20180795 Ver 1_As Built 2020_20200826

ID#* 20180795 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 09/03/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 8/26/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream Pr Wetlands r- Buffer r` Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20180795
Existing IDr
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*1
Existing Version
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Rockingham
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As -Built Plans
File Upload: Slingshot _100058_AB_2020.pdf 9.99MB
Rease upload only one RDFof the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature:*

FINAL
AS -BUILT BASELINE
MONITORING REPORT (MYO)
SLINGSHOT CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Rockingham County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID No. 100058
Full Delivery Contract No. 7525
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2018-01170
RFP No. 16-007330
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002
Data Collection: May 2020
Submission: August 2020
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652

FINAL
AS -BUILT BASELINE
MONITORING REPORT (MYO)
SLINGSHOT CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Rockingham County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID No. 100058
Full Delivery Contract No. 7525
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2018-01170
RFP No. 16-007330
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002
Data Collection: May 2020
Submission: August 2020
Prepared for:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652
Prepared by:
And
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Contact: Worth Creech
919-755 9490 (phone)
919-755-9492 (fax)
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact: Grant Lewis
919-215-1693 (phone)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 2
1.1 PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES............................................................................................ 2
1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND........................................................................................................ 4
1.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND STRUCTURE.............................................................................. 4
1.4 SUCCESS CRITERIA................................................................................................................ 5
2.0 METHODS............................................................................................................................. 6
2.1 MONITORING......................................................................................................................... 6
3.0 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................8
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Project Location
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. Planted Vegetation Totals
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Tables 9A-9D. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 10A-10D. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and
Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Tables 11A-1ID. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters -Cross -sections)
Tables 12A-12D. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E. Groundwater Gauge Soil Profiles
Appendix F. Preconstruction Benthic Data
Preconstruction Benthic Results (available upon request once received)
Habitat Assessment Dataforms
Appendix G. As -built Plan Sheets
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) Table of Contents page i
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC has established the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (Site).
1.1 Project Goals & Objectives
Project goals were based on the Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) report
(NCEEP 2009) and on -site preconstruction data collection of channel morphology and function
observed during field investigations. The Site is located within Targeted Local Watershed (TLW)
03030002010010. The RBRP report documents benthic ratings vary between "Fair" and "Good -
Fair" possibly due to cattle, dairy, and poultry operations.
The project is located within the Troublesome Creek and Little Troublesome Creek Local
Watershed Planning area (NCEEP 2004); project activities addressed priorities associated with the
LWP as follows with Site specific information following the LWP goals in parenthesis.
1. Protect and improve water quality by restoring wetland, stream, and riparian area functions
and values, which may have been, or may be, lost through historic, current, and future
impacts (4115 linear feet of stream restored/enhanced/preserved, 1.71 acres of wetland
restored/enhanced, and 11.6. acres of riparian buffer restored/enhanced).
2. Achieve a net increase in riparian zone buffers and wetlands acreage, functions, and values
(11.6 acres of riparian buffer were restored/enhanced, and wetland acreage was increased
by 1.02 acres).
3. Promote a comprehensive approach for the protection of natural resources (protected athe
Site, streams, wetlands, and riparian buffer through a permanent conservation easement).
In addition to the defined Troublesome Creek LWP goals, additional goals for the area generally
revolve around reduction of stressors to water quality. Stressors and how each were addressed by
project activities is as follows.
1. Nutrient Inputs — (livestock were removed from streams resulting in a direct reduction of
474.7 pounds of nitrogen, 39.3 pounds of phosphorus per year, and 4.7 x 10 i i colonies of
fecal coliform; eliminated fertilizer applications; and installed marsh treatment areas).
2. Streambank Erosion — (reduction of 220 tons of sediment per year).
3. Stormwater — (reduced bank height ratios and installed marsh treatment area to reduce
stormwater pulses).
4. Disturbed Riparian Buffer — (restored/enhanced 11.6 acres of riparian buffer along 4115
linear feet of stream).
5. Floodplain Alteration — (eliminated straightened, entrenched streams and removed spoil
material deposited in the floodplain).
Site specific mitigation goals and objectives were developed through the use of North Carolina
Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) and North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NC
WAM) analyses of preconstruction and reference stream systems at the Site (NC SFAT 2015 and
NC WFAT 2010) (see table below).
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 2
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Stream/Wetland Targeted Functions, Goals, and Ob_jectivest
Targeted Functions
Goals
Ob'ectives
Compatibility of Success Criteria
(I)HYDROLOGY
(2) Flood Flow (Floodplain Access)
• Attenuate flood flow across the Site.
• Minimize downstream flooding to the
maximum extent possible.
•
•
.
Construct new channel at historic floodplain elevation to restore overbank flows
and restore jurisdictional wetlands
Plant woody riparian buffer
Remove livestock
•
•
•
•
Over the monitoring period BHR not to exceed 1.2
Document four overbank events in separate monitoring years
Livestock excluded from the easement
Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
• Connect streams to functioning wetland
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
•
Deep rip floodplain soils to reduce compaction and increase soil surface roughness
•
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
systems.
.
Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
•
Conservation Easement recorded
(3) Stream Stability
• Increase stream stability within the Site
•
•
Construct channels with proper pattern, dimension, and longitudinal profile
Remove livestock
•
•
Cross-section measurements indicate a stable channel with cobble/gravel
substrate
Visual documentation of stable channels and structures
4 Sediment Transport
O p
so that channels are neither aggrading nor
•
Over the monitoring period BHR not to exceed 1.2
0
Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
degrading.
•
< 10% change in BHR over the monitoring period
(4) Stream Geomorphology
•
Plant woody riparian buffer
.
Livestock excluded from the easement
•
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
1 WATER QUALITY
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
.
Remove livestock and reduce agricultural land/inputs
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
• Remove direct nutrient and pollutant
inputs from the Site and reduce
.
0Plant
Install marsh treatment areas, where necessary
woody riparian buffer
•
•
Livestock excluded from the easement
Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
(2) Indicators of Stressors
contributions to downstream waters.
.
Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
•
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
Wetland Particulate Change
1 HABITAT
(2) In -stream Habitat
•
Construct stable channels with cobble/gravel substrate
(3) Substrate
(3) In -Stream Habitat
•
Add large woody debris in the form of log vane structures
•
Cross-section measurement indicate a stable channel with cobble/gravel substrate
(2) Stream -side Habitat
• Improve instream and stream -side
•
Plant permanent seed mixtures along banks to add rooting material and leafy
vegetation for macroinvertebrates
•
•
Visual documentation of stable channels and in -stream structures.
Attain Wetland Hydrology Success Criteria
(3) Stream -side Habitat
habitat.
•
•
•
Plant woody riparian buffer to provide organic matter and shade
Protect riparian buffers with a perpetual conservation easement
Restore/enhance jurisdictional wetlands adjacent to Site streams
•
.
Attain Vegetation Success Criteria
Conservation Easement recorded
3 Thermore ulation
Wetland Physical Structure
Wetland Landscape Patch Structure
Wetland Vegetation Composition
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 3
Slingshot Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

1.2 Project Background
The Slingshot Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site")
encompasses 11.6 acres of disturbed forest and livestock pasture along warm water, unnamed
tributaries to Lake Hunt. The Site is located approximately 2 miles west of Reidsville, just east of
Lake Hunt, and north NC Highway 158 in Rockingham County (Figure 1, Appendix A).
Prior to construction, Site land use consisted of livestock pasture, hay fields, and disturbed forest.
Livestock had unrestricted access to Site streams. A narrow riparian fringe had developed on the
stream margins that was composed of opportunistic species, invasive species, and a few mature
tree species. Approximately 55 percent of the stream channel was degraded contributing to
sediment export from the Site resulting from mechanical processes from livestock hoof shear. In
addition, streamside wetlands were cleared and drained by channel downcutting and land uses.
Preconstruction Site conditions resulted in degraded water quality, a loss of aquatic habitat,
reduced nutrient and sediment retention, and unstable channel characteristics (loss of horizontal
flow vectors that maintain pools and an increase in erosive forces to channel bed and banks). Site
restoration activities restored riffle -pool morphology, aided in energy dissipation, increased
aquatic habitat, stabilized channel banks, and greatly reduced sediment loss from channel banks.
1.3 Project Components and Structure
Proposed Site restoration activities generated 3185 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 1.321
Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs) as the result of the following.
• 2501 linear feet of Priority I stream restoration
• 587 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level I)
• 635 linear feet of stream enhancement (Level II)
• 391 linear feet of stream preservation
• 1.018 acre of riparian wetland restoration
• 0.606 acre of riparian wetland enhancement
Additional activities that occurred at the Site included the following.
• Planting 12.05 acres of the Site with 10,950 stems (planted species are included in Table 5
[Appendix Q.
• Site fencing has not yet been constructed. However, fencing the entire conservation
easement by leaving some pre-existing fencing, removing fencing, and installing additional
fencing will occur this year.
Deviations from the construction plans included removing the left vane arm from the structure at
sta. 05+63 on Slingshot Creek and removing the three log cross -vanes between sta. 03+00 and
04+00 on UT1 due to bedrock presence. No other deviations of significance occurred between
construction plans and the as -built condition. In addition, no issues have arisen since construction
occurred.
Site design was completed in November 2019. Construction started on March 13, 2020 and ended
within a final walkthrough on April 30, 2020. The Site was also planted on April 30, 2020.
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 4
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background
information are summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A).
1.4 Success Criteria
Project success criteria have been established per the October 24, 2016 NC Interagency Review
Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. Monitoring
and success criteria relate to project goals and objectives. From a mitigation perspective, several
of the goals and objectives are assumed to be functionally elevated by restoration activities without
direct measurement. Other goals and objectives will be considered successful upon achieving
success criteria. The following table summarizes Site success criteria.
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 5
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Success Criteria
Streams
•
All streams must maintain an Ordinary High -Water Mark (OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
•
Bank height ratio (BHR) cannot exceed 1.2 at any measured cross-section over the monitoring period.
•
BHR at any measured riffle cross-section should not change by more than 10% from baseline condition over
monitoring period.
•
A minimum of 30-days continuous surface flow for intermittent streams.
•
The stream project shall remain stable and all other performance standards shall be met through four separate
bankfull events, occurring in separate years, during the monitoring ears 1-7.
Wetland Hydrology
•
Saturation or inundation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for, at a minimum, 10 percent of the
growing season, during average climatic conditions. Note: Growing season length will be confirmed with a
continuous recording temperature gauge that will measure from February to April each monitoring year.
Vegetation
•
Within planted portions of the Site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3; a minimum of
260 stems per acre must be present at year 5; and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at year 7.
•
Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5, and 10 feet in height at year 7 in each plot.
•
Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting list for the site;
natural recruits not on the planting list may be considered by the IRT on a case -by -case basis.
Note: BHR will be calculated using procedures outlined in the latest approved guidance from NCDMS.
2.0 METHODS
Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc. Annual monitoring reports of the
data collected will be submitted to the NCDMS by Restoration Systems no later than December
31 of each monitoring year data is collected. The monitoring schedule is summarized in the
following table.
Monitoring Schedule
Resource Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Streams
Wetlands
Vegetation
Macroinvertebrates
Visual Assessment*
Report Submittal
*Visual Assessment will be complimented by permanent photographic points located at each permanent cross
section and vegetation plot.
2.1 Monitoring
The monitoring parameters are summarized in the following table.
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 6
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Monitoring Summary
Stream Parameters
Parameter
Method
Schedule/Frequency
Number/Extent
Data Collected/Reported
Stream Profile
Full longitudinal survey
As -built (unless otherwise
All restored stream channels
Graphic and tabular data.
required)
Stream Dimension
Cross -sections
Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
Total of 14 cross -sections on restored
Graphic and tabular data.
channels
Areas of concern will be depicted on a
Visual Assessments
Yearly
All restored stream channels
plan view figure with a written
Channel Stability
assessment and photograph of the area
included in the report.
Additional Cross -sections
Yearly
Only if instability is documented
Graphic and tabular data.
during monitoring
Stream flow regime is not in question.
Stream Hydrology
Continuous monitoring surface water
Continuous recording through
However, surface water gauges and/or
NA
gauges and/or trail camera
monitoring period
cameras will be used to document
bankfull events.
Continuous monitoring surface water
Continuous recording through
Surface water gauge on Slingshot
Surface water data for each monitoring
gauges and/or trail camera
monitoring period
Creek and UT 1
period
Bankfull Events
Visual/Physical Evidence
Continuous through
All restored stream channels
Visual evidence, photo documentation,
monitoringperiod
and/or rain data.
" Qual 4" method described in Standard
Pre -construction, Years 3, 5,
Results* will be presented on a site -by -
Benthic
Operating Procedures for Collection
and 7 during the "index
2 stations (one at the lower end of
site basis and will include a list of taxa
collected, an enumeration of
Macroinvertebrates
and Analysis of Benthic
period" referenced in Small
UTl and one at the lower end of
Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and
Macroinvertebrates, Version 5.0
Streams Biocriteria
Slingshot Creek)
Tricopetera taxa as well as Biotic Index
(NCDWR 2016)
Development (NCDWQ 2009)
values.
Wetland Parameters
I Parameter I Method I Schedule/Freauencv I Number/Extent I Data Collected/Renorted I
Years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Soil temperature at the beginning of
Wetland Groundwater throughout the year with the 11 gauges spread throughout each monitoring period to verify the
Restoration gauges growing season defined as restored/enhanced wetlands start of the growing season, groundwater
March 1-October 26 and rain data for each monitoring eriod
Veeetation Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Permanent vegetation plots 0.0247 acre
Vegetation (100 square meters) in size; CVS-EEP As -built, Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 10 plots spread across the Site Species, height, planted vs. volunteer,
establishment and Protocol for Recording Vegetation, stems/acre
Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008
vigor Annual random vegetation plots, 0.0247
acre (100 sauare meters) in size As -built, Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 2 plots randomly selected each year Species and height
*Benthic Macroinvertebrate sampling data will not be tied to success criteria; however, the data may be used as a tool to observe positive gains to in -stream habitat
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 7
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

3.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Monitoring Guidelines. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water
Quality Plan. Available:
https:Hdeg.nc.�zov/about/divisions/water-resources/plannin /bg asin-planning/water-
resource-plans/cape-fear-2005 [December 8, 2016]. North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016. Standard Operating Procedures
for Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates (Version 5.0). (online).
Available:
https:Hfiles. nc. gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Environmental%20 SciencesBAU/NCDWR
Macroinvertebrate-S OP-February%202016_final . pdf
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2009. Small Streams Biocriteria
Development. Available:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=2d54ad23-0345-4d6e-82fd-
04005f48eaa7&groupId=3 8364
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Cape Fear River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009 (online). Available :
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=864e82e8-725c-415e-8ed9-
c72dfcb55012&groupId=60329
North Carolina Stream Functional Assessment Team. (NC SFAT 2015). N.C. Stream Assessment
Method (NC SAM) User Manual. Version 2.1.
North Carolina Wetland Functional Assessment Team. (NC WFAT 2010). N.C. Wetland
Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual. Version 4.1.
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 8
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Simon A, Hupp CR. 1986. Geomorphic and Vegetative Recovery Processes Along Modified
Tennessee Streams: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Disturbed Fluvial Systems. Forest
Hydrology and Watershed Management. IAHS-AISH Publ.167.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2017. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.e�zov.usda. og v/App/HomePage.htm [May 2, 2018]. United States
Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1992. Soil Survey of Rockingham County,
NC. United States Department of Agriculture.
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 9
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Appendix A
Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page I
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Slineshot Creek Restoration Site
Stream
Existing
Mitigation
Restoration
Project
Stationing/
Footage/
Plan
Restoration Level
Mitigation
Footage/
Comment
Segment
Wetland Type
Acreage
Foot
Footage/
Ratio
Acreage
Acreage
Slingshot
00+00 to 03+05
305
305
Preservation
10:1
305
Creek -Reach 1
Slingshot
03+05 to 04+59
154
154
Enhancement (Level II)
2.5:1
154
Creek -Reach 2
Slingshot
04+59 to 05+78
156
119
Restoration (Priority I)
1:1
124
Creek -Reach 3
Slingshot
05+78 to 07+17
139
139
Enhancement (Level 1)
1.5:1
143
Creek -Reach 4
1261f of Slingshot Creek is located
Slingshot
2060-50-51
outside of the conservation
07+17 to 27+77
2069
25=
Restoration (Priority I)
1:1
1970
Creek -Reach 5
1934
easement and therefore is not
generating credit
Slingshot
27+77 to 28+74
97
97
Enhancement (Level II)
2.5:1
97
Creek -Reach 6
UT lA
00+00 to 01+95
195
195
Enhancement Level II
2.5:1
195
521f of the UT1 is located outside
UT 113
01+95 to 06+95
500
500-52=
448
Enhancement (Level I)
1.5:1
475
of the conservation easement and
therefore is not generating credit
UT 1C
06+95 to 09+70
273
275
Restoration PrioriI
1:1
270
UT 2
00+04 to 01+78
130
173
Restoration(Priority I
1:1
169
UT 3
00+00 to 01+89
189
189
Enhancement (Level II)
2.5:1
189
UT 4
00+00 to 00+86
86
86
Preservation
10:1
86
Wetland
1.018
Restoration
1:1
1.018
Restoration
Wetland
0.69
0.606
Enhancement
2:1
0.606
Enhancement
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058)
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Rockingham County, North Carolina
page 2
Restoration Systems, LLC
August 2020

