20201132 Ver 1_401 Application_20200903

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 1, 2020 Ver 3.2
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201132
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Towns at Cannon
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Daniel Kuefler
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
d a n ie I. kuefle r@wetl ands-epg. co m
Date Submitted
9/3/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Little Sugar Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.27792
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-80.79818
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
U
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
W Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
IFL_duplicate.pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
4 Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Eddie Flowe
2b. Deed book and page no.:
04548/782
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
5527 Manning Road
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Rbstal / Zip Cate
28269
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
daniel.kuefler@v,etlands-epg.com
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
366.05KB
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
U

3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Tyson Reilly
3b. Business Name:
The Ardent Copmanies
3c.Address
Street Address
2100 Powers Ferry Road
Address tine 2
Suite 350
Cky
State / Rovince / I3gion
Atlanta
GA
Postal / Zip Code
Country
30339
USA
3d. Telephone Number:
3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Daniel Kuefler
4b. Business Name:
4c.Address
Street Address
10612-D Providence Road
Address tine 2
PMB 550
City
State / Rovince / Pagion
Charlotte
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28277
USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
amber. lipsky@wetla nds-e pg. com
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Auth_duplicate.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
04507101, 04507209, 04509001
41.75
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
State / Rovince / Rion
Postal / Zip Code
Country
152.71 KB
U
3. Surface Waters

3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Little Sugar Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501030102
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site consists of wooded slopes and stream corridors of small tributaries to Little Sugar Creek. The topography consists of gentle slopes with the elevation ranging from 750 to 790
ft.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS_duplicate.pdf 496.54KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soils_duplicate.pdf 449.84KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2,978
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1.4
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Construction of road crossings, utility installations, and BMPs for a residential development.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Fill and grading of the site will use standard equipment, excavator, dump truck, track hoe, etc.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Plans_duplicate.pdf 3.61 MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-02172
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nic Nelson
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
Sd. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
This site was verified by D. Shaeffer (USACE) on 02/06/20. A copy of the signed JD approval is included in the Approvals section.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W. *
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Culvert
P
ff-mland Hardwood Forest
Wetland T
Yes
Corps
0.045
(acres)
W2
Culvert
P
ffo mland Hardwood Forest
Wetland U
Yes
Corps
0.099
(acres)
W3
Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland U
Yes
Corps
0.007
(acres)
t7lrIll
f
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland U
Yes
Corps
0.019
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.019
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.170
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.151
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
Type of
3gSwidth *
3h. Impacturisdiction*
❑
�[3f.
length*
S1
Road crossing
9
Permanent
Culvert
Stream B
Intermittent
Corps
p
4
56
Average (feet)
(liriearfcet)
S2
Utilities and Road crossin g
Permanent
Culvert
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
p
4
72
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S3
Sanitary sewer& water
Temporary
Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
4
25
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
�
Water
Tem orar
p y
Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Cor s
p
4
10
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S5
Water
Temporary
Stabilization
Stream A
Perennial
Corps
10
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
128
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
173
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
45
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection, design, and location/orientation of the proposed lots and
access routes. The Stream A crossing location was chosen to avoid the confluence of Stream A and Stream C. Roughly 6 acres of the site will be
dedicated to Mecklenburg County Parks and Recreation Department as well. Please refer to the cover letter for additional details.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:

Headwalls are proposed at each crossing and where possible 2:1 slopes will be implemented to limit impacts to site surface waters. With the approval
of CDOT, the road was narrowed from 70' to 56' to avoid impacts to the surrounding wetlands and shifted to cross Stream A perpendicularly. The
crossing at Stream B was minimized by shifting the pedestrian sidewalk directly behind the curb. The developer purchased additional land near
Wetland V to allow the road to enter the site from West Sugar Creek Road without impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank 9 Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
128
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.133
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
r WA - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government F State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
W Phase II r NSW r USMP r Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Mecklenburg County
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No

2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional phases are proposed at this time.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor NIA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A threatened/endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but the project is exempt as noted in the included T&E report.
Consultation Documentation Upload
T&E_duplicate.pdf 262.37KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
No essential habitat in the region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: https://nc.maps.arcgis.cort
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year flood plain?*
r Yes
r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
w,wv.fema.gov
hftps://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/
Miscellaneous
Comments
Compiled PCN attached
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Towns of Cannon PCN compiled_print.pdf 11.09MB
Signature 6
FJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
. I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Daniel Kuefler
Signature
OCIAC--y
Date
9/3/2020

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: The Towns at Cannon site
Property Address: NW of intersection of W Sugar Ck Rd & Cannon Avenue, Charlotte, NC
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 04507209, 04507101, 04509301
Select one: I am other
Name: Tyson Reilly
Company: The Ardent Companies
Mailing Address: 2100 Powers Ferry Road, St. 350, Atlanta, GA 30339
Telephone Number: 803-548-4656 [e-mail]
Electronic Mail Address: 7
Tyson Reilly (Director) - The Ardent Companies September 19th, 2019
Property Owner / Interested Buyer* / Other* Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 2880S
[phone]
I en. ri [e-mail]

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Tyson Reilly
The Ardent Companies
2100 Powers Ferry Road
Atlanta, GA 30339
Project: The Towns at Cannon
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 14, 2020
Expiration of Acceptance: 2/14/2021
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Catawba
03050103*
Riparian Wetland
0.133
Catawba
03050103*
Warm Stream
128
*DMS proposes to utilize the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area to meet the mitigation requirement.
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Daniel Kuefler, agent
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
NORTH CAROLINAD
Department of Emironmental Wality
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

