20070443 Ver 1_Application_20070313

„a STATE o
~~ ~
~_ `~ S
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPET I'
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
March 8, 2007
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office O
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 ®~
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Secondary road improvements to SR 1610 (Range Road) in Durham
County. WBS element SC.032043.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to upgrade and
pave SR 1610 (Range Road) in Durham County (Figures 1-6). Total project length is 4.92
miles. Transportation and highway laws of North Carolina (G.S. 136-44.6, 136-44.7, 136-
44.7A, 136-44.8, and 136-44.9) require the NCDOT to develop annual work programs
for construction and maintenance of secondary roads. These general statutes specifically
set forth requirements for annual construction and paving of existing unpaved roads.
Paving of these roads is performed in priority order as established by the NCDOT for
each unpaved road within a given county. This number is based on characteristics of each
road, including number of homes, schools, churches, businesses, industries, recreational
facilities, traffic counts, presence of school bus routes, and value as a thoroughfare. SR
1610 is scheduled to be paved as part of the Secondary Roads Construction Program.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Site 1 -Waters of US
Construction at this site will impact an unnamed perennial tributary to Rocky Creek
[NCDENR-DWQ Index No. 27-3-7.5-(1), Best Usage Classification WS-III NSW; HUC
03020201 ] (Figure 3) in the Neuse River Basin. The existing structure that conveys the
creek is a 36-inch concrete pipe that has disconnected end joints (see Photographs 1 and
2). The last joint will be reset. No new permanent impacts will result at the site associated
with resetting this joint. However, it will be necessary to armor the reset pipe end not to
exceed 10 linear feet along the stream banks with rip rap and to dewater the site during
this activity. The work zone will be temporarily dewatered for approximately 2 days.
This will involve the temporary placement of sandbags in the pipe inlet as well as
downstream of construction. Once the stream has been dewatered, the end joint will be
reset. Temporary concurrent impacts to the stream from this activity will result in
~[/~/,1~ ~ r-'
1 ti-~'
t a ~.
ey/:
if;"~' .
.y,
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

dewatering 10 linear feet of stream. The materials used for dewatering will be removed
after construction.
_ Site 2 -Waters of US
Construction at this site will impact an unnamed perennial tributary to Dry Creek [NCDENR-
DWQ Index No. 27-3-7-(1), Best Usage. Classification WS-III NSW; HUC 03020201]
(Figure 4) in the Neuse River Basin. The existing shucture that conveys the creek is a
24-inch concrete pipe that needs replacing (see Photographs 3 and 4). The old pipe will be
replaced with a new pipe the same length. No Iill in surface water will result from this pipe
replacement. However, it will be necessary to armor the new pipe ends not to exceed
l0 linear feet along the stream banks with i•ip rap at each end of the pipe and to dewater the
site during this activity. The work zone will be temporarily dewatered for approximately 2
days. This will involve the temporary placement of sandbags uphill and downstream of
construction. Once the stream has been dewatered, the pipe will be replaced. Temporary
concurrent impacts to the stream from this activity will result in dewatering 10 linear feet of
stream. Please note that there is no stream channel above the inlet, only a linear wetland area.
The materials used for dewatering will be removed after construction. Fill in wetlands is also
anticipated at this site. Upgrading this roadway and the associated pipe replacement with rip
rap armoring will result in 900 $' (0.02 ac) of fill in a fringe wetland along this stream. (See
Appendix One for USACE Wetland Delineation firms/DWQ rating sheets).
Site 3 -Waters of US
Construction at this site will impact an unnamed perennial tributary to Dry Creek [NCDENR-
DWQ Index No. 27-3-(1), Best Usage Classification WS-III NSW; HUC 03020201 ] (Figure
5) in the Neuse River Basin. The existing structure that conveys the creek is a 60-inch
concrete pipe that will not be altered (see Photographs 5 and 6). However rip rap armoring is
needed at point ends of this pipe to stabilize the shoulder section and adjacent ditch line. No
surface water impacts or dewatering is proposed at this site. The only impacts at this site will
include rip rap armoring not to exceed 10 linear feet along the stream banks at both ends of
this pipe.
Site 4 -Waters of US
Construction at this site will impact an unnamed perennial tributary to Camp Creek
[NCDENR-DWQ Index No. 27-3-(1), Best Usage Classification WS-II HQW NSW; HUC
03020201] (Figure 6) in the Neuse River Basin. The existing structure that conveys the creek
30-inch concrete pipe that has disconnected joints at both ends (see Photographs 7 and 8).
No new permanent- impacts will result at the site associated with resetting these joints.
However, it will be necessary to armor the pipe ends not to exceed 10 linear feet along the
stream banks with rip rap and to dewater the site during this activity. The work zone will be
temporarily dewatered for approximately 2 days. This will involve the temporary placement
of sandbags upstream and downstream of construction. Once the stream has been dewatered,
the joint will be reset. Temporary concurrent impacts to the stream from this activity will
result in dewatering 20 linear feet of stream. The materials used for dewatering will be
removed after construction.

