830015_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

Murphy -Brown, LLC
G rower(s):
Farm Name:
1 /3/2006
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Murphy -Brown
Farm 5177
County: Scotland
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean 0
Farrow to Feeder 1350
Farrow to Finish 0
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 0
Storage Structure: Anaerobic I
Storage Period:
Application Method:
>180 days
Irrigation
-agoon
2822 Hwy 24 West
P_ O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28396
RECEIVED
MAY 0 8 2006
OW-FAYETiEV ME RMOMI.OFRCE
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should -be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same_
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE. PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, f?, tons, etc.):
Capacity_Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 galtyr
gal/yr
1350
Farrow to Feeder
4015 galtyr
5,420,250 gal/yr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gal/yr
gal/yr
Wean to Feeder
223 gal/yr
galtyr
Feeder to Finish
986 galtyr
galtyr
Total 5,420,250 galtyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibs/yr
Ibs/yr
1350
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibs/yr
8,775 Ibs/yr
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibstyr
Ibs/yr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibstyr
Ibs/yr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 lbs/yr
Ibs/yr
Total 8,775 1 bstyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILI7-4TION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 56.43
Total N Required 1st Year: 16731.133
Total N Required 2nd Year: 16731.133
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 16,731 A3
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 8,775.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (7,956.13)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8

Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil Ist Crop Time to Ist Crop Ist Crop Lbs N/Ac. LEs N —To(&I Ibs W'2nd
liald lbs WILInit Rastcluat /Ac Utilized
Acreage Typo— Code--
Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs N/Ac Lbs N Taial lbs N
Code A- ply Ylald lbs N/UnIt ResIdual Me Utilized
-Apply
—
�
■ram
�
�■
��
�■■r■
■■��
�
��
��
r■■��
��
�
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
3(e) of 8

Reception Area Specifications
Tract F[eJW-- Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 11-st Crop 1st Crop Lbs KlAx Lbs N
Acreage Type Code _____Apply Yield lbs NfUnit. Residual Me
F �1 TWOUNTIM N—i-Ir, [M. �1-1�vul IM, M,
114 Tv 2 P-T-1
111111,11411
3(h) of 6

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N / bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N / ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N / ton
D
Corn - Grain
125 lbs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 Ibs N / ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N / lbs lint
G
Fescue -Grazed
50 lbs N / ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 lbs N / ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N / bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N / acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N / cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N / acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste-
4 of 8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications
PAN/ /animal
Farm Total/
0 Farrow to Wean
0.84
0
1350 Farrow to Feeder
1
1350
0 Farrow to Finish
4.1
0
Wean to Feeder
0.072
0 Feeder to Finish
0.36
0
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1350 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 6750 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 22 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 54 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to property
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5 of a

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
in/hr
*inches
3135 1A
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
1B
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
2A
McColl
B
0.65
1
2B
McColl
B
0.65
1
3A
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
3B
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
4A
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
4B
Wagram
B
0.6
1
5A
Wagram
B
0.6
1
5B
McColl
B
0.65
1
subl
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
Subfields indicate areas that will be applied to using an aerway applicator.
The bermuda in this plan is a combination of hay and graze rates. At least
half of the bermuda will be removed as hay.
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION .
Name of Farm: Farm 5177
Owner: Murphy -Brown
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
Ilwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be fled on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
Signature:
rown
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
I / S 16 6_1P
Date
J_ ) c A rk-
06
ate
Name of Technical Specialist:
Kraig Westerbeek
Affiliation:
Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address.,
2822 Hwy 24 West, p0 Drawer 856
WarsaSMC 28398
Telephone:
(910)3434
Signature:
3
Date
8of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within. a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recieving crop tvpe, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than-10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2of3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody. species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3 of 3

Sheetl
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Murphy -Brown Farm 5177
Address: PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
Table 1 - Field Specifications
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
Field of Field
County: Scotland
Date: 1 /3/2005
Maximum
Maximum Application
Application per Irrigation
Rate Cycle

Sheet2
TABLE 2 - Travelling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: 3" and 3.7" Travellers ; Nelson 150 guns
Travel Application TRAVEL LANE Wetted Nozzle Operating Operating
Speed Rate Effective Effective Diameter Diameter Pressure Pressure Are
Hydrant No. (fUmin) (in/hr.) Width(ft.) Length(ft) (feet) (Inches) at Gun(psi) at reel(psE) Pattern Comments - Acres per pull
1 A
3.28
0.51
252
965
284
1.18
60.
100
330
6.26
1 B
3.28
0.51
252
642
284
1.18
60
100
220
4.39
2A
3.28
0.51
220
981
284
1.18
60
100
330
5.57
2B
3.28
0.51
220
779
284
1.18 1
60
100
330
4.55
3A
3.28
0.51
220
977
284
1.18
60
100
330
5.55
3B
3.28
0.51
220
1000
284
1.18
60
100
330
5.67
4A
3.28
0.51
220
979
284
1.18
60
100
330
5.56
4B
3.28
0:51
220
1000
284
1.18
60
100
330
5.67
5A
6.57
0.84
120
978
284
1.18
60
100
330
3.04
5B
3.28
0.51
252
655
284
1.18
60
100
330
4.47
50.73

Sheets
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: Kraig Westerbeek
Company: Murphy - Brown
Address: P.O. Box 759 Rose Hill, NC 28458
Phone: 91 Q-289-2111
Required Documentation
The following details of design and materials trust accompany all irrigation designs:
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, pipelines, thrust block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources andlor calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required In the system
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USIA-NRCS standard for IRRIGATION WATER CONVEYANCE.
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and
address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip of 25' or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all
perennial streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.

Sheet7
CALCULATIONS
Sprinkler Specifications
Sprinkler Type: Nelson 150
Nozzle Size:
1.18 inches
Sprinkler Pressure:
60 psi
Flowrate(GPM):
225 gpm
Wetted Diameter:
284 feet *90% of manufacturer's charts
Lane Spacings
Desired Spacing (%):
70 %
Design Spacing(feet):
198.8 *PVC irrigation pipe normally comes in 20' pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
Actual Spacing (feet):
220 feet
Actual Spacing (%}:
77 %
Application Rate
Application Rate =(96.3xFlowrate)1(3.1415x(.9xradius)squared)' r
Design App. Rate =
0.42 in/hr
300 degree arc =
0.51 in/hr
220 degree arc =
0.69 in/hr
180 degree arc =
0.84 in/hr
Traveller Speed
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate / Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) =
0.5 inches
300 degree arc =
3.28 ft/min
220 degree arc =
3.94 ft/min
180 degree arc =
6.57 ft/min
Mainline Velocity
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate / pipe diameter squared feet/sec.**
**For buried pipelines, velocity should be below 5 feet per second
Pipe size:
inches
Velocity=
#DIV/01 ft/sec.
Page 1

Sheet?
Maximum Mainline Friction Loss
Most distant hydrant:
Total distance: feet
Friction Loss is figured using HazenlWilliam`s Equation
Friction Loss= #DIV/O! feet/100 feet
Max. Mainline Loss = #DIV/O! feet or #DIV/O! psi
Total Dvnamic Head
Sprinkler Pressure:
60 psi
Loss through traveller:
psi
Elevation head:
psi
Mainline loss:
#DIVIO! psi
Suction head and lift:
psi
5% fitting loss:
#DIV/O! psi
TOTAL(TDH) _
#DIV/O! psi or #DIV/O! feet
Horsepower Required
Horsepower = Flowrate x TDH(feet) 13960 / Pump effeciency
Pump Description:
Pump Efficiency: %
Horsepower Required: #DIV/01 Hp
Thrust Blocking
Thrust Block Area = Thrust / Soil Bearing Strength
Thrust:
feet
Soil Bearing Strength:
feet
End Cap:
#DIV/O!
ft2
90 degree elbow:
#DIV/O!
ft2
Tee:
#DIVIO!
ft2
45 degree elbow:
#DIV/O!
ft2
Pipe Pressure Rating Check
Pressure Rating of Pipe to be Used: psi
Max. Pressure on system when running: #DIV/O! psi
70% of Pressure Rating: 0 psi
If Max. Pressure on system is less than 70% of Pressure Rating, OK
Net Positive Suction Head Check
Page 2

Sheet7
NPSHA:
NPSHR: *from pump curve
If NPSHA>NPSHR OK
Page 3

Acreage calculations
Pull No.
Width
Lenqth Start
Stop
Total Acres
1A
252
965
0.68
0
6.26
1 B
252
642
0.68
0
4.39
2A
220
981
0.62
0
5.57
2B
220
779
0.62
0
4.55
3A
220
977
0.62
0
5.55
3B
220
1000
0.62
0
5.67
4A
220
979
0.62
0
5.56
4B
220
1000
0.62
0
5.67
5A
120
978
0.35
0
3.04
5B
252
655
0.68
0
4.47
50.76

Farm 5177
Scale: 1 "=400'
Total Field
Y 56.4ro Ao-
Wells w/100' offsets
Sao' Aso' alp' a�a�
3
A aA IA
�A WA Hog Houses
and
�8 Lagoon

Waste Management Plan Changes
� IIII����} �
DER , r. LLEREGlQ
lV�4L OFFICE
Facility (5 3 — 15 Farm -7, [ 7
This farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
❑ Crop changes
❑ Wetted Acres
�ncreased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ Plan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
❑ Other
Comments:
S ~O
Date

Murphy -Brown, LLC 5/25/2005 2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Murphy -Brown, LLC
7177
County: Scotland
Farm Cap aci
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 1350
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water andlor groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, it tons, etc.):
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gaUyr
gaVyr
1350
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
5,420,250 gallyr
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
gal/yr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gal/yr
Feeder to Finish
986 al/yr
gal/
Total 5,420,250 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Ca aci Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibslyr
Ibs/yr
1350
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
8,775 lbs/yr
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibsl
lbstyr
Total 8,775 Ibslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 65.22
Total N Required 1st Year: 18008.385
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 18,008.39
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 8,775.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (9,233.39)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8

Reception.:
Tract Field Irrigated soil 1st Crop TImeto UtCrop IstCrop LbsNIA . c Lim —NTcjj—W3-Fb.--N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield lbs N/UnIt Residual /Ac Utilized
18WO.39
3(a) of 8

Area
Total Ib! N
3(b) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 Ibs N / bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 Ibs N / ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 Ibs N I ton
D
Com - Grain
1.25 Ibs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 Ibs N / ton
F
Cotton
0.12 Ibs N / lbs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 Ibs N / ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 Ibs N / ton
I
Oats
1.3 Ibs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 Ibs N I acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 Ibs N / acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 Ibs N I cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 Ibs N I bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 Ibs N / acre 1 yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications P6Ntyrianimal Farm Tota
Farrow to Wean 0.84
1350 Farrow to Feeder 1 1350
Farrow to Finish 4.1
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates_ The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1350 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 6750 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 22 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to com at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 54 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
it is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables_ Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
in/hr
x inches
3135 1A
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
2A
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
3A
McColl
B
0.65
1
4A
McColl
B
0.65
1
1 B
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
2B
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
3B
Norfolk
B
0.5
1
4B
Wagram
B
0.6
1
5B
Wagram
B
0.6
1
Sub1
McColl
B
0.65
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
The bermuda in this plan is a combination of hay &graze rates. At least half
the yield will be removed as hay.
Subfield acreage is the balance of total acres minus wet acres at this site.
This acreage will be claimed when making application with an aerway machine.
7 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Faun: 7177
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be fled on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from
Signature:
Date
Date
Name of Technical Specialist:
Dawn Williamson
Affiliation:
Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address:
_ 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone:
[phone] _
Signature:
ID-ZS-or
Date
8 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recieving crop type, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips)-
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen-
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within Sp days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October i, 2004 RECE� V E�
Carroll's Foods Inc OCT 15 20-4
7177
PO Box 759 LDENR A�YLLEREGIONALOFMRCE
Rose Hill NC 28458
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS830015
7177
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Scotland County
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Carroll's Foods Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage
and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000. The issuance of this COC
supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS830015 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the 7177, located in Scotland County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an
annual average of 1350 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder
operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may be
replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts
for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please -pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring_ conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recyeled110%, Post Consumer Paper
NofthCarolina
Naturally

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance. of.a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 214 .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ce's)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Scotland County Health Department
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS830015
APS Central Files

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Perrnittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all. current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG 100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Scotland County Health Department
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS830015
NDPU Files

o f W A rFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
.� Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Carroll's Foods Inc
7177
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS830015
7177
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Scotland County
Dear- Carroll's Foods Inc:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality -(Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Carroll's Foods Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage
and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS830015 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the 7177, located in Scotland County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an
annual average of 1350 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder
operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may be
replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts
for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and Iimitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Pernvttee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. M
RU EMR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet http:/1h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Owners name--:CARROLLS FARM 77 County:SCOTLAND
Mail Address-:POBOX 1767,LAURN
Type of production unit ---- :FAR -FEED
Number of animal units-----: 1350
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Temporary storage period---: 180 days
Method of application ------ :IRRIGATION
Amount of animal waste produced-----------------: 9918 tons/year
Amount of plant available N produced by animals-: 8775 lbs./year
Commercial N to apply on planned acreage--------: 0 lbs./year
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your swine operation. The plan is based on the.
soil types, crops to be grown, and method of application for
your particular operation. The waste must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
C00101070128

Page 2
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field
soil Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Month to
No.
No.
Type Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
0
0
0 A
0
1.60
0.0
0
S-APRIL
3135
1
WAGRAM.L
N/A
133.00
3.0
399
S-APRIL
3135
1
MCCOLL L
N/A
133.00
6.0
798
S-APRIL
3135
1
NORFOLKL
N/A
133.00
35.6
4734.8
S-APRIL
3135
1
WAGRAM C
5.5
50.00
7.0
1925
MAR-OCT
0
0
0 A
0
1.60
0.0
0
S--APRIL
3135
1
NORFOLKC
6.1
50.00
13.0
3965
MAR-OCT
Total
64.6
11822
Available Nitrogen
(includes commercial)
8775
Surplus Or
Deficit
-3047
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Barley-bu.
B=Bermudagrass(graze)-tons
C=Bermudagrass(hay)-tans
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
E=Corn(silage)-tons
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
G=Fescue(graze)-tons
H=Fescue(hay)-tons
I=Oats-bu.
J=Rye-bu.
K=Small grain(graze)-acre
L=Small grain(hay)-acre
M=Sorghum(grain)-cwt.
W=Wheat-bu.
Y=Fescue(pasture)-tons
Z=Bermudagrass (pasture) -tons
COOIOI070129

Page 3
If more commercial fertilizer is used than shown in this plan,
then additional acres of land may be needed. A three to fifteen
feet wide permanent grass filter strip should be seeded along all
ditches infields that receive animal waste.
Additional comments:
--------------------
Prepared by: +-#DWOC-c) efsa"c Title:Pg5. (32p45. _ Date:
i ��\ r CI�:Pf1f.l� �DDS,�7dG
Concurred in by:� Dater
Producer
( I understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff
occurs.
Date:
Producer
Technical Specialist: 4azalQl Date: Sj31Q5
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)
C00101070130

FROM.: RICHMOND CO CO OP EXTENSION
FAX NO. :
Feb. 20 2001 06:46AM P19
7177
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or lees based on the most recent waste
analysis report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field Soil
Crop
Yield
Lbe. N
Acres
PAN
Month
No.
No.
Type
Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used;
Apply
3135
lA
NoA
B
6
37.5/T
5.s
1305
Mar -Sep
3135
2A
NoA
B
6
37.5/T
5.8
1305
Mar -Sep
3135
3A
Mc
B
3.5
37.5/T
5.9
774
Mar -Sep
3135
4A
Mc
a
3.5
37.5/T
5.9
774
Mar -Sep
3135
1H
NoA
B
6
37.5/T
4.0
900
Mar -Sep
3135
2B
NoA
B
6
37.5/T
4.6
1035
Mar -Sep
3135
3B
NoA
H
6
37.5/T
5.0
1125
Mar -Sep
3135
4B
N'oh/WeB
B
5.S
37.5/T
6.2
1279
Mar -Sep
3135
5B
NoA/WeB
B
5.5
37.5/T
5.2
1073
Mar -Sep
3135
-----------------------------------Total,-
---------------
--��
1
S 1O
a
/0
"2'�"
OVPRSEED
Tract
Field Soil
Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
PAN
Month
No.
No.
Type
Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
3135
lA
NoA
K
NA
50/A
5.8
290
Oct -Feb
3135
2A
NoA
K
NA
50/A
5.9
290
Oct -Feb
3135
3A
Mc
K
NA
50/A
5.9
295
Oct -Feb
3135
4A
Mc
K
NA
50/A
5.9
295
Oct -Feb
3135
1B
NoA
K
NA
50/A
4.0
200
Oct -Feb
3135
2B
NoA
K
NA
50/A
4.6
230
Oct -Feb
3135
3B
NoA
K
NA
50/A
5.0
250
Oct -Feb
313S
4B
NoA/WsB
K
NA
50/A
6.2
310
Oct -Feb
3135
5B
NoA/WeB
K
NA
50/A
5.2
260
Oct -Feb
3135
Total:
Z 4 47-0
Bermuda
Pasture
Total:
5-To
Overall
Total:
i 119 D
Available Nitrogen (includes commercial):
8,775
Surplus or
Deficit :—
3
QC. /e - 11-0

FROM,: PICHMOND CO CO OP EXTENSION FAX NO. Feb. 20 2001 06:46AM P20
Crop Codes: Crop -unit
----------------------
g=Sermudagrass(graze)-tone
K=Small grain (graze) -acre
This Waste utilization Plan has been amended by Bert Coffer
(certified Technical Specialist-NCCES) on May 17, 1999 to reflect
a change from hay to grazing and to include small grain overaeed_
The nitrogen rate on the Bermuda has been reduced to 75% of the
hay rate as required by NRCS standard_ Nitrogen can be applied
to the small grain overseed at the rate of 50 lbs of N per acre
during the indicated application window. The overseeded small
grain must be harvested before seedhead formation. Fields are
designated by irrigation pulls. Acreage has been determined from
pull measurements provided by manager.
Amended by Q_,L Date S 11:227
Affiliation: North Caro a Cooperative Ext.
Scotland Co. Center
231 E. Cronly St. Suite 800
Laurinburg, NC. 283S2
910-277-2422

9E
Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design fold that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
................ .................. ................----..-...-..-....... ..- .......... .......... ............................. --- ........... -........ ---- -----
Preview Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 11-17-2000 Specification Page 1

t
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Wastelnutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied ar agronomic rates in a manner that causes not runoff or drift
from site.
....... ...---�-....-- ................. .....--.... .......... ....... _...... _.........--..................._............_............._.....----........................-...... .--.........
Preview Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 11-17-2000 Specification rage 2

i
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
( r on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
.......... _ ....... ._............ ..................... ............................... . .... .................. ---............. ....................................
..............
Preview Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 11-17-2000 Specification Page 3

N
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records
for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
Preview Database Version 'I'05 Date Printed:. ------ 2000 Specification Page 4

. • , " ' EiS�"" 5 1, .F{ h 1.wC "nn a I1Y r'.e t +�r'+tif�yk�g'
' S«i'�'rY S�yl-�l .�Ji ,iF 'v I lr,L•rrr�'- i r �?ur�„c� ;
. `9;�t•ii��j7���ti•.�..i,v .l s �,. }�r r cYa�••��..rJ ;.; 1 4
'^� �i1�L+pa�`s,4 •:r-.i`: f {t,:`n,^'' '�-.kr �;i',
. .. � i- •R i ivy j{
•r r.: .�•. '�1, �'•l.ra + •'y.'1�6kh t+''f• `:,1'�', �,• � y ..}•Y�'r U��
;.
....'.i:'_..hv..
�S rfIT) %raj• 5
,d �;�1�,,-e','a�~t� ,�i 3'1{�!�i t`.,,t "1v ai}r � •'
'il ti
�'Fy •. Y �N y ��f til,f..i
�r��6 .. +�5�+{' c +31 het d^�;. b�•5 ,� �' i ES _ t �i yty,L Ir
;thy
",_t 'a�'y '���, }Nlwww"1' { e'"�i•sF �:5t;;�. - AIL
11 r2i�l
r-,� w ,
3� ti a
:p�f(•
5`C
I�°�`vaa. a ''��} - 1 r •:,� fi' .�

I
9310is
State of North Carolina - "
Department of Environment, Health and Natural R"fi D p�
A Division of Water Quality WAfERWL
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form-/ Survey SEP / 5 1997
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) 1t11rsl�
140n-Disc�$�� Peru' s
General Permit - Liquid Animal Waste, Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed byF el iVisioa,�pte
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question urnan`swveredL, LL1J
Application Date: CL_ 1JLA V\
O C i 0 b 1997
1. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Farm's name: 7177
2. Print Land Owner's name: Carroll's Foods Inc
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: PO Drawer 856
City: Warsaw NC Zip: 28398
Telephone Number: 910-293-3434 _
4. County where farm is located: Scotland
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a cop)'
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Laurinburo take 74 Bus. East and at the first red li' t
turn Lt. and go over railroad crossing and take the first left. ftoCced out of town and go over the first stop sign and at the
second stop sign nrnceed over onto dirt road. The dirt road bends to the left at the fork turn Rt. and proceed .75 mile to
6. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): �eAzz-e
7. Lessee's In gra[o ' name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): fJ�Q�i �S
83 - 15
FORM: AWO-G-E 2I26/97 Page 1 of 3

, .►
III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No.: 83-15
2. Operation Description: Swine operation
Farrow to Feeder
1350 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? E y s; Q no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Tyne of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow) 13 SO
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Turkey
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: 65.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWIAP): 64.6
4_ Number of Lagoons: I ;Total Capacity._ a 3 41593 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: 0 ; Total Capacity:
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains?
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon?
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
Cubic Feet (ft3)
YES o R (please circle one)
YES or O (please circle one)
1 9C • n_ (Land Owner's name listed in question I1.2), attest that
this application for lQ 1h��_0�1 I S F;1A km if I f (Farm name listed in question IIA)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returne to m incomplete.
Signature 1 Date _` I — ko� V
V . MANAGER'S/CERTTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, t1 Y- �J (Manager's name listed in question [1.6), attest that this
application for r ri (Farm name listed in question I1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best a my knowledge. [ understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete. �f�
Signature �/. -.d" � 11a" _ Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

"MiAI WASTE XAMAGMYE_*'T PI.XN CERTIFICATION FOR ESZSTING FEEDLOTS
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Hanagemeat at
the address on the reverse aide of this fors.
ffr fame or Farm (Pleae print) : ���y r i (,f�
,[ � _ I r
Mailing Add g u r p�-
Phone No.
County (of farm) : _Ie-e,j.fa,=,� _ Fart location: Latitude and Longitude Yk L /.1�17 a 11 (required). Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.):
Design capacity (number of animals): 1,350
Average size of operation (12.month population avg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
�=aaaaaaaagsaaaaaasasaasaaerssfeaaaaaasuaaaasRaa��saxac==aaa=aaaRsa�aaaaw�aa�3a=
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the
existing animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal
`waste maiiagai emt pima that mnaet'= thm cpnrzt�.... .=nd ma--nten a.nca _t-a.•..7a s m!7
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil
Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation.
Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F 0001-.0005. The
;ollowing elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been verified
by me or other designated technical spec4alists and are included in the plan as
applicable: minimum separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land
for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership of proper
:paste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from
stormwater runoff events less severe than the25-year, 24--hour storm.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) ,`c{ ,. Lin,sSeK
Affiliation (Agency) CAPAcALN
Address: M 3)RAuI� 654 Phone No . _ 0 - ZR3 _ 3 f_3 SL-
/ n c}} r
Signature: Date_
�=�a�as=si�aaaa=aaaasaastaasaaa :ra ossaaaaaaaazsaa�a=aaa=aa�aaaa=aaa.a=saac
Owner/Manager Agreement
(we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state either directly through a man-made conveyance cz Through runUri ircin a
storm event less severe than the 2S-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will
be filed at the farm and at the office of the local. Soil and Water Conservation
District.
4i
L
11 1 5 I?r ) , j�.
r
:lase of Land
(Please P in~)
a
Frs R
Signature:
Date:
jLi
Name of Hans er,
i different fx'om owner
(Ple se print} :��}����
r� Li.,c,
_
Signature:��
7
Date:
I
Note: A charnge in land ownership requires
notifi.ca--ion or a
new certification
(if the approved
plan is changed) within
60 days cf a title
transfer.
Dom''•; USt 4'.� v_-

UNITED STATES SOIL
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
AGRICULTURE SERVICE
231 EAST CRONLY.STREET SUITE 800
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA 28352
Telephone: [phone]
subject: Farm # 77 - McBryde Farm
Scotland County
Donald P_ Butler
Real Estate Manager
t Carroll's Foods, Inc_
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear Don:
Date: March 02, 1992
Enclosed is your copy of the swine waste management system for Carroll's
Foods, Inc. Farm # 77 in Scotland County. This design has been reviewed•
and approved by the Soil Conservation Service providing that the
Operation and Maintenance Plan and the Waste Utilization Plan of this
design is followed. To prevent excessive odors during start-up, the
treatment lagoon is required by Soil Conservation Service to be charged
to 1/2 of its capacity.
I
Should you have any questions concerning this design or need additional
assistance, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
at hew _ Ki ne
District Conservationist
Scotland County
enclosure:
Approved Waste Management Plan