NRCS ARCHIVED SOIL MAP — MECKLENBURG COUNTY
eD14 Cud.
Project Boundary V�
Study Limits
(+/-) 41.75 acres
r
CUB � {,
M0 F r
CaD 2"-� -
fir.
- eD
e � r C it
c F) 2'
CA�B 21 M 0
HeB
UK
En13
LOCATION United States Department of Agriculture, Natural
Lat: 35.27792 °N, Long:-80.79818 °W
Resources Conservation Service. 1980.
�;,y� � Soil survey Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
HUC: 03050103 (Lower Catawba) Sheet 4
Acres: THE TOWNS AT CANNON Drawn By: Reviewed By:
(+/-) 41.75 Mecklenburg County, NC PJK ALL
FIGURE
4 NRCS PUBLISHED SOILS MAP Prepared for:
09119119 The Ardent Companies
(Mecklenburg County, NC. Sheet 4) ,.I •,.
Subject to USACE and NCDEQ Verification

USGS MAP - Derita, NC Quadrangle (1993)
12
IT Ib
rt*
a a r
1 r • •j�L� �. Project Boundary , ' * $ I
r _ r
+ Study Limits 7,9 f! : • ■ ■ i � ■ •� �.� 1
(+/-) 41.75 acres
�4 = % ' ' x * `5 Flee
-�-
r � `
- — - ti .' • 5iL
Unnamed Tributary to
r-: Little Sugar Creek _
! I
1 iir
LOCATION
—`
Lat: 35.27792 °N, Long:-80.79818 °W
HUC: 03050103 (Lower Catawba) + ��
I
4.
I — ■.. i { 4
Acres: THE TOWNS AT CANNON Drawn By: Reviewed By:
(+/-) 41.75 Mecklenburg County, NC PJK ALL
FIGURE
3 USGS Map — Derita, NC Quadrangle (1993) Prepared for:
09/19/19 The Ardent Companies
Approximate Location, For Study Purposes Only '1111111; . 1111,
Subject to USACE and NCDEQ Verification

�©
Al
NgRR T
J
B �V
N
vm
�
O
c�TY�FRsi
CINDY LN
NWY g5
a
U
Q
a
z
Q
SITE
J
w
N
v
0
0
rn
o VICINITY MAP
SCALE: NTS
U
O
Q
U
U
Q
H
m
U
C
O
c
c
m
U
�n
_
CD
LOCATION MAP
DATE:
August 21, 2020
Landworks
THE TOWNS AT CANNON
PROJECT NO: 19004
Design Grou PA
P'
rn CREATING SPACES TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
I
SHEET#
WL-COVER
7621LIp1eMranu�Suih111 ak70441411604
atoe 704-8414UM
SCALE:
NOT TO SCALE

/ /f / ! / / l THE TOWNS AT \ 1 \\ 4 1ii� 1
11/ /--� \ 1 \\\\ \ 1 I 1 11 1
%/ii/ If CANNON AVENUE,)
II
/ / / BOUNDARY
l
\�\\ \\ ---—�---1 Z \
v
Ik
tilt11 \II\\\ I / / 11 1 v Sg�RE/ Y \\N\
11 it I�¢ A III / IA v
At11j11 j I I I I I 1 lv�R�'`� // A� \ �L \ 1 A v� z l l l l k I
AIIIII 1 1 1 V A �� �V I I p 1 cG I/ A G 1 1 1 \ I r
vv`vAj11111 I V �� 1/—V 1 r/ A I// \ I
11 I 1 1 1 \��� �� 1 / / ",D / /1 I I U
Illl ,vI // Ih�-_/ < III/ 1 1
/ 11j
\IP11�1111174��\ \ 1 \ \.•�—� \ �--/ / 1 ! IIyO�� 1 1 1 \\ \
Al / ♦�a�� 1111111111\VA�� \ _ A 1 V / / / /�� _ 1 v� —,1
' �I // — --���� IIIIIIIIII 1\IZI�I 1 v 1 1 �� AV�E I WETLAND W
�— / ��vv IIIII 11
(0.01 AC) 1 v
\�♦ 1 ! l �� A� �\
I11�1�
EXIST. \ ��%// I UST. INTERMITTENT
CULVERT I \�i/ i I j STREAM B j
o �} — WETLAND V\
(593 LF)— / /rt�'1 1 s -, i t \ �• \ of
I' h� A�1 11 �� / / lVI / Ir�. 1 / /vvl 1 A(0.02 AC) �N,
'1�
/ 1 / r v I 11141v �' '� ��<�-
I / liq
EXIST. PERENNIAL \ / i� ��\1\�-- /%// `��.�� �i i/1%��
1 / _ STREAM A I ys; WETLAND T
(1340Lf)'/ I11 Cs \ \(0.1\ AC)-� I/l kEXIST.INTERMITTENT 1\+
\ \ '// / / \ 'STREAM C I
WETLAND Z > J IIIII l \ \ �\\ r' / /'/ I / f •/ t I l 1 1 I
1 0.21 AC AL —_WETLAND X V .� Av A\ V i �I l I f 1 f I u \\ VI! (453 LI) 1 I l—
( ) \ 1
\VAV1
ON / 'WETLAND Y' \\ \ I I I / ! (
(0.01ACpVvv�vN.:\�!%j
/ ��%�Oq� /�h I l THE TOWNSAT� IA //j 1 IWETLANDU-11�13-\N\ILj`C
�: 1 A I f /1 1 0.92 AC
CANNON AVENUE / / / 1 ( ,) s"\ \ I
PROPERTY ! t /� j f I �I \�—/< 1 (I t{ 1 I I j� I //i --♦ II Oc
1'� // \ \l ! \lli1z I III \IIY /— BOUNDARY I I
\\/ N,\ �\ 1 \ t y \\�w'I III III w 11
EXIST. `��\ \1 EXIST. INTERMITTENT \�I11"% 1' < <; 1 �l �/\ 1 �\ t12, 1 1 III III cwC /
\� v A' 2 /! !I rl G%t [ 11Alll U
CULVERT-N \\ STREAM F
//I,'�/� .✓( �/ ! %\J �/ 1 I/ /i 1�wllllalIV
s�
� /��fr l!� I WETLANDS
V��v �_ /�jl;r(0.04AC)11U),1//i//%
\\�\ \ \e �`\� ` EXIST. / // //ri I i /I NON -JURISDICTIONAL
C r1t•� _a V \ ♦— CULVERTS// / ��. // ( \�/��� r� (GULLY 4 _—vA�A���� y/'ice
Ali
�v _i / III
EXIST. 48" CMPAV
IIIA�
/ / EXIST. BRIDGE
111�T\ -t0�
/f
All
v, v�v
� 1 1 /j111 I
�
% 1 I /�IIIIII I
till
/I
— — — — — — If
/.
0' 200' 400' 800,
N
SCALE: 1 "=400'
DATE:
EXISTING CONDITION August 21, 2020
Landw®rks THE TOWNS AT CANNON PROJECT NO: 19004
n Desl Group, PA SHEET#
g P' IVE, WORK AND PLAY THE ARDENT COMPANIES WL-1
CREATING SPACES TO L
7621 Little Avenue, Suite 111 tel:[phone] CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SCALE: _^
1