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits (continued)
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Rip
Wetland
Coastal
Marsh
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riverine
Non-Riv
Restoration
2501.000*
1.018
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
0.303
Enhancement I
391.333*
Enhancement 11
254.000
Creation
Preservation
39.100
73185.433
TOTALS
1.321
*An additional 126 linear feet of stream restoration is proposed to occur outside of the conservation easement and is therefore not included in this total or in mitigation credit
calculations.
**An additional 52 linear feet of stream enhancement (level I) is proposed to occur outside of the conservation easement and is therefore not included in this total or in mitigation
credit calculations.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Technical Proposal (RFP No. 16-007330
February 2, 2018
February 8, 2018
Institution Date (NCDMS Contract No. 100058)
--
Aril 24, 2018
Miti ation Plan
Se tember 2018
June 2019
Construction Plans
--
November 18, 2019
404 Permit
--
January 2, 2020
Site Construction Final Walkthrou h
--
Aril 30, 2020
Planting
--
Aril 30, 2020
As -built Baseline Monitoring (WO)
May 2020
August 2020
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 3
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site
Full Delivery Provider
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Worth Creech
919-755-9490
Designer & Monitoring Provider
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis
919-215-1693
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site
Project Information
Project Name
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site
Project County
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Project Area acres
11.6
Project Coordinates latitude & latitude
36.334687°N, 79.711665°W
Planted Area acres
9.3
Project Watershed Summary Information
Ph sio ra hic Province
Piedmont
Project River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project (14-di it)
03030002010010
NCDWR Sub -basin for Project
03-06-01
Project Drainage Area (acres)
270
Percentage of Project Drainage Area that is
Impervious
<5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Managed Herbaceous Cover & Hardwood Swamps
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058)
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Rockingham County, North Carolina
page 4
Restoration Systems, LLC
August 2020

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site (continued)
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Slingshot Creek
UT 1
UT 2
UT 3
UT 4
Length of reach (linear feet)
2920
968
130
189
86
Valley Classification & Confinement
Alluvial, confined
Drainage Area acres
270
60
65
9
22
NCDWR Stream ID Score
---
---
---
---
---
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Intermittent
Perennial
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
WS-III, B, NSW
Existing Morphological Description
(Ros en 1996)
G4/5
GS
GS
CS
Ego
Proposed Stream Classification (Rosgen
1996)
C/E 4
C/E 4
C/E 4
C5
Eg4
Existing Evolutionary Stage (Simon and
Hupp 1986)
III/IV
I/III/IV
IIIAV
IUIII
IUIII
Underlying Mapped Soils
Clifford sandy clay loam, Codorus loam, Davie sandy loam, Fairview -Poplar complex, Nathalic sandy loam, Poplar Forest
sandy clay loam
Drainage Class
Well -drained, moderately well -drained, somewhat poorly -drained, well -drained, well -drained, well -drained, well -drained
H dric Soil Status
Nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, nonh dric, res ectivel
Valley Sloe
0.0195
0.0315
0.0218
--- ---
FEMA Classification
NA
Native Vegetation Community
Piedmont Alluvial Forest/Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover (Site)
43% forest,55% agricultural land, <2% low density residential/impervious surface
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover
(Cedarock Reference Channel)
65%forest, 30%agricultural land, <5%low density residential/impervious surface
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive
Vegetation
<5%
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) page 5
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site (continued)
Wetland Summary
Information
Parameters
Wetlands
Wetland acreage
1.02 acre drained & 0.69 acre degraded
Wetland Type
Riparian riverine
Mapped Soil Series
Worsham
Drainage Class
Poorly drained
H dric Soil Status
H dric
Source of Hydrology
Groundwater, stream overbank
Hydrologic Impairment
Incised streams, compacted soils, livestock
Native Vegetation Community
Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial Forest
% Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation
<5%
Restoration Method
Hydrologic, vegetative, livestock
Enhancement Method
Vegetative, livestock
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States -Section 401
Yes
Yes
JD Package A D
Waters of the United States -Section 404
Yes
Yes
JD Package A D
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
CE Document A E
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
CE Document A E
Coastal Zone Management Act
No
--
NA
FEMA Flood lain Compliance
No
--
CE Document A E
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
--
NA
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058)
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
August 2020

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Project Location
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photographs
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058)
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
August 2020

C0P7igh'UO 'fi' fibMIF
So ci Me, b d
n
Ler
N
n' 'tray t`Pa ! • • 'r �_ ; ` f
i
d' • �� .,_/ � �,, t it �
J.
��•ti aS / . •r n Axiom Environimniar, mc.
Prepared for:
-=�. '\.� •- . �— ' • .� ' JO *ter �
158
RESTORATION
41
• `94 �•1 y � :'3
`_ •. I �. �' f • • ,-_��. �Y9 ,�-. � - �-' , Project:
't, �_ ` i �� - e� • �� �� '. M�, SLINGSHOT CREEK
-- -= Ev ~: f, �-_ I .� �_- ■ L,�'' ?414 k STREAM AND
WETLAND
Val
-��•�* ` - �� p ��- �'.�• ,� . I` v ;'�' '► MITIGATION SITE
NT
Rockingham County, N
� Title:
8758
k r': e' �� ' ~ L `' - /I • - .. y • • „.. } A �J ` . •:
Reidsville
/ o , .• 1, 29 SITE LOCATION
l �' d � - 1 C ` g : * s• Q end •. • .Danbury Ch '
Cem
-' } ]
cam. o-
29 ' jt ;{damp �53+• MemQ araens '� - r1S• r
Drawn by:
r �
158 f. , `� — _ r� - • f, KRJ
•� �: L , 'r} '��• $•ice -- - Faith Wail f S Date:
Arrfi�[p-�� DEC 2018
Scale:
i�
1:20,000
`�� '� - "� �.' / •'� USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Reidsville NC Quad)
t -• I� 4 cx I � B� ,.,T
�[ �:..— �: _ ,•C BMh7 . ; f �,. Project No.:
18-013
A �y``�� '�� // r' j Directions to the Site from Raleigh:
Z ,ter ? - .- - From Raleigh travel west on 1-40 for- 45 miles
a,• _3 - Take Exit 148 onto NC-54W toward Graham/Chapel Hilll and turn right onto Harden Street FIGURE
Travel - 1.6 miles, then turn right onto NC-87 N/W Elm Street
After - 5 miles, turn right onto NC-87 N/Ossipee Road
Travel - 19.3 miles, then turn left and stay on NC-87 N
After 4.1 miles, turn left toward US-158, then turn left onto US-158 W
•- - - _ '_ r • ^ _ After - 0.9 miles, take a slight right onto Iron Works Road, then take a right onto Harbor Road
The Site is located north of the end of Harbor Road
= rl «., . r Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic, - Latitude: 36.334687' N, Longitude: 79.711665' W
Imo+
Society, i-cubed
r

Legend1, .r f n ' ,' R N
Q Slingshot Creek Easement = 11.6 ac j ow
�' c '.v E►
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement (Level 1) �
4 f. f
Stream Enhancement (Level 11) S'sx'
Stream Preservation
Axiom Environnxnial, mc.
No Credit - Crossing '
Wetland Reestablishment G� "
Prepared for:
Wetland Rehabilitation
0 CVS Plots '
CVS Plot Origins 1009°`, : •.,, l
50m x 2m VegetationTransects
Cross-SectionsOD
RESTORATION
O Groundwater Gauge ;
Flow Gauge''
f'
Rain Gauge/ Soil Temperature Logger :4
a p Project:
(� Benthic Sampling Stations ; x
; juA SLINGSHOT CREEK
40
` STREAM AND
WETLAND
MITIGATION SITE
r XS-5 O �,
XC
• �,. .Y ,r ':f. + - is Y X
Rockingham County, NC
d r
;, �(,`' • ` �L;:_ r yoiAAJ Title:
M _ " y CURRENT
,;;�:r,:=;: 'r' ,�•� ` „� CONDITIONS
.. Fr
��w:•- ;. � - - .>; r PLAN VIEW
y2 " 4 UT1 KRJ
f. g_ _ ... �'";':` - ... ".. a: •� � � Date:
• is '?:` r• +�, z.: i "• m. ,.:.,,-,,_,,,.y._.._.
AUG 2020
�0. v`;
3
k`
S + . Scale:
x >;"
" O d' •.
K :. -"=:" :•. Lam, .. 1:2200
2. 2�' O4 }� Project No.:
1 1 N 18-013
2 � N �r �•:.F rvr�•
X °3.
FIGURE
250 500 1,000
��.. Feet

Slingshot Creek
MYO (2020) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken May 4, 2020)
I Plot 1 I
I Plot 4 1
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Report —June 2020

Slingshot Creek
MYO (2020) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (taken May 4, 2020)
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Report — March 2020

Appendix C
Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. Planted Vegetation Totals
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) Appendices
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site
Species
Total*
Acres
12.05
Alnus serrulata
350
Betula nigra
700
Celtis occidentalis
300
Cercis canadensis
200
Cornus amomum
1700
Diospyros virginiana
200
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
400
Fraxinus caroliniana
100
Liriodendron tulipifera
500
Nyssa sylvatica
500
Platanus occidentalis
1500
Prunus serotina
300
Quercus alba
500
Quercus nigra
1500
Quercus phellos
1400
Quecus shumardii
500
Rhamnus caroliniana
300
TOTALS
10,950
Average Stems/Acre
909
*Approximately 2000 live stakes of willow (Salix spp.), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), silky dogwood (Cornus amomum),
and ninebark (Physocarpus opulifolius) were planted but are not included in this table.
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058)
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
August 2020

Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Project Name: Slingshot Creek
Current Plot Data (MYO 2020)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
18013-01-0001
18013-01-0002
18013-01-0003
18013-01-0004
18013-01-0005
18013-01-0006
18013-01-0007
18013-01-0008
18013-01-0009
18013-01-0010
MYO(2020)
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
11
11
11
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
4
4
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Corpus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
2
2
2
9
9
9
7
7
7
3
3
3
8
8
8
6
6
6
5
5
5
171
17
17
58
58
58
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
31
3
3
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
10
10
10
11
11
11
3
3
3
27
27
27
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3
31
3
11
11
1
11
1
1
31
3
31
1
1
1
8
8
8
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
25
251
25
13
13
13
6
6
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
56
56
56
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
3
3
3
1
1 3
3
3
Quercus
oak
Tree
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
27
27
27
Quercus alba
1white oak
ITree
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
21
2
2
2
1
1
1
11
11
11
Quercus nigra
Iwater oak
ITree
4
4
4
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
6
61
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
22
22
22
Quercus phellos
1willow oak
ITree
1
1
21
21
2
1
2
2
21
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
191
191
19
161
161
16
151
15
15
20
20
20
271
271
27
381
381
43
27
271
27
26
261
26
221
221
22
261
26
26
236
236
241
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.25
61
61
6
7
7
7
51
51
51
51
51
51
91
91
91
61
61
8
61
61
61
61
61
6
41
41
4
4
4
4
141
141
16
768.91
768.91
768.91647.51
647.51
647.51
6071
6071
6071
809.41
809.41809.41
10931
10931
10931
15381
15381
17401
10931
10931
10931
10521
10521
10521
890.31
890.31
890.31
10521
10521
1052
955.11
955.11
975.3
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P-all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site
Species
T-1 (222°)
T-2 (230°)
Cornus amomum
5
7
Liriodendron tuli i era
1
Platanus occidentalis
6
5
uercus alba
7
1
uercus l rata
3
uercus phellos
9
uercus shumardii
2
Total Number of Stems
21
25
Stems/Acre
850
1012
Table 8. Planted Vegetation Totals
Slingshot Creek Restoration Site
Plot #
Planted Stems/Acre
Success Criteria Met?
1
768
Yes
2
647
Yes
3
607
Yes
4
809
Yes
5
1093
Yes
6
1538
Yes
7
1093
Yes
8
1052
Yes
9
890
Yes
10
1052
Yes
T-1
850
Yes
T-2
1012
Yes
Average Planted Stems/Acre
951
Yes
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) Appendices
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data
Tables 9A-9D. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables l0A-10D. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Tables 11A-1ID. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters -Cross -sections)
Tables 12A-12D. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058) Appendices
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Rockingham County, North Carolina August 2020

