310313_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200904

Facility Number 31 0
V Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency Q Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ( Owner Email:�—
Owner Name: Gyv� t I J� , 1 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Dt-u-k 8(b tt,�
Certified Operator: 'T,�) ( t
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
W n to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
yer
-tom
j
Non--
N Layer
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Imoactsand Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DW R)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Region: W1Jca
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes L ,46 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
O Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Ogn o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
®iPo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4., Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
ta o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:^
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):i�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
02-T1b
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
tn5o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
F9-�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ES]Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E;P/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAW MP?
❑ Yes
E�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
IS. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
E]J_�W
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
E�,40
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
240
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
N
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facilitv Number: Date of Inspection: 7
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®.?Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®.R6 ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
EJI�A
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
I
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
U.4 V
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
Eo,,/o
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Ed>6'
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
JJ
[].?Qo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
D/Pp
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
Ll J�Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawines of facility to better explain situations (use additional Mazes as necessarv).
T�� S1 Cs'15� RbuJeS l��Ve �oa� %61,�, N6 b,--kJC-
EO 1 //[ 7
5l s tw_ /U.e
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: L?/Q Q
Date: I IA
21412015