STREAM IMPACT SUMMARY
ROAD CROSSING 41 - STREAM B : 56 LF
UTILITIES & ROAD CROSSING #2 - STREAM A: 72 LF
TEMPORARY SANITARY SEWER & WATER IMPACT # 3 : 25 LF
TEMPORARY WATER IMPACT # 4 : 10 LF
TEMPORARY WATER IMPACT # 5 : 10 LF
PERMANENT STEAM IMPACT TOTAL : 128 LF
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT TOTAL: 45 LF
WETLAND IMPACT SUMMARY
ROAD CROSSING #1 - WETLAND T :
1,946 SF
UTILITIES & ROAD CROSSING 42 - WETLAND U :
4,309 SF
PEDESTRIAN TRAIL CROSSING #6 - WETLAND U :
306 SF
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT - WETLAND U :
823 SF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT TOTAL:
6,561 SF
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT TOTAL
823 SF
z �I I
< di I
\w Ilz II
mIlj II
r
PROPOSED \\\y \ PROPOSED ROAD
SAND FILTER#4 \\\� �\ OR\vE��'� CROSSING IMPACT #1
WETLAND Y
PROPOSED TEMPORARY \\\o \ WETLAND T III i
WATER IMPACT #5 \� SAND Q
FILTER #5
WETLAND X OUTFALL � `� e/ G
P
WETLAND
PROPOSED � 5% WETLAND V 1
PROPOSED TEMPORARY 4" WATER `\ WETLAND W II
SANITARY & WATER IMPACT #3 \' `� �.®�® 1 PROPOSED Y1
SAND FILTER #5 III II
PROPOSED ROAD SEWER TIE-IN II p II
CROSSING IMPACT #2 \ LOCATION II
WETLAND ULU
Y
PROPOSED UJ N_--
�q 8" SEWERD TRAIL IMPACT #6 II
I liU" I >% 6D I
PROPOSED ( p
8"WATER �E III
IIII� izUj
III
EXISTING
8" SEWER n I
PROP.
4" WATER
WI 1 __
SAND FILTER #2 THE ORIGINAL REZONING PROPOSED NO ROAD
OUTFALL CROSSING TO AVOID STREAM IMPACT. HOWEVER,
_
PROPOSED
SAND FILTER #1
•+ _ ��� ' CHARLOTTE DOT (CDOT) REQUIRED THE STREAM
_ 7 PROPOSED CROSSING TO PROVIDE BETTER ROAD NETWORK
CAN _ ���- CONNECTIVITY TO CANNON AVE & W SUGAR
NON � SAND FILTER#3 ��.
AVENU-CREEK RD. IN THE EFFORT OF MINIMIZING THE
E s
SAND FILTER #1
_
�%IMPACT TO STREAM A, IT WAS SUCCESSFULLY
OUTFACE
PROPOSED NON-JURISDICTIONALNEGOTIATED WITH CDOT TO NARROW THE
SAND FILTER #2 GULLY CROSSING ROAD WIDTH FROM 71' RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY / STREET TO 56' ROW. IN ADDITION, THE
1TLANDS —
WE-1 (ROW)
WATER IMPACT #4 SAND FILTER #3 —.WETLAND
DEVELOPER PURCHASED ADDITIONAL LAND UP
/ OUTFALL WETLAND AREA V TO ALLOW THE ROAD TO ENTER THE SITE FROM WEST SUGAR CREEK RD
jxNJ /'_--__--NEAR
O' 'j 5� PEE\.85 �� \ WITHOUT ANY IMPACTS IN THAT AREA.
MEND
THE ROAD CROSSING IS PROPOSED AT THE
\LOCATION PROVIDEN TO SUFFICIENT
CAPACITY FORT E WATER
QUALITY AND STORM
DETENTION BASINS WHICH IS REQUIRED TO
CAPTURE & TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE ENTIRE
PROJECT AND LOCATED AT THE NATURAL LOWEST
POINT OF THE SITE.
IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY
0' 200' 400' 800,
IMPERVIOUS AREA:
16.03 AC
SITE AREA:
41.03 AC N
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS AREA:
39.07 % SCALE: 1 "=400'
DATE:
o
SITE PLAN FOR STREAM & WETLAND IMPACTS
August 21, 2020
Landworks
THE TOWNS AT CANNON
PROJECT NO: 19004
Design Group, PA
sHEEr#
CREATING SPACES TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WL-2
N 7621 Little Avenue, Suite 111 te1: 704-841-1604
SCALE:
fax, 704-841-1 04
1 "=400'

