820706_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

MN
Islon of Water Resouumber ®- 70(, O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
O
Date of Visit: rrivai Time: Departure Time: P"?_ Y­_ County: J�~S4tA/Region
Farm Name: i} L Oq �"_COwner Email:
Owner Name: W, pi
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: fzan t,(_ p_�G( re4w_ "f ' Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: =I Integrator: flan x_
Certified Operator: k Certification Number: I 7
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Destgn Current
@apacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Design
Capactity
Current
Fop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Design Current Cow
D . !;Quit . Ca aci PLo Non -Dairy
La ers Beef Stocker
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Non-L.a ers
Pullets
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Boars
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes 7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Yes 0 No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ❑ No
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes tQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 01 Date of Ins ectiow.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [�Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No gNA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2
Identifier: 1
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window - ❑ Evidency.ef )Vind Drift Q Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
1
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No
acres determination?
17_ Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
_Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Tr fers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes TNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[DNA [] NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

acili Wumber: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit`/ ZZ t] Yes qgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Lr
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1 - Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
1Commep (refr to question #} Expfatn any. YES attswersandldt y addtionalFrecommendationsor any iitliei•comments,
.Use„drawursyof Facility=tobeiter_eiplam`situ�ahons:(use ad"tlitiDnsl pages as necessary) '`�.ZR
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
2/4 015
l Z-1 1-7

I
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: a Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 111 `, Arrival Time: :D© Departure Time: /�y County: �N
J Farm Name: `& A�"'.Ow'n`eer`EmaTii:
Owner Name: w
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:`) Title: Phone:
6
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
vi
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: Longitude:
Region:^fJ
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Gurreat
Swine ..
Ga aci; Po
P 1?'
Wet Poul
- try
Ca aci
P. w, ty
Po P•
Cattle Ca aci Po
P tY 1P
Wean to Finishy
La er
Dai Caw
Wean to Feeder
]Non -Layer
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
"'Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . P,Oniti
-Ca aci
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Dischar es and Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (galIons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
$0 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[] No
T NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No EPNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? []Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [] No Qg NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 95
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes h No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes to No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Ycs [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Dri Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): & ,
l�
13. Soil Type(s): Alok.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
i
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
LP No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists El Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[J)No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[] Yes
'tom'' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[p No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

IF&Uity Number: Date of inspection: 1113116
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes � No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ® No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes []I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Fie:
mments (refer to question Eap iii ny-.Y S- (use ado a nal imp -es tonalnecesrecommendations
endations or any ,other comments.
,. .. x �, y
drawui of. facile to better ex
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA - ❑NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
�No
❑NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Phone:
Date:
21412015

A ypc v1 v ISIL; W Uompuance inspecnon U uperanon Kevlew u atruciure r,vamanon U i ecnmcal Assisrance
Reason for Visit: *Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time:, County: _LAe-0"Region: fig'
Farm Name - Owner Email:
Owner Name: 4-yekwad Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
plt�
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: f Certification Number: 7 7 .7A
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
MELUes, Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Pop. _
Wet Poultry
Capacity
1'op.
Cattle Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
Layer
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
" "
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
0 rrent
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P,o.ul
Ca aci
Po P. _
-Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Qther
Turkez Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes M&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[)] NA
❑ NE
[]Yes
❑ No
! NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[P NA
❑ NE
[] Yes
No
7❑ NA
❑ NE
[-]Yes
ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page l of 3 21412014 Continued

ftcility Dumber: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes P9
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes to No NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: rr
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? `r
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop indow Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. CropT e s : C �5 C1 412 � '- clr' -+ 0 A&
Y�O ) /
13. Soil Type(s): A �_ ' yL&o
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[)§ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
k9pNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
[] NE
acres determination?
T
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
fo No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall [] Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [—]Yes E�kNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

F2reili Number: jDate of Inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes a
llo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑.Other:
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[DNA ❑NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ffl
y YES.
FUO
emdrawin�s of faci_9� i Won Explain lity to better a plain sintuatio s (use adtiitianal sees as necessary), answersand/of any additional mendabons or a "t_her cammei�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: J
21412014

type 01 visit: W c;omptiance inspection lJ vperanon meview U structure tvaluatiou U t eCnnical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral O Emergency Q Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 Arrival Time: ` 4; Departure Time: County: -Si}1^'i'Psd� Region: {�0
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Ly". 00d %e_--=&W Phone:
Mailing Address: r—
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
'T
Onsite Representative: k
k
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Integrator: eRS
Certification Number: !2 JA
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feederik
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Wet Poultry
La er
E Non -La er
I)r. eP.oW
Layers
Non -Layers
Design
Capacity
Design
Ca aci
Current
Pop.
Current
P,o
Design C►urren
Cattle C►►$pacify Pop.
DairyCow
DairyCalf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults.
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes tEpNo © NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Q NA ❑ NE
fM NA ❑ NE
t3NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
.Page l of 3 21412014 Continued

1117aciliNumber: ^ R y - Date of Inspection: j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
P NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: _ 1-
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
T
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify
DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[ No
T®
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
r
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
T
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside ovf_Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): _ Gmf S N .) f sr, - � V I i'� A
13. Soil Type(s): Jv 0
l4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ YesLfj
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
T No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes y
No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/412014 Continued

1Facili +Number: -6Z- r7Q(� Date of Inspection: Iff
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Ng No [] NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes M No [] NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
TV No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments refer to uestron[ . EY lain an YES answers and/or -an additional: recommendations or an other commenU
[ q y y y.
Use drawings of facility to _Better explain situations (use additional�pages`:asnecessary). -_
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Paige 3 of 3
i■a !' Film`
Phone: ib" 33- M
Date: 1 J Ll
21412014

i ype of visit: WUompliance inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation f) Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: • Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: j ?q Z Arrival Time: Departure Time: ;.pQ County: r�sw
Farm Name: J T f Ot, f;Lywl Owner Email:
Owner Name: L n WOA S Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
I(
Certified Operator: t4
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: re �r
Certification Number: 17 r I
Certification Number:
Longitude:
D sign Current Dest n Current Desi n
5wme Capa ty Pop. Wet-1?oultry Capacityx I'op. Cattle, Capacity
Finish Layer DairyCow
Current
Pop.
Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
o Finish
- ""' DairyHeifer
to Wean
Design;w Current D Cow
to Feeder
D ,1'onitr.
Caaei - Po , Non -Dairy
Eean
to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Pullets
Turke s
Beef Brood Cow
Turke Points
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b_ Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes 1P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes FM No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 6No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
21412011 Continued

Fecility Number: jDate of Inspection: iii y ZEj Z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ply
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) T�
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes} No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 91
Waste ADulication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l 0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
I] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes ® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes [P No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes Q9 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
0 NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility number: Date of lns ectian: 1 f 7 Zoi
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? Ir
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
y
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
`r No
T
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
mments (refer to question #j: Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recomendations or any other comiments�� ,
Fd
rawings.:of facility to better explain. situations (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9io ` 300
Date: 11/7/2,01
214,2011

l ype of visit: W c:omptiance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: /p 20 11 1 Arrival Time: Departure Time: 0 : vfl n+ County: SDN Region:
I ' 4Farm Name: J Owner Email:
Owner Name: "7nw7o� �q�r �jpt Phone:
I
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: y4j..&?r Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: U Certification Number: �?
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design'' Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Design Current.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Design
Cattle Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Non -La er I
Dairy Cow
I)QWea
to Feeder
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Design Current
D , Pioul Ca aci. Pko
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Dry Cow
Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Pullets
Beef Feeder
Boars
Beef Brood Cow
in Turkeys
Qther Turkey Pouets
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
C. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No CA NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
T
❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

FA!Ii Number: - 925ZD Date of lns ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structurai freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
38
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
P.No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ No �;%TA
Structure 6
❑ NE
❑ Yes IgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
f�pNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[:]Yes
[3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[] Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acce&,Lw
tableCrop�jWG��iinndyoww ❑ Ev�;6'Z)
id Drift/ 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r_ _ `` _ ` �'' 1 + d �� e�042 A
13. Soil Type(s): D24, A4b
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16_ Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. C] Yes 09 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain minbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

