20051798 Ver 2_More Info Received_20100219

bs-19g8 va,
CARY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
February 18, 2010
Mr. Ian McMillan
NC DWQ, 401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
PR .*IN
FEB 1 91 20M
RE: Request for More Information
Dear Mr. McMillan,
DENR . WATER QU UTf
V&-TLAt" AND 8TORUWATER BRANCH
We received your letter written on January 25, 2010 referencing DWQ Project # 05-
1798 and we have put together the additional information you requested at our
meeting that we had on February 17, 2010 at your office with yourself and Ms. Amy
Chapman.
In response to Item #1 in your letter, there are several factors that prevent us from
moving the "kiosk hub" outside of the buffer (131). These factors include:
The Kiosk Hub is located within a unique setting as it will serve as a central
point within the Town of Cary's trail system. From the Hub greenway users
will be able to connect to other major trails, like the American Tobacco Trail,
Umstead State Park, and the Raleigh Trail System. Additionally users will be
able to connect to greenway trails that exist within Cary (see maps entitled
"Future White Oak-Black Creek Greenway Corridor" and "Greenway'Hub'
Informational Kiosk Project"). The circular design of the Kiosk Hub
highlights the significance of the location for trail users. The kiosk that is
centrally located within the circular design will provide trail system
information to users and all mile markers used will start from this location.
The proposed location of the Kiosk Hub will NOT require any tree removal
(See document entitled "Black Creek Greenway Phase IV, Segment III Photos"
to see photos of existing site conditions).
Constructing the Kiosk Hub within the proposed location will require the
least amount of demolition to the existing trail and disturbance to the
surrounding area.
Relocating the hub would require realignment of existing trails and put the
hub within the exiting spillway that runs down to Bond Lake (see document
entitled "Greenway System 'Hub' Project" to see spillway). The current
location of the kiosk is approved by the Natural Resources Conservation
Service who has authority over Bond Lake - a flood control structure.
TOWN O CARY
316 North Academy Street -Cary, NC 27513-PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512-8005
te1919-469-4061 - fax [phone]- www.townofcary.org
There is a sewer line that runs near the location of the proposed Kiosk Hub.
Initial design plans (see plan entitled "Kiosk Plan Initial Design") showed the
Kiosk Hub over the sewer line in order to avoid buffer impacts. The Town of
Cary Developmental Review Committee requested that the Kiosk Hub be
moved outside of the 20' easement, which resulted in moving the Kiosk Hub
further south, into the buffer making it not possible to avoid an impact to the
buffer.
In response to Item #2, we have provided an additional drawing that shows more
clearly the Zone 2 impacts (see drawing entitled "Proposed Kiosk Hub"). It was also
brought to our attention during a meeting we had on February 17th at the DWQ
office that the proposed concrete headers are not considered a maintenance issue
but a disturbance within Zone 1 of the buffer. The PCN form has been updated to
address the concrete header impacts.
We hope the additional information provided will clear up any questions relating to
the location of the proposed Kiosk Hub and its buffer impacts.
Regards,
Paul Kuhn, RLA, ASLA
Senior Parks Planner- Town of Cary
316 N. Academy Street, Cary, NC 27513
PO Box 8005, Cary, NC 27512-8005
919.469.4360, Fax [phone]
A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
January 25, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Paul Kuhn
Town of Cary Parks, Recreation, & Cultural Resources
P.O. Box 8005
Cary, NC 27512-8005
DWQ Project # 05-1798,,Ver 2
Wake County
Subject Property: Town of Cary: Black Creek Greenway Phase IV, Segment III
Ut to Crabtree Creek [030402, 27-33-(10), C, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Kuhn:
On January 21, 2010, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated January 20, 2010,
to fill or otherwise impact 0.00 square feet of Zone 1 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer, and 256
square feet of Zone 2 Neuse River basin protected riparian buffer, to construct the proposed kiosk hub where
two major trails connect at the site. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or
provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to
process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless
we receive five copies of the additional information requested below, we will place this project on hold as
incomplete until we receive this additional information. If we do not receive the requested information, your
project will be formally returned as incomplete. Please provide the following information so that we may
continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. This Office believes that the kiosk labeled on the plans as "kiosk hub" can be moved or reconfigured to
avoid the impacts to the buffer (B 1). Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts, or provide
justification for the kiosk location within buffer Zone 2 and compliance with the Table of Uses in 15A
NCAC 0213.0233.
2. Please provide accurate Zone 2 impacts. Discrepancy exists between the PCN form and the plan sheets.
Please submit this information within 30 calendar days of the date of this letter. If we do not receive this
requested information within 30 calendar days of the date of this letter, your project will be withdrawn and you
will need to reapply with a new application and a new fee.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or
protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this
time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-1786 if you have any
questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit One
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Noi thCarolina
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 ?aturalt?
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: http://h2o,enr.state.nc,us/ncwetlands/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
Town of Cary
Page 2 of 2
January 25, 2010
Sincerely Y ,
4 Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
01 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/ijm
cc USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Lauren Witherspoon, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Filename: 051798Ver2TOCaryBlackCreekGreenwayPhaselVSegment111(Wake)On_Hold
oS - II R % CIO.
of war?9
o? oG Office Use Only:
_ Corps action ID no.
o DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number.
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes N No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Black Creek Greenway Segment III Phase IV
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Cary
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: NA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Town of Cary
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 02983 0871
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): NA
3d. Street address: P.O. Box 8005
3e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27512-8005
3f. Telephone no.: 919-469-4360
3g. Fax no.: 919-469-4344
3h. Email address: NA
Page I of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Sr. Parks Planner
4b. Name: Paul Kuhn
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Town of Cary Parks, Recreation, & Cultural Resources
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 8005
4e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27512-8005
4f. Telephone no.: 919-469-4360
4g. Fax no.: 919-469-4344
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 075305197293