I EXIST.
/ INTERMITTENT
STREAM B
WETLAND T
i �ROP.S 10' WETLAND �\
BUFFER \\.
764
I
PROP. STORM �\
PIPE TO WO BASIN /
PROPOSED ROAD y y y�2:1 SLOPE IS PROPOSED
CROSSING 41 IMPACT y TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
TO STREAM B : 56 LF �/I �' �u� y� IMPACTS OQ
PROPOSED ROAD
I � Q
CROSSING 41 IMPACT
TO WETLAND T: 1,946 SF
/
PROPOSED
760 / w � SAND FILTER#5
s;
�. •; 5 ��
�.. PROP.
WATER1
PROP. LINE
SANITARY
SEWER i f /!ii _ y WETLAND HYDROLOGY y y
—,WILL BE MAINTAINED y y y y
\ PROP. 8' SIDEWALK. l I l y Y y y y y ;� 'WITH PIPE UNDER
THIS PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK 1 .yl y y y y y/ y y ROAD CROSSING
IS SHIFTED DIRECTLY BEHIND
y y
THE CURB IN ORDER TO i MMQ '1! Z //y y y y y y y y y y y � y y \ y
j MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS. I 'W Jy y\�\
„„�4X y y
Oy
/ y SEE SHEETS WL-6 & WL-8
FOR CULVERT 41 PROFILE,
ELEVATION AND DETAIL
'EXIST.
a
WETLAND U INTERMITTENT
a LEGEND
STREAM C
y
IMPACTED
o
U
WETLANDS
c
° EX. WETLANDS
0' 15' 30'
60'
TO REMAIN
N
M
Ln
SCALE: 1 "=30'
DATE:
STREAM IMPACTS FOR ROAD CROSSING #1
August 21,
2020
o
Landworks
THE TOWNS AT CANNON
PROJECT NO:
19004
Design Group, PA
SHEET#
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
WL-3
CREATING SPACES TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY
c� 7621LittleAvenue ,Suite111 tel:[phone]
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE:
a
1 "=30'

EXIST. SANITAR
�� \\ SEWER (TY
TEMPORARY SANITARY SEWER & 8" \
WATER IMPACT #3 (25 LF). STREAM TO \
BE RESTORED TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONS. SEE SHEET WL-8 FOR
SEWER & WATER PROFILE AT STREAM s'
CROSSING
PROPOSED ROAD I
\\I CROSSING #2 IMPACT
TO STREAM A: 72 LF
I
LOWES PLAC
DRIVE
P.)
m
A-712 \\\
1
� � t
MANHOLE/
1 /
/ PROP 8"
\ WATER
2:1 SLOPE IS
PROPOSED TO �48
i '
\MINIMIZE IMPACTS j PROP STORM PIPE I
TO W.Q.W.. BASIN
1 (TYP.)
STREAM BANK STABILI2ATION
RIP RAP ARMOR TYP. p
RIP RAP TO BE PLACED ON
THE CHANNEL BANKS ±12"
ABOVE THE TYPICAL WATER PROP 4" \ '\
ELEVATION; NOT WITHIN THE / ID
f WATER
STREAM I \\ U)
vv EczTI
rii
i
I I I
I / / PROP.
D FILTER #2
TEMPORARY 4" WATER IMPACT #4
(10LF). STREAM TO BE RESTORED TO
PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS.
SEE SHEET WL-8 FOR WATER
PROFILE AT STREAM CROSSING
LEGEND
IMPACTED
WETLANDS
®TEMPORARY
IMPACTED WETLANDS
EX. WETLANDS \ ;V ,
TO REMAIN
0
0
tY
V
t�
\t
PROP. SAND
fi
FILTER #4
U)z�
�ml
_ c
mi
TEMPORARY UTILITIES IMPACT
i TO WETLAND U: 823 SF
REMOVE 6"-12" OF TOP SOIL OF
PROPOSED DISTURBED AREA.
TOP SOIL TO BE PLACED ON
FABRIC AND REPLACED UPON
COMPLETION.
r '^ PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
I EASEMENT TO BE RESEEDED
>/ WITH NATIVE WETLAND SEED MIX.
INSTALL ANIT-SEEP COLLARS AT
THE DOWNSTREAM (UTILITY LINE
GRADIENT) WETLAND BOUNDARY
WETLAND U
i
' f
li
54\�
SE\N
IN
i � I 953 l
i QQ
1 -�EikDW,4LLS' j � I � t
A� `1��+ •�/�: -� O •gyp. � \I
QI
PROPOSED UTILITIES &
ROAD CROSSING 42 IMPACT
TO WETLAND U: 4,309 SF
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
AS PART OF THE REZONING APPROVAL, THIS PROJECT DEDICATES
ROUGHLY 6 ACRES OF LAND TO THE MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARK AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT. THE LAND PLAN ALSO INCLUDES AN
EXTENSIVE TRAIL NETWORK - A PORTION OF WHICH IS REPRESENTED
BY THE PUBLIC SIDEWALKS ON THE MAIN SPINE ROAD. ON THE ROAD
CROSSING OF STREAM A, THE SIDEWALK/TRAILS ARE TIGHTENED TO
THE BACK OF CURB AS THERE WILL BE HIGHER THAN NORMAL
PEDESTRIAN AND CHILDREN ON BIKES USING THE SIDEWALKS/TRAILS IN
THAT IN THIS AREA, AND THE PLANTING STRIP SEPARATION WILL
PROVIDE AN ADDED LEVEL OF SAFETY AT THE STREAM CROSSING.
0' 30' 60' 120'
SCALE: 1 "=60'
UAI t:
o
STREAM IMPACTS FOR UTILITIES & ROAD CROSSING #2
August 21, 2020
Landworks
THE TOWNS AT CANNON
PROJECT NO: 19004
Design Groun PA
Group,
SHEET#
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
WL-4
CREATING SPACES TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY
N 7621 LRtlekmnue, Sdh m taL•704-8414604
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE:
a
1 "=60'

