NC0082139_Fact Sheet_20200716

FACT SHEET FOR EXPEDITED PERMIT RENEWALS
This form must be completed by Permit Writers for all expedited permits which do not require full Fact
Sheets. Expedited permits are generally simple 100% domestics (e.g., schools, mobile home parks, etc)
that can be administratively renewed with minor changes, but can include facilities with more complex
issues (Special Conditions, 303(d) listed water, toxicity testing, instream monitoring, compliance
concerns).
Basic Information for Expedited Permit Renewals
Permit Writer / Date
Sydney Carpenter 6/24/2020
Permit Number
NCO082139
Facility Name / Facility Class
Greenville WTP / PC-1
Basin Name / Sub -basin number
Tar -Pamlico / 03-03-05
Receiving Stream / HUC
Tar River / 0302010304
Stream Classification / Stream Segment
C; NSW / Index: 28- 94
Does permit need Daily Max NH3
limits?
No
Does permit need TRC
limits/language?
Already included.
Does permit have toxicity testing? IWC
if so.
Yes; IWC % is 90.
Does permit have Special Conditions?
Yes — Chronic Toxicity Monitoring (Quarterly);
Compliance Schedule for Fluoride and Copper; Permit Re-
o ener for WET Testing
Does permit have instream monitorin ?
Hardness Sampling — Upstream is being added.
Is the stream impaired (on 303(d) list)?
If yes, for what arameter s ?
No
Any obvious compliance concerns?
No enforcements. No violations during the last permit
cycle.
Any permit mods since lastpermit?
No
New expiration date
10/31/2024
Facility Overview:
The Greenville WTP operates a conventional water treatment plant designed for a potable
flowrate of 22.5 MGD. Treatment process for raw water consists of coagulation, flocculation,
sedimentation, ozonation and filtration. Upon expansion, a superpulsator will be added.
Wastewater consists of sedimentation basin residuals/alum sludge, filter backwash, analyzer
discharge, sample tap discharge and stormwater. Treatment process for wastewater consists of
settling over a surface area of 23 acres from inlet to the discharge point. The estimated
maximum, monthly average wastewater discharge is approximately 0.970 MGD, based upon
future flow estimations from Hazen & Sawyer, which encompasses the estimated max monthly
flow and max monthly loading plus contingency for clearwell and sedimentation basin draining.
Compliance History:
• No enforcements. No violations during the last permit cycle.
• Facility has failed 1 out of 12 toxicity tests from Nov 2016 — July 2019.

RPA:
A flow (Qw) of 0.970 MGD was used, based on flow estimations from Hazen & Sawyer,
received on 12/05/19. The Max Monthly Flow and Max Monthly Loading plus contingency for
clearwell and basin draining is estimated to be 0.970 MGD.
A 7Q10s of 0.0 cfs was used, as the receiving stream, at the outfall location, is suspected to be
tidally influenced (per USGS and current water treatment plant permitting strategy for
freshwater).
• Fluoride — reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards; applying chronic limit
with monthly monitoring.
• Copper — reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards; applying chronic and
acute limits with monthly monitoring.
• Zinc — no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards; predicted max < 50% of
allowable concentration; parameter not listed in previous permit's effluent table.
NCG59 General Permit Eligibility (for Conventional & Greensand WTPs):
• They have passed > 75% of TOX tests within the last 3 years (Nov 2016-Jun 2019), the
most recent failed test occurring in April 2018 — eligible
• Facility receiving Copper and Fluoride limits as RPA shows reasonable potential to
exceed WQS — ineligible
• Conclusion: Ineligible for NCG59 General Permit.
Changes from previous permit to draft:
• Added facility grade in A. (1).
• Removed former footnote #3 regarding samples collected concurrently with WET -test
samples as this is no longer required per 2009 Changes to WTP Strategy Memo.
• Removed Iron parameter in A. (1) Effluent table. Application states Iron sulfate does not
have the potential to be discharged. As per "Assistance with BPJ on WTP renewals"
2012 Memo, Iron does not have a recommend limit and was monitoring only in previous
permit.
• Removed Section A. (3) Permit Re -Opener: WET as the Permittee has passed > 75% of
TOX tests within the last three years.
• Added Fluoride chronic limit with monthly monitoring to Section A. (1) Effluent table, as
RPA shows a reasonable potential to exceed WQS.
• Added Copper acute & chronic limits with monthly monitoring to Section A. (1) Effluent
table, as RPA shows a reasonable potential to exceed WQS.
• Added Section A. (3) Compliance Schedule for new Fluoride and Copper limits and
monitoring, as well as corresponding footnote #5.
• Updated Turbidity monitoring frequency to 2/Monthly per Table 5.1 in the "Changes to
WTP Strategy" 2009 Memo.
• Updated eDMR footnote #1 in A. (1) and updated Section A. (4).

