20170537 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20201001

ID#* 20170537 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/01/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/1/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20170537
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Hannah Bridge
County: Johnston
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Hannah Bridge Bank Parcel MY2 Report.pdf 5AMB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:*

Bank Parcel Development Plan Year 2 Monitoring Report
Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site
DWR Project # 2017-0537v2
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Prepared By:
pres
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-829-9909
September 2020

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary.........................................................................
1.1 Project Location and Description ..................................
1.2 Project Success Criteria .................................................
1.3 Project Components......................................................
1.4 Riparian Restoration Approach .....................................
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions ..........................
1.6 Year 2 Monitoring Performance ....................................
2.0 Methods.......................................................................................
3.0 Reference....................................................................................
Appendix A: Site Mans
Figure l: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

1.0 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
EBX—Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide
this Bank Parcel Development Monitoring Report for the Hannah Bridge Riparian Buffer and Nutrient
Offset Mitigation Bank (Parcel). This Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for
unavoidable impacts due to development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey
(USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC — 03020201). In addition, it also provides nutrient offset
credits in the 03020201 HUC, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, for existing and proposed development
requiring such mitigation. This Parcel is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, 15A NCAC 0213.0703 and the RES Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits (UMBI), made and entered into by EBX-Neuse I,
LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality -
Division of Water Resources (DWR). Supporting figures can be found in Appendix A. The Parcel has also
been designed in concurrence with the Hannah Bridge Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site in the Neu -Con
Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2015-01799). The mitigation plan and baseline
report for the Hannah Bridge Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank have been approved by the Interagency
Review Team (IRT).
The Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately five miles south of the town of Four Oaks, NC
(Figure 1). The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03020201150020 and
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin Number 03-04-04. To access the Parcel from
the town of Four Oaks, travel South on NC Hwy 96 and turn left on Green Pasture Road. The coordinates
of the site are 35.380621°N and-78.417107'W.
When combining the Hannah Bridge Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Hannah Bridge Buffer
Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the conservation easement totals 46.2 acres and includes unnamed
tributaries, and storm water runoff from adjacent pastures that flow directly to Hannah Creek. The drainage
area of the Parcel is 1.39 mil. The Parcel is located in an area dominated by agriculture, livestock, and
residential land use. A majority of the Parcel was utilized for livestock pasture. Additional land use practices
included the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation and the relocation, dredging and straightening
of onsite streams has resulted in degraded water quality and unstable channel characteristics.
The Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site was built to provide stream restoration and enhancement on
approximately 8,524 linear feet of streams and wetland restoration, enhancement, and preservation on 16.7
acres of wetlands within the conservation easement through a separate mitigation banking instrument with
the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT). Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation
of the Neuse riparian buffer (as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0233) and other riparian areas onsite result in
immediate water quality benefits within the vicinity of the Parcel and include the removal of livestock
access to Parcel streams and reduction in nutrient loads from agricultural land -uses. The riparian restoration
activities within the Parcel also result in improved water quality within the downstream watershed.
Hannah Bridge I Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2020

1.2 Project Success Criteria
Riparian buffer vegetation monitoring will be based on the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five years and will be
conducted during the fall season with the first year occurring at least 5 months from initial planting. Ten
vegetation monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size and cover at least two percent of
the riparian restoration area. Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted Neuse buffer zones and
nutrient offset mitigation area and are representative of the crediting areas. The following data will be
recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. Photos are
to be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. The measures of
vegetative success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least 4 native hardwood tree species, where no
one species is greater than 50 percent of the established stems, established at a density of at least 260 planted
trees per acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance
standards. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become dominant or
alter the desired community structure of the site.
RES must monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, plots placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation area for buffer
and nutrient offset credits will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Hannah
Bridge Stream Mitigation Plan.
1.3 Project Components
Before ratios and reductions were applied, this Bank generates credit in 4.585 acres (199,724.56 ft2) of
riparian buffer restoration area, 0.385 acres (4,907.04 ft2) of riparian buffer enhancement area via cattle
exclusion, 3.41 acres (7,396.49 ft2) of riparian buffer preservation, of which only 1.660 preservation acres
were used for crediting, area, and 4.79 acres (10,891.71 lbs) of nutrient offset area. The riparian buffer
mitigation credits generated services Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the
Neuse River Basin excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Nitrogen nutrient offsets generated services
nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are authorized in 15A NCAC 02B .0703 within the
USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Sponsor maintains three credit
ledgers. One ledger accounts for buffer restoration credits, one ledger accounts for buffer preservation and
enhancement credits, and one accounts for nitrogen nutrient offset credits. All mitigation credit assets shall
be shown on these credit ledgers. The total potential riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits
that the Hannah Bridge Bank generates are summarized below.
Hannah Bridge 2 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2020