1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.785625
Longitude: - 78.821859
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 286.45 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: Bond Lake
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project is located within an existing park. Proposed improvements are for the existing trail system.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2 Acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
23,870 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Design a kiosk hub where two major trails connect
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Heavy equipment wil be used to install improvements
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:

? Yes ? No ®Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
? Preliminary ? Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ? No
® Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
? PER ? Corps
S1 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S2 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S3 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S4 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S5 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S6 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
411 Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID
number 5b.

Proposed use or purpose of 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
Greenway/ ? Yes
B1 ®P ? T Hiking UT-1 to Crabtree Creek ® No 200 SF 256.2 SF
Trails
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 200 SF 256.2 SF
6i. Comments: Existing Condition is mowed lawn
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to existing utilities we were unable to avoid a buffer impact at this location.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fence and tree protection fence will be installed to project buffers.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
NA
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes No
Comments: For this project, no new storm pipes were added in the riparian buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 12.3%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Plan in place to handle collection, detention, and routing of surface runoff, and to improve water quality & sediment
retention
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Town of Cary
® Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
®Yes ? No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a . Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b . If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
d
i
i El Yes ® No
a
d
t
onal development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Field Office
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
USFWS Field Office
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b . If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project creates no fill in the floodplain
8c . What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? GIS Maps
FAUL KLuRK
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
J
P, I

4

U
V\?I
A
f J/
l

ON-
O L 0
lr- ? U
OZ
Q

?IOpl,?,?O? /CLMU99.?cJ
L
U
v
cQ
?? ,!gym
0
1 ,
1 Qom`
?a z

r?
a?
iJ

a ?
0
s
a
a-+
C
N
E
d
V
L.
N
V d
O ca
a
Y
00
Y otS
c 2
o'm
ca
? L
E v
N
C N
Y
L
?a
T 2!'
m
ca
3 o
c r
o
L 012
0
Black Creek Greenway Phase IV, Segment III Photos
Proposed work includes replacing plastic flared end sections on both eastern
and western sides of the trail with conrete flared end sections

View of existing trail conditions looking northwest to
proposed Kiosk Hub location
Proposed location of the Kiosk Hub will effect the
grass section past the fence on the left side of the
trail shown in the picture
View of existing trail conditions looking east to
proposed Kiosk Hub location
Proposed location of the Kiosk Hub will effect the
grass section (highlighted in yellow) on the right
side of the trail shown in the picture
Eastern side view of trail crossing over creek
Western side view of trail crossing over creek
D ?
C
? o
t ?
V
Q
C
d
0
N
V
L
O
NN?
L.I.
L
U
v =
%0
O
L cc
L
.Q ?
Y
L
co
3O
'L^ O
V
• ?1
M
Kiosk Plan
Initial Design
SCALE: 1 "=40'
NOTE: NO \§i4NIFICANT ?? \\ I I /' / --
VEGETATION WIN
LIMITS OF WORK
sF, ABI / ----
- - - 131-3
1,354 REMOVE ULCH