Farm Name
NJ
1
CARROLL'S FOODS, INC.
Facility Design and Waste Management Plan
MC BRYDE
Farm No. 7 7
City
-.junty
Company Farm
LAURINBURG
SCO'TLAND
YES
1350 farrow to feeder.
Contract Farm

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Vicinity Map .............................................. 1
ASCS Field Map ............................................ 2
SoilsMap ................................................. 3
Soil Investigation Worksheet .............................. 4
Waste Treatment Plan ...................................... S
Waste Utilization Plan .................................... 6
Operation and Maintenance Plan ............................ 7
Construction Specifications For Lagoon .................... 8
Seeding Plan (Farm Site) .................................. 9
Computer .Drawing of Existing Ground .......................10
Existing Elevations.......................................11
Lagoon Cross Section Diagram..............................12
Computer Drawing of Proposed Lagoon & Building Pad ........13
Site Balance Report .................................... .14
Computer Drawing - All Data - Proposed ....................15
Computer Drawing - Contour Lines ..........................16
Computer Drawing - Sloping Lines ..........................17
Facility Overlaid on Existing Topo Map ....................21

-5
sodas
lill
rwti
LL
INSET
Pop. 0�77 I
Um
INSET (.
L-_4 lam nL
1 l9 p un — I
-P
im
RICHMOND no LM
n MILLPOND Mft
A A2Z
im
h- -11), JAU
1.9
UfA
Ida 1.77
Migr
3.7
v Au
IZZJ
-s 1 LAIURt KA 6wV
aringfiel 'Por.
C-
74
-1 o
1.3 lo
1124 . ij,
oi
19
•
, - u2s
1.7 •.9,
193
71 34*45'
nil
16it
0 V f I —OP.
kInLo
0 v .
i*D*5<)m co. 7sas
Ls. t _U29
jcon, co. i 2k
_V !ALI
Ln ft jo 1114
13
mcAl*—
ItL IAE
j Lul
77
Laurel Hitl
is jd
ll,d
5,21 Is I ]of
1p

am
'VAL
I

r f•�, f e� _ - �- -
' , i E � s... r L ~�� -f i7 a f -t• � �. '^:` r r7 � t �7
i ,� ► r �1 � -tom �' ? .r ��-
'•.i4R l'�t�l F S JI '�,f1 l?._ fy J1 i ..
_ - � emu:; f���Olt4-a - •r.. t-1- i� � ��� :- = 5 � '�v_ r -. ��,
2.1
Al
- 4t a r] r
'f �. i 3 _ � 1 7 l' - ,i 1•Jl ;� ! t4r ,�:`-�.`I�S'.:.
w I tr_'' e•Irr a r! _
i-
i ft
C � 1
• a r
'��_ - i�cy•'rf -� err+E�'cd

1::-" -77
tall
2K
Nn
ISLE
Lu.
-3
k—
Ma
UM
'Ll UL
11P uj,
22 LIM
im
EM ilff IM A lw jt
S—W. G-
1312.
1424
Old zY lilt
Lul
'ALL
Im IL
j7 LLI Ell
"LL
Is
UP
12M
'In
INI
1�0 Li
tSl
W
o
tog-,
/*
in A�
10
iO 4a Ila/
0.� �°
j
Scotland County I All/
—s southern border county was
estabished in 1899. Laurinburg is the
county seat of Scotland County, named
so for Scotland in the British Isles from
which many of the early settlers of the
region came.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalities of $10,000 per day
by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he
shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations, that restrict the
rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System
(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss
shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will
be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to
"Buffers" requried by DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 -- Filter Strips and Standard
390 (Interim) -- Riparian Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservaton tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. (see "H,eather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference -- Environment file for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occurrin order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Owners name--:CARROLLS FARM 77 County:SCOTLAND
Mail Address-:POBOX 1767,LAURN
Type of production unit ---- :FAR -FEED
Number of animal units-----: 1350
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Temporary storage period---: 180 days
Method of application ------ :IRRIGATION
Amount of animal waste produced-----------------: 9918 tons/year
Amount of plant available N produced by animals-: 8775 lbs./year
Commercial N to apply on planned acreage--------: 0 lbs./year
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your swine operation. The plan is based on the
soil types, crops to be grown, and method of application for
your particular operation. The waste must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.

Page 2
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type Code /Acre /Unit Used Apply
0 0 0 A 0 1.60 0.0 0 S-APRIL
3135 1 WAGRAM L N/A 133.00 3.0 399 S-APRIL
3135 1 MCCOLL L N/A 133.00 6.0 798 S-APRIL
3135 1 NORFOLKL N/A 133.00 35.6 4734.8 S-APRIL
3135 1 WAGRAM C 5.5 50.00 7.0 1925 MAR-OCT
0 0 0 A 0 1.60 0.0 0 S-APRIL
3135 1 NORFOLKC 6.1 50.00 13.0 3965 MAR-OCT
Total 64.6 11822
Available Nitrogen (includes commercial) 8775
Surplus Or Deficit -3047
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Barley-bu.
B=Bermudagrass(graze)-tons
C=Bermudagrass(hay)-tons
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
E=Corn(silage)-tons
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
G=Fescue(graze)-tans
H=Fescue(hay)-tons
I=Oats-bu.
J=Rye-bu.
K=Small grain(graze)-acre
L=Small grain(hay)-acre
M=Sorghum(grain)-cwt.
W=Wheat-bu.
Y=Fescue(pasture)-tons
Z=Bermudagrass(pasture)-tons

Page 3
If more commercial fertilizer is used than shown in this plan,
then additional acres of land may be needed. A three to fifteen
feet wide permanent grass filter strip should be seeded along all
ditches in fields that receive animal waste.
Additional comments:
--------------------
Prepared by: A-}-t�rt &n !686 t)'A Title: RA-
CoP45. Date: s 31
Concurred in by: in 7�� -� Date: r-31-q r
Producer
I understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff
occurs.
o..�� Date:
Producer
Technical Specialist: Q7. Date: -s 3+ 45
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

SCS-ENG-538 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Re, 5-70 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
F ; 9460
CI{v. Li7.6
F-It0.
w
L; ;
&.
J.
wq.a
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
•. DISTRICT
DATE —LLIIQ-L'TJ- ca
f i ••
.!. , -ACRFS PASTURE - ACRES
ii1 f POND CLASS WORK{ f
IN■■■EN�
—
l■■■Em
M■rs■i■
'
��■■�
■t■■■■■■■■■■ENEM
0
■
��
HE
r.,
l d,
s#mi�■
.'
T'2■������,
i
!
o■�000
■�r
■rid
■�■
Now
INN,
■i
■
r�■■E■■■
■N
ram■■■■NI
■o
■�■
MEN
MEN
0■
Nor.,
SEE
MEN
I■
■■
i■�.
■■■`�i■■■NiOON
.=M■■
�■■
■■
SOMEONE'
�■■WON
■■
■■■■EN■M
r■■■MIN■
�!
m
■■■■N
moomr-Uq■■r■o■■■■■
�n■r0■■��■■■��r■■rE■■■■■
■■EMEN■!i■■■
■r■�■
■■■t■
�i■i■
i■i■i■■
■
■■■■■
■■■■■
MEN
ONE
MEN
100001000111100'
•
in
RAM
01
Iri1
N
I■S"I'
l
{■�rl■f
1
'■lrlilrl�
�®':�iilfrl■I®I■!
�[
���I
��[[lE�;i�ri
4
�1i■�r;rf■lr
110,21E
�1
1.161001391[11■I■!
1
M
ml■
N
ll:t1■t�i(�l.�i■I��
1
{C�j
1
1r1�1r
c�MOM
MM.1
li
;E1
1�1�1�1N1
INI�;ilii■l�f��
c�m�lr��■
��
, �■I
I■1■l.'
"_�l�lritl
1L�1i�1■{■���■
ON
lrlr
rl
i,l
1■1�11�i�l�ltfr
I�'�I■1r1
■,
1HIM
WE
�►`�
1■i■I■i■��1
;�i
irl�lr�1■�
�
!+.i►li�r�■ir�■!�
-f 51A5vN L tfi,yk, WARP, TA61-P- .
X bf ke/%vt d tol h f -sf'Llc- 110"&P
Ertg�Ncc�t �w�euS 19-"d 4WAf4 fVf

U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
File Code: 210
1-RGo onr
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SKEET FOR DAMS
Landowner 0 AAkoa5 Facjs rNC- Faem r -71 County sco�Ivk?.A _
Community or Group—NConservation Plan No.
f
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam ll.o Ft. Length of Flood Pool 3 $o Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation og-ot.-4 2
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. -:st. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. _ Ft. Ft.
2 .
3 _
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach AI.N c . S; It, f5 A�r,�.r.:,�kr� I oo d l 4o ,k,, Wu�i
11M0 NtoA� etL Cxu .
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IY,(
By
name
Concurred By
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach ad'i'tinnAl chaptz ac nPadPd_
CARROLL'S FOODS, INC.
MCBRYBE FORM - F B R M # 77
FARROW TO FEEDER FACILITY
SCOTLAND COUNTY
LAURINHURC-,, NC
Date oD-06-52
Date

arator:CARROLL'S FOODS, FCounty: SCOTLAND Date: 02/09/92
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): 3000.0 feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0 sows
(farrow to finish)
x
1417
lbs.
= 0
lbs
1350 sows
(farrow to feeder)
x
522
lbs.
= 704700
lbs
head
(finishing only)
x
135
lbs.
= 0
lbs
sows
(farrow to wean)
x
433
lbs.
- 0
lbs
0 head
(wean to feeder)
x
30
lb§.
= 0
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 704700 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 704700 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW= 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 704700 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet ; "Owner requests no sludge storage.
Sludge will be removed as needed."
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 380.0 feet Inside top width 325.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 48.6 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 2.5 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 47.6 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 37.6 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 42.0 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 375.0 320.0 10.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
375.0 320.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
325.0 270.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
350.0 295.0
120000.0 (AREA OF TOP)
B7750.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
413000.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) * DEPTH/6
120000.0 413000.0 87750.0 1.7
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 1034583 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
380.0 325.0 123500.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 123500.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 704700 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 172092 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day *
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 72041.7 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches / 12 inches per foot x DA
Volume = ..72041.7 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 172092 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
Sc. --72042 cubic feet
5D. 72042 cubic feet
TOTAL 316175 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 1020875 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 1034583 cubic feet
Min. req, treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 704700 cubic feet
At elev. 44.8 feet ; Volume is 715338 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 962542 cubic feet
At elev. 46.9 feet ; Volume is �951432 cubic feet start pumping)
Seasonal high water table elevation 42.0 feet �
7. DESIGNED BY: I APPROVED BY:� �p""`3
�
(1� tt
DATE: `��'� "Z� DATE: Z ZS 9
0
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLP..N

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to soil conditions, flushing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 46.9 as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 44.8 or before fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) .
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
--------------------------------------------------------
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material.
Cut-off Trench:
A cut-off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
Construction of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall not be placed
in standing water and reasonable compaction of the fills shall be
performed by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of .the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill. heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will need to
be excavated a minimum of one (1) foot below grade and backfilled and
compacted with a suitable material (ie-CL,SC,CH). Refer to the soils
investigation information in the plans for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during construction to prevgnt excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction.

SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 2.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS @ 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
16 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS @ 8 LBS./AC-
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
O LBS. RYE GRAIN @ 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
D LBS. RYE GRASS @ 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
2000 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
4 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
200 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

ir-ientation: -46.0 Z Magnification: 19.6 Ynciinationl 20.0
Lowsr Left
3D Mesh Surface
Existing
Project: Mc Bryde
Drawing: ■ht 1
Numbar:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
owners
Estimator:
Prepared bu: using Sitework
30 Mesh Surface

�rwntwtion: 236.0 Z Macnificstion: 19.6 Inclination: 20.0
62. 0
60.0
48.0
46.6
44.0
42. e
40.0
38.0
36.0
34.$
Upper Right
30 Mush Surface
Existing
Project: Mc Bryde
Drawing: ■ht 1
Numbar:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bW: using sitswork
30 Mush Surface

—TYPICAL. V�M/e:5� A &7"
-�;�rw
comrwomowr -TOP IV I VM
PI T-
-SluffWIL"r
fal PIF
IWV912re25 r?fU
TaMl-
d5, OTT LSD
r47 p/ a WVAT I 4-Aj
0 x
to tq
z
Z

]rLentstian: 135.0
56.0
60.0
46.0
40.0
36.0
Upper Right
Z Macnificationt i7.3
30 Mesh Surface
Balanced
projects Mc Bryde
Drawing: sht 1
Number:
Location:
Bid Dates
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
InclLnationt 20,0
3D Mesh Surface
Prepared by: using SLtework

)rientstion: -46.^ Z Magnification: 17.l Inclination: 20.0
66.0
50.0
46.0
40.0
35.8
Lower mare
3D Mash Surface
Balanced
Projact: Mc Bryde
Drawing: ■ht i
Numbar:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Ownsr:
Estimator:
30 Mesh Surface
Prepared by: using Sitswork

!• i 1 [ t1111 i i swell percent: 20.0U Cut shrink/swell p !ent: 0.00
Iterating to balancing within 10.0 cubic yards...
delta
Cut
Fill
CUT - FILL
0.00
27932.33
27932.27
0.06
0.00
28091.22
27455.66
635.56
-0.00
28091.23
27455.60
635.63
0.04
27943.88
27897.12
46.77
0.04
27932.31
27932.33
-0.02
Raise "Proposed" by 0.04 feet.
New surface called "Balanced" has been created.
a.aaaa=a==a..a=siaxa¢xaasxzaz3
Project: Mc -Bryde
Drawing: sht 1
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
a aaaaeaa=as=zsaaarzaaaacaacocz
Prepared by: using Sitework
aaaaaaaaaaaaaas�ss se ss s�zoaoaszax

.44
49.84 \
r.I.I....
bCSS-6.84 j......................................................................t 61.049.
Y61. e I
.............. ....................... ..............�.........� 61 04
i I
60.4a i FA 1�4�jU✓ Il.1Ca
i
I...........................................................
"gr 60. 94
60.34
60 49.04
Q:9 49.04
49.04
60.64 51. 49 elk
69.24
48..
DaWlight
.34
s
i
:1 fr��48 • V 1 '
lLT'I'Glf..............................................................
Plot of all data for the surfaces
Balanced
Projectt Mc BrUd■
Drawingt eht 1
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Owner:
Eatimator:
Prepared bUt using 9itework
40.74
38.34
'W4 0 4

MJ0mmITS auTon :Rq pojwdnjd
'-AOIEWT-483
..Aaumo
IJOBUTBU3
:oiwa PTO
:UOT40=0-1
:.Auqwr%N
T I4m IOUTMWJO
mPMjq ow :40spoici
PUMUMT08
:mowjjns a41 joi wimp anoluco *41 jo ja7d
...................... ........... : ........................................ 1- ..............................
............................................ .......................... ......................... L.9.1
............. ........ .......... ........ ........
vle ITS ............... .................
............ ....... . ..... .........
VS ITS ......
Va*79 I .......... ........ ....... ................................
WC7\145TTMwO

0.24 (50.84
60.44
.44
49.84
!F2
4—' 60.94
50.34
60 49.04
/�STAT rv�
49.04
6.0 .
DaWligh
49.04
60.64 I-si-i-se 494 e48. 4
48.74
8.34
plat of the sloping lines for the surface:
Balanced
Project: Mc BrVds
Drawing: sht 1
Number:
Location:
Hid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimatort
Prepared bU: using 8itswork
40.74
38.34
364 0 4

Row Crop Gun Cart with galvanized body is
standard equipment. An optional Low Profile
Gun Cart Is also available.
Low Profile Gust Cart (Galvanized Body).
Performance Information
Model
FLOW
INLET
SPRINKLER
"WETTED
WETTED
ACRES Wl
(G.P.1N_)
PRESSURE
PRESSURE
WIDTH
LENGTH
1INCH 4N
(P.S.I.)
(P-S.L)
(FL)
(FL • MAX)
S DAYS
T40A
280
104
70
240
1370
72
with
30O
107
70
250
1375
77
NELSON
350
116
70
260
1380
90
SR200R
Sprinkler
400
126
70
270
1385
:102
450
138
70
280
1390
.`115 .
„480
145
70
290
1395
-123
T37A
220
99
70
:220
�1160
with
`250
104
70
230
-1165
NELSON
300
113
70
245
1173
SR15OR
350
125
70
250
1175.:-
=90....
Sprinkler
_137
70
255
;. -102 ,..,
142 .:
70
-: 260
_:1178.
T30A=
.
a,a4
`:1os5 -�-
NELSON
Z.
20with
'9` --
1
_ 60
215
.-:i='
7088
`=
51
SR150R
��220. "
(:.240
129 1
:,70 _
225
1093
,tx'56 r
..
Sprinkler
_
137
70
230
,' 260
:;:>147
70 _
235
1098 ..-
,'; 67
Recommended width is based on 70% of the wetted diameter
Specifications
Model
`" T40A
'`;T37A
T30A
Humber of Axles _
`- 2
-:PETube t Q. (In.)
4.0
a7
ti 3A
PE Tubel-ength(ft)
.1250
M1- 1050
;.;:1000
'Dry Weight (Iba)
81 oo
' ' 7500
4300
Weight with water (tbs.)
16380
12380
7270
` =Speed Range (InsimIns.)
10-60
10-60
: _ 740
.The $Ize
11Lx15
12.5Lx15
11tx15
Shipping dim.: (M In.)
Length
184
15-9
13-5
. tith - .. ._
_ _ . 9-1 0
S-3
7-5 _
-Height
32 8 :
_
. .. 11-10
31"
Note: T40AMZA w/o wheels = B-3 wide
Polyethelene Tube - Only PE tube designed and constructed
for the constant coiling and dragging is considered for use on
Ag-Rain Water -reels. The tubing is backed by a 5-year
pro -rated warranty.
PE Tube Repair - A simple "screw -in' mender is available for
repairing the PE tube should it become damaged for any
reason.
PE Tube Lengths - Longer tube lengthes are available for all
models. Performance and delivery information available on
request.
Lc.�rtuh-aga�l9,�ir
�tz G& N
bu0 S_ Schrader Ave., P.O. Box 290, Havana, IL 62644
Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
Standard Features
Radial Inflow Turbine - The heart of the drive system.
This extremely efficient motor delivers quiet, smooth,
continuous power. All the water you pump goes through
the sprinkler. None of the water is wasted as in bellows
or piston drives.
Automatic Shutdown for the turbine motor.
Heavy Duty Chassis and frame.
Speedometer.
Pressure Gauge.
Infinitely Adjustable Speed Ranges.
Speed Compensator.
Mliswrap Safety Stop.
PTO Rewind and Drive Shaft.
Gun Cart with adjustable wheel width.
Hose Guide to insure proper packing of hose.
Turntable.
Nelson Slow Reverse Gun with ring nozzles.
Lifting Mechanism for gun cart.
Stabilizer Legs - Heavy duty, crank down style.
4" Supply Hose x 30 ft. long with male ring lock
coupler.
Fixed Spool Brake requires no on/off adjustments.
Foolproof Cluth - Turbine and PTO drives cannot be
engaged simultaneously.
Sec — of wrni ""Xxt imprwemersis, ph = d maUinas in cis feafiet nap ncf :e dereaw n rsrrerl pww—ron The performance + tffl om in r u leaflet is taw on Im conducted wW a Oa=Uiv see cr a -A=n. Aortal dell par-
br ar" ray V" kn Rue eats deoers7nq m Banat cuc-,unswces cf tne. piace. «ea.)ef. ninon �&Pent and GCW faun. 5eea5ca�orn aM aze suClers m .�ciout naam.
GK 94MWii-D Nuad in U.S.A.

�i s
WASTE UTIL17ATION PLAN
REQUUtED SPECIFICATIONS
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited.
I There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has a notarized agreement for use of
adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of
waste, he/she shall provide a copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application_ It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure
an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land_
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at the
discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is
eroding at more than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application_ Waste should not be applied when there
is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be sail incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland_ When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control odor and flies.
8_ Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to
depth that would prohibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching.
Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop or forages brealdng
dormancy..
l i. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the
land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from
any residential property boundary and from any perennial swam or river other than an irrigation ditch or canal.
MRCS, NC
JUKE, 1996

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
I` f 1 " .: .
DWQ -11 0- `{ S L - aW
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 21 D - J'
SWCD
NRCS
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. EvaIuate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e_ Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a_ Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge:
d_ Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b_ Stop irrigation pump.
c_ Nlake sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
December 18, 1996

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - . After hours, emergency number. 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b_ If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a Contractors Name:�1. VV1G (fin`_�v �# 5
b. Contractors Address: 3 c 5
c. Contractors Phone: 9 l 0 �� ` n 4�
2 December 18, 1996

North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service
Agri -Waste Management
Biological and Elgricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
Jaynes C. Barker*
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a) From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from different locations using
nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From Storage
a) Collect about 2 Ibs of manure from under the surface crust avoiding bedding materials and
using nonmetallic collectors
B. Liquid Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a) Extend a ''/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into manure to pit floor.
b) Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over end of conduit) trapping manure
that has entered lower end, remove and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic
container.
c) Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d) Mix and add about'/. pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a) Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure chopper -agitator
pump or propeller agititor.
b) Take subsamples from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump or from manure spreader
and place in a plastic bucket.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department, North Carolina State University. Raleigh, NC

H. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse residues from container with
clean water but do not use disinfectants, soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as newspaper, box or package with
wrapping paper, and tape.
E_ Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available, Contacts:
1. A& L Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc.
7621 Whitepine Road
Richmond, VA 23237
Ph: [phone]
2. Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 Winton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
3. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
2320 S. Foster Avenue
Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone]
4_ NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
ii. Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P. O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
iii. Forward $4 along with the sample
iv. Include the following identification information with sample:
a) Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b) Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing, turkey -breeders, brooderhouse, grower, number
flocks grown on litter, etc.)
c) Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge;
broiler -house litter, stockpile)
v. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Ma, S, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B
vi. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, Mo, Cd, Ni, Pb

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause
BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of solids
0 Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits + Crusted Solids
Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation
Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along walers edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed Spillage C3 Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
CI Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
d ring winter).
Feed Storage • Accumulations of feed residues Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
5--l'Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
AN- ` - November 11, 1996, Page I

Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects. Site Specific Practices
Animal Holding Areas • Accumulations of animal wastes Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
itnunal.
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes ❑ Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systems day interval during summer; 15.30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
❑ Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
❑ Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For mare information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Sox 7613, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AMID' -'ovember 11, 1996, Page 2

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas ern
• Biological mixing;
• Agitation
i' Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
M_ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
1�Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
Minimum agitation when,pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • Nigh pressure agitation; M- irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles a Wind drift EF"'Minimum recommended operating pressure;
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface • Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
• Mixing while filling; level;
• Agitation when emptying. ❑ Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge • Agitation when spreading; ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets • Volatile gas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, • Volatile gas emissions while 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field drying p Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
surfaces
❑ Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal • Carcass decomposition ❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pits 0 Proper location/cons truclion of disposal pits
Incinerators • incomplete combustion ❑ Secondary stack burners
At -'C - November 11, 1996, Page 4

Source Cause BIHPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water around • improper drainage; Mr Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
Additional lnfonnation : Available From :
Swine Manure Management ; 0200 Rule[BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - BAE '
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 128-88 NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 129-88 NCSU - BA F r
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; P1H-33 NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual NC Pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
u / Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

"FA9-K -77
if
LM-1 U111 LIL
WL
LOA
i1a
LLa IML
s
2.2
UL- I= L
LM
Lai !Am
an,
U II
C-
Is U- uu kA"
Le LIU
y1j, MAD I
L�M
Ldr
LLU
12M
W. LIn
Y.
JLJJ i2o
"-a
L#AAWWMUAQ I 1AM .....
LM
IM
'11k
C4*0.
Is IUL
U111,
ito
-:F M
lilt j
% It
UM tv
.gyp aw
VA
'ILI
jo
Un
-A JP
LIU
Scotland Count
MALI
—'s southern border county was estabished in 1899. Laurinburg is the
county seat of Scotland County, named
5o for Scotland in the British Isles from
which many of the early settlers of the
region came.

ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S.12EGAN
Secretary
UNDA CULPEPPER
Interim Dlrectar
MBJ Farms, LLC
MBJ Farm 1
P.O. Box 535
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Dear MBJ Farms, LLC:
NORTH CAROLINA
Envtronn enW QUOW
July 21, 2018
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS830015
MBJ Farm 1
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Scotland County
In accordance with your July 12, 2018 request to change operation type without exceeding the permitted
steady state live weight, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to MBJ
Farms, LLC, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the construction and operation of the new irrigation system as well as the
continued operation of the existing animal waste management system including, but not limited to, the
management and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWW) for MBJ Farm 1, located in Scotland County, with a swine animal capacity
of no greater than the following annual avgrages:
Wean to Finish: 6127 Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other.
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS830015 dated March 9, 2018. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified
in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals
authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and
must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
E Q�
North Cardin Drumm of Envu mentel Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury street 1 16H Mail Service Center I Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1611
919.7079000

Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoringcns in this pgmit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per MRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 1I.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National Weather
Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: http://www.weather.gov/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 919433-3300. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
o�"� U�
fior Linda Culpepper
Interim Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG 100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Sampson County Health Department
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS830015)
Smithfield Hog Production
�D
4-�e- K QV
North Caropna Department of Environmental Quality I DMslon of Water Resources
512 North SailsbL" Street 1 1611 Mail $ervim Center I Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1611
919.707.9000

f,
r
Form IRR-2
G
Field Size (acres) a (A)
Farm Owner
Owiter's Address
Owner's Phone lR
Layom Irrlgallm Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
i
Jl '
EXHIBIT: B--z
1=acuily Number i 1 - I '
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operalor's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plaid
clop Type necomrnerided PAN I.oa,llnq - I(lb/acre) e (al
111 I,31 MI ref I51 In, VI lal fat Ilnl fill
bale
mrNddlyr
Mrlgntlnn
Wasle Analysls IIAN'
(Ibllatt4 golf
1 �a
PA14 Applied
(udacrol
_(!?! l@l_
r000
%!�•lo
umogea Ilelance'
filrraere)
(ul - (1e)
�O 5
q 74
Steil 11me
End time
Tnlnl
Mimrlas
M•M
Ir nr sp,h,krere
Qpereling
_ 1
r krw rlele
i{iaun,h,)
ZZ
#Dial vogrrne
(gattens)
(0)M(5)n 141
� ado
2 W v
sdo
duple
per Arta
(aat+raycre) ,
.,-UL
(A)
39
SI ?
�1-709
10-1_ 0�00
►0-l2-w
ZIl
Z17-6
Zll
ZIZa
z1z
2 v.
_ 1 Zo
r a
-r�-o1
UZ
67g7
3b0
I
Ca7S00
lZ28J
2.2
?$1(l
�.
�NV
Owner's Signature
Ceillned Operator (print)
Crop Cycle Totals 1 1
Operator's Slgnalure
Operalor's Cerlltfcalloll No. -
t NCDA Waste Annylysis or Equivalent or NRCS C'slfnlalo, Teelmlcal (Ailde Saclfon 033.
' Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) front (13). Continue subtracting column (10) morn column (11) follow6f) each Ilrigalfon evenl.

�F.orm IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
4. � REPORT DATE: 03/06/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # I Field # �— 7177 5-b_
Fields Size (acres) = (A) j 5.20—
FARM OWNER: C_a�roll'sFoodsslnc 7�iv�jEai1i "'u ,�j?iXi Vr` Irrigation Operator
Owner's Address P O Box 1767w Irrigation Operator's
�Laurinburg I NC. I28352 i Address
Owner's Phone [phone] Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
NIA
FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
COOMPLEX: 11 1
Crop Type BERMUDA/RYE Recommended PAN i 256 206/050
Loading (lbslacre) = (B) I
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Date Start End Total # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied
mmldd/yr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN
(gallmin) (gallons) (gal/acre) (Ibsl1000 gal) (Ibslacre)
(3)-(2) (6)x(5)x(4) 7/(A) See (9) Below (8)x(9)/1000
1 (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
Before 09/01/2000
"See (11) Below
After 09/01/2000
'See (11) Below
03/01/2000 1
6665
6666
60
1
225
13,500
2,596
1.40
3.6
+ 202
+ 50
03/02/2000
6665
6669
240
1
225
54,060
10,385
1.40
14.5
+ 188
+ 50
05/01/2004
8795
1 8800
I
300
1
225
67,500
12,981
1.40
18.2
+ 170
+ 50
05/02/2000
8800
8808
480
1
225
108,000
20,769
1.40
29.1
+ 141
+ 50
06/26/2000
9007
2114 -
9012
- 2118 --
300
- -240 ---
1
— —1
225
67,500
12,981
1.40
18.2
+ 122
+ 50
110/200
225
54,000
10,385
1.60
16.6
+ 122
+ 33
1011 2 0
— 2118
2120
120
1
225
27,000
5,192
1.60
8.3
+ 122
+ 25
10/1 0
2126 1
2129
180
1
225
40,506
7,788
1.60
12.5
+ 122
+ 13
10010122229
I2235
360
1
225
81,000
15,577
1.60
24.9
+ 122
-12
l2001
6942
I 6947
S 300
1
225
67,500
12,961
2.20
28.6
+ 122
-41
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP 7
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE 21.4 Before
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 0.0 After
580,500 4 (+) NUTRIENT NEED
09l0112000 CROP CYCLE TOTALS [-) NUTRIENT EXCESS
09/01/2000
•'• HOURS LEFT TO PUMP *11 - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zero! This is an estimate and vectors such as changes in appliration rates (Rpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be incorrect! Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(I1)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
MTN

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Owners name--:CARROLLS FARM 77 County:SCOTLAND
Mail Address-:POBOX 1767,LAURN
Type of production unit ---- :FAR -FEED
Number of animal units-----: 1350
Type of waste facility ----- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Temporary storage period---: 180 days
Method of application ------ :IRRIGATION
Amount of animal waste produced-----------------: 9918 tons/year
Amount of plant available N produced by animals-: 8775 lbs./year
Commercial N to apply on planned acreage--------: 0 lbs./year
Your animal waste utilization plan has been specifically
developed for your swine operation. The plan is based on the.
soil types, crops to be grown, and method of application for
your particular operation. The waste must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analvzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Soil incorporation
of waste will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
C00101070128

Page 2
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field
Soil Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Month to
No.
No.
Type Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
0
0
❑ A
0
1.60
0.0
0
S-APRIL
3135
1
WAGRAM L
N/A
133.00
3.0
399
S-APRIL
3135
1
MCCOLL L
N/A
133.00
6.0
798
S-APRIL
3135
1
NORFOLKL
N/A
133.00
35.6
4734.8
S-APRIL
3135
1
WAGRAM C
5.5
50.00
7.0
1925
MAR-OCT
0
0
0 A
0
1.60
0.0
❑
S-APRIL
3135
1
NORFOLKC
6.1
50.00
13.0
3965
MAR-OCT
Total
64.6
11822
Available Nitrogen
(includes commercial)
8775
Surplus Or
Deficit
-3047
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Barley-bu.
B=Bermudagrass (graze) -tons
C=Bermudagrass(hay)-tons
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
E=Corn(silage)-tons
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
G=Fescue(graze)-tons
H=Fescue (hay) -tons
I=Oats-bu.
J=Rye-bu.
K=Small grain(graze)-acre
L=Small grain(hay)-acre
M=Sorghum (grain) -cwt .
W=Wheat-bu .
Y=Fescue (pasture) -tons
Z=Bermudagrass(pasture)-tans
C00101070129

Page 3
If more commercial fertilizer is used than shown in this plan,
then additional acres of land may be needed. A three to fifteen
feet wide permanent grass filter strip should be seeded along all
ditches in fields that receive animal waste.
Additional comments:
--------------------
Prepared by: a Title: Rp5. Coks. Date: ;5- 31
-�j o� \ G�RpCC!'S J60DS ,=-
Concurred in by- ��,� -+-� Date:
Producer
I understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also
certify that the waste will be applied on the land according to
this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff
occurs.
Date: -10
Producer
Technical SpecialistI: t A. Date: 5131G5
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)
C00101070130

FROM RICHMOND CO CO O' EXTENSION FAX NO. Feb. 20 2001 06:46AM P19 -
7177
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or legs based on the most recent waste
analysis report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field Soil
Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
PAN
Month
No.
No.
Type
Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
3135
lA
NoA
B
6
37.5/T
5.8
1305
Mar -Sep
3135
2A
NoA
B
6
37.5/T
5.8
1305
Mar -Sep
3135
3A
Mc
B
3.5
37.S/T
5.9
774
Mar -Sep
3135
4A
Mc
B
3.5
37.5/T
5.9
774
Mar -Sep
3135
1B
NoA
H
6
37.5/T
4.0
900
Mar -Sep
3135
2B
NoA
B
6
37.5/T
4.6
1035
Mar -Sep
3135
3B
NaA
B
6
37.5/T
5.0
1125
Mar -Sep
3135
4B
NaA/WsB
B
S.S
37.5/T
6.2
1279
Mar -Sep
3135
5B
NoA/WsB
B
5.5
37.5/T
5.2
1073
Mar -Sep
3135
6A
WsB
B
5.5
37.5/T
3.0
619
Mar -Sep
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total:
51.4
10,189
OVERSEED
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Yield
Lbe. N
Acres
PAN
Month
No.
No.
Type
Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
3135
lA
NoA
K
KA
5O/A
5.8
290
Oct -Feb
3135
2A
NoA
K
NA
50/A
5.8
290
Oct -Feb
3135
3A
Mc
K
NA
50/A
5.9
295
Oct -Feb
3135
4A
Mc
K
NA
50/A
5.9
295
Oct -Feb
3135
1B
NoA
K
NA
50/A
4.0
200
Oct -Feb
3135
213
NoA
K
KA
5O/A
4.6
230
Oct -Feb
3135
3B
NaA
K
NA
50/A
5.0
250
Oct -Feb
3135
4B
NoA/WsB
K
NA
50/A
6.2
310
Oct -Feb
3135
5B
NoA/WaB
K
NA
50/A
5.2
260
Oct -Feb
3135
6A
WsB
K
NA
SO/A
3.0
150
Oct -Feb
Total:
51-4
2,570
Bermuda
Pasture
Total:
10,189
Overall
Total:
12,759
Available Nitrogen (includes commercial):
8,775
Surplus or
Deficit :-3,984

-PROM : RICNMOND CO CO OP EXTENSION FAX NO.
Crop Codes: Crop -unit
----------------------
B=Bermudagraes(graze)-tons
K-Small grain (graze) -acre.
Feb. 20 2001 06:46RM P20
This Waste utilization Plan has been amended by Bert Coffer
(certified Technical Specialist-NCCES) on May 17, 1999 to reflect
a change from hay to grazing and to include small grain overseed_
The nitrogen rate on the bermuda has been reduced to 75% of the
hay rate as required by NRCS standard. Nitrogen can be applied
to the small grain overseed at the rate of So lbs of N per acre
during the indicated application window. The overeeeded small
grain must be harvested before seedhead formation. Fields are
designated by irrigation pulls. Acreage has been determined from
pull measurements provided by manager.
Amended by Date S LZ
Affiliation: North Caroli a Cooperative Ext.
Scotland Co. Center
231 E. Cronly St. Suite 800
Laurinburg, NC. 28352
910-277-2422

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design fold that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly .
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. M hen animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in !North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
.......................................................... .. ...... I .... ............ ......... ....... .......... ......-.......................................... .._...... --... ----.... ...........----
Pre.iew Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 11-1 7-2000 Specification Page 1

method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8.. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 19951
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
tp
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage -ways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied ar agronomic rates in a manner that causes not runoff or drift
from site.
.......... ........ ........ ............ ...............................................................
............................................
.................................................--- ..--.--- -- --_
Preview Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 11-17-2000 Specification Page 2

16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
_........................................................ ............... ........--..............._........._................I.....I ----...............
PreNiew Database Version 1.05 Date Printed: 11-17-2000 Specification Page 3

metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records
for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
:.... ........................ -..--
....-.......-----
Da -----------------------
Preview tabase Version 1.05 Date Printed: 11-17-2000 Specification Page 4

\ C�
�� i x >��� �.lr � � --� 4 r s r - Y,.vC � � J ✓ s ar'rSs�:s:�y�[ � ��y t 7 �s� �rxx�^�i �._ -,
� Ix ' C > -4 ' i �i ram}- i "fi Y`5' •�F to-.:s" q`ei
�•-.. _ - � -/ Jam, � �=
I 1 x,� l•M - l� K 1' YlhlY �.
ter _ - - . . _ Y•
.��'+....�Ji�-.. _... .. .�r =.._ _ ....._._"r-.._. .;'.c _....,...,s Sri=u.'�i•�:.e rye_:'. C:t �.t:. .. '•f:'�3�es: '- - -

r `�

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD .
REPORT DATE: 03/06/2001
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # 1 Field #
i 7177
I_ 1-a
COOMPLEX: it
Fields Size (acres) _ (A)
5.80
FARM OWNER:
Catralls:Fgods,,Inc;,Utp a,(,' �"'
Irrigation Operator NIA
Owner's Address
IP 0 Box�1767
Irrigation Operator's
Laurinburg
-- I NC 28352 1
Address I
Owner's Phone
�^
,(910)-276-0648
_
Operator's Phone # !-
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type
_
BERMUDA/RYE
Recommended PAN 275
I
Loadino (lbslacre) = IBI
2251050
(1) (2) (3} (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
_
Date Start End Total - # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied
mm/ddlyr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibs/acre)
Nitrogen Balance
(lbslacre)
(gal/min) (gallons) (gallacre) (Ibs11000 gal) (lbslacre)
(3)-(2) (6)x(5)x(4) 7/(A) See (9) Below (8)x(9)11000
Before 09101/2000
"See (11) Below
After 09/01/2000
"See (11) Below
03l0312000
6676
6677
60 ; 1
225
13,500
2,328
1.40 3.3
1.40 16.3
1 A0 I 6.5
+ 222
+ 205
+ -- 199 ---
+ 196
+ 50
+ 50
- + 50
T + - 50 —
+ 50
- + 50 --_
+ 50 ----
--+ 30 - -
+ 19 ---
03/0612000
04/20/2000
6676
6681
8764
:1 300 1
225
67,500
11,638
8762
120 #- - 1
225
27,000
4,655
04l2512000
04/26/2000
8773
8774
8774
8779
I 60 1 1
300 i 1
225
225
13,500
67,500
2,328
11,638
1.40 3.3
1.40 16.3
1.40 - 1-- 22.8- -
1.40 19.6
1.40 '— 19.6
1.60 11.2-
+ 179
- + --157 -
05/04/2000
06/2612000
09/1312000
8819
T 9007
18
8826
9013
24
420 1
360 ? 1
3fi0 i 1
225
225
225
94,500
81,000 _
81,000
16,293
13,966
13,966
+ 137 - -
+ 137 - -
+ 137 -
—
10/02/2000
2098
2101
180 1
225
40,500
6,983
10/0912000
2104
2109
i 300 1
225
67,500
11,638
1.60 ! 18.6
+ 137
+ 1
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE i 36.8 Before 09/011 0 ...� uJ CROP CYCLE TOTALS ��.{-)`T'NUnuTR,rtI,cnENT' En�7(C�'
IE�__ ESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 0.2 � After 091t_
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP "' - caution should be taken when using Ihis estimate as it approaches xerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon anaiysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be, incorrectl Failure to allow for such changes can cause over appticafionsf
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(I1)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
DENR—FRO
JUN 13 2001
- Doi!' Q
Iof1

' Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report JJFIWAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
REPORT DATE: 03/06/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # 1 Field # I _ ` 7177 1-� _ COOMPLEX:
Fields Size (acres) _ (A) i 4,00
FARM OWNER. Cafrpll'skFoods,�lnc ,"„tf ", !Ifl ;g3 l"! Irrigation Operator INN//A�
Owner's Address iP 0 Box 1767 Irrigation Operator's
jLaurinburg NC 28352 Address
Owner's Phone (910)-276_0648 _ -- Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type BERMUDA/RY-E Recommended PAN 275 225/050
Loading (Ibslacre) = (B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Date Start End — Total # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied
mmlddlyr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN
{11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
Nitrogen Balance
i (Ibslacre)
(gallmin) (gallons) (gallacre) (Ibs11000 gal) (Ibslacre)
(3)-(2) (6)x(5)x(4) 711 See (9) Below (8}x(9)l1000
Before 09/01/2000
`See (11) Below
After 09/0112000
"See (11) Below
03/06/2000
6681
6684 i 180
1
225
40,500
10,125
1.40
14.2
+ 211
+ 50
03/07/2000
6684
6685
60
I
1
225
13,500
3,375
1,40
4.7
+ 206
+ 50
04/24/2000
8764
8769
I 300
1
225
67,500
16,875
1.40
23.6
+ 182
+ 50
04/27/2000
8787
8793
360
1
225
81,000
20,250
1.40
—28.3
+ 154
+— 50
05/03/2000
8808
8817
540
1
225
121,500
30,375
1.40
42.5
+ 112
+ 50
05/05/2000
8826
8830
240
1
225
54,000
13,500
1.40
18.9
+ 93
+ 50
09/13/2000
18
25
420
1
225
94,500
23,5
62
1.40
33.1
+ 93
* 17
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP I -
ON ENTIRE FIELD THE 196 Before 09/01/2000
41 e.ovu
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
I OD
-I+) NU I MItN I Ivtt=U
(-} NUTRIENT EXCESS
USING
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 3.6 After 09/01/2000
'-' HOURS LEFT TO PUMP '•'- caution should be laken when using this estimate as A approaches zerol This is an estimate and factors suet as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause A to be incorrectl Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applicaticnsl
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) foltowing each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report FINAL. REPORT FOR THIS FIELD_____
REPORT DATE: 03/06/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # i Field # 7177 2-a COOMPLEX: 1 J
Fields Size (acres) _ (A) 5.80
FARM OWNER: Garrroll'sEFu,?ods I!ng lilp ! Irrigation Operator NIA
Owner's Address IP 0 Box 1767 Irrigation Operator's ��
ILaurinburg _ NC 28352 Address
Owner's Phone erator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan _
Crop Type BERMUDAIRYE Recommended PAN 275 225/050� ~�
1 Loadina llbs/acre] = (81 I I
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date Start End Total # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied
mmlddtyr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
Nitrogen Balance
(lbs/acre)
(gal/min) (gallons) (gal/acre) (lbs11000 gal) (Ibslacre)
(3)-(2) (6)x(5)x(4) 71(A) See (9) Below (8)x(9)11000
Before 09/01/2000
"See (11) Below
After 09/01/2000
'See (11) Below
03/02/2000
6669
6671 1 120 1
{ 225
27,000
4,655
1.40 i
6.5
+ 218
+ 50
03103)2000
6671
6676 II 300
1
225
67,500
11,638
1.40
1.40
16.3
--29.3 — —
+ 202
- + 173 T
+ 50
+ 50 T-
04/24/2000
8764
8773 -�-- 540
f 1
I
225
121,500
20,948
04/26/2000
8779
8783 i 240
1
225
54,000
9,310
1A0
f
13.0
+ 160
+ 50
+ 50
04/2712000
0510312000
8783
—8811
8787 I� 240
8817 360
1
1
225
225
54,000
81,000
9,310
13,966
1,40
1.40
1.44
_ 13.0
+ 147
19.6
+ 127 _
+ 50
+ 50
05104/2000
8817
8819 120
i
225
27,000
4,655
6.5
+ 121
06/27/2000
9016
9019 180
1
225
40,500
6,983
1,40
1.40
9.8
+ 111
+ 50
09/11/2000
1
9 480
1
225
108,400
18,621
26.1
+ ill
—+ - - 24 —
09/12/2000
17
18
60
1
225
13,500
2,328
1.403.3
+ 111
�+ 21
10/02/2000
2101
2104
180
1
225
40,500
6,983
1.60
11.2
+ 111
+ 10
10/12/2000
2124
2125
60
1
225
13,500
2,328
1.60
3.7
+ 111 —
+ 6
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE 29.8 , Before 09/01/2000
t]RC,vUU
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
I aLf
"(+I NUThrItN 1 Ni
(-y NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 1767 After 109/01/2000
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP "' - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches
zerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gi and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it io be incorrect! Failure to allow tar such changes can cause over applicationel
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1of1

4
Form IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
REPORT DATE:
03/06/2001
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # I Field # �_ 7177
2-b
Fields Size (acres) _
T ^�
(A)
4.60
FARM OWNER:
g5FREI S=F_o_ooQ51
;,`;� "1` [ Irrigation Operator
NIA
Owner's Address
'P O Box 1767
�Laurinburg �
Irrigation Operator's
NC 128352 Address
Owner's Phone
I(910)-276-0648
�
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type
1 BERMUDAIRYE
Recommended PAN
Loading (Ibslacre) _ (8)
FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
COOMPLEX:
- 1f
-- l
275
225/050
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10} (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
Start
End Total
_
# of Sprinklers
Flow Rate
Total Volume
Volume
Waste Analysis
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
Nitrogen Balance
mm/ddlyr
Time
Time Minutes
Operating
per Acre
PAN
1
(Ibslacre)
(Ibslacre)
(gallmin)
(gallons)
(gallacre)
(lbsl1000 gal)
(Ibslacre)
Before 09/01/2000
After 09/01/2000
(3)-(2)
(6)x(5)x(4)
71(A)
See(g)Below
(8)x(9)11000 I
'See (11) Below
'See (11) Below
03/07/2000
6685 1
6689
240
1
225
54,000
11,739
1.40
16.4
+ 209
+ 50
05/01/2000
8793
8796
180
1
225
40,500
8,804
1,40
12.3
+ 196
+ 50
09/12/2000
12
18
360
1
225
81,000
17,609
1.40
24.7
+ 196
+ 25
09/14/2000
25
30
300 I
1
225
67,500
14,674
1,40
20.5
+ 196
�+ 5
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP cgJ,VJvu ry t+l nu tram' rntru
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE 1I 47.8 � Before E 09/01/2000 CROP CYCLE TOTALS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 1.2 After 09/01/2400 I) NUTRICNr EXCESS
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP "- • caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zero) This is an estimate and factors such as changes in applicalion rates (gpm) and ftucluations in lagoon anaiysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be incorrect! FAdure to allow for such changes can cause over applications)
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
01)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B), Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature ~
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
REPORT DATE: 03/06/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # 1 Field # 7177_I 3-a
Fields Size (acres) = (A) 5,90
FARM OWNER: CafrallsgFoods Incit f f r} zwri l i' Irrigation Operator 'NIA
,s,.�.-...,' �,��� l� Il�iltr��r: �i `�.ts 9 P
Owner's Address 'P 0 Box 1767 �J Irrigation Operator's
Laurinburg I NC 128352 I Address
Owner's Phone I(910)-276-0648 j Operator's Phone #
Crop Type
FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
COOMPLEX. ,1
From Waste Utilization Plan
BERMUDAIRYE Recommended PAN 181
Loading (lbs/acre) = fB)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
(11) First Crop_
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
(11) Double Crop
Nitrogen Balance
(lbs/acre)
_ _
Date Start End Total # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied
mmldd/yr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN
(gaVmin) (gallons) (gaUacre) (Ibs11000 gal) (Ibslacre)
(3)-(2) (6)x(5)x(4) 7/(A) See (9) Below (8)x(9)/1000
Before 09/01/2000
'See (11) Below
After 09/01/2000
'See (11) Below
04/20/2000
8762
8804
8764 120
8808 i- 240
1
- 1
225
27,000
4,576
1.40
1.40—
6.4
— 12.8 --
+ 125
+ - 112
+ 50
- + 50 -
05/02/2000
225
54,000
9,153
05/03/2000
8808
8811 i 180
1
225
40,500
6,864
1.40
�9.6
+ 102
+ 50
06/28/2000
9021
9026 300
1
225
67,500
11,441
1.40
16.0
+ 86
T + 50
09/11/2000
9
10
i 60
1
225
13,500
2,288
1.40
3.2
+ 86
�+ 47
10/10/2000
2109
2114
30D
1
225
67,500
11,441
1.60
18.3
+ 86
�+ 28
02/20/2001
6952
6957 i 300
1
225
67,500
11,441
2.20
25.2
+ 86
+ 3
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP "1.0vu yG -1+1 Nu i Hirty i Nttu
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE 17.1 Before 09101/2000 CROP CYCLE TOTALS '(-) NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 0.7 I After 09/01/2000
"' HOURS LEFT TO PUMP - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zero! This is an estimate and factofs such as changes m application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
May cause it to be inOOrrectl Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
REPORT DATE: 03/06/2001 - One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # I Field # I� _ 7177 3-b
Fields Size (acres) = (A) _ 5.00
'FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
COOMPLEX: 11 -
FARM OWNER: Carroll §iFads, lnc ��1 "hi(Ji Irrigation Operator -
Owner's Address IP O Box 1767 I Irrigation Operator's I
Laurinburg I NC 28352 ' Address —�
Owner's Phone ---�-- �—�—� - ---- -� — �(910)-276-0648 Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
BERMUDA/RYE Recommended PAN 275
Crop Type I Loadino {Ibslacre)= (B)
225/050 - - t
I
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date Start End Total # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied Nitrogen Balance
mmlddlyr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN (Ibslacre)
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
(gallmin) (gallons) (gallacre) (Ibs/1000 gal) (11 acre)
(3)-(2) (6)x(5)x(4) 71(A) See (9) Below (8)x(9)l1000
.Before 09/01/2000
'See (11) Below
After 09/01/2000
'See (11) Below
03108/2000 E
04/24/2000
6689
8773
6690 1
8774
60 + 1
60 j 1
IIt
225
13,500
2,700
1.40
1,40
3.8
3.8
3.8 --
+ 221
+ 217
+ 50
+ 50
225
13,500
2,700
04/25/2000 I
I
8773
8774
60 1
225
13,500
2,700
1.40--
+ - 214 -�
�+ - 50 -
04/26/2000
45l0112400
8774— 1-8782
8796
8800
480 1
240 1
225
108,000
21,600
1.40
1.4D
�30.2
15.1
+ 183
- + 168
+ 50
+ 54
225.
54,00D
10,800
05/02/2000
6800
8804 1
240 I 1
225
54,000
10,800
1.40
15.1
+ 153
+ 50
05/0312000
8817
8818
60 1
225
13,500
2,700
1,40
3.8 T
+ 149
+ 50
05/04/2000
8817
8826
540
i 1
225
121,500
24,300
1.40
34.0
+ 115
+ 50
06/28/2000
9019
9021
120
1
225
27,000
5,400
1,40
7.6
+ 108
+ 50
09/11/2000
6
10
I 240
1
225
54,000
10,800
1.40
15.1
76 -�
+ 108
+ 108 —
+ 35
- +- 27 --
09/12/2000
10
12
I 120
�~ 1
225
27,000
5,400
1.40 —
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
z 5
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE i Before 09/01/204D
4y�,6UU
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
14U
(+} NU I KitN I Ntt:U
(-) NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 7.2 j After 09/01/2000
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP — - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates Igpm) and flucwalions in lagoon analysis (especially during winter monlhs)
may cause it to be incorrect Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