Table 1. Hannah Bridge Mitigation Credits
Riparian Buffer Credit
Riparian
Credit
Existing
Used
Credit Per
% Full
Zone
Type
Mitigation Type
Acreage
Acreage
z
Acre (ft)
Ratio
Credit
Mitigation Assets
Riparian
Restoration
4.585
4.585
43,560
1:1
100%
199,724.56 ftz (4.59 ac)
Buffer
Riparian
Enhancement via
0.147
0.147
43,560
2:1
100%
3,197.83 ftz (0.07 ac)
Buffer
Cattle Exclusion
0-100,
Riparian
Preservation: Subject
2.717
1.622
43,560
10:1
100%
7,065.43 ft2 (0.16 ac)
Buffer
Streams
Riparian
Preservation: Non-
0.038
0.038
43,560
5:1
100%
331.06 ftz (0.01 ac)
Buffer
Subject Streams
Riparian
Enhancement via
0.238
0.238
43,560
2:1
33%
1,709.22 ftz (0.04 ac)
Buffer
Cattle Exclusion
101-200'
Riparian
Preservation: Subject
0.653
0.000
43,560
10:1
o
33%
0.00 ftz (0.00 ac)
Buffer
Streams
Riparian
Preservation: Non-
0.002
0.000
43,560
5:1
33%
0.00 ftz (0.00 ac)
Buffer
Subject Streams
Total Restoration
4.585
4.585
199,724.56 ftz (4.59 ac)
Total Enhancements
0.385
0.385
4,907.04 ftz (0.11 ac)
includes ratios & reductions
7,396.49 ftz (0.17 ac)
Buffer Preservation
3.410
includes ratios & reductions
Nutrient
Offset Credit
Zone
Credit
Mitigation Type
Acreage
Credit Per
Ratio
Mitigation Assets (Ibs)
Type
Acre Ibs
0-100'
Nitrogen
Restoration
1.59
2,273.02
N/A
3,619.66
101-200'
Nitrogen
Restoration
3.20
2,273.02
N/A
7,272.05
TOTAL
4.79
10,891.71
*According to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (4) and (5), "the area of preservation credit within a buffer
mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation ".
All riparian restoration in the table above is generated on land determined by DWR as being agricultural.
Therefore, the 4.585 acres (199,724.56 ftz) of Neuse riparian buffer restoration credits shown in the table
above, can be used for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both.
Neither riparian buffer preservation nor enhancement credits can be converted into nutrient offset credits.
The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit
conversions and transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and transfer
request submitted to the DWR, the Sponsor is to provide all updated credit ledgers showing all transactions
that have occurred up to the date of the request.
1.4 Riparian Restoration Approach
The land use adjacent to most of the streams on the Bank Parcel was pasture. Neuse riparian buffer
restoration was used for riparian buffer credit in cultivated areas while enhancement or preservation was
used in forested areas. All riparian restoration areas were planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet
from the stream with bare root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8 foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680
trees per acre. The buffered channels provide water quality and habitat functions within the sensitive Neuse
River watershed. Rapidly regenerating species and invasive species may develop greater individual species
Hannah Bridge 3 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2020

