20050368 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20090521

y
V rl-1?3q
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project
Columbus County
North Carolina
CU: 03040103
SCO# 020611301A
EEP Project No. 251
2nd Year Monitoring Report
January 22, 2009
Prepared for:
I os Will
1111 iff (111c l i
11M1' W.m
r
A?R9p,,yH???
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Parker Lincoln Building
2728 Capital Boulevard, Suite 1H-103
Raleigh, NC 27606
? FILE
? V
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project
Columbus County
North Carolina
CU: 03040103
SCO# 020611301A
EEP Project No. 251
2nd Year Monitoring Report
January 22, 2009
Prepared by:
ni7
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
900 Ridgefield Drive
Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27609
c
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Mill Branch Restoration Site is located on the James P. Jones property off Lebanon Church
Road (SR1141) south of Whiteville, Columbus County, North Carolina. The UT to Mill Branch is
located in a primarily agricultural watershed that has a total drainage area of 178 acres. The
approximately 3,500 linear foot project area is divided into four reaches: western, upper, middle
and lower. Priority 2 stream restoration was carried out on each of the reaches resulting in
restored C type channels. The pattern, dimension, and profile were restored throughout the
project site. Rock structures and root wads were installed to provide further stability to the
streams. Cattle were excluded from each of the newly planted riparian areas. Streambanks, the
floodplain and the upland areas within the easements were all planted with vegetation to
stabilize the channel and provide shade, food, and habitat as well as a vegetated buffer to treat
contributing overland flows. Approximately 1,750 linear feet of stream and 37.3 acres of
wetlands along Mill Branch downstream of the project were also preserved as part of this
project.
Year 2 monitoring site visits were completed on October 15, 2008, October 16, and November
6, 2008. Year 2 vegetation monitoring was completed using the Carolina Vegetation Survey
(CVS) - EEP protocol (Version 4.1). Two of the four vegetation plots met vegetative success
criteria of 320 stems per acre. Even though the site has met success criteria, a number of trees
across the site have died. The most significant area of vegetation distress occurs in the Middle
Reach. North Carolina has been in a severe drought this year contributing to much of the
vegetation stress along with the small caliper size of the bare root seedlings.
During the geomorphic assessment, some parts of the channel were dry. The channel is
overgrown with vegetation in many areas suggesting that there is not a consistent flow of water
in the channel. The lack of flow is likely due to the drought. Overall the stream reaches at Mill
Branch are stable and are showing few signs of instability. The middle and lower reach have
some minor to moderate structure scouring and piping issues. None of these issues require
immediate attention, however, they will be reassessed in subsequent monitoring years.
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5 January 2009
r x
I ti
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ..................................................................................................
1.0 Project Background ................................................................................................................1
1.1 Project objectives ........................................................................................................... ..1
1.2 Project Structure ............................................................................................................ ..1
1.3 Location and Setti ng .......................................................................................................... ..2
1.4 Project History and Background .................................................................................... ..5
1.5 Monitoring Plan View ..................................................................................................... ..6
2.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results ............................................................................ 13
2.1 Vegetation Assessment ................................................................................................. 13
2.1.1 Vegetation Problem Areas ...................................................................................... 13
2.1.2 Vegetation Problem Area Plan View ...................................................................... 13
2.2 Stream Assessment ........................................................................................................ 13
2.2.1 Hydrology ................................................................................................................. 13
2.2.2 Bank Stability ............................................................................................................ 14
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas ............................................................................................. 14
2.2.4 Stream Problem Area Plan View .............................................................................. 14
2.2.5 Stability Assessment ................................................................................................ 15
2.2.6 Quantitative Measures Summary ............................................................................ 17
3.0 References ........................................................................................................................... 22
Appendix A. Vegetation Raw Data
Appendix B. Geomorphologic Raw Data
Appendix C. Wetland Data (N/A)
Appendix D. Integrated Problem Area Plan Views
ii
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5 January 2009
'r
1.0 Project Background
1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
Project goals and objectives for the Mill Branch stream restoration project included:
• Improving water quality;
• Providing wildlife habitat through the creation of a riparian zone;
• Improving aquatic habitat with the use of natural material stabilization structures and a
riparian buffer;
• Excluding cattle from the stream;
• Reducing nutrient loads from entering the stream via the buffer acting as a filter exclusion
of cattle;
• Increasing the stream's access to its floodplain;
• Reducing erosion and sedimentation; and
• Protecting floral and biotic diversity via preservation.
1.2 PROJECT STRUCTURE
The UT to Mill Branch is located in a primarily agricultural watershed that has a total drainage area of
178 acres. The approximately 3,500 linear foot project area is divided into four reaches: western, upper,
middle and lower. The upper, middle and lower reaches are all sections of a main UT to Mill Branch that
generally flows south to north across the property. The western reach flows southwest to northeast and is
a smaller tributary to the main UT. The upper reach begins at the most upstream end of the main UT and
transitions to the middle reach at the confluence with the western tributary. The middle reach then
continues past the ford crossing and transitions to the lower reach at the culverted road crossing. The
lower reach then flows to the end of the restoration project. Prior to the restoration project, the banks of
the reaches were severely eroded and unstable with little or no riparian buffer. Cattle had unfettered
access to the Mill Branch causing bank erosion, vegetation degradation, and decreased water quality.
Both the western tributary and the main UT were classified as unstable G5 channel types.
Priority 2 stream restoration was carried out on each of the reaches resulting in restored C type channels.
The pattern, dimension, and profile were restored throughout the project site. Rock structures and root
wads were installed to provide further stability to the streams. Cattle were excluded from each of the
newly planted riparian areas. Streambanks, the floodplain and the upland areas within the easements were
all planted with vegetation to stabilize the channel and provide shading, food, and habitat as well as a
vegetated buffer to treat surrounding overland flows.
Approximately 1,750 linear feet of stream and 37.3 acres of wetlands along Mill Branch downstream of
the project were also preserved as part of this project. The stream preservation occurs on Mill Branch
from the vicinity of the restoration project downstream to the area where it loses its defined channel to a
beaver dam complex. Please see Figure 1.2 for a map of the easement area (to be provided by EEP).
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5 January 2009

Exhibit Table I. Project Restoration Components
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project EEP 0251

C U
d
CQ
0l ? c
?, O c
i, h
?Q
?,? a
i o
L tn?
tQ i ee?
bD CQ ?
bL c
W d
d F' ?y .
O U
o Q GC r'7
Reach ID Stationing Comment

Western 660 R P2 765.2 1.0 765.2 10+00.0 to
17+65.2 Smaller tributary
340 R P2 439.2 1.0 439.2 10+00.0 to Above confluence with trib
Upper 14+39.2
10+00
0 to Between confluence and road
Middle 1265 R P2 1555.3 1.0 1555.3 . crossing (includes ford
25+55.3
crossing)

Lower 670 R P2 747.8 1.0 747.8 10+00.0 to
17+47.8 Below road crossing
Restoration 2935 3507
5
Summa .
Mill Branch 1750 P - 1750.0 5.0 350.0 Downstream of restoration
project
Riparian 35.8 P - 35
8 5
0 7
2 Downstream of restoration
Wetlands . . . project
Non-Riparian 1.5 P - 1
5 5
0 0
3 Downstream of restoration
Wetlands . . . project
Mitigation Unit Summations
Stream (10 Riparian Nonriparian Total Wetland Buffer (ac) Comment
Wetland (ac) Wetland (ac) (ac)
3857.5 7.2 0.3 7.5 0.0
R = Restoration
P2 = Priority 2
P = Preservation
1.3 LOCATION AND SETTING
The Mill Branch Restoration Site is located on the James P. Jones property off Lebanon Church Road (SR
1141) south of Whiteville, North Carolina. (see Figure 1.1 Location Map). The project is located in
Columbus County, North Carolina, in the Lumber River 03040206 Cataloging Unit (CU) and North
Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasin 03-07-57. The site is immediately surrounded by cattle
pastures.
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5
January 2009
U) ai-0C3c?rc0aim
•V ON O O? -0 (1) -C J-0 ca a) 2
?, c? _OUa) -0 a)c U
U O ? r-cn CJ (a
co
a). N 600)(-)Z) U) IT)
= O () cv rn UN oZ o? o m a)
O amt C/) Ew a ?C ??U)
p s O =3 oo a)
V ON O N N N cn -0 -0 T°? a? ?a?i?:3 a) 2
U) m z TLEQ??Q-0
O m m O z w E Q Q ++I N U) O- Mwm U)?- a) (D
-0 m L V U N U) a c
O c O
J m Z c L L m o v ?0) cma-0 ,- ° Ev
r- Ntl N O }, L ch ?JL 1
M -0
?t' W O O J 2 of of u) > tl _ + m )a)0uiUo-30
U =c°-'?>?O
w U)
W N ? ?. O? N m cu a Uri J
L gyn. m? Efate
J C (0 N j O tY 7 in
(u
¦? U) O E N m L Q° .2 Of ? -C a) Z5
LL U o?iQz 2Uy
o
W f
z
:O
:V
O
0
O O
L
EU
J
?f

?._ 3 Rdl
Ln .0
ar g X00
15
r.• .. i co ) h SR 1
O h+? ? ? 1
Y? d
_ Q-
,. , " 5 .. ? ChurL?
j?:. b ?e?pao ?= _ f
a'
• --- Mollie Rd
U' 1? m FM G
w Ip
.,0 - a ?I y ip
_ d) S00'L 2IS o
Q
ti -0
m w f 1
,-
F 5' U t ,

Figure 1.2 Easement Map with Preservation to be provided by EEP
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5
January 2009
r
1.4 PROJECT HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
Exhibit Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History
Mill Branch Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 251

