20041203 Ver 1_Complete File_20040723

QG
?y
t?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 28, 2004
Dr. Greg Thorpe, PhD., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Thorpe:
Re: Proposed replacement of Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603 (Carriage Road) over Stony Creek, Nash County, Federal
Aid No. BRZ-1603(2), State Project No. 8.2322301, TIP Project B-3879.
Your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification to impact 0.01 acres of wetlands, and 12,262 square feet of
protected riparian buffers to construct Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603 (Carriage Road) over Stony Creek in Nash County
was received in the Division of Water Quality's Central Office on July 23, 2004. According to our rules [15A NCAC
2H.0507 (A), and 15A NCAC 2B .0259], if final action is not taker?,Within 60 days, the Certification is waived unless
DWQ has objected in writing to your application. Therefore, DWQ hit waived the requirement for a 401 Water
Quality Certification for your plans to impact waters as described in ydur July 23, 2004.
However, if any additional impact, or change to your project occurs, this.waiver is no longer valid and a 401 Water
Quality Certification and a Tar-Pamlico Buffer Authorization will be required.
Thank you for your comments. If you have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at [phone].
Sincerely,
n E. Hennessy
Transportation Permitting Unit Supervisor
cc: Mike Bell, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Field Office
Gary Jordan, USFWS
Travis Wilson, NCWRC
NCDWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
C:\ncdot\TIP B-3879\correspondence\041203 waiver.doc
One
Nm
thCarolina
Transportation Permitting Unit Nutirally
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone]/ Internet: htta://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
V
A S
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTWNT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS LYNDO TIPPETr
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
February 4, 2005
WBS Element: 33322.3.2
Contract No. C200964
F. A. Number: BRZ-STP-1603 (3) p 9dP D
County: Nash
Description: Bridge over Stoney Creek and Approaches on SR 1603 FEB 8 -- 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
MEMORANDUM TO: Ellis C. Powell, Jr., PE WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
State Construction Engineer
FROM: Wendi O. Johnson, PE
Division Construction Engineer
SUBJECT: Approved Preconstruction Conference & Permit Meeting Minutes
We are transmitting an approved copy of the minutes covering the preconstruction conference for
the above project, which was held on January 12, 2005. The minutes were approved by the
Contractor, Sanford Contractors, Inc., as recorded.
Attachment
c: Ron Lucas (FHWA)
Dr. Garland Pardue (US Fish & Wildlife)
Mike Bell (US Army Corps of Engineers)
Nicole Thomson (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality)
John Holley (NCDENR, Land Quality Section)
David Cox (NCWRC)
Scott L. VanHorn (NCWRC)
Ron Sechler (National Marine Fisheries)
Fred Lanzi, Progress Energy - Power (Transmission)
Bob Campbell, Progress Energy - Power (Distribution)
Bob Williford, Sprint - Telephone
Nate Harris, Adelphia - CATV
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Ellis:C. Powell, Jr., PE
February 4, 2005
Page 2
ec: Cecil Jones, PE
Donald Pearson
Robert Simpson
Andy Brown, PE
Bryant Bunn, PE
Andy Pridgen
Shannon Sweitzer, PE
Lloyd Johnston, Jr.
Eddie Bunn, PE
Kevin Lacy, PE
Victor Barbour, PE
Don G. Lee
Mike Parker
Jimmy Marler
Jamie Shern
Michael Robinson, PE
Warren Walker, PE
Haywood Daughtry, PE
John Williamson
Chris Kreider, PE
David R. Henderson, PE
Jermery Armstrong
Bobby Lewis, PE
Gerald McCauley
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND PERMIT MEETING MINUTES
VMS Element: 33322.3.2 (B-3879)
Federal Aid No.: BRZ-STP-1603 (3)
Contract No.: C200964
County: Nash
Description: Bridge over Stoney Creek and Approaches on SR 1603
The Preconstruction Conference for the above project was held in the Wilson Division Office Conference
Room on January 12, 2005 with the following in attendance:
NAME REPRESENTING
Kenny Brady Sanford Contractors
Randall Gattis Sanford Contractors
Brad Batchelor Division Four Right of Way
C. D. Francka Division Four Bridge
Jamie Shern Division Four DEO
M. D. Parker NCDOT Utility Coordinator
Bob Campbell Progress Energy (Distribution)
Katie Simmons NCDOT Roadside Environmental
Roger O'Briant Cox Communications
Joe Williamson Cox Communications
Shannon Douglas Barnhill Contracting
Buddy Rose Barnhill Contracting
Jeremy Whitehurst Barnhill Contracting
Fred Lanzi Progress Energy (Transmission)
Warren Walker Construction Unit
Andy Pridgen Division Four QA Lab
J. L. Lewis Division Four Construction
J. M. Long Division Four Construction
Jimmy Deal Division Four Construction
C. T. Berrier Division Four Construction
Eddie Bunn, Resident Engineer, presided over the conference.
Randy Richardson will act as Project Superintendent and Traffic Control Coordinator for the Contractor.
Jimmy Lewis will act as Project Inspector and Traffic Control Coordinator for the Division ofF ighways.
Jimmy Deal will be the Assistant Resident on this project.
The Contractor plans to begin work the middle of February.
The Contractor presented his progress schedule which will be checked, and he will be advised if
satisfactory. By copy of these minutes, we are advising the Contractor that his progress schedule has been
checked and is approved as submitted.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3879
Page 2
RIGHT OF WAY
Brad Batchelor advised that all of the right of way necessary for this project has been acquired.
The one item previously listed under Section 215 is to be demolished as part of the construction project. No
contamination; clear for demolition.
There is no known asbestos contamination, underground storage tanks or any known soil contamination
within the right of way of the project.
The Contractor is advised not to exceed the right of way or easement areas shown on the project plans
unless written permission is granted from the property owner.
ASPHALT PAVEMENTS
Mr. Andy Pridgen, Division QA Supervisor, asked the Contractor if he had any questions of the Special
Provisions outlined on pages 31 thru page 49.
Mr. Pridgen advised that the Special Provisions in this contract are dated 02/17104.
Barnhill will perform paving for this project.
UTILITIES
Progress Energy (Transmission) - Moving equipment in this week. Should be finished in 2-3 weeks. An
attached communications cable needs to be spliced at night. Two splices will be done simultaneously.
Scheduling of this work with an outside unit will be the most difficult part of this work.
Progress Energy (Distribution) - Dealing with right of way issues. Work should be complete by the end of
February.
Sprint - Work is complete.
Adelphia - Minor conflicts are currently being relocated.
Cox Communications - Their fiber is located on the west side of the project. North is underground; south,
east and west cable is aerial. Minor conflicts are currently being relocated.
There is an effluent monitoring station, owned by the Town of Nashville, on site. Access to this must be
maintained at all times.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3879
Page 3
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
GENERAL
Contract Time and Liquidated Damages - The date of availability for this contract is January S, 2005.
The contract completion date is December 31, 2006.
When observation periods are required by the Special Provisions, they are not a part of the work to be
completed by the completion date and/or intermediate contract times stated in the contract.
The liquidated damages for this contract are $200.00 per calendar day.
Intermediate Contract Time Number 1 and Liquidated Damages - Except for that work required under the
Project Special Provisions entitled "Planting" and/or "Reforestation", included elsewhere in this proposal, the
Contractor will be required to complete all work included in this contract and shall place and maintain traffic
on same by September 1, 2006.
The date of availability for this intermediate contract time is January 5, 2005.
The liquidated damages for this intermediate contract time are $500.00 per calendar day.
The Contractor will be responsible for and shall make corrections of all damages to the completed roadway
caused by his planting operations, whether occurring prior to or after placing traffic thru the project.
Major Contract Items - The major contract items for this contract are Asphalt Concrete Surface Course, Type
S9.5B, and 3' x 1'9" Prestressed Concrete Cored Slabs.
Friel Price Adjustment - The base index price for No. 2 Diesel Fuel is $1.388 per gallon as shown on page
three of the contract.
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
It is the policy of the North Carolina Department of Transportation that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
shall have the opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part by federal
funds in order to create a level playing field.
The Contractor is also encouraged to give every opportunity to allow DBE participation in Supplemental
Agreements.
The Contractor's EEO Officer and Minority Liaison Officer is Brent Sloan.
The Resident Engineer furnished the Contractor with required posters for his bulletin board. The Contractor's
EEO Policy Statement is to be posted on the project's bulletin board, which should be weatherproof, along
with the following posters:
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3879 .
Page 4
1. Davis-Bacon Minimum Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule
2. Wage-Rate Information - F/A/ Project, Form PR-1495
3. Notice Relating to False Statements, Form PR-1022
4. EEO Poster - Discrimination is Prohibited
The Contractor is urged to document, in writing, all actions taken in complying with Equal Opportunity of
Employment Provisions, Training Provision, and Minority Business Enterprise Provision. This includes
applicant referrals, meeting with employees, on-site inspections, wage evaluation, etc.
All subcontractors and suppliers are responsible for meeting the same requirements as the prime contractor,
and it is the prime contractor's responsibility to oversee that both are in compliance.
All alleged discriminatory violations should be brought to the attention of the Resident Engineer.
The State and/or FHWA will conduct a Contract Compliance Review sometime during the life of this contract.
Therefore, fair employment practice should be maintained at all times.
Contractor was reminded that EEO Reports are due in July.
Reporting Disadvantaged Business Einierprise Participation - When payments are made to Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise firms, including material suppliers, Contractors at all levels shall provide the Engineer with
an accounting of said payments as stipulated in the contract.
Retainage and Prompt Payment - The Department will not deduct and hold any retainage from the Prime
Contractor on this project. The Department will withhold an amount sufficient to cover anticipated liquidated
damages, as determined by the Engineer. Contractors at all levels, prime, subcontractor, or second tier
contractor, shall within 7 calendar days of receipt of monies, resulting from work performed on the project or
services rendered, pay subcontractors, second tier subcontractors, or material suppliers, as appropriate. This
seven-day period begins upon knowledgeable receipt by the contracting firm obligated to make a subsequent
periodic or final payment. These prompt payment requirements will be met if each firm mails the payment to
the next level firm by evidence of postmark within the seven-day period.
The Contractor's requested estimate period for this project will be the seventh of the month.
Contractor's License Requirements - If the successful bidder does not hold the proper license to perform any
plumbing, heating, air conditioning or electrical work in this contract, he will be required to sublet such work
to a contractor properly licensed, in accordance with Article 2 of Chapter 87 of the General Statutes (licensing
of heating, plumbing and air conditioning contractors) and Article 4 of Chapter 87 of the General Statutes
(licensing of electrical contractors).
Domestic Steel and Iron Products - All steel and iron products which are permanently incorporated into this
project shall be produced in the United States except minimal amounts of foreign steel and iron products may
be used, provided the combined project cost of the bid items involved does not exceed one-tenth of one
percent (0.1 percent) of the total amount bid for the entire project or $2,500.00, whichever is greater. This
minimal amount of foreign produced steel and iron products permitted for use by this Special Provision is not
applicable to fasteners. Domestically produced fasteners are required for this project.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3879 .
Page 5
Submission of Records - Federal Aid Projects - This project is NOT located on the National Highway System;
therefore, federal form FHWA-47 is not required.
Payroll submission is not required on this project, according to the Project Special Provision entitled
Submission of Records - Federal Aid Projects.
Contractor Borrow Source - If the Contractor proposes a borrow source, the environmental assessment shall
include wetlands and stream delineation extending 400 feet beyond the proposed borrow source limits.
Plant Pest Quarantines - This project may be within a county regulated for plants and/or pests. If the project
or any part of the Contractor's operation is located within a quarantined area, thoroughly clean all equipment
prior to moving out of the quarantined area. Comply with federal/state regulations by obtaining a certificate or
limited permit for any regulated article moving from the quarantined area.
Safety t'ests - All Contractors' personnel, all subcontractors and their personnel, and any material suppliers
and their personnel must wear an OSHA approved, reflective vest or outer garment at all times while on the
project. Non-reflective orange shirts are acceptable for all project personnel except flaggers.
Avelve 11orrth Guarantee - The Contractor shall guarantee materials and workmanship against latent and
patent defects arising from faulty materials, faulty workmanship or negligence for a period of 12 months
following the date of final acceptance of the work for maintenance and shall re place such defective materials
and workmanship without cost to the Department. The Contractor will not be responsible for damage due to
faulty design, normal wear and tear, for negligence on the part of the Department and/or for use in excess of
the design.
Where items of equipment or material carry- a manufacturer's guarantee for any period in excess of 12 months,
then the manufacturer's guarantee shall apply for that particular piece of equipment or material- The
Department's first remedv shall be through the manufacturer, although the Contractor is responsible for
invoking the warranted repair work with the manufacturer. The Contractor's responsibility shall be limited to
the term of the manufacturer's guarantee. NCDOT would be afforded the same warranty as provided by the
manufacturer.
Outsourcing Outside the USA - All work on consultant contracts, service contracts and construction contracts
shall be performed in the United States of America. No work shall be outsourced outside the United States of
America.
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
ROADWAY
Clearing and Grubbing - Perform clearing on this project to the limits established by Method III shown on
Standard No. 200.03 of the Roadway Standards.
The property owner will have no right to use or reserve for his use any timber on the project. All timber cut
during the clearing operation is to become the property of the Contractor, and shall be either removed from the
project by him, or else shall be satisfactorily disposed of as hereinafter provided.
Preconstructiom Conference Minutes
B-3879 .
Page 6
Buildinrg Removal - When a building has had or will have asbestos removed, and the Contractor elects to
remove the building such that it becomes a public area, the Contractor is responsible for any additional costs
incurred, including final air monitoring.
Temporary Fabric Wall - Furnish and install synthetic fabric for a temporary fabric wall in accordance with the
Special Provisions and as directed by the Engineer. Schedule a Preconstruction Conference at least 30 days
prior to construction of the fabric wall, with representatives from the Contractor, Resident Engineer and
Geotechnical Engineering Unit to discuss construction details.
Temporary Detours - Construct the temporary detours required on this project in accordance with the typical
sections in the plans or as directed by the Engineer.
Shoulder and Fill Slope Material - Required shoulder and slope construction for this project shall be
performed in accordance with applicable requirements of Section 226 of the Specifications except as
follows:
Construct the top 6" (150mm) of shoulder and fill slopes with soils capable of supporting vegetation.
Provide soil with P.I. greater than 6 and less than 25 and with a pH ranging from 5.5 to 6.8. Remove stones
and other foreign material 2" (50mm) or larger in diameter. All soil is subject to testing and acceptance or
rejection by the Engineer.
Material shall be obtained from within the project limits or an approved borrow source.
Reinforced Bridge Approach Fills - The Contractor is to be guided by the Special Provisions and all work
shall be done in the presence of the Engineer or Inspector. Will build with 78M.
Disposal of Vaste and Debris - Provisions include requirement for evaluation of potential wetlands and
endangered species at all work sites. Concrete deck will be sawed up and stored by Sanford. Steel beams will
also be stored by Sanford and sold for scrap. Creosote will be disposed of with appropriate people.
Posts and Offset Blocks - The Contractor may, at his option, furnish either of the following types of steel
guardrail posts. Only one type of post will be permitted at any one continuous installation. Use structural steel
posts throughout the project, unless otherwise directed or detailed in the plans:
1. Steel W6 x 8.5 or W6 x 9.0 posts
2. Steel 4.5" x 6.0" "C" shaped posts (C150 x 12.2 kg/m)
The Contractor may, at his option, furnish either of the following types of treated timber posts if specifically
directed or detailed in the plans. Only one type of post will be permitted at any one continuous installation:
1. Timber 6" x 8" (152mm x 203mm) posts
2. Timber 8" x 8" (203mm x 203mm) posts
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3879
Page 7
Guardrail Anchor Units, Type 350 - Prior to installation, the Contractor shall submit to the Engineer:
1. FHWA acceptance letter for each guardrail anchor unit certifying it meets the requirements of
NCHRP Report 350, Test Level 3, in accordance with Section 106-2 of the Standard
Specifications.
2. Certified working drawings and assembling instructions from the manufacturer for each
guardrail anchor unit, in accordance with Section 105-2 of the Specifications.
Preformed Scour Hole with Level Spreader Apron - Construct and maintain preformed scour holes, with
spreader aprons, at the locations shown on the plans and in accordance with the details in the plans.
Temporary Shoring for Maintenance of Traffic - Contractor has the option of submitting his own shoring
design or using the Standard shoring design, unless otherwise noted in the plans.
Drums - The Contractor shall provide a minimum of three orange and two white alternating horizontal stripes
covering the entire outside of each drum.
Permanent Seeding and Mulching - The Department desires that permanent seeding and mulching be
established on this project as soon as practical after slopes or portions of slopes have been graded. As an
incentive to obtain an early stand of vegetation on this project, an additional payment will be made to the
Contractor for all permanent seeding and mulching that is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the
requirements of Section 1660, Seeding and Mulching, and within the percentages of elapsed contract times
shown on page 58 of the contract.
EROSION CONTROL
The Project Inspector for DDT will give the Contractor a weekly erosion control fist advising Contractor of
items that need to be done in a timely manner.
Contractor should pay special attention to check dams. Weirs should be correct shape and size. Silt ditches
should be sloped to 2:1 ratio. Any changes to the erosion control design should be noted on the plans and
approved by the Roadside Environmental Unit, if necessary. Contractor was encouraged to contact Katie
Simmons with any questions relating to erosion control.
Environmenially Sensitive Areas - This project is located in an "Environmentally Sensitive Area'. This
designation requires special procedures to be used for clearing and grubbing, temporary stream crossings,
and grading operations within the area identified on the plans. This also requires special procedures to be
used for seeding and mulching and stage seeding within the project.
The "Environmentally Sensitive Area" shall be defined as a 50' (16 meter) buffer zone on both sides of the
stream (or depression) measured from top of stream bank (or center of depression). Contractor may
perform clearing but grubbing cannot be performed until Contractor begins grading operations. Erosion
control devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing operation.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3879
Page 8
Once grading operations begin, work will progress in a continuous manner until complete. All construction
within these areas must progress in a continuous manner such that each phase is complete and areas
permanently stabilized prior to beginning of next phase.
Temporary erosion control measures should be installed before the Contractor begins to disturb the soil, and
permanent stage seeding should be established as soon as possible.
TemporaryDiversion - The work by this section for installation, maintenance and cleanout of temporary
diversions shall be in accordance with Section 1630. The quantity of excavation for installation and cleanout
measured as provided in Article 16304 will be paid for at the contract unit price per cubic yard (cubic meter)
as provided in Article 1630-5 for "Silt Excavation".
Gravel Construction Entrance - The filter fabric shall meet the requirements of Section 1056 for Type 2
Fabric. Stone shall be Class A Stone and shall meet the requirements of Section 1042 for Stone for Erosion
Control, Class A.
Floating Turbidity Curtain - The Contractor shall install a floating turbidity curtain to deter silt suspension and
movement of particles during construction. The curtain shall be constructed around the work area on the south
bank and at locations as directed by the Engineer.
SIGNALS AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
General Regdrements - In the event the Contractor fails to perform in accordance with the plans and
Specifications within the time frame specified, the Department reserves the right to perform the maintenance
and emergency services necessary to assure continuous traffic signal operation. Further, all expenses incurred
by the Department in implementing this option shall be deducted from the payment due the Contractor, plus a
$250.00 liquidated damage per occasion, per day, or any portion thereof, until corrected. The liquidated
damages are due to increased public hazard resulting from the malfunction.
Fulcher Electric will perform the signal installation.
STRUCTURES
Contractor should use a non-shattering method for removal of old bridge and insure that nothing is dropped in
the water during removal of old bridge.
PERMITS
Notes to Contractor -
1. The Contractor shall adhere to the Best Management Practices for "Bridge Demolition and Removal"
during the removal of Bridge No. 73. (Contractor advised his bridge demolition plan would be
forthcoming.)
2. For the replacement of Bridge No. 73 and the construction of a detour structure, the Contractor shall
use top-down construction to eliminate in-stream activity as much as possible.
3. As part of the removal process for the existing bridge, wood pilings shall be cut off at the substrate
level.
Preconstructioen Conference Minutes
B-3879
Page 9
4. The existing fill material at the south end bent shall be removed, to the extent practicable, to natural
ground elevation to allow for a more natural stream flow.
5. During construction, turbidity curtains shall be placed around the work area on the south bank to
protect the stream in a "horseshoe" configuration. The turbidity curtain shall not be installed
perpendicular to stream flow.
6. A hardware cloth fence faced with small, clean gravel shall be placed along the footprint of the
construction area bordering the stream. A silt fence shall be used for the side slopes.
7. Equipment shall be maintained such that hydraulic fluids, oil, gasoline or other chemicals shall not enter
the stream. If chemicals are stored on site, they shall be stored a sufficient distance from the stream and
under secure conditions to prevent accidental contact with the stream. If chemicals are spilled on the
site, they shall be cleaned up immediately and not allowed to filter down into the soil.
8. Slurry shall be removed from the project construction site. No slung shall enter the stream.
The US Army Corps of Engineers and DENR have issued permits for this project, and the Contractor shall
comply with all applicable permit conditions during construction of this project.
Agents of the permitting authority will periodically inspect the project for adherence to the permits.
Should the Contractor propose to utilize construction methods (such as temporary structures or fill in waters
and/or wetlands for haul roads, work platforms, cofferdams, etc.) not specifically identified in the permit
(individual, general or nationwide) authorizing the project, it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to
coordinate with the appropriate permit agency to determine what, if any, additional permit action is required.
The Contractor shall also be responsible for initiating the request for the authorization of such construction
method by the permitting agency. The request shall be submitted through the Engineer. The Contractor shall
not utilize the construction method until it is approved by the permitting agency. The request normally takes
approximately 60 days to process; however, no extensions of time or additional compensation will be granted
for delays resulting from the Contractor's request for approval of construction methods not specifically
identified in the permit.
Where construction moratoriums are contained in a permit condition which restricts the Contractor's activities
to certain times of the year, those moratoriums will apply only to the portions of the work taking place in the
waters or wetlands, provided that activities outside those areas are done in such a manner as to not affect the
waters or wetlands.
Wetlands and stream buffers to be impacted will be flagged with high visibility fencing. Drawings of buffers
and wetlands to be impacted will be staked according to the digital files. These areas shall be clearly delineated
before any clearing begins.
The Contractor should contain his work within the footprint shown on the plans. Any deviation would be in
violation of the permits. The permit does not cover waste or borrow within wetlands.
All standard procedures will be implemented to avoid or minimize environmental impacts.
Do not exceed footprint shown for buffer zone and wetlands.
The Resident Engineer and the Contractor will hold monthly construction meetings. Contractor will advise
Resident of the date.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3879
Page 10
Mussel survey has been done and notice has been given to the appropriate resource agencies.
This meeting stands as the meeting with permit agencies; they were invited to the Preconstruction Conference.
The Contractor presented a letter advising names of persons authorized to sign Supplemental Agreements in
conjunction with this project.
There were no further questions and/or comments and the meeting was adjourned.
SANFORD CONTRACTORS, INC.
2 / z /4s- yPl-1w n - nA- V, Cd P2 , ?
DATE APPROVED NAME AND TITLE ?,¢,?c? .O?vl,tio?