It
Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
REPORT" DATE: 03/06/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # I Field # 7177 4-a�
Fields Size (acres) = (A) �- 6,90�
FARM OWNER: C3r�oll'§?gods,!�Inc'j 1:i ;"; ,r °'" (" Irrigation Operator NIA -
Owners Address P 0 Box�1767 I Irrigation Operator's
Laurinburg _ NC-�28352� Address
Owner's Phone ;(910)-276.0648 _I - Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
BERMUDA/RYE Recommended PAN 181
Crop Type Loading (Ibslacre) = (B)
FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
COOMPLEX:
- I
131/050
I
(1)
(5) (6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10) (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
_-(2) -(3) - --(4) ��
Date Start End Total # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied
mm/dd/yr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
(3)-(2)
(gallmin)
(gallons)
(6)x(5)x(4)
(gal/acre)
71(A)
(lbs11000 gal)
See (9) Below
(Ibslacre) Before 09/011200D
(8)x(9)11000 "See (11) Below
After 09/01/2000
'See (11) Below
06/29/2000
02121 I
9026
6957
9029
62
180
300
1
I 1
225
40,500
6,864
1.40
-�2.20
i 9.6
I25.2— I
+ 121
-+ 121
+ 50
+ 252` -
225 67,504 11,441
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP IiiVi ]7-iNUIKILN I Ni
ON ENTIRE FIELp USING THE 2i 4A Before 09/01/2000 CROP CYCLE TOTALS NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 4.9 I After 49/01/2000 '(•)
"- HOURS LEFT TO PUMP — - caution should tm taken when using this estimate as it approaches zerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpmi and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (aspeGally during winter monthsl
may cause it to be incarrectl Failure to allow for such changes can Cause over applications
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
It
REPORT DATE: 03/06/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # 1 Field # I 7177 T -� 4-b —� COOMPLEX: 1
Fields Size (acres) _ (A) r 6,20
FARM OWNER: Carroll'5iFoods'r11nc'?ii'Iti1 �l.t tit ii;i •--- - - — --- — ---- �,-a � „��,;,,�� ,t,��#j,rtl;,',,� Irrigation Operator !NIA - ---- _- i
Owners Address iiP 0 Box 1767 Irrigation Operator's i
�Laurinburg NC 28352 Address
Owner's Phone [phone] Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
- — --_- BERMUDA/RY� Recommended PAN - 255 206/050
Crop Type Loadino (lbslacrel = (B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
Date Start End Total # of Sprinklers Flow Hate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied
mmlddlyr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
(gallmin) (gallons) (gal/acre) (lbs11000 gal) (Ibslacre)
(3)-(2) (6)x(5)x(4) 71(A) See (9) Below (8)x(9)11000 I
Before 09/01/2000
'See (11) Below
After D9/0112000
'See (11) Below
03/01/2000
6660
6665 !
300 1
225
67,500
10,887
1.40 ;I 15.2
+ 191
+ 50
04/2612000
8782
8783
1 60 1
225
13,500
2,177
1.40� 3.0 —
+ 188
+ 50
04/27/2000
8783
8793
1 600 1
225
135,000
21,774
1.40 30,5
+ 157 ~
+ 50
05/01/2000
05/05l2000
8793
8826
8795
8833
120 — 1
420 1
225
225
27,000
94,500
4,355
15,242
1.40 6.1
1.40 ` I 21.3
1.40 i 21.3
+ 151
+ --50
+ 50
-+ 50
+ 130
O612712000
9012
9019
420 l 1
225
94,500
15,242
+ 108
—
09/1112000
1
6
I 300 1
I 225
67,500
10,887
1.40 !. 15.2—I
I
+ 108
i
+ 35
HOURS LEFT TOPUMP wyy,�ui� l*lrvuinicrvi nccu
u
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE 35.6 Before ; 091011200D CROP CYCLE TOTALS (-I NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 11.4 After 0910112000
—HOURS LEFT TO PUMP --caution should betaken when using this estimate as it approaches zero! This is an estimale and factors such as charges in appiicalion rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially curing winter months)
may cause it to be incorrect? Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)2nter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature-
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
REPORT DATE: 03/06/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # ! Field # ' 7177 _� 5-b _J COOMPI_EX: 11 -�
Fields Size (acres) _ (A) 5.20 — -
FARM OWNER: Cg° 'MErIrrigation Operator N!A
Owner's Address P 0 Box 1767 I Irrigation Operator's
jLaurinburg NC 28352 Address .r -
Owner's Phone _ 1(910)-276.0648 Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type BERMUDA/RYE I Recommended PAN 256 206/050
Loading (lbslacre) = (B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) ; (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
_
Date Start End Total # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied Nitrogen Balance
mmlddlyr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN (lbslacre)
Nitrogen Balance
(lbslacre)
(gal/min) (gallons) (gal/acre) (Ibs11000 gal) (lbs/acre) Before 09/01/2000
{3) (2) (6)x(5)x(4) 7/(A) See (9) Below (8)x(9)11000 "See (11) Below
After 09/01/2000
'See (11) Below
03/01/2000
6665 I 6666
6665 - 6669
8795 �- 8800
60 1-
-" 240 1
225
13,500
2,596
1.40
- -1.40 -
3.6
---
-14.5 -
+ 242
- + 188
+- 170 -mm
+ 50
- + - 50 - -
+ 50
D3/0212000
225
54,400
10,385
-
05/01/2000
300 l 1
225
fi7,500
12,981
1.44
18.2
45/02/2000
I 88DD I 8608
480 1
225
108,040
24,769
1,40
F29.1
18.2
I 16.6
8.3
+ 141
E + 122
+ 122
+ 122
+ 122 --
+ 50
+ 50
- -
+ 33
-+- 25-�—
Ofi/2612000
9D07 9012
300 �- 1 - ^'�
l
225
67,500
12,981
1.4D
1.60
-"1.60
1011012000�
2114 i 2118
2118 - - 2120
--
240 1
225
54,000
10,385
10/11/2000
--- 12D 1
---225
27,D00
5,192
10/12/2000
2126 I 2129
{ 180
1
225
4D,500
7,788
1,60 �1�12.5
- + 13 --
11/30/2000
02/16/2001
--2229W- 2235
6942 1 6947
360
300
1
1
225
225
81,000
67,504
15,577
12,981
1.60
2.20
24.9
28.6
+ 122
+- 122 -
12
-41
HOURS LEFT TOPUMP D6U,�uu Ir4 '(+)rvulrci�rvlrvul:u
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE 1 21 A I Before 49/D1/2D4D I CROP CYCLE TOTALS {-� NUTRIENT FXCTSS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 0,0 ! After D9/D O
'•- HOURS LEFT TO PUMP — - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zero! This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be incorrect! Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications)
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column 10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2
REPORT DATE: 06/05/2001
FARM # 1 Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
CafiollsF�oods
Owner's Address
IF, O Box 1767
Laurinburg
Owner's Phone
(910)-276-0648
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
1-b
4.00
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
NC 28352 Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
COMPLEX: 11 11
BERMUDA/RYE
Recommended PAN
275
225/050 }
Crop Type
Loading (lbslacre) = (B)
l
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) (5)
(6) (7) (8) (9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
Start
End
Total # of Sprinklers
Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
Nitrogen Balance
mmlddlyr
Time
Time
Minutes Operating
per Acre PAN
(lbslacre)
(lbslacre)
(gallmin) (gallons) (gaUacre) (ibs11000 gal)
(lbslacre)
Before 09/01/2001
After 09/01/2001
(3)-(2)
(6)x(5)x(4) 71(A) See (9) Below
(8)x(9)11000
`See (11) Below
'See (11) Below
03/19/2001
1 6978
1 6982
240
1
225 1 54,000 1 13,500
1 2.20
29.7
+ 195
+ 50
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP 3 Before D9101120D1 Ju 11) NU I NItN I Nt tL7
26.
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE CROP CYCLE TOTALS (-) NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 1 6.7 After 09101I2001
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP — - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zero! This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in Lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be incorrect) Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
REPORT DATE: 06/05/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # 1 Field # 7177 12_b COMPLEX: 11 `
Fields Size (acres) = (A) 4.60 1
FARM OWNER: G_alTiallpshoods, Ind.:. aIrrigation Operator NIA
Owner's Address P O Box 1767 Irrigation Operator's
Laurinburg I NC 128352 Address
Owner's Phone [phone] Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
BERMUDA/RYE Recommended PAN 275 225/050
Crop Type Loadina (lbs/acre) = 41131
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) (5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
mm/dd/yr
Start
Time
End
Time
Total # of Sprinklers
Minutes Operating
Flow Rate
Total Volume
Volume
per Acre
Waste Analysis
PAN
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
(lbs/acre)
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
(3)-(2)
(gal/min)
(gallons)
(6)x(5)x(4)
(gal/acre)
71(A)
(Ibs/1000 gal)
See (9) Below
(Ibslacre)
(8)x(9)11000
Before 09/0112001
'See(11)Below
After 09101 /2001
'See (11) Below
03/19/2001
6980
6981 1
60
1
225
13,500
2,935
2.20
6.5
+ 219
+ 50
03/24/2001
6982
6988
360
1
225
81,000
17,609
2.20
38.7
+ 180
+ 50
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP 27.E
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE
Before 091D112401
fA'ODU 4D
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
-(+) NUTRIENT NEED
•{-j NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 7.7
After 09/01/2001
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP — - caution should be taken when using this estimate as d approaches zerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (eapeciMy during winter months)
may cause it to be incorrectf Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applicational
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recleved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
REPORT DATE: 06/05/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # 1 Field # 7177 3-b i COMPLEX: 11 I
Fields Size (acres) _ (A) 5,00
FARM OWNER: Carroll,'s)Fw6 Ina. Irrigation Operator NIA
Owner's Address P O Box 1767 Irrigation Operator's
Laurinburg NC H28352 Address
Owner's Phone [phone] Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type BERMUDA1RYE Recommended PAN 275 225/050
Loadina (Ibslacre) = (Bl
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) (6) (7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
1 (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
mmlddlyr
Start
Time
End
Time
Total
Minutes
# of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume
Operating
Volume
per Acre
Waste Analysis
PAN
PAN Applied
I Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
(3)-(2)
(gallmin) (gallons)
(6)x(5)x(4)
(gallacre)
71(A)
(lbs11000 gal)
See(9)Below
(lbslacre)
(B)x(9)11000
Before 09/01/2001
'See (11) Below
After 09/0112001
'See (11) Below
03/19/2001
1 6978
1 6980
120
1
225 1 27,000
5,400
2.20
11.9
+ 213
+ 50
HOURS LEFTTO PUMP cr,uuu Ic {+1NUIKILN I NcrU
35,9 Before 09/0112001
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE CROP CYCLE TOTALS (-) NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 8.4 After 09/01/2001
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP • caution should be taken when using this esbmale as it approaches zerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in appiicalion rates (gpm) ar4 Ructualions in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be incorrectt Failure la allow for such changes can cause over applicetionsl
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
REPORT DATE: 06/05/2001 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
FARM # ! Field # 7177 4-a
Fields Size (acres) = (A) 5.90
COMPLEX: 11
FARM OWNER: Catiall's FtiodsInc:. Irrigation Operator N!A
Owner's Address P 0 Box 1767 Irrigation Operator's
Laurinburg NC 28352� Address —1
Owner's Phone [phone] Operator's Phone # f 11
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type
BERMUDA/RYE Recommended PAN 181 131/050
! Loadino ilbs/acre) = (B) 1 1
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) (6) (7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
mm/dd/yr
Start
Time
End
Time
Total
Minutes
# of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume
Operating
Volume
per Acre
Waste Analysis
PAN
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
(3)-(2)
(gal/min) (gallons)
(6)x(5)x(4)
(gal/ac(e)
71(A)
(lbs/1000 gal)
See (9) Below
(lbs/acre)
(8)x(9)/1000
Before 09/01/2001
'See (11) Below
After 09/01/2001
'See (11) Below
03/24/2001
1 6982
1 6988
360
1
225 1 81,000 j
13,729
2.20
30.2
+ 101
+ 50
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP tf I,UVU 3U (+)NUIFtItN1 Nt:tU
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE 20.0 Before 09101/2001 CROP CYCLE TOTAL {-) NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 9.9 After 09/01/2001
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP — - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zeral This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause k to be incorrectl Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enterthe value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

1 I
Form IRR-2
REPORT DATE:. 06/05/2001
FARM # / Field # 7177
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
5-b
5.20
COMPLEX: 11
FARM OWNER: 1parrolloods?Inc�Irrigation Operator IN1A
Owner's Address P 0 Box 1767 Irrigation Operators
Laurinburg NC 28352 1 Address
Owners Phone �(910)-276-0648 Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
BERMUDA/RYE Recommended PAN + 215 165/050
Crop Type Loading (lbs/acrel = (Bl I
0)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) (6) (7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
mmlddlyr
Start
Time
End
Time
Total
Minutes
# of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume
Operating
Volume
per Acre
Waste Analysis
PAN
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
(3)-(2)
(gal/min) (gallons)
(6)x(5)x(4)
(gallacre)
71(A)
(ibs11000 gal)
See (9) Below
(lbslacre)
(8)x(9)11000
Before 09/01/2001
"See (11) Below
After 09/01/2001
'See (11) Below
03/19/2001
1 6982
L 6983
60 1
1
225 13,500 1
2,596
2.20
5.7
+ 159
+ 50
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP I J,ouV n t+) NU I HIEN I NELI)
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE 27.9 Before 09/01/2001 CROP CYCLE TOTALS (-) NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 1 8.8 After 09/01/2001
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zeros This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may Cause it to be incorreW Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applicatlonsl
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 oft

MURPHY-BROWN
110 Drawer 856
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398
TEL: [phone]
To: John Hasty, D\X'Q-FRO
CC: RustY Collins, Nfark Pahl, bon 13utler
From: Dawn Williamson
Date: 05/01 /01
Re: Report on Uverapplication
2 a
DWO
This memo is a follow-up to the telephone call made to you on Thursday, April 26, 2001, which
reported overapplication on
fanns in our Laurinburg division.
Specific fans
and field information are as follows:
Lp�,
__....... Farm
Field
Acres
N evecss
u
/Over
2
4-a
1.8
13 lb/A
26%,
`770�
:.. ....
13-a
4.0
9lb/A
18%
5-b
5.2
41 lb/A
82%
:: , /7706.....
9-b
3.3
6 lb/A
12%
8
2.8
6Ib/A
12%,
i
2.4
71NA
14%
20
3.7
11lb/A
220/c.
10-b
4.3
13lb/A
26%
i:3-z.-'/7707
3
3.1
7INA
149%
19
3.4
9lb/A
1811/o
12
3.3
9lb/A
18°/o
f
g 3-17078- I
6-a
3.1
8 lb/A
16%
-a
0.88
7lb/A
- 14%
The crop on all fields was Small Grain Overseed, planned for 50 lb/A application rate.
The over application occurred on these pulls because OIC's were not provided copies of IRR 2
reports for the farnis they were in charge of pumping. Pumping personnel had to rely on mcmon: of
past pumping events to make decisions regarding which hydrants to pump from.
We will immediately revise our PAN balance. on the pulls above, to subtract the overapplied nitrogen
from the amount allowed on this season's Bermuda crop. The operators and pumping personnel have

May 1, 2001
been provided access to the IRR 2s for their fanns. The operators and pumping personnel have
received additional training on proper use of the reports and how to anticipate the amount of nitrogen
__they will be applying in Elie next event. Consistent use of this review_ method prior to pumping
should prevent another occurrence of overapplication on anN. pulls.
Carroll's of Laurinburg has hired a new Fanning Operations Manager. Rush Collins has been in
charge of the land and nutrient management for the division for about a month. He iviil be your
contact in Laurinburg for farm inspections_ etc.
If you have an)' questions, call nae at (lie Warsaw office or you can conlact Rush• in Laurinburg.

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number V - �5
Farm Name: -0 �?
On -Site Representative:
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: -7s:'.
Date of site visit:
Date of most recent WUP: S 3L-:`
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F9 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption Et E2 E3 E4
_v peration pended for wettable acre
determination based on .P1 P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: 301/7 pounds
x
Irrigation Systems) - circle #hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acresjs complete
and signed by an i or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on -spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years -of irrigation- records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations .(nu merous.d itches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage;-or_25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes::.
small,- irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres fortravelers:or less -than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number g,3
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER-
FIELD
-NUMBER'.2-
TYPE OF
`IRRIGATION-
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES-
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
COMMENTS3
0. `l o
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERZ - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS3 - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less -than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous.two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, -cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. _Back-up fields-must:be noted in -the comment section and must be -accessible
by irrigation system. Purl'
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations
P2
Plan lacks_ following information: -
Plan revision -may satisfy75% rule
adjusting all field acreage to.below'75% use -rate -.
P3 Other (iern process of installing new irrigation system):

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Carroll's Foods Inc
7177
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Cairoll's- Foods Inc:
ALT?01,A
— - r4i
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAT-URAL RESOURCES
September I, 2000
S EP 1 12000
fact L. ! I VIL.LE
PEG. OFFICE
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
7177
Facility Number 83-17
Scotland County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Jeffery Brown on 4/27/99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application_ The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing John Hasty the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to John Hasty, at 225 Green Street, Suite
714, Fayetteville, NC 28301, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any
questions please contact John Hasty at [phone]. If within 90 days you are unable
to provide John Hasty with the information you are automatically required to complete
a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within 180 days
of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina•27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledt10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
- - _--Gategory2:- - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - _
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and- the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

I,
c 0 Division of Soil C -and_Water. onservation'-'Olieration
N Division of Soil and Water C '*er*MjoA Compliance Luspertton ; - � '
rvision of Water Quality Cotnpltance )Inspection Y
,Other Agency Opera#on Reviewx r c
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number % Date of InspectionFFN
Time of inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted [3 Certified j] Condrittionally Certified 13 Registered E3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ....C�rrol1.s.............../....j.77.......-.....................-.--.................. County:........co��� c�....................--.....................
Owner Name:... -C .%.rC}.I� ....-.... S f...,�h.o,................... .... Phone No: ......... 2..7212--..Owl.6--....................................
Facility Contact:....e ................................... Title: -. L....L` ��/..C........ ........... Phone No:...............-...................................
Tailing Address: .... ....I(ra%S}.�...... ...............`............................................... .....1N.al ��. '' ..1....A.c................... z r
/ tl�
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Q,j�,i, ,_ Operator Certification Number:_._ .
...... ...L..!7.a. .. .................. ........... .... ,ice.. .. ..........
Location of Farm:
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude ' & Longitude • 6 "
"Design Current >- Desiga , Current;. Design Current .
Swine -= . Poe�lt —. -_. -
_- Capacity Population
: rY r., ,,,,. ,.Ca achy Po `ulation Cattle ,Capacity, Population,--"i-
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy —
❑ Feeder to Finish - ❑ Non -Layer _ ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean - -
❑ Farrow to Feeder 3 Other
_
Farrow to Finish Total Design Ca act z=
❑
Gilts _ -.
❑ soars Totia 1 SSLW
Number of;Lagoons-• ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area;
:.
-Holding'Poids /.Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Y
Dischar & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance lean -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water or the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stnicture 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ................... :............ ................... . ................. .............. ................................. I .................
.....
❑ Yes p"'Z'-'No
❑ Yes A�rNo
❑ Yes NNo
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ANo
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ YesCEf*No
Continued on back

Facility Number: — �' Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes
E�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
1KNo
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancetimprovement?
❑ Yes
�(No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
;'No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
Q(No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Exces ive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
G ra-.
)klNo
12. Crop type errn 4 a-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those desig a in th Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
;,No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
PO No
16, Is there -a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
;qNo
Renuired Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes O No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ANo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes 4No
20- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes P1 No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ,�No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑
Yes 4No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? [I Yes jk] No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 12No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes RQ No

Facility Number: 3 — Date of Inspection -dD
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Arc there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes j] No
29. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes / ` No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes K(Na
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ANO
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 044o---
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Carroll s Foods Inc
7177
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc:
0O.P&A
IT
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT' AND NATURAL- RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 RECEIVED
1 2000
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 83-15
Scotland County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. 1RR1, 1RR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere] ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Oualitv
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
C-1 E �- E June 26, 1998
Carroll's Foods Inc ,`UL 2 3 1598
7177
PO Drawer 856 FAYEi i EVILLE
Warsaw NC 28398 REG. OFF ICE
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N.KI uRAL RESOUrRGEs
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS830015
7177
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Scotland County
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on September 29, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we
are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Carroll's Foods Inc, authorizing the operation of
the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the 7177, located in Scotland County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 1350 Farrow to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS830015 dated September 29, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any
specific conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow
coverage under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition 11.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition III.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition 1II.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS830015
7177
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
_This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a -name -change -or -change in -ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Scotland County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Donald P Butler
Farm 7177
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Dear Donald P Butler:
A
�EHNFi
rrCEiilFD
September 29, 1997
0 1 1991
r oFFlc
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS830015
Farm 7177
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Scotland County
In accordance with your application received on September 16, 1997, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 83-15, authorizing the operation of an animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit
(attached). This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the
management of animal waste from the Farm 7177, located in Scotland County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than 1350 Farrow to Feeder and the application to a minimum of 64.6 acres of land as specified
in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAAW).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals -
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC. -
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A namelownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General-P-erniit,-please_ contact J_R. Joshi -at _(919) 7j5083 ext_ 363T
Sincerely
Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Scotland County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Scotland County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Carroll's Foods Inc
7177
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
Farm Number: 83-15
Dear Carroll's Foods Inc :
IN X.Y,-VA
A&14 00
�r
[DEHNF=1
August 14, 1997 RECEIVIED
AUG 1 4 IVV/
FAYETTEVi LLE
REG. 0E-riG-
You are hereby notified that 7177, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has thirty
clays to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with
Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date.
Your application must be returned within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the
application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for
each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The
signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application
package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any question concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at (91.9) 733-5083 extension
363 or Ed Buchan with the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone].
Sinc ely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Fayetteville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 12, 1996
Carroll's Foods Inc.
7177
PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC 28398
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Carroll's Foods 7177
Facility ID#: 83-15
Scotland County
Dear Farm Owner:
RECEIVED"
NOV 121996,
FAYETTEVILLE
AFR OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
A
AfPreston Howard, Jr., rector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687. ;6 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 C An Equal Opportunity/Affiirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 SO°6 recycled/101% post -consumer paper

02/02/00 WED 16:40 FAX [phone] CARROLL'S FOODS Q 001
RE:
CC:
II I
Fax Cover Sheet
RECEIVED
FEB.,
z 2aW
Red
DATE:- _0:� �;l - dOC)C)
TIME: �' 3 5(Q?�•- __ _., ,,//��
TO:_
FAX:
FROM: /
e�01 /.s
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
4 ,
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Message:`

02/02/00 WED 16:41 FAX [phone] CARROLL'S FOODS
IA 002
February 2, 2000
Mr. Jeffery Brown
Division of Water Qualfty
225 Green Street Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28314
'SO
Subject: 99p^ 11pights/ 83, 8 43-Y
Farms .177, �096, 7570, 7078-1, 7704, 7579 805
7706, 7F85 7171, 7682, 7572, 69 7575, 7576, 7578 4s-- S
'j3- 21
'11-
Dear Mr. Brown,
As weather permits we wi;l pump these lagoons down to at least the 19"
mark. To our knowledge, there is no surface water getting to the lagoons. We
have plans to install pressure reducers on these farms. This should cause a
reduction of water usage. Due to excess rainfall and snow, we are ahead on out
lagoons filling for the spring pumping.
If you have any questions, please call me at 910-276-0648 ext. 432.
Sincerely,
Leslie Stutts
Farming and Waste Manager
Laurinburg Division
L•

02/02/00 WED 16:41 FAX [phone]
FM 02 '00 10:S7AM CARROLL'S FOODS
CARROLL'S FOODS
P.12
9 003
Division of Water Quality
225 Omen Street -Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 29314
Subject: Plan of Action
Name: C AmIZ0//s -:100 d
Farm Name.
Facility No:
Address! ot—
Phone:
Checked below acre the items to be carried out on the above fan n:
f
1. Check inside and outside of buildings for water leakage and
water usage.
2. Repair and must any problems concerning excess water.
3. Inspect berms around the lagoon(s) to snake sure that
water is not entering the system. Repairs will be made
w%e problems are identified.
4. Review flushing and pit recharge schedules. Reduce
flushing and pit recharges where possible.
5. Closely monitor the soaking and clean -out of buildings
between herd placements_ Reduce time and amount of
water usage as much as possible.
6. Check the moisture levels and crop conditions in all
spray fields.'Utilize applications on winter cover crops
according to CWAW (original or amended).
7. Utilize the 30 day prior to planting practice on those fields
to be planted in taw crops.