Activity or Report Data
Collection
Complete Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan NA Jan 2005
Final Design - 90% NA Sept 2005
Construction Jan 2007 Jan 2007
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area Jan 2007 Jan 2007
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area Jan 2007 Jan 2007
Containerized and B&B plantings Jan 2007 Jan 2007
Mitigation Plan / As-built Year 0 Monitoring - baseline Aril 2007 June 2007
Year 1 Monitoring Nov 2007 Dec 2007
Year 2 Monitoring Nov 2008 NA
Year 3 Monitoring NA NA
Year 4 Monitoring NA NA
Year 5 Monitoring NA NA
Exhibit Table III. Project Component Table
Mill Branch Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 251
Designer Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300
Raleigh, NC 27606
Prima project design POC Brad Fairle , 919) 851-6866
Construction Contractor North State Environmental, Inc
2889 Lowery St. Suite B
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Construction contractor POC Darrell Westmoreland 336 725-2405
Planting Contractor North State Environmental, Inc
2889 Lowery St. Suite B
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Planting Contractor POC Darrell Westmoreland 336 725-2405
Seeding Contractor North State Environmental, Inc
2889 Lowery St. Suite B
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Seeding Contractor POC Darrell Westmoreland 336 725-2405
Seed Mix Sources contact North State Environmental, Inc
Nursery Stock Suppliers Dykes & Son Nursery
825 Maude Etter Rd
McMinnville, TN 37110
North State Environmental, Inc
2889 Lowery St. Suite B
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Stephen C. Joyce [phone]
Monitoring Performers (Year 2) Rummel, Klepper, and Kahl, LLP
900 Ridgefield Drive Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27609
Stream Monitoring POC Pete Stafford [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC Pete Stafford [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC NA
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5
January 2009

Exhibit Table IV. Project Background Table
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 0251

Project Count Columbus
Drainage Area 178 acres
Drainage impervious cover estimate % < 1 percent
Stream Order (from Soil Survey) 1" order: Western & Upper Reaches
2°d order: Middle & Lower Reaches
Ph sio ra hic Region Coastal Plain
Ecore ion Atlantic Southern Loam Plains 651
Ros en Classification of As-built C
Cowardin Classification Preservation Areas: PFO4/1A; PFO1C; PFOIA;
PSS 1/3A
Dominant soil types Muckalee: Lower, Middle, and Western Reaches
Goldsboro, Wa ram: Upper Reach
Reference site ID UT to Hog Swamp, UT to Ironhill Branch, Muddy
Creek, Mill Creek
USGS HUC for Project 03040206060020
USGS HUC for Reference UT to Ho Swam : 03040203180030
UT to Ironhill Branch: 03040206060040
Mudd Creek: 03030004080090
Mill Creek: 03030004070060
NCDW Subbasin for Project 03-07-57
NCDW Subbasin for Reference UT to Ho Swam : 03-07-54
UT to Ironhill Branch: 03-07-57
Mudd Creek: 03-06-14
Mill Creek: 03-06-14
NCDW Classification for Project C SW
NCDW Classification for Reference C - Mudd Creek
C SW - UT to Ho Swam ; UT to Ironhill Branch
WS-III - Mill Creek
An portion of an project segment 303d listed? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed
segment?
No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor No
Percent of project easement fenced 100%
1.5 MONITORING PLAN VIEW
See the following as-built drawings for the Monitoring Plan Views.
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5
January 2009
M
F
eP e?
w"w J
a V
". V) ii
5 o
w S LC)
cli
-
LU
W
,k
lam ? a?
x z
?4 ? zap
w`
w j
U o ?, ? rr I ?_
? ? BOO J ???
co?
4
x
?x \
A o o N ,x. ? ?
U LU
W?
za -
M.
Zh o
.DI I ml aey9ldem
l ? ? ?^1 MICR 1
1 ?I
lu z
?? Sods F-
--------- -? -?'
0" O •-
tJ In
i
-? ?
O ti W
co 0
LL C-0) L (A
\ 1 q HI Z == y Z O W
l 1 _WZ J
O O J O LL
?? N N CL
N
-jm
C8600COL 1 o*J0,Y OW
u0p•µse?s-1tl?a3A0N01S30111(IBStl'W3"19100£ILI\ADluenD-u6lsap-sIIIOQstl\uDla\u6lsep\we\ L9100£ICI\?f1
Wtl 6010£x(
LOOZ/SZ/!
C 133HS 33S - 3NII HOiVVI
r

a
J
n
O \
m j
\
o m

? w
wX
If
Cl)
m
C

U
C n
` m

X
'? o

? a G I ? I co
Q

rt N Cl)

J / ?
"..
L3

V1
z i

U m
o u
o
CL 1
W h
\/
- + f c? z
C

? G
• _ / / ? ,mow ?D
IN
0
C X
LLJ LL
ILL
ib

a
'o

x
a
0)
S

`66 .

?
x
JC
; -,? I +
\ X
fn LO cry
r II U
cnQUcl:?
u rl- C 7

??
Z? X
Tj N U
z z \
v
n
\ N

z `
w

U
Z cb

46
N
p

X

/
ZLL
OW
a?
-_-
wz
cg
O
U X
oo?o
o

M

o p
O

n >
K Fov

fl- 0
y r ? U
J zZN 04
W
0 8 m W
a

N Ix
O IZ
C7

m x
U
U,
m
N N O

J

Z
Q
m F
W
a g g z
W
d
W
LL
W
K
U)
Z
O
H
Q
U)
J
J
Q
W
H
O
Z
O
O N
CY,
CZ
Q
Z
0
Ln
w
J
Q
U
U)
0
I
Ln
N
w
w
? Q
w m
U ZZ
(n z
U Q _
Q F-
mO p O Z 0 a to U Z
J LL H H W O
Z Z Z H W O O O CL
-j -j
C7 C7 U_' a U F a a cn OF
co co U) z W W z W W co X 2
W
O 0? LL J > > U a
y x I
lJl
z J
J
w m
U
0
W Q m
J > g?g w
Cl)
S J ILL
Z J Z O
C7 j m
X Y > N > Y !7i J
U C7 O C7 Q Z Y (9<
? O O O m ¢ ZO
m
J J J J J -j z OF
m m m m m m U) ZZ
u a a cf) ¢ a a a o 0°
I ,
I
n
x
I
X 3?IIM 8?1b
M
?]6IM N3 8
a?b???
/OM 1SIX3
UVO& >
ES-3J V 7? IbH? z
CJ
/P
6l
li
? L
C
m °o
v s
> c
N G
? O
L Y
? LL
?` z G p c
?„te o
p +
N ? r LL 3
V 133HS 33S - 3NII HOiVIN
<??, J '
> / LLV3<i!
/ O Z LLO q
o" s
a O
N
OD w
>
+ N + / .
W
/ +
? 1s Q
U
mGm to
Q
? ui C; ? N
M
X N
I
1
r
Cl)
?N S + o

GG GR\DGG\
GAD ?
N
W
2
U)
W
LLI
LLJ
Z
J
U
L
x
?x
I
i
I '? o
II o
I O +
`n
I ? X U
' I W H
W o ov Z
I c 0 C, Lu
OclC6
Q h, rn rn !?
I Z o u o
W 11 Z
mZWW

w

O

U
Y
U

0
-

w

Z

>
C7

Q

w

-'
S2
U
Z
m

Cl)
a a
o o O

)

O Z
vLLI ) a
F5
W
D V5
W
D z
W Z W
O LL

> >

U
X

+ 0
Z
W
0

W ZQ
J >
J

Y
U
of

w

U

Y
Q
0O
J
w

Q
>
(D
O
J
w

Q
>
C) 0
O O
J J J

I=i
Y
m
FZQ
J J LL

O
D a
LL
O
m ?a
2 OF

m

CD
Q
m

U)
Q
CII

U)
Q Q 7
m m

Q Q C7 t Z5
!A Z z
LLI

?0

D
? o
r
?P
N
> ?
iJ
\ 0)
W.- M 00
y\ aom
DOD N
0n0
o W II Ali
O C co Z W
N
?V c7
X
U
?o
U ¢
L Y
? O
O• LL
C ?
? C
U m
?S?od
? ?LL3
W
Z
to
O
0
U
Y
U
O
w
z
t9
Cf)
w
0
0
W
Z
WW
J >
0
LY
U
Y
U
O
Ix
J
m
Q

N p,0 ?
W
U
Q

co z g

a
FL z
U. H H

O
O
O a
y a a O

7
> > v a

X
L I
r
X
i
?O? OD ??O I
L6
?o
--_ X OD P ?
Q +
O W CL %
zm
~G /
5 133HS 33S - 3NII HOiVV4
o
I
N
W
\ J
\ U
o
v w
Of
co
co
CO \ J
M \ m - co
N I Q
O
\ LL
? O
W
i H
\ Q
L - -? ? C O
tC \ r
LLt ? i
J I °, X LU
cf? z
w
N LU
Ir
\ Z
1 1 Y
N I ? , Q
Q
I ?? Z
bP
?P
tee'/
U /
I
£ 133HS 33S - 3NII HO1dW
w
z
U
U)
cn

U
Y
U
0

0

W
O

w

>
(?
O

(7

W
O

J

0
O

(3

W
0

w

Z

W

Z

U
w
Z
w
LL Z
m

M
U)

O
L
F
1

Z

H
O
a

W
>

H

O
a

W
>

Z

O

w

vi

0

Z

O
a
O

O=
0-
c **
N
? o
U 2
C l
Adr
?m 00 0
C*A
7?"?' o :' = = r p I
J I U)
w ? I co I
O +
I
4
NN 8 N\D
N A? J
>
Z

x

w J
J
0
Y
W
J Q

U)

Q (? J
U Q J Q LL
U C7 0 (7 00 >= ZQ
Ix -j JO JO w co
\ J_ J J J J J J
co CO co m m m m
\ a a a a_a a
Q
X ?
{
w
LL
O
J d
J
Q
Q ZD
m ?
F-
0
Z
LLI O mq

a ?' X \ I
7 \
I

+ C
C0
l+

X I
n
.?
I

Z g
y w
Zz
Zl
O
Q?

f a

r it
I
w w
Zgg>
0
C- 1
f0
0
\
l?
CD
+ Cl- =
r, n
n? o N
r ~ X?
?? m
N 2 z
X =, 1
n 1 ,?
Go
_ ? Q a
w
0 co
Q n
X
c
I
a
+

?
v
00 ?

a

? M !

