HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0001800_More Information (Received)_20200625June 261h, 2020
N.C. ❑epartment of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section —Class B Residuals Permit (DEDICATED)
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ATTENTION: Mr. Nathaniel Thornburg
REFERENCE: Yadkinville Minor Modification
Dear Mr. Thornburg:
In response to the additional information request for the Minor Modification for the Town of
Yadkinville, below are the responses to each point.
Soil Evaluation:
1. The updated soil samples are attached with the correct numbering to match the
fields.
2. Mercury results for each new field are now attached below. Per regulation 15A NCAC
02T .1104. c.2.13 only pollutants in section 15A NCAC 02T .1105.b. are required.
Molybdenum is not required when adding new non -dedicated land application sites.
3. The site maps have been updated and attached to meet all the requirements asked
for in the addition information request, along with an updated LASC.
However, if you require additional information or have further questions, please contact me
at (336-703-8681) or afox@synagro.com I look forward to working with you on timely turn
around for this project.
Sincerely,
Alex Fox
284 Boger Road, Mocksville, NC 27028 . Phone: (336) 790-1610 • Fax: (443) 489-9182
o�0F w A r�RQ6
State of North Carolina
� Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of 'Water Quality
LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR .FORM: LASC 08-11
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information or for an electronic version of this form, visit the Land Application Unit (LAU) web site at:
http: //portal. ncdenr. oiZ/web/wg/aps/lair
General -- This certification provides detailed information of receiving sites for land application of Class B residuals (may include
water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .I 100. Do not submit this certification for review
without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 08-11 or FORM: SDR 08-11).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 08-11):
❑ Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: LASC 08-11) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer,
❑ For new or renewed permits, submit the requested information for all land application sites.
® For modified permits, submit the requested information for oul those sites that are new, transferred or affected by the
proposed modification.
( Land Application Site Information:
® The status of the land application site with respect to this residuals land application program must be provided in table 1. The
status categories and their corresponding codes are as follows:
New (N) ♦ Renewed (R) ♦ Modified (M) ♦ Transferred (T) ♦ Deleted (D)
® Attach the following in accordance with each status code:
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
Im
✓
County Manager
Notification
Land Owner
Agreement
(If applicable)
Setback Waiver
Agreement
An updated vicinity/setback map in accordance with the "Map Guidance
for Residuals Land Application Pennits"
✓
✓
✓
W
A soils and agronomic evaluation in accordance with the "Soil Scientist
✓
Evaluation Policv"
An updated accounting of the land application site's cumulative
✓
✓
pollutant loading rates CPLRs)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 09-11 Page I of 3
Status Code
Required Item
N I
R
T
M
For previously permitted sites without a soil series name indicated in the
Attachment B, submit County Soil Survey Map (or equivalent) clearly
✓
indicate the location of the land application site and in accordance with
the soil map requirements in the "Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy"
Acknowledgement of field transfer from Permittee relinquishing field
✓
Acknowledgement of field transfer from Land Owner (Fields may not
be permitted to multiple Permittees over the same timeperiod)
* This item may be required for land application site with a status code "M", please contact the Division if you need assistant in
determining attachment requirements.
® Crop Type should include the most likely crop types for the life of the permit (five years).
® Predominant Soils Series Name must be either the name of the soil indicated in Attachment `B" of the existing permit, or
name of the soil series as provided by the licensed soil scientist.
® Predominant Soil Mapping Unit or Representative Slope: Either the Soil Mapping Unit or the representative slope of each
site must be provided. The predominant soil -mapping unit must be consistent with the predominant soil series nacre. Please
note that the soil mapping units are variable between Counties, so care should be taken in properly identifying the correct
mapping unit. If a representative slope is provided, it must he determined accordingly:
❑ For sites previously permitted for use, but do not have an established soil mapping unit (the mapping unit provides
information on both the soil series name and the slope of the soil), the Applicant may determine the representative slope
by using the average slope provided in the County Soil Survey (or equivalent). A soil type with a slope range of 4 - 8%
would have a representative slope of 6%.
❑ New Sites to be permitted must have slopes determined as part of the soils report prepared by a licensed soil scientist.
