20030013 Ver 1_Complete File_20030109

`4??d yam os
J
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GovERNoR
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH N.C. 27611-5201
October 14, 1997
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ms. Cyndi Bell
DWQ - DENR
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
C) 3 ) 13
;U (4.s0h
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
Review of Scoping Sheets for the following projects:
Project T.I.P. County Bridge No. Stat&Route Planning Engineer
B-3358 Onslow No. 91 SR 1509 ill Goodwin
B-3362 Person No. 11 US 158 /Dennis Pipkin
B-3324 Davidson No. 460 SR 1318 /Dennis Pipkin
B-3142 Columbus No. 12 NC 242 Jeff Ingham
B-3148 Columbus No. 248 /J SR 1740 ?Jeff Ingham
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets and location maps for the
subject projects. The purpose of this information and the related review procedure is to have an
early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby
enable us to better implement the projects. Scoping meetings for these projects are scheduled for
ri er 12, 1997 in the Planning and Environmental Branch Conference Room, _ 4T0).
These scoping meetings will be held back to back ; Offining'at 2:QQ P. A for B-3358 and
B-3362. The remaining project meetings will begin at 2:30 P. M. in the order shown above.
These meetings typically last 10 to 15 minutes per project, so all attendees should plan to arrive
at the beginning of the 2:00 P. M. or 2:30 P. M. session as applicable. You may provide us with
your comments at the meeting, mail them to us prior to the meeting, or e-mail them to
[e-mail] prior to the meeting.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any
questions about the meetings or the scoping sheets, please call the indicated Project Planning
Engineer, at 733-3141.
HFV/bg
Attachments
?r

d„c SfAT( o
au3
gNpv?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
December 30, 1997
MEMO TO: Project File
FROM: Dennis Pipkin, P.E.
Project Planning Engineer
SUBJECT: Scoping Meeting for Replacement of Bridge
No. 460 on SR 1318 over Branch of Swearing Creek,
Davidson County, Federal Aid Project No. MABRZ-1318(7),
State Project No. 8.2603801, TIP No. B-3324
A scoping meeting for B-3324 was held on November 11, 1997. The
following persons were in attendance:
Jimmy Goodnight Roadway Design
Leon Oliver Roadway Design
Jim Morrison Roadway Design
Ray Moore Structure Design
Parks Icenhour Location & Surveys
Jerry Snead Hydraulics
Debbie Bevin SHPO
Don Sellers ROW
Van Argabright Program Development
David Rhodes Program Development
Lawrence Gettier Traffic Control
Bruce Ellis Planning & Environmental
Dennis Pipkin Planning & Environmental
Jeff Ingham Planning & Environmental
Utility conflicts are considered to be medium to high for this project. In the
vicinity of the bridge, there are the following utilities:
- 250 psi gas service
- 90 psi gas line
- 18 inch sanitary sewer
- 12 inch water line
- high voltage power lines on two alignments
- telephone service attached to power poles
- cable television service attached to power poles
9,
Ms. Cyndi Bell of DWQ had indicated that the Branch of Swearing Creek
(also called Rat Spring Branch) is in the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin, and the
stream is classified as Class "C". No wetlands show up on the National Wetland
Inventory map. In summary, Ms. Bell felt that the project should have very low
impact.
Mr. David Cox of WRC indicated by memo, that NCDOT should routinely
minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources in the vicinity of bridge
replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain sedimentation control
measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with
spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is
recommended in most cases. Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation and vehicle related mortality at
highway crossings.
Ms. Debbie Bevin of the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
commented that there are not expected to be any impacts to historic
architectural resources, thus no architectural survey will be required. And since
the area has a low potential with respect to archeological resources, no
archeological investigation is required.
Mr. Jerry Snead of the Hydraulics Unit recommended replacing the bridge
on existing location with a double barrel 9 foot by. 8 foot reinforced concrete box
culvert, at approximately the same roadway grade as the existing bridge. If a
temporary on-site detour is used, two 72 inch corrugated metal pipes are
recommended, with a detour roadway grade approximately 3 feet lower than
existing, and located southwest (downstream) to avoid relocating the high
voltage power lines. The crossing is in a designated flood hazard zone; however,
there will be no significant effects on the existing floodplain nor on the
associated flood hazards. The project is not in a water supply watershed or a
high quality water zone; therefore, standard erosion control measures will be
used. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained to the extent practicable.
The Davidson County School Bus Transportation Coordinator indicated
that there are two school buses crossing the bridge twice daily, for a total of
four trips. He stated that road closure at the bridge would not create a problem
for bus operations.
i i
f+
The Traffic Forecasting Unit indicated that near Bridge No. 460, SR 1318
currently carries 1900 vehicles per day (1997). This figure is expected to
increase to 2500 vehicles per day by the year 2010. These traffic figures include
3% dual tired vehicles [DUAL], and 4% truck-tractor semi-trailers [TTST]. The
design hourly volume [DHV] is 10%. SR 1318 has a functional classification of
"Rural Local."
The Lexington Furniture Plant to the north of Bridge No. 460 is the major
traffic generator for SR 1318 at the bridge site. The plant has loading docks near
the end of state maintenance on SR 1318, and there is a significant proportion
of truck traffic (7%) currently using the bridge. SR 1318 is the only state road
reasonably near the plant, and there are no suitable off-site detours. Thus a
concern is how to accommodate traffic. Some comments had already noted that
the furniture plant has a paved drive that connects their buildings with city
streets at the opposite end of the plant.
Mr. Jimmy Goodnight of Roadway Design asked that P&E investigate
whether the Lexington Furniture Plant would be willing to accept closure of
SR 1318, and use only their drive to handle all plant traffic. This would avoid the
expense of constructing the on-site temporary detour. It was suggested that the
let date of May 2001 could possibly be moved to earlier that summer in order to
make sure that the bridge could be replaced in one construction season, and thus
minimize inconvenience to the plant. Dennis Pipkin of P&E will investigate this
request with Lexington Furniture.
Two alternates will be evaluated for replacing Bridge No. 460 over Branch
of Swearing Creek:
Alternate 1: Replace Bridge No. 460 in place, closing SR 1318 at the bridge.
Traffic would utilize other existing local roads.
Alternate 2 : Replace Bridge No. 460 in place. Traffic would be maintained with
a temporary on-site detour structure placed just to the southwest
(downstream) of the existing bridge.
The TIP cost estimate for B-3324 is $30,000 for right of way and
$270,000 for construction. Preliminary cost estimates are not available at this
time. The current project schedule calls for the right of way acquisition to begin
in May 2000, and construction to begin in May 2001.
BRIDGE PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
10/8/97
TIP PROJECT: B-3324 DIVISION: Nine
F. A. PROJECT: MABRZ - 1318(7) COUNTY: Davidson
STATE PROJECT: 8.2603801 ROUTE: _ SR 1318
DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Bridge No. 460 on SR 1318 over Swearing Creek
PROJECT PURPOSE: replace obsolete bridge
PROJECT U.S.G.S. QUAD SHEET(S): Lexington West Quad
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION: Rural Local
TIP CONSTRUCTION COST .......................................................................... $ 270,000
TIP RIGHT OF WAY COST .......................................................................... $ 30,000
PRIOR YEARS COST ...................................................................................... $ 0,000
TIP TOTAL COST ........................................................................................... $ 300,000
TRAFFIC: CURRENT est. 1500 VPD; DESIGN YEAR (2025) VPD
TTST % DUAL %
EXISTING ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION: Two lane shoulder section. 20 foot
pavement. grassed shoulders
EXISTING STRUCTURE:
LENGTH 9.5 METERS WIDTH 7.3 METERS
31 FEET 24.0 FEET
COMMENTS:
/v0 /Vwl 'UCq(
A? tlwar i .?
' !some 6a
^??^ ? „, Thomasrille ?,?
z,
rt
tiP??O?NORTH ?4yO` North Carolina Department of
q Transportation
° Division of Highways
1q
Planning & Environmental Branch
OF TRAa
Davidson County
Replace Bridge No. 460 on SR 1318
Over Branch of Swearing Creek
B-3324
Figure One
0

e
ETHERILL
ENGINEERING
WE Design Your Tomorrow...
September 5, 2003
Mr. Ronald Ferrell
Program Manager
Wetlands Restoration Fund
NCDENR
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1619
559 Jones Franklin Road
Suite 164
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
2003
J-1 JTyn
-SECTIOpy
Attention: Mr. Jeff Jurek
Subject: Payment to WRF for B-3324
Dear Mr. Ferrell:
This is to request an invoice for stream restoration credits for the subject project. The
invoice should be made to the City of Lexington in the amount of $30,000. This is the
cost previously furnished to the City for the 240 ft. of stream restoration credits @
$125.00 per ft. The invoice should be sent to Mr. Rick Austin PE, City Engineer, 711
Talbert Blvd., City of Lexington, Lexington NC, 27292.
Please note the following for clarification:
1- Condition #7 of approval letter for 401 Permit "240 feet of mitigation is
required"
2- Your letter of February 26, 2003- stated that credits are not available in Yadkin
River Basin, however, they are available in adjacent cataloging unit 0304101 if
acceptable to agencies
3- E-mail #2 from Cynthia Van Der Wiele- stated NCDOT mitigation in that
cataloging unit would be preferable, otherwise WRP is acceptable
4- E-mail #4 from Phillip Todd- stated NCDOT does not have any completed
mitigation plans in this cataloging unit at this time
Also attached for your records is a copy of the USACOE Nationwide 23, 404 Permit
previously issued for this project on January 17, 2003.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/DESIGN • BRIDGE/STRUCTURAL DESIGN • CIVIL/SITE DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION

Mr. Ronald Ferrell
September 5, 2003
Page two
The City of Lexington has been held up for some time due to issuance of the 401
Permit. They are most anxious to proceed with letting the construction contract.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. If there are any questions or I can
provide any additional documentation, please advise me at 851-8077.
Sincerely,
Wetherill Engineerin Inc
r
d
ka b
Edward G. Wetherill, PE
Attachments
CC: Mr. Rick Austin PE
Cynthia Van Der Wiele
Josh Dalton
WEnIMLL
RIGID m

0
Frank Fleming
From: Frank Fleming [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:54 PM
To: Cindi Karoly (E-mail)
Subject: B-3324 Davidson County
Hey Cyndi, .
thought you had fallen of the face of the earth, but I realized you got married. The name change threw me. I am writing
about a project that Josh Dalton of our office has been talking to you about. A bridge replacement for the City of
Lexington. We requested payment into WRP but that was denied in that catalog unit since they do not have a 'bank' in
that unit. They said if DWQ would allow an adjacent catalog unit to be used for mitigation then they could help. The
adjacent basin they mentioned is 03040101. Apparently you got a copy of the letter from Ron_ Ferrell. Can you help with
this?
Also, is it such a thing as private mitigation banks that you guys recognize? If so, is there a list or something online with
contact information?
Thanks for your help and Will Hines says hello. ,
Frank F. Fleming, PE
Sungate Design Group, PA
915 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

SEP 20[)3
1a
Page 1
2
Josh Dalton
From: Cynthia Van Der Wiele [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: B-3324
Josh,
Is NCDOT doing mitigation in that cataloging unit? If they are, then that would be preferable, otherwise we would accept WRP.
Cynthia
Josh Dalton.wrote:
Cynthia,We are working on a project (TIP B-3324) that has been submitted by the Town of Lexington, but the
construction and review will be administered by NCDOT. We have proposed to replace an existing bridge with a
box culvert. The stream impacts are 240 feet which are greater than the 150 foot cut-off. We submitted for a
permit to Cyndi Karoly and she sent a letter back requesting mitigation. Cyndi suggested we contact you regarding
this project. We have since asked WRP if they would accept payment for mitigation. They responded that they
would accept payment if DWQ would accept mitigation in adjacent catalog unit 03040101. The project is in catalog
unit 03040103. The Town of Lexington would very much like to pay into the WRP bank if possible. Would you
accept mitigation in the adjacent catalog unit? If mitigation in the adjacent catalog unit will not be accepted, what
are the Town's options?Thank you very much for your time. If you have any questions, please call me-PW"
or.v .;)s
Sungate Design Group, P.A.
phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
3/28/2003

