20201142 Ver 1_6_Fig_4_Pilot _Wetland_Delineation_Report_02.13.20_20200904

iiiiiiiii
PIIUWLJ
P I L❑ T E N V I R❑ N M E N T A L, I N C
February 13, 2020
Mr. Matthew McGovern
Sugar Solar, LLC
880 Apollo Street, Suite 333
El Segundo, California 90245
Reference: Wetland Delineation
Sugar Solar
Approximate 752-Acre Tract
Country Club Road
Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North Carolina
Pilot Project 3680.2
Dear Mr. McGovern:
Pilot Environmental, Inc. (Pilot) is pleased to submit this report of the wetland delineation for the
approximate 752-acre tract located east and west of Country Club Road in Yadkinville, Yadkin
County, North Carolina.
Background
Wetlands are defined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "those areas that are inundated or saturated
by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions." In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into waters
of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of the United
States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and streams,
intermittent streams, and wetlands. The EPA and the USACE jointly administer the Section 404
program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve,
condition, or deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
Jurisdictional features include wetlands, open waters, ponds, lakes, and perennial/intermittent
streams. Jurisdictional features are regulated by the USACE and North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (NCDEQ-DWR). Permits are required priorto
impacting any jurisdictional feature. The type of permit required is specific to the type, location,
and amount of impacts. Stormwater management plans and/or mitigation for proposed impacts
could be a requirement of the permit approval process.
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 3680.2
February 13, 2020
The findings and conclusions found in this report are our opinions based on field conditions
encountered at the time of the site visit. Changes including, but not limited to, regulations,
weather, timber/vegetation removal, and usage/development of the site or nearby properties
can alter the findings and opinions presented in this report. We recommend that this report only
be used for preliminary planning purposes. Agency verifications, followed by a survey of
jurisdictional features, are required to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional
features and are valid for a period of up to five years following issuance of a USACE Jurisdictional
Determination (JD) and/or NCDEQ-DWR Site Determination Letter.
Global Positioning System (GPS) location of jurisdictional features has been conducted by Pilot
personnel in the field utilizing a Trimble handheld GPS unit capable of sub -meter accuracy. Field
GPS data has been post -processed by Pilot personnel and digitally provided to the client for
assistance with preliminary planning. Pilot expresses no warranties or liabilities to the accuracy
of GPS locations and/or provided GPS data.
Scope of Services
Pilot was contracted to perform a wetland delineation for the approximate 752-acre tract located
east and west of Country Club Road in Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North Carolina. The site
consists of portions or the entirety of sixteen parcels identified by the Yadkin County
Geographical Information System (GIS) as Parcel Identification Numbers (PINS) 5818153663,
581800328577, 581800140879, 581800049419, 581800048150,581800038619, 580800926184,
5818114449, 581800218450, 5808916149, 581700283931, 581700174078, 581700381065,
581700372302, 581700362604, and 581700367810. The site is being evaluated for proposed
development with a solar farm. The scope of services included a delineation of jurisdictional
features (streams, wetlands, and other surface waters) located on the site. The site boundarywas
not marked at the time of our field delineation. The site boundary was provided in a Google Earth
digital file.
Pilot was also contracted to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and a Limited
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review in conjunction with the wetland delineation.
Details of these investigations are included in separate reports.
Literature Review
We reviewed the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey of Yadkin County, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
• The USGS Topographic Map (Drawing 1) depicts North Deep Creek crossing the southwestern
and southern portions of the site. Ponds and unnamed tributaries draining to North Deep Creek
iA