FsWflit3iDumber: Date of Inspection: /D 29 N
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No [DNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? T
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
( q 9)� P Y Y Yh mot-_ _..ea
FCo,Tm_me,n,ts referto. uestion Ex lain.an YES answers and/or an .additional recammendateons or:an �ot_lier" commein-draings,of facility to better explain situations (use additional paces as necessarv).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: id N
21412011

r
Division of Water Quality
====iHt,mber Q Division of Soil and Water ConservatioA
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: / 0 Arrival Time: Departure Time: V County: �ri`k(J Region:
Farm Name: TL 00Ct f4rfY1 Owner Entail:
Owner Name• 1N Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 1' Ur LUr Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: N integrator: �1"eg2- _ — ►y _
Certified Operator: D Operator Certification Number: 7 79"
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =1 o = ` ="
Longitude: 0 0 = I = u
Swine
Design
Capacity
Current
PopulationILD
Design Gnrrent WDes'gn Current
Wet Poultry C**opacity Population Cattlepacity Population
Wean to Finish
Layer
EE]
❑ DairyCow
❑ Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
El Layers ElNon-Dairy
Beef Stocker
❑Non -La ers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to FinishEl
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
LiTurke s
❑ Turkey Poults
LU�Other
Other
L=EIOther
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q3NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[2tNA
❑ NE
®NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[_1 Yes
P] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

r Facility Number:ZM Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
P NA
❑ NE
Struc I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: r
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �� u
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
k) No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes [�Mo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ElNE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop
, Window ❑ Evidence ofWindDrift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C� . 1 GmSS Cf 6yra0 rip(
13. Soil type(s) - Mo _ iAIQ -a.„,_ h j
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
5� No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Wo ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendattoas or any other comments y
Use drawings of.facility to better explain. situations (use additional pages as necessary)
E
Reviewer/Inspector Name i
Reviewer/I n Spector Signature:
\Page 2 of 3
1 %
Phone:�r
Date: f 24 f1tv
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 13 o -- Date of InspectionGpdn
] /�Q �
Required Records & Documents `�7��
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record ]seeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
F�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[g NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Vol No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[5�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2T Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
tfl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Od No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

t�
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Timev Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: YaOwner Email:
Owner Name: LQ f? Phone:
I I-
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
SAM S&j Region:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 6f integrator: Tf e,
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = =gg Longitude: =n l----] , = u
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Design
Wet Poultry Capacity
C►urrent
Population
Design Current
Cable C++specify Population
❑ Dairy Cow
El Wean to Finish
❑ La er
Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
IDry
Poultry
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ La
❑ Farrow to Finish
El Gilts
El Boars
Other
❑ Beef Stocker
Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
El Beef Brood Cowi
Number of Structures:
ETurkeyPouets❑Other her
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[�)NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
[PNA
❑ NE
c_ What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
Jig No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

t,
Q
Facility Number: — ()jq Date of Inspection 9
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
M Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a, if yes. is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
PNA
❑ NE
Structure I Stnicture 2 Structurc 3 Stawimc 4
structure
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
p
Observed Freeboard (in): �Z7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc_)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If of questions 4-6 were answered yes. and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify
DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
C�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes L4PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffets, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding [:]Hydraulic Overload ❑ Froze» Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > i 0% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [:]Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
—1) a A-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designs ed in the CAWMP?
ElYes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[i No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination
i ❑ Yes
Wo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17_ Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
W Nu
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
X) No
❑ NA
❑ NE
IComments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. I
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessa ry):
Reviewer/Inspector Name ` V Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 9— f+�- OC►
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection-'—'
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the approprrate box. M WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
❑ Yes 2jFflo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge'?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus toss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern'?
f yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�aa No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
LEI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yes
No
El NA
El NE
❑Yes
®No
El NA
[I NE
El Yes
No
El NA
El NE
El Yes
No
El NA
El NE
[:]Yes
UANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
C3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
J3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2!�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
W�4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addiitonal Comments and/or Drawings:Memo
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit A Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 9 Q Arrival Time: ��©� n Departure Time: :� le" County: �sb� Region:
Farm Naive: 11 � L Owner Email:
Owner Name: L WoPhone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: T� Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
U
Phone No:
Integrator: �5
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location -of Farm: Latitude: 00 = =46 Longitude: =° 0I EJ u
Sw�e
Design Current
Capacity Popul tea on
ram`.
Wet Poultry
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Poultry
❑ Layers
Design Current Desigtt Current
Capacity Population Cattle Capai�y Population
❑ DairyCow
❑ Da Calf
❑ Da' Heifer
❑ D Cow
El Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
❑ Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to WeanDry
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
' ❑ TurkeyPoults
❑ Other
Other
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
to No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
E�NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
[p NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
P9 NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
1P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number:b2f70& I Date of inspection
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ,5 NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
u
Observed Freeboard (in): 56
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
Q�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
tgNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
nNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
16No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
IM No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crap type(s) (-txi5-W��
i rJ
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑Yes
Lfi No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
51 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
59No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name q,E/,j� Phone: V S'S-Wa
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:ffi?�_aDate: %D
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

+ Facility Number. Date of Inspection q 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, cheek El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
QINo
❑ NA
[I NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
K7hNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
ElNE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
1PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�4Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
II
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
IRNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
1P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality 4 t
Facility Number Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation 1
- J 0 Other Agency 1� +&U1
Type of Visit'* Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit V R-ouutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: t Departure Time; County Region:_
Farm Name: ---, L flri Owner Email:
Owner Name:.tl1i�xy Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title.
Onsite Representative: l t
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification
Back-up Certification Number:
—7%q Co
Latitude: El o = ` = " Longitude: = ° El 0 "
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Potrltry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
(a ❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turke Points
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State` (if yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non-DaiTy
❑ Beef Stocke3
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: a—J
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
RNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
WA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility�Number: 6-Date of inspection `5►-`' "
V4'aste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a_ If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes [� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in);
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6_ Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes R No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes O No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[] Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Amlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes JZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding [3 Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [:]Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside
of Area
12. Crop type(s) VIkK-t?11JQ - � c<7''t'l G t' U f S
13. Soil type(s) NO
O
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
49 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/inspector Name _` KGTI K)6 Phone: ! /O 126
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: csf,
Il/Z51U4 C-antmuea

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers //'❑'' Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
NLVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
FT TA
❑ NE
Otherlssues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[j4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
N1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
t No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
64 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or
12128104

Facility No..
Farm Name
Owner _
Operator
Back-up
COC
Time In Time Out
Circle: General or
Integrator
— Site Rep
No.
_ No.
NPDES
Date
Design
Current
Design
Current
Wean - Feed
Farrow - Feed
Wean - Finish
Farrow - Finish
Feed - Finish
Gilts / Boars
Farrow -- Wean
Others
FREEBOARD: Design
Sludge Survey
Crop Yee
Rain Gauge
Soil 'Test � Wettable Acres
Weekly Freeboard 1r---- Daily Rainfall -�
Spray/Freeboard Drop
Weather Codes 120 min Insoections
Waste Analysis:
Date Nitrogen (N)
`7
Observed
Calibration/GPM
Waste Transfers
Rain Breake
PLAT
1-in Inspections `�-
Date Nitrogen (N)
Pull/Field Soil Crop Pan Window

0
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ORoutine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: I S Ap -04 Arrival Time: /: 3 2 Departure Time: 2; 3 County: YclPSc..r Region:
Farm Name: S t' f�q FaE-w� Owner Email:
Owner Name: L SAe II Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: iZcLn1 La.l1 N. &Afye.-Bon+' Title: f7 SC- Phone No: (Y10)$92- -577%
Onsite Representative: Integrator: pre s C A a FQ 1-wt S
Certified Operator: Rctil a $0Ltref0"0_4- Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e Longitude: = ° = 1 0 1i
Design Current
Swine C•apaeity Population
Design Current Design Current
11111
Wet Poultry Capty Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy Cow
❑Non -La er ❑ Dairy Calf
4 i ❑ DairyHeifer
.:N El Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
ElN ers ❑ Beef Stocker
❑Nan -La ers
El Pullets El Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Pouets n'
y
❑Other w�° y' iNumlie of Structures:
❑ Wean to Finish
® Wean to Feeder
O$D
❑ Feeder to Finish;-
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
El Boars
�:
Other 21
❑ Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ym No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: SZ — 701Q
Date of Inspection S —/6 D (o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes 09 No
❑ Yes D9 No
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): '05-8
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [8 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes EX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ElYes 0i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Q9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Auplication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes C4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 tbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) y 6f,
13. Soil type(s) IV-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes (O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
JS No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name �R; t k. feu a 1s _ _ _ Phone: NJ9 W3.3 -330 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
ruXe Z uJ 1 1 i,onrmuea

r
Facility [llutnber: ��,--7[?(� Date of Inspection
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes GjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No [❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes It No ❑ NA El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes CXVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
QgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
(3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2T
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
$0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
PO No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number G
Date of Visit: �'/ > o Time: g.� 30,4
ro
..�� �� NotOperational Below- Threshold
El ermitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm ?dame: ::Y—L Hc, County: -5-C FR Ci
Owner -Name:Cz Phone No:
Mailing Address: `3 &ass La,ea' f3�
Facility- Contact: �4.� del- Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: a Integrator: /I Pc?�lia/
Certified Operator: Ru�� �G�e%0-t'— Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
��ne ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 0° 04 Longitude C` 0• �-
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ub"On
can to Feeder 08 v ❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non-Dain
El Feeder to Fini,:sh
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ (`lilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La Pon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps U ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
I. is any discharse observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes t❑
Discharge originated at: ❑ Laeoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes [a go
b. if discharge is obsen•ed, did it reach Neater of the State? (If yes, notifi, DWQ) ❑ yes 0,90-
c. if discharse is observed. what is the estimated flow in sal/min? l
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0-m
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes D-No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the eaters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes DNo
Waste CollLetion & Treatment ��
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [3 Spillway El Yes Imo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ly,
05103101 Continued

