20201115 Ver 1_Riparian Buffer Authorization Request_20200830

Buffer Authorization Application Form
15ANCAC 02B .0233 (8)(b), .0243 (8)(b), .0250 (11)(b), .0259 (8)(b), .0267 (11)(c), .0607 (e)(2) Buffer Authorization Online Fo
Update 10/23/2018
Original Submittal 8/30/2020
A. Owner/Applicant Information
General Information
Primary Contact Email:* [e-mail]
Rease list the contact person's en -ail for questions or payrrent on this project if needed.
Who is submitting the application?* r Owner
W Applicant other than Owner
r Agent
Is there an agent working on this application r Yes
but not submitting it? r No
1. Property Owner Information:
la. Name on Recorded Deed:*
1b. Responsible Party:
1c. Mailing Address:*
1d.Telephone:* 9194383340
Marc Raymond Curry
(for Corporations)
Street Address
4505 Pike Road
Address Line 2
aty
State / Province / Fbgion
Raleigh
NC
Fbstal / Zip Code
Country
27613-4071
US
le. Email Address:* [e-mail]
2. Applicant's Information (if different from owner):
2a. Name:
David Myrick
2b. Company Affiliation:
Heritage Construction
2c. Mailing Address:
Street Address
7200 acc blvd #105
Address Line 2
aty
Raleigh
Rbstal / Zip Code
27617
2d. Telephone:
2525675541
2e. Email Address:
[e-mail]
State / Province / Pegion
nc
Country
Us

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ....... ....... ._.
1. Project Information ^
la. Name of Project:* Curry Addition
(Subdivision, facility, or establishrrent narre)
1b. Is this a publicly -funded transportation project?*
r Yes
r No
1d. Subdivision Name: Breckridge II
le. Nearest
Municipality:
1f. Property Size: 0.25
acres
1g. County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Wake
1h. Property ID# Date of Purchase
0787447870
Tax RN or Parcel id
1 i. Deed Information
Type of Book Book# Page#
Deed F
493
Map :��]F
87
1j. Attach a copy of the recorded map that indicates when the lot was last platted.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
clear survey2020-06-17 20193 LOT SURVEY.pdf 470.9KB
R7F only
1k. How would you like to provide the Latitude and Longitude information?*
f Address Lookup
r Manually
Latitude * 35°52'42.7"N Longitude * 78°42'50.0"W
11. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes
o No
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
lynn Lake
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:*
lake
2c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:*
i

80
(linear feet only)
3. Project Description:
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Single Family Dwelling. nothing complicated.
3b. Attach an 8'/a x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the site.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurnent
Pike rd topo.pdf 112.89MB
FDF only
3c. Attach an 8 % x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map depicting the
project site.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Soil survey info Pike rd.pdf 411.58KB
FtDF only
4. Proposed Activity
......................
Provide a detailed description of the proposed activity including its purpose and include the type of equipment to be used:*
Adding a sunroom and deck to the rear of the house. no heavy equipment being
used, all done by hand.
Attach a site plan as applicable to the project:
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Pike DEQ survey.pdf 487.02KB
FDF only
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have jurisdictional wetlands or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this
property/project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
f Yes
t: No
6. Project History
6a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes
4 No
7. Future Project Plans
7a. Is this project a phased project?* C Yes
4 No
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Buffer Impacts
Project is in which protected Basin?*
F Neuse River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0233)
r Catawba River Basin (15A NCAC 02B.0243)
f Randleman Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0250)
r Tar -Pamlico River Basin (15A NCAC 0213.0259)
r Jordan Lake Watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0267)
f Goose Creek Watershed (15A NCAC 0213.0606 & 15A NCAC 026.0607)

Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
Site# - Reason Stream Name Buffer Impact* Impact Type * Zone 1 Zone 2
Addition
Permanent
Allowable w/
211.00
200.00
rvbp label (e.g. Poad
(P)
mitigation
Square
Square
Crossing 1)
PbrmorTerrp
Feet
Feet
Total Zone 1 Impacts: 211.00
Total Zone 2 Impacts: 200.00
Total Buffer Impacts: 411.00
Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project.*
We have avoided going more than we have to because of a sanitary sewer
easement. There is no way to avoid this buffer because the 50' buffer ends up in
the middle of the e)asting house anyway.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.*
we are not using any heavy machinery to move material or build anything.
everything will be moved and built by hand.
2. Buffer Mitigation
2a. The table below identifies the square footage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer and the required mitigation.
Zone 1
Total Impactii Multiplier 11 Required Mitigation
211.00
3
633
Square Feet
Square Feet
Zone 2
Total Impact
Multiplier
Required Mitigation
200.00
Square Feet
1.50
300.00
Square Feet
2b. What is the mitigation plan proposed for f7 Payment to private mitigation bank
this project?* r Payment to Division of Mitigation (DMS)
W Permittee responsible mitigation
2c. Provide a description of your mitigation plan.*
NCDEQ required us to come up with a mitigation plan through this website. to let us
build this addition.

2d. Attach a detailed planting plan to include plant type, date of plantings, the date of the one-time fertilization in the protected
riparian buffers, and a plan sheet showing the proposed location of the plantings.*
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Pike DEQ survey.pdf 487.02KB
RDF only
2g. Comments:
E. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. What type of SCM are you providing?*
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
W Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
r Other SCM that removed minimum of 30% nitrogen
1 c. Diffuse Flow Docume ntation * Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Pike DEQ survey.pdf 487.02KB
FDF only
F. Supplementary Information
Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
r Yes
r No
Violations
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR
Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
r Yes
f No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact buffer authorization application?
r Yes
r No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
The house is sitting within the 50' buffer already. it was build before the new buffer
laws went into effect. so building anything onto the house will violate the buffer Law.
G. Additional Information
Please upload any additional information you would like the Division to consider during application review.
Additional Attachments: Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
FDF only
Additional Comments:
H. Sign and Submit
h
h
By digitally signing below, I certify that:

o I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
o I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act');
o I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
o I intend to electronically sign and submit the application form."
Print Name:* David Myrick
Signature
pj�
Submission Date: 08/25/2020
(Auto populated field)

Initial Review
Is this accepted into the review process?*
Is this project a public transportation
project?*
ID#*
Version:*
Select Reviewer:
Select Reviewing Office*
Has payment been received?*
O Yes O No
O Yes
O No
20201115
1
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
C No Payment Needed
r Fee Received
r Need Fee - send electronic notification