C-3
Frank Fleming
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Josh Dalton (E-mail)
Subject: B-3324 Davidson County
Phillip,
A little history first. Sungate Design is a sub for Wetherill Engineering who is replacing a bridge in Lexington for the City of
Lexington. It has a TIP number. My understanding is the City is paying for the design which includes getting the permit
and NCDOT is administrating the construction. It is also being reviewed by NCDOT. A CE was written by NCDOT.
We are proposing to replace the bridge with a culvert and we have 240' of impact to Rat Springs Creek. We submitted a
permit to DWQ(Cindi Karoly) and we were told that mitigation would have to be provided on a 1:1 ratio. We requested to
pay into WRP but they do not have any credits in that catalog unit (03040103) but we could pay into an adjacent unit (#
03040101) if DWQ would allow.
We forwarded this to Mrs. Karoly and was told that she was not handling this project anymore and to contact Cindy Van
der Weile from now on. We did this and she responded that she would except the adjacent unit if NCDOT did not have
any "credits" in the the original catalog unit(#03040103).
My question is that, does NCDOT have any mitigation credits in that catalog unit #03040103.
Frank F. Fleming, PE
Sungate Design Group, PA
915 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: 919.=859-6258

c1t)
Josh Dalton
From: Frank Fleming [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Josh Dalton (E-mail)
Subject: FW: FW: B-3324 Davidson County
Frank F. Fleming, PE
Sungate Design Group, PA
915 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip Todd [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Frank Fleming
Subject: Re: FW: B-3324 Davidson County
Hey Frank. I read the email below and have found out that we do not have
any
completed mitigation plans at this time.
Any further questions, please let me know.
PT
Frank Fleming wrote:
> This is what we talked about yesterday. Thanks for your help.
> Frank F. Fleming, PE
> Sungate Design Group, PA
> 915 Jones Franklin Road
> Raleigh, NC 27606
> Phone: [phone]
> Fax: [phone]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Fleming (mailto:[e-mail])
>,Sent: -Wednesday, April 09, 2003 2:17 PM
'[e-mail]. nc.us'
> Subject: FW: B-3324 Davidson County
> Bruce,
> I had sent this e-mail to Phil Harris, but I now understand you are the
mitigation mars now. Pl@aga takt a look and give fft€ a call.
> Thanks
> Frank F. Fleming, PE
> Sungate Design Group, PA
> 915 Jones Franklin Road
> Raleigh, NC 27606
01J/ "3/ LUUJ uti: 1 L `JI'JbJ'JbZDU DL NUH 1 C UG51UN UMLAJr THUG OL
CppY
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
(Web page - http-,#www.saw.usace.azxpy.mil/wetlands/index.htm)
Action ID. 200320381 TIP B-3324 County Davidson
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: City of Lexington Agent: Sungate Design Group, PA
Address: ATTN: Rick Austin, PE, City Engineer ATTN: Josh Dalton, PE
711 Takbert Boulevard 915 Jones Franklin Road
Lexington, North Carolina 27292 Raleigh, North Carolina
Telephone No.: [phone] 27615
[phone]
Location of proiect (waterway, road name/number, town, etc.): SR 1318; in Rat Spring Branch, southwest of
Lexington, North Carolina.
Description of Activity: Discharge of fill material impacting a total of 240 linear feet of stream (86 linear feet in
box culvert and 154 linear feet of riprap bank stabilization, for construction of the replacement of Bridge No. 460
with a double barrel box culvert (TIP No. B-3324), as shown in the attached drawings. The existing bridge will
maintain traffic until the culvert has been constructed, and the culvert construction has been phased so that it will be
constructed in the dry. See the attached Region Condition 2.e., regarding culvert construction. Note: This
verification does not include impacts to waters of the United States from any site de-watering, construction access,
bridge demolition, on-site detours, spoil disposal, or borrow sites. These impacts would have to be permitted
separately if they become necessary.
® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
? Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
? Section 404 and Section 10.
23 Nationwide Permit Number.
Any violation of the conditions of the Nationwide Permit referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop
work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Nationwide Permit verification does not relieve the undersigned permittee of
the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to
contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Eric A.ls a er at telephone number [phone], extension 23.
Regulatory Project Manager Signature Tel. No. 919-876-8441, ext.23
--LKA Q
Date January 17, 2003 ` Expiration Date January 1 , 2005
Note. When the nationwide permit authorization expires activities which have commenced or are under contract to
commence -in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized This is provided the activity is corrtnleted
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration modification or revocation
CF: 1; ft WA
09/05/2003 08:12 9198596258 bL)NbAit lltSlbN UKIA1r rHUt UJ
1434 ?279i f r'
?? moJECr ab urs
17 ¦ .'? ? ?? / ,? 'J?'r?? .isle ?.
1 oe
f490 Q
y 11
1497. ?1494 116
i
1101 1361
Z '

VICINITY
MAPS
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAVIDSON COUNTY
PROJECT- MOM CB-924)
BRIDGE NM 460 ON SR 1918
OVER RAT SPRINGS BRANCH
SHEET 1 OF -7 6 / 24 / 0Y
NORTH CAROLINA
CO)
w
w
Co
N

°°
?o
?i

O
0
0
\? it
°s
x

N
a(o)
..y
?y
?o
1i y
N
J
oil oo/wt7'i tio;1c

JUNUR i C UCJ l U1`I URUUr,
r(-1UC GJ
WETLAND LEGEND
-{ALB- WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE

L WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
DENOTES FILL IN
® WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
IZ'-48'
DENOTES FILL IN (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
DENOTES FILL
SURFACE WATER
R
(POND) SINGLE TREE
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLANO WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND DRAINAGE INLET
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL W SURFACE
WATER ROOTWAD
• • + DENOTES MECHANIZED
•
+
? ••• CLEARING
FLOW DIRECTION RIP RAP
T9
8
TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER ( \ ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
- - ? -PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
IF AVAILABLE
-- -- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL ? PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
A& PROP. RIGHT OF WAY -
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
-- - NG- -NATURAL GROUND
- --??--- - PROPERTY LINE
H
GRAS
- TDE-- TEMP. DRAINAGE S SWALE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
--EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
77 WATER SURFACE

LIVE STAKES
X
X X X X
x
X NCDOT
?'`?
) BOULDER
`___? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CORE FIBER ROLLS DAVIDSON COUNTY
PROJBCT:8.!603801 CB,39 f
BRIDGIB NO. 460 ON SR 1319
OVER RAT SPRINGS BRANCH
op 7 6/24/02
U7/U7/LUUJ UG:1L
0
Q
O F
-n r-
W ?'1
Ln
w.
rn?c
m
0
m
m
x
z
0
W
rnm ---------------
CC) i
In -1
m umi
N
_^ D
+ rn
(n
N
C° rn
a? Q
;n ad o,
b? Sz
O
n m
m
71 70:J7OL:JO

N
F `
z
I m ?
to z ?7 A
X C4
M
Z
r
m
n
0
x CO v
N u
a 2: m
o m
;y.
cin C-0
r
i
-r
rn
m
o
M
Mz
M
1
t ;
X301
i ?
?o
m?
aM
N m
zm°
t.p O p
C) 301
-1i D

w ? 1
? N d

X 'F
O

h
W

N
t N

a
2

C17/ o?/ cuo? oo. tc ?l ?o:.r?oc;_ro ..,??.?.+., ? ? ?•?••? ?

50 V
Q
O
p
O Q
L.Q
w

0
M

.--I
Lh
y O
LR ' C O
.04
N
x
co
C7
W
n

m
A
Z
v
m
N

+

o, N
Ol
e
N ! n

4.0
•
kl
1 a ?---J x
-u (A
m :-,
O O
9 O
O ?
l Q ?
1 .<
;u -4
0) b
4
d
a
a \
Z
rri
c o v?
N
X
a a o
m Cn
in m
00 :o
W O
f*(')- 4r- fCo) 0-
=?S `J
U, b
A, o

V J(V:J/LVVJ VO. 14 71 iu: 004"JD .7Lml mllm. LG.71171Y t3muur, rh4l7G VO
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
2 HENRY LINK CORP. P.O. BOX 1008
LEXINGTON, NC 27293
P.O. BOX 1008
YOUNG - HINXLE CORP. LEXINGTON, NC 27295

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
August 4, 2003
Davidson County
DWQ Project No. 030013
Replacement of Bridge No. 460 on SR 1318
TIP Project No. B-3324
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Mr. Rick Austin, P.E., City Engineer of City of Lexington
City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexington, North Carolina 27292
Dear Mr. Austin:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 240 linear feet
of Rat Springs Branch in order to replace Bridge No. 460 on SR 1318 in Davidson County. The project should be
constructed in accordance with your application dated January 7, 2003 (received January 9, 2003) and the additional
information received on July 23, 2003. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this impact is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Nos. 3403 and 3404 corresponding to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Nationwide Permit Numbers 23 and 14. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local
permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-
Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying §404 permit
unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified
below. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this. Certification and approval letter
and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the
future) exceed one acre, or if stream impacts exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions
listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. All work shall be performed during low flow conditions (below bankfull).
2. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
3. The presence of equipment in the channels must be minimized. Under no circumstances should rock, sand or
other materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the
immediate vicinity of the culverts.
4. The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not
altered (i.e. the depth of the channel should not be reduced by a widening of the streambed). Existing stream
dimensions are to be maintained above and below locations of the culverts. Placement of culverts and other
structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be placed below the elevation of the streambed to allow low
flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including
temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of
wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures.
5. Existing vegetated buffers shall not be mowed in order to utilize it for storm water sheet flow.
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
I
6. Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the
growing season following completion of construction.
7. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Wetland Restoration Program in order to compensate
for the impacts to streams. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2R .0402 and 15A NCAC 2B .0242(7), this
contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h) and 15A
NCAC 2B .0233(10). Until the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check (made payable
to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration Program), stream impacts (including fill) shall not occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell
should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning the Wetland Restoration
Program. You have one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment. For accounting
purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of 240 linear feet of perennial streams in the Yadkin River
Basin, Cataloging Unit 03040103, and 240 linear feet of stream mitigation is required. Please be aware that
the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) rules require rounding of wetland impacts to the nearest foot (15A
NCAC 2R.0503(b));
8. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the
401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless
you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Ms. Beth Barnes at 919.715.8394 or Mr. Steve Mauney of the Winston-
Salem Regional Office at 336.771.4600.
Sincerely,
Attachment
Pc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Eric Alsmeyer, USACE Raleigh Field Office
NCDWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Ron Ferrell, NCWRP
Central Files
File Copy
Klimek, P.E.
a
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, The City of Lexington has permission as outlined below to fill 240 linear feet of perennial
streams in order to replace Bridge No. 460 on SR 1318 in Davidson County, North Carolina. All activities associated with these
authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached certification. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID
WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT
WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION: Bridge No. 460 on SR 1318
COUNTY: Davidson
BASIN/SUBBASIN Yadkin (03-04-01-03), impacts to be mitigated for in an adjacent cataloging unit (03-04-01-01)
Impacts:
240 linear feet of perennial streams
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate for the above
impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands as outlined below prior to conducting any activities
that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Mitigation:
240 linear feet of perennial streams by W RP required for the 401 Water Quality Certification. The impacts will be mitigated for in an
adjacent cataloging unit (03-04-01701).
Note: Linear foot requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Program must be rounded to the
nearest foot and acreage requirements must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments according to 15 2r.0503(b).
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment of a fee to
the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option, please sign.this form and mail it to the Wetlands
Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this
form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR
PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Signature
Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (h9p://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands)
I
I 'If V'-" ETHERIL.L.
ENGINEERING
559 iunas Frankiln Road no ne. 9 i c 351 20 7
Suite 164 Fax: [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 wei wetherilleng.com
----------- --- -- - -- - - - -
WE Design Your Tomorrow...
May 2, 2003
Mr. Rick Austin, PE
City Engineer
City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
FILE COPY
4I 9SUED
Lexington, North Carolina 27292
Re: Permit For TIP Project B-3324 Davidson County
Dear Mr. Austin:
'b" L? _$k o3v` 1.3
OrLANDS1401
C,6OU?
#ATEAQUgCI
?ySECr1%
We are submitting a revised Nationwide Permit 23 request for your signature. The items of
concern, one and two, per the memo submitted to you on January 17, 2003 by Mr. John
Dorney, Water Quality Certification Program, have been addressed below. Mr. Joshua
Dalton, Sungate Design Group, has addressed items three through five. See attached memo.
1. Please explain why the road is being realigned and the bridge not being replaced in
place.
An on-site detour was proposed downstream of the existing structure under the
original design for project B-3324. By realigning the proposed roadway we are
able to maintain traffic along existing SR 1318 and eliminate the need for an on-
site detour. With the elimination of the on-site detour and constructing the
proposed culvert in phase we are able to minimize impacts to Rat Springs
Branch, existing utilities along the project site and the amount of required right
of way. Project cost is also reduced with elimination of the on-site detour.
2. Please explain why an off-site detour is not being utilized.
The only other access to the proposed project site is a privately owned
driveway. Since there is no other access that is maintained by the City of
Lexington or State of North Carolina there is not a feasible off-site detour route
available for the maintenance of traffic for project B-3324.
If you have any questions or require additional information please feel free 4- -lontact us.
Sincerely,
WETHERILL ENGINEERING, INC.
Bob May
-- 1--11-1 11 w.,w n•,r mco,n., 1- 1-1 nr......1 -1.11. 1-,-- ..?r.,n •, -ctV oC. rr)A1CT01trT1(1N l1RCFAVATV1111
. I S
Jftin Sungate Design Group, P.A.- ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
915 Jones Franklin Road • Raleigh, NC 27606 • Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
April 28, 2003
Mr. Eddie Wetherill, PE
Wetherill Engineering, Inc.
4915 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 295
Raleigh, N. C. 27606
Re: Permits for TIP Project B-3324
Mr. Wetherill,

