310469_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200915

(Y Division .of Water Itesourees
Pacility.umbex b Division of Soil and Water Conservation-'' .
0 Other Agemcy
(Type of Visit: (1) rRoutine
fiance Inspection- U Operation Review V Structure Evaluation V "Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I 10". Departure Time: County: L­Z i'v\ Region: Wt90
Farm Name: �Qe k H �Q� n �jA94-n ' Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
` - Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: J,dLK P �hi� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine -Capacity. Pop..
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
0 -0
0
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other.
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Drv_Poultry ° Canacitv Pon._
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Cattle,-, t
Design Currefit'
Capacity Pop. ,.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
&�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
[To
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection: —/S`
G
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ YesVN
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: d
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[ "No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
E340
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
52"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
E�J/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[L�4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes `l�'1"
cto
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 5 6-0/ 2
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
QKTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the lrrtgation design or wettable
❑ Yes
4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination? „ ,
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
FVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
6/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail, to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E/INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes FR40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: - D
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes &�No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [Z2/No
the appropriate box(es) below.. .
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does -the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [j2 No
❑ Yes &No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E <E
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ Yes
EK'
❑ NA
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Tlr►clvdc. v4eekll S+ock�"�11 mor�-�I, (cc,,.,d� dJeo( /w to
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: o �i N -f'� nn,�r Phone:
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 61 0 21412015