20040381 Ver 1_Complete File_20040311

?F W ATFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\O (? North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
O Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project No.: U ti3
Applicant: _
Project Name: M A, 12do3
R
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Qual ty
tion:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved %vithin the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the
401/Wetlands unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or
the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
1, 14 C-• 4,1J er , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer
Rules, the apps a pla is an cific ions, and other supporting materials.
Signature: IWf_ Date: a7
Agent's Certification
1, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer
Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
1, , as a duly registered Professional (i.e.,
Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized
to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permitee hereby state
that, to the best of my abilities, due care ?,.nd diligence was used in the observation of the construction
such that the construction was observed to be built Nvithin substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other
supporting materials.
Signature -Registration No. Date
?
Sr ?y ? O
1,
;%
9,p
?y
0 1.r
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Servic:• Cen,er, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
232' Crab,rev Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-?33-1786 (phone! 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr state nc.us/ncwetlands/
County:
r•
Inlet
SR 1001, Fallston Waco Road
Outlet
memo
Nc

Downstream
lop
pot
+ 'P

j
`; 1 • 4 - 1. ? A ?? i 1i ? ' ? ? ? ? ,t
y fr ?,
yy t J 4 Y ? •5,

F W A jE Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 ?8 9QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
b.ua y Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
> Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
0 15? -? Division of Water Quality
April 8, 2004
Cleveland County
DWQ Project No. 040381
MA12003R
SR 1001 (Fallston-Waco Road)
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Mr. M. L. Holder, P.E. WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
Division Engineer
N C Department of Transportation APR 1 9 20114
Post Office Box 47
Shelby, North Carolina 28151 WATER CIUAf.P T
Dear Mr. Holder:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 140 linear feet
of an unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek (130 linear feet of new pipe and 10 linear feet of riprap) and temporary
dewatering of approximately 200 linear feet of stream, in order to make safety improvements to NCSR 1001
(Fallston-Waco Road) in Cleveland County. The project must be constructed in accordance with the application
dated March 5, 2004 (received March 11, 2004), including the environmental commitments made in the application
letter. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Nos. 3404 and 3366, corresponding to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit Numbers
14 and 33. In addition, you must acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your
project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 Permit unless otherwise specified in the Water
Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ in writing and submit a new application. If the property is
sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for
complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of
total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions
listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper
design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must
be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North
Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction
sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
G-- For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated,
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining
Manual.
919 N. Main St., Mooresville, NC 28115 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Mr. M. L. Holder, P.E.
April 8, 2004
Page Two
d. Any reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with
the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
2. No wastes, spoil, solids or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint
of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notice Application. All construction activities, including the
design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they
shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Quality
has released the project.
4. Please note that this stream is classified as WS-III waters.
5. NCDOT will provide 1000 linear feet of riparian reforestation (500 linear feet upstream and 500 linear feet
downstream of the culverts) to provide streambank stability and stream shading.
6. Removal of vegetation at the stream crossing and adjacent to streams should be minimized. Native trees and
shrubs (e.g. Rhododendron, dog hobble, willows, alders, sycamores, dogwoods, black walnut and red maple)
should be planted along the streambank to reestablish the riparian zone and to provide long-term erosion control
in the vicinity of the road crossing and along the streams within dedicated rights of way.
7. NCDOT shall comply with any conditions or moratoriums requested by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
8. Where fish passage is present or where significant aquatic life may be present upstream (and where practicable),
culverts should be oversized and buried to prevent perched culverts. If oversized piping cannot restore aquatic
life passage by reconnecting the stream ecosystem, riprap installation should be accomplished in a manner to
provide or restore water channels downstream to help facilitate aquatic life movement.
9. Where practicable, culverts that are less than 48-inches in diameter should be buried to a depth equal to or greater
than 20% of their size to allow for aquatic life passage. Culverts that are 48-inches in diameter or larger should
be buried at least 12 inches below the stream bottom to allow natural stream bottom material to become
established in the culvert following installation and to provide aquatic life passage during periods of low flow.
These measurements must be based on natural thalweg depths. This may require increasing the size of the
culvert to meet flow conveyance requirements. If any of the existing pipes are perched, they shall be removed
and replaced, and re-installed correctly, unless demonstrated that this is topographically unfeasible. All waters
must flow though without freefalling or damming on either side of the culverts during low flow conditions, to
maintain aquatic life and /or fish passage.
10. The riprap used for temporary fill must be clean rock and free of fines. All of this material must be removed by
the completion of the project.
11. Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing
season following completion of construction.
12. Stormwater should be directed to vegetated buffer areas, grass lined ditches or other means appropriate to the site
for the purpose of pre-treating stormwater runoff, and must not be routed directly into streams. Mowing of
existing vegetated buffers is strongly discouraged, so that they may be utilized for stormwater sheet flow.
13. Riprap placed for bank stabilization should be limited to the streambank below the high water mark, and
vegetation should be used for stabilization above the high water elevation.
14. Heavy equipment must be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
15. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
16. Excavation of the stream crossings and relocations should be conducted in the dry, if possible. Sandbags,
cofferdams, flexible pipe or other diversion structures should be used to minimize excavation in flowing water.
17. If concrete is used during bridge construction (e.g., headwalls, piers), a dry work area should be maintained to
prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured
cona6te should not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for fish kills.
18. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface
waters is strictly prohibited.
Mr. Mike Holder, P.E.
April 8, 2004
Page Three
19. The presence of equipment in the channels must be minimized. Under no circumstances must rock, sand or other
materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the immediate
vicinity of the culverts. Instream dredging has catastrophic effects on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural
form of the stream channel will likely cause downstream erosion problems, possible affecting other landowners.
20. All work shall be performed during low flow conditions.
21. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion"
form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible
party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water
Quality upon completion of the project. NCDOT is strongly advised to send in photographs upstream and
downstream of each structure to document correct installation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please telephone Mr. Mike Parker of the Asheville Regional Office at 828.296.4500.
Sincerely, , Q
/e.
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Trish Simon, Division 12, DEO
Steve Lund, USACE Asheville Field Office
Mooresville Regional Office
Wetlands/401 Unit
Mike Parker, NCDWQ Asheville Regional Office
11
CN ?w?u7E??
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR

