NC0058084_Fact Sheet_20200813

FACT SHEET FOR EXPEDITED PERMIT RENEWALS
This form must be completed by Permit Writers for all expedited permits which do not require
full Fact Sheets. Expedited permits are generally simple 100% domestics (e.g., schools, mobile
home parks, etc) that can be administratively renewed with minor changes, but can include
facilities with more complex issues (Special Conditions, 303(d) listed water, toxicity testing,
instream monitoring, compliance concerns).
Basic Information for Expedited Permit Renewals
Permit Writer / Date
Brianna Young 8/13/2020
Permit Number
NCO058084
Facility Name / Facility Class
GoughEcon WWTP / WW-1
Basin Name / Sub -basin number
Catawba / 03-08-34
Receiving Stream / HUC
UT to Catawba River / 030501011405
Stream Classification / Stream Segment
WS-IV, B; CA / I I - 122
Does permit need Daily Maximum NH3
limits?
Already present
Does permit need TRC limits/language?
Already resent
Does permit have toxicity testing? IWC (%) if
so
N/A
Does permit have Special Conditions?
No
Does permit have instream monitoring?
Yes - Temperature
Is the stream impaired on 303 d list)?
Yes — PCB fish tissue advisory
Any obvious compliance concerns?
Yes — fecal coliform and ammonia nitrogen
exceedances
Any permit mods since lastpermit?
None
New expiration date
6/30/2025
Comments on Draft Permit?
None
Section 1. Facility Overview:
Gough Econ, Inc. operates manufacturing facility that produces light sheet metal
products, with wastewater generated by bathrooms onsite. The facility has a permitted
wastewater discharge of 0.0012 MGD. The facility generates an intermittent discharge
(2-3 days per week for 8 hours). The treatment system consists of a septic tank, dosing
tank, sand filter, recirculating tank with pump, mushroom fountains, tablet chlorine
contact tank, tablet dichlorination tank, cascade and effluent pipe.
Section 2. Compliance History (June 2015 — June 2020):
• 1 NOD for fecal coliform daily max exceedance
• 3 NOVs for fecal coliform daily max exceedances
• 1 NOD for ammonia nitrogen monthly average exceedance
• 3 NOVs for ammonia nitrogen monthly average exceedances
• 1 enforcement case for ammonia nitrogen monthly average exceedance
• 1 NOV for late/missing DMR
Page 1 of 7

303(d) listing:
J ICATAWBA RIVER (Lake Wylie below elevation 570)
1-95 bridge to the upstream side of Paw Creek Arm of Lake Wylie, Catawba River
Classification WS-IV,B;CA Length or Area 601 llnits FW Acres Previous AU Number
ment Criteria Status Reason for Rating Parameter of Interest Category
ding Criteria Fish Consumption Advisory PCB Fish Tissue Advisory (Advisory, FC, NC) IF
Section 5. Changes from previous permit to draft:
• Updated eDMR footnote inA(1) and language in A(2)
• Updated outfall map
• Added facility grade in A(1)
• Added receiving stream characteristics on the Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet
Section 6. Changes from draft to final:
• eDMR language updated in A(2)
Section 7. Comments received on draft permit:
• None
NPDES Implementation of Instream Dissolved Metals Standards — Freshwater
Standards
The NC 2007-2015 Water Quality Standard (WQS) Triennial Review was approved by
the NC Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on November 13, 2014. The
US EPA subsequently approved the WQS revisions on April 6, 2016, with some
exceptions. Therefore, metal limits in draft permits out to public notice after April 6,
2016 must be calculated to protect the new standards - as approved.
Table 1. NC Dissolved Metals Water Oualitv Standards/Aauatic Life Protection
Parameter
Acute FW, µg/1
(Dissolved)
Chronic FW,
µg/1
(Dissolved)
Acute SW, µg/1
(Dissolved)
Chronic SW,
µg/1
(Dissolved)
Arsenic
340
150
69
36
Beryllium
65
6.5
---
---
Cadmium
Calculation
Calculation
40
8.8
Chromium III
Calculation
Calculation
---
---
Chromium VI
16
11
1100
50
Copper
Calculation
Calculation
4.8
3.1
Lead
Calculation
Calculation
210
8.1
Nickel
Calculation
Calculation
74
8.2
Silver
Calculation
0.06
1.9
0.1
Page 2 of 7