Z
���� U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR The National Map BAYLEAF QUADRANGLE
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY tau I NORTH CAROLINA
Ic
science for a changing world VV Top 7.5-MINUTE SERIES
-78.7500'-78.6250'
36.0000' 703000ME 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 36.0000'
0
6Fy� �3�� oo L 400 ��n� woo a �Oo BEN,Tgtp 00 �o 0
3986000mN �. f� �� BREEDERS��HILL DR z o '
o0 86
3
85
/ C19FFk�R o
. ooo Al RD of 00 85
o \
�i o F S•• Oi%
C� g
DUN -=FP
�_
s
LtCk C� \ r C a
J - — �, ✓ J , / ° Penny-
� 98 1� v �° �(1 1�� <� oo �uN� yc �S - y o Hester,
84o
✓J�l goo �° cRFF �Nr o A 98 Bridge
84
m
"' � � � ;l �� ✓ _ � � PEEDR�
Mitchel.&300PDnd 0
L C o (`J MARGgR� B lnkley
LU
ake
83 �� O��NG ��P v��0 �` �� 3°0
ANICE-RD
a�ir
O I1C-(O RIA
83
O
_ s
00 � � � � � � � R o rQ���� L � I� �. ��� 400 • � � � C✓ " _ I � � w� � ,�
o � � SKI TT� 0 �'�F�/ ✓✓c�+ oP /J ��NO Cam/ .aoo � � z\ �� � O
Q ?�
82
O �� �� I a � qr ✓ T P5 -- _ o � 0 82
✓ 50 � D DR �� o Z � 0 � � Q�� o ., � � ''� % i
o V1 LLWo
1A
DSO � I KEMP RD � z� /� ��c-• � - �V°� o� t- O � ��� �
�� /� REG LWOOD,DR /y�� o �� a°j ��o, 0 � � w a ��Q•
BRANIYW
81 4Oo Ih� o g� G 50 cy goo A etrn Mtn
i
DAMSrMOUNTA/N
° 81
1
\��(P 60UE ] � Q � C o � STO,y �^�,� •!r � � zl
o�i
b0 �) -0 o DEER RU
�
m
80 h5° oo e �O o RWOOD RD o' ✓�
c / P 80
d h � 0�`. ,�i�J P � o ��Oo � ✓ vT� ���0 �P9R � o
�
o�� o G o
r v/� � �/ � � �i•� S!R� A � O �O ��FL QI °O � C � B�� is �
o l PLC J Z SO D �� '9'p 7J A %%��y�-,, � ti �1 M = O CL p,\•`` J
,d0 TA �� 5�� \tir✓ �� �� p� �y �� �I O A1gRT GPO a
pNSDALErDR
79
� J
j y�o 0 WAY o�� z o) _ ��O 0 �� FOR j05 ENO--Cr
OVE DR ��
_ Q
Rt�O�oN-GR� o� � 79
z
z � �- °" � o .f" _ m � Q- 2 � C.�, ��✓ ALLISON DR
78 z O r ( F40:y Q CRyyESB/[< R C A
78
IDUNWOODY DR 0 SANDHURST RD
pdo o v� R� o KAYWOO yCT BAYLEAF DR �SP�P
CAPE-HARLESDR "' �o O A �35i71 11 ° U A/y
77 �� [BEECHNUT TRL o� EME OD Di
0
row o� - b e ho �� � (�'� c✓ S� MELIA'AVE � 6 z
o� � � � "'�' F�BR/DGE-P z ✓/�� n m 77
t��0 �00 Q �o W o 4So BAILEYWICK"Rp O� a ✓J fl
�✓
o BRfRf
3 50° �EDSEL-D 0 h0 TOVUR
Q �� ✓ u o< t .� MISTYISLE-PL �
o � 111VVV///
y o
� � /y0 0✓ < 2 0 �U C o
o �
76WINDSOR� GROSVEN
PP v W_ TREE; R Aye 2
76
o '
US OR
CL"UB, 5HIR r0 moo McT C
0 i � EDR
� ���E OR © -
O
�F'
i71 O 1'p�
q� 45�-�� -� W�S,� P � R, -no ". I, � ✓,-� � � � � J � �� � � � Q�PRESS��A �W 0� d (�� �� yp;
RENNAN DTON ST 3 S R p �� Sixo�
n-
���
00 ? \� µES ✓ ��o ,W .�_ �� pR o �o �7
75 0 �P P v �0 Q SNOW�WINO �� FORUh1 DR �� S6N,pR� �o
75
R ��� ONEA�L RD A CK -
�, 3 > 460 STRI-
RD
ID p oho' II
�4
BRIDGE ��Rsr ?� Y WEAT
�� d / �(,"'• I �/ / "so KINGSLAND'DR � �-�� �� � P O l� P � �o �� ✓/ _ L i (( �� �� RO o �� �- � s � O oy p�� �J � HERGRL-EN. R o
74 "o�pF
� � � o_" � ( � / �. ,_ PLI _ 'Q to � T 'o p ,v0 W ♦' �P,
i
450� �' � �' o r" - / V I � '.✓ � /� ORL Y-DR r1 o p , O .O
STONEHENGE'OR go of �O Py50 74
z �� �% l � � 2 '�•�� � i!� I' � � l � `n � � l � / � / � � mo coo .<ii0 � 0 �� � C � � R"�L j �O
/ N
m i)� � � IE�I �' ✓��� i� �� ��� ;L—� i� I 0 .. � �'� � �R � V � ^' �I l,�' i v 1
SILVER" J i, �/ Ha nd dg \ SP c GLEN ROYALRD^Pr
73 SCOTLHCASTL-ED /' ��J LR� �% o o O
O � s o �, h
LENOR ti �i�, 0 ALLEY LAKEDR o WEDA'ND_DR �� UN S DR
0 gbVAY
- � B Na � i C��, r � o� �� V (� � . - l PNCASyjp� f CZ • tio� ,o � / z Q v h N ° OR
1���-a 3973000m N
� 0 1 R� R o WOODBEN VAN' P
ANGECRESTRD
c
I �
35.8750 ° 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 714000rnE
-78.7500"-78.6250' 35.8750'
Produced by the United States Geological Survey rnN * SCALE 1 :24 000 ROAD CLASSIFICATION
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and N 1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2 NORM Expressway Local Connector c�
1 000-meter grid:Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17S s°19' 1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000 AROLINA Secondary Hwy Local Road r`
This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be 1ss MILS Ramp 4WD N
1°21"
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government 1 0.5 0 1 Y
reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before 24 MILS MILES • Interstate Route US Route O State Route
entering private lands. 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 QUADRANGLE LOCATION N
oX
Imagery .....................................................NAIP, May 2016 - November 2016 FEET U)
Roads ......................................... U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 UTM GRIDAND 2019 MAGNETIC NORTH o
Names............................................................................GNIS, 1980 - 2017 1 Northeast Durham
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
Hydrography...............................National Hydrography Dataset, 2001 - 2018 1 2 3 2 Creedmoor �
Contours ............................................National Elevation DatasetCONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
, 2008 U.S. National Grid NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 3 Grissom �
Boundaries..............Multiple sources; see metadata file 2017 - 2018 100,000-m Square ID 4 5 4 Southeast Durham co O
5 Wake Forest Z
Wetlands.................FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1983 This map was produced to conform with the 6 Cary t j
QV National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011. 6 ] 8 7 Raleigh West
A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.18 ir
BAYLEAF NC Z a
8 Raleigh East , N O
Grid Zone Designation ADJOINING QUADRANGLES Z Z
17S 2019

