20171295 Ver 1_Baseline Monitoring Report_20201001

ID#* 20171295 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 10/01/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/1/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes a No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
rJ Stream r Wetlands [Buffer ❑ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Matt Butler
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20171295
Existing IDY
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Scout
Davie
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version: * 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Scout Baseline Monitoring Report.pdf 26.96MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Matt Butler
Signature:*

SCOUT
STREAM MITIGATION SITE
DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
RES YADKIN 01 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
SAW-2017-01469
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT
Provided by:
fires
Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
An entity of Resource Environmental Solutions
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-209-1056
September 2020

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary..................................................................................................................................... I
1.1 Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. I
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................... I
1.3 Project Success Criteria............................................................................................................. 2
StreamSuccess Criteria................................................................................................................... 2
VegetationSuccess Criteria............................................................................................................. 3
1.4 Project Components.................................................................................................................. 3
1.5 Stream Design/Approach.......................................................................................................... 3
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions...................................................................................... 4
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance(MYO)................................................................................. 4
Vegetation........................................................................................................................................ 4
StreamGeomorphology................................................................................................................... 5
StreamHydrology............................................................................................................................ 5
2.0 Methods.................................................................................................................................................. 5
3.0 References............................................................................................................................................... 6
Appendix A: Background Tables
Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Background Information Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photos
Monitoring Device Photos
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5: Planted Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Baseline Cross -Section Plots
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Appendix E: As -Built Plan Sheets
Scout As -Built Survey
Redline Scout As -Built Survey
Scout As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site September 2020

1.0 Proiect Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Scout Mitigation Site (the "Project") is located in Davie County, North Carolina, approximately eight
miles west of Clemmons and five miles northwest of Bermuda Run. Water quality stressors that affected
the Project included livestock production, agricultural production, and lack of riparian buffer. The Project
presents 3,144 linear feet (LF) of stream restoration and enhancement generating 2,918 Warm Stream
Mitigation Units (SMU) along Hauser Creek and two unnamed tributaries.
The Project is located in the Yadkin River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03040101, Target Local Watershed
(TLW) 03040101160010, and NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) subbasin 03-07-02. The current
State classification for Hauser Creek is Water Supply IV (WS-IV). WS-IV waters are sources of water
supply for drinking, culinary, or food processing purposes where a WS-I, II or III classification is not
feasible. These waters are also protected for Class C uses (NCDWQ, 2011).
The Project's total easement area is approximately 13.22 acres within the overall drainage area of 810 acres
and consisted of agricultural fields and wooded areas. The Project is between two separate portions of the
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Mockingbird Site. While each site could be developed
independently of the other, the combined easements result in a much larger contiguous protected corridor
and high -quality aquatic habitat. The Mockingbird Site has a total easement area that is approximately 27
acres and presents 8,998 linear feet of stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation. Additionally, the
Mockingbird Site connects to the upstream end of the DMS Hauser Creek Mitigation Site. All sites
combined total 49.3 acres and 14,605 LF of stream that are protected in perpetuity.
The stream design approach for the Project combined the analog method of natural channel design with
analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and floodplain. The
analog method involved the use of a reference reach, or "template" stream, adjacent to, nearby, or
previously in the same location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach were
replicated to create the features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed and
boundary conditions are similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al., 2001). Hydraulic
geometry was developed using analytical methods to identify the design discharge.
The Project will be monitored on a regular basis throughout the seven-year post -construction monitoring
period, or until performance standards are met. Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review
Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to Unique Places to Save (UP2S). This party shall serve as
conservation easement holder and long-term steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection
of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld. Endowment funds
required to uphold easement and deed restrictions will be finalized prior to site transfer to the responsible
party-
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream Functions
Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives will be realized by the Project. These goals
clearly address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were identified as major
watershed stressors in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River RBRP.
Scout 1 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site September 2020

The Project goals are:
• Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non -erosive manner in a stable channel;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbanks flows and
connection to the active floodplain;
• Improve instream habitat;
Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation; and
Indirectly support the goals of the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP to improve water quality
and to reduce sediment and nutrient loads.
The Project objectives to address the goals are:
• Designed and reconstructed stable stream channels with appropriate pattern, dimension, and profile
based on reference reach conditions;
• Added in -stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced
streams;
• Installed habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and pools of
varying depths to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduced bank height ratios and increased entrenchment ratios to reference reach conditions;
• Increased forested riparian buffers to at least 50 feet on both sides of the channel along the project
reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community;
• Treated exotic invasive species;
• Established a permanent conservation easement on the Project that excludes livestock from stream
channels and their associated buffers.
Limitations to achieving these watershed goals arise by remaining constrained to the project boundaries.
While we are restoring the habitat and streams to stable and effective conditions that achieve our goals
within the Project parcels, we are unable to influence the effect of poor riparian buffers and livestock impact
in other areas within the watershed. However, through this Project's connectivity with other projects in the
watershed, especially its close proximity to the DMS Mockingbird and Hauser Creek Sites, and responsible
stewardship of current restoration projects, overall watershed functionality and health will improve to meet
the RBRP goals.
1.3 Project Success Criteria
The Project follows the USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the "Wilmington District Stream
and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" dated October 24, 2016. Cross section and vegetation plot
data will be collected in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream hydrology data and visual monitoring will be
reported annually.
Stream Success Criteria
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years.
There should be little change in as -built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated
to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -cutting or
erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative
changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified
using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should fall within the
quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed
Scout 2 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site September 2020

1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross -sections on a given
reach. Channel stability should be demonstrated through a minimum of four bankfull events documented
in the seven-year monitoring period.
Digital images are used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success
of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should not
indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral
images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of
images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project will
follow IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover a
minimum of two percent of the planted area. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project is
the survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 trees per acre at
an average of seven feet in height at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria is 210 trees
per acre with an average height of ten feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees are counted, identified to
species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but did not count towards the success criteria of total
planted stems. Moreover, any single species can only account for up to 50 percent of the required number
of stems within any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of 50 percent are shown in the monitoring table
but were not used to demonstrate success.
1.4 Project Components
The Project area is comprised of a single easement located along Hauser Creek and two unnamed tributaries,
totaling 2,801 existing LF, which eventually drain into the Yadkin River. There are three stream reaches,
including Hauser Creek (HC3) and two unnamed tributaries (CHI and CH2), divided by treatment type.
The Project is located between two sections of the overall 27-acre Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
Mockingbird Site (Figure 1). The Project is accessible from Spillman Road, through the Project parcel.
The stream mitigation components are summarized below. Mitigation credits presented below are based
upon the Approved Mitigation Plan. To account for areas of more or less than minimum 30-foot buffer
widths, credits were adjusted using the USACE Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator.
Project stream lengths and credits are detailed further in Appendix A.
Scout Mitigation Plan Credits
Warm Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian Wetland
Total
2,918
NA
NA
1.5 Stream Design/Approach
Stream restoration efforts along the tributaries of the Project were accomplished through analyses of
geomorphic conditions and watershed characteristics. The design approach applied a combination of
analytical and reference reach -based design methods that meet objectives commensurate with both
ecological and geomorphic improvements. Treatment activities ranged from minor bank grading and
planting to re-establishing stable planform and hydraulic geometry. For full restoration reaches, natural
design concepts were applied and verified through rigorous engineering analyses and modeling. The
objective of this approach was to design a geomorphically stable channel that provides habitat
Scout 3 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site September 2020

