requested by the permh writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
SENZO(A)PYRENE
•
CJ
CJ
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550-22. Page 12 of 22

•
•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
'r POLLUTANT ,-
ik ,.
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLlMD4 -
Cones
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
um
of
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
SENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2CHLOROISO-
PROPYL)ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYLETHER
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,B-DIN"OTOLUENE
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22,
Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Outfall number. (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL"'
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
N-NfTROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
1,2,4-
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
z:.
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
•
•
•
EPA Fofrn 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-5 & 7550-22. Page 14 of 22

11
•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWfP
Initial Permit
Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION;
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design Flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
specles), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not Include
Information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate OA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If lest summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted In place of Part E.
If no biomondoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.I. Required Teets.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
❑ chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page lt more than three tests are being reported.
Test number: Test number. Test number:
a. Test Information.
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collecfion method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-69). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 15 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point In the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
I. For each test, include whether the test was Intended to assess Chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; If receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Recehring water
I. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
SaH water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%
LCm
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
•
•
•
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forrns 7650-6 & 7NO-22. Page 16 of 22

•
I.I
L
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial Permit
RIVER BASIN:
Catawba
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
IC15
%
%
p%/
/O
Control percent survival
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
E
I I
I I
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe:
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or Information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
= OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 17 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART FANDUSTRIAL USERx SCIiARGES AND RCRAICERCL A WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial usere or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatrnent program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
❑ Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works -
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of ClUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name:
Mailing Address:
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s):
Raw material(s):
F.S. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow, rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge Into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or Intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or Intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
0
•
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-0 8 7550-22. Page 18 of 22

L]
•
u
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
F.S. Problems at the Treatrnent Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, Interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.S. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three year: received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or Dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedlation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLAIRCRAIor other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next rive years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets If necessary.)
F.16. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If Intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1.99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-5 6 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional WWTP,
Initial Permit
Catawba
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G.
GA. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
C. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
C. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO dischame point
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Ouffall number
b. Location
(City or town, ff applicable) (Zip Code)
(County) (State)
(Latitude) (Longbude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft.
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
❑ Rainfall ❑ CSO pollutant concentrations ❑ CSO frequency
❑ CSO flow volume ❑ Receiving water quality
t How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
GA. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
Ll
•
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 20 of 22

i
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
Long Creek Regional VWVfP, Initial Permit Catawba
C. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
G.S. Description of Receiving waters.
a. Name of receiving water:
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of Slate ManagementlRiver Basin:
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
G.6. CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
END OF PART G.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-5 & 7550-22.
Page 21 of 22

AdAbW In(OnTMM, NPmWdw. W ppW on dw tftwhV f -
0
9
NPDES FORM 2A Add WW Infomretlon

Attachment # 3
•
11

Me 'E! IV4 11eAnOd144M;—A1,ti7W-M
'VIM
© — Pa9Ni Alapus a14dulo q 1e opeN EToz a:148uAdo7:njpaT,SraAe1 w1ma
:aouafa;;IP;o PIAOM a 5uIPIInB
H31V3AW N:)V18 ;saja;ul;o eajy
1 ..n/vN A ul xxxx•� le//xrv•e�
Ilepno 41I^^ d1MM leuO]Saa 1OWD Suo1 000'vz:l
UN3931 ;aab 000'z = 43u! T
uolle3olllepnO leaf
;ueld ;uaw;earl ja;eMa;sery� leuoleaa �laaj� 2uol 000 9
8 3 27M ;uowla8;o A41:) / A!!oH ;uno W ;o A3U
31101 a V H O / JajeA& a};olie4,
N
Jr
�i v41 .1� / 1�
LA.1,
LC
/ %� ;� �� •�{ ••���, /�' U� III (v� _.�.
.17
11-3
J
Ste.% ` 1, . ` �'h • � . rJ `�_ _- 1..� ,•';j•� � 07�. , i r 1'1jr :. v ,�i 1
-'t-, ��; �. • r ,` � �\��.-�� � '� f ^ � • � ,.,�'� ;� ,� /fit -
1y-
lY
7+ � `,r_• tee-- ._..��- \

N Charlotte Water/ CHARLOTTE
City of Mount Holly / City of Belmont W6TE R
Long Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
4,000
Feet Outfall Location ' r0T�TT, u
1 inch = 2,000 feet LEGEND
1:24,000
Long Creek Regional WWTP with Outfall
Area of Interest BLACK&VEATCH
Layer Credits: Copyright:o 2013 National Geographic Society, (cubed , Building a World of difference!
Molly-8e1montWWTP0o1fa11 Apn113,2016

4u x
Vill
Ak-

RECEI�'EUINCDEQID%fVR
JUN 0 6 2016
Attachment # 4
0
Water Quality
Perrnitting Section

6 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ORIGINAL
L
This PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and
executed by and between REVENTIIRE PARK INVESTMENTS I, LLC, a North Carolina
limited liability company (hereinafter "ReVenture"), CLARIANT CORPORATION, a New
York corporation (hereinafter "Clarlant'l and CITY OF CHARLOTTE, a municipal
corporation (hereinafter "Buyer" or the "City').
WHEREAS, ReVenture is the owner of approximately 248.9533 acres of real property in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, as described on Exhibit A ("ReVenture Property'l.
WHEREAS, Clariant is the owner of approximately 351.817 acres of real property in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, as described on Exhibit A ("Clariant Property").
WHEREAS, (1) ReVenture desires to sell to Buyer, and Buyer desires to buy from
ReVenture: (i) that portion of the ReVenture Property that is designated as "Tract A" on Exhibit
B (such portion of the ReVenture Property is referred to as 'Tract A"), (ii) that portion of the
ReVenture Property that is designated as "Tract B" on Exhibit B (such portion of the ReVenture
Property is referred to as "Tract B'J; and (2) Clariant (or ReVenture as the successor in title to
Clariant) desires to sell to Buyer, and Buyer desires to buy from Clariant (or ReVenture as the
successor In title to Clariant), that portion of the Clariant Property that is designated as `Tract C"
on Exhibit B (such portion of the Clariant Property is referred to as "Tract C") (Tract A, Tract
B and Tract C are collectively referred to as the "Property').
WHEREAS, as part of its waste water treatment operations, Buyer operates the Long
Creek Pump Station (the "Pump Station") located on Tract A; and
WHEREAS, Buyer desires to purchase the Property for the continued protection and
operation of the Pump Station as well as for construction and operation of a new regional waste
water facility (the "City Project'l to serve the citizens of Mecklenburg County and surrounding
areas.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth
herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
LAND SALE AND PURCHASE:
(a) As of the Effective Date (as defined in Section 31(t)), Clariant is the owner of
Tract C. Prior to Closing, Clarlant may transfer Tract C to ReVenture. If Tract C is
transferred to ReVenture, them ReVenture shall convey all -of the Property to Buyer at Closing.
If Tract C is not transferred to ReVenture, then ReVenture shall convoy Tract A and Tract B
to Buyer at Closing, and Clariant shall convey Tract C to Buyer at Closing. Accordingly, the
term "Seller" means ReVenture as to Tract A and Tract B, and Clariant as to Tract C, except
that if Tract C is transferred to ReVenture, then "Seller" means ReVenture as to all of the
Property.
(b) Seller agrees to sell and Buyer agrees to purchase the Property under the terms
and conditions hereinafter set forth.
PPAa 2024WW7

2. PROPERTY: The Property consists of approximately 181.252 acres, and comprises all
of tax parcels 053-051-03, 053-061-17 and 053-281-05, and a portion of tax parcel 053-051-02.
The Property is more fully described on the Recombination Plat (as defined in Section 7)
attached hereto as Exhibit B and a legal description derived from the Recombination Plat
attached hereto as Exhibit C.
3, EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT: Within three (3) business days after the Effective Date,
Buyer shell deliver to Chicago Title Insurance Company, 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 800,
Charlotte, NC 28202 C,Escrow Ageni'l the sum of $265,732.00 as an earnest money deposit
(such sum, together with any interest earned thereon, is the "Deposit"). Escrow Agent shall hold
the Deposit in an interest bearing account with a financial institution insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation. Escrow Agent shall hold and disburse the Deposit in accordance
with the terms of this Contract, including the terms on Exhibit At Closing, the Deposit will
be applied against the Purchase Price.
4, PURCHASE PRICE: The total purchase price for the Property is $ 6,579,700.00 as
determined pursuant to the schedule (and related map) attached as Exhibit E ("Purchase
Price'l. The Purchase Price shall be paid in cash by wire transfer at Closing.
5. CLOSING:.
(a) Seller and Buyer agree that, subject to the terns of this Agreement, the closing
of the Property shall be held at a time and place in Charlotte, North Carolina as agreed by
Buyer and Seller, on June 4, 2013 (hereinafter, the "Closing'j. At Closing, Buyer, in addition
to any and all other items required by the terms hereof, shall deliver to Seller the following
items: the Purchase Price; a closing statement; and any additional documents reasonably
and
customarily required by the Titre Company (as defined herein) for the proper consummation
of the transaction. At Closing, Seller, in addition to any and all other items required by the j
terms hereof, shall deliver to Buyer the following items: the Special Warranty Deed ("Deed']
as provided for herein; a lien waiver affidavit (but only as to work performed at the direction
of Seller); a get
tification as_oAIpplicable repro3entations and warranties as c the
-- - Section 18; and any and all additional documents reasonably and customarily requrr y
Titre Company for the proper consummation of this transaction.
(b) Ewb'pafty shall bear the costs of this transaction as follows: Buyer shall fPPay
for: (i) any escrow fee of the Escrow Agent and Title Company; (') llres
(in) the premium for the issuance, of the Owner's Title Insurance Policy; (iv) any and all
inspection costs described in Section 9 hereof; (v) the cost of the Recombination Plat and any
Survey (as defined in Section 10); and (vi) the recording fees for the Deed Seller shall pay
for. (i) any transfer taxes and/or documentary stamps, if any; (ii) the preparation of the Deed
and all other closing documents reasonably and customarily required by the Title Company to
properly transfer title to the Property, and (iii) Sencr,s attorney's fees.
(c) At Closing, Buyer shall pay ReVenture, in addition to the Purchase Price, the
rum of E265,732.00 ("Use Payment', representing payment for Buyer's pre -Closing use of
that .portion of Tract A where the Pump Station is located. If this Agreement terminates and
ReVenture is entitled to retain the Use Payment puVuant to the terms of this Agreement, then
9PAa 2M90M

the retention of the Use Payment by ReVenture imposes no obligations whatsoever on
ReVenture to lease the Property to Buyer after the date of such termination, and Buyer
acknowledges that the Use Payment represents payment to ReVenture for Buyer's pre -
termination use of such portion of the Property.
6. DUE DILIGENCE PERIOD: The period beginning in the Effective Date and ending on
May 31, 2013 is referred to as the "Due Diligence Period").
7. RECOMBINATION PLAT: Buyer, at Buyer's expense, has obtained a recombination
plat (the "Recombination Piet') for the Property, made by a surveyor duly licensed in the state
of North Carolina, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The legal deaerfption of the
Property to be attached to the Special Warranty Deed is attached as Exhibit C. Seller shall have
no obligation to convey the Property until the Recombination Plat has been approved by all
applicable governmental authorities, and has been recorded in the Office of the Mecklenburg
County Register of Deeds ("Registry'l. The Recombination Plat shall not be recorded until
Closing.
8. TITLE TITLE POLICY AND RF1vIEDIES: Either before or promptly following the
date of full execution of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer wiih copies of any title or
survey documents in its possession which pertain to the Property. During the Due Diligence
period, and without imposing any obligation on Seller, Buyer shall have the right to obtain, at
Buyer's expense, an Owner's Title Policy Commitment dated after the Effective Date (herein the
`Title Commitment) and issued by such title insurer of national recognition as Buyer shall
select (the `Title Company'l, together with complete and legible copies of all exceptions set
forth herein, showing good and marketable title to the Property (including any and all easement
rights owned by Seller relating to the Property) vested in Seller, free and clear of all liens, leases,
restrictions, claims, easements, public rights -of -way, encroachments, reservations, or other
matters or encumbrances, except those listed on Exhibit F attached hereto and mcorporsted
herein by reference (herein called the "Permitted Encumbrances"), which shall not be
considered to be title defects. Without imposing any obligation on Seller, said policy of the Title
Company shall provide full coverage against In
or materialinen's liens, have full survey
coverage and shall contain such other special endorsements as Buyer's counsel may reasonably
require.
9; INSPECTIONS: Prior to Closing, Seiler grants unto Buyer, and/or its agents,. employees
and/or contractors (as determined by Buyer) full permission and license to enter upon. the
Property for the purposes of inspection and the performance of any, and all tests or studies
including, but not limited to, feasibility studies, anvir" rental studies and geotecbnical tests
(collectively, the "Inspections'), in order to assure the Property is suitable- to Buyer for its
intended use. Buyer agrees to indemnify and hold Seller harmless from any and all loss,
liability, claims and damages arising out of the exercise of Buyer's rights under this Section 9
which indemnity shall survive the Closing of the Property and termination of this Agreement.
Immediately upon the completion of the inspections, Buyer shall (i) repair all material damage to
the Property caused by Buyer's inspections, unless caused by the
ller with a copy of
ence or willful
misconduct of Seller, its agents, employees or contractors, and (hi) prov de Se
any and all reports, conclusions, or summaries resulting from any Inspections performed by.
(� Buyer and/or its agents, employees or contractors on the Property. Buyer agrees that it shall
3
"As 2M9o7v7

keep confidential all information, findings and data which are developed by soil borings and tests
to determine the hydrocarbon and hazardous substance or chemical content of the soil, and that
same shall not be disclosed to any third party except as required by federal, state and local laws,
rules and regulations (including, without limitation, public records laws), or as may be necessary
for Buyer to disclose to .lenders and/or other third parties reasonably necessary for Buyer's
completion of the purchase contemplated by this Agreement. Buyer's obligations under this
Section 9 shall survive Closing and the termination of this Agreement.
10. BUYER'S OBJECTIONS:
(a) On or before May 28, 2013, Buyer shall inform Seller, in writing, of any
objections it may have to any survey of the Property obtained by Buyer ("Survey") o
r the
Title Commitment (hereinafter, the "Objections'). Within ten (10) days after Buyer delivers
its notice of Objections to Seller, Seller may deliver notice to Buyer of Seller 'a election to
attempt to cure or not attempt to cure eatb Objection ("Objection Response"). If Seller fails
to respond to any Objection within that ten (10) day period, then Seiler shall be deemed to
have elected not to attempt to cure that Objection. Seller shall have the right, but not the
obligstio%. to attempt to cure any Objections, at Seller's sole cost and expense, within twenty
-(20) days after receipt of Buyer's notice of Objections (hereinafter, the "Cure Perlod'T and, if
necessary, the Closing Date shall automatically be extended until the end of the Cure Period.
(b) If Seller refuses, or is unable, to cure the Objections within the Cure Period,
Buyer shall have the option, as its sole remedy, to either C) waive the Objections. and close
this transaction subject to the Objections, with no reduction in the Purchase Price therefor,
except for reductions in the Purchase Price £or Objections voluntarily created by Seller that
can be cured by payment of a stated fixed amount such as a lien (to the extent the lien arises
from work performed at the direction of Seller) or deed of trust or (ii) terminate this
I be Agreement, in which latter evont the Deposit, less !>�Us� � mid and neithler Buyer by Seiler), shall be returned to Buyer, this Agreem
Seller shall have any further rights, liabilities or obligations hereunder, except those that
expressly survive the termination of this Agreement. If Seller elects (or is deemed to have
elected) not to attempt a cure under Section 10(a), then Buyer must give notice to Seller
within (and, if necessary, the Closing Date shall automatically be extended until) ten (10) days
after the first to occur of (1) receipt of Seller's Objection Response or (2) the expiration of the
ten (10) day period in which Seller may deflver the Objection Response, as to whether Buyer
elects (i) or (ii) in this Section 10(b). Further, if Seller elects to cure, but fails to cure by the
end of the Cure Period, then Buyer must give notice to Seller within (and, if necessary, the
Closing Date shall automatically be extended until) ten (10) days after the end of the Cure
Period as to whether Buyer elects (t) or (ii) in this Section 10(b). N Buyer fails to make its
election (under either of the two preceding sentences) within the applicable ten (10) day
period, then Buyer shall be deemed to have chosen (1) in this Section 10(b).
(c) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, with respect to Objections to
Seller's title (other than Permitted Encumbrances or items arising out of Buyer's acts or
omissions) which first arise, occur or appear of record after the effective date of the Title
Commitment, Buyer may raise such Objections at any time prior to Closing. The Closing
shall be postponed for so long as necessary for the Objections to be cleared to the reasonable
a
PPA82049070