N F N

I
Xz
uJ

S
X
CJ
j
N
?0
I
77-
(J
O
\ i
? O I
b
v
T ro
Lf) 0 I

\^ o
?o?

in ?,
\ N hoc
°
\
Ln
C)°
Z
LO o rn n I
-

+ w
11
m Z W I
Q'oro-
w

X

V
J M O
?
?n
I
O)LO
S
z
II III
wZW
\
-

X-
-
1_
?a 7j a- -i
iQ:? -
a

X
17 133HS 33S - 3NII HOiVVY
0
Ln
W
J
Q
U
0
ti
imziuis

2.0 Project Condition and Monitoring Results
2.1 VEGETATION ASSESSMENT
Vegetative sample plots were quantitatively monitored during the first growing season. One 100m2 plot
was established for each of the four stream reaches (four plots total). Species composition, density, vigor
and survival were monitored. In each plot two plot corners are permanently located with rebar. On
November 6, 2008 the Year 2 vegetation monitoring was completed using the Carolina Vegetation Survey
(CVS) - EEP protocol (version 4.1).
As per the mitigation plan, the vegetative success criteria are based on the US Army Corps of Engineers
Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USAGE, 2003). The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of
260 5-year old planted woody stems per acre at the end of the year 5 monitoring period. An interim
measure of vegetation planting success will be the survival of at least 320 3-year old planted woody stems
per acre at the end of year 3 of the monitoring period. Two vegetation plots were successful in Year 2.
The Year 2 stem counts within each of the vegetative monitoring plots are included in Exhibit Tables Al
through A5 in Appendix A.
2.1.1 Vegetation Problem Areas
Even though the site has met vegetative success criteria, a number of trees across the site have died. The
most significant area of vegetation distress occurs in the Middle Reach. Southeastern North Carolina has
been in a severe drought this year contributing to much of the vegetation failure along with the small
caliper size of the bare root seedlings. Year 0 "As-built" vegetation sampling was completed in March
before any of the trees had sprouted leaves. It is likely that some of these very small newly planted
seedlings that were counted in Year 0 were not viable enough to survive the summer or the extreme
drought.
2.1.2 Vegetation Problem Area Plan View
Bare areas are shown on the Integrated Problem Areas Plan View map in Appendix D.
2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT
2.2.1 Hydrology
Any changes to land use in the two watersheds that would affect changes to flow within the project
streams will be assessed over the five-year monitoring period. As per the project scope, RK&K did not
measure flows with peak stage recorders. However, during the most recent field visit, racklines were
observed and photographed.
12
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5 January 2009

Exhibit Table V. Verification of Bankfull Events
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/ EEP Project No. 251
Date of Data Collection Date of Occurrence Method Photo
November 6, 2008 October/November 2008 Visual Observation Photo 35 Appendix B.4
2.2.2 Bank Stability
According to the NCEEP guidelines for monitoring, bank stability assessments will be performed during
year 5 monitoring. Bank stability will be assessed using the near bank stress (NBS) assessment and bank
erodibility hazard index (BEHI).
Exhibit Table VI. BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates
Mill Branch Stream Restoration - EEP Project No. 251
Bank stability will be assessed in monitoring Year 5
2.2.3 Stream Problem Areas
Overall the stream reaches at Mill Branch are stable and are showing few signs of instability. The middle
and lower reach have some minor to moderate structure scouring and piping issues. As discussed above,
there are some vegetation issues on upper, middle and lower reaches, and these issues are most likely
being compounded by the persistent drought.
The problems areas in detail are as follows and are the same as previous years: In the Upper Reach at
STA 10+20 (left floodplain) and STA 11+55 (right floodplain) the vegetation is sparse and medium sized
bare areas are present. In the middle reach there are vegetation issues at STA 12+20 (left floodplain),
20+50 (left floodplain), 20+60 (far left floodplain), and 22+50 (left floodplain). These areas are sparse in
vegetation with small to medium bare areas. The middle reach also has some structure issues; there is
piping around a log sill at STA 17+49, scour at the header boulder of a rock cross vane occurring at STA
24+61, piping around the header boulder of a rock cross vane at STA 24+88. The middle reach is
showing signs of aggradation at STA 15+04 in the pool. The lower reach's floodplain vegetation is semi-
bare at STA 15+40 (right floodplain) and 16+50 (right floodplain). The lower reach is experiencing the
following structure problems: scour around the log sill at STA 10+76, scour at the end of a rock vane arm
at STA 11+16, and scour around the log sill at STA 13+54. The lower reach is also showing some minor
rill erosion in the left floodplain at STA 12+85.
The channel is overgrown with vegetation in many areas suggesting that there is not a consistent flow of
water in the channel. The lack of flow is likely due to the extreme drought. A detailed table and photos
can be found in Appendix B.
2.2.4 Stream Problem Area Plan View
Stream problem areas are shown on the Integrated Problem Areas Plan View in Appendix D.
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5
January 2009
13
1 ?
2.2.5 Stability Assessment
Exhibit Table VII-A. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 0251
Mill Branch Stream Restoration (3,507.5 11)
Western Reach
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffles 100% 100% 100%
B. Pools 100% 100% 100%
C. Thalwe NA NA NA
D. Meanders 100% 100% 100%
E. Bed General 100% 100% 99%
F. Bank Condition 100% 100% 100%
G. Vanes/J Hooks, etc. 100% 100% 100%
H. Wads and Boulders NA NA NA
Exhibit Table VII-B. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 0251
Mill Branch Stream Restoration (3,507.5 1.£)
U er Reach
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffles 100% 100% 100%
B. Pools 100% 100% 100%
C. Thalwe NA NA NA
D. Meanders 100% 100% 100%
E. Bed General 100% 100% 99%
F. Bank Condition 100% 100% 100%
G. Vanes/J Hooks, etc. 100% 100% 100%
H. Wads and Boulders NA NA NA
Exhibit Table VII-C. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 0251
Mill Branch Stream Restoration (3,507.5 1.£)
Middle Reach
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffles 100% 100% 100%
B. Pools 100% 98% 98%
C. Thalwe NA NA NA
D. Meanders 100% 97% 97%
E. Bed General 100% 99% 99%
F. Bank Condition 100% 100% 100%
G. Vanes/J Hooks, etc. 100% 90% 90%
H. Wads and Boulders 100% 100% 100%
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5
January 2009
14
Exhibit Table VII-D. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 0251
Mill Branch Stream Restoration (3,507.5 1.£)
Lower Reach
Feature Initial MY-01 MY-02 MY-03 MY-04 MY-05
A. Riffles 100% 100% 100%
B. Pools 100% 100% 100%
C. Thalwe NA NA NA
D. Meanders 100% 96% 96%
E. Bed General 100% 100% 99%
F. Bank Condition 100% 99% 99%
G. Vanes/J Hooks, etc. 100% 93% 93%
H. Wads and Boulders 100% 100% 100%
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5
January 2009
15

2.2.6 Quantitative Measures Summary
Exhibit Table VIII. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulics Summary
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 251
Parameter USGS Gage
Data Regional
Curve Interval Pre-Existing
Condition Project Stream
Reference Design As-Built
Dimension Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med Min Max Med
BE Width (11) 2.8 6.5 4.7 3.8 14.2 9.0 6.0 12.0 9.0 5.9 10.8 8.4
Flood Prone Width
(ft) 2.9 70.0 36.5 100.0 300.0 200.0 38.0 90 64.0 40.6 85.8 63.2
BE Cross Sectional
Area (SF)
0.9
5.6
3.3
1.5
21.0
11.3
2.0
9
5.5
2.2
9.0
5.6
BF Mean Depth (ft) 0.3 0.9 0.59 0.5 1.9 1.2 0.4 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.8 0.6
BE Max Depth (ft) 0.5 2.0 1.2 0.7 2.6 1.7 0.6 2 1.3 0.7 1.8 1.3
Width/Depth Ratio 4.0 8.7 6.4 6.1 15 10.7 12.0 18 15.0 13.1 20.2 16.6
Entrenchment Ratio 1.00 10.8 5.9 20.4 26.6 23.5 4.0 10 7.0 6.3 8.7 7.5
Bank Height Ratio
Wetted Perimeter
(ft)
Hydraulic Radius
(ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth
(ft)
50
85
67.5
10
59
34.5
18
38
28
20
36
28
Radius of Curvature
(ft)
10
25
17.5
10
46
28
10
18
14
it
20
15
Meander
Wavelength (ft) 210 260 235 12 97 54.5 32 80 56 36 82 59
Meander Width
ratio
40
78.6
59.3
2.1
4.4
3.25
5.0
9.0
7
6.00
7.50
7
Profile
Riffle Length 6.3 12.5 9
Riffle Slope 0.003 0.005 0.004
Pool Length 13 19.1 16
Pool Spacing 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 5.4 3.2 26.9 41.00 34
Substrate
d50 (mm) 0.09 0.1 0.1
d84 (mm) 0.27 0.4 0.34

Additional Reach
Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface
Slope
BE Slope
Rosgen
Classification
*Habitat Index
*Macrobenthos
n- - P,Vjc? L SPGGll,O auu ucicnnmea pnmanty oy Rs-outlt monttonng plan/success cntena
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5
January 2009
16
1

x
o ro
N
O

G
O
? K

O ro
N
7
O

F T
N
O
O
r•I N
? N O
O

A. O N o0 0O 00
N ? M 7

W 00
CO
"a O
O
N

x '
"
o fir
GQ G? L
6) M i
{w J.+
y
QM
QM N

oc

o
O ?/
y
N
? l?
r vl N
o In V ?D vl .? N a`. [?
M N
? v1
N
i - ? o O M N O O O

"' O '"' N N N
M h m 00 .
. C co ?c

v' M O O O ,G N 7 7
`
`7
?
L N
?
i
U
ICI Q
as ea
U
o
?
r- r- r-
o
? ell
vl oo O

?+ 5
N
'a
r
c?
G

O

N

?

