WQ0002648_Monitoring - 07-2020_20200819

GW-59A COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM Permit #
(Submit one each monitoring period with GW-59 forms.)
I
Enter date monitoring results were due. (1-Q0910 ) Will this monitoring report (GW-59 and GW-59A)
OV
NO
be submitted after the established due date?
2
Was any required information missing on the GW-59 report forms?
YES
IF the answer to question 1 or 2 is "YES", list in the space provided below the well identification number(s) and
explain the problems encountered in obtaining the required information.
3
Are any of the monitor wells in need of repair or maintenance (damaged casing, unlocked or missing cap, missing
YES
identification plate, area overgrown, etc.)? If the answer is "Yes", contact the Regional Office for guidance.
4
Are any monitored constituents equal to or above the established standards?_
NO
If the answer to question 4 is "NO", skip to section B. Io
If the answer to question 4 is "YES" list the affected wells individually with constituent(s) and .confthtration(s)
exceeding standards in the space provided below: cr.)0 o_
PV ` of D-5 .So� n�1/
/ �.:
L Q
5
For the constituents identified in question 4 above, have standards been exceeded previously for the w
YES
O
same constituent(s) in the same well(s) in the last two years? -
If the answer to question 5 is "NO", skip to section 8.
If the answer to question 5 is "YES", list in the space provided below, each well with constituent(s) exceeding
standards, concentration(s) reported, and sample collection date for each occurrenceor the last two years).
C-J
CJ
:V
Are the monitoring wells listed in section 5 located at or beyond the review bounjary?
YES
NO
If the answer is "YES", a groundwater quality problem may be occurring. CONTACT THE REGIONAL
OFFICE IMMEDIATELY FOR GUIDANCE. If the answer is "NO", monitoring wells may be improperly
located; contact the Regional Office.
7
Is the permittee implementing previously approved actions required by the Division involving this
YES
NO
groundwater quality problem?
If the answer to question 7 is "YES", describe those actions in the space provided below.
If the answer to question 7 is "NO", contact the Regional Office within 90 days; an evaluation may be
required to determine the impact the waste disposal system is having at the review and compliance
boundaries surrounding this facility. Failure to do so may subject the permittee to a Notice of Violation,
fines, and/or penalties.
g
The person completing this portion (GW-59A) of the monitoring report should sign below and submit this
form with GW-59 forms for required wells to the address provided at the top of the current GW-59 form.
I hereby acknowledge that the above information was evaluated and the information submitted in this
report (Compliance Report GW-59A) is true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Aidur,of �Pemittee
(or Authorized Agent) Date
GW-59A 12/8/2003

SUBMIT FORM ON YELLOW PAPER ONLY
.
00
. .
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT 8 NATURAL RESOURCES'
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY4NFORMATION PROCESSING UNIT
COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 276994617 Phono: [phone]
FACILITY INFORMATION
Please Print Clearly or Type
PERMIT Number: W00002648 Expiration Date: 09/30/2020
Facility Name: Seagrove -Utah Metropolitan Water District
Non -Discharge UIC
Permit Name (if different):
NPDES Other
Facility Address: P. 0. Box 370
TYPE OF PERMITTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
Seagrove NC
27341
County Randolph
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation: Infiltration Gallery
❑■ Spray Field ❑ Remediation:
Contact Person: Larry Chilton
Telephone#:
❑ Rotary Distributor ❑ Land Application of Sludge
Well Location/Site Name:
No. of wells to be sampled:
3
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑ Other:
(from Permit)
SAMPLING INFORMATION
If WELL
WELL ID NUMBER (from Permit): MW-1
Date sample collected: 07/02/20
FIELD ANALYSES:
WAS
Well Depth: 90.8 ft.
Well Diameter: 4 in.
pH 00400: 6.71 units Temp. 00010: 20.5 °C
DRY at
Depth to Water Level 82546: 37 ft. below measuring point
Screened Interval: ft.
to ft. Spec. Cond. 00094: µMhos
—
time of
sampling,
Measuring Point is 2.0 ft. above land surface
Relative M.P. Elevation:
ft. Odor 00085:
check
Volume of water pumped/bailed before sampling:
106
gallons
Appearance
here: ❑
Samples for metals were collected unfiltered: 91 YES El
NO and field acidified: ® YES
El NO
LABORATORY INFORMATION
Date sample analyzed: 07/02-22/20
Laboratory Name: Cameron Testing
Services Certification No. #654
PARAMETERS NOTE: Values should reflect dissolved and
colloidal concentrations.
COD 00335
mg/L
Nitrite (NO2) as N 00615
mg/L Pb - Lead 01051 ug/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 <1
/100mL
Nitrate (NO3) as N 00620 0.086
mg/L Zn - Zinc 01092 mg/L
Coliform: MF Total 31504
/100mL Phosphorus: Total as P 00665 0.193
mg/L
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Orthophosphate 70507
mg/L Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
issolved Solids:Total 70300 95.0
mg/L
Al -Aluminum 01105
mg/L Sodium 10.6 mg/L
pH (Lab) 00403
units
Ba - Barium 01007
ug/L
TOC 00680 <1.00
mg/L
Ca - Calcium 00916
mg/L
Chloride 00940 10.8
mg/L
Cd - Cadmium 01027
ug/L
Arsenic 01002
ug/L
Chromium: Total 01034
ug/L
Grease and Oils 00552
mg/L
Cu - Copper 01042
mg/L ORGANICS: (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
Phenol 32730
ug/L
Fe - Iron 01045
ug/L (Specify test and method #. ATTACH LAB REPORT.)
Sulfate 00945 <2.9
mg/L
Hg - Mercury 71900
ug/L Lab Report Attached? ❑ Yes (1) ❑■ No (0)
pecific Conductance 00095
µMhos
K - Potassium 00937
mg/L VOC 78732: method # 8260B
Total Ammonia 00610 <0.100
mg/L
Mg - Magnesium 00927
mg/L method #
(Ammonia Nitrogen, NH3 as N, Ammonia Nitrogen, Total)
Mn -Manganese oloss
uglL ,method #
TKN as N 00625
mg/L
Ni - Nickel 01067
ug/L method #
For Remediation Systems Only (Attach Lab Reports): Influent Total VOCs: mg/L Effluent Total VOCs: mg/L VOC Removal%