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
03l z(-) 3
3?5A
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
D
December 1, 2004 Q p F=@F=0WF= D
?/
WBS Element: 33322.3.2 (B-3879) DEC 16 2004
Contract No.: C200964 DENR - WATER QUALITY
F. A- No.: BRZ-STP-1603 (3) WETLANDS AND sTORMWATER BRANCH
County: Nash
Description: Bridge over Stoney Creek and Approaches on SR 1603
SUBJECT: PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND PERMIT MEETING
Mr. Randall Gattis
Sanford Contractors, Inc.
628 Rocky Fork Church Road
Sanford, North Carolina 27332
Dear Mr. Gattis:
Per, our conversation, the Preconstruction Conference and Permit Meeting for this project is being
scheduled for Wednesday, January 12, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. The Preconstruction Conference is
contingent upon the award of the project by the Board of Transportation. The conference will be
held in the Conference Room of the Wilson Division Office. Our office is located at 509 Ward
Boulevard in Wilson, N. C.
Please be prepared to present the following documents at this conference: progress schedule, letter
naming persons authorized to sign Supplemental Agreements, and letter naming your Company EEO
Officer and Minority Liaison Officer.
We look forward to meeting with you at the above time.
WOJ/CBL.:.
Cordially yours,
n
Wendi O. Johnson, PE
Division Construction Engineer
Post Office Box 31.65, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Mr. Randall Gattis
December 1, 2004
Page 2
Ron Lucas (FHWA)
Dr. Garland Pardue (US Fish & Wildlife)
Nikki Thompson (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality)
John Holley (NCDENR, Land Quality Section)
David Cox (NCWRC)
Scott L. VanHorn (NCWRC)
Ron Sechler (National Marine Fisheries)
Mike Bell (US Army Corps of Engineers)
Fred Lanzi, Progress Energy - Power (Transmission)
Bill Campbell, Progress Energy - Power (Distribution)
Bob Williford, Sprint - Telephone
Nate Harris, Adelphia - CATV
ec: Cecil L. Jones, PE
Donald Pearson
Robert Simpson
Andy Brown, PE
Bryant Bunn, PE
Andy Pridgen
Shannon Sweitzer, PE
Lloyd Johnston, Jr.
Eddie Bunn, PE
J. Kevin Lacy, PE
Victor Barbour, PE
Ellis Powell, PE
Don G. Lee
Mike Parker
Jimmy Marler
Jamie Shern
Michael Robinson, PE
Warren Walker, PE
Haywood Daughtry, PE
John Williamson
Chris Kreider, PE
David R. Henderson, PE
Jermery Armstrong
Bobby Lewis, PE
Gerald McCauley

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
July 16, 2004
Attn: Mr. Michael Bell
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WATER QUAL17YSEC
TIpN
Subject: Nationwide 23 & 33 Permit Application and Buffer Certification.
Replacement of Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603 (Carriage Road) over Stony
Creek, Nash County. Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1603(2), State
Project No. 8.2322301, TIP Project No. B-3879. $ ?.Oa
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace existing Bridge
No. 73 on SR 1603 (Carriage Road) over Stony Creek (DWQ Index # 28-68, Class "C; NSW") in
Nash County. The project involves replacing Bridge No. 73 approximately on the existing
alignment. Traffic, during construction, will be maintained with an onsite detour using a 185-
foot temporary bridge downstream (east) of the existing bridge.
BRIDGE DEMOLITION
Bridge No. 73 is currently a 182-foot, 6 span structure, that consists of a reinforced concrete deck
on steel I-beams. The end bents and interior bents are composed of reinforced concrete caps on
timber piles. Removal of the bridge superstructure and timber piles should occur without
dropping any of the components into Waters of the United States, however there is potential for
components of the concrete caps of Bridge No. 73 to be dropped into Waters of the United States
during demolition. The potential temporary fill is calculated to be approximately 19 cubic yards.
The NCDOT will adhere to appropriate guidelines for bridge demolition and removal including
those presented in "Pre-Construction Guidelines for Bridge Demolition and Removal", "Policy:
Bridge Demolition and Removal in Waters of the United States", "Best Management Practices
for Bridge Demotion and Removal", and "Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters".
MAILING ADDRESS:
14C DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
04103
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
W ETLANUs,40, 6RO UP
JUL 2 3 2004
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
WEBSITE. WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US

BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
Bridge No. 73, a 192-foot long structure, will include four 48-foot spans with a cored slab as
superstructure. The substructure will consist of pile end bents and steel pile bents.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Permanent Impacts: Stony Creek will not be directly impacted by the proposed project.
However, construction of the proposed project will result in a total of 0.0023 acre (102 square
feet) of permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetland, in the form of mechanized clearing.
TEMPORARY DETOUR BRIDGE
A 185-foot long temporary bridge will be constructed downstream (east) of the existing Bridge
No. 73. This bridge will be required to provide a detour during bridge construction. Temporary
work bridge pile types and driving methods will be determined during construction by the
contractor. The detour bridge will be constructed at the elevation and location as shown in the
permit drawings. Non-mechanized clearing will occur prior to temporary detour bridge
construction. It is assumed that the contractor will begin construction of the proposed detour
bridge shortly after the date of availability for the project. The Let date is September 21, 2004
with a date of availability of October 18, 2004.
TAR-PAMLICO BASIN BUFFER RULES
This project is located in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin (subbasin 03-03-04, TAR4 03020102),
therefore the regulations pertaining to the Tar-Pamlico River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0259)
apply. Buffer impacts associated with this project total 9,767 sq. ft (0.22 acre) for Zone 1 and
10,883 sq. ft (0.25 acre) for Zone 2. All practicable measures to minimize impacts within buffer
zones were followed. Measures used to minimize impacts to the buffer zone include using the
current alignment. According to the buffer rules, bridges are ALLOWABLE. Uses designated as
allowable may proceed within the riparian buffer provided that there are no practical alternatives
to the requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this Rule. These uses require written authorization
from the Division or the delegated local authority. Therefore, NCDOT requests written
authorization for a Buffer Certification from the Division of Water Quality.
FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9
of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2003, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists three federally protected species for Nash County, however the
NC Natural Heritage Program database indicates a record for bald eagle in Nash County during
2003 (Table 1). Following endangered species surveys of the project site, Biological Conclusions
of "May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect" were rendered for the bald eagle, dwarf
wedgemussel, and Tar River spinymussel due to the presence of suitable habitat within the
project area. Concurrence was received from the USFWS for the two mussel species in October
2002 and for the bald eagle in April 2004. The Biological Conclusion remains "No Effect" for
the red-cockaded woodpecker due to lack of habitat.
B-3879
Page 2
Table 1. Federally-protected species of Nash County.
Scientific Name° '. Common Name Federal Status Biological Conclusion.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle T(Proposed for delisting) MANLTAA
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E No Effect
Alasmidonta heterodon Dward wedgemussel E MANLTAA
Elliptio steinstansana Tar River spinymussel E MANLTAA
Endangered (E) - is defined as a taxon that is threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its
range.w
Threatened (T) - A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant
portion of it's range."
MANLTAA - indicate a Biological Conclusion of May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the temporary detour bridge across Stony Creek will be
authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary Construction Access and
Dewatering). We are, therefore, requesting the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 33 authorizing a
temporary detour bridge across Stony Creek. All other aspects of this project are being
processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance
with 23 CFR § 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a
Nationwide Permit 23 (FR number 10, pages 2020-2095; January 15, 2002).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certifications numbers 3403 and 3366 will apply
to this project. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0501 (a) we are providing two copies of this
application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division
of Water Quality, for their records.
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0501(a), NCDOT is providing two copies of this application
to the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for review and issuance of a Tar-Pamlico Buffer Certification for impacts to
Tar-Pamlico Buffers in compliance with the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
http://www.ncdot.org/planning/pe/naturalunit/Permit.html. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Tyler Stanton at [e-mail] or
[phone].
Sincerely,
Gregory J. orpe, Ph.D. Environmental Management Director,
?- Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water
Quality (7 copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway
Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Joel Johnson, P.E., Project
Development
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Jim Trogdon, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Jamie Shern, DEO
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
(Cover Letter Only)
B-3879 Page 3
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
412`0
USACE Action ID No. DWQ Noy (If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)