satisfaction of Buyer and the Tide Company, provided, however, if said Objections are not
cleared within a period of fifteen (15) days after the Closing Date, Buyer may, as its sole
remedy, choose either (i) or (U) in Section 10(b) above by delivering written notice to Seller
within ten (10) days after the end of that fifteen (15) day period. If Buyer fails to make its
election within that ten (10) day period, then Buyer shall be deemed to have chosen (i) in
Section 10(b).
11. SPECIAL COVENANTS OF BUYER REVENTURE AND CLARIANT:
Buyer, ReVenture and Clariant (as applicable) make the following special covenants,
agreeing to be bound, each to the other.
(a) NPDES Permit. ReVenture has executed a lease and/or option to lease, and a
purchase agreement, concerning an adjacent parcel to the Property, which parcel is owned by
Clariant and described on Exhibit G (hereinafter the "Clariant Tract"). The Clariant Tract is
a brownfield site on which is located a currently operating wastewater treatment facility (the
"Clariant Plant!) that is currently permitted to discharge to the Catawba River pursuant to
NPDES Permit No. NC0004735 (the "NPDES Permit') issued by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources ("DENR'1. in anticipation of this
Agreement, Clariant requested and was granted a permit modification in 2011 that prescribes
(and Clariant intends to seek a further permit modification in 2013 that will prescribe)
conditions for transfer of 90a/a of Clariant's permitted Nitrogen and Phosphorus allocations
("Nutrient Transfer") to the Buyer and/or others, as provided in the NDPES Permit. On or
prior to the date of this Nutrient Transfer, Clariant and/or ReVenturs will have taken actions
to limit the quantity and type of wastewaters treated such that it can comply with the reduced
nutrient allocations. Prior to the Nutrient Trans* Clariant and/or ReVenture intends to have
made necessary provisions including any facility and permit modifications required by DENR
to allow the Clariant Plant (1) to treat and discharge contaminated ground water from the
Clariant Tract to the Catawba River, (ii) to treat as necessary and discharge storm water from
the Clariant Tract to the Catawba River; and (iii) to treat and discharge other miscellaneous
water generated by operations'on the Clan`atit Tract; provided that no shall prevent
Clariant or ReVenture from implementing alternative measures for the proper collection and
treatment of the ground water, storm water, and miscellaneous water. In the event that there
are discharges from operations on the Clariant Tract that (1) would cause the Clariant Plant to
exceed the then -permitted discharge of nitrogen and/or phosphorus to the Catawba River, or
(2) otherwise cannot be treated and discharged by the Clariant Plant under the NPDES Permit
(the "Additional Discharges'l, Clariant and/or ReVenture agrees to apply to Buyer for waste
water service to handle the Additional Discharges, and Buyer agrees to accept such
application and to provide such service in accordance with applicable law, policies,
regulations and/or ordinances of the Buyer as the same may then exist or may be subsequently
revised. Nothing in this provision may be construed to create a continuing obligation that
would extend beyond the fulfillment of each partyisobligations under this Section 11(a). This
Section 11(a) shall survive Closing.
(b) Nutrient Allocation.
PPAa2M9M7

(i) Simultaneously with the Closing of the Property, Buyer shall purchase
from ReVenture 90% of the permitted Nitrogen and
Phosphorous
allocations in theNutrient
n
Permit (286.65 lb day Nitrogen 6bdaY Phosphorus) be
Allocation"). At Closing, Buyer shall pay RWenture the price of $5,850,000.00 for the 900/a
Nutrient Allocation (the 1190% Nutrient Allocation Purchase Price").
(ii) After (A) Buyer has paid the 90"/o Nutrient Allocation Purchase Price,
(B) Buyer delivers to ReVenture a written notice requesting the 90% Nutrient Allocation
transfer be made, and (C) testing under the NDPES Permit has confirmed that, for four
consecutive months, the Clariant Plant has complied with its new nutrient limits that would
be effective after the Nutrient Transfer, ReVenture, at its own expense, shall provide DENR
with a written notification as prescribed in the NPDES Permit authorizing rans�� Nutrient
CCity
of Mt Holly, the City of Belmont and/or Buyer's NPDES permits
Allocation as provided in the NPDES Permits for Clariant, Mt Holly, Belmont and/or Buyer.
(iii) The City shall also have the right of first refusal to purchase the
remaining 10% of the nutrient allocations in the NPDES Permit for Six Hundred and Fifty
Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($650,000.00), at whatever time that ReVenture, in its sole
discretion, elects to sell such remaining '10% allocation.
(iv) Until such time that the Nutrient Allocation is formally transferred
-from ReVenture and/or Clariant by DENR, ReVenture and Clariant shall use their
commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the nutrient allocation reflected in the current
NPDES Permit
(v) If Clariant, and not ReVentuM is the NPDES Permit holder at the time
of the Closing of the sale of the Property and/or the nutrient allocation transfers identified
above, then Clariant shall (A) receive the 90% Nutrient Allocation Purchase Price from the
City at the Closing and (B) meet the transfer obligations of ReVenture under this Section
11(b), as the case may be.
- _ (vi) This Section 11(b) shall survive Closing.
Renewable Enertty Credits. Buyer acknowledges that the Property has been
(c)
conditionally designated as a Cleanfields Renewable Energy Demonstration Park
( 4Cleanftelds Park"} by the North Carolina Secretary of State pursuant to Session Law 2010-
195, an Act to Authorize the Bstablishment of Cleanfields Renewable Energy Demonstration
Park in the State ("C1eanflelds Act"). Buyer agrees to cooperate and take such actions, if
any, as are necessary to ensurethat the Property remains designated as a Cleanfields Park.
ReVenture shall be solely entitled to any additional renewable energy credits authorized by
("ItECs'j, together with any other environmental benefits,
Section 4 of the Cleanfields Act guation of the Property as a Cleanfield Park. Buyer
credits or attributes arising from the E
shall take such actions and execute such documents as may reasonably be required to confirm
's entitlement and/or title to such additional RBCs and any other environmental
Re take
benefits, credits or attributes. Thus Section 11(c) shall survive Closing.
(d) Access Em—ment
1
"AB2M499M

• fir) At Closing, Clariant shall grant to Buyer a temporary access easement
("Temp ry shown as "Access
over and b executing and delivering to
ora Access Ease ora ') Access Easemsent�Are� sting e way
Road" on Exhtb__it C Ae Easement Agreement attached as EJ The Temporary
Buyer the Temporary the date on which a bridge
e'l is
Access Easement shall be effective Tntai1thA with Tract B an and TractTn � ��r2p18 (the
over Long Creek that connects gayer shall
substantially complete such that vehicles can cross the Bridge
is the "Outside T nsaermry permits Date").
ftor the construction
date set forth in this subsection (b) eoliectively, "Permits") as
exercise commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all necess(collective
co complete
of the Bridge from the applicable governmental .permits are obtained,
promptly as possible after Closing and,
conshvction of the Bridge by the outside Tennination Date. time best
If as of outside Termination Date, Buyer has exercisedabsolute
rejection of
(d) and the Bridge,
by the applicable governments' authorities, r in title to
efforts, but the Permits have been not been obtained due to the final and abso ate
one or more of such Pemv hen Glariant (or ReVenture as successor upon
therefore, is not substantially �Plll exercise commerciauy reasonable efforts to at P
ant agreement ("Permanent Easement. Agreement'l that provides
the Clarient Tract) and Buyer
the form of an s over
rr from a public right-of-way over the Cl permaneni nt
Ea and to
ement
permanent access over a roadway The form of that Penman t Agreement
the Property C`Permauent Access Easement Area'. Access Easement
Agreement shall be substantially in the form of the Temporary compensation
vide for (e) a permanent easement, and (b)
in title to the Clamant Tract) for the value of the
attached nt Ex but shall provide t Aceess Easement Area
to Clariant (or mcnt tamed to Buas yer-The location of theAP Easement Area; Provided,
permanent easement gran may (1)
shall be substantially the location ce the Temporary
any portion of the Permanent Arm Easement Area prior
however, that Clariant (or, as the successor in title a the permanent
Tract, ReVen entering into
designate anew location for all or i Easement Agreement; and (2) at any time after
to entering
into the Permanentant, relocate all or any portion of the Permanent Access
the Permanent Easement A&re0m r in of to the Clariant Tract)
Basement Area. If Clariant (or ReVenture relocate as the successor rtion of the Permanent
designates anew location for, or elects ReVenture asll or any the successor in title to the Clarlant .
Ads Easement Area, then Clariant
f
Tract) equal to the condition of the road then existing within that
that is of a condition at lea
shall construct a road within the new location othe Permanent Access Easement
st Easement Ara that is being removed from the Permanent
ent Access
portion of the Permangnt Prior to comrnencin8 use of We mad in the Pe n
BAccess Basement Arca�asement Area, Buyer shall pave any unpaved portion of that mad (even if any Pa
portion of road was used as part of the Temporary Access Easement Area) pursuant to plans
approved by Clariant (or ReVenture as successor in title to the Clamant Tract).
ru This Section 11(d) shall survive Closing.
(e) intentionally Deleted.
Environmental
Menrto gasdnent. At Closing, Sellr the
er shalt en overerve�imder
M a non -exclusive perpetual easement
benefit of Seller, its'successors and assigns,
PPA8202y0N7

and through Property for the purposes of ingress, egress and regress to conduct such soil,
sediment, groundwater, surface water sampling and other response, reanovai, renhediation and
monitoring activities on, in and under the Property as may be required from time to time to
comply with applicable law (the "Permitted Activities' )- The easement shall provide that:
(i) Buyer, including its representatives, agents, contractors and
to observe all of Seller's
subcontractors, shall have the right to be present during and
activities at the Property under this Agreement.
t least three
(u) Seller shall provide Buyer. .with rtyto conduct the permitted Activities
business days in shall use good faith efforts ce of each entry onto the
cooperatively in coordinating times and
Seller and Buys
methods for each entry.
(iii) Seller and its representatives, agents, contractors and/or subcontractors
like manner, and in.a
shall conduct the Permitted Activities era prompt, good and woties at the Seller
manner that will not unreasonably interfere with Buyer'vin Carryingout the Permitted
shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations and guidance
Activities.
(iv) At the conclusion of the Permitted Activities,ding the Permitted Activities,
Property to the same condition as it was in immediately pr
or as close thereto as reasonably practicable. Seller shall, at its sole cost and expense,
remove from the Property and be responsible for (1) waste generated by the Permitted
Activities, and (2) all equipment brought onto the Property m eounection with this
t. Setter shall not treat, dispose or release on the Property any material or waste
Agreementhe Permitted Activities. In addition, no material or waste shall be stored at the
generated tby
.
Property after the conclusion. of the permitted Activities-
'CpJiDiTI9Na TO iNG: Buyer's obligation to close on the Property is
12. BUYERS <,Buyer's Conditions Precedent'):..
specifically contingent.up°n the following
(a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement are true
and correct in all material respects as of the date of Closing-
(b) All deeds of trust, liens and other charges against the Property (other than those
arising out of the acts or omissions of Buyer) drat are due and payable have, thish9 n, subject to
the payment by Buyer of any prorated share of such charges as required
paid and cancelled by Seller at or prior to closing.
(e) Title is delivered at Closing by special warranty deed and must be fee simple
marketable tide, subject only to ad valorem taxes for the current year and the Permitted
gueumbrances.
(ra Neither Seller nor any agent of Sella shall have received any notices from any
city, county or any governmental authority (other than Buyer) of any taking of the Property, or
any portion thereothy eminent domain or similar proceeding, and no such taking a other
8
yP�are:asmr

condemnation of the Property, or any portion thereof, shall be threatened or contemplated by
any such governmental authority (other thanBuyer).
In the event one or more of Buyer's Conditions Precedent are not met, or it becomes apparent
that Buyer's Conditions Precedent will not be met, on or before Closing, Buyer shall have the
option, exercised by giving written notice to Seller, of either (i) terminating
this '°"� lion,
(ll) waiving such condition. If this Agreement is terminated by Buyer pursuantto Buyers
the Deposit, less the Use Payment (which shall be retained by Seller), shall be returned liabilities
this Deposit,
less
greement shall be void and neither Buyer nor Seller shall have any further rights,
or obligations hereunder, except thoseoth�exp�ress�yte
osurvive the forthin � Shon of iAgreement'his
On thisAgreement
the event of the waiver by Buyer Y
ad other terms and conditions.
shall continue in full force and effect as to
13, SELLER'S CONDITIONS TO CLOSING' is Conditions Precedent sener's obligation to close °n the Property is
specifically contingent upon the following C
Agreement are true
(a) All representations and warranties of Buyer set forth in this
respects as of the date of Closing
and correct in all material
(b) The Recombination Plat has been recorded in the Registry.
not met, or it becomes apparent
In the event one or more of Seller's Conditions Precedent are
that Seller's Conditions Precedent will not be met, on or before Closing, Seiler sl>all have the
option, exercised by giving written notice to Buyer, of either (i) terminating this Agreement or
such condition. If this Agreement is terminated by Seder pursuant to this Section,
(ii) waiving ant which shall be retained by Seller), shall be returned to
then the Deposit, less the Use.Paym
Buyer, this Agreement shall be void and neither Buyer nor Seib shall have any further rights,
liabilities or obligations hereunder, except those that expressly survive the termination of this
Agreement. in the event of the waiver by Seller of any condition set forth in thus Section, this
A nett shall continue, fun force and effect as to all other temps and conditions.
shall be delivered to Buyer at the time of
14. POSE N possession of the Property t the
Closing free and clear of all tenancies, leases and licenses for the use of Una Property, ear cep
Permitted Encumbrances and as otherwise herein permitted.
OTHER AGREEMENTS AFFE INd PROPER .: Prior
15. LICENSES LEASES AND a eetnent with any third party for use of the
to the Closing, Setter shall not enter into any if that agreement would be binding on
property without prior written permission from Bute
Buyer after Closing.
SESSMENTS: Taxes and assessments applicable to the tax parcels
lb. TEAND AS
ES "Pas Parcels') for the calendar year of Closing will be allocated (by
containing the Property !'
age) between the Property and the remainder of the Tax Parcels and prorated on a calendar
Year basis. If the ad valorem real property taxes for the year in which Closing occurs have not
been determined by Closing, then the proration shall be based on the previous year's taxes, and
to . adjust between themselves any difference. in the estimated and actual
the parties agree
j� proration within 30 days after the actual tax statementstaxes are due and payabletat Closing;
Closing have been received. If ad valorem real property
9
PPAB2049020

then those taxes shall be paid at Closing. If ad valorem real property taxes are not due and
payable at Closing, then, at Closing, Buyer and Seller shall each deposit into escrow with Escrow
Agent their proportionate share of the estimated ad valorem real property taxes on the Tax
Parcels and Escrow Agent shall pay the taxes on the Tax Parcels at such time as those taxes are
due and payable. This Section 16 shall survive Closing.
17. BROKERA(lE: Seller and Buyer represent and warrant to each other that they have not
retained any broker in connection with the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. Should
any claim for commission be asserted, each party hereby expressly agrees to indemnify and hold
the other harmless with respect thereto to the extent. that such indemnifying party is shown to
have been responsible for the creation of such claim This Section 17 shall survive Closing and
the termination of this Agreement.
18 REppMENU jjgk S AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER: Seller represents to Buyer
that to Seller's actual knowledge as of the Effective Date.
(a) There are no lawsuits or similar legal proceedings pending or expressly
threatened against Seller regarding the Property or any portion thereof.
(b) Seller has received no actual notice of any eminent domain or condemnation
proceedings filed or pending, which affect the Property:
(c) Seller has not received any actual, written notice of any violations by Seller of
law, governmental ordinances, environmental regulations, orders or requirements applicable
to the Property, including, but not limited to; those relating to zoning, land use, hazardous
materials, building codes, and fire, health and safety codes (collectively, "Legal
Requirements'l other than onvironmental'regulations.
(d) Seller has not entered into any unrecorded leases, unrecorded easements or
unrecorded encumbrances affecting the Property that would be binding upon Buyer -or its
-successors or assigns after Closing.. .
(e) Except for the Permitted Encumbrances, Seller has entered into no agreement,
oral or written, encumbering the Property that would be binding upon Buyer or its successors
or assigns after Closing.
(f) The undersigned, as the designated representative of Seller, has the right,
power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and the closing documents and
consummate the sale of the Property. Seller shall deliver to Buyer at the Closing evidence
satisfactory to Buyer, Buyer's attorneys and the Title Company with respect to the right,
power and authority of Seller's designated representative(a) to execute and deliver the closing
documents and consummate the sale of the Property.
If requested by Buyer, Seller shall execute and deliver an instrument at Closing
reef inning, to the extent true, all of said representations and warranties. If any representation or
warranty above is not tree in all material respects at Closing as a result of a matter, event or
circumstance beyond Seller's reasonable control, then Seller shall not be in default under this
Agreement and Buyer's sole remedy shall be to terminate this Agreement as a result of the
10
PPAB2WM7V7