SUBMIT FORM ON YELLOW PAPER ONLY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY -INFORMATION PROCESSING UNIT
COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617 Phone: [phone]
FACILITY INFORMATION
Please Print Clearly or Type
PERMIT Number: W00002648 Expiration Date: 09/30/2020
Facility Name: Seagrove -Utah Metropolitan Water District
Non -Discharge UIC
Permit Name (if different):
NPDES Other
Facility Address: P. 0. Box 370
TYPE OF PERMITTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
Seagrove NC
27341
County Randolph
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation: Infiltration Gallery
❑■ Spray Field ❑ Remediation:
Contact Person: Larry Chilton
Telephone#:
❑ Rotary Distributor ❑ Land Application of Sludge
Well Location/Site Name:
No. of wells to be sampled:
3
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑ Other:
(from Permit)
SAMPLING INFORMATION
If WELL
WELL ID NUMBER (from Permit): MW-2
Date sample collected: 07/02/20
FIELD ANALYSES:
WAS
Well Depth: 29.6 ft.
Well Diameter: 4 in.
pH 00400: 5.91 units Temp. 000lo: 17.1 °C
DRY at
Depth to Water Level 62546: 15.9 ft. below measuring point
Screened Interval: ft.
to _ft.
Spec. Cond. 000sa: µMhos
time ofsampling,
Measuring Point is 1.0 ft. above land surface
Relative M.P. Elevation:
ft.
Odor 00085:
check
Volume of water pumped/bailed before sampling:
27
gallons
Appearance
here:
Samples for metals were collected unfiltered: 91 YES ❑
NO and field acidified: ® YES
❑ NO
LABORATORY INFORMATION
Date sample analyzed: 07/02-22/20
Laboratory Name: Cameron Testing
Services
Certification No. #654 / 591
PARAMETERS NOTE: Values should reflect dissolved and colloidal concentrations.
COD 00335
mg/L
Nitrite (NO2) as N 00615
mg/L
Pb - Lead 01051 ug/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 <1
/100mL
Nitrate (NO3) as N 00620 4.99
mg/L
Zn - Zinc 01092 mg/L
Coliform: MF Total 31504
/100mL Phosphorus: Total as P 00665 0.786
mg/L
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Orthophosphate 70507
mg/L
Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
ssolved Solids:Total 70300 528
mg/L
Al -Aluminum ol1o5
mg/L
Sodium 76.7 mg/L
pH (Lab) 00403
units
Ba - Barium 01007
ug/L
TOC 00680 <1.00
mg/L
Ca - Calcium 00916
mg/L
Chloride 00940 125
mg/L
Cd - Cadmium 01027
ug/L
Arsenic 01002
ug/L
Chromium: Total 01034
ug/L
Grease and Oils 00552
mg/L
Cu - Copper 01042
mg/L
ORGANICS: (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
Phenol 32730
ug/L
Fe - Iron 01045
ug/L
(Specify test and method #. ATTACH LAB REPORT.)
Sulfate 00945 71
mg/L
Hg - Mercury 71900
ug/L
Lab Report Attached? ❑ Yes (1) X No (0)
Specific Conductance 00095
NMhos
K - Potassium 00937
mg/L
VOC 76732: method # 8260B
Total Ammonia 00610 <0.100
mg/L
Mg - Magnesium 00927
mg/L
method #
(Ammonia Nitrogen. NH3asN. Ammonia Nitrogen, Total)
Mn - Manganese o1055
ug/L
, method #
TKN as N 00625
mg/L
Ni - Nickel 01067
ug/L
method #
For Remediation Systems Only (Attach Lab Reports): Influent Total VOCs: mg/L Effluent Total VOCs: mg/L VOC Removal%
Pe mitten a (or Authorized Agent) Name and Title - Please print or type
GW-59 Rev.212010