3
Riparian Buffer Impacts
The construction at each of the four sites involves a road crossing of streams that are
subject to the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rule. The unnamed perennial tributaries are
depicted on the most recent version of the Lake Michie (1977/1990) topographic
quadrangle (Figure 1) as well as on the Soil Survey of Durham County (USDA-SCS,
1971) (Figure 2). Each of these sites has minimal impacts within the buffer areas, which
are EX by being less than 401inear feet of impacts each (see the attached PCN for
specific impacts by site number).
Waters of the U.S./Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands and surface waters not affected by the project will be protected
from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of
construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
Minimization: The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at jurisdictional
sites. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices
for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during project
construction. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the
Environmental Officer during construction to minimize impacts to these sites.
Compensatory Miti ag tion: All compensatory mitigation requirements will be left to the
discretion of the regulatory review agencies.
Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the ESA. As of March 2007, there are three federally protected species
listed for Durham County. They include bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), smooth
coneflower (Echinacecr lacvigata), and Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxii). Areas within
the project limits are not suitable of supporting foraging habitat for the bald eagle. The
roadway shoulders along Range Road are regularly maintained from the gravel to the
woods line, eliminating the possibility for smooth coneflower or Michaux's sumac to
exist in this area. Additionally, a review of the Natural Heritage Program database (last
updated Fall 2006) revealed no occurrences of protected species within the project area.
Therefore, based on lack of suitable habitat observed during the 02/27/07 site visit and
the NHP database review, biological conclusions of No Effect have been rendered for
each of these species.
Historical Compliance
This project has been screened by all pertinent parties to ensure historic compliance.
Summary
NCDOT proposes to upgrade and pave SR 1610 (Range Road) in Durham County.
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 14, NWP 33, and NCDENR-DWQ Section 401 Water Quality
Certification (WQC) No. 3404 and WQC No. 3366 for above-described activities. An
automated payment procedure has been implemented between the NCDOT and
NCDWQ. This procedure will enable the Division to apply for the 401 WQC without

submitting a check for this permit application. This procedure will provide payment to
the NCDWQ by charging the permit application fee of $200.00 directly to the appropriate
NCDOT WBS element SC.032043. Apre-construction notification is attached with this
request. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms.
Heather Montague at [phone].
Sincerely,
~~ ~ ~~
x,71 J.W. Bowman, P.E.
0 Division Engineer
cc: Mr. Rob Ridings, NCDWQ Transportation Permitting Unit
Ms. Tasha Johnson, NCDOT Dist 2 Engineer
Mr. Joe Ng, NCDOT Durham County Maintenance Engineer
Mr. Donald Pearson, NCDOT Roadside Env Field Ops

Photograph 1.
upstream of inlet.
SR 1610 (Range Road) Durham County -Site 1 at STA 11+90
Photograph 2. View downstream of outlet.

.,c~
F ~~ ~3
h .;
s .. ' r
Photograph 3. View upstream of inlet.
SR 1610 (Range Road) Durham County -Site 2 at STA 77+40
r~» ~ ,~
~ r.,
a ~

Photogaph y. View downstream of outlet.

SR 1610 (Range Road) Durham County -Site 3 at STA 118+05
Photograph 5. View upstream of inlet.
Photograph 6. View downstream of outlet.

~'. y ~ ;~
,r
,,. ~„
. "' ~ ~~.
h
,.~~#.
w~" 2 ,~
rt ~ R .w« ~:
w
~r ~ ~. -
"~ AO g. yj"} ~Y it f Jy %1 ~y ~ M
" f
4r t b .u # 3q b~T '~ .ir N ~ ~~ }E ~ ,~ +..q}- M 51k~',
~.'~.. t'. # ~ .~ 9Y~. T ~ ~ Wd` d j ~ .Yr ~ ~ s.R` '4'J dF _ ~~
f ~ f
a ~ ~ R 3~. Fyn.. ~ v '~d` :f #- y, ~' r'~G"~4~*~+` '~
a ya a. ~ g ~' xt ~~, ~ ~,'
~ E +r gf~t. to ~ ~ ,.* t~
Photograph 7. View upstream of inlet.
.5 .~ '~,~ ',t A §" fE i. ~~k _.~~b.~ ,fit,..
"w* '~!
o
,:: ~ e,N ~ a' ~. s
~- r
..a ~' .
... . t ~.
s,
.R.
~ ,
' ay~y
'i~ M L1 ~e ~r~-.
~~va ~ ,~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ r eQ~~ i ?+` ~ ,d d yap -
~ ~
a JY ~. ~ F R~E"~9~ w' X y4,~
~ ; ~ ,~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ,..~~ ": v ~ ~ ~ ~~M; Fla ` Vi'a'
._ ~. 1
. '
S b .M
k~e ~ v
3//~
yy~` .~
Fi, .~ :s
U~/ ~L}?
~ "~
` ' ;e i9
Photograph S. View downstream of outlet.
«s~=,' .
•r~:~
q'~J
t~+~'~
SR 1610 (Range Road) Durham County -Site 4 at STA 264+80