failure of the condition under Section 12(a) and, thereafter, neither Buyer nor Seller shall have
any further obligations hereunder, except those that expressly survive the termination of this
Agreement. Further, if Seller acquires actual knowledge of any fact(s) rendering any of the
foregoing representations and warranties false at any time prior to Closing, Seiler shall promptly
notify Buyer in writing of such fact(s). The representations and warranties of Seller hereunder
shall survive Closing for a period of six (6) months only.
19. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER: Buyer represents to the
Seller that the undersigned, as the designated representative of Buyer, has the right, power and
authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and the closing documents and consummate the
We of the Property. Buyer shall deliver to Seller at the Closing evidence satisfactory to Seller,
Seller's attorneys and the Title Company with respect to the right, power and authority of
Buyer's designated representatives) to execute and deliver the closing documents and
consummate the sale of the Property. The representations and warranties of Buyer hereunder
shall survive Closing for a period of six (6) months only.
20. PROPERTY CONVEYED "AS IS"BROWNFIELDS:
(a) ' Property Conveyed As -Is. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that (i) the Property
shall be sold, and Buyer shall accept possession of the Property at Closing, "as is, where is,
with all faults", with no right of setoff or reduction in the Purchase Price except as set forth in
Section 10(b); (ii) except for the representations and warranties set forth in Section 18 and for
the special warranty of title in the deed to Buyer, neither Seller nor the Seller Related Parties
(as defined below) have or shall be deemed to have made any verbal or written representations
or warranties (whether express, implied, statutory or otherwise) to Buyer with respect to the
Property, any matter ad forth, contained or addressed in any documents or materials regarding
the Property delivered to or obtained by Buyer (including the accuracy and completeness
thereof) or the results of any inspections; and (itt) by closing on the Property, Buyer shall be
deemed to have confirmed independently all information that it considers material to its
purchase of the Property. BUYER SPECIFICALLY ACKNOWLEDGES _THAT,
EXCEPT FOR THE REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN
SECTION 18 AND FOR THE SPECIAL WARRANTY OF TITLE IN THE DEED TO
BUYER, BUYER IS NOT RELYING ON (AND SELLER AND THE SELLER
RELATED PARTIES DO HEREBY DISCLAIM AND RENOUNCE) ANY
REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, WHETHER ORAL OR WRITTEN,
EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, FROM SELLER OR ANY
SELLER RELATED PARTIES, AS TO: (1) THE OPERATION OF THE PROPERTY,
THE HABITABILITY OF THE PROPERTY, OR THE MERCHANTABILITY OF
THE - PROPERTY FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE; (2) THE PHYSICAL
CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY OR THE CONDITION OR SAFETY OF THE
PROPERTY OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, OR SUITABILITY OF THE
PROPERTY OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS THEREON FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE; (3) THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE, LOCATION OR SCOPE OF ANY
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (AS DEFINED BELOW),IN, AT, UNDER OR AROUND
THE PROPERTY; (4) ANY IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY AND THE
QUALITY OF THEIR CONSTRUCTION; (5) WHETHER THE PROPERTY OR THE
{
•
11
PPAB 202007v7

• IMPROVEMENTS THEREON ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS,
REGULATIONS OR ORDINANCES; OR (6) THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY.
(b) Brownfields.
(i) Buyer acknowledges that ReVenture has applied to enroll the Property,
the CWant Tract and other surrounding land in the North Carolina Brownfields Program,
through which ReVenture would obtain Brownfields Agreements C BFAs') pursuant to the
Brownfields Property Reuse Act of 1997, N.C. Gen. Stat. 130A-310-37, et seq. As part of
the brownfields process, ReVenture will record in the Mecklenburg County Register of
Deeds one or more Notices of Brownfields Property ("Notices"j covering both the Property
and the Clariant Tract, which Notices will contain land use restrictions and other
requirements. The" North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
("DENR") deemed the Property and the Clariant Tract eligible for a BFA by letter dated
June 30, 2011. Buyer fiuther acknowledges that Seller, in its discretion, may clod not to
include Tract C in the Brownfields Program and that Tract C may not be subject to
Brownfields protections or restrictions.
(ii) Buyer agrees to execute the Notice applicable to the Property to
acknowledge its recordation, and to execute such other documents as DENR may require to
subject Buyer's interests in the Property to the restrictions and requirements in that Notice;
provided, however, that (1) ReVenture shall provide Buyer with an opportunity to review the
Notice prior to agreeing with DENR on its final form, and (2) Buyer shall not be required to
acknowledge the recordation or priority of the Notice if the Notice materially interferes with
Buyer's planned uses of the Property for the City Project.
(c) Release.
(i) BUYER, FOR BUYER AND BUYER'S SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS, HEREBY RELEASES, DISCHARGES AND COVENANTS NOT TO SUE
SELLER AND THE SELLER RELATED PARTIES FROM OR FOR ANY CLAIM,
DEMAND, NOTICE, ASSESSMENT, LIABILITY, WARRANTY, OBLIGATION,
DAMAGE (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, CONSEQUENTIAL,
MULTIPLE AND NATURAL RESOURCES DAMAGES), COST, EXPENSES OR
LOSS WHATSOEVER, KNOWN OR UNKNOWN, ANTICIPATED OR
UNANTICIPATED, RELATED OR ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE FOLLOWING:
(1) ANY AND ALL STATEMENTS OR OPINIONS MADE
PRIOR TO, AT OR AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE, OR INFORMATION
FURNISHED BY SELLER OR THE SELLER RELATED PARTIES TO BUYER OR ITS
EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONTRACTORS OR REPRESENTATIVES (EXCEPT FOR
THE REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES UNDER SECTION 18 AND FOR THE
SPECIAL WARRANTY OF TITLE IN THE DEED TO BUYER); AND
(2) THE PROPERTY OR ANY MATTER PERTAINING
THERETO, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE FOLLOWING: LATENT
AND PATENT CONDITIONS, ANY AND ALL ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS;
12
PPA82024907v7

WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, THE PRESENCE OR RELEASE OF
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN, ON, UNDER, FROM OR AROUND THE PROPERTY
OR ANY ADJOINING PROPERTY; ZONING REQUIREMENTS, SUBSOIL
CONDITIONS; STORM WATER DRAINAGE CONDITIONS; THE EXISTENCE OR
CONDITIONS OF UTILITIES; RESTRICTIONS AND OTHER MATTERS
AFFECTING TITLE TO THE PROPERTY; ANY AND ALL LAWS, STATUTES,
RULES, REGULATIONS, ORDERS, NOTICES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS,
INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, COMMON LAW (COLLECTIVELY
"LAWS11 RELATING TO THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION,
ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS
(ii) BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT BUYER HAS BEEN
REPRESENTED BY INDEPENDENT LEGAL COUNSEL OF BUYER'S
SELECTION AND BUYER IS GRANTING THIS RELEASE OF ITS OWN
VOLITION AND AFTER CONSULTATION WITH BUYER'S COUNSEL.
(d) Definitions.
(i) "Hazardous Materials" means any waste, pollutant, chemical,
hazardous material, hazardous substance, tonic substance, hazardous waste, special waste,
solid waste, asbestos, radioactive materials, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum or
petroleum -derived substance br waste and any other pollutant, material, substance or waste
regulated under or as defined by any Environmental Laws.
00 "Environmental Laws" means all present and future Laws, including
without limitation any agreements or permits, issued, promulgated, approved or entered
thereunder by any government authority, relating to pollution or hazardous materials or
protection of human health or the environment, including the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980,42 U.S.C. §§9601 et seq., as
amended by the Superfimd Amendment and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 and
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act -of 1976, 42 U.S.C: •§§6901 et seq., as any of the
foregoing may be amended.
(iii) `Seller Related Parties" means Seller's officers, agents, managers,
members, directors, contractors, representatives and employees, and Seller's affiliated
companies, .and the officers, agents, managers, member$, directors, contractors,
representatives and employees of those affiliated companies.
(e), Survival. The terms of this Section 20 shall survive Closing and any
termination of this Agreement. The terns of Section 20(c) shall be ad forth in the deed to
Buyer.
21. "DEFA LT:
(a) If Buyer defaults in- the performance of any of its obligations under this
Agreement and fails to cure such default within ten (10) business days after receipt of written
notice thereof from Seller, than the Deposit shall be forfeited to Seller immediately, and Seller
may terminate this Agreement and/or seek any other remedies at law or at equity which may
13
PPA920UNW7

(0
be available to Seller for such default. In addition, at Seller's request (and only at Seller's
request) Buyer shall deliver to Seller all surveys, appraisals, site plans, reports, title
information, studies and any other due diligence information pertaining to the Property arising
out of the Inspections or otherwise within five days following such request.
(b) If Seller. defaults in the performance of any of its obligations under this
Agreement and fails to cure such default within ten (10) business days after receipt of written
notice thereof from Buyer, then Buyer may, as its sole and exclusive remedy, either:
(i) terminate this Agreement, in which case Escrow Agent shall refund the Deposit to Buyer,
and neither party shall have any further obligations under this Agreement (other than those
obligations that expressly survive the termination of this Agreement); (ii) seek specific
performance of this Agreement; or (iii) permanently waive the default and proceed to Closing
in accordance with the terms of this Agreement
(c) This Section 21 shall survive Closing and the termination of this Agreement'
22. NOTICE AND ADDRESSES: All notices concerning this Agreement shall be addressed
as follows:
BUYER: City of Charlotte
Ron Kimblo, Deputy City Manager
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Facsimile: [phone]
COPIES TO: City Attorney's Office
CMOC, 70' Floor
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Attn: Catherine L. Cooper
Facsimile: [phone]
SELLER: ReVenture Park Investments I, LLC
5320 Old Pineville Road
Charlotte, NC 28217
Attn: Thomas J. McKittrick
Facsimile: [phone]
COPIES TO: Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein L P
401 South Tryon Street, Suite 3000
C�wlotte, NC 28202
Attn. Thomas M. Quirk, Esquire
Facsimile: [phone]
Attn: Thomas N. Griffin, Esquire
Facsimile: [phone]
14
eeAezmvsmn

• CLARIANT: Clariant Corporation
4000 Monroe Road
Charlotte, NC 28205
Attention: Christopher S. Barnard
Facsimile: [phone]
Notice shall be effective upon the date of receipt by the intended recipient, provided that any
notice that is sent by tele-fax or electronic mail shall also be simultaneously sent by mail
deposited with the U.S. Postal Service or by overnight courier. Each party may change its
address for notification purposes by giving the other patty written notice of the new address and
the date upon which it shall become effective.
23. TERM OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall commence upon the Effective Date.
24. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENTS: There are no agreements, promises or
understandings between the parties except as specifically set forth herein. No modification,
waiver, amendment, discharge or other change to this Agreement shall be valid unless the same
is in writing and signed by the party to which the same is charged. Buyer has designated the City
Manager, or his designee, as the City's representative under this Agreement. Such representative
shall have the authority, on behalf of Buyer, to discharge responsibilities, exercise rights and
options, settle disputes, make adjustments and amendments (including reasonable time
extensions) and issue waivers, to the full extent permitted by law.
• 25. NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS: This Agreement is entered into by and between the
parties hereto for their exclusive benefit. The parties do not intend to create or establish by this
Agreement any third -party beneficiary status or rights, and no such third -party shall be entitled to
enforce any right of obligation or enjoy any benefit created or established by this Agreement.
26. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE: Each of Buyer, ReVenture and Clariant warrant and
represent, as to itself only, that this Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary action
on the part of such party, and has-been duly executed -and delivered by such party, and
constitutes the valid and binding agreement of such party, and is enforceable against such party
in accordance with its terms, and that each person executing this Agreement on behalf or Buyer,
ReVenture and Clariant has authority to do so.
27. RISK OF LOSS: Risk of loss prior to the Closing shall be on Buyer. If, prior to
Closing, any portion or all of the'Property is damaged or destroyed by fire or any other cause,
except where such event is occasioned by a willful negligent act of Seller or its employees,
agents or contractors, then this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and risk of loss
shall be on Buyer. If such event is occasioned by the willful negligent act of Seller or its
employees, agents or contractors, then Buyer may elect by written notice delivered to Seller on
or before Closing to either: (i) terminate this Agreement in which case the Deposit, less the Use
Payment (which shall be retained by Seller), shall be returned to Buyer, this Agreement shall be
void and neither Buyer nor Seller shall have any further rights, liabilities or obligations
hereunder, except those that expressly survive the termination of this Agreement; or (ii) take title
to the Property "as -is" without any credit or offset for such damage or destruction.
15
PPAB7624967v7

• 28. SURVIVAL OF COVENAM , REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES: Except
as otherwise expressly set forth in this Agreement, the representations, warranties and covenants
contained in this Agreement shall merge in the deed and shall not survive Closing. Without
limiting the prior sentence and in addition to the express survival provisions set forth in this
Agreement, the terms of Sections 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29 and 31 shall survive Closing and any
termination of this Agreement.
29. PARTIES BOUND: This Agreement and all rights hereunder shall inure to the benefit of
and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This
Agreement may not be assigned, in whole or in part, by Buyer.
30. TR" OF ESSENCE: Time is of the essence to both Seller and Buyer in the
performance of this Agreement, and they have agreed that strict compliance by both of them is
required as to any date set out herein. If the final day of any period of time set out in any
provision of this Agreement falls upon a Saturday or Sunday or a legal holiday under the laws of
the State of North Carolina, then and in such event, the time of such period shall be extended to
the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal Holiday in the State ofNorth Carolina.
31. MISCELLANEOUS:
(a) Words of.any gender used in this Agreement shall be held and construed to
include any other gender, and words in singular number shall be held to include the plural and
vice versa, unless context requires otherwise.
(b) The captions used in connection with the sections of this Agreement are for
convenience only and shall not be deemed to construe or limit the meaning of the language
contained in this Agreement, or be used as interpreting -the meanings and provisions of this
Agreement.
(c) In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for
any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
illegality or unenforeeability shall not affect any other provision hereof and this Agreement
shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been
contained herein.
(d) In the event Seller or Buyer or their successors or assigns shall breach any of
the terms of this Agreement and Sella or Buyer retain the services of any attorney for
enforcement, the prevailing party shall recover from the other party, in addition to any other
relief allowed provided herein, all reasonable costs of enforcement including reasonable
attorney's fees which are actually incurred at customary rates without presumption of law.
(e) This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws and judicial decisions of the State of North Carolina. Venue for any action with respect
to this Agreement shall he in any court of competent jurisdiction in Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina
(0 The date by which this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties shall
(• be known as the "Effective Date".
16
PMB 20249070

0
0
32. COUNTERPARTS: This Agreement may be signed in say number of counterparts, each
to be an original, but all of which shall constitute but one agreement, and it shall be sufficient to
bind a party if such party signs any such counterpart.
[SIGNATURE$FOLLOW)
17
"AS MMM
i

0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hand as of the date appearing below.
0
PPAB 202 ON'l
REVENTURE:
REVENTURE PARK INVESTMENTS I, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
By: CLEAN ENERGY, LLC, ,
a Nevada ' 'ted liability company,
its l 0
Date:
BUYER:
CITY OF CHARLOTTE,
a North Carolina municipal corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
Date:
CLARIANT:
CLARIANT CORPORATION,
a New York corporation
By.
Name 8. S. Barnard
Title:
Date: Secretary & General Counsel
18
r-