M

N

?-,

N •C7

u
2

d M O
M

N

l?
W ?--?
C •--, 7 7 0 --? O, N ? O p p 1O .p ,-- N
O
' y O
w l? v1 M M ?O N .N-i N ro

ti
00
7
N
0
0
v?
O
O
O ?c
+
C.
N
V
h
N
m N
?^
U
O O
o
O
c?c 00 M en M M 7
00 M Lr) ? 00 N M
o w .2 .2
E
6
•?
v
o
b a p p 7 ?" .C '[ CY. tom' J7 H
d ,? J." ` iC A p
% , , ? 0
?n oo .
• O M ?' N a?

3
Q
A
Q
°
'
v
3
v
v
u
rn
v
v
v
• W p
Z v) o o

3
m
m
3
w
;, o
' v o ti
c
x R a
°"o s
> ro
C c
c 3 x ro ° b ro ?+ U vz o
v ro

d o m ? ? ? 0 3

oc°. q ?, a a a`
r-I 00
O
O
N
N
O
z
? w
U ?
•? Q
O
O
? N
O ?
oq
Q.) o
o
U
as ?
00

.^.

N M

0

b

Q X
o
N co
c,

O
i

Y.
CC

O N
V] O p
N

p Z
• o
? C
O ?

,_i
+ N
?
N
M
vlV
V
O

!
7
•!I i i i M
ter
? 'o M O M m 7 ?!

6?
N
N
vn
N
N
N
O 1
U
p N i i i i N
O

y
?
?
N 00
M 0
l? i i i i N
Ogg

.?
Q"

V1

M

M

00

n

M
c)

Or

N
10

M

•

^ oo N N O N O, V M
L.
y
/ O
?"? U
J'
7
r
7
D`
7
N r
ro
00
01
D\
00
M
N
co M

CD

?!1
N N L,' O U

0-0 h

O
G? RS L r N 7 r o 00 O O N O N
M O O N Vl N 7 N

O N
?" M
r
N O
N M
O O
N N
10 N
oo N
O r
O `O
O fib.
N
M
D`
00
M
O`
W e ?
0
V
GJ

O

?"'
n
'_'

00

vi

O
o
N

N
r
Q

m

O?

00

C7,

N
?
M

M

'D

Mcn
r
o
r
N
y P. ,-. v? 0 N V O O N ," N C
,j

~ O N 7 N N x !
.?
p
O
U

O
O O
O O
L
U
r
oo
o0 Q

O

G
d
O
? N
O
O w ? ? ? .? ? ? ?; ? 0 0 ? •? O O O O O O W O p ? O
r?
3 ¢ Q Q ?L° b b b o o n C. o
a
i a
i
? ? ? ? v c7a f? U ca ? v ? o o i y °? ? LL U x

3
m
m
3
w `o
T 0 3 0 i a° o
°' `°
s c ?

u

3

x N

o

v

u > c

U

)
t1c
o
N V
L 3
0 L" co

L
? w
L

0.
A ? 4 d p
, Q'
OC
0
0
N
N
,.O
N
J
O
z
i
U ?
U Q
Gr
O ?
o
? N
L
o cz
a ?
O
O
? rO
U /.
? I
CQ

v

.? X
O ?

0

o X
N
7
O

b
C?

?I
^?
O
a
V1 p c
N c
?
O
L Z" Oi

O
O
C
I
/r

.= W
c?
C M 00
C?
?' 00 00 w O?
00
10
by V]

W
'C
a N

? V N ?O 7 M

N 3

N N O

O O

O
U
O O
E? ? ?
'b ? ? DD
N M
-- 00
V1 Q?
N
? y N
O ?/ N D,
^ 00 h d. r- r- N
L'
p M
^ O N N N O O O M O0
O ? O

V ? V1 Q.
? c{ ? ? N N ? O N C ro D, a\ Q? r 7 a, N c3 00 v1
yC `?' O O N '? M ?p ? N N G' O U
U
FBI ? O
d y
„
G? CE
? U o [?
M
? ?n
Vl N N
N E C
?
. [ N S N M 1W 00
fi
..
n
N

00

M

O

O

00

O

O

am
'?

M r-

M
M
O

2
kA O O cc
C
W L,
O ?
.

?
w
?^
c"
O
oo C,
O
ON
O
c0
O
oo 00
00
m
00
7
D`
oo
N
•--?
•--?
7, Q. h O d\ O O N " 7 N 'O O N 7 N N
^ O O U
y
p O O O

?
U

?"

O 00

O

O rq

l?

O^
O
?

m

00

d

F

O
00
O `
i
G N
O
p V w v t+ C. •p t 7 Y T ?. d p p
?
3 ¢ Q o ro ; o a a °?'
t a a $ w p

m
?
o
0.
.
; °_?
> b
3 v cn
? v
a cl
? i
E U
a v
a cn
cn o
n
ro
,o F v W U a " w o o cc °' v E
w u x
? w w
3 x ? ?, o
-ZV

i i

. a
i s 3
E" c ?' y F+ y ? ?
cc L t+' p b
a a s a d
00
0
0
N
O
z
U cli
N Q
O
kn
o `00
N
O ro
oq
E .f?
u o
? o
U
L

r
.D

O X
C13

0

b

o k
N

O

UU
C? c
G

G G X

q
z o
? ?
00

W
M N
00
00 K
M
^ h
N N
M

F+y C
N C13
oo
N
W
N
N
N
N
-'
O
O
U
Boa o o
?. o
M [?
yo
?

00
O
N
O N
p
L 00 O 00 0 O
? O

+"'
A?
? 0.00. ''Y
? N N N
N O
O N
O r
?
ro
D\
7
?n
7 M N4
?
?1 ? y N ?" M N o0 N O
N W
N N O
O U
FBI Ca 4 O
R N O N N V'1 l? V1 l?
F r iG G M [?

.O ?^
?'" 7
•--• N
D\ 06
DD 6
O O
N
11 N
6 v? O N '
M O
N 00
00
00 O?

.-
W G
O

?

6

b0

[`

'

N

N r

O

fXC

l?

7

?c

^

M

O

7s

M _

(V I

M
N

Vl
0
00 O l? O N 2 M N 00 by 0 vl N N O O U
L O O O

U

O

zT

a\

DO

DO

M O

M
N

0
b0 b0 O l-? ?.y
G r- r- N
O
w O C~ ?, ."". cd iy .."".. '".. E C-r •ro c cY. cY. y.,
4 '
2'. p N O
? ?

3 ;d
.?
Q N
Q N
C? '?
? G
? N
E 'b
ro O
? 7
b 'i7
ctl ,? b-0
o O ?A
? .?
o y
"
' bq
? W
? Q N U U
?='
'
y N
s
3 ? v i
a v a i
a v v rn
n y
a o
.o b y m U c>a °? o o c? °? U c
w U 2

m w
x
_ w a cl b
o u
u b
ca c d

d o 8

L
E
?
i v
o
`
ti
a a '
rn a a a d
O
N
F.
O
E
O
0
O
z
N
O
z
a
W
W
w
U ?
U Q
O
O 4"
0
? N
O
en
E .E-
o
o
U

3.0 References
Harrelson, C.C., C.L. Rawlins and J.P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An
Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO.
NCEEP. 2006. Content, Format and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports. North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. Raleigh, NC. Version 1.2 November 16, 2006.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. W ildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
21
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Project - EEP No. 251
RK&K - Monitoring Year 2 of 5 - Draft November 2008

APPENDIX A
' r
A.1 Vegetation Data Tables
Exhibit Table Al. Vegetation Metadata
Report Prepared By William Pete Stafford
Date Prepared 11/12/2008 10:47
Database Name cvs-ee -ent tool-v2.2.6.mdb
Database Location C:\Documents and Settings\pstafford\Desktop\CVS
Ve Data
Computer Name STAFFORDP
Description Worksheets In This Document
Metadata This worksheet, wich is a summa of the project data.
Planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems, for each
year. This excludes live stakes and lists stems per acre.
Total Stems Each Project is listed with its total stems for each year.
This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural/volunteer stems. Listed in stems per acre.
Plots List of Plots surveyed
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes
Vigor by Species Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species
Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of
occurrences and percent of total stems impacted b each
Damage by Species Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot Count of planted living stems of each species for each
lot; dead and missing stems are excluded
Project Summary
EEP Project Number 251
Project Name Mill Branch
Description Stream Restoration
River Basin Lumber
Length (ft)
Stream to Edge width (ft)
Area (sq. m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots 4
r
Exhibit Table A2. Vegetation Vigor by Species
Species 4 3 2 1 0 Missing Unknown
Betula ni ra 1 1 1
Car inns caroliniana var. caroliniana 1 1 3
Ce halanthus occidentalis 1
Cornus amomum 1 2 1 1 3
Liriodendron tuli i era var. tuli i era 2
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis 1 2
uercus lauri olia 1 1
uercusl rata 3 1 1
uercus ni ra 1 1
uercus pagoda I
uercus hellos 1 4 1