Zinc I Calculation I Calculation 190 1 81
Table 1 Notes:
1. FW= Freshwater, SW= Saltwater
2. Calculation = Hardness dependent standard
3. Only the aquatic life standards listed above are expressed in dissolved form.
Aquatic life standards for Mercury and selenium are still expressed as Total
Recoverable Metals due to bioaccumulative concerns (as are all human health
standards for all metals). It is still necessary to evaluate total recoverable aquatic
life and human health standards listed in 15A NCAC 213.0200 (e.g., arsenic at 10
µg/l for human health protection; cyanide at 5 µg/L and fluoride at 1.8 mg/L for
aquatic life protection).
Table 2. Dissolved Freshwater Standards for Hardness -Dependent Metals
The Water Effects Ratio (WER) is equal to one unless determined otherwise
under 15A NCAC 02B .0211 Subparagraph (11)(d)
Metal
NC Dissolved Standard, µg/l
Cadmium,Acute
WER* {1.136672-[ln hardness](0.041838)} e'l0.9151 [ln hardness]-3.14851
Cadmium, Acute Trout waters
WER*{1.136672-[lnhardness](0.041838)} e'l0.9151[lnhardness]-3.62361
Cadmium,Chromc
WER* {1.101672-[ln hardness](0.041838)} e'l0.7998[ln hardness]-4.4451 }
Chromium III, Acute
WER*0.316 e^{0.8190[lnhardness]+3.7256}
Chromium III, Chronic
WER*0.860 e^{0.8190[lnhardness]+0.6848}
Copper, Acute
WER*0.960 • e^{0.9422[ln hardness]-1.700)
Copper, Chronic
WER*0.960 • eA10.8545[ln hardness]-1.702)
Lead,Acute
WER*{1.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)) • eAll .273[ln hardness]-1.4601
Lead, Chronic
WER* { 1.46203-[ln hardness](0.145712)) • eAll .273 [ln hardness]4.705 }
Nickel, Acute
WER*0.998 e^{0.8460[ln hardness]+2.255}
Nickel, Chronic
WER*0.997 e^{0.8460[ln hardness]+0.0584}
Silver, Acute
WER*0.85 • eAll .72[ln hardness]-6.59}
Silver, Chronic
Not applicable
Zinc, Acute
WER*0.978 e^{0.8473[ln hardness]+0.884}
Zinc, Chronic
WER*0.986 e^{0.8473[ln hardness]+0.884}
General Information on the Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
The RPA process itself did not change as the result of the new metals standards.
However, application of the dissolved and hardness -dependent standards requires
additional consideration in order to establish the numeric standard for each metal of
concern of each individual discharge.
The hardness -based standards require some knowledge of the effluent and instream
(upstream) hardness and so must be calculated case -by -case for each discharge.
Page 3 of 7

Metals limits must be expressed as `total recoverable' metals in accordance with 40 CFR
122.45(c). The discharge -specific standards must be converted to the equivalent total
values for use in the RPA calculations. We will generally rely on default translator values
developed for each metal (more on that below), but it is also possible to consider case -
specific translators developed in accordance with established methodology.
RPA Permitting Guidance/WQBELs for Hardness -Dependent Metals - Freshwater
The RPA is designed to predict the maximum likely effluent concentrations for each
metal of concern, based on recent effluent data, and calculate the allowable effluent
concentrations, based on applicable standards and the critical low -flow values for the
receiving stream.
If the maximum predicted value is greater than the maximum allowed value (chronic or
acute), the discharge has reasonable potential to exceed the standard, which warrants a
permit limit in most cases. If monitoring for a particular pollutant indicates that the
pollutant is not present (i.e. consistently below detection level), then the Division may
remove the monitoring requirement in the reissued permit.
1. To perform a RPA on the Freshwater hardness -dependent metals the Permit
Writer compiles the following information:
• Critical low flow of the receiving stream, 7Q 10 (the spreadsheet
automatically calculates the 1 Q 10 using the formula 1 Q 10 = 0.843
(s7Q 10, cfs) 0.993
• Effluent hardness and upstream hardness, site -specific data is preferred
• Permitted flow
• Receiving stream classification
2. In order to establish the numeric standard for each hardness -dependent metal of
concern and for each individual discharge, the Permit Writer must first determine
what effluent and instream (upstream) hardness values to use in the equations.
The permit writer reviews DMR's, Effluent Pollutant Scans, and Toxicity Test
results for any hardness data and contacts the Permittee to see if any additional
data is available for instream hardness values, upstream of the discharge.
If no hardness data is available, the permit writer may choose to do an initial
evaluation using a default hardness of 25 mg/L (CaCO3 or (Ca + Mg)).
Minimum and maximum limits on the hardness value used for water quality
calculations are 25 mg/L and 400 mg/L, respectively.
If the use of a default hardness value results in a hardness -dependent metal
showing reasonable potential, the permit writer contacts the Permittee and
requests 5 site -specific effluent and upstream hardness samples over a period of
one week. The RPA is rerun using the new data.
Page 4 of 7

