Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0044423_Renewal (Application)_20200929 d-;;STA7i a'',-0a a, E::EGAN R t( 1 •1:fl jii z ' Secretary ', �, S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROL.INA Director Environmental Quality September 29, 2020 Appalachian State University Attn: Patrick Brittain, Asst. Dir. Facilities Operations ASU Box 32105 Boone, NC 28607 Subject: Permit Renewal Application No. NC0044423 Appalachian State WTP Watauga County Dear Applicant: The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges the September 25, 2020 receipt of your permit renewal application and supporting documentation. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's NPDES WW permitting branch. Per G.S. 150B-3 your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made. Continuation of the current permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit. The permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Please respond in a timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to allow a complete review of the application and renewal of the permit. Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at: https://dea.nc.gov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance/environmental-application-tracker If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the links available within the Application Tracker. Sincerely, aCtim, ci Wren Thedford Administrative Assistant Water Quality Permitting Section ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application gNorth Cara ra Departure;tof Ervrorrnenta Qua t I DivisionofWeter Fes:6.r;es V.rstorsSs err Fea ors Dff e 145D 1:'est Hares Ir Road,Su+te 3D6 11S'rStonSaem,North Groins 27105 "."..... ..... ..N.,•i if. 336 77b 98DD September 17,2020 Appalachian STATE UNIVERSITY Joe R.Corporon,L.G Facilities Operations Water Quality Permitting Section-NPDES ASU Box 32105 Boone,NC 28608-2105 Division of Water Resources,NCDEQ 828-262-3190 512 N Salisbury Street facilitiesoperations.appstate.edu Raleigh,NC 27604 Re: NPDES Permit No.NCoo44423 RECEIVED Permit Renewal Application SEP 2 5 2020 Mr.Corporon, NCDEOgVVR/NPDES The NPDES permit NCoo44423 for the Appalachian State University(ASU)Water Treatment Plant (WTP)will expire on March 31,2021.Enclosed is the Form C renewal application and associated attachments to apply for renewal of the NPDES permit. The NPDES permit issued April 1,2017 includes numerical limits for copper,zinc,and turbidity with a compliance schedule for the copper and zinc limits to become effective January 1,2021.As required by the permit,ASU has submitted an annual Corrective Action Plan(CAP)to document actions taken to achieve compliance with the limits. As part of the CAP,ASU has executed a sampling program from July 2019—July 2020 to characterize the constituent balance around the facility.The attached Corrective Action Plan Sampling Program Data Summary Memorandum summarizes the data collected during the CAP Sampling Program and builds on the most recent CAP submitted to the NCDEQ on March 24,2020. As detailed in the attached memo,data collected during the CAP Sampling Program indicates that the ASU WTP is on net removing zinc and copper from the Norris Branch Reservoir and indicates that the WTP is discharging a lower mass of metals than is withdrawn in the intake.The zinc and copper are present in the source water withdrawn from the same body of water the compounds are being discharged back into.It is ASU's opinion that the NPDES limit Reasonable Potential Analysis methodology should not be applied to a discharger that is withdrawing the compounds from the same water body to which they discharge them.In particular in the case when the mass being discharged is less than the mass withdrawn. With respect to the turbidity limit,we understand