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 3680.2
February 13, 2020
are depicted throughout the site. Drainage swales that could contain additional surface waters
or wetlands are depicted throughout the site.
• The USDA Web Soil Survey of Yadkin County (Drawing 2) identifies the following soil mapping
units on the site:
Map Unit
S mbol
Y
Map Unit Name
Hydric Soils
List
CaB
Clifford fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
No
CaC
Clifford fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
No
CcB2
Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
CcC2
Clifford sandy clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
CeB3
Clifford clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, severely eroded
No
CgB
Clifford gravelly fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
No
CrA
Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
Yes
DaB2
Danripple fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
DeA
Dan River sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded
No
DhA
Dan River and Codorus soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
No
DoB
Delila fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Yes
FaD
Fairview fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
No
FaE
Fairview fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
No
FdD2
Fairview sandy clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
FdE2
Fairview sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
FeC3
Fairview clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded
No
FeD3
Fairview clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, severely eroded
No
FeE3
Fairview clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded
No
FgD2
Fairview gravelly fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
FhD
Fairview-Gul lied land complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes
No
HaA
Hatboro loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
HsA
Hatboro soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
JaC
Jackland loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
No
NaB
Nathalie fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
No
SmE
Siloam sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
No
SmE3
Siloam sandy loam, 10 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded
No
SmF
Siloam sandy loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes
No
StB
Starr loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded
No
TaE
Toast fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
No
TeE2
Toast sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
TmD
Tomlin loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
No
TnC2
Tomlin sandy clay loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
TnE2
Tomlin sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
WwF
Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes, stony
No
Pilot also reviewed the last published USDA Soil Survey of Yadkin County (Drawing 2A). The map
depicts North Deep Creek and unnamed tributaries to North Deep Creek on the site in locations
generally consistent with the blue line streams shown on the USGS topographic map. Additional
streams are shown in drainage swales throughout the site.

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 3680.2
February 13, 2020
• The USFWS NWI Map (Drawing 3) depicts ponds and riverine features on the site, generally
consistent with the features shown on the USGS topographic map.
• The FEMA FIRM (Drawing 4) identifies the areas along North Deep Creek and an unnamed
tributary to North Deep Creek crossing the central portion of the site within the 100-year
floodplain. The remainder of the site is located in Zone X, an area of minimal flood hazard.
Field Delineation
Pilot personnel conducted the field delineation of Tract A July 27-28, 2018; Tract B December 26,
2018 through January 9, 2019; and Tract C October 24, 2019. The site contains agricultural fields
and wooded land. Several agricultural buildings and residences are located on the eastern and
western portions of the site. Overhead powerlines and the associated utility easement cross the
central portion of the site.
Three ponds are located on the central portion of the site. The ponds are hydrologically
connected to up and downgradient waters and are considered jurisdictional features by the
USACE. The ordinary high water mark of the ponds were geolocated with a Trimble handheld GPS
unit.
Streams are located throughout the site. The majority of the streams have well-defined, sinuous
channels with silt, sand, and cobble substrate; evidence of an ordinary high water mark;
moderate baseflow; and aquatic fauna. Based on our observations and the stream
characteristics, these streams are perennial. Streams ISA, ISB, ISF, ISG, and CSB exhibited weaker
stream characteristics and did not contain flowing water during our site visits. Based on our
observations and the stream characteristics, these streams are intermittent. The stream origins,
confluences, and intersections with site boundaries and culverts were marked in the field with
blue and white striped surveyor flagging. The streams were geolocated with a Trimble handheld
GPS unit.
Wetlands are located adjacent to and upgradient of the pond on the eastern portion of the site
and the streams in several areas. The wetlands are separated from surrounding uplands by
topographic, vegetative, and/or soil breaks. USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms,
supporting our opinions, are included as attachments. The wetland boundaries were marked in
the field with red and white striped surveyor flagging and geolocated with a Trimble handheld
GPS unit.
L!

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 3680.2
February 13, 2020
Watershed Classification/Buffer Requirements
The site is located in the Yadkin River Basin. The NCDEQ-DWR has classified North Deep Creek,
the site's receiving waters, as Class C waters. In accordance with NCAC 02B .0200, the streams
on the site are not subject to state regulated riparian buffers.
Based on a review of the Yadkin County Code of Ordinances and correspondence with the Yadkin
County Planning and Development Department, Yadkin County surface water buffer
requirements are generally consistent with the state regulations. The NCDEQ-DWR Interactive
Stormwater Map shows the site in an area identified as "No Program Identified; Verify with local
authority". Consultation with the local planning/zoning authority is recommended to determine
if the proposed development requires development buffers/setbacks from surface waters for
compliance with state and local stormwater requirements.
Agency Verification
The delineation of Tracts A and B has been verified by the USACE (JD SAW-2019-00099, dated
March 12, 2019). The delineation of Tract C was verified in the field by Ms. Brandee Boggs with
the USACE on January 23, 2020. Ms. Boggs indicated the USACE will issue a preliminary JD based
on the features as depicted on the attached Drawings 5 through 5.4. Drawings 5 through 5.4 are
intended for preliminary planning purposes. We understand that a survey will be completed to
determine the exact extent and locations of delineated features. A copy of the JD will be provided
as a separate attachment upon receipt from the USACE.
Closing
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (336) 310-
4527 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Seren M. Homer
Project Manager
David S. Brame, PWS
Senior Project Manager
Attachments: Drawing 1— USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 2 — Web Soil Map
Drawing 2A — Published Soil Map
Drawing 3 — NWI Map
Drawing 4 — FEMA FIRM
Drawings 5-5.4 — Wetland Map
Wetland Determination Data Forms
5