B" PVC
/ STNS,/ SCENT PLASTIC PIPES,'
- - REMOVE FLARE /rENtE
END SECTIONS
(WEST SIDE 'ONLY P4,
/ of
4< -'- BUFFER / ,
NAH
TOP RIM = 35138
INV. IN ?24") = 336.86 / i
INV. OUT (24") = 336.81/i?
'
' j -352/
i
S'c le: 1 "=4SY
- - - _y
In this initial design the proposed location of the Kiosk was located within the
sewer easement. Town of Cary Developmental Review Committee requested that
the design be moved outside of the sewer easement (see attached comments).
.1- ,
January 7, 2010
Town of Cary
PO BOx 8005
Cary, NC 27512
RE: Black Creek Greenway Segment 3 Phase IV
Town of Cary Project Number: 09-SP-055
Wake County Real Estate ID Number(s) 0102447
Dear Sir or Madam:
Planning Department
I am pleased to advise that on January 4, 2010 the Development Review Committee approved the above
referenced site plan subject to the following Special Conditions of Approval: .
Development authorized by this ep rmit/aR12roval may not take place until a new water and/or sewer connection
permit is issued 12er 36 of the Cary Code of Ordinances This approval does not guarantee issuance
of a utility connection permit by the Town.
Special Conditions of Approval:
The following comments must be addressed in the master set (reproducible set) submitted for approval. If outstanding
comments are not addressed, the master set will be returned without the required staff signatures:
[Ver. 2] [Edited By David Spencer]
Modify the minimumsign height for W11-2 to seven feet.
[Ver. 2] [Edited By Kevin Hales]
Created with idtPlar}s Review Page 1 of 6
Please show the locations of the W11-2/W16-7P signs on the layout plan and denote the sign types.
Modify the detail sheet to remove reference to W16-9P and replace with W16-7P.
Based on our previous conversations and e-mails, please revise the note regarding the maintenance of Streetprint to
be more specific about the fact that Public Works will be responsible for maintenance.
[Ver. 2] [Edited By Laura Cove]
We cannot approve a site plan with alternates. Please select one plan and proceed accordingly. If the plan changes
at a later date after approval, it can be modified through an official process.
Also the concrete Header overtop the sewer line. We don't allow structures of any kind within the sewer easement.
Here there is no sewer easement b/c its TOC property.
In most cases easements are 10' on either side of the sewer line. Greenway trails are allowed in the easements b/c
they are maintained and easily repaired.
The detail has been revised so that there is only asphalt over the sewerline. The kiosk has been offset so it is outside
of the '20" easement.
The double-barrel headwall is right on top of the sewer line. No structures are allowed on top of existing or proposed
sewer lines.
[Ver. 2] [Edited By Kevin Hales]
[Ver. 21 [Edited By Kevin Hales]
Utility lines added (Sewer & Water)
Created with idtPlans Review Pale 2 of 6
I'd recommend moving the Kiosk so that is not right over the sewer line. If this sewer line needs to be repaired then the
Kiosk will be torn up.
In lieu of indicating "alternatives" in the plan set, propose the fully-funded option as the project scope. Since no new
utilities are necessary, you can handle reduced budget allocations as construction "sequencing" concerns rather than
proposing several alternate scenarios. If you are not funded to construct "alternative 2" then simply construct
"alternative 1" only or no additional parking. Then, if funding becomes available within the 5 years that the plan is valid,
you can construct "alternative 2" without a new site plan.
Show the existing utility lines in the area of work and the areas that would traditionally be required easements (10 feet
either side of the line) on the landscape plan. Remove any vegetation proposed within the "easements".
1 .v
• The utility lines were added as requested, but the area typically required for a utility easement still has plants shown
within it. There should be no plant material within 10 feet of any water or sewer line (services are not considered utility
lines for this purpose).
[Ver. 2] [Edited By Kevin Hales]
BEFORE ANY WORK CAN BEGIN ON THIS PROJECT, with exception of early grading permits (Policy
66), the following items must be submitted to the Planning Department:
Please submit a master set (reproducible set) of the approved plans for signature in addition to a digital copy of the master