the NC DEQ Changes to Water Treatment Plant Strategy(October 2009)states that"turbidity will not be limited except for facilities that discharge to a receiving stream which is impaired for turbidity".Norris Branch Reservoir is not included in the 3o3d Impaired Water Bodies List,therefore a numerical turbidity limit is not consistent with NC DEQ's published strategy.In addition,the io NTU limit is based on the instream water quality standard for Trout Waters and is being applied directly to the effluent with no allowance for the dilution which occurs in the reservoir. Turbidity data collected indicates that the reservoir is predominately below the instream standard and the WTP discharge does not have a meaningful impact on the reservoir turbidity even when the effluent exceeds the io NTU numerical limit. Considering the data presented in the attached memorandum,Appalachian State University requests the removal of copper,zinc,and turbidity numerical effluent limits from the NPDES permit.ASU requests that the limits are replaced with once quarterly monitor and report requirements for the effluent and within the reservoir.Monitoring data can be used to continue to demonstrate that the WTP returns less or equal mass of metals compared to what is withdrawn in the intake and that the reservoir turbidity concentration continues to be below the instream standard. Should you have any questions,comments,or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. A MEMBER INSTITUTION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Mr.Joe R. Corporon August 31,2020 Sincerely, Patrick Brittain, PE License No.022085 Asst.Director Facilities Operation and Maintenance Cc. Lon Snider,PE,Regional Supervisor,NCDEQ Jenny Graznak, Environmental Specialist,NCDEQ Gary Carter, PE, Director Physical Plant,ASU Leigh-Ann Dudley, PE, Engineering Consultant, Dewberry Dewberry' MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Patrick Brittain, PE Appalachian State University Assistant Director Facilities Operations Date: August 31, 2020 From: Leigh-Ann Dudley, PE RECEIVED Re: Appalachian State University Water Treatment Plant SEF' 2 5 7020 NPDES Permit No. NC0044423 Corrective Action Plan Sampling Program Data Summary NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES Purpose of the Memorandum The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the data collected during the Corrective Action Plan Sampling Program from July 2019 through June 2020.This memorandum will build on the Corrective Action Plan letter submitted by Appalachian State University(ASU)to Mr. Corporon of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality(NCDEQ) on March 24, 2020,which summarized results of the sampling program from July 2019 through January 2020. Background The Appalachian State University(ASU)Water Treatment Plant(WTP) discharges filter backwash to the Norris Branch Reservoir, also known as the Appalachian State Reservoir, and is regulated under NPDES permit NC0044423.The source water for the ASU WTP is also the Norris Branch Reservoir.The Norris Branch Reservoir is subject to stringent water quality standards due to its classification as a Water Supply II,Trout, and High-Quality Water. The current NPDES permit is due for renewal on March 31, 2021. New NPDES permit limits for total copper and total zinc are scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2021.An effluent limit for turbidity became effective July 1, 2019 and is set at 10 Nephelometric Turbidity Units(NTU). NC0044423 includes the following numerical effluent limits for total copper and total zinc which become effective January 1, 2021: Table 1. Future Effluent Limits Analyte Monthly Average, µg/I Daily Maximum, WI Total Copper 4 5.2 Total Zinc 63 63 Historical monitoring indicates at times the effluent concentrations exceed the numerical limits for copper and zinc for both the monthly average and daily maximum. Per Condition A(3) of NPDES Permit No. NC0044423,Appalachian State University(ASU)Water Treatment Plant (WTP)was required to submit a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) annually"summarizing actions to be taken to achieve compliance with Total Copper,Total Zinc, and Turbidity at Outfall 001."This requirement necessitated further characterization and evaluation of the discharge,which included a Corrective Action Plan Sampling Program. 