An application for Nationwide Permit 23, Regional General Permit 198200031, and Water
Quality Certifications 3361 and 3375 for TIP Project B-3324 was submitted to NCDENR-DWQ
(Cyndi Karoly) on January 7, 2003. Comments were received from DWQ on January 17, 2003.
The project is located in Davidson County on SR 1318. The project involves replacing Bridge
No. 460 over Rat Spring Branch with two reinforced concrete box culverts, each 11 feet wide by
9 feet in height. This project is also listed as federal aid project MABRZ-1318(7) and state
project 8.2603801. Rat Spring Branch (index no. 12-113-5) is located in the Yadkin/Pee Dee
River Basin. Rat Spring Branch is a Class C stream with no High Quality Waters" Outstanding
Resource Waters, or Water Supplies occurring within 1.0 mile of the project area. The project is
located above headwaters with no wetlands located in the vicinity.
Approximately 240 feet (0.07 Acres) of the channel will be impacted, with 86 feet being
enclosed permanently in the box culvert. The remaining 154 feet of impacts result from riprap
lining of the banks at the outlet of the culvert and widening of the channel. The box culvert will
be buried 1.0 foot to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. The existing bridge will
remain as the detour structure until the culvert has been constructed. The culvert construction
has been phased so that it may be constructed in the dry while leaving passage for the average
daily flow.
The culvert has been revised to add a one foot sill to one of the boxes. Also, the inlet and outlet
channels have been benched to lessen the impacts.
Here are responses to Mr. Domey's comments:
3. The bridge replacement structure proposes the installation of a reinforced concrete box
culvert. Prior to approving the installation of a culvert, the Division of Water Quality must
insure that the culvert will not result in a destabilization of the stream. Please provide
information on the stream bankfull cross section. Please redesign the culvert to mimic the stream
bankfull cross section. One of the two concrete box culverts must have a sill for low-flow
conditions.
A stream bankfull cross section has been included. The culverts are to be buried one foot
and a one-foot tall sill has been added to one box for low flow conditions. The sill will
C
actually be two feet tall since but one foot of the culvert will be buried. Also, the channel
will be benched for low flow conditions.
4. Please explain why you propose to widen the stream.
The stream widening is necessary to provide adequate hydraulic opening of the culvert.
The channel has been benched to provide a similar channel in low flow conditions.
5. Your present design proposes stream impacts greater than 150 linear feet. According to 15A
NCAC 2H .506, stream mitigation is required for impacts greater than 150 linear feet. Please
submit a mitigation plan.
On February 15, 2003, a request was sent to the NC Wetlands Restoration Program and
requested acceptance of payment for mitigation. Per conversations with Cindi Karoly
(Division of Water Quality), the mitigation ratio will be 1:1. The City of Lexington
proposes to submit payment to WRP of $30,000 (240 linear feet at $125 per linear foot) to
meet the mitigation requirement. N
A response letter dated March, 2003 was received from WRP. The letter stated that they
would accept the payment if DWQ would accept mitigation in adjacent catalog unit
03040101. The project is located in catalog unit 03040103.
On March 17, 2003, we contacted Cyndi Karoly to see if payment to the adjacent catalog
unit was acceptable. Ms. Karoly directed us to contact Ms. Cynthia .Van' Der Wiele (DWQ)
regarding this matter. Ms. Van Der Wiele responded by email on March 28, 2003 that the
WRP payment would be acceptable if NCDOT did not have mitigation in the catalog unit.
We attempted to contact NCDOT (Mr. Phil Harris) on March 28, 2003 but received no
response. We next tried to contact Mr. Bruce Ellis with NCDOT on April 4, 2003 but also
received no response. Next, we contacted Mr. Phillip Todd on April 23, 2003 and received
a response the same day stating that NCDOT did not have mitigation credits at this time in
that catalog unit.
I have included a copy of the revised culvert survey report and a copy of the permit with the
bankfull cross section added.
If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
41 -a??
h Dalton, PE
Attachments
A-M
SDG
J.an 27 03 02:58p Edward
01/27/2003 15:37 3362493584
Or V-1t.
?O? QG
:i
Q N,
Wetherill [phone] P_
PAGE 01/01
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
North Caroline Department of Environment an(l Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division Ot Water Ouallty
CERTIFIED MAIL- Return receipt reque9ted
Mr. Rick Austin, PE, City Engineer for City of Lexington
City of Lexington
711 TakbertBlvd.
Lexington. North Carolina, 27292
Dear Mr. Austim.
January 17, 2003
Post-it® Fax Note 7671 Date p#aoof
To From
4.
co.roept.?? kTc co.
Phone # Phone #
Fax # Fax #
_ Re: Bridge No. 464 replacement on SR 1318, Fat Springs 13.ranc)]
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal for a §401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
retaking an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following areas:
1. Please explain why the road is being realigned and the bridge not being replaced in place-
2. Please explain why an off-site detour is not being utilized.
3. The bridge replacement structure proposes the installation of a reinforced concrete box culvert. Prior to
approving the installation of a culvert, the Division of Water Quality must insure that the culvert will not
result in a destabilization of the stream. Please provide information on the stream bartkfttll cross station.
Please redesign the culvert to mimic the stream bankfull cross section. One of the two concrete box
culverts must have a sill for low-flow conditions.
4. Please explain why you propose to widen the stream.
5. Your present design proposes stream impacts greater than 150 linear feet.
According to 15A NCAC 2H .506, stream mitigation is required for impacts greater than 150 linear feet,
Please submit a mitigation plan.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0507(x)(3), we will have to place the permit application on hold until we
are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC Division of
Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place the permit
application on hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please contact Beth 13arnes at 919.715.8394.
cc: Eric Alsmeyer. USACE Raleigh Field Office
Steve Mitchell, NCDWQ Raleigb Regional Office
File Copy
r
R. Do ey
r Quality Certifiicati program
North Garollna Division of Water Qualily. 401 Wotlands Certification Unit,
1850 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
232 t CretAree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604.2260 (Location)
918.733.1786 (phone), 919-733-8893 (tax), ntip://h2o.enr.stato.ne.us/ncwetlandsI
North Carolina ILF.EWA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor ?'?'? ??¦
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary NCDENR
Mr. Josh Dalton, PE
Sungate Design Group, P.A.
915 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
February 26, 2003
Subject: Payment to Wetlands Restoration Fund
Bridge/SR 1318
Davidson County
Dear Mr. Dalton:
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) received a February 15,
2003 letter requesting concurrence that the NCWRP accept payment for the compensatory
mitigation requirements for the culvert project in Davidson County. Based on information
provided by you, approximately 240 feet of stream channel in cataloging unit 03040103 of the
Yadkin River basin will be impacted resulting in the need for mitigation.
The Ion, term goal of the NCWRP is to be able to accept payments to satisfy
compensatory mitigation requirements throughout North Carolina. However, at this time the
NCWRP is unable to provide this service throughout the state. The Memorandum of Agreement
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), which allows payments to the Wetlands
Restoration Fund, requires that the compensatory mitigation performed by the NCWRP be within
the same cataloging unit as the impact. At this time the NCWRP does not have any stream or
wetlands impacts or potential stream or wetlands restoration projects within the respective
cataloging unit mentioned above. Therefore, unless the regulatory agencies would allow these
impacts to be mitigated for in an adjacent cataloging unit (03040101), the NCWRP is unable
to accept payment for this project.
We appreciate your interest in the Wetlands Restoration Program and regret that the
NCWRP cannot accommodate your request at this time. If you have any questions concerning
this matter please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
(A(
Ronald E. F rr
Program Manager
Cc: Cyndi Karoly, DWQ-401/Wetlands Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACOE-Raleigh
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
[phone] Fax: [phone]
1232 279
5 PROJECT LIMITS
i
1147
3156 157
1222
L
1299 cl) 1104 '.
1147 yyp 1297 J
i
1354 J 125
138 l22 296 _ 0?cn
Lenrpion Municipal Aipat
g
1224
85 ----- -?
1266
VICINITY
MAPS
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAVIDSON COUNTY
PROJBCT: 8.2603801 (B-3324)
BRIDGB NO. 460 ON SR 1318
OVBR RAT SPRINGS BRANCH
NORTH CAROLINA
M O +?
00
00 .
? ? ob
yy oSM,
on
? o °o y
°o
? o
0
??o? t? K?o of
-x-
b ob
co)
_i-? ?r ?s?N ?? I ?a
00
O ?b
W
;p 0 N
N o d ?.
o ?z °zZ
04 0
b$ z?
00
z 84
bd P
\
WETLAND LEGEND
r ?
--WLB- WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE

L WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
® DENOTES FILL IN
PROPOSED
PIPE CULVERT
WETLAND
12'-48'
DENOTES FILL IN (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
® CE W TER EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
SURFA A
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
®DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
• • DENOTES MECHANIZED
»' ++ ++ + CLEARING
-? FLOW DIRECTION
Tom- TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER
- -C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- - F- - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
- -2L- - PROPERTY LINE
-TOE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
WATER SURFACE
X X X
X X LIVE STAKES
X
X
CJ BOULDER
CORE FIBER ROLLS
& ABOVE
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
- ROOTWAD
RIP RAP
6 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
DITCH /
GRASS SWALE
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAVIDSON COUNTY
PROJECT. 8.2603801 84324)
BRIDGE NO. 460 ON SR 1318
OVER RAT SPRINGS BRANCH
SHEET 3 OF $ 6 / 24 / 02
I
L r r-
n I I
V1 N
O tW D m
Z
L)i - c?
-rl LO O
+ m
• -4
Ul ? K
o
(/)
4 m° m
O
? m
x
N_
z
z
c?

It

------
- - - - - - -
0
L OM
no
n -4
D m
m

m f?
f-n
mr ? ?f 11,? chi

D
_
J O
rn
o N

ICQ
O
w
d
O Y
z °z

b o

o
o
z -

?

z o
o

®
w
0 o
x
0
m
o
J Z J
I
(n =
Z
r
m
n
0
1 = ?
Z ? D
-? m
I
r Mz
Z CO
M
No

? r
O
zm
m -.I
D
?v m
. mm

i as

? OF ? o
-
sj
L Lo

'E -
EXISTING
I
I'
T:7ni4
I '
i
Z7 Q
rn Z
Dm
NM
Z °
m
m

?
\v J I
I
N
N Cj
n

x
o
o O

co J
301
J'
r
-4A
?I D
N
+ N

I ?

Ln;u
D

O
z

0- o, oo%
Lrl **-4 O O 00
.
?' `? O
0 o z /
m
r /
N / Zv
z / O
0
Q Q N 1 .\.
W m
N I
r
1
1 a?
N 1 a --? X
0 0
L 1
? ?D O
Ul O
n
O7 \ O
\ ? O
\ Co
G
c as ?\
9to b d
LA
?.? x
z zZ
OQ o
b $ z Ul o
0
rri
d?®
z ?- Q
?• W
? A ao
01 x
00
V' ? v 0
C) 0 C) C)

O
A ?
H
GC
a
r
w
v ,

? o
Cf)
? o
x iU
C
rr
r
0 __A
y v ty O
0t??
01) ?o g z?
z o4®
w
? x

0% 011. oll ON
? 0. O. Ol
O N O1.
n
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
1 HENRY LINK CORP.
2 YOUNG - HINKLE CORP.
P.O. BOX 1008
LEXINGTON, NC 27293
P.O. BOX 1008
LEXINGTON, NC 27293
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAVIDSON COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2603801 84324)
BRIDGE NO. 160 ON SR 1318
OVER RAT SPRINGS BRANCH
ET 7 OF !2r 6 / 24

1
0 z u?
D P co
r
A
T
O
r L.- O

N
X
cn
0 c
X
C) N
(D C
W (D
n

cD T
n

O 7
CL
7 C
< 3
N fD 'O
T
U <
T
a m

n 0
D
?`^» 3 (7

n o v
D
o u' ? (7
1

f/) Cl)
C

m D
o C,

T
z-
v d
c
0 o d
0
V 0
V
U)
2
T y
C
m
m 'D
O A

" a U) D
m
0
O
D
T z
T
00 O o U) -P
A
L- o m T
C) <
.? cn .
O = 3
D
00
x zT
3 c)m n
-1

0 ?
O o
T

m n 7 J
2Nf0
m
D Cl) A A

O = T
u
O
O
D • o , O
?rn Cl) Dx nm
.v CD z ?> ? o
;o 0 n
0 ?
> d
O
z
G) a
U) C
(n z o
Ww

D =
ou ?
o

z
n _

7 N

00
00 f? a
N
n ' j W
CD C
O T
W T
m
a N ?

N
n N 7 _
3
O
N CD
O A
C
61 ?p N

O n N A
7

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP23, WOC 3375,
WOC 3361, Regional General Permit 198200031 %
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rick Austin, PE City Engineer for City of Lexington
Mailing Address: City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:[phone]
E-mail Address: ricka(&,lexington.nc.net _
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Eddie Wetherill, PE Wetherill Engineering
Company Affiliation: Engineering Consultant to the City of Lexington
Mailing Address: 4915 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 295
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ewetherill(a),wetherilleng.com
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 460 over Rat Springs Branch
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3324
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
4. Location
County: Davidson County Nearest Town: Lexington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-85 South to Exit 91, Take a
right at the top of exit ramp, Left onto SR 1254, Go 1.5 miles, Right onto SR 1318, Bridge is
located lust before industrial plant.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):N 746705 E 1618528
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rat Springs Branch
8. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
(Note -y- this. must be one of North Carolina's seventeen desig ated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing single span (30') bridge. SR 1318 provides a rear
entrance to a lame industrial plant. Existing dge area is comprised mostly of residential
single-family homes.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing bridge will be used as an on-site detour while the outlet portions of the culvert
are constructed. Box culverts will either be preformed or cast in place. A temporary road will
be constructed on the completed portion of the culvert while the existing bridge is removed
and the remaining inlet portion of the culvert is constructed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to replace Bridge
No. 460 which is in poor condition with an estimated remaining life of 4 years.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No wetlands are located on site.
240 feet of Water of the US will be impacted. 86 feet of the impacts are due to culvert enclosure.
The remaining 154 feet of impacts result from riprap and widening of the existing channel.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No wetlands located in vicinity.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
I Culvert 86 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial
I Riprap/Widening 154 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240 feet
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

(acres)
(if Name p Waterbody
applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Box culverts were chosen over a bridize for several reasons. A box culvert exists immediately
downstream for ease of maintenance and for cost reduction. The box culvert will be buried 1
foot to reduce impacts and the channel will be benched to provide for low flow conditions. The
culvert construction will be phased so that it can be constructed `in the dry' and to allow passage
of the average daily flow. Also, strict adherence to Best Management Practices will be followed.
Extensive erosion control measures will be utilized during construction of the culvert and road.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Payment to NCWRP
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 240
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? State Clearinghouse does not review CE documents.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 teat perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property. %
Impervious acreage will not be changed. The road alignment will be shifted slightly to the south.
Stormwater will be conveyed with ditches.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
Engineering* Landscape Architecture* Environmental LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
AJK& 915 Jones Franklin Road
EIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Telephone: [phone] DATE: 7-23-03 JOB NO. 1128-01060
Facsimile: [phone]
ATTENTION: Beth Barnes
TO: RE:
NCDWQ B-33224 Davidson County
Bridge No. 460 Replacment
on SR 1318
WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ? Under separate cover via DSIOWU ys:
? Shop Drawings ? Prints ? Plans ? Samp4VL 2 Specifications
? Copy of letter ? Change order ? &A77 m 0%i1 & -
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION "J^UNIMA
7 7-23-03 401 Water Quality Certification Application
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
? For approval
? For your use
? As requested
? For review and comment
? FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS:
COPY TO: FILE
? Approved as submitted
? Approved as noted
? Returned for corrections
? Resubmit copies for approval
? Submit copies for distribution
? Return corrected prints
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