k
!NIL 11
t -
1
J+ f• ' 4•l
- � : — . - -_ � �r �- -�- J •gyp a $� � a
""� - =icy }` � � � �•�� —:� _ i,
.� 9
.
. �• �i:.-r��j ,,�...:,.::c._ 4mrg. } LEGEND
I1 Site Boundary
USGS Topographic Map
Drawing
USGS Topographic p Ma '-'t.::; ...:..:. w: Sugar Solar
;::. -...
Approximate 752-Acre Tract
Yadkinville, NC Quadrangle -_
Scale: 1" = 2,000' PIL01' '" Yadkinville, Yadkin County, NC
PILOT ENVIR0NMINTAL,IHC Pilot Project3680.2

7
mF PsF �� tr
n1 Fd' Na If£7 F{jT11 �B `
Iva
E2 gr pp .2
a Tn C Fa eB2it
w
Tn 62
T E FkE3 lac' � 2
R eF -OB Fap Ct tE
FOF2 Fap 2
m
G i`.H2
c8z h � F�Ip Cab �� • 3 t:C2
E 3 mF `82 hA l72 GS8 n�i Ti 6
TOO B2 Fa01 $� �
�9 B �C82
F 02 Ei E�Ft�
Fos d62 s
TaE r F�4 Tn
C�e� PpB2 a iT7 aC
rz�3 n � E2 • eB2
Frla2
Sri E) F � faE
iaE 2 Tn �� FdEi FdE2 W.wF � & Ea
Qh a 2 FdE d RdF G r P
TnD�
t. d
m To aE Fa d FdE 'a FrFi-
m
E fa
Fd F 5 B d aE Ftl - CC
►y�F2 r F E
8� F E � dd Gc HaG FdE
E2 Fd Fdp2 � � ,� FdE
SmE3
FsR FdEi d� F €
SmE H Fr.63 [}v FdE2 t�2
Tr
ihA
CIA
I: IiL1Si `" 7 rt 7 ?am ,
VIA LIM
r is
VOT it
tv
.2n ftt on cc
V . U" CIM
WE of--`�3 Or" Na
am { W LEGEND
VO Site Boundary
Drawing 2 Web Soil Map
Sugar Solar
USDA Web Soil Survey f,.
of Yadkin County, NC - = 4 Approximate 752-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 1,500' PIL01' '" Yadkinville, Yadkin County, NC
PILOT eHV1R0NMeXTAL,IXi Pilot Project3680.2

• - r ' �,�,-,yam " F.
j V
t '
t
97
11k; �
1 & 4 t
` L �
NOILLI
I L 0 T 9 1

i
- • - - - µlb! i � -
Drawing 3
USFWS NWI
Wetlands Mapper
Scale: 1" = 1,500'
1%
PIL01.
P I LOT ENV R O NMI X T A L, 1 X L
.}!
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Riverine
Other
NWI Map
Sugar Solar
Approximate 752-Acre Tract
Yadkinville, Yadkin County, NC
Pilot Project 3680.2

�
M
�T
�
77
4.
IA OR egulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
PF
Area with R educed R isk Due to Levee
FEMAF|RM
Drawing
National Flood Hazard Layer Sugar Solar
FnornFEK�AVVebK�apService
Approxirnate75Z-AoreTraot
Scale: 1"= 1,500' N ��NNN����N
~ Yadkinvi||e,Yadkin County, N[ �~/~ �°��~�~~~~ N
Pilot Project 368O Z

LEGEND
Site Boundary
Pond
• • • ■ ■ ■ ■
Intermittent Str1
Perennial Strear
— —
Jurisdictional Dil
Wetland
DP-1
Data Point
WA 1-5
Flag Number/Fe
■
Culvert
TRACTS A & B: THE LOCATIOI
TRACT A DELINEATION CON
TRACT C: THE LOCATIONS OF
2020. TRACT C DELINEATION
THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS L
r• �we�
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRI
Sugar Solar
and Pilot GPS Data Approximate 752-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 1,500' —
Yadkinville, Yadkin County, NC
Date: 10.31.19 PIL01
Revised: 1.28.20 PLOT ENVIAONMIXTAL.IXL Pilot Project 3680.2

