HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0001899_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200922€ O'-, COOPER
IMICHAEL S PEGAN
11 .1 .
S D �NIEL Sr.IITFI
Jason Kaplan
tiloncure I-Ioldin-s West LLC
3 10 Interlocken Pkwy. Suite 120
Broomfield CO 80021-3464
Dear .Mr. Kaplan:
� ii.�• LL'e1,144�1 �.t
•xc ctx�
MP,,- ni
September 22, 2020
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Moncure I-loldinos 'West N%'«°'rP
NPDES Permit No, NCOOOI S99
Chatham County'
�iMitch I laves of the Division of Water Resource, conducted the f0ll0WiIII_I subject inspection on
September 22, 2020. The assistance of Earl Beat and Lan-`• Murrav with this inspection was greatly
appreciated. Below is a list of findings de%eloped from the inspection and review of the permit:
1. The permit modification became cffecti%c December 1. 2017 and will expire July 3 I, 202 1.
Permit renewal is required within six months of'permit expiration date.
3. The facility processes stormwater and no longer utilirc5 the water treatment plant. The
treatment plant consists of the followinU units: one 1,200—allon mixing neutralization
chamber for pH adjustment: one 630.000--allon aeration basil with two ?0 I-IP floating
aerators: one I8.500 gallons 20-foot diameter clarifier: one 1.000,000 gallon polishing
pond: one composite sampler: one effluent flow ureter; one sandfllter drying bed: chlorine
contact chamber (currently inactive),
3. At the time of inspection, both aerators were In operation. Water flowing over the «eirs of
the clarifier and v-notch weir at discltar�_e OLItf,]ll 001 appeared clear With no solids or
foam.
4. Discharge ivlonitoring Reports fior the rcvic« period \'ovembcr 2018 tl)rou�IYlt August 2020
were checked for compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. The
following violation were noted: MOW111y average way exceeded for BOD in %,larch'_0?0.
5. Field Laboratory Certificate No. 5024 is certified for f]o«, 111-I, and temperature. All
records are being kept up to date. Meters are calibrated quarterly by ISI. ConductiVitV and
all other parameters are analysed by Pace Laboratory.
_/777— v,
I would like to thank Earl Beal and Larry Murray for their assistance with this inspection. It you
have any questions about the inspection or this letter, please contact Mitch Hayes at 919.791.4261
or at rnitch.havesf'r ncdenr.i-,oy
Sincerety,
Scott Vinson. Re4_ional Super-,isor
W atcr Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleluli Red-ional Office
Di%ision of Watcr Resources `C DEQ
cc: pernlit file, Lasertiche
cc: Larry Murray lmurray(d withersra% enc:l.colll
Earl Beat e.beal,'ct wither5rayellel.c(Im
United Stales Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Wash ngton a C 2gafi0
OMB Na 2040.0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires8-31-98
Section A. National Data System Coding (i.e, PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmo'day Inspectinn l•ype Inspector Fac Type
1 IN 12 151 3 NC0001899 Ill 12 20+C9122 17 18 I r-. I 19 I s I 201 I
LiL.! L__I
21 I 6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evatuaticn Rating B1 OA - Reserved --
67 701, I 71 ItyI 72 L N j 731 I 174 7 L_U80
LJ
1Data �1 LLl
Section B Faci.ity
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industria' Users d scharg ng to POTW also it,c'ude
Entry TimelDate
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10 00AM 20/09/22
17/12/01
Moncure Holdings West WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Dale
338 Pea Rdg Rd
New Hill NC 27562
10 50Ah1 20/09122
21/07/31
Name(s) of Onsile Representative(s)Mtles(s)1Phone and Fax Numbers)
Other Facility Data
111
Earl BeallFacility Manager1919-469-3340 I
Lawrence MurraylORC1919.622-2901 I
Lawrence D. MurraylORC1919-622-29011
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Tille/Phone and Fax Number
Jason Kaplan,282 Century PI Ste 2000 Louisville CO 8002711303-516-34781 Contacted
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit N Flow Measurement 0 Operations & Maintenar E Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Progran N Facility Site Review 0 Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Narne(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) AgencylOfBcelPhone and Fax Numbers Date
Mitchell S Hayes DWRIRRO W01919-791-42001
f
l ct-x '5' � I - e ' M& t`- g3" LC.1 L-V
Signature of Management 0 A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
l . 9- �11'i 13 — . 1 4 Z,o Z.,
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 944) Previous editions are obsolete
Page#
NPOES yrlmolday Inspection Type (Cont.)