02/02/00 WED 16:42 FAX [phone] CARROLL'S FOODS
• Fr-B 02 '00 10257AM CARROLL'5 FOODS. P.22
IZ 004
9. Review CWAW and begin spraying on coastal beamuda as
soon as plank allows (follow all regulations re: ranofl).
9_ Obtain required permission from adjacent landowner to
spray on designated fields. Amend the CWAhe before
any fields not cwTently on the CWAW are utilized.
10. - investigate the feasibility of installing pressure reducers
on water lines.
Additional practices to be used:
Date—,? -,V -o'zyoo

EG.
March 23. 2000
Mr. Robert F. Heath
North Carolina Department of
Envirorunent and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
CARROLL'S FOOD S, INC.
Box 1767 • 325 McKay Street
Laurintxug, North Carolina 28353
PH:91(Y276-064B FX:910276-2950
SUBJECT: Response to letter dated March 17, 2000 regarding freeboard levels.
Dear Mr. Heath:
The following facilities were lowered to or below the required freeboard level as
of March 3, 2000. Facilities 78-27, 78-8, 78-9, 78-10, 78-11, 78-12, 83-8, 83-12, 83-15,
and 83-12.
The following facilities were lowered to or below the required freeboard level as
of March 10, 2000. Facilities 78-28, 78-26, 83-10, and 83-19.
If you have any questions. please feel free to call me at 910-276-0648, ext. 432.
Sincerely,
Carroll's Laurinburg Division
Leslie L. Stutts
Environmental Manager
cc: Mark Pahl

We
02/02/00 WED 16:38 FAX [phone]
CARROLL-S FOODS
0001
Farx .Cover Sheet
RE'
DATE:
TIME: 3' 3
FAX:
FROM:
�r.�o IlS r
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
CC:,_
Number of pages including covet sheet: �6�
Message:

02/C2/00 WED 16:38 FAX [phone] CARROLU S FOODS
IR 002
I
February 2, 2000
Mr. Jeffery Brown
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28314
Subject: (Lagoon Heights
Farms 7177, 7096, 7570, 7078-1, 7704, 7579, 7805
7706, 7685, 7171, 7682, 7572, 7681, 7575, 7576, 7578
Dear Mr. Brown,
As weather permits we will pump these lagoons down to at least the 19"
mark. To our knowledge, there is no surface water getting to the lagoons. We
have plans to install pressure reducers on these farms. This should cause a
reduction of water usage. Due to excess rainfall and snow, we are ahead on out
lagoons filling for the spring pumping.
'. I
If you have any questions, please call me at 910-
Sincerely,
Leslie Stutts
Farming and Waste Manager
Laurinburg Division
8 ext. 432.

02/02/00 EYED 16:38 FAX [phone] CARROLU S FOODS
FEB 02 '00 10:57AM CARROLL'S FOODS
P.12
9 003
Date: 0- ;;? •mod
Division of water Quality
225 Green Street -Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28314
Subject: Plan of Action
Name: CAglzolls
Farm Name -
Facility No:
Phone: —os Z4 r- a6 �gg �
Checked below are the items to be carved ant on the above farm
1. Check inside and outside of buildings for waw leakage and
water usage.
2. Repair and adjust any problems concerning excess water.
}� 3. Inspect berms around the lagoon(s) to make sure that
water is not entering the system. Repairs will be made
where problems are identified.
4. Review flushing and pit recharge schedules_ Reduce
flushing and pit recharges where possible.
5. Closely monitor the soaking and clean -out of buildings
between herd placements. Reduce time and amount of
water usage as much as possible.
6. Check the moisture levels and crop conditions in all
spray fields. Utilize applications on welter cover crops
according to CWAW (original or amended).
7. Utilize the 30 day prior to planting practice on those fields
to be planted in row crops.

02/02/00 WED 16:38 FAX [phone] CARROLL'S. FOODS Q 004
FM 02 '00 10:57RM CARROLL•S FOODS P.22
8. Review CW% AW and begin spraying on coastal bermuda as -
soon as plan allows (follow all regulations re: nmo$).
9. Obtain required permission from adjacent landownw to
spray on designated fields. Amend the CWAh& before
any fields not currently on the CWAMP are utilized.
1/ 10. Investigate the feasibility of installing pressure reducers
on water lines.
Additional practices to be used:
Date "c'�' o-2mo
3
X
I

„Rye
RICHMOND CO CO OP EXTENSION FRX NO. Feb. 20 2001 06:46RM P19
1
7177
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Annual acreage
requirements may be more or lees based on the most recent waste
analysis report for your waste management facility.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field soil
Crop
Yield
Lba- N
Acres
PAN
Month
No.
No.
Type
.Code
/Acre:
/Unit
Used.
Apply
3135
lA
NOA
B
6
37.5/T
5.8
1305
Mar -Sep
3135
2A
NOA
B
6
37-5/T
5.8
1305
Mar --Sep
31.35
3A
Mc
B
3 - 5
37. 5/T
5.9
774
Mar -Sep
3135
4A
Mc
B
3.5
37_5/T
5.9
774
Mar -Sep
3135
1B
NaA
B
6
37.5/T
4.0
900
Mar -Sep
3135
2B
NaA
B
6
37.5/T
4.6
1035
Mar -Sep
3135
3B
NoA
B
6
37,5/T
5.o
1125
Mar -Sep
3135
4B
NoA/WaB
B
5.5
37.5/T
6.2
1279
Mar -Sep
3135
5B
NoA/WsB
B
5.5
37.5/T
5.2
1073
Mar -Sep
3135
-
-------------------------------------I'----------------
Total,
---
ig'44
9;51D
,a j
A1,11 /0r`�+al
OVBRSEED
Tract
Field Soil
Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
PAN
Month
No.
No.
Type
Code
Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
3135
1A
NoA
K
NA
50/A
5.8
290
Oct -Feb
3135
2A
NoA
K
NA
50/A
5.8
290
Oct -Feb
3135
3A
Mc
K
NA
50/A
5.9
295
Oct -Feb
3135
4A
Me
x
NA
50/A
5.9
295
Oct -Feb
3135
1B
NoA
K
NA
50/A
4.0
200
Oct -Feb
3135
2B
NoA
K
NA
50/A
4.6
230
Oct -Feb
3135
3B
NaA
K
NA
50/A
5.0
250
Oct -Feb
3135
48
NoA/WaB
K
NA
50/A
6.2.
310
Oct -Feb
3135
5B
NoA/WeB
K
NA
50/A
5.2
260
Oct -Feb
3135
,-.
__ J.
Total
Bermuda
Pasture
Total:
'49.4
9 szo
Available
Overall
Nitrogen (includes
Total:
commercial):
I yq0
8,775
DENV_r_
I
-�� ' ...�
Surplus or
Deficit

Form IRR.2 Laaoon Irriqation Fields Report FINAL REPORT FOR_T_HlS FIELD______ _
REPORT DATE: 4/22/2003
FARM # / Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
Crop Type
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
7177 1-a
5.80
Carrell's Foods, Inc. „
P 0 Box1767
11-aurinburg NC 28352
(910)-276-0648
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
BERMUDAIRYE Recommended PAN
Loading (Ibslacre) = (B)
N1A
COMPLEX: 11
275
225/050
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date Start End Total # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied Nitrogen Balance
mm/dd/yr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN (Ibslac(e)
(gal/min) (gallons) (gal/acre) (lbs/1000 gal) (Ibslacre) Before 10/15/2002
(3j (2) (6)x(5)x(4) 7/(A) See (9) Below (8)x(9u1000 "See (11) Below
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
After 10/15/2002
'See (11) Below
3/612002
5879
5881
120
1
225
27,000
4,655
2.20
10-2
+ 215
+ 50
3/712002
5881
5887
360
1
225
81,000
13,966
2.20
30.7
+ 184
+ 50
6/13/2002
7596
7604
480
1
225
108,000
18,621
3.00
55.9
+ 128
+ 50
12/30/2002
3931
3935
240
1
205
49,200
8,483
2.00
17.0
+ 128
+ 33
12/31/2002
3935
3936
60
1
205
12,300
2,121
2.00
4.2
+ 128
+ 29
2/13/2003
187
191
240
1
225
54,000
9,310
2.00
18.6
+ 128
+ 10
2/14/2003
191
193
120
1
225
27,000
4,655
2.00
9.3
+ 128
+ 1
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE
27 5
Before 10l15l2002
35�'�UU
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
'14b
'(+) NUTRIENT NEED
(-) NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS
0.2
After 1011512002
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP— - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zerot This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
My caused to be incorrect) Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applicationsl
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1of1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report I.FINAL REPORT FOR
THIS FIELD i1
REPORT DATE: 4/22/2003
FARM # / Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
Crop Type
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
7177 1-b
4.00
Carroll's Foods. lnc ,
P O Box 1767
Laurinburg NC 28352
(910}276-0648
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
BERMUDA/RYE Recommended PAN
Londina (Ibslacre) = fal
NIA
COMPLEX: 11
275
225/050
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
mmldd/yr
Start
Time
End
Time
Total
Minutes
(3)-(2)
# of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate Total Volume
(galtmin) (gallons)
(6)x(5)x(4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
71(A)
Waste Analysis
PAN
(Ibs/1000 gal)
See(9)Below
PAN Applied
(Ibslacre)
(8)x(9)11000
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
Before 10/15/2002
'See (11) Below
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
After 10/15/2002
"See (11) Below
6/14/2002
7604
7608
240
1
225
54,000
13,500
3.00
40.5
+ 185
+ 50
12/27/2002
7886
7887
60
1
225
13,500
3,375
2.00
6.8
+ 185
+ 43
12/28/2002
7886
7888
120
1
225
27,000
6,750
2.00
13.5
+ 185
+ 30
2/14/2003
193
196
180
1
225
40,500
10,125
2.00
20.3
+ 185
+ 10
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE i 27.3
Before 10/15/2002
13b,UVU
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
01
-(+j NU t MEN t Nttu
(.� NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS 1.4
After 1 10/15/2002
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP "' - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (espeaally during winter months)
may reuse it to be incorrectl Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6
(11 )Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Laaoon Irrigation Fields Report FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD _ I
REPORT DATE: 4/22/2003
FARM # ! Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
One Form for Each Field per Cron Cycle
7177 1 2-a
5.80 I
Carroll's Foods,.119.'
IP 0 Box1767
Laurinburg NC 28352
(910)-276-0648
Irrigation Operator NIA
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
COMPLEX: 11
Crop Type
BERMUDA/RYE
Recommended PAN
275
2251050
Loading (Ibslacre
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop I
(11) Double Crop
Date
Start
End
Total
# of Sprinklers
Flow Rate Total Volume
Volume
Waste Analysis
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
Nitrogen Balance
mm/dd/yr
Time
Time
Minutes
Operating
per Acre
PAN
(Ibslacre)
(Ibslacre)
(gal/min)
(gallons)
(gallacre)
(Ibs/1000 gal)
(Ibslacre)
Before 10/15/2002
After 10/15/2002
(3}(2)
(6)x(5)x(4)
71(A)
See (9) Below
(8)x(9)11000
'See (11) Below
'See (11) Below
3/8/2002
5887
5890
180
1
225
40,500
6.983
2.20
15.4
+ 210
+ 50
6/10/2002
7574
7579
300
1
225
67,500
11.638
3.00
34.9
+ 175
+ 50
11/15/2002
100
104
240
1 1
205
49,200
8,483
2,10
17.8
+ 175
+ 32
12/30/2002
3928
3931
180
1
205
36,900
6,362
2.00
12.7
+ 175
+ 19
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE
41.2
I Before 115/2002
194,100
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
81
'(+) NUTRIENT NEED
(-) NUTRIENT EXCESS
4.6
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS
After L10/15/2002
'•• HOURS LEFT TO PUMP "- - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zerol This is an esOrnale and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be Acorrectl Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1of1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report FINAL, REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
REPORT DATE: 4/22/2003
FARM # / Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
One Form for Each Field per Croa Cycle
7177 2-b
4.60 E
CarroN's Foods, lnc 7
P O Box 1767
Laurinburg NC 28352
(910)-276.0648
Irrigation Operator N/A
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
COMPLEX: 1
Crop Type
BERMUDA/RYE
Recommended PAN
276
I 225/050 1
Loading (Ibslacre) = (B)
`
I
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
Start
End
Total
# of Sprinklers
Flow Rate Total Volume
Volume
Waste Analysis
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
Nitrogen Balance
mmldd/yr
Time
Time
Minutes
Operating
per Acre
PAN
(Ibslacre)
(Ibslacre)
(gal/min)
(gallons)
(gal/acre)
(lbs/1000 gal)
(Ibslacre)
Before 10/15/2002
After 10/15/2002
(3)-(2)
(6)x(5)x(4)
7/(A)
See (9) Below
(8)x(9)11000
'See 01) Below
'See (11) Below
3/11Y2002
5891
5896
300
1
225
67.500
14,674
2.20
32.3
+ 193
+ 50
11/15/2002
96
100
240
1
205
49,200
10,696
2.10
22.5
+ 193
+ 28
12/29/2002
3925
3926
60
1
225
13,500
2,935
2.00
5.9
+ 193
+ 22
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE
32.8
Before
10115120712
130,201
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
61
•t+i NUTRIENT NEED
t.i NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE
ANALYSIS
3.7
After
10/15'
"" YIUUKS Lkh I I U PUMP "• - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zero! This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be incorrect) Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
me a

Form IRR-2 Laaoon Irriaation Fields Report FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD
REPORT DATE: 4/22/2003
FARM # 1 Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cvcle
7177 3-a
5.90
Carrall'S FOOdS; Inc � i ��pi;ry��'9i' 'mot
P O Box 1767 -
Laurinburg NC 28352
(910)-276-0648
Irrigation Operator NIA
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
COMPLEX: 11
BERMUDA/RYE
Recommended PAN
181
131/050
Crop Type
Loading (Ibslacre) = (B)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
Start
End
Total
# of Sprinklers
Flow Rate Total Volume
Volume
Waste Analysis
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
Nitrogen Balance
mm/ddlyr
Time
Time
Minutes
Operating
per Acre
PAN
(Ibs/acre)
(Ibslacre)
(gal/min)
(gallons)
(gal/acre)
(lbs11000 gal)
(Ibslacre)
Before 1011512002
After 10/15/2002
(3)-(2)
(6)x(5)x(4)
7/(A)
See (9) Below
(8)x(9)11000
'See (11) Below
"See (11) Below
3/8/2002
5886
5891
300
1
225
67,500
11,441
2.20
25.2
106
50
+
+
3/11/2002
5891
5896
300
1
225
67,500
11,441
2.20
25.2
+ 81
+ 50
6/12/2002
7588
7596
480
1
225
108,000
18,305
3.00
54.9
+ 26
+ 50
HOURS LEFT To PUMP
ON ENTIRE W
FIELD USING THE
3. B
Before
10/15/2002
243,040
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
105
(+I NUTRIENT NEED
(-I NUTRIENT EXCESS
7.3
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS
After 1
1011512002
— HOURS LEFT TO PUMP — - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter nnnths)
may cause it to be incorrectl Failure to allow for such Changes can cause over applicationsl
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lactoon Irriaation Fields Report FINAL REPORT FOR.THIS FIELD ___
REPORT DATE: 4/22/2003
FARM # 1 Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
One Form for Each Field Der Crop Cycle
7177 3-b
5.00
Carroll's Foods', Inc _ f
P O Box 1767
Laurinburg NC 128352
I(910)-276-0648
Irrigation Operator NIA
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
COMPLEX: 1
Crop Type
BERMUDA/RYE
Recommended PAN
275
225/050
Loading (lbs/acre) = (B)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
Start
End
Total
# of Sprinklers
Flow Rate
Total Volume
Volume
Waste Analysis
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
Nitrogen Balance
mmldd/yr
Time
Time
Minutes
Operating
per Acre
PAN
(lbslacre)
(lbslacre)
(gal/min)
(gallons)
(gal/acre)
(Ibs/1000 gal)
(lbs/acre)
Before 10/15/2002
After 10/15/2002
(3)-(2)
(6)x(5)x(4)
71(A)
See (9) Below
(8)x(9)11000
`See (11) Below
'See (11) Below
3/7/2002
5881
5886
300
1
225
67,500
13,500
2.20
29.7
+ 195
+ 50
6/11/2002
7579
7588
540
1
225
121,500
24,300
3.00
72.9
+ 122
+ 50
11/15/2002
100
103
180
1
205
36,900
7,380
2.10
15.5
+ 122
+ 35
12/30/2002
3927
3932
300
1
225
67,500
13,500
2.00
27.0
+ 122
+ 8
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE
22.7
Before 10/15/2002
293,400
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
145
(+} NUTRIENT NEED
•(-) NUTRIENT Excess
1.4
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS
After
10/15/2002
.-- nIJuHs i 1 10 PUMP ^• - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zero) This Is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it lobe incorrect! Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applicalionsi
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6
01)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2
REPORT DATE:
FARM # ! Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
Crop Type
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report 1, #Error
4/22/2003 One Form for Each Field per Crop Cvcle
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Recommended PAN
Loading (Ibslacre) = (B)
COOMPLEX:
(1) (2) (3) (4)
(5) (6) (7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date Start End Total
# of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume
Volume
Waste Analysis
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
Nitrogen Balance
mmlddlyr Time Time Minutes
Operating
per Acre
PAN
(Ibslacre)
(Ibslacre)
(gal/min) (gallons)
(gallacre)
(lbsl1000 gal)
(lbs/acre)
Before
After
(3)-(2)
(6)x(5)x(4)
71(A)
See(9)Below
(8)x(9y1000
'See (11) Below
'See (11) Below
or #Error
or #Error
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP Error Effor '(�) NUTRIENT NEED
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE *Error Before �...._._.. _1 CROP CYCLE TOTALS
NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS I #Error After
" HOURS LEFT TO PUMP "• - caution should be taken when using this estimate as it approaches zerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be incorrectl Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applications!
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6 Owner's Signature
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue Certified Operator (Print)
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve Operator's Signature

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report FFIIN�L REP6kf FOR THIS FIELD
REPORT DATE: 4/22/2003
FARM # / Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cvcle
7177 1 4-a
5.90
Carrail'sFoods, lnc. ,;,i;:pi„I Irrigation Operator
P 0 Box 1767 Irrigation Operators
Laurinburg NC 28352 Address
(910)-276-0648 Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
COMPLEX: 11
NIA
I
Crop Type
BERMUDA/RYE
Recommended PAN
Loading (lbs/acre) = (B)
181
131/050
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
mm/dd/yr
Start
Time
End
Time
Total
Minutes
(3)-(2)
# Of Sprinklers
Operating
Flaw Rate Total Volume
(gal/min) (gallons)
(6)x(5)x(4)
Volume
per Acre
(gal/acre)
71(A)
Waste Analysis
PAN
(lbs/1000 gal)
See (9) Below
PAN Applied
(Ibslacre)
(8)x(9u1000
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibs/acre)
Before 10/15/2002
'See (11) Below
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
After 10/1512002
'See (11) Below
3/12/2002
5896
5900
240
1
225
54,000
9,153
2.20
20.1
+ 111
+ 50
6/11/2002
7579
7588
540
1
225
121,500
20,593
3,00
61.8
+ 49
+ 50
11/15/2002
96
100
240
1
205
49,200
8,339
2.10
17.5
+ 49
+ 32
12/29/2002
3925
3926
60
1
205
12,300
2,085
2.00
4.2
+ 49
+ 28
2I1312003
186
191
300
1
205
61,500
10,424
2.00
20.8
+ 49
+ 7
2/14/2003
191
192
60
1
205
12,300
2,085
2.00
4.2
+ 49
+ 3
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS
11.8
Before 1 Q115/2QQ2
After 10/15/2002
311,111
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
129
'Itj NUTRIENT NEED
•(-1 NUTRIENT EXCESS
1 0.8
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP— - caution should betaken when using this estimale as it approaches zerol This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and flu6luations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter manlhs)
may cause it to be incorrect! Failure to allow for such changes can muse over applicationsl
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B), Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1 of 1

Form IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Report r FINAL REPORT FOR THIS FIELD I
REPORT DATE: 4/22/2003
FARM # 1 Field #
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
FARM OWNER:
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cvcle
7177 1 4-b
6.20
Carroll's Foods, Inc.'-
P O Box 1767
Laurinburg NC 28352
(910)-276-0648
Irrigation Operator NIA
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
COMPLEX: 11
Crop Type
BERMUDA/RYE
Recommended PAN
256
206/050
Loading (Ibslacre) = (B)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date
Start
End
Total
# of Sprinklers
Flow Rate Total Volume
Volume
Waste Analysis
PAN Applied
Nitrogen Balance
Nitrogen Balance
mmldd/yr
Time
Time
Minutes
Operating
per Acre
PAN
(lbs/acre)
(Ibslacre)
(gallmin)
(gallons)
(gallacre)
(Ibs11000 gal)
(Ibslacre)
Before 10/15/2002
After 10/15/2002
(3)-(2)
(6)x(5)x(4)
7/(A)
See (9) Below
(8)x(9)11000
'See (11) Below
"See (11) Below
3/6/2002
5877
5881
240
1
225
54,000
8,710
2,20
19.2
+ 187
+ 50
6/13/2002
7596
7604
480
1
225
108,000
17,419
3,00
52.3
+ 135
+ 50
12/30/2002
3932
3935
180
1
225
40,500
6,532
2.00
13.1
+ 135
+ 37
12/31/2002
3935
3937
120
1
225
27,000
4,355
2.00
8.7
+ 135
+ 28
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE
30.9
Before
10/15/2002
229J,500
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
93
'{+) NUTRIENT NEED
i) NUTRIENT sxcsss
B.5
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS
After
10/15/2002
--- NUUnZJLtr i IV PUMP- • Caution should betaken wizen using this estimate as it approaches zero! This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gprn► and Fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may muse it to be incorrectl Failure to allow for such changes can muse over applicationsl
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
1of1

Form IRR.2 Lagoon Irrivation Fields Report [FINAL REPORT FOR THIS_FIELD f
REPORT DATE: 4/22/2003
FARM # l Fleld #
717
Fields Size (acres) = (A)
lCarroll's
FARM OWNER:
Food
Owner's Address
IP O Box 1767
urinburg
N101-276-064
Owners Phone
Crop Type
One Form for Each Field per Cron Cycle
COMPLEX: 1
5.20
3, Inc. tt;°• 0 Irrigation Operator NIA
Irrigation Operator's
NC 128352 1 Address
3 Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
BERMUDA/RYE Recommended PAN 256 206/050
7 Ladino flhslacrel = f131
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) First Crop
(11) Double Crop
Date Start End Total # of Sprinklers Flow Rate Total Volume Volume Waste Analysis PAN Applied Nitrogen Balance
mmlddlyr Time Time Minutes Operating per Acre PAN (Ibslacre)
(gal/min) (gallons) (gailacre) (Ibs/1000 gal) (lbs/acre) Before 10115/2002
(3)-(2) (6)x(5)x(4) 71(A) See (9) Below (8)x(9j11000 'See (11) Below
Nitrogen Balance
(Ibslacre)
After 10/15/2002
'See (11) Below
3/12/2002
5896
5902
360
1
225
81,000
15,577
2.20
34.3
+ 172
+ 50
6/12/2002
7588
7596
480
1
225
108,000
20,769
3.00
62.3
+ 109
+ 50
12/27/2002
7886
7887
60
1
205
12,300
2,365
2.00
4.7
+ 109
+ 45
12/28/2002
7886
7889
180
1
205
36,900
7,096
2.00
14.2
+ 109
+ 31
2114l2003
192
196
240
1
205
1 49,200
9,462
2.00
18.9
+ 109
+ 12
HOURS LEFT TO PUMP
ON ENTIRE FIELD USING THE
23.1
Before 10/15/2002 I
Lt1! ,4UU
CROP CYCLE TOTALS
134
'N NU I HILN 1 NI-LL)
(-] NUTRIENT EXCESS
CURRENT SAMPLE ANALYSIS
2.6
After 10/1512002
'-- HOURS LEFT TO PUMP "' - caution should be taken when using this estimate as It approaches zero? This is an estimate and factors such as changes in application rates (gpm) and fluctuations in lagoon analysis (especially during winter months)
may cause it to be incorrect! Failure to allow for such changes can cause over applicationst
(9) NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 6
(11)Enter the value recieved by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue
subtracting column (10) form column (11) following each irrigation eve
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
WON

