820051_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Type of Visit: (>-Com Hance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit:Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: J+ Arrival Time: i v Departure Time: L rLl_J County: j4VU PA-W Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: A o2 T 4 C Phone:
-V
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C.'t,.v.+i s Be.y-t,z:Gr Title:
Onsite Representative: u
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
C
Integrator: pi-e-ct46,e,
Certification Number: 2 O 8
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine. Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Non -Layer
Dai Cow
Dai Calf
f
Wean to Feeder
_
Feeder to Finish
1 0
a 4 F
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dr. l;ouftr; Ca aci P.o .
[DrvCow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other .'
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other Other
t�
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
❑ Yes L24o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
BINA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
[ NA
❑ NE
c. Whafnis the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
[:]Yes
0 No
CTINA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Q o
❑ NA
0 NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the:State other than from a discharge?
Prr ge I of 3
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: a b A.60
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[3-NV—
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
D-<A
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): $� , 39
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑'Kb
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[ -5o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[3-No
0 NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
Fa*"&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): L � r' -tL_ Qh s (z f'u tt t r � -
IJAID
Caw �
W r
13. Soil Type(s): 19� �-1 �ey � !o�/
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? f
❑ Yes
[3 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Lrd,<
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑,lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[]"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
D10
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
'No
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
El
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
EKO
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
0 Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ <o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

(Facility Number: - 51 1 Date of Inspection: R G
24. Did the faciUty fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q-No
25. Is theifacility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes CD46
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification'? ❑ Yes L_I "o
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern'?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes [i]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes FrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes [D o [DNA ❑NE
❑ Yes F:;Ko
❑ Yes 7 N' o
❑ Yes [�rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments {refer to question #1) ,Expliiin any YES,answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.,
Useldrawings;of,facili ;;to befter:explaln situation`s.,,(use adddlttlonal ages. as necessary).
7c
CIC( 0110-- 3 0�_- 6M
Reviewer/inspector Name: 3 I �{ Phone (�
Reviewer/inspector Signature: � Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

I i I
Di"vi"sion of Water Resources
Far-lity Number - Division of Sail and Water Conservation
DQ Other Age -M-
Type of Visit: QMompliance Inspection n Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Cl"Rioutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Mt '� Arrival Time: Departure Time: n�pcounty: ;54 n(
Farm Name: 1169, FAVott, " Owner Email:
Owner Name: oc; �it/i� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Region:
Facility Contact: c,c� idv'-t'✓ l C� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: f ` Integrator: T-14
11,
Certified Operator: Jty t Certification Numher: �? —f 'IV
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current Dgn Cfu`�nt � " ' Design Curren
Swine Capacity Pop, Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cat le Capacity Pop
Wean to Finish La er Dair y Cow
Wean to Feeder Non -La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finishr
u,a, } DairyHeifer
1, My
�' '"m Design Current Dr Cow
Farrow to Wean �di'.;�� t ,.r:S rr trasr
Farrow to Feeder Ur Pbultr Ca acrt P,o y Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No (� NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (Ifyes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No LNA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gal Ions)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Ej�No
❑ Yes F!J*"'No
El"NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

>iacili Number: - Date of inspection: '
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 19-f1° D NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 2<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 'ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 5KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes eNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > I0% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window/ ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of
ffyApproved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): j+ L&- L e DA Y7l1) t
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reouired Records & Documents
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[?rNo
ONo
[];Ao
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes GgAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'? ❑ Yes [Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [✓] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute lnspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA [] NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [frNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continuer!

F'aclilty Number: 1 Date of Inspection:
24. Did lie facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Z34<_
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[R-15—o—
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[2-?�o'
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
3 o
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
I?wu
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�To
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[:J<o
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
D-Go
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
D-Qo
0 NA ❑ NE
Corninet is (refer to question #): Expiitin-any.YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other cotnrnents.
Use drawings oi'.facility to Better explain situations (use additional pages its necessary}.
Cl7
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Cw q10- JC)8'-66S(
Phone: tv``�'J'�
Y i
Date:
21412015

9 l W s- [� `[ h R)
C9'Division of Water Quality
,Facility Number ®- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency ................ ----: _....- __ -- - ___ __
Type of Visit: (D-Com fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:gili
Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:,g4 ` ` Region:,Fx�)
Farm Name (13
'0.7 5WoA_f Owner Email:
Owner Name: aM�2jA_ �G Phone:
Mailing Address: , .Q "&C�-W 60,�rr
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �e. I S 3ao-4+1.C(t Title:
Onsite Representative: V
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Phone:
Integrator: _ C—&) .5 F
Certification Number:[ Q eK �—
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
[±Layer
on -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes
[:]No
[ 'NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
El NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes [:]No [3*NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [:]Yes [3'-No ❑ NA C] NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of f 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: JDate of Inspection: lb I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [] Yes G5At—__❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No E3-<A 0 NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: eL� i�`►�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): r b
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
E3-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
P�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
E3 no
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[:]Yes
C2'Ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
Q-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[i]'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Applicati
on
Outside9fffApproved Area
12. Crop Type(s): [�.rQ� _�'__G 0 Cwlf �
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
I S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
WC,
❑ Yes [[&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [50-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [3'Tlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [] Yes ❑"No ❑ NA ONE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes CJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facilitv Number: Date of Inspection:
24'Did thhacility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? t
❑ Yes
[B<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[B"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[] Yes
[]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[ff�fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
[] Yes
dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer::to q'uestioir #): _I~xplain,aiiy .YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or atiy.other comments.
Use drawings,of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
WIL% t4rm."L — iv_ 6—(5
ate- 3,3
d-s 3 . C �(
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 33�3a
Date:
21412011

Facility Number - ,Si O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: Comp lance Inspect€on Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
sit: Rou Reason for Vitine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: �J /�1. Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: t+0:2- 1a/r"' Owner Email:
Owner Name: /4 - j�{-a � f -a.--M,$ ,$'h g_, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:r�-•�ilr�«c� S
P
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Region:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop,
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Daia Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes FA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes C] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
4 Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _ 3 3_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[:]Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
JQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[] Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
5�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
fZ] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12, Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [5No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes q No
❑NA [3 NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: O"
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes EZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes fC No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes r7i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes C.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rC No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
[allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
[,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments,.(refer to question #): Explain.any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility tobetter explain situations (use additional pages. as; necessary).
6
Cf''ti—_nh.Yt7G U3 i] rk ti 7— B', V 7cn" 1�-
v
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: ,/ D / Z.5_
21412014

q -3--lk
Wo'Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 5�j77 - p® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: (grCompliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: a, routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emereency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
? f - Arrival Time: I 4,Q-c-j
Departure Time:
Countys
Farm Name:
r+.,, F",
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
1- ie,4 ramu _2:�na.
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _ azrNer- ne) /' -r— Title:
Phone:
Region:
Onsite Representative: ,� � Integrator: 6_ne� fVj *—Z*a(Z:
Certified Operator: I red 6p6 Certification Number: y*_gDk1' f
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[]Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [allo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection: 7�-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 3ack om i J
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): J 9
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 �-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 5
[&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes ®,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
®-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Ej�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Be 'm Q
s
13. Soil Type(s): vi ar rV
0L'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
FU1 No
Va
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
[ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
E.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [gNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �a No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: ..
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes RNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, cheek ❑ Yes (;A_No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes allo
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [g No
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes O No
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes E� No
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes f% No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 5jNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
6!nrn6ts {refee;to:questi6 #} Explain"any YES'answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
t se drawings of.facIIIty`to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/lnspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9/"33L-.TJm
Date:
21412011

tl'Division of Water Quality
Facility Number :s, - © 4 Division of Soil and Water Conservation l 5�
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: Comp lance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral Q Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: //— Arrival Time: C) 1. p b7 Departure Time: i i r ' "? County:`
Farm Name: 24--��� Rrt-t Owner Email:
Owner Name: j��- pry ,mar �n C, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Region: ! D
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ��rYd 'Wtyry— Title: Phone:
v -
Onsite Representative: Integrator: au2e>*f g
Certified Operator: a�b Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop, Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Pullets
Poults
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[]Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [:]No
[]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - / Date of Inspection: Zl= lxl',go�7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: '00 00
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 17
Observed Freeboard (in): Z3:L r_ 1 .3_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
Structure 5
F721 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑No [3 NA ❑NE
Structure 6
0 Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes jig "`" ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes Ig No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
/k
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
allo
[DNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Pen -nit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps []Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes C&No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [] Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [a No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes .® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
[]Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes RLNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes JZ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ® No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes E�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[-]Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�j No
❑ NA
C1 NE
❑ Yes
®. No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
W No
[DNA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question;#} Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Usefdrarvings'.of facility to.better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary),
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9/Q-yam' 3-3-'roD
Date: 11-1y p20/3
21412011

It
Type of Visit: Complianee Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (Ercoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
-- 7_>
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: :3 D Departure Time: ', DD CountyRegion:�
Farm Names r' Owner Email:
Owner Name: M-p ;L Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: (Crr /%%r`C_ Title:,—c. Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: fjr"( �- Z2 latz Certification Number:
Rack -up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
S�vinc Capacity Pap.
Wet Ppultry
Capacity
P.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
La er
Non -La er
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Doi Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Soars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
MNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
CD
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
-No
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: --
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Z, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: f 00 VD 426TC)—
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes RLNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures
require Egly_,es ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aaulication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ELNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r ar�7.7-r�irrr�
l�yrr .--•-
13. Soil Type(s): j J o 125LXZy --1Anti
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
EI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Jallo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
JELNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [S-No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E,No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes D�LNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of a 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3l. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes E?j No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes MMNo [3 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
(3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
CEINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0—Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer. to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments
Use drawl4gs:of facility,to better explain situations (use additional Pages as necessary).
�Dw n uj , f( f6((D.Lr a wi L 71, ray-m,b_
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
C�W-303 _D1 Sl_�
Gr It
Phone: 2z�- 3�33
Date:
2/412011

Division of Water Quality �C
Facility Number ®- �� Division of Soil and Water Conservation /�7,4
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine 0 Complaint O Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: —/ Arrival Time: a Departure Time: 1 O : D County: Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: ���'`�tv' /I'Iaor^`C_ Title: ��, sp Phone:
Onsite Representative: a-- Integrator:
Certified Operator:/ate C Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
l a er
Non -La er
Design Current
DrX Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dai Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 2� No ❑ NA [] NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili_0 Number: - Date of —Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
t 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 2100 '�0 T O
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):9-
Observed Freeboard (in): �3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Q No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? O Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?-Y eS ®.No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require F. Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [-]Yes ® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. 1s there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence off Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � ,. /fl�r r'����i�i�1r� �` ce_ Cent / ..,k.•f%5��. ,.�--
f
13. Soil Type(s): 4. 71 / 2504 f 4r./ % _/o of /,„.., i�Av��,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 2] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? [] Yes ®. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes ER -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5a No
❑ Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,LNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes _S No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

_, Facili Number: -I Date of Inspection: —/-- / J
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [S-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gNo [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes f�L No
❑ Yes ac No
[]Yes E No
❑NA ❑NE
[DNA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question.#): Explain any YES.answers and/or any additional recommendations -or any other comments,�' A.`'Yy*
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional ages as necessary)),
0,-- %Sf Gl/D rlrC fil arty rr-� o[ 0 - G eat+ r
�i �'- �-r�►I� t pry. bn ac � �<r� a>� f� %a uS r z- �f 5 i � �p 0
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: gA* .3 3 o 0
Date: 12
21412011

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Q46utine O complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �! D Arrival Time: IT'D Departure Time: : H� County: Region; -_
Farm Name: Ad-!3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: A- i+ w%_ = n e,, Phone:
01
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: Facility Contact: (f-Z>�L-= Title:. % j:aL ��r� Phone No:
Onsite Representative: C� - Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
u
Other
❑ Other
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o F--I = " Longitude: 0 o =' =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkev Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Daia Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures.,
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El NA
El NE
El yes
El No
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
9,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Date of Inspection $10
Facility Number: — g'
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier: DZJ 0V AZOV
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
5.Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
R[Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Cl Yes
RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of AcceptableCrop Window ❑l Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ ApplicationOutside of Area
12. Crap type(s) '�`M-rfi s /%hl�/ / T �5 f�LIC .�f f f�wi
I.SMr-'roa
-o'
13. Soil type(s) ���I �ED $ L- G !`-'Dd�J��
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[2.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
21No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[3-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
irw7 ii
Commen ss,ire r toque lion #)€ _ plain any YES'answers and%or Any re r',l y
commendations or'an other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explainAsituptlans. (use additional pages;as necessary): .
_ . . .
7,
of A 1 C j A'M
Reviewer/Inspector Name F1CvG-y�j——^� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

1 Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 54-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5,01�ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
E4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification'?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
QSNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
.2
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
iayes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
tonal!gComments,andlar Drawin s;,' ","''
.P
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

6XR45 l a. w Zz - ZO 0 9 ,
ivision of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: iZ� -09 Arrival Time: i0; 3�` Departure Time: lQSSCounty: Region: GAO
Farm Name: B� �� �' Owner Email;
Owner Name: f� 8 �D-i �'Tt vim', �' Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: -laow e— , __ Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
��'<<- ✓
ILlrrO✓�
Integrator: 54f-110
Certified Operator: �0�Y4�
5�c-y
Operator Certification Number: 2025Y
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: o = ' = Longitude: =0=1
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population -Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish �z00
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
Other
Poults
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Pfeifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: M
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
[]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
El NE
❑ Yes
El No
,[_,_',—A
DNA
❑ NE
B<
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
C7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Ala
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 8 -��Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment ��
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? []Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural Freeboard? ❑ Yes l.7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: -2-/0 a ZZO�L Z_5-D2o
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [l Yes
Io
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
Io
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
2'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) ?+cleCYy. (H6 (pia loss%%t FSeu 6< l
r�a✓a.�
`
Cr O� S�
13. Soil type(s) 4r4, PC �e- /q- AfO 4 LAf6L,g
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
ET< ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
Q o
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination';[:] Yes 2 Igo ❑ NA ❑ NE
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
I S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes D o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Ins
c, v
Inspector Name
p Phone: Wo . S43.3, 3.3-n0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1z -Z/— 09
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: ° �Z-,s/ Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E'go_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes CTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
[--]Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWNW?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Comments and/or Drawings:
❑ Yes
2<o
❑ NA-
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2<oo
❑ NA
❑ N6
❑Yes
El NA
El NE
❑ Yes
Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
B o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
a<0
❑ NA
❑ NE
I /
El Yes
€�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes LH'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ElNE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
1?,128104

Facility. Number;
Q"iiivision of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit &'i,ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: /Z-/8-0Arrival Time: /d �3S` Departure'rime: //; /Q County: a^°"� Region:
Farm Name: $ hfj Owner Email:
Owner Name: -A/ L Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: „ 2 re4_ r'___ O-v-` _ Title: i a! Li Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: c¢oz✓!-ect_ FVI -
1-5
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = 0 0 6=Ig Longitude: ❑ o= 6
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
_ - 1 10 Non -La cr
Other
❑ Other T.
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy 1-Ieifej
E]Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: Fal
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
EY<A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
IA
❑ NE
Ea<
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
D 5o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
3<
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: $� _ ,S� Date of Inspection I rZ- I S P;
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes CIONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes LTNo ❑ NA [I NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ZAd D bG 2200 Z fOD n[
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 20 VD Zto
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 3<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) �
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes B o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes C7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes ❑-tro— ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [31o- ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? ��
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [I Yes Elgo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
2<oo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
B tvo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2' -oo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E;-Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name iG I" S Phone:
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date: r2 zoo
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropiate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes C"J�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes;N>o
NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facilityfail to calibrate waste application equipment as re required b the permit? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
pPq Y
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ffrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) �,�
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? El Yes L7No�❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes E3<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

alAIS /L//9/0o0.7
Aft DiV>sion of Water Quality n
Facility Number; �Z / Q'.Division of Soil24atid Water Conservation
=�,D Other Agency.
Type of Visit G-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason far Visit 9 outine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 27 / r e-. Departure Time: !S% /�.� County: H. 36M Region: �'�
Farm Name: Imo' 1 �-io�+ +^—. Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ A �- �SY►"��- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: 1 � Sfe�. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 494.1/1Z14 /::;SCcpDf�
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
"Swine..
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = O ❑ 1 Longitude: ❑ ° = i
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
PElLa er
Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current'
Cattle Capacity Population;..
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ DpL Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: $Z— Jr+< Date of Inspection Z /3-07
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
[j§No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: 'Z I d-o
Spillway?:
Designed freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 2-rf g e17 /
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
54 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[p No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
r
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'?
11.
Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
[?No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidenceof Wind Drifl [IApplication Outside of Area
12.
(paslvr�
Crop type(s) �* /�.L,�c.- fr Pa �,L j JW, /fd(P.,S-L j R-Sccaa-01
J \
. 5. G •�avus J
13.
Soil type(s) tt�, gg_ �<-Ar lQ0 h, t*Jtie ►-Z;
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
[4 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'? ❑ Yes
7 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
[P No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17,
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
J� No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
P No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name ; R"C_u Phone: 9Vd - 1�33 • 3 3.00
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Q e�-�a�i� Date: 1 Z -13 " Z.oQ 7
12128104 Continued

J
Facility Number: Z — j/ Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
17 No
ElNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: /Q 2 -p(o Arrival Time: //,'�fJ -, Departure Time: County: •
Farm Name: F S yob 6&,Ls3 Owner Email:
f)wnPr NAmP- TtL Ak'P_u �lll1`Y� _ PhnnP!
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Region:
Facility Contact: (s kLe-jc lif"i,irTitle: le-ch, 4zri- . Phone No:
Onsite Representative:4��-t.. ✓ )Wo,iv,C . Integrator: 60111.'d /�s� r5
Certified Operator: ,p�rad-6rci L ` cpo�+S _— Operator Certification Number: 95f_90gT�`
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: E] o E 3 = 11 Longitude: = ° 0 t = t,
Swine
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet I sultry Capacity Population CattleMMLUapcity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Laver ❑ Dair Cow
JE1 Non -Layer I ❑ Dairy Calf
/ O` El Dairy Heifer
Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Layers
' El Beef Stocker
❑ Non -Layers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
ID Other I Number of Structures:
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
UfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[)I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

