20021682 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090601

• Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
C Division of Water Quality
f
ff
mol ell IK '
Date o
O
ice Review:
- Evaluator
s Name(s):
Date of Report: Report for Monitoring Year: .3
Date of Field Review: Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Present: }
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: From Wilkesboro/Hwy 421 right on NC16 for 3 .5m to Miller's Crk inter., left on Old Hwy 421 for 2.6m, right on
Purlear Rd for.8m, at stop sign at church left & follow Purlear.6m to inter w/Vannoy Maxwell Rd. Project
ti....:.... '-_ '". ;....., " u.....,., o.' a.
(.Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20021682 Project History
Project Name: Purlear Creek-Phase 1 - - - - - i

County(ies): Wilkes Event Event Date
? Basin & subbasin: Yadkin 03040101
Report Receipt: Monitoring 4/14/2008
Nearest Stream: Purlear Creek c orsl Afk_a_A its,
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C O471(_k l?
Mitigator Type: EEP/WRP
DOT Status: t
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland:
Stream: 11500 linear feet
Buffer:
Nutr. Offset:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: "Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
----------------------
uring office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
20021682-1 11500 linear feet Stream Restoration
I
L_ -
AIC
Qo' S
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) \(Olds 16 (ty-
al gq1o
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 2 of 2

Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
VEGETATION - A __-
T - ---- - -
pproved Success Criteria: ? - -- - - - -
none listed Dominant Plant Species
? Species Story TPA/% cover ?
based on TPA and/or % cover?
Vegetation planted on site?
Date of last planting:
Yes No
Yes No
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
--
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas (e.g. buffer width, overall health of ve etation
i etc. ): ? 1?-/ - - - - - - - - 9-- - - - 14 -
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive
species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.
g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
>a? UMITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful un
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component: successful
I
Additional comments (e.g. DW ow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
I ,
Use the definitions in the joint state/federal stream mitigation guidelines to determine the correct type of J
mitigation used for this component.
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, problem areas, and/or important stream features.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report): 1a
Observational field datalgrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
Page 2 of 2
t
Stream Mitigation Component Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
,,,nponent: 11500 linear feet Stream Restoration
Jescription:
Location within project:
III. Success Criteria Evaluation:

STREAMBANK STABILITY - Approved Success Criteria:
Are streambanks stable? Yes No
if no, provide description and notes regarding stability issues:
STRUCTURES - Approved Success Criteria:
Component ID: 20021682-1
List all types of structures present on site: Z VAS Aw
J
Are the structures installed correctly? Yes No
Are the structures made of acceptable material? Yes No
(Unacceptable materials include: railroad ties, concrete with rebar, etc.
Are the structures located approximately where shown on the plan? Yes No
Are the structures stable (e.g. erosion, deposition, etc.)? Yes No
Provide description and notes regarding problematic structures:
FEATURES - Approved Success Criteria:
Are riffles and pools in approximately the correct locations Yes No
Is the final sinuosity and gradient designed approximately to plan specifications? Yes No
Any evidence of vegetation growing on the stream bed or in the thalweg Yes No
Percentage of the restoration reach that has: Flowing water Ponded areas
Describe any stream features that provide evidence of unstable stream reaches (e.g. mid-channel bars,
downstream meander migration, chute cutoff formation, etc.):
AQUATIC BIOTA - Approved Success Criteria:
Include a brief
?u"3
Is aquatic life present in the channel? es No
Description of taxa observed, incl. quantities of individuals and general distribution of biota.
description of the sampling methodology.
rwblf
n ?e1
Z s to address-{?g. erosion disc rg s/?i k toxicd t
List an remaining aqua c iotais, ,
Version 9.0 (August 22, 2007) ?fly/J
?f
c