"
J
PROP. 8'
PEDESTRIAN
TRAIL
-PROP.
PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE t
LEGEND
N
U IMPACTED
o WETLANDS
0' 30' 60'
120'
�j EX. WETLANDS
N
n TO REMAIN
SCALE: 1 "=60'
DATE:
o
STREAM IMPACTS FOR UTILITIES & TRAIL CROSSING
August 21,
2020
Landworks
THE TOWNS AT CANNON
PROJECT NO:
19004
Design Groun PA
Group,
SHEET#
CREATING SPACES TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WL-5
N 7621 LRtleAvene.Sulh m taL•704-8414604
SCALE:
a
11

TOP OF WA
ELEV. =±76(
7E
SLOPED WINGWP
(BEYO�
STREAM BANK STA
RIP RAP AI
RIP RAP TO BE F
THE CHANNEL E
ABOVE THE TYPIC
ELEVATION; NOT V
EXISTING GRAD
AT INTERMITTEN
STREAM
75
I'MIN. BURY IN PIP
PER NCDENR 4
PERMIT REG
74
CL
PROPOSEDLL
GRADE
o
TOP
OI
w
I
ELE
._
J Q
.3
of
a
,
LL
LOPED
I
D
(BEYOND)
i
31LI
ATION
42" RCD/
;M
.
LACED
ON
AN
S ±12"
—
TOP OF
A
AL
WATER
STREAM B
NI
fIT
RIP RAP ARM
S
REAM
RIP RAPT
BI
THE CHAN
EI
E
T
T
ELEVATION;
N
STREAM
TOTAL STREAM
MPACT: 56LF
STREAM0— (MEASURED77—
C/L
XI STING ST
EP
E
C/LGGRRADE
01
D.
CULVERT
CROSSI
G #1
PROFILE - ROAD CULVERT CROSSING #1
SCALE H: 1 "=40' V: 1 "=10'
STREAM
RIP RAP
ROAD CULVERT #1 ELEVATION AT HEADWALL
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
WALL
±760.5
'60
VGWALL
JK
STABILIZATION
DR TYP.
PLACED ON
BANKS ±12"
(PICAL WATER
OT WITHIN THE
'50
M
'46
NVERT OF 42" PIPE
12" BELOW FIN. GRADE
;MIN.)
UA I t:
o
CULVERT PROFILES & ELEVATIONS
August 21, 2020
rn
Landworks
THE TOWNS AT CANNON AV
PROJECTNO 19004
Design Group, PA
Q P'
SHEET#f
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
WL-6
rn CREATING SPACES TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY
76YfLRdeManuaS010 t&70�41-I�
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE:
a _M I
AS SHOWN