The overall hardness value used in the water quality calculations is calculated as
follows:
Combined Hardness (chronic)
= (Permitted Flow, cfs *Avg. Effluent Hardness, mg/L) x (s7Q 10, cfs *Avg. Upstream
Hardness, mg/L)
(Permitted Flow, cfs + s7Q 10, cfs)
The Combined Hardness for acute is the same but the calculation uses the IQ 10
flow.
3. The permit writer converts the numeric standard for each metal of concern to a
total recoverable metal, using the EPA Default Partition Coefficients (DPCs) or
site -specific translators, if any have been developed using federally approved
methodology.
EPA default partition coefficients or the "Fraction Dissolved" converts the
value for dissolved metal at laboratory conditions to total recoverable metal
at in -stream ambient conditions. This factor is calculated using the linear
partition coefficients found in The Metals Translator: Guidance for
Calculating a Total Recoverable Permit Limit from a Dissolved Criterion
(EPA 823-B-96-007, June 1996) and the equation:
Cdiss = 1
Ctotal 1 + { [Kpo] [SS(1+a)] [10-6] }
Where:
ss = in -stream suspended solids concentration [mg/1], minimum of 10 mg/L
used, and
Kpo and a = constants that express the equilibrium relationship between
dissolved and adsorbed forms of metals. A list of constants used for each
hardness -dependent metal can also be found in the RPA proeram under a
4. The numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by the default partition
coefficient (or site -specific translator) to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at
ambient conditions.
In some cases, where an EPA default partition coefficient translator does not exist
(ie. silver), the dissolved numeric standard for each metal of concern is divided by
the EPA conversion factor to obtain a Total Recoverable Metal at ambient
conditions. This method presumes that the metal is dissolved to the same extent as
it was during EPA's criteria development for metals. For more information on
conversion factors see the June, 1996 EPA Translator Guidance Document.
5. The RPA spreadsheet uses a mass balance equation to determine the total
allowable concentration (permit limits) for each pollutant using the following
equation:
Ca = (s7Q 10 + Qw) (Cwgs) (s7Q 10) (Cb)
Page 5 of 7

Qw
Where: Ca = allowable effluent concentration (µg/L or mg/L)
Cwqs = NC Water Quality Standard or federal criteria (µg/L or mg/L)
Cb = background concentration: assume zero for all toxicants except NH3*
(µg/L or mg/L)
Qw = permitted effluent flow (cfs, match s7Q 10)
s7Q 10 = summer low flow used to protect aquatic life from chronic toxicity
and human health through the consumption of water, fish, and shellfish from
noncarcinogens (cfs)
* Discussions are on -going with EPA on how best to address background
concentrations
Flows other than s7Q 10 may be incorporated as applicable:
IQ 10 = used in the equation to protect aquatic life from acute toxicity
QA = used in the equation to protect human health through the
consumption of water, fish, and shellfish from carcinogens
30Q2 = used in the equation to protect aesthetic quality
6. The permit writer enters the most recent 2-3 years of effluent data for each
pollutant of concern. Data entered must have been taken within four and one-half
years prior to the date of the permit application (40 CFR 122.21). The RPA
spreadsheet estimates the 95th percentile upper concentration of each pollutant.
The Predicted Max concentrations are compared to the Total allowable
concentrations to determine if a permit limit is necessary. If the predicted max
exceeds the acute or chronic Total allowable concentrations, the discharge is
considered to show reasonable potential to violate the water quality standard, and
a permit limit (Total allowable concentration) is included in the permit in
accordance with the U.S. EPA Technical Support Document for Water Quality -
Based Toxics Control published in 1991.
7. When appropriate, permit writers develop facility specific compliance schedules
in accordance with the EPA Headquarters Memo dated May 10, 2007 from James
Hanlon to Alexis Strauss on 40 CFR 122.47 Compliance Schedule Requirements.
8. The Total Chromium NC WQS was removed and replaced with trivalent
chromium and hexavalent chromium Water Quality Standards. As a cost savings
measure, total chromium data results may be used as a conservative surrogate in
cases where there are no analytical results based on chromium III or VI. In these
cases, the projected maximum concentration (95th %) for total chromium will be
compared against water quality standards for chromium III and chromium VI.
9. Effluent hardness sampling and instream hardness sampling, upstream of the
discharge, are inserted into all permits with facilities monitoring for hardness -
dependent metals to ensure the accuracy of the permit limits and to build a more
robust hardness dataset.
10. Hardness and flow values used in the Reasonable Potential Analysis for this
permit included:
Page 6 of 7