density and create a less diverse mix. During the site visit on April 16, 2015, DWR determined the upstream
portion of reach T 13 to be a ditch, while the downstream portion was a stream. The portion classified as a
ditch is only viable for nutrient offset credits. All disturbed areas within the easement were planted with
native wetland vegetation and livestock will be excluded with fencing installed along the easement
boundary.
Buffer enhancement occurred in areas where grazing was adjacent to the stream in accordance with the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). This includes areas adjacent to reaches
BB 1 and HB4. RES installed cattle exclusion fencing to exclude access to riparian areas and their associated
streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS specifications. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may
require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Acer rubrum) and
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Minimal maintenance is anticipated due to the past cultivation
history. Buffer enhancement can only generate buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient
offset credits.
IV and HF2 are in forested areas where cattle were not observed to be present and are subject to the Neuse
Buffer Protection Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0233 and are therefore generate preservation buffer mitigation
credit under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n) and (o)(5). Preservation activities ensure that the buffer is
permanently protected from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the
functioning of the buffer. Where HF2 flows into an oversized, channelized ditch nutrient credits are
generated. Preservation buffer credits also are generated in reaches HB1, HB3, HB4, and T 13 when
restoration activities occur in forested areas. Buffer preservation can only generate buffer mitigation credit
and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.
1.5 Construction and As Built Conditions
Revegetation of the site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream
Swamp is the target community type and was used for all areas within the project. The community is defined
by Schafale (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in April and May 2019. Deviations from the
initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A list of the planted species can be found in Table
2.
Stream construction activities were completed in May 2019. The site was constructed in accordance with
the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits and the construction was approved by the IRT on a
site visit in July 2019. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2015-01799), 401 (DWR # 17-0537), and NPDES Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan QC# 18-040-P) Permits. There were no easement changes between BPDP
approval and construction. The small change in crediting is due to a more accurate tree line survey being
used to generate the as -built credits. The conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs attached to either fences or t-posts. Fences were installed in
areas where livestock is present, and t-posts are used as physical barriers where livestock is not present.
1.6 Year 2 Monitoring Performance
The Hannah Bridge Year 2 Monitoring (MY2) activities were completed in September 2020. All MY2
data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and stream interim
success criteria. As requested by DWR in the Task 3 Credit Release Letter, RES has added three random
vegetation plots in DWR crediting areas that were measured in MY2 and will be measured each year for
the remainder of the monitoring period.
Hannah Bridge 4 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2020

Ten permanent vegetation plots (VP) and three random vegetation plots (RVP) were monitored during
September 2020. Vegetation tables are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MY2
data indicates that 12 of the 13 plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per
acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 283 to 890 planted stems per acre with a mean of 604 planted
stems per acre across all plots. A total of 14 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species
were noted in three plots, with an average of 638 stems per acre. The average tree height observed was 4.7
feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project. The supplemental planting that was performed in April
2020 was successful in all areas except in and around VP16. The 0.35-acre area in and around VP16 will
be replanted in the spring of 2021. RES inspected the easement boundary and found no evidence of damaged
fencing, missing easement markers or encroachment. The two areas of re -sprouted Chinese privet that were
located in the wetland crediting area during MY1 were treated in MY2. Two new areas of re -sprouted
Chinese privet were reported in MY2 however both are in wetland crediting areas and both will be treated
in MY3.
2.0 Methods
Vegetation success is being monitored at 10 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of
species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the
field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at
the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year. Additionally,
RES will conduct three 100 mZ vegetation transects in each year starting in MY2 and ending in MY5. One
transect will be placed entirely within the nutrient offset area near VP 3, one transect will be placed entirely
within the nutrient offset area near VP6, and one transect will be placed entirely within the nutrient offset
area near and VP12. The vegetation transects are to include the same vegetation data as the permanent
monitoring plots. DWR requested the vegetation transects as a result of the permanent vegetation plots
being installed half in the nutrient offset area and half in the wetland mitigation area.
3.0 Reference
Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC (2017). Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site — Bank Parcel
Development Plan
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NCDENR. 2009. "Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 0213.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Hannah Bridge 5 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2020

Appendix A
Site Maps

1
91PCkrn— Rd
ri e� b
Blackmon sry
Crossroads feR
a
c'
Legend
we64 MITI Rrl
Conservation Easement
0
a
ci
Charlie Rd Charlie Rd
ti
wpkl
u`
0
S
-•, 3lrick[ands cros
v
SSrlcklanes Crossroads Rd �
p
3
Nhi1e
w
q� "Drool F
P
n�
�a
P„ ry
b
5 m
.i •"�� Oak Forest
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Oak Fo" Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC,
r'�40penStreetMap contributors, and th,el,GIS'U'ser Community
N
Date: 8/5/2019
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
w e Drawn by: RTM rLms
Hannah Bridge Buffer/Nutrient Site
n s Checked by: BPB
0 500 1,000
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Feet

