20190157 Ver 3_BPDP for PN_20200901

ID#* 20190157 Version* 3
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 09/03/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/1/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Andrea Eckardt
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20190157
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Perry Hill II
County: Orange
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*3
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Perry Hill II Final BPDP 8.31.2020.pdf 13.49MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Andrea Eckardt
Signature:*
(t WlrtlC

PAW,
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
August 31, 2020
Ms. Katie Merritt
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Delivered Electronically: [e-mail]
Subject: Comment -Response Letter
DRAFT BPDP Perry Hill II
2019-0157 v3
Orange County, NC
Dear Ms. Merritt:
On August 4,2020, Wildlands Engineering received comments from the DWR on the draft Perry Hill II
BPDP dated May 2020. The BPDP establishes the proposed buffer and nutrient mitigation activities on
the project site. The following letter documents DWR's comments and Wildlands' corresponding
responses and revisions to the Plan.
DWR Comments, Katie Merritt:
1. Figures, Page 2: Need to add the following figure: approved Figure 6 of DMS Buffer Mitigation
Plan.
Response: Wildlands added Figure 6 of the DMS Buffer Mitigation Plan and revised the figure
numbers and references.
2. Appendices, Page 2: Need to add the following to Appendix C: Approval letter from DWR of
Catfish Pond DMS site, Approval Letter from IRT of DMS Site, Approved Concept Maps from
DMS site including Figure 6 of Buffer Plan for the DMS site.
Response: The e-approval issued by the IRT is enclosed in Appendix C. The relevant figures
from the DMS site are enclosed in the BPDP. Wildlands added a placeholder for the DWR
approval letter.
3. Section 1.0: Correct the rule citation from 0240 to "Nutrient Offset Credit Trading rule 15A
NCAC 0 2 B .0703"
Response: Wildlands revised this reference.
4. Section 1.0: Add the DMS ID ## for the full delivery site.
Response: Wildlands added the DMS ID to Section 1.0.
5. Table 2: Buffer Project Attributes, River Basin: Add "Upper Falls Lake Watershed" to this table
where applicable.
Response: Wildlands revised Table 2 to reference the Upper Falls Lake Watershed.
wWildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 843.277.6221 • 497 Bramson Court, Suite 104 • Mount Pleasant, SC 29464

6. Table 2: Buffer Project Attributes, Geographic Location: Change to decimal degrees.
Response: Wildlands revised the lat/long to decimal degrees in Table 2.
Table 2: Buffer Project Attributes, Total Credits: Make sure to change the credit to match the
revised asset table.
Response: Wildlands updated Table 2 to reflect the final revised asset table.
8. Section 2.4 Alternative Mitigation:
Explain how you determined bullet 2. What is the eligible ephemeral area? Add the
percentage from the table.
Response: The eligible ephemeral area was identified and listed as identified in the
Buffer Mitigation Calculation Tool.
Add another bullet to explain how the Proposed areas meet all applicable requirements
of paragraph (n) of .0295 for restoration and enhancement (see rule for specific
language).
Response: Additional bullet added to Section 2.4.
c. Explain how bullet #1 is achieved.
Response: Wildlands will permanently exclude livestock from the riparian area via
the construction of a perimeter fence 2 ft outside the proposed and illustrated
easement.
d. An enhancement plan must be provided as well. (see rule 0295) What is the
enhancement plan or where is it described?
Response: Section 4.3 identifies enhancement via cattle exclusion activities.
Wildlands revised this bullet.
Section 2.10 Site Location, Constraints, and Access: What are the widths of the crossings? Add
that detail to this section
Response: Wildlands updated Section 2.11 Site Location, Constraints, and Access to include
the widths and locations of the crossings at the Site.
10. Section 4.1 Parcel Preparation:
a. I suggest mowing, ripping, etc. be performed to remove compact soils typical of long-
term agricultural use within these riparian areas. Also, Fescue can out -complete bare
roots - no fescue treatment is proposed in the beginning to avoid this issue. Please
explain how Wildlands plans to control fescue during site preparation.
Response: Wildlands updated Section 4.1 Parcel Preparation to include the
following text: Undesirable species such as fescue within the areas slated for
riparian restoration and enhancement activities, will be subject to select chemical
or mechanical treatment. Site preparation may include select herbicide
treatments and/or limited mechanical clearing to remove undesirable vegetation.
If needed, invasive species will be selectively removed and/or spot treated by a
licensed pesticide applicator. Any vegetation control requiring herbicide
application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture
rules and regulations.
Page 2

Wildlands collected and analyzed soils samples to develop a site preparation plan.
Wildlands will apply soil amendments (i.e., an organic plant food and root growth
promoter, phosphate, and soil microbes to promote soil health) to planted areas
based on soil testing results. Wildlands noted compacted soils at the site and will
implement ripping or disking prior to planting to reduce soil compaction in the
planted areas. Soil compaction will be disrupted (disked or ripped) to a depth of
18" or more along haul roads and to a depth of at least 12" other planted areas.
Areas within the existing pasture and proposed easement will be chemically
treated with glyphosate to reduce competition on planted stems as needed.
Wildlands will implement two approaches to manage fescue at the Site. Both
approaches are designed to mitigate the adverse effects of fescue (i.e., direct
competition and allelopathic impacts) on planted vegetation. The first approach
consists of chemically treating select areas immediately adjacent to planted trees.
A second treatment may be required at the beginning of year two based on fescue
re-establishment and tree growth. The second approach entails a chemical
application over a broader area that is designed to eradicate fescue in those areas
not graded during construction. Following the chemical treatment, temporary and
permanent vegetation will be established. Pollinator species were included in the
permanent seed mix to promote diversity and enhance the health of the
herbaceous.
The Site Viability letter calls out a drainage conveyance B below the ag pond. How will
diffused flow by this conveyance be addressed
Response: A floodplain sill has been added downstream of drainage conveyance B
to act as a level spreader and to diffuse flow to the restored stream channel. This
will allow for dispersed overland flow through the restored buffer and into the
stable riffle section of Perry Branch.
c. Indicate that any chemical treatment will be safe for aquatic life
Response: Any vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be
performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture rules and
regulations.
11. Section 4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities:
a. Overall, section 4.1-4.2 is lacking insufficient detail to confirm compliance with 0295
(n)(2). Please address.
Response: Figures are enclosed that illustrate the proposed restoration and
enhancement areas. Wildlands revised Section 4 to include a vegetation plan and
a site preparation plan. Wildlands is not proposing to grade or changing
topographic elevations in the BPDP areas. Haul roads and stockpile locations will
be ripped or tilled prior to planting. The planting schedule is referenced in Section
4.0 and Wildlands detailed the monitoring plan.
There is no temporary or permanent seeding proposed. As suggested, ripping and other
measures to remove compact soils is going to need to be proposed. Seeding should
follow that effort. Add the seeding mixes to the table.
Response: See response to question 10a above.
Page 3

c. Planting a permanent seed mix that is abundant in annual and perennial pollinator
species is strictly voluntary but is strongly encouraged by DWR in other mitigation plans
to promote diversity and enhance the health of the herbaceous layer, which can also
greatly benefit planted stems.
Response: Pollinator species were included in the permanent seed mix to promote
diversity and enhance the health of the herbaceous. Layer.
d. Remove tag alder and Red Maple from the Planting Plan. These trees are proposed to
be planted within areas receiving buffer or nutrient offset credit and DWR does not
support including these in this planting plan.
Response: Tag alder and red maple were removed from the Planting Plan.
e. What "undesirable species" are present within the project area?
Response: Wildlands detailed a plan to chemically treat and mange fescue in
Section 4.
The trees need to be represented in a table format with Common Name, Species Name,
Sub Canopy/Canopy, Tree/Shrub, and Density to be planted
Response: Wildlands added tables 7a, 7b, and 7c to Section 4.2 which include
species, common name, stratum, and density per planting zone.
g. This statement says vegetation management is needed over the first few years. But,
there should be something proposed prior to initial planting.
Response: See response to question 10a above.
h. What is the anticipated planting density?
Response: Planting densities have been provided in Tables 7a, 7b and 7c in Section
4.2.
Since no density of planted species is provided in this section, I cannot confirm that the
provider will be planting in compliance with this performance standard
Response: Planting densities have been provided in Tables 7a, 7b and 7c in Section
4.2.
12. Section 4.3 Riparian Area Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion Activities:
a. Reference the fencing figure
Response: A reference to the Fencing Figure, Figure 7, has been added to Page 12.
b. What kind of seed mix?
Response: A reference to the proposed seed mixture, as identified in the Perry Hill
Mitigation Site Construction Plans has been added, and the plans are included in
Appendix C.
13. Section 5.1 Monitoring Protocol:
a. A plan to address how fescue will be treated before initial planting efforts should be
included in this section.
Response: Wildlands' approach for chemically treating and managing fescue prior
to planting woody vegetation is detailed in Section 4.1 (Parcel preparation).
Page 4

b. If your planting plan is going to include shrubs, then the performance standard could be
both "trees and shrubs". Please clarify what performance standard you want this parcel
to be held accountable for.
Response: Wildlands revised Section 5.1 to reference both 'trees and/or shrubs' in
the measure of vegetation success.
14. Section 5.2 Parcel Maintenance:
a. This paragraph should begin a new section titled 5.3 Easement Boundary & Fencing
Response: Section 5.3 has been added to the report.
b. Add that marking will be done prior to As -built inspection by DWR
Response: Easement marking requirements have been added to the plan,
including inclusion as part of annual reporting documentation.
c. This sentence isn't relevant for this site since Zone 1 and Zone are not on this Parcel.
Response: This reference has been removed from the plan.
15. Section 7.0 Mitigation Potential:
a. Add a reference to Figure 2 and define the Service Areas for each mitigation type in this
text.
Response: References to appropriate figures and Service Areas have been included
in Section 7.0.
How many ledgers will be provided? Indicate there will be a ledger for Buffer
Restoration, Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion, Nitrogen and Phosphorus.
Response: The Sponsor will maintain and report an independent ledger for (buffer)
restoration, (buffer) enhancement via cattle exclusion, and nitrogen and
phosphorus credits.
16. Table 7 Perry Hill II Mitigation Credits:
a. Where nutrient offset is the Credit Type shown for 0-100', 1 do not see it depicted in the
corresponding figure as nutrient offset. Did you mean "Buffer" for the Credit Type?
Please clarify. Just as a note: It's preferred to use 0-100' for buffer and not nutrient
offset (where viable) if the provider wants to have more flexibility with converting
buffer to nutrient.
Response: Figure 7 and Table 8 (previously Table 7) have been revised to illustrate
and claim buffer within the first 100' of the stream top of bank. Table 8 has been
updated to show Riparian Buffer (0-100) and Nutrient Offset (101-200).
b. Once comments are addressed on this table, DWR can further review the table for
completion. In its current form, the table will need to be edited.
Response: Table 8 has been updated and should be considered appropriate for
review.
c. Remember -for banks, we do not want credit shown in the cells that do not correspond
to the Credit Type you chose.
Response: Table 8 has been updated and should be considered appropriate for
review.
Page 5

d. Leave blank if Credit Type is Buffer.
Response: Table 8 has been updated and should be considered appropriate for
review.
e. Leave Blank if Credit Type is Nutrient Offset.
Response: Table 8 has been updated and should be considered appropriate for
review.
f. Check N/A if Credit Type is Buffer.
Response: Table 8 has been updated and should be considered appropriate for
review.
17. Table 8 Perry Hill II Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation: Can't approve table 8.0
until comments on Table 7 are addressed.
Response: Table 9 (previous Table 8) has been updated for review.
18. Table 9 Credit Release Schedule: Make sure this BPDP matches the MBI comments provided by
DWR.
Response: Wildlands revised the Credit release table (Table 10 — previous Table 9) to reflect
DWR's comments on the BI.
19. Figure 5 Watershed Map: Add width details in the legend for the Bank boundary vs the DMS
boundary. You can use +/- if needed.
Response: Figure 5 has been updated with appropriate widths in the legend (-50' width for
Bank CE, —200' Width DMS CE)
20. Figure 7 Credit Calculations Map:
a. Show crossing width. Why is this crossing necessary? It appears that just the crossing
on Perry Branch would be necessary to allow the farmer to access all the fields around
EC3. what type of crossing is being proposed here?
Response: Wildlands was able to eliminate the crossing between UT3 and EC3.
b. Show crossing width
Response: Crossing widths have been added.
c. This is B6 conveyance. Please add a label
Response: A label has been added to drainage conveyance.
d. Add width details in the legend for the Bank boundary vs the DMS boundary. You can
use +/- if needed.
Response: Boundary widths have been added to the legend.
e. How is an "external easement crossing" different than an "internal easement crossing"
for this Parcel?
Response: External easement areas were previously illustrated to identify areas
external to the proposed BPDP (and DMS) easement(s). Internal easement
boundaries are proposed within the DMS boundary, but not within the BPDP
Page 6

easement. Wildlands revised the figures to exclude references to external
easements.
f. It appears the riparian buffer credit is being sought within 0-100'. If correct, add that
width to the legend.
Response: The riparian buffer credit width has been added to the legend.
g. It appears the Nutrient offset credit is being sought within the 101-200' widths. If
correct, add that width to the legend. I did not see where nutrient offset is proposed
within 0-100'. Please show.
Response: Wildlands revised the figures to illustrate nutrient offset areas.
21. Figure 9 Monitoring Map:
a. Move this plot to the buffer credit area to have at least 1 plot representing an area
receiving buffer credits.
Response: The buffer plot was relocated as requested.
Add width details in the legend for the Bank boundary vs the DMS boundary. You can
use +/- if needed.
Response: Buffer width detail has been added to Figure 9.
Thank you for your review and comment on this submittal. If you have any further questions, please
contact me at 843.277.6221 or djohnson@ wildlandseng.com.
Sincerely,
i
l'
Daniel Johnson, MBA, PE, PH, Senior Water Resources Engineer
Page 7

a {
f
BANK PARCEL
DEVELOPMENT
PACKAGE
August 2020
ii-
PERRY HILL II
Orange County, NC
DWR Project Number 2019-0157v3
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
PREPARED BY:
w
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
497 Bramson Court, Suite 104
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
Phone: [phone]