It
Facility Number: 82. — p Date of Inspection s i • a'i
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 0"96
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes U-No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes 0'1q0-
8. Does any pail of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑-N-0
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes Q itio
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes B-190
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑'o
12.
Crop type / _'411 Gr
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
G-Wo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
�o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[ o
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ONO
16.
is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Ql'3o
),required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Owo
18.
Does the f'lity fail to have all co orients of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
{ie/ W�iP chec�dcsi tc.)
❑ Yes
ONG
19.
,
Does keeping improvement?
El Yes
[
record need {ie/ i on, free d, waste ysis a soil sam� rts)
-Pda
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑moo
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
U-No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑.#b
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes Belo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes BNO
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Contments,(refer t.jpo question #) Explain any YES answers and/or arty recommendations or any other comments. -
Use "drawings U facility to better explain situattoris [use�addt[ronal pages as necessary): -
❑-Pieeld Cony ❑ Final Notes
" r' Sfc�I
- 4as
/&`�S /p MO&
IAe �nS�rlp c9 � /�e lo�ooq wa/`S Te
P/Pvrr71_
alo/1'n-1S 7�( pin
S �ar>[
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name „ e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued
r-
n

r -. -
L3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Ageney
MS �
Division of Water Quality f�z3
�-WIMM -7% -,
0 Routine _0 Complaint O Fallow -up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection O
•
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)-
Registered ACertified [3 Applied for Permit Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name:.................. .....................'-•--
L......AYr`....... County:... ........... ....... ....
OwnerName:........... �Jh.`"'........ .......... .`1............................................. Phone No:.........��0............y6I ...............................................
Facility Contact:.-........�'�I�i?Yt� i� 11 Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: .........CVj ....... ...L`�c-.....jgcm '!........... ......... .......................i].9.,s Q�....�C............ I....... ......0��3�0�
Onsite Representative:..:... � �?�t.:2........S.�I�7T !!!�..F,,rj1!µ?� '��Atel;rator:.................. )rr . gj.C.......5rr► ..s........
Certified Operator:__...jsg�,( ..A tt pf ............... Operator Certification Number:-.-...__...---- ----- _-..........
Location of Farm:
0
'o
Latitude 6 r-- -�« Longitude 0• 04 "
Desig Current
d" •S�
Design
Current r , <Destgn ;Current
,y,.o ,'!�
Capacity=Population Poultry
a ...,. ,�'.4,�s�' -
Capacity Populatioii,!','Cattle rt . , Capacity `Poptila'twn
` Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
❑Dairy ;
�¢ ` ❑ Feeder to Finish
EEJ~fi ❑ Non -layer
�: ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to wean
r
❑ Farrow to Feeder
.,I[] Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
=
Total Dent n Capap -
w ❑ Gilts
.1P�]
❑ i3
1 oars
F
.k S c,Y ...
S
'"It
T W-
otal SS >°
-.-...-..
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
;&No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
[ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
Jo No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
to No
7/25/97

4' . 1
Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons.11oldine Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.
❑ Yes No
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes j�J No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):.._
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes A No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures Iack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Waste Annlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes IV No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff enterinng waters of the State, notify DW ) 4-
15. Crop type Cl �-i .-----...5 ...1...... .......
........ ... ..r Q -.....................................� . C - ....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? PQ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes IV No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
(Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
06 Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑Yes
No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
V(No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
AYes
❑ No
[3, No.vi61aid ons.or' deficiencies.rvere,noted,durifig' this. visit.. You:will ieceive no•ftirther.:
c6fnesOndeh6. fihout this:visit:-
X. 7k C4WMI9 kUS twv� All Ceryrr wl�+�; � a� G�a��_, die
YPr�j A"d�s � 5 �l C".,jy Gp �
01r. r Il � ,rr, `Zupti _6 6Yi�tS
PG A.-' �,v►-r� a}►�►• I " 1p�. Aa�s w �r�w 4 �;.5
is A,
`� ` U usf t 'a./-
le 60 Fusrrn. is F&-WV;r16j- 1vvt as AO-A-le�en✓✓ �=Pr i^a, 1"0001 leuc/5 at5 retu
6� ,,;U�25197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: /4 _ /_ 3 -- 99

SWINE FARM
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION,
AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR
LYNWOOD SPELL
JL HOG FARM
6080 Wean to Feeder
April 16, 1997
RECEIVED
J UN 2 4 1997
I VYETrEVILLC-
REG. OFi uE
I certify that this Plan has been prepared under my direct
supervision and meets the applicable regulations of
NRCS, DEM, and all other State and Local Regulations
to the best of my lrno &#ark belief-
M. Floyd A
License No.
���,,•�M CARO
P..........4
•` FESS/O0%
'��i,4Yp1
A110%%�

' SWINE FARM
DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION,
AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
' LYNWOOD SPELL
JL HOG FARM
' 6080 Wean to Feeder
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 ITEM
Lagoon Design Check List
'
Emergency Action Plan
Design Summary
Lagoon Design
Soil Investigation
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dams
Operation and Maintenance Plan
'
Construction Specifications for Lagoons
Seeding Specifications
'
Plan for Lagoon
Typical Cross -Section of Lagoon
Plan of Excavated Waste Storage Pit
'
Volume Calculations
Waste Utilization Plan
Waste Management Facility Site Evaluation
Certification of Notices to Adjoining Landowners
'
Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Insect Control Checklist
Mortality Management Methods
Maps
A. Vicinity Map
B. Topo Map
C. Soils Map
'
D. Flood Plain Map
E. ASCS Map
'
F. Wetlands Delineation Map

i 1
' CHECKED BY: F-VA:L c� Nr-> Am--s, PG.
r DATE:
' LAGOON DESIGN CHECK LIST
1. Copy of 026 and maps if clearing involved.
'
2.
Dam safety -
a. Dike over 15 feet to down stream slope and over 10 acre feet storage to top of
dike.
3.
Adequacy of storage volumes -
✓
✓
a. designed volume exceeds needs
b. stop pumping volume exceeds treatment volume
✓
C. 25 year storm volume exceeds volume at start pumping
✓
d. actual volume pumped exceeds required volume to be pumped
'
✓
e. all temporary storage stored above seasonal high watertable
✓
f. sludge volume included
✓
g. minimum 6 feet treatment volume depth
'
4.
Operation & Maintenance Plan (sheet) -
a. begin and end pump -out elevations
5.
Location sketch -
✓
a. distances to nearest residence
✓
b. road numbers
C. north arrow
6.
Hazard Classification Sheet (NC-ENG-34) -
'
a. distance to nearest stream in event of dike failure
✓
b. distance to nearest public road in event of failure
'
✓
c. topo map showing lagoon location and information to support a&b
7.
Waste Utilization Plan
✓
a. show all tracts & field numbers, field acreage, crops
'
_✓
b. signatures of producer & person preparing plan
�(g
C. agreement sheet signed by adjoining landowner if needed - showing tract
numbers, field numbers, acres, etc.
'
d. ASCS maps of fields to be used for effluent disposal
C. soil survey sheets showing all fields
.
f. check suitability of soils for crops planned
'
✓
g. include attachment 'B" on sampling procedure
h. waste plan is included but prepared by other qualified specialist - this plan is not
1
part of the engineer's review

8.
Soil Investigation Sheet (SCS-ENG-538)
✓
a. are sufficient borings made for size and condition of lagoon
✓
b. borings 2.0' below designed bottom of lagoon
✓
C. location & elevation of borings in relation to grid survey
✓
d. seasonal high watertable
✓
9.
Seeding specifications included (lagoon dike and other exposed areas around buildings)
10.
Construction Specifications (sheet included)
a. need for cut-off trench addressed
✓
b. need for sealing or lining with impervious material addressed and anticipated
locations of such area identified
C. protection of liner during initial filling and near flush pipes addressed
11.
Grid Sheet (original or ledgable copy)
✓
a. gridded area large enough to include embankment slopes and surface water
diversions
b. location & dimensions of lagoon & buildings shown (lagoon inside top
measurements shown and lagoon corners identified by grid stations)
C. surface water removal (pipes, outlets, etc) shown
✓
d. soil borings location show
_✓
e. TBM Iocation & elevation shown
WA
f. existing utilities located (if applicable)
N/A
g. emergency spillway shown (if applicable)
12.
Typical cross-section included
—�
a. dike elevation & top width shown
✓
b. Iagoon bottom elevation shown
✓
C. side slopes shown
✓
d. effluent outlet pipe invert elevation shown
e. effluent outlet pipe shown to discharge below water surface
✓
e. building pads - elevation & grade shown
1g
f. cut-off trench shown - if required
✓
g. liner shown - if required
B.
Volume Computations
✓
a. excavation
✓
b. dike fill
C. pad fill
14.
Summary Sheet
_✓
a. design requirements
_✓
b. excavation volume
C. fill volumes
d_ cut -fill ratio
N/4 15. Location of subsurface drainage (if present)
2

16. Presence of utilities addressed
✓ 17. Observation of cultural resources statement included
✓ 18. Operation is outside of jurisdictional limits of municipalities
f