Lagoon Fraaboa, As Laurin" Dlvplon
GG}MPIi674!1. 4rAfjNsM
5R81200.
Bli1100
8l9120Q
61,t.8f200z
6123fZOQ
8I30120027
00.2,@7�:1t412002i+7�1
042
7I2@12Q02AI
OU2
8;1.1f2Q02tiB1,1
�01
7189
7570
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
7574
35
43
45
40
42
42
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
7098(CLF)
50
50
48
50
50
50
50
48
48
50
50
50
50
t7.17.7Z
30
33
31
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
9258(Sntn)
33
33
30
33
42
42
42
42
42
38
38
44
38
7078.1
30
32
28
28
36
36
38
38
36
35
35
38
37
7078.2
35
35
33
33
36
38
38
38
40
38
38
38
38
7171
43
43
42
42
52
51
67
57
57
56
S8
55 55
7682
43
44
44
44
45
43
45
45
44
44
44
44 43
7572
34
35
38
40
41
39
38
37
37
38
38
32 33
7578
34
34
33
34
37
38
40
40
40
40
40
39 36
7701
40
39
40
41
40
40
41
41
40
41
41
37 38
7702
33
35
41
49
46
45
44
43
42
41
41
42 42
7710
38
42
43
44
44
44
44
44
44
M
44
45 51
7706
37
37
36
37
38
37
37
37
36
35
35
35
35
7707
34
38
36
39
38
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
770&7686
34
33
33
35
35
34
34
35
35
35
35
35
35
7708
41
40
40
40
42
42
42
43
43
40
40
40
40
V WOo
7097(Glbson)
42
42
42
44
46
46
47
47
47
43
43
43
43
7885
37
35
33
35
36
36
38
42
42
40
40
40
40
7053
43
43
43
44
44
44
44
44
44
42
42
42
42
AVERAGE
39.36
39.27
38.55
40.27-
41.55
41.09
41.35
43327
43.18
41.55
41;55
41.55
41.55
_
COMPLEX 1V 7578
42
42
40
40
41
38
37
36
35
34
34
35
38
7576
35
35
37
38
38
38
38
36
35
38
36
36
36
7575
38
39
39
42
45
45
45
43
43
43
43
43
44
7681
40
42
42
43
45
46
45
44
45
45
45
47
47
7694
37
37
37
37
39
39
40
41
37
41
41
42
43
7704
38
38
37
38
39
39
39
39
41
39
39
40 41
7711
80
84
70
70
74
78
72
72
74
72
72
76 78
7071
37
37
36
37
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
39 39
7072
44
43
43
43
44
44
44
44
48
44
44
49 48
7073
43
43
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
44
44
49 49
7074
44
44
44
44
44
44
44
45
45
44
44
46 46
7075
45
45
45
45
54
54
53
64
54
53
53
53 55
Division Avsrsgs 3917 39.87 39.04 41.16 43.04 42.76 42.04 43.24 43.27 42.42 42.42 42.96 42.87
I

ILW
Lapoon Freeboa
It Laurinburg DfvWon
COMP_i:E rf rnK'Ne�it ",
` Yf3141200215
t1@002'SJ113/2401-Bf2fiJ200
f491:1120�.
.d18l2042dd9115l2QD2�9 2J20Q2$
!....Q i
'14f40
i0 1 Q
1Q 8i
7169
7570
38
38
38
37 36
36 38
34
33
33
36
33
30
7674
38
38
38
41 41
38 40
38
38
36
38
33
33
7096(CLF)
50
50
50
50 50
50 50
50
50
50
44
30
30
7177
38
38
38
36 33
36 38
31
31
33
30
30
30
9256(Sntn►
38
44
38
38 38
38 40
38
38
38
36
38
36
7078.1
35
38
37
36 33
33 33
33
33
36
42
33
30
7078.2
38
38
38
37 33
33 33
30
33
33
33
36
29
7681.3
36
36
37
37 31
36 44
38
38
38
38
36
33
TOTALS
311
318
312
312 295
300 314
292
294
297
295
269
251
AVERAGE
38.88
39.75
39.00
39.00 36,88
37.50 39.25
36.50
36.75
37.13
30.88
33.63
31.38
COMPLEX II 7573
41
42
41
41 38
37 38
36
37
36
34
31
31
7171
56
55
55
52 49
49 49
45
45
43
42
37
36
7682
44
44
43
44 40
40 41
39
40
39
39
36
36
7572
36
32
33
32 28
28 31
31
34
37
37
31
30
7579
40
39
36
37 32
33 36
32
33
36
37
33
32
7701
41
37
36
37 34
34 34
33
33
33
32
28
28
7702
41
42
42
41 38
38 38
37
37
37
37
34
34
7710
44
45
51
48 42
42 39
40
40
42
37
37
37
7706
35 35
35
35
33
31
31
31
32
33
34
25
25
7707
37 37
37
36
34
33
34
35
36
37
37
31
31
7708(7686
35 35
35
38
37
41
45
44
44
44
44
39
39
7768
40 40
40
40
40
40
40
39
39
38
40
36
36
n
;49O�1'.a
7097(Gibson)
43 43
43
43
42
44
42
45
43
45
43
42
42
7685
40 40
40
40
38
37
37
36
34
34
35
30
29
7053
42 42
42
42
42
42
36
36
36
34
31
30
30
70530so)..rx r.?.41�ti+ZL4i1'rtw:'41P: ..
M 43 pA33tasf3�;u`.1,!if3
A
rFi7
7052
52 52
52
52
50
50
50
46
46
46
46
48
48
TOTALS
457 457
457
46D
442
444
440 441
439
436
433
394
392
I AVERAGE
41.65
41.55
41.55
41.82
40.18
40,36
40.00
40.09
39.91
39.54
39.36
35.82
35.64
COMPLEX IV 7576
34
35
36
37
35
34
36
34
36
37
38
35
35
7576
36
36
36
37
35
30
39
36
31
35
35
31
31
7576
43
43
44
44
41
41
43
40
41
39
41
37
37
7681
45
47
47
47
46
45
46
45
45
45
46
42
42
7684
41
42
43
43
41
42
42
42
43
42
42
40
40
7070
44
42
41
40
38
37
36
36
40
39
40
37
38
TOTALS
243
245
247
249
236
235
242
233
235
237
242
222
223
AVERAGE
40.50
40.93
41.17
41.33
39.33
30.17
40.33
38.63
32.17
39.50
40.33
37.00
37.17
COMPLEX V 7703
37
36
36
36
33
33
36
35
36
35
35
32
31
7704
39
40
41
40
36
36
37
36
37
36
35
33
35
7711
72
7B
76
77
74
74
76
74
74
76
76
76
74
7071
38
39
39
39
36
36
36
35
41
43
42
41
36
7072
44
49
46
49
45
43
44
43
43
43
43
41
41
7073
44
49
49
50
46
45
48
46
46
46
46
44
43
7074
44
46
46
45
43
43
44
43
43
43
43
41
40
7075
53
53
55
56
51
51
49
49
49
49
48
47
46
7076
51
56
55
54
50
50
52
52
51
51
52
49
51
TOTALS
422
4"
443
446
414
411
422
413
419
422
421
404
399
AVERAGE
46.89
49.33
49.22
49.56
46.00
45.67
46.89
45.59
46.56
45.59
45.76
44.69
44.33
DYvislon Average 42.42 42.90 42.87 42.84 38.60 38.64 39.40 38.20 38,53 38.71 39.49 35,51 34.91

Lagoon Freal noels Laurinburg Divlsion
GOMPLEMUNWWWAWWW40012112002
W400201
211 �19;1212x1
. 02#�t2r80"
IfBf
li 72 jL
7169
7570
30
32
32
30
33
33
33
33
24
22
21
27
28
7574
33
34
34
30
33
33
33
33
19
22
20
21
24
7D96(CLF)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
24
27
24
23
27
26
7177
30
30
30
33
30
30
30
28
26
22
27
28
27
9256(Sntn)
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
32
32
31
31
31
7078.1
30
28
28
27
26
26
28
28
22
24
24
24
24
7078-2
29
30
30
29
28
28
28
28
26
24
28
27
28
7681-3
33
36
38
34
33
33
33
30
29
30
27
27
30
TOTALS
251
258
256
249
249
249
251
240
205
200
201
212
218
AVERAGE
31.38
32.00
32.00
31.13
31.13
31.13
31.38
30.00
25,63
25,00
26.13
26,50
27.23
COMPLEX II 7673
31
30
29
26
25
25
25
22
24
21
20
20
24
7171
36
34
33
31
30
30
29
27
26
25
29
28
27
7692
36
36
35
32
31
31
31
29
28
27
27
27
25
7672
30
30
28
25
27
27
27
26
25
24
25
28
27
7579
32
31
31
26
25
25
24
22
20
25
24
24
24
7701
2B
27
27
25
25
25
27
26
25
24
29
31
31
7702
34
33
32
3D
29
29
29
27
27
26
26
27
26
7710
37
35
35
29
29
30
30
28
27
27
26
26
26
703
42
40.
40
38
37:.
.,37, .
37.:
36t':'.k
^'?•88'.. ;_.
:35
ti y?`: 34
.44?:"';+i: ar'5.4+
TOTALS
306
290
290
262
258
259
259
243
238
234
240
245
244
AVERAGE
34.00
32.80
32.22
22.11
28.67
29.79
29.79
27.00
26.44
26,00
29.67
27.22
27.11
111 7705
28
26
26
22
22
24
23
24
21
24
25
25
25
770e
25
24
24
22
24
25
24
24
21
25
26
26
26
7707
31
30
30
27
27
27
24
24
20
25
25
25
25
77080686
39
37
37
34
34
34
3D
3D
29
26
24
26
29
7788
38
36
38
34
34
34
32
32
32
30
30
33
36
204m4
4
MMIMSMOMMMM
7097(Glbsan►
42
42
42
41
40
40
40
40
40
39
39
39
30
7685
29
29
29
25
26
26
23
21
24
25
24
24
24
30
30
30
28
29
29
42
41
38
38
37
42
40
y7053
L• T`7 -dj;
ww
7052
46
48
_,..,1 .r
46
44
39
39
39
38
40
40
39
40
40
TOTALS
392
386
386
357
353
356
356
353
346
353
us
359
364
AVERAGE
35.64
35.09
36.09
32.45
32.02
32,38
32.36
32.00
31.45
32.09
111."
32.64
33.09
COMPLEX IV 757B
35
34
32
29
29
28.
27
26
26
24
24
26
29
7576
31
30
29
27
25
25
24
23
23
23
26
26
25
7575
37
37
36
33
33
33
31
3D
29
2B
28
2B
27
7681
42
42
41
39
37
38
38
36
35
35
34
35
35
7684
40
40
39
37
36
36
36
35
35
34
33
33
33
7070
38
37
36
34
35
35
35
34
33
32
31
31
31
TOTALS
223
220
213
199
195
195
191
184
181
176
176
179
180
AVERAGE
37.17
36.67
35.50
33.17
32.50
32.50
31.93
30.67
30.17
29.33
29.33
22.83
30.00
77D4
35
30
30
27
27
27
24
23
23
22
23
25
25
7711
74
74
74
78
78
78
78
76
76
78
7B
78
78
7071
36
36
36
35
35
35
35
34
30
30
26
29
29
7072
41
41
41
38
38
38
41
40
36
34
33
35
33
7073
43
43
43
41
41
41
42
41
41
40
39
41
41
7074
40
40
40
41
41
41
42
41
40
38
35
36
38
7076
48
48
48
46
46
46
44
43
40
37
35
35
35
7076
51
51
61
49
48
48
47
4fi
44
43
43
43
43
TOTALS
399
393
303
381
380
380
376
366
355
3"
338
348
344
DlvislonAverage 34.91 34.47 34,18 32.18 $1,89 31.98 31.84 30.60 20,44 29.04 28.00 29.80 30.00

Lagoon Freeboard 1 Laudnburg Division
�
1D
0
. 9�tl9
03'�Ali7d�1)0�
�
" 2Tr33!9!!AF[fi
,72
7169
7570
27
28
28
28
27
27
25
23
21
22
18
18
26
7574
21
24
25
24
24
24
23
19
18
21
18
18
22
7098(CLF)
27
26
27
27
30
27
22
21
19
18
17
17
26
7177
28
27
26
24
22
23
22
20
18
33
29
29
27
9256(Sntn)
31
31
30
27
27
26
25
27
32
29
25
25
24
7078.1
24
24
24
23
22
21
22
19
18
17
14
14
19 -
7078-2
27
28
28
27
26
25
24
23
20
20
18
18
18 -
7681.3
27
30
30
27
27
26
24
25
24
24
23
23
20
TOTALS
212
218
218
207
205
199
187
177
170
184
182
182
102
AVERAGE
26.50
27.25
27.25
25.88
25.63
24.88
23.38
22.13
21.25
23.00
20.25
20,25
22.75
COMPLEX H 7573
20
24
24
25
24
22
20
19
15
15
12
13
15 -
7171
28
27
27
27
25
23
21
20
19
18
14
18
25
7682
27
25
26
25
24
21
24
24
21
25
22
20
20
7572
28
27
26
25
22
23
24
23
18
17
13
18
22
7579
24
24
24
24
24
21
20
19
16
17
13
16
16 --
7701
31
31
31
31
24
24
21
20
17
17
14
14
16 -
7702
27
26
26
26
25
25
24
22
20
19
18
17
16
7710
26
26
26
26
25
24
21
25
18
i8
18
16
17
7663 .,' :
34
;.,.34L
34., ...
,- 34,
32+ ,.,,:::
31
', 31 r-,,..
30
;�23t;�•,-
TOTAL5
245
2"
2"
243
225
214
206
202
171
172
147
154
170
AVERAGE
27.22
27.11
27.11
27.00
25.00
23.78
22.89
22.44
19.00
19.11
18.33
17.11
18.89
7705
25
25
25
23
23
19
18.5
18
16
14
13
15
16.5
7706
26
26
26
24
24
19
16.5
18
17
17
15
19
24
7707
25
25
25
24
23
20
19
19.5
18.5
24
20
29
28
7708/7688
26
29
31
32
32
28
26
25
22
25
19
20
18
7768
33
36
39
43
43
40
40
38
36
36
31
31
31
a
7097(Gibson)
39
39
40
39
40
39
36
35
33
35
33
33
39
7685
24
24
24
22
24
20
19
18.5
18
18
16
18
20
7081
42
40
40
40
40
39
36
36
34
32
29
28
32
Y
7082
40
40
39
40
38
36
36
30
29
28
27
27
33
TOTALS
359
364
368
396
396
369
356
345
315.5
318
290
300
348.5
AVERAGE
32.64
33.09
33.45
33.00
33.00
30.75
29.67
28.75
28.29
26.50
24.17
25.50
29.04
COMPLEX IV 7578
26
29
28
27
25
23
22
20
18
18
16
16
22
7576
26
25
25
23
19
19
17
17
18
18
17
16
17 -
7575
28
27
27
26
26
26
24
22
26
20
19
18
17 -
7681
35
35
34 '
34
32
32
30
29
29
26
25
24
23
7684
33
33
33
32
31
31
29
29
26
25
24
24
23
7070
31
31
30
29
29
29
28
25
23
22
21
20
20
TOTALS
170
180
177
171
162
160
150
142
132
129
122
118
122
AVERAGE
29.53
30.00
29.50
28,50
27.00
28.67
25.00
23.67
22.00
21.50
20.33
19.67
20.33
COMPLEX V 7703
24
24
23
23
19
18
18
17
14
16
12
13
15 -
7704
25
25
25
25
24
24
24
20
18
18
14
15
15
7711
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
7071
29
29
28
29
25
24
24
23
21
21
19
25
26
7072
35
33
33
33
32
29
29
29
25
24
23
24
23
7073
41
41
40
41
39
35
35
33
33
31
30
30
28
7074
36
36
36
36
35
33
33
32
30
31
28
26
20
7075
35
35
35
35
34
33
33
30
29
28
26
27
26
7076
43
43
43
43
43
41
41
40
37
41
36
36
35
TOTALS
346
344
341
343
329
315
315
302
295
288
266
274
269
AVERAGE
38,44
38.22
37.09
30.11
36.56
3$.00
35.00
3156
31.67
32.00
20.56
30.44
29.56

Lagoon Freeboard ; Laurinburg Division
�
• . U
DD
20U ,
, bX�...
1 ,
COMPLEX VI Foxridge
Sow FamV 2184
30
28
23
23
19
21
20
NurlFin1218512186
31
29
24
24
19
21
24
Boar Stud/2005
39
38
33
33
28
30
30
Isolation/2187
46
47
41
42
38
40
41
Depot
30
29
29
19
17
18
18
Ext. Truck Wash
38
35
26.
19
14
15
30
Double L
39
36
30
32
26
28
29
Int. Truck Wash
38
37
30
30
24
25
24
Dogwood
Sow FaMV2135
20
19
19
20
18
22
20
NursM12138
24
20
20
25
24
24
25
Flnished2137
19
19
19
18
16
19
19
Ext, Truck Wash
37
37
29
26
23
26
35
Int. Truck Wash
48
48
41
42
39
42
42
TOTALS
439
424
364
353
305
331
357
AVERAGE
33.77
32.62
28.00
27.15
23.46
25.46
27.48
130C FARMS 7729
33
32
32
32
30
28
30
28
27
23
21
21
20
7734
17
17
16
16
15
13
12
11
10
13
13
13
13.5
TOTALS
50
49
48
48
45
41
42
39
37
38
34
34
33.5
AVERAGE
25.00
24.50
24.00
24.00
22.50
20.50
21.00
19.50
10.50
18.00
17.00
17.00
18.75
Division Average
30.24
30.41
30.35
30.61
29.61
28.22
28.73
27.64
24.99
25.08
22.47
23.37
25.07

7062
7053
7070
7071
7072
7073
7074
7075
7076
7078-1
7078-2
7096 (CLF)
7681-3
7171
7177
7570
7572
7573
7574
7575
7576
7576
7679
7681
7682
7683
7684
7685
7686
7701
7702
7703
7704
7705
7706
7707
7710
7711
7768
7729
7734
3424
MONTHLY RAINFALL
Jan Feb Mar Anr Mav June July Aun Sent C)ct Nov Dec
4
1.7
5.15
0.2
3.0
2.7
4.6
7.65
4.2
8.9
4.7
3'.1
3.3
1.4
4.8
0.4
2.2
1.1
3.2
4.6
3.7
5.8
4.1
6.6
6.7
0.8
2.4
2.2
1.8
2.1
2
5
2.7
5.1
4
2
3
5
2.25
5.5
1.2
1.9
4
1.3
4.1
1.9
2
2.8
1.6
3.5
1.7
2.8
1.9
3.5
6.5
2
4.3
3.6
2.7
4.5
0.35
4.3
0.5
3
4
3.5
8.25
4
2.25
1.75
2.25
4
1.1
2.9
2.3
1.9
1.2
1.4
9.8
2.9
5.8
3.3
4.8
3.25
1.55
2
1.3
2.3
3.4
4.1
7.7
2.8
5.9
4.4
4.15
3.2
1.2
4.3
0.6
2.4
1.2
5.5
6.9
1.5
6.2
3.9
4.3
6.5
1.5
1.7
0.8
3.1
0.6
2.1
5.5
2.6
4.5
4.5
5.8
6.5
1.5
1.9
0.8
2.1
0.6
2.1
5
2.8
4.6
4.4
6
3.3
1.7
4.5
5.95
4.6
3.9
2
8.7
1.9
4.9
4.6
4.6
1.4
6.2
5.8
2.7
1.6
2.9
8.1
5.6
5
3.8
3.6
2.02
1.7
1.8
0.55
1.1
0.25
1.5
5.25
1.15
7.2
2.7
6
5
2.5
4.75
3.25
4.5
1 3.25
4.75
6.5
6.25
7.5
7.5
6
1.25
1.5
0.5
1.5
0.75
0.1
1.85
3.5
0.5
1.1
0
2.8
1.9
0
1
0
2.1
2.5
3
7.25
1.6
5.8
2.1
2.6
3.5
1.9
2.1
5.2
1.1
1.4
5.6
5.25
2.7
9.5
9
10.5
3.5
0.1
4.8
1.1
0.3
0.1
12.4
12.2
7.5'
11.5
10
8
2.8
1
2.5
3.7
1.9
3.2
2.2
4
4.4
1.5
4
1.3
5
2.9
2.5
0.8
2.8
1.6
4
1.8
5.5
5.2
4
2.75
4
1.5
7.6
0.7
4.0
4.7
2.85
9.8
2.1
4.7
3.7
3.25
3.2
1
3.9
1.5
1.8
0.4
2.3
8.8
0
2
0.2
no record
2.3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.4
5.8
9A
3.20
1.6
3 1
2
0.6
2.3
2.9
9.9
3.3
9.2.
4.5
4.9
3.1
1.7
3.8
3.5
3.5
6
2.6
9.5
3.1
5.2
6.4
3
2.75
1.4
2.1
2.7
2.8
1.6
2.7
4
1.6
2
3.4
3
4.5
3.5
2.8
0.4
1
1.9
2.1
5.3
2.1
5.1
3.4
3
3.5
1.3
2.4
2.1
1.3
0.9
3.3
4
6.5
5.1
8
4.2
2.5
2.2
4
0.8
4.8
1.4
5.9
5.2
1.8
6.5
2.6
4
3.75
2.5
3.1
2.7
1.7
4.5
4.8
6
3.8
7
5.8
1.4
6.1
2.6
4.3
1.4
2.2
1
5.1
6.6
1.4
4.4
2.8
1.7
4.5
1.5
3.7
1.3
2.4
1.1
4.9
6.6
5.2
4.7
2.7
2.9
3
1.5
3.6
0.4
1.5
2.4
3.8
6.5
3 A
7
5.7
8.5
2.4
2
4
1.9
2.4
1.5
3.7
4.4
3.5
8.7
4.8
3.9
1.6
2.8
0.7
2.9
3.1
3.1
4.7
5.4
7.3
5.2
4.4
3.25
2.5
6.85
0.6
2
6.8
2.3
8.5
3.4
5.6
5.7
3.7
0.6
1.2
4.3
1.9
2.2
1
4.5
3.6
0.9
3.9
1.2
2.3
3.6
1.2
3.4
2.2
2.7
1.2
5.6
4.5
3.2
4.6
3.8
3.3 .
1.8
1.5
4.9
0.1
1.8
4
4.9
4.7
1.8
3.5
4.5
2.6
3.1
1.6
3.9
0.75
2.85
3.6
3.5
7.5
9
4
5.25
3.25
no record

7081
7082
7070
7071
7072
7073
7074
7075
7076
7078-1
7078-2
7096 (CLF)
7681-3
7171
7177
7570
7572
7573
7574
7575
7576
7578
7579
7681
7682
7683
76M
7685
7686
7701
7702
7703
7704
7705
7706
7707
7710
7711
7768
7729
1734
3424
MONTHLY RAINFALL
2003
Jan Fab Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

Rainfall
Complex 1
##WA*#
########
########
######## TOTAL
7570
0.2
2.6
0.1
2.9
7574
0.3
2.9
0.1
3.3
7096
0.6
2.6
0.1
3.3
7177
0.3
1.6
0.2
2.1
9256
0.9
2.6
0.1
3.6
7078-1
0.4
2.7
0.4
3.5
7078-2
0.4
2.7
0.4
3.5
7681-3
1.3
2.2
0
3.5
TOTAL
4.4
19.9
1.4
0 25.7
Complex 2 _########
########
########
######## TOTAL
7573
1
2.8
0
3.8
7171
1.4
3.1
0
4.5
7682
1.2
2.7
0
3.9
7572
1
3.5
0
4.5
7579
1.2
2.9
0
4.1
7701
0.6
2.3
0
2.9
7702
1.8
2.1
0
3.9
7710
0
0
7683
1.4
1.8
0
3.2
TOTAL
9.6
18A
0
0 30.8
Complex 3
####*U
#WM####
###ffiWt##
#MWHfW TOTAL
7705
0.5
3.2
0
3.7
7706
0.7
3.3
0
4
7707
0.7
3.5
0
4.2
7768
0.9
3
0
3.9
7685
0.2
2.7
0
2.9
7686
1.1
3
0
4.1
7097
0.9
3.2
0
4.1
TOTAL
5
21.9
0
0 26.9
Complex 4
########
########
########
### #### TOTAL
7575
0.8
2.9
0.1
3.8
7576
0.8
2.7
0.1
3.6
7578
0.8
3.1
0.1
4
7681
0.7
3
0
3.7
7684
0.8
3
0.1
3.9
7070
0.8
3.7
0
4.5
TOTAL
4.7
18.4
0.4
0 23.5
Complex 5
########
########
########
######## TOTAL
7703
0.3
3.7
0
4
7704
0.3
3.7
0
4
M 1
0.3
3.7
0
4
7071
0.3
3.2
0
3.5
7072
0.3
3.2
0
3.5
7073
0.3
3.2
0
3.5
7074
0.3
3.2
0
3.5
7075
0.5
3.4
0
3.9
7076
0.5
3.4
0
3.9
TOTAL
3.1
30.7
0
0 33.8

i
!f-or-mation contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed.
Farm Emergency Call Form
DWQ Facility Number
83 -- 15
Date
3-7-2003
Farm Name
7177
Time
Owner First Name
I
Control Number
1846
Owner Last Name
Carroll's Foods Inc
Q Reporting Q Complaint
Source
Plan Due Date
Date Plan Date Freeboard
Inches (? equals blank)
Received Level OK
Breached
Q Yes ONO Freeboard Lagoonl
18 319I2003
3-10-2003 3-12-2003
Depopulated
Q Yes Q No Freeboard Lagoon2
7
I F
Overflowed
Q Yes ONO
LQ Issue
Freeboard Lagoon3
Q Yes ONO
7
PermissionToPump
Freeboard Lagoon4
Q Yes Q No
� 'J
Inundated
Q Yes p No Freeboard Lagoons
Flooded
Q Yes Q NO Freeboard Lagoon6
7
Pumping Equipment
Q Yes Q NO
Comments
Rusty Collins called to report that the lagoon at this site is back into compliance at 22".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...........................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................•---...........................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
....................................................................................................................-.........................................----.........................................---.---.-----.---...-..
...............................................---- .................................................................. ................................................
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
......................................•----................................................................................................................................