Bank Parcel Development Package
Perry Hill II
Neuse River Basin
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Parcel Location and Description
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
2.3 Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
2.4 Alternative Mitigation
2.5 Watershed Characterization
2.6 Soils
2.6 Geology
2.7 Existing Vegetative Communities
2.8 Threatened and Endangered Species
2.9 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
2.10 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
2.11 Site Location, Constraints, and Access
2.12 Other Environmental Conditions
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
4.1 Parcel Preparation
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
4.3 Riparian Area Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion Activities
4.4 Riparian Area Preservation Activities
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
5.3 Easement Boundary and Fencing
6.0 Financial Assurance and Long -Term Management
6.1 Financial Assurances
6.2 Long -Term Management
7.0 Mitigation Potential
8.0 References
3
3
4
4
4
5
6
6
7
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
11
12
12
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
17
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 1 August 2020

TABLES
Table 1
Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Table 2
Buffer Project Attributes
Table 3
Project Features
Table 4
Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
Table 5
Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Table 6
Site Protection Instrument
Table 7a
Riparian Buffer Planting Zone
Table 7b
Wetland Planting Zone
Table 7c
Upland Planting Zone
Table 8
Perry Hill II Mitigation Credits
Table 9
Perry Hill II Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
Table 10
Credit Release Schedule
FIGURES
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Service Area Map
Figure 3
Site Map
Figure 4
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5
Watershed Map
Figure 6
NRCS 1977 Soils Map
Figure 7
Credit Calculations Map
Figure 8
DMS Credit Calculations Map
Figure 9
Riparian Buffer Zones Map
Figure 10
Monitoring Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Current Land Use Photographs
Appendix B
Historical Aerials
Appendix C
Agency Correspondence:
DWR Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter
DWR Stream Determination Letter
IRT Approval Letter for DMS Site
DWR Approval Letter for DMS Buffer Site
DMS Site Figure 6: Concept Map
DMS Buffer Site Figure 6: Credit Calculations Map
USFWS Self -Certification Letter
SHPO Request for Review and Response
Seed Mix (Sheet 4.1)
Appendix D
EDR Radius Map Report, Executive Summary
Perry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
kow HUC 03020201 Page 2 August 2020

Bank Parcel Development Package
Perry Hill II
Neuse River Basin
1.0 Introduction
The Perry Hill II Mitigation Bank Parcel (Parcel) is proposed under the terms and conditions of the Perry
Hill II Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI), made and entered into by Wildlands
Holdings V, LLC acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor) and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ) Division of Water Resources (DWR). The Parcel shall be planned and designed according to
the MBI, Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 0213.0703, and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 which became effective November 1, 2015.
The Parcel is in Orange County approximately three miles northwest of Hillsborough, NC, immediately
adjacent to the proposed Full Delivery North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Perry Hill
Mitigation Site (DMS ID No. 100093) and DWR Project Number 2019-0157 (Figure 1). The Parcel expands
the proposed conservation easement of the riparian areas on the DMS Site from 100 feet from top of
bank along the mitigated streams on the DMS Site to 100-200 feet from top of bank along mitigated Perry
Branch, three mitigated unnamed tributaries and two ephemeral channels. The primary purpose of the
project is to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits and nutrient offset credits to compensate for
unavoidable impacts in the Neuse River Basin 03020201 Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) within the Falls Lake
Watershed (Figure 2).
1.1 Parcel Location and Description
The Parcel is located within the Upper Falls Lake Watershed of the Neuse River Basin HUC
03020201030020 and DWR Subbasin 03-04-01. To reach the Parcel, traveling west on 140/85 from
Raleigh/Durham, follow 140/85 to exit 161 for US-70 Connector North. Take a right at the bottom of the
ramp and continue onto US-70 East (1.0 mile) via US-70 Connector North. Continue on US-70E (1.9 miles)
before taking a left onto Faucette Mill Rd. Continue (1.9 miles) and take a sight right onto Frank Perry
Road. The Parcel will be on right (0.5 miles).
Perry Branch and the three unnamed tributaries on the Parcel flow directly to Corporation Lake, a water
supply reservoir on the Eno River. The Eno River is classified as water supply waters (WS-11) and nutrient
sensitive waters (NSW). The Eno River subsequently flows to Falls Lake, which is also classified as water
supply waters (WS-IV) and NSW. All water supply waters are considered high quality waters (HQW) by
supplemental classification. In addition, all waters in the Neuse River Basin are classified as NSW which is
a supplemental classification intended for waters needing additional nutrient management due to being
subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation.
The proposed project supports specific goals identified in the following watershed management plans.
The 2009 Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan lists major stressors in Subbasin 03-04-01 to be total
suspended solids (TSS), nutrients, and chlorophyll a (NCDENR, 2009). The 2010 Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP) highlights the importance of riparian buffers for stream restoration projects
(NCEEP, 2010). Riparian buffers retain and remove nutrients and suspended sediments. Of the 123 miles
of streams in the Middle Eno River watershed (03020201030030), 23% do not have adequate riparian
buffers. The RBRP states that "priority [restoration] projects should increase or improve buffers." The
RBRP also states that a goal for the Neuse 01 is to, "...promote nutrient and sediment reduction in
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 3 August 2020

agricultural areas by restoring and preserving wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers." Another goal for
the Neuse 01 is to support the Falls Lake Watershed Management Plan.
This riparian mitigation project will reduce sediment and nutrient loading and improve terrestrial habitat.
The area proposed for restoration and enhancement via cattle exclusion is currently a mixture of active
livestock pasture with isolated forested areas. Existing conditions photos are included in Appendix A. By
removing livestock access and restoring the vegetation on the areas up to 200 feet from the streams and
ephemeral channels; the project will further reduce nutrient and sediment inputs to project streams and
downstream receiving waters. The restored floodplain areas will filter nutrient and sediment during high
rainfall events. Additionally, invasive vegetation will be treated within the project area and the new native
vegetation will provide cover and food for wildlife.
Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The major goals of the proposed buffer mitigation and nutrient offset project are to provide ecological
and water quality enhancements to the Falls Lake Watershed in the Neuse River Basin by restoring riparian
areas beyond the 100 foot wide DMS Site and maximizing the conservation of riparian areas out to 200
feet from top of streambanks where possible. Specific enhancements to water quality and ecological
processes are outlined below in Table 1.
Table 1: Ecological and Water Quality Goals
Goal
Objective
Exclude livestock from the conservation easement areas of
Exclude livestock from the Parcel
the Parcel by installing fencing around the perimeter of both
the Parcel and the DMS Site where necessary.
Nutrient input will be decreased by removing livestock
access. The off -site nutrient input from adjacent livestock
Decrease nutrient levels
fields and row crops will also be absorbed on -site by filtering
downslope runoff through the restored upland and
floodplain vegetation areas.
Sediment from upslope sources will be captured by
Decrease sediment input
deposition on the restored riparian areas where native
vegetation will slow overland flow velocities.
Create appropriate terrestrial habitat
Riparian areas will be restored by planting native vegetation
and removing invasive vegetation.
Permanently protect the Parcel from harmful uses
A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
The Parcel is approximately 15.52 acres and primarily consists of active livestock pasture along Perry
Branch, three unnamed tributaries (UT1, UT2, and UT3), and two ephemeral channels (EC1 and EC3).
Currently livestock have access to all project streams and ephemeral channels but the first 100 feet from
top of bank will be restored or enhanced via cattle exclusion as part of the DMS Site. The Parcel expands
beyond that boundary increasing the restoration and protection of riparian areas out to 200 feet.
In general, this area has maintained its rural, farming character over the last 81 years with only minor
changes in land cover. Historical aerials of the Parcel area included in Appendix B. This consistency in land
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 4 August 2020

use within the project watershed indicates that watershed processes affecting hydrology, sediment
supply, and nutrient and pollutant delivery have not varied widely over this time period. With a lack of
developmental pressure, watershed processes and stressors from outside the project limits are likely to
remain consistent throughout the implementation, monitoring, and closeout of this project.
Per the On -Site Stream Evaluation and Determination issued by DWR on April 16, 2019 (Appendix C), the
Parcel contains one perennial stream Perry Branch; three intermittent streams UT1, UT2, and UT3; and
two ephemeral channels EC1 and EC3. Perry Branch is a headwater system that originates onsite
immediately down valley from a riparian non-riverine wetland and flows southwest. UT1, UT2, and UT3
are all intermittent streams that flow southeast to Perry Branch. The ephemeral channels, EC1 and EC3,
flow southeast as well until they become intermittent streams at the start of UT1 and UT3, respectively.
All the streams and channels included in this project originate onsite (Figure 3).
Table 2: Buffer Project Attributes
Project Name
Perry Hill II
Hydrologic Unit Code
03020201020020
River Basin / Watershed
Neuse / Upper Falls Lake
Geographic Location (Lat, Long)
36.107144°,-79.129580°
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG)
To be recorded
Total Credits
37,689.306 buffer mitigation credits; 31,063.080 Ibs Nitrogen
and 2,000.702 Ibs Phosphorus
Types of Credits
Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
Bank Parcel Development Package Date
August 2020
Initial Planting Date
February 2021
Baseline Report Date
April 2021
MY1 Report Date
December 2021
MY2 Report Date
December 2022
MY3 Report Date
December 2023
MY4 Report Date
December 2024
MY5 Report Date
December 2025
2.3 Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
DWR performed an onsite visit to determine the Parcel's potential to provide buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset on February 25, 2019 and issued a Site Viability Letter on April 16, 2019 for the project.
Four of the six features assessed were deemed viable by DWR to generate either buffer mitigation or
nutrient offset. EC1 and EC3 required more information under 15NCAC 02B .0295(o)(7) to be viable. The
additional information to support buffer mitigation credit viability on the two ephemeral channels is
included in Section 2.4.
There have not been any changes to the land use in the project area since the February 25, 2019 DWR site
visit. Construction on the DMS Site has not started. A copy of the "Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation &
Nutrient Offset" letter from DWR is included in Appendix C and summarized in Table 3.
Perry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 5 August 2020

Table 3: Project Features
Feature Name
(DWR Evaluation)
Feature Type
Buffer Credit Viable
Nutrient Offset Credit Viable
Perry Branch
Perennial
Yes
Yes (non forested areas only)
UT1
Intermittent
Yes
Yes
UT2
Intermittent
Yes
Yes (non forested areas only)
EC1
Ephemeral
Yes (See Section 2.4)
Yes
EC3
Ephemeral
Yes (See Section 2.4)
Yes
2.4 Alternative Mitigation
In addition to buffer restoration on subject streams, per the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rules (15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (o), alternative mitigation is proposed on the Parcel in the form of buffer restoration on
ephemeral channels and enhancement via cattle exclusion. The proposed project complies in the
following ways:
Restoration on Ephemeral Channels 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7):
• The ephemeral channel is directly connected to intermittent or perennial stream channels and
will be protected under the same contiguous easement boundary (See Figure 3 for Parcel
easement boundary and DMS easement boundary).
• Per the current DEQ Project Credit Table Template, the buffer credit generated along ephemeral
channels is 8.5% of the total buffered area and compromises less than 25 percent of the total area
of buffer mitigation (See Table 8 for credit calculations).
• The mitigation area on the Parcel's ephemeral channels is located completely within its drainage
area (See Figure 5 for watershed boundaries).
• The proposed area meets all applicable requirements of Paragraph (n) of (15A NCAC 02B .0295),
for restoration or enhancement. Per the current Credit Table Template, buffer width is factored
into credit computations to derive buffer credits. This plan documents proposed restoration and
enhancement activities. Within one year of authorization of this plan, riparian buffer restoration
and enhancement activities will be documented. Following implementation, annual monitoring
reports will be submitted.
Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
• Wildlands will permanently exclude livestock from the riparian area via the construction of a
perimeter fence 2-ft outside the proposed and illustrated easement. Figure 7 illustrates the
proposed fence boundary and Section 4.3 details enhancement activities.
• Grazing was the predominant land use since the effective date of the applicable buffer rule and
was verified by DWR in the Site Viability Letter (See Appendix C).
2.5 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within the Targeted Local Watershed 03020201030020 and DWR Subbasin 03-04-01.
The Parcel contains tributaries which flow directly to Corporation Lake, a water supply reservoir on the
Eno River, then on to Falls Lake. The Eno River is classified as water supply waters (WS-II) and nutrient
sensitive waters (NSW) and Falls Lake is classified as water supply water (WS-IV) and NSW. All water supply
waters are considered high quality waters (HQW) by supplemental classification. In addition, all waters in
the Neuse River Basin are classified as NSW which is a supplemental classification intended for waters
needing additional nutrient management due to being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or
macroscopic vegetation.
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 6 August 2020