® Acceptable methods for determining location coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) and their corresponding codes are as
follows:
• Address Matching (ADD) • Digital or Raw Photo Extraction (EXT)
• Aerial Photography with Ground Control (AER) • Geodetic Quality GPS Survey (GEO)
• Cadastral Survey (SUR) • LORAN-C Navigation Device (LOR)
• Conversion from Coordinate Plane (CP) • Navigation Quality GPS (GPS)
• Conversion from Township -Section -Range (TSR) • Remote Sensing (RS)
• Conversion from Universal Trans Mere (UTM) • Zip Code Centroid (ZIP)
• Map Interpretation by Digital or Manual Extraction (MAP)
C. Waterbody and Classifications Information: (new sites only)
® Use an 8.5 by 11-inch copy of the portion of a 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map to identify the location where the
residuals program activities are planned to occur as well as the closest downslope surface waters as clearly as possible. Each
map portion must be labeled with the map name and number, the identified location, and be of clear and reproducible quality.
® Surface water body classifications information may be found at: hiip://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu
® Any questions concerning the waterbody and its classification, please contact the Division's regional offices.
A list of the Division's :regional offices, their county coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at:
hap:Hportal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/home/ro
General Instructions: There are 17 river basins in North Carolina. Each basin has associated waterbodies with assigned
subbasins, location descriptions, stream index numbers and established classifications.
I. Identify the project area on a 7.5 minute USGS topographical map (an 8.5 x 11-inch sheet showing the project area
should be submitted with the permit application regardless of whether a Stream classification was completed).
2. Determine the names of all the closest down slope surface waters from the project site, For unnamed tributaries, see
Table 1: Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas. Label any unnamed tributaries as
"UT to stream name" as the waterbody name.
3. Open the link h ://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/bims/re orts/re ortsWB.htmi, If this link does not work, open
hqp://portal.ncdenr.orj?lweb/wg/ps/esulclassifications and download weekly -updated classification lists for named
waterbodies.
® Stream Classification Process: One of the options below may be used depending on the known initial project information.
® KNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 08-11 Page 2 of 3
1. Select proper basin from the List all Waterbodies in Basin sorted report. Sort hydrologically as this will provide
the proper location descriptions if multiple runs.
2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
' 3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
® KNOWN COUNTY WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select the proper county from the List all Waterbodies in county, hydrologically report.
2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ UNKNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Use the Clickable basin map to hydrologically sorted list report.
2. Click on the approximate project location to bring up the hydrologically sorted list.
3. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
4. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the Iocation description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
5. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ Notes on index number and unnamed streams:
Unnamed Streams 15A NCAC 02B .0301(i).
❑ Any stream which is not named in the schedule of stream classifications carries the same classification as that assigned
to the stream segment to which it is tributary (at the point of entry) except:
(A) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications;
(B) unnamed freshwaters tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C"; or
(C) after November 1, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which are connected to Class SA waters by
approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" unless case -by -case reclassification proceedings are conducted.
❑ The following river basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other states or for specific areas of the
basin:
Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas
Hiwassee River Basin
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr."
Little Tennesse River
Basin And Savannah
River Drainage Area
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr." Such streams in the Savannah
River drainage area entering South Carolina shall be classified 'B Tr."
French Broad River
Basin
Streams entering Tennessee will be classified "B."
Watauga River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Broad River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
New River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Catawba River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C," and such streams entering South Carolina are
classified "C."
Lumber River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C Sw."
Roanoke River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C." Except that all backwaters of John H. Kerr
Reservoir and the North Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or
described shall carry the classification "B," and all backwaters of Lake Gaston and the North
Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall carry the
classification "C and B."
Chowan River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C."
Tar -Pamlico River
Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C Sw." except the main drainage.
canals to Pamlico Sound and its bays which shall be classified "SC."
Pas uotank River Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C."
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 08-11 Page 3 of 3
LAND A. -OLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
Applicant's name: Town of Yadkinville 10-t-
Land application sites currently certified: 122.8 net acres and Total to be certified: tenet acres.
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction E):
Status
Code'
Site/Field ID
Landowner(s)
Lessee(s) or Operator(s)
Net Acres
County
Crop(s)
Predominant Soil
Series Nameb
Mapping Unit
or Rep. Slope°
N
Yk-42-1
Phil Brown
16.0 Z.
Yadkin
Fescue
Clifford
2-7%
N
Yk-42-2
Peggy York
Phil Brown
MIAj
Yadlci_n
Fescue
Fairview
2-7%
N
Yk-42-4
James Sumerlin
Phil Brown
2W?J
Yam
Fescue
Fairview
2-7%
N
Yk-42-5
Mark Russel, David Porterfield
Phil Brown
19.0
Yadkin
Fescue
Clifford
2-7%
' Status Code for land application sites are: + N (New) + R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) + T (Transferred) + D (Deleted)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
° Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e. for a 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the rnapping unit is CeB2)
II. WATER13ODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction Q.-
Site/FieId ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Datum
Location Method Code
Location Accuracy
Waterbod y Subbasin and
Stream Index No.