Veaetation Condition Assessment
H Target Community
• • ®IIII�IIIIIII
C1� 3
f*.
<2�
❑ 6
O9
HB3
Y—
J
LN
`F 14
GO12
f
N
W E
S
0 150 300
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions Plan View
Hannah Bridge Buffer/Nutrient Site
MY2 2020
Johnston County, North Carolina
Date: 10/1/2020 1 Drawn by: RTM
1 in = 300 feet
LEGEND
OConvservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
o >320 stems/acre
o <320 stems/acre
o Random Vegetation Plot
Buffer/Nutrient Credit Type
o Restoration, 0-100'
= Enhancement, 0-100'
= Enhancement, 101-200'
- Preservation, 0-100'
Preservation, 101-200'
Nutrient, 0-100'
©Nutrient, 101-200'
KI Wetland Mitigation
— Stream Alignment

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
5,500
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
4,000
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
3,500
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
3,500
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
3,000
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
2,400
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2,200
Tuhptree
Liriodendron tulipifera
2,000
River Birch
Betula ni ra
1,600
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1,500
Cherrybark Oak
Quercus pagoda
1,100
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
600
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
500
Total
31,400
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
2
890
202
1093
Yes
5.2
3
647
202
850
Yes
3.6
6
688
0
688
Yes
7.0
9
809
0
809
Yes
7.0
11
364
0
364
Yes
3.6
12
688
40
728
Yes
5.4
14
567
0
567
Yes
4.1
15
567
0
567
Yes
2.5
16
283
0
283
No
2.7
18
688
0
688
Yes
2.5
R1
728
0
728
Yes
2.9
R2
486
0
486
Yes
8.0
R3
445
0
445
Yes
6.0
Project Avg
604
34
638
Yes
4.7

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 4a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Current Plot Data (MY2 2020)
Annual Means
05082019-01-0002
05082019-01-0003
05082019-01-0006
05082019-01-0009
05082019-01-0011
05082019-01-0012
05082019-01-0014
05082019-01-0015
05082019-01-0016
05082019-01-0018
MY2(2020)
MY1(2019)
MYO(2019)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
41
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
12
12
12
12
12
12
16
16
16
Cephalanthusoccidental icommon
buttonbus
Shrub
5
5
5
1
1
1
6
6
6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
9
9
9
17
17
17
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
31
5
8
101
Liriodendrontulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
11
1
11
11
7
7
7
8
8
9
91
9
9
23
23
23
Pinustaeda
loblollypine
Tree
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Platanusoccidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
24
24
24
17
17
17
29
29
29
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
10
10
10
751
75
75
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
9
9
91
4
4
4
8
8
8
6
6
6
1
11
1
2
21
2
1
1
1
31
31
31
26
26
26
8
8
8
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
31
2
2
21
2
2
2
5
5
5
19
191
19
161
16
16
5
5
5
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
7
7
7
6
6
6
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
22
22
22
19
19
19
17
17
17
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
9
9
9
10
10
10
18
18
18
Stem count
size (ares)
22
22
27
16
16
21
17
17
17
20
20
20
9
9
9
17
17
18
14
14
14
14
14
14
7
7
7
17
17
17
153
153
164
139
139
240
217
217
217
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
10
10
10
size (ACRES)
Species count
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.25
0.25
0.25
7
71
91
61
61
71
51
51
51
81
81
8
71
71
71
71
8
4
4
4
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
6
13
13
15
11
11
12
11
11
11
StemsperACRE
890
890
1093
647
647
850
688
688
688
809
809
809
364
364
364
688
688
728
567
567
567
567
567
567
2811
2931
2831
6881
688
688
6191
6191
664
5631
5631
9711
8781
878
878

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 4b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Random Plot 1
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Betula nigra
160
2
Platanus occidentalis
105
3
Platanus occidentalis
80
4
Quercus lyrata
135
5
Taxodium distichum
165
6
Quercus lyrata
54
7
Quercus lyrata
85
8
Cephalnthus occidentalis
60
9
Cephalnthus occidentalis
55
10
Platanus occidentalis
70
11
Quercus lyrata
110
12
Quercus phellos
55
13
Quercus pagoda
70
14
Cephalnthus occidentalis
35
15
Cephalnthus occidentalis
35
16
Platanus occidentalis
80
17
Platanus occidentalis
110
18
Quercus pagoda
135
Stems/Acre
728
Average Height (cm)
89
Average Height (ft)
1 2.9
Plot Size (m)
1 25 x 4
Random Plot 2
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Platanus occidentalis
300
2
Platanus occidentalis
25
3
Betula nigra
80
4
Quercus michauxii
150
5
Platanus occidentalis
400
6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
200
7
Quercus lyrata
180
8
Quercus lyrata
220
9
Platanus occidentalis
400
10
Platanus occidentalis
450
11
Platanus occidentalis
400
12
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
110
Stems/Acre
486
Average Height (cm)
243
Average Height (ft)
8.0
Plot Size (m)
25 x 4
Random Plot 3
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Quercus alba
100
2
Quercus lyrata
170
3
Quercus lyrata
160
4
Quercus lyrata
125
5
Quercus lyrata
135
6
Quercus lyrata
153
7
Quercus michauxii
175
8
Betula nigra
300
9
Liriodendron tulipifera
73
10
Platanus occidentalis
320
11
Platanus occidentalis
290
Stems/Acre
445
Average Height (cm)
182
Average Height (ft)
6.0
Plot Size (m)
25 x 4