SUBMIT FORM ON YELLOW PAPER ONLY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY -INFORMATION PROCESSING UNIT
COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM
,
• • •
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699-1617 Phone: [phone]
FACILITY INFORMATION
Please Print Clearly or Type
PERMIT Number: W00002648 Expiration Date: 09/30/2020
Facility Name: Seagrove-Ulah Metropolitan Water District
Non -Discharge UIC
Permit Name (if different):
NPDES Other
Facility Address: P. 0. Box 370
TYPE OF PERMITTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
Seagrove NC
27341 County Randolph
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation: Infiltration Gallery
0 Spray Field ❑ Remediation:
Contact Person: Larry Chilton
Telephone#:
❑ Rotary Distributor ❑ Land Application of Sludge
Well Location/Site Name:
No. of wells to be sampled:
3
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑ Other:
(from Perrnrt
SAMPLING INFORMATION
If WELL
WELL ID NUMBER (from Permit): MW-3
Date sample collected: 07/02/20
FIELD ANALYSES:
WAS
Well Depth: 25.6 ft.
Well Diameter: 4 in.
pH oo400: 5.93 units Temp. 00010: 17.1 °C
DRY at
Depth to Water Level 62546: 17 ft. below measuring point Screened Interval: ft.
to _ft. Spec. Cond. 000sa: µMhos
time ofsampling.
Measuring Point is 2.0 ft. above land surface
Relative M.P. Elevation:
ft. Odor 00065:
check
Volume of water pumped/bailed before sampling:
18
gallons
Appearance
here:
Samples for metals were collected unfiltered: W1 YES
❑ NO and field acidified: ® YES
❑ NO
LABORATORY INFORMATION
Date sample analyzed: 07/02-22/20
Laboratory Name: Cameron Testing
Services Certification No. #654
PARAMETERS NOTE: Values should reflect dissolved and colloidal concentrations.
COD 00335
mg/L
Nitrite (NO2) as N 00615
mg/L Pb - Lead 01051 ug/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 <1
/100mL
Nitrate (NO3) as N 00620 5.70
mg/L Zn - Zinc 01092 mg/L
Coliform: MF Total 31504
/100mL
Phosphorus: Total as P 00665 0.266
mg/L
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Orthophosphate 70507
mg/L Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
Dissolved Solids:Total 70300 478
mg/L
Al - Aluminum oilo5
mg/L Sodium 56.4 mg/L
pH (Lab) 00403
units
Ba - Barium 01007
ug/L
TOC 00680 <1.00
mg/L
Ca - Calcium 00916
mg/L
Chloride 00940 106
mg/L
Cd - Cadmium 01027
ug/L
Arsenic 01002
ug/L
Chromium: Total 01034
ug/L
Grease and Oils 00552
mg/L
Cu - Copper 01042
mg/L ORGANICS: (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
Phenol 32730
ug/L
Fe - Iron 01045
ug/L (Specify test and method #. ATTACH LAB REPORT.)
Sulfate 00945 24
mg/L
Hg - Mercury 71900
ug/L Lab Report Attached? ❑ Yes (1) ❑■ No (0)
Specific Conductance 00095
µMhos
K - Potassium 00937
mg/L VOC 78732: method # 8260B
Total Ammonia 00610 <0.100
mg/L
Mg - Magnesium 00927
mg/L method #
(Ammonia Nitrogen. NH3as N. Ammonia Nitrogen, Total)
Mn -Manganese oloss
ug/L ,method #
TKN as N 00625
mg/L
Ni - Nickel 01067
ug/L method #
For Remediation Systems Only (Attach Lab Reports): Influent Total VOCs: mg/L Effluent Total VOCs: mg/L VOC Removal%
MC.N4rl T (,d41kr"R.
Permittee (or Authorized Agent) Name and Title - Please print or type