set (be sure to include a copy of this letter of notification with the submittal of the master set). The plans must
include all information shown on the original drawings, as approved by the Development Review Committee, as well as
any remaining requirements or conditions of the approval addressed in this letter. Alterations to the plans, beyond the
scope of those indicated above, must be approved by the Town of Cary Staff prior to incorporation into the master set.
Each plan sheet within the master set will be initialed by staff as approved and then be returned to you.
All new and existing streets shown on this plan, whether public or private, must be labeled with approved names.
SUBMITTAL OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN PACKAGE
After you receive the signed master plan set, you will receive a checklist outlining the number of plans to be returned in
order to complete the review process. All items indicated on the checklist must be returned to the Town of Cary
Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permit and prior to beginning construction.
• Notify the Town of Cary Engineering Department at [phone] that construction is about to commence.
Please note that all documents delivered to, or to be picked up from, Town Hall should go through the Inspections &
Permits Department, located on the first floor of Town Hall.
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL ITEMS:
Plan approval becomes null and void if no substantial progress is begun within two years of the approval date (see
definition under Substantial Progress in Chapter 12 of the LIDO and refer to LDO Section 3.9.2 (K) Effect and Duration of
the Plan Approval). In no case shall the plan approval be considered valid for more than five years from the original
approval date.
Signage is a separate approval process and has not been reviewed nor approved as a part of this development plan
Please be advised any person conducting business in the Town of Cary, either by maintaining a business location within
the Town limits; personally or through agents, soliciting business within the Town or picking up and /or delivering goods
and services within the Town, is responsible for obtaining a Privilege License (Business License). For information
please call Kelli LaFrance-Girard at [phone].
Before erecting any signs on the property, you must obtain a sign permit. Please contact Brent Reck, Zoning Compliance
Supervisor at [phone] for information regarding temporary signs, or Debra Grannan at [phone] regarding
permanent signage.
No change can be made to this site plan unless the Town of Cary Planning Department is notified.
If you have any questions regarding the approved plan or if I can be of any assistance, please contact me at (919)
462-3944.
Sincerely,
m0w?__
Kevin A. Hales
Created avith idtPlans Review Page 3 of 6
• Correct the common name of shumard oak in the Alternate Plant Schedule. It currently appears as "lace bark elm".
Senior Planner
cc Stan Godwin, Engineering Field Technician Supervisor
Doug McRainey, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Resources
Wayne Nicholas, Planning Manager
Brent Reck, Zoning Compliance Supervisor
File
Town of Cary
Attn: Paul Kuhn
PO Box 8005
The Town of Cary, NC 27512
L" J
Created with idtPlans Review Page 4 of 6
lLJ
1
vv??v P w a w ?, a w
I ?
rem, wz^ ? ? ?z ? 'w
C-1 i
OZ
? I
AU? s
-------- ;UU=
- T \ - C\2 \
1 \. \th N Q?,7, O
\. A CYO, ?-- ? ? Q
V
rT,
c\2 f?
\ \ \ a z oo
\ \ \ C\2
\ \ \ ?D
U ?j
c
? o
V
r
Q
C
E
a.
d
0
N
V
L
O
V
O ?
L L
a?
5
o U
Rea
?a =
= o
o
aL
E
o ?
c vs
L
.Q ?
o.
?a
3 o
c c
L O
0 F-
0
CLSLZ eulloie0 y;joN °tie0 70VIN00 NOISOH3 8 ON/OVU9 S `NV7d.LnoAV7
? ,oE .qor .
;aaj;S Aiuape*V y;joN 9LS `NV7d N0I1170MG 8 SNOLLIUNOO ONIISIX3 > Z
9N/NNV7d S3fUVyd - H3Hd $ ' `Z£1# ' _ m m •° W ••
tied ?O uMOl Al Osegd `S Bag --YaaJ? -loela o t 3 a m
3WdN 103f 02ld 0 0 o E 0 o
a`a`8dow
41
! '?1 '3 1Ih :far ?`
f
ilw
' ? r ,M ? , t Y"?- Mr?[rp MI?U
It t r ?1 r a 1!C
I
?? rte.,, ,? •,
n so? Me uO!5OJ3 I? Bul ea
o ( Y •.
1f r'
r -
lit
9 d' _ -1
deal A;pkIDIA
W
U)
Q
a
z
w
w
Q
z
w
w
0
Y
w
w
U
Y
U
a
J
m
U
ry
Z)
0
U)
NJ
L{
:O
J C)
? O
Q
U N
U
o
z<
Q Z)
Z
00?
Q
LLJ
LU
(n
Y
Q
n
m
?C
M
M N
a CU CD N
o C -4 N Z co
75 a)
LLLNL f
0 Z' 0) (0 -p U
?U ooCD W<
U t CV)
_ O LO ?' L M
Q z = ° N c M
m
LLI coo ? S cm 'c
o UL? d co o(D o
N 3 ?Q
U CD a
w cf0 9
Q ?~ Uc?
Q
F-
L
C'4 \ \` f
X?•
II !
U !
> & 1 1 1 ; j
1 ??

