20201060 Ver 1_ IP NOTIFICATION Request_20200924

Strickland, Bev
From: Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (US) < [e-mail] >
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 4:36 PM
To: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Munzer, Olivia; Johnson, Alan; Byron
Hamstead; Gledhill-earley, Renee
Subject: [External] Subject: SAW-2017-01762_Kingston on West South Site (10-day Agency
Coordination)
Attachments: PCN (SAW-2017-01762).pdf
Importance: High
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Greetings,
The Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has received an application from 601 Kingston, LLC to place fill
material resulting in permanent impacts to 467 linear feet (270 perennial and 197 intermittent) and 0.14 acres of
wetland along with temporary stream and wetland impacts of 40 linear feet and 0.14 acres, respectively, to facilitate the
construction of a multi -family residential developmental in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. I have attached the
preconstruction notification.
You are receiving this notice in accordance with 2017 Nationwide Permit(NWP) General Condition 31(d)(2) because the
proposed project would result in the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of intermittent stream bed. You have 10
calendar days from the date of this e-mail to give our office notice that your agency intends to provide substantive, site -
specific comments. The comments must explain why your agency believes the adverse effects will be more than
minimal. If you contact our office within 10-days, we will wait an additional 15 calendar days before making a decision
on the pre -construction notification. We will fully consider agency comments received within the specified time frame
concerning the proposed activity's compliance with the terms and conditions of the NWPs, including the need for
mitigation to ensure the net adverse environmental effects to the aquatic environment of the proposed activity are
minimal. You will not receive a response from our office regarding your comments. However, we will document and
address your comments in the administrative record.
Please contact me via e-mail or at the number below if you have questions or require additional information.
Thanks,
Bryan Roden -Reynolds, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Office: [phone]

a`'pF wArE�Q�
C, vlllt:� Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Kingston on West South Site
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
601 Kingston, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
32230-344
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
338 South Sharon Amity Road, PMB 263
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28211
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Developer
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
W. Brandon Fulton
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
ECS Southeast, LLP
5c.
Street address:
1812 Center Park Drive, Suite D
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28217
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-525-5152
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
11907207, 11907208, 11907427, & 11907428
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.215305 Longitude:-80.86857
1 c.
Property size:
4.65 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Irwin Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
Catawba (Santee)
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is located off of West Boulevard in Charlotte. The project area currently contains wooded land and fields. The surrounding area
contains a mix of industrial, residential and c uses.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.24
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 750
3d.
See
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
appendices.
3e.
See
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
appendices.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all prior phases in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: SAW-2017-02627
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑x Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Carolina Wetlands Services
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Preliminary JD acquired from a formal Corps request.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.14
W2 T
Temporary Open Cut
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.014
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.154
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream A
PER
Corps
8
270
S2 P
Fill
Stream B
INT
Corps
6
107
S3 P
Fill
Stream C
INT
Corps
3
90
S4 T
Temporary Open Cut
Stream C
INT
Corps
3
40
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
507
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B 1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See appendices.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See appendices.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments: ECS plans to request a reservation letter from the NC DMS.
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
41.3 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The additional impervious area created by this project will be treated for water quality and water quantity by Stormwater Control Measures designed to
Charlotte/Mecklenburg and NCDEQ standards. SCM's will consist of 1 above ground detention pond which
have been designed to reduce post
development
flows to predevelopment flow rates.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Charlotte/Mecklenburg
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Charlotte/Mecklenburg
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other: NPDES
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
from
Wastewater
generated the site will be treated by the City of Charlotte's municipal wastewater system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See attached Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report received August 3, 2020. The site consists mostly of kudzu and other exotic species. The
streams are located on site are in an urban area, and consist of heavy sedimentation and debris in the bed and bank. ECS did not observe habitat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See appendices.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM Map Service Center GIS viewer, included in maps.
N.- • .per._
J"}..'.t* fl: i� ,-
{'
Brandon Fulton
09-18-2020
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
"Setting the Standard for Service"
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F-1078
NC Registered Geologists Firm C-406
SC Registered Engineering Firm 3239
Appendices:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
3d. Explain the purpose of the project:
The purpose and need of the proposed Kingston on West Townhome Development is to provide
much needed housing for the Historic Wilmore District area of Charlotte, NC. The proposed 34-
unit project will replace a 35 unit multi -family apartment complex that was onsite until it was
demolished in 2018. The intent for the townhome community is to provide attainable multi -
generational housing for residents, as this way of living has become a more prevalent need in
the community with the lack of sufficient care facilities for the elderly in the Charlotte Region.
The site layout and proposed unit count are largely dictated by our team's sensitive approach;
respecting community needs, overcoming limitations with respect to topography, adhering to
City of Charlotte's tenuous constraints, and minimization of impacts to waters of the US to the
maximum extent possible.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the he type of equipment to be used:
The proposed 34-unit townhome project will replace a 35 unit multi -family apartment complex
that was previously existing onsite until it was demolished in 2018. In addition to the proposed
structures, the project will include associated parking, recreational aesthetics, and stormwater
management controls.