Summary of Monitored Constituents Exceeding Standard
Seagrove Ulah Metropolitan Water District
DATES EXCEEDING CLASS GA
MONITORING MONITORED ESTABLISHED CONCENTRATIONS GROUNDWATER
WELL ID CONSTITUENT STANDARDS REPORTED STANDARD
MW-2 ITotal Dissolved Solids 07/02/20 1528 me/L 500 me/L
Page 1 of 5

Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Laboratory Report
Client: Seagrove Ulah CTS Proj.
Project: July 2020 MWs Regulatory
g ry
Sample Information
Sampled C. Cameron Date 07/02/20 Received
Analyses and Results
NC DENR #654
NC PHHS #37799
US EPA #NC01918
2007-022
Yes Page 1 of 2
C. Cameron Date 07/02/20
x CL n
Lab ID Sample ID
Analyte
Result
a
�
L- Std. Methods
o
:3 Reference
2007-022 01 MW 1 Gw Gr
Total Dissolved
a
Solids
95.0
mg/L
25
07/06/20
2540 C - TDS
Chloride
10.8
mg/L
0.01
07/08/20
4500 Cl- D
Sulfate
<2.9
mg/1
2.9
07/09/20
EPA 300.0
Nitrate as N
0.086
mg/L
0.05
07/07/20
4500 NO3 - E
Total Ammonia
<0.100
mg/L
0.1
07/09/20
4500 NH3 - D
Phosphorus: Total
as P
0 .193
mg/L
o.os
07/07/20
4500 P - B/E
Sodium
10.6
mg/L
8
07/22/20
EPA 200.8
Fec. Coliform-W
<1
cFu
/1oomL
1
07/02/20
9222 D - MF
TOC
<1.00
mg/L
1
07/18/20
5310 B2000
02 MW 2 Gw Gr
Total Dissolved
528
mgg/L
25
07/06/20
2540 C - TDS
Chloride
125
mg/L
0.01
07/08/20
4500 Cl- D
Sulfate
71
mg/1
2.9
07/09/20
EPA 300.0
Nitrate as N
4.99
mg/L
0.05
07/07/20
4500 NO3 - E
Total Ammonia
<0.100
mg/L
0.1
07/09/20
4500 NH3 - D
Phosphorus: Total
as P
0 .786
mg/L
o.os
07/07/20
4500 P - B/E
Sodium
76.7
mg/L
8
07/22/20
EPA 200.8
Fec. Coliform-W
<1
CFu
/100mL
1
07/02/20
9222 D - MF
TOC
<1.00
mg/L
1
07/18/20
5310 B2000
Sulfate analyzed by ENCO, Cary, NC; report attached.
219 S. Steele Str. 919-721-4067
Sanford NC 27330 919-208-4240
[e-mail]

Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Laboratory Report
Client: Seagrove Ulah CTS Proj.
Project: July 2020 MWs Regulatory
9 y
Sample Information
Sampled C. Cameron Date 07/02/20 Received
Analyses and Results
NC DENR #654
NC PHHS #37799
US EPA #NC01918
2007-022
Yes Page 1 of 2
C. Cameron Date 07/02/20
as
Lab ID Sample ID o '�
Analyte
Result
'�
c
° Y
E
V)
d
m
_ Std. Methods
Z V
M
R o
Reference
2007-022 03 M W 3 cW or
Total Dissolved
ac
Solids
478
mg/L
25
07/06/20
2540 C - TDS
Chloride
106
mg/L
0.01
07/08/20
4500 Cl- D
Sulfate
24
mg/1
2.9
07/09/20
EPA 300.0
Nitrate as N
5.70
mg/L
0.05
07/07/20
4500 NO3 - E
Total Ammonia
<0.100
mg/L
0.1
07/09/20
4500 NH3 - D
Phosphorus: Total
as P
0.266
mg/L
0.05
07/07/20
4500 P - B/E
Sodium
56.4
mg/L
e
07/22/20
EPA 200.8
Fee. Coliform-W
<1
CFU
/toOmL
1
07/02/20
9222 D - MF
TOC
<1.00
mg/L
1
07/18/20
5310 B2000
Sulfate analyzed by ENCO, Cary, NC; report attached.
Report
Review
Project Manager Date
219 S. Steele Str. 919-721-4067
Sanford NC 27330 919-208-4240
chris q camerontesting.conl

