The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20171292 Ver 1_Baseline Monitoring Report FINAL_20200930ID#* 20171292 Version* 1 Select Reviewer:* Erin Davis Initial Review Completed Date 09/30/2020 Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/30/2020 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No Type of Mitigation Project:* V Stream r Wetlands r- Buffer r- Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name:* Kasey Carrere Project Information .................................................................................................................................................................. ID#:* 20171292 Existing IDr Project Type: r DIMS r Mitigation Bank Project Name: Compass Point County: Yadkin Document Information Email Address:* kcarrere@res.us Version: *1 Existing Version Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Monitoring Report File Upload: Compass Point Baseline Monitoring Report 22.18MB FINAL.pdf Rease upload only one RDFof the corrplete file that needs to be subnitted... Signature Print Name:* Ryan Medric Signature:* COMPASS POINT MITIGATION SITE EMKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA RES YADKIN 01 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK SAW-2017-01465 AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT Provided by: fires Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC An entity of Resource Environmental Solutions 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27612 919-209-1056 August 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Project Summary..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. 2 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Project Success Criteria............................................................................................................. 3 StreamSuccess Criteria................................................................................................................... 3 VegetationSuccess Criteria............................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Project Components.................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Stream Design/Approach.......................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions...................................................................................... 6 1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance(MYO)................................................................................. 6 Vegetation........................................................................................................................................ 6 StreamGeomorphology................................................................................................................... 6 StreamHydrology............................................................................................................................ 7 WetlandHydrology.......................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Methods.................................................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 References............................................................................................................................................... 8 Appendix A: Background Tables Table 1: Project Mitigation Components Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3: Project Contacts Table Table 4: Project Background Information Table Figure 1: Site Location Map Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View Vegetation Plot Photos Monitoring Device Photos Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data Table 5: Planted Species Summary Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data Baseline Cross -Section Plots Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table Appendix E: As -Built Plan Sheets Compass Point As -Built Survey Redline Compass Point As -Built Survey Compass Point 1 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site August 2020 1.0 Proiect Summary L I Project Location and Description The Compass Point Mitigation Site ("the Project") is located in Yadkin County, approximately 4.5 miles northeast of Boonville. Water quality stressors that affected the Project included livestock production, agricultural production, and lack of riparian buffer. The Project presents 5,289 linear feet (LF) of stream restoration and enhancement generating 4,155 Cool Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) along three unnamed tributaries that drain directly to the Yadkin River. The Project is located in the Yadkin River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03040101, Target Local Watershed 030401011001, and NCDWR sub -basin 03-07-02. The current State classification for the Yadkin River at this location is Class C (NCDWR 2011). The Project's total easement area is approximately 16.46 acres within the overall drainage area of 271 acres and consisted of cattle pastures and wooded areas. Grazing livestock historically had access to most stream reaches within the Project. The lack of riparian buffer vegetation, deep-rooted vegetation, and unstable channel characteristics had contributed to the degradation of stream banks throughout the Project area. The stream design approach for the Project combined the analog method of natural channel design with analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and floodplain. The analog method involved the use of a reference reach, or "template" stream, adjacent to, nearby, or previously in the same location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach were replicated to create the features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed and boundary conditions are similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al., 2001). Hydraulic geometry was developed using analytical methods to identify the design discharge. The Project will be monitored on a regular basis throughout the seven-year post -construction monitoring period, or until performance standards are met. Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to Unique Places to Save (UP2S). This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-term steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld. Endowment funds required to uphold easement and deed restrictions will be finalized prior to site transfer to the responsible parh'- 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives will be realized by the Project. These goals clearly address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were identified as major watershed stressors in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River RBRP. The Project goals are: • Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non -erosive manner in a stable channel; • Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbank flows and connection to the active floodplain; • Improve instream habitat; Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation; and Indirectly support the goals of the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP to improve water quality and to reduce sediment and nutrient loads. Compass Point 2 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site August 2020 The Project objectives to address the goals are: • Designed and reconstructed stream channels sized to convey bankfull flows that will maintain a stable dimension, profile, and planform based on modeling, watershed conditions, and reference reach conditions; • Added in -stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced streams; • Installed habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and pools of varying depths to restored and enhanced streams; • Reduced bank height ratios and increased entrenchment ratios to reference reach conditions; • Increased forested riparian buffers to at least 50 feet on both sides of the channel along the Project reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community; • Treated exotic invasive species; and • Established a permanent conservation easement on the Project that excludes livestock from stream channels and their associated buffers. Limitations to achieving these watershed goals arise by remaining constrained to the project boundaries. While we are restoring the habitat and streams to stable and effective conditions that achieve our goals within the Project parcels, we are unable to influence the effect of all riparian buffers and livestock impact in other areas within the watershed. However, with responsible restoration and stewardship of the majority of reaches within this small watershed, overall watershed functionality and health will improve to meet the RBRP goals. 1.3 Project Success Criteria The Project follows the USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the "Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" dated October 24, 2016. Cross section and vegetation plot data will be collected in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Hydrology data and visual monitoring will be reported annually. Stream Success Criteria Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull events have been documented in separate years. There should be little change in as -built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 1.4 within restored reaches. The entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross -sections on a given reach. Channel stability should be demonstrated through a minimum of four bankfull events documented in the seven-year monitoring period. Digital images are used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of Compass Point 3 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site August 2020 images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation. Vegetation Success Criteria Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project follow IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover a minimum of two percent of the planted area. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project is the survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, at least 260 planted five-year old trees at seven feet in height at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria is at least 210 trees per acre with an average height of ten feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees are counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but did not count towards the success criteria of total planted stems. Moreover, any single species can only account for up to 50 percent of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of 50 percent are shown in the monitoring table but were not used to demonstrate success. 1.4 Project Components The Project area is comprised of a single easement location along three unnamed tributaries to the Yadkin River, totaling 5,289 linear feet. There are eight stream reaches, DWI -A, DWI-B, DWI-C, DWI-D, DW1- E, DW2-A, DW2-B, and DW3, divided by treatment type. The Project is accessible from Pulliam Road. The stream mitigation components are summarized below. The one minor change from the Mitigation Plan credits was a result of an easement area decrease (0.04 acres) at the top of DWI -A. The easement was offset 30 feet from the parcel line, however, during the original survey an incorrect parcel line was used. This error was corrected in the recorded easement but was never updated in the design files. Therefore, the length of DWI -A is now 15 linear feet (6 SMU) shorter in As -Built than what was shown in the Mitigation Plan, causing a reduction in total credits from 4161 SMUs to 4155 SMUs. More details about project stream lengths and credits are provided in Appendix A. Compass Point Mitigation Credits Cool Stream Riparian Wetland Non -Riparian Wetland Totals 4,155 NA NA 1.5 Stream Design/Approach Stream restoration efforts along the tributaries of the Project were accomplished through analyses of geomorphic conditions and watershed characteristics. The design approach applied a combination of analytical and reference reach -based design methods that meet objectives commensurate with both ecological and geomorphic improvements. Treatment activities ranged from minor bank grading and planting to re-establishing stable planform and hydraulic geometry. For full restoration reaches, natural design concepts were applied and verified through rigorous engineering analyses and modeling. The objective of this approach was to design a geomorphically stable channel that provides habitat improvements and ties into the existing landscape. Specifically, treatments included Priority I and II stream restoration, Enhancement II, and Enhancement III. The Project has been broken into the following reaches: Compass Point 4 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site August 2020 Reach DWI -A - This reach begins on the southwest end of the Project, flows northeast to a confluence with DW 1-B and DW2-B, and totals 247 linear feet of Enhancement IL Open pasture was located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities included improving habitat through livestock exclusion fencing and riparian planting. The livestock exclusion fencing removed livestock access to the riparian areas and provides wildlife corridors throughout the Project area. A flow gauge was installed midway on the reach to monitor hydrology. Reach DWI-B - This reach begins on the southern end of the Project from DWI -A and DW2-B, flows north to DWI-C, and totals 1,948 linear feet of Priority I/II restoration. Managed pasture was located adjacent to the reach on the upstream end. The downstream end was surrounded by intermittently grazed pasture and disturbed secondary growth in an area with previous timber harvest. Restoration activities included constructing a new channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, and log vanes were installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. Buffer activities improve riparian areas that filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. Reach DWI-C — This reach begins on the north end of the Project from DWI-B, and flows northeast to a culvert crossing and DWI-D. This reach totals 566 linear feet of Priority I/II restoration, beginning immediately downstream of a bedrock drop structure at the bottom of DWI -B. Sections of the existing road were decommissioned in the easement and planted. Restoration activities included constructing a new channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern, cutting a floodplain bench and backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, and log vanes were installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. Livestock exclusion fencing removed livestock access to the riparian areas and provides wildlife corridors throughout the Project area. Reach DWI-D - This reach begins at the downstream end of DWI-C and culvert crossing in the northern end of the Project, and flows northeast to DWI-E. The reach totals 758 linear feet of Priority I/II restoration. Restoration activities included constructing a floodplain bench to aid in connectivity to the existing floodplain and constructing a new channel with appropriate dimensions and pattern. When possible, bed material was harvested and reused to create stable bed features. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, and log vanes were installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. Buffer activities improve riparian areas that filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. Reach DWI-E - This reach begins on the north end of the Project, from DWI-D and flows north until it drains to the Yadkin River. This reach totals 432 linear feet of Enhancement III. Managed cropland was located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities included improving habitat through livestock exclusion fencing. Reach DW2-A - This reach begins on the southeast end of the Project, and flows west to DW2-B. This reach totals 760 linear feet of Enhancement IL Sparse woodland and managed pasture was located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities included targeted bank stabilization, riparian buffer planting, and installation of livestock exclusion fencing. An existing ford crossing was removed. Buffer activities improve riparian areas that filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. Reach DW2-B - This reach begins at the downstream end of DW2-A, and flows north to the confluence with DWI -A to become DWI-B. This reach totals 485 linear feet of Priority I Restoration. Actively managed pasture was present on both sides of the reach. Restoration activities included constructing a new Compass Point 5 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site August 2020 channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel. Native bed material was harvested when possible. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, and log vanes were installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. A crossing was installed along this reach. Buffer activities improve riparian areas that filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. Reach DW3 - This reach begins on the south end of the Project at the adjacent powerline easement, and flows north to DW2-A. This reach totals 93 linear feet of Enhancement II_ Disturbed woodland and intermittently grazed pasture was located adjacent to the reach. A maintained powerline easement is located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities included improving habitat through livestock exclusion fencing, and riparian buffer planting. The livestock exclusion fencing removed livestock access to riparian areas and provides wildlife corridors throughout the Project area. 1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions Stream construction, planting, and fencing was completed in June 2020. The Project was closely built to design plans and guidelines. One minor adjustment was made to the easement, causing a total decrease of 0.04 acres. The easement was offset 30 feet from the parcel line, however, during the original survey an incorrect parcel line was used. This change to the easement was already corrected in the original recorded easement but was not updated in the original mitigation plan. Therefore, the length of DWI -A is now 15 linear feet (6 SMUs) shorter in As -Built than what was shown in the Mitigation Plan, causing a reduction in total credits from 4161 SMUs to 4155 SMUs. A few other minor changes were made to structures during construction which are detailed in the redline version of the as -built survey in Appendix E. Project credits are based on design centerline, but as -built stream lengths are also shown on Table 1. Also, there were a few changes to the planting plan due to bareroot availability. Planting plan changes are shown in Table 5. 1.7Baseline Monitoring Performance (MYO) Vegetation Monitoring of the eight permanent vegetation plots and three random plots was completed during June 2020. Vegetation data are in Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot locations are in Appendix B. MYO monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 607 to 1,578 planted stems per acre with a mean of 1,108 across the eight permanent plots, while planted stem densities ranged from 1,012 to 1,821 planted stems per acre with a mean of 1,403 across the three random plots. A total of 14 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average stem height across all vegetation plots was 1.7 feet. Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is becoming well established throughout the project. Stream Geomorphology Geomorphology data for MYO was collected during June 2020. Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix D. Overall the baseline cross sections and profile on the restoration reach relatively match the design. The cross sections on the Enhancement II reaches were included to monitor the changes in Compass Point 6 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site August 2020 dimension post cattle exclusion and riparian planting. The as -built conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all restoration/enhancement reaches. All reaches were designed as very coarse sand bed channels and remain classified as very coarse sand bed channels post -construction. Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation. Stream Hydrology In June 2020, one stage recorder was installed on restoration reach DWI-B to document bankfull events and a flow gauge was installed on reach DWI -A to track the frequency and duration of stream flow events. Stream hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and in Appendix E. The stage recorder and flow gauge locations can be found on Figure 2 and photos are in Appendix B. Wetland Hydrology Three groundwater wells were installed in June 2020. The goal of the groundwater wells is to track the hydrology in the jurisdictional wetlands on site post -construction. There is no hydroperiod success criteria for these groundwater wells. Wetland hydrology data will be included in subsequent monitoring reports in this section and in Appendix E. Groundwater well locations can be found on Figure 2. 2.0 Methods Stream geomorphology monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three- dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at 14 cross -sections. Survey data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. Stream hydrology is monitored using stage recorders and flow gauges, which utilize automatic pressure transducers, and were installed within the channels. The stage recorders record frequency, duration, and stage of bankfull events and are programmed to record readings at an hourly interval. A surveyed elevation was recorded at the bed and top of bank at the stage recorder elevation, allowing for accurate bankfull events to be recorded. Flow gauges record frequency, duration, and stage of flow events and are programmed to read at an hourly interval. The height of the adjacent downstream riffle (from the gauge) is used to detect flow. Vegetation success is being monitored at eight permanent monitoring plots and three random plots for a total of 11 plots. Locations of random plots will vary from year to year and will be shown in Figure 2, and species and height will be recorded for all woody stems. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are taken from the origin each monitoring year. Wetland hydrology is monitored to document maintenance of jurisdictional groundwater levels in the stream restoration area (as requested by NCIRT). This is accomplished with three automatic pressure transducer gauges (located in groundwater wells) that record daily groundwater levels. One automatic pressure transducer is installed above ground for use as a barometric reference. Gauges are downloaded quarterly and wetland hydroperiods are calculated during the growing season. Gauge installation followed Compass Point 7 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site August 2020 current regulatory guidance. Visual observations of primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are also recorded during quarterly site visits. 3.0 References Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function - Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006. Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2 Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274 Resource Environmental Solutions. 2019. Compass Point Mitigation Site - Final Mitigation Plan. Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. Skidmore, 2001. Compass Point 8 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site August 2020 Appendix A Background Tables Table 1. Compass Point - Mitigation Assets and Components Existing Mitigation Footage Plan Mitigation As -Built As -Built or Footage or Mitigation Restoration Priority Mitigation Plan Footage or Credits Project Segment Acreage Acreage Category Level Level Ratio (X:1) Credits Acreage Comments DW1-A 315 262 Cool E II N/A 2.5000 105 247 99 Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement, 15 LF lost at as -built due to easement change DW1-B 48 110 Cool R 1 & 2 1.0000 110 110 110 Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent Conservation Easement DW1-B 1,907 1,838 Cool R 1 & 2 1.0000 1838 1838 1838 Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent Conservation Easement DW1-C 604 566 Cool R 1 & 2 1.2000 472 566 472 Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent Conservation Easement DW1-D 262 259 Cool R 1 & 2 1.0000 259 259 259 Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent Conservation Easement DW1-D 415 499 Cool R 1 & 2 1.0000 499 499 499 Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent Conservation Easement DW1-E 432 432 Cool E III N/A 7.5000 58 432 58 Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement DW2-A 760 760 Cool E II N/A 2.5000 304 760 304 Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement DW2-B 514 485 Cool R 1 1.0000 485 485 485 Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent Conservation Easement DW3 93 93 Cool E II N/A 3.0000 31 93 31 Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement Project Credits Restoration Level Stream Riparian Wetland Non -Rip Coastal Warm Cool Cold Riverine Non-Riv Wetland Marsh Restoration 3663 Re-establishment Rehabilitation Enhancement Enhancement Enhancement II 434 Enhancement III 58 Creation Preservation Total 4155 Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Compass Point Mitigation Site Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 2 months Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 2 months Number of reporting Years : 0 Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery Restoration Plan NA Jun-19 Final Design — Construction Plans NA Apr-20 Stream Construction NA Jun-20 Site Planting NA Jun-20 As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline) Jun-20 Aug-20 Year 1 Monitoring Year 2 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 4 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring Year 6 Monitoring Year 7 Monitoring = The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline Table 3. Project Contacts Table Compass Point Mitigation Site Designer RES / 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100, Raleigh, North Carolina 27612. Primary project design POC Dan Sweet & Frasier Mullen Construction Contractor Carolina Environmental Contracting Inc / PO Box 1905, Mount Airy, NC 27030 Construction contractor POC James Poe Survey Contractor Ascension Land Surveying PC / 116 Williams Rd., Mocksville, NC 27028 Survey contractor POC Chris Cole Planting Contractor H&J Forestry Planting contractor POC Matt Hitch Monitoring Performers RES / 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100, Raleigh, North Carolina 27612. Stream Monitoring POC lRyan Medric (919) 741-6268 Vegetation Monitoring POC JRyan Medric (919) 741-6268 Table 4. Project Background Information Project Name Compass Point County Yadkin Project Area (acres) 16.46 Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) Latitude: 36.269624 N Longitude:-80.638420 W Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted) 12.92 Project Watershed Summary Information Physiographic Province Northern Inner Piedmont River Basin Yadkin USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03040101 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 1 03040101160010 DWR Sub -basin 03-07-02 Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles) 271 ac (0.42 mil) Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 1 % CGIA Land Use Classification Reach Summary Information Parameters DWI -A DWI-B DWI-C DWI-D DW1-E DW2-A DM-B DWS Length of reach (linear feet) (designed) 262 1,948 566 758 432 968 277 93 Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined) Drainage area (Acres) 96 237 256 269 211 s3 90 28 Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral P P P P P P P P NCDWR Water Quality Classification Stream Classification (existing) CA F4/G4c CA B4c E6 CA G4c CA Stream Classification (proposed) cob B4c E6 I CA cob cob Evolutionary trend (Simon) (existing) *C4/C4b FEMA classification Regulatory Considerations Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Suppor ting Docs? Water of the United States - Section 404 Yes Yes SAW - 2016- 02357 Water of the United States - Section 401 Yes Yes DWR # 18-0063 Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Mit Plan Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Mit Plan Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA) No N/A N/A FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes N/A Mit Plan Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A Rockford Compass Point Site Lenoir AU Morganton 1 B roddord Yadkin R'Ne-r— Q 0 e Run or Legend !