MAR t 1 70O4
• 11 1•i ? A. ? J
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
PO BOX 47, SHELBY, NC 28151
March 5, 2004
Mr. Steve Lund
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 " "
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Subject: Nationwide Permit #14, #33
SR 1001, Section of Fallston-Waco Road Realignment/Pipe placement
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Lund:
The realignment and widening of Fallston-Waco Road, SR 1001 from SR 1905 to around
Bridge #155, which was originally constructed 1960, is an NCDOT Moving Ahead
project. The curvature of the road in this area is extremely dangerous with numerous
accidents occurring on this section of SR 1001; therefore, the road realignment and
intersection improvements are being done to improve safety under the Moving Ahead
initiative.
The realignment of the road results in the realignment of a stream crosspipe; therefore,
the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, proposes this
project for your issuance of a Section 404 Permit. We believe this project can be
accomplished under NWP # 14, Linear Transportation Crossing and NWP #33,
Temporary Construction, Access and Dewatering.
It is proposed that the existing 50 foot, 72"x 43"pipe on the existing road alignment be
removed and a double line of pipes on the new road alignment be installed. The double
lines would consist of a 180-foot, 54" main flow pipe and a 170-foot, 48" pipe flood flow
pipe. The flood flow pipe will be offset so as to allow the main stream flow through only
one pipe. The proposed pipe on the new road alignment will be installed adjacent to the
existing pipe on a skew; therefore, there is 130 feet of additional stream fill. Five feet of
?e
Mr. Steve Lund
Page 2- SR1001 Road Realignment, Cleveland County
March 5, 2004
riprap will be utilized at the inlet and outlet of the new pipes to provide structure
stabilization. Floodplain benches will be constructed at the inlet and outlet of the flood
flow pipe to direct baseflow through the main pipe as well as to maintain channel
dimensions. A stream profile was established by measuring the thalweg elevations at
various points upstream and downstream of the proposed pipe. The main flow pipe will
be buried one foot below the existing streambed elevation based upon this established
profile. The proposed pipe slope has been calculated to be 1.9%; therefore, stream
destabilization is not anticipated. Streambank reforestation is proposed on both banks of
the unnamed tributary for -500 feet upstream and downstream of the proposed pipe.
Enclosed is a streambank reforestation typical detailing the type and spacing of the tree
species to be planted.
Temporary cofferdams/pump around will be used to isolate the work area during the
installation of the pipe. Upon project completion, the cofferdams will be removed and the
area impacted will be restored to pre-construction conditions. I have enclosed a PCN
application, a sketch of planned activities- including a preliminary erosion control plan
for the permitted area, and location maps relative to the project.
The stream impacted by the proposed project is an unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek,
which is classified WS-III watershed. Based upon the "Guidelines for the Location and
Design of Hazardous Spill Basins", which are referenced in DOT's Best Mans eg merit
Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters, the applicable locations for the placement
of hazardous spill basins are at stream crossings on highways functionally classified as
rural or urban arterials and where the stream crossing is within '/s mile of the critical area.
SR 1001 is functionally classified a rural arterial; however, the project is not located
within '/s mile of the critical watershed area. Hazardous spill basins are not required.
Enclosed is the NCDOT hazardous spill basin checklist for this project.
A review of the Natural Heritage information for the threatened species listed for
Cleveland County, the dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora) revealed no
known sites in the vicinity of the proposed project. An on-site survey was conducted for
the heartleaf species in the project area on May 12, 2003. None were observed. No
effect on this species is anticipated. A review of the available information from the
National Register of Historic Places was also conducted. It is anticipated that no historic
site will be impacted by the proposed project.
Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. Should you
have any questions, please call me at 704-480-9020.
A
Mr. Steve Lund
Page 3- SRI 001 Road Realignment, Cleveland County
March 5, 2004
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY:
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Michael L. Holder, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Gary Spangler, Division Project Manager
Mr. Ron Humphries, Division Design Construct Engineer
Mr. Neil Trivette, Roadside Environmental Field Engineer
Mr. Ron Linville, N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Mr. Brian Cole, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Mr. Mike Parker, DENR, DWQ, Asheville Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney, DENR,DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit (7 copies)
File
It
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2, Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide #14. #33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mike Holder. N Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9020 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Trish Simon
Company Affiliation: N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704480-9044 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address: tsimon @,dot state nc us
Page 1 of 8