Parameter
Value
Comments(Data Source
Average Effluent Hardness
No RPA necessary
(mg/L)
N/A
Total as, CaCO3 or Ca+M
Average Upstream Hardness
No RPA necessary
(mg/L)
N/A
[Total as, CaCO3 or (Ca+Mg)]
7Q 10 summer (cfs)
N/A
No RPA necessary
1 10 cfs
N/A
No RPA necessary
Permitted Flow MGD
N/A
No RPA necessary
Page 7 of 7

the TI),artotte (96seruer
charlotteobserver.com
LakeN Z I N E n Carolina Brideos CL"T
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Amount#
Ad Number
ld.nhficatian
145583
1 0004694441
1 Public Notice North Carolina Environmental Management Commission/N
Attention: Wren Thedford
NCDENR/DWQ/POINT SOURCE
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 276991677
PUBLIC NOTICE
North Carolina Environmerrcel Management commatuarNPDES unit
1617 Mail Ser me Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Notice of Insert to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit 14Co05a09a Gough Econ W WTP
The North Caroline Environmental Management Commission proposes to laws a NPDES
wastewater da perm N to tha persons) Fstetl below. Wns[en comments regarNng the
proposed permit will be am ted umil 30 al Y after the publish date of this irome. The Dino
for of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) may hold a public hearing should Mare be e
si Aicant Eegme
o1 public Interest. Please mail comments antl/or intormetion requests to
D Rat the above aWress. Interested parsons may vistt the DWR at 512 N. Salisbury Sheet
Raleigh, NC to review inbrmason on Me. Addilpnel iMormaOan on NPDES permits antl Mis no-
6ce may be lound on our webs@.:Mpgidm.nc.gov/eboWmvisiona/watar-msourc Mater-res
nurses -as in reFxastewatwmnchMpfte wastewater/pubic-no ms,m by calling (919) 707-
3601.
GW9h Emn, Inc. has applied Mr renewal of permit NC005fal for Me Gough Eton, Inc
W WrP in MecldenbuM iDwr Thu permihed discharge is 00012 MGD crested wastewater to
an unnamed tributary to the (atewba River in the Catawba River Basin. This discharge may af-
feq tutors allotions inthis portion 0e Catawba River Basin.LPa69aaa1 ca
North Carolina } SS
Mecklenburg County }
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public
of said County and State, duly
authorized to administer oaths
affirmations, etc., personally appeared,
being duly sworn or affirmed according
to law, cloth depose and say that he/she
is a representative of The Charlotte
Observer Publishing Company, a
corporation organized and doing
business under the laws of the State of
Delaware, and publishing a newspaper
known as The Charlotte Observer in the
city of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg,
and State of North Carolina and that as
such he/she is familiar with the books,
records, files, and business of said
Corporation and by reference to the files
of said publication, the attached
advertisement was inserted. The
following is correctly copied from the
Insertions)
Published On:
July 10, 2020
c� 0(�-t lix�VD
Chem Foster. Regional Office Associate
In Testimony Whereof I have hereunto set
my hand and affixed my seal on the 9th
day of July, 2020
Electignic Notary Public State of North
Camtina

Young, Brianna A
From: Cook, Clinton
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 10:11 AM
To: Young, Brianna A
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES permit NC0058084 to public notice
Attachments: NC0058084 PWS memo (Cook).pdf
Brianna,
I appreciate the opportunity to review the subject draft permit and have attached an electronic copy of the
memorandum describing my response.
Please also note that the nearest downstream raw water intake for a public water system is associated with the City of
Belmont and is located approximately 1.9 miles downstream.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let me know.
Thanks,
Clint
Clinton O. Cook, PE
Regional Engineer
Division of Water Resources — Public Water Supply Section
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
704 663 1699 office
704 663 6040 fax
clinton.cook(cDncdenr.gov
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Young, Brianna A
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 9:44 AM
To: Cook, Clinton <[e-mail]>
Subject: Draft NPDES permit NC0058084to public notice
Good morning Clinton,
Attached is the draft NPDES permit NC0058084 for the Gough Econ, Inc. WWTP that has been submitted to public
notice. Please fill out the attached form and return it to me by August 7tn
Thank you,
Brianna Young
Environmental Specialist II
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Branch

Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 919-707-3619
[e-mail]
Mailing address:
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
MEMORANDUM
To: Clinton Cook
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
July 8, 2020
NC DEQ / DWR / Public Water Supply
Mooresville Regional Office
From: Brianna Young
Compliance and Expedited Permitting Unit
Subject: Review of Draft NPDES Permit NCO058084
Gough Econ, Inc. WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the draft permit and return this form by
August 7, 2020. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at 919-707-3619 or
via e-mail [[e-mail]].
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
RESPONSE: (Check one)
❑Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly,
the stated effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the
designated water quality standards.
Px� Concurs with issuance of the above permit, pfovided the following erditiors are et:*
* I have no appreciable expertise in implementation of the Clean Water Act requirements and have
minimal understanding of the information provided. As a result, I have no basis for opposing the
permit.
F-1 Opposes the issuance of the above permit, based on reasons stated below, or attached:
r
��' Date. 8/11 /2020
Signed.
D E Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
N(1HTH f:Ai(1!_INA �
n ­ro emoreowmen'e wQ� i 919,707,9000