The Parcel topography and relief are typical for this region, as illustrated on the Hillsborough and Efland,
NC USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles (Figure 4). The majority of the streams at the Parcel have
gently sloped alluvial valleys that vary in width throughout the project area. UT1 and EC1 include a
steeper, more confined valley than the other project reaches. Drainage areas for the project reaches
(Figure 5) were delineated using Stream Stats and contour intervals derived from the North Carolina
Floodplain Mapping Program's 2007 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data. Land uses draining to the
project reaches are a mix of active pastures, fields, and woodlands. The watershed areas and current land
use are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4: Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
Reach Name
Buffer Area
Watershed Area
(acres)
Land Use
Perry Branch
Perennial
175
68% managed herbaceous cover/pasture; 22% forested;
5% Shrub; 3% grassland/herbaceous; 2% residential area;
<1% impervious
UT1
Intermittent
10
>99% managed herbaceous cover/pasture; <1% forested
UT2
Intermittent
23
66% managed herbaceous cover/pasture; 34% forested
UT3
Intermittent
20
70% managed herbaceous cover/pasture; 30% forested
EC1
Ephemeral
7
>99% managed herbaceous cover/pasture; <1% forested
EC3
Ephemeral
17
85% managed herbaceous cover/pasture; 15% forested
2.6 Soils
The Parcel is mapped by the Orange County Soil Survey. The Parcel soils are described below in Table 5.
Most of the stream reaches are on Georgeville silt loam soils, with Enon loam, Iredell gravelly loam, and
Lignum silt within the upper reaches. Enon loam underlies UT2; Iredell gravelly loam underlies UT3; and
Iredell gravelly loam and Lignum silt underlies the headwaters of Perry Branch. Perry Branch, UT1. UT2,
UT3, EC1, and EC3 are all depicted on the 1977 NRCS Soil Survey provided in Figure 6.
Table 5: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name
Description
Enon loam
This series consists of well -drained soil with a slope of 2 to 6 percent located on broad ridges in
(EnB)
the uplands. Typically, the surface layer is loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil extends to a
depth of 25 inches.
Enon loam
This series consists of well -drained soil with a slope of 6 to 12 percent located side slopes
(EnQ
adjacent to ridges on the uplands. Typically, the surface layer is loam about 5 inches thick. The
subsoil extends to a depth of 25 inches.
Georgeville
This series consists of well -drained soil with a slope of 6 to 10 percent located on narrow side
silt loam (GeQ
slopes in the uplands. Typically, the surface layer is silt loam about 7 inches thick. The extends
to a depth of 65 inches.
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 7 August 2020

Table 5: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name
Description
Herndon silt
This series consists of well -drained soils on broad ridges on the uplands. The slopes range from
loam (HrB)
2 to 6 percent. The surface layer is silt loam about 4 inches thick. The subsoil is about 49 inches
thick.
Iredell
These soils are moderately well drained soils on broad ridges on the uplands with slopes of 1 to
gravelly loam
4 percent. The surface layer of the series is gravelly loam about 5 inches thick. The subsurface
(IrB)
layer is gravelly loam 3 inches thick. The subsoil is about 21 inches thick.
Lignum silt
This series consists of moderately well -drained soil on uplands with a slope of 0 to 3 percent.
Kg)
The surface layer is silt loam about 1 inch thick. The subsurface layer is silt loam about 5 inches
thick. The subsoil is about 30 inches thick.
Tarrus silt
This series consists of well -drained soil on hillslopes of ridges with slopes of 8 to 15 percent. The
loam (TaD)
surface layer is silt loam about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is silty clay about 14 inches
thick. The subsoil is about 24 inches thick.
Source: Orange County Soil Survey, USDA-NRCS,
https://www.nres.usda.govllnternetIFSE MANUSCRIPTS/north carolina1orangeNC19771textpdf
2.6 Geology
The Parcel is in a portion of the Piedmont known as the Carolina Slate Belt (NCGS, 1985). The rocks in this
region are primarily volcanic and sedimentary rocks that underwent low-grade metamorphism giving
them a slaty cleavage. Coarse -grained intrusive granites comprise the rest of the Slate Belt rocks (Rogers,
2006). The geology of this area has important effects on the Parcel hydrology, hydraulics, geomorphology,
and sediment transport. Streams in the Carolina Slate Belt tend to go dry during late summer and early
fall as a result of geologic, topographic, and climatic factors. A study by Giese and Mason states that the
"Carolina slate belt has among the lowest potential for sustaining baseflow in streams" throughout the
year as compared to other regions of North Carolina. Median low flows in the Carolina Slate Belt, defined
by the study as the 7Q10 (7-day consecutive low flow with a 10-year return frequency, or the lowest
stream flow for seven consecutive days that would be expected to occur once in ten years), can be as low
as 0.005 ft3/s/mi2 of drainage area (Giese and Mason, 1993).
2.7 Existing Vegetative Communities
The existing vegetation within the Parcel consist of actively grazed fields dominated by pasture grasses
such as fescue (Festuca spp.) and isolated scattered trees.
2.8 Threatened and Endangered Species
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database
were searched for federally listed threatened and endangered plant and animal species in Orange County,
NC. The Orange County listed endangered species includes the dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterodon), Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii), and smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), all of which
are endangered, and the Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), which is listed as proposed threatened.
A pedestrian survey conducted on August 14, 2018, indicated that the Parcel did not provide suitable
habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel. The pedestrian survey did indicate that the Parcel provides suitable
habitat for the Atlantic pigtoe, smooth coneflower, and Michaux's sumac but no species were identified
on the Parcel. Therefore, due to the absence of the listed species on the Parcel, the project has been
determined by Wildlands to have "no effect" on the smooth coneflower and Michaux's sumac. Poor water
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 8 August 2020

quality has resulted from the active cattle farm and due to this and the absence of the Atlantic pigtoe on
the Parcel, the project has been determined to "may affect, but not likely to adversely affect" the Atlantic
pigtoe. The project will have "no effect" on the dwarf wedgemussel due to the absence of suitable habitat.
Per the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Raleigh Field Office standard, Wildlands submitted
a Self -Certification Letter. The Self -Certification Letter states the USFWS does "concur with the "no effect"
or "not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and proposed and
designated critical habitat; additional coordination with this office is not needed. USFWS had no additional
comment during the thirty -day review period. All documents and correspondence submitted to the
USFWS are included in Appendix C.
2.9 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
There are no existing structures in the project area. The Parcel is not located near any locations listed on
the National Register with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). SHPO was contacted in a letter
dated February 18, 2019 and subsequently responded in a letter dated April 2, 2019 which stated there
were no concerns or comments on the project site. Correspondence with SHPO is enclosed in Appendix
C.
2.10 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Perry Branch and the unnamed tributaries are within Zone X, an area of minimal flood hazard. The Site
location is included on the Orange County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 9865. The map's effective date
is February 2, 2007. Portions of the Parcel are located in Zone X, no modeling or map revisions will be
required. Wildlands will coordinate with Orange County to obtain a floodplain development permit, if
necessary.
2.11 Site Location, Constraints, and Access
The Parcel is in central Orange County approximately three miles northwest of Hillsborough, NC and is
located within the Neuse River Basin HUC 03020201030020 and DWR Subbasin 03-04-01 (Figure 1).
The Parcel is accessible via two existing farm roads from Frank Perry Road. An overhead transmission line
is located at the downstream extent of Perry Branch. The proposed Parcel and DMS easements abut the
existing overhead utility easement. Two crossings internal to the DMS easement are proposed to support
on -going farming activities. The internal crossings are 60-feet wide, with a crossing top width of 20 feet.
The internal crossings are located at the reach break between Perry Branch Reaches 2 and 3 and within
Perry Reach 4. A 35-foot wide ford crossing will be located within the existing overhead utility easement
beyond the downstream limits of the project. No buffer or nutrient offset credit is claimed within the
proposed crossing locations (Figure 7). There are no other known constraints on or adjacent to the Parcel.
2.12 Other Environmental Conditions
An EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck was ordered for the Parcel through Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. on August 13, 2018. Neither the target property nor the adjacent properties were listed in
any of the Federal, State, or Tribal environmental databases searched by EDR. In 1991 there was one
leaking above ground storage tank documented 0.47 miles from the Parcel. The incident was reported
and cleaned up by excavating the contaminated soil. Based on the location from the Parcel, it was
determined that there is no evidence of any "recognized environmental conditions" in connection with
the target property. The EDR report is included in Appendix D.
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 9 August 2020

Site Protection Instrument
The land required for riparian planting and fencing, management and stewardship of the mitigation
project includes portions of the Parcel listed in Table 6. The Parcel will remain in private ownership,
protected in its entirety by an approved DWR long-term steward and will be managed under the terms
detailed in an approved DWR conservation easement.
Table 6: Site Protection Instrument
Site
Deed Book and
Acreage
Landowner
PIN
County
Protection
page Number
to be Protected
Instrument
Evelyn J. Perry,
Judy Kadlac, Gene
Conservation
Kadlac, Mary C.P.
9865081397
Orange
To Be Recorded
15.52
Bishop and Hubert
Easement
Bishop
Mitigation Work Plan
The project will convert agriculturally impacted land within the riparian areas (100' — 200') along Perry
Branch, UT1, UT2, UT3, EC1, and EC3 on the Parcel to a protected riparian corridor, improving the
ecological function of the area. The project design will ensure that no adverse impacts to wetlands or
existing riparian buffers occur. Figure 7 and 8 illustrate the conceptual design for the Parcel and DMS
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan, respectively. Figure 9 further depicts the riparian zone widths for the
Parcel. Sections 4.1 through 4.4 provide more detailed descriptions of the proposed riparian restoration
and enhancement activities. The Parcel will be constructed concurrently with the DMS Site and not before.
The USACE and DWR authorization letters for the DMS Site are enclosed in Appendix C.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land use within the Parcel has been maintained as cleared livestock pasture except for a few small
forested areas. Undesirable species such as fescue within the areas slated for riparian restoration and
enhancement activities, will be subject to select chemical or mechanical treatment. Site preparation may
include select herbicide treatments and/or limited mechanical clearing to remove undesirable vegetation.
If needed, invasive species will be selectively removed and/or spot treated by a licensed pesticide
applicator. Any vegetation control requiring herbicide application will be performed in accordance with
NC Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
Wildlands collected and analyzed soils samples to develop a site preparation plan. Wildlands will apply
soil amendments (i.e., an organic plant food and root growth promoter, phosphate, and soil microbes to
promote soil health) to planted areas based on soil testing results. Wildlands noted compacted soils at
the site and will implement ripping or disking prior to planting to reduce soil compaction in the planted
areas. Soil compaction will be disrupted (disked or ripped) to a depth of 18" or more along haul roads and
stockpile areas, and to a depth of at least 12" other planted areas. Diffuse flow is anticipated, and no other
grading is necessitated within the Parcel. Fertilization will occur prior to ripping and disking.
Areas within the existing pasture and proposed easement will be chemically treated with glyphosate to
reduce competition on planted stems as needed. Wildlands will implement two approaches to manage
fescue at the Site. Both approaches are designed to mitigate the adverse effects of fescue (i.e., direct
competition and allelopathic impacts) on planted vegetation. The first approach consists of chemically
treating select areas immediately adjacent to planted trees. A second treatment may be required at the
beginning of year two based on fescue re-establishment and tree growth. The second approach entails a
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 10 August 2020

chemical application over a broader area that is designed to eradicate fescue in those areas not graded
during construction. Following the chemical treatment, temporary and permanent vegetation will be
established. Pollinator species were included in the permanent seed mix to promote diversity and
enhance the health of the herbaceous layer.
4.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Riparian restoration will involve planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years of tree
establishment to prevent encroachment of undesirable species such as fescue that may out -compete the
planted native vegetation. The specific species composition to be planted is based on the desired
community type, observation of occurrence of species in riparian buffers adjacent to the Parcel, and best
professional judgement on species establishment and anticipated site conditions in the early years
following project implementation. Tree species planted across the riparian areas of the Site will include
species depicted in Tables 7a, 7b, and 7c.
Trees will be planted at an initial density of 604 stems per acre which has demonstrated to be sufficient
to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 planted trees per
acre at the end of monitoring. No one tree species will be greater than 50% of the established stems.
Planting is scheduled for February 2021.
Table 7a: Riparian Buffer Planting Zone — Bare Root
Species
Common Name
Stratum
Density
Platanus occidentali
Sycamore
Canopy
20%
Betula nigra
River Birch
Canopy
15%
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Canopy
10%
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Canopy
5%
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Canopy
5%
Populus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
Canopy
10%
Acernegundo
Boxelder
Canopy
10%
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Canopy
5%
Diospyros viginiana
Persimmon
Canopy
10%
Acerfloridanum
Southern Sugar Maple
Canopy
3%
Asimina triloba
Pawpaw
Subcanopy
5%
Viburnum prunifolium
Blackhaw Viburnum
Subcanopy
2%
Table 7b: Wetland Planting Zone — Bare Root and Live Stake
Species
Common Name
Stratum
Density
Bare Root
Platanus occidentali
Sycamore
Canopy
15%
Betula nigra
River Birch
Canopy
15%
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
Canopy
10%
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 11 August 2020