,N
SAC
3 LF
SA R
r 1.8 LF
r w
NL-- A
5AA
1510 LF
LEGEND
f Site Boundary
QWADP-1 Pond
Q WA DP-2 ; li
WA 1-3 # • • • • • • • Intermittent Stream
0.O35 ac.
Perennial Stream
— • • — Jurisdictional Ditch
r Wetland
DP-1 O Data Point
WA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
■ Culvert
TRACTS A & B: THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE (USACE JD SAW-2019-00099, DATED MARCH 12, 2019).
TRACT A DELINEATION CONDUCTED JULY 2018. TRACT B DELINEATION CONDUCTED DECEMBER 2018-JANUARY 2019.
TRACT C: THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON TRACT C WERE VERIFIED BY MS. BRANDEE BOGGS WITH THE USACE ON JANUARY 23,
2020. TRACT C DELINEATION CONDUCTED OCTOBER 24, 2019.
THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES.
EEL -
Drawing 5.1 Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRI :atR ;: ' err=-...f Sugar Solar
and Pilot GPS Data 4. - Approximate 752-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 450' PIL01 Yadkinville, Yadkin County, NC
Date:10.31.19 PILOT 9HYIA0NMIXTAL.IXi Pilot Project3680.2
Revised: 1.28.20

r
�111) LF
r LEGEND
Site Boundary
Pond
■ • • • • • •
Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
— • • -
Jurisdictional Ditch
t
Wetland
DP-1 •
Data Point
WA 1-5
Flag Number/Feature ID
■
Culvert
5B2
4 0 DP-2 y
\0 DP-1
TRACTS A & B: THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE (USACE JD SAW-2019-00099, DATED MARCH 12, 2019).
TRACT A DELINEATION CONDUCTED JULY 2018. TRACT B DELINEATION CONDUCTED DECEMBER 2018-JANUARY 2019.
TRACT C: THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON TRACT C WERE VERIFIED BY MS. BRANDEE BOGGS WITH THE USACE ON JANUARY 23,
2020. TRACT C DELINEATION CONDUCTED OCTOBER 24, 2019.
THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES.
Drawing 5.2 Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRI
g Y . f Sugar Solar
and Pilot GPS Data �NP
- Approximate 752-Acre Tract
- `..
Scale: 1" = 450' — .. Yadkinville, Yadkin County, NC
Date: 10.31.19 Pilot Project 3680.2
T lHYIRO IY #A! X iA L, I X L
Revised: 1.28.20

id#
— 320 LF
SWG
0.4SS a�,
SWG DP-1 O�
OSWG DP-2
SPA
4 0.33 ac.
\��
SSF
170 LF
SUE 2
0.007 ac.
SSE
2650 LF
'r--
SW B 1
SWA 1 I0,025 ac.
0A39ac. \ f
SWA2 5WB2
0.004 a c.
0.143 a c.
SSB
SW A 3 500 LF
0.057 ac.
SW C 2
SSD 0.003 ac.
SWA 4
30 LF
0A75 ac.
53C �+�+//+
'"d•
SSA
910 LF
2220 LF
SW F SUITE 1 \SLV C S
0.M ae. OA95 ac. 0.018 ac.
SWA 5
0.173 at.
1 r/^r1Um
5140 LF Site Boundary
Pond
• ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • Intermittent Stream
c Perennial Stream
— — Jurisdictional Ditch
Wetland
SE
' 5140 LFDP-1 O Data Point
WA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
■ Culvert
TRACTS A & B: THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE (USACE JD SAW-2019-00099, DATED MARCH 12, 2019).
TRACT A DELINEATION CONDUCTED JULY 2018. TRACT B DELINEATION CONDUCTED DECEMBER 2018-JANUARY 2019.
TRACT C: THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON TRACT C WERE VERIFIED BY MS. BRANDEE BOGGS WITH THE USACE ON JANUARY 23,
2020. TRACT C DELINEATION CONDUCTED OCTOBER 24, 2019.
THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES.
Drawing 5.3 Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRI
g Y Sugar Solar
and Pilot GPS Data ' t'a `.
_ _ r,� .�r- �-•M�y. ; , . _ Approximate 752-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 450' — �' , ,w - Yadkinville, Yadkin County, NC
Date: 10.31.19 Pilot Project 3680.2
l Ft N M! N T A C. i w C
Revised: 1.28.20 o T E N v l