SAMPSON COUNTY
1 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ) 910-486-1541
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES (EMS) 910-592-8996
SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD) 910-592--7963
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (MRCS) 910-592-7963
COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE (CES) 910-592-7161
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your
operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off the site. You should
NOT wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to
' consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an
accessible location for all employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may
' or may not be possible. Suggested responses to problems are
listed below:
A. Lagoon overflow --possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam, any
permanent alteration of the dam should be approved by a
qualified technical specialist,
' b. pump wastes to field at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all additional flow to the lagoon -hold waste in the
house if possible.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sere no surface water' is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste
application field -action include:
a.
Immediately
stop waste application.
1
b.
Create a temporary
waste.
diversion or berm to contain the
c.
Incorporate
waste to reduce further- runoff.
d.
Evaluate and
eliminate the reasons) that caused the
runoff.
e.
Evaluate the
application rates for the fields where
runoff occurred.
' C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle (flushing system) pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
' D. Leakage from flush system, houses, solids separators -actions
include:
a. Stop recycle (flushing system) pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon effect has been created.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid
separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

11
11
11
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. often this is seepage
as opposed to flowing leaks --possible action:
' a. Dig a small sump or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back into lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove
animals and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
' c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side
wails and the lagoon bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess
the extent of the spill and 'note any obvious damages.
a.
Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b.
Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
c.
Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or
property damage?
d.
Did the spill leave the property?
•e.
Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
f.
Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
'
surface waters?
g.
Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of
the property)?
'
h.
How much reached surface waters?
3, Contact
appropriate agencies.
a.
During normal business hours, call your DWO (Division of
Water Quality) regional office, at 910--486--1541, after
hours, emergency numbera919-733-394E. Your phone call
'
should include: YOUR NAME, FACILITY, TELEPHONE NUMBER,
THE DETAILS OF THE INCIDENT FROM ITEM #` ABOVE, THE
EXACT LOCATION OF THE FACILITY, AND THE LOCATION OR
DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT OF THE SPILL, WEATHER AND WIND
CONDITIONS. THE CORRECTIVE MEASURES THAT HAVE BEEN UNDER
TAKEN, AND THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE SITUATION.
b.
If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call
'
local (EMS) Emergency Management Services at
910-5921-8996.
'
c.
d.
Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department:
Contact local Soil and Water Conservation District
(SWCD), Natural Resources Conservation Service
(MRCS) office at 910-592-7963 and Cooperative Extension
'
Service (CES) at 910-592-7161 for advice/technical
assistance.
' 4. If none of the above works call 911 or the sheriffs Department
and explain your problem to thew and ask that person to contact
the proper agencies foe, you.
1

11
I I
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of the
problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Rhone:
' 6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS,
Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name; M. FLx:,Yo Ao&pAs, ?E,
b. phone: 9L��gts- ►c� __
7. Implement procedures as advised by DW(2 and technical assistance
agencies to rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess
the waste management plan to keep problems with release of wastes
from happening again.
B. If you are a contract swine grower associated with a swine
company integrator, contact the company representative at
1-910-592-5771

'
DESIGN SUMMARY
1
NAME: LYNWOOD SPELL
`
{
COUNTY ; SAMPSDN
TYPEOPERATION: 6080 WEAN —FEED
33.
i^
TOTAL REQUIRED VOLUME 404824
CU
FT
TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME AVAILABLE 420904
CU
FT}�
r' 'ESTIMATED:
i
r
Y
VOLUME OF LAGOON EXCAVATION 11195
CU
YDS _
F
Aik
TOTAL EXCAVATION
CU
YDS`
---11195
VOLUME` OF PAD FILL 6279
Cu
YDS
`,VOLUME OF DAM 2692
CU
YDS
'
TOTAL FILL 8971
CU
YDS +
'.
CUT —FILL RATIO 1.25
:1
'
*-AREAS
OF LAGOON WHERE (SM,SP) IS ENCOUNTERED
OVEREXCAVATE 1.6 FEET AND DACKFILL WITH GOOD
COMPACTED
;°.
CLAY MATERIAL. SP VANES CONTAIN A LOT OF WATER.
'
CONSTRUCTION WILL NEED TRENCHING AND DEWATERING
BEFORE
CLAY LINER CAN BE INSTALLED.
n, -
..
9 -
TOP OF DAM ELEVATION 52.0
START PUMPING ELEVATION 49.7
STOP PUMPING ELEVATION 47.0
'
BOTTOM ELEVATION 40.0
BEGIN PAD ELEVATION 52.0
'
END PAD ELEVATION 52.3

LAGOON DESIGN
gperator:LYNWDOD County: SAMPSON
Date: 04/14/97
SPELL ount
'fas
the Site evaluation -been completed & approved:
Y
1.
AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish) x 1417 lbs.
0 lbs
1
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x 522 lbs.
= 0 lbs
0 head (finishing only) x 135 lbs.
- 0 lbs
saws (farrow to wean) x 433 lbs.
= 0 lbs
'0
6080 head (wean to feeder) x 30 lbs.
= 182400 lbs
Describe other
0 lbs
Total Average Live Weight = 182400 lbs
2.
MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
'
1 Va ume - 182400 cubic ft (includes 0
cu. ft. add. treat. vol.l
�.
STORAGE
VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 45600.0 cubic feet
TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
'
Inside top length (feet) ---------------------
290.0
Inside t o p width ( feet) ----•--------------------
190.0
Top of dike elevation ( feet) ------------------
52.00
'
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet) ------------
40.00
Freeboard (feet)---------------�----------------
1.00
Emergency spillway depth of flow(feet)-------
0.00
Side slopes (inside lagoon) ------------------
3.0 1
'
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END: SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH
WIDTH DEPTH
'
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 284.0
184.0 11.00
AREA OF TOP
'
LENGTH * WIDTH =
284.0 184.0 52256 ( AREA OF
TOP)
'
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH
218.0 118.0 25724 (AREA OF
BOTTOM)
'
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH WIDTH * 4
'
251.0 151.0 151604 (AREA OF
MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP f (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA
BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
52256 151604
25724 1.83
'
Total Designed Volume Available
= 420904 CU. FT.

11
�.
TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
y:
�+
-
_DRAINAGE AREA:
'
Lagoon (top of dike)
t( Len th * Width )`+ Surface area of connecting waste
g 9
facility
Y
�,.
' 290. @ 190. 0 �.
r,
55 square 0 feet
F100
ldings (roof and lot water) or impervious area
0.0 square feet Describe
this area �"
TOTAL DA °.:55100. 0 'square feet
'
w De'sign temporary storage pe°riod' to be 180
days.
;.
A.
Vo 1 ume of waste produced
'
6ces & urine production in gall
gal,./day per .135 lb. ALW
1•.3 7
jtlolume = 182400 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW 1.37 gal/day
'`11e0;days
Volume 333184 gals. or 44543.3 cubic feet
B.
FF
Volume of excess water404
'.•- -
Volume = 1222.9 gallons/day 180 days storage/7.48 ga]}lons�
�-
pei� CF c
V.o.lume - 29427.2 cubic feet
y-
=C.
Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
.
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by
largest,'amount.
180 days evaporation = 13.3 inches
.�
'
180 days rainfall = 21.7 inches
*..
,
Volume = 21.7 in a DA / 12 in. per ft. .:- 99639
cubic feet r�ntff
Volume = 13.3 in * lagoon DA/12 in. /ft .= 61069
cubic feet Aapc'
Volume = 38570 cubic feet
1
,}'
L .r�•
.�
5 �
1

5D. Volume of 25 year 24 hour storm
' Volume of "Heavy Rain" 7.0 in.
Volume = 14.0 inches / 12
Volume = 64283 cubic feet
'E. Additional volume as follows:
1.
I
7.0 in.
inches per foot * DA
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
44543
cubic
feet
5B.
29427
cubic
feet
5C.
38570
cubic
feet
5D.
64283
cubic
feet
5E.
0
cubic
feet
TOTAL
176824
cubic
feet
SUMMARY
Temporary storage period====================)
Rainfall during wettest period of storage===>
Evaporation during storage period===========)
25 year — 24 hour
Heavy
Side
Inside top
Inside top
Emergency spillway elevation(if planned)====>
Top of dike
Bottom of lagoon elevation==»==========_ ===>
Top of sludge elevation=====================>
Total required volume=======================)
Actual design
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===)
Stop pumping elev.--------------===W___ —_}
Must be ) or = to the SHWT
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el. =)
Min. Required treatment volume==============)
Volume at stop pumping elevation============>
Start pumping
Must be at bottom of F.B. & 25 yr. rainfall
Act. vol. less 25 yr. and heavy rainfall====>
Volume at start pumping elevation===========)
Required volume to be pumped================>
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========)
Min. thickness of soil liner when required==)
DESIGNED BY; �.
fAlo's-
DATE: $11-+i97
180
days
21.7
inches
13.3
inches
7.0
inches
7.0
inches
1.00
feet
3.0
. 1
290.0
feet
190.0
feet
Hov
PIANKeD
52.00
feet
40.00
feet
41,70
feet
404824
cu.
ft.
420904
cu.
ft.
e
46.50
feet
47.00
feet
46.50
feet
46.00
feet
182400
cu.
ft.
186873
cu.
ft.
49.70
feet
& heavy
rain
356621
cu.
ft.
355318
cu.
ft.
112541
cu.
ft.
121742
cu.
ft.
1.6
feet
APPROVED BY. /p/ —v7j Ah-�{ PL.
DATE: 4 h 6I97

SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF LAGOON SITE
(—Growees Name t,rSores County 5,4m PSuAl
It 1
Date State p C
' SKETCH OF PROPOSED UCrOON SHOW12VG WHERE BORINGS WERE AWADE
21735 VAs5 L P"a t <PA - rHE Av€.
ZS 38Z " SR 'Ud(n
� ® ApfRil�r. tvtrn7o1
1 OF tAGoo+J
.
1 i Mc Cutcuvay $a trey O�<��
- Depth Boring Number
Ft. 1 2 3 50.-0. 4 48.1 5 6 7 8 9 10
5r)? 5 M
.0-1 sr►, 501 sc
1 1-2 5c. 15c, 5C St
2-3 5 5 Se 5
3-4 S3,5�G
1 4-5 -s Q * ,
5-6St
1 Sc
7-8 S In
P 5
1 '►�� 8-9 d S
u IL
9-10 `o
' t� Q CL 4P.0 Cc
10-11 �L e<� C
112CL
-121,. CL �L CL
-13
1 SHWT (Seasonal High Water Table)
Signature & Title ,�l , C Date 3 7
1

�7�w�aa
TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORING
,
I
IJ
A
UNIFIED CL,9SSIFIC4TION
1
-
GW
Well graded gravels; $ravel, sand mix
Sc Clayey sands; sand -lay mixtures
GP
Poorly graded gravels
ML Silts; silty, very sands; sandy or clayey silt
GM
Silty gravels; gravel -sand -gilt mix
CL Clays of low to medium plasticity
GC
Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity
SW
Well graded sands; sand -gravel nix
ME Elastic silts
SP
Poorly graded sands
OL Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
SM
Silty Sands
OH Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
L Suitable material for liner is available Yes No
Remarks:
se VcsKPs
2.
Explain hazards requiring special attention in design (seepage, spring, rock, etc.)
3.
General Remarks: The soil borings for this investigation represent only that particular confined area If during
construction, different materials are encountered, necessary modifications will be made in design. At the time of certifi-
cation, the waste ueaunent lagoon must meet all NRCS standards and specifications including liners, side slopes,
compaction, capacity and other requirements.
Depth
BoringNumber
Ft.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-10
10-11
11-12
12-13

' U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
ILandowner L A Wood SPeLL
Community or Group No.
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
County SAmOsod
Conservation Plan No. `"
' Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam 12- Ft. Length of Flood Pool 4on Ft.
11
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 317197
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :Est.
Elevation
Kind of
:Improvements:
of Breach
Reach:
Length:
Width: Slope: Land Use
Improvements
: Above :Floodwater Above
: Flood Plain:
Flood Plain
Ft.
Ft. %
Ft.
Ft.
W Ont LkNT>
N04
. TAjtTUTAAX y
M41a
2
1000
:5 BMa,�lnl+
_
3
.
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach -A .5yppgN tgi, Agy oe- rH-c s eec7-v&r= VJIL- NOT
AU6C 516N Arfi mAL(,e -ro Awy ioc LA6a64 is AFftox. 40D,
i FOM 7'2,8u-rAa� AnO loon' To _ 8_-AQ5XjJV SWAMP.744F-N 2.5 M«CS -ro 1VG Z4
I
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
1 Dam Classification (I, 11, I11, IV, V) 711
'BY Alm, N6
name (title)
1 Concurred By =,
name —(title)
' NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
id .
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
1
Date_ 31-719-7 _
Da te_4116(47

INSTRUCTIONS
All dams built with technical assistance from the Soil Conservation Service
must have a hazard classification assigned by the person responsible for
approving the design. Most farm ponds, except in borderline cases, can
be classified after a complete field investigation without assuming failure
and making breach studies. This data sheet is to be used for recording
the information obtained through field studies and for documenting the
hazard classification. Where there is a possibility for loss of life or
major property damage from a dam failure, an approved breach routing
procedure is to be used. (Consult with the area engineer.)
Hazard classifications of dams are made by evaluating the possibility
for loss of life and the extent of damage that would result if the dam
should suddenly breach --that is --a section of the dam be suddenly and
completely washed out. It is to be assumed that a wall of water will be
released equal to the height of the dam. This flood wave will be reduced
in height as it moves down the flood plain. The wave height (depth of
flooding) should be evaluated for a sufficient distance downstream until
the estimated flood level will not cause significant damage to improvements,
such as homes, buildings, roads, utilities, reservoirs, etc. The breach
flood level will be reduced depending on the valley storage, slope, and
openess of the flood plain; however, in a narrow steep valley slopes
steeper than 10% should be given special consideration. One method of
evaluation is to compare available valley storage (under flood conditions)
to impoundment storage (figured to the top of the dam) for each reach
evaluated with a judgment estimate made of the flood wave height at all
critical points downstream.
Should there be any questions about the hazard classification for a dam,
the area engineer should be consulted before making design commitments.

SHEET 1 OF 2
' OPERATION ANDMA1NTENANCEPLAN
- - -
1
11
n
1
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) and
180 days of temporary storage. The time required for the planned
fluid level (permanent and temporary storage) to be reached may vary
due to site conditions, weather, flushing operations, and the amount
of fresh water added to the system.
The designed temporary storage consists of 180 days storage for:
(1) waste from animals and (2) excess rainfall after evaporation. Also
included is storage for the 25 yr -- 24 hr storm for the location and a
heavy rain factor. The volume of waste generated from a given number
of animals will be fairly constant throughout the year and from year to
year, but excess rainfall will vary from year to year. The heavy rain
factor and 25 yr rainfall will not be a factor to consider in an annual
pumping cycle, but this storage volume must always be available.
The waste produced by the animals shall be utilized in accordance with
an approved waste utilization plan. Highly visible markers shall be
installed to mark the upper and lower elevations of the temporary
storage (pumping volume). Pumping shall be done as necessary to
maintain the liquid level between these markers.
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. Before wastes are introduced, the waste treatment lagoon shall be
charged to 112 its treatment volume to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin temporary storage pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches the elevation 49.70'as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -
out when the fluid level reaches elevation 47.00 . This temporary
storage less 25 yr and heavy rain contains 121742 cubic feet or
910627 gallons.

1 SHEET E OF 2
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation and
recommended maximum application rate is shown in the waste utilization
plan. Refer to the waste utilization plan for further details.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
' lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should befertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
I
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. Repair areas of the embankment that settle below the design settled
height or areas where cracking, sloughing, or ",jug" holes develop.
B. Repair waste inlet pipes that develop cracks or separate at the
,joints.
9. Remove undesirable vegetative
growth and floating or
lodged debris.
'
10. All surface runoff is to be
diverted from the lagoon
to stable
outlets when not included as part
of the design temporary
storage.
'
11. After five years the waste treatment
lagoon shall be
checked far
sludge accumulation annually.' If
sludge has encroached into
the
treatment volume, the sludge will
be removed and applied
at agronomic
rates based on analysis of the sludge.
Treatment volume
must have
'
a minimum of 4 feet of depth free
of sludge at all times.
' 12. In December 1992, the Environmental Management Commission (EMC)
in North Carolina revised water quality regulations that address
animal operations. These rules became effective on February 1,
1993 (15A NCAC 2H .0200). This animal operation shall be operated
' within the requirements of these rules and regulations.
13. Pipes that are used for recycling effluent to use as flush water
' and irrigation intakes must be placed 18 inches below the surface and
as far from the inlet discharge pipes as possible in order to provide
a cleaner effluent for flushing and to reduce odors when irrigating on
land. When these pipes are placed through the embankment, they should
' be installed no more than two feet below top of embankment and not in
the highest section of fill. The pipe trench shall be compacted with
clayey material or other material as approved by an engineer.
1
1
1

'
SHEET 1 OF 3
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
------
---_ -_______ _ __-----_-_________
FOUNDATIONPREPARATION:
'
The foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building pad shall be
cleared of trees, logs,
stumps, roots, brush, boulders, sod and rubbish.
Satisfactory disposition
will be made of all debris. The topsoil from
'
the lagoon and pad area
should be stripped and stockpiled for use on
the dike and pad areas.
After stripping, the foundation area of the
lagoon embankment and building
pad shall be thoroughly loosened prior
to placing the first lift
of fill material to get a good bond.
EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL
PLACEMENT:
------------------_....--..........----------
The completed excavation and earthfill shall conform to the lines,
grades, and elevations shown on the plans. Earthfill material shall
be free of material such as sod, roots, frozen soil, stones over
6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable material. To the extent
they are suitable, excavated materials can be used as fill. The fill
' shall be brought up in approximately horizontal layers not to exceed 9
inches in thickness when loose and prior to compaction. Each layer
will be compacted by complete coverage with the hauling and spreading
' equipment or standard tamping..roller or other equivalent method.
Compaction equipment shall travel in a direction parallel to the main
axis of the fill. Clayey soils shall be compacted with a "sheepsfoot"
' or tamping roller. Compaction of the fill material shall be in accord-
ance with the specified requirements for compaction and moisture. '
For the embankment, use the more impervious materials from the required
excavations. Construction of fill heights shall include S percent for
' settlement. Dikes over 15 feet in height and with an impoundment
capacity of le acre-feet or more fall under the .jurisdiction of the NC
Dam Safety Law. The height is defined as the difference in elevation
' from the constructed height to the downstream toe of the dike.
Precautions shall be taken during construction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation.
' LINER: THE MINIMUM REQUIRED THICKNESS SHALL BE 1.6 ft.
-------------------------------------------------
NOTE: LINERS (PARTIAL OR FULL) ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE ATTACHED SOILS
INVESTIGATION REPORT SO INDICATES OR WHEN UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF THE LINER
IS INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN WHEN LINERS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REPORT.
When areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will be over -
excavated below finish grade to the specified depth as measured
perpendicular to the finish grade. The foundation shall be backfilled
as specified to grade with a NRCS approved material tie - CL,SC,CH).
1 REFER TO THE SOILS INVESTIGATION INFORMATION IN THE PLANS FOR SPECIAL
CONSIDERATIONS.