® Conservation Easement iry Service Area - 03040101 TLW - HUC - 03040101090050 N Date: 8/20/2020 Figure 1 - Site Location Map w e Drawn by: HKH res s Compass Point Mitigation Site Checked by: RTM 0 375 750 Yadkin County, North Carolina , inch =750 feet Feet Appendix B Visual Assessment Data i a 3 •� t � v r y Tr p� it i �R1 At }3 R2Sill 1r 411 CP I.r , � 11 h 4 14 Vegetation Condition Assessment _ s - '�' 4 5 Target Community : ti w Present Marginal Absent Absent No Fill .lM *a►�' t Presen A' Mu.' .. ,. - ..s... _ DW1-E `t, r�s c �'� Z m 0 t25 250 Feet Current Conditions Plan View Compass Point Mitigation Project MYO 2020 Yadkin County, North Carolina Date: 8/25/2020 Drawn by: RTM Checked by: KC 1 in = 250 feet Legend Conservation Easement E]Fixed Veg Plot EIRandom Veg Plot ® Existing Wetland Cross Section Design Centerline Restoration Restoration (1.2:1) Enhancement II — Enhancement II (3:1) Enhancement III As -Built Top of Bank Stream Structure Flow Gauge O Stage Recorder Groundwater Well Compass Point MYO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Vegetation Plot 1 (6/17/2020) Vegetation Plot 3 (6/17/2020) Vegetation Plot 5 (6/17/2020) Vegetation Plot 2 (6/17/2020) Vegetation Plot 4 (6/17/2020) Vegetation Plot 6 (6/17/2020) Vegetation Plot 7 (6/17/2020) Vegetation Plot 8 (6/17/2020) Compass Point MYO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Random Vegetation Plot 1 (6/11/2020) Random Vegetation Plot 2 (6/11/2020) Random Vegetation Plot 3 (6/11/2020) •. - .., -47 -� ram: r � . Wetland Gauge (GW 1) Wetland Gauge (GW2) Wetland Gauge (GW3) Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data Table 5. Planted Species Summary Common Name Scientific Name Mitigation Plan % As -Built % Total Stems Planted Willow Oak Quercus phellos 15 14 2,200 Water Oak Quercus nigra 15 13 2,200 River Birch Betula nigra 15 13 2,000 Sycamore Platanus occidnetalis 15 13 2,000 Northern Red Oak Quercus rubra 10 13 2,000 Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 5 9 1,400 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 5 800 Yellow Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 10 5 800 Crab Apple Malus an usti olia 0 3 500 Black Walnut Ju lans nigra 0 2 400 Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 0 2 350 Sugarberry Celtis laevigata 0 2 300 Elderberry Sambucus canadensis 0 2 300 Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis 0 2 300 American Plum Prunus americana 0 MER2 300 Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica 5 0 0 Total 15,850 Planted Area 1 12.92 As -built Planted Stems/Acre 1 1,227 Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Plot # Planted Stems/Acre Volunteer Stems/Acre Total Stems/Acre Success Criteria Met? Average Planted Stem Height 1 607 0 607 Yes 1.6 2 1214 0 1214 Yes 1.6 3 1052 0 1052 Yes 1.7 4 971 0 971 Yes 1.7 5 1578 0 1578 Yes 1.7 6 890 0 890 Yes 2.0 7 1012 0 1012 Yes 1.5 8 1538 0 1538 Yes 1.8 R1 1012 0 1012 Yes 1.6 R2 1376 0 1376 Yes 1.7 R3 1821 0 1821 Yes 1.5 Project Avg 1188 0 1188 Yes 1.7 Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Compass Point Current Plot Data (MYO 2020) Annual Means Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 201701465-01-0001 201701465-01-0002 201701465-01-0003 201701465-01-0004 201701465-01-0005 201701465-01-0006 201701465-01-0007 201701465-01-0008 MYO(2020) PnoL P-all T PnoL P-all T PnoL P-all T PnoL P-all T PnoL P-all T PnoL P-all T PnoL P-all T PnoL P-all T PnoL P-all T Betula nigra river birch Tree 9 9 9 8 8 8 5 5 5 4 4 4 9 9 9 35 35 35 Cehis laevigata sugarberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 4 4 4 Corpus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 4 41 4 4 4 4 Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 7 7 7 Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 Liriodendron tuhpifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 9 9 9 8 8 8 2 2 2 1 1 1 20 20 20 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 2 2 2 10 10 10 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 18 18 18 Prunus americana American plum Tree 1 1 1 6 6 6 7 7 7 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 2 2 2 7 7 7 5 5 5 9 9 9 9 9 9 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 10 10 46 46 46 Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 1 1 1 91 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 15 15 15 65 65 65 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 15 15 15 30 30 30 26 26 26 24 24 24 39 39 39 22 22 22 25 25 25 38 38 38 219 219 219 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1 0.20 41 41 41 61 61 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 61 61 6 61 61 6 81 8 8 51 51 51 141 141 14 6071 6071 6071 12141 12141 1214 1052 10521 10521 9711 9711 971 15781 15781 15781 8901 8901 890 10121 1012 15381 15381 15381 11081 1108 1108 Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Random Plot 1 # Species Height cm 1 Cercis canadensis 48 2 Cercis canadensis 35 3 Cercis canadensis 40 4 Cercis canadensis 42 5 Cercis canadensis 41 6 Cercis canadensis 45 7 Cercis canadensis 59 8 Cercis canadensis 52 9 Morus rubra 55 10 Morus rubra 65 11 Morus rubra 50 12 Quercus phellos 50 13 Quercus phellos 46 14 Quercus rubra 60 15 Quercus phellos 30 16 Quercus phellos 75 17 Quercus phellos 45 18 Quercus phellos 45 19 Quercus phellos 50 20 Quercus phellos 50 21 Quercus phellos 56 22 Quercus phellos 75 23 Quercus phellos 35 24 Cornus amomum 50 25 Quercus phellos 55 Stems/Acre 1012 Average Height cm 50 Average Height ft 1.6 Plot Size m 50 x 2 Random Plot 2 # Species Hei ht cm 1 Plantanus occidentalis 48 2 Quercus phellos 35 3 Quercus rubra 40 4 Quercus rubra 42 5 Plantanus occidentalis 41 6 Quercus rubra 45 7 Quercus rubra 59 8 Plantanus occidentalis 52 9 Plantanus occidentalis 55 10 Plantanus occidentalis 65 11 Quercus rubra 50 12 Plantanus occidentalis 50 13 Malus angustifolia 46 14 Malus angustifolia 60 15 Malus angustifolia 30 16 Malus angustifolia 75 17 Diospyros vir iniana 45 18 Diospyros vir iniana 45 19 Diospyros vir iniana 50 20 Diospyros vir iniana 50 21 Quercus phellos 56 22 Quercus phellos 75 23 Quercus phellos 35 24 Quercus phellos 50 25 Quercus phellos 55 26 Quercus phellos 56 27 Quercus phellos 57 28 Quercus rubra 58 29 Quercus rubra 59 30 Quercus phellos 60 31 Quercus rubra 61 32 Ju lans ni ra 62 33 Ju lans ni ra 63 34 Ju lans ni ra 64 Stems/Acre 1376 Average Height cm 53 Average Height ft 1.7 Plot Size m 50 x 2 Random Plot 3 # Species Height cm 1 Quercus phellos 30 2 Betula ni ra 40 3 Quercus rubra 50 4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 50 5 Betula ni ra 80 6 Betula ni ra 75 7 Platanus occidentalis 30 8 Quercus phellos 45 9 Quercus phellos 40 10 Quercus phellos 40 11 Quercus phellos 65 12 Quercus phellos 70 13 Quercus phellos 35 14 Platanus occidentalis 30 15 Quercus phellos 50 16 Quercus rubra 45 17 Platanus occidentalis 50 18 Quercus rubra 50 19 Quercus phellos 60 20 Quercus phellos 60 21 Quercus rubra 40 22 Quercus rubra 30 23 Quercus rubra 55 24 Quercus rubra 45 25 Diospyros vir iniana 30 26 Quercus phellos 50 27 Quercus rubra 30 28 Platanus occidentalis 10 29 Quercus rubra 50 30 Betula ni ra 60 31 Platanus occidentalis 10 32 Quercus rubra 45 33 Quercus rubra 31 34 Quercus rubra 35 35 Quercus rubra 40 36 Quercus rubra 40 37 Quercus phellos 75 38 Quercus rubra 45 39 Quercus rubra 45 40 Quercus rubra 40 41 Quercus rubra 50 42 Quercus rubra 55 43 Quercus rubra 55 44 Quercus rubra 45 45 Quercus phellos 60 Stems/Acre 1821 Average Height cm 46 Average Height ft 1.5 Plot Size m 25 x 4 Appendix D Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW2-B - Cross Section 1 - Pool - Restoration 877 876 875 ° 874 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — d w 873 872 871 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MY02020 — ——Approx. Bankfull 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 1 Pool MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA 874.04 Bankfull Width (ft)' 10.9 Floodprone Width (ft)' N/A Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.3 Low Bank Elevation ft 874.04 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 12.0 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiot N/A Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Compass Point - Reach DW2-B - Cross Section 2 - - Restoration 877 876 875 0 ° 874 d w 873 872 871 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO 2020 — — — Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 2 1 Riffle MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA' 873.63 Bankfull Width (ft)' 9.6 Floodprone Width (ft)' 50 Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2 1.1 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 873.63 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2 )2 72 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' >5.2 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' 1.0 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 3 - .- _ _: - Restoration 871 870 869 ° 868 d w 867 OF 866 865 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO 2020 — — • Appro:. Bankfull 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 3 Pool MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) -Based on ABASA1 868.42 Bankfull Width (ft)' 11.6 Floodprone Width (ft)I N/A BankfullMaxDepth (ft)2 1.9 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 868.42 Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2 12.8 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t N/A Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t N/A 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 4 - . _...._ - Restoration 871 870 869 ° 868 M. — — d w 867 866 865 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO 2020 — — — Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 4 Riffle MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on ABASAi 868.29 Bankfull Width (ft)t 12.9 Floodprone Width (ft)' 49.8 Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2 1.4 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 868.29 Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2 11.1 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t >3.8 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t 1.0 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 5 - rxillille - Restoration 863 862 861 g 860 w 859 858 857 ! i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO 2020 — — — Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 5 Riffle MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Bas ed on ABASAi 860.30 Bankfull Width (ft)' 13.0 Floodprone Width (ft)' 50 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.7 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 860.30 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2 13.1 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 _3.8 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio i 1.0 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 6 - . _ _. - Restoration 863 862 861 860 0 859 w 858 857 856 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO2020 — —— Approx. Bankfull 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 6 (Pool) MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on ABASAi 859.88 Bankfull Width (ft)t 13.2 Floodprone Width (ft)I N/A Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2 3.3 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 859.88 Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2 19.8 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t N/A Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t N/A 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 7 - Pool - Restoration 851 850 849 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ° 848 w 847 846 845 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO 2020 — —— Approx. Bankfull 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 7 (Pool) MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on ABASAi 849.11 Bankfull Width (ft)t 15.2 Floodprone Width (ft)I N/A Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2 2.3 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 849.11 Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2 17.4 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t N/A Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t N/A 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 8 - Riffle - Restoration 852 851 850 ° 849 w 848 847 846 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO 2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 8 1 Riffle) MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) -Based on ABASAi 848.97 Bankfull Width (ft)' 11.6 Floodprone Width (ft)' 50 Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2 1.4 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 848.97 BankfullCross Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2 10.5 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t >4.3 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t 1.0 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 9 - Pool - Restoration 845 844 843 842 w 841 840 839 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO2020 — ——Approx. Bankfull 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 9 (Pool) 6MM MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) -Based on ABASAi 842.19 Bankfull Width (ft)' 12.4 Floodprone Width (ft)I N/A BankfullMaxDepth (ft)2 2.2 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 842.19 Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2 14.4 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t N/A Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t N/A 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 10 - . _...._ - Restoration 845 844 843 ° 842 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — > a) w 841 840 839 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO 2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 10 (Riffle) MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) -Based on ABASAi 842.10 Bankfull Width (ft)' 12.2 Floodprone Width (ft)t >49.9 Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2 1.6 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 842.10 BankfullCross Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2 12.6 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t 4.1 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t 1.0 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-C - Cross Section 11 - Restoration 826 825 824 _ _ _ _ ° 823 > d w 822 821 820 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MY02020 — —— Approx. Bankf.Il 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 11 B MYO 211 1d 2 %ff3 N Y5 ;7' _4 B;iuitiluREitiadolt(A)-Based on 9111-XSA 737-31 $umull Wi dth (ft), 5.7 Flo o dpnneWidth ft l >50 BanVLM -Max Deloth (ft)� 101 Lou-E#atab�Elei•atian ft 737�1 B antfull Cro s s Sectional Area ft' ' .29 2atil:Eu Entire nclimeritRatio l >8.7 B a:1 11 Bank Height Ratio 11 1.0 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-C - Cross Section 12 - . _...._ - Restoration 826 825 824 w 822 821 820 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO 2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 12 Ritlle MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on ABASA1 823.07 Bankfull Width (ft)' 13.8 Floodprone Width (ft)' 51.3 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.2 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 823.07 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 10.3 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t >3.7 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t 1.0 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-D - Cross Section 13 - . _ _. - Restoration 814 813 812 ° 811 w 810 809 808 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MY02020 — —— Approx. Bankfull 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 13 Pool MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on ABASA1 811.60 Bankfull Width (ft)' 13.6 Floodprone Width (ft)I N/A Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.9 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 811.60 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 17.1 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t N/A Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Upstream Downstream Compass Point - Reach DW1-D - Cross Section 14 - . _...._ - Restoration 814 813 812 ° 811 w 810 809 808 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Distance (ft) MYO 2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area 3X Vertical Exaggeration Cross Section 14 Ritlle MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on ABASA1 811.03 Bankfull Width (ft)' 15.4 Floodprone Width (ft)' 41.8 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 811.03 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 12.7 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t >2.7 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t 1.0 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary Compass Point Mitigation Site - Reach DW1-B Parameter Gauge Regional Curve Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD n Bankfull Width (ft) --- --- --- 11.5 --- --- 17.7 --- 2 7.1 --- --- 13.7 --- 2 --- 13.0 --- 11.6 12.4 12.6 13.0 0.7 4 Floodprone Width (ft) 13.1 --- --- 24.9 --- 2 >30 --- --- >50 --- 2 --- --- --- 49.8 49.9 49.9 50.0 0.1 4 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) --- --- --- 0.8 --- --- 1.2 --- 2 1.0 --- --- 1.4 --- 2 --- 0.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 'Bankfull Max Depth ft 1.3 --- --- 1.5 --- 2 1.2 --- --- 1.7 --- 2 --- 1.3 --- 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 0.2 4 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft) --- 13.7 14.5 2 6.7 --- 1 18.1 2 --- 11.1 --- 10.5 11.8 1 11.9 1 13.1 1 1.2 1 4 Width/Depth Ratio 9.6 21.6 2 7.4 --- 9.8 2 --- 1 15.3 --- --- --- --- --- --- I --- Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 1.4 2 >2.2 --- --- >4 2 --- 1 >2.2 --- 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.3 0.2 4 'Bank Height Ratio 1.7 2.5 2 1.3 --- --- 1.3 2 --- 1.0 --- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 4 Profile Riffle Length (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 6 --- --- 18 --- --- 13 --- 50 10 29 27 71 12 25 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1 3 3 7 1 25 Pool Length (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 3 --- --- 42 --- --- 14 --- 88 19 45 43 102 15 24 Pool Max depth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Pool Spacing (ft) --- --- --- -- --- --- 8 --- --- 64 --- 31 --- 125 52 73 72 145 18 24 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 20 --- --- 55.5 --- --- 24 --- 76 24 --- --- 76 --- --- Radius of Curvature (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 7 --- --- 103.3 --- --- 30 --- 80 30 --- --- 80 --- --- Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.9 --- --- 7.6 --- --- 2.1 --- 5.7 2.1 --- --- 5.7 --- --- Meander Wavelength (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 33 --- --- 66 --- --- 95 --- 181 95 --- --- 181 --- --- Meander Width Ratio --- --- --- --- --- --- 2.9 --- --- 4.8 --- --- 6.8 --- 13 6.8 --- --- 13 --- --- Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ --- --- Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull -- Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ --- --- Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification F4/G4c E4/E4b C4 C4 Bankfull Velocity (fps) --- --- --- -- Bankfull Discharge (cfs) --- --- -- Valley length (ft) 1884 --- 1799 --- Channel Thalweg length (ft) 2054 --- 1922 --- Sinuosity (ft) 1.09 --- 1.07 --- Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.015 --- 0.018 --- Channel slope (ft/ft) 0.014 --- 0.017 --- 3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres --- --- --- --- 4% of Reach with Eroding Banks --- --- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3 Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary (continued) Compass Point Mitigation Site - Reach DW1-C Parameter Gauge Regional Curve Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD' n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD' n Bankfull Width (ft) --- --- --- --- --- 13.6 --- --- 1 7.1 --- --- 13.7 --- 2 --- 14.0 --- --- --- 13.8 --- --- --- Floodprone Width (ft) --- --- --- --- --- 1 >30 --- --- >50 --- 2 --- --- --- --- 51.3 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- 0.9 --- --- 1 1.2 --- --- 1.4 --- 2 --- 0.