I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 23 and 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: 1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699
Telephone Number: 919-733-7844 Fax Number: 919-715-1501
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603 (Carriage Road) over Stony Creek,
Nash County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3879
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Nash Nearest Town: Nashville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Located on SR 1603 between
intersections with US-64 and SR 1609, northeast of Nashville over Stony Creek
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N35° 59.32' , W770 54.08'
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Stony Creek
8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at htW://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application Rural minor collector, with low density residential and
agricultural land dominant.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Four span, 192-foot long bridge replacement using mechanical highway construction
equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Investigations by the Bridge Maintenance Unit
indicate that rehabilitation of the existing structures is not feasible due to age and deteriorated
conditions. Bridge No. 73 carries a sufficiency rating of 25.4 out of a possible 100. This
structure is considered functionally obsolete. Replacement of the bridge will result in safer
and more efficient traffic operations.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There will be 0.0023 acres of permanent impacts
to iurisdictional wetlands due to mechanized clearing from the replacement of Bridge No 73
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Type of Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on ma) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
1 (21+65 to 23+57) Mechanized
Clearing 0.0023 Yes 45.0 Freshwater Marsh

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodpWn maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htty://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.05
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0023
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif )

USE each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us¢s.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mMuest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site.
Page 8 of 12
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name Wat
)
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
It has the lowest construction cost, and it will create comparatively lower environmental impacts.
Bridge No. 73 will be replaced with a new bridge at the existing location.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
IX. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7,242.0
2 5,020.0
Total 12,262.0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
X. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
N/A
XI. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
'N/A
XII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIII. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Upplicant/Agent's Signature `Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
NORTH CAROLINA
sil
WETLAND & SURFACE WATER
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY
MAP
NASH COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2322301 (B-3879)
SR 16®3
BETWEEN US 64 AND SR 1609
SHEET 1 OF 11 DATE
NASH COUNTY
c

t It ?
? P4L
v.
u : K

--
r eir. r
?I,t
rn Yash.'
I

6
h
tl r
SITE MAP
sss?YiinEs$$$$
SS$SSi $S$$$$$DGNS$$I
SSS$$$
8/13
a
0
r- C-)° rT,
m=z
O
z2t Nrn
0
MA7-Cy CINF T. SHF? 4
Sto 19100.00 \ e`$ roA3 Q °
mS ?, \ q
cia x ?.
' r
Si
,.
m
O m
EL P ti , It ..
31B DUCT IRON -V M
N N 4
ceNITARRY \ z
OF Tk µ s krrN?yiNe
J-- ¢ N• r µ ?, E'?'
Ygg }@f? ?T \ '
STONEY CREEK
CO ~
r ?
Ana Mb S9
A a
/ NIt IM, Iv,
A \
mm8 w ly ?. RF0 0 ?°"?
2 / k e
E
o l\ ? ? ?X
jj? 1,
T a \
-qM
O Hp?
\ ???3p ?? a ,/ II 25
peas _-
t p
Q'i
?S• I
ss
• ? I I
9 'E
I
n
?--1 rtre -- -9 -m
o? g? T r I ! \
i? ? fn i
o? a
qr gg? I
?z zz S \??
Cg] I i\ I a

1/y ONl?sry'
F$
0
r

$$ssS"i INESSSSs
stsssas SssSSSSpGNsSSSSSSSSSSSasst
st$s11GF RNCMFSS SS
? M.ar
CH U/yF 7.0 SN f 4
m
nn Er
)2y ; ;II `L_ sta 19.?.op
%m
1 04
TAX
' ySS ? / , Ill
nl l I I 2i
tl ```I ' I' N 1?I fin. ' ]K I
1 ,
0 • 319• Duct wol+ -C: MET - 'i6' ? ¢ ' ;' ' ` t / ? ? ? ? -
R W
?? B 118 UN??SAN11 AS
Y % I , lF?1F V
OF nrRX,rld ?'?s? II I I, Its r
CF§Ei(-_,?
F, ?a 70 Ln Z AK
M Fn
Wig
01 Z' I"
v \ 1 ` ;" {(°?, c""'"pp? --'yi. 11\ It{l I 1 1 _ -0I{ \ fc?1
-4-4 I'l
N QX
---.-
-----_ - ``i' 1; ^' i1 - •i' I- -
-----------
-O ENO Nb? _ W' ` \\\_?`-- I g J ` B/I? - \i \
--- I ?B2 \?, ;??1? _ = ,' , ??? - \ ?\` -•__-,"\B
ols,
,
---. --? --- - --- =' - - - ------ ---------- -
- - -- - h_----fin _- -I `?e?
c! 1:
7 t :
- - --- _ -efr - \ - _ i is 1
01
-----------------
-scl y' -sel ?? ?- 1_ 1
I
7R + ,
01 ;C'j'
w
® ; t'oi`l rll - -
to t? _ ? I / ,
0 `
,•1; Mq O
o --- - G?
X,I
2i 11/y,I, _i k ? g ^y?^y 4
I ??
8?'

oc= o
m IU)
?rn
?nt
r
rn q
A4.4TC ro
m M LINE Tp SyEET
stQ 19 +()0 .00
oOmIII
201 \
15
A \
? f
' E .:PAT Y OC( m
N
41B•DUCi IRO '-??p. :,?, k \ m \
EMEN7 k k m
OF K OUN7 sAn1T RY W I k k k µN µ µ4 z
4
C µ µ k kkµµ Sj .
k µkk T B
4 c I \'
• '
• STONEY CREEK a f \
T r? m •? ?j \f ,. Y
..._?.. k k k µ O '?•T
k
K. ??yy 1 fie+
Eoga ~ f
m ?? ? ? µ 41 Tr C,?iTS f
x •.
} m E
?Ork ?? 'gym rnE? mT I m
o,NO? o' ? ?? y \
h
O'?05 L Y`e ? ? ? _
.INN a ° ASM
/ // Itj I I fd. Mry
sMisMT ?
07A\
.01
I I m i ?
in ? g N i
o ? ? I
?O J •t
0 E? C1 I m In
9I ? $ 1 ' ca +90 rn ` .
STS ?? ,? ? ? I I ?
I
o z z ?? I .I
I A ?

-UL
,PR(
\6 projects\63879\TranSystems Permit\b3879 DETOUR wetland permit w contours.dgn
-1 V) --i ZZ
?u I n
m t ~y? UN ro sk 4
r S
r k. \
c) rna di 79.1,00.01,
~
p c~il 0 t I
rn Al
1 p \ 6E'
OB U85 s Y Duct R ? EMENi ,~ ? k?
?_ _. onr?cr_MOt7N SA .. - I? . - ?' N• ?'. ? ?Z \
CREEK m
R,
A.H
E?
n I b
H 2m
?D
74
'AS f
if
a ? ?SY? //? tin
M AI
Qu

P
t.
I
i
?I
v9- • ? A \ ?p?WE%
i
o Is ,
.. ? : RY EC QQ
m
N
121-

„?
K
?(/T e ft
8/]7/99
7
NI
M \
D
m \
m
z

m O? ?
m

??

^0 Iry 01A1y}3 1 1
•d?b.62
1 1 a/
P3 ' 1 ?I

•I

m In •, ? \ •,
\
P
R
\
9

I I
I \ \
I \ \
I \

/
0
??CC r
j =i;

w U)
-t6 t? a) W ON
F C)
Q [- to
-I
rn M
C7

rr,
E w
)

F"{ 3
C O ° m ¢
?z w
N O H

CL cq %D

U) > 1 C) c`?
N-0 z 00 m
o
H w
d
w .,
z - w
H 0
o
A °
o
w
W
x

Z

IL g LL ? y
CL -

co N
co
co

- O .r
U
U- U)

Z

N N a?
Q w U E

W

W
a
?
?
v y
to C o a
LL

-?v

m =

L

H
Q C y

? rL W C

W ?
Z y
= 'a
Z W E°1?
1Q
J w

H -
W
?j
? y

- m .
LL N y
d

? m

lp
O
O ? i'
N

Ct

N

? o J
<
iD z p
Q
F-
PROPERTY OWNER
NAME AND ADDRESS
OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS
O J. Co BELL, JR. 438 SOUTH OLD CARRIAGE ROAD
ROCKY MOUNT,NC 27804
O C.R. WESTER 2400 HORSESHOE DR.
ROCKY MOULT NC 27RO4
LINWOOD We MITCHELL 3523 GR, E-EN HILLS RD.
ROCKY MOUNT NC Z7804
J1, NORTH CAROLINA
Sil
BUFFER
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY NASH COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2322301 (B-3879)
?/?
MAP SR 1003
BETWEEN US 64 AND SR 1609
SKEET 1 OF 11 DATE
N A14SH COUNTY

' r
\
m
'
;1003 ?.? ?r

G
FF
o T
II 1 ? _?

?•
i t
z

nNorthern Nash;
? ?- r ? ?? ? ( q- IF7S
tt ?
??) o
_11 a 59
^ J
? J

11197

Westr

Al 'Al,

SITE MAP
x
)•
sas=s $$$s$$$s$DGN$$$$$$$sS$$ss$s$
tssIjqFRN4MFSttS

.. M G7
W

Z
O

mo ?o

a?
' ?(A
D -0

mrn rn rn
N
4(4TCH
UNF tp SHED 4
S1Q 19 f00,
n l 00
0
El PATH fi - ` c In
318' OUCT IRON " jb'gAWE k \ m
- B 1185 s? ASEMENT ' ? k 4 ? ?i
c OF 6 24 ..p
KT SANIT RY k kkk k
f k k k k?
STONEY OflE ? ? ?•
k k O \r
k
A
W rti
qqy ?
? `
k! , iFr
m
= k
R
nZ ? Q ) 1
a Q ? ,? T m IT1y
QQ y m I
r U ? 1 Y
\ ? 1
,??oo Q Q \ _ E
a MHO, _ '1•'
-C - -
L0 / II ??? 1 \
OAS
©I ?C\? 8 ?? 112 sa sa . -'
dl3 ?_ 1 I
% / /? '" a F I 6t
too t'? "1 ^? i a >k Arl i
0 0 ? i
\ /rn2 m 2 n n ~? i
yQ I I I a i i
a ?
.I I
00q , 1 ?E I i m JA
I ,< ,<
m
1• :
,...
;, • ?? - "wit ? ? a ..I
_ m
O -/y- ?? -_ _ xr?? 19 Q I O \
Ay
00\1 S? • mC;. 1 I ?I W
'1 \® OZ N I ' \
0
rz
C?J z
n
0 Now
c? -? C°' ? y I I r
? I
cn ?\ I LF I? l
I ?
I II :? 0
?r ?
1 1 ,
I
l 1 , ,
1 \ ,
\ _I
1 1 ' /
c\P ...-r.--\P7A7Q\T..--q.-- P-,-..\kzA7Q nPTNIP -- ..e..-- P., \..1.,.. \ \
03
lip? rn?
nN n?
2CU 20
mF, m?
(V ?
Ci i
?\ i
I
r
,
I
,
, n
„ \ f
\ _ - -
i
/
I ,
( / ? 11 1\ I
I \ 1 I 1 I
/ ' \ 1 \ 1 1
NF \
1'O
1//-L.
/ //l/ cl #' I9'00
L
ui / r l •?0 I
\
. + Iil 1 / 1 / \ 1
Iilr r ;
15
P \ r0 \` ? 11 \ / y?' ? r
_ f i hII .1 It,'b N. Ik'tAt K, ZA \ \ \ -+
`- CITY or n --/ .?•v \ i \ I t' \I II \ I r
\ I - 4 II I 11
? ;/i ?.??.:.= i \ \I ? A . ?` _ ?• - I• ?` ' ? / . m ' 1` • / l? /,, l city ?"es
Al?l
. ' ,)1 \I / I 1 1 / II ?\ ? -'"lNl I ,' -. \\?\.? '\\ `\
- - , \i'%?ai ??t S?n}i"' I 1 \ ale I I I\;'-' ¦
-It
25
AP 11
- - - -- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 03`' 44
.. - _ - .? i ` ??"? \ / / - I' // / ^I ```? 1/11/ I ^/ I I /^ - `? •?? / ?"I ?oMt 1 _ ^
Nof
?\\1/rl'•,
4
- III
\ \ 1 ? ` / A C 8
` H \
l
- •e's ? projec t5 •.E3871'. Tr orSys tems Rermi t%b387q DETOUR buffer permlx Rea.dgn

m W

C n4.4rcy?Lit,

N N
O 03
rnrn O
rnm
??
N
,
;
VIV

r
•' ?sray[y crrEen r
y ? LL
rn
-\ NZ I
QOM l??ff???l?yl?xX )? inm m? ~?1
Or m
\ ?10?
\ r n
X10 `VV 11 ? )
\,11]30 0ls5 t 1? \ ©0Zt I1?
O? 3-all 1S \. J. I ?? •tl0 d SY / / a
u
g ?
0
8
P" -V
?z m
on or
?' r z
F ? p
O ? n
17
?j
/ y
?qG ' /// tbt '1
x I
v
p mo

0
S
rp S \
NFFr 4
' a sb• 19+0p•0p
1- a
g 20 ?
r1 ' € C 6f1? N \ .
k kµ q O ? \ ? \
k y
k
?< I?. µµµi ??;k ? ? \
? Is7 I : .. ? qr , \
µ k µ ??... ? ?. C m
k ... µ µ k µ *YO 0 \/ 4pON
k ,\ •.
^? N k
?S k NE m? ' ? ?,
i
? / •? "' RFC oq?,?O°F?? €
k 1 <.M,TS ?, ? '
k ?..
p
IP- k O A
H
c
I
k µ k A a?
\ k k
µ M k N ¦
I ?
tro
25-
_ ?"-?-
/ ai

. ?I I I I?
44
o ? ? I
APE ? I
II
f- o I
I I

i
II
I E
I +
I ?
I ?