' SHEET 2 OF 3
Soil liner material shall come from an approved borrow area. The
minimum water content of the liner material shall be optimum moisture
content which relates to that moisture content when the soil is kneaded
in the. hand it will form a ball which does not readily separate. Water
shall be added to borrow as necessary to insure proper moisture content
' during placement of the liner. The moisture content of the liner
material shall not be less than optimum water content during placement_
The maximum water content relates to the soil material being too wet
' for efficient use of hauling equipment and proper compaction. proper
compaction of the liner includes placement in 9 inch lifts and
compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum ASTM D698 Dry Unit
Weight of the liner material unless otherwise specified. When smooth
' or hard, the previous lift shall be scarified and moistened as needed
before placement of the next lift.
The single most important factor affecting the overall compacted perme—
ability of a clay liner, other than the type of clay used for the
liner, is the efficient construction processing of the compacted liner.
The sequence of equipment use and the routing of equipment in an estab—
lished pattern helps assure uniformity in the whole placement and
compaction process. For most clay soils, a tamping or sheepsfoot
roller is the preferable type of compaction equipment.
The sail liner shall be protected from the discharge of waste outlet
pipes. This can be done by using some type of energy dissipator(rocks)
' or using flexible outlets on waste pipes.
Alternatives to soil liners are synthetic liners and bentonite sealant.
When these are specified, additional construction specifications are
included with this Construction Specification.
CUTOFF TRENCH:
------__--
A cutoff trench shall be constructed binder the embankment area when
' Shown on a typical cross section in the plans. The final depth of the
cutoff trench shall be determined by observation of the foundation
materials.
IVEGETATION:
I All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be seeded
to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after construc—
tion according to the seeding specifications. Topsoil should be placed
on areas of the dike and pad to be seeded. Temporary seeding or mulch
shall be used if the recommended permanent vegetation is out of season
dates for seeding. permanent vegetation should be established as soon
as possible during the next period of approved seeding dates.
REMOVAL OF EXISTING TILE DRAINS
-------------------------------
When specified, the contractor shall construct an observation trench
along the entire length of the embankment to a minimum of five feet
in depth. The trench shall have a bottom width adequate to accomodate
the equipment used for excavation, backfill, and compaction operations

LI,
SHEET 3 OF 3
and the side slopes shall be 1:1 or flatter. When tile. drains are
encountered, the tile shall be removed to a minimum of 15 feet beyond
' the downstream embankment toe as measured perpendicular to the
embankment. If a the line exists above the embankment it shall be
rerouted around the lagoon in an approved location. aackfilling
and compaction in the trench shall be in accordance with the EXCAVATION
AND EARTHFILL PLACEMENT requirements.
BOTTOM AND EDGES
---------------
The bottom of all lagoons shall be approximately level. The side
slopes shall be uniform from top to bottom. Scarify the bottom and
side slopes of the lagoon a minimum depth of six inches and compact
with a "sheepsfoot" or tamping roller to decrease the permeability
' of the finished bottom and side slopes.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
---------------
' During construction of the earth embankment, a qualified inspector
as designated by the designer must be on site during construction
' as necessary to verify proper construction. Testing will be required
as deemed necessary by the inspector and/or designer.
' During construction of a clay liner, a qualified, construction
inspector as designated by the designer must be on site during con-
struction as necessary to verify the liner is installed in accordance
with NRCS South National Technical Center (SNTC) Technical Nate
716 (Revised September 1993). In the absence of supervision of
construction by a qualified inspector, the liner must be tested to
verify a maximum hydraulic conductivity of 0.000001.25 cm/sec.
' When testing is required, the owner will be responsible for furnish-
ing test results and certification that the construction meets
the design requirements. Any tests and certification should be
performed by a certified laboratory.
n
1

11
SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 2.5.ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED AS FOLLOWS:
' 0.0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS AT 60 LBS. /ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 1 TO NOVEMBER 30
FEBRUARY 1 TO MARCH 30
0.0 LBS. RYE GRAIN AT 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
' 0.0 LBS. ' PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS AT E0 LBS. /ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 15
E0.0 LBS. HULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 8 LBS./ACRE
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0.0
LBS.
UNHULLED COMMON BERMUDA GRASS AT 10 LBS./ACRE
SEEDING DATES: JANUARY i TO MARCH 30
0.0
LBS.
RYE GRASS AT 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
'
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE
FOLLOWING:
E5010. 0
LBS,
OF 10--10--10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS*/ACRE)
5.0
TONS
OF DOLOMITIC LIME (E TONS/ACRE)
' 250.0 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
' APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
' ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.
1

"i'-'
� - - t 1 ._ _.. • _,. .. ..- .. �. .._. .w
_ —
I_
IFWI-
h.
w.*-rw_....�
r
f
_-
AM
-
-
-....!.
,...M
S._
..J
..F.+..r._.-.w..+w.Fw.+-..1
r+
�L_i-._..�_J-_L
_ _
I
R"
THAT
i i '�k
i�
'
�'IQI�1iQh
_,•EZI(~,K Vl-j-��}F`- - i-I-f•-' '--'� -
_.� � I `f � ��� • 1 ' ' I - _ � ^
{ -�_
��. •� i cq _I .I_ , _! I _� �.r� _ I- - - - 1. __ a_� tea. _
1 t ' - j '' `J" t '�+
-
�
_
- -
-
-
-
-
_
-
_
I
-I-
-
_
1 't--
1. _
I
I
- _ _ _
-
•41`
-�^
-
-
-
-
J�•�_
- •�-1Q_.
�• .ri-
�rll-•
F Imo_ {-
_
t
- (_ _� -I"_{._
�_` �"_
J
.. r T_.
Al.
wl� i ���'- _ r _j ...._-! �I � + � - -t'-t^ ._I._,` `'._I.-• �I_ .,.._ `_ I _ _�...i�
`}_-� ;.:�_'� � ...�. i � -;-��'t ;--`=t=�--1-- �;��-- - - --•r--�--j-f"--I'.�--
_ ., ,.. I. ��. �... jf-!_ _ ,j_ _ _�_L-jj{-II}- • I �j_ .,.1_I � - � �--�_� _J_�._
-•- �••-t- {`_i � I I l_.L..• _ _`I I I fi" I_ ._l- I E i
--{-�- .�. _ �- -
TFX- -r-}I �-
a►_ 4� 1 i. l i�- 1 j' "1sjK e,
t---_�.:. 1 i I..I_C1��al� f ..{-.-��J '-t... - �
-.-r t E T
!Y_�7N
AV-:r--ii--
I I , , �_ �` Q +'- ;-�_ rir` i d -I- :4 ; • I� I - I , _, I_-r -�--r^
,• Q -� ; j. I �, � �"� 1- •- L i .�. I-^r•-l--�_t•; i'- ;-1
�-j- _i_....I- �•_ j ,_'o� r a -f ; j•-- -m�-�:.{_.,.. a-•{-"—�----3_E._} _1_
-••t-•I••w•-w I E E - y j`��
�..•.. ...
. -
_
--
-
_f_
-
_
-_
_
I-Ar
- -
_�-
_
-
-
-�,
_I_1
j
'
{_ice'
�^��T
j-_
E I
J
_.,._'
�-1�
`T�"J_,,I
1-i
I
I I..
.�.-:Ji/.
�- �- W-{,'
�-�w�
�n
_, �__
'•i .t ��I Il+Z�I
_'gam
I.�`l.
j..,
!-I�
—IQ
J �
W' ;z
_.����
9f'
- -t -
-"I�-?.:�;�:.,....
; -
r- i'i
.�-.
7 �. ._.�
.
.
-}
r j - T�
,_; .,:.
�
� .t
,}
�
�> ,
,
-f ��
_,
_ o
I- -
_�...
-�
-•�"
'i-.._
_
_
_ -
•
-10
_
�
...I._lµ�
h '
�_1 _{_}
�-.
T
E-
�'
�_i
!-Yf E
� �_l_'
f I
` !
i'_
f
,
I I
f}jj t`
-f�
• i
_-1'_..1,_
�� .
..T.
�-{ i, �• 1.�
1 i
,- ,...; _._
x
. ,-.I_t-7 _
•-- - '1J1,�r i IY'Ir�. ; •T'a DTI 70r I
V��,-.T.-' -� .r( ~'
�r} -�r'j`I"
_i_�.
',_.}"Q'
-��'-h
'
I
I
I ,
$
I I ,
f•�
I
-
-�--:� � id► _ _ 1 �I , r
I -i-� , '�' i �..! �-; u ' �.l 'r � I- fh ! �"� �-�_.I- y��! Y
f,l I.�.{....,.�._
•'j.{-�j•-L-i--f"- I -{-i
�-
•�
I
�
_
I
~� .�-'�
!
_ -
-I'�r
j�
^"'IT�
� .. �..
t, .}._ -I i •Y-_�r.
f I
T._�_._--
-.7 _
-- -
77
--
- _. 1 �•
'i :;. , _ ! rt I , , E �.�! ,• sJ:- f--r -r . �
.1� I t It I i -� ( , , �_
-
-i'_I
-
-;-,
-
.��-={{t-I._I._!_.�.I_.I.,i..
4„ tt �
T1
, ,.., _�_
pit
i_ ..I
,
.i.+.l
Ir
i
.�
.1 . , .. . _.
,
,
v
r.
w ,
� � • � -� i ... _ .-�_ ,`�j.-,�_ _ _r�j i_ ��_ � I 1 1 IFF
_
_
� i
-I-
�'�i"i-
•-�-.
�
I
I•�Yi
�i_`
--•-. ,
_ Lf1 { SIX
i-,
Ell
__
�`
--
-^
-
i
!
- �Ti ` •` , -� 1 I II�....._IT•. _ .QV -
i' 't _.'.'I �_.,_.; _j-_r-�-,-i I _I- �y � • T F1-r
oi_"t" 1 :_
.
,R
. �
-
...:i
'
-j...
?
H+
7-c_#--
_.
-- A
-�--;-f
-,-_;--f--
_
r�--r-•
. - ._.
� {
_
t
I f i i
�' � i