Table 9a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058 - Segment/Reach: Slingshot
Creek Downstream
1200 feet
Parameter
Gauge2
Regional Curve
Pre-ExistingCondition
Flint Rock Farm Reference Data
Caswell Gameland Reference Data
Desi n
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
ILL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.7
11.7
15.8
6.9
7.5
8.1
14.6
18.4
21.9
11.5
12.5
13.3
12.59
12.64
12.64
12.69
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
12
20
100
100
100
100
23
33.5
44
70
100
150
100
100
100
100
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
1
1.3
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1
1
0.8
0.9
1
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.87
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.1
1.6
1.9
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.19
1.21
1.21
1.24
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
11.1
11.1
11.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
17.6
17.6
17.6
11.1
11.1
11.1
10.80
10.89
10.89
10.99
2
Width/Depth Ratio
6.7
12.4
22.6
7.7
9.6
11.6
14.9
19.6
24.3
12
14
16
14.65
14.66
14.66
14.67
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
1.6
10.5
12.3
13.4
14.5
1.5
1.8
2
5.6
8
12
7.88
7.91
7.91
7.95
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1.3
3
4.5
1
1
1
1.4
1.8
2.2
1
1
1.2
1
1
1
1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to staightening activities
18.37
26.49
26.21
36.17
4.90
21
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.005
0.019
0
0.015
0.036
0.02
0.025
0.034
0.003
0.017
0.016
0.050
0.009
21.000
Pool Length (ft)
3.33
11.96
14.28
18.64
4.92
22
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.6
2
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
1.2
1.7
1.9
0.34
1.00
0.96
1.72
0.22
15
Pool Spacing (ft)
8.9
17.8
32.7
31.6
58.2
101.8
37.4
49.9
99.7
31.81
47.71
46.26
68.03
7.49
21
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities
7.9
5.2
0.8
13.4
1.1
14.3
8.4
1.1
29.4
1.9
24.9
12.8
2.1
47.2
4.1
15
18.6
0.8
61
1
28.6
31.1
1.1
104.6
1.6
42.2
46.3
2.1
154.7
1.9
24.9
24.9
2
74.8
2
37.4
37.4
3
106
3
49.9
124.7
10
149.6
4
24.9
24.9
2
74.8
2
37.4
37.4
3
106
3
49.9
124.7
10
149.6
4
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/'
4.7
0.82
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
47.38
47.1
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G 4/5
E 5
Cg 3/4
E/C 3/4
E/C 3/4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
0.74
4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
44.4
Valley length (ft)
1200
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1368
1389
Sinuosity (ft)
1.14
1.22
1.14
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0171
0.0049
0.01
0.017
0.013
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells mdicate that these will typically not be filledm.
t=The distributions for these parameters can include information fiom both the ­ss-sectm measurements and the loneimdinalprofile. _=For projects wrth a proximal USGS gauge m4ine with the project reach(added bankffill -ication-
rare).
3. Utifizmg XS measurement data produce an estimate fthe bankffill tloodphm area m acres, which should be the area fiom the top fbank to the toe fthe tes riser/slope.
4 =Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual mu y for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of,alue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 9b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058 - Segment/Reach: Slingshot Creek Upstream
1609 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Flint Rock Farm Reference Data
Caswell Gameland Reference Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
ILL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6
8.8
14.6
6.9
7.5
8.1
14.6
18.4
21.9
10
10.8
11.5
11.17
11.44
11.44
11.72
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
12
16
100
100
100
100
23
33.5
44
30
50
70
100
100
100
100
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.9
1.4
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1
1
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.66
0.76
0.76
0.86
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.7
1.4
1.9
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.5
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.03
1.20
1.20
1.36
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
8.3
8.3
8.3
6.1
6.1
6.1
17.6
17.6
17.6
8.3
8.3
8.3
7.42
8.78
8.78
10.13
2
Width/Depth Ratio
4.3
9.8
24.3
7.7
9.6
11.6
14.9
19.6
24.3
12
14
16
13.55
15.18
15.18
16.81
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
1.5
11.4
12.3
13.4
14.5
1.5
1.8
2
2.8
4.6
6.5
8.53
8.74
8.74
8.95
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1.4
2.2
3.6
1
1
1
1.4
1.8
2.2
1
1
1.2
1
1
1
1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to staightening activities
6.63
23.23
21.07
65.30
11.04
31
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.005
0.019
0
0.015
0.036
0.018
0.023
0.031
0.002
0.019
0.017
0.039
0.009
31
Pool Length (ft)
3.20
11.09
10.42
30.30
6.05
34
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.6
2
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
1
1.5
1.6
0.64
1.01
0.97
1.36
0.20
13
Pool Spacing (ft)
8.9
17.8
32.7
31.6
58.2
101.8
32.3
43.1
86.2
21.08
41.48
38.75
79.89
13.91
31
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities
7.9
5.2
0.8
13.4
1.1
14.3
8.4
1.1
29.4
1.9
24.9
12.8
2.1
47.2
4.1
15
18.6
0.8
61
1
28.6
31.1
1.1
104.6
1.6
42.2
46.3
2.1
154.7
1.9
21.6
21.6
2
64.7
2
32.3
32.3
3
91.6
3
43.1
107.8
10
129.4
4
21.6
21.6
2
64.7
2
32.3
32.3
3
91.6
3
43.1
107.8
10
129.4
4
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/'
0.315
0.64
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
30.4
32.22
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G 4/5
E 5
Cg 3/4
E/C 3/4
E/C 3/4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
0.91
3.94
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
32.7
Valley length (ft)
1609
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1898
1042
Sinuosity (ft)
1.18
1.22
1.14
1.15
1.15
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.049
0.0049
0.01
0.0153
0.0127
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells mdicate that these will typically not be filledm.
t=The distributions for these parameters can include information fiom both the ­ss-sectm measurements and the loneimdinalprofile. _=For projects wrth a proximal USGS gauge m4ine with the project reach(added bankffill -ication-
rare).
3. Utifizmg XS measurement data produce an estimate fthe bankffill tloodphm area m acres, which should be the area fiom the top fbank to the toe fthe tes riser/slope.
4 =Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual mu y for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of,alue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 9c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058 - Segment/Reach: UT 1 968 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Flint Rock Farm Reference Data
Caswell Gameland Reference Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
ILL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.4
7.2
14.5
6.9
7.5
8.1
14.6
18.4
21.9
7
7.6
8.1
7.97
11.68
11.68
15.39
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
9
12
100
100
100
100
23
33.5
44
30
50
90
100
100
100
100
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.41
0.74
0.74
1.07
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.6
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.5
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.70
1.29
1.29
1.88
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
4
4
4
6.1
6.1
6.1
17.6
17.6
17.6
4.1
4.1
4.1
3.23
9.82
9.82
16.40
2
Width/Depth Ratio
4.9
12
48.3
7.7
9.6
11.6
14.9
19.6
24.3
12
14
16
14.45
17.06
17.06
19.67
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
2
13.7
12.3
13.4
14.5
1.5
1.8
2
4
6.6
11.9
6.50
9.52
9.52
12.54
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1.2
2.4
3.7
1
1
1
1.4
1.8
2.2
1
1
1.2
1
1
1
1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to staightening activities
2.89
15.29
14.31
68.79
12.62
26
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.005
0.019
0
0.015
0.036
0.032
0.039
0.053
0.005
0.024
0.020
0.078
0.018
26
Pool Length (ft)
1.79
8.61
6.24
26.47
6.27
26
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.6
2
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
0.7
1
1.1
0.34
1.50
1.57
2.46
0.66
16
Pool Spacing (ft)
8.9
17.8
32.7
31.6
58.2
101.8
22.7
30..3
60.6
12.76
30.71
27.39
74.65
13.50
25
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities
7.9
5.2
0.8
13.4
1.1
14.3
8.4
1.1
29.4
1.9
24.9
12.8
2.1
47.2
4.1
15
18.6
0.8
61
1
28.6
31.1
1.1
104.6
1.6
42.2
46.3
2.1
154.7
1.9
15.2
15.2
2
45.5
2
22.7
22.7
3
64.4
3
30.3
75.8
10
90.9
4
15.2
15.2
2
45.5
2
22.7
22.7
3
64.4
3
30.3
75.8
10
90.9
4
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/'
7.09
0.78
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
24.99
25.44
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G 5
E 5
Cg 3/4
E/C 3/4
E/C 3/4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
0.75
3.78
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
15
Valley length (ft)
968
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1142
812
Sinuosity (ft)
1.18
1.22
1.14
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0267
0.0049
0.01
0.0263
0.0228
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells mdicate that these will typically not be filledm.
t=The distributions for these parameters can include information fiom both the ­ss-sectm measurements and the loneimdinalprofile. _=For projects wrth a proximal USGS gauge m4ine with the project reach(added bankffill -ication-
rare).
3. Utifizmg XS measurement data produce an estimate fthe bankffill tloodphm area m acres, which should be the area fiom the top fbank to the toe fthe tes riser/slope.
4 =Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual mu y for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of,alue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 9d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058 - Segment/Reach: UT 2 130 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Flint Rock Farm Reference Data
Caswell Gameland Reference Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
ILL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.9
7.5
8.1
14.6
18.4
21.9
7
7.6
8.1
11.17
11.44
11.44
11.72
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
100
100
23
33.5
44
30
50
90
100
100
100
100
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6646
0.76
0.76
0.86
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.5
0.6
0.8
0.8
1.0274
1.20
1.20
1.36
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
6.1
6.1
6.1
17.6
17.6
17.6
4.1
4.1
4.1
7.4237
8.78
8.78
10.13
2
Width/Depth Ratio
7.7
9.6
11.6
14.9
19.6
24.3
12
14
16
13.547
15.18
15.18
16.81
2
Entrenchment Ratio
12.3
13.4
14.5
1.5
1.8
2
4
6.6
11.9
8.5343
8.74
8.74
8.95
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1.4
1.8
2.2
1
1
1.2
1
1
1
1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to staightening activities
8.6245
12.51
10.24
24.34
5.92
6
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.005
0.019
0
0.015
0.036
0.032
0.039
0.053
0.000
0.008
0.010
0.014
0.006
6
Pool Length (ft)
3.0779
6.51
6.01
12.29
3.07
6
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.6
2
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
0.7
1
1.1
0.9208
1.02
1.00
1.14
0.11
3
Pool Spacing (ft)
8.9
17.8
32.7
31.6
58.2
101.8
22.7
30..3
60.6
18.476
22.24
22.19
28.87
4.19
5
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools due to staightening activities
7.9
5.2
0.8
13.4
1.1
14.3
8.4
1.1
29.4
1.9
24.9
12.8
2.1
47.2
4.1
15
18.6
0.8
61
1
28.6
31.1
1.1
104.6
1.6
42.2
46.3
2.1
154.7
1.9
15.2
15.2
2
45.5
2
22.7
22.7
3
64.4
3
30.3
75.8
10
90.9
4
15.2
15.2
2
45.5
2
22.7
22.7
3
64.4
3
30.3
75.8
10
90.9
4
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/'
14.79
0.78
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
18.45
25.44
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G 5
E 5
Cg 3/4
E/C 3/4
E/C 3/4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
0.27
3.78
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
15.9
Valley length (ft)
130
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
152
166
Sinuosity (ft)
1.17
1.22
1.14
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0186
0.0049
0.01
0.0263
0.004
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
4% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells mdicate that these will typically not be filledm.
t = The distributions for these parameters can include information fiom both the ­ss-sectm measurements and the loneimdinal profile. _ = For projects wrth a proximal USGS gauge m4ine with the project reach (added b.Affi l -ication -rare).
3. Utifizmg XS measurement data produce an estimate fthe b.Affill tloodphm area m acres, which should be the area fiom the top fbank to the toe fthe tes riser/slope.
4 =Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual mu y for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of,alue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058) - Segment/Reach: Slingshot Creek Downstream (1200 feet)
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As-built/Baseline
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / So/
53
11
25
7
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°/
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di'/ disp (mm)
2Entrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5-1.99 / 2.0-4.9 / 5.0-9.9 / >10
Incision Class <1.2 / 1.2-1.49 / 1.5-1.99 / >2.0
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058) - Segment/Reach: Slingshot Creek Upstream (1609 feet)
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data Design
As-built/Baseline
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
52
7
27
7
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°/
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di'/ disp (mm)
2Entrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5-1.99 / 2.0-4.9 / 5.0-9.9 / >10
Incision Class <1.2 / 1.2-1.49 / 1.5-1.99 / >2.0
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in-
1 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
2 = Entrenchment Class -Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross -sections as well as visual estimates
3 = Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross -sections as well as the longitudinal profile
Footnotes 2,3 -These classes are loosley built around the Rosgen classification and hazard ranking breaks, but were adjusted slightly to make for easier assignment to somewhat coarser bins based on visual estimates in the field such that measurement of every segment for ER would not be necessary.
The intent here is to provide the reader/consumer of design and monitoring information with a good general sense of the extent of hydrologic containment in the pre-existing and the rehabilitated states as well as comparisons to the reference distributions.
ER and BHR have been addressed in prior submissions as a subsample (cross -sections as part of the design measurements), however, these subsamples have often focused entirely on facilitating design without providing a thorough pre-constrution distribution of these parameters, leaving the reader/consumerwith a sample that is weighted heavily on the stable sections of
the reach. This means that the distributions for these parameters should include data from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile and in the case of ER, visual estimates. For example, the typical longitudinal profile permits sampling of the BHR at riffles beyond those subject to cross -sections and therefore can be readily integrated and provide
a more complete sample distribution for these parameters, thereby providing the distribution/coverage necessary to provide meaningful comparisons.

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058) - Segment/Reach: UT 1 (968 feet)
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As-built/Baseline
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / So/
49
11
28
10
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Beo/
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
2Entrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5-1.99 / 2.0-4.9 / 5.0-9.9 / >10
Incision Class <1.2 / 1.2-1.49 / 1.5-1.99 / >2.0
Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058) - Segment/Reach: UT 2 (130 feet)
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built/Baseline
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / So/
45
9
23
12
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°/
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di'/ disp (mm)
2Entrenchment Class <1.5 / 1.5-1.99 / 2.0-4.9 / 5.0-9.9 / >10
Incision Class <1.2 / 1.2-1.49 / 1.5-1.99 / >2.0
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in-
1 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
2 = Entrenchment Class -Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross -sections as well as visual estimates
3 = Assign/bin the reach footage into the classes indicated and provide the percentage of the total reach footage in each class in the table. This will result from the measured cross -sections as well as the longitudinal profile
Footnotes 2,3 -These classes are loosley built around the Rosgen classification and hazard ranking breaks, but were adjusted slightly to make for easier assignment to somewhat coarser bins based on visual estimates in the field such that measurement of every segment for ER would not be necessary.
The intent here is to provide the reader/consumer of design and monitoring information with a good general sense of the extent of hydrologic containment in the pre-existing and the rehabilitated states as well as comparisons to the reference distributions.
ER and BHR have been addressed in prior submissions as a subsample (cross -sections as part of the design measurements), however, these subsamples have often focused entirely on facilitating design without providing a thorough pre-constrution distribution of these parameters, leaving the reader/consumerwith a sample that is weighted heavily on the stable sections of
the reach. This means that the distributions for these parameters should include data from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile and in the case of ER, visual estimates. For example, the typical longitudinal profile permits sampling of the BHR at riffles beyond those subject to cross -sections and therefore can be readily integrated and provide
a more complete sample distribution for these parameters, thereby providing the distribution/coverage necessary to provide meaningful comparisons.

Table 1 la. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058 - Segment/Reach: Slings ot Creek Downstream 1200 feet
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (Pool)
Cross Section 4 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.44
12.59
16.13
12.69
Floodprone Width (ft)
NA
100
NA
100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.352
0.858
1.369
0.866
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.997
1.236
2.289
1.19
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
18.17
10.8
22.08
10.99
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
NA
14.67
NA
14.65
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
NA
7.945
NA
7.88
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ft2
d50 (mm)l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I f-1-1
Table 11 b. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058 - Segment/Reach: Slinc shot Creek Upstream 1609 feet
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.17
12.09
11.72
12.41
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
NA
100
NA
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.665
1.182
0.865
1.314
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.027
1
1.85
1.364
1
2.281
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
7.424
14.29
10.13
1
16.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.81
NA
13.55
NA
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
8.952
NA
8.534
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ft2
d50 (mm)
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

Table 11c. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058 - Se ment/Reach: UT 1 968 feet
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.972
11.04
15.39
12.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
NA
100
NA
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.405
1.035
1.065
1.412
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.704
1
2.0281
1
1
1
1.876
1
2.435
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
3.231
11.43
16.4
18.08
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
19.67
NA
14.45
NA
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
12.54
NA
6.496
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
Cross Sectional Area between end pins(ft Z
d50 (mm)
Table 11d. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058 -Segment/Reach: UT 2 130 feet
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.453
7.796
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
NA
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.566
0.813
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.927
1.34
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
5.355
6.339
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.69
NA
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
10.58
NA
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ftZ
d50 (mm)
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

Exhibit Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058) - Segment/Reach: Slingshot Creek Downstream (1200 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
I MY-1
MY-2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.7
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
100
100
100
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.87
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.19
1.21
1.21
1.24
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
10.8
10.9
10.9
11
2
Width/Depth Ratio
14.7
14.7
14.7
14.7
2
Entrenchment Ratio
7.88
7.91
7.91
7.95
2
Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
18.4
26.5
26.2
36.2
4.9
21
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.01
21
Pool Length (ft)
3.33
12
14.3
18.6
4.92
22
Pool Max depth (ft)
0.34
1
0.96
1.72
0.22
15
Pool Spacing (ft)
31.8
47.7
46.3
68
7.49
21
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
24.9 37.4 49.9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
24.9 37.4 125
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
2 3 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)
74.8 106 150
6 Meander Width Ratio
2 3 4
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E/C 3/4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1389
Sinuosity (ft)
1.15
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.013
BF slope (ft/ft)
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
53
11
25
7
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Exhibit Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058) - Segment/Reach: Slingshot Creek Upstream (1609 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
I MY-1
MY-2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.2
11.4
11.4
11.7
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
100
100
100
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.66
0.76
0.76
0.86
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.03
1.2
1.2
1.36
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
7.42
8.78
8.78
10.1
2
Width/Depth Ratio
13.5
15.2
15.2
16.8
2
Entrenchment Ratio
8.53
8.74
8.74
8.95
2
Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
8.62
12.5
10.2
24.3
5.92
6
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
6
Pool Length (ft)
3.08
6.51
6.01
12.3
3.07
6
Pool Max depth (ft)
0.92
1.02
1
1.14
0.11
3
Pool Spacing (ft)
18.5
22.2
22.2
28.9
4.19
5
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
21.6 32.3 43.1
Radius of Curvature (ft)
21.6 32.3 108
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
2 3 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)
64.7 91.6 129
6� Meander Width Ratio
2 3 4
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E/C 3/4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1042
Sinuosity (ft)
1.15
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0127
BF slope (ft/ft)
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
52
7
27
7
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Exhibit Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058) - Segment/Reach: UT 1 (968 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
I MY-1
MY-2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.97
11.7
11.7
15.4
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
100
100
100
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.41
0.74
0.74
1.07
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.7
1.29
1.29
1.88
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
3.23
9.82
9.82
16.4
2
Width/Depth Ratio
14.4
17.1
17.1
19.7
2
Entrenchment Ratio
6.5
9.52
9.52
12.5
2
Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
2.89
15.3
14.3
68.8
12.6
26
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.08
0.02
26
Pool Length (ft)
1.79
8.61
6.24
26.5
6.27
26
Pool Max depth (ft)
0.34
1.5
1.57
2.46
0.66
16
Pool Spacing (ft)
12.8
30.7
27.4
74.6
13.5
25
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
15.2 22.7 30.3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
15.2 22.7 75.8
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
2 3 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)
45.5 64.4 90.9
6 Meander Width Ratio
2 3 4
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E/C 3/4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
812
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0228
BF slope (ft/ft)
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
49
11
28
10
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Exhibit Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site/100058) - Segment/Reach: UT 2 (130 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
I MY-1
MY-2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.45
9.45
9.45
9.45
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
100
100
100
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
1
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.93
0.93
0.93
0.93
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
5.35
5.35
5.35
5.35
1
Width/Depth Ratio
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
1
Entrenchment Ratio
10.6
10.6
10.6
10.6
1
Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
18.4
26.5
26.2
36.2
4.9
21
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.01
21
Pool Length (ft)
3.33
12
14.3
18.6
4.92
22
Pool Max depth (ft)
0.34
0.96
0.95
1.72
0.27
15
Pool Spacing (ft)
31.8
47.7
46.3
68
7.49
21
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
15.2 22.7 30.3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
15.2 22.7 75.8
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
2 3 10
Meander Wavelength (ft)
45.5 64.4 90.9
Meander Width Ratio
2 3 4
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E/C 3/4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
166
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.004
BF slope (ft/ft)
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
45
9
23
12
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix E
Groundwater Gauge Soil Profiles
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058)
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
August 2020