improvements and ties into the existing landscape. Specifically, treatments included Priority I Restoration
and Enhancement Level II.
The Project has been broken into the following reaches:
Reach HC3 — This reach, part of Hauser Creek, begins on the south end of the project and flows north
towards the Mockingbird Mitigation Site, transitioning off site through a 24 LF of 48-inch double barrel
RCP at a 40-foot-wide conservation easement break. Priority I restoration was completed along this reach
for a total of 2,686 LF. Sparse woodland and managed pasture were located adjacent to the reach.
Restoration activities included constructing a new channel within the natural valley to restore the stream's
connection with the existing floodplain and backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such
as log sills, brush toes, rock cross vanes, and log vanes were installed for stability and to improve habitat.
Habitat will further be improved through buffer plantings. Buffer activities improve riparian areas that filter
runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. A hunting blind
near the northern portion of the reach was removed, as well as an existing crossing.
Reach CH1 — This reach is a tributary on the western side of HC3 and flows east. This reach totals 348
linear feet of Enhancement IL Sparse woodland and managed pasture were located adjacent to the reach.
Enhancement activities included improving habitat through supplemental buffer plantings. The widening
and restoration of the riparian areas along the left bank will filter runoff from adjacent pasture, reduce
sediment loads, and provide wildlife corridors throughout the Project area.
Reach CH2 — This reach is a tributary on the western side of HC3 and flows east. This reach totals 110
linear feet of Enhancement IL Sparse woodland and managed pasture were located adjacent to the reach.
Enhancement activities included improving habitat through supplemental buffer plantings. The widening
and restoration of the riparian areas along the left bank will filter runoff from adjacent pasture, reduce
sediment loads, and provide wildlife corridors throughout the Project area.
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions
Stream construction and planting was completed in May 2020 and fencing was completed in July 2020.
Overall, the Project was built to design plans and guidelines. A redline version of the as -built survey is
included in Appendix F. Project credits are based on design centerline, but as -built stream lengths are
shown on Appendix A, Table 1.
Also, there were a few changes to the planting plan due to bareroot availability. Changes are detailed on
Appendix C, Table 5.
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MYO)
Ve etg ation
Monitoring of the seven permanent vegetation plots and three random plots was completed during May
2020. Vegetation data are in Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot locations are in
Appendix B. MYO monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320
planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 1,093 to 1,700 planted stems per acre with a
mean of 1,260 across the seven permanent plots, while planted stem densities ranged from 1,052 to 2,064
planted stems per acre with a mean of 1,470 across the three random plots. The site stem per acre average
was 1,324. A total of 13 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at
Scout 4 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site September 2020

baseline monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average stem height across all
vegetation plots was 1.7 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project.
Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphology data for MYO was collected during June 2020. Summary tables and cross section plots are
in Appendix D. Overall, the baseline cross sections and profile on the restoration reach relatively match
the design. The cross sections on the Enhancement II reaches were included to monitor the changes in
dimension post cattle exclusion and riparian planting. The as -built conditions show that shear stress and
velocities have been reduced for all restoration/enhancement reaches. All reaches were designed as very
coarse sand bed channels and remain classified as very coarse sand bed channels post -construction.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation.
Stream Hydrology
In May 2020, one stage recorder was installed on restoration reach HC3 to document bankfull events and
flow gauges were installed on reaches CHI and CH2 to track the frequency and duration of stream flow
events. Stream hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and in the
appendices. The stage recorder and flow gauge locations can be found on Figure 2 and photos are in
Appendix B.
2.0 Methods
Stream geomorphology monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-
dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane
feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at six cross -sections. Survey data were imported into
CAD, ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis.
Stream hydrology is monitored using stage recorders and flow gauges, which utilize automatic pressure
transducers, and were installed within the channels. The stage recorders record frequency, duration, and
stage of bankfull events and are programmed to record readings at an hourly interval. A surveyed elevation
was recorded at the bed and top of bank at the stage recorder elevation, allowing for accurate bankfull
events to be recorded. Flow gauges record frequency, duration, and stage of flow events and are
programmed to read at an hourly interval. The height of the adjacent downstream riffle (from the gauge) is
used to detect flow.
Vegetation success is being monitored at seven permanent monitoring plots and three random plots for a
total of ten plots. Locations of random plots will vary from year to year and will be shown in Figure 2, and
species and height will be recorded for all woody stems. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP
Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species
composition and density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field,
the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the
other corners. Photos of each plot are taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Scout 5 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site September 2020

3.0 References
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Resource Environmental Solutions. 2019. Scout Mitigation Site - Final Mitigation Plan.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE.
2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
Scout 6 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site September 2020

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Scout - Mitigation Assets and Components
Project Segment
Existing
Footage
or
Acreage
Mitigation
Plan
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation
Category
Restoration
Level
Priority
Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Mitigation
Plan
Credits Pill
As -Built
Footage or
Acreage
Comments
HC3
2,484
2,686
Warm
I R
1 1
1 1.00000
2686.000
1 2686
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
CH1
2491
3481
Warm
I Ell
NA
1 2.50000
139.44.000 200
348
Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement
CH2
68
110
Warm
EllNA
2.50000
110
Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement
Project Credits
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Rip
Wetland
Coastal
Marsh
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riverine
Non-Riv
Restoration
2686.000
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
Enhancement
Enhancement II
183.200
Creation
Preservation
Total
2869
Credit Loss in Buffer
-174
Credit Gain in Buffer
223
11 otal AaJusteds
2918

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Scout Mitigation Site
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 4 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 4 months
Number of reporting Years : 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
Jun-19
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Sep-19
Stream Construction
NA
May-20
Site Planting
NA
May-20
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
May-20
Sep-20
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
= The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Scout Mitigation Site
Designer
RES / 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612.
Primary project design POC
Frasier Mullen
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthwork Inc./ 5616 Coble Church Rd., Julian, NC
27283
Construction contractor POC
Kory Strader
Survey Contractor
Matrix East, PLLC / 906 N. Queen St., Suite A, Kinston, NC
28501
Survey contractor POC
Chris Paderick, PLS
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Planting contractor POC
Matt Hitch
Monitoring Performers
RES / 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612.
Stream Monitoring POC
lRyan Medric [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
JRyan Medric [phone]

Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name
Scout
County
Davie
Project Area (acres)
13.22
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Latitude: 36.030798 N Longitude:-80.516312 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
10.9
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
3040101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
3040101160010
DWR Sub -basin
03-07-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
810 ac (1.266 mil)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
2%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Agriculture (49%), Residential (8%), Forest (39%), Impervious (2%)
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
HC3
CH 1
CH2
Length of reach (linear feet) (designed)
2,686
348
110
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Drainage area (Acres)
810
43
156
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
P
I
I
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Stream Classification (existing)
E4
E4/5b
E4
Stream Classification (proposed)
E4/E5
E4/5b
E4
Evolutionary trend (Simon) (existing)
FEMA classification
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW-2017-
01469
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR #17-
1295
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
N/A
Mit Plan
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

set G,e
BM
I
a
A
a
Redfield
Y
O.
X.
�a
a
C
3
0
0
x
A.
9a
Sparks Rd
K
o
x
m
y
9
x
Triple H TO
Legend
Scout Easement "`
DMS Mockingbird Easement
- DMS Catbird Easement
- DMS Hauser Creek Easement
a
Service Area - HUC 03040101
A
TLW- HUC 03040101160010
Figure 1 - Site Location Map Date: 8/24/2020
Drawn by: HKH
Scout Mitigation Site res
Checked by: XXX
0 500 1,000
Davie County, North Carolina 1 inch = 1,000 feet
Feet

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Scout MYO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (5/28/2020)
Vegetation Plot 3 (5/28/2020)
Vegetation Plot 2 (5/28/2020)
Vegetation Plot 4 (5/28/2020)
Vegetation Plot 5 (5/28/2020) Vegetation Plot 6 (5/28/2020)

Vegetation Plot 7 (5/28/2020) Random Vegetation Plot 1 (5/28/2020)
Random Vegetation Plot 2 (5/28/2020) Random Vegetation Plot 3 (5/28/2020)

Scout MYO Monitoring Device Photos
Stage Recorder (HC3) (5/28/2020)
Flow Gauge (CH-1) (5/28/2020)

y .
y r, ,
4
n N'

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Mitigation Plan %
As -Built %
Total Stems Planted
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
15
14
2,000
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
15
14
2,000
Northern Red Oak
Quercus rubra
10
14
2,000
River Birch
Betula ni ra
15
10
1,600
Sycamore
Platanus occidnetalis
15
10
1,600
Yellow Poplar
briodendron tuli i era
10
8
1,100
Persimmon
Diospyros vir iniana
5
7
1,000
Crab Apple
Malus an usti olia
0
5
800
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
5
700
Black Walnut
Ju lans ni ra
0
3
400
Sugarberry
Celtis laevi ata
0
2
350
S Dogwood
Cornus amomum
0
2
300
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
0
2
300
Eastern Redbud
Cercis canadensis
0
2
300
American Plum
Prunus americana
0
2
300
Blackgum
N ssa S lvatica
5
0
0
Total
14,750
Planted Area
10.9
As -built Planted Stems/Acre
1,353
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Plante d
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height (ft)
1
1174
0
1174
Yes
1.7
2
1093
0
1093
Yes
1.3
3
1457
0
1457
Yes
1.5
4
1093
0
1093
Yes
1.8
5
1093
0
1093
Yes
1.7
6
1700
0
1700
Yes
1.8
7
1214
0
1214
Yes
2.0
R1
1052
0
1052
Yes
1.9
R2
2064
0
2064
Yes
1.9
R3
1295
0
1295
Yes
1.9
Fixed Avg
1260
0
1260
Yes
1.7
Random Avg
1470
0
1470
Yes
1.9
Project Avg
1324
0
1324
Yes
1.7

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Scout
Current Plot Data
(MYO 2020)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
0381-01-0001
0381-01-0002
0381-01-0003
0381-01-0004
0381-01-0005
0381-01-0006
0381-01-0007
MYO (2020)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
10
10
10
18
18
18
35
35
35
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
6
6
6
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
13
13
13
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
10
10
10
10
10
10
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
9
9
9
Juglans nigra
blackwalnut
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
71
7
7
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
21
7
7
7
9
9
9
1
1
1
22
22
22
Malus angustifolia
southern crabapple
Tree
9
9
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
12
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
11
11
11
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
3
3
31
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
18
18
18
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
8
8
8
3
3
3
8
8
8
6
6
6
4
4
4
1
1
1
6
6
61
36
36
36
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
7
7
7
4
4
4
9
9
9
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
35
35
35
Sambucus canadensis
I Common Elderberry
IShrub
1
11
11
11
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
29
29
29
27
27
27
36
36
36
27
27
27
27
271
27
42
42
42
301
30
30
2181
2181
218
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.17
6
6
6
9
9
9
11
11
11
7
7
7
7
7j
9
9
9
6
6
6
13
13
13
1174
1174
1174
1093
1093
1093
1457
1457
1457
1093
1093
1093
1093
1093
1700
1700
1700
1214
12141
1214
1260
1260
1260

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Random Plot 1
#
Species
Height cm
1
Quercus ni ra
75
2
Quercus rubra
70
3
Quercus rubra
64
4
Quercus rubra
72
5
Quercus phellos
56
6
uercus ni ra
65
7
Quercus ni ra
74
8
Quercus phellos
70
9
Quercus rubra
55
10
Diospyros vir iniana
34
11
Diospyros vir iniana
40
12
Platanus occidentalis
40
13
Quercus rubra
50
14
Quercus rubra
55
15
Quercus phellos
50
16
Quercus phellos
60
17
Quercus ni ra
35
18
Quercus ni ra
43
19
Celtis laevi ata
58
20
Quercus phellos
73
21
Quercus phellos
65
22
Quercus ni ra
55
23
Quercus rubra
63
24
Quercus rubra
45
25
Quercus rubra
68
26
Quercus phellos
68
Stems/Acre
1052
Average Hei ht cm
58
Average Height ft
1.9
Plot Size m
50 x 2
Random Plot 2
#
Species
Height cm
1
Betula ni ra
68
2
Ju lans ni ra
65
3
Quercus phellos
72
4
Betula ni ra
64
5
Betula ni ra
45
6
Liriodendron tuli i era
55
7
Betula ni ra
50
8
Quercus rubra
53
9
Betula ni ra
65
10
Quercus ni ra
28
11
Betula ni ra
46
12
Quercus rubra
51
13
Betula ni ra
55
14
Quercus rubra
35
15
Cercis canadensis
31
16
Betula ni ra
48
17
Betula ni ra
55
18
Betula ni ra
61
19
Betula ni ra
86
20
Betula ni ra
64
21
Quercus phellos
30
22
Quercus rubra
52
23
Betula ni ra
78
24
Betula ni ra
65
25
Quercus phellos
75
26
Platanus occidentalis
44
27
Betula ni ra
75
28
Diospyros vir iniana
27
29
Quercus rubra
50
30
Quercus rubra
76
31
Quercus ni ra
31
32
Betula ni ra
60
33
Quercus phellos
60
34
Platanus occidentalis
60
35
Quercus rubra
80
36
Quercus rubra
46
37
Diospyros vir iniana
55
38
Liriodendron tuli i era
52
39
Cercis canadensis
38
40
Quercus phellos
80
41
Betula ni ra
73
42
Betula ni ra
75
43
Quercus rubra
57
44
Corylus americana
49
45
Betula ni ra
75
46
Betula ni ra
87
47
Diospyros vir iniana
53
48
Diospyros vir iniana
67
49
Quercus rubra
27
50
Quercus phellos
65
51
Cercis canadensis
41
Stems/Acre
2064
Average Height cm
58
Average Height ft
1.9
Plot Size m
50 x2
Random Plot 3
#
Species
Height cm
1
Quercus rubra
53
2
Quercus rubra
64
3
Cercis canadensis
18
4
Quercus rubra
41
5
Quercus phellos
70
6
Quercus rubra
38
7
Quercus phellos
45
8
Quercus rubra
48
9
Cercis canadensis
31
10
Quercus phellos
62
11
Celtis laevi ata
45
12
Liriodendron tuli i era
61
13
Quercus ni ra
30
14
Quercus rubra
45
15
Malus angustifofia
51
16
Quercus phellos
48
17
Quercus phellos
45
18
Betula ni ra
75
19
Diospyros vir iniana
47
20
Quercus phellos
55
21
Liriodendron tuli i era
62
22
Diospyros vir iniana
45
23
Betula ni ra
81
24
Betula ni ra
84
25
Platanus occidentalis
53
26
Betula ni ra
80
27
Betula ni ra
73
28
Betula ni ra
81
29
Betula ni ra
60
30
Betula ni ra
79
31
Cercis canadensis
31
32
Diospyros vir iniana
56
Stems/Acre
1295
Average Height cm
57
Average Height ft
1.9
Plot Size m
50 x 2