r'-"' ~;nd Project
_ ____.
~
~
i~i~R
o~.~
ct~ ,,
4
~ ~' ~___----.SITE
1 ~
.; ~ ,
~;
.
. .. ~ ,
~ ~ ~ . }

.,

f- ~

~~
'
~ .
. ,~
~..~ ~ ~
r-.,
.
,.
,. .
• ~
,,
,
'

_>,• .
.
~..
.,,,,.. ,.... ~ •1, \ ~ la iti
,
~
~ } _
521'.
•'`... 1
):'
,.
~ ,

r
- ~'
j` r Project Study Area

~ ;: ~- ~„~ ~
--
~ R 1610 Range Roa
..
~
'

,~

,
H
__,. j '~.
~ ~
~ ~ ..
-
Durham County
.
,, r~~+ .r` Lake Michie USGS-
J J ,~ ~'~ ,,. ~ ` j ~` N Topo i~'Iap (1977/1990)
o

v
,,.
F

,,, .
L 1 1 G OO

Figure
~

F~
~ /1 ~ ~ ~ 1J
~ ~ `
f`
, _ _ ~
,' I ~
~ ~ t ~
t :
~
,
{ f
• i ~
_
~ 1
F

!I
`'

r
`
r(
1

i //
..~

r
_~

fir.
~ ~ "1
"J
._ ~r
1,
~ 1

~
...
ri ~
.r ,
t
}
° ..
<~,...~ +~
~ ~~

,'

~
j ~
`4stY
~ .~

l~
~~
..
,
-, is
~\
-~,. ~
ll~ir
- .;..._

~ "
- ~ f
/ ~-\

.~
/ r'v'
.~
r y

~w
_- ..
~~ ( ~ ~ `
=
.~
_ 3
~ zm~ ~~~ !~' SITE -
~ ~ ~ :
.

r. ~ ~

_
~,
,,
I
~
~,

~

~

... ..

Y;
r
'r d J'
) ~ -
~
~ - ,
e

_~
~ ~ *-' r'4 ~ . ~

_
~
~ ~ /
.:: -. '
' _

~ -
~ =tl3 t Y
_ ~ ~ i .. A
3 ~-
1 .. „ '
y S s
~~

//

•
V Y lNiJ .t l j

1
4 t `.~ f ' ~ ' z•.,~_y- •
l ,~

)
+ ~ ~' ,
. .. ' ~ l ~...~.
~ 1. t

.........
~ t ..._,
. ~
-

•
m. f ~' ~ '
y :
} m r-~ tY t
;, ~
r
'
SITE 2 "''~
t r tt.. -r
I - - ~" ~~ ~
~
1~

;. ~
r
fi
,
'1
, ,
'~
-. ._
r y
-+~
y y
~.
`"

a

a. `
,_„,
~..

`
r- *
~ t ~

~
c
..,-
_
~~
,
~
a
~ 30 ~
~
~
`)

~
J '
' ~ ~ r

i
~
j`.,,
.
s
I
J
:~,.~,,.~ ~ S ITE I

•
_
r f
~ ~ ~
y~..

_

~

`~/'
, ~,
_, ,Qy
~
C...
~ ~
Q ~ ~••~.' j A r
.. ,_ ~ i

„ <,!
~. I

~ff
'~{ •
.,~ ._/"•~ p k r„'.~ ~~ w ~ y»~
it Pro
Begl JeCt
CoovriahtfC11998. Maotech. Inc.