Frank Fleming
From: Frank Fleming [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:54 PM
To: Cindi Karoly (E-mail)
Subject: B-3324 Davidson County
Hey Cyndi,
I thought you had fallen of the face of the earth, but I realized you got married. The name change threw me. I am writing
about a project that Josh Dalton of our office has been talking to you about. A bridge replacement for the City of
Lexington. We requested payment into WRP but that was denied in that catalog unit since they do not have a 'bank' in
that unit. They said if DWQ would allow an adjacent catalog unit to be used for mitigation then they could help. The
adjacent basin they mentioned is 03040101. Apparently you got a copy of the letter from Ron Ferrell. Can you help with
this?
Also, is it such a thing as private mitigation banks that you guys recognize? If so, is there a list or something online with
contact information?
Thanks for your help and Will Hines says hello.
Frank F. Fleming, PE
Sungate Design Group, PA
915 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1
Josh
From: Cynthia Van Der Wiele [[e-mail]]
Seth: Friday, March 28, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: B-3324
Josh,
Is NCDOT doing mitigation in that cataloging unit? If they are, then that would be preferable, otherwise we would accept WRP.
Cynthia
Josh Palton.wrote:
Cynthia,We are working on a project (TIP B-3324) that has been submitted by the Town of Lexington, but the
construction and review will be administered by NCDOT. We have proposed to replace an existing bridge with a
box culvert. The stream impacts are 240 feet which are greater than the 150 foot cut-off. We submitted for a
permit to Cyndi Karoly and she sent a letter back requesting mitigation. Cyndi suggested we contact you regarding
this project. We have since asked WRP if they would accept payment for mitigation. They responded that they
would accept payment if DWQ would accept mitigation in adjacent catalog unit 03040101. The project is in catalog
unit 03040103. The Town of Lexington would very much like to pay into the WRP bank if possible. Would you
accept mitigation in the adjacent catalog unit? If mitigation in the adjacent catalog unit will not be accepted, what
are the Town's options?Thank you very much for your time. If you have any questions, please call me Pal"
57, Da40- 4 , PS
Sungate Design Group, P.A.
phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
3/28/2003
Frank Fleming
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Josh Dalton (E-mail)
Subject: B-3324 Davidson County
Phillip,
A little history first. Sungate Design is a sub for Wetherill Engineering who is replacing a bridge in Lexington for the City of
Lexington. It has a TIP number. My understanding is the City is paying for the design which includes getting the permit
and NCDOT is administrating the construction. It is also being reviewed by NCDOT. A CE was written by NCDOT.
We are proposing to replace the bridge with a culvert and we have 240' of impact to Rat Springs Creek. We submitted a
permit to DWQ(Cindi Karoly) and we were told that mitigation would have to be provided on a 1:1 ratio. We requested to
pay into WRP but they do not have any credits in that catalog unit (03040103) but we could pay into an adjacent unit (#
03040101) if DWQ would allow.
We forwarded this to Mrs. Karoly and was told that she was not handling this project anymore and to contact Cindy Van
der Weile from now on. We did this and she responded that she would except the adjacent unit if NCDOT did not have
any "credits" in the the original catalog unit(#03040103).
My question is that, does NCDOT have any mitigation credits in that catalog unit #03040103.
Frank F. Fleming, PE
Sungate Design Group, PA
915 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
r

Josh Dalton
From: Frank Fleming [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Josh Dalton (E-mail)
Subject: FW: FW: B-3324 Davidson County
Frank F. Fleming, PE
Sungate Design Group, PA
915 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip Todd [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Frank Fleming
Subject: Re: FW: B-3324 Davidson County

Hey Frank. I read the email below and have found out that we do not have
any
completed mitigation plans at this time.
Any further questions, please let me know.
PT
Frank Fleming wrote:
> This is what we talked about yesterday. Thanks for your help.
> Frank F. Fleming, PE
> Sungate Design Group, PA
> 915 Jones Franklin Road
> Raleigh, NC 27606
> Phone: [phone]
> Fax: [phone]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Fleming [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 2:17 PM
> To: '[e-mail]'
> Subject: FW: B-3324 Davidson County
> Bruce,
> I had sent this e-mail to Phil Harris, but I now understand you are the
> mitigation roan new. Pleat@ take a look and g]Lve rte a call.
> Thanks
> Frank F. Fleming, PE
> Sungate Design Group, PA
> 915 Jones Franklin Road
> Raleigh, NC 27606
1

ATFR
QG
y
r? 'C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
January 17, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL: Return receipt requested
Mr. Rick Austin, PE, City Engineer for City of Lexington
City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexington, North Carolina, 27292
Dear Mr. Austin:
Re: Bridge No. 460 replacement on SR 1318, Rat Springs Branch
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal for a §401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
making an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following areas:
1. Please explain why the road is being realigned and the bridge not being replaced in place.
2. Please explain why an off-site detour is not being utilized.
3. The bridge replacement structure proposes the installation of a reinforced concrete box culvert. Prior to
approving the installation of a culvert, the Division of Water Quality must insure that the culvert will not
result in a destabilization of the stream. Please provide information on the stream bankfull cross section.
Please redesign the culvert to mimic the stream bankfull cross section. One of the two concrete box
culverts must have a sill for low-flow conditions.
4. Please explain why you propose to widen the stream.
5. Your present design proposes stream impacts greater than 150 linear feet.
According to 15A NCAC 2H .506, stream mitigation is required for impacts greater than 150 linear feet.
Please submit a mitigation plan.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0507(a)(3), we will have to place the permit application on hold until we
are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC Division of
Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place the permit
application on hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please contact Beth Barnes at 919.715.8394.
Program
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, USACE Raleigh Field Office
Steve Mitchell, NCDWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
ffi
P.A. ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL
*#? Sungate Design Group'
915 Jones Franklin Road • Raleigh, NC 27606 • Phone [phone] • Fax 919,859.6258
January 7, 2003
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center - - -
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 ; r R L? L
' ._
Re: Permits for TIP Project B-3324 0 00 JAN
WETLANDS GROUP
Ms. Karoly, WATER OUALITY s=cr ON
This letter and accompanying documentation is to serve as an application for Nationwide Permit
23, Regional General Permit 198200031, and Water Quality Certifications 3361 and 3375 for
TIP Project B-3324. The project is located in Davidson County on SR 1318. The project
involves replacing Bridge No. 460 over Rat Spring Branch with two reinforced concrete box
culverts, each 11 feet wide by 9 feet in height. This project is also listed as federal aid project
MABRZ-1318(7) and state project 8.2603801.
Rat Spring Branch (index no. 12-113-5) is located in the Yadkin/Pee Dee River Basin. Rat
Spring Branch is a Class C stream with no High Quality Waters, Outstanding Resource Waters,
or Water Supplies occurring within 1.0 mile of the project area. The project is located above
headwaters with no wetlands located in the vicinity.
Approximately 240 feet (0.07 Acres) of the channel will be impacted, with 86 feet being
enclosed permanently in the box culvert. The remaining 154 feet of impacts result from riprap
lining of the banks at the outlet of the culvert and widening of the charnel. The box culvert will
be buried 1.0 foot to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. The existing bridge will
remain as the detour structure until the culvert has been constructed. The culvert construction
has been phased so that it may be constructed in the dry while leaving passage for the average
daily flow.
I have included a copy of the Categorical Exclusion Document and seven copies of the Pre-
Construction Notification Application Form with the $475 fee. I have also included pictures
from the site and drawings of the site with vicinity maps and an impact summary sheet.
If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
aJosh Dalton, PE
Attachments

Office Use Only:
Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. j
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not App : r e" r I ?..: .1 y 1
1 f
I. Processing
C
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: A--
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
F
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP23, WQC 3375,
WQC 3361, Regional General Permit 198200031
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rick Austin, PE City Engineer for City of Lexington
Mailing Address: City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexinpton, NC 27292
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: rickanlexington.nc.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Eddie Wetherill, PE Wetherill Engineering
Company Affiliation: Engineering Consultant to the City of Lexington
Mailing Address: 4915 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 295
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ewetherill(a)wetherilleng.com
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 460 over Rat Springs Branch
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3324
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
4. Location
County: Davidson County Nearest Town: Lexington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-85 South to Exit 91, Take a
right at the top of exit ramp Left onto SR 1254, Go 1.5 miles, Right onto SR 1318, Bridge is
located just before industrial plant.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):N 746705 E 1618528
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rat Springs Branch
8. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing single span (30') bridge. SR 1318 provides a rear
entrance to a large industrial plant. Existing drainage area is comprised mostly of residential
single-family homes.
Page 6 of 12

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing bridge will be used as an on-site detour while the outlet portions of the culvert
are constructed. Box culverts will either be preformed or cast in place. A temporary road will
be constructed on the completed portion of the culvert while the existing bridge is removed
and the remaining inlet portion of the culvert is constructed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to replace Bridge
No. 460 which is in poor condition with an estimated remaining life of 4 years.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
J.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No wetlands are located on site.
240 feet of Water of the US will be impacted. 86 feet of the impacts are due to culvert enclosure.
The remaining 154 feet of impacts result from riprap and widening of the existing channel.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.i.4ov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No wetlands located in vicinity.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 86 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial
1 Riprap/Widening 154 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.toi)ozone.com,
www.mapcluest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240 feet
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation,
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Box culverts were chosen over a bridge for several reasons. A box culvert exists immediately
downstream for ease of maintenance and for cost reduction. The box culvert will be buried 1
foot to reduce impacts. The culvert construction will be phased so that it can be constructed `in
the dry' and to allow passage of the average daily flow. Also, strict adherence to Best
Management Practices will be followed. Extensive erosion control measures will be utilized
during construction of the culvert and road.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
? wetlands
installation of
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
'but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm?ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
i
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? State Clearinghouse does not review CE documents.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
01/07/2003 10:38 3362493584
-f v.r an,cr:i u7. 11 71.='Jyb2!38
SUNGATE DESIGN GF20UP
PAGE 01/01
PAGE 02/02
,(f buffer mitigation is required, pleases discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e,, Donation
of Property, Conservation Easemont, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preser va4on or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within I$A. NCA,C 2B .0242 or .0260.
X1. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
ImpQnJous fcrea e, will not be c 2tUr e road i merit w'll be s ' ed sli ?t{t the south.
to Water will be conveyqd 'tchos, _
XIT. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatMoat methods aad disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N
XIIZ. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15,A, NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes [] No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application su£f'iciently in advancc of desired
constraction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with 0onstructioo, or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., thaw-dawn schedules for lakes, dates associated with. Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

7/c-,>??
(Agent's signature is valid only if an enthozxzatioxi letter from the ayplicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

N ORO1sWoY?ARCL
1222 /
1299,
1147 yu -j - 1297
1364 C rch ? ""
;F ? .
138 122 296
1232
a+sa i PROJECT LIMITS
? ! 167 •?...
/f298
CCCC 1318
\ 1104
-?-- 126
22 '
L,,dV- M- 01 A.PW
1224
85 -----
/-??/? 1266
VICINITY
MAPS
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAVIDSON COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2603801 (B-3524)
BRIDGE NO. 460 ON SR 1318
OVER RAT SPRINGS BRANCH
SHEET I OF -7 6 / 24 / 02
0
O?
Im
COP)?
O?
c?
yy o?
? o °o y
o
? o
0
dy?ro? t Koy.ruxv of
?xvz
-x-
bob
tlj
cop)
- ? -' acs ?N?t W • , I 1?
o^o?? 1?1?
-,,O ?b
?O
? W
? N
N o
x
o
J b &, x 0
z ~ Q ??
to i
WETLAND LEGEND I
--WLB- WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE

L WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
® DENOTES FILL IN
PROPOSED
PIPE CULVERT
WETLAND
12'-48'
DENOTES FILL IN (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
® EXISTNG STRUC TURES) 54' PIPES
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
®DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
* * * * DENOTES MECHANIZED
»» ** *' * CLEARING
- -? FLOW DIRECTION
TB TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER
- -C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- - - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
- -2L- - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-POE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
WATER SURFACE
X X X x x LIVE STAKES
X x x
BOULDER
CORE FIBER ROLLS
& ABOVE
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
RIP RAP
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE

LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
DITCH /
GRASS SWALE
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAVIDSON COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2605801 8-3524)
BRIDGE NO. 460 ON SR 1318
OVER RAT SPRINGS BRANCH
fv
cn O L
-te
I oo m
v, M ? 0
n
(/)

N -< '-`

m
?

C) A
ui
D Z
r
Z 0D m

-?
W-

p n n N0

0 Z m
? r
I
.
Lo
0 M D
co K: V) F-
to m

c? OF ?
co ?o

It

cn m
cz
i
no
?t 0
Dm
m
m (j)
f?
S?

D
_ °

JO rn
-0 N

CA _

EXISTING

til
0
z 9 z Z+

b o
o zz
z o 3
d
C4
OD
m '
J C2
i
z J
Z
m W?
0 Nm
0 0
Zm
m
J N (? o
D
X t
C)J
301
ol
t V) I IL
N
i ?
cn .ZJ
D
0
z
N
O- o., o'. O?
cn Ul O- ?I 00
O O O
0 o Z /
N /
m / ?O)
r / `rV
z / 0
0
4 Q N .?.
?o W m
1
N I b? X
1 N
O O
X 1 :O
O
,? c0
F5 m
1 O
C7
cc]
? O
?D
` co
In c d Z
w m
w -o x
z z Z o?
o
b g z0 LTI o
0
3?®
z Q
a
co
w O
?OD
x O- O- Ol Ol
Ul O- ?1 00
PRO]PIERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
P.O. BOX 1008
1 HENRY LINK CORP. LEXINGTON, NC 27293
P.O. BOX 1008
2 YOUNG - HINKLE CORP. LEXINGTON, NC 27293
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DAVIDSON COUNTY
PROTECT: 8.2603801 (B-3324)
BRIDGE NO. 460 ON SR 1318
OVER RAT SPRINGS BRANCH
ET (0 OF 1 6/2,

O
0 z cn

D o ?