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 'Bankfull Max Depth ft --- --- 1.3 --- --- 1 1.2 --- --- 1.7 --- 2 --- 1.3 --- --- --- 1.2 --- --- --- Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ -- 12.0 1 6.7 --- I --- 1 18.1 1 2 --- 12.2 --- --- --- 10.3 Width/Depth Ratio 15.5 1 7.4 --- --- 9.8 2 --- 16.1 --- --- --- --- Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 1 >2.2 --- --- >4 2 --- >2.2 --- --- --- 3.7 --- --- 'Bank Height Ratiol 1.0 1 1.3 --- --- 1.3 2 1.0 --- --- --- 1.0 --- --- Profile Riffle Length (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 6 --- --- 18 --- --- 13 --- 50 14 24 23 38 9 7 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1 2 2 4 1 7 Pool Length (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 3 --- --- 42 --- --- 14 --- 88 25 43 45 55 12 6 Pool Max depth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Pool Spacing (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 8 --- --- 64 --- --- 31 --- 125 41 69 73 84 15 6 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 20 --- --- 55.5 --- --- 24 --- 76 24 --- 76 Radius of Curvature (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 7 --- --- 103.3 --- --- 30 80 30 --- 80 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) --- --- --- --- --- -- 0.9 --- --- 7.6 --- --- 2.1 --- 5.7 2.1 --- 5.7 --- --- --- Meander Wavelength (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 33 --- --- 66 --- --- 95 --- 181 95 --- 181 Meander Width Ratio --- --- --- --- --- -- 2.9 --- 4.8 --- --- 6.8 --- 13 6.8 13 --- --- --- Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ --- --- --- Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull -- Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ --- --- Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification C4b E4/E4b C4 C4 Bankfull Velocity (fps) --- --- Bankfull Discharge (cfs) --- --- Valley length (ft) 550 --- 525 --- Channel Thalweg length (ft) 600 --- 566 --- Sinuosity (ft) 1.09 --- 1.08 --- Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.022 --- 0.014 --- Channel slope (ft/ft) 0.02 --- 0.0127 --- 3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres --- --- --- --- 4% of Reach with Eroding Banks --- --- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3 Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary (continued) Compass Point Mitigation Site - Reach DW1-D Parameter Gauge Regional Curve Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD' n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD' n Bankfull Width (ft) --- --- --- --- --- 12.9 --- --- 1 7.1 --- --- 13.7 --- 2 --- 15.0 --- --- --- 15.4 --- --- --- Floodprone Width (ft) --- --- 26.7 --- --- 1 >30 --- --- >50 --- 2 --- --- --- --- 41.8 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- 1.2 --- --- 1 1.2 --- --- 1.4 --- 2 --- 0.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 'Bankfull Max Depth ft --- --- 1.9 --- --- 1 1.2 --- --- 1.7 --- 2 --- 1.1 --- --- --- 1.1 --- --- --- Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ -- 15.3 1 6.7 --- I --- 1 18.1 1 2 --- 13.0 --- --- --- 12.7 Width/Depth Ratio 10.8 1 7.4 --- --- 9.8 2 --- 17.3 --- --- --- --- Entrenchment Ratio --- --- 2.1 --- --- 1 >2.2 --- --- >4 2 --- >2.2 --- --- >3.7 --- --- --- 'Bank Height Ratiol 1.5 1 1.3 --- --- 1.3 2 1.0 --- --- --- 1.0 --- --- Profile Riffle Length (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 6 --- --- 18 --- --- --- --- --- 11 29 25 66 16 11 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 2 3 3 5 1 11 Pool Length (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 3 --- --- 42 --- --- 14 --- 88 33 57 52 88 19 10 Pool Max depth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Pool Spacing (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 8 --- --- 64 --- --- 31 --- 125 60 86 79 143 26 10 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 20 --- --- 55.5 --- --- 24 --- 76 24 --- 76 Radius of Curvature (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 7 --- --- 103.3 --- --- 30 80 30 --- 80 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) --- --- --- --- --- -- 0.9 --- --- 7.6 --- --- 2.1 --- 5.7 2.1 --- 5.7 --- --- --- Meander Wavelength (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 33 --- --- 66 --- --- 95 --- 181 95 --- 181 Meander Width Ratio --- --- --- --- --- -- 2.9 --- 4.8 --- --- 6.8 --- 13 6.8 13 --- --- --- Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ --- --- --- Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull -- Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ --- --- Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification B4c E4/E4b C4b C4b Bankfull Velocity (fps) --- --- Bankfull Discharge (cfs) --- --- Valley length (ft) 734 --- 710 --- Channel Thalweg length (ft) 800 --- 758 --- Sinuosity (ft) 1.09 --- 1.07 --- Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.011 --- 0.022 --- Channel slope (ft/ft) 0.01 --- 0.021 --- 3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres --- --- --- --- 4% of Reach with Eroding Banks --- --- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3 Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary (continued) Compass Point Mitigation Site - Reach DW2-B Parameter Gauge Regional Curve Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD' n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD' n Bankfull Width (ft) --- --- --- --- --- 6.6 --- --- 1 7.1 --- --- 13.7 --- 2 --- 10.0 --- --- --- 9.6 --- --- --- Floodprone Width (ft) --- --- 10.9 --- --- 1 >30 --- --- >50 --- 2 --- --- --- --- 50.0 Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- 1.3 --- --- 1 1.2 --- --- 1.4 --- 2 --- 0.8 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 'Bankfull Max Depth ft --- --- 1.7 --- --- 1 1.2 --- --- 1.7 --- 2 --- 1.1 --- --- --- 1.1 --- --- --- Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ -- 8.5 1 6.7 --- I --- 1 18.1 1 2 --- 8.0 --- --- --- 7.2 Width/Depth Ratio 5.1 1 7.4 --- --- 9.8 2 --- 12.5 --- --- --- --- Entrenchment Ratio --- --- 1.6 --- --- 1 >2.2 --- --- >4 2 --- >2.2 -- --- --- 5.2 --- --- 'Bank Height Ratiol 2.5 1 1.3 --- --- 1.3 2 1.0 --- --- --- 1.0 --- --- Profile Riffle Length (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 6 --- --- 18 --- --- 10 --- 20 12 20 17 30 6 9 Riffle Slope (ft/ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0 2 2 4 1 9 Pool Length (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 3 --- --- 42 --- --- 23 --- 41 17 30 31 44 8 9 Pool Max depth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Pool Spacing (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 8 --- --- 64 --- --- 33 --- 52 33 50 53 58 9 8 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 20 --- --- 55.5 --- --- 30 --- 36 --- --- --- --- Radius of Curvature (ft) --- --- --- --- --- -- 7 --- --- 103.3 --- --- 23 40 --- --- --- Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) --- --- --- --- --- -- 0.9 --- --- 7.6 --- --- 2 --- 4 --- --- --- --- Meander Wavelength (ft) --- --- --- --- --- --- 33 --- --- 66 --- --- 82 --- 87 Meander Width Ratio --- --- --- --- --- -- 2.9 --- 4.8 --- --- 8.2 --- 8.7 --- --- Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ --- --- --- Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull -- Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ --- --- Additional Reach Parameters Rosgen Classification E4/E4b C4b C4b Bankfull Velocity (fps) --- --- Bankfull Discharge (cfs) --- --- Valley length (ft) --- 230 --- Channel Thalweg length (ft) --- 277 --- Sinuosity (ft) --- 1.2 --- Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) --- 0.031 --- Channel slope (ft/ft) --- 0.026 --- 3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres --- --- --- --- 4% of Reach with Eroding Banks --- --- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in. 1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare). 3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope. 4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3 Appendix D. Table 9 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections) Project Name: Compass Point Cross Section 1(Pool) Cross Section 2 (Riffle) Cross Section 3 (Pool) Cross Section 4 (Riffle) Cross Section 5 (Riffle) Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA' 874.0 873.6 868.4 868.3 860.3 Bankfull Width ft ' 10.9 9.6 11.6 12.9 13.0 Floodprone Width ft 1 N/A 50.0 N/A 49.8 50 Bankfull Max Depth ft z 2.3 1.1 1.9 1.4 1.7 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 874.04 873.6 868.4 868.3 860.3 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area f� z 12.0 7.2 12.8 11.1 13.1 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' N/A >5.2 N/A >3.8 >3.8 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A 1.0 N/A 1.0 1.0 Cross Section 6 (Pool) Cross Section 7 (Pool) Cross Section 8 (Riffle) Cross Section 9 (Pool) Cross Section 10 (Riffle) Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA' 859.9 849.1 849.0 842.2 842.1 Bankfull Width (ft)' 13.2 15.2 11.6 12.4 12.2 Floodprone Width (11)1 N/A N/A 50 N/A >49.9 Bankfull Max Depth ft z 3.3 2.3 1.4 2.2 1.6 Low Bank Elevation (ft 859.9 849.1 849.0 842.2 842.10 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area f�)2 19.8 17.4 10.5 14.4 12.6 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' N/A N/A >4.3 N/A 4.1 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A N/A 1.0 N/A 1.0 Cross Section 11(Pool) Cross Section 12 (Riffle) Cross Section 13 (Pool) Cross Section 14 (Riffle) Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA' 823.9 823.1 811.6 811.0 Bankfull Width (ft)' 14.7 13.8 13.6 15.4 Floodprone Width ft 1 N/A 51.3 N/A 41.8 Bankfull Max Depth ft