310453_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200914

0 Division of Water Resources Q T1n S
Facility Number - 4 53 O Division of Soil and. Water:Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance ( Reason for Visit: 'Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I j r yl Departure Time: County: Pup j� h
Farm Name: L�A2�{` t—A R.M Owner Email:
Owner Name: rS,4tAF_S E,A xL 8^01-dN Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ilocT S-mgw6N - Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ,A MI C 6WOJ
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design . Current
Swine CapacityR Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish f440 jyq6
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other ,
Other
Integrator:
Phone:
Region: W I f'o
Certification Number: m O ,
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design ° Current
Wet Poultry Capacity P_op.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry • ° Ca °acity, Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude:
oesigny " Current
Cattle •, Capacity • Pop:" °'.•
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow.
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [ (No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes 4erNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Other:
❑ Yes [�14o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

S9-u- aO
Facility Number: '� - - 5 Date of Inspection: -tea
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [B/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in): �a _
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
ER"N'o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q.lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ,S F, S 6-0
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[Z No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
EKSo ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
�I�lo ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VN ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
E2<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
ErNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [ <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 - 4 5-6 1 Date of Inspection: 5 — —9,OaO
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EV<o 0 NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ZNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes &KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [g/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA RfNE
❑ Yes ffNo
❑ Yes EJ11<0
❑ Yes [;?<o
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facilitv to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
„clvd� b -&Iy $'-hekin)Imo ��'-t� RC0451 OL140
- �L,, c Iv4c- Mo S+ (z cent- (post cor�A j P4,,vzr) WA cn at up 4LA V\JA
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Sc. W
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: UA
21412015