• Updated Section A. (2) with new results submission information.
• Updated current treatment components list and added new max monthly average, HUC,
and a note regarding completion of expansion to the Supplement to Cover Sheet.
• Added Hardness sampling to A. (1) Effluent table to monitor in conjunction with
hardness dependent metals already being monitored (copper), as per "Implementation of
Instream Dissolved Metals Standards" 2016 Memo. Sampling in effluent and upstream.
Added corresponding footnotes #6 & #7.
Changes from draft to final:
• None
Comments received on draft permit:
• None

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
IV4,4mar
Randall Emory, PE
Greenville Utilities Commission
PO Box 1847
Greenville, NC 27835-1847
Subject: Permit Renewal
Application No. NCO082139
Greenville WTP
Pitt County
Dear Applicant:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 21, 2019
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges the February 19, 2019 receipt of your permit renewal application and
supporting documentation. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's NPDES WW permitting
branch. Per G.S. 150B-3 your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made.
Continuation of the current permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit. The
permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Please respond in a
timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to allow a complete review of the application and renewal
of the permit.
Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental
Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at:
https://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance/environmental-application-tracker
If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the
links available within the Application Tracker.
Sincerely,
Wren Thedford
Administrative Assistant
Water Quality Permitting Section
ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application
North Ca r., ^a Department of Environmental Quairty I Divsoon of Water Resources
r,,EQ--
D Wash ington Regional Offce 1943 Wash ngton Square Mali I Washington, North Carolina 27889
2524M-M i

Greenville
Utilities
February 13, 2019
NC DENR, Division of Water Quality
Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Renewal Application of NPDES Permit NCO082139
Greenville Utilities Commission., Pitt County
Rscr.lvenlr C/VR/Dw
R
FE8 19 2019
®rrnftt'ng Section
By way of this submittal the Greenville Utilities Commission is requesting renewal of the
subject permit.
Enclosed please find an original and (2) copies of the NPDES permit application
(short form C-WTP), a schematic of flow through the facility and the sludge management
plan for this facility.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Julius Patrick at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Randall D. Emory, P.E.
Director of Water Resources
RDE/le
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Anthony C. Cannon, General Manager/CEO
Mr. David W. Springer, P.E., Assistant Director of Water Resources
Mr. D. Anthony Whitehead, Water Quality Manager
Mr. Julius E. Patrick, Superintendent, Water Treatment Plant
PO Box 1847
Greenville, NC 27835
www.guc.com
Your Local
Advantage

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit Number INCO082139
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Otherwise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name Greenville Utilities Commission
Facility Name Greenville Water Treatment Plant
Mailing Address 801 Mumford Road
City Greenville
State / Zip Code NC/27835
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone]
e-mail Address [e-mail]
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same as above ❑
Street Address or State Road 1721 Waterway Road
City Greenville
State / Zip Code NC/27834
County Pitt
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the
Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name Greenville Utilities Commission
Mailing Address PO Box 1847
City Greenville
State / Zip Code NC/27835-1847
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone]
4. Ownership Status:
Federal ❑
State ❑
Private ❑
Page 1 of 3 Version 5/2012

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
5. Type of treatment plant:
® Conventional (Includes coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation, usually followed by
filtration and disinfection)
❑ Ion Exchange (Sodium Cycle Cationic ion exchange)
❑ Green Sand Filter (No sodium recharge)
❑ Membrane Technology (RO, nanofiltration)
Check here if the treatment process also uses a water softener ❑
6. Description of source water(s) (i.e. groundwater, surface water)
Surface
7. Describe the treatment process(es) for the raw water:
Coagulation, Flocculation, Sedimentation, Ozonation, Filtration
8. Describe the wastewater and the treatment process(es) for wastewater generated by the
facility:
The waste water consists of sedimentation basin residuals/alum sludge, filter backwash,
continuous analyzer discharge, continuous sample tap discharge and storm water. Treatment
consists of settling from the inlet to the discharge which is a distance of about 2500 ft. over a
surface area of 23 acres.
9. Number of separate discharge points: 001
Outfall Identification number(s)
10. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ® Intermittent ❑
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs: Duration:
11. Plant design potable flowrate 22.5 MGD
Backwash or reject flow .673 MGD
12. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including
latitude and longitudes
Tar River
13. Please list all water treatment additives, including cleaning chemicals or disinfection
treatments, that have the potential to be discharged.
Alum / aluminum sulfate Yes El No
Iron sulfate / ferrous sulfate Yes No ❑x
Page 2 of 3 Version 5/2012

NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - WTP
For discharges associated with water treatment plants
Fluoride Yes ❑x No
Ammonia nitrogen / Chloramines Yes 0 No
Zinc -orthophosphate or sweetwater CP1236 Yes No 191
List any other additives below:
Sodium Permanganate, Powered Activated Carbon, Copper Sulfate, Sodium Hydroxide, Chlorine
DPD Reagents: (Acidic Salts, Ozone Reagents: (Malonic Acid), Potassium Acid Malonate, Ortho Phosphate,
Polyacrylamide, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ammonium Hydroxide, Calcium Thiosulfate
14. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one)
Yes ❑ No
15. Additional Information:
Provide a schematic of flow through the facility, include flow volumes at all points in
the water treatment process. The plan should show the point[s] of addition for
chemicals and all discharges routed to an outfall [including stormwater].
Solids Handling Plan
16. NEW Applicants
Information needed in addition to items 1-15:
New applicants are highly encouraged to contact a permit coordinator with the
NCDENR Customer Service Center.
Was the Customer Service Center contacted? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Analyses of source water collected
Engineering Alternative Analysis
Discharges from Ion Exchange and Reverse Osmosis plants shall be evaluated using a
water quality model.
17. Applicant Certification
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Randall D. Emory, P.E. Director of Water Resources
Printed name of Pe son Signing Title
Signature of Applicant
Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) proviWhat: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any application,
record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that
Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21
or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by
imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5
years, or both, for a similar offense.)
Page 3 of 3 Version 5/2012

Greenville
Utilities Greenville Utilities Commission WTP Residuals Handling Plan
Greenville Utilities Commission (GUC) existing residuals comprise of sedimentation
basin blowdown, filter backwash, and filter to waste. The residuals waste streams are all
directed to a manhole. Stormwater is also conveyed to this manhole. A 30-inch manhole
with reinforced concrete pipe runs west from the manhole into another manhole where
additional stormwater is tied in. A 36-inch reinforced concrete pipe runs west from this
manhole into an outfall at the residual lagoon. During a 10-year storm an estimated
7,400 gpm of stormwater is diverted to this pipeline, which is approximately half the
flowrate of the maximum instantaneous residual stream. The residuals lagoon is
approximately 23 acres with a depth of 14 feet from the lagoon invert to grade. With an
operating depth of 11 ft., the lagoon has a corresponding volume capacity of
approximately 350,000 cubic yards at 2.25:1 slope
GUC contracted with Hazen to conduct Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) in 2017.
The final report was produced in May 2018. The PER estimates that the lagoon has
210,000 cubic yards of solids or 60 percent full. Existing residuals management
practices, solid production estimates and evaluation of future residual management
alternatives were also included in the PER. The four residual management alternatives
were:
1. Alternative 1-Use existing lagoon -continue to direct all residuals streams to the
existing lagoon.
2. Alternative 2- Construct a new lagoon -direct all residuals streams to a new
3. Alternative 3- Solids Thickening and Dewatering- Direct sedimentation and future
blowdown to thickening and dewatering and continue to direct filter backwash
and filter to waste to the existing lagoon.
4. Alternative 4-Solids Thickening and Dewatering and Backwash Clarification- -
Po Box 1847 Direct sedimentation and future blowdown to thickening and dewatering and
Greenville, NC 27835clarification for filter backwash and filter to waste.
www.guc.com
Your Local
Advantage

The PER recommended that GUC select Alternate 1-continue to send all residuals
stream to existing lagoon. Also, a recommendation that GUC staff annually dredge new
solids that are collected to maintain the current lagoon functionality and capacity. GUC
had previously established a residual lagoon improvement capital project prior to the
PER. In December 2018, GUC proceeded with a request for bids for sludge removal
from the residual lagoon. A contract was awarded January 31, 2019 for removal of
approximately two times the annual average sludge production. GUC long term plan is
to remove twice the annual average solid production annually to restore additional
capacity in the current lagoon and future WTP expansion.

*ACTIVATED
CARBON ALUM
T
POLYMER
A
CAUSTIC
R 63 MG RAW WATER RAPID
R IMPOUNDMENT MIXER
RAW WATER *SODIUM
V OZONE
CONTACTOR PERMANGANATE
E
R
INTER-
MEDIATE
*POLYMER OZONE
CONTACTOR
' •' CHLORINE
PHOSPHATE
D
CAUSTIC "
s
AMMONIA 3 MG 3 MG T s
FILTERS GROUND GROUND I s
s
- STORAGE STORAGE B T
u
CHLORINE E
T
**Calcium FLUORIDE I M
Thiosulfate 0

t \ / �,.,�s�'•'�\ 1 � 'V
264 -_a i • 1 g
/! r` �• ��v l�� 10 / 1
Waterway Rd
Approximate
33 �`+ t• - •�.� is�%'_` _� ` ti `�--� Facility Boundary
40
s 1 J L -;'' • Fbamiels Ca
- - c
i. .: ..i
water
p}9.0
t 1
'
r Outfall 001�ITT _GREI
[flows southeast]
r Tar River
[flows southeast]
Greenville Utilities Commission
Greenville Water Treatment Plant
1721 Waterway Road, Greenville NC 27835
Receivine Stream: Tar River Stream Class: Q NSW
Stream Segment: 28-(94) Sub -Basin: 03-03-05
Drainage Basin: Tar -Pamlico HUC: 03020103
Latitude: 350 38' 04" Longitude: 770 23' S5"
State Grid/USGS Quad: E29NW / Greenville NW, NC
Facility
�f����a��f�; ►'�'
Location
r►���IIY►v17�7Ai,����bID
Scale 1 1 t
sS Permit NCO082139

Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
REQUIRED DATA ENTRY
Table 1. Project Information
Facility Name
WWTP/WTP Class
NPDES Permit
Outfal I
Flow, Ow (MGD)
Receiving Stream
HUC Number
Stream Class
❑ CHECK IF HQW OR ORW WQS
Greenville WTP
PC-1
NCO082139
001
0.970
Tar River
03020103
C; NSW
❑ Apply WS Hardness WQC
7Q10s (cfs)
7Q10w (cfs)
30012 (cfs)
CIA (cfs)
1 Q10s (cfs)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Effluent Hardness
Upstream Hardness
-----------------------
Combined Hardness Chronic
Combined Hardness Acute
25 mg/L (Avg)
I 25 mg/L (Avg)
--------
I 25 g/L
25 mg/L
Data Source(s)
Zero flow used for 7Q10s as receiving stream is
suspected to be tidally influenced (per USGS).
F-1 CHECK TO APPLY MODEL
Par01
Par02
Par03
Par04
Par05
Par06111111
Par07
Par08
Par09
Par10
Par91
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Par16
Par17
Par18
Par19
Par20
Par21
Par22
Par23
Par24
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Name wos Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL Units
Arsenic
Aquactic Life
C
150
FW
340
ug/L
Arsenic
Human Health
Water Supply
C
10
HH/WS
N/A
ug/L
Beryllium
Aquatic Life
NC
6.5
FW
65
ug/L
Cadmium
Aquatic Life
NC
0.5899
FW
3.2396
ug/L
Chlorides
Aquatic Life
NC
230
FW
Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds
Water Supply
NC
1
A
ug/L
Total Phenolic Compounds
Aquatic Life
NC
300
A
ug/L
Chromium III
Aquatic Life
NC
117.7325
FW
905.0818
ug/L
Chromium VI
Aquatic Life
NC
11
FW
16
pg/L
Chromium, Total
Aquatic Life
NC
N/A
FW
N/A
pg/L
Copper
Aquatic Life
NC
7.8806
FW
10.4720
ug/L
Cyanide
Aquatic Life
NC
5
FW
22
10
ug/L
Fluoride
Aquatic Life
NC
1,800
FW
ug/L
Lead
Aquatic Life
NC
2.9416
FW
75.4871
ug/L
Mercury
Aquatic Life
NC
12
FW
0.5
ng/L
Molybdenum
Human Health
NC
2000
HH
ug/L
Nickel
Aquatic Life
NC
37.2313
FW
335.2087
pg/L
Nickel
Water Supply
NC
25.0000
WS
N/A
pg/L
Selenium
Aquatic Life
NC
5
FW
56
ug/L
Silver
Aquatic Life
NC
0.06
FW
0.2964
ug/L
Zinc
Aquatic Life
NC
126.7335
FW
125.7052
ug/L
NCO082139 RPA 2020, input
6/25/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
H1
H2
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Effluent Hardness
Values" then "COPY".
Upstream Hardness
Values"then"COPY".
Maximum data points
Maximum data points
=58
=58
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1
25 25 Std Dev.
N/A
1
25 25 Std Dev.
N/A
2
Mean
25.0000
2
Mean
25.0000
3
C.V.
0.0000
3
C.V.
0.0000
4
n
1
4
n
1
5
10th Per value
25.00 mg/L
5
10th Per value
25.00 mg/L
6
Average Value
25.00 mg/L
6
Average Value
25.00 mg/L
7
Max. Value
25.00 mg/L
7
Max. Value
25.00 mg/L
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
49
49
50
50
51
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
56
57
57
58
58
NCO082139 RPA 2020, data
1 6/26/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pal 1
Part 3
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Use "PASTE SPECIAL -
Copper
Values" then "COPY".
Fluoride
Values" then "COPY".
Maximum data points
Maximum data points
= 58
= 58
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
10/6/2015
<
10
5
Std Dev.
11.2414
1
1/12/2016
120
120
Std Dev.
555.8079
2
1/12/2016
<
10
5
Mean
7.5789
2
4/5/2016
130
130
Mean
383.4000
3
4/5/2016
<
10
5
C.V.
1.4832
3
7/12/2016
570
570
C.V.
1.4497
4
7/12/2016
<
10
5
n
19
4
10/25/2016
440
440
n
18
5
10/25/2016
<
10
5
5
11/3/2016
160
160
6
11/3/2016
<
10
5
Mult Factor =
1.89
6
1/10/2017
1120
1120
Mult Factor =
1.94
7
1/10/2017
<
10
5
Max. Value
54.00 ug/L
7
4/4/2017
340
340
Max. Value
2370.0 ug/L
8
4/4/2017
<
10
5
Max. Pred Cw
102.06 ug/L
8
7/11/2017
1.2
1.2
Max. Pred Cw
4597.8 ug/L
9
7/11/2017
<
10
5
9
10/18/2017
170
170
10
10/10/2017
<
10
5
10
1/16/2018
170
170
11
1/16/2018
<
10
5
11
4/10/2018
2370
2370
12
4/10/2018
<
10
5
12
7/17/2018
310
310
13
7/17/2018
<
10
5
13
10/9/2018
150
150
14
10/9/2018
<
10
5
14
1/15/2019
100
100
15
1/15/2019
<
10
5
15
4/2/2019
110
110
16
4/2/2019
<
10
5
16
7/9/2019
220
220
17
7/9/2019
<
10
5
17
10/8/2019
220
220
18
10/8/2019
54
54
18
1/14/2020
200
200
19
1/14/2020
<
10
5
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
49
49
50
50
51
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
55
55
56
56
57
57
58
58
NCO082139 RPA 2020, data
-2- 6/26/2020