0
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hand as of the date -appearing below.
REVENTURE:
REVENTURE PARK INVESTMENTS I, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
By: CLEAN ENERGY, LLC,
a Nevada limited liability company,
ifs Manager
By:
Tom MdUttrick, Manager
Date:
BUYER*
CITY OF CHARLOTTE,
a North Carolina municipal corporation
By:—..���^�C
Name: _
Title: l�—
Date:
CLAWANT:
CLAWANT CORPORATION,
a Now York corporation
By:
Nam:
Trtie:
Date:.
18
PPAE 20 4"M

0 EXHIBIT
ReVenture Property and Clariant Property
The real property located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina and described as follows:
ReVenture Property
Tract 2
That approximately 56.718 acre tract ("Tract 2") designated as 'Tract 2" on the plat
(" ReVenture Plat') recorded in Plat Book 52, Page 643 in the Office, of the
Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds ("Registry');
Tract
That approximately 201.744 acre tract ("Tract 3") designated as "Tract 3" on the
ReVentm Plat;
Tract 4
That approximately 46.336 acre tract ("Tract 4'D designated as "Tract 4" on the
ReVerthm Plat;
LESS AND EXCEPT that portion of the property described above that was conveyed by
ReVentum to Catawba Lands Conservancy by deed recorded in Deed Book 26977, Page
599 in the Registry (which conveyed property is designated as "50.6874 ACRES" on plat
recorded in Plat Book 53, Pages 747-751 ("CLC Plat'), and as "5.1573 ACRES" on the
CLC Plat).
Clarlant Property
That approximately 351.817 acre tract designated as "Tract 1" on the plat recorded in Plat
Book 52, Page 643 in the Registry.
A-1
PPAB 2024MO

•
ZXHIBIT B
Reeombbutb= Pbit
B-1
nauasexr

Mai
I
9 r
taar � •� „
I YwY.YaTI
1• .� II,• wLf�� ��
I •
Iw�l

0
Tract A
a r.
Legal Description
(PROPOSED LONG CREEK WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT SITE)
REVENTURE PARK INVE91MENT I, LLC PROPERTY
BEING A REMAINDER PORTION OF THAT TRACT 3 AND ALL OF THAT TRACT 4
PER THAT PLAT TITLED "EXEMPT SUBDIVISION MAP FOR CLARIANT
CORPORATION" RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 52, PAGE 643, AND DESCRIBED IN BOOK
26318, PAGE 718, MECKLENBURG COUNTY REGISTRY (HENCE MCR) AND BEING
ALL OF THAT PROPOSED 102.149 ACRE TRACT A, AS SHOWN ON THAT MAP
TITLED "RECOMBINATION PLAT OF REVENTURE PARK INVESTMENT 1, LLC
TRACTS 1,2,3 & 4 - LONG CREEK WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT" PREPARED
BY THE SURVEY COMPANY, INC., DATED TUNE 15, 2012, SIGNED AND SEALED BY
MICHAEL C. SAWHILL, NCPLS #L-3223, TO WHICH REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE:
COMMENCING AT NCGS STATION "WHITE" HAVING NC GRID COORDINATES IN
U.S. SURVEY FEET OF NORTH 564,987.70 AND EAST 1,411,954.61 WITH A COMBINED -
GRID FACTOR OF 0.99984387;
THENCE, S 72--08'-58" W, A GRID DISTANCE OF 8,713.01 FEET TO A• FOUND 7/8"
PIPE, THE COMMON EASTERLY CORNER OF TRACTS 3 & 4 (MAP BOOK 57, PAGE
643, MCR) AND BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT CLARIANT
CORPORATION TRACT DESCRIBED IN BOOK-.5290, PAGE 804 (MCR) AND THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE, WITH SAID CLARIANT TRACT'S WESTERLY LINE, S 32°-29'-30" W, A
DISTANCE OF 2,518.49 FEET TO A FOUND 1/2" PIPE, THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER
OF THAT MECKLENBURG COUNTY U.S NATIONAL WHTTEWATER CENTER TRACT
AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 6230, PAGE 893 (MCR);
THENCE, WITH SAID MECKLENBURG COUNTY TRACT'S NORTHERLY LINES THE
FOLLOWING EIGHT (8) COURSES:
1) N 27'-20'-32"
W, A DISTANCE OF 1,342.06 FEET TO A FOUND 1 1/2" PIPE;
2) S 62'-39'-42"
W, A DISTANCE OF 421.97 FEET TO A FOUND ANGLE IRON AND 2"
GALVANIZED PIPE IN CENTER LINE OF TRIBUTARY TO LONG CREEK;
3) N 5T-02'-49"
W, A DISTANCE OF 25.23 FEET TO A FOUND 1/2" PIPE;
4) N 45°-3 V-37"
W, A DISTANCE OF 28.99 FEET TO A FOUND 1/2" PIPE,
5) N 48--3l'-41"
W, A DISTANCE OF 67.08 FEET TO A FOUND l/2" PIPE;
6) N 58--57'-04"
W, A DISTANCROF 47.75 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
Gl
"AB X24M7

7) N 66--53'-26" W, A DISTANCE OF 29.30 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
8) N 58--02'-06" W, A DISTANCE OF 25.25 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT ON THE
FERCMUKE REGULATORY LINE OF THAT CRESCENT RESOURCES TRACT
DESCRIBED IN BOOK 3146, PAGE 165 (MCR);
THENCE, WITH SAID FERCIDUKE REGULATORY LINE THE FOLLOWING ONE
HUNDRED FIFTY-NINE (159) COURSES:
1) N 01--36'44" E, A DISTANCE OF 38.21 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
2) N 05--33'-27" W, A DISTANCE OF 49.83 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
3) N 01--43'-33" E, A DISTANCE OF 32.90 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
4) N 18--17'-59" E, A DISTANCE OF 58.16 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
5) N 10--32'-38" A A DISTANCE OF 46.72 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
6) N 14'-34'-38" E, A DISTANCE OF 49.08 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
7) N 35--15'-38" E, A DISTANCE OF 48.37 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
8) N 37' 23'-39" E, A DISTANCE OF 49.92 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT; F
9) N 48--07'-57" E, A DISTANCE OF 54.98 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
10) N 51'-53'-11" E, A DISTANCE OF 46.02 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT; ;
11) N 34'-30'-Ol" E, A DISTANCE OF 55.62 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
12) N 04'-29'-47' E, A DISTANCE OF 54.67 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
13) N 41--17'-18" E, A DISTANCE OF 34.02 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
14) N 34--M- 13" A A DISTANCE OF 62.28 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
15) N 65'45'44" % A DISTANCE OF 56.64 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
16) N 45--15'-48" E, A DISTANCE OF 43.21 FEBT TO A CALCULATED POINT;
17) N 39'45'48" E, A DISTANCE OF 59.88 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
18) N 35'-59'-26" E, A DISTANCE OF 29.25 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
19) N 62'-32'-56" E, A DISTANCE OF 36.57 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
20) N 24'-59'-14" E, A DISTANCE OF 41.17 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
21) N 58'-24'-d' E, A DISTANCE OF 79.13 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
22) N 66'-56'-35" E, A DISTANCE OF 48.11 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
23) N 34'-08'-44" E, A DISTANCE OF 37.65 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
24) N 44'-33'-08" E, A DISTANCE OF 23.65 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
25) N 65'-07'-25" E, A DISTANCE OF 64.23 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
26) N 77'-37'-49" E, A DISTANCE OF 42.69 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
27) S 81--49'-43" E, A DISTANCE OF 39.97 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
28) N 60'-24'-52" E, A DISTANCE OF 73.79 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINP;
29) N 55--10'-19" K A DISTANCE OF 50.80 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
30) N 57'-39'-12" E, A DISTANCE OF 57.91 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
31) N 46--33'-29" E, A DISTANCE OF 51.09 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
32) N 52--27.'-30" E, A DISTANCE OF 41.78 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
33) S 86'-33'-39" E, A DISTANCE OF 21.51 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
3.4) S 64'40'-23" E, A DISTANCE OF• 33.82 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
35) N 3T-54'-56" E, A DISTANCE OF 51.62 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
36) N 14'-05'-22" E, A DISTANCE OF 60.75 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
37) N 05'-02'-2(Y". E, A DISTANCE OF 67.18 FEET TO A CALCULATED'POINT;
38) N 17'-54'-O8" E, A DISTANCE OF 27.63 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
39) N 12--24'-38" E, A DISTANCE OF 51.19 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
C-2
PPASM90747

40) N 23--10'-29" E, A DISTANCE OF 44.15 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
41) N 29--01'-11" E, A DISTANCE OF 72.71 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
42) N 29--08'-19" E, A DISTANCE OF 58.96 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
43) N 43--35'-39" E, A DISTANCE OF 44.56 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
44) N 18'-26'-17" E, A DISTANCE OF 52.61 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
45) N 17'-42'-13" W, A DISTANCE OF 39.94 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
46) N 09--28'-40" W, A DISTANCE OF 32.19 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
47) N 21'-19'-07" W, A DISTANCE OF 56.70 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
48) N 23'-36'-58" W, A DISTANCE OF 52.69 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
49) N 21--2l'-13" W, A DISTANCE OF 42.21 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
50) N 14'-30'-45" W, A DISTANCE OF 55.25 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
51) N 04'-41'- ' E, A DISTANCE OF 40.52 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
52) N 60'-35'-27" A A DISTANCE OF 61.81 TO A FOUND 112- PIPE;
53) N 68--35'-35" E, A DISTANCE OF 54,25 TO A FOUND 1/2" PIPE;
54) N 85'-28'-04" E, A DISTANCE OF 52.76 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
55) N 74'-37'-33" E, A DISTANCE OF 55.44 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
56) N 48'-08'-28" E, A DISTANCE OF 44.01 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
57) N 39'-28'-15" E, A DISTANCE OF 26.S5 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
58) N 38'-38'-33" E, A DISTANCE OF 35.30 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
59) N 69--25'-l9" E, A DISTANCE OF 30.73 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
60) S 74'-36'-25" E, A DISTANCE OF 24.73 FE13T TO A CALCULATED POINT;
66 N 73--23'-37" E, A DISTANCE OF 3791 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
62) N 58--09'-42" E, A DISTANCE OF 28.75 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
. 63) N 07'-30'-27" E, A DISTANCE OF 35.81 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
64) N 09'-37'-51" E, A DISTANCE OF 30.53 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
65) N 41'-49'-45" E, A DISTANCE OF 32.99 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
66) N 50'-06'-08" E, A DISTANCE OF 21.11 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
67) N 85'-50'-39" E, A DISTANCE OF 34.45 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
68) S 77'-06'40" E, A DISTANCE OF 33.41 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
69) S 61'-55'-06" E, A DISTANCE OF 34.31 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
70) S 56'-48'-13" E, A DISTANCE OF 34.09 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
71) S 30--23'-05" E, A DISTANCE OF 50.43 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
72) S 18'-44'-23" E, A DISTANCE OF 32.09 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
73) S 15--29'-06" E, A DISTANCE OF 25.72 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
74) S 38'43'45" A A DISTANCE OF 31.51 FEET TO A CALCULATED PORTr;
75) S 26%07'48" W, A DISTANCE OF 48.43 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
76) S 69--33'-44" W, A DISTANCE OF 46.64 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
77) S 82'42'40" W, A DISTANCE OF 37.21 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
78) S 23'43'-15" W, A DISTANCE OF 58.18 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
79) S l l'-55'-17" E, A DISTANCE OF 45.35 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
80) S 230-04'-07" E, A DISTANCE OF 71.80 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINI;
81) S 61--20'-09" E, A DISTANCE OF 61.80 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
82) S 79%25'-08" E, A DISTANCE OF 51.46 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
83) S 68%15'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 32.87 FEET TO A CALCULATED POIN ,,
84) S 83%36'-37" E, A DISTANCE OF 29.57 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
�. 85) N 50'-57'-33" E, A DISTANCE OF 58.94 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
C-3
PPA82MNW7

86) N 64'43'-32" E, A DISTANCE OF 55.51 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
87) S 45--51'-W' E, A DISTANCE OF 33.52 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
88) N 75'-2l'-44" E, A DISTANCE OF 27.41 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
89) N 63'-30'-34" E, A DISTANCE OF 30.06 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
90) S 60'-06'-19" E, A DISTANCE OF 16.42 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
91) S 53'-07'-27" E, A DISTANCE OF 46.53 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
92) S 42'-19'-13" E, A DISTANCE OF 42.99 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
93) S 53--53'-12" E, A DISTANCE OF 74.61 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
94) S 55'- l6'-56" E, A DISTANCE OF 69.90 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
95) S 61--36'-00" E, A DISTANCE OF 53.99 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
96) S 56%25'-52" E, A DISTANCE OF 39.61 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
97) S 71'-07'-15" E, A DISTANCE OF 31.50 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
98) S 33--54'-28" E, A DISTANCE OF 29.24 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
99) S 66--24'-47" E, A DISTANCE OF 58.90 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
100) S 56'-09'-21" E, A DISTANCE OF 73.97 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
101) S 70'-53'-41" E, A DISTANCE OF 60.03 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
102) S 63%36'-W' E, A DISTANCE OF 48.18 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
103) N 83'-04'-27' E, A DISTANCE OF 47.03 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
104) S 81'-57'-22" E, A DISTANCE OF 49.77 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
105) S 86--35'-3(Y" E, A DISTANCE OF 41.02 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
106) S 88--00'-35" E, A DISTANCE OF 60.52 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
107) N 01%13'-15" W, A DISTANCE OF 2.00 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
108) N 62'-20'-25" W, A DISTANCE OF 0.99 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
109) N 85'-56'-02" W, A DISTANCE OF 58.71 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
110) N 85--02'-37" W, A DISTANCE OF 45.17 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
111) N 80--59'-59" W, A DISTANCE OF 46.79 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
112) S 85'-17'-28" W, A DISTANCE OF 43.67 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
113) N 64%06'-20" W, A DISTANCE OF 51.21 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
l 14) N 69--01'-39" W, A DISTANCE OF 59.42 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
115) N 5'-10'-07" W, A DISTANCE OF 78.92 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
116) N 67'-20'-26" W, A DISTANCE OF 42.25 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
-1 I7) N 39%39'-13" W, A DISTANCE OF 23.18 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
l 18) N 61 %58'-04" W, A DISTANCE OF 50.18 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
119) N 50'-46'-40" W, A DISTANCE OF 27.03 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
120) N 57'-56'-W' W, A DISTANCE OF 58.15 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
121) N 55%21'-39" W, A DISTANCE OF 73.34 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
122) N 54--25'-04" W, A DISTANCE OF 70.96 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
123) N 46--04'-12" W, A DISTANCE OF 36.64 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
124) N 50--27'-00" W,.A DISTANCE OF 50.55 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
125) N 63'-08'.14" W, A DISTANCE OF 19.31_ FRET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
126) N 09'-42'-06" E, A DISTANCE OF 35.13 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
127) S 83--15'-53" E, A DISTANCE OF 43.09 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
128) N 45'-50'-31" E, A DISTANCE OF 34.12 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
129) N 33'-50'-24" E, A DISTANCE OF 38.66 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
130) N 31 %17'-57" E, A DISTANCE OF 33.00 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
131) N 64'-58'-10" B, A DISTANCE OF 31,81 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
C-4