OUNA - SHEET NU?~'SER
- - -~-~ ----- _ ,~o , z, _ _
ms ~ _
-r ---_ - -- - --------
6 ~ Wn -- _ e _ - _ _.
Q `~ _- ~,y__j-
• HeB T %I fr8 , •` He6 ~r - ~ -- ~ _ \~~,_^ (~ - HeB ~ FJ
f./ \ i
IrB/ / GeB ' ~~ 1 Lg6'
_`\ ~ J
\, I ~ `~ ~' GeB
APC ~~ HeB , ~ ~ ~ ail
\ '
SITE 3 ~ ~ Lg6 '
~ ~:
~~ ap6 ~^\~\ ~- HeC r HeC ~~ ~-.. , /~ '~
~-~~~ ~"\HeB _,
~ !t 4 ~~ f~
a GeB 1~ i \~ LgB y1 i
_ l
~ -
.~ ngum -[~ '- , - ~ I
~j Store ~. HrC - ~~- `r - ~ - ~ ~ !
~~
q ~ t .HeC ~' HeC ~
i ~,~ __ _ i' ~` ~ ~~ --~ i i i
HeC Wn 9 ~ ~ , / ~ ~
~\ ~ - ~ ~,~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~-HeC ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~
1l l~ ~~ - ~ - i -
~ ,~ HrC
,~~, /r LgB ~ ~ ~~ Lg6 G B Ch ~~ _ ~ ~i '1
~ LgB _ ~ [~~ / - LgB '~, ~ ii
\ ( ~ :f ~ ''i t HeC ~{ I '',~
\ GeB ~~ x~
GIE~~ ~ HrB ~ '~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ HeB ~ .I
SIT ~ ~~ ~ ' ~~~
~ ~c\
!~~ ~-%
\!
. ~ _i„
is ~~
t!
IrC ~' He,B He(
~i
1_ _ -
Cc ~ r
qpC /l
\ ~(
I '~ -_
~ y~B
~~~
~~ _ •'GeD
`~". GeC "
~..
~ Hr6 `~- GeB
f
~H{C ''' GeC
~._
~~
HrB" ' ~~
;c
,C- HrC ~
Hr6 H
HsC bMuCf
~ ~' ~ ~
Hr6 ~ ~~ _ GeC _
r ~ ~ \ ~ C( GeC l Gu HrC ~r~ '~ i '~
_~ HrC ~ ~ I --- ! ~ •, -6 ~~
~p
,~', ~/~~Hr3 \_ '-"-j - / GeC Ht8 ~~ ~y + I _~
~ HrC - ~ ~ -1 ~ ~
~- . ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~~ 1 GeB ~_ / i s } i I~ 1~
/ __ ~_ _ _ y
~' '~L - p...'"f ~i o
•" ~ 0~0
I \ '--GeB` / i o .cam
r HeC ~t . \ ~ ~ ~_ GeC ~ "a~ ~ ~
~ Ch n ;~
I ~~~ + I HrB \ ` \t • ~ GeB, G ~"~ cn
/ ; // \ ~ GeC _~_ ._ GeB Hr8 ' - ;~ _,'
MuB - ~.~' ~ j ~ HeC. „ -~`< SITE 1
~HrC ~ IC9 V ~
~ ,~
i p4uC ._ °' ~He6
,, ~ ~'~, j w~ '~ ~°!~Begin Pro'ect
/' 2 ~ ~.~ ~~ Mob GeB ~ GeC .~~ Wn ~ ~ ^
~, ( Wn ~
i '~:
\. ~~ V GeB "_.. ~ ~~
C> •1 ~\ ~ _..GeC
'~ ~ 1 : ~ Ge8 \ --~ He8 ~ s i
~,
~ ` GeC ~ i GeC ~ „~
~i ~ ~ ' ~~ i
- f c
MuCGyO .1 Hr6 UaB _Hr8 LgB : ~ / ~~~ /' ~ ~
~. GeB ~" ~ _ _ = ~' ~~ _ ~' ~h
., - ~ ~, ~ r
f GeC ~1 ~ ,
. ~% Ch ,~- , ~ I ~ .
`\ HrB,i ~ ~ _ ~ Project Study Area
~ ~ /, ~ ~1 ~. ~; ~ Hr6 :' SR 1610 Range Road
-, -: ~ tv ~ ~ Durham County
GeC ~,NaE /!TaE .;< .f- USDA-SCS (1971)
~'~ jr
r
Hr6 ~~ ~ Ge6 cec ~~ Figure 2A 1:15,840
HrC ~ ~
` %-~C I he -~ GeD- GeD -. - GeE
~ 4.R ~ /,.:... .L,.

~,~,P.OL!NA - SHEET NUMSER 2
_.___
,.
-- - ---