1 Mr.Patrick Brittain,PE August 24,2020 On March 24, 2020,ASU submitted a Corrective Action Plan to the NCDEQ summarizing results and providing an evaluation of a sampling program from July 2019—January 2020.The analysis, performed by Dewberry,found that for both zinc and copper a higher mass was being drawn into the WTP than was being discharged back to the reservoir.The data for turbidity indicated that the water quality within the reservoir meets the stream standard even when the turbidity of the WTP effluent exceeds the standard. The minimal impact of the effluent turbidity on the reservoir turbidity is likely due the particulates contributing to turbidity in the effluent are from particulates that are being withdrawn from the reservoir and rejected by the WTP membrane system.To further analyze zinc, copper and turbidity trends, data collection continued through June 2020.This memorandum presents an evaluation of the entire dataset from July 2019 through June 2020. Sampling Program Monthly effluent monitoring was conducted in accordance with the requirements of this permit.ASU conducted additional monitoring from July 2019 through June 2020 to characterize the background concentrations from the intake water and the concentrations in the reservoir upstream and downstream of the intake and discharge. Sampling locations are shown in Figure 1. All of the data collected during the sampling program is provided in the attached Table 2 and discussed below. Copper The mass of copper withdrawn from the reservoir through the WTP raw water intake and the mass of copper discharged back to the reservoir in the WTP effluent is presented on Figure 2.At every sampling event,a higher mass of copper was being withdrawn by the WTP intake than was being discharged back into the reservoir. For results below the method detect limit, the method detection limit value of 1 µg/I was used for mass calculations. Figure 2. Mass of Copper in WTP Raw Water Intake and Effluent 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3 3.0 - �. �, 2.5 o 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 • • r • • • �{• • • • ..0 � p '1S''��9 B�"f9 9119 7 00 1,1 1 ° �, , s1.0 O sob rO 61'ems 1,020 —0--Raw Water Intake f WTP Effluent The difference in the mass of copper in the intake and the mass of copper in the effluent is presumed to be present in the sludge which is disposed offsite. Sludge is sampled when it is removed from the facility 2 Mr.Patrick Brittain,PE August 24,2020 for off-site disposal, which occurs very infrequently.Sludge was removed on February 21 and 22, 2020 and was sampled once each day.The average copper concentration in the sludge was 574 µg/I. Copper sampling was also performed within the reservoir to evaluate the potential impact of the discharge on instream water quality. Figure 3 presents the concentration of copper in the reservoir upstream of the intake, in the reservoir downstream of the intake, and in the WTP effluent. Both samples with results below the method detection limit and samples that were non-detect are plotted as values equal to the method detection limit. The upstream and downstream copper concentration trends correlate well, with the downstream concentration often being a lower concentration that upstream. One exception,on November 6, 2019, the downstream copper concentration was 614 µg/l.This is suspected to be an anomaly.This data indicates that the effluent discharge is not having a negative impact on instream copper concentration. Figure 3.Copper Concentration in the Reservoir and Effluent 200 180 November 6,2019 I ■ 614 µ6/I(anomaly) 160 , 7, 140 , 120 -- 67, 100 : _. ■ 0 80 — 60 40 0 {� 1�10�-0\'�� 9 1,0° 911°jl�,lOS191��>(L �1)(19. 