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW1 / 36.33379,-79.715046
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-6
10YR 3/3
100
-
Silty Clay Loam
5-10
10YR 3/3
90
10 YR 4/6
10
Silty Clay
10-26
10YR 3/2
80
10 YR 3/1
20
Clay Loam
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: R/
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW2 / 36.333886,-79.714512
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Little disturbance
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-5
10YR 3/1
100
-
Silt Loam
5-10
10YR 3/2
80
10YR 4/6
20
Silt Loam
10-24
10YR 3/3
60
10YR 3/1
40
Clay
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: R/
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW3 / 36.333751,-79.714155
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Located in disturbed
area, along old channel
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-15
10YR 6/4
100
Clay
15-20+
10YR 3/1
100
Silty Clay
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: R/
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW4 / 36.333944,-79.713206
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Disturbed soil along old
channel. Profile was saturated
throughout.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-15
10YR 5/4
100
Clay
15-24
10yr 3/1
100
Silty Clay Loam
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w /�""a
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW5 / 36.3334117,-79.713155
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-6
10YR 4/3
100
-
silty clay loam
6-10
10YR 4/3
90
10 YR 4/6
10
silty clay loam
10-18
10YR 4/1
90
10YR 4/6
10
Clay loam
18+
10YR 4/1
95
10YR 5/6
5
Clay loam
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w /�""a
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW6 / 36.334779,-79.710099
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Moved gauge outside of
low area of standing water,
gauge still inundated during
installation
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-5
10YR 3/3
100
-
Silt Loam
5-10
10YR 3/2
90
10YR 5/6
10
Clay Loam
10-20
10YR 4/2
95
10YR 5/6
5
Silty Clay
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w /�""a
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW7 / 36.33474,-79.711577
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-5
10YR 4/2
100
-
Loam
5-10
10YR 4/2
90
10yr 5/6
10
Clay Loam
10-20
10YR 5/1
90
10YR 5/6
10
Clay Loam
20-30+
10YR 5/1
95
10YR 5/6
5
Clay Loam
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w /�""a
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW8 / 36.334514,-79.710731
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-5
10YR 3/1
100
-
Loam
5-10
10YR 6/1
50
10YR 5/8
20
Clay Loam
10-24
10YR 6/2
90
10YR 5/6
10
Clay Loam
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w /�""a
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW9 / 36.336692,-79.710099
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-6
10YR 4/3
100
-
Loam
5-10
10YR 5/2
90
10YR 5/8
10
Clay Loam
10-20
10YR 6/2
90
10YR 5/6
10
Clay Loam
20-30
10YR 5/2
95
10YR 5/6
5
Sandy Clay Loam
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w /�""a
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW10 / 36.337131,-79.709605
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes:
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-6
10YR 3/2
100
-
Silty Clay Loam
10-18
10YR 4/1
90
10 YR 4/6
10
Sandy Silty Clay
18-35
10YR 4/1
80
10 YR 5/6
20
Clay Loam
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w /�""a
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Project/Site: Slingshot Stream & Wetland Mitigation Site
County, State: Rockingham, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates: GW11 / 36.335724,-79.710878
Investigator: Lewis
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Notes: Gauge located in fill in
old stream channel. Abundant
surface hydrology and Fe- from
springs along toe of slope
upstream
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
0-10
10YR 5/6
90
10 YR 5/3
10
Silt Clay
10-22
10YR 5/6
100
-
Silt CLay
22+
10 YR 6/1
100
Clay Loam
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: w /�""a
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

Appendix F
Preconstruction Benthic Data
Preconstruction Benthic Results (available upon request once received)
Habitat Assessment Dataforms
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058)
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
August 2020

3/06 Revision 6
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ OTAL SCORE
Directions for use: The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters with 200 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right-of-way. The segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. To complete the form, select the
description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions,
select an intermediate score. A final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
C 4`"."
Stream k 'Location/road: ZJ501e, (Road Namej�(y°" ECc(• _ ]County � �' � ✓`�
Date 'io CC# (7 ? 0 3 o n ©Z Basin a rota/ Subbasin U 3 - O G, �G I
Observer(s) &L 4 Type of Study: ❑ Fish enthos ❑ Basinwide ❑Special Study (Describe)
Latitude 3b 33383 I Longitude — 71q. a-IK349Ecoregion: ❑ MT _KP ❑ Slate Belt ❑ Triassic Basin
Water Quality: Temperature I k °C DO !J_ mg/1 Conductivity (corn) _#* µS/cm pH
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location - include what
you estimate driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use: %Forest %Residential �%Active Pasture % Active Crops
%Fallow Fields % Commercial %Industrial %Other - Describe:
Watershed land use : 1617orest Pflgriculture ❑Urban ❑ Animal operations upstream
Width: (meters) Stream js Channel (at top of bank) zo ` Stream Depth: (m) Avg `� Max
❑ Width variable ❑ Large river >25m wide
Bank Height (from deepest part of riffle to top of bank -first flat surface you stand on): (m) 3
Bank Angle: `I' D ° or ❑ NA (Vertical is 90°, horizontal is 00. Angles > 900 indicate slope is towards mid -channel, < 900
indicate slope is away from channel. NA if bank is too low for bank angle to matter.)
J9 Channelized Ditch
Deeply incised -steep, straight banks ❑Both banks undercut at bend ❑Channel filled in with sediment
❑ Recent overbank deposits ❑Bar development %Mkiried structures ❑Exposed bedrock
❑ Excessive periphyton growth ❑ Heavy filamentous algae growth ❑Green tinge ❑ Sewage smell
Manmade StabilizationO ❑Y: ❑Rip -rap, cement, gabions ❑ Sediment/grade-control structure ❑Berm/levee
Flow conditions: Wi ❑Normal ❑Low
Turbidity: ❑Clear QISlightly Turbid ❑Turbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes)
Good potential for Wetlands Restoration Project?? P YES ONO Details
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or low flow conditions.
A. Water reaches base of both lower banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ............................ ❑
B. Water fills >75% of available channel, or <25% of channel substrate is exposed ........................ �t
C. Water fills 25-75% of available channel, many logs/snags exposed ............................................. ❑
D. Root mats out of water................................................................................................................... ❑
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools ..................................................... ❑
Weather Conditions: (" o _Photos: ❑N ❑Y ❑ Digital 1335mm
Remarks:
39

Score
I. Channel Modification ........................ 5
A: channel natural, frequent bends ............................. 4
uent bends channelization could be old) ......................................................
B. channel natural, mfreq
......... 3
C. some channelization present.....................................................................................................
D. more extensive channelization, >40% of stream disrupted...............................................................
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabion etc .....................
............................
❑ Evidence of dredging ❑Evidence of desuagging=no large woody debris in stream ( arks . of . uniform .s P Subtottal Z
Remarks - -
H. Instream Habitat: Consider the percentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. If >74% of the
reach is rocks, 1 type is present, circle the score of 17. Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and have
begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Mark as Rare Common or Abundant.
Rocks Macrophytes Y Sticks and leafpacks Snags and logs Undercut banks or root mats
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION OR COVER
>70% 40-70% 20-40% <20%
Score Score Score Score
16 12
4 or 5 types present ................. 20 15 11 7
3 types present ......................... 19 14 1
2 types present ......................... 18 13 9
I type present ........................... 17
No types present ....................... 0 Subtotal Q
❑ No woody vegetation in riparian zone Remarks —
III. Bottom Substrate (silt, sand, detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) Look at entire reach for substrate scoring, but only look at riffle
for embeddedness, and use rocks from all parts of riffle -look for "mud line" or difficulty extracting rocks. Score
A. substrate with good mix of gravel, cobble and boulders 15
1. embeddedness <20% (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders) .............. 12
2. embeddedness 20-40%......................................... ................................................................ 8
3. embeddedness 40-80%.......................................................... ....................... ................. 3
4. embeddedness>80%.................................................................................... .........................
B. substrate gravel and cobble
1. embeddedness<20%......................................................................................
11
................................................................................. 6
2. embeddedness 20-40%....................... 6
3. embeddedness 40-80% ......•"•'•"""•""""""•"•
4. embeddedness>80%.........................................................................
C. substrate mostly gravel
1. embeddedness<50%..................................................................
................... 4
2. embeddedness>50%:................................. ......................................................
D. substrate homogeneous 3
1. substrate nearly all bedrock.................................................................................................. 3
2. substrate nearly all sand....................................................................................................... 2
3. substrate nearly all detritus..................................................................................................... ") 1
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay.........................................................................................
_Subtotal
Remarks
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams, or side eddies. , Score
A. Pools present
1. Pools Frequent (>30% of 200m area surveyed) ...................... 10
a. variety of pool sizes.........................................................................................8
b. pools about the same size (indicates pools filling in) .....•••••••••
..............................................
2. Pools Infrequent (<30% of the 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes ............................. ID
.................................................................................
b. pools about the same size....................................................................................................... 0
B. Pools absent............................................................................................................... Subtotal
❑ Pool bottom boulder-cobble=hard ❑ Bottom sandy -sink as you walk Silt bottom ❑Some pools over wader depth
Remarks Page Total 13
40

V. Riffle Habitats
Definition: Riffle is area of reaeration-can be debris dam, or narrow channel area. Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
Score Score
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream.... ) 12
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width .................................... 14 7
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ............................. - 10 3
D. riffles absent................................................................................................................... 0
Channel Slope: ❑Typical for area JOSteep=fast flow ❑Low=like a coastal stream Subtotal(, 0
VI. Bank Stability and Vegetation
FACE UPSTREAM Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
A. Banks stable
1. little evidence of erosion or bank failure(except outside of bends), little potential for erosion.. 7 7
B. Erosion areas present
1 diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems ..................................... 6 6
)few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ........................... (3) 5
3. sparse mixed vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ................. 3 3
4. mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at high flow.. 2 -2
5. little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ........................................... 0 0
Total .7
Remarks T
VH. Light Penetration Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead. Note shading from mountains, but not use to score this metric.
Score
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration ............................................. 10
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent ..................................................... 8
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal ....................................
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas ....................................................... 2
E. No canopy and no shading............................................................................................................ 0
r
Remarks Subtotal 1
VIII. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: Riparian zone for this form is area of natural vegetation adjacent to stream (can go beyond floodplain). Definition: A break
in the riparian zone is any place on the stream banks which allows sediment or pollutants to directly enter the stream, such as paths
down to stream, storm drains, uprooted trees, otter slides, etc.
FACE UPSTREAM Lft. Bank Rt. Bank
Dominant vegetation: EfTrees M�ghrubs edrasses ❑ Weeds/old field ❑Exotics (kudzu, etc) Score Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
1. width > 18 meters..................................................................................... 5 5
2. width 12-18 meters................................................................................... 4 4
3. width 6-12 meters..................................................................................... 3 3
4. width < 6 meters...................................................................................... 2 2
B. Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1. breaks rare
a. width > 18 meters......................................................................... 4 4
,-C width 12-18 meters....................................................................... 3 3
c. width 6-12 meters....................................................................... 2 2
d. width < 6 meters......................................................................... 1 1
2. breaks common
a. width > 18 meters......................................................................... 3 3
b. width 12-18 meters...................................................................... 2� 2
c. width 6-12 meters....................................................................... 1 11
d. width < 6 meters......................................................................... 0 (()/
Remarks Total
Page Total 2
❑ Disclaimer -form filled out, but score doesn't match subjective opinion -atypical stream. TOTAL SCORE 4S
41

Supplement for Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Diagram to determine bank angle:
900 450
Site Sketch:
Other comments:
Typical Stream Cross-section
42
1350
This side is 45' bank angle.

3/06 Revision 6
Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Mountain/ Piedmont Streams
Biological Assessment Unit, DWQ OTAL SCORE (6 4
Directions for use: The observer is to survey a minimum of 100 meters with 200 meters preferred of stream, preferably in an
upstream direction starting above the bridge pool and the road right-of-way. The segment which is assessed should represent average
stream conditions. To perform a proper habitat evaluation the observer needs to get into the stream. To complete the form, select the
description which best fits the observed habitats and then circle the score. If the observed habitat falls in between two descriptions,
select an intermediate score. A final habitat score is determined by adding the results from the different metrics.
Stream 1ICT-) Location/road: e; tillB (Road Name 4k,, )County & k r4 r,.
Date �_.7-8 1 ZO CC# w)- 03000 Z_ Basin_ e, -new,' Subbasin �'� • "® t
Observer(s) b-AY-1 Type of Study: ❑ Fish POenthos ❑ Basinwide ❑Special Study (Describe)
Latitude °Yr.33�SI-Longitude—11.7%04.Ecoregion: ❑ MT P ❑ Slate Belt ❑ Triassic Basin
Water Quality: Temperature Ok °C DO VV mg/1 Conductivity (corr.) OA' µS/cm pH MjJA
Physical Characterization: Visible land use refers to immediate area that you can see from sampling location - include what
you estimate driving thru the watershed in watershed land use.
Visible Land Use: 2 3> %Forest %Residential b, %Active Pasture % Active Crops
%Fallow Fields % Commercial %Industrial %Other - Describe:
Watershed land use: O(Forest Agriculture ❑Urban ❑ Animal operations upstream
r'
Width: (meters) Stream 2— _ Channel (at top of bank) 5- Stream Depth: (m) Avg Max <o
❑ Width variable ❑ Large river >25m wide
Bank Height (from deepest part of riffle to top of bank -first flat surface you stand on): (m)_
a
Bank Angle: ° or ❑ NA (Vertical is 900, horizontal is 0°. Angles > 90° indicate slope is towards mid -channel, < 900
indicate slope is away from channel. NA if bank is too low for bank angle to matter.)
❑ Channelized Ditch
❑Deeply incised -steep, straight banks ❑Both banks undercut at bend ❑Channel filled in with sediment
❑ Recent overbank deposits ❑Bar development ❑Buried structures ❑Exposed bedrock
❑ Excessive periphyton growth ❑ Heavy filamentous algae growth ❑Green tinge ❑ Sewage smell
Manmade Stabilization: ON ❑Y: ❑Rip -rap, cement, gabions ❑ Sediment/grade-control structure ❑Berm/levee
Flow conditions: ❑High ❑Normal ❑Low
Turbidity: ❑Clear q Slightly Turbid ❑Turbid ❑Tannic ❑Milky ❑Colored (from dyes)
Good potential for Wetlands Restoration Project?? "S ❑NO Details
Channel Flow Status
Useful especially under abnormal or low flow conditions.
A. Water reaches base of both lower banks, minimal channel substrate exposed ............................
❑
B. Water fills >75% of available channel, or <25% of channel substrate is exposed ........................
( Q
C. Water fills 25-75% of available channel, many logs/snags exposed .............................................
❑
D. Root mats out of water...................................................................................................................
❑
E. Very little water in channel, mostly present as standing pools .....................................................
❑
Weather Conditions: ag Photos: ON ❑Y ❑ Digital 1135mm
Remarks:
39

I. Channel Modification
frequent bends
Score
5
A. channel natural, ........................................................................................................
B. channel natural, infrequent bends (channelization could be old) ......................................................
4
C. some channelization present..............................................................................................................
D. more extensive channelization, >40% of stream disrupted...............................................................
2
E. no bends, completely channelized or rip rapped or gabioned, etc ....................................................
0
❑ Evidence of dredging ❑Evidence of desnagging--no large woody debris in stream banks of uniform shape/height �1
Remarks _ _ Subtotal
H. Instream Habitat: Consider the percentage of the reach that is favorable for benthos colonization or fish cover. If >70°/" of the
reach is rocks, I type is present, circle the score of 17. Definition: leafpacks consist of older leaves that are packed together and have
begun to decay (not piles of leaves in pool areas). Mark as Rare Common, or Abundant.
Rocks Macrophytes D Sticks and leafpacks Snags and logs Undercut banks or root mats
AMOUNT OF REACH FAVORABLE FOR COLONIZATION OR COVER
>70% 40-70% 20-40% <20%
Score Score Score Score
4 or 5 types present ................. 20 16 12 8
3 types present ......................... 19 15 11 7
JW 6
2 types present ......................... 18 14
1 type present ........................... 17 13 9 5
No types present ....................... 0
Subtotal `
❑ No woody vegetation in riparian zone Remarks
III. Bottom Substrate (silt, sand; detritus, gravel, cobble, boulder) Look at entire reach for substrate scoring,
but only look at riffle
for embeddedness; and use rocks from all parts of riffle -look for "mud line" or difficulty extracting rocks.
A. substrate with good mix of gravel, cobble and boulders
Score
1. embeddedness Q0% (very little sand, usually only behind large boulders) .........................
15
2. embeddedness 20-40%..........................................................................................................
12
3. embeddedness 40-80%..........................................................................................................
4. embeddedness>80%.............................................................................................................
3
B. substrate gravel and cobble
14
1. embeddedness<20%............................................................................................................
11
2. embeddedness 20-40%.........................................................................................................
6
3. embeddedness 40-80%........................................................................................................
2
4. embeddedness>80%............................................................................................................
C. substrate mostly gravel
8
1. embeddedness<50%............................................................................................................
4
2. embeddedness>50%............................................................................................................
D. substrate homogeneous
3
1. substrate nearly all bedrock...................................................................................................
2. substrate nearly all sand........................................................................................................
3
3. substrate nearly all detritus....................................................................................................
2
4. substrate nearly all silt/ clay...................................................................................................
1
Remarks
Subtotal
IV. Pool Variety Pools are areas of deeper than average maximum depths with little or no surface turbulence. Water velocities
associated with pools are always slow. Pools may take the form of "pocket water", small pools behind boulders or obstructions, in
large high gradient streams, or side eddies.
A. Pools present Score
1. Pools Frequent (>30%" of 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool sizes............................................................................................................... 10
b. pools about the same size indicates pools fillip in 8
2. Pools Infrequent (<30% of the 200m area surveyed)
a. variety of pool'sizes............................................................................................................
b. pools about the same size......................................................................................................
0
B. Pools absent............................................................................................................................................
Subtotal
❑ Pool bottom boulder-cobble=hard 04Bottom sandy -sink as you walk ❑ Silt bottom ❑ Some pools over wader depth
Remarks _ _ _
- - - Page Total `L
40

V. Riffle Habitats
Definition: Riffle is area of reaeration-can be debris dam, or narrow channel area. Riffles Frequent Riffles Infrequent
Score Score
A. well defined riffle and run, riffle as wide as stream and extends 2X width of stream.... 16 12
B. riffle as wide as stream but riffle length is not 2X stream width .................................... 14
C. riffle not as wide as stream and riffle length is not 2X stream width ............................. 10 3
D. riffles ab ent................................................................................................................... 0 '-7
Channel Slope: Wypical for area ❑Steep=fast flow ❑Low=like a coastal stream Subtotal `
VI. Bank Stability and Vegetation
FACE UPSTREAM Left Bank Rt. Bank
Score Score
A. Banks stable
1. little evidence of erosion or bank failure(except outside of bends), little potential for erosion.. 7 7
B. Erosion areas present
1. diverse trees, shrubs, grass; plants healthy with good root systems........... ........................... J) t
2. few trees or small trees and shrubs; vegetation appears generally healthy ........................... 5 5
3. sparse mixed vegetation; plant types and conditions suggest poorer soil binding ................. 3 3
4. mostly grasses, few if any trees and shrubs, high erosion and failure potential at high flow.. 2 2
5. little or no bank vegetation, mass erosion and bank failure evident ........................................... 0 0
Total f Z
Remarks
VH. Light Penetration Canopy is defined as tree or vegetative cover directly above the stream's surface. Canopy would block out
sunlight when the sun is directly overhead. Note shading from mountains, but not use to score this metric.
Score
Remarks
A. Stream with good canopy with some breaks for light penetration ............................................. C5
B. Stream with full canopy - breaks for light penetration absent ..................................................... 8
C. Stream with partial canopy - sunlight and shading are essentially equal .................................... 7
D. Stream with minimal canopy - full sun in all but a few areas ....................................................... 2
E. No canopy and no shading............................................................................................................ 0
Subtotal, % D
VIH. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Definition: Riparian zone for this form is area of natural vegetation adjacent to stream (can go beyond floodplain). Definition: A break
in the riparian zone is any place on the stream banks which allows sediment or pollutants to directly enter the stream, such as paths
down to stream, storm drains, uprooted trees, otter slides, etc.
FACE UPST AM Lft. Bank Rt. Bank
Dominant vegetation: ❑ Trees [rubs ❑ Grasses ��Veeds/old field ❑Exotics (kudzu, etc) Score Score
A. Riparian zone intact (no breaks)
1. width > 18 meters.....................................................................................
2. width 12-18 meters...................................................................................
3. width 6-12 meters.....................................................................................
4. width < 6 meters......................................................................................
B. Riparian zone not intact (breaks)
1. breaks rare
a. width > 18 meters.........................................................................
b. width 12-18 meters.......................................................................
c. width 6-12 meters.......................................................................
d. width < 6 meters.........................................................................
2. breaks common
a. width > 18 meters........................................................................
b. width 12-18 meters......................................................................
c. width 6-12 meters.......................................................................
d. width < 6 meters.........................................................................
Remarks
❑ Disclaimer -form filled out, but score doesn't match subjective opinion -atypical stream
41
t1-1-9 0
4 4
3 3
2 2
4
3
2
1
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
Total C
Page Total
TOTAL SCORE

Supplement for Habitat Assessment Field Data Sheet
Diagram to determine bank angle:
WO
1 ,
1 �
90° 450
Site Sketch:
other comments: _
42
1350
This side is 45° bank angle.