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Report Date:
06/18/2C Page
1 of 2
Permit:
nc0058084
MRS Betweei 6 - 2015 and 6 - 2020
Region:
%
Violation Category:%
Program Category:
Facility Name: %
Param Nam(%
County:
%
Subbasin: %
Violation Action: %
Major Minor:
%
PERMIT: NCO058084
FACILITY: Gough Econ Inc - Gough Econ WWTP
COUNTY: Mecklenburg
REGION: Mooresville
Limit Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
%
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
Over
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
06-2015
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
06/30/15
2 X week
ug/I
17
20
17.6
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
07-2015
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
07/03/15
2 X week
ug/I
17
18
5.9
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
09-2015
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
09/02/15
2 X week
ug/I
17
18
5.9
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
07-2019
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
07/29/19
2 X week
ug/I
17
24
41.2
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
08-2019
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
08/02/19
2 X week
ug/I
17
19
11.8
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
08-2019
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
08/13/19
2 X week
ug/I
17
20
17.6
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
08-2019
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
08/16/19
2 X week
ug/I
17
20
17.6
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
11 -2019
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
11/01/19
2 X week
ug/I
17
22
29.4
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
01 -2020
001
Effluent
Chlorine, Total Residual
01/03/20
2 X week
ug/I
17
18
5.9
Daily Maximum
No Action, BPJ
Exceeded
04-2016
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
04/26/16
2 X month
#/100ml
400
411
2.8
Daily Maximum
Proceed to NOD
Broth, 44.5 C
Exceeded
08-2016
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
08/09/16
2 X month
#/100ml
400
2,419.6
504.9
Daily Maximum
Proceed to NOV
Broth, 44.5 C
Exceeded
01 -2018
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
01/10/18
2 X month
#/100ml
400
1,553.1
288.3
Daily Maximum
Proceed to NOV
Broth, 44.5 C
Exceeded
10-2019
001
Effluent
Coliform, Fecal MF, MFC
10/21/19
2 X month
#/100ml
400
579.4
44.8
Daily Maximum
Proceed to NOV
Broth, 44.5 C
Exceeded
06 -2016
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
06/30/16
2 X month
mg/I
2
2.13
6.5
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
N) - Concentration
Exceeded
01 -2018
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
01/31/18
2 X month
mg/I
4
5.82
45.6
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
N) - Concentration
Exceeded
05-2018
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
05/31/18
2 X month
mg/I
2
2.35
17.5
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOV
N) - Concentration
Exceeded

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Report Date:
06/18/2C Page
2 of 2
Permit:
nc0058084
MRS Betweel 6 - 2015 and 6 - 2020
Region:
%
Violation Category:%
Program Category: %
Facility Name: %
Param Nam(%
County:
%
Subbasin: %
Violation Action: %
Major Minor:
%
PERMIT: NCO058084
FACILITY: Gough Econ Inc - Gough Econ WWTP
COUNTY: Mecklenburg
REGION: Mooresville
Limit Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED %
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT VALUE Over
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
09 -2018
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
09/30/18
2 X month
mg/I
2 2.08 3.8
Monthly Average
Proceed to NOD
N) - Concentration
Exceeded
11 -2018
001
Effluent
Nitrogen, Ammonia Total (as
11/30/18
2 X month
mg/I
4 5.32 33
Monthly Average
Proceed to
N) - Concentration
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED %
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT VALUE Over
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
10-2015
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
10/31/15
5 X week
deg c
Frequency Violation
No Action, BPJ
Centigrade
06 -2016
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
06/04/16
5 X week
deg c
Frequency Violation
No Action, Facility
Centigrade
Reporting Error
03 -2017
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
03/04/17
5 X week
deg c
Frequency Violation
No Action, Facility
Centigrade
Reporting Error
10 -2019
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
10/05/19
5 X week
deg c
Frequency Violation
No Action, Facility
Centigrade
Reporting Error
10 -2019
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
10/12/19
5 X week
deg c
Frequency Violation
No Action, Facility
Centigrade
Reporting Error
10 -2019
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
10/19/19
5 X week
deg c
Frequency Violation
No Action, Facility
Centigrade
Reporting Error
10 -2019
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
10/26/19
5 X week
deg c
Frequency Violation
No Action, Facility
Centigrade
Reporting Error
11 -2019
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
11/02/19
5 X week
deg c
Frequency Violation
No Action, Facility
Centigrade
Reporting Error
01 -2020
001
Effluent
Temperature, Water Deg.
01/04/20
5 X week
deg c
Frequency Violation
No Action, Facility
Centigrade
Reporting Error
Reporting Violation
MONITORING
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED %
REPORT
OUTFALL
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT VALUE Over
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
05-2017
07/01/17
Late/Missing DMR
Proceed to NOV