,: ~. ; . .
;, - _ - ; , ~ End Project .. , ~ ~ ''
_ ~._
F~, - ~-~-~. SITE 4 .~ - _
~ ' _ PERSQN COL *tTY" _ ~ ~'.
\\
~~ _'Se ~ d~ ~ ~ ~~~ A~ - ~~ t. -- ~ _ -
1I _a B ~ ,Z- '~! " 11 "~~-' j ~ .t '! pd'' ~ e
.` ~ :, ~`
PB ~ HrC ;~ ~ ~`i '`~~He($ ~Cc % ~~ \\~ , ~ tieC~ ''
~ ~ y 1~Ch ~~ 1~ HeB ~ ~~ - ~ ~~~ ~ ~ -
~ e6
• "~ o r _` ~ 11 ~ _ ,
~~'~ npB ~ ~ l/~ A~ ; ~ HeB > , ~~ - a
,x \ ~ ! ~i i~ APB r~ \ qpg ~ IrB '~ ~ ~ ~~
i ~ ~ ~ -
//. ~ ~ 1
i ~ / . ! ~i HeC `1~ ~ ~ ~ ~-'" ~
- APB ~~ ~/ NeB,~ "'s ~ I ~~l ~ ~~~ ~ `~_ -~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~
~ ApB ~ ~
_G~~ j `~ ~ APB ~~~ ~ ~ Cc ~ HeC k~
HrC i ~ ~ _ v ~ ~~~ t ~ ~, 1 ~ HeB ~~. ~ ~
~ Hr8 ~~ °_ ~ - ~
_~ ~ ApC Ch' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ , °-2.
~. a ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HeC ~ ~ ~~~
_, -
~.._ .. - e -_ r
~ ~ CEB CfE ~ ~ _ ~ ~'
6~ GeC ~ ~ ~I I ti:,, ' APG _ ~ _ ~ ~- _~
I ~' _ ~CfB _ G , ' ~
,. ~~ ,~~: ~ r HeB ~ r
'HeB Wn ~ , ~ °~
\\ \ HeC ApB ~ _~ a a ~ ~' Ch }
~ ~ B APB ~ ~~~ ~ .~., ~~ z ~i~.
;~ Lg ~f ~ ':~ d ~ c ~ ~ HeB
~"~ Sy °Z' i w~ '~} ~e~ 4 ~~ s~ r~ ~ ApC ~~
.HrC - APC ~~ _ ~ ~ Ch O ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~
\: ~ i
ApC ~ qAC ~ ~~ ~ AP8 ~ -. ~ ~ '~ ~:
m ADB ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~, , '_ ~ ,. ~ ~~ ~ _
Wn~ ~ ~ V y4~„ -~ O ~~
,, ;
- 7
x :
~ ~ '~ ~ APB Ch ~~ ~ ~< x ~ ~ 0 =. ~ ~ 0 ~, r ~.
He6 ~'w ~~ APB ,~. A~~C ~ ~s gpgY/ ~, ~ ,~,.
,t 1 7 fh+`
HrC - o~ ~ b - ~ -~ ~ ~ ': lr ~~ ~. "~ ~'~~~
.' -Y ~ ~ ~ Chi ~ ~ ~ MSC ~; ~~ s
`~ ~, r
_ ~' _ t, ~~ r~ f
_ 11 _ .:,~ ~, t
APC rv 1 APB _ HeB ~ .n s _ ~~ 4 3 ~~ .~ ~ ~4
_ _ _ ~. > ~<
~y ~ - {
` ~ ~~ ,
,re ~ \ -. wXe
HrG we'"` ~ ~ - A '`
~ .• A
;~ , , ~ _
H rB t' APB ~~ ~ , -,,
APB ~ 1 r. ;` '~ _ -~ ~_-
1 Gu - ~ ~ i ~ ' e~ HeS
t .' ~B 't+ea 7
HeB Ci a ` t ' .,° ~ _ /~'
N
Z
Q
_Z
J
O
rY
Q
U
I-
Z
r
Z
C
L
Q
S
C
4
i
b
Project Study Area
SR 1432 Crawford Currin Road
Granville County
USDA-SCS (1992)
Figure 2 a 1:24,000

T
U
0
~L
C
O
O
a ~-
0 0
~ a
a ~
- o
L ~
H
~ ~
~ [
O •-
a +-
o
~ X
~ W
~ ~
O W
z - I
~ 3
~ o
~ ~ ;
a
~--- +
o v-
L O
~ Q lD
~ ~ L
I t I
0
a o
a, ~ o
C a ~
C M
II
u bA o
~ V ~"'"

O O ~
U ~ M
i
I ~ ~ ~
~ ~
w (~

~ I m ~_ I
I > 3 I ~

~
~ I O T I
I E- a o --31

~0ti2~ I ~ 3 I
I o v I