Appendix G
As -built Plan Sheets
As -built Baseline Monitoring Report (Project No. 100058)
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Rockingham County, North Carolina
Appendices
Restoration Systems, LLC
August 2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
o /�1
0 1
WW
U
H
N
0
L
a
m
Q
L
o}
00
C
vCO>
UL
N C O
Lame
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
AS BUILT PLANS
SLINGSHOT CREEK SITE
LOCATION: ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TYPE OF WORK: STREAM RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT (CLEARING,
GRUBBING, GRADING, EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING)
VICINITY MAP
Not to Scale
P \
/ r
P ¢
Fa 00
Fa
whitetail Trl , d N o
/ ¢ U0 olkS R
/ SR 2406 x Iron
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 1001
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 5
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
PROPOSED LENGTH OF MAIN
=2874 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH OF UT3 =189 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH OF UT1= 970 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH OF UT4 =86 LF
PROPOSED LENGTH OF UT2=
170 LF
TOTAL STREAM LENGTH = 4293 LF
RESTORATION LEVEL
STREAM (linear footage)
RIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)
NONRIPARIAN WETLAND (acreage)
RESTORATION
2502
1.020
0.000
ENHANCEMENT
1212
0.690
0.000
PRESERVATION
391
0.000
0.000
TOTALS
4106
1.710
0.000
MITIGATION UNITS
3186SMUs
1.370 RIPARIAN WMUs
NONRIPARIAN WMUs
158
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET NUMBER SHEET
01 Title Sheet
01A Symbology
03A As -Built Fencing
04 THRU 12 As -Built Structure Sheets
13 As -Built Planting
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION(S)
Surveyor's disclaimer: No attempt was made to locate any cemeteries, wetlands, hazardous material
sites, underground utilities or any other features above, or below ground other than those shown.
However, no visible evidence of cemeteries or utilities, aboveground or otherwise, was observed by
the undersigned (other than those shown).
certify that the survey is of an existing parcel or parcels of land or one or more existing easements
and does not create a new street or change an existing street.
JOHN A. RUDOLPH , certify that this plat was prepared under my supervision from an actual field
survey made under my supervision, of as -built conditions.
That the boundaries not surveyed are clearly indicated as such and were plotted from information as
referenced hereon; That the ratio of precision as calculated was 1:7,500+ and that the
global navigational satellite system (GNSS) was used to perform this survey and the following
information was used:
Class of Survey: CLASS B (HORIZONTAL) CLASS B (VERTICAL)
Positional Accuracy: 0.12 feet (HORIZONTAL)
Type of GPS field procedure: RTK
Dates of survey: June 2020
Datum/Epoch: NAD 1983(2011)
Published/Fixed Control Use: OPUS
Geoid Model: 2012B CONUS
Combined Grid Factor: 0.99990680 GROUND TO GRID
Units: US SURVEY FEET
That this plat meets the requirements of the standards of practice for land surveying in North
Carolina. Witness my hand and seal this XX day of XXXX 2020
SEAL OR STAMP
\y\ \%IIIII//i/I
�� (N CAIyo/�,� 8/25/2020
\� Q�'�ESS��
SEAL
'. L-4194
IO;'QDocuSigned by-
0 Q\
SUP, �OIC9a73aBB9
6 , WYL
Rv'\` 4vy
L-4194
Professional Surveyor License Number
Slingshot Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site #100058
Cape Fear 03030002
Rockingham County
_, Contract 40007525
� Q, Latitude:36.334687
�j Longitude:-79.711665
ty
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE: 6.85 AC NA
Designed By..
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh, NC 27603
GRANT LEWIS
AA- ErvNoom .rhn
PROJECT DESIGNER
Restoration Systems
1 101 Haynes St.
Suite 21 1
Roleigh, NC 27604
WORTH CREECH
SITE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
Prepared in the Office of:
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
Sj�:I
1089�8C4E3..�
. ' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27606
—
2697
ENGIFIRM$LIICENSE NO. C-890
— —
N���
JOSHUA G. DALTON, P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER
8/25/2020

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
CONVENTIONAL
PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
SYMBOSTRE ONA
rRotEcr NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
Note: Not to Scale
*S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
COUNTY: ALAMANCE DATE: 2020
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP P.A.
State Line
— -
Exist Permanent Easment Pin and Cap
O
Pipe Culvert
. '
FR ROAD
County Line
New Permanent Easement Pin and Cap
00
Footbridge
9
>----------
.
U�f� III! _�\II//_
RA EIGH, NORTH CA
TELEIGH.NORTHCAROLINA27606
EN�IFIRM$ CENSENO. C_990
Township Line
Vertical Benchmark
m
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
CB
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
City Line
Existing Right of Way Marker
0
Paved Ditch Gutter
SS Forced Main Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
Reservation Line
Existing Right of Way Line
-
Storm Sewer Manhole
O
Property Line
New Right of Way Line
%)
Storm Sewer
MISCELLANEOUS:
Existing Iron Pin
a
Utility Pole
•
New Right of Way Line with Pin and Cap
�
UTILITIES.
Utility Pole with Base
❑
Computed Property Corner
New Right of Way Line with
POWER:
Utility Located Object
o
Property Monument
0
Concrete or Granite RAN Marker
Existing Power Pole
i
Utility Traffic Signal Box
❑s
Parcel/Sequence Number
23
New Control of Access Line with
Proposed Power Pole
b
Existing Fence Line
-X—X X—
Concrete C/A Marker
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
�TL
Proposed Fence Gate
D
Existing Control of Access
Existing Joint Use Pole
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
C�
New Control of Access
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
Existing Wetland Boundary
- - - -wLa- - - -
Existing Easement Line
9
E
Power Manhole
©
AG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
0
Proposed Wetland Boundary
wLa
New Conservation Easement
E
Power Line Tower
z
Geoenviran mental Boring
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
a
New Temporary p ry Drainage g Easement
TDE
Power Transformer
El
W(G Test Hole LOS A S.U.E.* )
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
a
New Permanent Drainage Easement
PDE
U/G Power Cable Hand Hole
Abandoned According to Utility Records
AATUR
Existing Historic Property Boundary
�Pa
New Permanent Drainage /Utility Easement
DUE
H-Frame Pole
~'
End of Information
E.O.I.
New Permanent Utility Easement
PUE
U/G Power Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
- - - -P- - - -
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.-
New Temporary Utility Easement
TUE
U/G Power Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
--p--
Riffle Rip Rap
p p
oaf oo°oo oo
5MMOV0000<
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
O
New Aerial Utility Easement
AUE
U/G Power Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
Log Vane
Sign
o
TELEPHONE:
Log Cross Vane
Well
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.
Existing Telephone Pole
f
Small Mine
O
Existing Edge of Pavement
Foundation
0
Existing Curb —
— — — —
WATER:
Step Pool Structure
°oo oa°o
Area Outline
0
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut - -
- C - - -
Water Manhole
OO
Be in End"r
9
Cemetery
0
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill - -
- - - -
Water Meter
o
Stream Plug
Building
Proposed Curb Ramp
cR
Water Valve
School
Existing Metal Guardrail
T T
Water Hydrant
Floodplain Interceptor
Church
Proposed Guardrail T
T T T
U/G Water Line LOS B (S.U.E*)
Proposed Fence
e
Dam
Existing Cable Guiderail I
n °
U/G Water Line LOS C (S.U.E*)
- -w- -
Limits of Disturbance
— LOD —
HYDROLOGY-
Proposed Cable Guiderail °
° ° °
U/G Water Line LOS D (S.U.E*)
AS -BUILT -
Stream or Body of Water
Equality Symbol
ED
Above Ground Water Line
A/c orate
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
J
Pavement Removal
®
Stream Centerline
Jurisdictional Stream
`
VEGETATION -
Stream Top of Bank
— — — — -
Buffer
Buffer Zone 1
�s
Bz ,
Single Tree
{�
Gas Valve
0
Stream Gauge
O
Buffer Zone 2
Bz 2
Single Shrub
b
Gas Meter
Groundwater Gauge
# •
Flow Arrow
E
Hedge
U/G Gas Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
- - - -I- - -
Disappearing Stream
>
U/G Gas Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
- - - -
Benthic & Water Quality Station
Woods Line �"�-�O�-�O�-�°�-COL'
U/G Gas Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
Spring
€�
Orchard
�? f? f?
Origin Point on CVS Plots
Wetland
Vineyard
�°eyard
Above Ground Gas Line
A/C C-
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
SANITARY SEWER:
CVS Plots
#
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
OO
RIGHT OF WAY & PROJECT CONTROL:
MAJOR:
Sanitary
SanitaSewer Cleanout
Cross Section
Xs' 1 0R
Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point
.
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
coNc
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
Primary Horiz Control Point
0
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
coNc AA
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
At6 "'It" y Saver
Adjusted Stream Structure
Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point
/
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
coNc Hw
SS Forced Main Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
- - - -rss- - - -
SS Forced Main Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
- -rs�- -
Not Constructed
X

DocuSion Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT FENCING 3A
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM DATE: 2020
EXISTING FENCING
/ USED AS EASEMENT FENCE SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
U T 4 , ' RA EIGH ER T CALIN ROAD
SURVEY INFORMATION PROPERTY/ ENG FIR, LI NSE NO. UNA 27dA5
_ �\1I�� _ ENG FIRM LICENSE NO. G830
Environmental, Inc.
EASEMENT PROVIDED BY: axiom
/
K2 DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
5688 U.S. HIGHWAY 70 EAST
GOLDSBORO, NC 27534
/
/ I
UT3 I 100' 50' 0 100, 200'
P I
/ I SCALE: 1"= 200'
EXISTING FENCING
/ USED AS EASEMENT FENCE
i
MAIN
P r I
I UT 1
MAIN
I
/ I
I I
/ I
EXISTING FENCING
USED AS EASEMENT FENCE
UT 2
EXISTING FENCING
USED AS EASEMENT FENCE
ED
ii
EXISTING FENCING
,10
USED AS EASEMENT FEN4
��s

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
813 o EA
ME�11�� ���
-�� v_��� ,-' 812� r ----!� 8i FENCE LINE, 1
-�� 810_�g g� STA�2�''PR�SERIZRTI� \_'� 81� rTb&
,N[tYR_STORA
�go� 05-
ST II+00.00_=1VIAI 7 809�� � �,_ �g� �� �� _ _SST RTIENh EM'EN
E IS ��G �E%1 1 ---8� ��-��I�� �-i80� 5�� ` 00
-USEz
q-AS�
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 4
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM I DATE: 2019
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
M5 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27606
TEL 59-2243
_ ENGIFIRM 919) SLICENSE NO. G800
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
-�` 04- �� -� -� �_ i� ���- ��" /� BA�YKFULL� OI/ 25' 12.5' 0 25' 50'
-802 _ 801 _ _ - _�
� � ��=�-'�E�¢P�RESE'RVA_��C3N �� � rt EN[�'��NWANO
0 .�gTAR�,ENkYA EM�NT 00 �� TA 1 2'1� _ °�
o r SCALE: 1"=50'
hE-LE_SS, JANV H. s� _
��� STA + - ��� go _ ST�S+ 68� AkN
`-g0 � 0 'lr-�VI, _ � �0@-R{SB-E-RT,��_L
��
\ II d � ENt Qn T SIDE, O-G- IiO�S 6�. VgS 1 �,
IN - hlCtT- N
_ c—
\ 81,-�<-785786-d _z %I: �O J S�
mw-
78
EIP � / � � i � �� � O � � ��. �_ �_ � ��8��`�'782-
1C1�
,LLL—
'�
co
MEt4tr—
I E� �� /�� �i ���` — — — — _�� � ' CROSS E l &H 1
og �� �iN — vANE F
0M, C ISTHER r i / �� / '- i 1 S/� Clj
AURA���� ZBL �� EET 3�
J �
OFSEC AS EAS NI Ng '
As -Built -MAIN- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
�PkEikRVAT'16N,�� Design AB Survey
" / b +55:52 T ��58 �` �- N STR. TYPE NORTHING EASTING Channel Channel
STA I�RESE �/A�Tf'0 b� i�%�� 3+�� � N-� -MILNRING, bdl E -D _ TOPOGPAHY OUTSIDE
AND �VIR INIA 98 Elevation Elevation
.91�r�1T4- _ � � OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
9" �� /-Y,9 i�i�� ti, �y-1�5, 0a69 LOG CROSS VANE 942,317.48 1,790,869.54 772.99 773.15 NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
I Jl t LOG CROSS VANE 942,251.98 1,790,862.93 772.70
MENT II
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Docu§iged by, R
10�9A���S1�YJ94C3... �j�
SEAL
26971
y�q G P
��1/IIIIIII���\
8/25/2020
DATE:
0 +50 01 +50 02 +50 03 +50 04 +50 05 +50 06 +50