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Upstream
Downstream
Scout - Reach HC3 - Cross Section 1 - Pool - Restoration
727
726
725
724
° 723
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
>
d
722
w
721
720
719
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63
Distance (ft)
MY02020 — ——Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA
723.17
Bankfull Width (ft)'
22.2
Floodprone Width (ft)'
-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)'
4.0
Low Bank Elevation ft
723.17
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')'
45.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Scout - Reach HC3 - Cross Section 2 - o:FF' - Restoration
72s
727
726
725
° 724
723
722
721
720
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 2 1
Riffle
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
723.13
Bankfull Width (ft)'
20.4
Floodprone Width (ft)'
>64.9
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2
2.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
723.13
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )2
33.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>3.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Scout - Reach HC3 - Cross Section 3 - . _...._ - Restoration
725
724
723
722
° 721
w 720
719
718
717
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — -Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 3 1
Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull IIevation (ft) -Based on ABASA1
720.11
Bankfull Width (ft)'
20.0
Floodprone Width (ft)'
>65.1
BankfullMaxDepth (ft)2
2.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
720.11
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
38.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
>3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Scout - Reach HC3 - Cross Section 4 - . _ _. - Restoration
723
722
721
720
—
—
awnw
Mr—
° 719
w 718
717
716
715
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 4
Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA
720.08
Bankfull Width (ft)t
23.2
Floodprone Width (ft)'
-
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2
4.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
720.08
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
50.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Scout - Reach HC3 - Cross Section 5 - Pool - Restoration
721
720
719
718
—
—OP.M.—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
717
w 716
715
714
713
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 5
Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASAi
717.81
Bankfull Width (ft)'
22.3
Floodprone Width (ft)I
-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
3.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
717.81
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
44.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio i
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio i
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Scout - Reach HC3 - Cross Section 6 - . _...._ - Restoration
722
721
720
719
°
718
w
717
716
715
714
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 6 Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA
717.82
Bankfull Width (ft)t
20.6
Floodprone Width (ft)'
>64.9
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2
2.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
717.82
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
38.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
>3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Scout Mitigation Site - Reach HC3
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
10.7
---
---
11.9
---
2
---
---
13.7
---
---
1
---
19.0
---
20.0
20.3
20.4
20.6
0.3
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.2
---
---
30.2
---
2
---
---
>50
---
---
1
---
>50
---
64.9
65.0
64.9
65.1
0.1
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
2.3
---
---
2.4
---
2
---
---
1.4
---
---
1
---
1.8
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.4
---
---
3.7
---
2
---
---
1.7
---
---
1
---
2.4
---
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.7
0.1
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
---
25.6
27.4
2
---
---
18.1
---
I ---
1 1
---
35.1
---
33.7
37.0
1 38.4
1 38.9
1 2.9
1 3
Width/Depth Ratio
4.5
5.2
2
---
---
9.8
---
1
---
1 10.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
I ---
Entrenchment Ratio
2.3
2.5
2
---
---
>2.2
---
1
---
>2.2
---
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
0.1
3
'Bank Height Ratiol
1
2.1
2.1
2
---
---
1.0
1
---
1.0
---
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
6
---
---
18
---
---
8
---
24
10
22
21
39
8
39
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.00
1.03
0.77
3.17
0.84
39
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
5
---
---
42
---
---
7
---
57
8
44
43
75
13
39
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
18
---
---
64
---
---
24
---
87
38
66
62
103
16
38
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
26.2
---
---
55.5
---
---
39
---
71
---
---
---
---
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
13.5
---
---
103.3
---
---
32
---
87
---
---
---
---
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
1
---
---
6.9
---
---
1.7
---
4.1
---
---
---
---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
49.4
---
---
66
---
---
80
---
104
---
---
---
---
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
--
---
---
3.6
---
4.4
---
---
2.1
---
5
---
---
---
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
---
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4
E4
E4/E5
E4/E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
--
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
--
Valley length (ft)
2378
279
2560
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2504
318
2686
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.05
1.14
1.05
1.05
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0068
0.004
0.0035
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0041
0.004
0.0035
---
3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix D. Table 9 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name: Scout
Cross Section 1(Pool)
Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
723.2
723.1
720.1
720.1
717.8
Bankfull Width (ft)'
22.2
20.4
20.0
23.2
22.3
Floodprone Width ft 1
-
>64.9
>65.1
-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft;
4.0
2.5
2.7
4.2
3.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
723.17
723.1
720.1
720.1
717.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area f� z
45.4
33.7
38.9
50.9
44.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
-
>3.2
>3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 6 (Riffle)
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
717.8
Bankfull Width ft '
20.6
Floodprone Width (11)1
>64.9
Bankfull Max Depth (11;
2.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft
717.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area f�)2
38.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratios1
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Appendix E
As -Built Plan Sheets