31 NC0001899 11 12 20/09/22 17 laic,
Section C Summary of FindinglComments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
The permit modification became effective December 1, 2017 and will expire July 31, 2021. Permit
renewal is required within six -months of permit expiration date.
The facility processes stormwater and no longer utilizes the water treatment plant. The treatment plant
consists of the following units: one 1,200-gallon mixing/neutralization chamber for pH adjustment; one
650,000-gallon aeration basin with two 20 HP floating aerators; one 18,500 gallons 20-foot diameter
clarifier; one 1,000,000 gallon polishing pond; one composite sampler; one effluent Flow meter; one
sandfilter drying bed; chlorine contact chamber (currently inactive).
At the time of inspection, both aerators were in operation. Water flowing over the weirs of the clarifier
and v-notch weir at discharge Outfall 001 appeared clear with no solids or foam.
Discharge Monitoring Reports for the review period November 2018 through August 2020 were
checked for compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements. The following violation were
noted: Monthly average was exceeded for BOD in March 2020.
Field Laboratory Certificate No. 5024 is certified for flow, pH, and temperature. All records are being
kept up to date. Meters are calibrated quarterly by ISI. Conductivity and all other parameters are
analyzed by Pace Laboratory.
Page#
Permit: NCO001 a99 Owner - Facility: Moncure Holdings West W4N7P
Inspection Date: 09/22/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ 1:1 ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS. MCRT, Settleable ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: No solids present. Treats stormwater only.
Permit
Yes
No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
❑
MEI
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
M
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
M
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
a
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Record Keeping_
Yes No
NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab, reg. required 5 years)?
M
❑
❑
[]
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? ❑ ❑ ❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 2V7 with a certified operatc ❑ ❑ M ❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification'
0
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
M
❑
❑
❑
Page# 3
Permit: NC4441899
Owner -Facility: hioncure Holdings west VANTP
Inspection Date: 49I2212424
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for reviews ❑ ❑ M ❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
s
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
a
❑
❑
❑
R
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) hoes the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Meters calibrated quarterly by ISI.
Equalization Basins
Yes
No NA NE
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the basin aerated?
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the basin free of excessive grease?
0
❑
❑
M
❑
❑
0
❑
Are all pumps present?
❑
❑
0
❑
Are all pumps operable?
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
Are audible and visual alarms operable?
❑
❑
❑
M
❑
❑
❑
# Is basin sizelvolume adequate?
Comment: This is a 650,000 allon lagoon with two floatin aerators.
5econda Clarifier
Yes
No NA NE
is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
0
❑
❑
❑
M
❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
a
❑
❑
❑
i
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
9
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
1s the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solidsipin floc?
R
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/. of the sidewall depth)
M
❑
❑
❑
Page# 4
Permit. NC0001899 Owner - Facility: Moncure Holdings West VN1TP
Inspection Date: 09/22/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Comment: No solids Present, only stormwater. effluent api2eared clear flowing over the weirs.
Aeration Basins
Yes
No NA NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑
❑
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
0❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mgll)
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: No foam.
Lagoons
Yes
No NA NE
Type of lagoons?
Facultative
# Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
q
Are lagoons operated in?
Series
# is a re -circulation line present?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?
❑
❑
❑
# Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
❑
❑
®
❑
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation?
❑
❑
❑
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
❑
0
❑
❑
Are dikes free of seepage?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are dikes free of erosion?
n
❑
❑
❑
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
N
❑
❑
❑
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple
❑
❑
❑
0
locations?
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth?
❑
❑
r
❑
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
9
❑
❑
❑
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting?
N
❑
❑
❑
Comment: One lagoon had high weeds and trees surrounding the edge of the lagoon.
Page# 5