Typical construction materials and machinery will be used on -site during the construction
process.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in
designing project:
Brief Project History
We would like to provide a brief history of our efforts in minimizing the stream and Wetland
impacts on the current site. The team met with the USACE for the intent of pursuing an
Individual Permit which would allow for 42 townhome units. Based on feedback from that
meeting, it was determined that this approach would not be feasible due to the impacts that
were proposed. However, it was determined that the option of pursuing a Nationwide Permit
would be entertained if we could depict a reduction in impacts and meet the compliance of the
NWP regulations. We have since removed 8 units from the proposed site to reduce the impacts
to existing streams and wetlands in response and consideration to the feedback. We have
reduced the unit count to a point that would allow the project to be economically feasible, 34
units. Any amount of units less than 34 would put additional costs on the residents in terms of
Home Owner Association fees and would not be in alignment with our intention of providing
affordable/ attainable housing for the multi -generational market. Both of the site plans for the 42
and 34 townhome developments are attached, with the 34 townhome development as the
proposed site plan.
ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Texas, LLP
www.ecslimited.com

Key Drivers to site layout
Charlotte -Water Easement Condemnation — The City of Charlotte has recently placed two 60"
CMP culverts within the property line and project limits that significantly impacts where
proposed units can be placed on the site. Additionally, the development team is working with
the City of Charlotte via the condemnation process as they installed the sewer line via the City's
eminent domain authorities. As such, we were and are limited from a site layout perspective as
we have to design "around" the newly installed sanitary sewer line and sanitary sewer easement
that has been placed on the property by the local water and sewer utility department. See
screenshot below.
o s.�wti,
I �\
w�a".ww:wn
Screen
raos w.irKn'
.n K� i wiim.
aio �'som'sn
i
,� � ".'rv" :K.o. "�.. • w.-u cexwn HEmv;!
Y awnnr,a rowan, mWF�.�•. awr- • ..
STS
OUt M-�
rerv. w. e,ua+ E .�
• o�ro..,�..��ora ..Eo.�,rA.s
v • P�,w��ew�as —
��
n O /e
ms� O
� a +zesa O
we —oc
An existing 96" Storm Water pipe crosses site — the proposed project is required to pick up an
offsite stormwater system (see ex. 96" CMP in screenshot below), carry the flow through the
site, and discharge the water on -site. This burdensome condition severely impacts the layout of
the site, the infrastructure costs associated with the requirement, and our project's ability to
pursue design alternatives that lessens our proposed stream impacts. As such, our design
team introduced the 90 degree turn in the onsite storm water system (shown in blue) as a
design alternate to pick up the offsite flow that follows the dashed red line and return it to the
appropriate outfall location. Without this design change, the project would be considered
infeasible if the on -site storm drain system was placed along the dashed red -line.

The proposed stormwater management plan will provide full water quality treatment, channel
protection, and will assist in controlling peak control for 10 and 25 year storm events for all on -
site impervious surface. The bypass system is only being relocated and will not reduce flows
from the existing overall rates and volume. Flooding has been a concern for existing site
conditions and behind the current townhomes. The City completed a culvert rehabilitation
project that was recently used to address the flooding issues. The proposed stormwater
management plan will assist with the current system and discourage future flooding concerns.
5% Commitment to Housing Affordability for fifteen (15) years This project has committed to dedicating up to 5% of its units as affordable housing units that
will be deed restricted to ensure housing affordability is maintained for fifteen (15) years as
requested and desired by the city of Charlotte. Housing affordability and economic mobility
remain a significant challenge in Charlotte NC and Mecklenburg County, as noted in this report,
where Charlotte ranked 50 out of 50 with economic upward mobility. As such, this development
project seeks to make a positive difference in the lives of those challenged by lack of access to
quality housing and economic mobility by providing housing affordability for five percent (5%) of
the proposed townhome units. Achieving adequate density and lot yield is paramount to
ensuring that the overall project can move forward and include the necessary affordable
housing units. Losing additional units (as 6 units have already been lost due to preserving
existing wetland areas) would compromise the entire project and certainly reduce and likely
eliminate the affordable housing component of the project.
Proposed Impacts
As part of the proposed site plan, impacts are proposed as follows:
Stream A: 270 linear feet of permanent impact for placement of a culvert
Stream B: 107 linear feet of permanent impact for placement of buildings
Stream C: 90 linear feet of permanent impact for placement of buildings and parking area; 40
linear feet of temporary impact to install outfall for Stormwater SCM.
Wetland A:.14 acre of permanent impact for placement of buildings and parking area; .014 acre
of temporary impact to install outfall for Stormwater SCM.