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wake County,
North Carolina
August 25, 2020

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface......................................................
How Soil Surveys Are Made ....................
SoilMap .....................................................
SoilMap ..................................................
Legend....................................................
Map Unit Legend ....................................
Map Unit Descriptions .............................
Wake County, North Carolina ..............
PbD—Pacolet-Urban land complex,
Ur —Urban land ................................
References ................................................
10 to 15 percent slopes.
.2
..5
.8
..9
10
11
11
13
13
14
15

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
706355 706363 706371 706379 706387 706395 706403
35° 52' 43" N 35° 52' 43" N
1
■
1 1
L
' r �
I . 'J 1
...1 • D
ti
ti r r r r b
N
N
r
v
N— ^
•• N
r
N J
1 ,
r
i
'16J L��. u
Soil MaN may not he valiel at this scale. }
L
35° 52' 41" N I { 1 35° 52' 41" N
706355 706363 706371 706379 706397 706395 706403
b o
Map Scale: 1:343 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. N
` Myers `
N 0 5 10 20 30
Feet
0 15 30 60 90
Map projection: Web Mercator Coner000rdinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WCS84
9

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0 Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Survey Areas
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
IWO
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
t
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
p
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Custom Soil Resource Report
oa
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
7
a
Wet Spot
Other
.•
Special Line Features
Political Features
0
Postal Code
0
PLSS Township and
Range
0
PLSS Section
Water Features
Streams and Canals
0
8-Digit Hydrologic Units
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 20, Jun 3, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 19, 2019—Oct
28, 2019
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
PbD
Pacolet-Urban land complex, 10
to 15 percent slopes
0.2
73.4%
Ur
Urban land
0.1
26.6%
Totals for Area of Interest
0.3
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Wake County, North Carolina
PbD—Pacolet-Urban land complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2xhb4
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet and similar soils: 60 percent
Urban land: 30 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pacolet
Setting
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 27 inches: clay
BC - 27 to 35 inches: clay loam
C - 35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material: Impervious layers over human transported material
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Udorthents, loamy
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Ur —Urban land
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2gwpc
Elevation: 70 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 51 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 54 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Urban land: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material: Impervious layers over human -transported material
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
14

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
it.