• 132) N 79--10'-Ol"E, A DISTANCE OF 41.29 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
133) N 64'-55'-26" E, A DISTANCE OF 41.75 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
134) N 78'-53'-26" W, A DISTANCE OF 40.51 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
135) N 45%] 0'-24" W, A DISTANCE OF 29.70 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
136) N 24'-07'-47" E, A DISTANCE OF 57.77 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
137) N 27'-47'-32" E, A DISTANCE OF 34.38 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
138) S 57--04'-11" E, A DISTANCE OF 34.21' FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
139) N 76'-32'-38" E, A DISTANCE OF 68.33 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
140) N 49'-36'-16" E, A DISTANCE OF 54.40 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
141) N 43'-37'-26" E, A DISTANCE OF 52.60 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT; i
142) N 20--05'-24" E, A DISTANCE OF 37.45 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
143) N 18'-23'-34" W, A DISTANCE OF 56.64 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
144) N 54'46'46" W, A DISTANCE OF 40.88 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
145) N 68'-57'-24" W, A DISTANCE OF 48.70 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
146) S 62'42'-39" W, A DISTANCE OF 54.91 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
147) S 09'-34'-25" W, A DISTANCE OF 50.51 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
148) S 15'-36'-02" E, A DISTANCE OF 30,09 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
149) S 35--06'-29" W, A DISTANCE OF 17.02 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
150) N 42'-57'-20" W, A DISTANCE OF 19.12 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
151) N 25'-55'42" W, A DISTANCE OF 34.01 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
152) N 020-40'-59" W, A DISTANCE OF 38.12 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
153) N 14'-5l'-21" W, A DISTANCE OF 47.28 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
0
154) N 10'44'47- E, A DISTANCE OF 55.76 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
155) N 06'-30'-32" W, A DISTANCE OF 46.13 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT, `
156) N 32'-09'-23" W, A DISTANCE OF 55.47 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
157) N 53'-07'-42" W, A DISTANCE OF 50.60 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
158) N 73'-28'-05" W, A DISTANCE OF 37A6 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
159) N 05'-22'-20" E, A DISTANCE OF 38.69 FEET TO A FOUND #5 STEEL REBAR, THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 PER THAT PLAT TITLED `BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR
CATAWBA LANDS CONSERVANCY" RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 53, PAGE 747 (MCR) ;
THENCE, WITH SAID LOT'S SOUTHERLY LINES, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1) N 71--21'-10" E, A DISTANCE OF 138.97 FEET TO A FOUND #5 REBAR;
2) S 57--29'-40" E, A DISTANCE OF 399.21 FEET TO A FOUND #5 REBAR, THE
SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1B PER THAT PLAT TITLED "BOUNDARY SURVEY
FOR CATAWBA LANDS CONSERVANCY" RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 53, PAGE 747 (MCR)
THENCE, WITH SAID LOT'S SOUTHERLY LINE,•S 57'-30'-13" E, A DISTANCE OF
632.77 FEET TO A FOUND #5 REBAR, THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT
1B, IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT NW SOUTHEAST HOLDINGS, LLC TRACT
DESCRIBED IN BOOK 27030, PAGE 157 (MCR);
THENCE, WITH SAID WESTERLY LINK S 32'-29'-W' W, PASSING THROUGH A
FOUND #5 REBAR AT 373.05 FEET AND CONTINUING ANOTHER 128.76 FEET FOR A
TOTAL DISTANCE OF 501.81 TO A FOUND 7/8" PIPE, THE MOST NORTHERLY
C-5
r

0
CORNER OF THAT CLARIANT CORPORATION TRACT DESCRIBED IN BOOK 4677,
PAGE 309 (MCR);
THENCE, WITH SAID CLARIANT TRACT'S WESTERLY LINE, S 32'-29'-30" W,
PASSING A FOUND #5 -REBAR AT 388.17 FEET AND CONTINUING ANOTHER 229.94
FEET FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 618.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND
CONTAINING 102.149 ACRES OR 4,449,614 SQUARE FEET OF LAND, MORE OR LESS,
ALL ACCORDING TO THAT MAP TITLED "RECOMBINATION PLAT OF REVENTURE
PARK INVESTMENT 1, LLC TRACTS 1,2,3 & 4 - LONG CREEK WASTE WATER
TREATMENT PLANT" PREPARED BY THE SURVEY COMPANY, INC., DATED JUNE
15, 2012, SIGNED AND SEALED BY MICHAEL C. SAWHILL, NCPLS #L -3223, TO
WHICH REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE.
in the event that the above metes and bounds legal description of Tract A encompasses property
lying outside of the .boundaries of Tract 3 and Tract 4 as shown on plat titled "Exempt
Subdivision Map for Clariant Corporation" recorded in Map Book 52, Page 643 in the Office of
the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds (any such property lying outside the boundaries of
Tract 3 and Tract 4 is referred to as the "Excluded Proper(y'), then the boundaries of Tract 3
and Tract 4 as shown on that plat shall control and the Excluded Property is not part of Tract A
and will not be conveyed by Seller to Buyer.
Tract B
That approximately 56.718 acre tract (`Tract Tj designated as "Tract 2" on the plat
("ReVenture Plat') recorded in Plat Book 52, Page 643 in the Office of the Mecklenburg
County Register of Deeds ("Registry'j;
Tract C
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT I PER THAT PLAT TITLED "EXEMPT
-SUBDIVISION MAP FOR CLARIANT CORPORATION" RECORDED IN MAP BOOK
52, PAGE 643, MECKLENBURG COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE AND BEING
ALL OF THAT PROPOSED 22.385 ACRE TRACT C, AS SHOWN ON THAT MAP OF
SURVEY TITLED "RECOMBINATION PLAT OF CLARIANT TRACTS 1,2,3 & 4 -
LONG CREEK WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT" PREPARED BY THE SURVEY
COMPANY, INC., DATED DECEMB13R 09, 2010, LAST REVISED MARCH 25, 2011 AND
SIGNED AND SEALED BY MICHAEL C. SAWHILL, NCPLS #L-3223, TO WHICH
REFERENCE IS MADE.
COMMENCING AT NCGS STATION "WHITE" HAVING NC GRID
COORDINATES IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. OF NORTH 564,987.70 AND EAST 1,411,954.61,
WITH A COMBINED GRID FACTOR OF 0.99994387;
THENCE, S 84--17'-02" W, A HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE OF 10,623.65
FEET TO A FOUND Y2" PIPE, THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
C-6
wAa M4wr.r

THENCE, S 54--55'-00" E, PASSING A FOUND 3/4" WITNESS PIPE AT 1,142.69
FEET AND CONTINUING ANOTHER 50.27' FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 1,192.96 FEET
TO A CALCULATED POINT ON THE FERC(REGULATORY LINE;
THENCE, WITH THE FERCI REGULATORY LINE THE FOLLOWING TWELVE
(12) COURSES AND DISTANCES:
1) N 30.4 V-29"
E, A DISTANCE OF 106.20 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT,
2) N 23--43'48"
E, A DISTANCE OF 155.74 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
3) N 30'-43'-09"
E, A DISTANCE OF 103.78 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
4) N 55--37'-01"
E, A DISTANCE OF 79.96 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
5) N 23'-40'-39"
E, A DISTANCE OF 86.58 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
6) N 24--21'-14"
E, A DISTANCE OF 93.12 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
7) N 47'-23'-09"
E, A DISTANCE OF 107.97 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
8) N 55'-16'-05"
E, A DISTANCE OF 87.55 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
9) N 49%02%23" E, A DISTANCE OF 116.6 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
• 10) N 58'44'48" E, A DISTANCE OF 105.83 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
11) N 72'-49'-55" E, A DISTANCE OF 65,74 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT;
12) N 52'45'-29" E, A DISTANCE OF 53.83 FEET TO A CALCULATED POINT IN
THE CENTER LINE OF LONG CREEK;
THENCE, WITH THE CENTER LINE OF LONG CREEK THE FOLLOWING THREE
(3) COURSES AND DISTANCES.
1) N 52'-45'-29" E, A DISTANCE OF 3.57 A CALCULATED POINT;
2) N 26--39'41" E, A DISTANCE OF 86.27 A CALCULATED POINT;
3) N 18'46'-52" E, A DISTANCE OF 86.43 A CALCULATED POINT;
THENCE, DEPARTING LONG CREEK, N 84'-59'-W' -W, PASSING A SET #5
WITNESS REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "THE SURVEY COMPANY, INC.)
AT 50.00 FEET AND CONTINUING ANOTHER 888.18 FEET FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE
OF 938.18 FEET TO A SET #5 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "THE SURVEY
COMPANY, INC.;
THENCE, WITH THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
• RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 274.11 FEET AND A CHORD OF 196.00
C-7
PPA0202490M

0
FEET BEARING N 86'47'-34" W TO A SET #5 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED
"THE SURVEY COMPANY, INC.),
THENCE, S 57'-53'-48" W, A DISTANCE OF 222.93 FEET TO A SET #5 REBAR
WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "THE SURVEY COMPANY, INC.);
THENCE, S 51--20'-54" W, A DISTANCE OF 334.69 FEET TO A SET #5 REBAR
WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "THE SURVEY COMPANY, INC.);
THENCE, N 86'-03'-36" W, A DISTANCE OF 166.39 FEET TO A SET #5 REBAR
WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "THE SURVEY COMPANY, INC.);
THENCE, WITH THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 52.55 FEET AND A CHORD OF 51.95
FEET BEARING S 78'-00'-38" W TO A SET #5 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED
"THE SURVEY COMPANY, INC.);
THENCE, S 56--59'-49" W, A DISTANCE OF 56.58 FEET TO A SET #5 REBAR
WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED'THE SURREY COMPANY, INC.);
THENCE, S 46'-56'-01" E, A DISTANCE OF 75.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNWG AND CONTAINING 22.385 ACRES OR 975,112 SQUARE FEET OF LAND
ALL ACCORDING TO THAT MAP TITLED "RECOMBINATION PLAT OF REVENTURE
PARK INVESTMENT 1, LLC TRACTS 1,2,3 & 4 - LONG CREEK WASTE WATER
TREATMENT PLANT" PREPARED BY THE SURVEY COMPANY, INC., DATED JUNE
15, 2012, SIGNED AND SEALED BY MICHAEL C. SAWHILL, NCPLS #L-3223, TO
WHICH REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE.
In the event that the above metes and bounds legal description of Tract C encompasses
property lying outside of the boundaries of Tract 1 as shown on plat titled "Exempt Subdivision
Map for_ Clariant Corporation" _recorded. in ,Map Book 52, .Page 643 in the Office of the
Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds (any such property lying outside the boundaries of Tract
1 is referred to as the "Excepted Property'l, their the boundaries of Tract 1 as shown on that
plat shall control and the Excepted Property is not part of Tract C and will not be conveyed by
Salter to Buyer.
rrna2M9otr
C-8

• EXHIBIT D
ESCROW PROVISIONS
1. In performing any of its duties as Escrow Agent, and except for damages, losses
or expenses arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Escrow Agent, Escrow
Agent shall not incur any liability to anyone for any damages, losses or expenses, including
(a) any action taken or omitted in good faith upon advice of its legal counsel given with respect
to any questions relating to the duties and responsibilities of Escrow Agent under the Agreement;
or (b) any action taken or omitted in good faith reliance upon any written notice or instruction
provided for in the Agreement. Escrow Agent may rely upon any written notice or instruction
provided for in the Agreement as being duly executed, valid and effective, and as containing
accurate information and genuine signatures.
2. Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, in the event of a
dispute between Seller and Buyer arising prior to or at the time of the delivery or other
disposition of the Deposit by Escrow Agent pursuant to the Agreement, which dispute shall be
sufficient, in the sole discretion of Escrow Agent, to justify its doing so, Escrow Agent shall be
entitled to tender the Deposit into the registry or custody of any court of competent jurisdiction,
together with such legal pleadings as it may deem appropriate, and thereupon Escrow Agent
shall be discharged from all finther duties and liabilities under the Agreement. Any such legal
action may be brought in such court as Escrow Agent shall determine to have jurisdiction
thereof. Escrow Agent's reasonable determination of whether a dispute exists between Seller
and Buyer shall be binding and conclusive upon all parties hereto, notwithstanding any
contention that no dispute exists. All costs and expenses insured by Bscmw Agent in taking any
action pursuant to this paragraph shall be covered by and paid pursuant to the indemnification of
Escrow Agent contained in the following paragraph.
3. Seller and Buyer shall and do hereby jointly and severally indemnify, defend and
hold Escrow Agent harmless from, against and in respect of. (a) any and all demands, judgments,
expenses, costs, losses, injuries or claims of any kind whatsoever whether existing on the date
hereof or hereafter arising, incurred by Escrow Agent by reason of, from or in connection with
the Agreement or any action taken or not taken by Escrow Agent under or in connection with the
Agreement, except for any such demands, judgments, expenses, costs, losses, injuries or claims
arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Escrow Agent; and (b) any and all
counsel fees, expenses, disbursements of counsel, amounts of judgments, demands, assessments,
costs, fines or penalties, and amounts paid in cdmpromise or settlement, incurred or sustained by
Escrow Agent by reason ot; in connection with or as a result of any claim, demand, action, suit,
investigation or proceeding (or any appeal thereof or relating thereto or other review thereof]
incident to the matters covered by the immediately preceding clause (a).
4. If Escrow Agent shall notify Seller and Buyer of its desire to be relieved of any
fitrther duties and liabilities hereunder, then Escrow Agent shall deliver the Deposit to a
successor esomwee designated by Seller and Buyer. If Seller and Buyer shall fail to agree upon
and designate a successor escrowee within two days after having been requested by Escrow
Agent to do so, then Escrow Agent shall in its discretion designate the successor eserowee. The
successor escrowee designated by Seller and Buyer or by Escrow Agent, as the case may be,
D-1
rrAasoacsurr

0
shall be a bank or trust company having bust powers in good standing and located in Charlotte,
North Carolina, and shall agree to be bound by all the terns and conditions of the Agreement.
Immediately upon agreement by the successor escrowee to be bound by all the terms and
conditions of this agreement, the original escrowee shall be relieved of any and all duties and
liabilities under or in connection with the Agreement accruing after the date of the delivery of the
Deposit to the successor escrowee; provided, however, that no successor escrowee shall assume
any liability for the acts or omissions of its predecessor escrowee(s) under the Agreement.
5. The agency created in Escrow Agent hereby is coupled with an interest'of Seller
and Buyer and shall be binding upon and enforceable against the respective successors, legal
representatives and assigns of Seller and Buyer. The escrow shall not be revoked or terminated
by reason of the dissolution or liquidation of Seller or Buyer but shall continue to. be binding
upon and i»rforceable against the respective successors, legal representatives and assigns of
Seller and Buyer in the manner provided in this Exhibit D. In the event of the dissolution or
liquidation of Seller and Buyer, Escrow Agent may rely and act upon any notices permitted or
required to be given hereunder from any person, firm, partnership or corporation believed by
Escrow Agent in good faith to be the successor, legal representative or assign of such dissolved
or liquidated party.
PPA9 20249070
D-2

i(0
EXHIBIT E
PURCHASE -PRICE
iicYenfaiie.Eazli SY __ _
-
Acres
$/Acres
Value
Tract
Unencumbered
52.234
$50,000
$2,611,700
Conservation/Deed Restr
28.641
$12,500
$358,01
Floodplain
6.24
$25,000
$156,000
Watershed
0
$251000
Duke Easement Area
15.034
$50,000
$751,
Total:TractA:'_
Acres
$/Acre
Value
Tract B
Unencumbered
33.897
$50,000
$1,694,
Conservation/ Deed Restrict
22-628
$12,500
$282,8
Floodplain
0.073
$25,000
$1,825
Watershed
0.12
. $25,000
$3,
__...,.._..,:_, _ _ _ _ �6v
Awes
$/Acre
Value
Tract
Unencumbered
31.727
$50,000
$586,350
Conservation/ Deed Restrict
10.643
$12,500
$133,03
Floodplain
0.015
- $B4O00
$37
Watershed
0
$25,000
TOWLTract C
PPAB 202490797
(See attached map on following page)
E-I

0 EXHIBIT F
PERMITTED ENCUMBRANCES
1. Ad valorem taxes for the year of Closing;
2. Matters that would be shown on a current and accurate survey of the Property;
3. All easements, covenants, restrictions and conditions of record, including, but not
limited to, the following:
(a) Long Creek East [Tracts 2 &.2b] Deed of Conservation Easement recorded in
Book 26977, Page 618 in the Registry; ,
(b) Long Creek West [Tracts 4 & 5] Deed of Conservation Easement recorded in
Book 26977, Page 657 in the Registry;
(c) Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions recorded in Book 26977, Page 678
in the Registry;
(d) Trail and Parking Easement Agreement recorded in Book 26977, Page 639 in
the Registry;
(e) Access Basement Agreement recorded in Book 26977, Page 693 in the
Registry;
4. All easements, restrictions and rights -of -way as may be apparent from an
inspection of the Property;
5. All zoning, subdivision, land use and other laws, regulations or ordinances
applicable to the Property;
6. Any matters arising out of Buyer's operations on the Properly prior to Closing;
and
7. Notice of Brownfields Property recorded in Book Page in the
Registry.
F-I
PPAb MOM
I

