HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0033430_Wasteload Allocation_19930209NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0033430
PERMr= NAME: Camp Judaea
FACILITY NAME: Camp Judaea
Facility Status: _Existing
Permit Status: Modification
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Minor
Design Capacity: 0.030 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
100 %
Comments:
Expansion request, 0.015 -> 0.030 MGD
STREAM INDEX: 6-55-11-9
RECEIVING STREAM: Henderson Creek
Class: C-Trout
Sub -Basin: 04-03-02
Reference USGS Quad: F9NW, Fruitland (please attach)
County: Henderson
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/95 Treatment Plant Class: I
Classification changes within three miles:
Becomes C at Clear Creek
Requested by;
Prepared by:
Jule Shanklin
�opc� t 30.5s 135 w
Date: 11/5/92
Date: 2/ S19J
Date: a g3
3
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
s'Wl►-)
l► to qZ
"lZlo
Drainage Area (mi`) 3. Avg. Streamflow (cfs): G, S
7Q10 (cfs) / • ! Winter 7Q10 (cfs) /. 7 30Q2 (cfs)?
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
IL
-
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (m )
30
36
NH3-N (mg/1)
/9
D-O. (mg/1)
hr
hr
TSS (mg/1).
F. Col. 000 ml)
Z06
Zoo
pH (SU)
6 _9
a�/
11MNr';W
rw ra
Comments:
refer: Basinwide / Streamline WLA file
at front of subbasin
OFA,c
o.0
M�
3o
�-9
'71 25'
MILE
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
)02
3918
-;a17oaa-N
I
MOIR
o1SCHARGE•;2TATE 26r ANT -A GEOL02G2°22'30-
£5.7 AV. POINT `
1 A 202•NW)
ROAD SIFICAT
Heavy-duty .. Poor motor road ....
Medium duty .... «= Wagon and jeep track----
Light-duty Fool trail .......... _______
�1 Interstate Route C3 U. S. Route 0 State Route
v to developed areas. only through roads are classified
FRUITLAND, N.C.
N3522.5—W8222.5/7.5
1965---•-•- -
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 7210
Facility Name:
Camp Judaea
NPDES No.:
NC0033430
Type of Waste:
Domestic - 100%
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Modification
Receiving Stream:
Henderson Creek
Stream Classification:
C-Trout
Subbasin:
040302
County:
Henderson
Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office:
Asheville
USGS #
Requestor:
Shanklin
Date:
Date of Request:
11/6/92
Drainage Area (mi2):
3.8
Topo Quad:
F9NW
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
1.1
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
1.7
Average Flow (cfs):
6.8
30Q2 (cfs):
2.4
AVC M:
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting permit modification for expansion from 0.015 MGD to 0.030 MGD. Tech
Support recommends expansion be allowed.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional continents from Reviewers:
LJ i33 zs -r E -AEG?(v,Loa x l Al Ta 30 A
Recommended by: Date:
Reviewed by
Instream Assess nt;
Regional Su .
Permits & En neerin
1/3/93
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: FEB 12 1993
2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.015
BOD5 (mg/1):
30
NH3N (mg/1):
monitor
DO (mg/1):
nr
TSS (mg/1):
30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
nr
pH (SU):
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
nr
Temperature (C):
monitor
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
WQ or EL
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.030
0.030
BOD5 (mg/1):
30
30
EL
NH3N (mg/1):
19
monitor
WQ,AT
DO (mg/1):
nr
nr
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
EL
----Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
200
200
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
28
28
Temperature (C):
monitor
monitor
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Limits Changes Due To: Parameters) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures Fecal Coliform, Chlorine,
NH3-N
New facility information
X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated he ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met? r-G-C- 4-L coc.t C t-09) NE
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
41/
NG oo 3 3 g 3d
��d � 6c .9rc.q , #,4/0
v36Z
�vl
7Qlc�
W �9 C 47
G
c6
Sop 7- G6
<
l G'
0,30
je
S'�/'.�"� � •!sue% - �� � ��
S'7�7�a � � ,ems ,,:;,` - !,,• /� ,,.,,'
7" rf
-2.
2, cry`'
r7�
cle,
3
0cu
dish dish Sti°�
(Y)0/"E
iv!
ail
E
nrf
;,. 41: x..* I',' �: i ;.i:,.l I ", A'
, �111 A T
fit
IN K N R
2
101
0
,:, 4
i
Y ,�� [
tt
pp
i
��
L�
�
�
ro
i
L�
�i _.
�. �.,
tis `.. .
i�.
I
�
� f ;
�:! ��
; i iy
is i.� ..
f
i.'';!
i '.'
l
� ...
'� j fi
;?
i1
I �
"i l �
- ��
�
..
f i �
. C? U
3
.. . ;:�
�3.
i