20200820 Ver 1_More Info Received_20200914

Strickland, Bev
From: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 1:33 PM
To: Munzer, Olivia
Cc: Homewood, Sue; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Oak Ridge Landing, SAW-2020-01090
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
0 rnal email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
nc. ov
Good Afternoon Olivia,
Schweinitzi's sunflower has very distinct leaves and there are only a few sunflower species that mimic it. With the
evaluation area being as small as it is, we did a species survey to see if Schweinitzi's sunflower or any similar in
appearance species were present. If we had identified any potential plants, it would have been necessary to revisit the
site and observe them while in bloom (the optimal survey window). If David Bailey or the USFWS determine that this is
not enough they will require more although we do not feel it is warranted. David can correct me if I am wrong, but
generally the USACE consults directly with the USFWS when issuing permits if they feel there is an issue.
With regard to issue two, we have also seen instances where wetlands and jurisdictional areas get mowed or otherwise
disturbed. However, there are many properties that have jurisdictional features on them throughout the state, most of
which do not have deed restrictions. The developer is putting deed restrictions on them in an effort to protect them. If
landowners do not abide by the deed restrictions or commit unpermitted activities, they can be held responsible for
impacting the areas including restoration requirements. Unless there is some fund available to purchase developable
lots that have jurisdictional features, I am unaware of other alternatives that may afford better protection.
The applicant is adhering to the state regulated riparian buffer requirements with the project design. There is no
argument that 100 or 200 foot undisturbed buffers are preferred and would benefit the environment. Thank goodness
we are in a watershed that has buffer regulations or the environmental impacts would be more significant. I will inform
the applicant of your preferred buffers but do not anticipate that they are going to voluntarily increase the buffers,
revise site plans, sacrifice lots and go through the site plan reapproval process.
Sincerely,
Michael T. Brame
336.708-4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.r)ilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
From: Munzer, Olivia <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:43 PM
To: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>

Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; David. [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Oak Ridge Landing, SAW-2020-01090
Michael,
I noticed the Schweinitz's sunflower surveys were conducted in July. The optimal survey window for this species is late
August through October. We would prefer the surveys are conducted during that time period, but we defer to the
USFWS. If you haven't already, please contact the USFWS to determine if they are satisfied with the surveys.
I understand that lots with jurisdictional features will have deed restrictions; however, my experience is that often those
features still get mowed or disturbed. I am most concerned with the wetlands that are within the lots, particularly WDA
18-36 on Lot 4. Ideally, we would prefer the lot is not developed or it is smaller. Perhaps the lots in the cul de sac could
be resized so the wetland is removed from the lot and kept as an open space. Overall, there are no buffers around the
wetlands unless they are within the stream buffer. We prefer at least a 100' undisturbed, native vegetated buffer
around perennial streams and 50' for intermittent streams and wetlands. Based on the site plans, a 50' buffer is
proposed around streams and the pond; however Zone 2 (20') of the buffer can be disturbed but must be
revegetated. We request at least the 50' buffer around streams are natural and undisturbed, as well with wetlands.
Thank you,
Olivia
Olivia Munzer
Western Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:32 PM
To: Munzer, Olivia <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [External] RE: Oak Ridge Landing, SAW-2020-01090
Fyi
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
-f xN N. t ,. {�... ? '
: #:.
From: Michael Brame <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 4:36 PM
To: David. [e-mail]; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Cc: asiegal_williams <asiegal [e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Oak Ridge Landing, SAW-2020-01090

• ternal email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Good Evening David and Sue,
Our response to the request for additional information for the Oak Ridge Landing site is attached. Please let us know if
you need additional information in order to issue the permit. Thank -you.
Sincerely,
Michael T. Brame
336.708-4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
From: Michael Brame
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 4:09 PM
To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Homewood, Sue
<[e-mail]>
Cc: asiegal_williams <asiegal [e-mail]>
Subject: Oak Ridge Landing
Good Afternoon David and Sue,
We are working diligently to respond to your concerns on this project. We have completed the T&E survey, redesigned
the road crossing and are currently working with the surveyors to locate the jurisdictional features within the
lots. Please grant us an extension on this one as we move through the hurdles. Thank -you.
Sincerely,
Michael T. Brame
336.708-4620 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
PO Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
3