?o ?.. 1 lat
° r' 1 1 '•-s
Cb
o
r
! ? g
A ZRZRZR
g C',
e . E prc.ie:as.E3975.Tr erSystems Permit'.b387cl DETOUR -etlond permit .. contours.dgn
Q)
_ m rT
rt,
m ? ? ? MArcH?V??? To
oR 2
°?
IF
m
z
GO
gIII- . !
I At
I ..V/ - 11. ._' 1

A
x

r q?pl
Q?;?jydt?

lig
s ?
0
j `Slow CREEK ? '•j ?,
-\... \..
m
o a ?.
m •'
r
°k?
R 1.
QOt ?? ?? ? >?m mF~
?-I?-1`n ro?i ? m 1
n
oxen t ^? \ Q Q j3
© ?qQ?'? Yom' ?
A / NIA S? ? SP
Fo ?
^s L I?
m

T4
Stq 19-f-00.00
F
k Ik q
!F K
N• N•Nµ1F?k k k, N-
Ikl
k IE 1?1? ?.
rn RFC '?°,?
Oq
m
N
Z
H
Z' \e
a \

r 1 \I
`? ?nq 1 I
d7y,kZ
P ' 1?1
• 1?1
I
i \
w
p?\m \
i
Im I m
Im I ?' ?
I` m e A
n
25\ E
0
I ?
I
I
\ r y?
?I I .I ?c\ f;\? Ir35jj ?
$
d
Ferrrn •.,t 2 77 DETOUR ?.etl.,. psrrrut w wn wur s.dgn / /
? C = Z
Z
?•I
rn
?rn2
? RZ y
r
O ? n
CEO
m
m
MAr?
m
I ttt;pppl
1 `'- \\ ?' 1 II
H?U>v+k ro SHE l \ \ \
4 ?L
S
m / t°• 19+ I
?P • . ??a /J/J?/ '? J / 00 Op I
//// l / \ (\
151
J F l ?
\F
1? IF
n k \
? / ???y CRE6 ^ ?j m ^• ? jai co
I r
J \\
44,
AV 0
l t ?. ??a r
\\?l rte,` ,
Fr-
rzm-
-Fri
jzo-
p 25 \
?3???e?•r' vim'/ , ? -.? ?s?' 9y ??- --' ? ?? 1 ? ?''?i2e - ----??.. ?/ ? ? 0ZI ,,, _?--??? ??`_??
dI3
?Cs^+sm 1 t
19,
_ Sfl, \ u\\ 1 5C / S£t-
?T7 L4
?s fist 1? ,,?\?? hl/ \ \
% -7' fc ?r I rm'
AO'
m
l•i ?. :. J.' O I\\ \ /'1 \ I?/ \ .. \ \ L' / ilk
T
y \ v/? ?I
r\
1\ I
\ 1 \
a
E

0
O N z 0 m

r
N_
t
W
? T

O
+
t
U1
V
O
(D
S }'
In
y ? .-
co --4
c
a n m m
(D co
C7
O O
X X cn D .
z v
GO)
"0 rn
D
n r ?
-i rn
r rn
m

rn ? m
rrA o n?i - r" 3 .

cn

A

0 D
r
r-
0

3

CD
K3
w
w
b
co
Z

?. m
?

D

>
C) "I
N -4 c
3
m
3

N O
CD O
V _??
,
0)
N W ? " ??
N
O
ti z
.. m
J

O G) .

m
v ?
N r
m

r
N
O
?
m m
r-

D c
C
? m
m
N
O
m
m
N

PROPERTY OWNER
NAME AND ADDRESS
OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS
O J. C. BELL, JR. 438 SOUTH OLD CARRIAGE ROAD
ROCKY MOUNT,NC 27804
0 C.R. WESTER ?-4UU HORSESHOE D R_
ROCKY MOUNT NC 27 4
LINWOOD W. MITCHELL 3523 G R EE N HILLS RD.
POCKY MOUNT NC 27 804
I.
23-APR-2004 0805
is ant ton387ATSPDEA206356
Y
r
09/08/9
LCONTRACT: C200.9604 TIP PROJEC"To B-3879-j
w w
0 0

? wo w w
T
m
o
O ZY A

n?
o p N
o
o y
?
r
.r
t y Z
o c o
T
C
Z O

A b

n 1 voc?1 =

N
-

5<-lv<c?i.A? ?
O
N II 11 II II II II
I I
O C C p W O O W V
^'??3aE?aQ°
?y
N
o
M Z )
Q ?
m r Z Z
?
y
y
c?c?
m? Z ?]

Z C ° O

;a

North Old
16 j Carrl• a Rd.

?I S 1A40

II -,

D? I
?? ,ate 7C
?y
;•
,1080
OA •
91-
W
n
0
ti
k
k
?I C Q O
-4
C x -y
n ? Zv O
N
T? ?-4 :j a y
2 O ` °
?A
0 IF-
10 0
CMO II CO
y sC p yQ,?. co)
O o II C [?! ® 1 J
M." W r?G7
?A
o ? vZ ?- _
X33 ? Z.
c
° +w +2! Cq
N?
Z2
? o
Q
m O ?a z ...--?R r0
-4 Im rim
a ti 0
o? oa te0? c ? ? b ? P???I
O T rn SR SO
X
Z b 90
?N\ n,. SORE gp
Z v n L? II
?N y
rn ? ?
O
00
w
el C-b
47 ?
H U?
00
b ?
f
^ A

A
a
8

23

W
CCP
C
"W C
sN•ONpM N
o?
a° ;
, v m 0 c 3' fl
T"3

0 3
S c
6- 7 a O A Q a10
• X A
3 Oi
eo s ? wo
• ? ? S
ao
o ?
n
$
3 +
`° V

a c
° O
h
o ? p o
o ?

' I

y
-moo ? .o ? •'o ? A •o ? ?°
-v -? -i gmg 0 S Z°. 6c Z° Z°. ago ?
?? v 3 3? O???? m n
S ' S ?o an
m m ° o C 3! C C
m m
3
C Cl a A
A
I
,? ,?, m m IDAI fy D
-I
r) -0
c
07

3
c
c A
C)
'g s
o ca
0
0

o w

a 3 6 - -n
n

0 e?
T
?I! ?; ?? III 1 ?
I cS ?f
3 C p 7 CT 2. 1 A Fn .2-1-0 T oOg? gN O? 47 O S a a. ?t "a
2 2 A O. A. fl
a n 4 S Q g. -1 O S •y c O 'O -1 S ?- -1 •p 'O
C 'n O' p0 N O C 3 O - t O n_ g` A O A O 2 O? A O O
a m 7 A. ; N O p O A A 3 o m $ O ' m QA °p A ? ? '°O 0
n r ° D °- c n g c g 0 'o ?p o
rt C 7 i A C A! a- ° A ?0 .0 m o m
O Si O' O' ' ° A fl A Fi b o
0 -• O' A i O' i i G O- S' A O
y -1 0 3
U
3 a- W I A C
-o o a ' I x c. ; Q'
O. i ;
a
O-
n
I
T I? I
I
I
y
I
I
-o p M = 3:
0

p
13
3.
m°
O

g T
c

d
in

°

O
c

A
?

a
Ro

aa?
7

z
p ? o

I Y if
I ? II ?
®D SAOo ®m O®O O ®I 2 e G>0 S a 0 0 a 0 4 4+ o- .• ? I ' II
TT c 3: XT 0 -0-0m mm no nN
3 0 s 3` m m m o c ir
to to Q JD 3 pm c Z? ?o? w v 3
m m C Q Q 7 c O O; A
d d `? = JD W A a' c C 0 '0 3 3 r A o
>> cc c m i o
C
o ca a q:
O_ CL O ` a N
C Q. Q• 3
Q MI c w o
.
3 c 0-0
a c
c- a. Q 31 0 I I y
c M a Q O
Q 7 C
i
m m f o ? o ? P• ? N ?] ?Q ? I I I ? 1 ? CL a
x
m m m m m m m rx W , 1 I I i
II I?I (I II?
? II
1 ? .I I
C -1 3 a. 7 a. O 9 7 a. a. 7 3. 7 ?. 7 ?. L
A O O N s A.
-n CL CL
ton
3? o Q Fw• -1 S ° I 40
3 in ?• C 4 ?, 3 A O 4 m
MD
O° n A N ' °
c o m a
c' y C j A v?
o ?_ -m o LA C m '' c C
o° ° n 0 w in V O ie
fA C c
c m ;
C fA ;
in
m
D
S y Q 3 O O
p A 7 7 m
4 O rP x a O c A O Q
T a c A S c in c
a" O S C o
to
y 3
A
o a °• CA -f 0 S m ?• -a ?.
N c11 3

O
O A
o
- N i i
c

y

S
6 ?

?O I5?
1 3 I

I C I Q
?
?
Q

? ? , i ; I 1 1
/ i I I I I
1 I I
( ; i I I I
1 11 1
I
o :L7
, ? ? I
I I
I
I
; I
ti ?
I I - Q
? ` ? I I 1 1
? , I I I I ; I
; 1
3 ?
a0 O A O n T X" O e
c _
- 3 3 a' °
c n -v CL
a2
-
*

?
a
v
S ,
-
4
0
m °
?
O A ?

I

n
O
Z
m
Z
O
Z
D
r
N
3
O
y
Pi
IIII ??? y
x Eo me
N
C
m
11
C
m
m
z
p
z
m
pa
00
f?
i ?m
r
n
ze VD
?rnrn
O ? y ? g $ O
??SS x ? ro °° c'' So C
c H?rn? nl
ct -n 00is o?o$•- n,
tTTr
?O tJ1 .??N(?„Ryl O
8g? ?? r Z? Z = ?ss7 Zt
m ?
H
~ tn
~
sm
I
mmz?arov I?
<W-IL,- i
t
w
174 m
Noo N I)I ?? DP-
t
4? o z
•- m 1
-ri (A 11
g -a 11
z z II
+ II
? N 1
II ?
I L ? ?mz r??
I PPPP ? u u n i
/ ? nINN?rF

n (A
// ? ?
1 'xG Z
y
// N
L4
~
r
Z?
rr / p
u ?

/ / ?mzrmlz
! <n a>r? To
i ? RNymw?m
.w,rO VIA Cm
! Wm0
\ n rn
1 1
OO z
¦ N
Y
1}7pI ? w
7133N0 /,3N015 m ; I
N J
\
O nb ®
4 k,
CIO w
'IOU
to O ° \
nt2:?n?n
49
Dl\
rn O R7 H b '=7 O ?7 In b 'b S'? v ° ~ ----
O O O IN { 'IS _/ , S i mmz"owwz
nw-
m;41
O O / ? ?/ rmZ rppm ?Nmr
?O,Y •?? / /? <11ns p0 11 aaSm wm ONm
C/? CJ v t• O 777 f9 Ol w??r?1 ,n7mamo^I D
?!goQV?+'
H p0 O m n u ygi=g 'mC'a0A ggr n of
n <wmp01 r+I I 1 '?
O Ny :Zip m m0
b O W N N't7 N A -1 /.' I Op 2
((',Y? H i cn• am o
h?? w O> z II/ z N
bs _ NI 1\ Iy m a wr z cu "
j s m w
COb? p a o 0, ?-aiaJ
rnti O y z w rn zw
H H b 50' m : z w rn
yO WA M"
rtl r a s <
H Z l=J t '"
n? H b Ov p1 ?:
??? O v(A(??
O ,, O ?O • NSW
o
"b mmz0rmz a
j m n n t7 r g I
Gh !? H `Ny N 1
I a?m m "
O?Y'o N
(] OY toa?p z
n m m
1 >
O? Q t cg
o
w
N O
a
?mzpcap
mun?H
<War_sm?
? vlmmmW
J pwON?
m
n
r7 nd
Q O
QA z
3 +
o
g
" W W
m
0
W N
m
mm
v
w '
ED ' O
NN ' S
m 01
Ww
4.0
mm '
NN rn
N
N C9 1
WA co
Amm '
M
r
m
a
-a
N - Z
T ,0
N UJI '
O .j..
-c
104
0 3>
V M
UIM ' z
O '
C-
M
n
1
r O
;
N ; M
N
?i
W A W m r W
m W
m N f
C
U j
W N
0 o Z

r
C) M
NN mWc)?F9 W? a

T 1n J
W W M ; m
mm
15 ? mra maw M
UI a w W N w y
V V m W
?? 14 -4
W A
W N
W m; Z W m W W W W W ZZ
T T ' W V V W T
TW ? -+

N ' =
T cnmWa X .O W X
? -4
ANT V T WA _
I
U W TUTA A AT

00 J W W W N V

@m V mm VI Tw
.O VIN V V .0N
m m 00 m G (D
N N N N N NN
w w w W w w w
N N; D N N N N N N N' rn
a
a A VI A. 0 0 ' a
N
w
.0 m.DmW ' N
.0.0
D -I
to O
WN A.J, W m.wO N.D 1
aW WT N V W W Ut T W ;
Swam vT.DD
J W
m T .0 V
m@ ' O
m m m m B O m'
M m
r r
m
a rn
a
-I -
i
. .. o c
z II??
Z
m J
N
N
N
.O ,
• m
O
)
VI W' T V W a ,O
.0 W VIJ mmV
C
? ? C