Request for Waiver and Mitigation
ECS performed a site visit on July 28t" to document the condition and aquatic function of the
streams and wetlands onsite. All three streams had water flowing in their respective channels.
All three streams appeared to receive high amounts of runoff from the adjacent urban setting,
and contained high amounts of sedimentation, rip rap, trash, debris, and some type of bacterial
growth within the channel. The aforementioned bacterial growth did not appear to be the typical
iron oxidizing bacteria found in intermittent and perennial streams, but instead appeared as a
dingy dark brown versus a brown or reddish hue typically consistent with iron oxidizing bacteria.
No benthic macro - invertebrates were identified within any of the stream reaches.
ECS performed the NC Stream Assessment Method on Streams A, B, and C. All three streams
resulted in ratings of Low.
ECS performed the NC Wetland Assessment Method on Wetland AA, which resulted in a rating
of Low.
3

Subsequent to reducing and re -configuring to the greatest extent possible, the total
number of townhomes to minimize impacts to waters onsite; and as a result of the
streams and wetlands exhibiting low aquatic function, the client requests the use of a
waiver to exceed the 300 linear feet of stream impact threshold, and permit proposed
impacts under Nationwide Permit 29 (Residential Developments).
Client proposes a mitigation ratio of 1.5:1, purchased from the NC Division of Mitigation
Services extended service area, which result in a final mitigation ratio of 3:1.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques:
Disturbance of the stream and wetlands shall be minimized to the extent practicable in order for
the proper installation of the facility. The construction techniques shall be conducted in
accordance with NCDENR standards. Temporary and additional erosion control measures shall
be maintained throughout the construction process. Silt fencing will be placed at the bottom of
the slopes to deter sediment and erosion control during roadway development activities.
Temporary erosion, sedimentation, and pollution controls will be installed prior to and
maintained during the entire construction duration and until final stabilization is established.

LOT
` r t
�i
STON APARTMLNTS LLC
3.
PG 32 ,
iN
550
7 24
S- I/
I I - OR 0.4127 ACRES
I_or
so
} Vv
p FS �
.. rJ %
z R '87 q ,A i s
s � •�, .
�r
r /
r
M.B. 3, PG. 329 L-- - •.__ � _
EX. STORM D.B. 18155, PG. 242
\ 1� PIN:119 074-27 �-
�li DRAINAGE (TYP) L�/� �: AffA
1 57.571 SO. FT.
-
l
�->,
I
fSTREAM
r t
A l
0-7
` IIIIII i.
l� • � . 4rf� �y
,� WOOD. E P
+'try
1{ r CKI
M.B. PG. 295
III /
4 r�
i
4
STREAM B
(107 LF)
M.B. 4, PG. 295
D.B. 21873, PG. 188
PIN:119-074-28
ABU
103.644 SO. FT.
WETLAND AA-
(0.24 AC) =� 1
STREAM C
(226 LF)
iS � • 4 pt°r !
\ � , LOT a
1 _
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
aquatic resources in
Type of aquatic
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
review area (acreage
resources (i.e.
"may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non-
and linear feet, if
wetland waters-
Section 404 or Section
applicable
10/404)
Stream A
35,2152
-80.8687
417If
Non -wetland
404
water
Non -wetland
Stream B
35.2155
-80.8685
107 If
404
water
Non -wetland
Stream C
35.2149
-80.8687
226 If
404
water
Wetland
35.2151
-80.8685
0.24 ac
Wetland
404
AA
7/15/2020
Kingston on West South Site 0 60 120
EXIISTING CONDITIONS MAP
.30 90
LundDeswm.
SCALE: 1 "=60'

L
CHARLOTTE URBAN FORESTRY- TREE PLANTING AND PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS
PLANT MATERIAL
1. MINIMUM TREE SIZE AT PLANTING IS 2" CALIPER AND 8' TALL FOR SINGLE -STEM TREES. ALL MULTI -STEM PLANTS
MUST BE TREE FORM, 13. MINIMUM TREE SIZE AT PLANTING IS 2-INCH CALIPER (FOR SINGLE STEM TREES). ALL
MULTI -STEM PLANTS MUST BE TREE FORM, MAXIMUM 3 TO 5 TRUNKS, AND MINIMUM 10, TALL. WHERE 3"
SINGLE -STEM CALIPER TREES ARE SPECIFIED/REQUIRED THE MINIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE 10' TALL, IF MULTI -STEM
TREES ARE SPECIFIED THEN THEY SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12' TALL.