.10
EXHIBIT G
CLARIANT TRACT
That approximately 351.817 acre tract.designated as " Fract 1" on the plat recorded in Plat Book
52, Page 643 in the Registry ("Tract 1'), LESS AND EXCEPT that portion of Tract l depicted
as "Tract C" on the Recombination Plat.
G-1
"AB 20OWM
0
ri

0
0
0
PM22m m
SIT H
(MENTIONALLY DELETED)
H-1
I

0
FrAS qM
't
a
1-1

EXH IBiT I
TEMPORARY ACCESS
EASEMENT AREA 3 r,
' t i
-----------------
r `
r
!t
�1.
C
.Fyn:
1� Y
'� lJ

0 EXHIBIT J
Temporary Access Easement Agreement
TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is
entered into 20 by CLARIANT CORPORATION, a New York
corporation ("Ciarlant'j, and the CITY OF CHARLOTTE, a municipal corporation ("City").
A. Clariant owns the real property located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina,
designated as `Tract 1" (`"Tract I'l on the plat recorded in Map Book 52, Page 643 in the
Mecklenburg County Public Registry ("Registry'), less and except that portion of Tract i
depicted as 'Tract C" on Plat ("Plat'l recorded in Map Book Page ^ in the Registry
("Clariant Property'l.
B. - City owns the real property located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina,
designated as "Tract A", `Tract B" and'Tract C" on the Plat ("City Property'l.
C. City intends to construct a bridge over Long Creek that will connect Tract A with
Tract Band Tract C ("Bridge").
D. Clariant has agreed to grant for the benefit of City a temporary access easement
over and across the portion of Clariant Property designated as "Access Road" on Exhibit
("Access Easement Area').
NOW 'THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are acknowledged, Clariant and City agree as follows:
1. Grant of Easement Clariant grants for the benefit of City a non-
exclusive temporary easement ("Access Easement') over and across the Access Easement Area
for pedestrian and vehicular ingress, egress -and regress as reasonably necessary for the sole
purpose of mobilizing equipment and materials necessary for the construction of the Bridge. The
Access Easement is granted subject to all conditions, covenants, restrictions, easements and other
matters of record, to any matters that would appear on a current and accurate survey of the
Aooess Easement Area and to all subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, land use regulations
and other laws, regulations or ordinances applicable to the Access Easement Area. The Access
Easement shall terminate on the earlier of: (i) the date on which the Bridge is substantially
complete such that vehicles can cross the Bridge; and (ii) January 1, 2018.
2. Terms of Easement
(a) 1)se of Access Easement The intersection of the Access Easement
Area and Highway 27 shall be used by the City as an entrance onto the Access Easement Area
and shall not be used by the City as an exit from the Access Easement Area onto Highway.27.
The intersection of the Access Easement Area and Belmeade Drive shall be used by die City as
an exit fiom the Access Easement Area onto Behneade Drive and may not be used by the City as
140
J-1
PPA9 ZRW7V7

an entrance to the Access -Easement Area. The Access Easement Area may be used solely for
access to City Property for the purpose of mobilizing equipment and materials necessary for the
construction of the Bridge. Accordingly, the Access Easement Area may not be used by City in
connection with the construction of any wastewater treatment facilities, or any other structures or
facilities, on the City Property except as set forth in the preceding sentence. To the maximum
extent reasonably possible in connection with the mobilization of equipment and materials
necessary for the construction of the Bridge, City shall access the area of the Bridge from Tract
A. City shall limit its use of the Access Easement Area to occasions when the mobilization of
equipment and materials can not be accomplished through Tract A. In no event shall the Access
Easement Area be used for the removal of dirt or debris from the area of the Bridge (and all such
dirt and debris shall be removed through Tract A). Except in connection with the mobilization of
equipment and materials necessary for the construction of the Bridge, contractors and others
working on the Bridge shall access the area of the Bridge through Tract A.
(b) No Obligation to Maintain. Clarant shall have no obligation to
maintain, repair or replace the road located in the Access Easement Area ("Roa(r), or any other
portion of the Access Easement Area.
(e) Dom. if City or any of its agents, invitees, contractors,
employees or representatives, damages the Access Easement Area or the Road, then, within
thirty (30) days after demand therefor, the costs of repairing any such damage shall be paid by
City to Clariant or the City shall make the necessary repairs to restore the road.
(d) Relocation. Clariant may relocate, at its sole cost, the Access
Easement Area upon prior written notice to City. If Clariant elects to . relocate the Access
Easement Area, then Clariant shall construct at least a dirt road (consistent with the condition of
the dirt road then existing within the Easement Area) within the new easement area. Upon the
completion of that road and, at the sole cost of Clariant, an instrument specifying the location of
the new easement area shall be recorded in the Registry, and the Access Easement shall no
longer burden the portion of the Access Easement Area from which the Road was relocated, but
shall burden the new easement area. Upon the recording of such instrument,. -the new easement
area shall constitute part of the Access Easement Area.
(e) Continued Use of Easement Areas. Clariant shall have the right to
use the Access Easement Area, including the full use of the Road, in any manner which will not
prevent or unreasonably interfere with the use of the Road or the exercise of the easement rights
under this Agreement , Any damage to the Road as a result of the use by Clariant will not be the
responsibility of the City.
3. Easement Appurtenant. The Access Easement shall burden, and tun
with title to, the Access Easement Area and benefit, be appurtenant to and run with title to, the
City Property.
4. Covenant Against Lieus. City shall promptly pay and discharge on or
before the due date any claim or obligation for labor or materials furnished at the direction of
City which, if not paid or discharged, would result in a lien on the Property.
1-2
PPAa 702490 ?

. 5. Release, Indemnification.
10
(a) City acknowledges that the exercise of the rights granted to City
under this Agreement involves risks, including death, personal injury, property loss and property
damage, and City hereby agrees to accept and assume all risks. City shall not hold Clariant, its
directors, officers, shareholders, agents, employees, affiliates, successors and assigns
(collectively, "Clariant Related Parties', liable for any loss, injury or damage which may
occur to City or its property, and City hereby releases and discharges Clariant and the Clariant
Related Parties from (and covenants not to sue Clariant and the Clariant Related Parties for) any
such loss, injury or damage or any claims related thereto.
(b) City shall indemnify, defend (with counsel acceptable to Clariant)
and hold harmless Clariant and the Clariant Related Parties from and against all liens, claims of
lien, losses, fines, penalties, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' and consultants' fees) arising in any manner, directly or
indirectly, out of or by reason of (i) the activities of and/or presence of City, its agents, invitees,
contractors, employees or representatives upon or about the Clariant Property; and (ii) City's or
its agents, invitees, contractors, employees or representatives breach of any of representations,
warranties or obligations under this Agreement
6. Insurance. City shall maintain Commercial General Liability Insurance
against claims for personal injury or death and property damage in an amount of not less than
$2,000,000.00 per occurrence and aggregate limits of not less than $5,000,000.00, commercial
auto liability insurance and such workers' compensation/employer's liability insurance as
required by law. If City enters into any agreements that necessitate access to the Property by
City's contractors, then such agreements shall require that City's contractors maintain
Commercial General Liability Insurance in the above amounts, commercial auto liability
insurance and workers' compensation/employer's liability insurance. All liability policies
required by this Section 6 shall: (a) be issued by insurers that are authorized to issue the
applicable insurance in the state where the Property is located and are reasonably acceptable to
-.- Clariant; (b) name Clariant as an additional insured; (a) contain a provision by which the insurer
will give Clariant at least 30 days prior written notice before making any material change in the
nature or extent of the coverage provided under such policies and/or canceling or terminating
such policies; and (d) contain a provision by which City's policies are primary to and non-
contributory with any coverage that Clariant may have in effect Prior to exercising any rights
under this Agreement, City shall provide Clariant with evidence satisfactory to Clariant of the
policies required by this Section 6. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City may provide the
required insurance and proof of such insurance under a qualified self-fimded insurance program
in accordance with the terms and provisions of the letter to be provided by City. Notch Carolina
law prohibits the naming of additional insureds under self -funded programs.
7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by North Carolina
law:
8. litlnding Effect This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
T-3
PPABID24WM

• 9. Interpretation. Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement; (a)
"includes" and "including" mean includes or including by way of illustration and not by way of
limitation; (b) "may" is permissive; (c) references to Exhibits, Sections or subsections are to
those attached to or included in this Agreement, and all Exhibits are incorporated into this
Agreement; and (d) the section and other headings in this Agreement are for convenience only
and do not limit or expand any provisions of this Agreement.
•
10. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or
unenforceable, then such provision will be fully severable from this Agreement; and the
remaining provisions of this Agreement will remain in fill] force and effect and will not be
affected thereby. Furthermore, in lieu of such invalid or unenforceable provision, there shall be
added automatically as a part of this Agreement a valid and enforceable provision as similar in
terms to such invalid or unenforceable provision as may be reasonably possible.
11. Notice. Any notice contemplated by ibis Agreement must be in writing,
addressed as set forth in the records maintained by the Mecklenburg County Tax Assessor's
Office and shall be either (a) sent by United States Mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested, in which case the notice will be deemed delivered two (2) business
days after being deposited in the United States mail, (b) sent by overnight delivery using a
nationally recognized overnight courier, in which case the notice shall be deemed delivered one
(1) business day after deposit with such courier; (c) sent by facsimile, in which case the notice
shall be deemed delivered upon confirmed transmission of such notice, provided that no later
than the next business day after the facsimile is sent, a hard copy of the facsimile transmission is
also sent in the manner set forth in (a), (b) or (d) of this subsection; or (d) sent by personal
delivery, in which case the notice will be deemed delivered oil the date of delivery.
12. Survival. The terms of Sections 2(c), 4, 5, 7-10, and 11-13 shall survive
the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.
13. Amendment. No provision of this Agreement may be amended without
the prior written consent of Clariant and City.
TO HAVE AND`TO HOLD the Access Easement granted herein, together with all
privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging, for the use and purposes aforesaid unto the
parties hereto, their successors and assigns, for the term specified in this Agreement.
PPAa M4907v7
[SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW]
J-4

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written
CLARIANT CORPORATION,
a New York corporation
By:
Name:
Its:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MHCKL13NBURG
I, a Notary Public of County and State
of North Carolina, do hereby certify that ("Signatory'l, personally came
before me this day and acknowledged that- he is of CLARIANT
CORPORATION, a New York corporation, and that he, as being authorized
to do so, executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of the corporation.
I Certify that the Signatory personally appeared before me this day, and
(check one of the following)
(I have personal knowledge of the identity of the Signatory); or
(I have seen satisfactory evidence of the- Signatory's identity, by a current
state or federal identification with the Signatory's photograph in the form of`,
(check one of the following)
--- a driver's license. or
in the form of ); or
(a credible witness has sworn to the identity of the Signatory).
The Signatory acknowledged to me that he voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument
for the purpose stated and in the capacity indicated.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal this day of .2013.
Notary Public
Print Name:
[Note. Notary Public must sign exactly as on notary.sealj
My Commission Expires:
(NOTARY SEAL) (MUST BE FULLY ]LEGIBLE)
J-5 .
PPAa24219DM

CITY OF CHARLOTTE,
a municipal corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
I, a Notary Public of County and
State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that
("Signatory'), personally came before me -this day and acknowledged that- he/she is
of CITY OF- CHARLOTTE; a municipal corporation, and that he, as
, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing instrument
on Behalf of the municipal corporation,
I certify that the Signatory personally appeared before me this day, and
(check one of the following)
(I have personal knowledge of the identity of the Signatory), or
(I have seen satisfactory evidence of the Signatory's identity, by a current
state or federal identification with the Signatory's photograph in the form of.
(check one of the following)
_ a drivees license or
in the form of ); or
(a credible witness has sworn to the identity of theSiguatory).
The Signatory acknowledged to me that he voluntarily signed the foregoing instrument
for the purpose stated and in the capacity indicated.
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal this . day of 2013.
Notary Public
Print Name:
(Note: Notary Public must sign exactly as on n0tary.W11
My Commission Expires:
w [NOTARY SEAL) (MUST BE FULLY LEGIBLE)
1-6
"Aa 202JMO

0
rrea20Unrn
FXfIIBIT A
to
Temporary Access Easement Agreement
ACCESS EASEMENT AREA
(Temporary)
J-7

0
Attachment # 5
•
0
RECENEDINCDEOIDVNR
TJN 0 6 2"I12
Water Quality
Permittinq Section

• Memorandum of Agreement
Between City of Belmont and City of Charlotte through Charlotte -Mecklenburg
Utilities
The City of Belmont (Belmont) and the City of Charlotte (acting through Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Utilities) (Charlotte) each provide wastewater collection and treatment
services to their customers and residents. Behnont has been notified by the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) that substantial
improvements will soon be required to the existing Behnont wastewater treatment plant.
Belmont has considered a number of alternatives as to how they may best achieve the
objectives of the new requirements, including decommissioning their existing wastewater
treatment plant and contracting with other wastewater utilities to provide on -going
services to their residents. In light of those considerations, Belmont wishes to enter into
an agreement with Charlotte to participate in a regional wastewater treatment program.
The elements of the proposed regional treatment program would consist of:
• Portions of wastewater from Belmont would be treated at Cramerton's existing
wastewater plant (per existing agreements) and at Charlotte's existing plant(s)
• To create capacity to accommodate Belmont's flows in the Charlotte wastewater
system, Charlotte proposes to construct a new, advanced wastewater treatment
• plant near Long Creek in Mecklenburg County
• The new plant at Long Creek is proposed to treat wastewater that is currently
treated at Charlotte's Irwin Creek and/or McAlpine Creek wastewater plants,
thereby creating capacity for flows from Belmont in Charlotte's Irwin Creek
and/or McAlpine Creek plants
• The regional wastewater treatment program will provide additional environmental
protection by providing advanced treatment for Belmont's wastewater while
satisfying nutrient TMDL allocation goals for Lake Wylie
This Memorandum of Agreement authorizes Belmont and Charlotte to continue
negotiations leading to implementation of this regional wastewater treatment program
and confirms each party's commitment to negotiate in good faith. This memorandum of
agreement will be the basis of a formal interlocal agreement (Agreement) to be developed
jointly by the parties.
Implementation will include the following steps and actions:
1. Charlotte will work with DENR to obtain environmental approvals for the
project(s) at Charlotte's expense
2. Belmont agrees to transfer NPDES wasteload allocations specified in the Lake
Wylie TMDL to Charlotte through a mutually agreed upon process and to
decommission their existing treatment plant upon completion of the necessary
• infrastructure required to convey those flows to Charlotte
3. Decommissioning and abandonment of the Belmont treatment plant will be at
Belmont's expense
4. Belmont will construct, own, and operate flow equalization and pumping station
systems in Behnont at Belmont's expense that will transfer wastewater to
Charlotte's Paw Creek basin/lift station

Memorandum of Agreement
Between City of Mount Holly and City of Charlotte
• Through Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
January 14, 2013
The City of Mount Holly ("Mount Holly").and the City of Charlotte (acting through
Charlotte;Mecklenburg Utilities) ("Charlotte") each provide wastewater collection and
treatment services to their customers and residents, and both cities forecast the need for
additional wastewater treatment capacity.. Mount Holly has been notified by the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) that substantial .
improvements will soon be required to the existing Mount Holly wastewater treatment
plant.
A high-level feasibility study in 2006 compared six alternative ways that Mount Holly
and Charlotte could meet their additional capacity needs individually or jointly. The -
study concluded that construction of a regional treatment plant provided the most
environmental and economic benefit.
Subsequent to the 2006 Feasibilitj Study, Mount Holly and Charlotte continued joint and
separate consideration 'of a number of alternatives as to how to best achieve the new
requirements and provide the needed increase in capacity. Those considerations included;
expanding and upgrading Mount Holly's existing wastewater treatment plant,
decommissioning Mount Holly's existing wastewater treatment plant to facilitate a
regional wastewater treatment approach involving Charlotte and/or Gastonia, and
• broadening a regional approach by including the City of Belmont and/or an existing
industrial wastewater treatment plant in the planning process. In light of those
considerations and the need to continue more detailed planning, Mount Holly and
Charlotte seek to enter into an agreement to participate in a regional .wastewater treatment
program.
The elements of the proposed regional treatment program would consist of:
• Wastewater from Mount Holly would be pumped to Charlotte via a new pump
station and force main across the Catawba River/Lake Wylie.
• Charlotte proposes to construct a new, advanced regional wastewater treatment .
:plant. near Long Creek in Mecklenburg County that would treat wastewater from
the region.
• Charlotte proposes to replace the existing 4 mgd Mount Holly wastewater
treatment plant with 4 mgd of upgraded capacity in the new Long Creek plant in
exchange for the nutrient discharge allocation into Lake Wylie currently assigned
to Mount Holly.
• The new plant at Long Creek is anticipated to be connected to other existing
wastewater treatment plants in Mecklenburg County whereby additional and/or
reserve capacity could be provided.
• Charlotte proposes to acquire phosphorus and nitrogen allocations from the City
of Belmont and from the existing Claziant/ReVenture industrial wastewater
treatment plant which .can be used to facilitate overall achievement of TMDL
• goals for Lake Wylie.
• The regional wastewater treatment program will provide additional environmental
protection by providing advanced treatment for Mount Holly's wastewater,
satisfying nutrient TMDL allocation goals for Lake Wylie, reducing the: risk of