I 5E
5140 LF 4Q40
q
ISG �.
1422 LF � a
i�
ai
�s
.i
t•
ai
-+--- 0 DP-5
0 DP-6
S1
!104 LF
5J SK
574 LF 24 LF
WA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
*,
■ Culvert }-F
---
TRACTS A & B: THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE (USACE JD
TRACT A DELINEATION CONDUCTED JULY 2018. TRACT B DELINEATION CONDUCTED DECEMBI
TRACT C: THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON TRACT C WERE VERIFIED BY MS. BRANDS
2020. TRACT C DELINEATION CONDUCTED OCTOBER 24, 2019.
THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES.
Drawing 5.4
Satellite Imagery from ESRI
and Pilot GPS Data
Scale: 1" = 450'
Date: 10.31.19
Revised: 1.28.20
PIL�1' '"
L 07 E N v l q O N M e N T A C. I w c
Wetland Map
Sugar Solar
Approximate 752-Acre Tract
Yadkinville, Yadkin County, NC
Pilot Project 3680.2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Sugar Solar City/County: Yadkinville, Yadkin Sampling Date: 7.27.18
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: WA DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Slope (%): 1 Lat: 36.16738 Long:-80.65650 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: DoB Delila fine sandy loam NWI Classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDING5 — Attacn site map snowing Sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No _
Depth (inches): 4
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point WA DP-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Absolute
% Cover
20
Dominant
Species?
Y
Indicator
Status
FACW
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
3.
4
5.
6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
7.
8. Prevalence Index worksheet:
40 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) FACW species X 2 =
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Y FAC FAC species X 3 =
2. Ligustrum sinsense 15 Y FAC
3.
FACU species X 4 =
4 UPL species X 5 =
5. Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
20 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Woodwardia areolata 5 Y FACW
2. Thelypteris noveboracensis 5 Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
10 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
ydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X_2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3.0'
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present. unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/2 80
7.5YR4/6 20 C M Loam
4-18 2.5Y 4/2 80
7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (IVILRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (IVILRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (IVILRA 147, 148)
(IVILRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(IVILRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
IVILRA 147, 148)
IVILRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Umbric Surface (F13) (IVILRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (IVILRA 148)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Stripped Matrix (S6)
disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Sugar Solar City/County: Yadkinville, Yadkin Sampling Date: 7.27.18
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: WA DP-2
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Slope (%): 1 Lat: 36.16739 Long:-80.65642 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: DoB Delila fine sandy loam NWI Classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDING5 — Attacn site map snowing Sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes _ No X
Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point WA DP-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lirodendron tulipifera
Absolute
% Cover
40
Dominant
Species?
Y
Indicator
Status
FAC
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
3.
4
5.
6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
7.
8. Prevalence Index worksheet:
60 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) FACW species X 2 =
1. Carpinus caroliniana 5 Y FAC FAC species X 3 =
2. Ligustrum sinsense 5 Y FAC
3.
FACU species X 4 =
4 UPL species X 5 =
5. Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
10 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
5 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Y FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
ydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X_2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3.0'
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present. unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 7.5YR 5/8 100 CL
C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (I -RR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (I -RR N,
IVILRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (IVILRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (IVILRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions(F8)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (I -RR N,
IVILRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (IVILRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (IVILRA 148)
Hydric Soil Present?
2Location: PL=Pore Linina. M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (IVILRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(IVILRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(IVILRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Yes No X