F
:::
l Salix sericea 3 1 4
To
T.. 12 6 16 6 4 1 13
Exhibit Table A3. Vegetation Damage by Species

Species All
Damage
Categories
(no
damage)

Deer

Unknown
Betula ni ra 3 3
Car inus caroliniana var. caroliniana 5 5
Ce halanthus occidentalis 1 1
Cornus amomum 9 7 1 1
Liriodendron tuli i era var. tuli i era 2 2
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis 3 3
uercus lauri olio 2 2
uercusl rata 5 5
uercus ni ra 2 2
uercus pagoda 1 1
uercus hellos 6 6
Salix sericea 8 7 1
TOT: 12 47 44 1 2

Exhibit Table A4. Vegetation Damage by Plot

lot All
Damage
Categories

no damage)

Deer

Unknown
E0251-ac-0001- ear:2 11 11
E0251-ac-0002- ear:2 13 12 1
E0251-ac-0003-year: 2 9 7 2
E0251-ac-0004- ear:2 14 14
TOT: 4 47 44 1 2
Exhibit Table A5. Stem Count by Plot and Species

pecies

Total
Planted
Stems

#

lots

vg#
stems plot
E0251
-ac-
0001-
ear:2 plot
E0251
-ac-
0002-
ear:2 plot
E0251
-ac-
0003-
ear:2 plot
E0251
-ac-
0004-
ear:2
Betula ni ra 2 2 1 1 1
Carpinus caroliniana var.
caroliniana
2
2
1
1
1
Ce halanthus occidentalis 1 1 1 1
Cornus amomum 5 3 1.67 1 3 1
Liriodendron tulipifera
var. tuli i era
2
1
2
2
Platanus occidentalis var.
occidentalis
3
3
1
1
1
1
uercus lauri olia 1 1 1 1
uercus l rata 4 3 1.33 1 2 1
uercus ni ra 1 1 1 1
uercus pagoda 1 1 1 1
uercus hellos 6 3 2 2 1 3
Salix sericea 4 2 2 1 3
TOT
12
32
12
1.33
9 11
4
7
12

Exhibit Table A6. Stream Problem Areas
Feature Issue Reach Station Number Suspected Cause Photo Number
Bare Area -Upper 10+20 Poor planting/Drought VPA 1
Upper 11+55 Poor planting/Drought
Middle 12+20 Poor planting/Drought
Middle 20+50 Poor lantin /Drou ht
Middle 20+60 Poor planting/Drought
Middle 22+50 Poor planting/Drought
Lower 15+40 Poor planting/Drought
Lower 16+50 Poor planting/Drought
Cattails All Reaches Located throughout the
project Dry conditions that
have allowed seeds to
germinate VPA 2

A.2
Vegetation Problem Areas (All pictures recorded on 11/6/08)
t `` • .'?? ,,,,, -? ? ,fir
44
4,1

All pictures recorded on 11/6/08
VPA 2 - Throughout Project
VPA 1 - Middle Reach - 20+50
I I
A.3 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (All pictures recorded on 11/6/08)
#^ N ,. it
l a
400
s ?
s4 t,
s?
r°.i a1
All pictures recorded on 11/6/08
Photo Station 7 - Vegetation Plot I - looking north
Photo Station 8 - Vegetation Plot 2 - looking south
1 i
I i

r r ??

All pictures recorded on 11/6/08
Photo Station 15 Veg Plot 2 - looking northeast
Photo Station 16 - Veg Plot 2 - looking west
. r . r

'ILI .' ..?
a
;?• v; e, _i?ir?
dr.?s-ti
i
a
.'fir':
.,rt' ff 1'. •qc. Amt i..d.
All pictures recorded on 11/6/08
Photo Station 21 - Veg Plot 3 - looking east
Photo Station 22 - Veg Plot 3 - looking west

y 1
1
a'

•? 1?,,? ?,
j? N J •Y ^ t j
r7 l1) rh'. . • .. (j
n???;? i?'l •a 1 ? •.?r v?
All pictures recorded on 11/6/08
VA
'`j

Photo Station 29 - Veg Plot 4 - looking northeast
Photo Station 20 Veg Plot 4 - looking southwest

APPENDIX B

Appendix B. Geomorphologic Raw Data
B.1 Problem Area Plan View (Stream)
See the Integrated Problem Areas Plan View in Appendix D for stream problem areas.
B.2 Stream Problem Areas Table
Exhibit Table B.1 Stream Problem Areas
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site EEP Project No. 251
Feature Issue Reach Station Number Suspected Cause Photo Number
A radation Western 10+00 to 13+50 N/A
Upper 10+00 to 12+50 N/A
Cattails All Throughout Dr Conditions VPA 2
Bare Ground Middle Reach 20+30 Dr Conditions VPA 1
Pictures for aggradation areas were not taken due to vegetation growing in the channel and blocking the view

Appendix B.3 Stream Problem Area Photos
See Integrated Problem Areas Plan View (Appendix D)
Exhibit Table B.2.1. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 0251
Western Reach
(# Stable)

Number Total Total % Feature
Feature
Metric (per As-built and reference baselines)
Performing Number Number/Feet Perform Perform.
Category Per As- in Unstable in Stable Mean or
as
Intended built State Condition Total
A. Riffles 1. Present? 29 29 0.00 100.00
2. Armor stable (eg no displacement?) NA NA NA NA
3. Facet grade appears stable? 29 29 0.00 100.00
4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining? 29 29 0.00 100.00
5. Length a ro iate? 29 29 0.00 100.00 100
1. Present? (e.g. not subject to severe aggrad.
B. Pools or migrat.?) 30 30 0.00 100.00
2. Sufficiently deep (Max Pool D:Mean Bkf>
1.6?) 30 30 0.00 100.00
3. Length appropriate? 30 30 0.00 100.00 100
1. Upstream of meander bend (run/inflection)
C. Thalweg centering? NA NA NA
2. Downstream of meander (glide/inflection)
centering? NA NA NA NA
1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled
D. Meanders erosion? 30 30 0.00 100.00
2. Of those eroding, # w/concomitant point bar
formation? 30 30 0.00 100.00
3. Apparent Rc within spec? 30 30 0.00 100.00
4. Sufficient flood lain access and relief? 30 30 0.00 100.00 100
1. General channel bed aggradation areas (bar
E. Bed General formation) 1765 1765 0.00 100.00
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of
increasing down-cutting or head-cutting? 1765 1765 0.00 100.00 0
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping
F. Bank bank? 1765 1765 0.00 100.00 0
G. Vanes 1. Free of back or arm scour? 8 8 0.00 100.00
2. Height appropriate? 8 I 8 0.00 I 100.00
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate? I 8 I 8 I 0.00 100.00
4. Free of piping or other structural failures? 8 8 0.00 100.00 100
H.
Wads/Boulders 1. Free of scour? NA NA NA NA
2. Footing stable? NA NA NA NA NA

Exhibit Table B.2.2. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 0251
Upper Reach
(# Stable) Total Total % Feature
Feature Metric (per As-built and Number
Performing Number Number/Feet Perform Perform.
Category reference baselines) per As- in Unstable in Stable Mean or
as
Intended built State Condition Total
A. Riffles 1. Present? 15 15 0.00 100.00
2. Armor stable (eg no

displacement?) NA NA 0.00 NA
3. Facet grade appears stable? 15 15 0.00 100.00
4. Minimal evidence of
embedding/fining? 15 15 0.00 100.00
5. Length appropiate? 15 15 0.00 100.00 100
1. Present? (e.g. not subject to
B. Pools severe aggrad. or migrat.?) 15 15 0.00 100.00
2. Sufficiently deep (Max Pool
D:Mean Bkf> 1.6?) 15 15 0.00 100.00
3. Length appropriate? 15 15 0.00 100.00 100
1. Upstream of meander bend
C. Thalweg (run/inflection) centering? NA NA NA
2. Downstream of meander
tide/inflection centering? NA NA NA NA
1. Outer bend in state of
D. Meanders limited/controlled erosion? 15 15 0.00 100.00
2. Of those eroding, #
w/concomitant point bar
formation? 15 15 0.00 100.00
3. Apparent Rc within spec? 15 15 0.00 100.00
4. Sufficient floodplain access
and relief? 15 15 0.00 100.00 100
1. General channel bed
aggradation areas (bar
E. Bed General formation) 1439 1439 0.00 100.00
2. Channel bed degradation -
areas of increasing down-cutting
or head-cutting? 1439 1439 0.00 100.00 100
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or
F. Bank slumping bank? 1439 1439 0.00 100.00 100
G. Vanes 1. Free of back or arm scour? 7 7 0.00 100.00
2. Height appropriate? I 7 7 0.00 I 100.00
3. Angle and geometry appear
appropriate? 7 7 0.00 100.00
4. Free of piping or other
structural failures? 7 7 0.00 100.00 100
H.
Wads/Boulders 1. Free of scour? NA NA NA NA
2. Footin stable? NA NA NA NA NA