: Facility Number: $Z — 5/ Date of Inspection 0-20%
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: Zl UD 2ZOV 25-00
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
J# a �i
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
[]Yes [M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [B No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [% No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11.
Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
E�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12.
Crop type(s) BGYfuu.�a . A z r _ /�./�� � . R� t� Gvitl�u fl'�e �. Fstu �
C ►zz
-e .r
13.
Soil type(s) e�o / a A Ib i ida,
14,
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
El NA El NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElIg Yes
,WpNo
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/or any.recommendadons or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
T
Reviewer/inspector Name I T l� PC:VPhone: 9/0 .3 'J d�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /6 - 2V - Z ffb (p
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: �Z j / Date of Inspection o zy—oG
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes
[51 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26,
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification'?
❑ Yes
[;gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
H3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
[gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
C9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: : d u q,h Departure 'Time- County: s�oeags-�— Region:
Farm Name: /3, Owner Email:
Owner Name: f� 12 He s 11'-ar$..,a tahe p Phone:
Mailing Address: �'1 od 311 is i.a � I�dC !l os, A:(�
Physical Address: ,�pp
Facility Contact: hi l{roa r { Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: - __e,r_+t'SrIntegrator:
Certified Operator: �dt g r�v 1 /G / J Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = 1 = " Longitude: = o = , 0
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non-Layet
Other
❑ Other - 1k
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stoekei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: ,ti — 6-1 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
��
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
[I Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freel�oa d?,
[I Yes
❑ No
El NA
❑ NE
ti '6.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: a/ 0 v aal 0 o 0'2 6- 0 a
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ' " R D " A $
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
[RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Es No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes EFNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12.
Crop type(s) �r r., c.4 Civn e _;;C,/l -A A
s2ze
P
13.
Soil type(s) 2, R _ �_ A.
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16,
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:❑
Yes
[qNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
[I NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
,[-9,,,'CCN'�o
ED/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(gax,_ haSuu•1 13es J� ' oV- stet :1/o0 A-vSae,, r
Reviewer/Inspector Name :j.�d�it�.. a �i t �'' ° Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128/04 Continued

r
Facility Number: — S 1 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [g"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 52"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
EgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
G 'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28,
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern'?
❑ Yes
['No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit`? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
ED No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[0,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and76rawings
�►iilkditional Comments i'p
_day[s
�/jdSi+ if I'/7
OR le -/oi/iCc
12128104

Facility Number Z S ( Date of Visit: Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: . » ..._.....
Farm Name: ..» .... _i .......11`7a1 ... �"� ._rrfl,C:lniCounty:....»
Owner Naive: . „ �.�»»..»... :.1 Lt Tl�.� !!lAr.�t_ ,� t!k,f�� ._ . _ .... Phone No:
Mailing Address:.
Facility Contact: .. „..{,�.1 1�r3�.. _..!!�Q(1x' .» _ Title:..__.. ._..__...._. ._. ..._w_. _ _. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �.�.__t2�..�_..._.__..__._ ..» » ».... Integrator:
Certified Operator:.._...-r GS ... _ »Goa�^� 4_ _.... _........ ...... Operator Certification
Location of Farm:
a Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ horse Latitude ' 4 44 Longitude • 4 «
Discbaraes & Stream I, mMEts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ]$ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes J&No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes JMNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _.__,» . ».. r ..��__ ... Z,rt? ... ...__ .... _...._... . _....._. ........ _____._....__ ....»
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: gz — SI Date of Inspection to
4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes SLNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are, there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes 0No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes RNo
B. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes Rio
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes KNo
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JR No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type CCOL4.,.1 . S vr+ w� ¢ r i , (.7 i
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes KNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes J&No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ja No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ;KNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes P No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes JANo
Air Quality representative immediately.
J iMJ W V.d WliNIl /i6(i

Faciliyy Number: Date of Inspection O t 0
1;
Required_ Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
W No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUV(E"hecklis$4esign, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
KNo
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Applicatioe[3 FreeboarOl"❑ Waste Analyses(] Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Ca No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
j$No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
Q No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Q No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
KNo
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Flo
NPDES Permifto Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ® Yes ❑ No
31. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ®,No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ®,No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ELNo
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo
[I Stocking For Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfak-'❑ Inspection After 1" RaiW/'
❑ 120 Minute Inspection❑ Annual Certification Form/
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
1Z/s/03
z.
2.1 , z.1
��ti /oy
2•N,
s.y, Z•?
7410 /o4
2,41
3. &I , Z.Z
g�Z�oy
2•�,
1.Z, O.q�
3 S . � 1�.� 7�(.�,e S� oc�H r•c� t•arw�g C 40 � '[�. �r..e�� Sw•.i {{,�. �a..tti«� S, °��
a..nK ua� c f-�-;�: a.`iti`c�► �o�v�s i *� 0+1 - 5 4e- r-e c_o r v6 .
12112103

r/to
State of North Carolina
Department of Envir6nmant,
Health and Natural Resources A00^
i
Fayetteville Regional Office 74fA
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor p E H N F�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 14, 1995
A&B Hog Farm
ATTN: Mr. Aubrey Moore
100 Balkcum Road
Rose Hill, NC 28458
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Moore:
On July 26, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance
Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility is
In compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being
properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me at (910)
486-1541.
Sincerely,
Ricky Revels
Environmental Technician IV
RR/bs
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville. North Carolina 28301-5= Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5096 recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: D
Facility No. F 2 - S I
O
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Farm Name/Owner: /4
Mailing Address: i00
County:_ 56meg-C, ,✓
Integrator:- - L t 5 9=
On Site Representative: —
Physical Address/Location:
DATE: 1995
Time: 17- : 0 Z
� 8 h�� �u rrs•ti
,C3alKcur� Rd.
Fd.r� s
r_ e
0 o ele-
2 S4S
Phone: Sz 9 - 4&53cv
Phone% 532
u�er+r G?r %r A4, I[Sy4-y 41V 5, Near ' .rat. r re `lp
Type of Operation: Swine _/ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 5575 F�ov, Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 34 ° `+" 1 ' '+ 3 " Longitude: 'IS ° / & ' / 0 "
34 50 14 Circle Y es-% No19 oc,
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) ® or No Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft. (� Inches
Was any seepage observed from the la oon(s)? Yes or� Was any erosion observed? Yes oro
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate`! Qor No
Crop(s) being utilized: 5er a..
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? (r s_ r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orb
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes 0(9�)
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or(j;W If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (vol nes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes ortN.o'
Additional Comments:
9"C' , R2 V ?_ & / 7 , /' "-?.�
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

ly- nI_
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
A & B Hog Farms, Inc
A&BHog Farm
2207 Moores Bridge Rd
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Dear A & B Hog Farms, Inc:
RECEIVED
DEQIDWR
JUL 18 2017
WQROS
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
July 12, 2017
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820051
A&BHog Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Sampson County
The Division of Water Resources (Division) received your sludge survey information on July 5,
2017. With the survey results, you requested an extension of the sludge survey requirement for
the lagoon #2100 at A & B Hog Farm facility. Due to the amounts of treatment volume
available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until December 31, 2021.
The next sludge survey for the lagoon #2100 at A & B Hog Farm facility should be performed
before December 31, 2021. Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
-z-9 �
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Program
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Permit File AWS820051
Nothing Compares':-,
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

Water Resources w
Environmental Quality
A & B Hog Farms, Inc
A & B Hog Farm
2207 Moores Bridge Rd
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Dear A & B Hog Farms, Inc:
RECEIVED
DEQ/DWR
JUL 18 2017
WQROS
FAYETTEVILLE RFGIONAL OFFICE
July 12, 2017
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secretory
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820051
A&BHog Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Sampson County
The Division of W rTlivision) received your sludge survey information on July 5,
2017. With the su -"'-e sludge survey requirement for
the lagoon #2100 .tnts of treatment volume
available, the Div 3 until December 31, 2021.
The next sludge,,; ��� � S� p gn E-:Nc'e rtn facility should be performed
before Decembe, if you have any questions.
.tions Program
cc: Fayettc-----. !l Operations Section
Permit File AWS82UU:r
r.�Nurhing Cempares:- :-
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Reglonai Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal
This plan has been prepared for:
A&B Hog Farm
Aubrey Moore
100 Balkum Road
Rose Hill, NC 28458
[phone]
11-22-2005
Wastelutil'009 2.
LOW�ol
This plan has been developed by:
Greer Moore
Private
PO Box 338
Harrells, NC 28444
(910) 53 -4493
, �z�-
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature ( er)
Signature (manager or producer)
/) -;� �;L, -�
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Co servation Commission.
Plan Approved By:�
Technical Specialist Signature D e
821949
Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 11-22-2005 ��Cover Page 1

Narrative
Coastal Bermuda may he applied on from March 1 st thru October I5th, unless frost occurs first.
a
,-wow
1
`""� 821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: If -22-2005 Narrative Page I of I

a
.-' Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 7,638,480 gals/year
by a 8,240 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
roduction facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 day!.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
17593
Incorporated
30214
Injected
33274
Irrigated
19123
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
28,027.80
11,195,452
-3,556,972
tiote: In source 1D, S means standard source. U means user defined source.
821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-22-2005 Source Page I of 1

=idle table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
6425
10
4.70
4.70
N/A
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagmss Pasture
4.5 Tons
6425
11
5.40
5.40
NIA
Woodington
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
6425
12
5.70
5.70
NIA
Woodinoon
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
6425
13
4.80
4.80
NIA
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0'I'ons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5'rons
6425
14
1.40
1.40
N/A
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
6425
15
5.40
5.40
NIA
Au ille
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
6425
5
5.40
5.40
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
6425
6
5.40
5.40
NIA
Norfolk
Cereal/Annual Ryc O/S, Hay4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
Pend Millett, Pasture
5.5 Tons
6425
7
5.40
5.40
N/A
Norfolk
Cereal/Annual gyeMS, HayAn Harvest
2.0 Tons
Pearl Millett, Pasture
5.5 Tons
6425
8
4.20
4.20
NIA
Norfolk
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Pearl Millett, Pasture
5.5 Tons
6425
9a
1-201
1.20
NIA
Blanton
CcmaUAnnual Rye US, Ha-4/7 Harvest
2.0 Tons
Pearl Millett, Pasture
4.1 Tans
6425
9b
1.20
1.20
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tans
7090
1
3.60
3.60
N/A
Blanton
Sma11 Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
7090
2
2.00
2,00
N/A
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Toms
H rid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
7090
3
2.30
2.30
N/A
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
7090
4
4.50
4.50
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bcrmudagtass Pasture
4.5 Tons
7091
16
4.10
4.10
NIA
Leon
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
on I AA!1 nw.t-o.. ll.,e:.,.. i 1 rUtr %4: F.A I I r)-Inm;

Planned Crops Summary
Tract i
Field
'total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (Ll)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Hybrid Bermudagress Pasture
3.0 Tons
7091
1 17
3.101
3.10
NIA
lAutryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7091
18
1.30
1.30
NIA
Autryvillo
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Torts
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 'Cons
7091
19
3.90
3.90
NIA
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7091
20
4.70
4.70
NIA
Au ille
Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 'rons
7091
21
6.10
6.10
NIA
Au ille
Small drain Oversoed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7091
22
6.10
6.10
NIA
Awryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
7091
23
5.40
5.40
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagmss Pasture
4.5 Tons
7091
24
4.60
40
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
7091
25
5.70
5.70
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bcrmudsgrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
7091
26
1.50
1.5
NIA
Blanton
Small Grin Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
7091
27
3.70
3.70
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tars
7091
28
3.80
3.80
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
7091
29
3.80
3.80
NIA
Blanton
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 120.40 120.40
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
< 2
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<- 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zo ne.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
nutrient leaching below the root zom
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
> 10
should be considered. Fxamples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based
Rotations (328), Long -Term No-Td1(778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
0'1 s n 4n ne,olwr. V..ai.... 'Z 1 rlat. Ur4m.A r r l7 MMK

Waste Utilization Table
VnAr 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Tonal
Acres
Use.
Acres
1 Crop
RYE
APplic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
RegV
(Ibs/A)
Canm
Fert.
Nutdcnt
Applied
(Ibs1A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applea
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs1A)
Liquid
MmmrA
pp5od
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid 1
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
IOOD
gal/A
Tans
1000 gals
tons
6425
7
S7
Norfbtk
5.40
5.40
CereallAnnuai Rye O/S, Hay-4n Harvest
2.0 Tans
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
1 brig.
100
39.94
0.
215-70
O.Ot
6425
7
S7
orfaik
5.40
5.40
Pearl Millem Pasture
5.5 Tons
4/1-9/15
209
0
0
brig
Z
83.48
0.
450.$1
0.41
6425
8
S7
Norfolk
4,20
4.20
Cemd/Annuel Rye O/S, Hay-4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
10/1-3131
100
0
0
brig.
100
39.94
0.
167.7
0.04
6425
8
S7
Narfolk
4.20
4.20
Pearl Millets Pasture
5.5 Tons
4/1-9/15
209
1 0
0
Irri&
209
93.48
0.
350.63
0.41
6425
9a
S7
Blanton
1,20
1.20
Cereal/Annual Rye OIS, Hay4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
brig.
100
39.9
0.
47.93
0.0(
6425
98
S7
Blantion
1.20
1.20
Pearl Millett, Pasture
4.1 Tons
4/1-9/15
162
0
0
Ini&
162
64.71
0.00
77.65
0.04
6425
9b
S7
Blwiton
1.20
110
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1 OA-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
t9.97
0.
23.97
0.0(
6425
9b
S7
Blanton
1.20
1.20
Hybrid Bermudagmss Pasture
4.5 Tons
1 *311-10/15
161
0
0
Irrig,
161
64.31
0.
77.17
0.01
7090
1
S7
Blanton
3.60
3.601
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
IQ/ 1-3/31
50
0
0
Irri&
S
t9.97
O.
71.90
0.01
7090
1
S7
Blanton
3.60
3.60
Hybrid BermudWws Past=
4.5 Tons
•311-10/15
161
0
0
Irri&
161
64.31
0.
231-52
0.01
7090
2
S7
Bleoton
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Oveaseed
1.0 Tans
1011-3/31
SO
0
0
Irri&
50
19.97
OA
39.94
0.01
7090
2
S7
Blanton
2.00
2.00
Hybrid Bamudagrass Pastore
4.5 Tons
•311-10115
161
0
0
Irri&
161
64.31
O.00
128.62
0.0(
7090
1 3
S7
Blanton
2.30
2.30
Small Grain Overseed
1.O Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irri&
50
19.9
0.
45.
0.01
7090
3
S7
Blanton
2.30
2.30
Hybrid Bermudagress Pasture
4.5 Tons
•3/1-10115
16t
0
0
Irrig,
161
64.31
00
147.91
0.01
7090
4
S7
Blanton
4.50
4.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irri&
50
19.97
0.
99.87
0.01
7090
4
S7
Blwton
4.50
4.50
Hybrid Bennudagress Pasture
4.5 Tons
*311-10/15
161
0
0
Uri&
161
64.31
0.
289.40
0.01
7091
16
S7
1xon
4.10
4.10
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.9
0.
81.99
0.01
7043
16
S7
4.10
4.10
Hybrid Bermudagtass Pasture
3.0 Tons
03/1-10/15
100
0
Q
brig
I
39.9
0.
163.77
0.01
7091
17
S7
Autryville
3.10
3.10
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.0
61.91
OD
7091
17
S7
Autryvillc
3.10
3.10
Hybrid Bennudagrass Pasture
5.5'Ibns
*3/1-10115
202
0
U
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.00
250.13
0.01
7091
18
S7
Autryville
1.30
1.30
Small brain Overseed
1.O Ttwns
10/ 1-3131
50
0
U
brig,
51
19.4
0.00
25.96
0.04
7091
18
S7
Auuyvillc
1.30
1.30
Hybrid 13ermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tuns
*3/1-10115
202:]
0
U
Irrig.
20
80.6
O.
104.89
0.04
�+C, Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/22/" j WUT Page 4
J ,. �

