310742_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200826

0 Division of Mater Resources
facility Number 3 j ya O Division of Soil and Water Conservation`
„ �° - °
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 7Routine
pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: v o Departure Time: County: uyplin
Farm Name: C1Y��?S �' ��fieYwv� or� 1-a�'�1/L Owner Email:
Owner Name: (Aw'is Q - ert MLl B 4, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: S_CL� l B G1_1 j
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other_
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: ORoo
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Resign ' m Current . ° Design Current
Capacity. Pop.' °V4 etPoultry _ capacity .-Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design'; Current
Drv_Poultrv°° ° °Capacity" on.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Region: W IkO
Design° Current .
:.'Cattle' -Capacity.= Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
VTNO
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
v
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: A6
B
Waste Collection & Treatment
�
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes lvl l"
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier: i "Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 1.
Observed Freeboard (in): y
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes Eg'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes M/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [—]Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes V' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ElrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Z 14 5 it O W %
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[alo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[Dlo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
L?d""c
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[grNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[/N
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑Yes
LJ�1V 0
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Eq/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 1 = Date of Inspection: -2fo—oZ�a b
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes EdTN ❑ N ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes o NA ❑ NE
-a6-ap
Other Issues $
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes �/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D /NE
❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
k /7 SfaC_k" y' w�o�-t-� I� R �o,rJ
N �� S f3 i �a wet -Fa PIA—f`
dW 0.rC. S Roo a
Cy
S P ccl R P T B.r W z Q 4OT-
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1A N ?IRO -` Phone: )
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Q2 � Date: — 2c)'21.O
Page 3 of 3 21412015