0 31�� O c,r6P- 1'1�1(01P- —4,—Reservoir Upstream —4—Reservoir Downstream —0—WTP Effluent Zinc The mass of zinc withdrawn from the reservoir through the WTP raw water intake and the mass of zinc discharged back to the reservoir in the WTP effluent is presented on Figure 4.At every sampling event, with the exception of October 8, 2019, a higher mass of zinc was being withdrawn by the WTP intake than was being discharged back into the reservoir. For results below the method detect limit,the method detection limit value of 1 µg/I was used for mass calculations. 3 Mr.Patrick Brittain, PE August 24,2020 Figure 4. Mass of Zinc in WTP Raw Water Intake and Effluent 3.0 2.5 — 2.0 1.5 - C N 1.0 0.5 ) 4 ' A • • • • • O.O ,.gyp9. 11 6�.0S 81P1,9 91'1,t Y0 .0 4Ce1.0.16A 19011.'bV , 111°10 413y1°10 .411I o 4 y(Oc t°5I161 10 01511p10 -�- Raw Water Intake WTP Effluent The difference in the mass of zinc in the intake and the mass of zinc in the effluent is presumed to be present in the sludge which is disposed offsite.The average zinc concentration in the sludge was 556 µg/I. Sampling was also performed within the reservoir to evaluate the potential impact of the discharge on instream water quality. Figure 5 presents the concentration of zinc in the reservoir upstream of the intake, in the reservoir downstream of the intake, and in the WTP effluent. Both samples with results below the method detection limit and samples that were non-detect are plotted as the method detection limit. The upstream and downstream concentrations trend very well together. On November 6, 2019,when the downstream concentration was much higher than the upstream,the effluent concentration was 48 ug/L, below the future limit.This data indicates that the effluent discharge is not impactful on instream zinc concentration. 4 Mr.Patrick Brittain,PE August 24,2020 Figure 5.Zinc Concentration in the Reservoir and Effluent 4000 3500 3000 _.___ ? 2500 a 2000 V _C H 1500 _ _ 1000 ' 500 lark" 0 �°1�°9il°0o9a1 1°91�1 aPN ,$)v- �h� �t��y�,'f���4' 11 C 19� �4) 'g 414 (,10�1116�o Reservoir Upstream -4 -Reservoir Downstream -f-WTP Effluent Turbidity Effluent monitoring data collected in accordance with the permit indicates the effluent turbidity at times exceeds the numerical limit.The NC DEQ Changes to Water Treatment Plant Strategy(October 2009) states that"turbidity will not be limited except for facilities that discharge to a receiving stream which is impaired for turbidity". Norris Branch Reservoir is not included in the 303d Impaired Water Bodies List. The 10 NTU limit is based on the instream water quality standard for Trout Waters and is being applied directly to the effluent with no allowance for the dilution which occurs in the reservoir. Turbidity data collected within the reservoir from July 2019 through June 2020 indicates the water quality within the reservoir is below the 10 NTU stream standard, even when the turbidity in the WTP effluent exceeds the instream standard.The upstream and downstream turbidity data trend correlate well, indicating the WTP discharge does not have a meaningful impact on the turbidity even when the effluent exceeds the 10 NTU numerical limit. Based on this recent data, it appears the ASU WTP discharge is not increasing the instream turbidity above natural background conditions or the instream water quality standard. Figure 6 presents a summary of the data collected. 