N
N
N
N
N
?o D D O
D
fW)I
P .0 W0 D
t*1 ' N
? m W w? mom -1
wvw yl
M z O
?
m NW,OW ••.0
Z
T O '
M a V N '-' W W O '
m
n
-4
r r
a
rn
T
T
N (n
m
?
nN m
1 Wv
maoao
m
1
m W W :0 W
cn(D cnaG) co
W
r
1 W r r r r r
1 1 1 1 1 1
pr"ZZOM
mn.. AS
?Nml- OHO
GW Now
JmN t0
c•ON?
rD 0 ?
1 =
n 4'
°o
? o
try ro w_`?
A
nrzW
'_-' W W N
V7 -+
rnoaoaTi
" z
x N M
T m
z N m D
z -4
r)N NZ
r cn
?mm'
m -4 fT
W N
O (j
W
M
M
r
a
p
z r z W
W N W «3 "
y
M W
L
M. I B m
ovmmm3?
Z N
O N z
UI
A -4 N
N
L7 ,p
2C cn
Nm W
W
w
M
Z
C*)
D
a
N N W N N ' .1..
00 Ul.0. wwNm '
' O
r r H W r r
r o
1?1? r?7 m
m W N t?
Ul b. W W W W W W; ??
W 0)T T T0)
NBA v.U4l1I' 2
w W W a W
.W.. z mN
Ul .0 N (31 V N T
to m m m m m
N N N N N N'
NNNNNN ' rn
Ut?VtWaa ? a
aWOWmwr.Wi
rnmmm.n - '
.0 m W? m? 'U(-1 V
m mmmmm
.m
r
m
? D
wimpp: z
J J N .0 ;
.r
N N N N N N' N
VI VITA VI VI -/
aamwmv??
N .0 m W W ?
.0 T a W W m z
'
m V w '• too
to cn
NUa10a1 cTnI ;
WNM W.a0 '
W z W r r r
1 -4 --1 1 1 1 '
Cori
y
h
N-
'y
v
i
i
Z?
O

Z
O
O
8
G1
y< D
m

O
A s
m
z
C

z my
m
m
r
w
O. v o
ll/ x
m
c
A z
SM3
HINGE POINT M
FOR RLLS =
Z
O
°•' w i
f m
m
m
z
c
O
D,
ZI
T W

D ;° m
I I o
N
o
r- m
M

rn

r
?I

D
z m Il
o
IP
?
N
Z
Z
O I I N m Q ^y O
70
6
> m ?
A a, T 1 -0
J
o C,
-I o
I b
HINGE POINT
FOR FILLS
a
H
O
v?
m?
(Lu O

A
I M
v c r I

v _
-?
N D
? O r

0
0 M
O C?
0 c
Q o
00 z
?p O
+
+
C?,
010
C p
0 Q

_
? rl i M n°) ° w ro
W< m m v v
-ImDv
Dv O
v
?v
-I v
• m
r > v
mu
v
xD x > x s xm- m -1m mm
x
1
,
vo > ? ?o m-1m p
mm w y N o D o o M
0
00,
. { p o -< O
•m-1> -4 = m z?Z. Z. °
-IISm w 9 z r?9 7mo 7
zr°-
om z
p O m mo><
i m<> >>
<v m- s<
-ImD =>
o'o W >
> D<
m<D ?D>
<v
.? p
> -°m
m •O
m -Io• m 1
'v
m am= •O
v
Nm v m -1 > .T,
NMD• ?1
Do Dm X• °mo A
m .,D• yy
Do
< :° > O ZZMW Ox zin O X y
mK
zmm
x
O
+-I m > i mm
° m• m rr
r
x m pm m??o--I 9w r--4 N s r
Da--I aro
z i g D
x
- D x x D
-
I m 4 -
i
- -I MA> E 1 M- Kv
•
v
D
g m
m xxmD
OOV mg
OWO zmzD
vvW
> > m
p mmD
WO 10 m
OD p
<

> z
x -n MF4n <W
m y •n> Z•nx vW T

m
m D
"
- D
ca vzmD
x W o>
I
M
•G p 1
-4
-1 a-I -4 mr
xrD- ?> -v ir
-
N
T o ma0 NO DtmO m--4 a? Q
O °-4 171
m
W c
x Wro
ON z rO
W z m o
9 A Z
?
m a r--I
m r0
m m z r
MO Z

-i
z ?n 9 CD 1 z F C) C)
S Dz
-i y? 1
x m m Z m m -
M o Z .
m m •
O
>
r zmm mm ?Om O T m m Omm mm n
m -1 m m m m M-4
=
m G=WD WD m?z W W m +o?c
Xo Wm 177
m OtA O co CD -I W
Oi O O W
1 x M. m m rAAm -4 c D 9

D
co
•<O
<O
-IrC
r m
.? m
"-<O
•<M C
O m?C ?C Do0 A 'M
G D
ZOm
O
>,
7
y
?
Z.
m

m ?
?
m 1

So
{
-
IVw w
Y
M
.gym
vo
?
v p xmm m Nlu
-I V
m>
z •9mC
-I za
O
70-
a m m
am m
9 O
°
m m m
= mz
M -' -{ 0 c
0 -?m OW

M a
9
m <
m
MO
p
m
x
}
m
° z
y O m v1

0 ?I1
m Go
Mo. {
Ow a-
m M-<
m
T
m moxm N
OI -ui' m -4
Q"{ -4
=W Am
1 7
6 o xv O
Om m O
w . O° m W
c - a 7
D co OCR a
p
r oo m W

,. 07 O7

p n
o+, N
w M
V
T
O
o Z
z
p y
ca --i
w
?
+ C
w
'tom
Q
W C
CA)
Z , N
N
n
v
? v
r ?N
2 z? ?
z ?
3 1
- IF) O C N (?
v
1
N O ?N
?o 'n
N
Z ? v
w ?I
z ? N
R \Pro
O
is
{7n
N
C
z
v
P r

A
all i f
L -

N }

W

7-

j3 yCAZ E
z O o
v r

v i. O
N
N ?
c h
m
INGE POINT
FOR FILLS
N
M
t
O
A
v
HINGE POINT
i
FOR FILLS
? N
w
m
m
z
W
1
D
O'
N
^^I Ll?
?i
m ° O- i
I F
C
Z m I?
Y
O
W
R,
o€
A
I I I
I
N
DDN
O++
w
'00-P
o
"b.0
8O8
y>D
W a O
r,°D0
C
cn m 0
D
r
CA
m o
c
z
° p
c
v

Z

O
CA)
N
T
O

O

c -1 -v 1 N 1 N ° w j V
D
m
m x a s ° > < N N < N
° '° ?
°
a ?
o w - a > • 1 M

° -i
1 I
O O m m m -C m <
D O
?^ m x m
m -i m x x V/
d! H

m > m < m m
-0 01 -u 01 m
z m m ° °° m °° p

m ...
I
G" m
O ° Im
m

w
0
m °
P? M
W W
a° P O
W O (A Z
..I m v
?O
I
o? z
2!a O
° w N
.? V s
O ? N
m .n
PZ O
N
TO
PM .
0

<

r

c
z
v

p,
V V
a
HINGE POINT
FOR FILLS
I J
N

W
p
l N
m
m a
m o

O
Z m c o 0
a
Z

Z
'g m
°
p
O
O o v
N
O
rn
00
0
c
z
v
Cl)
Q

A Q

rn
HINGE POINT

FOR FILLS

13_ PR
L. N , N W N 0? M
D
:E m n
v
m
<
w
RI
m x ? ? > > = < N N < N
9 ° 70 ^
o OB 171
a
. -
I m m Co Z

??eC m m m
D F. O
1 10 --1 M
-I
'"
m
'"
m 1 m x I* = (j)
m 01 j 00 W C)
< M C o m
m D c o m S
m r- 9 m .
01
z m m o m m to
0

m m r
m m
o o o
n
m
m
O
O
C
Z
O
0
-1
O?
Ica N ;
v -p 1 ``0
z n O IN
N ? ? N
M
C rNTI O ?
1! 0
o Z Z _ 1f1b??
Z m O
? O 6s O N
m O
c
0 o,
?N
a >>

O
0
z
v
6 6 c
II--I --I
Ul M 0
Z

+ o > ? ?Z
m
Ti
..i +
o m?
Q O
O ;
O
? Z °o Z
4
w
v
o• p p A

a O OO
oZ P w ?Z
O y y0

c? N

6/2/°
OD I
w
8/17/99
7

Ilunuu1
oI
? I
r
v
ro
t0
N
8
8
a a a
© a a a N
a © ?a
© a ? s?
a
a
a a
a a mD
a a Nx
a a N
a ?z
a=
a
c
06"99L I
?eLS
? I
y Iv ?' m
< ^? ?
A
Z
H O
A
m

y
F

Z
O

mm^.? m
ftl
N N _ 40
=S? m

V O• h
aO „
O
I v ?

C
Q A

? A

Q A
a?Q
"?Fy 510-68-, ?q 19? Oo 00

0
N
m
a
a
m O
- S 1
n O ?
t0
N
n
e m
6/17/99
, M ' M C
„ q
?
w
r
M II I
w?gcyo

H y
1`OD?
?II a I ISO
nl ? N y o
R
(-. 1
Y
y ?V
70 '
k -? Z
? ? 8v
A
Nm
? r
r
d?
I O
0
_l, 1
1
1 A
?l.l I ? v Vl L ? --
1 $ N W Y a r
V... >s
.. ?? Y330 a3N0 a W m
r
O????
57 zt
o O m n
vOm ?... p'- 77
ci
ON +
R N 1 "8 R+?+
g ?'mn.?ir? I a ? $ M II
-? O ON? HOO ? p p' ? + ? I
n \ 030 V
o = /tl / i
S ? F O ©I I ? ` /
fit'
/ o
V/ate'
/ c Z? ? m 1
? sR Ir#3 ? °m ? I , ? ?` rn
+ V „ rn
' ' ^ro ?1qi. ? i m ? ? (/1 R r? 01 a I
° r A p .,off- II
4
p N o X39 s? ? ? : ,{, 900 m I
2 ? $ l" Ya ? i }1NS tYl w ? ? ? I II?
$ Sao x I
?? 8
$'A 9'`?^? N z P E
? all
2
N N W fAN
mmmmm
mmmmm
CA ItA (A CA w
2m2m2m2rn2
H y 0. y?1
V P N IN
Y' -n -n O
A
00
=°°oa
MW
1
(A in
'O - A
pOM
rCOFF
Om
W pNS0
C 2
m?
aZ
mG
c r
V!

N
m
CA
N
N = P. Z
b
5' +?
N y Vin
?
?

y
+
OZ -0
na 2
y U?
F ,.
4
w
N
mA
m
C T
Cm
?
D
?
rn
O?
Zrn

OS w p
Z?:j +
WO

= CA
y a
O 4' 4• +
T
m 01
M

Ts ?? IF
RYi
-i O
°
$ n s `,n
J
m L ?'O.
N v N• "•A
ro? ,
°n
x
m
p? T O
pO?
s
vv ?
z2m
0
+ r
z4 O
s W
}
J$
m r \
Fi< mn
pC ?9 G N
N m
2
?O l N m \
\ \E g\
0
m
N\F F
e \
m ?
- o
? B q ? fl?
0
;Ito
?al?l?OD?
I ISO
sm?o
W-
µ a?
A
µ AFO ?qk T?y? r \
I ? : C u ^"^?' err < c?F >
I M cl
sq
a
N
1
? ? S I
'Ali
I\ +?«,? µ1B $ y 22! ? ? O A
3 (V m
MWTAft
Qb 3BId AL 1 3 ? ?1? • - ? ?? ?? 1 r 91
I os A Mib oMtSixy f.
.dJH .i2
I Jot II1 141
I
Its
dH Wa?v?g i59
ll
? : ? ?? ? gnNiW I I,
y? W s?
m 1
r'- ?D V! ? a n ? ? •
-1 s
IA?V ' •`? ?
g} , I n w ° v?fir
t E3
?p
?t
o
x
I? $y
= I?
® cl
?-sc.an.c95J
'M/b Ol dl3 ,b!'0 •L6'655
$ hl Iql : I
\III ICI' I
I III I ? I"
III A m
o °
z o ?
m
III ? ? ' ? ? x
III A l j ? ?
I
I II ?qi ? y?9
ma
II s n •°c?
I C) n ?^ yg991
I II ?I I I m '? M,56y0.ZL5
?I 1 n T
02
0
z
Cl
m
n
x
t/f
z
v
3
m
z
i
m
O z
v
? v
v
m
r
I I

A f A ?
N Cs
m a•
r
\ = m
u
\\ °1 m
\\ N m
S j \
a ? ?py
o A ?R au
°RR a
,
I
I ?
/N
0
o z
m,
N N
? F
m
o r
o p
v
O
0? 9E
i
a 51 /? nti
z °?Zwpz
asx o o0SA
P°M..
mmmm ^ ?m
mmAm z
SS S m
w A ZN ?o
v
'o°?z?? Gee
o
-e ? A S .o
OT? 5?
rn z
Q
? N n
A3x01s ro`?
3yj
/ O K3
y j
/ as ?1
r
z
Quo
O
\,`A030
0
U (_ J
F
i

/
r/
I ?? II
I 19
II II Adz
1 it I zpo
II 0
If Z
f , o$
J JI ff zoc
J Jf ' o
T v
ODD
O -n
ti ?10
/ A
I
/
\f
I
P
Jrrp .
f y
?rr T/aI 'I I ?
I !
r
:! I
.. I
I
I
,g' I iF
Oe?c: e `' C
i29 F?( \
IF Ir•u. V ``. °
9
IF K' w Ihµ IF 4 ?O \
Tm
T CO
a ,

©I ?? '4 // III ,
Om .4
'NO ff / , 4 "? ??
GCS ? sli 609
? I:' I
q ? ? ? ? m al
P P
?' °' ? ry ? a 0y?s? II I I
'9`ns. ? ??oo m I II
?+? C0 A I III
x. N r I I I I
9Fo ? ? lyl?
09?• ?, a ?cP?? ?I?
(?? Z_ /'? III
?•`` ?J u / ? ?a ?' II
S ^ o f?l ?I ?I
STS ?? '?`\ ;,?,^II

J o
5 H
? `rTp
04Y yCc/- ..
/rr ??Mir
o
m y'D,
N
a m
N
m
m Z
?n m
2
AW5
N N II N N?
N II p
40
II 1 N N N l p
y 1
f????'D`IrOp? '
N N N N N rN I N
? y
",,I1p-1 r°D?
N N 1111" p
p N
V0 N?o
?ro
\f
n
i
A
O
m
/99
I
125
13
Ilk
N/V
44
I z
-mni I ? z
I ?
mll +
qV, '?K p ??? ? ? ? mp
? / ? "T+-? of SR
? // 3811 nt'AGdW3 dl3 T'/? \? I
I f?, .d?a.bz `--
I 1.V?I .
3M ? WW 1 ' lit
I ? a I r
a ? pa?
8Oy '. I I
I I r W N ? m e
i
3 1 ;- r ? m Z al)
II II: ? $ ?°m ??ZZ
_ o
11 ? n O
n
O
G ?
! l ll F\ ? ? ? ? ?
Nash County
Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603
over Stoney Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1603(2)
State Project No. 8.2322301
T.I.P. No. B-3879
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
?.
CIL
D TE - regory J. Thorp, PhD
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
1
DATE ,,r; -John F. Sullivan, III
v Division Administrator, FHWA