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Sugar add on City/County: Yadkin Sampling Date: 12/26/18
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.1597 Long:-80.6598 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Siloam NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation x Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes x No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
terrace between stream channel and cleared area.. Vegetation impacted from adjacent clearing
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. None present
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1. Pau/ownia fomenfosa
5 Yes
UPL
FAC species 10 x 3 = 30
2. Liquidambarsfyracl§ua
5 Yes
FAC
FACU species 40 x 4 = 160
3. Acerrubrum
5 Yes
FAC
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
4.
Column Totals: 60 (A) 225 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.75
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
15 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. ✓uncus effusus
5 Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicerajaponica
40 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
40 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 5/2 100
Loamy/Clayey
3-14 10YR 5/1 90
10YR 5/4 10 c m
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Sugar add on City/County: Yadkinville/Yadkin Sampling Date: 12/26/18
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.1597 Long:-80.6598 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Siloam NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation x Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
terrace between stream channel and cleared area.. Vegetation impacted from adjacent clearing
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-2
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. None present
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Pau/ownia fomenfosa
10 Yes
UPL
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2. Ligusfrum sinense
10 Yes
FACU
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
3.
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
4.
Column Totals: 70 (A) 290 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.14
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
20 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. None present
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Rosa mu/fiflora
40 Yes
FACU
2. Lonicerajaponica
10 Yes
FACU
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
50 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
Present? Yes No x
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 7.5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Sugar add on City/County: Yadkinville/Yadkin Sampling Date: 12/26/18
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.1595 Long:-80.6629 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation x Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes x No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Floodplain adjacent to ag field. Vegetation impacted from adjacent clearing
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-3
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
None present
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species 25 x 2 = 50
1.
P/afanus occidenfa/is
5 Yes
FACW
FAC species 25 x 3 = 75
2.
Acernegundo
5 Yes
FAC
FACU species 7 x 4 = 28
3.
Ligusfrum sinense
2 No
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 57 (A) 153 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.68
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
12 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
6 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
✓uncus effusus
20 Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Microsfegium wmineum
20 Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
40 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Rosa mu/fiflora
5 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No x
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 5/2 80
10YR 5/6 20 c m
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-14 10YR 5/2 90
10YR 5/4 10 c m
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Sugar add on City/County: Yadkinville/ Yadkin Sampling Date: 12/26/18
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-4
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 20
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.1595 Long:-80.6629 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Codorus NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation x Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
slope between ag field and floodplain
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-4
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. None present
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1. P/afanus occidenfa/is
5 Yes
FACW
FAC species 0 x 3= 0
2. Ligusfrum sinense
2 Yes
FACU
FACU species 62 x 4 = 248
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 67 (A) 258 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.85
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
7 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
4 20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. None present
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicerajaponica
60 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
60 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
Present? Yes No x
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Sugar add on City/County: Yadkinville/Yadkin Sampling Date: 12/26/18
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-5
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.1465 Long:-80.6524 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Hatboro NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation x Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes x No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
wet seep, recently clear cut, vegetation highly impacted
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
x High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 5
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-5
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. None present
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1. LigusfruM sinense
5 Yes
FACU
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
2.
FACU species 25 x 4 = 100
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 110 (A) 350 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.18
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
5 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. MicrosfegiuM uimineuM
80 Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. ✓uncus effusus
5 No
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
85 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
43 20% of total cover:
17
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Rosa mu/fiflora
20 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
20 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes No x
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
recently clear cut area, regenerating vegetation
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 5/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Sugar add on City/County: Yadkinville/Yadkin Sampling Date: 12/26/18
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-6
Investigator(s): Pilot Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): side slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.1465 Long:-80.6524 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview sandy loam NWI classification: none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation x Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
recent clear cut area
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-6
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. None present
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Ligusfrum sinense
5 Yes
FACU
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 15 (A) 60 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- Dominance Test is >50%
9.
-2
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
5 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. None present
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicerajaponica
10 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover:
2
Present? Yes No x
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 5/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Sugar Solar City/County: Yadkinville/Yadkin Sampling Date: 10/24/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: SWG DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.165328' Long:-80.651878° Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview fine sandy loam (FaD) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: SWG DP-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 5
SaDlina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Lolium perenne
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
% Cover
Species?
Status
5
Yes
FAC
10 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
2 No FACU
2 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
FAC species 5 x 3 = 15
FACU species 2 x 4 = 8
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 12 (A) 33 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.75
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

SOIL
Sampling Point: SWG DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/1 90 5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority. AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Sugar Solar City/County: Yadkinville/Yadkin Sampling Date: 10/24/19
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: SWG DP-2
Investigator(s): Pilot Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.165406' Long:-80.651754° Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview fine sandy loam (FaD) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: SWG DP-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Morus rubra
2. Carya tomentosa
3. Acer rubrum
4. Pinus taeda
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 35
SaDlina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Juniperus virginiana
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Phytolacca americana
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
20 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
25
Yes
UPL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
1
(A)
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata:
4
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
25.0%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0
x 1 = 0
FACW species 0
x 2 = 0
5
Yes
FACU
FAC species 25
x 3 = 75
FACU species 27 x 4 =
108
UPL species 25 x 5 =
125
Column Totals: 77 (A)
308 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4.00
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
1
5 =Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
20% of total cover: 1 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2 No FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
2 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 1 height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018

SOIL
Sampling Point: SWG DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-18 5YR 4/6 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Loamv/Clavev
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0