11 JAMES R. WATSON , CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECT
AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT THIS GROUND
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL (2 SIGMA) TO MEET FEDERAL
GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE STANDARDS; THAT THE HORIZONTAL ACCURACY 1S 0. 10, THAT THE VERTICAL
ACCURACY 15 0. 15' AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED ON 312012019 ; THAT THE SURVEY
WAS COMPLETED ON 712112020 ; THAT CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON MAY NOT MEET THE STATED
STANDARD, AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NAD 83(2011) ; AND ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED
ON NAVD 88 ,
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER
AND SEAL THIS 5TH DAY OF AUGUST , A.D., 2020.
L-47f2
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS USED TO PERFORM THIS GNSS SURVEY.
CLASS OF SURVEY: A
POSITIONAL ACCURACY:-
TYPE OF GPS FIELD PROCEDURE: RTK
DATES OF SURVEY, 312012019 & 8 5 2020
DATUM / EPOCH: NAD 83 2011
PUBLISHED / FIXED CONTROL USED: OPUS SOLUTION
GEOID MODEL: GEOID 12
COMBINED GRID FACTOR: 0.99993451
UNITS: U.S. SURVEY FEET
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
XS = CROSS-SECTION
VP = VEGETATION PLOT
= LOG STRUCTURE
000= = ROCK STRUCTURE
® = STAGE RECORDER
O = FLOW GAUGE
= BRUSH TOE
® = CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
= GRA VEL PA TH / CROSSING
= RIP RAP
LCE = CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
— - - - - = ADJOINER BOUNDARY LINE
= WOODLINE
X x = WIRE FENCE
= WOOD FENCE
�\N00W I II i II I///////��
SEAL
r L-4712
O'
SURv�' 0
IIII11In�i�
HUC 03040 101
SURVEY
AS —BUILT
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM IS NAD 83(2011) AND THE VERTICAL DATUM 1S NAVD 88,
J. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES.
4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS TO SHOW POST CONSTRUCTION AS -BUILT CONDITIONS OF THE
STREAM RESTORATION AND MAY NOT SHOW ALL UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND BOUNDARIES.
5. NO PROPERTY LINES WERE SURVEYED DURING THIS SURVEY. ALL CONSERVATION EASEMENTS,
PROPERTY LINES, AND ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS ARE SHOWN BY PREVIOUS SURVEYS BY
MATRIX EAST, PLLC AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I3, PAGE 138 IN THE DAVIE COUNTY REGISTRY.
6. THE LOCATION OF THE FLOW GAUGES AND STAGE RECORDER SHOWN HEREON WERE PROVIDED BY
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC AND WERE NOT SURVEYED BY MATRIX EAST, PLLC AT
THIS TIME.
PROJECT COORDINATES:
LATITUDE: 36.030970 N
LONGITUDE: 80.51673' W
PROJECT DIRECTORY
DESIGNER. -
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, LLC
J600 GLENWOOD AV, SUITE
RALEIGH, NC 27512
[phone]
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR:
KBS EARTHWORKS, INC.
5616 COBLE CHURCH RD.
JULIAN, NC 27283
[phone]
MONITORING PERFORMERS:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS, LLC
100 J600 GLENWOOD AV., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
[phone]
SURVEYING:
MATRIX EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST, SUITE A
KINSTON, NC 28501
[phone]
SHEET INDEX
COVER
SHEET
STREAM
BASELINE
OVERVIEW
STREAM
MONITORING OVERVIEW
STREAM
BASELINE
AS-BUILTS
(HCJ)
STREAM
BASELINE
AS -GUILTS
(CHI & CH2)
STREAM
BASELINE
AS -GUILTS
(CH3 & CH4)
si
S2
S2
S3 THROUGH S6
S7
SS
SEAL
DRAWING NO.
sl
SHEET Na.
1 OF 8
J
z
0
0
H
>0
W
LLI
a
H
H
z
W
Lm
m
yo
a�
z
a
W
0
LLI
z
LLI
LLI
v
0
LLI
cc
xix
Eas t
MATRIX
EAST,
PLLC
906
N. QUEEN
ST., SUITE
A
KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: 252-522— 4 74 7
FIRM LIC. # P-0221
E-MAIL [e-mail]
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE
8/19/2020
SCALE
########
PROJECT NO.
20170064
DRAWING NAME
SCOUT AS-BUILT.DWG

I
0
STREAM BASELINE OVERVIEW
120 0 60 120 240
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 120 ft.
480
k0
NANCY SPARKS MILLER
DB 179, PG 6
REACH HC3
RESTORA TION
(STA 0+53 TO 27+39)
H. CURT HEGE, SR.
D8 103a PG 258
STREAM MONITORING OVERVIEW
S7A:27+39 1 l
1
I /
a LCE '
25' ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT
I D8 1065, PG 81
P8 12, PG 408
06RP
ENVIRONMENTAL 84NC
XS06LP XS05RP y & EXCHANGE, LLC.
y DB 1065, PG 58
P8 12, PG 409
X505LP
OI
N VP-7 NANCY SPARKS MILLER
C-) DS 179, PG 6
VP-6
` OSR REACH CH4
1 VP-5
I ❑ XSO4RP
U
XSO4LP REACH HC3
X503LP XS03RP RESTORATION
STA:3+86 (STA 0+53 TO 27+39)
REACH CH
ENHANCEMENT 11 <C'<,
(STA 0+38 TO 3+55)
NANCY SPARKS MILLER
�
v DB 179, PG 6
VP-4
STA:0+38
STA:2+ 10
REACH CH2
ENHANCEMENT II
(STA 1 +00 TO 2+ 1 p)
STA: 1 +00
H. CURT HEGE, SR. fw f
DB 1036, PG 258 v J f
BASELINE MONITORING CROSS SECTION CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
NORTHING
FASTING
ELEVATION
XS01LP
832,992.0296'
1,551,911.1193'
724.08'
XS01RP
833,023.3643'
1,551,968.1134'
724.09'
XS02LP
833,043.6965'
1,551,914.1794'
723.23'
XS02RP
833,031.1103'
1,551,977.8982'
724.99'
XS03LP
833,655.5412'
1,551,473.4551'
720.81'
XS03RP
833,648.8127'
1,551,538.0521'
720.62'
XSO4LP
833,666.1450'
1,551,481.9746'
720.49'
XSO4RP
833,706.6292'
1,551,533.1770'
720.36'
XS05LP
834,230.1977'
1,551,391.2939'
718.11'
XS05RP
834,279.1738'
1,551,433.6932'
718.01'
XS06LP
834,271.3979'
1,551,375.0034'
717.84'
XS06RP
834,285.0912'
1,551,438.3285'
718.06'
XS01RP 1
I
XS01 LP r�tT
v 1
VP-3
\ REACH HC3
RESTORATION
F` (STA 0+53 TO 27+39)
NANCY SPARKS MILLER
08 179, PG 5
BREACH CH3
H. CURT HEGE, SR. S8
DB 1036, PG 258
cvp-- 1
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 120 ft.
STA:0+53 J WAYNE WEBB
D8 742, PG 328
7A BEGIN REACH HC3
STA:0+00
■
SEAL \\0\01 I I IIll y/k
DRAWNG NO.
O
s'Ip��'L�i
= ti9 •9
S2
4O
- SEAL
L-4712
•f9 ge• c
" ••••
i SURN y0
z5 R +W P��
-�1111111W_
SHEET No.
2 OF 8
�5 7�29
J
H
z
0
Fm
3
�
■
W
J
c■
W
�p
z
�o
LLI
Ift
W
:p z
J
-a
HO
y
F- -
mi Z
z
z
som
Lai
2
#Aas
Q
2
W
�z
z
a�
W W
0
�(n
ya
�
W
a
W
z
H
LLI
LLI
0
0
U)
LLI
cc
ix
E a s t
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906
N. QUEEN
ST., SUITE
A
KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC. # P-0221
EMAIL: [e-mail]
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE
7/21 /2020
SCALE
1 " =
120'
PROJECT NO.
20170064
DRAWING NAME
SCOUT AS—BUILT.DWG