5 Mr.Patrick Brittain,PE August 24,2020 Figure 6.Turbidity Data 30 25 s 20 i. .t 15 10 5 -- 7/1/2019 8/30/2019 10/29/2019 12/28/2019 2/26/2020 4/26/2020 6/25/2020 f-Reservoir Upstream Reservoir Downstream —Water Quality Standard-♦—WTP Effluent Conclusions Data collected during the Corrective Action Plan Sampling Program from July 2019 through June 2020 indicates that the ASU WTP is net removing metals zinc and copper from the Norris Branch Reservoir as the mass of metals in the intake is greater than the mass of metals being discharged back to the reservoir. In addition, copper and zinc are not identified on the SDS compositions for any of the chemicals used at the facility.As such there is no known source of copper and zinc in the effluent besides that in the intake.The data also indicates that WTP discharge is not impactful on instream copper and zinc concentrations. Generally, upstream copper concentrations are higher than downstream concentrations.The upstream and downstream zinc concentrations trend very well together. On occasions where the downstream zinc concentrations exceeded those of the upstream, WTP effluent concentrations were significantly below the proposed permit limits, suggesting other influences contributed to the elevated concentrations. The NC DEQ Changes to Water Treatment Plant Strategy(October 2009) states that "turbidity will not be limited except for facilities that discharge to a receiving stream which is impaired for turbidity". Norris Branch Reservoir is not included in the 303d Impaired Water Bodies List.Turbidity data collected within the reservoir from July 2019 through June 2020 indicates the water quality within the reservoir is below the 10 NTU stream standard, even when the turbidity in the WTP effluent exceeds the instream standard. 6 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP For discharges associated with water treatment plants Mail the complete application to: N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit MailService Center, Raleigh,1617Ma g , NC 27699-1617 NPDES Permit Number NC0044423 If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type. 1. Contact Information: Owner Name Patrick Brittain R C F��.,/ED c Facility Name Appalachian State University WTP G '' Th?f SEP y Mailing Address 265 Dale Street NCDEQ1DvvitiNPDES City Boone State / Zip Code NC Telephone Number 828 262-8787 Facilities Office 828 262-3197 Water Plant Fax Number 828 2624017 e-mail Address brittainps(;appstate.edu johnsonja2@appstate.edu 2. Location of facility producing discharge: Check here if same as above ❑ Street Address or State Road 800 Rainbow Trail City Boone State / Zip Code NC County Watauga 3. Operator Information: Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC) Name Jeremy Johnson Mailing Address 265 Dale Street City Boone State / Zip Code NC Telephone Number 828 262-3197 Fax Number 828 262-4017 4. Ownership Status: Federal ❑ State ® Private ❑ Public ❑ Page 1 of 3 Version 5/2012 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP ' For discharges associated with water treatment plants 5. Type of treatment plant: ❑ Conventional (Includes coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation, usually followed by filtration and disinfection) ❑ Ion Exchange (Sodium Cycle Cationic ion exchange) ❑ Green Sand Filter (No sodium recharge) ® Membrane Technology (RO, nanofiltration) Check here if the treatment process also uses a water softener ❑ 6. Description of source water(s) (i.e. groundwater, surface water) Surface Water, Norris Branch Reservoir 7. Describe the treatment process(es) for the raw water: Raw water is pumped from the lake to a basin where it is pre-chlorinated prior to membrane filtration. A small percentage of the water is backwashed and returned to the source water. 