310049_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200827

WDivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 31
O Division of Soil and Water Conserva lou
O Other Agency
of Visit: 0 Coylpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
,n for Visit: 4Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other . O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 02'}- Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: IOdf brd
Farm Name: DA I L 13 ii d' 4,E RA 0 EPLOA tb J)AI L 5 ` 1 a Owner Email:
Owner Name: E>Wan-D hA'Li✓ Phone:
Mailing Address:
.Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: JEL WOODJL�E%L-
F' '
Certified Operator:A �L
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region: W 11z6
Certification Number: OAS
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current 'Design Current° ' a. Desigb,Current
Capacity ' Pop.. ° , •W' Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle A Capacity Pop,
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
S-610
9 S0
Farrow to Wean
yD
3'3D
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Layer
Non -Layer
° Design 'Current `
Other
Poults
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No '
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
2To
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[,4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume.that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
2<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
&�4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
�j<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 - Ljj jDate of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
EZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: L.wtr` M',Jdje UPpb� S- la
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 19 . S 1
Observed Freeboard (in): �_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of he structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El Yes
2zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
VNoE]
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): IJ �1� C70
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
to
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�10
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
El Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 j - 1f9 jDate of inspection: g 'a� a.GAoZb
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes z ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [E'ONA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do .subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [J�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EEl"NE
❑ Yes E+ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E]Ao ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes;,f,"o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any.other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
re-c.a rdS
N) 6 WA, LATE FE91, bf tY Man PLY e,/e'4'5
ca Cs A->L U
Reviewer/Inspector Name: `$d.NtJ R n,ILLI
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: (°9_ 10 {01g"%2T 7�
Date:
21412015