Table 7b: Wetland Planting Zone — Bare Root and Live Stake
Species
Common Name
Stratum
Density
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Canopy
13%
Ulmus americana
American Elm
Canopy
10%
Acernegundo
Boxelder
Subcanopy
8%
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Subcanopy
7%
Live Stake
Salixnigra
Black Willow
Canopy
10%
Salixsericea
Silky Willow
Subcanopy
4%
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
Subcanopy
4%
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
Subcanopy
4%
Table 7c: Upland Planting Zone — Bare Root
Species
Common Name
Stratum
Density
Platanus occidentali
Sycamore
Canopy
15%
Betula nigra
River Birch
Canopy
20%
Nyssa sylvatica
Black Gum
Canopy
10%
Quercus falcata
Southern Red Oak
Canopy
5%
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Canopy
5%
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Canopy
12%
Quercus alba
White Oak
Canopy
10%
Ulmus alata
Winged Elm
Canopy
10%
Populus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
Canopy
8%
Oxydendrum arboreum
Sourwood
Subcanopy
5%
4.3 Riparian Area Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion Activities
Permanent boundary fencing will be installed to exclude livestock from the buffer enhancement areas
(Figure 7) as outlined in Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6). The enhancement via livestock exclusion areas
will be protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement along with the areas being planted in the
adjacent fields within the Parcel. Planting within the enhancement areas will be limited to severely
degraded forested areas that currently exhibit low woody vegetation (stem) densities. A seed mix (as
identified on Sheet 4.1 of the Perry Hill Mitigation Site Construction Plans, enclosed in Appendix C) will be
applied where livestock have created bare soils and sufficient sunlight is available to support the species
in the seed mix. Planting and fencing will happen in conjunction with the proposed Perry Hill Full Delivery
Mitigation Site.
4.4 Riparian Area Preservation Activities
No buffer preservation activities are planned for the Parcel.
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 12 August 2020

Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and evaluated within the Parcel to measure the
survival of the planted trees. A total of 11 permanent plots will be randomly placed throughout the
planted areas (Figure 10). The size of individual quadrants will be 100 square meters.
Vegetation assessments will be conducted following the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2 Protocol
for Recording Vegetation (Lee et al. 2008). A reference photo will be taken from the southwestern corner
of each of the plots. Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the
annual reports. All planted stems will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Visual assessments of the enhancement area will be performed on a semi-annual basis during the
monitoring period. Problem areas with vegetative health will be noted (e.g. low stem density, vegetation
mortality, invasive species or encroachment) and included in the annual monitoring reports. Visual
assessments will include documenting the condition of livestock exclusion fencing and observing if
livestock are accessing the conservation easement area.
Planting is scheduled for February 2021. Prior to planting, fescue within the Parcel will be treated which
is outlined in Section 4.1. The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end of the first
growing season, at least five months after planting has been completed and no earlier than the fall season.
Species composition, density, height, and survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot. The
total number of volunteer woody stems will also be documented and reported. The measure of vegetative
success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least four native hardwood tree species, where no one
species is greater than 50% of the established planted stems, and an established density of at least 260
planted trees and/or shrubs per acre at the end of monitoring year five. Subcanopy species will be
excluded from height requirements. Appropriate and desirable native volunteer species may be included
in the density to meet the performance standards with DWR approval.
The Sponsor shall submit the annual monitoring report to DWR by December 31s' of each year for five
consecutive years and will follow the terms and conditions of the Perry Hill II MBI.
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented.
Parcel maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high
likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought,
livestock, or insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve
the success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any Parcel
maintenance performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year. A mowing and/or
herbicide schedule may need to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the
restoration areas to prevent establishment of invasive species including fescue, that may out -compete
the planted native vegetation. Herbicides used on the Parcel will be applied in accordance with North
Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.
5.3 Easement Boundary and Fencing
Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and
adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker, post, tree -blazing, or other means as
allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Contact information for the conservation
easement holder will be included on easement markers. Boundary markers that have been disturbed,
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 13 August 2020

damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. The easement boundary
will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities.
Easement boundary marking will occur prior to the as -built DWR inspection. Easement boundary
conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to
DWR.
Financial Assurance and Long -Term Management
6.1 Financial Assurances
Following approval of the Perry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package, the Sponsor shall provide a
performance bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best. The performance
bond amount shall be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the project as described in the
Bank Parcel Development Package, but not less than $150,000.00. In lieu of posting the performance
bond, the Sponsor may elect to plant the project prior to the first credit release. In that case no
performance bond will be necessary.
After completion of the planting, a separate performance/maintenance bond will be secured for 100% of
the estimated cost to implement the monitoring and maintenance plan but not less than $100,000.00.
The performance/maintenance bond shall apply at the inception of the monitoring period for a term of
one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon DWR approval, this may be lowered
each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the monitoring.
Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the next years' monitoring
period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when
applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted
without proof of bond renewals when applicable.
6.2 Long -Term Management
The Parcel will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by an approved DWR long-term
steward and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved DWR conservation easement. The
long-term steward will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure that the restrictions
documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity.
Mitigation Potential
Of the 15.52 acres protected under the conservation easement, the mitigation activity for 15.33 acres is
riparian restoration with 0.60 acres being proposed for buffer restoration credit (Falls Lake Watershed
only) and 13.67 acres being proposed for nutrient offset mitigation credit that can serve Neuse 03020201
(Figure 2). There is also 1.06 acres of buffer enhancement, via cattle exclusion within the conservation
easement proposed for riparian buffer credit. The mitigation credit calculations were derived based on
Wildlands' conceptual design for maximum ecological uplift. The management objectives, mitigation type,
and proposed amount of buffer mitigation and nutrient offset are presented in Tables 8 and 9, below. The
riparian restoration areas on this Parcel were deemed viable for either nutrient offset credits or riparian
buffer credits by DWR and can be converted upon written approval by DWR if within the first 100 feet
from top of bank. In order to convert to nutrient offset credits, the credits must service impacts in the
Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 2). The Sponsor will maintain and report ledger entries via independent
ledgers for (buffer) restoration, (buffer) enhancement via cattle exclusion, and nitrogen and phosphorus
credits.
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 14 August 2020

Table 8: Perry Hill II Mitigation Credits
Neuse 03020201- Upper Falls Lake Service Area
19.16394 N Credit Ratio (sf/credit)
297.54099 P Credit Ratio (sf/credit)
Total
Min-
(Creditable)
Initial
Feature
Max
Total
Area of
Credit
% Full
Final Credit
Convertible to
Riparian
Convertible to
Delivered Nutrient
Delivered Nutrient
Credit Type
Location
Subject?
Type
Mitigation Activity
Buffer
Feature Name
Area (sf)
Buffer
Ratio
Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian Buffer?
Buffer Credits
Nutrient Offset?
Offset: N (Ibs)
Offset: P (Ibs)
Width
Mitigation
(x:1)
(ft)
(sf)
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
Perry Branch
-
9,984
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
9,549.000
N/A
0.000
0.000
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
Perry Branch
354,504
-
1
33%
-
N/A
-
Yes
18,498.492
1,191.446
Enhancement via
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
0-100
Perry Branch
-
10,909
2
100%
2.00000
Yes
5,454,500
No
-
-
Cattle Exclusion
Enhancement via
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
101-200
Perry Branch
-
27,098
2
33%
6.06061
Yes
4,471.167
No
-
-
Cattle Exclusion
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
0-100
UT1
-
445
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
445.000
N/A
0.000
0.000
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I / P
Restoration
101-200
UT1
50,891
-
1
33%
-
N/A
-
Yes
2,655.560
171.039
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
Restoration
0-100
UT2
-
9,707
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
9,707.000
N/A
0.000
0.000
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
I / P
Restoration
101-200
UT2
77,269
-
1
33%
-
N/A
-
Yes
4,032.000
259.692
Enhancement via
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
0-100
UT2
-
329
2
100%
2.00000
Yes
164.500
No
-
-
Cattle Exclusion
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
Enhancement via
101-200
UT2
-
7,916
2
33%
6.06061
Yes
1,306.139
No
-
-
Cattle Exclusion
Buffer
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
0-100
EC1
-
93
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
93.000
N/A
0.000
0.000
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
101-200
EC1
5,029
-
1
33%
-
N/A
-
Yes
262.420
16.902
Buffer
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
0-100
EC3
-
6,064
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
6,064.000
N/A
0.000
0.000
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
101-200
EC3
107,598
-
1
33%
-
N/A
-
Yes
5,614.607
361.624
Totals: 595,291
72,545
24,182
Eligible for Preservation (sf):
Total
Min-
(Creditable)
Initial
Max
Final
Feature
Total
Area for
Credit
% Full
Riparian Buffer
Credit Type
Location
Subject?
Mitigation Activity
Buffer
Feature Name
Credit
Type
Area (sf)
Buffer
Ratio
Credit
Credits
Width
Ratio (x:1)
Mitigation
(x:1)
(ft)
(sf)
Buffer
Preservation
0
0
—
Preservation Area Subtotal (sf): 0
Preservation as % Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 0%
Ephemeral Reaches as %Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 8.5%
Perry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 15 August 2020

Table 9: Perry Hill II Total Area of Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
26,293
26,293.000
Enhancement:
46,252
11.396.306
Preservation:
0
0.000
Total Riparian Buffer:
72,545
37,689.306
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient
Offset:
Nitrogen:
595,291
31,063.080
Phosphorus:
2,000.702
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by DWR, the
mitigation credits associated with Perry Hill II will be released as described in Table 10 below.
Table 10: Credit Release Schedule for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
% Credit Available
Task
Project Milestone
for Sale
Instrument and BPDP approved by DWR, full -delivery mitigation plan
1
approved by DWR, conservation easements recorded and financial
20%
assurance posted
Mitigation Site earthwork, planting and installation of monitoring
2
devices completed for both the Perry Hill full -delivery site (DMS
20%
ID#100093) and the Bank Parcel
3
Monitoring financial assurance posted and approval of As -Built report
10%
Monitoring Report #1 approved by DWR** & financial assurance
4
renewed
10%
Monitoring Report #2 approved by DWR** & financial assurance
5
renewed
10%
Monitoring Report #3 approved by DWR** & financial assurance
6
renewed
10%
Item B(1) of Section X in the Instrument has been completed and
7
o
5/
approved by DWR
No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has been assigned to an
approved land trust or steward
Monitoring Report #4 approved by DWR** & financial assurance
8
5%
renewed
Monitoring Report #5 approved by DWR** and final site visit by DWR
9
has been conducted
10%
Total
100%
**DWR approval provided upon a determination that the Parcel is meeting performance
standards contained within this approved Plan.
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 16 August 2020

References
Giese, G.I and Robert R. Mason Jr. 1993. Low -Flow Characteristics of Streams in North Carolina. U.S.
Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2403.
Lee, M. T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Level 2. Version 4.2. Carolina Vegetation Survey. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-
eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.pdf
North Carolina Division of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), 2009. Neuse River Basinwide
Water Quality Plan. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP), 2010. 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration
Priorities Plan (RBRP).
https:Hfiles.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Neuse_River_Basin/FINAL%
20RBRP%20Neuse%202010_%2020111207%2000RRECTED.pdf
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 1985, Geologic Map of North Carolina: Raleigh, North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Geological Survey Section, scale
1:500,00, in color.
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 2009. Mineral Resources.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Mineral%20resources/mineralresources.html
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2018. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Orange County, NC.
Rogers, John J.W., 2006. The Carolina Slate Belt. In Steponaitis, V.P., Irwin, J.D., McReynolds, T.E., and
Moore, C.R. (Ed.), Stone Quarries and Sourcing in the Carolina Slate Belt (pp. 10 — 15). Retrieved
from http://rla.unc.edu/Publications/pdf/ResRep25/Ch2.pdf
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2020.
Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2018. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Orange County, NC.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/orange.html
wPerry Hill II Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201 Page 17 August 2020

