The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWQ0000819_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200909ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN secretary S. DANIEL SMITH Dirxtor NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality September 22, 2020 George W Radford Plantation Harbor Property Owners Association Inc 202 Sumter Ct Havelock, NC 28532 SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report Plantation Harbor WWTF Non -discharge Permit No. WQ0000819 Craven County Dear Mr. Radford: The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Plantation Harbor WWTF on 9/09/2020. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the conditions and limitations specified in Non -discharge Permit No. WQ0000819. The findings and comments noted during this inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report entitled "Compliance Inspection Report". There were no significant issues or findings noted during the inspection and therefore, a response to this inspection report is not required. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Paul Mays with the Water Quality Regional Operations Section in the Washington Regional Office at 252-948-3940 or via email at pau1.mays@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Pa "s Paul Mays, Environmental Specialist I Water Quality Regional Operations Section Washington Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ ATTACHMENTS Cc: Laserfiche Gam/—"�!S ✓ M1 C=I 9s... fE .n: Js F a t a .n..7 a s. ti -gf e._ ke f .gt n, Nwltl Compliance Inspection Report Permit: WQ0000819 Effective: 01/22/18 Expiration: 12/31/22 Owner: Plantation Harbor Property Owners Association Inc SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Plantation Harbor WWTF County: Craven Antebellum Dr Region: Washington Havelock NC 285329797 Contact Person: George W Radford Title: Director Phone: 252-6704415 Directions to Facility: US Hwy 70 E ti Havelock, NC. Veer left onto NC Hwy 101 past Main Gate USMC Cherry Point and proceed to Harlow. Turn left onto Adams Creek Road and proceed northerly to Antebellum Dr. (entrance to subdivision). System Classifications: SI, Primary ORC: Kevin Wesley Mullineaux Certification: 25041 Phone: 252-723-0101 Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 09/09/2020 Entry Time 10:OOAM Primary Inspector: Paul M Mays Secondary Inspector(s): Robert B Tankard Reason for Inspection: Routine Permit Inspection Type: Wastewater Irrigation Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Question Areas Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Use Records Treatment Lagoons Treatment Flow Measurement (See attachment summary) Exit Time: 02:OOPM Phone: 252-948-3940 Phone :252-946-6481 Ext.23 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent Miscellaneous Questions Treatment Record Keeping End Use -Irrigation Treatment Disinfection Page 1 of 5 Permit: WQ0000819 Owner -Facility: Plantation Harbor Property Owners Association Inc Inspection Date: 09/09/2020 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: On 09/09/2020 Paul Mays and Robert Tankard from the Washington Regional Office with the Division of Water Resources conducted a compliance evaluation of Plantation Harbor permitted under permit #WQ0000819. Below are the findings of the compliance evaluation. The facility was as described in permit #WQ0000819. The 3.6 MG storage lagoon and 2.6 MG treatment lagoon looked good. The influent flowmeter was down during inspection. The ORC stated the influent flowmeter stopped working the same month and repairs have been scheduled. All required documents were present during the inspection or emailed for review after the inspection. March 2020 NDMR and NDAR was spot checked against records and lab data with no discrepancies. At this time groundwater monitoring is not required. However, when the facility begins averaging 20,000 gallons per day the facility must contact the Washington Regional Office to reevaluate the status groundwater monitoring the reporting program for the facility. This is required by the permit under Condition 1 under Schedules. 4 monitoring wells are temporarily abandoned but maintained. The vegetative cover on the spray fields was adequate and well maintained. There was a visual inspection of the irrigation fields and no issues were found during the inspection. The facility was found to be compliant with Non -Discharge Permit #WQ0000819. Page 2 of 5 Permit: W00000819 Owner - Facility: Plantation Harbor Property Owners Association Inc Inspection Date: 09/09/2020 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Tvae Yes No NA NE Activated Sludge Drip, LR Recycle/Reuse Single Family Drip Infiltration System Reuse (Quality) Single Family Spray, LR Activated Sludge Spray, LR Activated Sludge Spray, HR Lagoon Spray, LR Treatment Yes No NA NE Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit? Do all treatment units appear to be operational? (if no, note below.) Comment: The facility was as described in permit #WQ0000819 The 3.6 MG storaqe lagoon and 2.6 MG treatment lagoon looked good The vegetative cover on the spray fields was adequate and well maintained. Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent Yes No NA NE Is flowmeter calibrated annually? Is flowmeter operating properly? Does flowmeter monitor continuously? 0 El 7 El Does flowmeter record flow? Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? M Comment: The influent flowmeter was down during inspection The ORC stated the influent flowmeter stopped working the same month and repairs have been scheduled Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Use Records Yes No NA NE Is water use metered? Are the daily average values properly calculated? Comment Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent Yes No NA NE Is flowmeter calibrated annually? Is flowmeter operating properly? Does flowmeter monitor continuously? Does flowmeter record flow? El El ■ Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? El E3 0 Comment: Page 3 of 5 Permit: WQ0000819 Owner -Facility: Plantation Harbor Property Owners Association Inc Inspection Date: 09/09/2020 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Treatment Disinfection Yes No NA NE Is the system working? 0❑ ❑ ❑ Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is there adequate detention time (>=30 minutes)? 0 El ❑ ❑ Is the system properly maintained? N❑ ❑ If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe? ❑ El E ❑ Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is the chlorinator accessible? 0 El ❑ ❑ If tablets, are tablets present? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Are the tablets the proper size and type? ❑ ❑ Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If UV, are extra UV bulbs available? ❑ ❑ If UV, is the UV intensity adequate? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ # Is it a dual feed system? ❑ ❑ Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)? ❑ ❑ N ❑ If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site? El ❑ 0 ❑ If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- If yes, then when was the RMP last updated? Comment: Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Is a copy of current permit available? N El El 0 Are monitoring reports present: NDMR? 0 El El El NDAR? Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? 0 El El El Are application rates adhered to? Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)? El El 0 0 Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters? 0 El El n Are there any 2L GW quality violations? El El0 Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility? Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW? Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards? ElE Are annual soil reports available? # Are PAN records required? # Did last soil report indicate a need for lime? 0 El El D If so, has it been applied? Page 4 of 5 Permit: W00000819 Owner -Facility: Plantation Harbor Property Owners Association Inc Inspection Date: 09/09/2020 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Are operational logs present? 0 El El F Are lab sheets available for review? Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR? 0 El El F Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s? Are Operational and Maintenance records present? Were Operational and Maintenance records complete? Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months? Is a copy of the SOC readily available? No treatment units bypassed since last inspection? Comment: All required documents were present during the inspection or emailed for review after the inspection. March 2020 NDMR and NDAR was spot checked against records and lab data with no discrepancies. At this time groundwater monitoring is not required However, when the faciliy begins averaging 20 000 gallons per day the facility must contact the Washington Regional Office to reevaluate the status groundwater monitoring the reporting program for the facility. This is required by the permit under Condition 1 under Schedules 4 monitoring wells are temporarily abandoned but maintained End Use -Irrigation Yes No NA NE Are buffers adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ Is the cover crop type specified in permit? 0 ❑ ❑ Is the crop cover acceptable? 0 ❑ ❑ El Is the site condition adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ Is the site free of runoff / ponding? N ❑ Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized? 0 ❑ ❑ Is the application equipment present? E ❑ ❑ Is the application equipment operational? S ❑ ❑ Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes? E ❑ ❑ Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use? 0 ❑ El El Are any supply wells within the CB? ❑ ❑ 0 El Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB? ❑ ❑ How close is the closest water supply well? ❑ ❑ Is municipal water available in the area? ❑ 0 S El # Info only: Does the permit call for monitoring wells? ❑ ❑ Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB and CB? El ❑ Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval? ❑ ❑ 0 Are monitoring wells damaged? ❑ ❑ Comment: The vegetative cover on the spray fields was adequate and well maintained There was a visual inspection of the irrigation fields and no issues were found during the inspection Page 5 of 5