Information contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed.
Animal Operation's Telephone Log
DWQ Facility Number M—F-1 Date 3-7-2003
Farm Name 17177 Time
Caller's Name IRusty Collins Control Number 11846
® Reporting 0 Complaint Region JFRO
Caller's Phone 9
Access to Farm Lagoon Questions
Farm Accessible Breached 10 Yes O No
from main road O Yes O No Inundated O Yes O No
Overtopped 10 Yes O No
Animal Population Wader on 0 Yes ON
Outside Wall
Confined Dike Conditions O Yes O No
O Yes O No
DepoP 10 Yes O No
Freeboard Level
Feed Available 10 Yes O No
Freeboard Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboard
Mortality 10 Yes O No Inches (? equals blank) Received Level OK
Lagoonl 18 3/9/2003 22
Sprav Availability Lagoon2
Pumping Lagoon3
Equipment O Yes O No
Lagoon4
Available
Fields O Yes O No
Lagoons �
Lagoon6
.............................-...... ..............---..............................-----..............................-............------....---..........................--................---.................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
i�a�s•vcr[.:,�on•:,zsty'rvavrvxzava.�:ti�*zr.��ax,�,�zrx:w,tia�:lres�rFaw.vrz�tifititzszvw-:4ttiz,•tir.,z:u:r.�Ycava:�[•:sw`tiw�a}cw,�azocc�x�:a� z��
�Fperson[taiungtcall i
r..er�e3ec icn+.erccrc[�c_.;t�tein .
y5'Fh F: ' . F: U`s [jira ry r l Lr�a [3• Slr-% a[ ' u trr,[fr?[�% rra c: . o [i
tlli ZF"iF�}F�si S F;l[ F FPS 3 ? 1 SLi
iNS tL iF iF r T1 �3i S k:� [ 5 F 'r L�F� rFSiFLX iFZS�d � �:yn T�'3? ti� F.IiRSX'i LiFL�E'-. S FON Fi:STs'iF35 i i i
Comments2

03rr10/2�003� 0 :06 +«91.0276563719144%1�� ..,., .... RGOLLINS
PAGE 27
PLAN OF ACTION(Poet) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facliiy Number: 83-15 County: Scotland
Facility Name: Farm 7177
Certified Operator Name: Operator Number:
1. Current liquid levels) In Inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid tenet
in tfte lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spi Nvays.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/113: 7177 _
Spllway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is withtn acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations, Bolume and PAN Content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan Is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval Pram the DWO prior to transfer of writs to a site
not covered In the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corraWnding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another pe►m4ted facility, provide facility number, lagwn
freeboard lavers and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin lend application of waste: .3 I!s 10-3
I hereby Certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included wilthin the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information Is
accurate and correct.
fmnwas O f- dar,rsl' w a 1 AS 4 COILS Phone: .
Facility Owner/Manager (p -nt)
Date: 7!0 S
Faal' Owner/Manager (signature)

03/10/2003 09:06 9102765637 RCQLLINS PACE 28
Wfar 06 03 0B r I as MUKt�nY-9%KU1fi1'1 a 1 lILJJJ A r
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIEE
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1_ Stricture Name/ldentirter (ID). 1177
2. Cu+rent liquid volume In 25 yrI24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current licquld level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr_124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) _ 1.0 Inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below 91ructural freeboard elevation) 120 000 fe
e. line G12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslf*3 74800 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g, volume of waste produced according to structural design 172092 f
n. current herd # 1350 certified herd #1 1350
actual waste produced • current herd # x line g = 172092 its
certified herd # �-
I. volume of wash water according to structural design L�JW
j. excess rainfall over evaporalion according to design 72047 ft3
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 daysAlne t= 304352 gallons
4. Total PAN to be lend applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 02J1912003 2.1Q Ibs/1000 gal.
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I - 7'96.2 Ibs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I rOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE_
(Crick on the nerl Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

03,(10/2003 09:06 9102765637 RC:DLLINS
Plar Um Uj uts: L-re 11umrn l -no%urii
PAGE 29
Ii. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDlOR 25 YR.124
MR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1, Structure ID: 7177
line rn = 796.2 lb PAN
2. Structure ID:
line m = Ib PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
fine m = 1b PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m = lb PAN
n. lines 1 t2+3+4+5+6= 796.2 lb RAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWF
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT SE APPLIED DURING T114I3 3U 13AT 1-tK1Uu
0. "do P, field # CI. crop r. acres s. remainlrg IRR t TOTAL PAN u. apDileagon window'
2 PAN balance 9ALANCE FOR
QW11CM) hII:LI} {Ib*.j
column rx s
3135 1 Bermuda Past 5.80 225.00 1305.E Mar -Oct
ouaw vufTi7r9 uvN a►IUirry apptrrauUn O&W OF n%IxL Drop GAWPHUauUn 0 pr1ning aa[e TUr avanaofe
receiving crops during 30 day draw down per;od.
v. Total PAN available for all fletsie (Bum of column t) = 1305.0 lb. PAN
TV. FACILITY'S PcA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied Illne n from section 11) = 796.2 Ib. PAN
PnA (30 Day) 2121!00

03/10/2003 09:06 9102765637 RCQLLINS PAGE 30
Mar' Ub UJ un; lea MUKr'"T-nKUWn JJULJJJyrM �.. .
x. Crop*s remaining PAN balance (line v from aoctlon Ill) 1306_0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -9 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficlt, Vat course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, hem reduction, etc. For pump & haul and hard reduction optlons, recalculate new PAN
based on new h&rmation. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalmdeie the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted factllty, provide informetion regarding the nerd population and lagoor. freeboard levels at the
receiving fepllty;
irrigation onto existing spray fields will
available for pumping d needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2121100
as weather and field conditions permlt Additional land is

Murphy -Brown Wit✓
P.O. Drawer 856
2822 Hwy._24 West
Warsaw, NC"
C 28398
'%L•:910-293-3434
Fax:[phone]
August i 9,:2010
Murphy Brown LLC Engineering File
P.O. Box�856
Warsaw; NC 28398
Re: 51771iner repair
Tlie:niaititenance°and'repaus.of die 1a —, n wave erosion his been completed closing. this:
pmjecton=f�%17/10. per'11ic plan outlined below. These, repairs weir performed ley the
1Vlurp iy Brotim Hcayy.equipment department under.the direction of Dave Elkin,
Professional' Engineer for Murphy Brown LLC.
Upon review of this farm there has been significant erosion to the clay liner due to wave action.
Currently'tfie erosion'is not a threat to the structural integrity of the dike. However, to maintain_
the designed integrity of the lagoon liner, a.repair is required.
The. recommended actions;for this farm.are as follows:
1) Pi m'mJ water:.ddt'o1:,ttie lagoon as quickly as the nutrient utilization plan will allow. The goal
should be.to:achieve greater than 72 inches of freeboard: This will require going below the
stop pump level ,of normal operation to allow for the repairs.
a. The goal to reach 72 inches of freeboard will be August 1,,2010.
2) Upon reaching the72 inch level, the upper portion of the llnershall be repaired to eliminate
any potential seepage.
3) Tiie;repalr will consist of the following steps:
a. The repair area will include the entire length of the.east dike through the corners.
The depth would be a minimum of the top 4-feet, which equals 12' of surface
area.from the inside top of dike toward the.water surface at the 3:1 slope.
b. This repair shall be done as soon as practical which will include the earliest time
atwhich the72 inch freeboard level can be achieved and a projected period of
one week of dry weather to allow for the construction. to be performed under
good working conditions. This will help assure quality earthwork can be
performed and improve safety while working on the potentially slick slope above
'the water surface.
Step:
1)� Removal of the organic matter (grass, sludge, etc.) from the clay liner surface.
2) Excavate a depth of 1.5' perpendicular to the liner / inside of dike surface in the
proposed area, to allow for clay liner replacement in this work.area.

I ii
IJ
3j ;Suitable day has been identified by Murphy -Brown, l LC soil scientist to achieve
the required permeability of the re
a pe y pair area of 1.25x10^-6 cm/s. This material will
be hauled from borrow area on adjoining ClF farm.
,Fill undercut areas with suitable clay material in 6' lifts compacted with sheep's
foot roller until total Uner thickness of 1.5' Is achieved.
Re if ; y„ _ :...... O
DavidSS' Ikin; P.E:
Director a•irigirieering
CC: I DA rdin
• ; Mike Cudd
l i
I
I i it I1.� I
•�Q'
a SEA�•iT�
t_
023994

�onnectGIS
- -. MIEB. l�dSiiNG'
1:300 Feet
k rI
.� r jrN'�"�'Ij n ..,fir.
a d� F o +fiPr
x
AE
r
h N
� 4-
R
4
L {g,, r ' � r t � - f r'•��
it
11
n. 3Wi,rr ,�
Y
Page 1 of 1
Hel
ittp://3 8.124.248,92/ConnectGI S_v6/Map.aspx?p=Laurinburg 4/16/2013

NCDA&C5 Agranomi '!Davit ion Pho>ve s,(9.19)733-2655 ..Web site::www.ucagll-bop/agronomy. ...
.:. „ Report::,WQ7072 .:. '... ,:..
Grouser.,
Waste Analysis Rolort
" svnruis''
Murphy Brown UC
da Mike Odd
325 McKay St
Law-Itibmg, NG 28352
Parm: 51771
Copies to:
Received: 03/31/201
D Completed: 04/07/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Scotland County
Sample Informalioll
.Laboratory, Results (parts per rnlllion unless otherwise. noted).
Sample 1D.
N
!' K Q7 N8S
Pe Mu Za
Cie 8 Mo
C'1 C
Total 93.6
13.1 180 92.6 33.9 9.29
29.0 0.24 0,75
0.18 0.41
Waste Corte.
-NH4
Na Ni Cd Pb Al
Se Lill
SS C-N DM%
CU% ALE(KPI)
ALS
-NO3
r77q-
6.74
Descriplion:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Li .
Uraa
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for Firsl Crop
lkllo00 allow
Other Elements
1bs11000 allows
Applicallo» Method
N P203. X20 Ca A1g S Pe Mn ?,'n Cu
8 . AID G't -
Na M Cd Ph
At : so Li
Irrigation
0.39 0.18 14 0.54 4.20 0.05 0.17 7 T T
T
o.61 .:
Completed: 415(2010
The pH of the lagoon liquid is below
the ideal range for bacterial actlon and waste treatment. Gradually adlttst pit by adding 1 lb. of agricultural lime per 1000 cu. fi..of Ilgnid rernsJcdrlg in the lagoon. Sample ihe. .
on nionill and continue to ad ull pH until it is within the desired wge of 7.0.6.0.
Sample lnforn,aliou
Laboratory Results (parts per
Sample ID.
Al
P d Ca M S
Fe Mrr Zrr
Of 8 Mo
C1 C
7bfn1 142
1 t.9 238 86.8 -38.3 6.67
19.4 0.18 0,19
0.14 038
5C2 . `... ` :
waste Cade.
-NH4
No Ni Cif Pb Al
Se Li P11
SS C:N DM%
CCG% ALE t9
ALS
-1V03
96.4
6.98
Description:
OR-N
Suine La ooin Lip .
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Availablc for First Crop
lbs 1000 ailons
011ter Elements
40000 gallons
Applicnlfou MOW
iv PdOS K20 Crr Mg S Pe Mt: 7tr CL,
B MO -Cl.
Nis Nf 'Cd - . _ , PG
Al So Li
irrigation
0.59 0.16 1.9 0.51 0.22 o.04 0.11 T T T
7
0.80
The pH of [lie lagoon liquid Is below ilte Ideal range for bitcterW action and waste treatment. Graduafly adjusl pH by adding 1 lb, of agricultural lime ML 1000 cu. f,, of liquid remaining bt the lgoan.. Sample Ilia
I• oon months and continue to nd'ust Hvnlil 1 is N ii n the desired ran a of 7.0-8A.
r '
->-.I glef -

aitentiation. Stable isotopes have, become. a common lool for tracing the sources of water and
solutes in small watersheds- but are underzniliztd in larger basins and in agricultural areas.
FRa.diO� nestdwl !+031
29 lertda«
t 40%
015 tfnnficallon
> ao�s
A10
b MRnualuen
� F.4ie�a
mWft
kfi�ize, r
s _ t soa � rrwnuti.:�1K
o L
matt«
40 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
6IsN %a AR
Figure fi. Nitroucri and Oxvtmn isotopic composition
of nitrate.
Synthetic nitrale produced by the
Haber -Bosch process have Icnv
C�''N values that reflect an oriZ1in of
atmospheric N2 generally in the
ranee. of -4 to +4%o, and (3180
values front 15 to 25%o reflecting
the atmospheric 02 composition of
2 3%t, (Figure 8). Plants and soil
nitrogen have similar 61-N values
(4-2 to MO. and cultivated soils
have slightly lower 615N values than non -cultivated soils. Plants fixing N2 fi-om the atmosphere
have 6'-.N values of —tl to +?�„n- close to the 51'N value of atmospheric N_, (= W"', m). Mom
terrestrial plants have 615N in the ranee of -5 to +2%o. Consumers (microbes to vertebrates) arc
2-3%9 enriched in 15N relative to their diet. This is mainly due to (tic excretion of low ,i"N
organics in urine, so there is a 6''N enrichment of--3.-3")(P in tissue compared to diet in most
animals. Manure is enriched in the heavier isotope by ammonia volatilization, and titc altlount (A
volatilization is dependent on 1101v the manure is stored and/or processed. Artimal waste with a
typical 615N value, of abort +`%o is converted to nitrate. the. 615N values are generally in the
range of -1-15 to-1-30%o. So tertili7el• nitrate to groundwater call be distinguished fi•om animal
waste in groundwater by the S''N;.;c;; and ,i'80Nc,3 unless the isotopic values are significantly
altered by denitrif:icat] on.
Denitrifica.tion results in the production of isotopically depleted N2 or NZO, which concentrate
the heavier isotope in the residual groundwater nitrate (Kendall 1998, Kendall and Aravcna
2000). The residual nitrate nitrogen be cones twice as enriched as nitrate oxygen in the heavier
isotope (615NN03 versus S "ONO3) in this microbial driven process. Groundwater nitrate isotopic
8

compositions are shifted along a line with a slope ot' 0.5:1 in areas of extensive denitrification
(Figure 6), Showers et al.. (2005) used this relationship to deternlinc the source ol• groundwater
nitrate and to define areas of derntri.fication in biosolid application fields. Showers et al., (2008)
used the denitrification model of Seiler (2005) to detennine if denitrification or dilution by
development- If the original isotopic composition of the nitrate contaminate source is known. ii
NN03 and 180 tvo3 can be used to quantify the amount (if denitrification in groundwater using an
exponential denitrification model (Figure 6, Seiler, 2005, Showers et al., 2008). Isotopes of
nitrogen and oxygen in nitrate can separated animal l human waste from fertilizer sources, but
can be complicated by extensive denitrification ol• groundwater nitrate. Using a multiple isotope
approach, the amount of denitrification ccui be estimated by Raleigh fractionation models.
Animal waste cannot be confused with fertilizer sources because the groundwater nitrate
reservoir can only become more positive with microbial recycling.
Chloride Bromide Ratios in (hwund►vater
Chloride and bromide ratios in around water behave conservatively anti have also been used to
separate uncontaminated, septic and animal waste- sources (Davis et al., 1998, Panno et al. 2006).
Cl/Br ratios can be determined by various analytical techniques. and the results vary depending
upon tite analytical rnethod and the region (Davis et al.. 1998, Panno et al. 2006, Hudak and
Blanchard 1997, Hudak 2003). In the southwest USA and Alberta. Cl/Br ratios are generally
<50-150 for rainfall, <100 for unaffected soil water. 100-200 for most groundwater. 300-600 tier'
domestic sewage, and 1000-10,000 fir runoff affected by brines (Davis ct al_, 1998). Cl/fir
ratios in ground waters from the raid -west are higher, possibly due to tiie prevalence of road salt.
Groundwater affected by animal waste in the mid -west had Cl/Br ratios in the between 1250-
1650 (Panno et al. 2006). Studies in 'Texas indicate that oil field brutes, which have very high
C1Br ratios, and were pervasive contaminates in shallow groundwater (Hudak and Blanchard
1997, Hudak 2003). Showers et al., 2008 found that Cl/Br ratios in North Carolina groundwater
were distinct between areas affected by animal wastes and septic systems.
9

Surface NVater %naly%is
Alethods
Water samples were collected from surface drainages at Farm 5177 on .tune 18, 2010. placed in
_.���.a�.�fe�,a��d:iu-�u�lu-w�.1��: �,'��SU�S�ablc;,lar�t:c,We.,Lab,i�.�talei�,..N��T�hle :�.7. j- �.�Sauip_wc�t•e
filtered tltrorigli a 0.45 1rm filler and kept at 4"C until analysis. Nutrient and ion concentrations
(N031 NH4, POa, Cl. Br) were deie.rmined by flow injection clu-omatography (Showers et al.,
2005, USEPA 19933, LaCllat 2001, 2002, Shovers el al., 2008). NO3 and N1­14 concentrations are
repotted as NO3-N and NI-1-,-N. An automated Ilow injection method for bromide and chloride
was niodified to increased dcttctiiin liniits by doubling the size of the injection loop from
standard techniques (Shmvcrs el of-, 2008). hi addition, baseline detection levels were reduced
by using >1.7 mega0lim poli lied RO water li)r the can-icr liquid and to mix all standards and
chemicals. With these modifications. minimum detection levels were reduced from 0.5 to 0.25
mg/I for chloride and 5 mgd to 40 Itu�l tier bromide. With the single injection loop, chloride
standards had a reproducibility- ol- -i 3% from 5 it) 100 rng/l. With a double injection loop
chloride standards were reproducible : 3% at 5 nlgil and + 1-5 ",o at 0-5 ing/l. Bromide standard,
were reproducible _1 i%i, at 5 mt-1. -i_5i at 2.5 im-3/1. and 1- 9% from 1.5 mg11 to 40 pgd. Thesc
techniques allow Cl/Br ratios to be delemiined in the groundwater samples. The VN NC)i.
00 — NO3 and 6'5N -- N114 ► as determined by Elemental Analysis (EA), pyrolysis (TCEA) and
Continuous Flow Isotope patio N-lass Spectrometry (Showers et al., 2005, 2008). Nitrate and
ammonium were concentrated front dissolved samples on ion exchange resins (Biorad AG 50-
WX8 cation and: AG 2-X8 anion resins). Eluted samples were neutralized and then cleaned of
organic contaminants by passing the eluied sample through a. column of cation resin, PVP, silica
gel, and SPE C- 18. or i f organic rich, with a double column of SPE C- 18- The nitrate was
converted to AgNO3 with AgO, lyophilized, and analyzed by combustion (SiSN) or pyrolysis
(b'SO) with a Carlo Erba NC2500 EA, a Thenno TCEA., and a Finnigan Mat Delta+ XL CH-
IRMS (Showers et al., 2005, 2008). Ammonium samples were analyzed by EA combustion of'
the cation resin with a carbon trap inserted before the GC column (Showers et al., 2005). Isotopic
results were calibrated and con-ected to NBS, MIST and intenial lab isotope standards (Showers
et al., 2005, 2008), and are reported as per nul deviations from the international standard
according to the following equation:
ff

SI'N, 6'80 = E[.(R)sDFl, / (R)sIcil-I; * 103 -
It = 15N/14N, or Is0/'00. Std = Air or VSMOW
Statistical analyses of nutrient and isotopic results were completed using Microsoft Excel
spreadsheets.
---ram.
TABLE I tMajor Ion Results
Sample #
11LDLtM.
EgLO3
NFf4
PO4
5,i02-
5177-1
6/18/2010
DRAIN#1
10.90
0.11
0.00
0.48
5177-2
611812010
#2 SEEP
15.40
124
0.04
0.00
5177-3
6/18/2010
#2 SEEP Lover
24.60
117
0.00
0.31
5177-4
6/18/2010
EAST STREAM #1
2.36
0.27
0.02
5.95
5177-5
6/18/2010
EAST STREAM #2
0.18
0.10
0.07
6.25
5177-6
608/2010
Jordan Creek
0.41
0.09
0.01
6.57
5177-7
6/18/2010
Shoe Hill Creek
0.33
0.06
0.01
7.28
5177
6!18/2010
LAGOON
661
5177
6118/2010
LAGOON
660
5177
6M B12010
LAGOON
666
"Fable 2 Cl, Br and Isotopic Results
Sam pie #
5177-1
cl
8.00
8
0-045
CIlBr "s
178
i3
6.380
5177-2
106.OD
0.123
862
9.880
114.15
5177-3
99.70
0.130
767
4.434
5177-4
25.90
0.030
872
2
5177-5
29.90
0.059
505
15.532
5177-6
3.75
0.015
257
8.213
51774
4.55
0.030
152
9.008
5177
329
0.311
1058
28.217
5177
331
0.315
1051
28.305
5177
330
0.356
927
28.429
SURFACE GEOCHEMISTRY RESULTS
Three lagoon samples and five surface water samples were collected on Farnr 5177, and two
river samples above and below the tarrn on Jordan Creek (McGirts Bridge Road) and on Shoe
Heel Creek (Old Maxton Road) were collected and analyzed (Tables 1. 2). Amtnoniuni
concentrations were approximately 660 mg/I N in the lagoon at Fann 5177 (Figure 7).
Ammonium concentrations were low in the northem and southern drainages in the wetlands

CEOPMYSLCAL EVALUATION
On June i S, 2010. A Intl ltifireyUCl)CV electrom.agneti.c (E- ) investigation was conducted on
-=�a—"laa tn�zsa�3-sn-iiacls�uai-o#eartnhuali
changes in the soil and sballouv groundwater between the lagoon and the Shoe Hill Creek. The
EM evaluation Nvas completed using a GEM-2 Multifrequency Electromagnetic Profiler (GEM-2
EM) manufactured by Geophex. Inc. The GEM-2 was carried by hand using a shoulder strap.
Tlhe GEM-2 was used to collect the in -phase and quadrature mode data at 7-frequencies (1470
Hz, 5010 l-fz; 9990 Hz. 19950 1Iz. 39510 ilz.. 60030 I4z and 90030 Hz). Each quadrawre data sct
was converted to apparent electrical conductivity values using the WinGenh2 Software. Basc d
on the results ol, these. data, Gco Solutions selected the 60M30 Hz data to best represent the
distribution of the combined sail and gm-oundwater conductivity data- The result of the apparent
electrical conductivity values the 00030 Hz frequency FIM data was tabulated and then
contoured. The results of -this comotiring process are presented in figure 5.
The red hues of figure 5 indicate increased soiiigroundwater conductivity. whereas green and
light yellow hues indicate nomial and low conductivities. A dark red hue value appears
as an elongate Icature beginning at the ton° of the southeastern ed22c of the hog waste lagoon and
trends perpendicular to the retaining belie. This pattern is typical of a conductivity plumy
emanating I' orn a waste ia-gpon. The source of the increased conductivity values could be tFrc
result of a small surlace or groundwater relrase.
IN

r/jlw�! G�DSfiRr� `mil=tNC 4��3� •�tt�.t ��
�c„� �'e-r `tt7 _ Ev.� l � ,�.rt.� �-�-5 u t 1-s Witti ev�� Caves h�►uF � a--��� .
d3-0 is
Geo�S'o'' Solutions Ltd.
`� LO OIOZ t
fir$o. 37698
Raleigh, North Camlina 2 7627
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Fax)
Privileged and Confidential (DRAFT)
.tune 25, 2010
Ntr. Kraig "Ies(erbeek
Vice President, EH&S Compliance
Murphy Brown. LLC
2822 NC Highway 24 West.
PO Box 856
Warsaw, North Carolina 28398
Dear Mr. Westerbeek,
rCI
4
Re: Preliminary Geophysical Survey,
and Geochemical Evaluation of Murphy
Brown Farm 5177. Scotland County, NC
Geo Solutions Limited, Inc. (Geo Solutions) is pleased to submit the results of a prtliminary
geophysical and geochemical evaluation conducted at a Murphy Brown Farn) (45177) in
Scotland County, NC (Figure 1). Farm 5177 (formerly Carols Farm #7177) is located just to the
west of Shoe Heel Creek south of the confluence of .Jordan Creek and Shoe: Heel Creek, and
north of Highway 74. The farm is located west of -the Laurinhurg-Marton Airport. which ha a
small Waste Water Treatment Plant (I tngd capacity. 0.5 mod avcra`_te discharge) that drains into
Shoe Hill Creek above Farm 5177_ The purpose of this study was to gather prelimina►y data to
investigate suspected seepage on the easteni side of the waste lagoon at this farm site.
The waste lagoon covers about 2.57 acres at this site, and supports a "farrow to feeder' hog farm
with a design capacity of 1,350 animals. At this site. hydric (wetland) soils extend fFotn Shoe
Heel Creek to the southeastern side of the lagoon and along an unnamed creek to the north of the
Farm (Figure 2). The unnamed creek to the north and west of the farm had flowing water at the
time of sampling (June 18, 2010). Surface water samples were collected for major ion and
isotopic analysis at the farm site, in Jordan Creek at Mcgirts Bridge Road north of the farm, in

Digital-Topo=Maps.com = TopograpNc flaps
Dig ital-Topo-Maps.com Home Terrain Navigator Aerial Photos National Geographic Topo DeLorme Topo USA
Instructions: 1) Zoom in to your location; 2) click the "MyTopo" button for topo maps
' f '-NSF •• I 41 � � �E'I��■j � 5 >tl, � 1
LO
Y
f r:
tllfif,,` l!, I I :,,n11Y;�'/`(��
,H • ! 1 _ r��S - w... �yr11 ,t. �J � ' ,� 44 �y ',, ,r ,,.
r-�jt�f:'{j�1� "1'd;': n'+{�' I I,� 1� I��•11 - " •'"� �'4� � ,�� _ � �'� '�{� � s'f �'�d
fl4y K 1
44, Rr,.� _ li"j prle �•' 1 6,- �•,��(�:
No
� 1, II' ,} µ I, r Y k r, ! ,,II II.1 - I� �` : � + ' .:.>�i '�' +<F �;r, ta� !� �° I♦ �'� � '{ I� k l� I"l
�; _�JI { {� 1 �' R •.SI=1 r ,. ( .. �,.� -I�l ^IE �p`il,rr
1S i1 i r F•I it,',1
A, C G�F! �rf. ,er.l ,! lilll Ipp�� I}. -,a i • f. � .. ,,. �I, i' � „ I' ',-^ 1' � �' lf' A ,�r • �-�' �+
! 1 7 prF�p411";di, •��,
1 (Lq���i' , ,.' I � - y � u, � � `iy'r • F b � I r � 1•
#' IJ�.�'I tl S! Ik I�! Eil1 lid s•�d�fl, p f '� r,n - i �.� ,Id ...
I N I � � yy s i !I I', ' i,t rlt .€€ ,ii�Y�du€IN ' f - � �,: •1,! 1r ; rpya '1#� R Ij � YI � �J: 1;��'
Is,.......tip
r r I IIFl1 }; dlzl� �;�i��' 71ry1i (i� NR ! r;r r it r ..N= {(��� ,t•� �j i ' zl� , .. � .f, r I r r f�,�
..irr3'3.�.� 'a • 1 ; ! � �r=" � .I ii I �1 �' �. �r ,_ r--� q / 13 �dt' Ld�l
-1' ' Itj(j i 1 I� 1lil �d , �^ urs. E Fk.- r •] * 1 iF' ,r
jlft�I.l#rr.J!fl,{E ill�l+l,+il?�1, i!` .ra.'" k �} ✓ t M. �i. (14,, :fl'' .4
i gl l rl Ili,! I:ir r Ifr , k '' I 3 { ' pr��jf P!•' yr, 4 . F:,
1 r III dii l tl P h},,:il) If rr :r ,I t. 1 it I,t w. r� ! r
�I�j
'� •r Ik.� �{.•e# r ,t. ,I'IG Iii ii''r"t:S I., I1.1 +' i� .Y f ', I :p c 4 r q,::
\N
1�. ,
:1• w I 11 I�lili I��, MIN ) :r f' 3 , i ( { Y! 1F I jy i
VA
�{ •`Fil �..i1#;. ,' » Yk Irdl 'I' {
S In3 ' t :lk
,Ih{€r[l�.rhl ,y llfVli �. �•1--.r4 M+Wi::l - .i'; l •1 .u. .r l AID, y�-'�. 'y,.'=� .i^,. .' .•i. N,'r !',.� ',I �I,I i Gr"'xa
�. I,ri' ._,, : ">.. ,1 .;..,.IraNl k�r�:--_.r.. "-:, :I f'.�, d r�l 4.' '. 'j :.h ..