Appendix A

MN��E �
4w
Cedar G f
9
4a�e 011
Kernon Rd
� ar`
A.
Halls Mill Rd � ¢
5o�Ahern Dr /
c�
n Jcmr� sto II P
0
7C�
v
,-��_•4
Dims: Traveling West of 1-40W/1-85S
from Raleigh/Durham, follow 1-40W/1-85S
to exit 161 for US-70 Connector N. Take
a right at the bottom of the ramp and continue
onto US-70E (1.0 mile) via US-70 Connector N.
Continue on US-70E (1.9 miles) before taking
a left onto Faucette Mill Rd. Continue (1.9 miles)
and take a sight right onto Frank Perry Road.
Destination will be on right (0.5 miles).
�O
.FO u
g�
�v
I - -
Hillsborough
U4 x,rg St
Occonaechem D
857(tMountain
'r r
� I
A3f�
Project Location
Bank Conservation Easement Boundary
DMs Conservation Easement
Perry Hill Phase II Bank Parcel Location
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
*VWILDLANDS 0 0.5 1 2 Miles Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Bank Parcel Development Package
Meuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

+ i i ► ti
A i I
I � i
Perry Hill Phase II Bank Parcel Location
,Falls Lake Watershed
Lw,shuy %
I lill � i � ili M
�.�••1••-•
�+ •�'•�,
i_ l ; .ii + ,k• F.�I��.t•�••� � 11 i.l i. ill•:
l•IIII r••� '
bul on
.} •fir
i' it il., il•:
.1• '�•
Y•i �dWl . t •
i Hd 63020201 •'•
4 �n!.L...i. � . �•� •r.+•:� it ..i�
silk i Ili 1614
!� l
t x -
f :III � , � , L
1
:, rL�e'• ''""
469 Fr E rIn
1-inn • /•� +
Walkerlo n .�
coearw
F lii•:: w: y.I.,,,,g Like Fed`Ory �..�•
! F ' f ail 1 1 rI.J
kill
w q
iService Area Nutrient Offset Credits
RaeFad Service Area Riparian Buffer Credits
_ �� "I" I'll' �••_••i County Boundaries
Figure 2 Service Area Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 6 12 24 Miles Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

Figure 3 Site Map
W I L D L A N D 5 0 175 350 700 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I Bank Parcel Development Package
w
Meuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map
kV,WILDLANDS 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I Bank Parcel Development Package
Meuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

Figure 5 Watershed Map
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I Bank Parcel Development Package
w
Meuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

2
:�:.__ xk:+ ......--
:; }Y
W.
Gel
ZA:u ` • ty ..
:. ...+
$f i + :: : v c .o-r .:ice• • ::,�da lroF
Project Location
1977 Soil Survey of Orange County Bank Conservation Easement Boundary
Figure 6 NRCS 1977 Soils Map
kv,WILDLANDS 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

5
s
o IL
All
Drainage
Conveyance
Project Location
Bank Conservation Easement Boundary (+/- 50' Width)
v DMS Conservation Easement (+/-200' Width)
Internal DMS Easement Crossing (60' Width)
�r
Riparian Buffer (0-100' from TOB)
■ Nutrient Offset (101-200' from TOB)
i # ' Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion
No Credit
Perennial Project Stream Mitigation
mill=5 Intermittent Project Stream Mitigation
Headwater Conveyance
Ephemeral Channel
A Non -Project Stream
41 Existing Treeline
• `'� y.. — M Proposed Fencing
-
Figure 7 Credit Calculations Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 175 350 700 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Bank Parcel Development Package
W
Meuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

Figure 8 DMS Credit Calculations Map
W I L D L A N D 5 0 175 350 700 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I Bank Parcel Development Package
w
Meuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

Lo
T'
Vi �♦ r'
�♦ I
i -
Project Location
r Bank Conservation Easement Boundary + 50' Width
DMS Conservation Easement (+/-200' Width)
200 Foot Buffer Width
100 Foot Buffer Width
50 Foot Buffer Width
" - Internal Easement Crossing (60' Width)
Perennial Project Stream
mill=' Intermittent Project Stream
Headwater Conveyance
Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
Figure 9 Riparian Buffer Zones Map
kv,WILDLANDS 0 175 350 700 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

!I
=�r
D
... ❑ All
�l ❑ „
'Iff 1 .
Project Location
n r Bank Conservation Easement Boundary (+/- 50' Width)
y , �r�r'
Elv DMS Conservation Easement (+/-200' Width)
hr
Internal Easement Crossing (60' Width)
r r
Proposed Buffer Vegetation Plots
❑ Riparian Buffer (0-100' from TOB)
Nutrient Offset (101-200' from TOB)
❑ . Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion
44 � � No Credit
Perennial Project Stream
4 mill=f Intermittent Project Stream
h � Headwater Conveyance
Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
M Proposed Fencing
Figure 10 Monitoring Map
i!*,W1LDLANDS 0 175 350 700 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

CURRENT LAND USE PHOTOGRAPHS
Perry Hill II

ice' Iw�♦�t
18:
14 i g Project Location
\ ♦ / i'
Bank Conservation Easement Boundary
- �� =
13 / 9 / r DMS Conservation Easement
Internal Easement Crossing
15 � � Existing Wetland
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
/ 1 low
r
Topographic Contour (4')
{ y' Surveyed Treeline
J CExisting Utility Line Alignment
•r
' Photo Point
f
Existing Utility Pole
Photo Log Site Map
I!V,WILDLANDS 0 175 350 700 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Bank Parcel Development Package
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

a - � ■
Photo Point 1— Northwest View (0310312020)
Photo Point 2 — Northeast View (0310312020)
1
III
Photo Point 3 — Northeast View (0310312020)
Photo Point 4 — Northeast View (0310312020)
Photo Point 5 — Southwest View (0310312020)
Photo Point 6 — Northeast View (0310312020)
Photo Point 7 — Northeast View (0310312020)
Photo Point 8 — Northeast View (0310312020)
Perry Hillll AppendixA
HUC 03020201 August 2020

Photo Point 9 — South View (0310312020) 1 Photo Point 10 — Southwest View (0310312020) 1
Photo Point 11— Southwest View (0310312020)
Photo Point 12 — South View (0310312020)
Photo Point 13 — Southeast View (0310312020) 1 Photo Point 14 — Downward View (0310312020) 1
Photo Point 15 — Northwest View (0310312020) I Photo Point 16 — Northwest View (0310312020)
Perry Hillll AppendixA
HUC 03020201 August 2020

�Q
Y
Photo Point 17 Southeast View (0310312020)
Photo Point 18 — Southeast View (0310312020)
Photo Point 19 — Southeast View (0310312020)
Photo Point 20 — South View (0310312020)
Perry Hillll AppendixA
HUC 03020201 August 2020

Appendix 6

i
• Perry Branch Watershed 1
Perennial Project Stream
• Intermittent Project Stream I
+' Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
1938 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

1950 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

•jam + e.: ,� ,
`tip, . .tom t' 1• .. Al
{
-vie - � •� .. ti: }� := �. r� c ,.
ilk
4b,.. ..
tSiL t',i:.l
- IN
ik i.�. .`� .J � •,sty d ti:` 'f.�� . c .` + '.. . � 5,�� �tW� � .+.
• r
sw
ex
�• '6
Perry Branch Watershed
Perennial Project Stream
Intermittent Project Stream
Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
1955 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E C R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

ary,X t J
t t! r; r • �` 7: � i
� 1
_mot ' .� ^� r•'�'� .. , r�7.� '���._ i r.r � r�
4
Aft
r 1 ✓ ^ �-�
+r.x
Mgt
,f.am=
�1 i 'I t,r^.�• y� 1 , r�r fL t. � fir,
R� ^+ r ��' "'► �,*1•� Perry Branch Watershed
ftti� Perennial Project Stream
t '
r! • r •{ - x �•'. ' s Intermittent Project Stream
Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
1960 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E C R 1 N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

1964 Aerial Photo
PAW, W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

"
N.
07,
V Illp
r
LS
� i �I �� � � as ■ _ �
+' • R �.
�S
SN'j., =a
,''
Perry Branch Watershed
min
:zk 1
i� A+ ors k Perennial Project Stream
Intermittent Project Stream
Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
1975 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

..f
AAVV77 �1 _
In
r � a
Perry Branch Watershed
•:tiyr --_ Perennial Project Stream
Intermittent Project Stream
Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
1977 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

1980 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

r
r
i
4
P• �
e
i
r,
I�
k
1,
10
r,
f 1
1
x
Jc
IN
' r 'P�y,� ' .." 1, �•'
-
•' a �1 '*_1
* • . • 41..
• �... ray -� Perry Branch Watershed
T Perennial Project Stream
Intermittent Project Stream
Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream N
+0
1982 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

'•� is
�. 4
rr ►• r • f � � 1F •iF •� � ' r ,�, '�7
4.
I i yak 5 r
• � Y
r ,
r y r
7 A 3 .1RI +
ti-f ' fie'
.� -.•. '.r y { � �' r r � `•ice •
�r
P00go . 1� / -
r .e Je
10
40
f Perry Branch Watershed
_ r
Perennial Project Stream 'r
,�.. Intermittent Project Stream
Ephemeral Channel
y Non -Project Stream
yr f Awe. t,
1993 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

M0
1999 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

Al
y• �?,, fix;" � rn � f 1r. • t: .��• .r• f- • , r � r ■ •,[ .
r r' F� i J +f k * x�
r e'
~ f 't•f r- ,+r ' 1r �. �;-p �Y =fir ��K :tt :4j" j .1 3-^''
r { 10
,, �, '��'
44
its. .
i a r�:
r
Jf
1131
h �
i. P .. •r'6. �i �'•' � •a. � "�;' 'f •'• !eS ++T7S r'�'S-"4
,LIB 'i�!tifS • i'; R ,,yyy��,---
1pr Y
•,ry�;�r.• M.` r Vx i.#� i # A Perry Branch Watershed
Perennial Project Stream
Intermittent Project Stream
�f ■ r.•. •..�w�Srw
Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
2012 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

71
r•� _-
p 's f':••
Agli
y:r,:a�.� �....,tE.p �•�;; 6''a'. 'rh 'r,%' ! �•�ti:•'"'R ` ;�- a'
.• f
fir' �:•:::.:�" �A:
y'.
i b.
44,
-
:c...a:�:' ..: ma's " � ��'�.*, r i+'�• r � �t;�
01
IN
�.
t
'Ss �sr.•�':f
1AM..a AA. ti v
t
Perry Branch Watershed
Perennial Project Stream
Intermittent Project Stream
r }1 Ephemeral Channel
• Non -Project Stream
2013 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

2016 Aerial Photo
W I L D L A N D 5 0 300 600 1,200 Feet Perry Hill II
E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I Buffer Parcel Development Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

Appendix C

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CUtPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 16, 2019
John Hutton DWR# 2019-0157
Wildlands Engineering, Inc Orange County
I430 S. Mint St., Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
(via electronic mail: jhutton(rrlwildlalidseng.com)
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Perry Hill Site
Located near 2623 Frank Perry Rd, Hillsborough
Neuse 03020201
Dear Mr. Hutton,
On February 25, 2019, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) for an onsite mitigation determination
near the above -referenced site (Site). The Site is located within the Upper Falls Lake
Watershed of the Neuse River Basin in the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code. The Site is being
proposed as part of a full -delivery nutrient offset, stream and riparian buffer mitigation
project for the Division of Mitigation Services (RFP #16-007576). Members of the
Interagency Review Team (IRT) and Division of Mitigation Services were also present
onsite. At your request, on February 26, 2019, Ms. Merritt performed an onsite assessment of
riparian land uses adjacent to streams onsite, which are shown on the attached map labeled
"Concept Map".
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and. landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
Featutg
CIassiRcation
onsite
t5ublect
in
Buffer
Riparian Land uses
adiacent to Feature
(0 200')
Euf a
Credit
Viable
zNutrient
Uffset
Viable at
Mitigation Type _peterminatinn
w/in riparian areas
Rule
2,273.02
Ihs_Ni peacre
ECI
Ephemeral
(see map')
No
Non -forested pasture grazed
by cattle
'Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
0295 (o)(7)
Must submit supporting
documentation ofadditional
requirements under. 0295 (0)(7) to be
viable for buffer mitigation.
NorIIs Cm01Ina DepatTmera of EnvIronmrnraI Qualloy I DIVIsYon of Water Rrsourf rN
511 NoftIk Salisbury St reef 1 $617 Mall Servlcr Crntet I Raleigh. Nurrh Carollria 27b'49-Ibli
Q�)
R+r, 9019.707.9000