-- Lc:t -
LCE LCE _ \\
L(
\
11
�79 \ \ REACH HC3 /
nrc+rnnATrnar
0+53 -1 uj 1
WAYNE WEBB
DO 742, PG 328
Ox�
726 725
LC7- LCE
LCE LCE
LCE LCE
�tCc-
REACH HC3
RESTORATION �E
r i27
0+53 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50
735
730
725
720
715
710
5
7+00 7+22
RI HT T P OF 9ANK
LEI TOP fF lKVK RIGHT TO OF NK
LVT TOP OF iANK RlrT TOP 0 BAN
LEFT TOPI OF 8 4NK
A —BUILr THA WEG
—9UIL r TmIlwtG OF
AS BUILT THAL EG
f
0+53 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50
735
730
725
720
715
710
7+00 7+22
0 30 60
HORIZONTAL SCALE
1. = 30'
0 3' 6'
VER77CAL SCALE
I- - 3.
SEAL OW111,1118/i/
C A R O
DRANANG NO.
?o: oFEss'o
..y
S3-
; 4 SEAL r
L-I ¢
4-9 2.
R . W A�\\\
rr 111011
SHEET No.
3 OF 8
V
■
N
■
N
+
J
■
m
+
�o
LLI
W
>a
J
�
CC�
a
� H
H `r
W
�
y
H J
J �
Z
Smo
LLI
cc
aL
cd
z
aZ
W a0
� d
IA
z
>
>
z
a
W
Lij
V
0
(n
LLI
cc
7X
Eas t
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE
A
KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: 252--522— 4747
FIRM LIC.
# P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor®motrixeast.net
DRAWN BY
JRw
DATE
8/19/2020
SCALE
1 " =
30'
PROJECT NO.
20170064
DRAWING NAME
SCOUT AS-RUILT.DWG

728
_ 72, 726
724
�LCE
726 l LCE LCE \ "op �2s �__ `.('E 723
r,c \ \\ \ `
725
724 . 72 1
Q
REACH HC3
RESTORATION
(STA 0+53 TO 27+39)
725 � I
\ \�\ REACH CH2 /
724
REACH HC3
�
RESTORATION
(STA 0+53 TO 27+39) \
12+00_ �
\ \ 2+00 2+25 ` ti3k00�
XSO 1 LP ��2 / \ 719 . \ L 4+00 <�
/
10+00
XS02LP/ / J I % / `� \
1 722 —
, 2
723 -
2 \
720
XS01RP
YQR9RP
\ l _ 725
/ - -- i
J � 201
~ — 726 301
7+22 7+50
735
730
725
720
715
710
7+22 7+50
8+00
8+50
9+00
9+50
10+00
10+50
11+00
11+50
12+00
12+50
13+ 00
13+50
RIGH r TOP OF INK
L FT T P OF BANK RIGHT TWI OF rW
LEFT OP 0 aANK R HT T9P OF BAN
EFF Tr OF BAN
'.00 FIN L,,o 0' V ;04
S-B 1LT PiALWEG
AS- UILT THAL G
Aa'-BUIL r MA4 WEG
8+00
8+50
9+00
9+50
10+00
10+50
11+00
11+50
12+00
12+50
13+00
13+50
14+00 14+ 17
735
730
725
720
715
7i0
14+00 14+ 17
0 30 60
HORIZONTAL SCALE
1. m ,30'
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
1. = 3'
SEAL \\\\IIII Illll1/�
DRAWING NO.
S4SEAL
r ; -
r L-4712
-..4b tAt
�9...,rc .,.�yo
�j�S
SHEET No.
4 OF 8
w
r
■
r
■
■
N
+
W �
J
'
CC
� H
�
JUA
J
z
Lu
mo
Hcc
2
aL
ca
Z
az
W Q
0
low
�L
�
y
LLI
y M
�
:c
>
>
T■
a
W
ch
cc
LLI
C�
0
U)
LLI
1X
East
MATRIX
EAST, PLL C
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE
A
KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC.
# P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor©matrixeast.net
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE
8/19/2020
SCALE
1 " =
30'
PROJECT NO.
20170064
DRAWING NAME
SCOUT AS—BUILT.DWG

N g \ cl
719- 1
REACH CHI / 1
VP-4 /
VP-5
XS03LP
:r 1 0 - 72C
REACH HC3
RESTORATION
(STA 0+53 TO 27+39)
11�15
725 \
1 1 \ 1-1
14+ 17 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00
16+50 17+00 17+50
18+00 18+50
19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21 +00 21 + 18
730
725
720
715
710
7n s
730
RICH TOP F K
L F TCP OF BANK
RIG T TD OF 9ANK
L FT T P OF BANK RIGHT P OF BANK
L07 TOP OF BANK
-7\
7
N110000 00�
AS. -BUIL THAL EG
AS BUILT nMLWEG
AS BULL THALIVEGJ
14+ 17 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 Zu+uu 1u+ou
725
720
715
710
705 0 30 60
21+00 21+18
HORIZONTAL SCALE
1" = 30'
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
I- = 3'
SEAL 1111114�If+frl1
\\\��� N CA R 0
DRAWING NO.
o.•�eSSGe•.'ti
S5—
; a SEAL r
L-4712
9••�'os••50�
R. W P'\��`\
SHEET No.
5 OF 8
us(
J
z
0
r
'
■
N
■
ti
r
W
W
�
V
►J r
i a
Q
H H
�
~ W
J
J
m 0
H cc
aL
�a
a
aZ
W a
L
�
uj
H
v
�
x
a
LLI
W
cc
LLI
0
(n
`�1X
Eas t
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE
A
KINSTON,
NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: 252 —522
— 4747
FIRM LIC.
# P--0221
EMAIL: surveyor@matrixeost. net
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE
18/19/2020
SCALE
1" =
30'
PROJECT NO.
20170064
DRAWING NAME
SCOUT AS—BUILT.DWG