219 S. Steele Str.
Sanford, NC 27330 Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Chain of Custody
Phone: [phone] NC WW/GW Cert. #654 NC PHHS Cert # 37799 US EPA NC01918 Page of —�
Company: Seagrove/Ulah Met.Water Dist. !Email: o
CTS lab use
Contact: — -- Sample -
Larry Chlton Phone: � ple Temp Proj. ID a' `1
Address (City, P. O. BOX 370 Fax: --- - —
Ice (Y/N)
State, Zip) - - - -- --- - i
samples colleceted in Mar., July, Nov.
i - - -
Seagrove, NC 27641 I Notes:
Permit (Y/N)
I
Project: n CZ c \
�'� R t. t ush (Y/N) Due:
Sample j /1 �
Collecion: Name: ( l '
��,5 l_._ Signature:
c
Sample Information Number of bottles + preservative Require esting na ysis
Client Sample 0) Q .0 5 z CTS
p ` w a o 0 0- N Preservatives: (U)npreserved, H(C)I,
I� j j= 10 0 I � i a, � M L � oa � H2(S)04, H(N)03, (Na)Thiosulfate, Sample
> Na(0)H, (P)hosphoric, Other (X), Indicate ID
MW-1 1 U 1 U 02, SO4
� 4'S
t i - C N
1 S __�—+ -- r-- -- - - fJ
I
MW-2
0`i53
— NH3,NOX,TP, ---- �f'
M W-3 ' -
----I 1 Na I I Fec-W
--- - -- ---- - Na
— -- — - -- -- -- — ---I-- _ I 1 1 p TOC - - - - ---
- - ----, — -- ! 1 C
' ; VOC (Nov. only)
- -- --
-- _
Bottle set for all samples Analyses for all samples
� � I
1
tel'n ui he Received:
Date/Time
Rush work will require prior approval. Additional charges will apply

ENCO Laborat-o'
nes-
Accurate, Timely. Responsive. Innovative,
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Thursday, July 16, 2020
Cameron Testing Services, Inc. (CA039)
Attn: Maryanne Sims
219 South Steele Street
Sanford, NC 27330
RE: Laboratory Results for
Project Number: [none], Project Name/Desc: July MWs
ENCO Workorder(s): CD10948
Dear Maryanne Sims,
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on
Monday, July 6, 2020.
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures.
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative if applicable. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full, without the written approval of the Laboratory.
This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
•
Bill Scott
Project Manager
Enclosure(s)
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page T of 4

L
tion:MW-1
trix: Ground Water
ject: July MWS
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 5911
Anatvte rcA N „„ti .i
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Lab Sample ID:CD10948-01
Sampled:07/02/20 09:45
Sampled By: Client
E=NCO
www.encolabs.com
Received: 07/06/20 11:32
Work Order: CD10948
Result Flaa Units PF � Batch e
Sulfate as 504 [14808-79-8]^ 2 9 0 Method Analyzed ]iy Notes
mg/L 1 2.9 5.0 0GO8037 EPA 300.0 07/09/20 02:47 UI
Description: MW-2 Lab Sample ID: CD10948-02
Matrix: Ground Water Received: 07/06/20 11:32
Sampled:07/02/20 09:53 Work Order: CD10948
Project: July MWs Sampled By: Client
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591J
Analvte rrA N —h.
Besul
Sulfate as SO4 [14808-79-8]^ 71
fin Units
Qf MQL pM Batch
Method Analyze d BY Notes
ription: MW 3
mg/L
1 2.9 5.0 0G08037
EPA 300.0 07/09/20 03:06 UI
Lab Sample ID:CD10948 03
:Matrix:Ground WaterSampled:07/02/20
Received: 07/06/20 11:32
roject: July MWs
10:10Work
Order: CD10948
Sampled By: Client
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591 J
Analvte r A Numb d Results
Sulfate as SO4 [14808-79-8]^
MI 9 Units
PF IHJ2L P� Batch
1Nethod Analyzed AY Notes
24
mg/L
1 2.9 5.0 0G08037
EPA 300.0 07/09/20 03:24 UI
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.
Page 2 of 4

E NCO
www.encolabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DEFINITIONS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The analyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
Instrument. This value is considered an estimate.
MRL Method Reporting Limit. The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
PQL PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit. The PQL presented is the laboratory MRL.
N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence (85% or greater
confidence) to make a "tentative identification".
Greater than 25% concentration difference was observed between the primary and secondary GC column.
The lower concentration is reported.
[CALC] Calculated analyte - MDL/MRL reported to the highest reporting limit of the component analyses.
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.
Page 3 of 4

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LASORATORIE,S CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECOIM
1-'?n ***1 P9r, "r. 4e14 Uft I I I
turf wk,f4.mm Ja*wn+es.R.322 f��tindre�inc5ssirtYCac:f
( Ma-W4 F+X (4M) 4. 5 (gat} 2016 Cry FSX (Wq 29SJ4210 cwY. PC Mi i
� � i�9;r67�io r�r�3:�aer: sss
trYtltoar
Cameron TeSfing Se(vices 2007-{}22
kokum 2 S. Steele Street ' Nor-v#=
SeWMVS Utah- Ju* 2020 MWs
�Sa ftwd, NC 27330 two
Sdfl Pb JD
MW Z
MW 2
MW 3
sc�5oa
rowmd)
Calbct OO 04W
07/02120
0945
Grab
07102120
0953
Grab
07102/20
1010
Grab
Wdec)
m
Carftkws
x
1 x
x
L,
<_
—wrr aa Is i emNs as JtacK..Ft
i
siasm t1'dtor WW-VV43stuwiAr "- -k O-Cther (dew in tcmnMaj Preservat7oa: Nce N Ntit� 3 5-H2SN NO•Na k W-fo _ Art sampbos V-trraCod to ENCO Labs aro t =Vda1oa WITI Ids "MA arvS v ndtttons listed on ttra rave of W tans, unless pdor mitten agreements otdst
Wage of
Tines
NcQe : P.stt ram+ ptaQ
ptanm t v am 1**
SEanda€d
__._.. Expe4ded
Rue I I
M
Page 4 of 4

GW-59A COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM Permit # YJA6XIDg26 LK
(Submit one each monitoring period with GW-59 jarms.)
1
Enter date monitoring results were due. ( d;L9 ) Will this monitoring report (GW-59 and GW-59A)
NO
be submitted after the established due date?
2
Was any required information missing on the GW-59 report forms?
YES
IF the answer to question 1 or 2 is "YES", list in the space provided below the well identification number(s) and
explain the problems encountered in obtaining the required information.
3
Are any of the monitor wells in need of repair or maintenance (damaged casing, unlocked or missing cap, missing
YES
identification plate, area overgrown, etc.)? If the answer is "Yes", contact the Regional Office for guidance.
4
Are any monitored constituents equal to or above the established standards? <=IR
NO
If the answer to question 4 is "NO", skip to section 8.
If the answer to question 4 is "YES" list the affected wells individually with constituent(s) and concentration(s)
exc/e/eyd�in�g� standards in the spaces provided below:
5
For the constituents identified in question 4 above, have standards been exceeded previously for the
YES
O
same constituent(s) in the same well(s) in the last two years?
If the answer to question 5 is "NO", skip to section 8.
If the answer to question 5 is "YES", list in the space provided below, each well with constituent(s) exceeding
standards, concentration(s) reported, and sample collection date for each occurrence (for the last two years).
Are the monitoring wells listed in section 5 located at or beyond the review boundary?
YES
NO
If the answer is "YES", a groundwater quality problem may be occurring. CONTACT THE REGIONAL
OFFICE IMMEDIATELY FOR GUIDANCE. If the answer is "NO", monitoring wells may be improperly
located; contact the Regional Office.
7
Is the permittee implementing previously approved actions required by the Division involving this
YES
NO
groundwater quality problem?
If the answer to question 7 is "YES", describe those actions in the space provided below.
If the answer to question 7 is "NO", contact the Reqional Office within 90 days: an evaluation may be
required to determine the impact the waste disposal system is having at the review and compliance
boundaries surrounding this facility. Failure to do so may subject the permittee to a Notice of Violation
fines, and/or penalties.
g
The person completing this portion (GW-59A) of the monitoring report should sign below and submit this
form with GW-59 forms for required wells to the address provided at the top of the current GW-59 form.
I hereby acknowledge that the above information was evaluated and the information submitted in this
report (Comp 'ance Report GW-59A) is true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
-Za Z D,
ign ure of Permittee ( r Authorized Agent) Date
GW-59A 12/8/2003

Summary of Monitored Constituents Exceeding Standard
Seagrove Ulah Metropolitan Water District
DATES EXCEEDING CLASS GA
MONITORING MONITORED ESTABLISHED CONCENTRATIONS GROUNDWATER
WELL ID CONSTITUENT STANDARDS REPORTED STANDARD
MW-2 Total Dissolved Solids 07/02/20 1528 me/L 500 me/L
Pagel of 5

Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Laboratory Report
NC DENR #654
NC PHHS #37799
Client:
Seagrove Ulah
US EPA#NC01918
CTS
Pro .
�
2007-022
Project:
July 2020 MWs
Regulatory
Yes
Page 1 of 2
Sample Information
Sampled
C. Cameron Date 07/02/20
Received
C. Cameron
Date 07/02/20
Analyses and Results
Lab ID
CL
Sample ID E
M o Analyte
Result
CL —
a, E
' Std. Methods
U
Reference
2007-022 01
MW 1 cw Gr Total Dissolved
Solids
95.0
mg/L
25
07/06/20
2540 C - TDS
Chloride
10.8
mg/L
0.01
07/08/20
4500 Cl- D
Sulfate
<2.9
mg/1
2.9
07/09/20
EPA 300.0
Nitrate as N
0.086
mg/L
0.05
07/07/20
4500 NO3 - E
Total Ammonia
<0.100
mg/L
0.1
07/09/20
4500 NH3 - D
Phosphorus: Total
as P
0 .193
mg/L
o.0s
07/07/20
4500 P - B/E
Sodium
10.6
mg/L
8
07/22/20
EPA 200.8
Fec. Coliform-W
<1
CFU
/1OomL
1
07/02/20
9222 D - MF
TOC
<1.00
mg/L
1
07/18/20
5310 B2000
02
MW 2 cw cr Total Dissolved
Solids
528
mg/L
25
07/06/20
2540 C - TDS
Chloride
125
mg/L
001
07/08/20
4500 Cl- D
Sulfate
71
Mg/1
2.9
07/09/20
EPA 300.0
Nitrate as N
4.99
mg/L
0.05
07/07/20
4500 NO3 - E
Total Ammonia
<0.100
mg/L
0.1
07/09/20
4500 NH3 - D
Phosphorus: Total
as P
0 .786
mg/L
o.os
07/07/20
4500 P - B/E
Sodium
76.7
mg/L
8
07/22/20
EPA 200.8
Fec. Coliform-W
<1
/100mL
CFU
1
07/02/20
9222 D - MF
TOC
<1.00
mg/L
1
07/18/20
5310 B2000
Sulfate analyzed by ENCO, Cary, NC; report attached.
219 S. Steele Str. 919-721-4067
Sanford NC 27330 919-208-4240
chris@canierontesting. coin

Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Laboratory Report
NC DENR #654
NC PHHS #37799
Client:
Seagrove Ulah
US EPA #NC01918
CTS Proj.
2007-022
Project:
July 2020 MWs Regulatory
Yes
Page 1 of 2
Sample Information
Sampled
C. Cameron Date 07/02/20 Received
C. Cameron
Date 07/02/20
Analyses and Results
Lab ID
x ❑,
Sample ID 0 Analyte Result
.2
y
Std. Methods
o
Reference
2007-022 03
M W 3 cW Gr Total Dissolved
¢
C7
Solids 478
mg/L
zs
07/06/20
2540 C - TDS
Chloride 106
mg/L
0.01
07/08/20
4500 Cl- D
Sulfate 24
mg/1
2.9
07/09/20
EPA 300.0
Nitrate as N 5.70
mg/L
0.05
07/07/20
4500 NO3 - E
Total Ammonia <0.100
mg/L
0.1
07/09/20
4500 NH3 - D
Phosphorus: Total
0.266
as P
mg/L
0.05
07/07/20
4500 P - B/E
Sodium 56.4
mg/L
8
07/22/20
EPA 200.8
Fec. Coliform-W <1 cFu
/100mL
1
07/02/20
9222 D - MF
TOC <1.00
mg/L
1
07/18/20
5310 B2000
Sulfate analyzed by ENCO, Cary, NC; report attached.
Report %
Review
Project Manager
14L41 �
Date
219 S. Steele Str. 919-721-4067
Sanford NC 27330 919-208-4240
chris Cckainerontestingxoni

ENCO Laborato
nes
Accurate. Timely. Responsive, Innovative.
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Thursday, July 16, 2020
Cameron Testing Services, Inc. (CA039)
Attn: Maryanne Sims
219 South Steele Street
Sanford, NC 27330
RE: Laboratory Results for
Project Number: [none], Project Name/Desc: July MWs
ENCO Workorder(s): CD10948
Dear Maryanne Sims,
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on
Monday, July 6, 2020.
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures.
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative if applicable. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full, without the written approval of the Laboratory.
This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Bill Scott
Project Manager
Enclosure(s)
FINAL Thls report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 1 Of 4