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Mr. David Risley
Gough Econ
Post Office Box 668583
Charlotte, North Carolina 28266
Dear Mr. Risley:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
27 March 2019
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Gough Econ WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO058084
Mecklenburg County
Tracking #: NOD-2019-PC-0076
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the subject facility on
March 21, 2019, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Please inform the facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge (ORC) of our
findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
This report is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) due to the following:
1) Failure to properly maintain the sand filter (solids removal);
2) Failure to repair the metal support structure for the tablet chlorinator;
3) Failure to properly document effluent results and meter calibrations/verifications for all sampling events;
4) Failure to properly report effluent data on the Discharge Monitoring Reports (eDMRs);
These are violations of the subject NPDES Permit and North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215 as detailed in the Sand
Filter (Low Rate)/Summary, Disinfection -Tablet and Record Keeping/Summary Sections of the attached report. Pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6A, a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation, per day may be
assessed against any person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of any permit
issued pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1. Penalties may also be assessed for any damage to surface waters of the State that may result
from the violations.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by April 17, 2019, detailing the actions taken to address all
above -noted violations. hi responding, please address your comments to the attention of Mr. Wes Bell.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
ece�- DEQ
�� Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 1 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NORTH CAROLINA
o,g.aE""'°" bl°"'niv 704,663.1699

Mr. David Risley
Page Two
27 March 2019
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not
hesitate to contact Mr. Bell at [phone] or at wes.bellgncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
A14CC681 AF27425...
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure:
Inspection Report

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 IN I 2 15 1 3 I NCO058084 111 12 I 19/03/12 I17 18 I C I 19 I G I 201
21111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIII IIIIIIIIIII f6
Inspection
Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ---------------------- Reserved -------------------
67
2.0 70 71 [.. I 72 l-1 L �, � 73 L_LJ74 751 1 1 1 1 LU80
LJ
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES oermit Number)
09:32AM 19/03/12
15/07/01
Gough Econ WWTP
9400 N Lakebrook Rd Sr
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Charlotte NC 28214
12:30PM 19/03/12
20/06/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Steven L Lam bert/ORC/704-546-2602/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
David P Risley,PO Box 668583 Charlotte NC 28266/President/704-399-2306/
Yes
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Wes Bell DocuSigned by: MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2192/ 3/26/2019
�Piy �e&
A61696D90CC343T
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
W. Corey Basinger Division of Water Quality//704-2;
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
DocuSigned by:
3/27/2019
AlaccsalAFvazs... Page#

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.)
NCO058084 I11 12, 19/03/12 117 18 JCJ
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
RECORD KEEPING SECTION cont'd:
Only one effluent total residual chlorine (TRC) result was reported for the weeks of 4/22/18, 10/28/18
and 12/23/18. The inspection verified that the above -noted monitoring violations were transcription
errors and therefore, revised eDMRs will be submitted and mailed in to the Division. The Permittee
and ORC must ensure that all eDMRs are accurate and complete prior to submittal.
The records reviewed during the inspection were organized and readily accessible; however, there
were several instances of either the pH and TRC effluent results or the meter calibrations/verifications
not being properly documented as required by the subject Permit [Part II, Section D(6) Records
Retention & D(7) Recording Results]. The Permittee and ORC must ensure that all data is properly
documented and maintained.
SAND FILTERS (LOW RATE) SECTION cont'd:
Ponding was observed during the recirculation process and the ORC indicated that the entire sand bed
is submerged during a discharge event from the dose tank. Extensive ponding for extended periods of
time can negatively impact the aerobic biological treatment processes. The Permittee and ORC must
ensure that the sand bed is consistently raked of solids, spent sand is replaced when needed, and the
sand bed is not submerged for extended periods of time. In addition, the Permittee and ORC must
also ensure that no short-circuiting of the initially dosed wastewater (bypasses the recirculation
process) occurs during a discharge event.
Page#

Permit: NCO058084
Inspection Date: 03/12/2019
Owner - Facility: Gough Econ WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
❑
0
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The last compliance evaluation inspection was performed by DWR staff on 9/12/16.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
❑
0
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
❑
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported CM
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
❑
0
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑
❑
0
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
❑
❑
M
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment: Discharae Monitorina Resorts (eDMRs) were reviewed for the period January 2018 throuah
December 2018. Effluent ammonia monthly average violations were reported in January,
May, September, and November 2018. An effluent fecal coliform daily maximum violation
was also reported in January 2018. The Division has previously addressed these limit
violations through the issuances of either a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) or Notice of Violation
(NOV). See "Summary" Section for additional comments.
Page# 3