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
As -Built
-MAIN- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Design
Channel
Elevation
AB Survey
Channel
Elevation
LOG CROSS VANE
942,162.63
1,790,789.81
771.75
771.70
LOG CROSS VANE
942,120.86
1,790,727.85
770.76
771.09
LOG CROSS VANE
942,079.12
1,790,695.28
769.79
769.99
LOG CROSS VANE
942,042.55
1,790,699.95
769.11
769.34
LOG CROSS VANE
942,006.12
1,790,689.08
768.61
767.82
LOG VANE
941,900.50
1,790,550.77
765.64
765.36
LOG CROSS VANE
941,855.50
1,790,535.73
765.07
765.4
LOG CROSS VANE
941,776.88
1,790,422.41
762.83
762.97
EASEMtNT SATE,
�A EN_ ,r` WHELESS, hAN H,�_-
_j �/' --F INE7N�5- �-�-AND�4Bf�/L
K�
�_--- B94Y269;�F
F_ I EYISTING
L CHANNEL
�- - - -_'P
R-O
CATTLE GA TYP
r--\- 73` 2-PLUG
771780(L9 BANKFcc�,
OOX ,-LOG CROSS------
-VANE
--_? _ ----- 7
_ _ - ---
� apt r � �
Un
aX'
O
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM I DATE: 2020
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
10 ' M5 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27606
TEL59-2243
�\1I�/ _ ENGIFIRM SLICENSE NO. G800
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
25' 12.5' 0 25' 50'
SCALE: V=50'
J
UT
1�1 CD
8-9L �u��
122-
i �\ _ PdHAN�EI�1Tl LOG vVANE, - ,_'�,--
✓ _ STET I STOI ATION_og7` �EASEMENF, << - - _ _ �SZL- - _ _ , 522- _ - _ - LOG- kb§
5.\06=MAIN- _ FENCE �INE ��C�- ,� �P�RMANENT��ROS5+NG9 - --� � �� VAN
-z� -�gL �_ 7� oS - -�_,_ ,��36�£MP� 2 - N ��
PROPOSED £82� �� Ogg ���� ����a�8' _c_mP_ L-00w_Lk� ' -2 G�ATT� �TXP
BANK�Utt-6�` ig _ -����� �087� - _-_PJP_E E4C1 �SSID�-
'-�TiBj
���� Lam_- �9g2-�_ -�� ��-�b8L-g�� �� �_
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DocuSjghed\tiy:N
1ARO
0i�AOIi_G 41�94C3.� 0
SEAE
26971
y�q G D P
8/25/2020
DATE:
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
+50 07 +50 08 +50 09 +50 10 +50 11 +50 12 +50 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
25' 12.5' 0 25' 50' d�
tFtM �`�
-cr— — SCALE: 1"= 50'
LOG
C
A 1 Mt
RO�SR
� �,- N4-€��
cb0 VANE- --- - �EENCE` LINE,___ _
AS� EASEMENT J_------
`�5�� ,\ --FENCE LIN,E`2
i
EAS'�X�T -GATE
/ / \ PRO OSED _ _ - C�4TTtE GATE (T`ll��
BANKrL LL - ,-- --------
��
STREAM- � _--------,- o s
\x
i z o I PLUG C)
� i �' 'l + m >--
'ST PLUG O `�
>v " T�� `� '7 7� STREAM PLUG v� n
— CD
o _LOG_ YANE_-
o �
rnm
__LOG _ VA E
_
�� - `� LOG CROSS �� �N CROSS - - - - 3 ��AN�
+o - -�/ANE _- 09L- 2 VANE 6S S P
cS10 _ _LOG- CROSS - ---092_, ���, �� V�x�
7----VANE__
R DOSED
--- - FULL
,BAKFULL, ND E� TION------
STA9+69.46-UT1- lock
STA 16+88.34 -MAIN-
�o� FSEMENT GATE _
CATTLAT inP)
-_E MElST �� �_, �� -��, s Aklfl ROBERT L _ �- EASEMENT
,8 �� s 4ER1vA1 t'�77 �� F DICE-LIN
-�FfN CI�IE -� 9� �`
J
EASEMENT
FENCE LINE 7T�
Co /
As -Built
-MAIN- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Design
Channel
Elevation
AB Survey
Channel
Elevation
LOG CROSS VANE
941,706.80
1,790,413.02
761.33
761.50
LOG CROSS VANE
941,667.20
1,790,381.85
760.33
760.65
LOG CROSS VANE
941,573.50
1,790,334.03
758.37
758.55
LOG CROSS VANE
941,455.24
1,790,307.66
756.57
756.81
LOG CROSS VANE
941,316.77
1,790,182.24
754.56
754.13
LOGVANE
941,273.58
1,790,153.93
753.94
753.73
1(W,CMP-FLOODPIl -
PIPE EACK SIDE
`` '-'NOT BURIED
-W TCP,WIDTH�JTYP}'-
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES 6
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM I DATE: 2020
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
100 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH GAROLINA27305
I ENGFIRM SLICENSE NO. G890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
DoauS- gedby�. . i I Ii
SEAL
26971 _
y�q G N P
8/25/2020
DATE:
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
As -Built -UT1-STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
Design
AB Survey
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Channel
Channel
Elevation
Elevation
LOG CROSS VANE
941,427.70
1,790,355.67
757.89
757.84
UTl
13
+50 14 +50 15 +50 16 +50 17 +50
18
+50 19 +50

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
I
25' 12.5' 0 25' 50'
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
m
As -Built -MAIN- STRUCTURE
LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Design
Channel
Elevation
AB Survey
Channel
Elevation
LOG CROSS VANE
941,267.18
1,790,066.81
753.26
753.48
LOG CROSS VANE
941,267.94
1,789,981.30
752.04
752.26
LOG CROSS VANE
941,267.94
1,789,981.30
751.04
751.00
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM I DATE: 2020
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
1/ ' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27306
TEL
ENGI919)FIRMS59-2243 LICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Docc�r�ed br� ARA
Spw�`iq",
- 1'1 sA - '1CC4994C3...
SEAL
2697;\
7,�
I G'
ii cC �L -77
{ a\( '�1 'c �' \ N - \ \ v _ —` = - �2� 8/2 5/2020
V DATE:
i9 _ - C�
� W-4
Z �• I / � � � � 1 V � �J�—v `I� � � 1— (�A � —A � �'� P� i �'�i — � _ � a am o l_P��
w
r
ono baG,—
oa 8
C ,Qj
F \
STREAM /g / PROPOS D\ bL -� •
Q c�, PLUG 1 _ _ - `vim — �' BANKF LL - v MW-2 2
v2Z
3 9SL--
/---�`---
-�E-ASEMENI GATE -
LOG CROSS-------------------- ---- --
--------___ VANE - SSL-------- --1NTiE Al� ESS�JH.
--_ �� - - -----
CATTLE GATE -
cps
- 9SZ-- --AND-R'0BERT
-
- --- -- ----- -BOCK 12-H-RO_0277 - - - _ -SSL--- --
- _ ---
ENDRESTPRATION- ---AA o9L
-STA +77. -UT2- v, ------ ---- --- v
STA 22=MALN---=s ��9-��1 ��--�- ���09Z' _ ' �Z� �19L -� �� ��� '09<I�� ���-",�`- LS TOPOGPAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
�Z L - - - - - '9gL SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
780�_--- _v t SCALE 1"=50' I
- - - E -� � I -5,AS € NTH _00
--------_ EASEMWr- cE coo �__
EXISTING F_EI�E��16=� �L�QPPRCA�fJ-'� --__
- - -- �1JSfD �4 - --- �` v �PI,P_E ;E '_gLjr- - _; ESf iV -__
- - _ - - - -EASEMENT-F-ENCE - - _- �� �_� �7NQ ��IRI€ 7(T--
STREAM \PLQG ' - - - -766- - - - - 76 - - � - � N v _'
� DESIGN EEI�C1N 65, , E - _ - v i / -� ; -i��- / �- -&4ST4 �
— - - ,NOT C-©NSTRUCIED - - � _ � _ `-' - �� ;' / FEN�T�
1�� --- -EASEMENT _ 63-
W2 '� F �. 76`2-RfltitB_� _-_ - _�� ---- -�
ST
--------BE-5 - - - -r �� \_ -
/1 `>
_----/--�-- s76 ------GAITL�AT— —
-75 65-= ---- ��
5 �TR
OUT 4 7-�l
► � �
+50 20 +50 21 +50 22 +50 23 +50 24 +50 25 +50 26

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
m
�? A:
0 PROJECT NAME:
— 8 / f
SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM I DATE: 2020
_1780 —
���— v� fE INS----_JNHEC�S�9 JAIL Hr— ���—�81' �780/ — I
� N� - -
- -- AND —,
-71 �AStE NT-FENC€ - -- - , - - -DESIGN
�F t a� �� t- IY I - <<� -77 AA­E��o-o�,R�e��al, In,
A$EM��—' v 775— ����_%1 CO � ����` _77 _ 25' 12.5' 0 25' 50'
�FE CE—CFNE' `�SE�� _-=BEYzLi�l�5� 5== ��� STANtEY,� T P�I�IZL4E1Tki�
\ _
�f�D PAWN kl_ _— SCALE:1"=50'
—77 �� — 7 7 f ,=� _ _ _� 7.
EN[)7-�PO_�L= fi - itTING- \\
_ _ _ _ -77
I7 r-C %_Tp-� �p��r' — —_ _
77
n
�;'�`� --- -747 �Nt�ENHANII��_
Urn ��i i b� - ; _ _ _ EIS 46, STA 2$+73�5l AIN
rn
gb -- - -
m N a o jo' o t►SbL MN� _ \ _ SREVIS, JAME-S
rn _ o� -- �I — _— 74 D _PAYFIDN- �—
CD
PROPOSE
Z BANKFU L
M -1 i i� -8b� 6)bBR0V1 ; JOHN F4AIN1 Ll
SANDRA
As -Built -MAIN- STRUCTURE
LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Design
Channel
Elevation
AB Survey
Channel
Elevation
Step Pool Structure
941,124.24
1,789,440.89
745.49
745.68
Step Pool Structure
941,098.75
1,789,392.62
741.95
743.03
- - - _ ------- _ - EN _ RESTORATN
BEGKGIN-ENHANCEME
S 27t10 mm-
EASEMENT
FENCE
C_
9.
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
M5 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27306
TEL 59-2243
ENGIFIRM 919) SLICENSE NO. G800
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
��JJIIiiilulj
DocusiD7d\by: C A R 0
�1089/�D8O1 994C3...
SEAL
26971
y G P
8/25/2020
DATE:
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
26 +50 27 +50 28 +50 29

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM I DATE: 2020
m
GO
c
y� r �� 25' 12.5' 0 25' 50'
SCALE:1"=50'
A ! �^ I IE> ISTING �EN+CING� ��
�°r LIS�DA� EASF�MENT FE`NC�
l� I m � O
0�cb
o�SEI�E�
NRINGr= CQ
j AND V�IIA �T ���
IR/
�(o r �BOO�C I;2i65; PG LVU8 6901
i
i Z
�6� 1 I �� �� —_ \ _—��/L—
�� I / o I �, —Z B_ — — — —' ? W
��
— Q
3Bb Lc)
_per
i 1 ri
00
Go
— 6 ET-S-� CC) )� l
L 1 xl A
S1h T ENHANCE T
STA 0 1 0 KJT� - '� ��
ECO
L V=7§0.�28 , ` '" D
I � � �
) 51�� �r) �TRA�R, BRAND N 06
�hQ' AND JESSICA `WRIG \E d
`r BOOK 153Q, PG'0993 '/yI ' S6w11 �(9 ' 1
�6, �� EE E�LINE �WHELESS, JA.N� �H.
Z 6 SAND ROBEPT� L I
cp
l
BOOK 12 9,`PG 102� 7
co
Al f
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27306
TEL I _ _ ENGFIRM SLICENSE NO. G890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
��A1111111/I�
Uqa 7nef"�,, R0
C.I"M /
10$9BC14994C3(:)i�
SEAL
26971
8/25/2020
DATE:
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
0 +50 01

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
25' 12.5' 0 25' 50'
_810__--^�' ��,�� �a�_�� �;o �' / �`� SCALE:V=50',' zv
/ 6< 5
rg10— _,� / / �� b
^/-/i1 ,�
4 ff j i AND SZOE�E1� `7� i r id2 7
O —B 4 t —/ r _ r gBL � � r / -, _
_ _�R r — _ b 0 / 0r / �l �' i i —_�gL� EASF—MENT/ L /
EN� EP41--kRd M-EN�`(�� �801' ig0 I 9�� I �(0 I�i
-STAkT/ENHAN EMERYTf-'`�_7g5�''- �78���/
9.9� �i— OI— �� �� �.i -� 9 i
00� - r ' _ _' CAT�L GATE LqG C1tOSS
�9 .99/r _-798 7g7� �' - REM9 XSi �BI'PE N/ CIE''
-- 0 �� EX %AE _ =-7 — — —— _ _�� �' / / �� i // Sc��,776— 7.
C cb
LINE _ =-- ��------795-7-
9�� _
5 - _ -- CRfl �-
_���� E S REST f ,-' � / / / �
Tb
�8 ---- ------
_---_—_-----790 — '�'� �EBRCX__T�CT
—7 --787_�9 __-------- — —__' 5�0
---86 IST --- 9 -�/ ' —Pjt
-----�ED A5 -- - — — — — —
-EA -E ENT—_HNC—E
99z------780--------
— — — '�_-7BO—L—
� ----- --_ 17<
IN 53-
bgL -- — — —
/ —Og7�
SHREVE—R 9
D4WE-L —zp�— ZOG,CROSS — -- - _ �-
—HBO-0KWPGIO9� �_� ---- ig
—i�-�_�� 8 BANULL�
/7� v 6 r S < —g / �1,OG RQSS
<OF
�� 7� �-
`� ��z ' - - - - _ , ` - , ' PERMA�I �C 0SWl` G,
��� �/ASEM�N� `� �,�SEMEt�1T G_A_TE� �- �Ig� -zg7 _ �T ��5 ���36" F zzz
6z - FENCC- 9L11�1E � � � � � CATTL�g�ATE ` - � � NET Bl'4 /-<�(�� I
���•-��� �� `� tt 7� 16 TOP WIDTH P)
-l� Eld AN`GE-MENT� EASEMENT _� i8 - �L
_ STD 0+0 �6 =l�T�- _ _ -FENCE LINE �8< <- ��8�,
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM DATE: 2020
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
100 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27606
TEL 59-2243
ENGIFIRM 919) SLICENSE NO. C-890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Dgc�3•S�i ed I�:Q R
r
10e AM�14994,Cl..
SEAL
26971 _
y�q G P
8/25/2020
DATE:
As-Built-UT1-STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Design
Channel
Elevation
AB Survey
Channel
Elevation
LOG CROSS VANE
941,480.77
1,790,970.47
773.00
774.63
LOGCROSSVANE
941,470.16
1,790,777.79
768.06
767.93
LOG CROSS VANE
941,481.92
1,790,739.15
766.57
766.68
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
0 +50 01 +50 02 +50 03 +50 04 +50

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
Z
IS
-784-
7g5 _ 785-GVH_ELE"SS,-J-AN H_-
AND-POaERT L -'�
9-- -KOK- 1269, PG 0-2/77,CF
�ND'�hHAWEI�7IEI NTk'
5 RESTOf2AT101V,' ��
SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT STRUCTURES ll
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM I DATE: 2020
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
1/ ' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROUNA27306
TEL (919)
859-2243 _ ENGFIRMLICENSE NO. G890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
785-� ST�6 9�5' 5�U 1='/� � D �� -, ��3�,_, _ 25' 12.5• 0 25' 50'
SCALE: 1"= 50'
SZH -Igo -- ���� i �� �L � Eke EMENT169
FtNCF'L1NE
' -� o' - PIZdPOSEE
- LOG--VAPB,8' - - h W , -
--� '
C+
---- _ _ _76 RG 7�3
----771 -7-�c������ - LO&-ANE
- 2,
-�
Ln
00
LLj LLJ
/ i I
I-
-----' T T
-69) I
i —
L VANE 17,
�4�
/� V i � � I
FENCE LINE �> >� r� EASEM�IT L� Z
FENCE LTNE7
� � T � � 1 I 67L � � �-• L�L
V _
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Dow§ig ed by, A R
10U�9�6-1�694C3...
SEAL
26971 R
8/25/2020
DATE:
As -Built -UT1-STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Design
Channel
Elevation
AB Survey
Channel
Elevation
LOG VANE
941,491.70
1,790,724.12
765.90
764.65
LOG CROSS VANE
941,445.27
1,790,613.43
763.82
763.56
LOG VANE
941,426.67
1,790,590.11
762.93
761.45
LOG CROSS VANE
941,429.07
1,790,561.19
762.43
762.75
LOG CROSS VANE
941,430.74
1,790,498.21
760.92
761.24
LOG VANE
941,429.37
1,790,477.07
760.33
759.98
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
T + 50 05 + 50 06 + 50 07 + 50 08 + 50

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
r j
r=�/
TiFfNCE�
_ 8 0i? /
X_
V�
T� ,
N /CI
7--OOG4—I2F99PG_0277——=��11r��1��_i���k-
- -765— I ti f
����� ,, —_—' 'S7rA,0+04.8-11T2�
��
--_Z'gL �L �� ����� ��� _ — TREAM CIA
r4 L �� ' PLUG
J`y O
ti �� — 5T-7
RETAIN
/ c ,0 _
h �L \ G i \
lu
VANE--� �� �D
S
�UP- )
.FENCE_Ll I(
< o)
'lqO
1
25' 12.5' 0 25' 50'
SCALE: 1" = 50'
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM I DATE: 2020
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27d05
ENGIFIRM SLICENSE NO. G890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Docybined hy:4 R ,
s
_ 1 89}� C 4994C3..oy
-� SEAL
26971
y�q G P
8/25/2020
DATE:
As -Built -UT2- STRUCTURE LOCATIONS
Design
AB Survey
STR. TYPE
NORTHING
EASTING
Channel
Channel
Elevation
Elevation
LOG CROSS VANE
941,207.49
1,790,166.44
753.85
TOPOGRAHY OUTSIDE
OF SURVEY LIMITS BASED ON
NC SPATIAL DATA QL2 LIDAR
0 +50 01