i N O I
L
I I
~
I I I
I I I
II I i
I
I
I
BZ2
~ ~
~

N
Y
~eti~ i 1 1 I I ~
i I I
I I I
I I I
I
~'BZI ~
o
'
~

~
Y I
I I ~ I
I I ~ I I
I +
I ~ ~ ~
' o
~ L ~
L
a~
a L
L
U

~ I I ~ I I +.° n
p-
L
E }
~
~

~
U ~

~~
~

-
~ I I ~ I
L
I I o 1
I I ~ I I N+
y
1 ~o
I

; ~

~-
U 3
a~
'O
_
~ C
- ~ _ I \ 1.~...-
wiaaw~
~ L
L

~
L
~

I I y

~
~
~ ~

~
I
I
.
~ 3
~ I
~
I I I I
I
~~ U
o
o
L I I ~ I
I I I ~ \`\ a
+

E
o
~ ~

BZ ' I

I I I I

I

' \
I
m
o
o
a

; I I
I I I

II I
I I
I

I

~

~
BZ2~ I I
I I I
I I I
I
0
m
~ +
N a
F-
w
I
I I I I
I _ + I
I m ~ I
I o ; I
I L I
I ~ oT I
I~ } 3 -~I
w ~
I ~ ~ I
I N O I
I L I

~\
w~~

T
U
0
~L
c ~
o ~
- o
~- +-
Q ~ N >,
p O ~ ~
L ~- ~ O
Q ~ - [
L L LL 7
~ O
~ ~ m
O ~ O ~
~ ~ [n ~
Oa -+- a °
o ~ O ~
~ ~x ~ ~
~ w a. ~
N L.L m
+- H ~ J
O ", W ~
z - I I
N
Y
o ~
~ ~
L L
a~ ~
a .~
E o
~ °~
o ~
~, L
~ o
~ ~
E
U
O
a /
0
N ~
~ ti
}
,~ a
H
!n
~ 3
N O
~ ~ ,
o
E- a i- ~~
o v- ;
L O
d tD /
L `L
~ I D V I i0~
I ~ 3 I
I n T I
I~ o-~I
I } ; I
v- v
I o 0 1
I N ~ 1
L , ~
I I I I ~ 0~
I I I I ~
I i I I
I I I i ~ o
I I I I 4- L
I I I I ~ _n
I I I I ~ L
I I I I
I I I I
I I ~ I I ~,s
I I I I
I I ~ I
I I C I I ~ti,^,.
I 1 ~
//
~ I v
I I I I \
I I I I
H
~ W
I I I
I ~ I I
I I ~ I I
I ~ 1 I
I I ~ I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I 1 I I
I i I I
I L I
I m ~ I
I > 3 I
I L I
I a ~ I
I y- U I
N O
I Q 0 I
I L I li
H
W
,BZI
~BZ2//
0
~ o
~ M
4 ~ O
O
~ ~ .w M
o ~i p II
v GA o `'"
~ ~ U
ca ~ ~
V ~
A ~
N
~ ~
C/~
a~
Y
7
o p~
> C
L L
N ~
a ~
E o
` 3
~ ~
O ~
} L
~ o
~ 4-
E
a~
U
O
n.

T
.~
0
c
0
p
d ~
p O
~ a
a~
_ p
L ~
~ ~
~ ~
O •-
a {-'
O _~
~- X
~- W
+- f-
O W
z - I
0
M }
N -_
+
~ a
~ 3
N O
~ ~

~ 0
-
-~
f a +
o v-
L O
4 tD
~ ~ L ~
~
1 I
I v v I
I j 3 I ~
I a T 1
i IF O-al i
I } ~ I 1

I o v I
I N O
I ~
~
--BZ2 ~ I I L I ~
~
I I
I I
f I I
I I
I BZ2
~

i
BZI i
I I
I I I
I I
I I

~
I I
I I I
I BZI

o i
I I
I

~ I
I I
I
; o
~L
+L.
`~
; I
I I
1 H-
a
a
O'[~ I
I I ~ I
I I _
~ L

~ I I C
v I I
_
_
_
~> II
~ II
I

~4
_ T ;'
i~
----BZI-
i
---BZ2~
i
w
I ~ ~~
I I ~ I I
I I ~ I i
I I ~ I I
I I N I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
i I I I
I I I I
I I I 1
I I I I
I I I I
I L I
I m ~ I
I > 3 I
I ° I
I P ~ I
IE + 3 ->I
I ~ ~ I
,~ o
I N O I
I L I
r t - _ -
1
~~~ ~
1
I
i
-BZI-
,-BZ2-
W
0
s~ o
y ~ c 0