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Par21
Use "PASTE SPECIAL
Zinc
Values" then "COPY".
Maximum data points
= 58
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
10/6/2015
<
10
5
Std Dev.
0.0000
2
1/12/2016
<
10
5
Mean
5.0000
3
4/5/2016
<
10
5
C.V.
0.0000
4
7/12/2016
<
10
5
n
19
5
10/25/2016
<
10
5
6
11/3/2016
<
10
5
Mult Factor =
1.00
7
1/10/2017
<
10
5
Max. Value
5.0 ug/L
8
4/4/2017
<
10
5
Max. Pred Cw
5.0 ug/L
9
7/11/2017
<
10
5
10
10/10/2017
<
10
5
11
1/16/2018
<
10
5
12
4/10/2018
<
10
5
13
7/17/2018
<
10
5
14
10/9/2018
<
10
5
15
1/15/2019
<
10
5
16
4/2/2019
<
10
5
17
7/9/2019
<
10
5
18
10/8/2019
<
10
5
19
1/14/2020
<
10
5
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
NCO082139 RPA 2020, data
- 3 - 6/26/2020

Greenville WTP
NCO082139
Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Using Metal Translators
MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58
Qw (MGD)
= 0.9700 WWTP/WTP Class: PC-1
1Q10S (cfs)
= 0.00 fWC% @ 1Q10S = 100
7Q10S (cfs)
= 0.00 IWC% @ 7Q10S = 100
7Q10W (cfs)
= 0.00 IWC% @ 7Q10W = 100
30Q2 (cfs)
= 0.00 IWC% @ 30Q2 = 100
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs)
= 0.00 IW%C @ QA = 100
Receiving Stream: Tar River HUC 03020103 Stream Class: C; NSW
Outfall 001
Qw = 0.97 MGD
COMBINED HARDNESS (mg/L)
Acute = 25 mg/L
Chronic = 25 mg/L
PARAMETER
NC STANDARDS OR EPA CRITERIA
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPEApplied
J
a
z
Chronic Acutc
D
n # Det. Max Pred Cw Allowable Cw
Standard
Acute: 10.47
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Copper
NC
7.8806 FW 10.4720
ug/L
19 1
102.06
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
1 values > Allowablee C w
Acute: NO WQS
Fluoride
NC
1800 FW
ug/L
18 18
4,597.8
-----------------------------------------------
Chronic: 1,800.0
RP shown - apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
1 values > Allowable Cw
Acute: 125.7
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
Zinc
NC
126.7335 FW 125.7052
ug/L
19 0
5.0
Monitoring required
-----------------------------------------------
Chronic: 126.7
No RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw - No
NO DETECTS
Max MDL = 10
Monitoring required
Acute:
0 0
N/A
_
Chronic:----------
--------------------------
Acute:
0 0
N/A
_ _ _ _ _
Chronic:
Acute:
0 0
N/A
Chronic:
Acute:
0 0
N/A
_ _ _ _ _
Chronic:
NCO082139 RPA 2020, rpa
Page 3 of 3 6/25/2020