z 2.2 1.2 1.9 1.1 Low Bank Elevation (ft) 823.88 823.1 811.60 811.0 Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 1907 10.3 17.1 12.7 Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio' N/A >3.7 N/A >2.7 Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A 1.0 N/A 1.0 1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation 2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation Appendix E As -Built Plan Sheets COMPASS POINT MITIGATION PROJECT YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA YADKIN RIVER BASIN CU,06 03040101 AS -BUILT SURVEY PKOJECT DIRECTORY DESIGNER: RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC 3G00 GLENWOOD AVENUE -SUITE 100 RALEIGH NC, 27G 1 2 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR: CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTING, INC (CEC) 150 PINE RIDGE KID, MT AIRY, NC 27030 MONITORING PEKfOKMERS: RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC 3G00 GLENWOOD AVENUE -SUITE 100 RALEIGH NC, 27G 1 2 SURVEYOR: ASCENSION LAND SURVEYING MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028 BANK SPONSOK: ENVIRONMENTAL BANC � EXCHANGE CERTIFICATE Of SURVEY AND ACCURACY "I CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPEKVISION AND THAT THIS GROUND SURVEY WAS PEKfOKMED AT THE 90% CONFIDENCE LEVEL TO MEET EEDEKAL GEOGKAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE STANDARDS; THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PEKfOKMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS EOK A TOPOGKAPHIC/PLANIMETKIC SURVEY TO THE ACCURACY Of CLASS "A" AND VERTICAL ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE TO THE CLASS "A" STANDARD, AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED ON 1 0/25/ 1 8; THAT THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON I 0/2G/ 1 8; THAT CONTOURS SHOWN AS [15KOKEN LINES] MAY NOT MEET THE STATED STANDAKD; AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON 'NAD 83/20 1 1 AND ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88/GEOID 1 2A (1) CLASS Of SURVEY: CLASS -A CA R �' - NOTES: (2) POSITIONAL ACCURACY: 0.07' (3) TYPE Of GPS FIELD FKOCEDUKE: KTK/VKS ;:�o��o�ESSIo�°lf�,, • ALL DISTANCES Af�E NOf�IZONTAL IN U.S. SUf�VEY FEET (4) DATES Of SURVEY: I I /27/20 18 SEAL = o - - . NOKIZONTAL DATUM IS NAD83(20 1 I VERTICAL DATUM IS �� (5) DATUM/EPOCH: NAD83/20 I I NAVD 88 (G) GEOID MODEL: 1 2A '�-,,� 'DSURv ' �� T�1I5 MAP IS NOT INTENDED I=OK RECORDATION, SALES Of, REVISION: ADD VEGETATION PLOTS, CROSS (7) UNITS: U.S. SURVEY FEET CONVEYANCES SECTIONS AND MONITORING STATIONS TO • THE FUKF05E OF T�115 MAP AND SUKVEY IS TO ILLUSTKATE SHEET-2 8/57/220220 WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBEK AND SEAL THIS 24TH DAY THE POST-CONSTKUCTION AS BUILTS OF THE STKEAM Of AUGUST, A.D., 2020. KESTOKATION AND MAY NOT 5�10W ALL IMFKOVEMENT5 OR UTI LITI ES • NO FKOPEKTY LINES WERE SUKVEYED, ALL BOUNDAKY LINES REVISION: ADD MISSING "BRUSH TOE" WERE KEFEKENCED I`KOM RECORDED PLATS LOCATIONS (8/157/2200) • VEGETATION PLOTS WERE Pf�OVIDED BY THE CLIENT AND CHf�ISTOPHEf� L. COLE L-5008 WERE NOT ACTUALLY SUKVEYED. SHEET INDEX: SHEET- I COVER SHEET SHEET-2 OVERALL, LEGEND, NOTES, CROSS SECTION DATA SHEET-3 THROUGH SHEET-9 PLANIMETKIC AND FKOEILE VIEWS FKOJECT COORDINATES (THALWEG INTERSECTION DWI A AND DW2B) N: 9 1 9,32 1 E: 1,5 1 G,833 LAT: NO3G° 1 5' 53" LONG: W080° 38' 20" Point Table Point # Northing Easting Elevation Description 507G 919276.78 1516901.49 874.40 RBF XS1 5077 919295.83 1516880.57 873.67 RBF XS2 5 133 919251.54 1516857.40 874.36 RBF XS 1 /2 5547 919537.52 1516807.23 868.23 RBF XS4 5548 919509.77 1516799.30 869.08 RBF XS3 5549 919930.92 1516739.37 860.68 RBF XS5 5550 919938.91 1516741.33 860.57 RBF XS6 5551 919943.20 1516791.15 860.26 RBF XS6 5552 919911.10 1516785.16 860.96 RBF XS5 5553 919510.99 1516849.64 868.65 RBF XS4 5554 919507.63 1516849.32 868.82 RBF XS3 5,542 920463.94 1516965.60 849.47 RBF XS7 5,543 920496.94 1516958.56 849.12 RBF XS8 5887 920463.74 1516915.57 849.67 RBF XS7 5888 920475.66 1516913.72 849.46 RBF XS8 G215 921532.42 1517318.20 824.20 RBF XS12 G219 921530.17 1517316.40 824.31 RBF XS11 G243 921484.67 1517336.94 824.49 RBF XS11 G244 921515.28 1517366.48 822.85 RBF XS12 G35G 921720.08 1517776.41 811.16 RBF XS14 G359 921710.85 1517746.63 811.88 RBF XS13 G425 921670.01 1517776.14 813.65 RBF XS13/14 50G54 920853.12 1516848.09 842.49 RBF XS10 50G55 920834.13 1516852.35 842.93 RBF XS9 PL- TH TB LEGEND aD CROSS-SECTION CONTROL POINT (FEBAR) .N Tr1ALWEG B TOP OF BANK E LAND CONSERVATION EASEMENT (PREVIOUSLY RECORDED) BANK PROTECTION ROCK STRUCTURE LOG STRUCTURE PROPERTY LINE -NOT SURVEYED THALWEG TOP OF BANK CENTERLINE `Q SEAL =� " NOW OR FORMERLY WINNIE WAGONER PIN 591 2-70-5269 1 AF Pr; ni-, m YA5 -RIVER SITE REACH DW3 VICINITY N T S. MAP ctiC�pcy oxoo \\711 m v 0 SEAL/ 01 opt �J, \ 885 �D, REACH DW2-A �g5 ENHANCEMENT II ✓ \\ `cF \\�^\\\\\ \ I I \ I��/ / VEGETATION STA 0+00 TO STA 7+GO _ PLOT # I G� /_ LCE _ \ co 00 LcE 00 Lp LICE � LcE v c,t LCE \ \� �� REACH DW2-B X \ \ \ \ LCE �G STA 70+GOOTO STA 12+45Cc� o LCE / � I LcE mot ILcE \/ �cF m' A Station 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 RIGHT TOP OF BANK LEFT TOP OF BANK LEFT TOP OF BANK ThALWEG RIGHT TOP OF BANK RIGHT TOP OF BANK "I +UU L+UU 1j+UU b+UU No .o rxewpq ZA O _4p O o v � � �L00 o^- 00 75 v c) .. >' W D Z -_ w � Ci — Ly — LL Z J � o o cv— LU �ZV1w� oOz:� cv— LU o — �z QZ��z cv �.v J O �- � o- w � J cv— wv�z CL Ly w V O o w M `A O M w w I M � Q 00 w cv0 �. r Q v � �w Q w Q Jo Q z � A �Z o � v �O Q J z z�Lu 3 LU QQ� YADKIN \REACH DWI -A VICINITY MAP tiC�pc (N.T.S.) ti v� 00 OT T1 ON P 2 s 19 Q \ - LG \ REACH DW2-B REACN DWI -B RESTORATION RESTORATION STA 04+70 TO STA 23+08 i \ \ STA 7+GO TO STA 1 2+45 g° clt ar m cD v 0 :rt Station I b u y+UU 1U+UU 11+UU 11+UU 11+4: RIGHT TOP OF BANK LEFT TOP OF BANK EX TFIALWEG LEFT TOP OF BANK RIGHT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG LEFT TOP OF BANK RIGHT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG 7+nn R+nn Q+nn 1n+nn 11+nn n 70 s�� ID 63, oI O lie 4 SEAL " °E A 00 O J -p O V � 00 00 o^- (� S 75 V O .. >, W � D � w v � -- — — E LL z J O O rA ZLU cv—LU W Z z cncv— � rA Q:) Q) Z C,,/ Q) LU °j�Qz �wJ°o� a W Q) � o 3 - � � V a� w� � O o w Z 0 d V W O C./ Z 0 Q 0- i- M LvO 00 rA O rA LL w w LU 01 W O J M �A rA J JW = z�LU 3�j QQ� C* oo7 m cu w O Z3 4 00 12+45 / 00 00 Ii= Ta - o -\� rB ITs ` rn �` o o SLOW GAIL) N j s I II VEGETATION / PLOT #2 / o + _ / o 1 2+00 873 / w I \ \ XS 2 O / o LDOUB I \ ✓ / LE 48" HDPE REACH DWI -A (SEE PROFILE) ENHANCEMENT II 5TA 0+58 TO STA 3+20 I \ / \ \ IXS I /2 XS I I I I +50 I I I� LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE I I r�idIu I -A/ I � 875 I \ REACH DW I -B �00 RESTORATION STA 07+GO TO 5TA 1 2+45 J I I k50 \ � �0 w n \ 1+nn ?+nn i+nn A+nn 22' 48" PIPE 1 .00% LEFT 0.73% RIGHT RIG HT TOP OF BANK INV. LT: 878.03' INV. LT: 877. INV. RT: 878.20' NV. KT: 878.041 I' /RIGHT TOP OF BANK LEFT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG -� RIGHT TOP OF BANK LEFT TOP OF BANK RIGHT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG LEFT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG ItUU LtUU .StUU :1 70 \V,�'I)N LOT #3 REACH DWI A3 RESTORATION STA 03+20 TO STA 04+30 STA 04+70 TO STA 23+08 YADKIN RIVER SITE VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.) oy Doti Cy/ �N � N v U �L75 o^- S �O v E � � W cv— w Z O N" cv— LL Z 0 a w cv— CL w cv— CL V W O Z 0 Q 0- v z z 0 v C) M 0 00 rA 0 rA O w w I 01 J K) V M rA 3�j QQ� Ti D u 3 YA5 —RIVER SITE �Golh :: C!R VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.) SEAL sul aG 872 9C7 — — XS 6 Lp Ln \ ✓ �� o / / REACH DWI -B I I \ \ XS 5\ RESTORATION \ XS 6 � STA 04+70 TO STA 23+08 VEGETATILCE \ \ \ I \ ON / PLOT #3 \ AGE - LCE \ I / \ u LGE — — LCE I LCE I \ LGE — — LCE \ I LCE LCE LCE �� LCE —LCE I �Ge — — LCE VEGETATION LCE LCPL � #4 � E 4+UU S+UU b+UU /+UU 6 1 u y+UU 1U+UU 11+UU 12+UU 13+U1 ROAD PROFILE INV. CTR: 8G8.G0' INV. CTR: 8G8.55' INV. RT: 8G8.72' INV. KT: 878.G0' EFT TOP OF BAN RIGHT TOP OF BANK 23' 54" PIPE 0.39% LEFT 0.22% CENTER 0.522% RIGHT EX THALWEG EX THALWEG LEFT TOP OF BANK RIGHT TOP OF BANK EX TIIALWEG LEFT TOP OF BANK RIGHT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG EX THALWEG 4+nn ,s+nn r,+nn 7+nn R+nn a+nn 1n+nn ll+nn 19+nn 1.11+nc 70 53 00 O O � � N cn O U CL00 v — 6� 00 (� �- 75 V O .. w 0— v o J O LL Z J O O Z I Lv L U LU I- W � -D Z 3:ZV1w (A OpZ Ow OLL �� \ 4� z cv— O dwOo � 3: Wv z � �/ W V O o v 1 O \ W M Z 0 a F- V W O 0- 00 M LvO �00 rA N rA V Z O rA LL W TW LU Q 01 Z W JO � M rA O V YADKI RIVER SITE oti BASIS 0F3FA7ZINCiS:— O�� NC CIZID, NAD 83 (2011) — y VICINITY MAP N.T.S. / "J / / — — � � � xs 10 Ln CA : ylpo _ \ / / O o o SAL 842 X5 to ` \ N \ C��iL/.td VEGETATION PLOT #5 43 XS 9 J / pPgv STAGE o —� 0REM 8 XS 7 X5 8 - u� k �cF \ / / — ` \ 8S0 o XS 8 — LCE � / GROUNDWATER WELL \ Xs 7 / / // LCE \ / — LCE LCE \ / F REACH DWI -B / — LCE LCE RESTORATION / LCE \ LCE STA 04+70 TO STA 23+08 — LCE — LCE — LCE lcF — LCE 1 EON 83' 1 Station ;i+UU 1 4+UU I S+UU I b+UU I/+UU I ti+UU 1 y+UU 1U+UU 21 +UU 11+UI RIGHT TOP OF BANK LEFT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG LEFT TOP OF BANK RIGHT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG RIGHT TOP OF BANK LEFT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG 7 .