u ~ O :~
w ~ U
~ ~ ~

V ~ "'i ~
i
,
~ .~r ~
M a A ~

~ ~ ~

T
U
0
LL
c
0
~-
O
Q ~
p O
L a
a ~
- p
~ L
a~ ~
~ ~
O •-
Q +
O ~
~- •X
n- W
N ~
+ ~-
O w
z - I
m
o ~
> ~
L L
N ~
a .~
E o
` 3
~ ~
o ~
+ L
~ O
N ~
E
m
U
v
a
0
v ~
v
m ~
+ N
In Q
H
N
~ 3
a~ o
~ ~

~ 0
~- a + ~
o ~
L O
a ~
}

~ I I
I v v I
I j ; I
I
IF a T I
O-al i

i
~ I ~ I
~ I ~
O O 1 i
I N O I
L ~
'-BZ2'

~ i I
I I
I I
I I ~
I I
I I
I
~ BZ2

BZI ~

~ I
I I
I
1 I i
I I
I
I I

BZI-
c I I I I
a o I I ~ 1 1 ~ a
~
+L~
4- +
m ~ I I
~ ¢ I I c
~ '. ;F-
H- _
BZIi
i
~BZ2~
~ w
~w
~BZI
BZ2
LL
r
w~
0
~ o
w 'ti
~ .. o

O ~, ~ o
M
U ~ C ,~
~ U
C ~" ~

U ~ ~ ~
s°',
~ ~ ~
o ~
~~
~ ~ w

a~
Y
o ~
> C
l L
a~ ~
a ~-
E v
3
w ro
o ~
} L
~ O
N ~
E
a>
V
v
a

Office Use Only: Fonn Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 4 3
Ott any parncuiar netn is not appucanie to tats project, please enter i~ot Hppncaoie or i~ir~ .~
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14 and NWP 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If pa}nnent into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division 5 J.W. Bowman
Mailing Address: 2612 N. Duke St. Durham NC 27704
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-snail Address: wbowman(a~dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: __
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a :vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Up~ding and paving SR 1610 (Ran =eg_Road) in Durham County.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Durham Nearest Town: Durham
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Roxboro Rd in
northeast Durham travel north on SR 1004 (Old Oxford Hwy) for approximately 8.7 mi.
Then make a left onto Cassam Road with T-intersects with Range Road on the be ig nning end
of the project.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a dist inct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum):
Site 1: 36.1815 °N 78.8068 °W
Site 2: 36.1871 °N 78.8239 °W
Site 3: 36.1980 °N 78.8239 °W
Site 4: 36.2352 °N 78.8261 °W
6. Property size (acres): 35.78 acre (Project is 4.92 mi longs
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UTs to the Rocky Crk Dry Crk and Camp Crk
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 9

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Sites are surrounded by wooded areas and agriculture land.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Grade,
drain pave and erosion control at SR 1610 (Range Rd). The NCDOT will also dewater the
work sites during construction. Equipment may include excavator, backhoe, bulldozer,
grader, and crane.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project is part of the secondar ry oad pavint;
program. The existing~gravel roadway will be paved with a~halt.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Upgrading the existing- rg avel
roadway and associated right-of--way clearing will impact wetlands at Site 2 and some
dewatering is required at Sites 1 2 and 4. Rip Rap armorin~is proposed at all Sites.
Page 3 of 9

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
( es/no) (linear feet)
Site 2 Fill herbaceous no Adjacent 0.02
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.02
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.02 ac
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact .Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number S[ream Name Type of Impact
' Stream Width Length Impact

(indicate on map) Intermittent
?
Before Impact
(linear feet)
(acres)
Site 1 R ckytCrk Fill (piped length) Perennial 3 NONE NONE
Rip rap armoring

along stream bank 10 0.0007
Temporary 10 0.0007
dewatering concurrent concurrent
Site 2 Dry Crk Fill (piped length) perennial 2 NONE NONE
Rip rap armoring
along stream bank 20 0.0009
Temporary 10 0.0005
dewatering concurrent concurrent
Site 3 Dry Crk Fill (piped length) perennial 4 NONE NONE
Rip rap armoring
20
0
0018
along stream bank .
Temporary 20 0.0018
dewatering concurrent concurrent
Site 4 Camp Crk Fill (piped length) perennial 2 NONE NONE
Rip rap armoring
20
0.0009
along stream bank
Temporary 20 0.0009
dewatering concurrent concurrent
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 70 0.0124
Page 4 of 9

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on map) ocean, etc.) (acres)

N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0124
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.02
Open Water Impact (acres): NONE
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0324
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): 70
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. All wetlands and surface
waters not affected by construction will be protected from _unnecessary encroachment during
construction Strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of wetlands
Page 5 of 9

and surface waters will be enforced during construction Only the smallest amount of fill
necessary to complete the project will be placed in waters of the United States or ri arian
buffers.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 1 SA NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
All compensator mitigation requirements will be left to the discretion of the re ug latory
review a encies.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the .NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at h~://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Page 6 of 9

Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NlA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC ZB .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 1 SA NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Site 1
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 409 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 375 1.5 N/A
Total 784 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 9

Site 2
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
I 225 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 179 1.5 N/A
Total 404 N/A
* Zonc 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I .
Site 3
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 400 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 270 1.5 N/A
Total 670 N/A
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet ti-om the edge of Zone 1.
Site 4
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 354 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 256 1.5 N/A
Total 610 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss Stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property.
If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total
proposed impervious level. There is 16.1 acre existing impervious surface (avg 27 foot wide
gavel road, 4.92 mile project) of the 35.78 acre proiect size. The proposed impervious surface is
less with 11.9 acre (proposed 20 foot wide asphalt paved road 4 92 mile protect) of the 35 78
total project size. Erosion and sediment control devices along the project are comprised of
temporary rock silt checks temporary silt basins and temporary silt fence The temporary
structures will be removed once the vegetation has been established and then reseeded .
Page 8 of 9

XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This Rroiect will not uenerate wastewater
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Up~radin~ SR 1610 will not result in additional development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~~ " 03/0 9/0 7
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Ag'ent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

Appendix One
(USAGE Wetland Delineation forms/
NCDWQ rating sheets)
~~

DATA.. FO~tM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE WetlarSds Determination Manual) '
s~~ ~~~
Project I Site: !5~ t) ~a~ Date: Z ~-7~°7
.Applicant /Owner: c'DoT 1N 5 County• w~,haw~
•
Investigator: +~. State:
N ~-
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes / No . Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No /
_ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No~ Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. M~~ros~e.t:v.~. SP ~ Floc g.
^
2. CA..~u c~ ~~ _~ ~~ 10.
3. Tyr ~.~,,,. N ~%~ C+ 11.
4. c rabrun,. T FAG 12.
5.!-~9~ ~ d A.,-b.ti sh.ray (,~..~ _~ ~R G f 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). l~ ~~~
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...

HYDROLOGY.
- Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):, Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs Primary., indicators:

Other ,
~ ipundated
~~
_ aturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: -Sediment Deposits
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: ~ (in.) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~ (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves

0 ~ocal Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil:
(in.) ~ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~ f ~ ~ / w
~~

SOILS
S,~ ~.. ~f
Map Unit Name , ,
(Series and Phase): ~r~t cee,~, ~ Ghtu~J ac.~a•- Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Descriotion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist (Munseli Moistl AbundancelContrast Structure, etc.
C>- 2- / o `;K 3 2 SGL

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
__._ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_~. Qeducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~y~r~~ .Sa/~,f riP~c~
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes / No Is the Sampling Point /
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ~~ No Within a Wetland? Yes / NO_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes / No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
7fU3 ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~~
~~

Project Name ~ l ~' t ° ~ R°"'~~ '~°°`~ ~ Nearest Road 5~ 1 V I o
County "Du^'~'^-~'~ - Vt'etland Area ~ atO ac;es Wetland Width ~ 5° feet
Name of evaluator ~}~~~ 'M`'dF"~'''~' Date ~ °
-- -
Wetland Location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
/on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
Soil series Ca^ ~~- * C~trrac~-
predominantly organic -humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral -non-sandy
predominantly sandy
IIydraulic factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width 2100 feet
Adjacent land use
(within 1/2 mile upstream, upaope, or radius)
'~forested/natural vegetation 2 ~
~ agriculture, urban/subur~an 7p
/ impervious surface ~%
Dominant vegetation
T
(2) ~'~~ ~
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
/' intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of floodin¢ or surface water
Wetland type (select one)*
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna. -
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest ~ Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest - ~ Other ' ~ ~~""~ .
_-_____ *the ratin~n system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream charnels
------- ----------------------- ---------------------- -
wcight

R
Water storage x 4.00 = ~~ Wetland
v ~~ ~"~`
.: Rating
_~:
~

A
BanlJShoreline stabilization 2
x 4.00 =
~~~v~%
~ ~`~`_ .:.....

::::<.;;::.:;<v
~~~

1'
Pollutant removal
~
* x 5.00 = ~ :.
`Y -

I

~ Wildlife habitat
Z

x 2.00 - ...........
.::., :.:..:

N

Aquatic life value

Z-

x 4.00 = .

" • °~~
r
_,

G RecreationlEducation x 1.00 - ~:<I'~<'~<

*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >1 0% no npoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,

u
slo
e x ,~
or radius
----------
p
~
------- _
-r- ~~-
----------- ----------- ~ ----- -------------------- -------------------------

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLA~~ DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlal5ds Determination Manual)
5,~ Z ~~~
Project 1 Site:__ ~ 14to ((Za.~.gt,. R11~ Date: Z z o1
Applicant /Owner: l~/ County: -•~
Investigator: FF Mo State:..l~-
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes / No
- Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No
~ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No r/ Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator

2. T u6r T ~_ 10.
3. ~_ /APL 11.
4. ~s~ s~ " µ ~/PL 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). .SD°/~
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available water Marks
^
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: +Royld (in.) Secondary Indicators:
~ IZ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
De th to Free Water in Pit:
p (in.
) _Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: ~~ ~ (in.) _
FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

_, ,

SOILS ~ ~/ ~ Z I
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
43 ~o~'R 3 ~..
~~~ ~~`~R s~G
Hydric Soil Indicators: .
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
___ Suifidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
__ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
I(/tl'1 ~ ~ ba ~ ~ S ~' S~7

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No / Is the Sampling Point /
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ~ Within a Wetland? Yes_ No /
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

y~