11"&AMn%,0N co .
TYPICAL VIEW OF A ONE -STAGE LAGOON SYSTEM
Top Width
Confinement Bldg.
.?.
Settled Top Elevation 5 Z.a
Pipe Invert Elevation
49.7
�,SS 3 1
Pit
7
S 11 Pipe (Needs to be adequa e1y
supported)
Bottom Elevation 404 �
T Ss 3 : 1
Treatment
Lagoon
1
Depth = 9.7
�I
SS 3-1
.cSF �ANSUITI�Ci�L=__Mf�T►"s�'�CAL _
NOTE: FLEXIBLE PIPE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO OUTLET PIPES TO DISCHARGE WASTE BELOW LAGOON SURFACE.
RIP -RAP OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL WILL BE PLACED AT PIPE OUTLETS TO PREVENT BROSION OF CLAY
LINER

' U. S. DEPARTMENT Of AGRICULTURE mc-EAG-GO
Solt Canservatlan Service Rev. 7/91
' PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE PIT
' NAME: Ly r4WOOD 5 Pe f-—._ _ —_ - Date: 4-1 1 Y- 97
County., 5AMP&4
' Address: R 05 a Sp 8 a N L
'
Ellont 2�!-0
o�. ,, Xj •o AVE. TOP ELEV.
/off.
w MI O SECTt01t
Y
40.0 !
\�.
AvE. 80T109 ELEV. /
�
1 I
LENGTH 256
1
(See beck for vats calculations)
F
Use of facility: ANIMAL WgSrlr, -TRg-arftAcwr z-Ar-a6W
Capacity: _:' 1 4-8.5 t', I Gallons +zo 9 04 Ft3
Soil Type: do6
Bench Dark DesCrip on T6 rh - 50. o HAIL i N , GUM TA I: "OCATU .2-0
5. c of S-,-Aw&w Cp'sV
Bottom
Normal Liquid Level
Storage for normal Precip.
Maximum Liquid Level
25 yr. Storm Storage
BW HErAYtr RAINFAi.L-
Max.Flov Depth)
Freeboard
Top of Dam
Elev.
46.0
Elev.
49.7
(+)
-- Ft.
Elev. 49 -T
(+)
.&I Ft.
Elev.
. & S
(+)
Ft.
(+)
1. o Ft.
Elev.
5.2 •o

M M r r M M M M M M M M M M M M M r M
r,t Woob 5'
mpsw4 Ca ,
52.0
Sf.o Freeboard (I.Q fool minimum) 1/
a Depth of 25--year, 24—hour storm event on lagoon surface Q4*l—a.f �A
0
a
„ "Heavy Rainfall' Factor -- As a minimum must be equal to or greater than the ( )
4 j,-r depth of 25—year, 24—hour storm on the lagoon surface 49,7
p T Depth of normal precipitation less evaporation on the lagoon surface Maximum elevation
a I accumulated during the treatment period for prrrnp (NJ
uMoximum operoling level Volume of manure, wastewater, ana excess water accumulated Maximum d€owdown
47.0 durin the treatment per w5V �7.0 � Pump OFF--- �
T
Minimum treatment volume (MTV) 4 fool minimum
6 foal minimum
l Ik
Volume of accumulated n for period
,4-0.0 _IL �between sludge removall events (Sv)
Nola:
the minimum treatment volume for an
anaerobic waste treatment lagoon Is
bused on vdolls solids.
FIGURE A — TYPICAL ANAERnDIC LAGOON CRI'ISS SECTION
47_ .7 J_ -
1/
If on emergency spstlwoy Is used. the design dapth
of flow mull be added to the freeboard.
x1 LA z
[ .I
n n 7a n
c ' 4
+•i Sn
;o z
40 fn

' (*Her-f.44
US Department of Agriculture
' Soil Conservation Service
' CROSS-SECTION DATA
QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
' prepared For
L_ Ne P4 W C3 C3 n SPELL
1 in
SAMPSON, Co pant Y, North Carolina
' Designer : GLENN CLIFTON Checker
Date : 04/14/97 Date
Job Number 944?a!`i "Y
,<fYY
' x .LAGOON EXCAVATION
TEMPLATE DATA:
1 Beginning Elevation = 40 '.
Beginning Station = 2+4,4
2+14 to 4+57 C\3CL118/3 0.00000 ft/ft
�ECTION NUMBER 1
Centerline Station 2+16
' ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 45.5 100. 0 l 46 :_3 200.0 / 49.2 300.0 / 49.7
IECTION NUMBER 2
Centerline Station 3+00
' ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 47.4 100.0 /
RECTION NUMBER 3
Centerline Station 4+00
' ORIGINAL DATA:
48.1 200.0 / 49.5 300.0 / 50.2
0.0 / 47.3 100.0 / 49.1 200.0 / 50.3 300.0 / 50.5
IECTION NUMBER 4
Centerline Station 4+57
' ORIGINAL DATA:
0.0 / 47.3 100.0 /
1
49.3 200.0 / 50.3 300.0 / 50.8

1 OH-Ver-1.44
US Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
PLANNED
QUANTITY-16.ALCUL'AT I ONS
r.
' P paged for
L_YMW'Q,011D SPELL.
ign
E
SA41SON County
North Carolina
u
$'
Designer
SLENN
CLIFTON ,*
Checker
Date
04f 14/97
Date
,JobNumber 946
��'*"�����'�����'�'�"�'�.'rF**'>E�����'�'x'.����'>E�'>E'�,������_
��,mat'*-�'����rE�.*.�'�"�"�'����'iF���_
'�'���f�����'►�*'x��k
r
'
LAGOON EXCAVATION
** EXCAVATION'** I
** FILL'
*
Left Right
Off—CL
I CL D-ist
I Area Volume I
Area
Vol�ime`
�Hot
idth
'SS SS
(ft)
I Sta ('ft`)
I (SgFt) (Cu.Yds) I
(SgFt)-
(Cd.1Ld's)+
>:
1 19
3.` 1 3: 1
66.0
1 2+16 l.'
1 1017.9 1
0.
84
I 3490. 7' `°I
..4#
118
3: 1 3: 1
66.0
1 3+00
1 1226.1 .. ' !
0.0
�`
•,::
100
I 8291.0 i
.0"0.
' 118
3: 1 3: 1
66.0
1 4+00
1 1366.1 1
0.0
x
1 57
1 11194.6 I
0 QI�i4
118
3:1 3:1
66.0
1 4+57
1 1384.7 1
0.0
;..