Hazen Memorandum
RECEIVED
Re: Lagoon and NPDES Future Flow Estimations
DEC 0 5 2019
• Residuals Flow Estimations WDEOIDWRODES
o Typical Operation
■ Scenarios:
• Scenario 1: Average flow (21 mgd), average solids loading (300 lb/MG)
• Scenario 2: Average flow (21 mgd), maximum month solids loading
(500 lb/MG)
• Scenario 3: Maximum month flow (30 mgd), average solids loading (300
lb/MG)
■ Operational Conditions
• 100 hour filter run times
• 1 sedimentation basin blowdown per train per day
• 1 hour Superpulsator cycle run times
o Increased Residuals Operation
■ Scenarios
• Scenario 4: Maximum month flow (30 mgd), maximum week solids
loading (570 lb/MG)
• Scenario 5: Maximum month flow (30 mgd), maximum month solids
loading (500 lb/MG)
■ Operational Conditions
• 60 hour filter run times
• 1 - 2 sedimentation basin blowdowns per train per day
• 1 hour Superpulsator cycle run times
o Add Contingency for Clearwell and Basin Draining
■ One Clearwell = 3 MG
■ One SuperP = 0.5 MG
■ 3.5 MG averaged over 30 days = 0.12 MG
o Max Month Flow and Max Month Loading plus contingency for clearwell and basin
draining = 0.97 MG
*does not include any stormwater discharge to lagoon
Solids
Average Flow
Average Flow
Max Month
Max
Max
Production:
Avg Loading
Max Month
Flow
Month
Month
Loading
Avg Loading
Flow
Flow
Max Week
Max
Loading
Month
Loading
Scenario
1
2
3
4
5
Volume (MG):
0.52
0.52
0.57
0.93
0.85
Hazen and Sawyer • 4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500 • Raleigh, NC 27607 • 919.833.7152

Dow&NnEnvelo',pe5BCF-9F58-4132-97D7-1595CA7A3F07
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ® NPDES Unit ❑ Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: NCO082139
Attn: Sydney Carpenter Facility name: GUC WTP
From: Randy Sipe
Washington Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge fg acili , staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 2/5/20
b. Site visit conducted by: P. Mays, R. Bullock, and R. Sipe
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Julius Patrick and their contact information: (252) 551 - 1561 ext.
e. Driving directions: No change since last permit was issued
2. Discharge Point(s): Outfall 001
Latitude: 3 5.634444N Longitude: 77.398611 W
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Tar River
Classification: C; NSW; 28-(94)
River Basin and Subbasin No. Tar -Pamlico, 03-03-05
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The raw water intake for the GUC WTP
is approx. 0.35 mile upstream of the wastewater effluent outfall. The Tar River at the outfall is also used
for recreational purposes such as fishing, big, and other aquatic sports.
II. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Julius Patrick Certificate #: PC-1/996041 Backup ORC: Robert Booth Certificate #: PC-1/999225
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Description of existing facilities: Filter backwash, sedimentation basin blowdown, and filter to waste is piped to a
23 acre sludge lagoon that periodically discharges to the Tar River. Management of the solids from the sludge
lagoon has been contracted to Bio-Nomic Services and is being p9rformed under Permit No. W00039053.
Proposed flow:0.8 MGD
Current permitted flow: 0.8 MGD
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: C4F95BCF-9F58-4132-97D7-1595CA7A3F07
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.) The facili , has replaced the use of sodium bisulfate with calcium thiosulfate. The facility description should
be revised to reflect this change.
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain: N/A, discharge facility
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain: Management of the solids from the sludge lagoon has been contracted to Bio-Nomic
Services and is being performed under Permit No. W00039053.
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable`? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain: N/A, discharge fg acility
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: discharge fg acilitX
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ❑ Yes or ® No
If no, please explain: The facility has replaced the use of sodium bisulfate with calcium thiosulfate. The facility
description should be revised to reflect this change.
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain: discharge facility
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
O I I/
O I II
O I I/
O I II
O I II
O / 11
O I II
O / /I
O I I/
O / /I
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: No compliance issues were noted during the
inspection.
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: C4F95BCF-9F58-4132-97D7-1595CA7A3F07
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: None observed.
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A, water treatment plant
III. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
® Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer: Dwit
Signature of regional supervisor: P,,- z Tay"
Date: 2/6/2020
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: C4F95BCF-9F58-4132-97D7-1595CA7A3F07
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 4