REACH HC3
RESTORATION
(STA 0+53 TO 27+39)
1
715
/ryX�tiX�
ryZk /
` r 71 rr,
REACH CH4 -�
301 — `� — — 301
21+18 21+50
725
720
715
710
705
MIR
�720�
22+00
1
LCE
E 720
`— c - i
rr I>u k:L
•.,nMr,w
nN�.vL r.Mh;.
REACH HC3 Pt,
/ RESTORATION n o x—
XS06LP /
VP-7 / (STA 0+53 TO 27+39) r'' ; :; "
26+00
•�1
717� I�
1 l
INV.=714.04'
\ \ 1NV +713. IX o
27+39
XS06RP
715�
�\ .713
�INV. =713, 94' j
5
�1
720 m
XS05RP
72 /
�301 � ��� 301
301/
30
301 301 1
3�
�
0� 301
J 3` 301
Ib
ENVIRONMENTAL BANC
\�
r - 723 �, I 1
do EXCHANGE, LLC
N D8 1065, PG 58
/
721 —� Q 9 \ P6 12, PG 409
ca
`
22+50
23+00
23+50
24+00
24+50
25+00
25+50
26+00
26+50
27+00
x LLI
U
J
RCP
714.10'
1
INV. -713. 10'
I
'7V INV I=714.03'
rt42" RCA I
" RCP
RIGHI TOP OF NK f
LEFT TOP OF S41 1K Rl HT TC P OF BANK
EFT TOP O 54NX RIGHT TOP OF BANK
LEFT TOP OF SAi VK
v V,
F7
\.,00 .100
AS -BUILT LWEG AS BUIL FHA WEG
AS-SUIL"'THA WEG
21+18 21+50
22+00
22+50
23+00
23+50
24+00
24+50
25+00
25+50
25+00
26+50
27+39
725
720
715
710
705
700
27+00 27+39
NAD 83(2011)
0 30 60
HORIZONTAL SCALE
1 " = 30,
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
SEAL
��u�1tif 1 i aurr//i//i
DRAWING NO.
?'aO
ti9 0. :
��
SEAL r
L-4712
9.'0Slhi�O; •• 0�
iv9
•IW1P���\\\
5FiEEt No.
6 OF 8
N
Z
0
N
.
o
�
in
r
W N
H
a
Q
H �
�
J W
J
W
m�
O
Hcc
ad
aZ
Wa
cc J
I
H
W
x
a
W
W
W
H
W
IX
East
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE
A
KINSTON,
NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX 252—
522— 4 747
FIRM LIC.
# P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor©motrixeast.net
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE
18/19/2020
SCALE
1" =
30'
PROJECT NO.
20170064
DRAWING NAME
SCOUT AS—BUILT.DWG

CHI PLAN & PROFILE
(STA 0+38 - 3+86)
727
�— 726 —
%p0 — I
0+3
N V
REACH CH 1
ENHANCEMENT 11
(STA 0+38 TO 3+86)
ul
00
\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ 722 -- —
1 +00
735 r-
730
725
720
715
710 L---
1+00
0 30 60
HORIZONTAL SCALE
1 " = 30'
0 36'
VER71CAL SCALE
1
1+50
1+50
2+00
womm
WEgra�OR
T
2+00
2+50
2+50
3+00
3+00
3+50 3+86
735
LEFT TOP
R10H TOP
AS —BUILT
0
CH2 PLAN &PROFILE
(STA 1 +00 - 2+10)
1+00
735 r-
730 1 730
725 1 725
720 1 720
715 1 715
' I I I ' 710
3+50 3+86
710 L-
1 +00
REACH CH2
FNHANC: FMFNT !1 h
1+00NN
722. i
1 ti
1 +50
1+50
OF
2+00 2+20
735
730
725
720
715
I ' 710
2+00 2+20
NAD 83(201 t)
0 30 60
HORIZONTAL .SCALE
1" = 30'
0 3' 6'
VER77CAL SCALE
1" = 3'
SEAL 4 k l f f Ill y
CA RO����ii
ES3i�•`:y
DRAWING NO.
C SEAL r
S7
L-4712
` •• UR4
SHEET No.
7 OF 8
RW
Ir 111111
g
C�
J
J
H
z
a
■
W0�
Wcc
uj
>L
�a
HZ
a
�
Z
N
Lu
m
a�
r
z
0
a=
�
LLI
H v
�
a
W
�
>
cc
z
LLI
LLI
0
(n
LLI
cc
�xix
East
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE
A
KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC.
j P-0221
EMAIL: [e-mail]
DRAWN BY
JRW
DATE
�8/19/2020
SCALE
11" =
30'
PROJECT NO.
20170064
DRAWING NAME
SCOUT AS-BUILT.DWG

CF13 PLAN &PROFILE
(STA 0+50 - 2+33)
1 p
O \
REACH HC3
1 \ REACH CH3
0*0
0+50
740 r--
735
730
725
720
715 L-
0+50
0 30 60
HORIZONTAL ']SCALE
1 " — 3O
0 36'
VERTICAL SCALE
I. = 3'
1 +00
1 +00
OF
1 +50
1+50
93
2+00 2+33
740
CH4 PLAN &PROFILE
(STA 1 +00 - 2+00)
}
I LLI I ��� REACH 14C3
I�
lREACH CH4
l w
U
ors �
1+00
730 r--
735 1 725
730 1 720
725 1 715
720 1 710
715
2+00 2+33
705
1 +00
1+50
TOP
1+50
6:1
2+ 00
---i 730
OF BANK I
725
720
715
710
705
2+00
�,
0 30 60
HORIZONTAL SCALE
1" = 30'
0 3' 6'
VERTICAL SCALE
f" = 3'
SEAL \\\110W I I Irrr'/////
DRAWNG NO.
?O; O�0-SS�p4, _v
sa
a SEAL
L-4712
� r9;;�S(JRV�••�p�
X��sR •W P�y�\`\\
rrr�lil�tiu
SHEET No.
8 O 8
�5�z�2Q
J
W
1
16
�O
W cc
> L
�a
HZ
I= I
z
_L
Lu
m
a�
ca
�
z
a=
W �0
°c
H
LLI
y
a
W
z
ul
in
LLI
0
0
(n
LLI
cc
ix
East
MATRIX
EAST, PLLC
906 N. QUEEN ST., SUITE
A
KINSTON, NC 28501
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
FIRM LIC.
# P-0221
EMAIL: surveyor©motrixeast.net
DRAWN BY
JRw
DATE
18/19/2020
SCALE
1" =
30'
PROJECT NO.
20170064
DRAWING NAME
SCOUT AS-BUILT.pwG