Map Unit Description: Ailey loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes —Scotland
County, North Carolina
Scotland County, North Carolina
AeC—Ailey loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 750 feet
Mean annual precipitation. 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period. 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Ailey and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 7 percent
Description of Ailey
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landfonn position (three-dimensional). Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 80 inches to dense material
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water
(Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 inlhr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Low (about 3.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4s
Typical profile
0 to 4 inches: Loamy sand
4 to 37 inches: Loamy sand
37 to 53 inches: Sandy clay loam
53 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
Minor Components
Candor
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
MB FARM 5177
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/9/2010
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2

Map Unit Description: Ailey loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes —Scotland
County, North Carolina
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Scotland County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Apr 30, 2009
MB FARM 5177
LSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/9/2010
;" Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2

Map Unit Description: Lumbee sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely
flooded —Scotland County, North Carolina
Scotland County, North Carolina
LuA—Lumbee sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely
flooded
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period. 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Lumbee, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Lumbee, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Description of Lumbee, Drained
Setting
Landform: Backswamps on stream terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material, Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting
textural stratification
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit wafer
(Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding. None
Available water capacity. Low (about 4.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3w
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy loam
6 to 14 inches: Sandy loam
14 to 36 inches: Sandy clay loam
36 to 80 inches. Loamy sand
Description of Lumbee, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Backswamps on stream terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Loamy alluvium over sandy alluvium
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
MB FARM 5177
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/9/2010
'i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2

Map Unit Description: Lumbee sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely
flooded —Scotland County, North Carolina
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting
textural stratification
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water
(Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 inihr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding. Occasional
Available water capacity: Low (about 4.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 6w
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Sandy loam
6 to 14 inches: Sandy loam
14 to 36 inches: Sandy clay loam
36 to 80 inches: Loamy sand
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Scotland County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Apr 30, 2009
MB FARM 5177
U5DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey "/2010
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2

Map Unit Description: Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slope"cotland
County, North Carolina
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landforrn: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Scotland County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Apr 30, 2009
MB FARM 5177
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey M12010
WWI= Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2

Map Unit Description: Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes —Scotland MB FARM 5177
County, North Carolina
Scotland County, North Carolina
WaB—Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Wagram and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components. 5 percent
Description of Wagram
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on
marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional). Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water
(Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 inlhr)
Depth to water table: About 60 to 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding. None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 6.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2s
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Loamy sand
8 to 24 inches: Loamy sand
24 to 75 inches: Sandy clay loam
75 to 83 inches: Sandy loam
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
us Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/9/2010
�� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2

conductivity area in the wetlands, and increase in the northern unnamed drainage al the site.
However. 815NI nitrate values, in surface waters in creeks adjacent to Farm 5177 are very low
suggesting minirnal to no influence of animal waste in Jordan and Shoe Heel creeks near the site.
Geo Solutions has completed a preliminary evaluation of a suspected lagoon seepage site located
at the Murphy -Brown Farm 5177, Scotland County, North Carolina. Based on the results of our
Geophysical and Geochemical investigation we have concluded the following:
1. A number of local nitrogen sources potentially discharge to the Shoe Heel Creek: farm
7092, the NItinicipal .ALirliorl Treatment System, numerous farms and agricultural fields.
and >~ arn) 5 177.
2. Surface: Nvater- samples collected from Shoe Heei Creel: indicate that influences from
these potential sources appear to he minimal, rt any.
3. Geophvsical results show a distinct zone of increased sail and groundwater conductivity
decreasing in stren_th away From the southeast corner of the lagoon. The apparent
conductivity of the zone of elevated conductivity indicates rapid attenuation ofthc
observed conductivity plcnne to the east of the lagoon.
4. Surface water seepage collected east of the Faun 5177 waste lagoon indicate elcyaled
concentrations ot-amnioniunt and nitrate compounds. Comparison seepage saniples
collected at varvin;�, distances away from the pond indicate reduced concentrations id'
nitrate and atnnlonia, stiguesting that denitrification is occurring away from the pond chits
reducing the potential impact on Shoe Heel Creek (approximately 1,000 feet cast of the
pond).
5. Gcochemical analysis of nitrate, ammonium; chloride, and bromide and nitrogen isotopic
analysis of the nitrate and annnoniurn containing waters from the seeps suggest that the
lagoon waters is a potential source.
17

Geo Solutions Recornmcnds the follo%ving:
1. :additional geochemical and geophysical evaluations may be completed to establish the
horizontal extent of the potential niirogen plume. Here, we suspect that nitrate and
ammonia concentrations do not impact the waters of neighboring Shoe Heel Creek.
.,_ . _ - ... _ -c�rmp}eyed-to-establts�t-xhe-gro rvater - -
�:-=�'errrprYrarr-�•rrrn7itrmn�--�rtH-srtrfa�*- -
concentrations ref organic compounds as a function of distance and time from the pond
(tltis will be used to establish the point where groundwater is no longer influenced by the
potential pond release).
i. The ENI survey area may be expanded to include the lands between the lagoon and Shoe
Heel Creek (this established the attenuation of the conduction groundwater plume
detected in this evaluation.
4. NVaters ol'Shoc [feel Creek should be sampled directly above and below the potential
release site.
18

Literature Cited
Aravena R, Robertson \VD, l Ise of multiple isotope tracers to evaluate denitrification in ground
98-7,
Davis, S.N., 1Vhit-temore, D.O., Fabryka-A'fartin, J.F. Uses of Chloride/Bronude Ratios in
Studies ofPotablc Water. Grotind fFater, 1998, 36(2): 338-350.
Hudak, P.F. ChloiideiBromide ratios in leachate derived from farm -animal waste. Envirrut.
1'011., 2003, 121: 23-25.
LaChat QuickChem Method 10-1 17-07-1-13 Determination of Chloride by Flow lil_jection
Analysis Colorimetry (PHercuric Thlocyanate) Pruefer, A. 2001.
LaChat Quickchem Method 10-1 35-21-2-B Bromide in Waters Bogren, K. and Smith P. 2000.
Karr, J.D., Shovers, W.J. and Jennings G.U., Low-level nitrate export from confined dairy
farmitw detected in North Carolina streams using, 015N, A-gricUlture, Ecosystems and
Environment, 2003. 95:103-1 10
Karr, J.D., Showers, 1V,1, Gilliam, JNX', Anders, AS. Tracing nitrate transport and
environmental impact irons intensive swine farming using 615N. J. Environ. (hurl.. 2001. 30-
11.63-1 1 75.
Kendall C. Tracing sources and cycling of nitrate in catchments, In Isotope I rucet:c ill
Catchment H_udrohl qy. 1998, C. Kendall and J..l. McDonnell (eds.), pp. 519-576. Elsevier.
Amsterdam.
Kendall, C, Aravena R, Nitrate isotopes in ground water systems. In: Enviranniewal Tracers in
Suhvitface Mydrologtl. 21I00. P.G- Cook and A-L. Herczeg (eds.), KluNver Academic, Bosion.
pp. 261-297-
Pantio SA"., Hackle.1t K.C., Hwang H.H., Greenberg; S.E., Krapac I.G., Landsberger S.
O'Kelly D.J. Characterization and identification ol'Na-CI source` in ground Nvater. Grorlttd
lVater. 2006, 44(2): 176-187.
Seiler RL, Combined tisc of 15N and "0 of nitrate and 11 B to evaluate nitrate c ontamillation ill
ground water. flpplie{l Geochem. 21105. 20: 1626-1636-
Showers , N11'.J., Genna, B., McDade, T., Bolich, R., and Fountain, J.C. Nitrate
Contamination in Ground "later on an Urbanized Dairy farm. 2008 Envir. Sci. &,Tech. V.
42(13) 4683.
Showers, WJ, Usrv, B, Fountain, At, Fountain, JC, McDade„ T, DeMaster, D.. Nitrate Flux
froin Ground to Surface Waters Adjacent to the Neuse River Waste Water Treatment Plant.
Univ. gf'North Carolina IVRRI, 2005 Report No 365a, 38 pp.
19

APPENDIX 1. Soil Report on Scotland County, NC.
20

Acreage and Proportionate Extent of the Soils
sand Cminty, none Cato"
s map
Map rm4 coma
Aaes
Percent
to-'4S Waft
AuB
Aui;+ 'sandal! to 6 percet s6op�s
2lT 181i
9.0
BaA
Bbfa sods, 0 W 2 percard slopes, frequently flooded
2A36
1.2
SIC
:6331;4cn sand. (3 to 15 persertt ab Des
9.791
4.6
BrB
.
Bragg Jbamy sand. 1 to 4 percent slopes
1,510
0.7
CaC
Cardav and CJa1ai@a $ OjS' j 'to 15 peicenl slopes
l,2C8 •
0.6
COA
cornite loam. 0 to 2 percerd slopes
6,023
2.9
ObA
Dunbar fine sandy loam; 0 to 2 percent dopes
3,574
1-7
DpA
Dupfm sandy bam• 0 to 2 percent &topes
Z688
1.3
God
Goldsboro loamy sand; 4 to 2 percm�t slopes
1.610
0.7
GrS
Gritney sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
116
GrC
GrCnay:sandy team, 6 to. 10 pawn slopes
65
JmA
Jatursmn ". 0 to 2 percent slopes, f e*.tly Doodad
12,945
63
JaA
Jotms Este sandy loam, 0 to 2 percerd dopes rarely 000dsd
1,971
1-0
KaA
KahnW loamy sand, 0 to 2 Percent dopes
271
0.1
Kn6
Kenmmvft loamy sand, ModBratety wet 0 to 4 porma slopes
2.294
IA
LuA
Lumbee sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
1.712
0, 5
LyA
Lynchburg sandy Foam, 0 to 2 percent &topes
2,185
1 1
M-W
macwtaro sus water
75
MaA
Manbad io $mks, 0 to 2 pamard slopes. rarely flooded
627
0.3
MCA
McColl foam, 0 to I percent slopes, ponded
C465
31
MxA
Maxwn loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
201
NcA
Noboco hm" sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
10,279
5.0
NCO
noboco barmy sand, 2 In 6 percent slopes
2,462
1.2
NoA
Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
6,455
3 1
NOB
Nork& loarny sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
4,542
2.2
OcA
Ocilla loamy sand. 0 to 2 percent slopes
1.156
0.6
OsA
Osier bamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slop", rarely flooded
662
03
PaA
Pacbbn Immy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
1,112
0.5
PeA
Pamlico and Johnston sods. 0 to 1 percent slopes. frequently flooded
8,013
3.9
PnA
Pantago loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
1,701
Do
PoA
PeSan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
506
0.2
N8
Pelion ioamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
5,680
28
POC
Pekon loamy sand, 6 to 1D percent slopes
4,191
2.0
Poo
Pe6On loamy sand, i D tO 15 percent slopes
930
05
PuA
Phrmmer and Osier sods, 0 to 2 percent slopes
2,626
1.3
PsA
Paxvde bare. 0 to i percent slopes, rarely ftoodod
1,120
05
RaA
Rants *w sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
4,872
24
RuA
RuDege loamy sand. 0 to 2 percent slopes. Wray flooded
3,909
1 9
ThA
Throw loamy sand. 0 to 2 percent slopes
210
0.1
ThB
Thursa loamy sand. 2 to 6 percent slopes
250
0.1
Ucc
Lichee foamy sand. 6 to 12 percent slopes
971
05
USDA NstuM Rmwces Tabular Data Version_ 15 ' Sea footnote at end of table
f osftcerlrntinfl Sert3re Tabrolat Data Version Date: 0460*ao Page 1 of 2
ff

Acreage and Proportionate Extent of the Soils
Scotland County, Ma.-ttr Canodr,a
LUP
syrnboi
Map utd nwm
Aces
POW"
Vag
Vauchue loamy sand. 2 to 6 e.en: y slopes
:360
0.2
VaC
Vauckm loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
l,TM
0.8
W
Water
1,435
6.7
Was
Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
17,627
8-6
WCB
Wa64a and Candwmb, 0 to 8 percent:b s
3! 930
15.6
WkB
Wakuna and Candor aoil%. moderately wet. 0 to 8 pereent slopes
3272
16
Wus
WAU112-Rimf6 oomph., 0 to 0 Percent st?pee
433
Total
205,331
100.0
Less than 0.1 percent,
USDA Nstm- l Resources Tabular oala Version- 15
Cortserration Fire Tabular Data Version bale: 01:r3012M Page 2 of 7
22

Permit Limits
Permit Name
Per. Exp
I
Wells _ Cl- ._
I I
Cu I Fecal
I K
I
I Na
I 1 5 I I I
I NH3 I TKN I NO2 NO3 I - P
I
I 10
I
Jan
I Fels I Mar j Apr
I May
Jun
I Jul I Aug I Sep
I Oct Nov
Dec
pH
SO4
(mg/L)
I
I
I TDS I TOC _ Zn
(mg/L) (mg/L) I (mg/L)
500 I I 1
500
500 I I 1
�L
II
I (mg/L1
(mg/L) I#/100mL
I (mg/L)
I (mg/L)
(mg/L) I (mg/L) I (mg/L) (mg/L) I (mg/L)
I su
_
I 11
i
AWS090017
(Allen Bros.
I09/30/141 3
250 I 1
I M
I� M
M I
1.5 I I I 10 I M I
M
I
I l I j 11
11 I I I I l
i I I 1
AWS780081 IBuckhorn
109/30/14I 3
250 1 1?
I M
M I
M I
M
I I I 10 I
M
I 1,
AWS820020 Stokes McKoy
09/30/14I 2 I 250 I 1
I M
I M I
M I
1.5 I I 10 I M I M
1 1.5 I I 10 M I M j
I I
AWS820187 (Bradshaw 109/30/141 3 1 250 1 I M I M I
7
— I I
I 1 1

Permit Limits
I Per. Exp I
�_
I I
I
1.5 I
I
I
I 10
I
I tan
I Feb I Mar I Apr I May I tun I Jul I Aug I Sep I Oct I Nov I Dec
I I i i I I I I I I I
Permit IName
I I Weilsl
-- I. _.
CI-
I (mg/L)
1 Cu I Fecal I K j
I (mg/L) I #/1oomL I (mg/L) I
Na I
(mg/L) I
NH3 I TKN NO2
(mg/L) I (mg/L) I (mg/L)
I NO3 I P
I (mg/L) I (mg/L)
I pH
I su
I SO4
I (mg/L) I
TDS
I TOC
I Zn
I
(mg/L) I (mg/L)
I (mg/L)
F-f
I I I
I
I
I
I I
AWS090017
IAllen Bros.
09/30/14I 3
250
I 1
I M
I M I
M I
1.5 I I
10
I M
I_M
I I
500
I I
1
I
I. 1 I_
I 1 1 I
I 11 I I I
I I 11 I I I
11 I
AWS780081
IBuckhorn
I09/30/14I 3
250 I 1?
I M I M I M { M I I
I 10 I I M I
500 I I
I
11
AWS820020
Stakes McKoy
I09/30/14I 2
I 250
j 1
I M
M I
M_
1.5
I {
I {
I 10 I M
I 10 I M
I M
I M
I
i
500
I_
I
iTTI
I
1 I I { 11
I_
I
AWS820187
Bradshaw I09/30/14I 3 I 250 1
I M
{ M I
1.5
I
1 1 I I 11

ry
ontact Us Download Soils Data Archived Soil Surveys Soil Survey Status Glossary Preferences Logout Help
Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Map Soil Data Explorer Shopping Cart (Free)
Printable Version I Add to Sh, I
Oul
Search Soil Map
l fJ A Amiy __:J 1: j Scale
Map Unit Legend
Scotland County, North Carolina (NC165)
Map Unit
Map Unit Name
Acres in Percent
of
Symbol
AOI
AOI
AeC
Ailey loamy sand, 8 to
7.3
23.9%
15 percent slopes
AuB
Autryville sand, 0 to 6
0.6
1.9%
percent slopes
JmA
Johnston soils, 0 to 2
3.1
10.1%
percent slopes,
frequently flooded
JoA
Johns fine sandy loam,
0.4
1.4%
0 to 2 percent slopes,
rarely flooded
LuA
Lumbee sandy loam, 0
12.4
40.7%
to 2 percent slopes,
rarely flooded
M-W
Miscellaneous water
2.6
8.6%
WaB
Wagram loamy sand, 0
4.1
13.4%
to 6 percent slopes
Totals for
Area of Interest
30.5
100.0%
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
have zoomed in beyond the scale at which the soil map for th

=�—m
rl
W p
W

Shoe Heel Creek at Old Maxton Road south of the fam7 (Figure 3). and an EM Survey wa,
completed on the ivestem side of the dike between the waste lag(min and Shoe Heel Creek to
determine any waste lagoon influences on surface or seep waters.
Figure t. Warm 5177 (fornmiy, 7t77) located west of the Shoe Hsi River and north of Hwy 74 in Scotland
County, NC-
4
L—

5177-6 rdan Creek
7096
517 t a on I "'NA :.
$ 51771
I
;.3 ' ,
5477 7 Sr

BACKGROUND
Geologic Background
Farm 5177 is situated in the southern central coasial plain of North Carolina in the Lumber River
Basin. The farm is underlain at depth by the MIMcndorf Formation (Kni. Figure 4)) which is
comprisM of sari . KE stone. an tnu s one. gran pi e gray wt ] an (5fange cas to color. -In
the l-ornration. clay balls and iron -cemented concretions are common. the beds are laterally
discontinuous. and crass -bedding is comunon. This sandy well drained Cretaceous beach deposit
is overlain by Quaternary surticial deposits of sand. clay, gravel. and heat deposits in fluvial
(river) environments. These geomorphic features contain well developed dendfitic drainage
systems that have the traditional coastal plain features of slaw flowing creeks, and well
developed surrounding htidric toils occupying a -wide tloodplain IFigure 4)_ The shallow surface
sands have been sculptured by the placement of Carolina Bay geomorphologt. Here. shallm
elongate circular depressions commonly are filled with fine grained sediments and rimed along
the southeast edge of the basin with elevated coarse sand ridges. Based on county aerial
photographs it appears that the southeast corner of the waste lagoon is positioned along the
southeast wing of a small Carolina Bay.
Figure 3. Geological map of southern Scodand County. Farm 5 177 is underlain by the Middendorf formation
(Km) which is a sandy Cretaceous beach deposit:.
4

SPATIAL ANALYSIS
Spatial data was downloaded 1rom the I JSGS Seamless Data Server
(http://seamless.usgs.go-,,.,"). and soil data was downloaded from the USDA NRCS Soil Data Niart
-) y and the Soil Data Viewer V5.2 Arcmap extension was used
to process the soil data sets. ESRI ArcMap V9.3 was used to view and proem the spatial data.
The farm complex is 0.7 miles by 0.45 miles in size and is approximately 0.25 miles from the
Shoe Heel River. The soils are well drained fine ~ands, loamy sands, and sandy loarns (Figure 4)
typical of the reworked Middendorf formation that take up the Quaternary coastal plain
deposits. A large Carolina Bay is present in the western application field on this farm. The soil
types are listed in Appendix 1. Hydric soils are present in the Carolina Bay and between the
lag(K)n and the Shoe Heel Creek. but not bet,,,,-een the lagoon and the unnamed creek to the north
of the houses and lagoon (Figure 2).
Figure 4. Soil map of Farm 5177. A Carolina Bay is present in the application field (Nic).

Figure 5. Map of 60030 Hz frequency apparent conductivity values for EM showing dark red hues (elevated
conductivity) trending from the lagoon in the adjacent hydric soils to the east of Farm Pond 5177.
GEOCHEMICAL EVALUATION:
Background
Groundwater Contamination 'Sources and Isotopic Discrimination
The geophysical results can be qualified by geochemical and isotopic analysis of surface waters
at the site. 6'5N and 81HO of NO3 in surface and groundwaters has been used to differentiate
between potential nitrogen sources in agricultural areas, and can indicate areas of extensive
nitrate attenuation by denitrification (Aravena and Robertson 1998, Kendall 1998, Kendall and
Aravena 2000, Showers et al., 2005, 2008). In many circumstances isotopes offer a direct means
of source identification because different sources of nitrogen have distinct isotopic compositions.
Biological cycling of nitrogen by the microbial community often changes the isotope ratios in
predictable directions (Figure 6) that can be used to quantify the amount of natural nitrate
7

adjacent to Fann 51 ,7, but where high in the high conductivity seep fowid in the southwest
portion of the lagoon berm (Figure 7. 120 nig I N). Ammonium concentrations in .lordan Creek
and in Shoe HiH (`reek were ne_Uligible (l=igure S) suggesting little influence of the waste lagoon
off the Farnt site.
Figure 7_ Ammonium concentrations in surface waters at Farm 5177.
12

Figure S. Ammonium concentrations in surface Seaters in creeks adjacent to Farm 5I77.
Nitrate concentrations are high in the seep and in the southern drainage (5177-1) at this site
(Figure 9, 10 — 25 mgI l N). Nitrate concentrations are low in the northern drainage. (Figure. 1).
0.2 — 2 mg/l N), and in Jordan Creek and Shoe Heel Creek (Figure 10) suggesting little impact
off the faun site of animal waste. Cl/Br ratios are high in the waste lagoon and in the northern
drainage at the site, but love in the southern drainage in the wetlands on the farm and in the
adjacent Jordan and Shoe Heel creeks. This supports the interpretation that there is little
influence of animal waste in the adjacent creeks, but suggests that there is drainage northward
into the unnamed creek of animal waste nitrate. But the nitrate concentrations are low in the
unnamed northern drainage, so the hydric soils in the creek must naturally attenuate the nitrate
before it reaches Shoe Heel Creek to the east. The nitrogen isotopic results support this
conclusion. 815N nitrate values are very high in the lagoon and in the seeps in the high
13

_ n �
7=7 w A!'
r5iTrA
46
177-2
- J, 1

�� 1. S r ,•.*� 1..}F•�
, ,
`�.kC. - 'f 6.' -- ��; +` a •r. x _
�,Zyj7.�
'
r
4 l
i e
�:�.
.•far

Figure 13. S"N nitrate values in surface waters at Farm 5177.
Figure 14. W N nitrate values in surface waters in creelo adjacent to Farm 5177.
16