DocuSign Envelope ID: F3A2632B-75AB-4F7F-9FCC-B5D9EA890D3E
SHEET NAME
SHEET NUMBER
AS -BUILT PLANTING 1 I3
PROJECT NAME: SLINGSHOT STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
COUNTY: ROCKINGHAM I DATE: 2020
Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Species
Total*
Acres
12.05
Tag Alder Alnus serrulate)
350
River birch Betula nigra
700
Silky dogwood Celtis occidentalis
300
Red bud Cercis canadensis
200
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum
1700
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana
200
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
400
White ash Fraxinus caroliniana
100
Tulip poplar Driodendron tulipifera
500
Black gum Nyssa sylvatica
500
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
1500
Black cherry Prunus serotina
300
White oak Quercus alba
500
Water oak Quercus nigra
1500
Willow oak Quercus phellos
1400
Shumard oak Quecus shumardii
500
Carolina buckthorn Rhamnus
caroliniana
300
TOTALS
10,950
Average Stems/Acre
909
*Approximately 2000 live stakes of willow (Salix spp.), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), silky dogwood (Corpus amomum),
and ninebark (Physocarpus opulifolius) were planted but are not included in this table.
SUNGATE DESIGN GROUP, P.A.
' 905 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA27606
TEL (919)
ENGFIRM SLICENSE NO. G890
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Do}cus4rldd bye:' I I i l i i i
AR
,`shGk��ij
O�
AEAA
26971 _
y�q 6 P
I/jIHHWvvv
DATE:
8/25/2020

stmgshot Creek Lower (S. 00+00 to 10+00)
Rofte
1/21,20
i
00
116120
116163
1] 5
116165
116197
323
1161 90
116227
35.1
1161 19
116225
428
116170
116231
4 8
1162 64
11620
619
116362
116368
H2
116449
iim4
8117
116345
116462
863
116321
iim4
807
116530
116539
954
116421
116542
1022
116406
116544
1055
116505
116551
1318
116559
116597
1356
116511
116593
1445
116452
116589
1504
116488
1165M
1590
116587
11W 14
1911
116018
116650
1937
1165 34
116042
2001
116527
116048
2093
116543
116044
2149
116639
116658
2353
116636
116689
2383
116578
116685
MO
1165 fib
116684
2545
116573
116685
261 4
116073
1167 M
2891
116714
116750
2921
116051
116747
2973
116051
11674
W39
11W%
11674
3069
116720
11674
3296
116762
116778
3318
116686
116782
3377
116076
116780
3 8
116660
116779
3507
116748
116783
3690
116752
116821
3738
116724
116016
3831
116682
116016
3925
116703
116013
3969
116012
116823
4166
116014
1160
4205
116771
116055
4244
116767
110 %
4 9
116076
116884
4 6
116866
11089
4773
11089
116932
4856
116769
116041
4916
116043
1169M
4990
1100
116928
W51
11082
1169M
5342
116953
116972
5370
11069
116975
5430
1169M
116967
551 3
1169M
116974
5542
116969
1169M
5812
1169M
117041
5864
116942
117041
5942
11091
117041
6009
116916
11]O4]
W70
117016
117O 50
022
117016
117076
6343
1169M
117081
6415
116952
117075
W7
116044
117083
W 6
116919
117079
6505
1170M
117082
6709
117089
117126
6737
11]O4]
117117
6782
11 ]0 36
117128
6823
117115
117121
6946
1171 30
117155
7084
11710
117175
7103
1170M
117176
7164
11 ]061
11]1 73
7249
11 ]0 ]8
11]1 76
7266
1171 86
11 71%
7490
11 72W
11]2 41
]550
11]1 44
11]238
]605
11]1 10
11]238
]698
11 ]148
117242
7739
11721]
117239
8045
11726
11 72M
8069
117181
117293
81]9
117197
117294
8190
117302
117309
8331
117312
1173M
84fi0
117278
117340
m
117256
11]33]
8552
117237
11 ]341
8580
117304
117343
8839
11731]
117366
8886
117281
117365
8%
1172 53
117364
9060
1]23]
117237
117366
9096
11]331
117362
9240
117348
117372
941 3
117376
117393
9436
117298
117394
9510
1172 57
117392
%2 1
117222
117390
9646
11]34]
117394
9874
117389
117436
9890
117343
117435
W56
117357
117431
10326
117472
1174 M
Baseline
I Asneeded
Avg. Water S.rfa.. Slap.
0.0130
Riffle Length
26
Avg. Bi®e Slap.
0.0167
P.al Length
12
Slingshot Creek, Slingshot Creek Lower (Sta 00+00 to 10+00)
Baseline Profile 2020
1176
1174
1172
a
r.
a 1170
r.
a
1168
m
w
1166
0
e
1164
m
W
1162
1160
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Distance (feet)
—"Bed Baseline 1/21/2020" —^water Surfa.e Baseline V21/2020^
O
pQ' FEssio
SEAL
L-4194
n ... SUP, p

Slingshot Creek Upper (Sta 10+00 to 20+00)
Profile
1/21/20
2020
Baseline Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevatii
9956
117357
117431
10326
117472
1174 86
1041 5
11 74 38
117517
1068 8
11 74 64
117475
1071 3
117357
117476
10762
117331
117476
10836
1173 94
1174T
10868
117459
117479
11109
1174 M
1175.12
11124
1174.19
1175 M
11185
117443
117507
11247
117485
117510
11422
117516
117572
11455
117473
117567
1153.1
11 74 34
117567
11619
117479
1175 M
11652
117531
117570
11932
117561
1176 M
12004
1175 N
117601
12062
1175.13
1176 M
1221 6
117522
1176.10
12365
117493
117605
12379
117623
117635
12603
1175 %
117633
12851
1176 94
117703
12866
1175 %
1176 %
12925
1176 M
117705
12952
11 76 92
117697
13183
1177M
117737
13209
117667
117731
13288
1176 M
1177 M
13335
117618
117732
13397
117673
117743
1344 7
1177 34
117742
1362 6
1177 M
117789
1365 0
117697
11 78 02
1371 0
1177 M
117801
13722
117801
117803
, 388.1
117787
117845
1391 6
117720
11 78 38
13948
117726
117841
13978
117833
1178 M
14173
117875
1178 M
14209
1177 W
117882
14263
117751
117887
14326
11 77 99
117885
14359
1179 02
1178 %
1459.1
117939
117985
1462 9
1179 04
117983
1469 0
1178 48
117977
14744
117863
1179 90
1,1836
117867
117974
1,1844
1180 N
118021
14979
117978
118035
14997
117931
118039
15053
1179 40
118033
15082
1180.18
118042
15195
118053
118076
15226
117981
118078
15274
117985
118091
15363
117967
118091
15376
1180 92
1181 00
1 %1 5
1181 09
1181 %
1 %4 2
118037
1181 60
15726
1180 44
1181 60
15764
118129
1181 60
16000
1182.11
1182.15
1024
1181 00
1182.16
16108
118062
118220
16116
1182 36
118237
, 640.1
118263
1182 64
1662 6
1182 88
1182 92
16769
118295
1183 30
16784
118257
1183 30
1073
1182 48
118332
16915
118320
118361
1 713 8
1183 84
118420
17162
1183M
118421
17234
118304
118417
1 727 8
1183 88
118423
17415
1184.14
1184 4fi
1 743 4
118328
1184 4fi
17516
118285
118450
17630
1183 M
118448
17863
118477
118520
17890
118382
118518
17965
1184.18
118520
18038
1183 N
118517
808 0
1184 44
118517
818 ]
1185 30
1185 42
1 M35
118527
118565
1 M7 0
1184 39
118562
1854 6
1184 76
1185 64
1858.1
1185 50
1185 71
, 8864
1186.13
118642
1889 8
1185 53
1186 45
1894.1
118528
118638
1902 0
1185 26
1186 43
,W74
118599
118649
1920 8
1186 52
1186 92
1936 2
1186 79
1187 M
19388
118600
1187_11
1950 5
1186 04
1187_„
,% 3
118704
118749
1971 2
1186 50
1187 42
1983 7
1186 60
1187 41
1987 2
1187 42
1187 49
2004 7
1187 48
1188 00
2007 3
1186 85
1188 01
20, 21
1186 44
1187 97
2014 3
1187 85
1188 00
2035 4
1188 52
1188 72
2038 9
1187 70
1188 62
2044 6
1187 38
1188 63
20508
1187_19
118864
2053 0
1188 48
1188 66
20]2.1
1188 72
1189.10
20748
1188.18
118909
20r, 0
1187 74
118901
2093 5
1187 76
1189 01
2094 2
1189 40
1189 45
210] 0
1189.18
1189 62
2,08 3
1188 52
1189 64
21,34
118837
118961
21152
1189.12
1189 73
21354
118962
1190.13
2137 0
1189 29
1190 09
21443
118888
1190.10
21452
1190.18
119029
2168 9
1190 47
1190 54
21715
1189 50
1190 %
217 3
1189 51
119057
2182 2
1189 46
1190 54
2, 898
„8958
„9057
21967
„9949
„9087
22161
„9954
1191 N
2221 3
1189 93
1191 03
22269
„8987
„91 N
2234 0
1189 95
119104
2235 4
11 9107
119131
22657
119157
119175
2271 6
1190 79
119177
2275 7
„90 39
119177
22778
119, 88
119
22970
119162
W
119202
23, 0 5
119191
1192.16
23142
119095
1192.16
23240
119089
1192.18
23269
119176
1192.16
2M5 8
119197
1192 44
2347.907738
1191.239507
1192.523401
2351.126851
1191.465067
1192.454528
2353.894342
1192.056416
1192.451361
2369.634914
1191.940244
1192.480186
2372.130582
1191.528329
1192.415783
2376.860877
1191.436474
1192.515164
2383.57158
1191.748098
1192.520649
2387.102222
1192.109137
1192.512202
2407.45187
1192.325187
1192.759682
2410.951552
1191.560184
1192.806627
2414.305226
1191.612297
1192.723134
2422.003461
1191.211516
1192.795122
2424.185889
1192.491603
1192.800602
2430.819184
1192.795357
1193.052366
As needed
As needed
As needed
Baseline
As needed
Avg. Water Sorface Slope
0.0127
Rl®e Length
23
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0194
Pool Length
11
�N CA&C%
SEAL
'. L-4194
o ••. do �� .: Q ;
�ti •••. SURV •• p`�:
/gsNL EY .R�� \\\\
'///I(III10

1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
"Bed Baseline 1/21/2020"
"Water Surface Baseline 1/21/2020"
Slingshot Creek, Slingshot Creek Upper (Sta 20+00 to 24+31)
Baseline Profile 2020
Slingshot Creek, Slinghshot Creek Upper (Sta 10+00 to 20+00)
Baseline Profile 2020
1195
1190
1185
1180
a�
1175
0
.�
a�
W 1170
1000 1100
Distance (feet)
.N CAR
SEAL
L-4194 =
.• SURD•.••' p\
SNL EY RHO `�\\
//lllllll\\\\
1194
1192
1190
1186
1184
2000 2050
Distance (feet)
2100
2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450

UT 1 (Sta 00+90 to 08+12)
Profile
1/21/20
P"kh"" Keith
2020
Basdine Snsvey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
0.0
1116.06
1176.00
11.6
1176.16
1176.53
14.8
1175.89
1176.51
19.1
1175.81
1176.54
23.9
1176.07
1176.47
27.0
1176.45
1176.68
46.3
1176.87
1177.04
47.9
1176.45
1177.08
52.8
1176.41
1177.03
54.7
1177.06
1177.19
70.5
1176.99
1177.50
72.8
1176.35
1177.45
79.4
1176.22
1177.54
81.9
1177.34
1177.41
103.2
1177.55
1177.92
104.4
1177.00
1177.94
106.2
1176.72
1178.01
107.4
1177.38
1177.94
123.1
1177.78
1178.28
125.9
1177.39
1178.25
131.2
1177.50
1178.28
133.1
1178.13
1178.52
146.7
1178.34
1178.68
148.2
1177.70
1178.66
154.2
1177.64
1178.77
170.9
1178.55
1179.13
172.6
1178.07
1179.14
176.6
1178. 10
1179.11
182.0
1178.01
1179.08
185.2
1178.92
1179.37
2004.
1179.59
1179.89
202.8
1178.92
1179.86
207.2
1178.58
1179.89
211.8
1178.58
1179.95
215.8
1178.05
1179.92
218.4
1179.74
1180.05
230.1
1179.71
1180.21
233.3
1179. 13
1180.20
239.0
1179.10
1180.19
240.1
1180.57
1180.72
255.1
1180.51
1181.05
258.2
1179.55
11.1.04
262.7
1178.48
1180.94
273.1
1180. 11
1180.92
282.4
1180.34
1180.90
284.8
1180.65
1181. 17
295.7
1181.25
1181.80
298.4
1180.69
1181.79
305.1
1181.93
1181.93
315.4
1181.42
1182.03
324.5
1180.34
1181.98
330.2
1180.58
1181.99
338.1
1180.99
11:1.91
340.4
1182.22
112.22
347.6
1181.77
1182.28
349.6
1181. 19
1182.26
354.5
1181.29
1182.29
356.7
1182.34
1182.60
360.4
1182.37
1182.65
362.2
1181.44
1182.63
367.7
1181.82
1182.61
369.5
1182.91
1183.01
383.3
1182.64
1183.30
386.2
1181.35
1183.27
393.3
1181.56
1183.29
396.9
1183.36
1183.75
401.6
1183.44
1183.82
403.4
1181.94
1183.81
412.3
1182.83
1183.78
415.1
1183.71
1183.87
428.5
1183.92
1184.24
441.4
1183.99
1184.49
444.1
1182.50
1184.52
448.4
1182.17
1184.51
455.6
1182.46
1184.49
461.2
1184.32
1184.77
476.2
1184.48
1185.39
478.1
1183.31
1185.33
481.6
1183. 10
1185.33
486.1
1182.93
1185.34
490.6
1183.49
1185.29
495.0
1184.98
1185.27
500.8
1184.89
1185.42
509.8
1185.37
1185.71
512.2
1184.66
1185.71
515.1
1184.46
1185.57
517.6
1186.02
1186.04
524.4
1185.47
1186. 10
529.0
1184.97
1186.12
535.6
1184.29
1186. 12
541.2
1184.29
1186. 11
546.6
1184.56
1186.14
551.0
1186.36
1186.30
553.3
1185.20
1186.33
556.8
1185.42
1186.34
559.9
1187.28
1187.33
562.8
1186.98
1187.28
570.8
1185.01
1187.27
579.6
1185.27
1187.24
585.4
1185.43
1187.27
597.3
1185.48
1187.29
606.6
1187.22
1187.29
616.6
1188.03
1188. 12
626.1
1188.48
1188.81
630.1
1188.49
1188.83
634.6
1188.49
1188.82
637.5
1188.48
1188.79
640.6
1189.09
1189. 13
652.2
1189.02
1189.19
656.8
1189.21
1189.25
663.7
1189.84
1189.92
6s9.5
1189.0s
1189.92
675.2
1188.77
1189.93
684.3
1189.36
1189.93
687.5
1189.29
1189.92
689.9
1189.06
1189.93
693.4
1189.01
1189.93
697.8
1189.58
1189.91
704.1
1189.32
1189.95
707.5
1189. 15
1189.90
712.2
1189.11
1189.93
716.2
1189.57
1189.93
723.4
1189.65
1190.02
734.5
1189.70
1190.03
749.6
1190.23
1190.48
770.6
1191.59
1191.79
778.7
1192.03
1192.56
785.0
1193.14
1193.31
786.0
1192.60
1193.27
788.1
1192.74
1193.31
790.8
1193.95
1194.01
800.1
1193.79
1194.08
811.6
1193.77
1194.12
As needed 1 ne
eded eeded i As needd e
Bed Elec ation \8ater Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation 7 Water Elevation
Basdine
As needed
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0228
Bif le Length
15
Avg. Bif le Slope
0.0245
Pool Length
9
CA "/
SEAL
'. L-4194
O
�7, '••. SURD •' p`/:
////))1111\\\

Slingshot Creek, UT 1 (Sta 00+00 to 08+12)
Baseline Profile 2020
1200
1195
1190
1185
1180
lot
a�
1175
a�
W
1170
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Distance (feet)
"Bed Baseline 1/21/2020" "Water Surface Baseline 1/21/2020"
o� Fes�p ;
SEAL
L-4194

Project Name
Reach
Feature
Date
Crew
Slingshot Creek- Baseline (2020) Profile
UT2(Sta00+90 to01+67)
Profile
1/21/20
Perkins- Keith
2020
Baseline Survey
As needed
As needed
As needed
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation \i ater Elevation
Station Bed Elevation \i ater Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
0.00
1172.96
1173.35
18.05
1173.17
1173.35
19.71
1172.39
1173.34
25.08
1172.44
1173.37
28.36
1173.27
1173.32
38.89
1173.08
1173.47
43.33
1172.58
1173.42
46.08
1172.57
1173.42
49.43
1172.53
1173.45
51.17
1173.25
1173.43
60.58
1173.34
1173.43
63.85
1172.58
1173.44
69.78
1172.68
1173.43
73.36
1173.19
1173.49
85.60
1173.29
1173.57
89.27
1172.88
1173.54
94.77
1172.56
1173.56
101.57
1172.41
1173.55
102.24
1173.29
1173.56
112.19
1173.32
1173.56
114.14
1172.39
1173.57
117.22
1172.46
1173.53
121.06
1173.42
1173.59
129.69
1173.32
1173.70
131.70
1172.59
1173.70
137.99
1172.77
1173.68
139.54
1173.28
1173.72
151.97
1173.29
1173.82
163.88
1173.39
1174.02
166.44
1173.01
1174.02
Baseline
As needed
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0040
Riffle Length
13
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0076
Pool Length
7
Slingshot Creek, UT 2 (Sta 00+00 to 1+67)
Baseline Profile 2020
1175
1174
a 1173
a
1172
w_
C
0
d 1171
W 0 20
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Distance (feet)
F -^Bedsasehnev2M-."-^watersurrAceBAsetineS/2S/2020^
SEAL -
L-4194
�,l,•••� SURV�c •••�p�:
'�''��gsyL EY IFZ\\\ •��•