Exhibit Table B.2.3. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 0251
Middle Reach
(# Stable)

Number Total Total % Feature
Feature Metric (per As-built and
Performing Number Number/Feet Perform Perform.
Category reference baselines) Per As- in Unstable in Stable Mean or
as
Intended built State Condition Total
A. Riffles 1. Present? 42 42 0 100.00
2. Armor stable (eg no

displacement?) NA I NA
NA NA
3. Facet grade appears stable? I 42 I 42 0 100.00
4. Minimal evidence of

embedding/fining? I 42 I 42
0 100.00
5. Length appropiate? 42 42 0 100.00 100
1. Present? (e.g. not subject to
B. Pools severe aggrad. or migrat.?) 41 42 1 97.62
2. Sufficiently deep (Max Pool
D:Mean Bkf > 1.6?) 41 42 1 97.62
3. Length appropriate? 42 42 0 100.00 98
1. Upstream of meander bend
C. Thalweg (run/inflection) centering? NA NA NA
2. Downstream of meander
lide/inflection centering? NA NA NA NA
1. Outer bend in state of
D. Meanders limited/controlled erosion? 41 42 1 97.62
2. Of those eroding, #
w/concomitant point bar formation? 41 42 1 97.62
3. Apparent Rc within spec? 42 42 0 100.00
4. Sufficient floodplain access and
relief? 39 42 3 92.86 97
1. General channel bed aggradation
E. Bed General areas (bar formation) 2535 2555 20 99.22
2. Channel bed degradation - areas
of increasing down-cutting or head-
cutting? 2540 2555 15 99.41 99
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or
F. Bank slumping bank? 2545 2555 10 99.61 100
G. Vanes 1. Free of back or arm scour? 19 20 1 95.00
2. Height appropriate? I 18 20 2 90.00
3. Angle and geometry appear
appropriate? 18 20 2 90.00
4. Free of piping or other structural
failures? 17 20 3 85.00 90
H.
Wads/Boulders 1. Free of scour? 1 1 0 100.00
2. Footin stable? 1 1 0 100.00 100

Exhibit Table B.2.4. Visual Morphological Stability Assessment
Mill Branch Stream Restoration Site/EEP Project No. 0251
Lower Reach
(# Stable)
Number Total Total % Feature
Feature Metric (per As-built and Performing Number Number/Feet Perform Perform.
Category reference baselines) per As- in Unstable in Stable Mean or
as
Intended built State Condition Total
A. Riffles 1. Present? 19 19 0 100.00
2. Armor stable (eg no

displacement?) NA NA NA NA
3. Facet grade appears stable? 19 19 0 100.00
4. Minimal evidence of

embedding/fining? 19 19 0 100.00
5. Length appropiate? 19 19 0 100.00 100
1. Present? (e.g. not subject to
B. Pools severe aggrad. or migrat.?) 18 18 0 100.00
2. Sufficiently deep (Max Pool
D:Mean Bkf> 1.6?) 18 18 0 100.00
3. Len h appropriate? 18 18 0 100.00 100
1. Upstream of meander bend
C. Thalweg (run/inflection) centering? NA NA NA
2. Downstream of meander
tide/inflection centerin ? NA NA NA NA
1. Outer bend in state of
D. Meanders limited/controlled erosion? 17 18 1 94.44
2. Of those eroding, #
w/concomitant point bar
formation? 18 18 0 100.00
3. Apparent Rc within spec? 18 18 0 100.00
4. Sufficient floodplain access
and relief? 16 18 2 88.89 96
1. General channel bed
aggradation areas (bar
E. Bed General formation) 1748 1748 0 100.00
2. Channel bed degradation -
areas of increasing down-
cutting or head-cutting? 1748 1748 0 100.00 100
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or
F. Bank slumping bank? 1728 1748 20 98.86 99
G. Vanes 1. Free of back or arm scour? 16 17 1 94.12
2. Height appropriate? 15 17 2 88.24
3. Angle and geometry appear
appropriate? 15 17 2 88.24
4. Free of piping or other
structural failures? 17 17 0 100.00 93
H.
Wads/Boulders 1. Free of scour? 1 1 0 100.00
2. Footing stable? 1 1 0 100.00 100
B.4 Stream Photo Station Photos (all photos recorded on November 6, 2008)

i {Y 1 i r .,+r
k
y
j ; t
`
'
:'
rye ir. •^
?v y
?: "`i !?P?i
,?, t ° . rJ

Er ?
t
r ?
1 Y.
.a...'?'.

k 140, IM,
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 1. Beginning of Western Reach - Upstream
Photo Station 2. Beginning of Western Reach - Downstream
I ?

?
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008

^G
ry
Photo Station 3. Riffle Cross-section 1 - Downstream - Western Reach
Photo Station 4 Riffle Cross-section 1 - Upstream - Western Reach

M
t
Z4
ti?t r
a {
i t t y y,?
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 5. Pool Cross-section 2 - Downstream - Western Reach
Photo Station 6. Pool Cross-section - Upstream - Western Reach
I
A Y;?
c

r'

Photo Station 9. Beginning of Upper Reach - Upstream

Pit
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 10. Beginning of Upper Reach - Downstream
r r
r
Ir4
Ate" '
a
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008

Photo Station 11. Pool Cross-section 3 - Downstream - Upper Reach
Photo Station 12. Pool Cross-section 3 - Upstream - Upper Reach
r

i. •
?' 7 Fs ?r1 ' ,?•?
y t

AL,
'. Cis r. :.: - •J' •~ 1? ? e ? f'
i , (?{' . J ry 1?? ( r
mat
Photo Station 13. Riffle Cross-section 4 - Downstream - Upper Reach
17 7 71-r, F
s rv'`' t f '
n

All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 14. Riffle Cross-section 4 - Upstream - Upper Reach
f
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 17. Confluence of Western and Upper Reaches - Western Reach
Photo Station 18. Confluence of Western and Upper Reaches - Upper Reach

"5 AL
sir .. .i r'& 4
Y .
i, ze,
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 19. Ford Crossing - Downstream - Middle Reach
Photo Station 20. Ford Crossing - Upstream - Middle Reach

41
NV
A. 44
r
5?? to h

`t to IF
1
? h
• r

r
A ?R
a '•
-1
r
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 23. Riffle Cross-section 5 - Downstream - Middle Reach
Photo Station 24. Riffle Cross-section 5 - Upstream - Middle Reach

t
q

r
Ta
k 2
A-4
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 25. Pool Cross-section 6 - Downstream - Middle Reach
Photo Station 26. Pool Cross-section 6 - Upstream - Middle Reach

4

- 1
1X.
It
L?M'$` :r1 .? J? ?'i ? :t •')[?,I., ,? - f ? .. . rte. q
f
All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 31. Riffle Cross-section 7 - Upstream - Lower Reach

IMP,
{ ?.
? # E r 4t J"• •.
r
? S s"r i" 4 • ?%..

l
dr .i

All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo Station 33. Pool Cross-Section 8 - Upstream - Lower Reach
Photo Station 34. End of Project - Upstream - Lower Reach

All photos recorded on November 6, 2008
Photo 35 - Bankfull Event - Rack line in the flood plain
1 f
f ?

8
9
°
r
O
I
I p
N

N ?
i
N

rl Y?E
C
I
° 00
O
N
R.
R 0 i

Cdr ?
"?
W 4r AA

N t, v
?j
V H A
ci
0
M ti a

c
? Q
O
s.l

' i
I i
I N
I
I
j

O
ooe ONO 00 0000 ON ? r- r -
(14a3) UOIIUAaI:i
x
?l
f
S
E
e=
?S -
O
0

I N
i
0
00

l
O

I 1'H
I
I

O
+
c.
? I
N a

H W N
?..? ?
N

V Y
C% w
00 00
O C ? ?
v ? A
r
0
it

N 00
N
a

V ?
V1
I
p d
v? I '
O
s. I
V
' I
O

I
I O
N
O
OMO ONO 00 Op0 ? ? ? ? ?
( Paj) UOIJUAaj:j

9
?Y
s
i
L
am
'??emmoom?e????em?mm
?? n n n n r r n n r r n n r n n n r n n r n n n
.geonm"^<????mwmm38om?o non
` L .G m n n n r r n r r?? n n n
rv?$ m m$ m n ? m ? u? ?$
$ O1 m e?? m m nm m$ m m$ o
[3
L
d
s s ? r
s?•,
O
O
N
O
00

i I
O
rl
O
r'I
N
?? I O
^I N
[? 1 N 1

i 2

? a A

CCf a
?
o
MiM
h+l 1
M O
00 O

N
?
.w Y!
?
v
Rte.
W
O
?y
U
W
C.
C?
O

I O
N
+I
O
00 r-
( Pa3) aolJenal3

.May` .r
I? y
p r JAS. . •!.' t 'A ? ;.', ?.
.•2 p? fir,
p -_
i
t
ra -
s E
J. ?'N o ?o ro?rv n °?? $im
L
f
E
Y Y L ?
0
0
N
000
0
I
O
--
00
kn
00
rl O
N
Q O y

y? I
00
O O
H a?
U
?
N ? ?
W y
fn

C
K ?
?
MM
h?
00 o
H
? O yai
Cd ± Y
F-1 '.
0
U

? N

t` kn IV
r t` n r t` M N
r t`
(;aa;) UOIJUAal:i

7
i
k.
^wF
8
8
Ss--

= o?4H°aRRem88???mm

?
m
_E

a
-
= C
4 - _
-5

rl
N

F
P? p=
I C?
0
oa
N .d
C
.? 1
MM? ?
? O
V
rn
rn
O
it
V
K
O
c
a
CC
Lzl
Y
C
CO

O
N
O
rl
O
rl
O
d'
ti
00
0
0
N
O ?
N N
.ti
L
GC
W
O
COQ
m
A
r
0
0 0
00 N
FQ
O Q
O
O
0
N
I o
C? 00
r r ? 00
133;) UOIIPAal:i
E L
c
?y t
8
8

s

x
?
O
rl

I I
O
O

I
N p
'y 00
N
N o
p
N

? ?
0 v
^
L w

C
U
cJ
QJ
?
a '?
CL
p
r'

N
Cy
,? '? rzt I A
? o
CC ? 0

? D Cn
a

V O ?
y d' va

V
J
0

I N
i
I
I
O

(;aa3) uoi;enal:4

t ?
's
s
s
kf

p e r .. ? s a n a _? o a a _ __ a k r

t
a

s E
? yy
5
5
s2

E
e .i.
:r
O
?Y
r

O

O
N

I I
?