M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Fallston-Waco Road (SR 1001) Road realignment/intersection
improvements , Cleveland County.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): MA12003R (Moving Ahead
Project
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N.C. DOT Right of Way
4. Location
County: Cleveland Nearest Town: Shelby
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Hwy 150 east of Shelby,
turn left onto SR 1001 in Waco and proceed -3.5 miles to permit site.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): (1)35°24'03N/81 °27'41 W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Pasture.
7. Property size (acres): 8.0 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed tributary to Buffalo
Creek (from source to point 0.3 miles upstream Long Creek). WS-III Watershed.
9. River Basin: Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 8
4
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to widen an
existing section of SR 1001 and to make intersection improvements at SR 1908 and SR 1905
to improve safety under the Moving Ahead initiative The partial road realignment at SR
1905 will result in the placement of a double pike on an UT to Buffalo Creek (54" main
flow pipe & 48" flood flow pipe)An existing 50-foot, 72" x 43" CMP will be removed on
the old road alignment,
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Work will be done using
i Al heavy construction equipment
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The surrounding_ area is residential
pastureland,
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
There are no future permit requests anticipated for this project. however, there are several stream
crossings on other sections of SR 1001 which may be =laced in the future
VL Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 8

1. Wetland Impacts: 0
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to Nearest
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100 year Floodplain** Stream (linear feet) Type of Wetland***
indicate on ma acres no