i
'-e'
1 VICINITY MAP - 1" = 2000' 1
IMPERVIOUS AREA
EXISTING
HOUSE/PORCH: 973 SF
DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK/AC: 1,334 SF
DECK: 261 SF
"I CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION USING REFERENCES
SHOWN HEREON; THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION IN BOOK , PAGE OR
OTHER REFERENCE SOURCE ; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION OR POSITIONAL ACCURACY IS 10,000+; AND THAT THIS MAP
MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56. 1600)."
THIS DAY OF
SEAL
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
2020.
RETAINING WALL: 115 SF
TOTAL: 2,683 SF (24.48%) /
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR AREA /
WITHIN LOT ONLY. (EXCLUDES RING /
/ A
/ O CURB /
/INLET/
/ �1J MAIL BOX /
16 EllP
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
/ BM. 1992 PG. 87
/ CABLE
S PEDESTALc01
0,
OF
TP GF o
/ RETAINING
/ WALL (tYp.)
3 STORY
WOOD FRAME
TELLINGuT
AIC
PAD
LOT 21
LINDSEY, TYLER
OLIVER LINDSEY,
PHILIP BAILEY
PIN:0787448844
D.B. 14997 PG. 2417
B.M. 1992 PG. 87
20' CITY OF RALEIGH
i
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
BM. 1992 PG. 87 / 4' CHAIN
LINK FENCE
OO
i
¢' /
i Sow �
i
O /
1*COO
IOPOSED PATIO/
GRILLING DECK
f\ COo-
20
�`/ice
i
� EIP
LOT 19
HOEFT. SUZANNE MAGRI,
HRISTOPHER J
PIN:0787448844
D.B. 8549 PG. 1304
B.M. 1992 PG. 87
SANITARY SEWER
/Z
IAANHOLE (typ.)
FES
RIP-P '
i
�PROPGSED
J NR00M LOT 20
10,960 SF
0.2516AA
i
.aB�.
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BM. 1992 PG. 87
OPEN SPACE
HILBURN TOWNHOME ASSOC INC
PIN:0787448484
D.B. 8959 PG. 2294
B.M. 2001 PG. 1048
TOP
SCALE: 1 = 40 1. AREAS BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. PIN 0787447870
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES.
3. ALL STREETS ARE PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. LOT NUMBER 20
4. OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY.
0 20 40 80 5. NO TITLE SEARCH PERFORMED FOR THIS SURVEY. SUBDIVISION BRECKENRIDGE II
6. NO NCGS MONUMENT WITHIN 2.000 FEET OF PROPERTY.
7. NO FEMA FLOOD HAZARD AREAS PER FIRM NUMBER 3720078700J DATED MAY 2, 2006. BOOK OF MAPS 1992 PAGE 87
DEED BOOK 8192 PAGE 493
LEGEND
LOT SURVEY
• EIP = EXISTING IRON PIPE
® IPS= IRON PIPE SET
PROPERTYOF
o CP= CALCULATED
MARC RAYMOND CURRY
o PK = PK NAIL
PK
RIW = RIGHT-OF-WAY
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
❑O TP = TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® WM = WATER METER
OO CO = SEWER CLEANOUT
® EM=ELECTRIC METER
BASS, NIXON & KENNEDY, INC.
DATE:
06-17-2020
XXXX DENOTES ADDRESS
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SCALE:
ill = 40'
• 6310 CHAPEL HILL ROAD, SUITE 250
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 97607
• TELEPHONE:[phone] OR(800)354-1879
FAX:[phone]
• CERTIFICATION NUMBERS: NCBELS (C-0110); NCBLA (C-0267)
4505 PIKE ROAD
SURV�D BY:
CC
PROJECT NO. 20193
DRAWN BY:
ROB
R:\2020\20193 - 4505 Pike Road\SURVEY\20193LDD\dwg\20193 LOT SURVEY.dwg, 6/17/2020 1:11:50 PM, RALPH