Waste Utilisation
'rable
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applie
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
OWA)
Camm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Man=
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
LigW
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
M=nc
Applied
(acre)
Li4tid
AAmnue
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manic
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
ga1000 OD
tons
1000 gain
tons
7091
19
S7
utryville
3.90
3.90
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.
77.89
0.01
7091
19
S7
Autryville
3.90
3.90
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
*311-10115
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.0
314.69
0.01
7091
20
S7
Aunyville
4.70
4.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.4
0.
93.87
0.01
7091
20
S7
Autryvillc
4.70
4.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasu"
5.5 Tons
*311-10115
202
0
0
brig.
202
80A9
0.
379.23
0.01
7091
21
S7
Aunyville
6.10
6.10
Small Grain Ovcrseed
LO Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.0C
121.93
0.01
7091
21
S7
Autryvillc
6.10
6.10
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
*3/1-10/15
202
0
0
trrig.
202
80.69
0.
492.19
0.01
7091
22
S7
ALruyville
6.10
6.I0
Small Grain Oversecd
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.9
0.
121.93
0.01
7091
22
S7
Autryville
6.10
6.10
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
*3/1-10/15
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.
492.19
0.01
7091
23
S7
BlftntM
5.40
5.40
Small Grain Oversced
LO Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.9
0.
107.85
0.01
7091
23
S7
Blanton
5.40
5.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
*311-10M
161
0
0
brig.
161
64.31
0.
347.27
0.01
7091
24
S7
Blanton
4.60
4.60
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Taas
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.0
91.87
0.01
7091
24
S7
Blanton
4.60
4.60
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
*31L-10/15
16I
0
0
Irrig.
161
64.31
0.
295.83
0.N
7091
25
S7
Blanton
5.70
5.70
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
5
19.97
0.
113.94
O.Or
7091
25
S7
Menton
5.70
5.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasttm
4.5 Tons
$311-10/15
161
0
0
brig.
161
64.31
0.
366.57
0.04
7091
26
S7
BIMMM
1.50
1.50
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.9
0.
29.96
0.01
7091
26
S7
Blarrton
1.50
1.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
63/1-10/15
161
0
0
Irrig.
161
64.31
0.
96.47
0.01
7091
27
S7
Blanton
3.70
3.70
Small Grain Overseed
L.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.
73.90
0.01
7091
27
S7
Blanton
3.70
3.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
*3/I-10/15
161
0
0
Irrig.
161
64.31
0.00
237.95
0.01
7091
28
S7
Blanton
3.80
3.90
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Img.
50
19.97
0.00
75.89
0.01
91
28
S7
Blanton
3.80
3.80
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture4.5Tons
•311-10/15
161
1)
0
1rris.
161
64.31
0.
244.38
O.Ot
91
r70
29
S7
Blanton
3.80
3.80
Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
I(VI-3131
50
0
0
brig.
5
19.97
0.00
75.89
0.01
7091
29
S7
Blanton
3.80
3.80
11lyhrid Berrnudagrass Pastum
4.5'rons
*311-10115
16E
0
0
Irrig,
161
64.31
0.00
244.38
0.01
Database Version 3.1 t Date Printed: 11/22r,k�
tit
WUT Page " ` 4

r235LE RJcuunt[VU
InUIC xcur
1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
R4d
Qbs/A)
Cam.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
pbs/A)
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic.
Meftd
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
pbs/A)
Liquid
ManurtA
pplied
(a=)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(am)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gd/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
ToW Applied,
1000 gallons
11,195.4
Total produced, I000 gallms
7,638.4
Balance, 1000 gallons
-3,556.9
Total Applied, tons
0•04
Total Prodaccd, tons
0.01
Balance, tons
0.01
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means laser entered data.
�'� Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: I I/22r WUT Page f } 4

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate ofthe quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen fi-orrl each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
VPnr I
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Aces
Use.
Aces
C 14P8�
RYE
Period
trcgen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(IWA)
Cornm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Re,
(lbs/A)
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
OWA)
Liquid
ManurrA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manua:
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manuro
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
aUA
Tons
1000 1�
toms
6425
10
S7
lanton
4.70
4.70
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
I011-3131
So
0
0
brig.
so
19,97
0,
93.87
0.01
6425
10
S7
Bhurton
4.70
4.70
Hybrid Bermudagmss Pastare
4.5 Tons
•311-10/15
161
0
0
brig.
161
64.31
0.
302.2
0.0t
6425
11
S7
Woodington
5.40
5.40
Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.00
107.95
0.04
6425
It
S7
Woodington
5.40
5.40
Hybrid Bermudagress Pasture
4.5 Tons
•311-10115
146
0
1 0
brig.
146
58.3
0.00
314.92
0.01
6425
12
S7
Woodingbon
5.70
5.70
Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
l0fl-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.9
0.
113.94
0.01
6425
12
S7
Wooft9ton
5.70
5.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4.5 Tons
03/1-10/15
146
0
0
Irrig,
146
58.32
0.0C
332.42
0.01
6425
13
S7
Autryvdlc
4.80
4.80
Small Grain Ovcrsmd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
O.01
95.87
O.Of
6425
13
S7
utryville
4.90
4.80
Hybrid Bermudagrsss Pasture
5.5 Tons
*311-10115
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.
387.30
0.01
6425
14
S7
Autryville,
1.40
1.40
Small Grain Ovase d
1.0 Tons
10(1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.
27.96
0.01
6425
14
SZ
Antryville
1.40
1.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
•3/1-10/15
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.
112.96
0.04
6425
15
S7
Autryville
5.40
5.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10(1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.
107.85
0.0(
6425
15
S7
Autryville
5.401
5.40
Hybrid Bermudagress Pasture
5.5 Tons
'311-10/15
202
0
0
brig.
1 202
80.6
0.00
435.71
0.01
6425
5
S7
Blariton
5.40
5.40
Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.0
O.00
107.85
0.01
6425
5
S7
Blunton
5.40
5.40
Hybrid Bermudagnas Pasture
4.5 Tons
'3/1-10/0
161
0
0
brig.
161
64.31
0,00
347.27
0.01
6425
6
S7
Norfolk
5.40
5.40
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4n Harvest
2.0 Tons
1011-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
100
39.94
().00
215.70
0.0E
6125
6
S7
orfalk
5.40
5.40
Perri Millen Pasture
5.5 Tons
4/1-9/15
204
0
0
lrrig.
2
83A8
0.0
450.81
0.04
�lr Database Version 3.1 r Date Printed: 11/22/, }
WUT Page ' , j 4

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity ofthe facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
Ifavailable storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish oon Liquid
Desi n Stora a Capacity Da
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
I
1
115
1
2
102
I
3
133
1
4
143
l
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
180
I
11
174
1
12
155
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
821949 T Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-22-2005 Y Capacity Page I of I

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number ofacres needed for
'-=vJr % sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
1�
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
IOW gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Yeats Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
.orn 120 bu
150
13.16
103.30
206.60
309.90
Nay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
51.65
103.30
15495
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
96.84
193.69
290.53
821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-22-2005 Sludge Page I of 1

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
6425
10
Blanton
0.75
1.0
6425
1 11
Woodington
0.40
I.0
6425
12
Woodington
0.40
1.0
6425
13
Autryville
0.60
1.0
6425
14
Autryville
0.60
1.0
6425
15
Autryville
0.60
1.0
6425
5
Blanton
0.75
1.0
6425
6
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
6425
7
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
6425
8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
6425
9a
Blanton
0.75
1.0
6425
9b
Bunton
0.75
1.0
7090
1
Blanton
0.75
1.0
7090
2
Blanton
0.75
1.0
7090
3
Blanton
0.75
1.0
7090
4
Blanton
0.75
1.0
7091
16
Leon
0.65
1.0
7091
17
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7091
18
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7091
19
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7091
20
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7091
21
Autryville
0.60
).0
7091
22
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7091
23
Blanton
0.75
1.0
7091
24
Blanton
0.75
1.0
7091
25
Blanton
0.75
1.0
7091
26
Blanton
0.75
1.0
7091
27
Blanton
0.75
1.0
7091
28
IBlanton
0.75
1.0
7091
29
Blanton
0.75
1.0
0'%1 nAn n...,,1..,_„ /..«.:,,.. 1 1 r%-.-11 nItnnni TAC it„..„ 1 wC 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 7,638,480 gals/year
by a 8,240 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of aperoximately 180 da s.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
17593
Incorporated
30214
Injected
33274
Irrigated
19123
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
28,027.80
11,195,452
-3,556,972
dote: In source 1D, S means standard source. U means user defined source.
821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-22-2005 Source Page I of I

1N A rFjQQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
v3 r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007
A & B Hog Farms Inc 1�
A&B Hog Farm '11�� 2 7 K.1
100 Balkum Rd
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No, AWS820051
A&B Hog Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Sampson County
Dear A & B Hog Farms Inc:
In accordance with your application received on 4-Jan-07, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to A & B Hog Farms Inc, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the A&B Hog Farm, located in Sampson County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 8240 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition I11.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: wwwnewateraualitv.ora I oeation: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
N r Carolina
Natumlly
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .01 I l(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-433-3300. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Sampson County Health Department
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AW S820051

C, 0O w A T��vG Michael F. Easley, Governor
Uj r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Noah Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E, Director
Division of Water Quality
December 1, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL RECE:fZU
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Tl
A& B Hog Farms Inc ['DEC 0A&B Hog Farm art .
100 Balkum Rd .�AYETiEH
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring NPDES General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation NPDES General Permits, which expire on
July I, 2007. Due to changes in federal rules, facilities that do not discharge nor propose to discharge may choose whether or not to
retain coverage under an NPDES General Permit. Copies of the draft animal waste operation NPDES general permits and the State
Non -Discharge General Permits are available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslaps/afou/downloads.htm or by writing or calling:
NCDENR — DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under one of these two types of general 12ermits, you must submit an application for permit
coverale to the Division. Enclosed you will find a `Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an Expirin
NPDES General Permit.' The application form must be completed and returned by January 2, 2007. Please note, you must include
two (2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel free to contact the
Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221.
Sincerely,
e
Ted L. Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - 820051
Garland Farm Supply
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Internet: www.ncwatMuality.org location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh. NC 27604
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper
Telephone:
Fax l:
Fax 2:
Customer Service:
N�o"�`Karolina
(919) ✓ aturally
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

The following crop note applies to field(s): 6, 7, 8
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded— Hay
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tail) bermudagrass sod.
If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short Bermuda sod followed by a light
cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be
1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda
prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between
September 15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs-acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If
rye growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of bermuda. A harvest is required prior to heading
or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading bermuda and
reducing its yields.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegrass should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied between September
15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional
PAN is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce
bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or
April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging bermuda during April -May period. To
favor the production of the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegmss
canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 9a
Pearl Millett: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): 6, 7, 8
Pearl Millett: No Comment
821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-22-2005 Crop Note Page 6 of 6

The following crop note applies to field(s): 9a
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded — Hay
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
If drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed by a light
cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be
1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda
prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between
September 15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If
rye growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuda, PAN rates for the
subsequent Bermuda crop are based on realistic yields of Bermuda. A harvest is required prior to heading
or April 7, which ever comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading Bermuda and
reducing its yields.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegmss should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
bermudagrass sod. if drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied between September
15 and October 30. An additional 50 lbs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. If additional
PAN is applied to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -May will reduce
bermuda yields and shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or
April 7, which ever comes first to prevent shading of emerging bermuda during April -May period. To
favor the production of the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass
canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-22-2005 Crop Note Page 5 of 6

The following crop note applies to field(s): 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs i" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
821949 _ Database Version 3.1� Date Printed: 11-22-2005 � Crop Note Page 4 of 6

The following crop note applies to field(s): 16
Bermudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 2, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 3, 4, 5, 9b
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
921949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-22-2005 Crop Note Page 3 of 6

The following crop note applies to field(s): 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15 November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 11, 12
Bermudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and duly. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-22-2005 Crop Note Page 2 of 6

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 11, 12
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/dri11 row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 16
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 1 S November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushelslacre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 2, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 3, 4, 5, 9b
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
921949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-22-2005 Crop Note Page 1 of 6

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 14 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: U /2212005 Specification Paize 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/22/2005 Specification Pale 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
821949 Y� Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/22/2005 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
821949 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11C22/2005 Specification Page 4

State cif North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Mr. Aubrey Moore
100 Balkum Road
Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458
I LT?WA
4 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA (DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
June 16, 2004
DEINR-FRO
JUN 17 2001
DWQ
SUBJECT: Re-evaluation of the Notice of Referral for
A&B Hog Farm, Facility Number 82-51, Sampson County
Dear Mr. Moore:
After talking with Ms. Osborne with Enviro Ag Compliance about your irrigation records, she
stated that pull 15 had accidentally been credited to pull #5. This had caused an over application
requiring a referral to the Division of Water Quality. After reviewing the Irr-1 forms and the
corrected Irr-2 forms, there was no over application to either pull #5 or pull #15. This was
brought to DWQ's attention and was cleared up. Make sure in the future to keep the irrigation
records up to date on approved forms for review on the day of the operation review.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation and the assistance
provided to you by your irrigation record keeping company. If you have any questions regarding
this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or at the address listed below.
Sincerely,
Trent Allen
Environmental Engineer
cc: Paul Rawls, Division of Water Quality
Sam Warren, Sampson Soil and Water Conservation District
Carroll Pierce, Division of Soil & Water Conservation
Alfred Smith, Garland Farm Supply
225 Green Street, Suite 714I Systel Bid, North Carolina 28301 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department -of Environment
and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
Division of Soil & Water Conservation
May 17, 2004
Mr. Aubrey Moore
100 Balkum Road
Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral for
A&B Hog Farm,
Facility Number 82-51
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Moore,
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL- RESOURCES
DENR--FRO
MAY 17 2004
DWQ
On April 20, 2004, an operation review was conducted of A&B Hog Farm, facility number 82-
51, in Sampson County. This review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is
one of two routine site visits scheduled for all subject animal operations in 2004. Staff from
the Division of Water Quality will conduct a separate compliance inspection.
During the operation review, the following item was noted:
Over application of nitrogen to pull #5 (5.4 acres) small grain. The waste plan allows 50
pounds of nitrogen per acre to small grain, and 70 pounds was applied. This may have
been a result of the wrong nitrogen rate being used on the Irr-2 form,
It was for this reason that your operation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for
further investigation. G.S. 143-215.10E requires staff from the Division of Soil and Water
Conservation to notify the Division of Water Quality and the owner/operator of these observed
violations.
A copy of the operation review report is enclosed for your information. Site findings and
recommended corrective actions as discussed are noted in the comment sections.
225 Green Street, Suite 714 1 Systel Bid. Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone]
FAX [phone] An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Aubrey Moore
May17, 2004
Page 2
Please remember that in order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental
regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the.animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems must be properly maintained and
operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
On behalf of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation, I appreciate your cooperation with
this operation review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 910-486-1541 if you have any
questions, concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Trent Allen
Environmental Engineer
cc: Paul Rawls, Division of Water Quality
Sam warren, Sampson Soil & Water Conservation District
Carroll Pierce, Division of Soil & Water Conservation
Alfred Smith, Garland Farm Supply
225 Green Street, Suite 714 / Systel Bid. Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone]
FAX [phone] An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

FARM NAME
FIELD SIZE (ACRES)
FARM OWNER
OWNER'S ADDRESS
OWNER'S PHONE
CROP TYPE
Moore Farms
5.4
Aubrey Moore
100 Balkcum Rd
Rose Hill, NC 28458
910-533-4855
Coastal / Rye
IRRIGATION RECORDS
FIELD NUMBER (PULL)
IRRIGATION OPERATOR
OPERATOR'S ADDRESS
OPERATOR'S PHONE
RECOMMENDED P.A.N.
Pumping Dates
5
Charles Coats
2207 Moore's Bridge Rd
Rose Hill, NC 28458
910-532-2847 -
161 + 50
Mar - Sep
Oct - Mar
NO. OF
FLOW
OXN. PER
1,000 GAL
PAN_
APPLIED
__-....._....-..._.-
(Ebslacre)
NITROGEN
BALANCE
..--.__- _ ._.
(Ibslacre)
START
END
TOTAL
SPRINKLERS
RATE
TOTAL
GALLONS
DATE
Crop
Lagoon
TIME
TIME
MINUTES
OPERATING
_
in)
(gal/min)
GALLONS
PER ACRE
fil aW
Coasts!
2500
360
1
150
54000
10000
712M
Coasts.
25W
7:00
12:00
300
1
150
45000
8333.333333
2.6
_
21.66686G7
113.3333333
el20103
Coastal
2100
8:00
1:00
300
1
150
45000
8333.333333
2.1
-- 17.5
95.83333333
8f31103
CO2stai
2200
7:00
12:00
300
1
150
45000
8333.333333
2.5
20.8333333
75 -
61-3—W
Coasiai
2200
7:00
1:00
360
1
150
.54000
10000
2.5
11/6/03
Rye.
2100
6:00
4:00
480
1
150
72000
13333.33333
2.1-
28
- - - 133 - --
12118=
1 Rye
2100
1 10:00
4:00
360
1
150
54000
10000
2.1
21
112
1112/04
a
2100
1 10':00
1 4:00
360
1 1
150
54000
1 10000
1 2.1
21
1 --91 --
�D�

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facility Number $2 - 51 Date: 120104 Time: 1 12:45 1 Time On Farm: 210 FRO
Farm Name A&B Hog Farm County Sampson Phone:
Mailing Address 100 Balkum Road
Rose Hill NC
Onsite
Representative Aubrey Moore & Louis Moore Integrator lGarland Farm Supply
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
8240
8240
Q Routine
O Response to DWQIDENR referral
O Response to DSWCISWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by prod ucerlintegrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
910-532-4855
28458
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
910-532-4855
28458
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Other
910-532-4855
28458
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
® yes ❑ no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
B. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier 2100 2200 2500
Level (inches) 33 21 1 3
CROP TYPES Icoastal Bermuda -graze small grain overseed Millet 771 IRye grass (graze) Fescue -graze
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES BOB
Wo
Au
NoA
LeA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 82 - 51 Date:
4/20/04
PARAMETER
0 No assistance providedlrequested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
El 10. Level in structural freeboard
5. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
2
®
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms heed In
El
El
El 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
(list comment section)
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
®
❑
014. Over application >= 10% & 10 Ibs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 Ibs.
30. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading -
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
® 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Latelmissing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
®
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
® 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
® 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Reguilatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
®
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation des ignlin
El
El
El Other...
system stall ation
Date:
44• Secure Irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating Improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
Z
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.3.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements{GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 82 _ 51 Date: 4120104
COMMENTS:
1- Field #2 needs work where the cows are feed. The feeding area needs to be rotated to avoid destroying the bermuda
stand.
22,25 - Pull #19 is written as bermuda graze. This is a fescue field.
Pull #17 is written as fescue. This is a bermuda graze field.
Contact your technical specialist to correct the waste plan.
33,41- This farm has a NPDES permit and needs the irrigation system calibrated and the lagoons need a sludge survey
completed.
29- Needs to start keeping approved Irr-1 forms, daily rainfall events within 24 hours, stocking records, and all other
information required by the new permit on DWQ approved forms. Needs to send the annual certification in as soon as
possible.
4,14- Pull #5 on the Irr-2 form shows over application to small grain. The waste plan allows 50 pounds of nitrogen per acre,
and 70 pounds was applied. This may have been caused because the wrong rate was used on the Irr-2 form. Need to review
Irr-2 forms to avoid over application in the future. The over application will be reported to DWQ,
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST rrent Allen
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 5/17/04 Entered By:
rent Allen
3 03/10/03