5. Mount Holly will pay Charlotte for the actual operating and maintenance costs of
• the'proposed pump station, flow equalization facility, and force main. Ownership
and operation of these facilities remains open for consideration and will be
determined in the Agreement.
6. Charlotte will allocate 4 ingd of wastewater treatment capacity (measured as the
average daily flow in each billing period, said billing periods anticipated to be.
monthly) from Mount Holly at one or more of the,Charlotte treatment plants at no
capital cost to Mount Holly in exchange for the nutrient allocation currently -held
by Mount Holly in the existing TMDL (50 lb/day total phosphorous and 300
lb/day total nitrogen).
7. Mount Holly will pay Charlotte for treatment services for up to 4 mgd based on
the actual flow received each month at a treatment fee rate based on the average
cost per 1,000 gallons treated of operations and maintenance at all of Charlotfe's
wastewater treatment plants: This fee is subject to re -calculation by -Charlotte for
each fiscal year: -
8. Charlotte will allocate 1 mgd of wastewater planning capacity to Mount Holly to
allow Mount Holly to plan and permit growth of their customer base. This
planning capacity is in addition to the 4 mgd of wastewater treatment capacity
described in Paragraph 6. Mount Holly will be required.to increase its treatment
capacity pursuant to Paragraph 9 when Mount Holly's wastewater discharge
frequently or consistently exceeds it 4 mgd-wastewater capacity. Specific
triggers that would require. such an increase will be defined in the Agreement.
9: Upon•proper notice and subject to issuance of all required permits and
:. authorizations, Mount Holly may increase the amount of treatment capacity it is
allowed to use in Charlotte's system from 4 mgd up to 6 mgd by doing either of
the following:
a. Paying Charlotte a negotiated rate per 1,000 gallons for wastewater,
treatment in excess of 4 mgd, said negotiated rate to be based on O&M
costs plus a reasonable amount to cover Charlotte's. capital costs; or,
b. Participating proportionally in. the capital cost of existing, new, or
expanded treatment capacity and paying a treatment rate as described in
item 7 (above).
i. Mount Holly may increase its purchased allocation from 4 mgd
up to 6 mgd in single or multiple increments of 500,000 gal/day.
ii. If Mount Holly chooses to, increase its purchased,allocation prior
to January 1, 2025, the cost of each increment will be based
proportionally, on the actual cost to design and construct the initial
phase of the Long Creek wastewater treatment plant.
iii. After January 1, 2025, the cost of each increment will be based on.
the actual cost (or agreed upon estimate if no construction is
required at that time) cost to design and construct an expansion of
the Long Creek wastewater treatment plant.
10. Future expansion of treatment or planning capacity in Charlotte's system
.available to Mount Holly beyond the initial capacities may be .initiated and
implemented by either Mount Holly or Charlotte individually, or may be initiated
and implemented jointly by both parties. Future expansions are subject to
• issuance of all required permits and authorizations.
11. Based on state and federal regulations, Mount Holly and Charlotte agree that
regulation of discharges to the sewer system are necessary and will be provided
through sewer use ordinances adopted and enforced separately by both parties.

Permit Modification Language for Nutrient Allocation
Clariant's Current Permit
The reduction in Clariant's nutrient mass limitations reflect a 90% nutrient allocation transfer of 287
pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day Total Phosphorus to the City of Charlotte's proposed
Regional W WTP. The allocation transfer and subsequent reduction in Clariant's nutrient mass
limitations will become effective upon the Division's receipt of both (a) an Engineer's Certificate of
Construction Completion for the Charlotte Regional W WTP, and (b) written notification from Clariant
authorizing such nutrient transfer. Clariant's reduced mass nutrient limitations are based on a 12-
month rolling average (refer to Section A.(4)).
Clariant's Proposed Permit
The reductions in Clariant's nutrient mass limitations reflect a 90% nutrient allocation transfer of 287
pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day Total Phosphorus to the City of Mt. Holly and the City
of Belmont in the following amounts:
City of Mt. Holly: 223 pounds/day of Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day of Total
Phosphorous
'. City of Belmont: 64 pounds/day of Total Nitrogen and 0 pounds/day of Total Phosphorous
The allocation transfer and subsequent reduction in Clariant's nutrient mass limitations will become
effective upon the NC Division of Water Quality's receipt of written notification from Clariant
authorizing such nutrient transfer. Clariant's reduced mass nutrient limitations are based on a 12-
month rolling average (refer to Section A.(4)).
Belmont Proposed Permit
The daily limits for Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorous set forth in this Permit include the transfer
of 64 pounds/day of Total Nitrogen and 0 pounds/day of Total Phosphorous from the permit held by
Clariant Corporation. This transfer reflects the terms of an agreement between Clariant and the City of
Charlotte to reduce and transfer a total of 287 pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day Total
Phosphorus from the Clariant permit in anticipation of the construction and operation of the Charlotte
Regional W WTP, as described in Clariant's permit. Notwithstanding the limits set forth in this Permit,
Belmont agrees to maintain its discharge such that the total allocation of nitrogen and phosphorus
prescribed by the TMDL for Belmont and Mt Holly, including the allocation previously permitted to
Clariant to Lake Wylie, is met.
Upon receipt of both (a) an Engineer's Certificate of Construction Completion for the Belmont
Wastewater Transfer Liftstation, and (b) written notification from Belmont, the entire Total Nitrogen
and Total Phosphorus allocation within this permit shall be transferred to the Charlotte Regional

W WTP permit (414 pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 58 pounds/day Total Phosphorus). It is
understood that as condition of this nutrient transfer Behnont will transfer all wastewater flows
currently treated under this permit to Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities for treatment as described in the
Record of Decision for the Long Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impact
Statement and will cease operation of the facility subject to this permit.
In the event the Charlotte Regional W WTP is not constructed or cannot be constructed, the nutrient
allocations described above and the allocation placed in the Mt Holly permit (223 lbs/day of Total
Nitrogen and 361bs/day of Total Phosphorus) from the Clariant permit will become a permanent
allocation to this permit once Belmont has reimbursed Charlotte for the Nutrient Allocation as
described in the Memorandum of Agreement and/or Interlocal Agreement and provided proof of such
reimbursement to NC Division of Water Quality.
Mount Holly Pronosed Permit
The daily limits for Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorous set forth in this Permit include the transfer
of 223 pounds/day of Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day of Total Phosphorous from the permit held by
Clariant Corporation. This transfer reflects the terms of an agreement between Clariant and the City of
Charlotte to reduce and transfer a total of 287 pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day Total
Phosphorus from the Clariant permit in anticipation of the construction and operation of the Charlotte
l� Regional W WTP, as described in Clariant's permit. Notwithstanding the limits set forth in this Permit,
Mt. Holly agrees to maintain its discharge such that the total allocation of nitrogen and phosphorus
prescribed by the TMDL for Behnont and Mt Holly, including the allocation previously permitted to
Clariant to Lake Wylie, is met.
Upon receipt of both (a) an Engineer's Certificate of Construction Completion for the Charlotte
Regional W WTP, and (b) written notification from Mt Holly, the entire Total Nitrogen and Total
Phosphorus allocation within this permit shall be transferred to the Charlotte Regional W WTP permit
(523 pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 86 pounds/day Total Phosphorus). It is understood that as
condition of this nutrient transfer Mt Holly will transfer all wastewater flows currently treated under
this permit to Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities for treatment as described in the Record of Decision for
the Long Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impact Statement and will cease
operation of the facility subject to this permit.
In the event the Charlotte Regional W WTP is not constructed or cannot be constructed, the nutrient
allocations described above will become a permanent allocation to the Belmont permit once Belmont
has reimbursed Charlotte for the Nutrient Allocation as described in the Memorandum of Agreement
and/or Interlocal Agreement and provided proof of such reimbursement to NC Division of Water
Quality.

• Memorandum of Agreement
Between City of Belmont and City of Charlotte through Charlotte -Mecklenburg
Utilities
The City of Belmont (Belmont) and the City of Charlotte (acting through Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Utilities) (Charlotte) each provide wastewater collection and treatment
services to their customers and residents. Behnont has been notified by the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) that substantial
improvements will soon be required to the existing Belmont wastewater treatment plant.
Belmont has considered a number of alternatives as to how they may best achieve the
objectives of the new requirements, including decommissioning their existing wastewater
treatment plant and contracting with other wastewater utilities to provide on -going
services to their residents. In light of those considerations, Belmont wishes to enter into
an agreement with Charlotte to participate in a regional wastewater treatment program.
The elements of the proposed regional treatment program would consist of:
• Portions of wastewater from Belmont would be treated at Cramerton's existing
wastewater plant (per existing agreements) and at Charlotte's existing Plant(s)
• To create capacity to accommodate Belmont's flows in the Charlotte wastewater
system, Charlotte proposes to construct a new, advanced wastewater treatment
• plant near Long Creek in Mecklenburg County
• The new plant at Long Creek is proposed to treat wastewater that is currently
treated at Charlotte's Irwin Creek and/or McAlpine Creek wastewater plants,
thereby creating capacity for flows from Belmont in Charlotte's Irwin Creek
and/or McAlpine Creek plants
• The regional wastewater treatment program will provide additional environmental
protection by providing advanced treatment for Belmont's wastewater while
satisfying nutrient TMDL allocation goals for Lake Wylie
This Memorandum of Agreement authorizes Belmont and Charlotte to continue
negotiations leading to implementation of this regional wastewater treatment program
and confirms each party's commitment to negotiate in good faith. This memorandum of
agreement will be the basis of a formal interlocal agreement (Agreement) to be developed
jointly by the parties.
Implementation will include the following steps and actions:
1. Charlotte will work with DENR to obtain environmental approvals for the
project(s) at Charlotte's expense
2. Belmont agrees to transfer NPDES wasteload allocations specified in the Lake
Wylie TMDL to Charlotte through a mutually agreed upon process and to
decommission their existing treatment plant upon completion of the necessary
• infrastructure required to convey those flows to Charlotte
3. Decommissioning and abandonment of the Belmont treatment plant will be at
Belmont's expense
4. Belmont will construct, own, and operate flow equalization and pumping station
systems in Belmont at Belmont's expense that will transfer wastewater to
Charlotte's Paw Creek basin/lift station

5. Charlotte will construct, own, and operate a force main from the Belmont
pumping station to the Charlotte wastewater system at Charlotte's expense
6. Charlotte will treat up to 2 mgd of wastewater (measured as the average daily
flow in the maximum month of each year)from Belmont at one or more of the
Charlotte treatment plants at no capital cost to Belmont
7. Belmont will pay Charlotte for treatment services for the first 2 mgd based on the
actual average cost per 1,000 gallons treated of operations and maintenance at
Charlotte's wastewater treatment plants.
8. Upon proper notice, Belmont may increase the amount of treatment capacity it is
allowed to use in Charlotte's system from 2 mgd up to 5 mgd by doing either of
the following:
a. Paying Charlotte a negotiated rate per 1,000 gallons for wastewater
treatment in excess of 2 mgd, said negotiated rate to be based on O&M
costs plus a reasonable amount to cover Charlotte's capital cost; or,
b. Participating proportionally in the capital cost of existing, new, or
expanded treatment capacity and paying a treatment rate as described in
item 7 (above).
9. Future expansion of capacity in Charlotte's system available to Belmont beyond
the initial capacity may be initiated by either Belmont or Charlotte individually,
or may be initiated jointly by both parties.
1 O.Based on state and federal regulations, Belmont and Charlotte agree that
regulation of discharges to the sewer system are necessary and will be provided
through sewer use ordinances adopted and enforced separately by both parties.
11.Based on design criteria, state, and federal regulations, Belmont and Charlotte
agree to limit industrial waste discharges to appropriate standards.
12.Belmont will be solely responsible for regulating industrial discharges originating
within their collection system or within collection systems that discharge into
Belmont's collection system according to terms and conditions to be included in
the Agreement.
13.Charlotte will be solely responsible for regulating industrial discharges
originating within their collection system or within collection systems that
discharge into Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities' collection system according to
terms and conditions to be included in the Agreement.
14.Charlotte will provide periodic reports to Belmont about wastewater system
performance and compliance, operating costs, and anticipated future capital costs
(if any).
15. Belmont will provide periodic and timely reports to Charlotte about Behnonf s
collection system expansion, any collection system performance issues that could
impact Charlotte's system, significant changes related to industrial discharges,
and any other information that is relevant to the quantity or characteristics of the
wastewater discharged by Belmont
16.Belmont and Charlotte agree that other terms and conditions should be included in
the Agreement and may agree during continued negotiations that the Agreement
should provide terms and conditions different from those proposed within this
MOA.
Approved by:
City of ont
City of Charlotte
•
•
•

Memorandum of Agreement
Between City of Mount Holly and City of Charlotte
• Through Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
January 14, 2013,
The City of Mount Holly ("Mount Holly") and the City of Charlotte (acting through
Charlotte -,Mecklenburg Utilities) ("Charlotte") each provide wastewater collection and
treatment services to their customers and residents, and both cities forecast the need for
additional wastewater treatment capacity.. Mount Holly has been notified by the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) that substantial .
improvements will soon be required to the existing Mount Holly wastewater treatment .
plant.
A high-level feasibility study in 2006 compared six alternative ways that Mount Holly
and Charlotte could meet their additional capacity needs individually or jointly. The
study concluded that construction of a regional treatment plant provided the most
environmental and economic benefit.
Subsequent to the 2006 Feasibilij Study, Mount Holly and Charlotte continued joint and
separate consideration of a number of alternatives as to how to best achieve the new
requirements and provide the needed increase in capacity. Those considerations included
expanding and upgrading Mount Holly's existing wastewater treatment plant,
decommissioning Mount Holly's existing wastewater treatment plant to facilitate a
regional wastewater treatment approach involving Charlotte and/or Gastonia, and
• broadening a regional approach by including the City of Belmont and/or an existing
industrial wastewater treatment plant in the planning process, In light of those
considerations and the need to continue more detailed planning, Mount Holly and -
Charlotte seek to enter into an agreement to participate in a regional wastewater treatment
program.
The elements of the proposed regional treatment program would consist of:
• Wastewater from Mount Holly would be pumped to Charlotte via a new pump
station and force main across the Catawba River/Lake Wylie.
• Charlotte proposes to construct a new, advanced regional wastewater treatment .
plant near Long Creek in Mecklenburg County that would treat wastewater from
the region.
• Charlotte proposes to replace the existing 4 mgd Mount Holly wastewater
treatment plant with 4 mgd of upgraded capacity in.the new Long Creek plant in
exchange for the nutrient discharge allocation into Lake Wylie currently assigned
to Mount Holly.
• The new plant at Long Creek is anticipated to be connected to other existing
wastewater treatment plants in Mecklenburg County whereby additional and/or
reserve capacity could be provided.
• Charlotte proposes to acquire phosphorus and nitrogen allocations from the City
of Behnont and from the existing Clariant/ReVenture industrial wastewater
treatment plant which .can be used to facilitate overall achievement of TMDL
• goals for Lake Wylie.
• The regional wastewater treatment program will provide additional environmental
protection by providing advanced treatment for Mount Holly's wastewater,
satisfying nutrient TMDL allocation goals for Lake Wylie, reducing the: risk of