2. ALL NEW TREES MUST HAVE STRAIGHT TRUNKS WITH STRONG CENTRAL LEADERS INTACT TO THE TOP OF THE
CROWN UNLESS MULTI -STEM TREES ARE SPECIFIED. ALL REQUIRED TREES SHALL BE TYPICAL OF THEIR SPECIES
AND VARIETY, HAVE NORMAL GROWTH HABITS, HAVE WELL -DEVELOPED BRANCHES, BE VIGOROUS AND HAVE
FIBROUS ROOT SYSTEMS. TREES WITH CO -DOMINANT BRANCHING WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. TREES THAT HAVE
BEEN SHEARED, TOPPED OR CUT BACK TO MULTIPLY THE BRANCHING STRUCTURE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
TREES SHALL BE FREE OF ABRASIONS, DAMAGE, DISEASE, PESTS AND CRACKS. ALL PRUNING CUTS GREATER
THAN'/z INCH DIAMETER SHALL HAVE CALLUS TISSUE FORMED PRIOR TO PLANTING. NO PRUNING CUT ON THE
TRUNK SHALL BE MORE THAN ONE-HALF THE DIAMETER OF THE CENTRAL LEADER AT THE HEIGHT WHERE THE
CUT WAS MADE. ROOT FLARES SHALL BE LOCATED AT GRADE. TREES WITH MORE THAN 2" OF SOIL COVERING THE
ROOT BALL/FLARE FROM WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED (CLDS.40.09).
3. SIZE OF REQUIRED PLANTS, SPREAD OF ROOTS AND SIZE OF BALLS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI Z60.1
(LATEST EDITION) AS PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN NURSERY & LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION, EXCEPT WHERE
SPECIFIED/AUTHORIZED BY URBAN FORESTRY.
4. ALL REQUIRED TREES OF A PARTICULAR SPECIES AND VARIETY SHALL BE UNIFORM IN SIZE AND
CONFIGURATION.
5. PERIMETER TREES IN URBAN ZONES SHALL BE 3" IN CALIPER AND BE FREE OF BRANCHES UP TO 6' FROM THE
TOP OF THE BALL.
6. A MINIMUM OF 50% OF NEW TREES MUST BE NATIVE SPECIES, AND SITES WITH MORE THAN 20 TREES REQUIRED
WILL HAVE TO INSTALL MULTIPLE (3 OR MORE) SPECIES PURSUANT TO THE TREE ORDINANCE GUIDELINES.
7. 75% OF REQUIRED TREES MUST BE LARGE MATURE SPECIES EXCEPT IN SITUATIONS WITH OVERHEAD POWER
LINE CONFLICTS.
PLANTING REQUIREMENTS MAXIMUM 3 TO 5 TRUNKS, AND MINIMUM 8 FEET TALL.
8. SEE CLDS 40.01 (ON PLAN) FOR DETAILED TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS.
9. PLASTIC HOSE PARTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR TREE STAKING. SEE CLDS 40.01 FOR APPROVED STAKING
METHOD/MATERIALS.
10. ALL STRAPPING, AND TOP 1/3 OF WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP MUST BE CUT AWAY AND REMOVED FROM ROOT
BALL WHEN PLANTING.
11. FOR NEW PLANTING AREAS, REMOVE ALL PAVEMENT, GRAVEL SUB -BASE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS;
REMOVE COMPACTED SOIL AND ADD 24" NEW TOPSOIL, OR TILL AND AMEND THE TOP 24" OF EXISTING SOIL TO
MEET TOPSOIL/PLANTING MIX STANDARDS FOR TREES (WITHIN ENTIRE MINIMUM AREA OF 274 SQUARE FEET PER
LARGE MATURE TREE AND 200 SQUARE FEET PER SMALL MATURE TREE).
12. REVIEW SOIL REQUIREMENTS IN THE TREE ORDINANCE GUIDELINES AT: HTTP.//LANDPERMITS.CHARMECK.ORG
THEN CLICK TREES.
13. LARGE MATURING TREES MAY NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN 25OF OVERHEAD POWER DISTRIBUTION OR
TRANSMISSION LINES. IF TREES CONFLICT WITH POWER LINES OR SIGNS, CALL URBAN FORESTRY TO RESOLVE
BEFORE PLANTING.
14. ADJUST TREE PLANTING LOCATIONS TO AVOID UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PLANT 15' FROM ALL UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES.
15. NO LIGHT POLES, UTILITY POLES OR TRANSFORMERS CAN BE INSTALLED IN TREE ISLANDS.
16. COMMERICAL SCALE LIGHTING (>15' IN HEIGHT) MUST BE A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 30' FROM A TREE.
PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING (=15' IN HEIGHT) MUST BE A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 15' FROM A TREE. SHOW SITE
LIGHTING ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
TREE SAVE AND PRESERVATION
17. TREE PROTECTION MUST BE INSTALLED AND VERIFIED BY URBAN FORESTRY PRIOR TO STARTING ANY
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
18. SHOW TREE PROTECTION AND TREE SAVE AREAS ON EROSION CONTROL, GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
SHEETS.
19. COMMERCIAL TREE SAVE AREAS MUST BE RECORDED ON A FINAL PLAT WITH THE MECKLENBURG COUNTY
REGISTER OF DEEDS BEFORE URBAN FORESTRY HOLDS CAN BE RELEASED. A 10, NO BUILD ZONE AROUND TREE
SAVE AREAS MUST BE REFERENCED ON THE PLAT.