Nash County
Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603
over Stoney Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1603(2)
State Project No. 8.2322301
T.I.P. No. B-3879
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Documentation Prepared in
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch By:
7- 2- -e:)
DATE el A. Johnson
Project Development Engineer
DATE William T. Goodwin Jr., P.E., Uni ead
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
b
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Replacement of Bridge No. 73
On SR 1603 over the Stoney Creek
Nash County
Federal-Aid No. BRZ-1603(2)
State Project No. 8.2322301
T.I.P. No. B-3879
Commitments Developed Through Project Development and Design
Roadway Design Unit, Roadside Environmental Unit, Division Four Construction,
Structure Design
NCDOT will adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) for `Bridge
Demolition and Removal' during the removal of Bridge No. 73.
Roadway Design Unit, Structure Design Unit, Roadside Environmental Unit,
Hydraulic Design Unit, Division Four Construction Unit, Project Development and
Environmental Analysis Branch
The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was consulted in regard to the
effect of project construction on the Tar spinymussel and the Dwarf wedge mussel. The
USFWS concurred in the biological conclusion that project construction is "Not Likely to
Adversely Affect" the Tar spinymussel and the Dwarf wedge mussel if the following
environmental commitments are implemented:
1) The replacement Bridge No. 73 and the construction of a detour structure will use "top
down" construction to eliminate in stream activity as much as possible.
2) As part of the removal process for the existing bridge, wood pilings will be cut off at the
substrate level.
3) The existing fill material at the south end bent will be removed, to the extent practicable,
to natural ground elevation to allow for a more natural stream flow. The replacement
bridge will be lengthened as necessary to accommodate this.
4) During construction, turbidity curtains will be placed around the work area on the south
bank to protect the stream in a "horseshoe" configuration. The turbidity curtains will not
be installed perpendicular to stream flow.
5) A hardware cloth fence faced with small clean gravel will be placed along the footprint of
the construction area bordering the stream. A silt fence will be used for the side slopes.
6) Equipment will be maintained such that hydraulic fluids, oil, gasoline, or other chemicals
will not enter the stream. If chemicals are stored on site, they will be stored a sufficient
distance from the stream and under secure conditions to prevent accidental contact with
the stream. If chemicals are spilled on the site they will be cleaned up immediately and
not allowed to filter down into the soil.
7) Slurry will be removed from the project construction site. No slurry will enter the
stream.
8) The erosion control plans for Protected Aquatic Species will be used during project
construction. These plans include the following requirements:
Sediment and Erosion controls will be in place prior to land clearing activities. No
sediment from either bridge demolition or construction activities will be allowed to
enter the flowing stream.
¦ "Environmentally Sensitive Areas" will be defined on the plans, which consist of a
50-foot buffer zone on both sides of the stream..
Green Sheet
Categorical Exclusion Page I of 2
July 18, 2003
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
The Contractor may perform clearing :operations, but not grubbing operations in the
"Environmentally Sensitive Areas" until immediately prior to beginning grading
operations.
¦ Once grading operations being in "Environmentally Sensitive Areas" as specified on
the plans, work will progress in a continuous manner until complete.
¦ Seeding and mulching will be performed immediately following final grade
establishment.
Stage seeding will be performed on cut and fill slopes as grading progresses.
Roadway Design Unit, Structure Design Unit
Final design plans will be mailed to the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission upon
completion.
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
The NCDOT Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch will conduct
an in-stream survey for the Dwarf-wedge mussel and the Tar spiny-mussel just prior to the
construction let date.
Division Four Construction
The NCDOT resident engineer will be responsible for alerting the Natural
Environment Biological Surveys Unit Head of the Project Development and Environmental
Analysis Branch two months prior to the project being awarded so that the in-stream survey
may be scheduled.
The NCDOT resident engineer will be responsible for providing a written invitation
to the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission, Non-game and Protected Species Branch, and
the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the construction field meeting for this project.
Green Sheet
Categorical Exclusion Page 2 of 2
July 18, 2003
Nash County
Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603
over Stoney Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1603(2)
State Project No. 8.2322301
T.I.P. No. B-3879
INTRODUCTION: The replacement of Bridge No. 73 is included in the current North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Transportation Improvement Program
and is eligible for.the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. The
location is shown in Figure 1. No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The
project is classified as a Federal "Categorical Exclusion".
1. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 24.2 out
of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is posted for load limits of 22 tons for
single vehicles and 27 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailers and is structurally deficient and
functionally obsolete. The replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer
traffic operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project is located on SR 1603 (Carriage Rd.) over Stoney Creek just north of US 64
between Nashville and Rocky Mount in Nash County (see Figure 1). Development in the
area is agricultural and residential in nature.
SR 1603 is classified as a rural minor collector in the Statewide Functional Classification
System. This route is not a designated bicycle route and there is no indication that an
unusual number of bicyclists use this roadway.
In the vicinity of the bridge, SR 1603 has a 23-foot (7.0-meter) pavement width with 6-
foot (1.8-meter) grass shoulders (see Figures 3 and 4). The roadway grade is flat in the
area of the bridge. There is a horizontal curve on the south end of the project and a road
intersection on the north end of the project. The existing bridge is on a tangent. The
roadway is situated approximately 17.0 feet (5.2 meters) above the creek bed.
Bridge No. 73 is a six-span structure'that consists of reinforced concrete deck on steel I-
beams. The end bents and interior bents consist of reinforced concrete caps on timber
piles. The existing bridge (see Figure 3) was constructed in 1957. The overall length of
the structure is 182 feet (55.5 meters). The clear roadway width is 24.0 feet (7.3 meters).
The bridge is posted 22 tons for single vehicle and 27 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailer.
There are no utilities attached to the existing structure. Underground telephone lines are
aerial at the bridge on the east side, power aerial lines are on the west side, a sanitary
sewer line on the south side of Stoney Creek, and a pump station is located in the south-
east quadrant. There is a power transmission line crossing SR 1603 just south of the
bridge. A telephone pedestal and fiber optic delineator post indicate other underground
utilities in the project area. Utility impacts are anticipated to be heavy.
The current traffic volume of 4,900 vehicles per day (VPD) is expected to increase to
10,300 VPD by the year 2025. The projected volume includes one- percent truck-tractor
semi-trailer (TTST) and two-percent dual-tired (DT) vehicles. The posted speed limit is
45 miles (72 kilometers) per hour in the project area.
The NCDOT Traffic Engineering Branch indicates 12 crashes have been reported in a
recent 3-year period. Only one sideswipe accident (no injuries) was located at the bridge.
The other accidents were at the intersection just north of the bridge
School buses cross this bridge 17 times per day. However, since an on-site detour is
being provided, school bus routing should not be affected.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
The replacement structure will consist of a 192-foot (58.5-meter) long bridge. The
bridge will be 44 feet (13.4 meters) in width to provide for three 12-foot (3.6-meter) lanes
with a 4-foot (1.2-meter) offset on each side.
The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing
grade at this location.
The new roadway cross section would be two 12-foot (3.7-meter) lanes that will
transition to three 12-foot (3.7-meter) lanes. The shoulders will be 8 feet (2.4 meters)
wide on both sides, including 4 feet (1.2 meters) of paved shoulder and 4 feet (1.2 meters)
of grassed shoulder. This roadway will be designed as a rural minor collector.
B. Reasonable and Feasible Alternatives
The one alternative for replacing Bridge No. 73 that was studied is described below
Alternative 1 Replace Bridge No. 73 with a new 192-foot (58.5-meter) long bridge at
approximately the same location and roadway elevation as the existing bridge. Traffic
will be maintained using a temporary on-site detour located to the east (downstream) of
the existing bridge during construction. The temporary bridge will be approximately 185
feet (56.4 meters) in length.
2
C. Alternatives Eliminated From Further Consideration
Due to the large volumes of traffic and the lack of a suitable off-site detour, road closure
and replace in-place was not an option.
The "do-nothing" alternative will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge. This is not
acceptable due to the traffic service provided by SR 1603.
"Rehabilitation" of the old bridge is not practical due to its age, deteriorated condition
and design. The substructure is in poor condition. It is not practical to rehabilitate timber
bents.
Replace in place with an on-site detour just west of the existing bridge was eliminated
from consideration due to the wetlands and utility conflicts.
Replace on new alignment just west of the existing bridge using the existing bridge to
maintain traffic was eliminated from consideration due to the wetlands and utility
conflicts.
D. Recommended Alternative and Reasons for Recommendations
Bridge No. 73 will be replaced at approximately the same location and elevation as the
existing bridge. The new bridge will be 10 feet (3.0 meters) longer than the existing
bridge. This will allow for the removal of approximately ten feet of the existing fill
material at the south end of the bridge This will improve the opening under the bridge and
allow a more natural stream flow. Traffic will be maintained using a temporary on-site
detour located just east of the existing location as shown by Alternative 1 in Figure 2.
Alternative 1 is recommended because there is no suitable off-site detour. An offsite
detour located west of its existing location was eliminated from consideration due to
increased wetland impacts and cost. Also adding to the utility cost, a sewer pump station
would have to be relocated.
3
IV. ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated cost for the one alternative is as follows:
Alternative 1
Recommended
Structure $ 600,600
Roadway Approaches $ 570,000
Detour Structure and Approaches $ 368,000
Structure Removal $ 36,400
Misc. & Mob. $ 340,000
Eng. & Contingencies $ 285,000
Total Construction Cost $ 2,200,000
Right-of-way and Utility Costs $ 300,000
Total Project Cost $ 2,500,000
V. NATURAL RESOURCES
A. PHYSICAL RESOURCES
Soil and water resources that occur in the study area are discussed below. Soils and
availability of water directly influence composition and distribution of flora and fauna in
any biotic community.
The project study area lies within the eastern Piedmont Physiographic Province. The
topography in this section of Nash County is broad and flat to long slopes and is drained
directly by Stoney Creek. Project elevation is approximately 115.0 ft (35.1 m) above
mean sea level (msl).
A.1 Soils
Three soil phases occur within the study area: Meggett loam, Altavista sandy loam, and
Georgeville loam soils. They are as follows:
• Megggett loam is a frequently flooded, poorly drained, nearly level soil that occurs on
flood plains. Permeability is slow, surface runoff is very slow, the seasonal high
water table is at or near the surface most of the year, and this soil type is subject to
flooding after prolonged rains. (USDA 1989)
• Altavista sandy loam with 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded, moderately well
drained, nearly level to gently sloping soil that occurs on low terraces along the large
4
streams in Nash County. Permeability is moderate, surface runoff is slow, and the
seasonal high water table is located between 18 and 30 inches below the surface
during the winter. The seasonal high water table and the hazard of flooding are the
major limitations for this soil type. (USDA 1989)
Georgeville loam with 6 to 10 percent slopes, well drained, moderately sloping soil
that occurs *on upland side slopes and slopes breaking to streams throughout Nash
County. Permeability is moderate, surface runoff is rapid, and erosion is a severe
hazard if soil is not protected. Slopes and moderate permeability in the subsoil are
limitations of this soil type. (USDA 1989)
A.2 Water Resources
This section contains information concerning those water resources likely to be impacted
by the project. Water resource information encompasses physical aspects of the resource,
its relationship to major water systems, Best Usage Standards, and water quality of the
resources. Probable impacts to surface water resources and minimization methods are
also discussed.
A.2.1 Waters Impacted and Characteristics
Stoney Creek will be the only surface water resource directly impacted by the proposed
project. (Figure 2). Stoney Creek is located in subbasin 03-03-02 of the Tar-Pamlico
River Basin. The average baseflow width is approximately 35.0 ft (10.7 m). The average
depth is approximately 7.0 ft (2.1 m). Stoney Creek has a loamy sand substrate.
A.2.2 Best Usage Classification
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the NCDWQ. The
classification of the Stoney Creek (DEM Index No. 28-68) is C NSW (NCDWQ 1999).
Class C refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing,
wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. The supplemental classification of NSW
denotes Nutrient Sensitive Waters that require limitations on nutrient inputs.
Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS4: undeveloped
watersheds or WS-II: predominately undeveloped watersheds), nor Outstanding
Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the project study area.
A.2.3 Water Quality
The DWQ has initiated a basin-wide approach to water quality management for each of
the 17 river basins within the state. To accomplish this goal, the DWQ collects
biological, chemical, and physical data that can be used in basinwide assessment and
planning. All basins are reassessed every five years. Prior to the implementation of the
basinwide approach to water quality management, the Benthic Macroinvertebrate
5