8. Describe the wastewater and the treatment process(es) for wastewater generated by the facility: The backwash is treated with sodium thiosulfate to begin oxidation of the chlorine residual and flows by gravity to a containment facility where is stored until it is suitable for discharge. Over the last 12 months (July 2019 -June 2020) the plant has averaged a daily raw water withdrawal of 233,400 gallons with an average daily wastewater discharge of 12,000 gallons. This 0.012 MGD backwash is discharged 2-3 times monthly. 9. Number of separate discharge points: 1 Outfall Identification number(s) C 10. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ❑ Intermittent IZ If intermittent: Days per week discharge occurs:2-3 times monthly Duration: 2 hrs 11. Plant design potable flowrate 2 MGD Backwash or reject flow .08 MGD 12. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including latitude and longitude): Norris Branch Resevoir 13. Please list all water treatment additives, including cleaning chemicals or disinfection treatments, that have the potential to be discharged. Alum / aluminum sulfate Yes No X Page 2 of 3 Version 5/2012 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP For discharges associated with water treatment plants Iron sulfate / ferrous sulfate Yes No X Fluoride Yes No X Ammonia nitrogen / Chloramines Yes No X Zinc-orthophosphate or sweetwater CP1236 Yes No X List any other additives below: Chlorine Sodium Hypochlorite Sodium Hydroxide 14. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one) Yes ❑ No 15. Additional Information: > Provide a schematic of flow through the facility, include flow volumes at all points in the water treatment process. The plan should show the point[s] of addition for chemicals and all discharges routed to an outfall [including stormwater]. • Solids Handling Plan 16. NEW Applicants Information needed in addition to items 1-15: • New applicants are highly encouraged to contact a permit coordinator with the NCDENR Customer Service Center. Was the Customer Service Center contacted? ❑ Yes ® No Analyses of source water collected • Engineering Alternative Analysis Discharges from Ion Exchange and Reverse Osmosis plants shall be evaluated using a water quality model. 17. Applicant Certification I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. Patrick Brittain Assistant Director, Facilities Operations Printed name of Person Signing Title 09/08/2020 Signature of Applicant Date North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6(b)(2)provides that:Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation,or certification in any application, record,report,plan,or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article,or who falsifies,tampers with,or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article,shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed$25,000,or by imprisonment not to exceed six months,or by both. (18 U.S.C.Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than$25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years,or both,for a similar offense.) Page 3 of 3 Version 5/2012 Raw Water Treated Water Waste Water 12 Month 12 Month Date Backwash (MG) (MG) (MG) Rolling Total Daily Avg Jan-19 8.585 8.055 0.53 6.17% Feb-19 10.387 9.659 0.728 7.01% Mar-19 8.712 8.205 0.507 5.82% Apr-19 10.345 9.848 0.497 4.80% May-19 6.532 6.238 0.294 4.50% Jun-19 5.046 4.828 0.218 4.32% Jul-19 6.707 6.417 0.29 4.32% Aug-19 9.637 9.231 0.406 4.21% Sep-19 11.968 11.485 0.483 4.04% Oct-19 9.926 9.506 0.42 4.23% Nov-19 8.443 8.009 0.434 5.14% Dec-19 5.549 5.189 0.36 6.49% Jan-20 7.581 7.068 0.513 6.77% 5.150 0.014 Feb-20 10.006 9.281 0.725 7.25% 5.147 0.014 Mar-20 5.148 4.831 0.317 6.16% 4.957 0.014 Apr-20 2.239 2.104 0.135 6.03% 4.595 0.013 May-20 3.515 3.328 0.187 5.32% 4.488 0.012 Jun-20 4.475 4.261 0.214 4.78% 4.484 0.012 '''\\ 4> ‘ ....D \ .....0 t. D J ,/." ------- \ 0 /7 :LP t. ..... ,.. 