20. THE AREA OF ANY EASEMENTS (WATER, SEWER, UTILITY, ETC.) CAN NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE TREE SAVE
REQUIREMENT.
21. ANY ALTERATIONS TO TREE SAVE AREAS MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT MECHANIZED EQUIPMENT.
22. NO STRUCTURE WILL BE ALLOWED WITHIN 10' OF TREE SAVE AREAS UNLESS APPROVED BY URBAN FORESTRY.
23. ALL TREES ON PUBLIC PROPERTY ARE PROTECTED AND REMOVAL MUST BE PERMITTED BY THE CITY ARBORIST
[phone].
GENERAL
24. CALL [phone] FOR AN INSPECTION OF TREE PROTECTION/PLANTING AREAS, A MINIMUM OF 5 DAYS
BEFORE A CO IS NEEDED.
25. VISIT CITY OF CHARLOTTE'S LAND DEVELOPMENT WEBSITE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND URBAN
FORESTRY REQUIREMENTS: HTTP://LANDPERMITS.CHARMECK.ORG THEN CLICK TREES.
TREE PLANTING NOTES
1. MINIMUM TREE SIZE AT PLANTING IS 2-INCH CALIPER (FOR SINGLE STEM TREES) AND 3-INCH CALIPER IF PLANTED IN CITY
RIGHT-OF-WAY. SMALL MATURING MULTI -STEM TREES MUST BE TREE FORM, MAXIMUM 3 TO 5 TRUNKS, AND MINIMUM 8 FEET
TALL.
2. UNLESS APPROVED BY URBAN FORESTRY STAFF ALL REQUIRED TREES MUST HAVE SINGLE STEM TRUNKS WITH NO
CO -DOMINANT TRUNKS OR BRANCHES. TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE STRAIGHT IN FORM AND FREE OF DAMAGE OR CRACKS.
PRUNING CUTS SHALL BE CALLUSED OVER. BRANCH LENGTH SHALL BE TYPICAL FOR THE TREES AGE AND NOT BROKEN,
DISEASED OR INJURED. ROOT FLARE SHALL BE LOCATED AT GRADE AND BE FREE FROM EXCESSIVE ADVENTITIOUS ROOT
GROWTH.
3. ALL STRAPPING AND TOP 3/3 OF WIRE BASKET MUST BE CUT AWAY AND REMOVED FROM ROOT BALL PRIOR TO BACKFILLING
PLANTING PIT. REMOVE TOP Y3 OF THE BURLAP FROM ROOT BALL.
4. FOR NEW PLANTING AREAS, REMOVE ALL PAVEMENT, GRAVEL SUB -BASE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS; REMOVE
COMPACTED SOIL AND ADD 24" NEW TOPSOIL, OR TILL AND AMEND THE TOP 24" OF EXISTING SOIL TO MEET
TOPSOIL/PLANTING MIX STANDARDS FOR TREES WITHIN ENTIRE MINIMUM AREA OF 274 SQUARE FEET PER TREE.
5. LARGE MATURING TREES MAY NOT BE PLANTED WHERE THERE ARE OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION OR TRANSMISSION LINES. IF
TREES CONFLICT WITH POWER LINES OR SIGNS, CALL URBAN FORESTRY SPECIALIST TO RESOLVE BEFORE PLANTING.
6. A MINIMUM OF FIFTY (50) PERCENT OF NEW TREES MUST BE NATIVE SPECIES, AND SITES WITH MORE THAN TWENTY (20)
TREES REQUIRED WILL HAVE TO INSTALL MULTIPLE SPECIES PURSUANT TO THE TREE ORDINANCE GUIDELINES.
7. SITE LIGHTING MUST BE A MINIMUM THIRTY (30) FEET AWAY FROM A TREE. IF PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING IS BEING USED,
THEN LIGHTING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF FIFTEEN (15) FEET AWAY FROM A TREE, UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE BY THE CITY.
SHOW SITE LIGHTING PLAN. NO LIGHTS OR UTILITIES IN ISLANDS WITH TREES.
8. ADJUST TREE PLANTING LOCATIONS TO AVOID UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PLANT 15FROM ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
(GAS, WATER, PHONE, AND ELECTRICAL LINES). REFER TO UTILITY PLANS FOR CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND UTILITIES.
9. ATTENTION LANDSCAPER: NOTIFY URBAN FORESTRY OF ANY SIGN, POWER LINE, OR OTHER CONFLICTS BEFORE PLANTING
NEW TREES.
10. COMMERCIAL TREE SAVE AREAS MUST BE RECORDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN ON A FINAL PLAT AT
THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE BEFORE URBAN FORESTRY HOLDS CAN BE RELEASED.