TOP OF WALL
ELEV. = ±748.i
75
PROPOSE[
HEADWALL
Ito] a$70:7-1011i
STREAM BANK STAI
RIP RAP AF
RIP RAP TO BE P
THE CHANNEL E
ABOVE THE TYPIC
ELEVATION; NOT V
74
EXISTING GRAD
AT INTERMITTEN
STREAM C
PROP. 4" DIP WATE
732
PROPCSED
GRADE----
c a'
T
JOQI
E
UOO�
a
L
66" RC
P
BI
1
M
EF
EF
31LIZATION 77�:_-�
;MOR TYP.
LACED ON
STREA
ANKS ±12"
/
EEO./
STABIL
AL WATER
RIP RA
'ITHIN THE
RIP RA
STREAM
ON THI
62 LF PROP
CULVERT
BANKS
TYPICE
TOTAL STREAM
IMPACT: 72LF
ELEVA
\
T
(MEASURED
AT
THE S�
S I REAM
C/L)
1`
PROP.
8" DIP WATERJ
CLi
R
PROP. 8" DIP SEWER
CULVE
T CROSSING
#2
PROFILE - UTILITIES & ROAD CULVERT CROSSING #2
SCALE H: 1"=40' V: 1"=10'
3 - 66"
HEADWALL
FOOTING
1.5' SILL
1.0' SILL
ROAD CULVERT #2 ELEVATION AT HEADWALL
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
TOP OF
HEADWALL
-1-1.5' SILL
)P OF WALL
_EV: = ±749.1
'50
DPED WINGWALL
:YOND)
N. BURY IN PIPE
NCDENR 401
MIT READ.
0 BANK
IZATION
ARMOR TYP.
TO BE PLACED
:CHANNEL
±12" ABOVE THE
L WATER
ION; NOT WITHIN
REAM
TING STREAM
'RADE
'34
-INVERT OF 66" PIPE
12" BELOW FIN. GRADE
(MIN.)
NOTE: THE SILLS ARE PROPOSED AS SHOWN
TO MAINTAIN THE FLOOD ELEVATION.
THE FLOOD ELEVATION CANNOT BE RAISED
TO AVOID FLOODING ON ADJACENT
PROPERTIES AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.
DAI t:
o
CULVERT PROFILES & ELEVATIONS
August 21, 2020
Landworks
THE TOWNS AT CANNON AVE
PROJECT NO: 19004
Design Grou PA
P'
SHEET#
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
WL_7
CREATING SPACES TO LIVE. WORK AND PLAY
N 7621 LMNAww45dbm a1704-8414604
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE:
AS SHOWN

CC
HE
CC
WI
CON
FOO
ENLARGED UULVtK I i& HtzAUVVALL Utz I AIL
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE PROP. GRADE
EX. GRADE
765 PROP.GRADE
760
755
100 YR.
FLOOD
ELEV.
750
745
ii
z 740
z
t
735
IG STREAM
ELEVATION
PEINVERT I
-
1
■■■
I■1■■■s
I■1�■■I■
I■11■■I�
I■■1■■11
I■■I■■lti
1
■■■
\■■
ANN
U■■
WIN
IMI■'■■I
■■■■■■■■
�■■■■■
I■■■■■�■■■
I■■■�■■■■
WEill■■■II■
,
A■■■I�ILi■■I/
■1\\■■IIII■■■■%I
■\■■IIII■■■I/�■
■■No
■■��■■■■■I■■■�■■■■
■■\
�����i■■
■■ � . � ■
11
■■■1\\■■■■■IIII■■■�/i■■■
■■■111■■■■■111
I ■■■■Ill
■■■
■■■■\■■■■■IIII■■■■I/I■■■
■■■■1\1■■I■■■
■■■Ill
■■■■
■■■■■
►
■■■■■■
. J
RADE
¢ 7
1+00 1+80 ~
y GENERALNOTES 750 750
1. TEMPORARY OPEN CUT SANITARY SEWER & WATER IMPACT.
2. STREAM TO BE RESTORED TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS.
3. BORING UNDER STREAM FOR SEWER & WATER NOT FEASIBLE DUE TO 745 745
DEPTH REQUIREMENT FROM BOTTOM OF STREAM TO TOP OF PIPE.
P ROP.4" D1
WATER LINE 74
1 +00
o TEMPORARY SEWER & WATER
IMPACT CULVERT #3 740 0
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
TEMPORARY WATER IMPACT #5
n
n
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
DATE:
STREAM & WETLAND IMPACT FOR
August 21, 2020
Landworks
THE TOWNS AT CANNON
PROJECT NO: lsooa
Design Group,PA
SHEET#
n CREATING SPACES TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WL-g
T621LRd•Avw•�• Sulbm t*704-s41_16a
SCALE:
i foe 4604
1
NOT TO SCALE

WATER QUALITY NOTES:
1. WATER QUALITY BMP'S SHALL BE INSTALLED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF CHARLOTTE
POST CONSTRUCTION CONTROLS ORDINANCE
(PCCO), AND THE MECKLENBURG COUNTY BMP
DESIGN MANUAL.
2. BMP DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
APPROVED BY CITY OF CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
====I= Ili
ul
O u
III
O
PROPOSED ROAD
\ CROSSING IMPACT#1 j
� I I
PROPOSED A� ��� / . pl
SAND FILTER #4�G
SAND FILTER
#4 OUTFALL
PROPOSED ROAD
CROSSING IMPACT #2 PROPOSED
SAND FILTER #5
SAND FILTER#5
OUTFALL 9
/j Lu
110
iIm
�
z w
Luw
of V
(D
PROPOSED
SANDFILTER#3
NON -JURISDICTIONAL,
PROPOSED
-q SAND FILTER #1
_
CgN�lp --- — � GULLY
NAVEN<IE
U SAND FILTER #1
a—
a OUTFACE
-�
PROPOSED SAND FILTER #3
SAND FILTER#2 OUTFALL
z
SAND FILTER #2--/
LLI
OUTFALL
,NJ Ira
a
C
0' 200' 400'
800,
C)
N
n
SCALE: 1 "=400'
o
WATER QUALITY MASTER PLAN
DATE:
August 21, 2020
Landworks
THE TOWNS AT CANNON AVE
PROJECT NO: 19004
a Design Group, PA
CREATING SPACES TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET#
WL-9
a 7621 Little Avenue, Suite 111 tel: [phone]
SCALE:
A' Chadotte. NC 28226
fax:[phone]
1 "=400'