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0.
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Length of Perennial or
Impact Site Impact Average Width of Intermittent?
Number Type of Impact* (linear feet) Stream Name** Stream Before Impact (please specify)
(indicate on
ma
Unnamed
1 Pipe fill 180 feet tributary to
Buffalo Creek 3 ft Perennial
Riprap on stream-
1 bank for structure 5ft upstream "
stabilization 5 ft downstream
1 Temporary 200 feet "
Cofferdam
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.Qov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.manauest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Permanent fill impacts =
175 feet, 10 feet of streambank impacts. Temporary impacts= 200 feet.
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U. S.: NO OPEN WATER IMPACTS
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary' sound,
indicate on ma acres bay, oc etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8
4. Pond Creation: NO POND CREATION
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application,
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed road realignment of a section of SR 1001 and impacts to the UT to Buffalo Creek
is necessary to provide intersection safety improvements at SR 1908, The proposed double pipe
is being designed to provide main flow through a 54" pipe while flood flow opacity will be
provided by a parallel 48" pipe which will be offset from the main flow pipe A floodplain
bench is to be constructed at the inlet and outlet of the 48" pipe to maintain channel dimensions
and to direct the stream flow to the main flow 54" pipe Streambank reforestation is proposed on
the both banks approximately 500 feet upstream and downstream of the proposed pipe to provide
stream stability During constructiom upstream and downstream tempgary impervious
cofferdams will be used to isolate the stream flow from the proposed work area The stream
flow will be piped/pumped around the new pipe installation work area from above the upstream
cofferdam to below the downstream cofferdam
VIIL Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Page 5 of 8

aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strtngide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreagellinear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
THE PROPOSED PIPE LENGTH ON THE NEW ALIGNMENT IS 180 FT. THE
EXISTING 50 FT PIPE IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE ALIGNMENT OF THE NEW
PIPE; THEREFORE, THERE IS ONLY 130 FEET OF ADDITIONAL FILL IMPACTS
(THE EXISTING ROAD WAS CONSTRUCTED 1960). AN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN
REACHED WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER TO PROVIDE
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION -500 FEET UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF
THE PROPOSED PIPE TO PROVIDE STREAMBANK STABILITY AND STREAM
SHADING.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hiLtp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/vap/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
Page 6 of 8
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Page 7 of 8

XL Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The total agmge of the existing impervious surfaced within the prr ject area (Waved
roadway/arassed shoulder) is -4 acres The partial realignment and widening, of SR 1001 will
create -1.0 acres of additional impervious surface The abandoned pavement section of SR
1001 will be removed and the area seeded and stabilized Appropriate erosion and sedimentation
control measures will be in place during; construction Riorap lined ditchlines and preformed
scourholes will be utilized to reduce stormwater velocity and promote settling of sediment before
reaching surface waters.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
a

Unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek adjacent to SR 1001 realignment project. New road alignment will
shift away from the existing stream. Area of streambank reforestation in background.
P

Unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek adjacent to SR 1001 realignment project. Approximate area of new
pipe placement in foreground. Area of streambank reforestation in backgound.
I I I I I 'i
k4S
r
o>C,2
qx
a
(D

0 u I
?m d ti

r
:*
Q
U
tj
((D : o
zmp
° -om

r o o>

05 1 -
?mr
r
0 T C ?
M
-1 (D

O =T
v L4
m:+
\'OT
I Lh a
?? + + + +
} ?\ G C O
w u u
1 ? 24
? l
O \ 2n \? O
-XI
a? ?\ \
cm to \I
? L.
z
-< d Q 1
0
0 m
w
f
1 2
1 J 0
n
O
1 Z
z (?? f
1Z '\ ??O 1"11 'G
\
f!1 \ 3
?i? p 9
y?S m \
? r
m ?^g
22, IT zh
1
n
0
7
7
z ? ? l
OMM
o D
LA
0
m=om
o
R? °• N 0 !0
T -C1?
AWE
o g
r
5:l TAPER
M n+LA
4'01
? W I
4-U-lT,7`W
_Y
wat
•
z
n
r
rn
m
z
z
m
C)
2
0
m
m
M
WD PANEL ,
51
WD PANEL I ?

0
,n
?r
?
0 L?
c a
? y

ya
114
\ / 2
?\ \ (Z
i l.r
/

m
0
a
Z
r0
x
M
z
z
m
n
Ul
m
;7
m
n2
to m?
m
-?Irr
? n
O .
?N
v0
? W
W ?
II
F Nv
T

I- LUUL)PLAI N bL NUH UL / AIL
PLAN VIEW
d3l
01-W RCP
(MAIN PLOW
© 1-4r Ra
A
PROP. REINFORCED
CONCRETE ENDWALL
PP.)
PROP. aASS I RIPRAP
(1YP. 4 CORNERS]
PROF. RIPRAP (CLASS 0
9Lr IANG BENC•JL
m p-)
(ZrrTinni n_n
(BLOWN-UP FOR CLARITY)
"NOTE"
M"AP ON STREAM BANK ONLY
PROP. IIAC KFTLL WITH
STMEAMBED MATERIAL
(FOLLOWED BY SEEDING)
;V WED
{ I MPRAP
NERS)
TOP OF FLOODPLAIN B
ExIsnNG CHANNEL W
IW IB' RCP
INY 54' RC?
,- ?---•
eD' y
LONG' I@ICH
(Md
D
0
x
?l
V
a N