Permit: NCO058084 Owner - Facility: Gough Econ WWTP
Inspection Date: 03/12/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory
Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
❑
❑
0
❑
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: On -site field analyses (dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, TRC) are performed under the
Gough Econ's field laboratory certification #5083. Statesville Analytical Holdings, LLC
(Certification #440) has also been contracted to provide analytical support for all effluent
parameters except field.
Effluent Sampling
Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
❑
❑
0
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
❑
❑
0
❑
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
❑
❑
❑
representative)?
Comment: The subiect Dermit reauires effluent arab samDles. The ORC and staff must ensure that
effluent samples are collected during a representative discharge event.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
sampling location)?
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Septic Tank
(If pumps are used) Is an audible and visual alarm operational?
Yes No NA NE
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Page# 4

Permit: NCO058084
Owner - Facility: Gough Econ WWTP
Inspection Date: 03/12/2019
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Septic Tank
Yes No NA NE
Is septic tank pumped on a schedule?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are pumps or syphons operating properly?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are high and low water alarms operating properly?
❑
❑
M
❑
Comment: The septic tank is pumped by a contracted company (Rays) once every two years.
Sand Filters (Low rate)
Yes No NA NE
(If pumps are used) Is an audible and visible alarm Present and operational?
❑
❑
M
❑
Is the distribution box level and watertight?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is sand filter free of ponding?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is the sand filter effluent re -circulated at a valid ratio?
❑
❑
0
❑
# Is the sand filter surface free of algae or excessive vegetation?
❑
0
❑
❑
# Is the sand filter effluent re -circulated at a valid ratio? (Approximately 3 to 1)
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment: The dosing tank (single bell siphon), distribution box and recirculation tank (single
pump)
were operational and in service. Excessive accumulation of solids was observed on the
sand bed. These solids should be removed and properly disposed.
See "Summary" Section for additional comments.
Disinfection -Tablet
Are tablet chlorinators operational?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Number of tubes in use?
Yes No NA NE
■
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
1
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The tablet chlorinator was severely tilted to one side due to structural issues with the metal
supports. The support structure must be repaired as soon as possible. Please be advised
that the subject permit requires the permittee to properly operate and maintain all facilities
and systems of treatment and control at all times [Permit Condition Reference: Part II,
Section C(2) Proper Operation and Maintenancel.
De -chlorination
Yes No NA NE
Type of system ?
Tablet
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
❑ ❑
0
❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
❑ ❑
0
❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
❑ ❑
0
❑
Page# 5

Permit: NC0058084 Owner - Facility: Gough Econ WWTP
Inspection Date: 03/12/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
De -chlorination Yes No NA NE
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of tubes in use? 4
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
❑
❑
0
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment: Instantaneous effluent flows are based on the bucket and stop watch method.
Effluent Pipe
Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment: The facility was not discharging at the time of the inspection.
Page# 6

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Gough Econ, Inc.
Attn: David P. Risley, President & CEO
PO Box 668583
Charlotte, NC 28266
Subject: Permit Renewal
Application No. NCO058084
Gough Econ WWTP
Mecklenburg County
Dear Applicant:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 16, 2020
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges the June 11, 2020 receipt of your permit renewal application and
supporting documentation. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's NPDES WW permitting
branch. Per G.S. 15OB-3 your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made.
Continuation of the current permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit. The
permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Please respond in a
timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to allow a complete review of the application and renewal
of the permit.
Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
https://deg.nc.gov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance environmental -application -tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
Sincerely,
IA
Wren Thedford
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
North : arD ra Department of Environmental Quetity I Dtvs*n of Water Fesouroes
Mooresv a Regona Off ce 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 1 A'aoresv e, NortI,:&ro na 2S115
704£62-1588

irDOUGH
ECON,INC.
BULK MATERIALS HANDLING SOLUTIONS
June 8, 2020
Mr. Wren Thedford
NC DENR / DWQ / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617
Subject: Permit Renewal Application Package
NPDES Permit NCO058084
Gough Econ Inc.
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Thedford,
RECEIVED/NCDEn, �rR
JUN z 2020
Non-D'schar, -
P'�iitin 9r
9 Unit
Please accept our apologies for applying late to renew our permit. In the past we have always
received a notification from the state reminding us about the renewal is coming up. However, we did not
receive anything until June 3. When an email from Charles Weaver came in telling us that our permit
expires June 30, 2020. Please see attached our renewal application for the waste treatment permit
referenced above. There have been no modifications made since our last permit was issued.
The application asks for a narrative description of our sludge management plan. We hire the
services of a licensed waste company to pump out the septic tank and remove sludge when instructed to
do so by our ORC, Mr. Steven Lambert.
If you should have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate contact our
ORC/Steven Lambert via phone or email or 704-657-8847 by email Steven Lambert
[e-mail].
Respectfully Submitted,
gh Ec
Davt P. Risley
President & CEO
Cc: Steven Lambert — ORC
o:\wpdata\dpr\wastetreatment\NPDESpermit renewal 2020.doc
Gough Econ, Inc. P.O. Box 668583 Charlotte NC 28266-8583 Tel. [phone] Fax [phone]