11. PLEASE CALL [phone] FOR AN INSPECTION OF TREE PROTECTION AND/OR TREE PLANTING AREAS, 1 TO 2 DAYS
BEFORE THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS NEEDED.
12. ORDINANCE - REQUIRED TREES MUST BE MAINTAINED IN TREE FORM AND ALLOWED TO GROW TO THEIR NATURALLY
HEIGHT / FORM, WITH A MAXIMUM OF 3 STEMS OR TRUNKS. (NO TOPPING OR ROUNDING OVER).
13. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHARLOTTE - MECKLENBURG LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NO.
40.01 AND 40.09.
GENERAL PLANTING NOTES
1. AN UNDISTURBED TREE ANALYSIS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE FIELD WITH URBAN FORESTRY PRIOR TO SITE
CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT.
2. TREES WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE PROTECTED BY LAW. A PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM THE CITY ARBORIST
AT [phone] PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY TREES.
SUBJECT TO NCDOT PLANTING PERMIT (WITHIN R/W) AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS. NCDOT PLANTING PERMIT TO BE OBTAINED
FROM TIM SIMPSON -
DIVISION ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENT ENGINEER
PHONE [phone]
INTERNAL TREES
REQUIREMENT
1 TREE / 10,000SF IMPERVIOUS
INTERNAL TREES REQUIRED
89,210 SF IMPERVIOUS = 9 TREES
INTERNAL TREES PROVIDED
9 TREES
PERIMETER PLANTING REQUIREMENTS
PERIMETER TREES
PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED
(1 TREE PER 40 LF FRONTAGE - LARGE MATURING)
±419 LF FRONTAGE / 40 LF = 11 TREES
PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED
11 TOTAL TREES
STREET TREE CALCULATIONS
WEST BLVD.
PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED
±263LF @ 40' o.c. = 7 LARGE MATURING TREES
PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED
7 PROPOSED TREES @ 40' O.C.
FUTURE WEST WORTHINGTON AVE.
PERIMETER TREES REQUIRED
±156LF @ 40' o.c. = 4 LARGE MATURING TREES
PERIMETER TREES PROVIDED
4 PROPOSED TREES @ 40' O.C.
T-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I \ /
I I
I \
I
I I
!
I I
I I I
I I
EX. GAS LINE, TYP.
s
s EX. WATER LINE, TYP.
S' EX. SANITARY
SEWER LINE, TYP. � / \
T ?r
q
E1
�fll�
VICINITY MAP
PLANT SCHEDULE
TREES
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
CONT.
CAL.
HT.
QTY
0000°aa'0%
0 0
o
Betula nigra / River Birch
B & B
2" cal.
12` -14' ht.
7
o
0 0
0 0
°000000000o
(D
Liquidambar styraciflua 'Rotundiloba` / Fruitless Sweet Gum
B & B
3"Cal
12-14'
9
(D
Quercus phellos 'Hightower / Willow Oak
B & B
3"Cal
12`-14'
4
SHRUBS
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
SIZE
HEIGHT
SPREAD
QTY
Buxus microphylla 'Winter Gem'/ Winter Gem Boxwood
5 gal
4' o.c.
18"-24" ht.
154
K
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 'I-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
15' 0' 15' 30' 60'
SCALE: I" = 30'
lV
0
cV
00
fV
U
Z .0
0 N
t� M
O tV
L M
� M M
Ln
.o
o� E (:?
�LI: oUy..��
L V
un Ln a)
fV 'A
Moov_
M
Z o J
N > z
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
U
�
Z
V)
J
z
Z
LU
U
z
LU
CL
G
z
/rW
V
O
�
Q
Z
z
CL
Q
z
cn
o
U
0
W
�z
�
Q
O
Y
z
Q
V)
2E
U
J
z
z
J
Z0
C
LU
0
z
0
w
CO C)
I Q I
O
D
CV m m O C77
•
bow ii
Uwm�'i= �
��ZYmLLIW
�U
H
w
Iij-�­3
T Qo
w
<Luofw�= 011
2
00oUdow
U) `J

\
w \ 60
A
IT
41
SIB
51
10
co
649 I S e PROP. 96" RCP11 s� X
643 o F a r x
co
\ - n
r
PROP. 34 UNIT�—
\\\ TOWNHOME ° `O