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Water Pollution Control System Operator Certification Commission
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Coleen H. Sullins, Chairman
February 21, 2001
A & B Hog Farms, Inc.
100 Balkum Road
Rose Hill NC 28458
SUBJECT: Designation of Operator in Charge
Farm Name: A&B Hog Farm
Facility ID #: 82-51
County: Sampson
Dear A & B Hog Farms:
NCDENR
MAR 2 7 2001
AEG �OFFICEE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on Agricultural
Waste, was enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly. This legislation requires owner of a certified
operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle,
75 or more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid waste management
system.
Our records indicate that the operator designated as the Operator In Charge (OIC) for your animal waste
management system is no longer certified. Therefore, you must designate a properly certified animal waste
management system operator as the OIC for your facility. The enclosed designation form must be returned to this
office by April 1, 2001. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in
locating a certified operator.
Failure to designate a properly certified Operator in Charge for your facility is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2
and 15A NCAC 8F .0201(a) and may result in the initiation of enforcement action. Please be advised that nothing
in this letter should be taken as resolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for
your failure to have a properly certified Operator in Charge designated for your animal waste management system.
If you have questions concerning this matter, or if this office can be of further assistance, please call Beth
Buffington at [phone], extension 313.
Sincerely,
Dwight Lancaster, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Enclosure
cc: TAC Files
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Fayetteville Regional Office
Central Files
1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1618
Phone: 919 — 733-0026 1 FAX: 919 — 733-1338
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED / 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

11 %L lw

I
r &VZ7j „ywsr GdH v(aww6a%
(d M I- sloo)) 56c'da Mod
f�v�ar1 '�i
i � .l rYi'YcL'-r
�` SlS r7
-EQ)h

1�1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Aubrey Moore
A&B Hog Farm
100 Balkum Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
Dear Aubrey Moore:
A1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH GARC 'OF
ENviRONMENT AND NffuRAL RESOURCES
July 6, 1998
0 8 1998
FfiYE i i EV9 IE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820051
A&B Hog Farm
Swine Waste Collection.7reatment,
Storage and Application System
Sampson County
In accordance with your application received on May 21, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Aubrey Moore, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG 100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the A&B Hog Farm, located in Sampson County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 8240 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS820051
A&B Hog Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A nacnelownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Sampson County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

.'� State of North Carolina WA
:QU�
n Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality MQY 2.1 1998
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
General Permit Existing PHOTOCOPIEDHIS FORM MA Y BE ORIGINAL) j
Liquid Animal Waste OT erations�° �e�l
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division.-`Pleffsc+w-mw
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
i
R1=\0L_ 'I
1.1 Facility Name: A&B Hog Farm f
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Aubrey Moore ' ' t n 8 1998
1.3 Mailing address: 100 Balkum Rd
N'CIIC
City, State: Rose Hill NC Zip: 28458 RIM r—
Telephone Number (include area code): 910-5324855
1.4 County where facility is located: Sampson
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Take 421 S. from Clinton towards Harrells go approx.
10 miles to secondary Rd. 1 140 turn riaht on road 1140 and Fo aDnrox. 3 miles operation will be on left.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
L7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): DogwoodtFarms
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/92
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): %zo g 4
2.1 Facility No.: 82T (county number); 51 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
8240- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Xlyes; =no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Thu "No. of Animals" should be the maximum numberfor which the waste management structures were designed.
T ee of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/26/98 Page 1 of 4

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 145 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 84.2
2.4 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or PO
(please circle one)
2.5 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or(please circle one)
2.6 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
(�S)or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations; lie A )71
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and y�
field locations where animal waste is land applied; 81)91
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit fj(1
application for animal waste operations. f
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
infection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every, land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.)
if your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, such as an irrigation design,
or site evaluation, please include the additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 2 of 4

Facility Number: 82 - 51
Facility Name: A&B Hog Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I,
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application fot 4 —1� 4 A FGt/-1 , —Tv C (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate ancc comple a to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be re ed to me as i omplete. / Q
Signature Date
5. MANAGER'S 4TIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
M
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewe y me and is accurate and complete tote best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this. application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 3 of 4

v
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Aubrey Moore
Location: 100 Balkcum Rd.
Rose Hill NC 28458
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 8240.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

x
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
8240 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 15656 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
8240 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 18952 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

r
r ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
7090
1
BOB
BH
4.5
225
3.19
717.75
I
MAR-OCT
7090
SG
I�1
1I
11
150
13.19
1159.5
SEP-MAY
7090
2
BH
4.5
IBoB
I
I
1225 1
118.5614176
MAR-OCT
7090
SG
1
1-2
1
I
150 1
118.56�928
SEP-MAY
6425
2
BH
6.1
INOA
II
I
1305 1
12-5.001762.5
MAR-OCT
6425
SG
1
50
25.00
1250
1-2
1
I
I
I I
I
SEP-MAY
6425
NEW
BH
4.5
IWO
I
1
�225 1
120.7
�4657.5
MAR-OCT
6425
-NEW
SG
1
I
I
150 1
�20.7
11035
SEP-MAY
END
I
I
'
TOTAL120548.7
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
__---
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
_
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
.. Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. in fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
SG
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
SMALL, GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
AC
50
50
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
67.45
20548.75
0
0
67.45
20548.75
* BALANCE
-1596.75
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
• acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 3048.8 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 15244
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 50.8133333333 acres of land. if you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 121.952 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by.25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
6425
2
NoA
BH
0.50
*1.30
6425
NEW
Wo
BH
0.40
*1.30
6425
�2
SG
6425
"NEW
SG
7090
1
BOB
BH
0.75
*0.65
7090
2
BOB
BH
0.75
*0.65
7090
7090
" 1
SG
" 2
SG
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 160.00 days of temporary stowage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
5.33333333333 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste
be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm
storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24
hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
G. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such.that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUTRED_SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
• take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5 ) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
n
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:A & B Hog.Farms Inc.
' Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Aubrey Moore
(Please print)
Signature: & Date:
Name of Manager(I different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (please prin
Affiliation
a��r7ah
cJ.
SGe I
Dos
wa. d
FFa/M1' / T.,C,
Address (Agency) :
�o.
�uX
Lo,
q10- S47_- zl u 4
Signature: ij Date: 'Y /4
Page: 12

• .;7 _;��:''rr,� ''r-:Y�:;}��^y�. t�•- ice• .�.
t '^„f1'• ��!J,}�Fs�f.+s�` �'� � r ��[ry� J= �y �' � f� x } r%T[`�i4� )%r'�' �►
"•"•r r�� � S .:Sr1 it lip
27
J
.AK`=�'�'"'''t�.*}',�`�
ti
-47
.. ^'4 aye ✓' Y^'f t' r •ri(♦�•.• � rw •�
�: ``mil• '.r :.�:;. :j,.'.r �.>- .: %
��:r .fi:c'• .Y.-�ww,. �+". r'-.:' ,S k.'�lL�.� a1�„L'•_'r� •� ,� •a yl'
ftr
^`w A..•..• ice`
dry ._: JyYJ'b�l�,. yam. •�:� y�"�' �. �' �x!r•�
a� _, 1'.,a: `� .a•7r. +.':�.}�,
.i�

13
14

� r�y• ! r{��•°L. .t,,'•3r'-tr ti ... ,,." •, �, ..� 1'
�t
(. ;f 1s].r .. I �J r''t 1�!�� t r' i '� y Fc •F� i' 3 4.:;-0 lji.:a :i-. if:.'".y- .�:''jAl�!•r"•'�'r� ;i��%{ L-ir.i �• ��a�•t a�'�:r• ���,f�lpM� �'.-;Y''. • �Z�'s:
1 . c'r� . _"�'�r !'. J 'e�y ► 1`a� `S- � i � r.. � -�.� • [• * �i • ..L. r f� s,�. �(���fl.'-. /, r�� r_-!: �,A T ti� 4
.4,: r j y' i . ��4::.•'� .� ,; r� !~�/f 'j , '� �' t �.- ._L - rti . +{�f�,lr'' �_11. 1117�1 1.5 r• 7 • 'Syia= H �I!t.,�'.•,i • - 'fir
env r7` -�.. }e i�� f Si.�x� 1 Tlr r�• / " �� ,►pr tr -vi yjj�S'.I�►i. ��iY�# i �' !�"Y�' ,':. t{
;{ ,T! l,` ,� 7 _I IL .� r, ,'+ �"' r � J •k'• Y`.5,�'`. �' �t �;�1}�:�f3��%'�.'�,I jr;j'.., %-
on �' tom' �1 I t 4 r i ri �� •.!/: ' f •' .al'�(. t,' . I i � 1 ` ••,_; t :�• Flu
r +Xi "; t'M� 1 f - ,} r.� r M fir
1' r ��'i1 k .�. 1 - •t- L �' t? !�• •{'►•S ! ', y . -. ~''.
I _ I I �" '} �\!..- � .•� w �� �j� ..�� ��:,t ,r�Y. t k•7+� � (f� rti a _
-1 II sir„ �;J�1• Jv�'' ��' � ����, :i yy � �. C�1.��. �;•i3. '���.�':v {] 4Sy�i•�: .���7{::�:'+���
�,� �-� �"� �i '�` �-' u _ i ` ,'ti".?i �r �w `ij +j":' •;i, .:x� 5/`•s �r � 3 � ir.
um
wig
r�i r(' 40 rSi• ^r I(L� wr'.¢ l� // f.• -its i - a- .ir. F M JI r":r ••r iVy
i �``. { Ly � f il�rA \" � � '� •:'-. '� Si , ; 'R�[f�� y x �-y,'J
I n _y I If]�, .r . `a1��' - •. O J si '} ..1iy-jC..,:,,I;,_ • .i • { y4�.,J. 7 * a _ r rl+ 'r.�r�}'t'k
I :•'} fi.. -pt l,' .�! .�Lr fly yf•,•r�:^•' 4�•'
.$..i � - - .� �C• J_- 4 ��' ' y•, �•ar i'� .1-. _ .k ? �. \`ti ` .��' ir`-L
j r� '' V r/� _ �" r ,L� •Ywt1• ,�,�. � �-,f .�` -\ �r�fs �r�-j •'{r��/�r{y�,.,Y �• ,r'yiy�:►-'�� i . r � y��,,,y'
,�- � i df/ o' f �' I. • /•^GO k• �` 'i �rji 'S.7=��'Yj��/y _!� 1 �x �4 1��,�iR,f.y sr : r -
:t` r �t { 1� t 11� {.. 4'• ^}�hiis`;`., � - �•�` �4 r�y�.Y s+�_�.r`f'�'.' -*„J Y / •�'i•7..`
,,\ :•-!.i 4, :. jt+ ` ••S�J+•'j '�4 'r:''is•1{`?.(y:[- y.��`}r•r++{��jillr�'; •/�
1,•QIr1 �'� r • �' •.t �Y � i 1'. i-F�T r Y� , S_ � �?JF+�'#.��'�iR'= r -
.^ I •` .4 h t „:.''• ,f! * ' • J*: y _• e • ` 1, if .S� r s 1 ..
�Ar�'k ,bt'J ✓�� ;y, +y��`+ 'J aY �Fh�,jw, .� k • �1w} , k .,>�•^wr s17, • ; '�•jx�'Ii, •��. �+fr�)+rl� :- /' S� ' �''� - �.• !i� •_
IN,
-r' , .f. 1 • 3' /i •.Lr�•', �a .(;1. �7Ct r _ _ •�i•� �! .i ,lr •�• r ` '�•!}ji-.t•'•� i E.. r r•.•� 1.' •..r!�-.
r ��Et,, . �'\ r K.l �' a�1 ti . ��r � •r :r,�;,yq t� �-. f �•� ,� � :i �,a�. �• ,,(�;�,',�1,a ►�._� L Y r':.•-�..'d: ,,
r� J' •'ir- Jr •r-7,.:... �,•�{• ({ �,, :u{,, i i _�s � `t?q�• iY?. .7 *• r •:''.`�yyyrl '�� q -lr�r' ''r,{`''ti �r: _.. •
:1 L- - r: �, s r L'��ri��--'Lw �I.rt0.�iKF� - -' 'r. '$y'.r � {.. �.� - f��(.4Z su .�• ,�' r'• —.rjt r: .'�' ..
S` sir M `.k x Y{:?1:t ti` �e. }tii. ��ll t .;:::�'rJ' • •j y; A 91 -1M� p'_ 'i }�,p, ry'�-r TrJ� �. ( -_ ~ �S .tt 't� ,
44
i �r'' / ♦ - y. ir' h• a i' s ss 4[ r d
J�y. •; r'1 �• :�iJ � iY -Ar _i {`. • �j�1,',,i(�� !=••s�� - J j� ,
'`Ir 6 I'. * �%�, # • ij • ; 1, a.���if'' ;} �.gg7y z• 1. + F ty�=� (.('..; .� t :Y ' f
Polk
,. r�.. r •� ry , r• 4 is ;{ i� : y� �y h;'•r rr �( r �s "'t ; F(� {�rl.� .,. �• i_^ i j(s ' l
�' x f'�T��"j� � � f. �:..'� it,�',• ,yam'- r_t �.'•.v�, xy�s`{•r f' +(y,Y' •k �'•,Xr"' ��� r " f,�:'ii�:.'K7•-.
•'ri �Y-.
fyyT'= , �'!. � 4:� _ ' ,S••4 •. a�.e:sr� '4-�_;!`.��.� S ai•,� p Ali r ��ye '�( y/' :r/�i�r '•�� fi' i. .� �.
ppY` 'd1 1 S�i;'•* ���%ij•i'` ' N +`.t'x••_. r �; ! +ei',�J L 'S• •s y'!•r T• si � � .r
S� ki .x �a S _r: + ^rn = Tr�rr 'k ., yZ1 r' �:'' n Y',f: r� s c,- tiF• .t �%ir, ;�j'►�lz '
h /J ��. 1r:; "t'„s iT s•� •''�"� 't-''- 1�' l�e'�tj '.r,-��r1r' s. r,� L:�►y �.
�' - •-b4 w — � • �- ¢ _ ���w '.•`, .. • - i.., � • .�. 1��r,� r`r, !0.
� � "' J� �[ `Y'�•��.;y �'��, 1 ..I r'-. Y ��� - !1 _ �
+` ^t, r'^ .) (� ,I•s :�t ` - / ��::,- Z: �. i �.5 Y;�ir`+f I i k Ti r 111 t: - •'s. 4A
''ar r+.} a � �'��-` '," ,1}•,, s i.�i':s:z' �' �,rEr� _� Y '•; ,, r r. '.F�:�;�!•y�' J�,.:�7 - :� ?+�! �y'!' _ �l. t
'��'a t �' �• �'r"[��y�f�,'�S'�=�� -�•1". 7 t'i r i �' 'iS::' '�:.= 1 .'l .i� ,1 _ .,.
��`'t . "•SST � Y q � '•r•^ i Y.4-� •-r...��T •t � �.�ry •�r,. t�.��i _� e�•-•'rttii �' ^�S t;•►"�'. 'i is ,r: •� y� .1 t/ l �.�'} '.� � �
` �.: , kC �: _ ._ `,� '."Zb ;_, �' 'r-- a�...� r '/;.ti�..::l.t i)u.. � .tif + -�+' �'�,►,•t. �''tR..- .�' "-�
' 1,� : ,�: 1,R' } _ ./e1�.i:��'i� /w--! Y* k'l 'ti • '+dxlJ±ii f'' i�.� �',y r.'�,dr r;t% /
'.:.,�, ` �' •r.: .� ` _ _
` '�' ,
_ .,:+.-� Si ; �rr�� .. .i ':. .� �„= • /�� • 3r r �'c�' k i Q ik .�y,r: ,� I r� � ,r
vs .ItYit,t. t' a�• �, yr i fii Ali * f�� �i•�'' liri �tS �7y� {jr �S t`T'�t l �t r .5•�
' i, .�. r,. .tsr.'' sic:' ~, �' "t .__ �'•�'�` ti1•_i.�.M��":;�'r+1'. !� •'i ('.y •,�, �.,•rVIM
i. 4, r,. ��.r";-;V,:+J1T`S• r,-r .fAT j •� - n' _
%r,'f.�` k T / ty a ~ 4._ ...R_y► r `iy i �O1� '-�plfi+j�' r�jy�t L..•�t�'y r{
'•! :' i �l,-'Ii /;'i .v a ': j� • r _ }� r ��'�r { ! �' t 4�.
ii�•,+i``. r•�/{'t
�d� �•r� ,s �If r. i�'.' r- /'( ',K+\ii4` � � �, ;r'�t„�-„��l;ti��' •=M.' ir.. •4��Y [.' 't' . i Ij• �.�-la'��'f'.'`•j'� j�."�'�,+f` �,��+�,�, '+�1 �f �1��•�i`�', J', ;•.H�
}y a L- r•
I;� '1t • J s •�{�i4a��•l4. f •� - =s�� r � t• ,ti..�•a w r �a^� •�t{�,�•T.t�''S'�' •t'j. yA.�a�•,��t��I�� ����' •-��r.��.'•r.ti��.s.�~. i-�..
.. .� s J { f�• 5r -I�I<x `� iifa� ">-, /+. `�- ri•;�ilr .� _=ti� ',�_ #' '�• .'j�"_j �.g:a- �' �.'��.�4s:•r' JAf; �r •i• �r.!••�i.-
�.ry� . i �; •-�� � •'' r': � t
.#* .Y. _ �' wN.k:'.-� _ .. tIti 2 sY( �'� '!r.•: ti' -'L �'- :')' :•','� �t :_. ,r '.t
ri_
'.y VA(!_ ..w'wb�'�=�'•n•.' '•r,. .i '.�'i •�-.. .p 4,ra. f'_ •\.7..% - . - r '�%. �' ' `1�� ;4 �L • is-'l r 7^• 4• .� • -t� }.-.
f�•- ^� rti... 14} 71r: y, _ •,• rr� ?� A.. _ _ i.' ., �• _ _ i Idki - _ 1.{•�, ., •'.,�� : �. •ti �,i
+i� C+� _^�;:; :�: ��{;iy? fop ~�'•'���"= �` } �' } ,,y>,t,��r.� :ti ; f.
r�•� �;4 • 4e-� •,ik"►`��c�'�.i5''' j5,]} - .yr-•,:r'.� - i#'�, t fILL-
z }-/,ti;t.:'� " }jc�•!'9••!- _y',• _�.,•L:•
',- t.i ti: •i i 'r `ti + • �'"�':.0 1� sjsj �• W:•-��s�A-'1ti�'� � '�� ��.."-l`� ' � r i L �yr �� ��.]*�' J• �1 ti •.;k��' r� :r. , ���`�- '.t. 'rr �t>< �+ •t"i 1 y11Y�(; Z. r JV
"K s .t -�!{#►rVi. -i. `•.�f1lF, • .. •. rt .� .:i /' _ ' 1 i
n•i'!t, '.f:ir+�"': :- L � -•J t.�'; I t 6 'yy .,:,,r•' �s2 ''�J ja: -, -.Y'', -f�- i r �,� . ' ,.
;`�1 . -•i__ •, ` •.'A- 3.' R fLyrf, _ .r :'-iN:� e,,i ':t'.k .i _�; .�.;' .i..`:i3t_: q r s.�•'�+`.'-'y.,'..�'r -i�i: ;:1�r'- i C
t-•' � M�'rt. r" yr. YS ' ,} i?.° \ t ti y . •+- � - - - r 1'.. '-Y A 1
.t' -F. {•-:asf.�i4 '.j�'a.;;� r� ." c.• ;yr •'��.�'r'' ir'"f "I•}}�,sL na.r' (' � .rs:�•� r} t. t-;. � .
,'�. i. '�' _ i,.�-.::y_�; i J.i,�'• �r1t�C} i''':"_iJ .:� .riT- La�f..Jt'�'1�,+..'
-�. :1 + ".►• �1['�' t. • � �•f[.i.�:y r �{;•.{'r a' j. __ , J �;� R � �: }
�,fs r �. .�.� r.C' s.• .�f�. �.-ii�'•h i� Sf•�'• � ;4-�.^=�� ri. �,�,•?'-.� �' ;: rti:�ti,:cj,r'T.:,�+. •.`
-�� 4 t � 4 ��:• •.. � " '."+.`. �:;; «•�.i=r �� -r;••: I�R ,qr�' '.�'� . �,: �lh � •j �,r: •_�•.• • s: �};�� � ',-
,l' L �� ,�,•-i.-.,�'"�* ,j- �., ' •Q �-� �'• .s7:a:•+S.ti ..,y.(; r�, 4{�.*tee �-._ -. �.''WY,{/:'-�i•rr'' -;?{
Y"� �- J," _ � r- � ^� .i •tf '- '1•".•4.i s ��:T�=•-.r �i�tr.:� 'tf •:w,
$' �>`• w:-���^ 4} f ', i s.+y d ; r -.i y yJ lr '�� ' mat •+
4p ' �R1; $.•
k- 't, J Mll: f`r r r�j 11 ' r�Y 7r••": �.�..'-S.^�i��1•j'_�}y � (r2 ).r
'a ._a..-. - - - • - -i. .Y. {. ... �i. y. YTJ. •J �i i, • :_d.l r,r l�.. � .+- lt':� ..pia :Y�� �`�r�T'a���5.1 •