Perry Bill Site
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
April 16, 2019
eature
Ciassitication
'Subject
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
2Nutrient
Litigation Type Determination
onsjte
adjacent to Feature
w/in riparian areas
lQ
C e i
Offset
fo-Z0011
Suffer
Viable
Viable -Al
Rule
2,273.Q7
Ibs-N per
acre
UTI
Stream
Yes
Non-foresrcd pasture grazed
Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
by cattle
AZ95 (n)
Perry
strew
Yes
Combination of forested &
3.4yes
Yes fnon-
Nan -forested areas - Restoration
Branch
non -forested pasture grazed
forested
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
by cattle
areas only)
Forested areas - Enhancement Site
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) if
fence is installed n&reservation
Site per 15A NCAC 0213.0295 (o)(5) if
fence isn't installed.
UT2
Intermittent
No
Combination of forested &
3•-0Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration
(a-[ DWR flag
non -forested pasture grazed
forested
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
by cattle
areas only)
Forested areas - Enhancement Site
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) if
fence is installed Preservation
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4) if
fence isn't installed.
EC3
Ephemeral
No
Non -forested pasture grazed
'Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
(see map)
by cattle
.0295 (o)(7)
Must submit supporting
documentation of additional
requirements under. 0295(o)(7) to be
viable for buffer mitigation,
UT3
intermittent
No
forested pasture grazed by
'•'Yes
No
Forested areas - Enhancement Site
crossing &
cattle
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) if
woodline
fence is installed QLPreservation
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4) if
fence isn't installed.
A
off-line pond
No
Non -forested pasture
No
No
NIA
Page 2 of 4

Perry Hill Site
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
April 16, 2019
Feature
Ossification
'Subject
LQ
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
Credit
xNutrient
Offset
Miftation Type Determination
wf in riparian areas
OuiLe
adjacent to Feature
Suff r
o� 200'j
Viable
Viable
Rule
2 2. 73.U2
lbs-N
per
acre
B
Drainage
No
Non -forested pasture
No
Yes
Restoration Site per I SA NCAC 02B
conveyance
.0295 (n)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated April 15. 2019 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the MRCS.
'- NC Division of Water Resources - Melhodolagy and Calcularions_for determining !Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
'The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per t SA NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation only site to comply with this rule.
'The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all 15A NCAC 02B M295(o)(5). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.
5T`he area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shaI I comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
The maps attached to this letter were prepared by Wildlands and were initialed by Ms. Merritt on
April 15, 2019 and April 16, 2019. This letter should be provided in all stream and wetland,
buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation plans for this Site.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this site to generate mitigation credits. Pursuant to 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to DWR for written
approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters for
buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240. a proposal regarding a proposed nutrient
load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for approval prior to any
mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation most follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
Page 3 of 4

Perry Hill Site
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
April 16, 2019
This viability assessment will expire on April 16, 2021 or upon the submittal of an As -Built Report
to the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in all stream, wetland or buffer
mitigation plans for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
KAH/km
Attachments: Concept Map, Site map
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Sincerely,
,t7�" 0
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Page 4 of 4

fi■ i
200' 200'
1 ■
65
POW
•
Pf Im
_.9
�� ■ 1■ ++ Y � A r w .
■ 200'
►•JlJCiI�r3 tom} ■ I! r
ii���JJJ��� ■ 1
•
I
■
■■ , 65' �• L..
s -
® Project Location
■ ■ - -� Proposed Conservation Easement
■
100 ' Proposed Internal Crossing
t , Proposed Buffer Restoration
` - - - Proposed Buffer Enhancement (via Cattle Exclusion)
A +
G)
WILDLANDS
kt� E N G I N E E R I N G
\0
,,ccam�
11 , 4J Utility Pole
0 250 500 Feet
L_ i I I I t -*A
or
j
Riparian Buffer Concept Map
Perry Hill Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

Project location
a--R
Proposed Conservation Easement
n
AS-
40
ri C7C7 r • \ 45 �R
i• ', '• ► ►r
lk
/ ,♦r Reach Name
•• ` - Stream Restoration
r + •T ' ,'� Per Branch Reach 2
UTI
rrr ♦.r Subtotal
Stream Enhancement I
i � r "s � / y • � � ! M•
Per Branch Reach 1
m UT2 Reach 2
h " Subtotal
Wkw WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R J N G
Uream Enhancement II
,,jjffWPerry Branch Reach 3
UT2 Reach 1
r.,.� UT3
Subtotal
Site Total
% lncis % Erosion
67% 81%
68% 89%
67% 83%
21% 67%,
54% 75%
38% 72%
45%
76%
63%
55%
76% _
100%
76%
0 250 500 Feet Site Map
Perry Hill Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Direc[ar
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 15, 2019
John Hutton DWR Project # 2019-0157v2
Wildlands Engineering, Inc Orange County
1430 S. Mint St., Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Subject: On -Site Stream Evaluation and Determination for Applicability to the
Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0233) and Water Quality
Standards
Project Name: Perry Hill Site
Address/Location: 2623 Frank Perry Rd
ParcellD's: N/A
Streams Evaluated: LITs to Eno River
Field Date: February 26, 2019
DWR Staff: Katie Merritt
Determination Type:
Buffer:
Stream:
®
Neuse (15A NCAC 02B .0233)
® Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial
❑
Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 02B .0259)
Determination (where local buffer
❑
Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0243)
ordinances apply)
❑
Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
❑
Randleman (15A NCAC 02B .0250)
❑
Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B .0605-.0608)
See the following table and written explanation regarding the stream determinations.
North Carolina Department of E nvirontnent al Quality I Division of Water Resources
D_ E Q' 512 North Sallsbury Street l 1617 Mall Service Center 1 kalekjh, North Carolina Z7699-1617
rrrsni rsrxtru
919.707.900[]

Wildlands Engineering, Inc ,
Neuse River Riparian Buffer/Stream Determination
DWR Project #2019-0157v2
Page 2 of 3
Feature V
Feature
Not
Subject
Start@
Stop @
Soil
USGS
Type'
Subject
Survey
Topo
Perry Branch
P
X
Easement
Throughout
X
X
Boundary
EC1
E
X
Culvert
UT1
X
UT1
I
X
DWR Flag
Perry Branch
X
UT2
I
X
DWR Flag
Perry Branch
(headcut
below
wetland)
EC3
E
X
DWR flag
UT3
UT3
I
X
Woodline @
Perry Branch
crossing
A
Off-line pond
I X
I
See map
B
Drainage
N/A
N/A
See map
conveyance
1 See maps provided showing labeled features
2 Ephemeral (E), Intermittent (1), Perennial (P), Ditch (D)
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) received a Request from Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
(Wildlands) for a Stream Buffer Applicability Determination for a potential mitigation site at the
location described above. A Landowner Authorization Form was provided by Wildlands for the
subject site. On February 26, 2019, DWR staff, along with staff from Wildlands and Division of
Mitigation Services conducted a site visit.
DWR determined that two (2) features on the site, Perry Branch and one Unnamed Tributary to
Perry Branch (UT1) are both streams and are subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules
and are both located on the most recently published NRCS Soil Survey of Guilford County, North
Carolina. There are two (2) other Unnamed Tributaries to Perry Branch, UT2 and UT3, that were
determined to be at least intermittent but not subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules.
There may be other streams or features located on the properties and on the included maps
that may be subject to the buffer rules or may be considered jurisdictional according to the
US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners
or affected parties that dispute a determination made bythe DWR may request a determination
by the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of
this letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via US Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):

c/o Karen Higgins
D WR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
Neuse River Riparian Buffer/Stream Determination
DWR Project #2019-0157v2
Page 3 of 3
% Karen Higgins
D WR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within
sixty (60) days.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve
any activity within the buffers. The project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the
proposed activity. Any inquiries regarding applicability to the Clean Water Act should be
directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions rega rd i ng t h i s determination, please feel free to contact Katie Merritt at
[phone],
Sincerely,
k" C I r4
Karen Wiggins, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Attachments: Site Map, Topo, Orange County Soil Survey
cc: 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch file copy
RRO via email- Stephanie Goss
Evelyn Perry, Judy. .Kadlac, Mary Bishop.— PO'Box 179, Hiklaorough,-N,C 272-78
Filename: 2019-0157v2PerryHil]5trearnCall(Orange)

�o
J r ..ryi f s�SIWO
Project Location � A ❑ � ; +��' k yr *, '
Proposed Conservation Easement`
� r'�,`�� A' � � .. iT as �� �ir ir' Yy�•- ' 7i
NZ A
V.
+'
3`t'E.► r �.. ''
Cam] { ' ■
;y ♦ ,All
'°'� �...♦r ;fig t} n 1 r t+ r +�
IF
��r, . ` ,♦♦ • Reach Name % Incision % Erosion
+ .' ,• Stream Restoration
r►� � `ifs �t
+y► Perry Branch Reach 2 67% 81%
'► . �' UT1 68°% 89%
,' ♦� r Subtotal 67% 83%
�� __ y♦ Stream Enhancement I
Perry Branch Reach 1 213'° 67%
, � �►,. ', _. -` �` �w+. UT2 Reach 2 54% 75% �
r t' �x' Subtotal 38% 72%
lr $ream Enhancement II
Perry Branch Reach 3 45°% 58%
,. i �'sa;��`� ¢•� UT2 Reach 1 75% 76%
63% 100% "
Subtotal 55% 70°%
f Site Total
W I L Site Map
E NGINEERING LANDS 0 250 500 Feet Perry Hill Mitigation Site
E�� � I I
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

r;
i
ION
r
Efland USGS 7.5 Minute Topographical Quadrangle
0
at
13791
f�
��J� Pr '
go0 ojeot Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
W I L D L A N D S 0 250 500 Feet
E N Cw I N E E R I N C3
o�<
USGS Site Topographic Map
Perry Hill Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin (03020241)
Orange County, NC

WftWILDLANDS 0 2S0 500Feet
ENC3INEERING I 1 1
p IvnL-a 1� i i galls Ivla p
�IJ Perry Hill Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Division of Mitigation Services
Attn: Jeremiah Dow
1652 MSC
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 16, 2020
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
(via electronic mail: [e-mail])
Re: Perry Hill Buffer Plan Approval
Dear Mr. Dow,
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) received a draft Mitigation Plan (Plan) from the Division
of Mitigation Services (DMS) for the Perry Hill site (Site) in 2020. Appendix 1 of this Plan was
the Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan (Buffer Plan) submitted to DWR for review and approval
under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to be used primarily as a buffer mitigation project. DMS prefers
flexibility to use this Site for either buffer mitigation or nutrient offset depending on the need,
therefore, DWR also reviewed the Buffer Plan for compliance under 15A NCAC 02B .0703. DWR
reviewed the Buffer Plan and provided comments and recommendations. DMS submitted a
revised Buffer Plan that addressed all comments and recommendations provided by DWR. The
table below summarizes the timeline of the Buffer Plan:
Project Site
DWR Project
Initial Mitigation
Revised Buffer Plan
Location/HUC
Name
ID #
Plan
Received
Received
(Final Draft)
Perry Hill
2019-0157
May 7, 2020
September 2, 2020
03020201
Falls Lake WS
By copy of this letter, the Final Draft of the Buffer Plan is approved. A copy of the final draft can
be found online at:
https://edocs.deq.nc.govlWaterResourcesIDocView.asl2x?id=1282310&dbid=0&repo=WaterResources
Please feel free to call [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
DocuSigneduAby- - -
-MSAA
A43C72700BD543E—
Katie Merritt
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
cc: DWR File Copy (Katie Merritt)
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
N(1HTH f:A�i(1!_INA �
0­Om or eowM—W Q"I 919,707,9000

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
July 30, 2020
Regulatory Division
Re: NCIRT Review and USACE Approval of the NCDMS Perry Hill Mitigation Site / Orange
Co./ SAW-2019-00125/ NCDMS Project # 100093
Mr. Tim Baumgartner
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Dear Mr. Baumgartner:
The purpose of this letter is to provide the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) with all comments generated by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team
(NCIRT) during the 30-day comment period for the Perry Hill Draft Mitigation Plan, which closed
on June 10, 2020. These comments are attached for your review.
Based on our review of these comments, we have determined that no major concerns
have been identified with the Draft Mitigation Plan, which is considered approved with this
correspondence. However, several minor issues were identified, as described in the attached
comment memo, which must be addressed in the Final Mitigation Plan.
The Final Mitigation Plan is to be submitted with the Preconstruction Notification (PCN)
Application for Nationwide permit approval of the project along with a copy of this letter. Issues
identified above must be addressed in the Final Mitigation Plan. All changes made to the Final
Mitigation Plan should be summarized in an errata sheet included at the beginning of the
document. If it is determined that the project does not require a Department of the Army permit,
you must still provide a copy of the Final Mitigation Plan, along with a copy of this letter, to the
appropriate USACE field office at least 30 days in advance of beginning construction of the
project. Please note that this approval does not preclude the inclusion of permit conditions in
the permit authorization for the project, particularly if issues mentioned above are not
satisfactorily addressed. Additionally, this letter provides initial approval for the Mitigation Plan,
but this does not guarantee that the project will generate the requested amount of mitigation
credit. As you are aware, unforeseen issues may arise during construction or monitoring of the
project that may require maintenance or reconstruction that may lead to reduced credit.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter, and if you have any questions
regarding this letter, the mitigation plan review process, or the requirements of the Mitigation
Rule, please call me at 919-554-4884, ext 60.
Sincerely,
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager
for Tyler Crum bley
Enclosures
Electronic Copies Furnished:
NCIRT Distribution List
Jeremiah Dow, Lindsay Crocker—NCDMS
Jeff Keaton—WEI