D

p

Q N
+
N o
T

V`
0 ? D
?
0
x
11 cn
D
--Q .A
0 m
m
V V
Cn 0%
O O O
V V V
V OD %0
O O O
t
I
O I
I
I

!

I
+ I
O I
O I
I
I

N I
I
1

+

O I

O I
I m
I ?
r o

I o

m

W x

+
1 ?

? I
I ?
m
I
D I

c7
+ =

Z I
O I
Z I
m
I
I

? I
I
+
O I
O
l

t

ON 1

+
O 1
O
I
I
1

V I
I
I

+
O
O

v STREAM CHANNEL PROF
STATION ELEV
0+00.00 783.74
0+45.02 782.94
0+89.72 780.64
1+34.04 780.63
1+67.77 779.47
1+90.28 779.46
2+00.82 778.52
2+03.45 778.51
2+05.75 778.46
2+07.90 778.37
2+27.29 778.49
2+28.39 778.50
2+34.52 778.66
2+39.22 778.77
2+45.78 778.22
2+56.25 778.17
2+63.09 778.22
2+66.89 778.14
2+75.37 777.62
2+79.09 776.83
2+92.32 777.44
3+06.70 777.03
3+15.44 777.25
3+30.00 776.32
3+49.69 776.30
3+58.84 776.29
3+74.62 775.88
3+88.98 775.15
4+11.40 774.75
4+15.57 774.63
4+67.43 774.43
4+82.22 774.85
4+88.49 774.80
4+94.56 774.22
5+17.64 774.01
5+29.84 773.80
5+35.26 774.35
5+41.62 773.80
5+50.31 773.73
5+55.20 773.21
5+68.04 772.42
5+72.81 771.68
5+89.41 772.93
5+96.00 772.52
6+11.36 771.83
6+23.31 771.98
6+39.02 771.87
6+51.51 771.78
6+60.63 771.04
Ran Rm rwrr Y.YOQ xu '°??''
ra. wsn
C. RF-2
R•n ..oaw ......aun .rAlnw.
? TYPE 1 STREAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALT. BE PLANTED 0.9m TO 1.52m ON CENTER. RANDOM
SPACING, AVERAGING 1.22m ON CENTER APPROXIMATELY 6726 PLANTS PER HECTARE.
? TYPE 2 STREAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLANTED L8m TO 3.Om ON CENTER, RANDOM
SPACING, AVERAGING 2.4m ON CENTER. APPROXIMATELY 1680 PLANTS PER HECTARE.
? NOTEs TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 STRFAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE
PAID FOR AS "STREAMBANK REFORESTATION"
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION TYPICAL
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION
b MF.TYPE. SIZE, AND FURNISH SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOUDWINGs
•RTT 1
50% ALNUS SERRULATA
50% SALiX NIGRA
TYPE 2
25% L IRIODENDRON TULIPWM
25% PLATANUS OCC DENTAL.IS
25% JUGLANS NIGRA
25% BETUTA NIGRA
SMOOTH ALDER
BLACK VALLAW
TULIP POPLAR
SYCAMORE
BLACK WALNUT
RIVER BIRCH
300mm - 460mm BR
300mm - 460mm BR
300mm - 460mm BR
300mm - 460mm BR
300mm - 460mm BR
300mm - 460mm BR
? SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR AREAS TO BE PLANTED
S ANK REFORESTATION
DETAIL SHEET
N.C.D.O.T.- ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE (PSH) WITH
LEVEL SPREADER APRON
P1 AN VIFW
Pipe or
Ou-
Square
Scour F
(Rip Rap
basin n
for clai
SECTION A-A
3vel and flush
Mural ground.
B _5'
D I,
W 4'
d 0.5
F///S, Pipe or Dltch
Outlet
PSRM
D(I'mWW _ d Natural
Ground
Liner: Class B' Rip Rap tuck
thick with Filter Fabric
EST. RIP RAP: 5 TONS+/-
EST. F.F.: 12 SY+/-
EST.26 Sy PSRM
HIM9
F?msa
a
!,.!,.... F
1802228
9 1 1 -1-4
p011111
RBm?
r.WP
Smm 10
SH s?
5$ ? ?g
0 1.1C m
g ms
0
n
m
N
N
d?
ob
l^?
?
oY '^

v ?
;? o y4i

x r, \
Q/

?
d t?
!X I
?
y
¢

a 4-,
an 4 '
I

d ?
¢?e g i
El
MATCHLINE- T
?35+00.00 SHFF
T
VP4
fill
I 6? ' o
1 0rQ J? "
1 ?
p jt ?•
rq
da m?
2
b?? P
61M
??p3
F
k??^
4ea '
TS/
t

l9 I4P 14P o II
Is % g'r h
r9ai gsy m
y
3a} 7g fIg
?3G
-1
$ ? E ° ?nx?rbDs
wSE 4 4 p ?4r
? oo c nNO r"""""L^
r
?? tl do
o InA-IrbDv
J :s
ga0 h "rr r
a C n € m Atn??i,-
i
\ 4 4 4 C ° ?4o IVV ?"Va
1 5Z
I 1 x
L
^ a

gs
s
/
I I
e
/
a "Ri
a o 0
17
Y / a
?d
A
p

41?gtl
a
a
p: m

gat% ¢>°m
r
?
4 ¢ Ind rn

p
s o ?.I VArN-1
s?ON?N ?r

3 0
?
H

A
r
I
' i
ryI ? a fF' /? ? wy?,
r
922
I
1
*,'^ r?l "1 `'?,? New pipe on UT -' ? k
to Buffalo Crk
LN
rr r Road Realignment
496
Baker Cross 'ads
i .
tr
t PauLl??r
I YI / -- r? I i;
T 964
_
Ile
Name: CHERRYVILLE Location: 035° 24' 00.45" N 081° 27' 31.77' W
Date: 3!4@004 Caption: Road realignment/Pipe placement on SR 1001, UT to Buffalo
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Creek, WS-III Watershed, Broad River Basin
Copyright (C) 1998, Wptech, Inc
,i, loz< ? \
of
on --f eM
° / \\ .991?;?'
ZONE A ZONE
A
ZONE X
Little
m 0
Buffalo ?.
Creek
n
rn/ i
\?\ 922
ZONE X 459• - ---
---
---
lot
\. 986
?.., / ¢ % Baker Crossroads
?'' ?r St Paul
919
Beam Mill
ZONE A ch
-BM 1001 ??.
° "A ... ?
'leaaant Grove
-'h
1908
? Ba
m
it
u
Golf \Course II
%
?\
JOINS PANEL 0200