A
N T U)
O E
3
o
N
X
Cn
Iq Cn =
A
0 N n
m c
@
n

(D T
n j -

O d ?
N
7
3
d
ET'P O
m
T
a

Z
v
X
v
D

D o' D

O 0
I

y Cl)
O m C
O CD 0
A O 03.
7
°?
CD D
o - a .t1

Z T
61 ?
O C
O O m Cl)
O
V O
V C
G
c
x
T
C
m D
D c

' C) D
m
0
O
z
T -i D
n

J p 0
CD
Cl) -P
--i
?

0 T
cn .
o T
Z
O D
0
:1 0M -i

D
O O X. Cl)
G) o x
z
:3
-0 =3 5
Z ?ln A A nN Co
Zl 2 "
O O O
?
D ? 0 ;
O
z co 0)
o
? O
n
Z O O ?
°'
G) Cn C Z n
(n z O

m

z d n
0
n
00 co
N
n : W
T
O
m
A N X
p n N 7 3
C.
N J D
n
n ?
m ? 1
y
0
? d 7

Davidson County,
Bridge No. 460, on SR 1318
Over Rat Spring Branch
Federal Aid Project MABRZ-1318(7)
State Project 8.2603801
TIP Project B-3324
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
APPROVED:
5-7-00
Date
3 /- 12000
Date
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

?e
y? a
?F t J
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
;(=-z U'j-.
Nicholas L. Graf, 1f.E.
Division Administrator, FHWA

