310042_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200827

9 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number�j� - �a� O.Division of Soil and Water Conservation`
Q OtherAgency,
Type of Visit: Co liance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint O Follow-up ' p-Referral O Emergency 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: -a -d o Arrival Time: 0 Qn~ Departure Time: aM.. County:
Farm Name: C70,,(- n21' gr-AA Owner Email:
Owner Name: VA1 L & 41e_f5 A tO &t7 W N-(7 PA I LL- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: ELin10"UD lr AINEA--
Certified Operator: Eju.)C r 4 DAI L
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
'Design Current
Swine ;Capacity ° Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
rj b
4 5
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other"
Other
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Region: W I Ka
Integrator: SZ Fl,--LD S
Certification Number: 1 3- �� s
Certification Number:
Design
Current'
WaYoultry
Capacity
POP'.'
Layer
Non -Layer
Design'
Current .
Dry Poultry
Capacity
Pop.,
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Cattle .
DesignCurrent
Capacity - -POO.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
[—]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
.ZYOEJ
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 231 - jDate of inspection: - L a0mi�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
D40
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 1 a`
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ` 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
RZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
MN
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
E?rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
, �/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �-64-k- 6-6
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EJ/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
E3/TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
Ev o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
UD"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�To
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checldists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E21<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Ejto ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 - 47c' , Date of Inspection: `X?- -;Z0a 6
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2zo
r❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes ❑ No D A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes a-lq'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 2 NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E]�To
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[,2�<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or, any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to'better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
T-,n _ju Qe lWeekiy Si'oGk�'��Iii�lOf/
Aid .0C io re-c_6fels /
kr 2oae be-4o-re Cw,o WMCR-,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: :S-0-H tj &,Iy
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:/'q 111 � I %- C? 577
Date: 7_ a,� _� 6;Z0
21412015
1