farm Approved - OY$ rlo. 0560-0004
A04026 lua-174p UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND CONSERVATION MELC) AND WETLAND
CONSERVATION (WC) CERTIFICATION `LAC
3, Nam of PnxkxW
2. Identification Number 13.
Crop Year
4.
Do the anald AD-1026A(s) list all -your farming interests by county, and show current
YES
NO
SCS determinations? If "No", contact your County ASCS Office before completing this form.
S.
Are you now applying for, or do you have a FmHA insured or guaranteed loan?
6.
Do you have a crop insurance contract issued or reinsured by the Federal Crop
1<as uwce Corporation?
7.
Am you a landlord on any farm listed. on AD-1026A that will not be in compliance with
HELC and WC provisions? 1
&
Has a HELC exemption been approved on any farms listed on AD-1026A because the
landlord refuses to comply? -
9.
List bere or attach a list of affiliated persons with farming interests. See reverse for a r _
e hmadon. Enter "None', if applicable. .}�--
9 kettns 7 tw Sar>e answered 'YES', circle the applicable farm number on AD- 1026A.
CWfng eMi,er the crop year entered In Item 3 above, or the term of a requested USDA loan:
.a
.li
ti
10.' Will you plant or produce an agricultural commodity on land for which a highly erodible
YES
NO
land determination has not been made?
IL Will you plant or produce an agricultural commodity on any land that is or was a wet area
on'-vrbkh planting was made possible by draining. dredging, filling, or leveling or any other
Ll
.means a b;r December 23, 1985?
12. W1�1.yva,.oi- ave you since November 28, 1990, made possible the planting of any crop,
pasaare dgricultuml commodity, or other such crop by: (a) converting any. wet areas by
draining, dredging, filling, leveling, or any other means, or, (b) improving, modifying, or
E�
maintaining; an existing drainage system?
l3. Will you convert any wet areas for fish production, trees, vineyards, shrubs, building
construction, or other non-agricultural use?
If anS7I m 1D lilM8 'YES' for any one of these items, sign and date in item 14 below. Circle the applicable tract
number on AD-1026A, or list tract number in item 12 on AD- 1026A. ASCS will refer this AD-1026
10,11, 12, or 13 are: to SCS for a determination. DO NOT sign in item 16 until SCS determination is complete.
'NO" for all of these items or SCS determinations are complete. complete item 16,
covey flint the above Information, and the information on attached AD-1026A's, Is true and correct to the best of my
14. S>ijnaltue of and belifef r ;
PraoducMir ! Da
1S. Referral To SCS Enter a V a SCS determination is needed because Date Aelened Sigl1nature of ASCS Representative j
(Com pMW by ASCS) -Yes is answered in item 10, 11, 12, or 13. ,� 1 L/ - e( �P i ! ' ; i ` C f ! ( r !
iii►I 1 =M = a ti?�
Ining in Item 15, 'Head AU-1025 Appendix.
l hereby certify that the above information,. and the Information on attached AD-1026A's, is true and correct to the best of my
llo►o krcfge and bellef. if Is my responsibility to fife a new AD-1026 in the event there are any changes in my farming
Operationfs). In signing this form, 1 also certify that I have received and will comply with the compliance requirements on
AD-1026 Appendix, and any addendum thereto.
{ 16. swoture of
PloducCr-00-
scs COPY

1
-1026 (Rdv®rse) toe-1?-94j
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ITEM S of AD-1026
3 p oducet requesting benefits on AD-1026 shall attach to AD-1026 a list of the applicable affiliated persons with
farminn intorAsts whe are raaulred to file AD-1026. Follow the rules In this table.
producer requesting
ietitx is a(an) ...
THEN affi'llated persons who must file AD-1026 if they have farming interests are...
vidual}
Iminor
7E...If khe individual
3 is minor child, the
er and mother shall be
rd as 0illates
spouse with separate farming interests, or who receives benefits under their individual ID number.
children with separate farming interests, or who receive benefits under their individual ID number.
estates, trusts, partnerships. and joint ventures that the individual filing or the indlMdual's spouse or
minor children have an interest.
corporations that the individual filing or the individual's spouse or minor children have more than 2we
interest.
eras a eartnership
first level members of the entity -
' venture
'ed partnershi
a
icable trust
an tribal venture
an group
iocable trust
-)oration with stockholders
first level members with more than 20% interest in the corporation.
'a
none
.rch or other
rRable organization
nt
4c school
)oration with no
:kholders
KEY TO SCS DETERMINATIONS IN ITEMS 8 THROUGH 11 LISTED ON AD-1026A
HEL = Highly Erodible Land: 9.. 027 = Approved Farm Plan (CPA-M7):
"Y" = SCS determined highly erodible land. "Y" = Tract has an approved farm plan.
"N" = SCS determined no highly erodible land. "N" = Tract does not have an approved farm plan.
" = SCS has not made a determination. "X" = HEL flag is "Y". Producer has a 2-year
grace period after soil survey is available to
obtain an approved farm plan.
A027 = Applying Farm Plan:
"Y" = Producer is actively applying an approved
farm plan.
"N" = Producer is NOT actively
applying an approved farm plan
11. W = Wetlands:
"Y" .= SCS determined wetlands on this tract.
(* See footnote.)
"N" = SCS determined no wetlands on
this tract.
" = SCS has not trade a wetland determination
on this tract.
SCS has determined a wetland does exist on this tract. Contact your local SCS office or ASCS office for details concerning the
location of the wetlands and restrictions applying to the land according to SCS determination before planting an agricultural
colrtmodity or performing any drainage or manipulation on this tract.

• .` ,fir 4�_.
�a srrrr�rr er r•■sr�e�s It1rC*�1r►
+tRnme�+ratrrow aewwwmw earrnce Ht
REOUQST FOR COMMED WETLAND MI-----.Z10i.;QQLIfNKJiTFr: N
ftM ~ rrr ON" +ewtMM a awetlsb
. tvame�
r
OWNER
4 aa7-o-
z-
-RA I Ad&m,
5 Q,�-•-e•
Are you a USDA program Parbdpsrt? (tt yW AD-IM UMN be an ft,) 4, No
AQWT • ( PV%ATOR)
Have you previously rw erved a wed" detenrxnatw or ctakww eon on fts VW kom Vw NM unW Resources Coreeervsbon $&moo
ff wwoy Sdt Carrwvwkw Sr "m) or the Corps of Enpr wws? Yet /�No
Umban of Im*W y (dee+d;ptbon): f tl. a-�Us qa I _ hT/? r Igo S t! 3 a.�.�
[ I' m No.: � ? `� � � Trad No.: 702 ( Aeras in tract me or snit Ofta um ft Iowan euft
Ley '
PURPOSE OF ww FOR D£TEAMtNATiOWDELPOEATiON pima err aw avow
4-4
y w*v 00 erre , a1 OLMOp., Am.)
Non-AQria�barai pspose(t?:
r'� as: arerrrrsreW drrerlopn+nC rear. a�.l
lntonr{Isoorat twrpoee(sl:
• I Certify to i am the owner or agent of rw owner tar the property prOVKYrtiy deacr1w.
• 1 76rt 1M NsLgW PAmmumme Gwaarwsbn Service for t%w artepnsrro R~+w Vw V9 to enlrr Vw p►aMly p wAOLWy descried to
ascertain V e eresrtt of wso,-wu an sad property.
• l undwsWO" Vw irairarnise, w oodecteed and the comfied +retard is pubtio Wft,nttlon ud my bs rOm
b to y,ubk or ultiised in any of be age cm, dwa beset, or pub abed on Wkw wwtiend rrnpt.
Stgnmrs of Owrwr Oft:
5 use of Aq*M:. ALIP%Wgw ay rw awry, L7ets:
I a U. S.C. Seceare tool prowd" rm: vvhoovw. n Ow rf wvw wwvn the pnsdre*an at mw daparrane ar s" tcy or Tew umm sm"s womm we spy —
tsrMna. a� ar aorew up sM WW rck m&w ms. or qi no s nam%w Ise or wdow tear tails. r ama or A w wWm A MWWwwa* w mp a#rw maw
MOM Or 1MM am tares war♦ Or OMMM rarr (f W" MOM ro QWNW wW :wa• bCMWA Or VEWS " rIMUNent Or $my, sW"d bi cyan fig ware rw t 1
or dnpnmm" nay MGM rw M years. or balm

SCS-C✓pA4U26 1. Name and Aooress of Person
J'SoilConsdtivationService (June91) Au„brey Macr7-t3
d' -
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND '4J 3
CONSERVATION DETERMINATION
2. Date of Request
14/,/4��
3. County
r
4. Name of, USDA Agency or Person Requesting Determination 5. Farm No. and Tract Np
P7S A- 1 13091 T-_7bgl.-_Lln.tL4.01
SECTION i. HIGHLY FRoniRLF LAND
6. Is soil survey now available for making a highly erodible land determination? Yes ❑ No
FIELD NO-W
TOTAL. ACRES
- x
7. Are there highly erodible soil map units on this farm? Yes ❑ No
6. List highly erodible fields that, according to ASCS records, were used to produce an agricultural commodity in any
crop yeas during 1gal .1985,
9. List highly erodible fields that have been or will be converted for the production of agricultural commodities and,
according to ASCS records, were not used for this purpose in any crop year during 1981.1985; and were not
enrolled ih a USDA set -aside or diversion program.
10. This Highly Erodible land determination was completed in the- Office Field ❑
tz
SFt_TrnN II . WFT1 ANr1
FIELD NO.(%
TOTAL ACRES
11. Are there hydric soils on this farm? Yes No
12. Wetlands (W), including abandoned wetlands, or Farmed Wetlands (FW) or Farmed Wetlands Pasture (FWP).
Z,tN !` Z. 3�
Wetlands may be farmed under natural conditions. Farmed Wetlands and Farmed Wetlands Pasture may be
4 S
farmed and maintained in the same manner as they were prior to December 23, 1985, as long as they are not
�t S
abandoned.
13. Prior Convened Cropland (PC). Wetlands that were converted prior to December 23, 1985. The use, management,
drainage, and alteration of prior converted cropland (PC) are not subject to the wetland conservation provisions unless
the area reverts to wetland as a result of abandonment,
14. Artificial Wetlands (AW). Artificial wetlands includes irrigation -induced wetlands. These wetlands are not subject
to the wetland conservation provisions.
15. Minimal Effect Wetlands (MW). These wetlands are to be farmed according to the minimal -effect agreement signed
at the time the minimal -effect determination was made.
16. Mitigation Wetlands (MIW). Wetlands on which a person is actively mitigating a frequently cropped area or a wetland
converted between December 23, 1985 and November 28. 1990.
17. Restoration with Violation (RVW-year). A restored wetland that was in violation as a result of conversion after
November 28, 1990, or the planting of an agricultural commodity or forage crop.
16, Restoration without Violation (RSW). A restored wetland convened between December 23, 1985 and
November 28. 1990, on which an agricultural commodity has not been planted.
19. Replacement Wetlands (RPW). Wetlands which are convened for purposes other than to increase production,
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second site.
20. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW+year). Wetlands on which ASCS has determined a violation to be in good faith and the
wetland has been restored.
21. Converted Wetlands (CW). Wetlands converted after December 23, 1985 and prior to November 28, 1990. In any
year that an agricultural commodity is planted on these Converted Wetlands, you will be ineligible for USDA benefits.
22. - Converted Wetland (CW+year), Wetlands converted after November 28, f 990. You will be ineligible for USDA
program benefits until this wetland is restored.
23. Converted Wetland Non -Agricultural use (CWNA). Wetlands that are converted for trees, fish production, shrubs,
cranberries, vineyards or building and road construction.
24. Converted Wetland Technical Error (CWTE). Wetlands that were converted as a result of incorrect determination
by SCS.
25. The planned alteration measures an wetlands in fields are considered maintenance and are in compliance
with FSA.
26. The planned alteration measures on wetlands in fields are not considered to be maintenance and if
Installed will cause the area to become a Converted Wetland (CW). See item 22 for information arrCW+year.
27. The wetland determination was completed in the office ❑ field r'p,16nd was delivered❑ mailed[,PT'10 the person on
U. Remarks. Area,::-- ea.S " A l vV 4 Ca^- r7@� (� �L-r� ! La'i+^1Ct s CL^-tr H'I �+-P b E t� iG`�p•� ��
29. 1 cerrrfi� that the aho%-e determinarinn is rorrerr and adequate Jhr use in derermrnnv
ekwhilirr for• USDA program heneltts, and that ++erland hedrolovy. M-dric soils, and
h.drnpkrnc reaeranon under normal rrrcumstanr•es exist on ail areas outlined as
to of SCS District Conservationist 31. Date
Assistance and programs of the Soil Conservation Service aratiebte without regard to race,
SCS ("vy
"fax, 'sgv, or handicap.