C
O O
N

I
U
42

N x" ? ea

V ? - A

Mi.i
h+ti I
[? e
? ? o
N

? O
5
y J
F? u
y
CC

VT Q
h
it
U
o
0
N
O

( aaa}) uoyeeajrj

f
V x

0
0
r..
z d? 1

i Yea i
• ?? t?

B
X X

<1

A MIh

E ' -

9

e? - -
S
f
5 E
n i
2

1
Q
V I ?
~ w
w
x
? C
CE
v
o
00
0
y
L
U
0
O
0
N
N
CC
A?A
?+ Y
a
W
c?
A
0
0
N
'eh
r
C
N
(;aaj) UOIIVAal3
0
M
O
M i
bo
0
..a
O
O
M
u
e
bn
0
O .a
N
?O o
N
u
u
y
H
0
L
U
O ?
N
b
a
0 3
N s
F
i
r
c
c
N
O
O
N
m
O u
L
rl `/ 7
L
d
R
C? 3
F I N
o
V? °o
O
O
N
O
O
rl
0
O
O
N
N
X
w
O
N
00
0
0
N
0
bD
3
r
F
N
DO
O
O
N
bD
d
3
R
F
Q
r
0
0
N
00 m 000 ? r- T
(U) NIOLLVAI 1I
0
u
u
H
0
L
U

d
3
R
s
F
r
0
0
N
d
u
w
L
L
d
CC
3
N
G
O
O
O
N
lo
lo?
H
y
A
V
y

3
C
ce
N
r?
G
O
O
N

b
r

b0
3
s
F-?
N
r
00
O
O
N
¦
3
s
F•
o
d
r
0
0
N
0
N
O
14
(U) NIOLLVA3 lg
0
M
F
O ?
N ca
M ?
to
0
.a
O
O
M
a
0
O a"+
04 ?
N H
0
L
U
O
N
d
3
?a
? H
N -¦
r
0
0
N
O
N 1
N
O ?
O w
N 3
L
d
3
000 w
0
0
O N
FLL
?
0
? L
7
cn.
Y
O ?
4T m
~ N
O
O
N
O ?
N ?
O a?i
0 3
H
N
00
O °o
00 N
O
bD
3
L
p 7
h
Q
r
0
0
N
O I
N

ON
T
(M) NOILVA3r-19
r
O
x
U?
z?
?a
?a
r?
?C

? N
Q
a?
z
'
axo
?oz
?x+o

a V1 N

1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
1
I
1

• food # U01133S S013 IL i;:VLS
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
a133RI L aoWail s oaf ZT+ :?',?S
C? 'n
W) NOI.LVA:1'I:4
0
M
0
N
M
0
0
M

O °
00 a
N
`O o
d
h
O
L
U
O
N
00
3
N r
N H
r
0
0
O N
O
N
z °
O
`~ 3
r^' N?
P'1 00
O
O
N
x
O
rl
7
W
C
R
Q?
N
N
00
O
O
N
1
I
¦
O I
O 1
rl
bA
d
3
R
Z
F
O N
00
iG
00
O
O
N
O ?
OD
3
r
O F,
Y
I?
1
O
O N
N I
0
0

0
number of particles
O L17 O 4D O LD O L[? O
a LO <t M M N N 4) v O
o O
0
CU
7
E
U
I
U
i.
d
3
O
ra
C
7
O
U
2
a
L"
U
C

N
7
Q
N
O
D
:J
ll
a
6
----------------.,.---------
I
--------------
1 t
S i Y
I
O
O
O
O
O
O
E
E
CD,
? N
N_
N
U_
Q
0
a
o O
C C C C C C C 0 O 0 p
O O O O O O O O O O O
O O CO I- O 47 cf CO N
ueyIjauy;uaoaad
N n O O O
000
w
CL
H
N N v
O N > 'O
M
O O
vt an OD U Q
1.11 I, N
O 00 r,
V I? n
C ? O N
p ?--? rl M
O N O
7
?2 O
O
L, N G1
C
O m cL 3
N ? N Y
n E v
N N I, c-I 'I Ln
LD lD LD '! N cf
0 0 0
000
E
E
a, W Ln O Ln Cr Ln
N -1 M Ln LD
0 0 0 0 W O1
0 0
c
Cli LO
O N 0O
v
N OCp NNNV CC) co O N
W
0 0 0 0 N'v w m-- 0 N M L*O Z OOj ?2 N; LO. O O O
1 NM LO. N V U
i i i l i l l i i i l l i i l i
O O N N LO cV V LO 00 LD N N LO: t O 00 O: O N N_ 'q W
O O O O N M 7 O O) .- - N.M.? O O
N w
> a a o p
:8,22 :2 :9 :2 22 O
N N N N:? H U
?' c c ? 0 m m E E m N N 0 ! v v (D ?° o ?° a a0-
2 a r ? r
w m c> >_ w E m m
4) L) L) M
EE 0000 > > E > E
> > >
0
0
c
0
?i
z°
1 ? ' 1
N
Q]
U
M
Q
O
-it
0
a)
is
E
fUUr
I
V
CE
Yil
Q
l.r
6)
3
Q
7
O
U
.Q
QI
V
Q
it

number of particles
C) Ln
?t (+') CO N O - O ([) O
O
O
O
Op
O
O
O
E
r ?
N
N
_U
m
Q
0
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o O
o
C O o O a O C O o O ( O o O a O C C
O
O O
O V7 W n (V u) V r) (V
ueyjaaug;uaoaad
y
0
5

ll

6
3
6
-
i
i -------------------------
i

i

C
7
CI4 if)
00 (D °
O • N - v N (O OD O (.0 N N N <Y D)
O O O O N It (O M-- (D CN (O V OM 0 0 (D O C) O
NM V (D. . N MtO N V' U
N (O (O (O N V (D M r- (D N N (O It O :OD O W N N V W ?
O O 04 N O N M It O 0 N W L O _ N V O-
O O O N M (O O O
N
O
>' 'O "O ? '0 '0 N N N N N? N N N N a) a) a)
N C C C C C > > > > > > > > >-0 d-0 -0 N N N N D
(A N N N N 2 N N fi N f` (`0 (? f`0 O-0 -0 -0 -3 75 V? O
(D I E 4) 0) 0) 0) 0) O 0) 0) (M 0) QY O O 0 0 0 0 0
? Q) 0 w _0 _0 0 0 o N E m c`o CU m rn
> E >, E E 0 0 0 cg ? ate) i>, a) U)) (D ?o m
> r E
> > > E >
tD W O O O
O O
O)
Q
H
m - v v
v a
-0
> 3
Oa
m U
r, -tr r,
Ln r-4 w
r, 00 00
.1 m W
C m Ln M
O O
y O N O
7
} O N
N N OJ
C
(CO CL 3
N a N N
E -o
N O1 'i (? 00 V
ID 1.0
O O
O O O O
00
E
E
N M Ln lD 00 rn
0
0
c
0
Y C -0
` "L O U
-0 3
U a)
m
O
Z

i m
IU
La
0
0
1=
LJ
a
^O
d
0
U
_d
a
U
b
L?
it

number of particles
Ln O Ln o Ln o n o
et d' co m N Oq LP O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N M O O O
O O
O
O_
T
H
T ?
0 - N N
U > 6
>
H N 00 U 9
O
O
Ln M V
Ln O rn
M M Ln
H N O
C ci r-I In
O rI M
O N O
E
? C
t- O N
r N 01
C
O
N C

U N E -

0

CL
N N N eA N
0 0 0 O M
O O
000
O
E
w w 0 O LO v M
N H M 111 W M O
in O O O O O m
L I?-1T L -? O
0 0 0
0o 0 0 0 0 0 00 o O
o a o 0 0 0 0 c
O t7 n n n Ln (-, M N
O c-1
O 6] 00 ti CO Ln M ? N
ueyjaeuijjueoied
M
C
7
D LO V w to OU
O N LO W O LO N N N V M
O O O 0 N: T CO .00 ?.LO N N '.LO .? O N 00 Lq "CO O O O
?.N M V.LO O ?..-NM Ln N ?t U
N LO LO LO c- N V' Lp CO r (p. N N LO V: O 00 O CO N N V 00 M
O CO N N O N M.? CO O N M LO O _ N 7 d
O O 0 'N M LO O.O
N .r
O
C C C C -C 5 N N N 5 0) N z 01 T O O 0) Y C 'O
> > > > > > > > >'a -0 .0 .0 .0 - 0 .0 .O U M O
Ow Ow of 02 L`v LLo L`v LL L`o m m L`o : a M -0 0210 o v
N m Lu m m O) O) a o) 0) 0) 01 o1 01 8 8 LOO c8 ,. 0 0 000 °? r
C C E 0 0 m m o (D a1 _ .n .0 a a a m m Ln
0) 4)
"a Oodw?6EEEE CD
0§?-, 008000 a) Wwz-Mn 0
CD > E E ; E o
> > >
0
0
c
m
O

U I number of particles
t? ?
n M O CIO N O CI4 O O O
0
e
a)
7
E
U
U
L
'v
a
b
0
U
6>
QI
U
b
C?
it
?Q
O
1
O
Q
O
O
a?