Current and Proposed
Class
Yk-42-1
360 13' 2.80"
800 35' 6.25"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
12-83-2-0.3
CJ
Yk-42-2
360 12' 50"
800 34' 55"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
12-83-2-0.3
C
Yk-42-4
360 14' 9.1"
800 35' 22.14"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
12-68
C
�
Yk-42-5
360 14' 15.8"
800 35' 15,55"
NAD 83
ADD
Nearest Second
12-68
C
r— '
FORM: LASC 08-11 Page 1
APPLICATION MAP
a
z
Ul
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA
UNSUITABLE AREA
— — — — — —
PRIVATE ROAD
W
WATER
GRAPHIC SCALE
— — — —
STREAM
III =660'
ONSITE HOUSE
-
DRAIN
660' 0 660'
OFFSITE HOUSE
FENCE
OUTBUILDING
PROPERTY LINE
Q
SOIL BORING 0
WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within A I C—YK— �12
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established V i i� `F
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All locations are approximate. Fields ,{ l —2
APPLICATION MAP
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA
UNSUITABLE AREA
— — — — PRIVATE ROAD
W WATER
— — — — STREAM GRAPHIC SCALE
® 1=660'
ONSITE HOUSE
— DRAIN
660, D 660'
XX FENCE OFFSITE HOUSE
PROPERTY LINE OUTBUILDING
•0 SOIL BORING 0 WELL
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within N C-YK-42
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate. Fields 4-5
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: (919) 733-2655 Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY20-SL022011
Client: Alex Fox Advisor: Alex Fox
vo- Heavy Metals Synagro Synagro
284 Boger Rd 284 Boger Rd
Iti' ..`..� Mehlich-3 Extraction Mocksville, NC 27028 Mocksville, NC 27028
$ Soil Report
Links to Helpful Information Sampled County: Yadkin
Client ID: 501947 Advisor ID: 501947
Sampled: Received: 01/15/2020 Completed: 06/22/2020 Farm: Phil Brown
Agronomist's Comments:
This report contains both routine soil test information as well as heavy metals data in a section labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results. Using Mehlich 3 as a
soil test extractant, background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium (Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium
(Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead (Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). Note elevated lead (Pb) in samples 2, 3 and 4. Although the above
metals here are not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where elevated above background levels. Note any lime and fertilizer
recommendations. Tissue testing is suggested where the soil pH is high as in samples found here. Jagathi Kamalakanthan 1/l7/2020<br><br>This report contains both
routine soil test information as well as heavy metals data in a section labeled as Heavy Metals under soil test lab results. Using Mehlich 3 as a soil test extractant,
background levels of these metals typically seen in NC soils when analyzed are as follows: arsenic (As)- 4.5 ppm, cadmium (Cd)- 0.1 ppm, chromium (Cr)- 0.2 ppm, lead
(Pb)- 4.2 ppm, nickel (Ni)- 0.8 ppm, & selenium (Se)- 0.2 ppm (FY2005-2007). <span style="background-color: #ffff00;">(Note levels by sample if elevated signficantly
as needed.)</span>Although the above metals here are not believed to pose a concern for plant growth, continue to monitor these and note where elevated above
background levels. <span style="background-color: #ffff00;">This report was also flagged with a "C" and/or "Z" to alert you that copper and/or zinc have accumulated in the
soil and are approaching a level that could be detrimental to crop production. The C and Z symbols are printed on your report for soil test index levels of 2000 or more; for
peanuts with zinc, the level is 300. This note is designed to be a "trigger" that allows enough time to either reduce the rate of application or find another field for application
of biosolids and/or waste water. The CTL (critical toxic level) for Cu & Zn has been set at 3000 index; for peanuts with zinc, the level is 500. These levels are used by
DENR as a benchmark to determine when application of waste products should be stopped. The CTL for copper and zinc was set to prevent levels from accumulating to
the point where they become toxic to crops grown on a field.</span> Note any lime and fertilizer recommendations. Where soil test phosphorus (P) is very high (P-1 >
100), crops will not respond to additional P applied. <span style="background-color: #ffff00;">Tissue testing is advised where soil pH is elevated and where Zn and Cu
levels are of concern as in samples found here.</s an>
Sample ID: 1
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 30 40 0 0 pH$ 0 0 0
Note: 12 Note:
2 - 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.27 1.08 7.0 93 0.5 6.7 48 49 78 11 97 117 77 ill ill 267 0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.1 Cadmium, 0.1 Nickel, 0.3 Chromium, 0.3 Lead, 4.5 Selenium, 0.1
Norl h C,irolivj
Tobacco Trust FwW C47mmisslon
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Aqriculture
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: (919) 733-2655 Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY20-SL022011
Alex Fox
Page 2 of 3
Sample ID: 2
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 70
10
0 0
pH$
0
0
0
Note: 12 Note: $
2- 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.32 0.99 10.0 96 0.4 6.9 30 76 63 29