04- 1\i\\ ti 4: to 0 \\\--_____________ o S.L33HS OOZ tibl-LL S133HS 00l L4l-EL mar S133HS OS 1til-ZZ Sludge Management Plan Solids/Sludge generated from waste water is pumped from the clarifying facility every two years or as needed and transferred to the local wastewater treatment facility. } �l f win.-�`r -`�� \\ .-� • • :7-.•:\ \,,,‘:-........_ ..S. • (----,-,n \ l\, ,-, ilkkriain i7i''\'i''i'„,.,-i„,\-.-);3i4.,_.1--1 ‘:.,..1....-.„-‘'.,.—.. �r — K„.__-.-._,\_.,N r-.-.:-i..,,s f t F'/,21r\- \, �/ 1 rf ✓+• 5 -.—)_,-/'-7,/.,.4.",.,..,.,...,0,.7_.._.„7.07,-.-,-.,...-.•7-t."... _-„.,,_,___4j_-_____1.,..,' .\...:.\-•%\._.-„\.- .-_."k::!\,"\)?' `e*-,-j)-,.'4.\f---=--7w\-.Y.:--\:Th-\,-)\,i-:. ..--;4„—'.(-'-\<P-1c-\.1-;.•.L•.-•.NC..•-•s.4,,. ,'i-/,y -'1-/"-i...-‹.7, ,..1....-,a./.,,•,.',71- .., �~ ;i ii 'rig ~. \ ° • i '� //;/f tl f - l"�~ 1S'��e r. l J 'e n t' ,f \-.mil' .. ! , - ; 3 ' 1. i ,i 8 . ter---+ �s "`"'� :J� -. �; `*��.r",.`c 0 .o E., �\ /b .... j (it (...<„ s3. \ ....... 41-1 .,1_.,.,\,,\.‘,\,,,,,. --"....,Z.1.,N_____,....,......NN6.,..__„,..\_.___, ,. :tx, I N▪-&,.„ --_,..' 4i., 3400 ---"N.::::-) / fq:'' ,(` 4‘ I k--- ..:N'\\::T----N*4"--' ,) ,,-.4„.." i- Discharge Location `� l V/ ,, ; Q� .) ''".b,o. ...11._,.._ti!..,;...(..?„2:4},.- \\\,.. , ---,, -;--- ---------„,„\N-1 \_ . l'Ilk7: 1,..*,-,,-Ic.:__- ,)-4-7-----)-1,„--.., . '------ e -• •6 \ 1,-. -. ''''.,..'' ''',,N_, ''.:-` .▪\.sk ) , (7'''. ' N .."1\ '.' _.-7- .\\—. ' \ , . i-,,N. up-,f----,_,, 1, (------. \,.,y( .0 f ---\\e"---- ----., 7.----N____ ...... v \,,, . '\ \ \ ./-""---- 7, J i 1 ii....-)....r 1 , N.:.7." „1 . *,'/ / ____,...) ( r .‘—'...,_„_, .....i.ii , •,;---' "440iii," . '.. . *\---'N ,\ .\\) )1,...... `c,..\..S.../j). II if I 1"-M,1„,---) _".„./\---\-1(-"-. / / % IX/ I(;1 e1M-Wri::"....7\_:: 1-,.., . * -A, 1,*T4 6 'le 7/ . - ../."--/ 1 \N„........ \'': .Qar) \:,..,.....y/71:7 r.\ t.,/ / /617, L.,..N. -11--Z-121. .,.._.\_\\ - ,___1_ r1,, :,r..i ,..., \ti',_\_,__._._, r' ii,,,\., '• t31 ,,' is . P N._ / --- i\l. fir- -,i iLt, "---. 4'=�) __yr,— f."--'..-- -- , 1":„._ 2.44\ t01-31.‘•1 \ \,N344-,,.@ RI 299, V").\-\\-17:-\\.,...T.b. , ,., 1I CI,. ..._____, r, ) .-- - I 'I V3 ‘ ... %;.;.: ' 3,22.,,5 j \ --? / - ."---,--' )\vii \-_,--_y*T ( or:\ '"---T r \ .:_ '-\\‘"--..„-::_.,-/rs\-‘, \ s•-__J. ,--,-:s.2 ) V'---/ '',\ \-----). *---=-:;'"' i ' \ \ ):. Ire "" •�'7,,,,_--\\,, l`\tr \ ��t...../��`\\1��„` \-\\lt(� \ \ t a \ /'7{�}`� ti \yam/- /,-*s.,_, `1 Facility Information Facility - Latitude: 36°14'13" Sub-Basin: 05-07-01 Location Longitude: 81°40'20" Quad Name: Boone -0§),, Stream Class: WS-II Trout CA Receiving Stream: Norris Branch Appalachian State University WTP North NC0044423 W County County al 1 1 111 61 1 I I I I 1 il I l I 1 11 11 11 4 l I 1 I 61 r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i I■■■■■■■■11■■■11 I■■■III■■■I I■■■■■III■■■■■■■■■■■ 11111 '■■■■■■ _-k I 11111 /0 il ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ .■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ ., i 1 ■■■��■■ II :- ■■■■■■■ ■i r. : ■■■■■■. pt, .a Ii� .I ''Y■■■■■■■ . 44 rW I ■■■■■■ 4' `� Ives, ■■■■■■ U = ,.' `+. ■■■1■■■■ ''^^ r VJ � �w<d k - d r .. 0. k„ liaaIIIIUIUII 11111.11111111111 C i ,.'z4° wi ■■■■■■■ ` ^mot' yr ' ■ _0 ■ ■ ■ A ■ (a O ■ CD L 1111 � .> 40144 CO +ae !►"�' 01 U)r ■ ..._., , — -* -...0....... ,--ftc .. , 0 cn , cu ill , • 4t, • II * -.1..44krir ,,i* .4, —'� .w -", , 't yaw' c, (..) W *'. * ' **4 4:414,1.‘-ix - MIME MN . < . 4 MEMBENE .,, ,, vii .. 4,, ., ., ..� 4- , 0411110 ■■■■■■■ It »� pry .w it - ■ a) ■■II .: . ■ r ■■■ AL * * . � ■■ E 3 ■■ k �y ■■ c• ii `, e ` s .. .i* may,�. {, - ° ■�EE■■■