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Hannah Bridge MY2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (9/22 20 0
1.
\>
\
. : t
Iv
»
�Al,�?/2^
Vegetation Plot 6
Vegetation Plot!!
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation /G12

Vegetation Plot 14
Vegetation Plot 16
Vegetation Plot 15
Vegetation Plot 18

Hannah Bridge DWR MY2 Random Vegetation Plots (9/22/2020)
Random Vegetation Plot 1
Random Vegetation Plot 3
Random Vegetation Plot 2

Appendix D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

Plot (continued): 05082019-01-0002 Sep 2020 Data o TIRS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH CDddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (in) (in) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0002 arty: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): Date: / / / / New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.3780 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.420458 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (in): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 10
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
o
908
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.3
0.3
270.0
1.0 ❑
910
Quercus phellos
®
R
1.1
1.9
Missin g
❑
911
Quercus lyrata
®
R
0.3
6.2
Missin g
❑
912
Quercus lyrata
O
R
1.1
4.8
175.0
0.5 ❑
913
Taxodium distichum
R
1.9
3.4
115.0
DBH? ❑
915
Quercus phellos
O
R
3.9
0.9
100.0
❑
916
Quercus lyrata
O
R
6.0
0.7
80.0
❑
917
Quercus lyrata
R
5.1
2.1
Missin g
❑
918
Quercus lyrata
O
R
4.3
3.7
82.0
❑
919
Betula nigra
R
4.0
4.4
175.0
0.1 ❑
920
Quercus lyrata
O
R
3.4
5.4
160.0
0.5 ❑
921
Quercus lyrata
O
R
2.5
7.0
112.0
DBH? ❑
922
Quercus lyrata
O
R
1.6
8.8
230.0
0.8 ❑
923
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.4
9.4
Missin g
❑
924
Betula nigra
O
R
3.0
9.5
400.0
2.5 ❑
925
Quercus lyrata
O
R
3.7
8.1
215.0
0.6 ❑
926
Betula nigra
O
R
4.4
6.8
300.0
2.0 ❑
927
Betula nigra
@
R
5.2
5.6
320.0
2.5 ❑
928
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.9
4.1
10.0
❑
929
Quercus nigra
O
R
6.5
2.8
95.0
❑
931
Quercus pagoda
O
R
7.7
0.6
90.0
❑
932
Quercus nigra
O
R
9.7
3.3
91.0
❑
933
Quercus lyrata
O
R
8.9
4.6
80.0
❑
934
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.0
6.1
70.0
❑
936
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.2
8.9
127.0
DBH? ❑
937
Quercus lyrata
(y)
R
9.3
9.9
200.0
0.6 ❑
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
_-m-_-
_-m-_-
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05082019-01-0002
Sep 2020 Data
o
TIRS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
#sterns: 26 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source X Y Height DBH Vigor* Damages Notes
p (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Fxplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamoline*:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): Li 10cm L1 50cm Li 100cm Li 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
**Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
064
••
N5
••
�6
•
�7
�S
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0002
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 10 ° # stems: 26
0-N map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0003
VMD Year (1-5): F31 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ / / /
15.3775 Datum: NAD27
78.419435 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 178
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* I cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
939
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.3
0.5
118.0
DBH? ❑
940
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
4.1
1.0
122.0
DBH? ❑
941
Quercus lyrata
O
R
3.0
2.1
165.0
0.3 ❑
943
Quercus michauxii
®
R
0.8
5.0
135.0
DBH? ❑
945
Quercus phellos
O
R
1.5
7.6
135.0
DBH? ❑
946
Quercus lyrata
®
R
2.8
6.3
127.0
DBH? ❑
947
Quercus nigra
R
3.9
5.0
112.0
DBH? ❑
948
Taxodium distichum
O
R
5.1
4.0
70.0
❑
949
Taxodium distichum
O
R
6.1
2.7
85.0
952
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.8
4.3
95.0
953
Quercus phellos
R
7.6
5.7
120.0
DBH?
954
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.3
7.3
135.0
DBH? ❑
955
Quercus lyrata
O
R
5.0
8.6
110.0
DBH? ❑
956
Quercus lyrata
O
R
3.6
9.8
62.0
❑
957
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.8
9.8
110.0
DBH? ❑
958
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.0
8.4
60.0
❑
# stems: 16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05082019-01-0003
Sep 2020 Data
o