Ambient Network (BMAN) assessed water quality by sampling for benthic
macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites throughout the state. There is one
BMAN station located on Stoney Creek within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the project study
area. The station (DEM No. T2-7, DEM Index No. 28-68) is located on Stoney
Creek at SR 1603 in Nash County and was assigned a biological classification of fair
in July 1992.
Many benthic macroinvertebrates have stages in their life cycle that can last from six
months to one year, therefore, the adverse effects of a toxic spill will not be overcome
until the next generation. Different taxa of macroinvertebrates have different tolerances
to pollution, thereby, long-term changes in water quality conditions -can be identified by
population shifts from pollution sensitive to pollution tolerant organisms (and vice versa).
Overall, the species present, the population diversity, and the biomass are reflections of
long-term water quality conditions.
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program. Any discharger is
required to register for a permit. No point source dischargers are located on Stoney
Creek within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the project study area.
A.2.4 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Replacing an existing structure in the same location with a road closure during
construction is almost always preferred. It poses the least risk to aquatic organisms and
other natural resources. Bridge replacement on a new location usually results in more
impacts. Utilizing the full right-of-way width of 80.0 ft (24.4 m), anticipated impacts to
Stoney Creek due to the bridge replacement will be 80.0 ft (24.4 m). Project impacts,
both aquatic and terrestrial total 1.6 ac (0.6 ha). The area of aquatic and terrestrial
environment's impacted is 0.06 ac (0.03 ha) and 1.5 ac (0.6 ha) respectively. Usually,
project construction does not require the entire ROW, therefore, actual impacts may be
considerably less.
Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters:
1. Increased sedimentation and siltation from demolition, construction and/or
erosion
2. Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased sedimentation and
vegetation removal
3. Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/or additions to
surface and ground water flow from construction
4. Changes in water temperature due to streamside vegetation removal
6
5. Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from exposed areas
6. Increased concentration of toxic compounds from highway runoff, demolition,
construction, and toxic spills.
Precautions must be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the study area.
NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMP) for the Protection of Sensitive Waters
must be strictly enforced during the construction stage of the project. Guidelines
for these BMPs include, but are not limited to minimizing built upon area and
diverting stormwater away from surface water supply waters as much as possible.
Provisions to preclude contamination by toxic substances during the construction
interval must also. be strictly enforced.
B. BIOTIC RESOURCES
Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. This section describes those
ecosystems encountered in the study area as well as the relationships between flora and
fauna within these ecosystems. Composition and distribution of biotic communities
throughout the project area are reflective of topography, hydrologic influences, and past
and present land uses in the study area. Descriptions of the terrestrial systems are
presented in the context of plant community classifications and follow descriptions
presented by Schafale and Weakley (1990) in Classification of Natural Communities of
North Carolina where possible. Dominant flora and fauna observed, or likely to occur, in
each community are described and discussed.
Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are provided for each
plant and animal species described. Plant taxonomy generally follows Radford et al.
(1968). Animal taxonomy follows Martof et al. (1980), Potter et al. (1980) and Webster
et al. (1985). Subsequent references to the same organism will include the common name
only. Fauna observed during the site visits are denoted with an asterisk (*). Published
range distributions and habitat analysis are used in estimating fauna expected to be
present within the project area.
B.1 Terrestrial Communities
Six distinct terrestrial communities are identified in the project study area: successional
community, riparian community, Fresh Water Marsh Community community, maintained
yard, cleared lot, and maintained/disturbed roadside. Community boundaries within the
study area are well defined without a significant transition zone between them. Faunal
species likely to occur within the study area will exploit all communities for shelter and
foraging opportunities or as movement corridors.
7
B.1.1 Successional Community
The successional community is present to the east of SR 1603 and south of Stoney Creek.
It borders the maintained/disturbed roadside community to the east and is adjacent to the
riparian community. This area is vegetated in the canopy with sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciua), red maple (Acer rubrum), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). The understory
consists of high bush blackberry (Rubus argutus), smooth sumac (Rhus glabra),
American holly (Ilex opaca), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica).
Wildlife associated with the successional community include: white-tailed deer*
(Odocoileus virginianus) evidenced by tracks, eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus),
opossum (Didelphis marsupialis), deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), gray squirrel
(Sciurus carolinensis), raccoon* (Procyon lotor), and snakes* (Ophidia).
Avian species utilizing the successional community likely include: pigeons* (Columba
livia), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), American robin (Turdus migratorius), red-tailed
hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), and mallards (Anas platyrhynchos).
B.1.2 Riparian Community
The riparian community is present.along the Stoney Creek corridor. The canopy is
composed of river birch (Betula nigra), water oak (Quercus nigra), willow oak (Quercus
phellos), sweetgum, and swamp tupelo (Nyssa bflora). Vegetation of the understory
includes cherry (Prunus sp.), black haw (Viburnum prunifolium), green brier (Smilax
rotundifolia), American holly, ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and lizard's tail
(Saururus cernuus).
Faunal species frequenting the riparian community will be largely those species
inhabiting the successional community.
B.1.3 Fresh Water Marsh Community
The Fresh Water Marsh Community occurs on both sides of Stoney Creek. Vegetation
within this area includes lizard's tail, soft rush (Juncos effuses), black willow (Salix
nigra), and arrow arum (Peltandra sp.).
Faunal species frequenting the Fresh Water Marsh Community will be largely those
species inhabiting the successional community.
B.1.4 Maintained Yard
The maintained yard is present east of SR 1603 and north of Stoney Creek. Grasses
(Festuca sp.) are the predominant vegetation occuring within this area.
8
l
Faunal species frequenting the maintained yard will be largely those species inhabiting
the successional community.
B.1.5 Cleared Lot
The cleared lots are present to the south of Stoney Creek and the Fresh Water Marsh
Community communities. Grasses (Festuca sp.) is the dominate vegetation type
inhabiting this area.
Faunal species frequenting the cleared lots will be largely those species inhabiting the
successional community.
B.1.6 Maintained/Disturbed Roadside
The maintained/disturbed roadside community includes road shoulders along SR 1603
that are present along the entire length of the project. This area is vegetated by fescue
(Festuca sp.), Japanese honeysuckle, plantain (Plantago sp.), ragweed (Ambrosia sp.),
Indian strawberry (Duchesnea indica), trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans), high bush
blackberry, goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Virginia- creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia),
ash, sweetgum, red maple, poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and wild onion (Allium
canadense).
Faunal species frequenting the maintained/disturbed roadside community will be largely
those species inhabiting the successional community.
B.2 Aquatic Communities
One aquatic community, Stoney Creek, will be impacted by the proposed project.
Physical characteristics of a water body and the condition of the water resource influence
faunal composition of aquatic communities. Terrestrial communities adjacent to a water
resource also greatly influence aquatic communities. No submersed or emergent aquatic
vegetation was observed within this section of Stoney Creek. Vegetation along the bank
of Stoney Creek includes river birch, water oak (Quercus nigra), cherry, black haw,
willow oak, green brier, American holly, ironwood, sweetgum, swamp tupelo, and
lizard's tail.
Fauna associated with these aquatic communities includes various invertebrate and
vertebrate species. Fish species likely to occur in Stoney Creek include minnows*
(Family Cyprinidae). Invertebrates that would be present include various species of
caddisflies (Trichoptera), mayflies (Ephemeroptera), dragonflies (Odonata), damselflies
(Odonata), amphipods* (Amphipoda), bivalves* (Bivalva), and water. striders*
(Gerridae).
9
B.3 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Construction of the proposed project will have various impacts on the biotic resources
described. Any construction related activities in or near these resources have the potential
to impact biological functions. This section quantifies and qualifies impacts to the
natural resources in terms of area impacted and ecosystems affected. Temporary and
permanent impacts are considered here as well.
Calculated impacts to terrestrial resources reflect the relative abundance of each
community present within the study area. Project construction will result in clearing and
degradation of portions of these communities. Table 1 summarizes potential quantitative
losses to these biotic communities resulting from project construction. Estimated impacts
are derived using the entire proposed ROW width of 24.4 m (80.0 ft). Usually, project
construction does not require the entire ROW, therefore, actual impacts may be
considerably less.
Table 1. Anticinated imnactc frnm the nrnnnced nrniert to hintir rnmmnnitiPC_
Permanent Project IM pacts
Community Types Wetland U land Totals
Successional Community -- .0.10 (0.04) 0.10 (0.04)
Riparian Community -- 0.17 (0.07) 0.17 (0.07)
Fresh Water Marsh Community 0.05 (0.02) -- 0.05 (0.02)
Cleared Area -- 0.84 (0.34) 0.84 (0.34)
Maintained Yard -- 0.05 (0.02) 0.05 (0.02)
Maintained/Disturbed Roadside -- 0.32 (0.13) 0.32 (0.13)
Stoney Creek 0.06 (0.03)-- -- 0.06 (0.03)
Total 0.11 (0.05) 1.48 (0.60) 1.59(0.65)
Note: Values cited are in acres (hectares).
Plant communities found within the proposed project area serve as nesting and sheltering
habitat for various wildlife species. Replacing Bridge No. 73 and its associated
improvements may reduce habitat for some faunal species. However, due to the size and
scope of this project, it is anticipated that impacts to fauna will be minimal.
Areas modified by construction (but not paved) will become road shoulders and early
succession habitat. Reduced habitat will displace some wildlife further from the roadway
while attracting other wildlife by the creation of an early succession habitat. Animals
temporarily displaced by construction activities may repopulate areas suitable for the
species.
Aquatic communities are sensitive to even small changes in their environment. Stream
channelization, scouring, siltation, sedimentation, and erosion from project-related work
would affect water quality and biological constituents. Although direct impacts may be
10
temporary, environmental impacts from these construction processes may result in long
term or irreversible effects.
Impacts often . associated with in-stream construction include increased
channelization and scouring of the streambed. In-stream construction alters the
stream substrate and may remove streamside vegetation at the site. Disturbances to
the substrate will produce siltation, which in excessive amounts may clog the gills
and/or feeding mechanisms of benthic organisms (sessile filter-feeders and deposit-
feeders), fish and amphibian species. Benthic organisms could also be covered by
excessive amounts of sediment. These organisms are slow to recover or repopulate a
stream. Due to the negative effects of siltation, it is recommended that silt curtains
be used during construction.
The removal of streamside vegetation and placement of fill material at the construction
site alters the terrain. Alterations of the streambank can enhance the likelihood of erosion
and sedimentation. Revegetation stabilizes and holds the soil thus mitigating these
processes. Erosion and sedimentation carry soils, toxic compounds, and other materials
into aquatic communities at the construction site. These processes increase turbidity and
can cause the formation of sandbars at the site and downstream, thereby altering water
flow and the growth of vegetation. Streamside clearing also leads to more direct sunlight
penetration and to elevations of water temperatures that may impact some species.
C. JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS
This section provides descriptions, inventories, and impact analysis pertinent to two
important issues; "waters of the United States" and rare and protected species.
C.1 Waters of the United States
Surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands fall under the broader category of "waters of
the United States" as defined in 22 CFR Part 328.3. Any action that proposes to dredge
or place fill material into surface waters or adjacent wetlands falls under the jurisdiction
of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(33 USC 1344). Surface waters include all standing or flowing waters that have
commercial or recreational value to the public. Wetlands are identified based on the
presence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and saturated or flooded conditions
during all or part of the growing season.
C.1.1 Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
Potential wetland communities were investigated pursuant to the 1987 Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. The three-parameter approach is used where
hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and prescribed hydrologic characteristics must all be
present for an area to be considered a wetland.
11
There are wetlands in the project area on both sides of Stoney Creek. According to
Cowardin's classification system, the Fresh Water Marsh Community is a PEM 1 C
wetland type (palustrine, emergent, persistent, seasonally flooded) (Cowardin et al, 1979).
The wetlands are of medium quality. Vegetation within the area includes lizard's tail,
soft rush, black willow, and arrow arum. Soils within these communities are as follows:
Data Point 1:
0 to 13 cm (0 to 5 in) - matrix color of 10YR 3/2 with 2.5YR 3/6 redoximorphic
features
13 to 30 cm. (5 to 12 in) - matrix color of 10YR 5/2 with 2.5YR 3/6 redoximorphic
features
Soil saturated within the upper 30 cm (12 in)
Hydrological characteristics for this area include waterstained leaves and drift lines.
Data Point 2:
0 to 10 cm (0 to 4 in) - matrix color of l OYR 5/4 with 2.5YR 3/6 gleying features
10 to 15 cm (4 to 6 in) - matrix color l OYR 6/8, no apparent redoximorphic features
15 to 23 cm (6 to 9 in) - matrix color l OYR 6/6, no apparent redoximorphic features
Below 23 cm (9 in) - matrix color l OYR 5/2, no apparent redoximorphic features
Soil saturated in the upper 30 cm (12 in)
Hydrological characteristics within this area includes drift lines, drainage patterns, water
stained leaves, and water marks on trees.
Stoney Creek is a jurisdictional surface water under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(33 USC 1344). Discussion of the biological, physical, and water quality aspects of all
surface waters in the project area are presented in previous sections of this report.
C.1.2 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Anticipated impacts to surface waters are determined by using the entire project ROW
width of 80.0 ft (24.4 m). Considering the proposed project, impacts to Stoney Creek
will consist of an 80 linear foot width and a 35.0 ft (10.7 m) long crossing of Stoney
Creek, for an area of 0.06 ac (0.03 ha). Usually, project construction does not require the
entire ROW, therefore actual surface water impacts may be considerably less. The total
area of wetlands impacted within the project area is 0.05 ac (0.02 ha).
C.1.3 Permits
As described above, impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated from the
proposed project. As a result, construction activities will require permits and
certifications from various regulatory agencies charged with protecting the water quality
of public water resources.
12
Nationwide Permit 23 (33 CFR 330.5(a) (23)) is likely to be applicable for all impacts to
"waters of the United States" resulting from the proposed project. This permit authorizes
activities undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated, funded, or financed in whole or part
by another federal agency or department where that agency or department has determined
that pursuant to the Council on Environmental Quality regulation for implementing the
procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
• the activity, work, or discharge is categorically excluded from environmental
documentation because it is included within a category of actions which neither
individually nor cumulatively have a 'significant effect on the human environment,
and
• the office of the Chief of Engineers has been furnished notice of the agency's or
department's application for the categorical exclusion and concurs with that
determination.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the DWQ prior to
the issuance of the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires that
the state issue or deny water certification for any federally permitted or licensed activity
that may result in a discharge to "waters of the United States." Section 401 Certification
allows surface waters to be temporarily impacted for the duration of the construction or
other land manipulation. The issuance of a 401 permit from the DWQ is a prerequisite to
issuance of a Section 404 permit.
Projects located within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin are subject to the recently-developed
Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rule, administered by the DWQ. These rules address loss of stream
channel buffers for field verified streams appearing on the USGS Topographic Quad
and/or the NRCS Soil Survey. Bridge construction is allowable provided that there are
"no practical alternatives". As this bridge replacement project is currently proposed,
it is allowable under the Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rule. However, a written authorization
is required from the DWQ. A request to the DWQ for the authorization should be
included in the cover letter of the permit application package.
C.1.4 Bridge Demolition
Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603 is located over Stoney Creek in Nash County. The
superstructure is composed of reinforced concrete deck and rails on steel beams. The
substructure is composed of concrete caps on timber piles. Removal of the bridge
superstructure and timber piles should occur without dropping any of the components into
the Waters of the United States. However, there is the potential for components of the
concrete caps to drop into the Waters of the United States during construction. The
resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete caps is approximately 19 yd3 (14.2
m3).
13
C.1.5 Mitigation
The COE has adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a wetland
mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and
sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical,
biological, and physical integrity of "waters of the United States," specifically wetlands.
Mitigation of wetland impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include avoiding impacts
(to wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and
compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these three aspects (avoidance,
minimization, and compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially.
C.1.5.1 Avoidance
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting
impacts to "waters of the United States." According to a 1990 Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the COE,
in determining "appropriate and practicable" measures to offset unavoidable impacts,
such measures should be appropriate to the scope and degree of those impacts and
practicable in terms of cost, existing technology and logistics in light of overall project
purposes. Due to the fact that this is a bridge replacement project, avoidance is not
possible.
C.1.5.2 Minimization
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the
adverse impacts to "waters of the United States." Implementation of these steps :will be
required through project modifications and permit conditions. Minimization typically
focuses on decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction of
median widths, ROW widths, fill slopes and/or road shoulder widths. Other practical
mechanisms to minimize impacts to "waters of the United States" crossed by the
proposed project include: strict enforcement of sedimentation control BMP's for the
protection of surface waters during the entire life of the project; reduction of clearing and
grubbing activity; reduction/elimination of direct discharge into streams; reduction of
runoff velocity; re-establishment of vegetation on exposed areas; judicious pesticide and
herbicide usage; minimization of "in-stream" activity; and litter/debris control. Wetland
impacts are minimized in this project by not building the replacement bridge or the
temporary detour bridge on the west side of the existing bridge.
C.1.5.3 Compensatory Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated impacts to "waters
of the United States" have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent
practicable. It is recognized that "no net loss of wetlands" functions and values may not
be achieved in each and every permit action. Appropriate and practicable compensatory
14
mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse impacts that remain after all appropriate
and practicable minimization has been performed. Compensatory actions often include
restoration, creation, and enhancement of "waters of the United States." Such actions
should be undertaken in areas adjacent to or contiguous to the discharge site whenever
possible. Compensatory mitigation is not usually necessary with a Nationwide Permit
No. 23.
C.2 Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of flora and fauna have been in, or are in, the process of decline either
due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human activities. Federal law
(under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended) requires that
any action, likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally protected, be subject
to review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Other species may receive
additional protection under separate state laws.
C.2.1 Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under the
provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. As of 25 February 2003, the FWS lists the following federally protected
species for Nash County. A brief description of the characteristics and habitat
requirements for these species along with a conclusion regarding potential project impacts
follows Table 2.
Table 2. Federally Proteeted Cneripe fnr Nuch i'nunty
Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker Endangered
Alasmidonta heterodon Dwarf wed emussel Endangered
Elli do steinstansana Tar River in ussel Endangered
nnum crcu is uerumeu as a species that is threateneo with extinction throughout all or a significant portion
of its range.
Picoides borealis (red-cockaded woodpecker) Endangered
Animal Family: Picidae
Date Listed: 13 October 1970
The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) once occurred from New Jersey to southern
Florida and west to eastern Texas. It occurred inland in Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas,
Oklahoma, and Missouri. The RCW is now found only in coastal states of its historic
range and inland in southeastern Oklahoma and southern Arkansas. In North Carolina
moderate populations occur in the sandhills and southern coastal plain. The few
populations found in the Piedmont and northern coastal plain are believed to be relics of
former populations.
15
The adult RCW has a plumage that is entirely black and white except for small red
streaks on the sides of the nape in the male. The back of the RCW is black and white
with horizontal stripes. The breast and underside of this woodpecker are white with
streaked flanks. The RCW has a large white cheek patch surrounded by the black cap,
nape, and throat.
The RCW uses open old growth stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine
(Pinus palustris), for foraging and nesting habitat. A forested stand must contain at least
50% pine, lack a thick understory, and be contiguous with other stands to be appropriate
habitat for the RCW. These birds nest exclusively in trees that are greater than 60 years
old and are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age. The foraging range of the
RCW is up to 500 ac (200 ha). This acreage must be contiguous with suitable nesting
sites.
These woodpeckers nest exclusively in living pine trees and usually in trees that are
infected with the fungus that causes red-heart disease. Cavities are located in colonies
from 12-100 ft (3.6-30.3 m) above the ground and average 30-50 ft (9.1-15.7 m) high.
They can be identified by a large incrustation of running sap that surrounds the tree. The
incrustation of sap is believed to be used as a defense by the RCW against possible
predators. A colony of woodpeckers usually consists of one breeding pair and the
offspring from previous years. The RCW lays its eggs in April, May, and June; the eggs
hatch approximately 38 days later. Clutch size ranges in number from three to five eggs.
All members of the colony share the raising of the young. Red-cockaded woodpeckers
feed mainly on insects but may feed on seasonal wild fruits.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
The mature, open pine stands that the RCW needs are not present in the project area. The
pines that exist in the project area are not mature enough and do not contain the large
open tracts of foraging habitat required by the RCW. The North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program database was checked on March 29, 2001 and there were no records of
existing populations of RCW in the project area. No habitat for RCW exists in the project
area. Thus, no impacts to RCW will occur from project construction.
Alasmidonta heterodon (Dwarf wedge mussel) Endangered
Animal Family: Unionidae
Date Listed: 14 March 1990
The dwarf wedge mussel is a small mussel having a distinguishable shell noted by two
lateral teeth on the right half and one on the left half. The periostracum (outer shell) is
olive green to dark brown in color and the nacre (inner shell) is bluish to silvery white.
Known populations of the dwarf wedge mussel in North Carolina are found in Middle
Creek and the Little River of the Neuse River Basin and in the upper Tar River and
16
Cedar, Crooked, and Stoney Creeks of the Tar River system. The dwarf wedge mussel
inhabits creek and river areas with a slow to moderate current and a sand, gravel, or
muddy bottom. This mussel is sensitive to agricultural, domestic, and industrial pollutants
and requires a stable silt free stream bed with well oxygenated water to survive.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NOT LIKELY TO ADVERSLY AFFECT
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database was checked on March 29,
2001 and there were no records of existing populations of the Dwarf wedge mussel in the
project area. A mussel survey was made on September 12, 2002 by NC DOT Technical
Specialist, John Alderman. No federally listed species were found and habitat quality for
the listed species was poor throughout most of the surveyed area.
Elliptio steinstansana (Tar River spinymussel) Endangered
Animal Family: Unionidae
Date Listed: 29 July 1985
The Tar River spinymussel is endemic to the Tar River drainage basin, from Falkland in
Pitt County to Spring Hope in Nash County. Populations of the Tar River spinymussel
can be found in streams of the Tar River Drainage Basin and of the Swift Creek Drainage
Sub-Basin.
This mussel requires a stream with fast flowing, well. oxygenated, relatively silt free,
circumneutral pH water, and a stream bottom composed of uncompacted gravel and
coarse sand. This mussel is known to rely on some species of freshwater fish as
intermediate hosts for its larvae.
The Tar River spinymussel is a very small mussel named for spines which project
perpendicularly from its surface and curve slightly ventrally. As many as 12 spines can
be found on the shell which is generally smooth in texture. The nacre is pinkish (anterior)
and bluish-white (posterior).
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NOT LIKELY TO ADVERSLY AFFECT
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database was checked on March 29,
2001 and there were no records of existing populations of the Tar River spinymussel in
the project area. A mussel survey was made on September 12, 2002 by NC DOT
Technical Specialist, John Alderman. No federally listed species were found and habitat
quality for the listed species was poor throughout most of the surveyed area.
C.2.2 Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species
There are eight Federal Species of Concern listed by the FWS for Nash County. Federal
Species of Concern are not afforded federal protection under the Endangered Species Act
17
and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally
proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. However, the status of these species is
subject to change, and so should be included for consideration. Federal Species of
Concern (FSC) are defined as a species that is under consideration for listing but for
which there is insufficient information to support listing. In addition, organisms, which
are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) by the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program list of Rare Plant and Animal Species, are afforded
state protection under the NC State Endangered Species Act and the NC Plant Protection
and Conservation Act of 1979.
Table 3 lists federal species of concern, the state status of these species (if afforded state
protection), and the potential for suitable habitat in the project area for each species. This
species list is provided for information purposes as the protection status of these species
may be upgraded in the future. Surveys for these species were not conducted during the
site visit, nor were any of these species observed. A review of the NCNHP database on
March 29, 2001 of rare species and unique habitats revealed no records of endangered,
threatened, or federal species of concern within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) project study area
Table 3. Federal Snecies of Concern for Nash County
Scientific Name Common Name State
Status Habitat
Present
L thrurus matutinus Pinewoods shiner SR** yes
Elli do lanceolata Yellow lance - T yes
Fusconaia masoni Atlantic i oe T yes
Lam sills cariosa Yellow lam mussel T yes
Lasmi ona subviridis Green floater E yes
S eria diana Diana fritillazy butterfly SR** yes
Lilium iridollae Sandhills bog lily T* no
Trillium usillum var. usillum Carolina least trillium E no
"E"--An Endangered species is one whose continued existence as a viable component of the State's flora is
determined to be in jeopardy.
"T"--A Threatened species is one which is likely to become endangered species within
the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
"SR"-A Significantly Rare species is one which is very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20
populations in the state, generally substantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction, direct
exploitation or disease. The species is generally more common elsewhere in its range, occurring
peripherally in North Carolina.
* - Historic record - the species was last observed in the county more than 20 years ago.
**-Obscure record - the date the species was last observed is uncertain.
18

VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject. to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at Title 36 CFR
Part 800. Section 106 requires Federal agencies to take into account the effect of their
undertakings (federally funded, licensed, or permitted) on properties included in or
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and afford the Advisory
Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings.
B. Historic Architecture
On December 5, 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviewed the
subject project. Subsequently, the SHPO recommended no architectural surveys be
conducted in connection with this project (see attachment).
C. Archaeology
On December 5, 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviewed the
subject project. Subsequently, the SHPO recommended no archaeological surveys be
conducted in connection with this project (see attachment).
VII. GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate
bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
The project is considered to be a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope
and lack of substantial environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or
natural environment with the use of the current North Carolina Department of
Transportation standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No
change in land use is expected to result from the construction of the project.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of-Way acquisition
will be limited. No relocatees are expected with implementation of the proposed
alternative.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected
to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
19
The proposed project will not require right-of-way acquisition or easement from any land
protected under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966.
This project has been coordinated with the United States Natural Resources Conservation
Service. The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their
representatives to consider the potential impact to prime farmland " of all land acquisition
and construction projects. There are no soils classified as prime, unique, or having state
or local importance in the vicinity of the project. Therefore, the project will not involve
the direct conversion of farmland acreage within these classifications.
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included in the
regional emissions analysis and a project level CO analysis is not required. If vegetation
is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local
laws and regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality
in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520. This evaluation completes the assessment
requirements for air quality (1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the National
Environmental Policy Act) and no additional reports are required.
The project will not substantially increase traffic volumes. Therefore, it will not have
substantial impact on noise levels. Temporary noise increases may occur during
construction. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway traffic
noise of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), Part 772 and no additional reports
are required.
An examination of records at the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section and the North
Carolina Department of Human Resources, Solid Waste Management Section revealed no
underground storage tanks or hazardous waste sites in the project area.
Nash County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program. There are no
practical alternatives to crossing the floodplain area. Any shift in alignment will result in
an impact area of about the same magnitude. The proposed project is not anticipated to
increase the level or extent of upstream flood potential.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that- no substantial adverse
environmental impacts will result from implementation of the project.
20

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
NASH COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE 73 ON SR 1603
OVER STONEY CREEK
B-3879
Figure One
Looking North toward the Bridge
-3879 FIGURE Looking North from the Bridge

Looking South from the Bridge
-,7g
FIGURE 3B
LLooking at Downstream, sire the Bridge

United States Department of the-Interior
FISH. AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27630726
May 14, 2003
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development-and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North.Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:

This letter is in response to your letter of April 29, 2003 providing the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) with notification of a design change for the replacement of Bridge No. 73 on
SR 1603 over Stoney Creek in Nash County (TIP No. B-3879). The design change has occurred
since the Service provided its October 9, 2002 letter concurring that the project is not likely to
adversely affect the federally-endangered dwarf wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and the
Tar spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana). The Service finds that the design changes are minimal
and will not change our initial concurrence. These comments are provided in accordance with
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions
regarding ouaresponse, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincerely,

Garland B. Pardue, Ph.D.
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc: Mike Bell, USACE, Washington, NC
David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington, NC
John Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmore, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC
;OCEI v O
M4Y 16 2003
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Feld Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolitia 276363726
October 9, 2002
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:

0CT = 2002 =
OV
=2
r
YYP° ?
t?,, l DEYE?? `yg
This letter is in response to your letter of October 3, 2002 providing the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) with the biological conclusion of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) that the replacement of Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603 over Stoney Creek
in Nash County (TIP No. B-3879) is not likely to adversely affect the federally-endangered dwarf
wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and the Tar spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana). These
comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
According to the information you submitted, a mussel survey was conducted at the project site
on September 12, 2002. The survey was conducted 100 meters upstream and 300 meters
downstream of SR 1603. Neither of the federally listed species was found, and habitat quality
for the two species was poor throughout much of the surveyed area. However, the dwarf wedge
mussel has been found in Stoney Creek several miles upstream near SR 1302.
During an informal on-site meeting held on September 24, 2002, several environmental
commitments were discussed and agreed upon by all parties. These environmental commitments
are listed in Joel Johnson's September 24, 2002 memo to the NCDOT B-3879 Project File,
which was included as an attachment to your October 3, 2002 letter to us.
Based on the mussel survey results, and provided that NCDOT adheres to the stated
environmental commitments, the Service concurs with your conclusion that the proposed bridge
replacement is not likely to adversely affect the dwarf wedge mussel and Tar spinymussel. We
believe that the requirements of section 7 (a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied. We remind you
that obligations under section 7 consultation must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals
impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not
previously considered in this review; (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that
was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat determined that
may be affected by the identified action.

The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions
regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
<; jZx ??
Garland B. Pardue, Ph.D.
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc: Eric Alsmeyer,. USACE, Raleigh, NC
John Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
David Cox, NCWRC, Northside, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC
.,
•y r
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
ichael F. Easley, Governor
sbeth C. Evans, Secretary
March 26, 2001
MEMORANDUM
Jeffrey
To: William D. Gilmore, PE, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
From David Brook `U Ugs?-
Deputy State Histo 'c Preservation Officer
Re: Replacement of Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603 over tributary of
Stoney Creek, TIP No. B-3879, Nash County, ER 01-7936
On December 5, 2000, April Montgomery of our staff met with the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds
concerning the above project. She reported our available information on historic
architectural and archaeological surveys and resources along with our
recommendations. NCDOT provided project area and aerial photographs at the
meeting,. Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed
at the meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project
In terms of historic architectural resources we are aware of two historic structures
located within the area of potential effect. We recommend that no historic
architectural survey be conducted for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the project area. Based on our
present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which
maybe eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, will be
affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that no
archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project
MAY 2'7 0003 ,-=
Having provided this information, we look forward to the receipt of either a
Categorical Exclusion or Environmental Assessment, which indicates how NCDOT
addressed our comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
u , t) ??`, s15d r-?
P F
?G?1 uE?
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
dministration 507 N. Blount St. Raleigh. NC 4617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone].733-8653
irstion 515 N. 13lount St. Raleigh . NC 4613 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801
& Planning 515 N. Blount St. Rakich. NC 4618 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4613 (919) 7334763 •715-4801

Page 2
William Gilmore
March 26, 2001
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have any questions
concerning the above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental
- Review Coordinator, at 919 733-4763.
DB:kgc
cc: Mary Pope Furr
C"
,y =s.

Jphrn tt-
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 38726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636.3726
April 15, 2004
Phil Harris
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Harris:
C)q 1 zo 3
,AJ075?,)
This letter is in response to your letter of April 1, 2004 which provided the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) with the biological conclusion of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation that the replacement of Bridge No. 73 on SR 1603 over Stoney Creek in Nash
County (TIP No. B-3879) may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the federally threatened
bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). These comments are provided in accordance with section
7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531- 1543).
According to the information you submitted, a walking visual search was conducted within a one
mile radius of the project site on March 25, 2004. No eagles or eagle nests were observed.
Based on the information provided and other available information, the Service concurs with
your conclusion that the proposed bridge replacement may'affect, but is not likely to adversely
affect the bald eagle. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been
satisfied for this species. We remind you that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by this identified action.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions
regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
7??
Garland B. Pardue, Ph.D.
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc: Mike Bell, USACE, Washington, NC
John Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC