Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190049 Ver 1_Meeting Minutes_IRT Walk_20190116W WILDLANDS ENGINEERING MEETING MINUTES MEETING: Post Contract IRT Site Visit CARPENTER BOTTOM Mitigation Site Catawba River Basin 03050103 (expanded service area); Gaston County, NC NCDEQ Contract No. 7731 Wildlands Project No. 005-02179 DATE: Wednesday, January 16, 2019, 9:30 am LOCATION: Gaston-Webbs Chapel Road Lincolnton, NC 28092 Attendees Todd Tugwell, USACE Kim Browning, USACE Paul Wiesner, Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) Matthew Reid, NCDMS Melonie Allen, NCDMS Kirsten Ullman, NCDMS Mac Haupt, NC Department of Environmental Quality Olivia Munzer, Wildlife Resource Commission Shawn Wilkerson, Wildlands Engineering Eric Neuhaus, Wildlands Engineering Materials • Wildlands Engineering Technical Proposal 8/10/2018 in response to NCDMS RFQ 09132018 Meeting Notes 1. Wildlands gave a brief site overview before the walk which discussed stream and wetland approach and general site conditions. 2. The group entered the proposed wetland re-establishment area from the northeast field adjacent to Ditch 3 as shown on the proposal concept map. Wildlands was asked about plans for Ditch 3 and it was noted that the ditch would be filled within the proposed wetland re-establishment area. Upstream of the proposed wetland re-establishment area, drainage from Ditch 3 will be directed into the wetland to support hydrology. 3. Soil borings were taken towards the eastern edge of the proposed wetland re-establishment area. The consensus from the group was that site soils were depleted with a low chroma, consistent with the Licensed Soil Scientist (LSS) investigation included with the proposal. Site soils were deemed suitable for the proposed wetland restoration at the surface. Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 1 CARPENTER BOTTOM mitigation site Post -Contract IRT Site Walk 4. The walk continued into the proposed wetland rehabilitation area, where two headwater ditches were observed, and soils were double checked for consistency. A rehabilitation approach was discussed including plugging of the existing drainage ditches, treatment of invasive vegetation (including but not limited to hardy orange, Chinese privet, and white pine trees), wetland plantings, and cattle exclusion. IRT members noted that a jurisdictional delineation will need to be done to verify the wetland rehabilitation boundary, but overall, they agreed with the approach. Soils observed within the rehabilitation area were consistent with previous soil borings taken within the re-establishment area. 5. Fish and Wildlife noted that there is potential habitat for a stream specific crayfish and dwarf flowered heartleaf species on -site. Neither of these species was observed during the site walk but Wildlands noted that they would look for these specific species as part of the categorical exclusion and threatened and endangered species walks. 6. A soil boring was taken within the wetland re-establishment area west of Ditch 2 shown on the proposal concept map. Soils were consistent with other observations on site and were deemed appropriate for wetland re-establishment at the surface. 7. Overall, IRT members agreed with the proposed wetland restoration approach and proposed ratios of 1:1 for areas of wetland re-establishment and 1.5:1 for areas of wetland rehabilitation. 8. Wildlands will prioritize getting the jurisdictional delineation completed within the proposed wetland rehabilitation area. Additionally, Wildlands will install groundwater gages throughout the wetland restoration area prior to the 2019 growing season. 9. The walk continued south toward the headwater tributaries of Carpenter's Branch. IRT and NCDMS representatives were shown the approximate location of intermittent and perennial stream calls based on field mapping. It was discussed that these calls would be further refined as the project moved forward, but generally intermittent and perennial calls presented in the proposal were agreed upon. 10. Ditch 1 shown on the proposal map east of the wetland rehabilitation area was discussed in detail. Wildlands current proposed approach was to install channel plugs at various locations upstream of the intermittent call to redirect drainage back into the adjacent proposed wetland area. It was noted that if the channel was deemed jurisdictional above the current field call, Wildlands would either restore or enhance the channel and include it within the proposed conservation easement. 11. The site walk continued to the headwaters and ultimately down the entire length of Carpenter's Branch. Wildlands originally proposed all streams on -site including headwater tributaries, the entire length of Carpenter's Branch, and UT1 for an enhancement II approach at a 2.5:1 credit ratio. After field observations and discussions with the IRT, it was determined that the streams on -site need to be fully restored using a priority I approach until an existing bedrock portion of the channel, which will be proposed for a preservation approach. The change in approach will be incorporated by Wildlands and updated crediting information will be supplied to DMS. 12. It was noted that a current culvert crossing over an unnamed tributary from the right floodplain will be removed as part of the project. The portion of this channel within the proposed conservation easement will be restored and tied to the proposed alignment of Carpenter's Branch as part of the project. 13. IRT members noted that a flow gage will need to be installed along UT1 to document continuity of flow for the project reach, regardless of stream approach. 14. In addition to restoring Carpenter's Branch with a Priority I restoration approach, Wildlands agreed that they would discuss putting the additional property (approximately 5.7 acres) on the right floodplain of Carpenter's Branch within the proposed conservation easement with the property owner. This would allow for an extended buffer along the right floodplain of Carpenter's Branch and allow Wildlands to eliminate the proposed 30' internal culvert crossing shown in the proposal. 15. The IRT noted that the site could be a prime candidate for benthic and water quality monitoring with a potential associated 2% credit bonus if property monitoring was carried out. Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 2 CARPENTER BOTTOM mitigation site Post -Contract IRT Site Walk