1 VICINITY MAP -1" = 2000' 1
IMPERVIOUS AREA
EXISTING
HOUSE/PORCH:
973 SF
DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK/AC:
1,334 SF
DECK:
261 SF
RETAINING WALL:
115 SF
TOTAL EXISTING:
2,683 SF (24.48 % )
PROPOSED
SUNIROOM: 255 SF
GRILLING DECK: 157 SF
TOTAL PROPOSED: 412 SF
PROPOSED TOTAL:
"I CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION USING REFERENCES
SHOWN HEREON; THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION IN BOOK , PAGE OR
OTHER REFERENCE SOURCE ; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION OR POSITIONAL ACCURACY IS 10,000+; AND THAT THIS MAP
MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56. 1600)"
THIS DAY OF , 2020.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
R0 /
/
/
PROPOSED SUNROOM AREA IN ZONE 1: 129 SF
PROPOSED DECK AREA IN ZONE 1: 82 SF
PROPOSED SUNROOM AREA IN ZONE 2: 125 SF
PROPOSED DECK AREA IN ZONE 2: 75 SF
/ I-,'
CURB
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR AREA / / O INLET /
WITHIN LOT ONLY. (EXCLUDES RM/) / ( C " 6 MAIL BOX /
EllP
/ l �1\J ♦ ,�� \ 20'DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BM. 1992 PG. 87
CABLE —A
PEDESTAL
NM
J` PEDESTAL o5 P\ \ \
CP
TP \ �b
RETAINING �
/ WALL (typ.)
LOT 21
LINDSEY, TYLER
OLIVER LINDSEY,
PHILIP BAILEY
PIN: 0787448844
D.B. 14997 PG. 2417
B.M. 1992 PG. 87
20' CITY OF RALEIGH
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
BM. 1992 PG. 87
/
O /
O
AC
PAD / M
COO
LOT 19
HOEFT, SUZANNE MAGRI,
HRISTOPHER J
PIN: 0787448844
U.B. 8549 PG. 1304
B.M. 1992 PG. 87
rr SANITARY SEV/ER
/ MANHOLE (typ.)
/ S
FES /
RIPf7AP �
i
/
PROPO$EH� —PROPOSEO
'101GRIL1ING SUNROOM LOT 20 / /
DE�cR /' 10,960 SJ '
f CO /s / 0.2516 A S
/ i / EIP
NKF
�" 0 2 A fl
f i// .2)A a s
/
/
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BIA. 1992 PG. 87
OPEN SPACE
HILBURN TOWNHOME ASSOC INC
PIN: 0787448484
D.B. 8959 PG. 2294
B.M. 2001 PG. 1048
TOP
SCALE: 1 = 4O 1. AREAS BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. PIN 0787447870
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES.
3. ALL STREETS ARE PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. LOT NUMBER 20
4. OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY.
0 20 40 80 5. NO TITLE SEARCH PERFORMED FOR THIS SURVEY. SUBDIVISION BRECKENRIDGE II
6. NO NCGS MONUMENT WITHIN 2,000 FEET OF PROPERTY.
7. NO FEMA FLOOD HAZARD AREAS PER FIRM NUMBER 3720078700J DATED MAY 2, 2006. BOOK OF MAPS 1992 PAGE 87
DEED BOOK 8192 PAGE 493
LEGEND
LOT SURVEY
TPIPE ING ISEET RON PIPE
® PS= IRON
PROPERTYOF
o CP = CALCULATED POINT
MARC RAYMOND CURRY
e PK = PK NAIL
RAN = RIGHT-OF-WAY
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
❑O TP = TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® WM = WATER METER
OO CO = SEWER CLEANOUT
® EM=ELECTRIC METER
BASS, NIXON & KENNEDY, INC.
DATE:
07-21-2020
XXXX DENOTES ADDRESS
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SCALE:
1 40'
• 6310 CHAPEL HILL ROAD. SUITE 250
• TELEPHONE:(919)s5i-4a2OR 800)354-1879
FAX:[phone]
• CERTIFICATION NUMBERS: NCBELS(C-0110);NCBLA(G0267)
4505 PIKE ROAD
SURV'D BY:
CC
PROJECT NO. 20193
DRAWN BY:
ROB
R:\2020\20193 - 4505 Pike Road\SURVEY\20193LDD\dwg\20193 NRB EXHIBIT.dwg