+nn �4+nn ��+nn 1R+nn �7+nn 1R+nn lq+nn gn+nn 9�+nn ��+6 50 37 00 O 0 -p O 5 O o V DL00 O _ 0075 �d-s V c) O �— Z S D � � E � to w rA �.L V Z J O O Z rA cv— �V 1 w opZ�� cv- Ly Q) Lu o —�z QZ��z cv- < LU LU cv—v z� CL (y W O o � � O W M `A O r w W I M � Q 00 W �.. r Q v � W Z � v _0 z w O Jo �� Z �rA �Z o � v O Q J z z�Lu 3 LU Q � U> 81 YADKIN RIVER AG S'icy�o N O y/CC cy �G^ VIC(NIT S.) AP �01 30, 3DI 3m J7l ;10 J0l 30� 3D1 30� REACH DW I -D RESTORATION �� 4 SEAL STA 27+84 TO STA 31 +33 STA 3 1 +93 TO STA 3G+92 �D suRvr�' N01 Xs I I Xs 112� /�� l� —� \ \ GROUNDWATER/ / �0 WELL VEGETATION _/ r � / \ \ \ PLOT #6 �G Xo _ GROUNDWATER PLOT \\\\�\ ` �� \\C WELL LCE I LCE L E LCE L / / v0t LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE I \ l N� 840 \ / 32+00 REACH DWI -C RESTORATION STA 23+06 TO STA 27+84 AW LEFT TOP OF BANK NIGHT TOP OF BANK EX TIIALWEG "�v EX TIIALWEG RIGHT TOP OF BANK EX TI-IALWEG LEFT TOP OF BANK EX ThALWEG ►9+nn 9'1+nn 94+nn 9.xi+nn 9R+nn 97+nn 9R+nn 9q+nn 'in+nn '11 +nl .e a ME 18 00 O c� J -p 0 � F-, � 00 o^_ �O75 S v V O .. O �— Z � � � S D to � W I— W �O O Lv 0- Cj 0 (/1 w rA Qw`� v 03w z� w 0 0 M M M 00 LvO 00 rA O rA LL O 00 W TW LU 01 J JW = z�LU 3�j QQ� RAW FORD CROSSING 41 32+00 rn �0 \ / �XS -I \\ 6 \ \\\\\ Cb f _ _ Cb XS 14Go REACH DW I -D \ / \ Ln �� \ RESTORATION STA 27+84 TO STA 31 +33 l \ m \ o \ �cF STA 3 1 +93 TO STA 3G+92 VEGETATION S \ \ 8� �/ \ \\ ,XS 3 4 \ ��Ox ��J / k CEO PLOT#7 \CC,, ccE REACH EJ 1 ENFIANCEMENT III LCE � LCE - LCE � LCE LCE LCE LCE LCE LCSTA 36+92 TO STA 4 I +24 �0E / — SCE. / LCE LCE �� \-C- / 3 LOON a[ LEFT TOP OF BANK RIGHT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG LEFT TOP OF BANK KIGHT TOP OF BANK EX THALWEG EX THALWEG 1 +nn ,ig+nn ,vi+nn '14+nn ,i.+nn ,iR+nn *17+nn ,iR+nn lla+ni 20 10 05 YADKI ER VI VI R SITE /,y�0�0 VICINITY MAP cy��cy (N.T.S.) 00 � ` � N N C v� 00 00 �r- o - � �O d- 75 \ V O .. � O W E W V_ ,u T J O Z J O O I — Z ' cv— W I— z 3:ZV1W (A Q:)OZ� cv- C,,/ Ow O�— LL Q W J O CL dwOo W cv—,,vim 4.L (y 'z1 I O o v 1 O LU M Z 0 a V W O C./ Z 0 Q 0- 00 c6 E W N rA v Z I W J 129 0 O W W z (1 Q 01 Z J O � M rA O V YADKIN RIVER EAL 4-x 00 Q� op VICINITY MAP cA/ N \ (N.T.S.) ti J -I-, 41 \� a �Ln0 00 \00 O75 U / > v o >> o a� a� \ o ��> LU ko DWI-E S / L W — — /U > —� w VEGETATION PLOT #8 / \-GE V vct O / AGE L O� LU cv— LU I— ucE / w ZV1w� oQZ�� cv— LU o —>z Station Q Z O 39+00 40+00 41+00 41+37 cv- 820 U20 d O O J CL cv-v Z� � LY LU O o LEFT TOP OF BANKrA O O M O RIGHT T P OF BANK O 81 w w I M � O 00 LU i 00 rA v � �w Z � v _Q z w 81 10 O J O EX THALWEG rA �Z o � v �O Q J oQ� 80 05 39+00 40+00 41+00 41+37 �l QQ� i7Sfe _wa STa^.y+ Knoll Ca�e�and Nebo LEvel Cuss %n7#01 VICINITY MAP NTS 0 0 � alic Know what's below. Call before you dig NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR „ ROJECT LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DIGGING, OR EXCAVATION THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST AND CROSS THROUGH THE AREA(S) OF CONSTRUCTION, WHETHER INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR NOT. CALL "8 1 1 " A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING OR EXCAVATING. REPAIRS TO ANY UTILITY DAMAGED RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. PROJECT DIRECTORY DESIGNED BY: RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC 3000 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100 RALEIGH, NC 27G 1 2 SURVEYED BY: ASCENSION LAND SURVEYING, PC G WILLIAMS ROAD MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028 PROJECT TOPOGRAPHY AND AS -BUILT PLANIMETRICS SURVEY WAS PROVIDED BY ASCENSION LAND SURVEYING, PC (NC FIRM LICENSE NUMBER C-4288, CHRISTOPHER L. COLE, NC PLS L-5008), DATED AUGUST 15, 2020 COMPASS POINT RECORD DRAWINGS YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA V YADKIN RIVER BASIN: HUC 03040101 AUGUST 2020 RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC 3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100 RALEIGH, NC 27612 L E - J� ,,ITF NAAP IV I -�) 5heet Li5t Table 5heet Number 5heet Title - COVED 51 LEACH DW 52 LEACH DW 53 LEACH DW 54 LEACH DW 1 55 LEACH DW 5G LEACH DW 1 57 LEACH DW 56 LEACH DW2 59 LEACH DW2 510 LEACH DW3 pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental LLC License: F-1428 SEAL li.i p o N CD ~ N 0 0- M U) 0 Z oC Q 0 0 0 0 00-, U) w O J U w IY IY 0-1 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: 0 JI rr m al O O O O O J rr m Q s Q U c 0 0- pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q O 0 N O � N O LO J N 0_ 00 O U) 0 0 C� N N O Z c� O O LL U) 0 0 0 p Q z U U) FD w O U LLJ > u1 O0 � Ir 0-1 Z Z 3:O Q 0 U O 0 U O z = / moU Z LU Z v 0 D LL O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 0 0 Q Z w o U Q 0= 0= 0_ 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S 1 0 JI rr m al O O O O O J rr m Q s Q U c 0 0- pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q O 0 N O � N O LO J N 0_ 00 O O (D N Z � OC O CM O LL 0 O Q z 0 0 z Q O J U > -D FLI > Ir u1 Ir 0 � 0-1 Z Z 3:O Q 0 U O 0 U O z = mow/ Z LU Z v 0 D LL O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 0 0 Q Z w o U Q 0= 0= 0_ 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S2 0 JI rr m al O O O O O J rr m Q s Q U c 0 0- pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q O 0 N O � N O LO J N 0_ 00 O U) 0 0 C� N N O z 0 O N LL U) O 0 0 p Q z U z c� Q O J U > Ir 0 u1 Ir O� 0-1 Z Z 3:O Q 0 U O 0 U O z = / moU Z LU Z v 0 D LL O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 0 0 Q Z w o U Q 0= 0= 0_ 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S3 0 JI rr m al O O O O O J rr m Q s Q U c 0 0- pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL ( 0 FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q o 0 N O N O LO J N 0_ 00 O O Cri N N O Z ; >_ o N O LLQ O Z -:3 z LL, q Q z O w O U LU w Ir 0 � o 0-1 (n � Q Z Z_ O Q 0 U O 0 U O z = mow/ Z LU Z v 0 D LL O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 0 0 Q Z w o U Q 0= 0= 0_ 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S4 0 JI rr m al O O O O O J rr m Q s Q U c 0 0- pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q O 0 N O � N O LO J N 0_ 00 O O (D N Z O CM O LL 0 O Q z0 0 0 w LU LU � Ir O � Ir Z Z 3:O Q 0 U O 0 U O z = mow/ Z LU Z v 0 D LL O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 0 0 Q Z w o U Q Ir Ir 0_ 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S5 0 JI rr m al O O O O O J rr m Q s Q U c 0 0- pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q O 0 N O � N O LO J N 0_ 00 O N (U N O Z � N O O 0-1 LL O z J z w 0 O O Q z_ j O > O J U FLILU LU u1 Ir O � Ir 0-1 Z Z 3:O Q 0 U O 0 U O z = mow/ Z LU Z v 0 D LL O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 0 0 Q Z w o U Q Ir Ir 0_ 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S6 LEGEND O EXISTING WETLAND W W j O EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC m UTILITY LINE OHE W PROPERTY LINE — - -- z gol \ PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50 PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR Q PROPOSED TOP OF BANK — - -J PROPOSED CHANNEL CENTERLINE AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR 50 - 818 / AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — — TB 3S� - 815 \ 00 O \ Q AS -BUILT CHANNEL CENTERLINE — — BRUSH TOE PROTECTION S 13 O 91, , '��> �° 3�+50 xs 14 �1 �O40+50 LOG SILL k00 i 39+50 _ -- 37+50 kOD LOG VANE OO _ �`SO 37 k / 8+50 X \ LOG CROSS VANE S I3/I4 8`0 38+00 3 r ROCK CROSS VANE �\ S VEGETATION V \ \ \ REACH DWI -E PLOT #8 RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL CE \ ROCK CROSS VANE ENHANCEMENT III SCE \�� NOT INSTALLED SINCE STA 3G+92 to STA 4 1 +24 CE AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE r �� NO DROP NEEDED TO TIE L LCE TO EXISTING CHANNEL SCE \ AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE \ \ AS -BUILT LOG CROSS VANE \1 49 AS -BUILT ROCK STRUCTURE AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION AS -BUILT GAUGE 825 (520 (515 (510 (505 3G I I -z w Q - AS BUILT CH BED AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK z N 0 c U O _ - PR PO ED 1OP OF1 BAN 4,1 PR CH PO NN ED L BE J 1 +00 3G+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00 40+50 41 +00 41 +50 42+ SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3' 825 z O AS -BUILT VEGETATION Q MONITORING PLOT w LIMITS OF PROPOSED LCE CONSERVATION EASEMENT (520 NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED (515 (510 (505 00 pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q o Q N O N O LO J N 0_ 00 O O Cri N N O ;1>_ Z _ o N O LLQ O z Q Q w OQ w O U LU LU u1 Ir O � Ir 0-1 Z Z Q Q 0 U O� 0U O LU Z 2 Z LU Z 0^ Z) I..L O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 U Q CD Z w o U Q Ir Ir 0_ Q PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S7 0 JI rr m al O O O O O J rr m Q s Q U c 0 0- pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL 0 FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q O 0 N O � N O LO J N 0_ 00 O O (D N N O Z � O CMo O _ LL 0 0 0 O Q z -D O J LU LU Ir O � Ir 0-1 Z Z 3:O Q 0 U � � N O 0 U O z = mow/ Z LU Z v r 0 D LL O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 0 0 Q Z w o U Q Ir Ir 0_ 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S8 0 JI rr m al O O O O O J rr m Q s Q U c 0 0- pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL 0 FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q o 0 N O N O LO J N 0_ 00 O N (U N O Z ; N O O LL O z z uJ 0 O O z_ j O > Q O J U FLILU LU u1 Ir O � Ir 0-1 Z Z 3:O Q 0 U � � N O 0 U O z = mow/ Z LU Z v r 0 D LL O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 0 0 Q Z w o U Q Ir Ir 0_ 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S9 cli 0 JI rr m al O O O O O J rr m Q s Q U c 0 0- pres 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100 Raleigh, INC 27612 Main: 919.829.9909 www.res.us Engineering Services Provided By: Angler Environmental, LLC License: F-1428 SEAL FULL SCALE: 1 "=30 0 30 60 2" FULL SCALE I\ 1" = HALF SCALE 6i Q O 0 N O � N O LO J N 0_ 00 O N (U N O Z � CMO O Q� LL 0 O _ z J z 0 w 0 O O Q z cD > O w U J W oC O CL/ oC 0-1 fVnJ V Z 7 z 3:O 0 U M O 0 U O z = mow/ Z LU Z v r 0 D LL O U Z Q 0- ~ 0 0 0 Q Z w o U Q 0= 0= 0_ 0 PROJECT NUMBER: 00400 PROJECT MANAGER: KC DESIGNED: IDS DRAWN: SCF CHECKED: AFM SHEET NUMBER: S10