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Fxplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplinu**: 7
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
094
••
N5
••
6 �7
•
�8I:Z
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0003 X-axis: 178' #stems: 16
map size:
N 0 small
Y
(0,0) X:5m
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0006
VMD Year (1-5): F31 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ / / /
15.3801 Datum: NAD27
78.417073 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 59
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1010
Platanus occidentalis
(�)
R
0.4
0.5
350.0
2.6 ❑
1012
Quercus lyrata
O
R
2.8
2.2
165.0
0.4 ❑
1014
Quercus nigra
®
R
0.7
5.0
120.0
DBH? ❑
1015
Quercus pagoda
O
R
0.8
9.4
220.0
0.4 ❑
1016
Quercus michauxii
®
R
1.8
7.9
Missing❑
1017
Quercus lyrata
O
R
2.7
6.7
140.0
0.2 ❑
1018
Quercus michauxii
®
R
3.9
5.1
100.0
❑
1019
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.7
3.9
270.0
2.3 ❑
1020
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.6
2.1
450.0
3.0 ❑
1021
Quercus lyrata
R
6.2
0.7
200.0
1.1 ❑
1022
Quercus lyrata
O
R
9.3
1.8
230.0
1.4 ❑
1023
Quercus lyrata
R
8.3
3.1
80.0
❑
1024
Quercus lyrata
O
R
6.3
6.2
40.0
❑
1025
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.5
7.5
400.0
3.0 ❑
1026
Quercus lyrata
O
R
4.6
8.6
125.0
DBH? ❑
1027
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.6
9.7
300.0
2.0 ❑
1028
Quercus lyrata
Q
R
8.3
8.1
220.0
0.7 ❑
1698
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.0
4.2
200.0
0.8 ❑
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05082019-01-0006
Sep 2020 Data
o
TIRS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Fxplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplinu**: 7
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
094
••
N5
••
6 �7
•
�8I:Z
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0006
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 59- N #stems: 18
map size:
0/ small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0009
VMD Year (1-5): F31 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ / / /
15.3803 Datum: NAD27
78.4151 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5TX-Axis bearing (deg): 128
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1067
Quercus michauxii
O
R
8.8
0.9
142.0
0.3 ❑
1068
Quercus lyrata
O
R
9.3
4.7
160.0
0.5 ❑
1069
Quercus pagoda
@
R
8.0
3.6
190.0
1.0 ❑
1070
Quercus pagoda
O
R
6.8
2.5
230.0
1.5 ❑
1071
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
5.8
1.6
132.0
DBH? ❑
1073
Quercus michauxii
O
R
0.4
0.3
180.0
0.5 ❑
1074
Quercus lyrata
O
R
1.9
1.7
210.0
1.5 ❑
1075
Quercus lyrata
®
R
3.7
3.2
220.0
1.4 ❑
1076
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.0
4.2
175.0
0.7 ❑
1077
Quercus lyrata
R
6.2
5.6
190.0
0.8 ❑
1078
Quercus lyrata
R
7.6
6.7
210.0
0.8 ❑
1079
Quercus lyrata
O
R
9.0
8.1
195.0
0.5 ❑
1080
Betula nigra
O
R
7.4
9.9
400.0
3.1 ❑
1081
Betula nigra
O
R
6.0
9.1
375.0
2.3 ❑
1082
Betula nigra
O
R
4.5
7.9
350.0
2.1 ❑
1083
Betula nigra
R
3.2
6.6
240.0
1.1 ❑
1084
Betula nigra
O
R
2.0
5.3
225.0
1.0 ❑
1085
Quercus michauxii
O
R
0.6
4.0
148.0
0.3 ❑
1086
Quercus sp.
®
R
0.4
7.4
142.0
0.3 ❑
1087
Taxodium distichum
®
R
1.6
8.7
140.0
0.2 ❑
# stems: 20 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05082019-01-0009
Sep 2020 Data
o
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Fxplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplinu**: 7
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requimdifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
•••3
•• 094
N5
••
6
•
�7
�8I:Z
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0009
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 128' #stems: 20
N
0 map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0011
VMD Year (1-5): F31 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ / / /
15.3807 Datum: NAD27
78.415965 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 208
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1112
Taxodium distichum
®
R
1.9
3.1
Missing❑
1114
Quercus phellos
R
3.3
0.2
147.0
0.2 ❑
1117
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
2.8
5.4
45.0
❑
1118
Betula nigra
R
1.6
7.3
230.0
0.7 ❑
1119
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
2.9
9.0
80.0
❑
1120
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.6
8.0
190.0
0.4 ❑
1121
Quercus michauxii
R
5.5
6.1
100.0
❑
1125
Quercus michauxii
O
R
9.1
3.6
30.0
❑
1126
Quercus nigra
®
R
7.5
9.5
110.0
DBH? ❑
1127
Quercus lyrata
O