1
9
r

i

P? 9A
2
3u
s ?
3 3 c2 .
P 2
rill
320? S
olol
3182
z
3182 ?o
a 11 3
.,1 11
8.10 SOIL MAPPING LEGEND OF APPROVED AND PROVISIONAL MAP UNITS
CLEVELAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA .
(MAP UNITS LISTED ALPHABETICALLY BY NAME)
September, 1999
Field Old Corr.
S ol .•Symbrils Status Mau Unit Name Notes
36B (303,57B,5063, A Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes 1,32,34,41
338,236B,34B)
36C (36D,30C,57C, A Appling sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes 21,33,35,
57D,34C,236C) 51,52
703 (70) A Buncombe loamy sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes, occasionally flooded 9,36,72
3182 (25B,250,318, A Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to B percent slopes, eroded 12,30,36,
2582,19B,23B, 38,62,70,71
31C,32B2,2382
93B,SOB,50C,903)
38 A Cecil-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 31,36
4A (4) A Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded 10,36,53
900 A Cliffield-Pigeonroost complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very stony 40
90E A CliffieId-Pigeon roost complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very stony 40
9OF A Cliffield-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes 40
25013 (250,5448,544) A Dogue sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, rarely flooded 61,79,83
250C)
95D A Evard-Cowee complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony 6,17,47,73
95E (92C,92D) A Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony 6,17,48,74,
80181182
95F A Evard-Cowee complex, 50 to 85 percent slopes, rocky 6,47,75
JSD (39D,318E,37E, A Grover gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, rocky 40,43,58
30D)
38E A Grover gravelly sandy loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes, very stony 54,76
59B (80A,80) A Helena-Worsham complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes 18,36
38B (39B) A Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 40
38C (39C,318C,318D) A Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony 40
138C (1388) A Hulett-Saw complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky 47,52,55
2388 A Hulett-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 40
3782 (37B,318B,38B2) A Madison gravelly sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 25,36
37C2 (37D,37D2) A Madison gravelly sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 25,52
13782 (19882, 197B) A Madison-Bethlehem complex, 2 to B percent slopes, stony, eroded 40
137C2 (198C2, 197C, A Madison-Bethlehem complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stony, eroded 40
17C)
17B A Madison-Bethlehem-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 52
49E (48F) A Montonia very channery silt loam, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very stony 1,2,37
32C2 (32D,25C2,19D, A Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 1,13,39,63,66
324D3,23C2,'
19D,236D,237C,
23D,23D2,22C,
93C,28C3)
32D2 (36E,324E,32E, A Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 24,52,56,64
344E,93D,35D)
98B2 (97B,35B) A Pacole t -Bethlehem complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 1,42 '.
98C2 (26C2,244D,28D, A Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 1,16,42,65
27C,35C,324D,97C)
Soil Mapping Legend (Cont'd.)
Field Old Corr.
Symbol Symbols Status Map Unit Name Notes
98D2 (26D2,244E,28E) A Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 36
97D (27D) A Paco let-Bethlehem complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony 8,15,36
7B A Paco let-Bethlehem-Urban land complex, 2 to B percent slopes 1
7C A Pacolet-Bethlehem-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 52
6882 (68B) A Pacolet-Sew complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 1,67
6802 A Pacolet-Saw complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 1
69D A Pacolet-Saw complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony 36
3C A Pacolet-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 52
Pt (QU) A Pits, quarries 1
66E (324F,32F) A Rion-Ashlar complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, rocky 24,57,77
60E (30E, 60F) A Rion-Cliffside complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very stony 19,44,
49,52
69C (606) A Saw-Wake complex, 4 to 15. percent elopes, very rocky 1,5,59
68D A Saw-Wake complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very rocky 1,5,59
46B (4682) A Tatum-Montonia complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 1,2,37
46C (46C2,40C) A Tatum-Mantonia complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 1,2,31
43D (48E,46E,249, A Tatum-Montonia complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes 1,2,37
40D)
lA (1,2A) A Toccoa sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occationally flooded 50,68,84
Ud (UO,UdB,UdC, A Udorthents, loamy 1,4,60
UuC)
Ur A Urban land 1
43B (232B,48B) A Uwharrie silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 1,3,37
43B2 A Uwharrie silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 1,3,37
43C (46D,232D,48D, A Uwharrie-Tatum complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 1,3,37
41A)
43C2 A Uwharrie-Tatum complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 1,3,37
69 (6C) A Uwharrie-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 1,3,37
BA (86,8) A Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded 78
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 12?- County: -Cie-yPland River Basin: Broa
Project ID: MA12003R (Moving _Ahead project)
Route: SR 1001, Partial Road Realignment for intersection improvement at
SR 1905. Stream: UT to Buffalo Creek, WS-III Waters
Water Quality Criteri a:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS R 17
ORW r Fr
WSI F F
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W. S. Critical Area r r
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Yes No
Arterial Urban r rr
Arterial Rural F F
Additional Site Information:
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
r F
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).
?Ye? o
a
? auw
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
04013
MEMO TO: John Dorney, DENR/DWQ/401/Wetlands Unit
FROM: Trish Simon, Division 12 Environmental Supervisor-P
DATE: March 5, 2004
SUBJECT: Pre-Construction Notification/401 Automated Payment
Q pp
u
OAR h a 7004
4J?GTIO 9
Enclosed are seven copies of a pre-construction notification for a NCDOT "Moving
Ahead" project in Cleveland County for your review.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure
• Work order number: 159062-55120005-37441-3855
• TIP #: NA
• Project Category: -420"0 Fee
is
Post Office Box 47 Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0047