DWR Approval Letter for
DMS Buffer Site
Placeholder

v
,,1
W. /ICI id
4
Project Location
r Proposed Conservation Easement
1.
Proposed Internal Crossing
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
No Credit Project Stream
No Credit Headwater Conveyance
No Credit Ephemeral Channel
Non -Project Stream
r r
Existing Utility Line
Reach Break
Figure 6 Concept Design Map
kv,WILDLANDS 0 175 350 700 Feet Perry Hill Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I I I I Mitigation Plan
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

Figure 6 Credit Calculations Map
W I L D L A N D 5 0 175 350 700 Feet Perry Hill Mitigation Site
E N G I N E E R I N G I i I i I Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan
w
Meuse River Basin (03020201)
Orange County, NC

itA! a4LWL5rk
r United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE,
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
& Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: February 12, 2020
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0634
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01422
Project Name: Perry Hill Mitigation Site
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

02/12/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01422
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

02/12/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01422
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

02/12/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01422
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

02/12/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01422
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0634
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01422
Project Name: Perry Hill Mitigation Site
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: The Perry Hill Mitigation Site is located approximately three miles
northwest of Hillsborough, NC. The project area includes a DMS
mitigation project, as well as an adjacent mitigation bank. The DMS
mitigation site includes approximately 26.75 acres of restoration and
enhancement of riparian buffer, part of Perry Branch, and 3 unnamed
tributaries that flow to it. The mitigation bank will include restoration and
enhancement of approximately 15 acres of buffer adjacent to the DMS
site. Both projects will proved buffer and stream mitigation credits in the
Neuse River Basin 03020201.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/place/36.10849714158877N79.12807503335586W
Counties: Orange, NC

02/12/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01422 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784

02/12/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-01422 4
Flowering Plants
NAND L STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECTAREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

QP��ayeNT Of Tye, FINEI&w �,■FE
y� tiQ United States Department of the Interior
0
9 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE s
. ��RCii 3�gb. fYi 1' n1K
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 02/28/2020
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Perry Hill Mitigation Site
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or ❑
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect'' determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Species Conclusions Table*
Project Name: Perry Hill Mitigation Site
Date: 02/28/2020
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Notes / Documentation
Determination
Critical Habitat
None
Bald Eagle
Unlikely to disturb nesting
No Eagle Act Permit Required
Not within 660 feet of large bodies of water.
bald eagles
NLEB
No suitable habitat present
No Effect
No NLEB registered in Orange Count
Atlantic Pigtoe
Suitable habitat present,
Not likely to adversely affect
Survey conducted August 14, 2018 and found that species are
Fusconaia masoni
s ecies not resent
not likely to be found due to poor water quality.
Dwarf wedgemussel
No suitable habitat present
No Effect
Habitat assessment indicated no potential habitat present.
Alasmidonta heterodon
Michaux's Sumac
Suitable habitat present,
Not likely to adversely affect
USFWS-Historic Record Status, Survey conducted on August
Rhus michauxii
species not present
14, 2018 and February 14, 2020 indicated species absence.
Smooth Coneflower
Suitable habitat present,
Not likely to adversely affect
USFWS-Historic Record Status, Survey conducted on August
Echinacea laevi ata
species not present
14, 2018 and February 14, 2020 indicated species absence.
Neuse River Waterdog
No suitable habitat present
No Effect
A Field Survey was conducted on February 14, 2020 and no
(Necturus lewisi)
suitable habitat was found due to poor water quality and
stream sizes. No individuals of the species were found. The
proposed project is not in the proposed critical habitat area
designated by USFWS for this species. Per NCNHP data
explorer, no known element occurrences exist within the
proposed project area.
Carolina Madtom
No suitable habitat present
No Effect
A Field Survey was conducted on February 14, 2020 and no
(Noturus furiosus)
suitable habitat was found due to poor water quality, siltation,
and stream sizes. No individuals of the species were found.
The proposed project is not in the proposed critical habitat
area designated by USFWS for this species. Per NCNHP data
explorer, no known element occurrences exist within the
proposed project area.
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an informed decision about
impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
--[�Z 7-�
Environmental Scientist
Signature /Title
Date
02/28/2020
*Species conclusion table for this project was originally submitted 4/16/2019 and was included in the Categorical Exclusion that was approved on 6/6/2019. The table
is being resubmitted to include the newly proposed threatened Neuse River Waterdog and proposed endangered Carolina Madtom.

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
February 18, 2019
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
RE: Coordination Request
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
PERRY HILL MITIGATION SITE
Orange County, North Carolina
Catalogue Unit 03020201
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. is contracted by the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) to conduct stream restoration/enhancement activities for the above- referenced
project. We are requesting your office to review and comment on any possible issues that may
emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with the proposed
stream restoration/enhancement project. Included in this package are USGS Site Topographic
Map at 1:24,000 scale, and Site Map.
The project area is located in Orange County, North Carolina approximately 2 miles northwest of
Hillsborough. The project is located on the Efland, North Carolina 7.5-minute topographic map
from the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The project area begins at latitude 36' 06'
41.9"N and longitude 79' 07' 31.9"W and terminates at latitude 36' 06' 18"N and longitude 79'
07' 56.1"W. The site is located off Frank Perry Road, one mile west of Highway 86.
The Perry Hill Mitigation Site was identified to provide in -kind mitigation for unavoidable stream
impacts. Segments of this stream have been identified as incised, eroding, and no longer
connected to its floodplain. In total, 5,634 linear feet are proposed for stream restoration,
enhancement I and enhancement II on four unnamed tributaries all which drain to the Eno
River. Limits of Disturbance will be contained to the easement, with the exception of haul road
to access the site from Frank Perry Road. Exact acreage of disturbance is subject to change. The
enclosed map displays the areas proposed for restoration/enhancement.
There are no existing structures with the areas proposed for restoration or enhancement
Furthermore, no architectural structures or archeological artifacts have been observed or noted
during preliminary surveys of the site for restoration purposes. In addition, the majority of the
site has historically been disturbed due to past and current management for cattle grazing and
rearing.
Wildlands appreciates your timely attention to this matter. If we do not hear from you within 45
days, we will assume that there are no comments with regard to project and area archaeological
or cultural resources. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions regarding this
project or the extent of proposed disturbance at [e-mail] or by phone (313)-
969-7318.

it
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Sincerely,
Carolyn Lanza
Environmental Scientist
ENCLOSURES
Figure I Site Map
Figure 2 USGS Site Topographic Map

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
April 2, 2019
Carolyn Lanza
Wildlands Engineering
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Perry Hill Mitigation Site, Hillsborough, Orange County, ER 19-0946
Dear Ms. Lanza:
Thank you for your letter of February 28, 2019, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review&ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(�� d u'L wt.
6='Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Appendix D

Perry Hill
2323 Frank Perry Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Inquiry Number: 5390419.2s
August 13, 2018
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDR . Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
Orphan Summary---------------------------------------------------------
11
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GRA
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary
A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map-------------------------------------------
A-5
Physical Setting Source Map
A-14
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-16
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC5390419.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
2323 FRANK PERRY ROAD
HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
36.1093450 - 36' 6' 33.64"
79.1315400 - 79' 7' 53.54"
Zone 17
668180.2
3997492.2
680 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
Northeast Map:
Version Date:
Southeast Map:
Version Date:
Northwest Map:
Version Date:
FA=IN/e1IIIIIIIIIJ:[91111t0Zr]:7A0va1.09:1102N4*91:49
Portions of Photo from:
Source:
5947915 EFLAND, NC
2013
5947438 CALDWELL, NC
2013
5947925 HILLSBOROUGH, NC
2013
5947913 CEDAR GROVE, NC
2013
20140619
USDA
TC5390419.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
2323 FRANK PERRY ROAD
HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
1 WARREN, LILLIE 2421 N. HWY. 86 LAST, IMD Lower 2486, 0.471, ENE
5390419.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG---------------- RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Engineering Controls Sites List
TC5390419.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY_______________________ Recycling Center Listing
TC5390419.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HIST LF_______________________ Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9----------- Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI___________________________ Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________ Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER _ _ _ _
_ _ _ PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
TC5390419.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST: A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
A review of the LAST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/04/2018 has revealed that there is 1 LAST
TC5390419.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
WARREN, LILLIE 2421 N. HWY. 86 ENE 114 - 112 (0.471 mL) 1 8
Incident Number: 6521
Current Status: C
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Records of Emergency Release Reports
IMD: Incident Management Database.
A review of the IMD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/21/2006 has revealed that there is 1 IMD
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
WARREN, LILLIE 2421 N. HWY. 86 ENE 114 - 112 (0.471 mL) 1 8
Facility Id: 6521
TC5390419.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC5390419.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW MAP - 5390419.2S
IV
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Upgradient Area
Power transmission lines Hazardous Substance
100-year flood zone Disposal Sites
500-year flood zone
■ National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Perry Hill CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 2323 Frank Perry Road CONTACT: Chris Roessler
Hillsborough NC 27278 INQUIRY #: 5390419.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.109345 / 79.13154 DATE: August 13, 2018 1:12 pm
Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 5390419.2S
IV
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
i
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1 /9 1 /4 1 /2 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Power transmission lines Disposal Sites
100-year flood zone
500-year flood zone
■ National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Perry Hill CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 2323 Frank Perry Road CONTACT: Chris Roessler
Hillsborough NC 27278 INQUIRY #: 5390419.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.109345 / 79.13154 DATE: August 13, 2018 1:14 pm
Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc. (,)2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-CESQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST 0.500
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
TC5390419.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1 /8
1/8- 1 /4
1/4- 1 /2
1/2- 1
> 1
Plotted
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
M QQIN9us] ill Ie10=Iill 191:i67ill lkyil=11ill III ril00**Q0IR
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
HIST LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN ODI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ODI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US CDL 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
IMD 0.500
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
SPILLS 90 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TC5390419.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1 /8
1/8- 1 /4
1/4- 1 /2
1/2- 1
> 1
Plotted
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ECHO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ASBESTOS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
AOP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TC5390419.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
- Totals -- 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC5390419.2s Page 7

Map ID
MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
EDR ID Number
Elevation
Site
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1
WARREN, LILLIE
LAST S103130940
ENE
2421 N. HWY. 86
IMD N/A
1/4-1/2
HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278
0.471 mi.
2486 ft.
Relative:
LAST:
Lower
Facility ID: N/A
Actual:
UST Number: RA-6521
633 ft.
Incident Number: 6521
Contamination Type:
SL
Source Type: 19
Product Type: P
Date Reported: 04/10/1991
Date Occur: 03/23/1991
Cleanup: 04/10/1991
Closure Request: Not reported
Close Out: Not reported
Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
Not reported
Tank Regulated Status:
Not reported
# Of Supply Wells: 0
Commercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
Not reported
Risk Classification:
H
Risk Class Based On Review:
H
Corrective Action Plan Type:
Not reported
NOV Issue Date: Not reported
NORR Issue Date: Not reported
Site Priority: 125
Phase Of LSA Req: Not reported
Site Risk Reason: Not reported
Land Use: RES
MTBE: No
MTBE 1: Unknown
Flag: No
Flag 1: No
LUR Filed: Not reported
Release Detection: 0
Current Status: C
RBCA GW: Not reported
PETOPT: 4
RPL: False
CD Num: 0
Reel Num: 0
RPOW: False
RPOP: False
Error Flag: 0
Error Code: Not reported
Valid: False
Lat/Long: 36 7 22.98 79 6 43.98
Lat/Long Decimal: 36.12305-79.11222
Testlat: Not reported
Regional Officer Project Mgr:
CED
Region:
RAL
Company:
Not reported
Contact Person:
LILLIE WARREN
Telephone:
Not reported
RP Address:
2412 NC Hwy 86
RP City,St,Zip:
HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278
RP County:
Not reported
TC5390419.2s Page 8