R
9.2
8.9
63.0
❑
# stems: 10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) lcm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & so bsam plin2* *:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50c m ❑ 100c m ❑ 13 7c m
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS-
HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS-
DBH
TREES- DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBtI)
**Required ifcrtoff>1Ocmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
•3
••
0#4
••
NS
••
�6
•
�7
8I;T
TZ
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0011
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 208 °
NO
# stems: 10
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0012
VMD Year (1-5): F31 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ / / /
15.3814 Datum: NAD27
78.413113 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 95
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1129
Quercus lyrata
R
7.0
0.8
115.0
DBH? ❑
1130
Platanus occidentalis
R
8.9
1.8
290.0
2.0 ❑
1131
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.5
5.0
105.0
DBH? ❑
1132
Quercus lyrata
O
R
8.3
4.5
180.0
0.6 ❑
1134
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
5.1
2.9
120.0
DBH? ❑
1135
Quercus pagoda
O
R
3.6
2.1
65.0
❑
1136
Quercus pagoda
O
R
2.0
1.3
75.0
❑
1137
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
0.4
0.4
105.0
DBH? ❑
1138
Quercus alba
®
R
0.4
3.4
100.0
❑
1139
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.4
6.1
72.0
❑
1140
Liriodendron tulipifera
R
5.2
7.1
Missin g
❑
1141
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.3
7.1
250.0
1.4 ❑
1142
Platanus occidentalis
@
R
9.2
8.2
240.0
1.3 ❑
1143
Betula nigra
O
R
6.3
9.5
280.0
1.5 ❑
1144
Quercus phellos
R
3.2
8.1
175.0
0.5 ❑
1145
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.4
7.1
230.0
2.0 ❑
1146
Betula nigra
®
R
1.0
9.1
310.0
2.1 ❑
1147
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.0
9.7
100.0
❑
# stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05082019-01-0012
Sep 2020 Data
o
TIRS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Fxplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplinu**: 7
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
094
••
N5
••
6 �7
•
�8I:Z
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0012
Y:5n
J)
O
4
0
0
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 95° N #stems: 18
map size:
small 0l
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0014
VMD Year (1-5): F31 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ / / /
15.3821 Datum: NAD27
78.412387 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5TX-Axis bearing (deg): 136
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1174
Taxodium distichum
O
R
0.4
0.5
142.0
0.2 ❑
1176
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.4
3.8
95.0
1179
Taxodium distichum
O
R
0.9
8.7
83.0
1180
Quercus michauxii
O
R
5.0
9.8
165.0
0.3 ❑
1181
Quercus michauxii
®
R
4.7
8.2
41.0
❑
1183
Platanus occidentalis
R
4.2
3.7
200.0
0.7 ❑
1184
Quercus michauxii
O
R
4.0
1.4
105.0
DBH? ❑
1185
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.7
3.5
170.0
0.3 ❑
1187
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.5
8.0
165.0
0.5 ❑
1188
Taxodium distichum
O
R
9.3
7.4
112.0
DBH? ❑
1189
Quercus phellos
R
9.1
4.8
140.0
0.2
2115
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
3.0
8.0
67.0
2116
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
3.0
6.0
100.0
2117
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
6.0
2.0
145.0
0.1
# stems: 14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05082019-01-0014
Sep 2020 Data
o
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Fxplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplinu**: 7
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
094
••
N5
••
6 �7
•
�8I:Z
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0014
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 136° #stems: 14
N map size:
0 small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0015
VMD Year (1-5): F31 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ / / /
15.3830 Datum: NAD27
78.416015 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 330
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1195
Cephalanthus occidentalis
@
R
9.5
5.9
52.0
❑
1196
Cephalanthus occidentalis
R
8.7
5.0
135.0
DBH? ❑
1197
Quercus michauxii
O
R
7.6
3.9
130.0
DBH? ❑
1198
Quercus michauxii
(in)
R
6.6
3.1
125.0
0.4 ❑
1199
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.7