1. UPON COMPLETION OF STREAM CROSSING WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKRLL
AND MECHANICALLY TAMP (NO SPECIFIC DENSITY) SOILS INTO PLACE AND DRESS
DISTURBED SURFACES
2. BEGINNING AT A POINT 2' ABOVE WATER SURFACE ELEVATION, GRASS DISTURBED
AREAS (SEED. FERTILIZER k STRAW MULCH) STREAM BANK, TOP OF BANK AND
DISTURBED AREAS UPLAND OF STREAM
3. INSTALL COIR FIBER NET/MAT STARTING MINIMUM 12' BELOW WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION AND EXTENDING A MINIMUM 5 BEYOND TOP OF BANK. MINIMUM
SPECIFICATIONS FOR COIR FIBER NET/MAT AS FOLLOWS:
— MIN. THICKNESS OF 0.30 INCHES
— 100% COCONUT FIBER AND WOVEN INTO TONE
— AVG. WEIGHT OF 20 OUNCES/SQ. YD.
4. COIR FIBER NET/MAT SHALL BE SECURELY HELD IN PLACE WITH USE OF WOODEN
STAKED AND WIRE STAPLES (AS NEEDED)
5. INSTALL LIVE STAKES BEGINNING AT WATER SURFACE ELEVATION AND EXTENDING
2 VERTICAL FEET UP THE STREAM BANK. SEE LIVE STAKE DETAIL FOR
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
6. INSTALL SILT FENCE W/1WRE REINFORCEMENT ALONG TOP OF BANK (ADJACENT TO
END OF COIR FIBER NET/MAT) FOR WIDTH OF DISTURBED SOILS
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
COIR FIBER NET/MAT
GRASS (SM, MULCH do FERTILIZE) —
REMAINING DISTURBED STREAM BANK
AREAS INCLUDING TOPS OF BANK
(UNDER COIR NET/MAT)
LIVE STAKE (WLLOWS OR —
SPECIES APPROVED BY
COW/DHEC) FOR FIRST 24'
ABOVE NORMAL WATER
SURFACE ELEVATION
24'3
12't
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 24'IN LENGTH
2. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE 0.5'-1.5' IN DIAMETER AT THE TIME
OF PLANTING
]. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE BLACK WALLOW OR SPECIES
SPECIFIED BY COE/DH£C OR CONSULTANT
I1.
i. SPECIES SHALLBE DpiMANT AT THE TIME OF ACQUISITIONAND
PLANTING AND LOCALLY GROWI/HARVESTEOS.
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED Y D.C.
6. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 18' IN N
DEPTH VATH NO MORE THAN 4'-8' OF STAKE EXPOSED
EXTEND COIR FIBER MAT
W BEYOND TOP OF BANK
1-I I i
;-
I EXTEND COIR FIBER NET/MAT
4 1 k l 12' BELOW WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION - LIVE STAKE
TYPICAL DETAIL — N.T.S.
5 ❑ 2.5 5 10
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FE>r'1' )
20 ❑ 10 20 40
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
INSTALL SILT FENCE
REINFORCED WITH HOG
WIRE AT TOP OF BANK
(EDGE OF CDIR FIBER
NET/MAT)
LARGE ROC[ (SNOT OR IMPORT)
MAY BE USED TO REFORM
STREAM BANK (STACKED), 16' OF
SOIL SHALL COVER STREAM
SIDE FACE OF ROCK STACK.
(USE OF ROCK TO ANCHOR BANK
IS OPTIONAL)

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. co m
For 1515 Cannon Avenue
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
August 14, 2020
www.wetiands-epg.com
Ashesrile Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

1515 Cannon Avenue - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The 1515 Cannon Avenue site (+/- 41.75 acres) is located just north of Cannon
Avenue, and west of W. Sugar Creek Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina. It can be found on the Derita, NC USGS Topographic
Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.2779 N, longitude is-80.7981 W. The topography
consists of gentle slopes, creeks, and riparian corridors, with the elevation
ranging from 750 to 790 ft. (Figure 1).
Figure 1:
USGS MAP - Derita, NC Quadrangle (1993)
�� '' t �r: . s •'I rita
Project 8arrndary / r• - -'
Study Limits
:I
f(a- 1+1-) 51-75 ages � � �'`vp
-
Ath19t'C
field_
'INTERCHANGE 4
93 . ■� .F $5 _ ` Nil
■� - - l
Unnamed TrlGu[ary to � • + tit `
/ .. Ufla.SLrgar Erask
67 • 1 / -1'
LOCATION
Lat' 35-77792 9K, Long:-80.79818 9W
HUC:03050103 (Lower Catawba)
-7
acres: 1515 CANNON AVENUE on>rn uy- uc��rwmd uy:
{+/-1 41-75 Mecklenburg CauntV, NC "K
FIGURE
1 p9119/I9 USGS Map — Derita, NC Quadrangle (1993) me kdc a cnmvanW' _
ApproA mate Localim, For5tudy Pu'p tSeS Un�y
S.NMt to U5ACC NCaO, and CAa55 vrArmfion
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