Description: MW-1
Matrix: Ground Water
Project: July MWs
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Cary certified anafyte [NC 59IJ
Analvte rCAS Nm eb i
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Lab Sample ID: CD10948-01
Sampled:07/02/20 09:45
Sampled By: Client
www.encolabs.com
Received: 07/06/20 11:32
Work Order: CD10948
r Results Flao uniU Q
Sulfate as SCW [14806-79 8]^ MDL I'OL Batch Method Analyzed!� Notes
Description: MW-2
2 9 mg/L 1 2.9 5.0 0G08037 EPA 300.0 07/09/20 02:47 UI
Lab Sample ID: CD10948-02 Received: 07/06/20 11:32
Matrix: Ground Water Sampled:07/02/20 09:53
Work Order: CD10948
Project: July MWs Sampled BY: Client
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Cary certified anafyte [NC 591J
AnalA rCAS N�mbMd ResultRE
Sulfate as SO4 [14808-79-8]^Method Analyzed �1C Notes
71 mg/L 1 2.9 5.0 0GO8037 EPA 300.0 07/09/20 03:06 UI
Description: MW-3 Lab Sample ID:CD10948-03
Received: 07/06/20 11:32
Matrix: Ground Water Sampled:07/02/20 10:10
Work Order: CD10948
Project: July MWs Sampled By: Client
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Cary certified anafyte [NC 591]
Analvte Q Numb d Results flag yAM pF
Sulfate as SO4 [14808-79-8]^ 24 � P4.6 Batch Method A al z )}y Notes
mg/L 1 2.9 5.0 0GO8037 EPA 300.0 07/09/20 03:24 UI
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.
Page 2 of 4

E=iVCt:�
www.encolabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DEFINITIONS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
J The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The analyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
Instrument. This value is considered an estimate.
MRL Method Reporting Limit. The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
PQL PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit. The PQL presented is the laboratory MRL.
N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence (85% or greater
confidence) to make a "tentative identification".
P Greater than 25% concentration difference was observed between the primary and secondary GC column.
The lower concentration is reported.
[CALC] Calculated analyte - MDL/MRL reported to the highest reporting limit of the component analyses.
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full.
Page 3 of 4

{o �
39jA0 SiV6tAiD816® UB77UM aoy0 fitF+{ta+'tttrc3 fiFA 7P 3SDBr,@,t gi; V0 POWs) SUC'kPL= PUB cuuW 901 +AIM ool-'e JR?5=
u{J{ we S'l
0O
MY3 a�o; �po}o;usge�rs-Mso+�Aw=Ct pt; W1VH QN•914 SZH-G CQVWR B Map1xPe-0
/
W '11 tt:r
id;S�W:(Gro sdtue: S y.:M»ioe��
I I anc]
Pa;JP8K a
pewEls
AM-4 a7 }C smm*dlme
;o s6ei
CD
0££LZ ON ApX Ln
4�781.
�rtsnAr
�AAI<If 0 I i -u In a E
S aP84S '136lz
iw
faw
vwtW4., Z {1'Li3C Z 990.Wes 6ugse-L tiaratuso
aurk .
9fi8Stwfs: xy pt { st31te"t6L{>M#i S►9l3tSit;tfi>tixt
tLuz -/f-Lon 3 r►c5�iu�Cii•
oppmag GUONN�
CM033H A(201 fiO" A0-NIVHD S3rd0.LVW0I9YI N0I1hrAW3SN00 -IV1. SWNOUlAN3

219 S. Steele Str.
Sanford, NC 27330 Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Chain of Custody
Phone: 919-20 - 8 4240 NC
WW/GW Cert. #654 NC PHHS Cert # 37799 US EPA NC01918 Page L of
Company. 'Seagrove/Utah Met.Water Dist. ;Email
CTS lab use
--- - --- _
Contact: -- - _ ------
Larry Chlton Phone: Sample Temp 0 Proj. ID �
Address (City, P. 0. Box 370 Fax: Ice (YIN)
State, Zip)
samples colleceted in Mar., July, Nov. {
Seagrove, NC 27641 Notes: Permit (Y/N) - I-- - - ----- -
I ,
Project:
- - --
-�Q'2C) t(N Rush(Y/N) Due:
Sample
Collecion: Name:
C �S � �Signature:
Sample Information Number of bottles + preservative Require esting7A nalyy is
Client Sample 2 ? CTS
L r oa o- o w Preservatives: (U)npreserved, H(C)I,
I� j= U (g o H2(S)04, H(N)03, (Na)Thiosulfate, Sample
!8 I U�(S U 1 U 1 U I f m I I W co
Na(0)H, (P)hosphoric, Other (X), Indicate ID
MW-2 7 ' TDS, Cl,NO2, SO4
-__ - Uw ,
- I Cr-1S3 _ ! is
- - -
NH3,NOX TP, <-
M W-3-
_
�0lO . �— - � � I -'
-_ 1Na �— Fec-W
-- - -
1N ' Na
TOC
ic
VOC (Nov. only)
Bottle set for all samples Analyses for all samples
I- - -- - ---- - -
� I ,
Rel'tl ui he
Received: Date/Time
E- 7
Rush work will require prior approval. Additional charges will apply