CD
O
O
O
O
N LOO O O O
O O
O
CL
H
T
6 N 4)
> ? 7
` a o O O
N N OD V d
Ln 0) •i
CD Ln r-4
0) CO
LD r-I I,

'1 M
O N O
E '
E
CD o
O N Z;; N
O
C
IN C
3
N
U N E 1 H

ME

O_
i
1
I ?
1
1
1
I
w
i
i

N N I, In CD -4
ID W O O O 'i N V
O O O O O O
O
E
W l0 V1 O N ct Ln
N .-i M M w 00 M
V) O O O Ot a 0
O
Z?, 9 9 9 9 9 -e 0e 0 - O
O O O O O O O O O O CD
O O) 00 1-- CO LD -t M CJ
uey}aauy}uaajad
o
0
C
7
CN LO U
O ? N? O O (O N N Ct 00 CD ?
O O O O r N 7 (D M ? N.M IT (D .? N.M _ N 7 ? N V O U
N Ln O LO N V O M CO N N L 7 O M O CD N N_ q- M C6
Cl O O O p ? N M V CO O) N M . N M lO O O
O
N
O
N C C C 'C C: N N N N N N d N N O O N N Y C 'O
U fQ N f0 C C - > > > > > > > > > M 'O "O 'O 'O 'O U M O
tl) to y Ow N- N f` N f0 N f` (`6 N O O-0 7 7 7 7 7 'p 2 w
.N O N E N N O) O) O)O)o)O) O) O)O.. U U G
w w N e' O N o E E N O N O: - (D O OOaoOM a M a m N N
-- m 0 L
Z ? `m m E a a >> e e a `, m E 0) 0) E
o m m =3 2 T
m E °o L 0 a°) coo) o o 0 vE, m c6 E E m c-`v 0
> E E L- Z E w E
> > > > w
CD
0
c
7
O
(6
O
Y
0
Z
r
Appendix C. Wetland Raw Data
Wetlands were not restored as part of this project

Appendix D. Integrated Problem Areas Plan View
O
M
wf .-A o
F o_
rI ma?f
:1 SS
1-4 z
?o
y w
k ('05
4 0 0 ??
V w M
_ w
Q
°doy
n AA v
' N
0? h©3
S ?' her \ ? ?°
`' \
I
o
n
m
Q)
N z
tul
0
o (n ? c
:N
O E W
2
r ?I , U (n oo $ o
-fi r I v o Cn
:U) z a
?
o 0
LJ W O u
i-' w W Ln u'f
W w - H
? oe
w W
U) 0
L? J
W o W
U. 0
I 4 to LM O n d
N? N?? N?
voice
E8600COLI Jagfoycr
uDD'lleeys-Ailtl3n ON01S30111085V'W3-19100t111\ Rbl?eno-u01se0-s AingsV\uDld\uDlsep \ we \! 9b0£ILI\?fl
Wtl 60-Ot'I
40OZISZI
s
a
i
y
n +!
o
z -
ra -
4 •-
C-:
I r
T O
"? I .I
j L
Ll ,
O , -
+ Y
r r. ?-
n
`.4 v

1 _ ry
^,

r . , tt
L [Q 1
I
4

WZ n
G

V
Fe
I

n[
N.
L
V S
Ir
K
? Y
C
Y q
S
_ s
C
s
' L
t
.t s I
4 f
rc -
O ?s S
.w l
r ? la f
rc?
J ]
Z
F- CO !
n ? y
m jy 4
1
t1
z C
o
fl y j
m ;? n

m

? Z Z Z
`D /0
O V/
i
Q 0
< U) O
W
?-- W
E
?
Q J_
U m
A
i
O
.

U

It °
O .
t 1 K
} r e•.
Zn°i
S
Z
[7
W
t
4?Tf
f 40 z
ti
J
i
u
d W
t]

A
4S y m

0

47

u
0

J

Yl

.11
7 ;

a

'?%

*

,

W

?

Li

V

I
ul

U
H
?_

J
T
y
?y
i
2:

>

N
4

U U
F
tt

N

Q

V

Z

rJ

S
M
z J
( LI
w
V Y
w 7 [[
Q
J - ?
f!I
47 _
W
1 J
IM z
C]
]C G7 Y
U U t7 !? r
6 A J x
rt
J
~ J J J -
m CO a m x
U1 L+ frl 'l C)
t a
V
V
t I
Y •r
ZV
Y x
Z . F
?o

l ..

C 133HS 33S - 3NI-1 HOiVIAJ
dt
i
s
r
z Q
Z

Z) O

L Q
0
?
O

Q Q - 0 [if
17 133HS 93S - 3N11 H31VVJ
V n/ Q ui w Y'. --
W LL 1-
r J G
Q U m
V)
F1
' a
L

W
11
W
N

P •. JA

n
z

C N
W
LLJ
2
U)
W
1
w
_z
2
U
C?
L
O r.
??4 ti! t7 W
7 ?
J.
1
r
a'io 1
?r
Ir
1
Y^bl
0-+ f
obibbik
i?
?y
:few
?r? 4
Ng
= i 5
aye ?? E
11
W

n

O
lY
Y u
7
J
C? t!1 "1 u
1 t Orr' Oi -j
Iw ]^•: 2 2 T ? L
LD 0 w u
..?'• W W. t
L
J
c
L
? M
U)
u

Cfi
F- z
4
V
L

J
h
G
C

V
J
4i
rk

V
T
a-
O

O
w iu rr
i V d

yyy i
s / !, O
y1 O /''?
0 1-
}s C! C (? ??" W Vj
z
f c oCpr w a Z U l?
W 11 1 z z
't mzW LULL
C J
; . , ? C? cc T O 'Y.
Ct'
I. . n s 4?

u
yam.
M

a 4 r
i

1

? 7
?
•n Y ?
R 'T 1I
? Y
rrs'> LL _ t

N
U
a
?. Y
y
Yl
V 1
O
O
CJ
r?
1
r-?
g
? .1
_j
:1 r of
? N
.ft Vl
n :Ip
w
i
tj
G -i
4
A
[9
i

W
L i
O
? L
LL J
irf 2 ?+
Y?
u1 ? A
o i
i P
i"
H ? f
n
Y -+
a
Q ?V iV
V ? ? of
V ti'
F
wl
G
R LL
1. -
C
r i
tL bl^Y
Z.I-
?f
60
N
4 i' •
r Y.'
t
r
L
r-
0

Y

11 . _

1
l
vt1 -
S 133HS 33S - 3NI I HOiVVV - ----
f I11
v
z
-r.
i m
9C u
Y ?? iA 2
v Ot c u F i y _
u u r u Y T
t '
J
Z
rW V3 1
V
V
Li n
J _ , III ? ' 'p tl ? .
J r.'
Li L
C 7 J Z U 7 J +•
Y g ' -f ! LL ) a
U I?
r J - co
Irk ?`?
09
t
n ?o Y m N 2~Z A.v
L7 w [l K
'tic
r
W
6
43
eo Y v
F
1
y r
a -?! t
r_
Q
r
t
1 r
\? W
r } .y
.ti
, M

1
N7 V - - S
,
1 I -

%

t
i ?
n= , I r
`
a?

~
f
l
i

Co
N
IL
:r 1
Ji
P ?-
yr'
r
r y ip
ry T
k ^I. ,, I
C 133HS 33S - 3NII HOIVVV
7
Z
Z
O ? O
L C) J
Q C? ? W J
Q U o0 ?
a ;j j

u
c
>

u
_
41 Z
r
W ' _ C
U W
4
Cl
Uy C'
1.
' N
U
N
~
r •-` - K
?
O Cl w l
1
o z 2
I. z
J
l ? `n c~.'1 U w e

0 Z y
V W

z
11
C
III

Li
cl
OAC
O
-L

w n n u - LL
i
a
U
t
li -
` wr J
LU 1 j
_j z Y
_,-oo? xr1 Tl r? y Y c ?
? a
W ^ J J
C3
Y O d
of ? e; d c:
cJ
LL-
C? J
?r l c
rr - N- _.
417
tD Ii '?
(Y
4 ? [il
N ?` v4
1 e +
LL
I_ 1
LL
K e 7 y I _
fi.4
4 '
w a ? --
N: ,I
U3 ? ? V
p1
' k
t r- Ar
iri
o
?? y ra
t> 1 t!`
Z Z
`v O Z Z) O
L 0 J C)f 0
Q <
Of w w
J_
Q U m
O
L
a

d S E: - 1

t9 O < Z ? U

Q
Q z
x
c
?
J J J Z ?
"
FFF
e i n
. m Y.
f
. U

1

a
C• K O r?
G?
n
n
L'
?t
P?
.7Cp - .5
1•
y ` Jlt F i
LI
J.
t
? pp p
F= it
n ?
R
x R -f
T ?
n n
x

o
?) ? a+
' CI
M? a 8

O
O
r_1
U
II

Nei Eli
4n 0fDO
(V f 2'V J t1
W I I
t`7 f t' fn
-41 mLLL
J ? a
e% o

W ¢
.
k

? In -
in

- Y i

17 13AHS AAS - ANII HOiVn