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
WARREN, LILLIE (Continued)
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
Comments:
Loss of —100 gals #2 fuel oil. Envirochem hired to excavate 30 - 40
cu.yds of contaminated soil to rock. TPH conc. @2,000 ppm at bedrock
interface. Site assessment report prepared for Allstate insurance. to
be forwarded to NCDEM. Allstate contact Herbert Tyler @ 872-3200.
File transfer from UST on 5-5-05. 03/11/08 - CED conducted file
review. - No rpts in file, just release info. WSWs within 1500'. High
Risk. ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT NECESSARY - CED
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
PIRF:
Facility Id:
6521
Date Occurred:
Not reported
Date Reported:
Not reported
Description Of Incident:
Not reported
Owner/Operator:
Not reported
Ownership:
5
Operation Type:
5
Type:
Not reported
Location:
Not reported
Site Priority:
125B
Priority Update:
Not reported
Wells Affected Y/N:
Not reported
Wells Affected Number:
Not reported
Samples Taken By:
Not reported
Samples Include:
Not reported
7#5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Pirf/Min Soil:
Not reported
Release Code:
Not reported
Cause:
Not reported
Source:
Not reported
Source Type:
0
Last Modified:
12/18/2006
Incident Phase:
FU
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held:
Not reported
Corrective Action Planned:
Not reported
SOC Signed:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
IRS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date:
Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
IMD:
Region:
RAL
Facility ID:
6521
Date Occurred:
3/27/1991
Submit Date:
5/5/2005
GW Contam:
Groundwater Contamination status unknown
Soil Contam:
Not reported
Incident Desc:
Loss of 100 gals #2 fuel oil. Envirochem hired to excavate 30 - 40
cu.yds of contaminated soil to rock. TPH conc. @2,000 ppm at bedrock
interface. Site assessm
Operator:
WARREN, LILLIE
S103130940
TC5390419.2s Page 9

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
Site
WARREN, LILLIE (Continued)
Contact Phone:
Not reported
Owner Company:
Not reported
Operator Address:2412
NC Hwy 86
Operator City:
HILLSBOROUGH
OperCity,St,Zip:
HILLSBOROUGH, NC
Ownership:
Federal
Operation:
Industrial
Material:
Not reported
Qty Lost 1:
Not reported
Qty Recovered 1:
Not reported
Source:
Spill -surface
Type:
Heating Oil
Location:
Not reported
Setting:
Not reported
Risk Site:
Not reported
Site Priority:
125
Priority Code:
B
Priority Update:
Not reported
Dem Contact:
ERIC RICE
Wells Affected:
No
Num Affected:
Not reported
Wells Contam:
Not reported
Sampled By:
Not reported
Samples Include:
Not reported
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Latitude:
36.123055
Longitude:
-79.112222
Latitude Number:
Not reported
Longitude Number:
Not reported
Latitude Decimal:
Not reported
Longitude Decimal: Not reported
GPS:
EST
Agency:
DWQ
Facility ID:
6521
Last Modified:
5/5/2005
Incident Phase:
Follow Up
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action
Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
RS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S103130940
TC5390419.2s Page 10

Count: 0 records.
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
NO SITES FOUND
TC5390419.2s Page 11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
Federal CERCLIS list
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 92
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC5390419.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Federal RCRA generators list
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC5390419.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators
(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5390419.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2018
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018
Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 08/15/2017 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2017 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Number of Days to Update: 64 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5390419.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2018
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2018
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona. California. New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2018
Number of Days to Update: 61 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017
Number of Days to Update: 136
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2018
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 05/30/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
TC5390419.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5390419.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018
Number of Days to Update: 20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC5390419.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/03/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2018
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2018
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC5390419.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 71
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018
Number of Days to Update: 30
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 06/12/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2018
Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2006 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 339
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: N/A
TC5390419.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/15/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018
Number of Days to Update: 198
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TC5390419.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018
Number of Days to Update: 2
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC5390419.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017
Number of Days to Update: 126
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 43
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC5390419.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FI FRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2018 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2018 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2018
Number of Days to Update: 74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017
Number of Days to Update: 218
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 23
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 05/03/2018 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018
Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 02/25/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 83
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5390419.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018
Number of Days to Update: 30
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018
Number of Days to Update: 41
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 10/15/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2018
Number of Days to Update: 48
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/02/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2015 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/18/2016 Last EDR Contact: 07/30/2018
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2018
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2018
Number of Days to Update: 43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018
Number of Days to Update: 38 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018
Number of Days to Update: 50 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 01/26/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2018
Number of Days to Update: 90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered GovL Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5390419.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2018 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2018
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/26/2018
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2018 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/01/2018 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Number of Days to Update: 19 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2018 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018
Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2018
Number of Days to Update: 62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC5390419.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018
Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2018
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: PennWell Corporation
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant
its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC5390419.2s Page GR-26

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
PERRY HILL
2323 FRANK PERRY ROAD
HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278
Ira:zC]=1192:z•»a:4r-«•z•1NQI,Fit 9*1
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
Northeast Map:
Version Date:
Southeast Map:
Version Date:
Northwest Map:
Version Date:
36.109345 - 36' 6' 33.64"
79.13154 - 79' 7' 53.54"
Zone 17
668180.2
3997492.2
680 ft. above sea level
5947915 EFLAND, NC
2013
5947438 CALDWELL, NC
2013
5947925 HILLSBOROUGH, NC
2013
5947913 CEDAR GROVE, NC
2013
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC5390419.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General SW
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
North
TIP
T T
�V O •�
N
South
W- - . - - . - . -
O V,
N N N A
N �
t0 �
West I East
TIP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 680 ft.
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC5390419.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
3710986500J
Additional Panels in search area:
3710986600J
3710985600J
3710985500J
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
EFLAND
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC5390419.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Volcanic Rocks
System: Cambrian
Series: Cambrian volcanic rocks
Code: Cv (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
TC5390419.2s Page A-4

SSURGO SOIL MAP - 5390419.2s
I'
T
;
3� it 3
i
i
i
5
�
g
i%
1
l
�
i
3
* Target Property
N SSURGO Soil
N Water
0 1116 118 14Al.
SITE NAME: Perry Hill CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 2323 Frank Perry Road CONTACT: Chris Roessler
Hillsborough NC 27278 INQUIRY #: 5390419.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.109345 / 79.13154 DATE: August 13, 2018 1:14 pm
Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: Enon
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 7.8
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
7 inches
11 inches
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 7.8
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
11 inches
33 inches
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 7.8
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
33 inches
74 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 7.8
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC5390419.2s Page A-6

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Georgeville
silt loam
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
2
7 inches
61 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
3
61 inches
78 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name: Georgeville
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
TC5390419.2s Page A-7

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
5 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
2
5 inches
35 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
3
35 inches
78 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 4.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name: Herndon
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
TC5390419.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
3 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
2
38 inches
44 inches
silty clay loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
3
44 inches
78 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
4
3 inches
7 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
5
7 inches
38 inches
silty clay
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 4
Min: 3.6
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name:
Enon
Soil Surface Texture:
fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:
Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
High
Depth to Bedrock Min:
> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inches
TC5390419.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 7.8
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
7 inches
11 inches
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 7.8
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
11 inches
33 inches
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 7.8
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
33 inches
74 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 7.8
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.1
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 6
Soil Component Name:
Water
Soil Surface Texture:
fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group:
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Not Reported
Depth to Bedrock Min:
> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inches
No Layer Information available.
TC5390419.2s Page A-10

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 7
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Tatum
silt loam
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
5 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 0.42
Max: Min:
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
5 inches
53 inches
silty clay
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 0.42
Max: Min:
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
53 inches
62 inches
weathered
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 0.42
Max: Min:
bedrock
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 8
Soil Component Name: Iredell
Soil Surface Texture: gravelly loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can be
drained and classified.
Soil Drainage Class:
Moderately well drained
TC5390419.2s Page A-11

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 46 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
gravelly loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 8.4
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.6
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
7 inches
29 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 8.4
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.6
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
29 inches
40 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 14
Max: 8.4
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 1.4
Min: 6.6
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
Soil Map ID: 9
Soil Component Name: Lignum
Soil Surface Texture: silt loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 53 inches
TC5390419.2s Page A-12

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
1 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: Min:
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Clayey
Soils.
2
1 inches
11 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: Min:
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Clayey
Soils.
3
11 inches
38 inches
silty clay
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: Min:
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Clayey
Soils.
4
38 inches
55 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: Min:
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Clayey
Soils.
5
55 inches
78 inches
weathered
Silt -Clay
Not reported
Max: 14
Max: Min:
bedrock
Materials (more
Min: 0
than 35 pct.
passing No.
200), Clayey
Soils.
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 0.001 miles
State Database 1.000
TC5390419.2s Page A-13

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
1 USGS40000893913 1/2 - 1 Mile North
2 USGS40000893620 1/2 - 1 Mile South
3 USGS40000893622 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
[9]I1.1=11:*-Ir_dI=1111 Ue4rel -leF9:11111 I lk1101Nkv, FAN Ile] .
TC5390419.2s Page A-14

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP — 5390419.2s
County Boundary
N Major Roads
N Contour Lines
OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
® Water Wells
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas
I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: Perry Hill CLIENT: Wildlands Eng, Inc.
ADDRESS: 2323 Frank Perry Road CONTACT: Chris Roessler
Hillsborough NC 27278 INQUIRY #: 5390419.2s
LAT/LONG: 36.109345 / 79.13154 DATE: August 13, 2018 1:14 pm
Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
1
North
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
Organization ID:
Organization Name:
Monitor Location:
Description:
Drainage Area:
Contrib Drainage Area:
Aquifer:
Formation Type:
Construction Date:
Well Depth Units:
Well Hole Depth Units:
Database EDR ID Number
FED USGS USGS40000893913
USGS-NC
USGS North Carolina Water Science Center
O R-274
Type:
Not Reported
HUC:
Not Reported
Drainage Area Units:
Not Reported
Contrib Drainage Area Unts:
Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline
-rock aquifers
Felsic Metavolcanic Rock
Aquifer Type:
19730409
Well Depth:
ft
Well Hole Depth:
Not Reported
Groundwater levels, Number of Measurements:
Feet below surface: 15.0
Note: Not Reported
2
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
Organization ID:
Organization Name:
Monitor Location:
Description:
Drainage Area:
Contrib Drainage Area:
Aquifer:
Formation Type:
Construction Date:
Well Depth Units:
Well Hole Depth Units:
Level reading date
Feet to sea level:
USGS-NC
USGS North Carolina Water Science Center
Well
03020201
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
90
Not Reported
1973-04-09
Not Reported
FED USGS USGS40000893620
OR-273
Type:
Not Reported
HUC:
Not Reported
Drainage Area Units:
Not Reported
Contrib Drainage Area Unts:
Piedmont and Blue Ridge
crystalline -rock aquifers
Phyllite
Aquifer Type:
19790914
Well Depth:
ft
Well Hole Depth:
Not Reported
Groundwater levels, Number of Measurements:
Feet below surface: 30.0
Note: Not Reported
3
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
Organization ID:
Organization Name:
Monitor Location:
Description:
Drainage Area:
Contrib Drainage Area:
Aquifer:
Formation Type:
Aquifer Type:
Level reading date
Feet to sea level:
Well
03020201
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
330
Not Reported
1979-09-14
Not Reported
FED USGS USGS40000893622
USGS-NC
USGS North Carolina Water Science Center
OR-030 Type: Well
Not Reported HUC: Not Reported
Not Reported Drainage Area Units: Not Reported
Not Reported Contrib Drainage Area Unts: Not Reported
Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline -rock aquifers
Epiclastic Metavolcanic Rock
Not Reported Construction Date: Not Reported
TC5390419.2s Page A-16

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Well Depth: 160
Well Hole Depth: Not Reported
Groundwater levels, Number of Measurements:
Feet below surface: 25
Note: Not Reported
Well Depth Units: ft
Well Hole Depth Units: Not Reported
Level reading date: 1966
Feet to sea level: Not Reported
TC5390419.2s Page A-17

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_NHEO
NC50003166
Elclass:
I
Precision1:
S
Eostat:
E
Gisid:
172014
Edr id:
NC50003166
NC_NHEO
NC50006301
Elclass:
I
Precision1:
M
Eostat:
E
Gisid:
341638
Edr id:
NC50006301
NC_NHEO
NC50019747
Elclass:
I
Precision1:
S
Eostat:
E
Gisid:
283160
Edr id:
NC50019747
NC_SNHA
NC10003015
Acres:
17.57
Sitename:
ENO RIVER
AQUATIC HABITAT
Quality type:
Not Reported
Sig:
A
Site id:
3015
Edr id:
NC10003015
TC5390419.2s Page A-18

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
14 1.65 0.3 4.6
3 4.40 0.7 7.7
Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for ORANGE COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 7
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L
Living Area - 1 st Floor 1.157 pCi/L 100%
Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported
Basement 0.800 pCi/L 100%
% 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L
0% 0%
Not Reported Not Reported
0% 0%
TC5390419.2s Page A-19

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC5390419.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
NC Game Lands: Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC5390419.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC5390419.2s Page PSGR-3