Davidson County,
Bridge No. 460, on SR 1318
Over Rat Spring Branch
Federal Aid Project MABRZ-1318(7)
State Project 8.2603801
TIP Project B-3324
I. I
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis
Branch By:
Date
. ?-ov
Date
Dennis Pipkin, P.E.
Project Planning Engineer
IVCL
Wayne tlliott
Bridge Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
,3-9-00 rCl/.
A-?
Date Lubin V. Prevatt, P.E., Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
`,??tirunrr?rr4
CAR
QgpFESS/??::
E J 76
`1t•t
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS:
B-3324, Davidson Countv
Bridge No. 460, on SR 1318
Over Rat Spring Branch
Federal Aid Project MABRZ-1318(7)
State Project 8.2603801
1. Roadway Design Unit, Roadside Environmental Unit, Resident Engineer:
Revegetation: The temporary detour structure and approaches will be removed after the
new bridge is completed, and the area will be revegetated with appropriate plant species.
2. Roadway Design Unit, Structure Design Unit, Project Development & Environmental
Analysis Branch, Resident Engineer:
Bridge Demolition: The Natural Resources Technical Report for this project was
completed prior to the start of the new documentation procedures for bridge demolition.
Therefore, bridge demolition will be addressed at the time of permit application. During
construction, Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed.
Categorical Exclusion Document Page 1 of 1
March, 2000
Davidson County,
Bridge No. 460, on SR 1318
Over Rat Spring Branch
Federal Aid Project MABRZ-1318(7)
State Project 8.2603801
TIP Project B-3324
NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge Number 460, in Davidson County. Bridge Number 460
carries Highway SR 1318 over Rat Spring Branch, in the central part of Davidson County. NCDOT
and FHWA classify this action as a Categorical Exclusion, due to the fact that no notable
environmental impacts are likely to occur as a result of project construction.
I. SUMMARY OF PROJECT:
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 460 with a structure consisting of a 2 @ 9 x 8 feet reinforced
concrete box culvert (RCBC). A paved•travelway of 24 feet will be accommodated, with 8 foot
grassed shoulders on each side. Where guardrail is required, shoulders will be a minimum of 11 feet
wide on each side. An on-site detour structure will be placed to the south (downstream) of the existing
bridge. The on-site detour structure will consist of 2 @ 72 inch corrugated steel pipes.
The estimated cost is $400,000 including $50,000 for Right-of-Way acquisition and $350,000
for construction. The estimated cost projected by the 2000-2006 Transportation Improvement
Program is $405,000; including $50,000 in prior year cost, $30,000 for Right-of-Way Acquisition,
and $325,000 for construction.
II. ANTICIPATED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS:
No design exceptions will be necessary for this project.
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS
NCDOT classifies SR 1318 as a Rural Local Route in the Statewide Functional Classification
System. The land use of the surrounding area is rural residential, with a large furniture manufacturing
complex to the west of the bridge.
Near Bridge No. 460, SR 1318 is a two lane, paved facility, 18 feet in width, with 6 foot wide
or greater grassed shoulders on each side. The existing bridge carries two lanes. SR 1318 terminates
approximately 0.1 mile west of the bridge.
Vertical and horizontal alignment in both directions is good.
NCDOT built Bridge No. 460 in 1964. The bridge has an asphalt overlay wearing surface on
a steel plank deck on 1-beams. The end bents are timber caps and posts, concrete sills, and timber
bulkheads. The deck of Bridge 460 is 13 feet above the stream bed. Water depth in Rat Spring Branch
is approximately one foot at the bridge vicinity. Bridge 460 is 31 feet long, with a 24 foot roadway
width. Two lanes of traffic are carried and the load limit is posted at 19 tons for single vehicles (SV)
and 24 tons for Truck-Tractor Semi-Trailers (TTST).
According to NCDOT Bridge Maintenance records, the bridge's sufficiency rating is 19.8 out
of a possible 100.0. The current traffic volume is 2,000 vehicles per day (VPD), projected to increase
to 3,200 VPD by the design year (2025). No speed limit is posted in the area, therefore it is assumed
to be 55 mph by statute.
Traffic Engineering accident records indicate there were no vehicle crashes reported in the
vicinity of Bridge No. 460 during the three year period between May 1, 1994, and April 30, 1997. The
Transportation Director of Davidson County schools indicates that there are two school busses
crossing the bridge twice per day, for a total of four trips per day. Road closure can be accommodated
by the school busses.
IV. ALTERNATES:
NCDOT will replace Bridge Number 460 at the same location, as shown in Figure 2. The
existing bridge will be replaced with a 2 @ 9 x 8 feet reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC). A
paved travelway of 24 feet will be accommodated, with 8 foot grassed shoulders on each side. Where
guardrail is required, shoulders will be a minimum of 1 I feet wide on each side. The new structure
will be at approximately the same elevation as the existing grade. The project will not require
substantial new work on approach roadways. An on-site detour structure will be placed to the south
(downstream) of the existing bridge. The on-site detour grade will be approximately 3 feet below the
existing grade and utilize 2 @ 72 inch corrugated steel pipes.
Consideration was given to replacement on existing location with road closure. The
Lexington Furniture Inc. (Plant No. 7) rejected this concept, since traffic would be required to utilize
indirectional private drives. With this concept, all traffic would also be required to utilize an at-grade
crossing of a high speed rail line operated by the Norfolk Southern Railway.
Consideration was also given to replacement on new location. SR 1318 terminates
approximately 200 feet west of the existing bridge at industrial drives to the Lexington Furniture
plant. Existing utilities near the bridge include two high voltage electric lines, two gas lines of
different pressure service, sanitary sewer, water line, telephone, and cable television.
New location to the north would involve substantial utility impacts and the geometrics would be
difficult to tie back in to the intersection with industrial drives to the west. New location to the south
would also involve substantial utility impacts and would improve design speed for only a very short
distance. Thus, replacement on new location was dropped from further consideration.
The "do-nothing" alternate is not practical; requiring eventual closing of the road as the
existing bridge completely deteriorates. The sufficiency rating of the existing bridge is only 19.8 out
of 100.0. Rehabilitation of the existing deteriorating bridge is neither practical nor economical.
2
V. COST ESTIMATE
Estimated cost of the recommended alternate is as follows:
Structure
Roadway Approaches
Structure Removal
Temporary Detour & Structure
Subtotal
Engineering and Contingencies
Total Construction Cost
Right-of-Way and Utilities
Total Project Cost
$49,200
177,680
7,440
71,680
306,000
44,000
350,000
$400,000
VI. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 460 at the existing location as shown in Figure 1. An on-site
detour structure will be utilized to maintain traffic.
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 460 with a structure consisting of a 2 @ 9 x 8 feet reinforced
concrete box culvert (RCBC). A paved travelway of 24 feet will be accommodated, with 8 foot
grassed shoulders on each side. Where guardrail is required, shoulders will be a minimum of 11 feet
wide on each side. An on-site detour structure will be placed to the south (downstream) of the existing
bridge. The on-site detour structure will consist of 2 @ 72 inch corrugated steel pipes.
Initial design indicates that completed project will provide a design speed of 60 MPH.
NCDOT recommends that the bridge be replaced at its existing location, with an on site
detour, in order to accommodate the high traffic volumes and to provide normal and emergency
access to the Lexington Furniture plant complex near the bridge. There are no suitable detours. The
Lexington Furniture Inc. plant management has indicated that road closure would create a hardship
with both emergency access and routine access to their facility.
The Division 9 Engineer concurs with the selection of the recommended alternate.
SR 1318 is not designated as a bicycle route, and there is no indication that an unusual
number of bicyclists use the road.
VII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
A. General Environmental Effects
The project is considered to be a "Categorical Exclusion" (CE) due to its limited scope and
insubstantial environmental consequences.
3
The bridge project will not have a substantial adverse effect on the quality of the human or
natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No change
in land use is expected to result from construction of the project. No adverse effect on families or
communities is anticipated. Right-of-way acquisition will be limited.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected to
adversely affect social, economic or religious opportunities in the area.
No publicly owned parks, recreational facilities or wildlife or waterfowl refuges of national,
state, or local significance are in the vicinity of the project.
Construction of the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the floodplain or
associated flood hazard. The elevation of the 100-year flood will not be increased by more than 12
inches.
NCDOT expects utility conflicts to be low for a project of this size and magnitude.
There are no known hazardous waste sites in the project area.
B. Architectural & Archaeological Resources
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966, as amended, & implemented by Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations
for compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires that if a federally
funded, licensed, or permitted project has an effect on property listed on or eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places, the Advisory Council on Historic.Preservation will be given an
opportunity to comment.
Architectural Resources
A meeting was held with The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to evaluate potential
effects of the project. The SHPO stated that there are no historic structures located within the area of
potential effect (APE) for this project, and recommended that no historic architectural surveys be
conducted. Thus, it is concluded that the project will have no effect on historic architectural
resources.
Archaeological Resources
The SHPO indicated that there are no known recorded archaeological sites within the area of
potential effect, and it is unlikely that any archaeological resources could be affected by the project.
Therefore, the SHPO recommended that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection
with this project. Thus, it is concluded that the project will have no effect on archaeological resources.
4
C. Natural Systems
PHYSICAL RESOURCES
Area and Regional Characteristics
Davidson County lies within the central portion of the Piedmont physiographic region of
North Carolina. A gently rolling to hilly landscape characterizes the general topography 'f west-
central Davidson County and the local topography within the project area (McCachren, 1994). The
project is located in a narrow flood plain area associated with Rat Spring Branch. The project area's
elevation ranges from 690-699 feet above mean sea level (msl) along the southeast portion of the
project to 680-689 feet above ms] along the northwest portion of the project. Rat Spring Branch,
situated near the center of the project area, is 670-679 feet above msl (USGS quadrangle map
(Lexington West), 1987).
Four soil units occur within the boundaries of the project: Cecil sandy loam (2-8
percent slopes), Cecil sandy loam (8-15 percent slopes), Chewacla loam (0-2 percent slopes), and
Mecklenburg loam (8-15 percent slopes).
Core samples taken throughout the project area revealed loamy to sandy loam textured soils.
The soils did not exhibit hydric conditions, such as low chroma colors, in low areas of the flood plain.
Therefore, hydric soil indicators, as defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual, were not observed within the project study area.
Water Resources
Waters Impacted and Physical Characteristics
Rat Spring Branch is located in sub-basin 030307 of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. The
stream is a tributary to Swearing Creek, and has its confluence with the creek approximately 0.67
mile (linear channel distance) downstream of Bridge No. 460.
The banks of Rat Spring Branch at Bridge No. 460 measures, on average, approximately 15
feet wide and 4 feet deep. The stream bed at the same location measures, on average, approximately
15 feet wide and 0.5 feet deep. The stream's substrate consists of sand, cobblestones, stones, and
boulders. The waters of Rat Spring Branch were clear at the time of the survey. Highly dense algal
growth covered much of the stream's substrate. Signs of bank erosion were observed both upstream
and downstream of Bridge No. 460.
Best Usage Classification
The DWQ categorizes streams according to a best usage classification. Rat Spring Branch
[index no. 12-113-5] is categorized by DWQ as Class C. Class C designates waters protected for
aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation (e.g., wading, boating),
and agriculture (NCDENR, DWQ, Water Quality Section; 1 September 1998 Internet update).
. Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I: undeveloped watersheds or
WS-11: predominately undeveloped watersheds), nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur
within 1.0 mile of project study area (NCDENR, DWQ, Water Quality Section; I September 1998
Internet update).
Water Quality
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network
The Benthic Macro invertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) assesses water quality by
sampling for benthic macro invertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites throughout the state.
There are no BMAN monitoring sites located within 1.0 mile downstream of the project area. The
closest BMAN monitoring site is situated on Swearing Creek at SR 1104, approximately 1.7 miles
downstream of Bridge No. 460. Two BMAN samplings at the site yielded bioclassifications of "fair"
in October 1985 and "good-fair" in November 1987.
North Carolina Index of Biotic Integrity
The North Carolina Index of Biotic Integrity (NCIBI) is a method for assessing a stream's
biological integrity by examining the structure and health of its fish community.
No fisheries studies were completed on Rat Spring Branch or within 1.0 mile downstream of
the project area.
Fish Tissue Analysis
Fish tissue samples were collected and analyzed within subbasin 030307 of the Yadkin - Pee
Dee River Basin between 1980 and 1994. According to the document entitled Basinwide Assessment
Report Support Document: Yadkin River Basin (NCDEHNR-DEM, 1997 Draft), metals were
analyzed in 1980 and 1985 from fish tissues collected along Swearing Creek near the city of
Lexington. The document does not specify an exact sampling location within Swearing Creek. The
sampling location may or may not be within 1.0 mile downstream of Bridge No. 460. According to
the analytical results, fish tissues collected at Swearing Creek did not exceed FDA action levels,
USEPA recommended screening values, or NCHD's toxicological criteria for metals.
Point Source Dischargers
The most current DWQ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) report
(1998) lists no facilities located within 1.0 mile of the project area which hold an Individual NPDES
Permit. There is one facility within 1.0 mile of the project area that obtained a General NPDES
Permit. The facility, Lexington Furniture Industries, obtained General NPDES Permit No.
SR0400018 on 18 August 1993. Lexington Furniture Industries' permit regulates point source
discharges into Rat Spring Branch.
Non-discharge systems are also required to obtain an NPDES permit. One non-discharge
system located within 1.0 mile of the project area obtained an NPDES permit. This system, which is
situated upstream of Bridge No. 460 along Rat Spring Branch, falls under NPDES Permit No.
SR0400018.
6
Non-Point Source Dischargers
The NCDOT field investigators conducted a visual observation of any potential Nonpoint
Source (NPS) discharges located within or near the project area. The field investigators did not
observe any agriculture, construction, or land clearing activities near the project area.
Summary of Anticipated Water Resource Impacts
In order to minimize potential impacts to water resources in the project area, the NCDOT's
Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly enforced
during the project's construction phase. Guidelines for BMPs include minimizing built upon areas
and diverting stormwater away from surface water supplies. In addition to the BMPs, revegetating
stream banks after grading and limiting in-stream activities will further reduce water resource
impacts.
BIOTIC RESOURCES
An asterisk (*) denotes fauna observed during the site visit. Published range distributions and
habitat analyses are used in estimating fauna likely to occur within the project area.
Terrestrial Communities
Mixed hardwood forest and a maintained/disturbed community comprise the terrestrial
communities within the project area. The project area contains no wetlands.
Hardwood Forest
The hardwood forest, situated along the southwestern side of SR 1318, comprises the vast
majority of the area potentially impacted by the recommended alternate. A smaller mixed hardwood
forest area along the northeastern side of SR 1318 is located within the area potentially impacted.
A third hardwood forest area occurs along the banks of Rat Spring Branch, and is potentially
impacted.
The forest community's canopy consists of redbud red maple, sugar maple, sycamore,
American beech, shagbark hickory, hickories, red cedar, ironwood, black cherry, American elm,
pawpaw, sourwood, red oak, and rock chestnut oak. The community's shrub layer consists of
seedlings and saplings from the canopy trees, multiflora rose, American holly, Chinese privet,
strawberry bush, and black haw. Spotted wintergreen comprises the herbaceous layer, while the
community's vine layer consists of cross vine and poison ivy.
The recommended alternate potentially impacts a small, hardwood forest, area that occurs
along the banks of Rat Spring Branch.
Riparian vegetation along the banks of Rat Spring Branch includes tag alder, sycamore, river
birch, hickories, red maple, sweet gum, rock chestnut oak, silky dogwood. Christmas fern, giant cane,
and Japanese grass were observed within the community's herbaceous layer.
Maintained/Disturbed Community
An irregularly maintained roadside shoulder and a regularly maintained powerline corridor
and gas easement comprise the project area's maintained/disturbed community. The irregularly
maintained roadside shoulder is situated along both sides of SR 1318, and extends roughly the entire
length of the road. The regularly maintained, powerline corridor runs northeast to southwest in a
somewhat perpendicular fashion to SR 1318. The gas easement, situated along the southwestern side
of SR 1318, runs parallel to SR 1318 before turning southwest just west of Rat Spring Branch.
Flora observed within the irregularly maintained roadside shoulder include asters, fescue
grasses, golden rods, Japanese honeysuckle, strawberry, red maple, rabbit tobacco, rose shrubs,
manna grasses, Chinese privet, blackberry, ash, tulip tree, foxtail grasses, multiflora rose, and broom
sedge. The roadside shoulder also includes flowering dogwood, sweet gum, and red oak tree
seedlings and saplings.
Flora observed within the regularly maintained powerline corridor and gas easement include
elephant's-foot, blackberry, golden rods, greenbrier, cross vine, Queen Anne's Lace, asters, woolly
mullein, Japanese honeysuckle, broom sedge, winged elm, and sunflower. The following tree
seedlings and saplings were also observed within the powerline corridor and easement: elms,
sassafras, red maple, and mockernut hickory.
Terrestrial Wildlife
Several species of wildlife inhabit or are likely to inhabit the project area. The following sections
list many of these wildlife species.
Lepidopterans
Members of the order Lepidoptera include insects such as moths, skippers, and butterflies.
Larval species of Lepidoptera that may be found in the project area include the luna moth, satyres,
cecropia moth, promethea moth, imperial moth, and cherry scallop shell moth.
Amphibians
A variety of amphibian species are likely to occur within the project area's one aquatic and
two terrestrial communities. Salamanders commonly found in the communities include the eastern
newt, spotted salamander, marbled salamander, northern dusky salamander, two-lined salamander,
three-lined salamander, mud salamander, and red salamander. Frogs and toads inhabiting the project
area may include the American toad, Fowler's toad, northern cricket frog, gray treefrog, spring
peeper, upland chorus frog, bullfrog, green frog, pickerel frog, and southern leopard frog.
Reptiles
Numerous reptiles, including turtles, lizards, and snakes, may inhabit the project area. Turtle
species inhabiting the project area may include the snapping turtle, eastern musk turtle, painted turtle,
and eastern box turtle. Eastern fence lizard, five-lined skink, southeastern five-lined skink, broadhead
skink, ground skink, and six-lined racerunner comprise the six lizards that may inhabit the project
area's communities. Finally, several snake species may be found in the project area, including the
8
worm snake, ringneck snake, mole kingsnake, eastern garter snake, eastern ribbon snake, smooth
earth snake, and copperhead.
Avian
Several avian species are likely to inhabit the project area's communities. The bird species
include the mourning dove*, Carolina chickadee*, northern cardinal, song sparrow, yellow warbler,
American crow, rufous-sided towhee, winter wren, blue jay, brown-headed cowbird, and common
grackle.
Mammals
Mammalian species that may inhabit the communities within the project area include bats,
moles and shrews, rodents, and carnivores. The silver-haired bat, eastern pipistrelle, red bat, and
evening bat are four bat species that may occur in the project area. Moles and shrews likely to occur
within the project's ecological communities include the southeastern shrew, northern short-tailed
shrew, and eastern mole. Several rodents may inhabit the terrestrial and aquatic communities,
including the eastern chipmunk, woodchuck, red squirrel, southern flying squirrel, beaver, gray
squirrel, white-footed mouse, hispid cotton rat, woodland vole, and meadow jumping mouse.
Raccoon, long-tailed weasel, and striped skunk are carnivores likely to inhabit the project area. Other
mammals that may inhabit the project area include the white-tailed deer, eastern cottontail, and
Virginia opossum.
Aquatic Communities and Wildlife
One aquatic community, Rat Spring Branch, will be impacted by the proposed project. Rat
Spring Branch flows northeast to southwest through the project area.
Fauna associated with the aquatic community includes various vertebrate species. Fish
species which may inhabit these waters include rosyside dace, fieryblack shiner, bluehead chub,
golden shiner, redlip shiner, sandbar shiner, spottail shiner, creek chub, creek chubsucker, eastern
mosquitofish, and tessellated darter. The literature lacks specific information on fish species in Rat
Spring Branch. A seven-mile headwater reach of nearby Swearing Creek, which includes the
confluence of Swearing Creek and Rat Spring Branch, is too small and polluted to be off any fishing
importance.
Summary of Anticipated Biotic Resource Impacts
Construction of the subject project will have various impacts on the aforementioned biotic
resources. Any construction related activities in or near these resources have the potential to impact
biological functions. This section also discusses temporary and permanent impacts.
Terrestrial Impacts
Project construction will permanently and/or temporarily impact the project area's terrestrial
communities due to clearing and paving activities. Replacing Bridge No. 460, as proposed under the
recommended alternate, will result in permanent (i.e., irreversible) ecological impacts to the
hardwood forest and maintained/disturbed communities. The on-site detour bridge proposed under
the recommended alternate will also result in temporary terrestrial community impacts. These
9
impacts are temporary because the area impacted by the detour bridge will be restored once
construction of Bridge No. 460 is completed. Table 1 summarizes the project's estimated permanent
and temporary impact areas. Calculated impacts to terrestrial communities reflect the relative
abundance of each community present in the study area. Estimated impacts are derived from the
project lengths along with the proposed right-of-way width of 60 feet. However, project construction
often does not require the entire right-of-way. Consequently, actual terrestrial community impacts
may be considerably less than the impacts in Table 1.
Permanent terrestrial impacts associated with the recommended alternate will result in 0.71
acre of temporary impacts and 0.06 acre of permanent impacts to the project area's three terrestrial
communities.
TABL°E'1. Anticipated Impacts to Terrestrial Communities
Community Temporary Permanent
Impacts Impacts
Hardwood Forest 0.41 0.02
Maintained/Disturbed 0.30 0.04
Totals 0.71 0.06
Note: - Impact values cited in acres.
Plant communities found within the proposed project area serve as nesting and sheltering
habitat for various types of wildlife. Replacing Bridge No. 460 will reduce habitat for many faunal
species, thereby diminishing faunal numbers. Reduced habitat will also displace some wildlife
further away from the road. However, impacts to fauna are anticipated to be minimal because of the
project's limited size and scope. Unpaved areas modified by construction will become road shoulders
containing early successional habitat for certain wildlife. Furthermore, animals temporarily displaced
by construction activities will repopulate areas suitable for those species.
Aquatic impacts
Bridge construction activities will result in short and long term environmental impacts at the
project area and well downstream of the project. Reducing riparian canopy removal, limiting in-
stream construction, revegetating exposed soil immediately following grading activities, and strictly
adhering to BMPs and design standards in sensitive waters will minimize impacts to aquatic
communities.
Bridge construction will result in short and long term environmental impacts to the project
area's aquatic community. Replacing Bridge No. 460, as proposed, will result in 60 linear feet of
impacts to the portion of Rat Spring Branch traversing the project area. The on-site detour bridge
proposed will also impact an additional 50 linear feet of stream situated along the project area. The
detour bridge's impacts are temporary because the stream's banks and substrate will be restored back
to their original conditions once Bridge No. 460 is completed. Estimated aquatic impacts are derived
from the project lengths along with the proposed right-of-way width of 60 feet. However, project
construction often does not require the entire right-of-way. Consequently, actual aquatic community
impacts may be considerably less than the impacts presented above.
Proposed bridge construction may also impact aquatic communities downstream of the project
area, including Swearing Creek and other sections of Rat Spring Branch. Downstream aquatic
10
impacts are difficult to quantify, and depend on numerous factors, including construction techniques,
mitigation efforts, weather conditions, and terrestrial and aquatic communities present.
JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS
This section provides impact analysis pertinent to waters of the United States and rare and
protected species.
Waters of the United States
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) promulgated the definition of "waters of the
United States" under 33 CFR §328.3(a). Waters of the United States include most interstate and
intrastate surface waters, tributaries, and wetlands. Areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or
groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances
do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions are
considered "wetlands" under 33 CFR §328.3(b). Any action that proposes to place dredged or fill
materials into waters of the United states falls under the jurisdiction of the USACE, and must follow
the statutory provisions under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. 1344).
Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
The NCDOT field investigators examined potential wetland communities pursuant to the
1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Based upon the results of the field
investigation, the project area contains no jurisdictional wetlands.
Rat Spring Branch is considered a jurisdictional surface water under Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act. Above sections of this document discuss the biological, physical, and water quality
aspects of the stream.
Permits
The Clean Water Act §404 establishes a permit program to regulate the discharge of dredged
or fill materials into waters of the United States. The USACE, which administers the permit program
under CWA §404, established nationwide permits for minor activities, specialized activities, and
activities regulated by other authorities. Nationwide Permit No. 23, entitled "Approved Categorical
Exclusions", covers certain activities undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated, funded, or financed,
in whole or in part, by another Federal agency or department. Nationwide 23 applies when another
Federal agency or department determines that their activity, work, or discharge is categorically
excluded from an environmental impact statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). The activity, work, or discharge becomes categorically excluded when its actions neither
individually nor cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Also, the Office
of the Chief of Engineers must receive notice of the agency's or department's application for the
categorical exclusion and concur with the categorical exclusion determination (61 FR 65874, 65916;
December 13, 1996). This project's impacts on the waters of the United States will likely require a
Nationwide Permit No. 23.
Clean Water Act §401 authorizes states to determine whether activities permitted by the
federal government comply with state water quality standards. The DWQ may require a Section 401
Water Quality Certification if a project fills or substantially modifies waters'or wetlands. North
11
Carolina developed General Certifications (GCs) that satisfy CWA §401 and correspond to the Corps
of Engineers' Nationwide Permits. Water Quality Certification No. 3107, which corresponds to NWP
23, will likely be required for this project's impacts to wetlands and waters.
Mitigation
The USACE adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a mitigation
policy that attempts to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of waters
of the United States, especially wetlands. According to the CEQ, mitigation includes avoiding
impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and compensating for
impacts (40 CFR § 1508.20). The USACE also embraces the concept of sequencing, which instructs
the regulated community to sequentially consider each component of wetlands mitigation. Finally,
mitigation policy incorporates a no net loss of wetlands functions and values.
Avoidance
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting
impacts to waters of the United States. According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
between the USEPA and the USACE, "appropriate and practicable" measures that offset unavoidable
impacts should be appropriate to the scope and degree of those impacts and practicable in terms of
cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes. The construction of
Bridge No. 460 will result in some unavoidable surface water impacts.
Minimization
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the
adverse impacts to waters of the United States. Implementation of these steps will be required through
project modifications and permit conditions. Minimization typically focuses on decreasing the
footprint of the proposed project by reducing median widths, right-of-way widths, fill slopes, and/or
road shoulder widths. Other ways to minimize the project's impacts on the waters of the United
States include strictly enforcing sedimentation control BMPs during the entire life of the project,
reducing clear and grub activities, reducing/eliminating direct discharge into streams, reducing runoff
velocity, re-establishing vegetation on exposed areas, judiciously applying pesticides and herbicides,
minimizing in-stream activities, and controlling litter and debris. In order to minimize potential
impacts to water resources in the project area, the NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMPs) for
the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly enforced during the project's construction phase.
Compensatory Mitigation
In most situations, the NCDOT must avoid and minimize to the maximum extent possible all
unavoidable adverse impacts to the waters of the United States before considering compensatory
mitigation. Compensatory mitigation includes restoring, creating, and/or enhancing waters of the
United States. The USACE usually requires compensatory mitigation for activities authorized under
Clean Water Act §404 if unavoidable impacts to waters of the United States total more than 1.0 acre
of wetlands or 500 linear feet of perennial and intermittent streams. The DWQ may require
compensatory mitigation for activities authorized under a CWA §401 permit if unavoidable impacts
to waters of the United States total more than 1.0 acre of wetlands and/or 150 linear feet of perennial
streams. The USACE determines final permit and mitigation decisions under Section 404 of the
CWA.
12
Compensatory wetland or stream mitigation will probably not be required for this project.
Estimated unavoidable stream impacts fall below compensatory mitigation levels required by the
regulatory agencies. Compensatory mitigation for wetlands will not be required because wetlands do
not exist within the project area. However, the regulatory agencies will provide final permit and
mitigation decisions for the project.
Rare and Protected Species
Federal law (under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended)
requires that any action likely to adversely affect a species classified as federally protected be subject
to review by the FWS.
Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended. As of March 2000, the FWS
lists three federally protected species for Davidson County. The bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii)
is listed as Threatened Due to Similarity of Appearance [T (S/A)]. This listing denotes a species that
is threatened due to a similarity of appearance to other rare species. A brief description of each
species' characteristics and habitat follows:
Schweinitz's sunflower Endangered
Plant Family: Asteraceae
Federally Listed: 6 June 1991
Flowers Present: mid September-early October
Schweinitz's sunflower is a rhizomatous perennial herb that grows 3-6 feet tall from a cluster
of carrot-like tubrous roots. The stems are deep red, solitary and only branch above mid-stem. The
leaves are rough feeling above and resin-dotted and loosely soft-white-hairy beneath. Leaves of the
sunflower are opposite on the lower part of the stem and usually become alternate on the upper stem.
The broad flowers are borne from September until frost. These flowers are yellow in color and
arranged in an open system of upwardly arching heads. The fruit is a smooth, gray-black achene.
Schweinitz's sunflower is endemic to North and South Carolina. These sunflowers grow best
in full sunlight or light shade in clearings and along the edges of open stands of oak-pine-hickory
upland woods. The species normally resides in moist to dryish clays, clay-loams, or sandy clay-
loams, often with a high gravel content and always moderately podzolized. Natural fires and large
herbivores are considered to be historically important in maintaining open habitat for these
sunflowers.
Habitat for the Schweinitz's sunflower exists within the project area because the area contains
a maintained/disturbed community along the shoulder of SR 1318, and a powerline right of way is
nearby. On October 7, 1999, NCDOT Natural Resources Specialists conducted a survey of the
project site. No populations of Schweinitz's sunflower were found. Another species of sunflower,
Helianthus microcephalus, was found. Therefore, it is concluded that this project will have no effect
on the Schweinitz's sunflower.
13
A review of the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats on November 1998
revealed no records of the Schweinitz's sunflower within 1.0 mile of the project area.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Bald eagle Threatened
Animal Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: 11 March 1967
Adult bald eagles are identified by their large white head and short white tail. The body
plumage is dark-brown to chocolate-brown in color. In flight bald eagles can be identified by their
flat wing soar.
Eagle nests are found in close proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path
to the water, in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the surrounding land.
Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. The breeding season
for the bald eagle begins in December or January. Fish are the major food source for bald eagles.
Other sources include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.,
The proposed project will not impact the bald eagle because its habitat does not exist within
the project area. Also, a review of the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats on
November 1998 revealed no records of the bald eagle within 1.0 mile of the project area.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Bog turtle T (S/A)
Animal Family: Emydidae
Date Listed: 01 May 1997
The bog turtle is North Carolina's smallest turtle, measuring 3 to 4 inches in length. It has a
dark brown carapace and a black plastron. The bright orange or yellow blotch on each side of the head
and neck is a readily identifiable characteristic. The bog turtle inhabits damp grassy fields, bogs and
marshes in the mountains and western piedmont.
The bog turtle is shy and secretive, and will burrow rapidly in mud or debris when disturbed.
The bog turtle forages on insects, worms, snails, amphibians and seeds. In June or July, three to five
eggs are laid in a shallow nest in moss or loose soil. The eggs hatch in about 55 days.
The proposed project will not impact the bog turtle because its habitat does not exist within
the project area. Also, a review of the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats on
November 1998 revealed no records of the bog turtle within 1.0 mile of the project area.
The bog turtle is listed as T(S/A). This designation is due to the bog turtle's similarity of
appearance to another rare species currently listed for protection. Species designated under T (S/A)
are not subject to Section 7 consultation. Therefore, a biological conclusion for this species is not
required.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION
NOT REQUIRED
14
D. Air Quality and Traffic Noise
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, thus it is not required to be included in the
regional emissions analysis (if applicable) and a project level CO analysis is not required.
If the project disposes of vegetation by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with
applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15
NCAC 2D.0520.
The project will not substantially increase traffic volumes. Therefore, it will have no
substantial impact on noise levels. Temporary noise increases may occur during construction.
E. Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 requires that all federal agencies or their
representatives, to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction projects on prime and
important farmland soils. These soils are determined by the US Natural Resources Conservation
Service (MRCS) based on criteria such as potential crop yield and possible level of input of economic
resources. The project will result in the conversion of a small amount of land but the area to be
converted is void of agricultural uses. Therefore, no further consideration of impacts to farmland is
required.
15