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. DENR / Division of Water Resources / NPDES Program
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit INCO058084
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name
David P. Risley
Facility Name
Gough Econ Inc
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 668583
City
Charlotte
State / Zip Code
N.C. 28066-8583
Telephone Number
[phone]
Fax Number
[phone]
e-mail Address
[e-mail]
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same address as above ❑
Street Address or State Road 9400 N. Lakebrook Rd.
City Charlotte
State / Zip Code N.C. 28214
County Mecklenburg
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, public organization or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring
to the Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name Steven Lambert - Certified Waste Treatment Operator
Mailing Address
154 Sunflower Rd.
City
Statesville
State / Zip Code
N.C. 28625
Telephone Number
[phone] cell
Fax Number
[phone]
e-mail Address
Steven Lambert <[e-mail]>
1 of 4 Form-D 9/2013

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
4. Description of wastewater:
Facility Generating Wastewater(check all that apply):
Industrial
X
Number of Employees 45
Commercial
❑
Number of Employees
Residential
❑
Number of Homes
School
❑
Number of Students/Staff
Other
❑
Explain:
Describe the source(s) of wastewater (example: subdivision, mobile home park, shopping centers,
restaurants, etc.):
Manufacturing facility (light sheet metal products) Wastewater generated by restrooms.
Number of persons served: 45
S. Type of collection system
X Separate (sanitary sewer only) ❑ Combined (storm sewer and sanitary sewer)
6. Outfall Information:
Number of separate discharge points 1
Outfall Identification number(s) 001
Is the outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes X No
7. Name of receiving stream(s) (NEW applicants: Provide a map showing the exact location of each
outfall):
Unnamed tributary to catawba river in the catawba river basin
8. Frequency of Discharge: ❑
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs
Continuous
2-3
X Intermittent
Duration: 8 hrs. approx..
9. Describe the treatment system
List all installed components, including capacities, provide design removal for BOD, TSS, nitrogen and
phosphorus. If the space provided is not sufficient, attach the description of the treatment system in a
separate sheet of paper.
System consists of a septic tank, dosing tank, sand filter, recirculating tank with pump,
mushroom fountains, chlorine contact (tablet), dichlorination tank (tablet), cascade and
effluent pipe. Facility is designed to provide acceptable parameter concentrating at .0012 MGD.
Phosphorus is not monitored. Original design limitations as set forth by NC Debt of Natural
Resources in 1983:
Parameter Limitation
Flow 0.0012 MGD
BODs 24 mg/L
NH3 18 mg/L
TSS 30 mg/L
Fecal Coliform 1000/ 100 ML Effluent D.O. : 5 mg/L PH : 6.0-8.5 s.u.
2 of 4 Form-D 9/2013

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
3 of 4 Form-D 9/2013

NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
10. Flow Information:
Treatment Plant Design flow .0012 MGD
Annual Average daily flow .00037 MGD (for the previous 3 years)
Maximum daily flow .00072 MGD (for the previous 3 years)
11. Is this facility located on Indian country?
❑ Yes X No
12. Effluent Data
NEW APPLICANTS: Provide data for the parameters listed. Fecal Coliform, Temperature and pH shall be grab
samples, for all other parameters 24-hour composite sampling shall be used. If more than one analysis is reported,
report daily maximum and monthly average. If only one analysis is reported, report as daily maximum.
RENEWAL APPLICANTS: Provide the highest single reading (Daily Maximum) and Monthly Average
over the oast 36 months for naram.eters currentlu in uour nerm.it. Mark other naram.eters "NIA"_
Parameter
Daily
Maximum
Monthly
Average
Units of
Measurement
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5)
27
3.76
mg/L
Fecal Coliform
1553
4.99
#/ 100 ml
Total Suspended Solids
13
1.1
mg/L
Temperature (Summer)
31
22
Degrees C.
Temperature (Winter)
19
7
Degrees C.
pH
7.0
6.9
S.U.
13. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications:
Type
Hazardous Waste (RCRA)
UIC (SDWA)
NPDES
PSD (CAA)
Non -attainment program (CAA)
Permit Number
NCO058084
14. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
Type
NESHAPS (CAA)
Ocean Dumping (MPRSA)
Dredge or fill (Section 404 or CWA)
Other
Permit Number
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best
of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
David P. Risley President 8s CEO
Printed name of Person Signing Title
,tip' - ?i -
Signature of Apr
Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) states: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any
application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management
Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required
to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a
punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.)
4 of 4 Form-D 9/2013