it p; v } ? ?? 1 1
'u N?
? .117 0 ? i
m
S, ; 1
\ ? !1 ?1 •
W
\ 1
N}? 1!?
! ? ?+ ?? ?n
ly N}G1 ?

MNi` 3?• \

\v\g \? i
rya%;tiPQ-y
?, .?. qnH 31so/3f ;veld uol;!loulaQ
??«? 8 suol;ipuo3 Bul;slX3
�y
ROOM
.O
ON
O�
o
*ao
44
•a
LU
BLACK CREEK GREENWAY SEGMENT III PHASE IV
NOTE: NO SI(N,
VEGETATION WITI
LIMITS OF WORK
/
/
40000
REMOVE MULCH , \
/' T1T711'A-•� T\TT t T IH O I
Northuty
Address: 801 High House Road
-
Owner: Town of
Real Estate
Total Acreage: •
6.46 acres
Zoning: RR
Watershed: Crabtree Creek Watershed, Neuse River Bas"
• .' Site Impervious:
�\ \ AO -A/'
\ \ \ 1 1 I
3�8
loll
\
i I
ZONE 2 .-•- -
X ­ BUFFER
_ IP
g„ PVC
;��...��.. I ,S;- - __— - Zoe•-'" --� _
LIMITS OF WORK
2 EXISTING 24"
�S N �% �'' '-'! `� �"� y / �•''' l y CEN PLASTIC PIPES // --
S
_ . H —
i �-350.50----­--------
aloe
REMOVE FLARED."
END SECTI S ,• , ;
RIP
(WEST SIDE -6 LY �, �' ❑ P�� 1 �`� ;
,-ZONE
% R
.•'• r� I yY=
S RI /
MH
' •�•'' ' ' ,', j TOP RIM = 351.78
ice•-'' / ' t INV. IN 24") = 336.86
NV. OU (24") = 336.81 '
1 I
1 I
1
I I
I I
1 �1
1 r 1
I �I
1 <I
101
1 F 1
I 1 - ZU $ /
SEE 1A-9 DETAIL #24 x''
ASPAHLT
FOR KIOSK HUB DETAIL / ,. I // / `�j / •p
ZONE
2_
6' MULCH UFFE
� B R
SOFT SURFA
loft
cRLIMITS OF WORK
_lie
1b 4001 T
BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 2
CENTER
DITCH (B1) 6.4 SF
Or1E1-•''�R`-
BUFFER IMPACT %'�a ��N\ �. ' �`n1
® ZONE 2•/
�\ (Bl) 249.8tSF/BUFFER IMPACT
- ❑
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
_ •-' /©'� �`�,'�,
(1311) 100 SF �!' 1 1, \ ZONE 1
(Bi) 100 SF
® FLARED END SECTIO Sa/
I 2
ON EACH END OF THE EXISTING HDPE PJ. E. ! `\1`, ZONE
USE ADAPTORS PROVIDED BY MANUFAC�'I7RER I, ^S ;pAgN BUFFF ER
® TO CONNECT. REMOVE & REPLACP.-4IP RAP06
AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL FLARED �' � ,�
END SECTIONS.
i 3
ZMINA
UT /moi
NEW TRAIL \TO MATCH
GRADE OF E)d4TING TRAIL—
ENSURE POSITM DRAINAGE
AWAY FROM TRAL`,,-------
I I
\ 1340-A/
\
i \\amu' \`s �•-•-t' •�' � ( /'- `� � / / /
s
.• 1
A;/ __ZONE
RIPARIAN $UFFE
r /' ' _ •"/y'e`a/
v
i
............TEMPORARY 6' MITU'll T
(FOR PUBLIC ACCESS
TO BE INSTALLED PIU69
TO DFS@I',ITION J '
_ II
4
ZEE 1 " FEES= ,
_ gUF
_RIPA '
/
\ ,ZONE Z R r /'
_ tJFFE
B
o , '
i
i
ok
N
y
w
z
W
0_
Project: Black Crk.
Project By: PK
Drawn By: LM
Compiled By: PS
Date: 07228 Z09
Scale: 1"=30'
SHEET N0.
1
ANOS9p
`L
N W
� J _
Project: Black Crk.
Project By: PK
Drawn By: LM
Compiled By: PS
Date: 07228 Z09
Scale: 1"=30'
SHEET N0.
1