SUBDIVISION
\ STREAM A
(IMPACT 270 LF, 3480 SF) sa
N / / ` / / ✓
N /
STREAM B
PROP. 12'X5' BOX / (IMPACT 107 LF, 1231 SF)j��� `_
1 Ir
CULVERT A / � 1/ /-
�
�' // `� ••�. ,; r � 1, � ����/��i/� /�=\
l y s3s ��� •• i� �// I PROP. RETAINING
At � s�i��;, � (// WALLS (TYP) / \
WETLAND AA \ lV
(IMPACT WITH PROP
/ /' x/ �� / �/ I • . . • I UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 0.14 AC)
/ / /� ��� ._. �.I:.••• / /% %� / STREAM C
/ / / �� /�/ • • • • • // / I I I (IMPACT 90 LF, 270 SF)
��// •�•,•,• �� ��/ WETLAND AA 1
/ ��� � � � • • • �� � // / j(TO REMAIN 0.083AC)
PROP. BMP
WETPOND (DIRECT
DISCHARGE TO STREAM A) I
i
STREAM C �
(TEMPORARY IMPACT 40 LF, 120 SF)
WETLAND AA \ \ \ \ I
(TEMPORARY IMPACT 0.014 AC)
STREAM/ WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
STREAM/ WETLAND LABEL
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA (ACRES)
TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA (ACRES)
IMPACT LENGTH (LF)
TEMPORARY IMPACT LENGTH (FT)
STREAM "A"
0.08
N/A
270
N/A
STREAM "B"
0.028
N/A
107
N/A
STREAM "C"
0.005
0.0025
90
40
WETLAND
0.14
0.014
N/A
N/A
Kingston on West South Site
L
�- PROPOSED IMPACT MAP
7/15/2020
0 60 120
30 90
SCALE: 1 "=60'

m
3
to
of
o�
S
i
d
i
U
i
V J
^n
W
3
0
0
Ln
rn
Y
i
O
U
i
Ln
0
U
Ln
C
0
i
0
0i
O
/0i
IH
¢
U
O
i
Y
Ln
0
3
¢
U
TOP OF WALL
ELEV. 635.00
WINGWALL°
1 STRUCTURE HW-1 - PLAN
S-1 SCALE: 1/4' Y
llWPll
STATION 0+00.00
INVERT 631.75
FOOTING KEY/CUTOFF WALL
C STRUCTURE HW-1 - ELEVATION
S 1 SCALE: 1/4' 1"
2-#6x2'-6" DIAGONALLY
AT TOP CORNERS
PROPOSED
1 i'x..i' R('°Rr.
ELEV. 636.00
co
0
rl I
cn
w
3 SECTION AT HEADWALL
S-1 SCALE 3/4' 1' 0"
1 1/2" CLR
/-- 3/4" CHAMFER TYPICAL
#5@6" O.C.
ELEV. VARIES 635.00 TO 638.75
- #5@12" O.C.
#5@12 O.C.
3" DIA. PVC WEEP HOLE WITH STONE AND
FILTER FABRIC ON FILL SIDE IN ACCORDANCE
• • WITH ARTICLE 414-8 OF THE NCDOT
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS TYPICAL WHERE
SHOWN PLACED 8" ABOVE GRADE ON
EXPOSED SIDE AT 48" O.C. MAX.
J
c�
N
0
I
•
3" CLR
2-#5 CONT.
•
3" CLR
3" CLR
2" CLR
#5@12" O.C.
#5@12" O.C.
FOOTING KEY AND
CUTOFF WALL
3'-9„
5 SECTION AT WINGWALL
S1 SCALE� 3/4" = 1'-0"
TOP OF FTG. ELEV. 630.75
} 5-#5 CONTINUOUS
TOP AND BOTTOM
3" CLR
2-#6 EXPOSED FACE OF
WALL CONTINUOUS TO
WINGWALLS ON EACH SIDE 1 " CLR
OO
EXPANDED COIL INSERT AT 12"
O.C. MAX. WITH #5 DOWEL WITH
10" EMBEDMENT INTO HEADWALL
IN TOP SLAB AND 18"
EMBEDMENT INTO SIDE WALLS
SEE DETAIL 2/S-4
PROPOSED 12'x5' REINFORCED O
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
3/4" CHAMFER TYPICAL
TOP OF WALL ELEV. 638.75
2-#5 FILL FACE OF WALL CONTINUOUS
TO WINGWALLS ON EACH SIDE
llwplt O
INVERT 631.75
TOP OF FTG.
ELEV. 630.75
J O
U
N
t.
d
3" CLR °
2-#5 CONT.
I A #5@12" O.C.
f
3" CLR
3" CLR
FOOTING KEY AND
CUTOFF WALL
5'-3"
#5012" O.C.
3" CLR
S-9"
4 SECTION AT CULVERT
S 1 SCALE� 3/4' 1' 0"
STRUCTURE HW-1 NOTES:
1. SEE NORTH ARROW FOR PLAN ORIENTATION.
2. ELEVATION IS SHOWN LOOKING PERPENDICULAR TO ENDWALL.
WINGWALLS ARE SHOWN SKEWED TO THE ENDWALL.
3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE.
4. REFER TO DRAINAGE DRAWINGS FOR EXACT LOCATION OF STRUCTURE.
5. SEE 1 /S-4 FOR WALL CORNER DETAIL.
6. SEE 2/S-4 FOR THREADED INSERT DETAIL.
6. SEE SHEET S-4 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
7. "WP" INDICATES WORK POINT AT STATION 0+00.00 WITH INVERT
ELEVATION 631.75.