2.3
32.0
❑
1201
Cephalanthus occidentalis
O
R
3.8
0.4
72.0
❑
1205
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
3.8
3.6
35.0
❑
1208
Quercus lyrata
O
R
6.7
6.8
35.0
❑
1213
Quercus pagoda
O
R
6.3
9.9
Missin g
❑
1214
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.2
9.2
Missin g
❑
1215
Quercus sp.
®
R
4.1
8.1
Missin g
❑
1217
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.3
6.2
20.0
❑
1218
Cephalanthus occidentalis
®
R
1.2
5.3
130.0
DBH? ❑
1219
Cephalanthus occidentalis
O
R
0.4
4.5
100.0
❑
2118
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.0
0.5
82.0
❑
2119
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.8
4.9
62.0
❑
2120
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
3.6
6.0
40.0
❑
# stems: 17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
j --
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05082019-01-0015
Sep 2020 Data
o
TIRS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Fxplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplinu**: 7
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
094
••
N5
••
6 �7
•
�8I:Z
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0015
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 330°
# stems: 17
0 map size:
, small
N
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0016
VMD Year (1-5): F31 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ / / /
15.3830 Datum: NAD27
78.414487 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 330
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1241
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
9.0
7.8
95.0
❑
2121
Quercus michauxii
®
R
4.7
5.7
60.0
❑
2122
Quercus alba
R
4.9
2.5
54.0
❑
2123
Quercus michauxii
®
R
2.0
2.0
68.0
❑
2124
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.0
4.9
100.0
❑
2125
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.0
9.6
75.0
❑
2126
Cephalanthus occidentalis
O
R
10.0
5.5
122.0
DBH? ❑
# stems: 7 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cutoff
& so bsam Piing* *: 7
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species 1000
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requimdifcrtoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1
•2
•
•3
••
064
••
NS
••
�6
•
�7
�8
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0016
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 330'
# stems: 7
map size:
small
N
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0018
VMD Year (1-5): F31 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
/ / / /
15.3748 Datum: NAD27
78.417931 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 348
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10 Y: 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1285
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
0.4
0.3
100.0
❑
1286
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.6
6.4
80.0
❑
1288
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.6
7.4
170.0
0.3 ❑
1289
Quercus michauxii
®
R
1.9
3.5
80.0
❑
1290
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
1.9
1.3
15.0
❑
1291
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
3.2
0.3
20.0
❑
1292
Liriodendron tulipifera
R
4.1
1.7
Missin g
❑
1293
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
4.1
2.9
110.0
DBH? ❑
1294
Quercus michauxii
O
R
4.2
4.4
100.0
❑
1296
Quercus michauxii
O
R
4.6
7.9
20.0
❑
1297
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
(m)
R
6.2
9.2
Missin g
❑
1298
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.2
5.3
80.0
❑
1299
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
6.2
2.3
115.0
DBH? ❑
1300
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.6
0.6
40.0
❑
1301
Liriodendron tulipifera
R
8.1
3.2
25.0
❑
1302
Quercus michauxii
@
R
8.1
5.7
110.0
DBH? ❑
1303
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
7.3
8.3
72.0
❑
1304
Quercus michauxii
O
R
8.3
9.8
127.0
DBH? ❑
1305
Quercus sp.
O
R
9.5
1.5
12.0
❑
# stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVs-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
05082019-01-0018
Sep 2020 Data
o
TIRS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Fxplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplinu**: 7
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•
• 3
••
094
••
N5
••
6 �7
•
�8I:Z
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0018
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 348°
# stems: 19
map size:
0 N small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1