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20,160
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fee Type
1 E 2 15 1 3 I NCOOB2139 I11 12 20/02/05 17 1a Li 19 t ! t 20I
211111 1 1 I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 1 11 I I �6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CA Reserved
67 70 r, r 71 itI I I 72 r„ 731 r 174 75I I, I I I I I I80
LJ LJ I I
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
10:00AM 20/02/05
15/06/01
Greenville WTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
1721 Waterway Rd
Greenville NC 27834
11:30AM 20/02/05
19/10/31
-Names) of Onsite Representative(s)/Tilles(s)/Phone and fax Number(s)
-Other Facility Data
///
Julius Eugene Patrick/ORC/252-551-1561/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Ronald D EIks,PO Box 1847 Greenville NC 278351847//252-551-1550/2525511598
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance 0 Records/Reports
Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspectors) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Robert E Bullock DWR/Division of Water Quality/252-948-3924/
Paul M Mays DWR/WARO WO/252-948-3940/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
NC0082139 11 12 20/02/05 17 18 ICI
(Cont.)
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Julius Patrick ORC, Anthony Whitehead and Jessie Chadwick were present during inspection. The July
2019 DMR was reviewed with no discrepancies to be found. The review period 06/2019 through
11/2019 had no enforcements found on the facility. It is important to note that the facility is undergoing
an expansion process at the time of inspection (02/05/2019).
The facility is judged to be compliant with NPDES permit #NC0082139
Notes on Lab Work
-The facility is field parameter certified for pH, Temperature and Total Residual Chlorine (TRC).
-Field Certification #5567
-Jessie Chadwick was Lab Tech at the WTP
-Facility uses NSI Solutions for PT Samples
-Facility uses Environmental Testing Solutions for toxicity
-Facility uses Environmental Chemist for all other parameter testing
Page#

Permit: NCO082139
Inspection Date: 02/05/2020
Permit
Owner • Facility: Greenville WrP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment: -Current permit is expired and new permit is in the works with the Division
-The facility is currently undergoing an expansion process
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The grounds were very well maintained.
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment: A propeller -driven meter is used to measure flow from facility
and cannot be calibrated
by
reasonable means.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
M
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Page# 3

Permit: NCO082139 Owner -Facility: GreenvilleyJrP
Inspection Date: 02/05/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Yes
No NA NE
Transported-C-OOs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
0
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWO?
❑
❑
Q
❑
(if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
❑
❑0
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑
❑
M
❑
Comment: -Julius Patrick ORC keeps ORC log stored electronically on laptop
-Robert Booth is the back-up ORC
Laboratory
Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a, certified lab?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
M
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 deg'rees
❑
❑
❑
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑
❑
M
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
M
❑
Comment: -The facility is field Parameter certified for pH Temperature and Total Residual Chlorine
T( RC).
-Field Certification #5567
-Jessie Chadwick was Lab Tech at the WTP
-Facility uses NSI Solutions for PT Samples
-Facility uses Environmental Testing Solutions for toxicity
-Facility uses Environmental Chemist for all other parameter testing
Lagoons
Yes No NA NE
Type of lagoons?
# Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
1
Are lagoons operated in?
# Is a re -circulation line present?
❑
❑
0
❑
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
❑
❑
0
❑
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation?
❑
❑
M
❑
Page# 4

Permit: NC0082139
Inspection Date: 02/05/2020
Lagoons
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
Are dikes free of seepage?
Are dikes free of erosion?
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
Owner -Facility: Greenville WrP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (a) been measured periodically in multiple
locations?
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth?
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting?
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: -The lagoon is a settling basin and decant pond The effluent is discharged to the Tar River
Basin.
-There are a lot of solids still present in the lagoon and the facility is currently removing -the --
solids through dredging.
-The supernate still appears clear over the solids
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ..
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment: -The effluent pipe Is a metal quick connect type pipe
-The area was maintained for easy access
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Page# 5