Site
Slingshot
Tm
1
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, Slingshot Creek, XS - 1, Pool
1202
--1201
0
1200
W-----
B-kfull
1199
MY-00 1/21/20
N�CARO�'',
0
10 20 30
0�•
Station (feet)
��$$��•���'
SEAL
_A 9 DA
Creek
Watershed:
Ca e Fear, 03030002
XS ID
Slingshot Creek, XS - 1, Pool
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/28/2020
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elev
0.0
1201.2
2.8
1201.2
6.5
1201.3
7.1
1200.7
7.9
1200.2
8.8
1199.8
9.7
1199.5
10.2
1199.2
10.3
1199.3
11.4
1199.3
12.5
1199.2
13.9
1199.2
14.7
1199.4
15.4
1199.7
16.3
1199.7
16.4
1199.8
17.4
1200.3
18.5
1200.E
19.4
1201.1
20.0
1201.2
21.4
1201.3
23.3
1201.2
'y ••.••SUR p �.
��'�, 9SHL EY
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1201.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
18.2
Bankfull Width:
13.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.0
Low Bank Height:
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Slingshot
Stream Type
E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, Slingshot Creek, XS - 2, Riffle
1203
____________________________________________________________
1202
o____________
_______________________
_____________
d
W 1201
-----B-kfull
----- Flood Roue Area
MY-00 1/21120
�N CA/�C '%
//�
1200
��
0
10
20 30
ESS/..
Station (feet)
SEAL
_A 4 DA
Creek
Watershed:
Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID
Slingshot Creek, XS -2, Riffle
Feature
Riffle
Date:
4/28/2020
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.0
1201.5
1.8
1201.E
3.7
1201.E
4.9
1201.5
5.5
1201.3
7.3
1200.E
7.9
1200.2
9.2
1200.1
10.3
1200.2
11.9
1200.1
13.2
1200.1
14.E
1200.2
15.4
1200.5
16.3
1200.9
17.3
1201.1
18.0
1201.3
19.8
1201.4
22.1
1201.4
25.0
1201.4
�7, '••. SURD •' IN/
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1201.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
10.8
Bankfull Width:
12.E
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1202.5
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Low Bank Height:
1.2
Mean Depth at

DNA
Tm
t-
s _._• _
Y
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot
Creek, Slingshot Creek, XS - 3, Pool
1205
______________________________
w 1204 777777�
0
1203
W-----Bavkf
ll
MY-00 1/21/20
1202
0
10
20 30
�
CARO�'.,,
Station eet
if
oFess/°-..'1,
SEAL
Site Slingshot Creek
Watershed: Ca e Fear, 03030002
XS ID Slingshot Creek, XS - 3, Pool
Feature Pool
Date: 4/28/2020
Field Crew: Perkinson, Keith
Station Elevation
0.0 1204.E
2.8 1204.7
5.1 1204.7
6.9 1204.3
7.6 1204.1
8.4 1203.7
9.4 1202.7
10.9 1202.3
14.2 1202.5
16.7 1202.7
17.7 1203.2
17.8 1203.1
18.E 1203.4
19.8 1204.0
20.9 1204.4
22.4 1204.7
24.0 1204.7
25.2 1204.7
26.3 1204.7
L-4194
=
o •��-�ti yo�•� Qz,
%til,•••� SURV�•`p�:
SUMMARY DATA
Station Elevation
0.0 1204.E
2.8 1204.7
5.1 1204.7
6.9 1204.3
7.6 1204.1
8.4 1203.7
9.4 1202.7
10.9 1202.3
14.2 1202.5
16.7 1202.7
17.7 1203.2
17.8 1203.1
18.E 1203.4
19.8 1204.0
20.9 1204.4
22.4 1204.7
24.0 1204.7
25.2 1204.7
26.3 1204.7
L-4194
=
o •��-�ti yo�•� Qz,
%til,•••� SURV�•`p�:
SUMMARY DATA
L-4194
=
o •��-�ti yo�•� Qz,
%til,•••� SURV�•`p�:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1204.E
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
22.1
Bankfull Width:
16.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
Low Bank Height:
2.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
O�..
Slingshot
...
h,Fa�x
.� �t��._
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, Slingshot Creek, XS - 4, Riffle
1206
21205_______________
_____________________________
W
1204
----- B-kfuu
-----F-Rove Area
1203
MY.0 112112
\\Illll�ttt///
N CAR
0
10
20
30
S S.. �i
Station (feet)
OMAI
Creek
Watershed:
Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID
Slingshot Creek, XS - 4, Riffle
Feature
Riffle
Date:
4/28/2020
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.0
1205.5
2.7
1205.4
5.3
1205.3
6.4
1205.3
7.2
1204.8
8.0
1204.2
8.8
1204.0
10.4
1204.1
12.0
1204.0
13.2
1204.1
14.8
1204.1
15.7
1204.2
16.4
1204.3
17.E
1204.E
18.5
1204.9
19.3
1205.1
20.3
1205.2
21.8
1205.3
23.0
1205.3
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1205.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
11.0
Bankfull Width:
12.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1206.3
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:1.2
Low Bank Height:
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
7.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
' 0y� ti0 SUR��'�: pQ:
.R��

�ESs/d....
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, Slingshot Creek, XS - 5, Riffle
1220
---------------------------------------------------------
1219
______ __
__________________________
_____________
0
W 1218
-----B-kfull
----- Flood Roue Area
1217
MY-00 1/21,20
N CA&O ' ////
0
10
20 30
Station (feet)
�9
.9
SEAL
Site Slingshot Creek
Watershed: Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID Slingshot Creek, XS -5, Riffle
Feature Riffle
Date: 4/28/2020
Field Crew: Perkinson, Keith
Station Elevation
0.0 1218.4
4.1 1218.3
6.2 1218.E
6.9 1218.4
7.9 1218.1
8.8 1217.7
9.5 1217.4
10.5 1217.5
11.8 1217.5
13.0 1217.5
14.1 1217.E
15.0 1217.E
16.0 1217.8
16.8 1218.1
17.7 1218.4
19.1 1218.E
21.4 1218.7
23.E 1218.5
o
• :9ti
gsNL E
Station Elevation
0.0 1218.4
4.1 1218.3
6.2 1218.E
6.9 1218.4
7.9 1218.1
8.8 1217.7
9.5 1217.4
10.5 1217.5
11.8 1217.5
13.0 1217.5
14.1 1217.E
15.0 1217.E
16.0 1217.8
16.8 1218.1
17.7 1218.4
19.1 1218.E
21.4 1218.7
23.E 1218.5
o
• :9ti
gsNL E
o
• :9ti
gsNL E
0

O
' - �.
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, Slingshot Creek, XS - 6, Pool
1220
1219
w
01218
W 1217
-----B-kf B
MY-00 1121/20
1216
��iilll�tttt/////
0
10 20 30
N �A?O
Station (feet)
FEssio•�Gy
ti9
:y
SEAL
Creek
Watershed: Ca e Fear, 03030002
XS ID Slingshot Creek, XS - 6, Pool
Feature Pool
Date: 4/28/2020
Field Crew: Perkinson, Keith
Station Elev
0.0 1218.8
2.3 1218.9
3.5 1218.9
4.6 1218.E
5.4 1218.2
6.2 1217.9
7.1 1217.5
8.0 1217.2
8.9 1217.1
9.8 1217.0
11.2 1217.0
12.1 1217.1
12.E 1217.3
13.4 1217.5
14.2 1218.1
15.3 1218.7
16.1 1218.9
17.5 1219.0
18.8 1219.2
20.9 1219.3
L-4194
o •1�-�ti y0•� Qz
%til,•••� SURV�•`IN/:
gsNLEY
.R�\ `\�.
SUMMARY DATA
Station Elev
0.0 1218.8
2.3 1218.9
3.5 1218.9
4.6 1218.E
5.4 1218.2
6.2 1217.9
7.1 1217.5
8.0 1217.2
8.9 1217.1
9.8 1217.0
11.2 1217.0
12.1 1217.1
12.E 1217.3
13.4 1217.5
14.2 1218.1
15.3 1218.7
16.1 1218.9
17.5 1219.0
18.8 1219.2
20.9 1219.3
L-4194
o •1�-�ti y0•� Qz
%til,•••� SURV�•`IN/:
gsNLEY
.R�\ `\�.
SUMMARY DATA
L-4194
o •1�-�ti y0•� Qz
%til,•••� SURV�•`IN/:
gsNLEY
.R�\ `\�.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1218.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
14.3
Bankfull Width:
12.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.8
Low Bank Height:
1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
L2
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Slingshot Creek
Watershed:
Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID
Slingshot Creek, XS -7, Riffle
Feature
Riffle
Date:
4/28/2020
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.0
1225.0
2.6
1224.8
4.5
1224.7
5.8
1224.7
6.6
1224.3
7.2
1224.1
7.8
1223.8
8.5
1223.7
9.1
1223.5
9.7
1223.4
11.2
1223.4
12.2
1223.6
13.3
1223.6
14.3
1223.9
15.5
1224.1
16.5
1224.4
18.2
1224.9
19.7
1225.2
21.0
1225.2
23.2
1225.3
:Q
'. L-4194
' O0 p:2,
��j, �'O SUR��'``
p ��'�i�`S//LEY .R�� `\�.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1224.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
10.1
Bankfull Width:
11.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1226.1
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
Low Bank Height:
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
W / D Ratio:
13.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type I E/C 3/4
­11111-m Flu
Slingshot Creek, Slingshot Creek, XS - 7, Riffle
1227
1226
m
-------------------------------------
0 1224
0
a
m
W
1223 - - - - - B-kfuu
- - - - - Food Rove Area
MY-00 1/21/20
1222
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

Tm
Creek
Watershed:
Ca e Fear, 03030002
XS ID
Slingshot Creek, XS - 8, Pool
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/28/2020
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elev
0.0
1225.0
2.5
1225.0
5.2
1224.7
6.1
1224.3
6.7
1224.1
7.6
1222.5
8.4
1222.E
9.7
1222.5
11.1
1222.E
12.0
1222.9
12.7
1223.1
14.0
1223.5
15.0
1224.1
17.0
1224.E
19.1
1225.1
20.5
1225.1
22.2
1225.2
o ••. do
�7, '••. SURD •' p`�:
NL EY .R��
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1224.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
16.3
Bankfull Width:
12.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
Low Bank Height:
2.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Slingshot Creek
Watershed:
Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID
UTl, XS -1, Riffle
Feature
Riffle
Date:
4/28/2020
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.0
1212.1
2.7
1212.1
4.4
1212.0
5.8
1211.9
6.4
1211.4
7.3
1211.5
8.2
1211.1
9.3
1211.2
10.6
1211.2
11.7
1211.0
12.5
1211.4
13.0
1211.4
13.5
1211.6
14.0
1211.7
15.8
1211.7
17.5
1211.8
19.3
1211.8
F
Q C
L-4194
c� .y
��j, '••. SURD •' p`�:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1211.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
3.2
Bankfull Width:
8.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1212.4
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
Low Bank Height:
0.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
19.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
12.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, UTl, XS -1, Riffle
1213
m
----------------------------------------------
2 1212
0
-----B-kfull
- - - - - Flood Roue Area
MY-00 1/21,20
1211
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

SEAL
..
,a.
r
r-
a A'
... .
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot
Creek, U I, XS - 2, Pool
1214
1213
w----------------------
_______
01212
W 1211
-----B-kfull
MY-00 1/21/20
1210
0
10
20 30
Station (feet)
ESS/p�9!li9
Site Slingshot Creek
Watershed: Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID UTl, XS - 2, Pool
Feature Pool
Date: 4/28/2020
Field Crew: Perkinson, Keith
Station Elevation
0.0 1212.8
3.3 1212.7
5.2 1212.7
6.8 1212.1
7.7 1211.8
8.7 1211.4
9.5 1210.9
10.2 1210.9
11.1 1211.0
12.0 1210.7
12.9 1211.3
13.9 1212.0
14.5 1212.2
15.6 1212.7
16.8 1212.8
18.5 1212.9
19.9 1212.9
� F
:Q
L-4194
=
o'�9ti yo•IQz,
��'��gsNL EY .R�\ ``�.
SUMMARY DATA
Station Elevation
0.0 1212.8
3.3 1212.7
5.2 1212.7
6.8 1212.1
7.7 1211.8
8.7 1211.4
9.5 1210.9
10.2 1210.9
11.1 1211.0
12.0 1210.7
12.9 1211.3
13.9 1212.0
14.5 1212.2
15.6 1212.7
16.8 1212.8
18.5 1212.9
19.9 1212.9
� F
:Q
L-4194
=
o'�9ti yo•IQz,
��'��gsNL EY .R�\ ``�.
SUMMARY DATA
� F
:Q
L-4194
=
o'�9ti yo•IQz,
��'��gsNL EY .R�\ ``�.
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1212.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
11.4
Bankfull Width:
11.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.0
Low Bank Height:
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

��
zr
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, UI'1, XS - 3, Riffle
1222
________________
__________________________
1221
21220
0
W
1219
-----B-k.11
----- Flood Rove Area
��iii���//t/�//
1218
MY-00 1/21/20
N CA&O
0
10 20 30
E S S/ O •.. 51 1
Station (feet)
�9
.9
SEAL
Creek
Watershed: Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID UTl, XS -3, Riffle
Feature Riffle
Date: 4/28/2020
Field Crew: Perkinson, Keith
Station Elevation
0.0 1219.9
2.3 1219.8
3.9 1219.4
5.2 1219.0
6.5 1218.5
8.3 1218.1
9.4 1218.0
10.4 1217.9
11.6 1218.2
12.3 1218.3
13.3 1218.5
14.4 1218.8
15.5 1219.1
16.9 1219.5
17.9 1219.9
19.3 1220.1
20.3 1220.2
o ••
. do
U
�7, '••. SRD •' p�
`:
/gsNLEY
.R��
SUMMARY DATA
Station Elevation
0.0 1219.9
2.3 1219.8
3.9 1219.4
5.2 1219.0
6.5 1218.5
8.3 1218.1
9.4 1218.0
10.4 1217.9
11.6 1218.2
12.3 1218.3
13.3 1218.5
14.4 1218.8
15.5 1219.1
16.9 1219.5
17.9 1219.9
19.3 1220.1
20.3 1220.2
o ••
. do
U
�7, '••. SRD •' p�
`:
/gsNLEY
.R��
SUMMARY DATA
o ••
. do
U
�7, '••. SRD •' p�
`:
/gsNLEY
.R��
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1219.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
16.4
Bankfull Width:
15.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1221.7
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.9
Low Bank Height:
1.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
W / D Ratio:
14.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Slingshot Creek
Watershed:
Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID
UTl, XS - 4, Pool
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/28/2020
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.0
1219.6
2.3
1219.6
3.4
1219.6
4.5
1219.3
5.5
1218.9
6.3
1218.5
6.8
1218.0
7.7
1217.4
9.1
1217.2
10.2
1217.3
11.3
1217.1
12.0
1217.3
12.5
1217.9
13.4
1218.2
14.3
1218.5
15.3
1219.0
16.2
1219.5
16.8
1219.9
17.5
1220.1
18.1
1220.2
19.5
1220.2
21.1
1220.3
\IIIIIItttt
CA&
=CAI
'. L-4194
0 v p: 2;
�7, ' •. SURD p`":
gsNL EY
ttt1111111 W
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1219.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
18.1
Bankfull Width:
12.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.4
Low Bank Height:
2.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, UI'1, XS - 4, Pool
1221
1220
w
_______________________ __________
�1219
0
1218
- - - - B-kfull
W-
1217
MY-00 1/21/20
1216
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

E
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, UT2, XS - 1, Riffle
1209
________________________________________________________________
1207
0
0
W 1206
-----B-kfull
----- Flood Roue Area
IIIlitttt
1205
MY-00 1/21120
CA&O ' ////
0
10
20
S S ''
Station (feet)
/
oy9'L9 ;
Creek
Watershed: Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID UT2, XS -1, Riffle
Feature Riffle
Date: 4/28/2020
Field Crew: Perkinson, Keith
Station Elevation
0.0 1207.0
2.4 1206.9
4.0 1206.8
5.0 1206.E
6.1 1206.3
6.9 1206.0
8.0 1205.9
9.1 1206.0
10.2 1205.9
10.8 1206.0
11.3 1206.2
11.9 1206.3
12.5 1206.5
13.8 1206.8
15.1 1206.9
16.4 1207.0
17.7 1207.1
o ••
�. do
7, '••. SURD •' p`�:
SUMMARY DATA
Station Elevation
0.0 1207.0
2.4 1206.9
4.0 1206.8
5.0 1206.E
6.1 1206.3
6.9 1206.0
8.0 1205.9
9.1 1206.0
10.2 1205.9
10.8 1206.0
11.3 1206.2
11.9 1206.3
12.5 1206.5
13.8 1206.8
15.1 1206.9
16.4 1207.0
17.7 1207.1
o ••
�. do
7, '••. SURD •' p`�:
SUMMARY DATA
o ••
�. do
7, '••. SURD •' p`�:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1206.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
5.4
Bankfull Width:
9.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
1207.7
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Low Bank Height:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
16.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
10.E
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Slingshot Creek
Watershed:
Cape Fear, 03030002
XS ID
UT2, XS - 2, Pool
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/28/2020
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Keith
Station
Elevation
0.0
1206.5
1.7
1206.6
3.9
1206.7
6.0
1206.6
6.4
1206.4
6.9
1206.1
7.5
1205.7
8.2
1205.4
8.9
1205.3
10.1
1205.4
10.9
1205.5
11.6
1205.7
12.1
1206.2
12.7
1206.3
13.7
1206.6
15.2
1206.9
16.4
1207.0
17.8
1207.0
19.5
1207.1
L-4194
0': yti Off. Q2`,
��'��gsNL EY 19
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
1206.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
6.3
Bankfull Width:
7.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
Low Bank Height:
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type E/C 3/4
Slingshot Creek, UI'2, XS - 2, Pool
1208
1207
0
a
1206 - - - - - - - ;700 W-----Bavkf ll
MY-00 1/21/20
1205
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)