1 VICINITY MAP -1" = 2000' 1
IMPERVIOUS AREA
EXISTING
HOUSE/PORCH:
973 SF
DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK/AC:
1,334 SF
DECK:
261 SF
RETAINING WALL:
115 SF
TOTAL EXISTING:
2,683 SF (24.48 % )
PROPOSED
SUNIROOM: 255 SF
GRILLING DECK: 157 SF
TOTAL PROPOSED: 412 SF
PROPOSED TOTAL:
"I CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION USING REFERENCES
SHOWN HEREON; THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION IN BOOK , PAGE OR
OTHER REFERENCE SOURCE ; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION OR POSITIONAL ACCURACY IS 10,000+; AND THAT THIS MAP
MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56. 1600)"
THIS DAY OF , 2020.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
R0 /
/
/
PROPOSED SUNROOM AREA IN ZONE 1: 129 SF
PROPOSED DECK AREA IN ZONE 1: 82 SF
PROPOSED SUNROOM AREA IN ZONE 2: 125 SF
PROPOSED DECK AREA IN ZONE 2: 75 SF
/ I-,'
CURB
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR AREA / / O INLET /
WITHIN LOT ONLY. (EXCLUDES RM/) / ( C " 6 MAIL BOX /
EllP
/ l �1\J ♦ ,�� \ 20'DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BM. 1992 PG. 87
CABLE —A
PEDESTAL
NM
J` PEDESTAL o5 P\ \ \
CP
TP \ �b
RETAINING �
/ WALL (typ.)
LOT 21
LINDSEY, TYLER
OLIVER LINDSEY,
PHILIP BAILEY
PIN: 0787448844
D.B. 14997 PG. 2417
B.M. 1992 PG. 87
20' CITY OF RALEIGH
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
BM. 1992 PG. 87
/
O /
O
AC
PAD / M
COO
LOT 19
HOEFT, SUZANNE MAGRI,
HRISTOPHER J
PIN: 0787448844
U.B. 8549 PG. 1304
B.M. 1992 PG. 87
rr SANITARY SEV/ER
/ MANHOLE (typ.)
/ S
FES /
RIPf7AP �
i
/
PROPO$EH� —PROPOSEO
'101GRIL1ING SUNROOM LOT 20 / /
DE�cR /' 10,960 SJ '
f CO /s / 0.2516 A S
/ i / EIP
NKF
�" 0 2 A fl
f i// .2)A a s
/
/
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BIA. 1992 PG. 87
OPEN SPACE
HILBURN TOWNHOME ASSOC INC
PIN: 0787448484
D.B. 8959 PG. 2294
B.M. 2001 PG. 1048
TOP
SCALE: 1 = 4O 1. AREAS BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. PIN 0787447870
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES.
3. ALL STREETS ARE PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. LOT NUMBER 20
4. OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY.
0 20 40 80 5. NO TITLE SEARCH PERFORMED FOR THIS SURVEY. SUBDIVISION BRECKENRIDGE II
6. NO NCGS MONUMENT WITHIN 2,000 FEET OF PROPERTY.
7. NO FEMA FLOOD HAZARD AREAS PER FIRM NUMBER 3720078700J DATED MAY 2, 2006. BOOK OF MAPS 1992 PAGE 87
DEED BOOK 8192 PAGE 493
LEGEND
LOT SURVEY
TPIPE ING ISEET RON PIPE
® PS= IRON
PROPERTYOF
o CP = CALCULATED POINT
MARC RAYMOND CURRY
e PK = PK NAIL
RAN = RIGHT-OF-WAY
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
❑O TP = TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® WM = WATER METER
OO CO = SEWER CLEANOUT
® EM=ELECTRIC METER
BASS, NIXON & KENNEDY, INC.
DATE:
07-21-2020
XXXX DENOTES ADDRESS
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SCALE:
1 40'
• 6310 CHAPEL HILL ROAD. SUITE 250
• TELEPHONE:(919)s5i-4a2OR 800)354-1879
FAX:[phone]
• CERTIFICATION NUMBERS: NCBELS(C-0110);NCBLA(G0267)
4505 PIKE ROAD
SURV'D BY:
CC
PROJECT NO. 20193
DRAWN BY:
ROB
R:\2020\20193 - 4505 Pike Road\SURVEY\20193LDD\dwg\20193 NRB EXHIBIT.dwg