i STATE: g'r 3
KDRESHtri)
mprf t
nhs�s. ntLL, f'!1.
eme»t.al to AD--i 02b! PAGE
f 2. _MLWY : SAWSON 163. 3_ W.' YEAR -. 9`6 4..I D '10. 2T,7-Aa-!.64 ---_
*^'y:;p, �. ,M V�v cx:trC wart{ AnY+JI.L.14 ro
VVI ♦VA. .1
tgt8? s3?-1855 EMPI' ;.ikPi7f ESA ';PEKE (910)
80 CCUt+M CWLEY. RD.
C:.. TnC4 • !IC �8318-4?27
i. %irCie Eacri i-r, cct for vinic i a 'YEEZ' aalY3�;er apClies-to the t-an Tor -Items io, ii, i2, OR 14
an AD-076. 'CF = ' era cr; (N = Wner: M = Owner sperafcr).
F9PK
Cr,
7A7 UM"rLA
34;ia
KNO/GRID
'-SC.S k7EPHINATIONS-
.NO
OW/
'm
8.
9.
iD. 11,
w
' .
02.
R0,27 Uetland
106
CU
6960
M
ps-_-Y 3 MOChf
;{ 19.r33
N
N
N
i 3C91
OG
0`424
6,7
AUBRE'f R itOO.RE'
OWN 9 N
N
N
N
i3091
QF
6421
aa,'
LOUISE H �',GOTEE
i(19/2A
Z sti31
00
G': =;
'.'T
�
,UBFI.Y �: .�
Ki 912.4
,N
1Y
sNf
N
�N
;II
!:• a -
��
.an,
J ...�
110
—...
Alj r,Ey C' 4n+-c
I:vr'1 .�. .. !"4..i
V4C`7r
i. yr 1l_:
?.i
1
�[
`1
1't 1
i3Pi
I12w
6424
N.9
LOU147 " MCCOK .
'd1U7,c
N
N
N Y
642
?4,4
A,;MfjPPE
� 4K/'so
N
►i
�� v
_ ..
L'0
6 r. E'
,, , .
I V 1 At 1ryW : „ %: �:., _
iZ I
•W.a.1
^�
•t^.7
I�•ri
tt
•.I.v`!
r^ a *n U
11 '..V�11V
1 ,nr.n
�.1
1
ITACi
(Sy.�
Ula
�,�
van
/L�,�I��it�b'yR
AUuf'E R MOCTSir
t 18"2-
f"
i30 ,
GF
Ll
�C1a.f
+'i ��A ..:LA:a
L.'❑i«V
f[
�'�:
i1
It�
0$91
0O
6439
v.6
AUPJRLI,•R '
K19/B
N
N
N Y
1'591
00
Wi
18.1
A UBREY R
K 19/23
N
N
N
i3D9i
CP
643i
i8ai
LOUISE m mm
W/2S
N
N
N
3v?'
r
a i2
29.a
"4;=f ; ;�i'w';E
Wi2A
N
Ni
N
i 3V7 i
UU
8Y 7
iiIJP T n !
J?=
;�
14
#v59:
:w
7=A
.�
117nJ [
,�E�Brltf fi ;if�4E
airy+r2A
��
w
1; .f
+7rlei
• Vv
r1-V�
�V_a.uL .. 41VL: ,r
,4V %y.
r
L
r.: v
Si 1
091
M
7P991
.7
Atur-lY 2 Wz
i_i3i.A
kf
N
N
4 780.
ne.
-,•� u ynn^►
4 ^ a.,
y
},
V:9!^r
xl
�
11
N
Y '� CtiL i
.ti. l
.1
ji•JV
'J.J
�.:r�7L Vr. .'iC!RE
_I.a r.+
i•
''i
IT
c�,yo,
CC
gatic
:r�
RL; z- urn;
L.i2 -U
i7ocI
CP
i°4Cc
?_.c
;cj T z lc.."M
v17lip
.J•Jii
i
i'�ta]
:G._
_...L 1,*i -A7 . _.. ".::tl
l:-ii�!
.a VCj
:.~
i'`'. •.�vGl _.
_CIF71:J JI :ll'J... J�a': ill N1�
ji !•) iiii'IJC� . LiJ-'^�. IJ
JC.JIi.
G,CdY --C1i
:ti i�
__.. `..-1 �A�+., i'v
3' .a'41M3
_ 'J: NO :n
•:le. [1.a•...Ji•JC7:Jr?
.]dr� JI _... ,'11'V,j�;' C�-•:� ,C
:il'�a.:as-11Q�"'CI- JQ:i �la'?
>11. ice- —li_ w.. ——..
].... : ..s ,�. .ti
al, aJ:•'= ie- �i�...
�IJ �'. ',C"_ _ �3: 1:'::~� :lit.l _.
�i it
.;j'li'�r-
i, n�
3^.
?..,J
iir'7TiiJ� 3 i'?:4 s{''.'i -3 -;ti
'.,-.L—:J.57 •:. ,;i;+_�
1 :".' .. 'zi: 'IQ;C4;
l
yL''`i
•, SIB. '^'
� .—ryatY Jy�r`.�,
-.. •,--n�.J
rl^.:.. .
�t ,....
rit

1`
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
11987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: `e-1 - Date: .3
Ap0licant/Owner: 74v County: - r
Investigator: State:
DolNormat Circumstances exist on the site? Yes'; No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Y No Transect ID. -
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes, No Plot ID:
Ilf needed, explain on reverse.) LrN ! rt Z
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species ;, Stratum
Indicator
Oomininr-Plant Species Stratum I iestor
_. j�,ln , +ems dic,
s.
4. tr ie, i r. 4. ii& i,
12.
5.
13.�_
e.
14.
7.
is.
a.
1 a.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC
5
lexcluding FAC-).✓✓�,
r _ /
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Onto (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream. Lakes or Tide Gouge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
ec �No Rorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water r lin.)
Depth to Free Water in Plt: (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: ri (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indieatore'
.,*'Inundated
Saturated it Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Panama in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Raw Channeis in Upper 12 Inches
Wetar•Stsin"d Leaves
71ocal Soil Survey Date
_
� AC•Neutrsl Test
Other lEmisin in Remarkal
Remarks: j+r rA..-:... �:.:-•.r.:rn nwr `C °.Z.^. /•-!./I �1 = C ��,`�1 ._yS.'Y•
II � r r. J1� ?i, fry}V Jr' ryr
J

SOILS
Map Unit Name 'S
(Sense and Phase): I,� i
/
Drainage Close: r..xrr r'��rn.,••eE�
Taxonomy iSubwmml: T i c
Field Ob+ervations
Confirm K40ped Typo? Yee No '
Profile Dssmretion:
Depth Matrix Color Moitls Colon Mottle Texture, Concretions,
[Inches) Horizon_ ( neall Moir).! (Munseq
Wgistl Abundance Controot 5 r,,,(t etu►e. etc.
Hydric Sail Indicators:
Histasol
Concretions
Histie Epipedon-
_:�Oigh Organic Content in Surfece Lsvnr in Sandv Soils
_ Sulfldic Odor
_ Organic Streaking in SwWv Soils
Moisture Regime
r/Liated on Local Hydric Soils Get
_CAquic
_ Reducing Conditions
_✓Lined an National Hydrie Soils List
kf'Glsved cr low-Chroma Colon
Other (Emisin in Romarksl
Remarks:
WETLAND DMRM1NATiON
F
egetation Present? �a�' No (Circle) ICirelel
logy Present) Yes N
ovoW `Y.i No Is this Samaiing Point YAINn a Wetland? Yee..• No
;vvrovadl Dy 3,92

i
L
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
{ 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: �l -Date:
Applicant/Owner: "Jo County: _ -) _
Investigator: l- State: J,f
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ; No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed {Atypical Situation)?_ Yet- Na Transect ID:
LIse area a potential Problem Area? ,I Yes . No Plot ID:
ff needed, explain on reverse.) /tN 1 ri L
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant ,2vecies . Stratum Indicator
2.
3, sl . r4 A,
4. mini
S.
e.
Dominant Plgr I Soertes Stratum I icato►
10.
12.
13.
14.
is.
se.
Percent of Dominant Special that are QBL. FACW or FAC
{excluding FACA. �JJ
Remorkeda
1 r
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Somarke):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
_,:,'INo Recorded Dote Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: _ On,)
Depth to Free Water in Pat: ^� tin.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 1 lin.l
Watland Hydrology Indicators:
✓'emery Indicators:
/inundated
,_seturated 1n Upoef 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Do-pasite
�_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SeconQary Indicators (2 or more required):
_ Qxidited Raor. Channels on Upper 12 Inches
_ Water•Stoin,,l Leaves
_✓LDeal Soil survey Date
/FAC•Neutrel Test
other IEsplatn In Remarks!
{.i: ,r.; .l .. 5 :l•4...1 `CL�-+,V/�f J/w� r. r'.�i } �:. . .
ra
I

I
SODS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phes@):C %�^-S
_ „ Drainage Class:��
Taxonomy (Subgrotatsl:T c i<�Q
Field Obgarvetions
Confirm Mapped Type? Ye No
eroAla Dasrri o
Depth Matrix Color
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions,
Agghavi Horizon M nsell Moist
M nsell moisTI.. AbundencelContrest Structure, e
o -S 10`
YR ;;
5c
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi
Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Solis
_ Sulfidie Oder
Organic Streaking in Sandy Sails
AQuic Moisture flegime/Cisted
on Local Hydric Solis List
_ Reducing Conditions
_&:fListsd on National Hydric Soils List
�Gleyed or Law-Chroma Colortr
_ Other (Explain in Remarks$
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
HydrolDhyde Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circle)
Wedend Hydrology Present? Y-W No
Hydric Soil@ Present? .,x43 No In the Sampling Point Wirr+in a Wetland? Yew No
I Remarks:
m

United States Natural
❑epar"ent of Resources
Agriculture Conservation
Service
Waste XANAG ' 01M T IF kC -= S= EVALIT IYIOIY
NC-CPA-17
REV. 1, 2-W
czvM-a.A.L �rFORasaTio�v✓1n d S• ��� �tb.,
NAME �.jorc. l ► t a ate- LOGiION S � /l40 .� .r
;1I G zas
TELEPHONE (9 / o�- S3 a- - 4 gSS S= OPERA77ON 1*3
LOCATION DATA
DMTANCr FROMNEARYST R=ENCr Y0T OWNED BY PROOL'CIM I (000'OF1;
DLST,ANCE FROM,NEAUSI' PUBLIC FACE fFY C=bwL chutsti. dA) -> f_;, ida Fr.
iS SITE WLIHN 100-YE.ARFLOOD PLALV7 YES _ NO
If yes, MRCS cannot provida assistance.
M SITE AT LEAST 100 FL FROM A "BLUE ICE- PERMPNtAL STREAM? YES V/ NC _
If on, site must be relocated.
IS SITE W11mN 1 MILE ZONING =DIC ION OF A ]rl=C2ALITC7 YES NO -Z
If yes, Iandowner should consult with local zoning board about required
permits Permits must be obtained prior to design approvaL
AM tj7TM IES Di CONSTRUCTION A EA7 . YES _ NO
If yes, sea Part 103 of the National Engfneering Xanual and follow policy.
{Copies of maps or other reference materials may be attacked to site
WILL SIT INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND O"NYNON-CROPLAND? YF.S Z NO
If yes, producer must complete Form MRCS-CPA-38 (Acquest for Cardfled o zL
Wetland Determinatlao/Deiineation). .41 F Z
e
WILL ACTION RESULT LV SWAN(PBUSiuVG7 YES NO
IF WET"NUS ARE INVOLVED, IT LS THE RSSPONSMMrrY OF THE PRODUCER. TO CONTACrMM US AR34T CORP OF
ENGINEERS ,AND THE DIVISION OF L"11 RONMENT.AL M ANAGE rtENf TO DETE U,= IF PER&= ARE REQUIRED.
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED. THE PRODUCER SHOULD NOT CL-41LANY LAND UNTILA WETLAND DF.LLVEA=N
IS MADE
NRCS will provide technical assistance is wetlands only under the following condtttonL For namrai wetland
inCiusioas Iess than one acre In sue, MRCS will provide assistance only if the functions and values Iasi are fully
mitigated. For natural wetlands greater than one acre In size, MRCS will provide assistance only after a
rigorous sequencing prates: to include avoidsace, mimimiz+ciaa of Impacts, and compensatory mitigation is
arried out In that order of preference.
ODOR CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONZc OL BED DISCUSSED WITH PROOUC—r-R.:
• PREDOMINANT WZM DfRE,=GN? YESZ NO
• PRECH RGEVO L:COCN WiT:i r'R: SH WA M TO AT L ..AS v: YES NO
O F T rI= CAPACIT.^t
• us= GCOO SO4ND XMGMfE. m'IN LkNu •?PL'CATION YES V YQ
OF w.uT7
R.o

{"-
NC-CPA-17
REV. 1, 2-96
Page 2
OT= E.WMON.MFU ITAL FACTO RS
IS ENDANGERED AMWOR TM ATE` M SPECLES HABITAT PRESENT?
YES—
YO
iS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SC_'k4C AREA M4CLUDElb V TIE PLANMO O REA 0R,
WILL PL4PF = ACTIONS MIPAC: ON AN ADIACMI T NATUR.IL SCM4C .ARSA?
YES
NO
IS AN ARCII AEO LOGICAL OR MS MRICAL SITZ LOCATED IN rrM PLANNED AREA.?
YES
INFO —Z
ARE THMME ?MZ UNIQUE, STAM OR LOCALLY L1 PORTANI' F.AR1"N1DS L4 THE
YES
NO
OPERATING UNIT?
�
WILL THE AC^OK RESULT IN SODEUSTING7
YES
NO Y
Yf the saswer to any of the above is yes. ?MRCS will not provide tech- c=l
assistance unless agency policy is followed.
WASTE N(A.YAG1MMN T
DOES PRODUCEEROWN LNOUGH LAND TO PROPERLYI.A.'tO APPLY ALL. WASTE YES Z NO
INCLUDING SLUDGE, ALTHOUGH SLUDGE MAY ONLY BE APPLIED INFREQUENTLY?
IF NO, DOES ice. ODUCE1 HAVE ACCESS TO MORE "%M? YES � NO _
IF LAND ISNOT O WNM BY PIRODUCM CAN PRCOUCS& GET ACRZMMN T ON LAND YES � NO _
ON WHICH TO ,APPLY WA z?
(Attach Waste Udiintion PIan to site evaluation.)
VALM ONLY IF SOLL
SS=.A= AC=
IS SOCL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON?
IS ALt .q—cQumm?
TYPE OF L 24M TO BE USED:
IF CLAY L24EM IS TO BE USF,3a. IS S=TAM—v CLAY AVALLABLE ON
SITE?
IF CLAY LS NOT AVAM.ABL` ON SITr. DOES LANDOWNERHAVE
ACCESS TO CLAY?
18 A. CORE ME`ICH.Ze.QUL M?
(Attach soil investigadom sheet to site evaluadon.)
L5 SUBSURFACE DRALN=- ?RESMN ?
(If yes, rile must be removed or plugged)
YFS �/ NO _
YES V YO
CLAY Zm?TONITB SY?ETiCETIC _
YES z NO
YES NO
YES NO
ram_ NO� Bevy cr.
CGMTS f �G ✓� .a.f i e Ir i .i l�l �i R-:A.77'h.� I—Sys---.��e/`.- T'o"++�If'�P, y
THIS SITc INVESTIGA ON IS VALM FOR TWELVE 1 iONTci5 FROM THE DAZE SHOWN BELOW. IF CONSTRUCTION
HAS NOT BELAY START'M WTT-xM4 TWELVE MCN rAS. %NEW SITE NV=OATION WILL SE REQLM=. Y
SIGNATURE -A-' DATE _jL-L_-JZ96
u CIzanges is the local or state law or changes in the stsadard maid require(a arm site iin/vestigat'an.
l � �� : f r iL r =S r, • a G�' r i .
.
'SFr I9 c ,�-; !►•, r #
/ Q.a}
/
�•- •' n. S a�
�^
4-0
L ''� r �.... r. .�` M ..i V i.�rr1] '�r!"'r-• A'"-!trl r. '^r Gc.f� l.. '�'1. w..J--�+.
2'-
r S � /-4.+^eF�
-�

f'
operator. Aubrey Moore County:
Sampson
Date: 08/23/96
• Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1575.0 feet
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
• 0 sows (farrow to finish)
x
1417 Ibs.
= 0
Ibs
0 sows (farrow'. feeder)
x
522 Ibs.
= 0
Ibs
2880 head (finishing only)
x
135 Ibs.
- 388800
Ibs
0 sows (farrow to wean)
x
433 lbs.
= 0
lbs
0 head (wean to feeder)
x
30 lbs.
= 0
Ibs
• Describe other:
0
Total Average Live Weight = 388800 Ibs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 388800 Ibs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)llb. ALW = 1 CFllb. ALW
Volume = 388800 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)--------------
320.0
Inside top width (feet)-- ---------
270.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)
53.5
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)----------
43.5
Freeboard (feet)-- ----------
1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)-
3.0 :1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SSIEND2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 314.0 264.0 9.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
314.0 264.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH *WIDTH =
260.0 210.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
287,0 237.0
82896 (AREA OF TOP)
54600 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
272076 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM) * DEPTHI6
82896.0 272076.0 54600.0 1.5
Total Designed Volume Available = 614358 CU. FT.

6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
• DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
320.0 270.0 86400.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lotwater-)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 86400.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 388800 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 710208 gals. or 94947.6 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storagel7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall — 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA 112 inches per foot
Volume = 50400.0 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches 1 12 inches per foot " DA
Volume = 54000.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 94948 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 50400 cubic feet
5D. 54000 cubic feet
TOTAL 199348 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period____________________>
Rainfall in excess of evaporation=====______>
25 year - 24 hour rainfall__________________>
Free board=====_____=________________________>
Side slopes_________________________________>
Inside top length___________________________>
Inside top width____________________________>
Top of dike elevation_______________________>
Bottom of lagoon elevation__________________>
Total required volume_______________________>
Actual design volume________________________>
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
Stop pumping
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.====______>
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
Required minimum treatment volume=====______>
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====_=__=__>
Start pumping
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
Volume at start pumping elevation=====__=___>
Required volume to be pumped________________>
Actual volume planned to be pumped=====_____>
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==>
7. DESIGNED BY: }L.�h^� J��'`I APPROVED BY:
�z
DATE: DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:
180 days
7.0 inches
7.5 inches
1.0 feet
3.0 : 1
320.0 feet
270.0 feet
53.5 feet
43.5 feet
588148 cu.ft.
614358 cu. ft.
44.4 feet
49.9 feet
44.4 feet
49.5 feet
388800 cu. ft.
410339 cu. ft.
51.8 feet
560358 cu. ft.
557176 cu. ft.
145348 cu. ft. "
146837 cu. ft.
1.5 feet

rator:AUBREY MOORE County: SAMPSON Date: 08/19/92
stance to nearest residence (other than owner): 1200.0 feet
STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
0 sows (farrow to finish) x 1417 lbs. = 0 lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x 522 lbs. 0 lbs
Z480 head (finishing only) x 135 Ibs. = 334800 lbs
0 sows (farrow to wean) x 433 lbs. — 0 lbs
0 head (wean to feeder) x 30 lbs. = 0 lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 334800 lbs
MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 334300 lbs. SSLW x Treatme.nt Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. SSLW= I CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 334800 cubic feet
STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume 0.0 cubic feet ; "Owner requests no sludge storage.
Sludge will be removed as needed."
TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 326.0 feet ; Inside top width 200.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 45.0 feet
Freeboard 1.3 feet ; Side slopes 3.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon>
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 43.7 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 33.0 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 35.0 feet
Total design volume using prismcidal formula
3S/END 1 SS/E`1D2 SS; 3I DE 1 SS,'S IIDE2 LENGTH W I D T H DEPTH
3.0 3.t7 . .o 3.0 318.2 192.2 10.7
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH i� WIDTH =
a1a.2 13 .2
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
254.0 128.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
236.1 160.1
61158.0 (AREA OF TOP)
32512.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
133213.4 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = CAREA TOP + cY�rRE�. MIDSECTION) + AR+EjA BOTTOM: * DEPTH;,E,
61153.0 IV3218.4 3'2512.0 1.s
VOLUME OF LAGOCN AT TOTAL DESIG"v LIOUiD LEVEL = 493734 CU. FT.

'" TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
326.0 200.0 65200.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 65200.0 square feet
Design .temporary storage period to be 180 days.
Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/1-6 SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 334800 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 81760 cubic feet
Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day 180 days storage/7.4c`•3. gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfail exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall - 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 38033.3 cubic_ feet

ume of 25 year — 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches 1 12 inches per foot DA
Volume = 38033.3 cubic.feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 81760 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 38033 cubic feet
5D, 38033 cubic feet
TOTAL 157827 cubic feet
S. SUMMARY
Total; required volume 492627 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 493784 cubic feet
Mi'h.-req. treatment volume iglus sludge accumulation 334800 cubic feet
At.`elev. 41.0 feet Volume is 339584 cubic feet tend pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 455751 cubic feet
F,y4 A+t elev.
43.0 feet Volume is.. 451720 cubic feet (start pumping)
r� efi
Seasonal high water table elyevatan 35 0 feet
a�,� 4t
7..r' DESIGNED BY: °APPROVED BY
r 1
.% n+ DATE: r
S iNOTE. AC
• SEE SAT S ILY ATION PLAN
�'E
a: a

` w
SAMPSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROUNA
• 1rt _
►RE►AMEN EY THE
to 'u` �`�
Lm
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
! `e'l
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS —PLANNING AND RESEARCH BRANCH
IN COO►iRATlpM WITH THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
•�o
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
I
ti
bl4p.
SCALE
S91
0 1
l
1'T„G
0 1 Au
'J °
SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS
lul
Lw
ti
Lm
- L(el �,
,
•o
1'
LTs
imLIU
!t]t 1,
^
Lift
Lm
ta1 JUL
4
1/
`/ 7.! '/iSi7 ,�
1+�9 ii IQ•, j
�. '+ r/ .7 1.0
t
1.2
/�
Teylas l,id !!JS '''.o 71
Lm
!
I
1374 v 11 LN
�9
Iy LI ti ' 1lIE !i
• an
r `�• ;i r'
v MILS
.Do,
C.... 7
din
LLa
17
` Y
Ltu # 1
1144] ,1 1 ie7
I
Ull
LU2
LIM
�g r J ��-, r�
.. •LNIc4w Eun
){PI
BL;CA
dil
l 4 I
Crw#
�A 1# ✓ IJ_LS
1i7lti ,. !!_il 1�1
fuwaher, j
f 71i
1301
Lul
=
)yid
,o,
• {"'.'-
''%
1'
1 �j
16

Operator: Aubrey Moore County: Sampson
Date:
06/17/98
• Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1575.0 feet
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish) x 1417 lbs.
=
0 lbs;
0 saws (farrow to feeder) x 522 lbs.
—
0 lbs
2480 head (finishing only) x 135 lbs.
=
334800 lbs
0 sows (farrow to wean) x 433 lbs.
=
0 lbs
0 head (wean to feeder) x 30 lbs.
=
0 lbs
Describe other:
0
Total Average Live Weight =
334800 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
E� E V E D
Volume = 334800 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. ALW
WATER QU�.iTYSECT,0,14
Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. ALW = 1
CF/lb. ALW
.JUN 1 81998
Volume = 334800 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Nor Lzischarge permitting
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)
326.0
Inside top width (feet)-------------------
200.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)--»--
45.0
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)--------
33.0
Freeboard (feet)
1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)---------
3.0 :1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1
SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0
3.0 320.0 194.0 11.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
320.0 194.0
62080 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH
254.0 128.0
32512 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
287.0 161.0
184828 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
62080.0
184828.0 32512.0 1.8
Total Designed Volume Available = 512270 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA;
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length *Width
326.0 200.0 65200.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 65200.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW
Volume = 334800 lbs. ALW1135 Ibs. ALW " 1.37 gal/day
Volume = 611568 gals. or 81760.4 cubic feet
513. Volume of wash water
180 days.
1.37
180 days
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day • 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in ' DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 38033.3 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches 1 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 40750.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 81760 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 38033 cubic feet
5D. 40750 cubic feet
TOTAL 160544 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period============c=======>
Rainfall in excess of evaporation=====______>
25 year - 24 hour rainfall_____________----__>
Freeboard_____________________________=====_>
Side
Inside top length======-___=________________>
Inside top width____________________====---=>
Top of dike elevation====___________________>
Bottom of lagoon elevation__________________>
Total required volume===____________________>
Actual design volume________________________>
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
Stop pumping
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.====______>
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
Required minimum treatment volume=====______>
Volume at stop pumping elevation=====_______>
Start pumping
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
Volume at start pumping elevation=====______>
Required volume to be pumped=__ ____________>
Actual volume planned to be pumped=====_____>
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==>
7. DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:
180 days
7.0 inches
7.5 inches
1.0 feet
3.0 : 1
326.0 feet
200.0 feet
45.0 feet
33.0 feet
495344 cu. ft.
512270 cu. ft.
35.0 feet
41.0 feet
35.0 feet
39.0 feet
334800 cu. ft.
339584 cu. ft.
43.3 feet
471520 cu. ft.
469565 cu. ft.
119794 cu.ft.
129981 cu. ft.
1.8 feet
w
w
w

SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
Included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location..
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to Indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches the
elevation 43.3 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 41.0 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 129981 cubic feet or
972261 gallons.

SHEET 2 OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
G. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish In vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Heatth, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

Operator: Aubrey Moore
County: Sampson
Date: 06/17/98
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1575.0 feet
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish)
x
1417 lbs.
= 0 lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder)
x
522 lbs,
= 0 lbs
2880 head (finishing only)
x
135 lbs.
= 388800 lbs
0 sows (farrow to wean)
x
433 lbs.
= 0 lbs
0 head (wean to feeder)
x
30 lbs.
= 0 lbs
Describe other:
0
Total Average Live Weight =
388800 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 388800 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/ib. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. ALW = 1 CFAb. ALW
Volume = 388800 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)---
326.0
Inside top width (feet)
220.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)-------w------
45.0
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)--------
33.0
Freeboard (feet)------------w--------
1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)-------------
3.0 : 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH
WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 320.0
214.0 11.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH • WIDTH =
320.0 214.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH ' WIDTH
254.0 148.0
68480 (AREA OF TOP)
37592 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH "4
287.0 181.0 207788 (AREA OF MIDSECTION "4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4'AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] ' DEPTH/6
68480.0 207788.0 37592.0 1.8
Total Designed Volume Available = 575410 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length " Width =
326.0 220.0 71720.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 71720.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 120 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 388800 lbs. ALW1135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 120 days
Volume = 473472 gals. or 63298.4 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in SA.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day ` 120 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
120 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA 112 inches per foot
Volume = 41836.7 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot " DA
Volume = 44825.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 63298 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 41837 cubic feet
5D. 44825 cubic feet
TOTAL 149960 cubic feet
8. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period====================>
Rainfall in excess of evaporation===========>
25 year - 24 hour rainfall==================>
Freeboard=---=============================_=>
Side
Inside top length=----=----------============>
Inside top
Top of dike elevation=-- ====__==============>
Bottom of lagoon elevation==================>
Total required volume=======================>
Actual design
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
Stop pumping
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.-===___===>
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
Required minimum treatment volume====—====>
Volume at stop pumping elevation==—=======>
Start pumping
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
Volume at start pumping elevation===========>
Required volume to be pumped===----.=====--===>
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========>
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==>
7, DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:
120 days
7.0 inches
7.5 inches
1.0 feet
3.0 : 1
326.0 feet
220.0 feet
45.0 feet
33.0 feet
538760 cu.ft,
575410 cu.ft.
35.0 feet
41.1 feet
35.0 feet
39.0 feet
388800 cu.ft.
389998 cu.ft.
43.3 feet
530585 cu.ft.
528255 cu.ft.
105135 cu.ft.
138257 cu.ft.
1.8 feet

SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
120 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 120 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 112 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches the
elevation 43.3 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 41.1 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 138257 cubic feet or
1034160 gallons.

SHEET 2 OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) Inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish In vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

Operator: Aubrey Moore County: Sampson
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish) x 1417 lbs.
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x 522 lbs.
2880 head (finishing only) x 135 lbs.
0 sows (farrow to wean) x 433 lbs.
0 head (wean to feeder) x 30 lbs.
Describe other:
Total Average Live Weight =
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Date: 06/17/98
1575.0 feet
0 lbs
0 lbs
-- 388800 lbs
0 lbs
= 0 lbs
0
Volume = 388800 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/Ib. ALW = 1 CF/Ib. ALW
Volume = 388800 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)------ ------
320.0
inside top width (feet)-----------
270.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)»----------------
53.5
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)- -----
43.5
Freeboard (feet)---------------------
1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)------------------
3.0 : 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
388800 lbs
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 314.0 264.0 9.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
314.0 264.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH
260.0 210.0
82896 (AREA OF TOP)
54800 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
287.0 237.0 272076 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
82896.0 272076.0 54600.0 1.5
Total Designed Volume Available = 614358 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length ` Width =
320.0 270.0 86400.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 86400.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gal./day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 388800 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 710208 gals. or 94947.6 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA 112 inches per foot
Volume = 50400.0 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches 112 inches per foot " DA
Volume = 54000.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. 94948 cubic feet
5B. 0 cubic feet
5C. 50400 cubic feet
5D. 54000 cubic feet
TOTAL 199348 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period===================>
180 days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation===========>
7.0 inches
25 year - 24 hour rainfall=============== --=>
7.5 Inches
Free board________________--__________---____>
1.0 feet
Side siflpes_________________________________>
3.0 : 1
Inside top length===--===========--=========>
320.0 feet
Inside top width____________________________>
270.0 feet
Top of dike elevation=======================>
53.5 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation============ =====>
43.5 feet
Total required volume=======================>
588148 cu. ft.
Actual design volume========================>
614358 cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===>
44.4 feet
Stop pumping elev.----__=====w----_______-_>
49.7 feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.==========>
44.4 feet
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=>
49.5 feet
Required minimum treatment volume===========>
388800 cu. ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation============>
395580 cu. ft.
Start pumping elev.====w_====_______ ________>
51.8 feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==>
560358 cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation===========>
557176 cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped================>
145348 cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========>
161596 cu. ft.
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==>
1.5 feet
7. DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY:
DATE: DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:

SHEET 1 OF 2
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
Included is storage for the 25 year - 24 hour storm for the location.
The volume of waste generated from a given number of animals will be
fairly constant throughout the year and from year to year, but excess
rainfall will vary from year to year. The 25 year rainfall will not
be a factor to consider In an annual pumping cycle, but this storage
volume must always be available.
A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed at the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be Installed at this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain lagoon treatment depth.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment In order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out;
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 112 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times, When precharging is complete,
Rush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches the
elevation 51.8 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 49.7 . This temporary
storage, less 25 yr- 24 hr storm, contains 161596 cubic feet or
1208738 gallons.

SHEET 2 OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish In vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
B. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well. Waste shall be applied in a
manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

EMERGENCY ACTION PEAK
PHONE XLTI4LBERS
DWQ (ce)- 731-50R3
EMERGENCY NI NAGEMEINT SYSTEM
SWCD (91flL-592-7963
N-RCS [phone]
This plan will be irnplem==d in the eve -it that wastes from your operation are leaking.
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surace waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible Iocation for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take -
I
. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Laaoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields whe:,- runoff ocz:=,ed.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close vza yes to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting, pumps.
D: Leakage from flu-sh ,;stems. houses. solid secarator_-action Mc?uoe:
a. Stoc recvcle ourno.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. MUke sure nQ siphcn occurs.
� . Stop 'ail '!ow.i in thl- !buss- _dpu:.'I( S.

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Die a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage.
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trao or remove animals and fail
holes and compact with a clay t., a soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate -the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bortom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
A. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was re'.eased and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employer injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
a. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office: Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-7J3-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact Iocation of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , IocaI SWCD office phone number
and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works tail 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to msnimize off -site
d =-.e.
a. Contractors Name:
h. Cvntrac:ors AddrZ:=: r n r✓[
c. Ccmractor=_ Phone: 4 0- z - 3

b: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer. etc,) -
a. Name: ;6;27et
b. Phone: Teo - se, y S-t?r
i s Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify' the darnage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with re!e_se of w' astes from haupenina again.

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Suer ce Cause - 11p11's to Control Insects - Site Specific I'ractices - -
Litluitl Systems — --
Flush (i1111CI5 . Accmnulalion of solids _ .$'luslt system is designed and operaled Y
sufficiently to remove accuntulaled solids from
milers as designed.
Ra - Remove bridging of accmnulated solids ill
discharee
Lagoons and Pils 0 Crusled Solids 13' Maintain lagoons, stilling; basins and pits when:
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
!�tcbes over more fluor 30% of sm-fa c.
-Fxce:s�.ive Vegc1illivc . 1)ecuying vegelalion Maintain vegetative control along hanks of
(it meth lagoons and (tiller iutponn(menls In prevent
acculnatlation of decaying vegetative matter
along; seaters edge on impundment's perimeter.
Itry 5ystenas
ee:Jee:. 1'CCAI Silillcegt Design, uper;dt and naaiulain Icet1 syslcuas
hunkers and (roughs) to minimize the
sntudation of decaying wastage.
ga' Clean up spillage nn a rnuline basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day inle mil daring smnnaer; 1 S-30 day interval
t wing winler).
I'ecel Slotiige Accmmdalions of feed residues Reduce nmistttre accunnllalion within and
around immediale perimeter of Iced storage
areas by insuring draiu;Ige away Irool rile
:Ind/or providing adetluale containntcnl (e.g;..
covered hiu for brewer's grain Noel similar high
e tlisnlre grain proelocis).
FT' ]nspe cl for and remove or We,& Iagti accnnmlcaled
solids in filler ships around 1i cd storage as
needed.
AA11C-Novem1wi- 11, 1996, ('age I

Snurce Cause IMPS lu Control Insects. Site Specific Praclices
Animal l lolding Areas Accinnnlations of animal wastes • Eliusinale low areas flim trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is.
�untmal.
L1 Maintain fence rows and rilter'sirips around
animal bolding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect For and
remove or break np accuniulaied solids as
needed).
my h1milue i landlinb Aecununlalions of animal wastes f3fteenove spillage on a ronflin; basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systems day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
n Provide for adeclnate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
n Inspect for and remove or break tip accumulaled
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure Dandling areas as needed.
Fair Inure inlilnnalion contact Ilse Cooperalive Fxlension Service, Department of Entomology, llox 7613, North Carolina Stale Universily,
Raleigh, NC. 27695-7613.
ANHC - t•luvember 11. 1996. Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Chm-ldist
Swim; ploductioll
RRIPS to Mitlilslize
-----�Fv,zeIa-trvc or wooded httf"I: is;
wll-t ecolil lite ntled best imall-agell telvi placlit-CS-1
jildellICIII -11111 Common Sense
A nimal 1111d)' :Ms fill:c-i Dilly maillile-Clivaell animals Dry Ilools
I- 1111pi %Ill I.ik C'. WaA mal till t;-Ci Wci cd fitpois rA-
1`1---Widucus located liver slolled floni -s;
P-I'veders al high end of snlid floors;
P--s-napt.: manure hilildilp froull floors;
How venlilalioll ["tic (hying;
M.111111': ClAICtAilm fill-.
0 1 J1 ille;
Fleclulcull limallic FC111ov;ll by Thol. )I[ Ict-11.11ge.
4 Pailial Illicillhial decoollmi11it111
I1 •Crape;
M, t mlei floor mitilal imi
W1161,11i'lit C\11;111%1 1.111),
• VC)hlilc 1!;ISL.S-
I 111.11111civa11Ce;
1-3111117Ificicill air Intivellicill
I C
wil lit, 1-1401111.; 431'attimals;
r Feed addifives;
-I'Cll
r4--
delively 1I111V nl)(1111 ex(Clitlev; to Is.-l-des
Covets
A1111alitsn of recycled lag min
0 f SJl tank Coves-S.,
litillit) while lank -Sate fillilig,
fill jillf-S 10 IIL'.'If IM1111111 ill'IMILS Wills
alm-Sipholl Vt!IIIS
alh-)-.
Af,ilulinu diiiiiig wastmall(Ir
PI Indi rfloor flush wills mideoililor velilihiloo
ronveymice
Agilalimi ol'iccycled lag-mm
rl"-l"XIC1111 inn Ilfpils
liquid while pits are filling,
wills ami-Siliblin VCIIIS
Lill !J.11JOILN
A gilmion (filling sump lank
171 Sump Imik covers
and 11rawdown
lilhidC dlikilk U011CCliMll
• Agil;ilimt 1141filln W;1Nl1C%Vi1II-F
F1 Ilox towels
lit 111111-11tall I)MICS
Cilliveplice
At, 14 -11 owulkiller I 1, 1996. Ila Cc 3