41 127
79
298
298
100
0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.0 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.4
Chromium, 0.2
Lead,
10.8
Selenium,
0.1
Sample ID: 4
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1-Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.3 120-200 130
110
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 12
2- 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.36 0.96 6.5 82 1.2 5.8 5 17 54 26
36 62
54
134
134
73
0.1 2
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.0 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.4
Chromium, 0.2
Lead,
7.1
Selenium,
0.1
Sample ID: 5
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 60
100
0 0
pH$
0
0
0
Note: 12 Note: $
2- 0.0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
S-1 Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.36 1.03 7.5 91 0.6 6.7 32 18 65 25
51 91
61
260
260
85
0.1 1
Heavy Metals (parts per million): Arsenic, 0.0 Cadmium, 0.1
Nickel, 0.4
Chromium, 0.5
Lead,
8.1
Selenium,
0.0
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: (919) 733-2655 Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY20-SLO22011
Alex Fox
Page 3 of 3
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at onE
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-1
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
Mn-
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft . If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/obpart4.htn*fsfind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
Zn-1
zinc index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-Al2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinel
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit wwwncagr.gov/agronomi/uvrst.htm
•
Waypoint
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax 804-271-6446
ANALYTICAL
www.waypointanalytical.com
Sample Summary Table
Report Number: 20-161-0001
Client Project Description: Phil Brown/Yadkinville WWTP
Lab No Client Sample ID
Matrix Date Collected
Date Received Method
Lab ID
72601 1
Solids
06/09/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72602 2
Solids
06/09/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72603 4
Solids
06/09/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
72604 5
Solids
06/09/2020 SW-7471B
WP MTN
WP MTN - Memphis, TN: Waypoint Analytical - TN, Memphis, TN
Page 1 of 5
Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46507
Synagro Central LLC/ Yadkinville
Project
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Information
Mocksville , NC 27028
Submitted By : Alex Fox
Report Number : 20-161-0001
Lab No : 72601
Sample ID : 1
Test
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax 804-271-6446
www.waypointanalytical.com
Alex Fox
Phil Brown/Yadkinville WWTP
REPORT OFANALYSIS
Report Date : 06/15/2020
Received : 06/09/2020
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Matrix: Solids
Sampled:
Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0374 mg/Kg 0.0150 1 06/12/2012:15 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
L Limit Exceeded
Page 2 of 5
Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46507
Synagro Central LLC/ Yadkinville
Project
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Information
Mocksville , NC 27028
Submitted By : Alex Fox
Report Number : 20-161-0001
Lab No : 72602
Sample ID : 2
Test
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax 804-271-6446
www.waypointanalytical.com
Alex Fox
Phil Brown/Yadkinville WWTP
REPORT OFANALYSIS
Report Date : 06/15/2020
Received : 06/09/2020
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Matrix: Solids
Sampled:
Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0317 mg/Kg 0.0149 1 06/12/2012:17 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
L Limit Exceeded
Page 3 of 5
Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46507
Synagro Central LLC/ Yadkinville
Project
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Information
Mocksville , NC 27028
Submitted By : Alex Fox
Report Number : 20-161-0001
Lab No : 72603
Sample ID : 4
Test
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax 804-271-6446
www.waypointanalytical.com
Alex Fox
Phil Brown/Yadkinville WWTP
REPORT OFANALYSIS
Report Date : 06/15/2020
Received : 06/09/2020
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Matrix: Solids
Sampled:
Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0368 mg/Kg 0.0156 1 06/12/2012:18 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
L Limit Exceeded
Page 4 of 5
Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
46507
Synagro Central LLC/ Yadkinville
Project
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Information
Mocksville , NC 27028
Submitted By : Alex Fox
Report Number : 20-161-0001
Lab No : 72604
Sample ID : 5
Test
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax 804-271-6446
www.waypointanalytical.com
Alex Fox
Phil Brown/Yadkinville WWTP
REPORT OFANALYSIS
Report Date : 06/15/2020
Received : 06/09/2020
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Matrix: Solids
Sampled:
Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0386 mg/Kg 0.0154 1 06/12/2012:19 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
L Limit Exceeded
Page 5 of 5