1 VICINITY MAP -1" = 2000' 1
IMPERVIOUS AREA
EXISTING
HOUSE/PORCH:
973 SF
DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK/AC:
1,334 SF
DECK:
261 SF
RETAINING WALL:
115 SF
TOTAL EXISTING:
2,683 SF (24.48 % )
PROPOSED
SUNIROOM: 255 SF
GRILLING DECK: 157 SF
TOTAL PROPOSED: 412 SF
PROPOSED TOTAL:
"I CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION USING REFERENCES
SHOWN HEREON; THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION IN BOOK , PAGE OR
OTHER REFERENCE SOURCE ; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION OR POSITIONAL ACCURACY IS 10,000+; AND THAT THIS MAP
MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56. 1600)"
THIS DAY OF , 2020.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
R0 /
/
/
PROPOSED SUNROOM AREA IN ZONE 1: 129 SF
PROPOSED DECK AREA IN ZONE 1: 82 SF
PROPOSED SUNROOM AREA IN ZONE 2: 125 SF
PROPOSED DECK AREA IN ZONE 2: 75 SF
/ I-,'
CURB
IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR AREA / / O INLET /
WITHIN LOT ONLY. (EXCLUDES RM/) / ( C " 6 MAIL BOX /
EllP
/ l �1\J ♦ ,�� \ 20'DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BM. 1992 PG. 87
CABLE —A
PEDESTAL
NM
J` PEDESTAL o5 P\ \ \
CP
TP \ �b
RETAINING �
/ WALL (typ.)
LOT 21
LINDSEY, TYLER
OLIVER LINDSEY,
PHILIP BAILEY
PIN: 0787448844
D.B. 14997 PG. 2417
B.M. 1992 PG. 87
20' CITY OF RALEIGH
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
BM. 1992 PG. 87
/
O /
O
AC
PAD / M
COO
LOT 19
HOEFT, SUZANNE MAGRI,
HRISTOPHER J
PIN: 0787448844
U.B. 8549 PG. 1304
B.M. 1992 PG. 87
rr SANITARY SEV/ER
/ MANHOLE (typ.)
/ S
FES /
RIPf7AP �
i
/
PROPO$EH� —PROPOSEO
'101GRIL1ING SUNROOM LOT 20 / /
DE�cR /' 10,960 SJ '
f CO /s / 0.2516 A S
/ i / EIP
NKF
�" 0 2 A fl
f i// .2)A a s
/
/
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BIA. 1992 PG. 87
OPEN SPACE
HILBURN TOWNHOME ASSOC INC
PIN: 0787448484
D.B. 8959 PG. 2294
B.M. 2001 PG. 1048
TOP
SCALE: 1 = 4O 1. AREAS BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. PIN 0787447870
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES.
3. ALL STREETS ARE PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. LOT NUMBER 20
4. OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD MAY AFFECT THIS PROPERTY.
0 20 40 80 5. NO TITLE SEARCH PERFORMED FOR THIS SURVEY. SUBDIVISION BRECKENRIDGE II
6. NO NCGS MONUMENT WITHIN 2,000 FEET OF PROPERTY.
7. NO FEMA FLOOD HAZARD AREAS PER FIRM NUMBER 3720078700J DATED MAY 2, 2006. BOOK OF MAPS 1992 PAGE 87
DEED BOOK 8192 PAGE 493
LEGEND
LOT SURVEY
TPIPE ING ISEET RON PIPE
® PS= IRON
PROPERTYOF
o CP = CALCULATED POINT
MARC RAYMOND CURRY
e PK = PK NAIL
RAN = RIGHT-OF-WAY
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
❑O TP = TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® WM = WATER METER
OO CO = SEWER CLEANOUT
® EM=ELECTRIC METER
BASS, NIXON & KENNEDY, INC.
DATE:
07-21-2020
XXXX DENOTES ADDRESS
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SCALE:
1 40'
• 6310 CHAPEL HILL ROAD. SUITE 250
• TELEPHONE:(919)s5i-4a2OR 800)354-1879
FAX:[phone]
• CERTIFICATION NUMBERS: NCBELS(C-0110);NCBLA(G0267)
4505 PIKE ROAD
SURV'D BY:
CC
PROJECT NO. 20193
DRAWN BY:
ROB
R:\2020\20193 - 4505 Pike Road\SURVEY\20193LDD\dwg\20193 NRB EXHIBIT.dwg