N

40000
uo?r„ North Carolina Department of
Transportation
Division of Highways
rI Project Development & Environmental
CW T"*? ? Analysis Branch
Davidson County
Replace Bridge No. 460 on SR 1318
Over Rat Spring Branch
B-3324
Figure One

0
Looking east across
Bridge No. 460
Looking west across
Bridge No. 460
North Carolina Department of
Transportation
Division of Highways
Project Development & Environmental
Analysis Branch
Davidson County
Replace Bridge No. 460 on SR 1318
Over Rat Spring Branch
B-3324
Figure Three

SSATT -.? w.
r/.y' f •?YZ ? nr3
• ? ? ., y.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
Division of Archives and History
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary November 21, 1997
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Bridge 460 on SR 1318 over branch of Swearing
Creek, Davidson County, State Project
8.2603801, Federal Aid Project MABRZ-
1318(7), B-3324, ER 98-7735
Dear Mr. Graf:
On November 12, 1997, Debbie Bevin of our staff met with North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds concerning
the above project. We reported our available information on historic architectural
and archaeological r jecty area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting.
project
NCDOT provided
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the
meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, we are aware of no historic structures
r commend that no historic
located within the area of ducted for this project.
architectural survey b
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be -conducted in connection with this project. orical Having provided this information, menlook t which indicates how NCDOT addtessed our
Exclusion or Environmental Assess
comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
1 02 C
Nicholas L. Graf
11/21/97, Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
0" , Z I
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: H. F. Vick
B. Church
T. Padgett
® North Carolina WAdlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis Pipkin, Project Planning Engineer
Planning & Environmental Branch, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Co ator
Habitat Conservation Program - /
DATE: December 5, 1997 )
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacements, Davidson, Guilford, Forsyth, and Stokes
counties, North Carolina, TIP Nos. B-2951, B-3179, B-3330, B-3332, B-
3333, B-3374, B-3324.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have
conducted site visits as need and have the following preliminary comments on the subject
projects. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our stanaard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not
require work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment.
The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human
and wildlife passage beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and
does not block navigation by canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the
stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
Bridge Replacement Memo 2 December 5, 1997
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed
back to original ground elevations immediately upon. the completion of the
project. Disturbed areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and
native tree species should be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'.
If possible, when using temporary structures the area should be cleared but not
grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other
mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact, allows the
area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of
the steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the
option of requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and
we can recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist
Mr. Tim Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these
sensitive species may be required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service for information on requirements of the Endangered
Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy
entitled "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12,
1997)" should be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
If corrugated metal pipe arches or concrete box culverts are used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means
that the culvert or pipe invert is buried at least 1 foot below the natural stream
bed. If multiple cells are required the second and/or third cells should be
placed so that their bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similar to Lyonsfield
design). This will allow sufficient water depth in the culvert or pipe during
normal flows to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are long, baffle
systems are required to trap gavel and provide resting areas for fish and other
aquatic organisms.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed
to remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or
widening is required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of
structures usually causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment
deposition that will require future maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same
location with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be
designed and located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to
Bridge Replacement Memo 3 December 5, 1997
avoid destabilizing stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old
structure should be removed and the approach fills removed from the 100-year
floodplain. Approach fills should be removed down to the natural ground elevation. The
area should be stabilized with grass and planted with native tree species. If the area that
is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the area to wetlands. If
successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject project or other
projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2951 - We have no specific comments.
2. B-3179 - We have no specific comments.
3. B-3330 - We have no specific comments.
4. B-3332 - We have no specific comments.
5. B-3333 - We have no specific comments.
6. B-3374 - It is unlikely that this stream supports trout. We have no specific
comments.
7. B-3324 - We have no specific comments.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and
maintain sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent
wet concrete from contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of
bridges with spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is
recommended in most cases. Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation and vehicle related mortality at highway
crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding
bridge replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity
to review and comment on these projects.

T '
?F
BEDROCK UPSTREAM OF EXISTING BRIDGE
LOOKING UPSTREAM FROM EXISTING BRIDGE
LOOKING UPSTREAM
LOOKING DOWNSTREAM FROM BRIDGE
dlr
LOOKING EAST
j

k a -.. .rod,
f
x +4?

LOOKING WEST
t Y, r
o _ y ?. II ?y

030013
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
Form Version May 2002
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Appl e ".
1. Processing
#?
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: `
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or W tershe"uffer Rules"
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit if fh'DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP23, WOC 3375,
WOC 3361, Regional General Permit 198200031
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rick Austin, PE City Engineer for City of Lexington
Mailing Address: City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ricka(a,lexington.nc.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Eddie Wetherill, PE Wetherill Engineering
Company Affiliation: Engineering Consultant to the City of Lexington
Mailing Address: 4915 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 295
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: eetherill(a-,wetherilleng.com
Page 5 of 12
1
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 460 over Rat Springs Branch
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3324
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
4. Location
County: Davidson County Nearest Town: Lexington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-85 South to Exit 91, Take a
right at the top of exit ramp, Left onto SR 1254, Go 1.5 miles, Right onto SR 1318, Bridge is
located lust before industrial plant.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):N 746705 E 1618528
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rat Springs Branch
8. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing single span (30') bridge. SR 1318 provides a rear
entrance to a large industrial plant. Existing drainage area is comprised mostly of residential
single-family homes.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing bridge will be used as an on-site detour while the outlet portions of the culvert
are constructed. Box culverts will either be preformed or cast in place. A temporary road will
be constructed on the completed portion of the culvert while the existing bridge is removed
and the remaining inlet portion of the culvert is constructed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to replace Bridge
No. 460 which is in poor condition with an estimated remaining life of 4 years.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No wetlands are located on site.
240 feet of Water of the US will be impacted. 86 feet of the impacts are due to culvert enclosure.
The remaining 154 feet of impacts result from riprap and widening of the existing channel.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.izov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No wetlands located in vicinity.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 86 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial
1 Riprap/Widening 154 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us. ,ov. Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapciuest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240 feet
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Box culverts were chosen over a bridge for several reasons. A box culvert exists immediatelv
downstream for ease of maintenance and for cost reduction. The box culvert will be buried 1
foot to reduce impacts. The culvert construction will be phased so that it can be constructed `in
the dry' and to allow passage of the average daily flow. Also, strict adherence to Best
Management Practices will be followed. Extensive erosion control measures will be utilized
during construction of the culvert and road.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.htm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism .(e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? State Clearinghouse does not review CE documents.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone L extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
01/07/2003 10:38 3362493584
-1wtr4WVuJ U7. 11 ?t?tl?ybl4?i
SUNGATE DESIGN GRaJP
PAGE 01/01
PAGE 02/02
Lf buffer mitigation is required, pleases discuss what type of nnitipation is proposed (ix,, Donation
of Property, Coztservation Easemont, %parian Buffer Restoration / Enharteemmt, preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fluid). Please attach all appropriate infonztation as
identified within 15.A, NCA,C 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both exisbg and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Im a rious reg a will of e c e ro i ent w' be shifted slightty IQ The sau
Bo=ater will be gorive
Y , . 'tcltea?. ,?.
XIr. Sewage Disposal (required by DW(G)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods And disposition (non-dzscharge or discharge) of
wastewater gmerated fz-ow the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N-46
XIH- Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15,A, NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes [I No 2
Is this an after-the-Fast permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application suf 1ciently in advance of desired
coztstluddon dates to allow processing time for these permits. Howfrver, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits ozX
work schedules (e.g., 41-aw-d6wn schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
A eau A nt's lguatare ate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization latter from, the a licant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

13JU 1I
r
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applica trA o ?.a
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: -
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed-Buffer Rules'
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from D- WQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested; NWP23, WQC 3375,
WQC 3361, Regional General Permit 198200031
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rick Austin, PE City Engineer for City of Lexington
Mailing Address: City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ricka(a lexington.nc.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Eddie Wetherill, PE Wetherill Engineering
Company Affiliation: Engineering Consultant to the City of Lexington
Mailing Address: 4915 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 295
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ewetherill(a),wetherilleng.com
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 460 over Rat Springs Branch
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3324
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
4. Location
County: Davidson County Nearest Town: Lexington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-85 South to Exit 91, Take a
right at the top of exit ramp, Left onto SR 1254, Go 1.5 miles, Right onto SR 1318, Bridge is
located lust before industrial plant.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):N 746705 E 1618528
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rat Springs Branch
8. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing single span (30') bridge. SR 1318 provides a rear
entrance to a large industrial plant. Existing drainage area is comprised mostly of residential
single-family homes.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing bridge will be used as an on-site detour while the outlet portions of the culvert
are constructed. Box culverts will either be preformed or cast in place. A temporary road will
be constructed on the completed portion of the culvert while the existing bridge is removed
and the remaining inlet portion of the culvert is constructed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to replace Bridge
No. 460 which is in poor condition with an estimated remaining life of 4 years.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No wetlands are located on site.
240 feet of Water of the US will be impacted. 86 feet of the impacts are due to culvert enclosure.
The remaining 154 feet of impacts result from riprap and widening, of the existing channel.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