1515 Cannon Avenue - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website http://www.fws.gov/endangered/ was
referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and
Protected species for Mecklenburg County North Carolina, the results of which
are listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and
the site was investigated during the weeks of October 14, 2019 and August 10,
2020.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Mecklenburg County
County: Mecklenburg, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on October 14, 2019 ***Updated August 10, 2020
Group Name Status Record Status
Invertebrate
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona
Endangered
Current
decorata
Invertebrate
Rusty -patched Bumble Bee
Endangered
Historic
(Bombus affinis)
Vascular Plants
Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea
Endangered
Current
laevi ata
Vascular Plants
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus
Endangered
Current
schweinitzii)
Vascular Plants
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Endangered
Current
Vertebrate
Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis
Threatened
Probable/Potential
septentrionalis)
Vertebrate
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
Protected under the Bald
Current
leucocephalus)
and Golden Eagle
Protection Act
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

1515 Cannon Aveyi»e - T177-eatened / Endangered / M-ntected Species Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
Three plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally Endangered,
is typically found in open habitats which historically have been maintained by
wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most occurrences are limited to
roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility rights -of -way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides, clear cuts, dry
limestone bluffs and power line rights -of -way, requiring abundant sunlight and
little competition from other plant species.
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered, requires
habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species requires periodic fire
as a part of its ecology.
Four animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of open water
such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are suitable fish
populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
• Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
restricted to cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable, silt- free stream beds
are required for this species. Typically, stable areas occur where the stream
banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally Threatened.
During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath
bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Males and non -
reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. It
has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds. Northern
long-eared bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Rusty -patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis), listed as Federally Endangered,
live in colonies that include a single queen and female workers. Rusty -patched
Bumble Bees historically occupied grasslands and tallgrass prairies. Bumble
bees need areas that provide nectar and pollen from flowers, nesting sites
(underground and abandoned rodent cavities or clumps of grasses), and
overwintering sites for hibernating queens (undisturbed soil).
WEPG 4
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

1515 Cannon Aveiiw, - T177-eatened / Fndanger(,d / M-ntected Species Evaluation
RESULTS:
This site is in an urbanized setting. It is surrounded by a residential
neighborhood to the north, commercial and light industrial businesses to the east
and west, and Interstate-85 corridor to the south. The site consists of wooded
slopes and stream corridors of small tributaries to Little Sugar Creek. There is a
strong presence of non-native invasive species throughout the site. This
condition is not uncommon in older, urbanized areas in the city.
The majority of the site is covered in a mixed hardwood forest with mature trees.
Many of the trees are covered with climbing English Ivy (Hedera helix), which is
also the predominant ground cover in some areas. Canopy tree species include
American Elm (Ulmus americans), Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Black
Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), Willow Oak (Quercus phellos), White Oak (Q.
alba), Sweet Gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera),Cottonwood (Populus deltoides), Black Walnut (Juglans nigra), River
Birch (Betula nigra), and Red Maple (Acerrubra). Sub -canopy species include
Southern Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), Sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum),
Flowering Dogwood (Corpus f/orida), and American Holly (Ilex opaca). The
primary shrub species present is Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense). Additional
shrub species includes Blackberry (Rubus sp.), Multiflora Rose (Rosa multif/ora),
and Red Tips (Photinia sp.). English Ivy (Hedera helix) is the strongly dominant
vine. Additional vines observed were Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica),
Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and Catbrier
(Smilax sp.). Herbs present include the dominant Japanese Stiltgrass
(Microstegium vimineum), along with Christmas Fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), Ebony Spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), Panic Grass
(Panicum sp.), False Nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), Jumpseed (Tovara
virginiana), and Knotweed (Polygonum sp.).
The slopes and adjacent uplands on the western side of the site are covered with
mixed mature and young Loblolly (Pinus taeda) dominated pine stands along
with Short -leaf Pine (P. echinata) and Virginia Pine (P. virginiana).
There is an old fence line along Cannon Avenue, with overhanging tree limbs
and climbing English Ivy. The boundary along the roadside is shady. The thin
transitional areas are dominated by common weedy species such as Goldenrod
(Solidago sp.), Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), Rabbit Tobacco (Gnapthalium
obtusifolium), and Pokeweed (Phytolacca americans).
WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

1515 Cannon Avenue - Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Evaluation
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
• All potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower, Michaux's Sumac and
Smooth Coneflower along the roadside, transitional areas and woods
edges were examined and none of these species were present.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings
nor were any nesting sites observed.
The streams on site do not have the habitat characteristics required to
support populations of the Carolina Heelsplitter. Based on existing
documentation, Carolina Heelsplitter populations have not been previously
identified within this basin. No individuals were observed during the survey
nor would any be expected on -site.
Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the Northern
Long-eared Bat.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Range Map for Rusty -patched
Bumble Bee
(https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/rpbbmap.html)
Mecklenburg County is in it's Historic Range, and as such, Section 7
consultation is not needed. WEPG concludes that Rusty -patched Bumble
Bee is not present.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
041XI # 1*e�l
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
August 14, 2020
6
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

1515 Cannon Avenue - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist/ Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 50,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora).
• Found Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
This discovery led (in part) to the purchase of the site by the State of North
Carolina Plant Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This
population has become a Recovery Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in
Mecklenburg, Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
7
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.