310033_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200827

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 33 O' Division of Soil and Water°Conservation."° ° 9
O Other Agency '
Type of Visit: gCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: a.. aoa Arrival Time: Departure Time: :00 County: 'IvA. Region: W 1 Rd
Farm Name: L_2pl L fwi n c, LOC ST64 . LL C Owner Email:
Owner Name: ?,AuL Np_pR%{ "J)qi L, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ru �Pw"",,,`� Integrator:
Certified Operator: 04U Certification Number: J d0 LiR'6 S
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design 'Current
"Swine Capacity, 'Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish '� oo 10010a
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other °
Other
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current s Design'
Current`.
Wet Poultry Capacity ` .. Pop: Cattle a Capaeity 'Pol..
Layer
Non -Layer
Design . Current
llyd`Pm,lfrcr i7anarity Vnn .
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
y Cow
y Calf
y Heifer
Cow
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[QTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:.
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[Ek<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
DJJNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
FAo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
191<0
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
[E4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 1 - 33 . jDate of Ins ection: 8—.� —off OaU
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes CI ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes�Nyo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 11 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1 y
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in)
Observed Freeboard (in)
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes �NoD ❑ NE
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmentV threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1V 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes EZ�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? '
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C. Cra
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving .crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes VNo 0 NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Yes f No
❑ Yes 524
❑ Yes tN(oElYes10
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes 2 NNoo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 4lo NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes EDI& ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 r 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: l - 3 3 jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes /No❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes EffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No dNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
No
❑ Yes
[v]
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[?(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Yes
No
NA
NE
❑
❑
❑
❑ Yes
2/No
0 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[
Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
S+oc�"�/Ynox-f^lji
fec6.rd5 we�1/
Add WG
Reviewer/Inspector Name: o tiJV P'R-n-` l
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Dater XZ L _RC)
21412015