Bethal,ia �
5 k I i
I N E`ran
YORTH'.vesr Y
r _
- ors
�' J Lewi�yrlllt
�iu:�tsvR"t
r - -
caQeniibm
I�fffFlri S ^IT. .,I-
4
I =' li-C v e
rarna 2or
=w:z 1211111x0a116161-Al 0]01
i4rad.a
Reidy -reek a
Welcome h
.d
�zo,aM�w,oR o'i,zmaHE� #'- -
VICINITY MAP
NTS
AS -BUILT TOPOGRAPHY, PLANIMETRICS, CHANNEL
STRUCTURES, AND CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SURVEY
WAS PROVIDED BY MATRIX EAST, PLLC (FIRM LICENSE
NUMBER P-022 1, CHRISTOPHER K. PADERICK, PLS
L-4 189), DATED AUGUST 20, 2020
SCOUT RECORD DRAWINGS
DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
YADKIN 01 RIVER BASIN: HUC 03040101
SEPTEMBER 2020
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
SITE MAP
H CH3
5heet Li5t Table
5heet Number
5heet
Title
-
COVED
51
LEACH
HC3
52
LEACH
HC3
53
LEACH
HC3
54
REACH
HC3
55
LEACH
HC3
5G
LEACH
CH 1
57
LEACH
CH 2
56
LEACH
CH3
59
LEACH
CH4
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler Environmental LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
w
Q o
N
O
N
O
J
0_ CF)
Z
Q
o 0-1
0
z 66
�L.0 q
O
U) iY
U)
w O
>
w
J U
w LU
Iz
Iz iY
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:

N
FT
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0
30 60
2"
FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q O
0 N
O
� N
O
J
U)
>z
0= Q
0
z
0
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w w
Iz
Iz 0-1
Q
Z
(n
J
CD
O
Z
0�
Q
U
Q
p
U
�
2
0
O
Z
O
U
Q
W
W
Z
O
O
U
w U
W
w
w
0
z
Q
0
Ir
Ir
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S 1

N
FT
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0
30 60
2"
FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q O
0 N
O
� N
O
J
U)
>z
0= Q
0
z
0
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w w
Iz
Iz 0-1
Q
Z
(n
J
CD
O
Z
0�
Q
U
Q
p
U
�
2
0
O
Z
O
U
Q
W
W
Z
O
O
U
w U
W
w
w
0
z
Q
0
Ir
Ir
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S2

N
FT
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0
30 60
2"
FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q O
0 N
O
� N
O
J
U)
>z
0= Q
0
z
0
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w w
Iz
Iz 0-1
Q
Z
(n
J
CD
O
Z
0�
Q
U
Q
p
U
�
2
0
O
Z
O
U
Q
W
W
Z
O
O
U
w U
W
w
w
0
z
Q
0
Ir
Ir
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S3

N
FT
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0
30 60
2"
FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q O
0 N
O
� N
O
J
U)
>z
0= Q
0
z
0
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w w
Iz
Iz 0-1
Q
Z
(n
J
CD
O
Z
0�
Q
U
Q
p
U
�
2
0
O
Z
O
U
Q
W
W
Z
O
O
U
w U
W
w
w
0
z
Q
0
Ir
Ir
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S4

N
FT
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0
30 60
2"
FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q O
0 N
O
� N
O
J
U)
>z
0= Q
0
z
0
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w w
Iz
Iz 0-1
Q
Z
(n
J
CD
O
Z
0�
Q
U
Q
p
U
�
2
0
O
Z
O
U
Q
W
W
Z
O
O
U
w U
W
w
w
0
z
Q
0
Ir
Ir
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S5

N
FT
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0
30 60
2"
FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q O
0 N
O
� N
O
J
U)
>z
0= Q
0
z
0
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w w
Iz
Iz 0-1
Q
z
(n
J
CD
O
z
0�
Q
U
Q
2
p
�
2
U
00
O�
z
=
O
U
Q
w
w
z
O
O
CU
w v
w
w
w
p
z
Q
o
Ir
Ir
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S6

N
FT
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0
30 60
2"
FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q O
0 N
O
� N
O
J
U)
>z
0= Q
0
z
0
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w w
Iz
Iz 0-1
Q
z
(n
J
CD
O
z
0�
Q
U
Q
p
�
2
U
00
O�
z
=
O
U
Q
w
w
z
O
O
CU
w v
w
w
w
0
z
Q
0
Ir
Ir
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S7

a�
N
ca
FT
U
i
LEGEND
( J, EXISTING WETLAND
^ EXISTING OVERHEAD
�J ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE OHE
\ PROPERTY LINE — —
\ \ PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50 -
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR — -
� e
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK —
\'�6PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR 50
_ \ AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
N�
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE
\ 1 REACH HC3 PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
(SHEET S 1)
F
11 1 AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
/ REACH CH3 \
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
/ \AS -BUILT RIFFLE
/ I I
� I I
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER O
735
730
725
720
715
AS-
OF
UILT
ANK
TOP
—
-i.00%
CHAT
S-
NEL
UILT
BED
z
LU
z
PROPCSED
HA
NEL
BED
O
Q
w
n
Q
z
O
U_
O
J
�
735
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION Vp_#
MONITORING PLOT
730
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
LCE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
725
720
715
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50
SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3'
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0
30 60
2"
= FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q0
0 N
O
� N
O
J
U)
Z_
oC
O
0
z
Diu
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
J
W
Ir
Ir 0-1
Q
z_
(n
J
CD
O
z
0�
Q
U
Q
0
�
2
U
00
O�
z
=
O
U
Q
LU
w
z
�O
O
CU
w U
W
w
H
Q
H
0
C3
Z
u
Q
O
Iz
Iz
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S8

a�
N
ca
i
� LEGEND
1 \ EXISTING WETLAND W W W
\ \\ EXISTING OVERHEAD
\\ ELECTRIC UTILITY LINE OHE
In 1 I PROPERTY LINE — —
rn I PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50 -
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR —
I PROPOSED TOP OF BANK — —
��/ / REACH HC I PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE
REACH CH4 (SHEET S4) AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR 50
I �� �
/ AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR
--- AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — TB
AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE
I /
II I I BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
Irn i �
I \
—� — PROPOSED LOG SILL
TB —
91 — — \\
I \
I � �
PROPOSED LOG VANE
I
I
f \ \ PROPOSED ROCK STRUCTURE
'
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
I �
IJ-1 AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE
J � I'
n o I I I AS -BUILT RIFFLE
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER O
730
725
720
715
710
TOP
AS-
OF
UILT
ANK
.7z,
P
HA
OPO
NEL
ED
5ED
_
—
z
Q
w
z
BED
AS-
CHA
UILT
NEL
O
Q
Ct—
w
O�
U
Q
U_
O
J
730
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE \
AS -BUILT VEGETATION Vp_#
MONITORING PLOT
725
LIMITS OF PROPOSED
LCE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
720
715
710
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50
SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3'
Ores
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0
30 60
2"
= FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
LU
Q0
0 N
O
� N
O
J
U)
z
oC
O
0
z
Diu
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w w
Iz
Iz 0-1
z_
(n
J
CD
O
z
0�
Q
U
Q
0
�
2
U
00
O�
z
=
O�
U
Q
LU
w
z
�O
O
U
w U
w
w
u
0
z_
Ir
Ir
0-
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
0312
PROJECT MANAGER:
BPB
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
AFM
SHEET NUMBER:
S9