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing and Self Monitoring Summary
Granite Falls WWTP
NCO021890/001
County: Caldwell
Region:
ARC,
Basin:
CTB32
Mar Jun Sep Dec
SOC JOC:
Ceri7dPF
Begin:
6/1/2015
chrlim:13%
NonComp:
Single
7Q10:
9.3
PF: 0.90
IWC:
13 Freq: Q
J
F M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
2016
-
- Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
2017
-
- Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
2018
-
- Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
2019
-
- Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
-
Grantsboro WTP
NCO088323/001
County: Pamlico
Region:
WARO
Basin:
NEU10
Mar Jun Sep Dec
SOC JOC:
Mysd24PF
Begin:
11/1/2018 Ac P/F Monit: 90% M NonComp:
7Q10:
NA
PF: NA
IWC:
Freq: Q
J
F M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
2016
-
- Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
2017
-
- Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
2018
-
- Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
H
Pass
-
Pass
2019
-
- Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
Greater Badin Water& Sewer District
NCO074756/001
County: Stanly
Region:
MRO
Basin:
YAD08
Jan Apr Jul Oct
SOC JOC:
Ceri7dPF
Begin:
3/1/2014
chrlim:83.4%
NonComp:
7Q10:
0.26
PF: 0.55
IWC:
77 Freq: Q
J
F M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
2016
Pass
- -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
2017
Pass
- -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
2018
Pass
- -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
2019
Pass
- -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Greensboro Osborne WWTP
NCO047384/001
County: Guilford
Region:
WSRO
Basin:
CPF02
Jan Apr Jul Oct
SOC JOC:
Ceri7dPF
Begin:
7/1/2014
chrlim:90%
NonComp:
Single
70.10:
2.1
PF: 40.0
IWC:
95 Freq: Q
J
F M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
2016
>100
- -
>100
-
-
94.9 >100(P)
-
-
>100
-
-
2017
>100
- -
>100
-
-
>100
-
-
>100>100(P)
-
-
2018
Pass>100(P)
- -
<22.5 >100(P)
>100
-
>100
-
-
>100(P)Pass
-
-
2019
>100
- -
>100(P)
-
-
>100(P)
-
-
Pass
-
-
Greenville WTP
NCO082139/001
County: Pitt
Ceri7dPF
Begin:
6/1/2015 Chr Monit: 90%
NonComp:
J
F M
A M
2016
Fail
- -
Fail -
2017
Pass
- -
Pass -
2018
Pass
- -
Fail -
2019
Pass
- -
Pass -
Greenville WWTP
NCO023931/001
County: Pitt
Ceri7dPF
Begin:
3/1/2016 chr lim: 20%
NonComp: Single
J
F M
A M
2016
-
- >80
- -
2017
-
- >80
- -
2018
-
- >80(P)Pass
- -
2019
-
- >80
- -
Region: WARO
Basin: TAR05
Jan Apr Jul Oct
7Q10:
PF: 1.2 IWC:
Freq: Q
J
J
A
S
O
Pass
H
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
Pass
H
Region: WARO
Basin: TAR05
Mar Jun Sep Dec
7Q10: 109
PF: 17.5 IWC:
20 Freq: Q
J
J
A
S
O
>80
>80
-
>80(P) >80
-
-
Pass
-
>80
H
>80
>80
-
-
>80(P) Pass
-
SOC JOC:
N
Pass
SOC JOC:
N
D
D
>80 >80(P)
Pass >80(P)
>80
Pass
I eeend- P= Fathead minnnw (Pimnhales nrnmelas)_ H=Nn Flow ffnrility is artive)_ s = Snlit test hetween Certified I ahs Page 42 of 102

Media of East Carolina
Key West Citizen - Florida Free Press - Paradise
The Daily Reflector - The Daily Advance - The Rocky Mount Telegram
Bertie Ledger - Chowan Herald - Duplin Times - Farmville Enterprise - Perquimans Weekly
Standard Laconic - Tarboro Weekly - Times Leader - Williamston Enterprise
PO Box 1967 Greenville NC 27835 - [phone]
Date: May 07, 2020
- CLASSIFIED RECEIPT -
Thank you for advertising with us! This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run on the
dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact Kim Bandy by phone at
[phone] or email at [e-mail].
CUSTOMER INFORMATION
Account #:
133315
Name:
NCDEQ - DIVISON OF WATER
RESOURCES
Address:
ATTN: WREN THEDFORD
1617 MAIL SERVICE
CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699
Telephone:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
AD INFORMATION
Ad ID:
343250
Run Dates:
05/10/20 to 05/10/20
Total Cost:
$102.70
Account Rep:
Kim Bandy
Phone #:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
PAYMENTS
Publications:
Daily Reflector
Reflector.com
DATE METHOD CARD TYPE LAST 4 DIGITS EXPIRES CHECK # AMOUNT PAID
Total Cost: $102.70
Paid Amount: - $0.00
Amount Due: $102.70
Thank you for advertising with us!
Your ad
Ad shown is not actual print size
Public Notice
North Carolina Environmental Man-
agement Commission/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Notice of Intent to Issue a
NPDES Wastewater Permit NCO082139
Greenville WTP
The North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission proposes to
issue a NPDES wastewater discharge
permit to the person(s) listed below.
Written comments regarding the pro-
posed permit will be accepted until 30
days after the publish date of this no-
tice. The Director of the NC Division
of Water Resources (DWR) may hold a
public hearing should there be a signif-
icant degree of public interest. Please
mail comments and/or information re-
quests to DWR at the above address. In-
terested persons may visit the DWR at
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC to
review information on file. Addition-
al information on NPDES permits and
this notice may be found on our web -
site: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/
water-resources/water-resources-per-
mits/wastewater-branch/npdes-waste-
water/public-notices,or by calling (919)
707-3601. Greenville Utilities Com-
mission requested renewal of permit
NC0082139/Greenville WTP. Facility dis-
charges to Tar River/Tar-Pamlico River
Basin. Currently, total residual chlorine
is water quality -limited.
05/08/2020
If payment was made by debit/credit card, payment will show up on your statement as
APG East.
Any chargebacks will be subject to a $25.00 fee per transaction