sewer overflows by reducing the need to transport wastewater long distances, and
providing other benefits from a regional system. .
This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) authorizes Mount Holly and Charlotte staff to
continue negotiations and work leading to implementation of this regional wastewater
treatment program and confirms each party's commitment to negotiate in good .faith.
This MOA will be the basis of a formal interlocal agreement ("Agreement") to be
developed jointly by the parties.
Implementation will include the following. steps and actions:
1. Charlotte will work with DENR to obtain environmental approvals for the
project(s) at Charlotte's expense. Mount Holly agrees to provide information and
support in this effort as needed.. -
1 Mount Holly agrees to transfer NPDES wasteload allocations specified in the
Lake Wylie TMDL to Charlotte through a mutually agreed upon process and to
decommission their existing treatment plant upon completion -of the necessary
infrastructure required to convey those flows to Charlotte.
3. Decommissioning and abandonment of the Mount Holly treatment plant will be
at Mount Holly's expense.
4. Mount Holly will pay, at its expense of up to a maximum of $14 million (based
on actual costs), for a pumping station, force main, and flow equalization facility
to transfer flow to Charlotte at or near the site of Mount Holly's existing
wastewater treatment. Mount Holly will provide the land required for this, •
facility, the cost or value of which is not included in the $14 million ceiling.
a. The pumping station, force main, and flow equalization facility are
expected to be owned, operated, and financed by Charlotte as set forth in
the Agreement and will be designed according to design and performance
criteria agreed upon by both Charlotte and Mount Holly.
b. Should the actual cost exceed $14M, Charlotte and Mount Holly agree to
review the scope and design .of the facility to attempt to reduce the cost.
If the cost.,still exceeds $14M,'Charlotte may elect to pay the overage or
to withdraw from the Agreement.
c. Mount Holly's payment to Charlotte for the pumping station, force main,
and flow equalization costs will be based on an amount equal to the
annual debt service of the actual construction amount.(amortized over -a
30.year period) and payments will begin upon completion of the
construction of those facilities. This debt service payment will be in
addition to other costs described in .this MOA.
d. Alternatively, Mount Holly may elect to reimburse Charlotte via lump
sum payment for the actual cost instead of relying on Charlotte financing.
e. All financing and payment arrangements are subject to approval by bond
counsel and the NC Local Government Commission as necessary.
f. Mount Holly and Charlotte agree that construction of the pumping station,
force main, and flow equalization facility may precede the construction of
the proposed wastewater treatment plant. In that case, Mount Holly may
continue to operate its existing wastewater treatment plant up to its •
permitted and reasonable capacity and to send additional flows to the
Charlotte system generally per the other terms of this MOA. and per the
terms of the Agreement and subject to all required regulatory approvals.

5. Mount Holly will pay Charlotte for the actual operating and maintenance costs of
• the'proposed pump station, flow equalization facility, and force main. Ownership
and operation of these facilities remains open for consideration and will be
determined in the Agreement.
6. Charlotte will allocate 4 mgd of wastewater treatment capacity (measured as the .
average daily flow in each billing period, said billing periods anticipated to be.
monthly) from Mount Holly at one or more of the Charlotte treatment plants at no
capital cost to Mount Holly in exchange for.the nutrient allocation currently -held
by Mount Holly in the existing TMDL (50 lb/day total phosphorous and 300
Ib/day total nitrogen).
7. Mount Holly will pay Charlotte for treatment services for up to 4 mgd based on
the actual flow received each month at a treatment fee rate based on the average
cost per 1,000 gallons treated of operations and maintenance at all of Charlotte's
wastewater treatment plants: This fee is subject -to re -calculation by.Charlotte for
each fiscal year:
8. Charlotte will allocate 1 mgd of wastewater planning capacity to Mount Holly to
allow Mount Holly to plan and permit growth of their customer -base. This
planning capacity is in addition to the 4 mgd of wastewater treatment capacity
described in Paragraph 6. Mount Holly will be required to increase its treatment
capacity pursuant to Paragraph 9 when Mount Holly's wastewater discharge
frequently or consistently exceeds it 4 mgd wastewater capacity. Specific
triggers that would require. such an increase will be defined in the Agreement.
9: Upon•proper notice and subject to issuance of all required permits and
authorizations, Mount Holly may increase the amount of treatment capacity it is
allowed to use in Charlotte's system from 4 mgd up to 6 mgd by doing either of
the following:
a. Paying Charlotte a negotiated rate per 1,000 gallons for wastewater,
treatment in excess of 4 mgd, said negotiated rate to be based on O&M
costs plus a reasonable amount to cover Charlotte's.capital costs; or,
b. Participating proportionally in_the capital cost of existing, new, or
expanded treatment capacity and paying a .treatment rate as described in
item 7 (above).
i i. Mount Holly may increase its purchased allocation from 4 mgd
up to 6 mgd in single or multiple increments of 500,000 gal/day.
ii. If Mount Holly chooses to. increase its purchased,allocation prior
to January 1, 2025, the cost of each increment will be based
proportionally on the actual cost to design and construct the initial
phase of the Long Creek wastewater treatment plant.
iii. After January 1, 2025, the cost of each increment will be based on.
the actual cost (or agreed upon estimate if no construction is r
required at that time) cost to design and construct an expansion of
the Long Creek wastewater treatment plant.
10. Future expansion of treatment or planning capacity in Charlotte's system
.available to Mount Holly beyond the initial capacities may be _initiated and
implemented by either Mount Holly or Charlotte individually, or may be initiated
and implemented jointly by both parties. Future expansions are subject to
issuance of all required permits and authorizations.
• 11. Based on state and federal regulations, Mount Holly and Charlotte agree that
regulation of discharges to the sewer system are necessary and will be provided
through sewer use ordinances adopted and enforced separately by both parties.

12. Based on design criteria, state, and federal regulations, Mount Holly and
Charlotte agree to limit industrial. waste discharges to appropriate standards. •
13. Mount Holly will be solely responsible for regulating industrial discharges into
Mount Holly's collection system according to terms and conditions to be
included in the Agreement.
14. Charlotte will be solely responsible for regulating industrial discharges into
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities' collection system according to terms and
conditions to be included in the Agreement.
15. Charlotte will provide periodic. reports to Mount Holly about wastewater system
performance and compliance, operating costs; and anticipated future capital costs
(if any).
16. Mount Holly will provide periodic and timely reports. to Charlotte about Mount .
Holly's collection system expansion, any collection system performance issues
that could impact Charlotte's system, significant changes related to industrial
discharges, and any other information that is relevant to the quantity or
characteristics of the wastewater discharged by Mount Holly.
17. If Charlotte acquires the phosphorus and nitrogen.loading allocations from the
City of Belmont and/or Clariant/ReVenture's existing industrial wastewater
treatment plant(s) Charlotte agrees to allow Mount Holly to use these allocations
to comply with NPDES permit requirements until the proposed Long Creek
W WTP is completed; subject to NC DENR approval.
18. In the event Long Creek WWTP is not constructed due to findings of -the
Environmental Impact Statement.or other unforeseen circumstances, Mount
Holly agrees to purchase:phosphorus and nitrogen allocations from Charlotte.
The purchase price will be the same amount Charlotte paid to Clariant/ReVenture
and to Belmont to acquire these allocations. Mount Holly and Charlotte agree
that it may be necessary to develop a separate agreement to enact this provision,
and if so, agree to -cooperate in a timely manner to obtain necessary approvals.
19. Charlotte and Mount Holly will cooperatively work with NC DENR to obtain
NPDES permit modifications to ensure nutrient allocations can be used, applied
and/or transferred as described in this MOA.
20. Mount Holly and Charlotte agree that other terms and conditions should be
included in the Agreement and may agree during continued negotiations that the
Agreement should provide terms and conditions. different from those proposed
within this MCA.
21. Notwithstanding any provision.herein to the contrary this MOA is not intended to
be a contract, and the Elements set.forth in this MOA are subject to continued
additions, revisions, and modifications, without prejudice to either Party, as the
Parties continue negotiations toward an Interlocal Agreement.
Approved by: 4 ^
L.211
City Man er City Manager
City of NfninV iod / City of Charlotte

Permit Modification Lanauaee for Nutrient Allocation
Clariant's Current Permit
The reduction in Clariant's nutrient mass limitations reflect a 90% nutrient allocation transfer of 287
pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day Total Phosphorus to the City of Charlotte's proposed
Regional W WTP. The allocation transfer and subsequent reduction in Clariant's nutrient mass
limitations will become effective upon the Division's receipt of both (a) an Engineer's Certificate of
Construction Completion for the Charlotte Regional W WTP, and (b) written notification from Clariant
authorizing such nutrient transfer. Clarant's reduced mass nutrient limitations are based on a 12-
month rolling average (refer to Section A.(4)).
Clariant's Proposed Permit
The reductions in Clariant's nutrient mass limitations reflect a 90% nutrient allocation transfer of 287
pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day Total Phosphorus to the City of Mt. Holly and the City
of Belmont in the following amounts:
City of Mt. Holly: 223 pounds/day of Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day of Total
Phosphorous
City of Belmont: 64 pounds/day of Total Nitrogen and 0 pounds/day of Total Phosphorous
The allocation transfer and subsequent reduction in Clariant's nutrient mass limitations will become
effective upon the NC Division of Water Quality's receipt of written notification from Clariant
authorizing such nutrient transfer. Clariant's reduced mass nutrient limitations are based on a 12-
month rolling average (refer to Section A.(4)).
Belmont Proposed Permit
The daily limits for Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorous set forth in this Permit include the transfer
of 64 pounds/day of Total Nitrogen and 0 pounds/day of Total Phosphorous from the permit held by
Clariant Corporation. This transfer reflects the terms of an agreement between Clariant and the City of
Charlotte to reduce and transfer a total of 287 pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day Total
Phosphorus from the Clariant permit in anticipation of the construction and operation of the Charlotte
Regional W WTP, as described in Clariant's permit. Notwithstanding the limits set forth in this Permit,
Behnont agrees to maintain its discharge such that the total allocation of nitrogen and phosphorus
prescribed by the TMDL for Behnont and Mt Holly, including the allocation previously permitted to
Clariant to Lake Wylie, is met.
(� Upon receipt of both (a) an Engineer's Certificate of Construction Completion for the Belmont
Wastewater Transfer Liftstation, and (b) written notification from Belmont, the entire Total Nitrogen
and Total Phosphorus allocation within this permit shall be transferred to the Charlotte Regional

WWTP permit (414 pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 58 pounds/day Total Phosphorus). It is
understood that as condition of this nutrient transfer Belmont will transfer all wastewater flows
currently treated under this permit to Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities for treatment as described in the
Record of Decision for the Long Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impact
Statement and will cease operation of the facility subject to this permit.
In the event the Charlotte Regional W WTP is not constructed or cannot be constructed, the nutrient
allocations described above and the allocation placed in the Mt Holly permit (2231bs/day of Total
Nitrogen and 36 lbs/day of Total Phosphorus) from the Clariant permit will become a permanent
allocation to this permit once Belmont has reimbursed Charlotte for the Nutrient Allocation as
described in the Memorandum of Agreement and/or Interlocal Agreement and provided proof of such
reimbursement to NC Division of Water Quality.
Mount Holly Proposed Permit
The daily limits for Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorous set forth in this Permit include the transfer
of 223 pounds/day of Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day of Total Phosphorous from the permit held by
Clariant Corporation. This transfer reflects the terms of an agreement between Clariant and the City of
Charlotte to reduce and transfer a total of 287 pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 36 pounds/day Total
Phosphorus from the Clariant permit in anticipation of the construction and operation of the Charlotte
Regional W WTP, as described in Clariant's permit. Notwithstanding the limits set forth in this Permit,
Mt. Holly agrees to maintain its discharge such that the total allocation of nitrogen and phosphorus
prescribed by the TMDL for Belmont and Mt Holly, including the allocation previously permitted to
Clariant to Lake Wylie, is met.
Upon receipt of both (a) an Engineer's Certificate of Construction Completion for the Charlotte
Regional W WTP, and (b) written notification from Mt Holly, the entire Total Nitrogen and Total
Phosphorus allocation within this permit shall be transferred to the Charlotte Regional W WTP permit
(523 pounds/day Total Nitrogen and 86 pounds/day Total Phosphorus). It is understood that as
condition of this nutrient transfer Mt Holly will transfer all wastewater flows currently treated under
this permit to Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities for treatment as described in the Record of Decision for
the Long Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impact Statement and will cease
operation of the facility subject to this permit.
In the event the Charlotte Regional W WTP is not constructed or cannot be constructed, the nutrient
allocations described above will become a permanent allocation to the Belmont permit once Belmont
has reimbursed Charlotte for the Nutrient Allocation as described in the Memorandum of Agreement
and/or Interlocal Agreement and provided proof of such reimbursement to NC Division of Water
Quality-
0

Attachment # 6
•
•

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNW OF MCKLENBURG CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into this j_day of 20J3 by and
between the City of Belmont,. North Carolina CBelmont'l and the City of Chaviotte, North Carolina
("Charlottel,
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Whereas, Charlotte (acting through the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utility Department - "CMUD") intends
to purchase the Nutrient Allocation (36.lbs of phosphorus (P) and 286.65 Ibs of nitrogen (N)) within the
NPAES permit for the Clariant Wastewater Treatment Plant. This amount equates to 90"/u of the total
Clariant Nutrient Allocation.
/:reT]
Whereas, if the Long Creek; RegionalWastewater Treatment Plant is not constructed, Charlotte desires
to sell, and Belmont. desires to purchase the 90% Nutrient Allocation at the negotiated price of
$5;850,00% as outlined in the terms and conditions in the Agreement,
AND
Whereas, Charlotte and Belmont have entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA),'dated
August 22, 2p 11, which outlines the conceptual agreement between Charlotte and Belmont regarding the
-scope, schedule, and financial obligations for each party for thetreatment of Belmont wastewater at
exstittg or future CMUD plants,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein set forth, Charlotte and Belmont agree
on the. following:
1. Subsequent -to Charlotte's purchase gf Clariant's Nutrient Allocation, in the event that
Charlotte is not able to acquire a NPDES permit for the proposed Long Creek Regional
Wastewater plant or it in Charlotte's sole discretion, Charlotte determines that, the plant is no
lobger viable for economic or any other reason, then Belmont agrees'it shall purchase the
Nutrient Allocation that Charlotte has purchased from Clariant.
2. Belmont agrees to pay Charlotte the sum of $5,850.000 for the 90% NutrientAllocation
which equates to 36 lbs of Phosphorus and 296.65 Ibs ofNitrogen.
In the event that Charlotte is required to take legal action to collect the funds owed, each
party will be responsible'for their owti legal fees and charges. Any dispute. Between the
parties shall be referred to mediation prior to institution of legal action by either party.
3. If Charlotte purchases any additiQpal Clariant Nutrient Allocation beyond the'90% Nutrient
Allocation originally purchased, that Nutrient Allocation may also be purchased;byBelmont

at Charlotte's cost under the same terms and conditions outlined.for the 90%u Nutrient •
Allocation.
4. If Charlotte does determine that the Long Creek Regional Wastewater Plant is not feasible
and that Belmont should purchase the Nutrient Allocation, Charlotte warrants that it will not
make a request for payment any sooner than December 31, 2015 or two years from giving
written notice to Belmont for the purchase, whichever.is the later date. Belmont's
requirement to purchase is contingent upon Belmont obtaining financing acceptable to them
or upon Charlotte allowing Belmont to extend payment over a period not to exceed 59
months.
5. In the event that construction of the Gong Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant is no
longer viable and the Nutrient Allocation is no lodger transferrable to Belmont due to
regulatory actions or other constraints beyond the control of Charlotte or Belmont, then
neither party is liable to the other and neither party would be considered in breach of this
agreement.
6. If the decision is trade to request Belmont to purchase the Nutrient Allocation in the fixture
but the Nutrient Allocation has been reduced through regulatory actions beyond the control of
Charlotte, then Belmont agrees to purchase the remaining share of the allocation based on a
prorated amount of the remaining allocation to the original total.
7. This is the entire agreement between the parties. There are no terms on the subject matter of
this Contract which are not set forth herein. This Contract may not be amended except by a
written document, executed by both parties, •
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties here to have caused this instrument to be executed, the day and
year first above written.
CITY OF BEILMONT, NORTH CAROLINA
ATTEST:
BY: , Witness:
L LLL4,
City fyr ger City Clerk —
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
ATTEST:
BY. Witness:
City Manager' er
AcLml+l. Ctss�
0

•
Attachment # 7
•
•