I I i i
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No wetlands located in vicinity.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 86 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial
1 Riprap/Widening 154 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us¢s.,iZov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapauest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240 feet
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)
,?
Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Box culverts were chosen over a bridle for several reasons. A box culvert exists immediately
downstream, for ease of maintenance, and for cost reduction. The box culvert will be buried I
foot to reduce impacts. The culvert construction will be phased so that it can be constructed `in
the dry' and to allow passage of the average daily flow. Also, strict adherence to Best
Management Practices will be followed. Extensive erosion control measures will be utilized
during construction of the culvert and road.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? State Clearinghouse does not review CE documents.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* "Lone 1 extends out 30 teet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Zone L extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
01/07/2003 10:38 3362493584
•.rv.rtuuc i 07.11 71'MntlbZ-'18
SUNGATE DESIGN GF20UP
PAGE 01/01
PAGE 02/02
,ff buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Basement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhapcement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within I$A, NC,A,C 2B .0242 or .0260.
X1. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater cotztrols proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impm,-ions acreage will 4t be c r t he road alig=ent wzll b? a shi gd„ slightly the sau h.
to yyater 3 1 be qor1vey_,
X11. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated frolla the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N
XM- Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of D'WQ Wetland Rules (15.A. NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes Q No E
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application suf 'zciently in advance of desired
constmction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may
impose limits on
work schedules thaw-dawn schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

7/o ::-s
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the ap(plicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

03001)
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing i
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian ?r ,W rshed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetlaa,d e, if,-., ISVVQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP23, WOC 3375,
WQC 3361, Regional General Permit 198200031
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rick Austin, PE City Engineer for City of Lexington
Mailing Address: City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ricka(@,lexington.nc.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Eddie Wetherill, PE Wetherill Engineering
Company Affiliation: Engineering Consultant to the City of Lexington
Mailing Address: 4915 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 295
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ewetherill(a),wetherilleng.com
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 460 over Rat Springs Branch
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3324
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
4. Location
County: Davidson County Nearest Town: Lexington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-85 South to Exit 91, Take a
right at the top of exit ramp Left onto SR 1254, Go 1.5 miles, Right onto SR 1318, Bridge is
located just before industrial plant.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):N 746705 E 1618528
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rat Springs Branch
River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing single span (30') bridge. SR 1318 provides a rear
entrance to a large industrial plant. Existing drainage area is comprised mostly of residential
single-family homes.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing bridge will be used as an on-site detour while the outlet portions of the culvert
are constructed. Box culverts will either be preformed or cast in place. A temporary road will
be constructed on the completed portion of the culvert while the existing bridge is removed
and the remaining inlet portion of the culvert is constructed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to replace Bridle
No. 460 which is in poor condition with an estimated remaining life of 4 years.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No wetlands are located on site.
240 feet of Water of the US will be impacted. 86 feet of the impacts are due to culvert enclosure.
The remaining 154 feet of impacts result from riprap and widening of the existing channel.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No wetlands located in vicinity.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 86 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial
1 Riprap/Widening 154 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intetmt sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240 feet
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Box culverts were chosen over a bridQe for several reasons. A box culvert exists immediately
downstream, for ease of maintenance, and for cost reduction. The box culvert will be buried 1
foot to reduce impacts. The culvert construction will be phased so that it can be constructed `in
the dry' and to allow passage of the average daily flow. Also, strict adherence to Best
Management Practices will be followed. Extensive erosion control measures will be utilized
during construction of the culvert and road.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmaide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? State Clearinghouse does not review CE documents.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
01/07/2003 10:38 3362493584
..... -If aWua U7. 11 71?CinybY!H
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP
PAGE 01/01
PAGE 02/02
if buffer mitigation is required, pleases discuss what type of lnitxgation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Basemont, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Find). Please attacks all appropriate iiaf'ormation as
identified within I $ A, NCA,C 2E .0242 or .0260.
NZA
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss staxznwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Im a rious reage wi of e e 4The ro aligent wail be slljed s1i?Y tp the south.
to atery' 1 be conveys wi tchea
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DW(G)
Clearly detail the ultixnate treatMent methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater smerated firolla the proposed project, oar available capacity of the subject facility.
N'
XIM Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15,A, NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes Q No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these pcnnits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

(Agent's signature is valid only if an euthoriz4t1Q1x letter from the a4licant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
c f ?
U 3 U 0 1 J
VV
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicablef' ?.. ...r... * 11
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffet Rules .K`
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP23, WQC 3375,
WQC 3361, Regional General Permit 198200031
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rick Austin PE City Engineer for City of Lexington
Mailing Address: City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ricka00exington.nc.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Eddie Wetherill, PE Wetherill Engineering
Company Affiliation: Engineering Consultant to the City of Lexington
Mailing Address: 4915 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 295
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ewetherill(a)wetherilleng.com
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Re-placement of Bridge No. 460 over Rat Springs Branch
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3324
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
4. Location
County: Davidson County Nearest Town: Lexington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-85 South to Exit 91, Take a
right at the top of exit ramp, Left onto SR 1254, Go 1.5 miles, Right onto SR 1318, Bridge is
located just before industrial plant.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):N 746705 E 1618528
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rat Springs Branch
8. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing single span (30') bridge. SR 1318 provides a rear
entrance to a large industrial plant. Existing drainage area is comprised mostly of residential
single-family homes.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing bridge will be used as an on-site detour while the outlet portions of the culvert
are constructed. Box culverts will either be preformed or cast in place. A temporary road will
be constructed on the completed portion of the culvert while the existing bridge is removed
and the remaining inlet portion of the culvert is constructed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to replace Bridge
No. 460 which is in poor condition with an estimated remaining life of 4 years.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No wetlands are located on site.
240 feet of Water of the US will be impacted. 86 feet of the impacts are due to culvert enclosure.
The remaining 154 feet of impacts result from riprap and widening of the existing channel.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No wetlands located in vicinity.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 86 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial
1 Riprap/Widening 154 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us¢s.¢ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240 feet
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation,
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Box culverts were chosen over a bridge for several reasons. A box culvert exists immediately
downstream for ease of maintenance and for cost reduction. The box culvert will be buried 1
foot to reduce impacts. The culvert construction will be phased so that it can be constructed `in
the dry' and to allow passage of the average daily flow. Also, strict adherence to Best
Management Practices will be followed. Extensive erosion control measures will be utilized
during construction of the culvert and road.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
? wetlands
installation of
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? State Clearinghouse does not review CE documents.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
01/07/2003 10:38 3362493584 PAGE 01/01
f .I Awu:i rr 7. 11 71 ?tl0 yb1t) 13 SUNGATE DESIGN GRaiP PAGE 02/02
,(f buffer midgationa is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easemont, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Fnhaneement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 1S.A, NCA,C 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both exisftg and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wet, ds
downstream from the property.
IM will of a =ons rea a e c e ro i ent w' be shifted slit1 The sou .
to ater YdIl be coav
wi tchea
X.11, Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non?discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated flow the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N
XIII, violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15,A. NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes (? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application suf leiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with aonstructaion or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with. Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

7/e-) ??
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authozizatiQn lotter from the a4licant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
sA
03001)
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not
1.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval (s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ?
? Section 10 Permit ?
® 401 Water Quality Certification
NQW
e
Riparian or Watershed-Buffer:
Isolated Wetland Permit from.
Q
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP23, WOC 3375,
WQC 3361, Regional General Permit 198200031
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rick Austin, PE City Engineer for City of Lexington
Mailing Address: City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ricka(a,lexington.nc.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Eddie Wetherill, PE Wetherill Engineering
Company Affiliation: Engineering Consultant to the City of Lexington
Mailing Address: 4915 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 295
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ewetherill(a)wetheri lleng.com
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of prof ect: Replacement of Bridge No. 460 over Rat Springs Branch
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3324
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
4. Location
County: Davidson County Nearest Town: Lexington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-85 South to Exit 91, Take a
right at the top of exit ramp Left onto SR 1254, Go 1.5 miles, Right onto SR 1318, Bridge is
located just before industrial plant.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):N 746705 E 1618528
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rat Springs Branch
8. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing single span (30') bridge. SR 1318 provides a rear
entrance to a large industrial plant. Existing drainage area is comprised mostly of residential
single-family homes.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing bridge will be used as an on-site detour while the outlet portions of the culvert
are constructed. Box culverts will either be preformed or cast in place. A temporary road will
be constructed on the completed portion of the culvert while the existing bridge is removed
and the remaining inlet portion of the culvert is constructed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to replace Bridge
No. 460 which is in poor condition with an estimated remaining life of 4 years.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No wetlands are located on site.
240 feet of Water of the US will be impacted. 86 feet of the impacts are due to culvert enclosure.
The remaining, 154 feet of impacts result from riprap and widening of the existing channel.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No wetlands located in vicinity.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secify)
1 Culvert 86 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial
1 Riprap/Widening 154 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us,gs.Qov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240 feet
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Box culverts were chosen over a bridge for several reasons. A box culvert exists immediatelv
downstream for ease of maintenance and for cost reduction. The box culvert will be buried 1
foot to reduce impacts. The culvert construction will be phased so that it can be constructed `in
the dry' and to allow passage of the average daily flow. Also, strict adherence to Best
Management Practices will be followed. Extensive erosion control measures will be utilized
during construction of the culvert and road.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stmi,ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? State Clearinghouse does not review CE documents.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
a
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
01/07/2003 10:38 3362493584
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP
PAGE 01/01
PAGE 02/02
Lf buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e,, Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancemmt, preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within I$A, NCA,C 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect auarface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Imps rious Wreage will not be c W.The road ali ent w 11 be shifted sli
__itl?? the south.
to aterill be c,Q?veYgdwAditchea,_
X11. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatMent methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of
w
astewater gauerated froth the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N2A
XIH- Violatious (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15,A, NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No 21
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application au#ficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that raay impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

7/o ?
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the ayplicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
s

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicab
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or1Wat6rshgd Buffer Rules:
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit frown DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP23, WOC 3375,
WQC 3361, Regional General Permit 198200031
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Rick Austin, PE City Engineer for City of Lexington
Mailing Address: City of Lexington
711 Takbert Blvd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ricka(a,lexington.nc.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Eddie Wetherill, PE Wetherill Engineering
Company Affiliation: Engineering Consultant to the City of Lexington
Mailing Address: 4915 Waters Edge Drive, Suite 295
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ewetherill(a-,wetherilleng.com
Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 460 over Rat Springs Branch
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-3324
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
4. Location
County: Davidson County Nearest Town: Lexington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-85 South to Exit 91, Take a
right at the top of exit ramp, Left onto SR 1254, Go 1.5 miles, Right onto SR 1318, Bridge is
located just before industrial plant.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):N 746705 E 1618528
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A (NCDOT Right of Way)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Rat Springs Branch
8. River Basin: Yadkin/Pee Dee
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing single span (30') bridge. SR 1318 provides a rear
entrance to a large industrial plant. Existing drainage area is comprised mostly of residential
single-family homes.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing bridge will be used as an on-site detour while the outlet portions of the culvert
are constructed. Box culverts will either be preformed or cast in place. A temporary road will
be constructed on the completed portion of the culvert while the existing bridge is removed
and the remaining inlet portion of the culvert is constructed.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to replace Bridge
No. 460 which is in poor condition with an estimated remaining life of 4 years.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No wetlands are located on site.
240 feet of Water of the US will be impacted. 86 feet of the impacts are due to culvert enclosure.
The remaining 154 feet of impacts result from riprap and widening of the existing channel.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No wetlands located in vicinity.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(pleasespecify)
1 Culvert 86 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial
1 Riprap/Widening 154 Rat Springs Branch 15 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us,gs., og_v. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.to2ozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240 feet
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Box culverts were chosen over a bridt?e for several reasons. A box culvert exists immediatelv
downstream for ease of maintenance and for cost reduction. The box culvert will be buried 1
foot to reduce impacts. The culvert construction will be phased so that it can be constructed `in
the dry' and to allow passage of the average _daily flow. Also, strict adherence to Best
Management Practices will be followed. Extensive erosion control measures will be utilized
during construction of the culvert and road.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 12
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnn.ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? State Clearinghouse does not review CE documents.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
01/07/2003 10:38 3362493584
-+.r .r aciuii o7. li 71'4tln`Jb2bb
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP
PAGE 01/01
PAGE 02/02
ff buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easemont, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservadon or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within I$ A, NCA,C 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both, exis6g and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss ston'nwater controls proposed. in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Im a tious acreage will. of be chalAUM e road i ent w' be s ' ed sHgbtly IQ The sau
to MaterB1 be goaveyQ. with . tchea,.__
X11. Sewage Disposal (required by DW(G)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods And disposition (non,dischuge or discharge) of
wastewater gez-Aerated t'irow the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N
XIH- Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Mules (15,A, NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Mules?
Yes [] No E
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes D No
XIV. Other Circumstances (optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advanco of desired
construction dates to allow prOcnsing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or Sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., c11aw-dawn schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

71e)(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the axplicant is provided.)

Page 12 of 12
w'
c?
z
?d
dz
?x

41
0
0
z
d
r?
z
C
CD
CD
41
J
O
O

N
Lft.t? ?,,. O
O O
CO)
C
z
a
m
a
m
Cl)
Q
z
G)
m
0
c
13
M
a