�I14I 1'l'l:
{,Il llSC
HMI's Ht 114iuinllIC {11In!Sill: Specific I'l-ac[icts
1'1lII UI dI:11i411111C] :11
Agilalllllt dllrllljj 1Yitsle\V:ItI'r
I.xlelldi discharge point (if pipcs lll+llcl-ne:lth
I:l1;17[1r1
conveyance
lagonn liquid level
I.:lpoll Surfaces
Volatile gas eillisomy
Proper lagnnn liquid capacity;
•
Biological mixing;
C.4�Cnnecl lagoon slallilp proeednres;
•
Agilation
f�' Aliuitnnul surF+cc alca In w►I+In+c r:+lilt;
W"Minimum agilalinll when pn+nping;
91 blbl ethnical aciatiun;
N 1'1'11Vt:11 biological additives
IIlrl;anl+n Sill rlll,ler
I lll;ll ptessillt! agilalloll;
Illlg:ltc on Illy days 1VSIh Illlle or ntl wink;
nuirl�'
Mild thin
_/
f�Mtininuun recnnutlended ollcrlling pressnll:;
r Plimp intake near lagoon li<luid sulfact:;
{-1 1'nmp from second-slaf;e hil,norl
ilnl.rl.41;1111.uIIGc.111 •
I',Ilh;llllllcrul►I:Ildcl'111111101illiln;
(1 1initrli11orinitllevelIo:+dr111'.
mu Lme •
kllxltlg whilc lilting;
n 'I'ilnk C11Ver S;
•
Agilolion when Cinplytllh
1-1 Basin Sill fact` Vials Ill Solids;
n hovel. biological a1111ilives Ilr oxidants
51 nlin�; Il.I,ill �n+I;II c
I'ailial lui, ubial Ifccnlill}usiliml;
("1 lixll:nd drainpipe outlet:: —1111(fellicalh 1i11uid
•
Nfixilig while filling;
Icvel;
•
Agilaliun when culptying
17.1 Itemove Settled SI11ids regularly
T k�l.lmll e, Sll,it}' lal ]lilt ll'C~y
A1; II:Ir 11111 ►YIICI1511tCalllilt„
Pr- HI Ill slllt rylslodres;
slntad�t uu{leis
Volatile gas vinissi{Ills
%ash residual nrulllrc linnl sprcai Ul' :lllcl' list,';
VP,t)vcri
biological adliilives or oxidants
I Iniu►Cll ll lu:,uulc,
Volallk has cI- issiuns tYllilc4
Soil iujcctiun tit sluilylslullgcs
s1111r1' of ShIA!;C Ill. lidd
(11'yiiil;
Fr, -Soil incolporatioll within'iH his.;
Star Llrct.
ca,l.in Thin imilinnl I:+yers fill- ral►id dipiij-,;
I"rnvcn binlogical additives of oxidmils
I t�a�l al,im.115 -
[',,Ir.,ss deu►Inposiulrn
per dispositionof carcasses
11, .I11 anlu,.lk II ,I��1.:11 - -
[:;ur, iss III tuulposilinn -- --n
Complete covering of calcasse5 in Luiial tills;
1u1.1
11 Proper Inratianlronshul:linn of dispa►sal piss
Inl.lul_l:"Inl,
Int:nny►Irlt cunlbil•'lil►ll
171 Seconll:ny 51.1a bnrlleci
H 1,11 1r ; - I lovcn,hcr 11, 1996, hake •1

�- inlice — � —CnnsC 11M1's If) Rlinimlcc I1duI' — - ---Silo SI►rcitir I'IarticcsLL ����_..
Slaulling %VACI alnund • lulproper drainal;e; FrOadc and landscape such Ural water drains --� - --- - -- -- --
lal:ifitic� Micrnhial rlecunlposilion of away from Facilities
organic manor
A1.115111e (IilAcd own 6 foully maintaoled access roiuls 0f F.11111 access road 11miolenancc_.--.---..---.---
1111111ic lo.uls liom Iarni
a+rl:css
,l�Illiliooal Infuin►iilinn : _
—Swine MoIllile Al.lwagemCelt ; 021111 I1111CI NII' Packet-
%winc 19ndoclioll Fame Polcnlial I tdor S011FCCS and Itenredies ; FIIAF. Fact Sheet
;urine {'lnll wOor! Facility Manure Management: Pit Itecllarge - Lagoon'i'realment ; I?1IAIi 129-88
`;wine I'MILIlrClilltr Facifily 1O:lolr:e lv{anagemenl: Untlei floor FhISI! - Laguon Ticalmerll ; FBAE 129-88
I..Iguun IIcsips arld Managemem li►r Livestock Manure Ticatment a11SI Storage ; IillAF 103-111
( .1111ll.ltiulr 41(1A nine Well Wastewaler Applicalion F(pliptuenl ; FHA;? Fad Sheet
I'nurlulliog 1ldurs liner S%VillC IiniliingS ; I'll1-33
Lli ilginn►culid Assurance I'Iogiam ; NI'11C Manual
1 1111ilu11 lur Malloglnl, ( tllor ; a icpmi liom the Swine Odor Task Force
I Ims-mice ('nocems in Animal Manure Alanagcnrcnt: Odins mid Flies ; I'M )107, 1995 Cmd'emicc 1'rorcedings
I%MI tl • - 11.)vI:11111cI 11. 1996. P.11;C 5
Avail:dlll� ]�ulm
—PII'SI I, 1'11n►!ty i{Alrnsinn ('1�n11:1 - ---_-- - -
14CSI I - I{AI:
1ICSI1 - IIAF
NCSI I - I I A F
NCSI1 - IIAI:
HCSI I - 11A1:
Nt Sl 1 - Swine FKICIISirlr!
N(' Poll, I'Iullucels Assnc
N1."ill AgiI ('u mmmiralimis
1:111II11i1 (-111111vialive 1:%tv Iv.illl!

`lortality Management tilethods
(check which methods) are bung implemented)
'.� Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within ?= hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at Fast S00 feet from anv flowing
• stream or public body of water.
Renderng at a rendering plant Iicensed under G.S. 106.163.7
r1 Complete inc;ne aticn
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
rs Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the Srate Vet.--inarian must be
attached)

z,.
K
EMERGENCY ACTION PEAK
PHONE vZJ%iBERS
DWQ (219) 71._j_;0f3j
E.%'tERGE`CY .vI.-NACE';'vMNT SYSTEM
SWCD [phone]
N-RCS 910 592--796
This plan wi11 be impiamenced in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking.
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make a ery efr-crt to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should t.ke.
I. Stoo the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to be.:-rt to increase elevation of dawn.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. CalI a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a te:noorary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields whe runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprnklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Slop ir:ization pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate funher discharge.
d. R.pair all leaks prior m restartim: pumps.
D: Leakage from flush _ 'sie.TS. houses. solid inc'.ude:
a. Stop rec cld nur c.
�'. Stop irn_YLicn pu.—,-p.
C. �['sl:� su-z n-, ril'hQrl
�.. SIJp 71l ll? .. in �. iL_1 s%:zes= crs.

M
e. Repair all leaks prior to restartinz pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage.
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and €iil
holes and compact with a clay rune soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate thecondition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was re'.esed and for what duration?
e. Any damage noted. such as ernplov= injury, fine kills, or propery damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters'?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of tre property)?
R. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. Dunne normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
reaionai office: Phone - - Ate: hours, emergency number: 919-t -319-?.
Your phone call should include: your narre, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the Iocation or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number
C.
Instruct ENIS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - -
and local tiRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and .--,plain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
Contact the contra,aor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off site
damzJ=.
a. Contrac.crs me: F1'e y=)A,
b. Contractors :ire`: G//d,g NC
c. Ccntr:,c:crs ?"cr.e:, V40- �7111 .

6: Contact the technical specialist who cerifted the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer. etc.)
a. Name:e
b. Phone: frc� _Sv-si'�r
7: Implement procedures as advised by DW'Q and technical assistance agencies to
re.tifv the darnage. repair the system. and re_ssess the waste management plan to
keto problems with re'.ease of w=es from happening again.

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
5uurcc C iussc I1MI's Ili Control I:1scels- - - - Sift Sliccific Praclices - - -
__ —. Liquid Syslcnls ---�
lush I tuners Accnuiullation of solids OFT11 sh system is designed and operaled r
suflicieluly to remove accumulated solids from
� rtters as ticsigned.
fX itemove bridging of accumulated solids ,il
discharge
I-ugouus and NIS C;rosted Solids Maintain lagoons, scllling basins and Bits ►vhere
pesl hrceding is apparent In nuninii-te the
crostiug of solids Io a delilh of uo more than 6 -
H inches aver utnre Ilum 30% of surface.
I:Hcessivt: vct;cl;wive • Decaying vegelatioll Fr Maintain vegetative emurol along banks of
I iris+►Ih lagoons and other impoundments to premil
accmnulalion of decayinrg vegclalivc miller
Moog miler's edge on impoundnlcul's perimeter.
Dry Systems
1:Ce-lcrr, • Fecd Spillanc ee Design, nperale and ro dolnii: Iced syslcurs (e.g.,
blinkers mud limighs) In minimite Ilic
trurtilaliou of decaying waslage.
F-r 1 lean tip spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - Its
day inhaval dining sumnner; 15-311 day iatcival
iog ► biter).
I-'eed Slurage ��— Accuoml;rlions of feed residues Reduce nwislnte accimmialion within and
around iminediale lies imeler of Ii cd storage
areas by insoriog, alraimrge awtiy (rum rile
and/or providing, adctguale coulainnicat (e.g.,
a►vered bin for hre►ves's grain and similar Irigh
�i oislure grain prodocls).
Fr Irislicd lilt arld remove or Inca- tlp accrosud; fed
solids in filler strips around 1ecd slnrage as
needed.
AMIIC - November 11, 1996, Pagn

Snares Ca Ilse IIN11's to Ci1nIr41 Insects. Sile Specific Practices
Animal I14041ing Amv; • Accumulations of animal wastes Eliminate low areas that Irap mnislure along -�
and reed wastage fences and other locatimis where waste
accunmlales and disimbance by animals is.
DI y Mmulle I landling Accumulations of animal waslcs
Syiicuts
animal.
r lviaintain fence rows and filler strips ainttnd
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
Needc(l).
W'Remove spillage on a rouline hasis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during sutnnter-, I5-30 day inlerval
during winler) %Yltcre manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Cl Provide for adequate drainage around rtIant►rc
stockpiles.
C7 Inspect for and remove or break up accimmialed
waslcs in liller strips around stockpiles aml
m:uunc handling areas as needed.
For mere inlimmalion contact Ilse Cooperalive Extension Service, Depar411enl of I:nlomnlogy. Box 7613, With Carolina State I INivcrshy,
ItalciGh, NC, 27695-7613.
AMIC - 1-lovember 11, 1996. Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
llNlI,.S 10 Njilliolite (ipflos, Silt: SlIccilit: Practicr%
1��Vvc�lafivc or woollcil bolfi:ls;
wl-i ecol III lien (tell hest 111.111.1g1,l) IC131 placlices-1
Fr-11C.,ml jililgillelil and comillon Scilse
A ijimal Molly --ov fact";
• Dilly
F Dry Itools
U 1111 iF .III 1 -11 1*%
IIICII Hums.
r.Kv.ticl CFS located over Slimed flom S.
f-4- lecilers at lkigh evil ofsnfid Hoots;
D--Sciapc immure buildop front liom-,;;
W-11�111(11-1
1111or VC111ilmiull For Illyilig
111.110111C
IJI 111c;
PI-1 FIC(locill oulnule FvIlloval by HIISII. 161 ICL-II;IIJ'C,
�I , , cr;lliv;
vr 1111lclllool vcilfilatioll
VC11111,111-111 COIAIIA 1.1IL5
• VOIL1111C gww%;
ninvitlocill
ti
r-1 cder uveis;
F�Fccll ddivcty Ilimmllool exlentica.; 101 14"t-fIct
Agiml imi. of Pecycicil lago011
Fr�'-I-Sll wok -covets;
lilloid while milks me lilloll.
vllcllfl fill fillf."i 143 III-af litiliflol of Lull.': wilh
. -tilli -Sillholl velits
conveyaklcc
I'll I.. 11.1111t, Viblill', • Al,,ilmimt III it-cycicit lagqino k-fli"Ill IC(lialge lilies it) heal b(IIII)III of Itils
hy6d while pits are filling Ividl ant i-Silillon VC111.5
Lill i1.7111I11i Agilation ilotiog snout wok- Fl 51111111 wok. Covets
fillifig and c1lawflown
111150c dwin collcclimi Agilation doringwaAmalet 171 Box covels
III Illimlloo 111mes Conveyance
A Nit )C - I lowcoilict 11. 1996, Pare I
a .0 # A

1,1111 ol'41willpilles .11
lagnorl
•
Agiulimi during waslewaler
conveyance
IM111's Ill M111hilize 041411. Silt slictilic I'l arfiuc%
R*Fxlcnd discharge point of pipes midemeadi
lagnon lipoid level
Lisploll Sill I'accs
Volillile gas emissions;
Proper lagnon liquid cap;lcily;
•
Biological mixing;
rr--(.,()FICCI lacrion 51.111111) procedures;
Aghalimi
W'*-Nlipdnmm surface aica-lo'-whillic Falio-I
F-KNfininjum agilalicin when litimpirig,
acialion;
additives
Iglit-alioll S'plllllklcr
U."SINIC al"ilallml;
I i h i igale em Illy days with fillic or im wind;
ih
olicralioil; pessuit-1-
licar larooll filplid sull-acc.;
flom second -slake lagoon
Pallial Illiclubial decailillosilioll;
N Holloull or midlevel IlImIt'1111:
:,Ill late
•
Mixing While filling;
Fl Tank covets;
•
Agilalimi when emplyirig
(A 11asill surface orals of, Solid%;
rl hoveit biological addifives or oxidatils
Pallial mi':sollial ducomposilioll;
F1 I-XII-Ild (Imillpille (3110cls Illitlellicnill lilloid
•
Mixing while filling;
lcVcI;
•
Agitation when cipplyirig
Cl Remove ScIlIC(I Solids sel"Illatly
H-milve. •Alll I y 411 %lodre
a
Agiwlimi Micui Sspicmhng;
5 HI illicc(ioli ol'shilly/511111res;
*
Villatile gas 1.11lissiolts
ash residual numme limn spreader after iise,
wProven
biological addilives or (millaills-
(jllq:'oVc'lcIl 111.1-111AIC,
Villatilc gas cloh-sillils
.111101. Ill
5-ing
iticcoporalim wilhin 49 his..
> S, read in 11iiii unifill ill laycis I'ir Falvid ill yirig;
:1xillaills
11mven biological addilivvs or
decumposillon
j7 Ili c
I'raprr (itioll arC.ISSCS
'alcass decomposilinli.
fl Con plac Covering fit' calcas%cs in I ill ial Ails;
17 Proper localioll/colislilli'lion 0i'llinposal pils
111174 kill Illoc L1111111infillik
171 secollifal). slack Illillicis
1,11 W - I lovellilict 11. 1996. Pajo'c -1

7%uulc! f'uusc H1111's fn I4lininli-re (1dol��—_w—_�..-•--�------,tine. tiperi(i,-..I'ra+•lirrs—.----.._.�_..
Slaudinl; walcr al+,nod • Imploper draillal;e: _ (dada anti Iclndscallc such that wafer drains — ---- - — - -- -- �---
la,:ilities0 Microbial decomposition of :away from Glcililies
organic n1a11er
Ll.ulwc 11acLc+! crntn • 111141tly mamlauled :access ItIMIS FaIlla 11CCC55 1011I I11a1n1ellinlCC -- y
11111pli4 to,ul; li,lnl linen
aa:css
Additional Infi11r11:ati+m : Availahl+7 I'mm
Shine hlanuse h1miagollcul ; 021111 IIIlle/11KI1' Packcl M('SI I, ('smelly Fx lcllsioll ('clllcl
"Wine I't+,d+t,.6011 I:an11 I'+llcnlical ( Wor Sources and Itcnlc+lies ; FIIAI: Fact Sheol II('SI I - IIAIi
titville INM1114:6011 1=:lcility Manure htamlgement: Pit Itecipuge - Lagrlou •Trealuacnt ; I:IIAIi 1211-88 M(_'SI I - 11A1:
Swine I'mducliou Facilily hlatlule Managenacnl: I Indetlloor flash - Lagoon-Tsealment ; UBAE 129-89 MIN I - IIAE
I.;+gorin Ihaign 111+1 hlanagelncns for I.ivcsloek Manure Tlcatsllenl and Simage ; I:IIAI? 103-113 I CMI - IIAF
I',+111ualiou of Maltule an+l Wastewalcr Applicaliutl Ftlui;anactll ; I-IIAE Tact Shect II('S! I - IIAI.
I'u►11110flig I IIIIIrS Irons Swint: Illsildings ; PM-33 NCSI I - swille Extenyiun
I.uvil++mocntal Assurance I'robrllm ; MI111C Manua) PI(' I'usl. I'unlllccls Ass+lc
( 11+(i++us I hlanal;inI,( Mor ; it rept)l( linul the Swine (3+lor -Task I'm Cc IWNI I Ag1i ('mimmitivarions
I III ISMILC ('unL:rrns its Anirnal Malls IF hIallagemem: Odols and I:Iies ; I'ItI M17, 19+15 Con IcIvilre I'slice col ill gs Flotilla t'ollp -l: liv+. FK14-u64111
txhl( It' - I IovrinLcs 11. 1996, 1'.11;c 5
• 40 1 0

IN-lortality Management Methods
(check which me.hod(s) are being imolemented)
..! Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 3= hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least ;OQ feet frorn any Flowing
stream or pubiic body or water.
• Rende-;ng at a rende;.ng plant licensed under G.S. 106-163. i
Complete incine aticn
In the case of dead poultry only. piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
'Anv method which. in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of p= of a dead aninzl's value xithout endangering
human or animal health. (written approval of the Smct Veterinarian must be
attached)