8. LENGTHS OF ENDWALL AND WINGWALLS ARE DIMENSIONED ALONG
FRONT FACE OF WALL.
5-#5 CONTINUOUS
TOP AND BOTTOM
i
NO
J �
N
QD ip_�
Y
d
:
O
J
Q
W
(n
z
O
(Z
(n
LJJ
0
Ld
Q
Q
O
N
� U
Z O
z
cn
W
W
Z
� J
00
z z
Lu c c6
J �O 00 ��
m0Vc)
-0="
Q °o 0 �
J �z�
=3 o
U- `.
O
00 c
m 000 U a
W
u�u
1�
V 1
O
MZ
a
1
p
N
9
1r T,�l
1�
w
O
O
w
O
O
� L
DATE
04-16-2020
JOB NUMBER SHEET NUMBER
1907 S-1
0
0
O

660 660
655
N M N
o6
a �?? O
» >
a y cc z z z
655
Ow
650
EX.
GRADE AT
STORM
CENTERLINE
DRAINAGE
(TYP.)
650
645
PROP. GRADE
AT
STORM
CENTERLINE
DRAINAGE
(TYP.)
645
xo°'�
a
&>
a
M
—N
v m
c r
o�z
m o ?
°� ��
V_Nn
�.6
y-
�
640
_
640
a
X. DUAL
TO REMAIN
60" CMP
635
635
D
n
LF OF
5'X 12' BOX
CULVERT
R%P@1.6-
-
--
—
AL2%
--
--
---=
--
----
—
pROP.309.86
—
--
--
----
--
—
—
— —
--
=
EX. 2.98.50
OF 20"SS@
LF — — — _ —
—__—
EX. DUAL 60" CMP TO BE REMOVED
630
630
—
--
----
--
----
EX.
298.55 LF
OF 24"SS@0.75%
�—�--
--
625
625
STORM
DRAINAGE PROFILE
EXISTING GROUND
OF-1 TO JB-2
I I I I
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 20'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 4'
PROPOSED GROUND
620
1
1
1
620
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00

PCCO SUMMARY
ORIGINAL PARCEL ID NUMBERS
11907427, 11907428
MULTI -FAMILY
SUBJECT TO PCCO? Y/N
YES
DEVELOPMENT TYPE
IF "NO" WHY?
WATERSHED:
IRWIN
DISTURBED AREA (AC):
3.30 AC
SITE AREA (AC):
3.68 AC
ON -SITE (ENTIRE ASSEMBLAGE)
TOTAL ON -SITE AREA (AC):
3.68 AC
EXISTING BUILT -UPON -AREA (SF):
35,011 SF (0.80 AC)
EXISTING BUA TO BE REMOVED (SF):
35,011 SF (0.80 AC)
EXISTING BUA TO REMAIN (SF):
0.00 SF (0.00 AC)
PROPOSED NEW BUA (SF):
66,030 (1.52 AC)
TOTAL POST -PROJECT BUA FOR SITE:
66,030 SF (1.52 AC)
PROPOSED % BUA
41.30%
DENSITY (HIGH / LOW)
HIGH
DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT?
DEVELOPMENT
TOTAL STREAM BUFFER PROTECTED ON -SITE
(AC):
N/A
TRANSIT STATION AREA? Y/N
NO
DISTRESSED BUSINESS DISTRICT? Y/N
YES
MITIGATION TYPE (IF APPLICABLE)
N/A
NATURAL AREA MITIGATION? Y/N
NO
BUFFER MITIGATION? Y/N
YES
TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS MITIGATION? Y/N
NO
I
1
I
I
1VlN�I----------------- - - -
- y-------
WEST —
ss / BOULEVARD
60' PUBLIC RIW
S - - DB 18155 PG 236
/� /
- c
A�
0,�
,0-0
, , /
PLAN LEGEND
IMPERVIOUS AREA (66,030 SF)
(9)
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
L.ndDe%m-
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
KEY MAP
SEAL
C O�
Quo • S % pN9C /��:
SEAL -
043168
�' S• •FNGINEEF�.'�O .
���11111111\\
0512912020
PROJECT
KINGSTON ON
WEST - SOUTH
SITE
J.S. SON'S CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, LLC
5226 ADDISON DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28211
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
1017051
REVISION / ISSUANCE
DESIGNED BY: MTG
DRAWN BY: MTG
CHECKED BY: MLG
SCALE NORTH
VERT: N/A
HORZ: 1 "=40'
0 20' 40' 80'
SHEET TITLE
POST DEVELOPMENT
IMPERVIOUS AREA
6/1/2020 12:00 PM MASON GREESON N:\ 2017\1017051\CAD\CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS\SOUTH\17051 POST DEV IMPERV.DWG ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
SHEET NUMBER
C-5.7