1 M-Uer-1. 44
US Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
CROSS-SECTION DATA` 3
QUANTITY CAR:ULATIONS-
,.
..
pr'e pare'd for
'
LIV""wcl0n_-'` E3F'ELL`
in
SAMPSON Co,dn�yt yi � ort h Carolina
-,Designer : GLENN CLIFTONy
Checker
Date 04/ 14/97 = ..
Date
J,ob Number 947
i
D`F I L L.'
•=
-
TEMPLATE DATA:
•.; `
,.
..
r�
1
Beginning Elevation
_
= 52
Beginning Station =
2+15
2+i5' to 2+15
D44CLE80\4
2+15 to 2+40
D/4CL340\4
0.00000
ft/ft
'
2+40 to 2+70
to
D'l4CL 3; "'�0\4
0. 00000!
ft / ft g
`J
12+70 3+80
D/4GL30\4
0.0020
ft/ft
3+80 to 4+35
D/4CL34.0\4
0.00000
ft/ft
1ECTION
NUMBER 1
1
Centerline Station
2+15
ORIGINAL DATA:
100.0 / 49.3 200.0
! 49.1 300.0 / 49.6 400.0
/ 50.3
500.0
/!� 50. 4
1
SECTION NUMBER 2
' Centerline Station 2+40
ORIGINAL DATA:
'50.0 / 49.5 100.0 / 49.4
500. 0 / 50. 7
1ECTION NUMBER 3
Centerline Station 2+70
' ORIGINAL DATA:
50.0 / 49.6 100.0 / 49.6
500.0 / 50.9
SECTION NUMBER 4
'Centerline Station 3+00
ORIGINAL DATA:
49.2 300.0 / ..49.8
200.0 / 49.4 300.0 / 50.0 400.0 / 50.4 '

I
�AD FILL (continued) 04/14/97
50.0 / 49.7 100.0 ! 49.8
500, 0 / 51. 1
SECTION NUMBER 5
Centerline Station 3+80
ORIGINAL DATA:
50.0 / 50.2 100.0 / 50.
500.0 f 51.2
�ECTION NUMBER 6
Centerline Station 4+00
' ORIGINAL DATA:
50.0 / 50.3 100.0 / 50.3
500.0 ! 51.2
RECTION NUMBER 7
Centerline Station 4+35
' ORIGINAL DATA:
50.0 / 50.3 100.0 / 50.3
' 500.0
page 2
200.0 49.6 300.0 f 50.2 400.0 i 50.5
200.0 / 49.8 300.0 / 49.9 400.0 / 50.3
200.0 / 49.8 300.0 / 49.9 400.0 / 50.2
200.0 / 49.8 300.0 / 49.9 400.0 / 50.2

04-Ver-1. 44
US Department .of Agriculture
Sail Conservation Service
' PLANNED Y ,Tpl
' QUANTITY CALCULATIONS
prepared for
lLYr%JtoJC)C7U E3F'ELL-
i n
SAMPSON County, North Carolina '
Designer :.GLENN CLIFTON Checker
Date4/ 14/97 Date
Job Number 547
�UaF�f�iElFiEdEiE�E•IfiFiFIFIF'1EIE�FaFIF'JF1F1F1F�F-IF1F1fif1E�F*�Flf'dF•IE••1I9FiFiF�F�E�EiFiF�FiFIFIEdFiFi�r�EiFIU�F-IFIFIEIFiF1fIF�iF�1E1FiLiFif•dF1E��F�F�iF
' PAD FILL L r.
I EXCAVATION t* FILL
lTopLeft Right Off-CL I CL Dist 1 Area. Volume 1 Area; V'ouneV
idth SS SS (ft) I Sta (ft) I (SgFt) (Cu.Yds) I (SgFt) (CUM
' I I I ,. .•_ . y . .
2130 4:1 4:1 128.0 1 2+1 5 1 0.0 1 708. 0
1 25 1 0.0 1 T7132. 7
340 4:•1 4:1 65.0 1 2+40 1 0.0 1 831.5R
1 30 1 0.0 1
340 4:1 4:1 65.0 1 2+70 1 0.0 1 768.3
1 30 1 0.0 1 24a4�. 9
340 4:1 4:1 65.0 1 3+00 1 0.0 1 731.9 -' ,•�wr•
683:
1 80 1 0.0 I 4'2'
340 4:1 4:1 65.0 1 3+80 1 0.0 1 785.7
1 20 1 0.0 1 526,411.
340 4:1 4:1 65.0 1 4+00 1 0.0 1 762.6
' 1 35 1 0. 0 I ia278.r5
340 4:1 4:1 65.0 1 4+35 1 0.0 1 782.6
1

U.S. DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE
NC-ENG-12
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
Rev. 6/82
EARTHWORK
COMPUTATION
SHEET
NAME:
LYNWOOD
SPELL
SETTLED
TOP DIKE ELEVATION
52.0
TYPE EARTHWORK.
X Dike
_3:1_ SS _
129_Top:
Excav:
Pad
STATION
ELEV.
FILL
END AREA
SUM OF
DISTANCE
DOUBLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GROUND
HEIGHT
(Sq. Ft.)
END AREAS
(feet)
VOLUME
0
49.3
2.7
54.27
25
49.1
2.9
60.03
114.30
25.00
2858
140
46.0
6.0
180.00
240.03
115.00
27603
220
45.4
6.6
209.88
389.88
80.00
31190
286
47.5
4.5
114.75
324.63
66.00
21426
386
.47.6
4.4
110.88
225.63
100.00
22563
472
47.7
4.3
107.07
217.95
86.00
18744
548
49.4
2.6
51.48
158.55
76.00
12050
648
50.4
1.6
26.88
78.36
100.00
7836
668
50.4
1. 6
26.88
53.76
20. 00
1075
1. Double Volume of Fill
2. Volume of fill (line 1/27) -
3. Allowance for settlement(5%)
4. Total Cubic Yds (2 + 3)) _
Computed by:
Date: 04/14/97
Checked by:
-----------------------
668. 00 145345
72672.3
Cu.
Ft.
2691.6
Cu.
Yd.
134.6
Cu.
Yd.
2,926.1
Cu.
Yd.

1
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
----------------------
Producer-----4LYNWOOD SWELL County:SAMPSON
Name of Farm-:1 L. HOG FARM
' Location ----- :2935 PASS LAKE RD
ROSEPORO NC 28328
Phone -------- :910-564-6565
Type Operation -------_---------WEAN--FEED
Number of Animal -----�--�---_. 6080
Storage Structure ---------- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Method of application ------ :Irrigation
' Amount of waste produced per year----------------:
Amount of plant available N (RAN) produced/year-:
1
fl
2567 tons/year
2918 lbs. /year
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent.pollutiDn of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be use
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the
crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
Thiswaste-utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting
nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle.
Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner:
I. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at more
than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
in runoff to the surface waters which is not allowed under DWG!
regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoild drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and
to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be
applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days
prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to,change methods in the future, you need to revise
this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have

Page 2
11
11
11
plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be
applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content
and the crop type. Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the
optimum range for, specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the
requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the
Environmental Management Commission.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field
Sail
Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Month to
No.
No.
Type
Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
3258
1
NoA
D
110
1.25
3.5
481
MAR-JULY
3258
1
NoA
W
60
2.40
* 3.5
504
S-APRIL
'
32,58
1
NoA
S
33
4.00
3.5
462
JUNE-OCT
3258
2
WaB
B
4.7
50.00
5.0
1175
MAR-OCT
3258
2
WaB
K
N/A
50.Oel
5.0.
250
S-APRIL
-'
3258
3
NoA
D
110
1.25
2. 0
275
MAR--JULY
3258
3
NoA
W
60
2.40
* 2.0
288
S-APRIL
3258
3
NoA
S
33
4.00
2.0
264
JUNE-OCT
----- ----- ----- ------
Total 21.0 3699
Available Nitrogen (includes commercial) 2918
Surplus Or Deficit -781
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Harley-bu.
B=Bermudagrass(graze)-tons
C=Bermudagrass (hay) -tons
D=Corn(grain)-bu.
E=Corn(silage)-tons
F=Cotton-lbs. lint
G=Fescue(graze)-tons
H=Fescue(hay)-tons
I=Oats-bu.
J=Rye-bu.
K=Small grain(graze)-acre
L=Small grain(hay)-acre
M=Sorghum(grain)-cwt.
W=Wheat -bu.
S=Soybeans-bu.
Z=Bermudagrass(pasture)-tons
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
' time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.

Page 3
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require
farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in
bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing, hay and/or
silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they reach a
height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants
are grazed to a height of four inches. In fields where small grain
etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care should be exercised
not to to let small grain to reach maturity, especially late in
the season (i.e. April or May). Shading may result if small grain
gets too high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and
less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for
hay or silage just before heading as is the normal situation, you
are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the
season, depending on time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September
or early October. Drilling is recommended over broadcasting.
Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a height of about two
inches before drilling for best results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer annuals
under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning may occur in
livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is
recommended.
Acres shown in the tables are considered to be the usable acres
excluding required buffers , filter strips along ditches, odd
areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the field listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization
of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provision for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 438 lbs. of plant available
nitrogen per year in the sludge.
If you remove sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately
2189 lbs. of PAN to utilize. assuming you apply this PAN to
hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 lbs. of nitrogen
per acre, you will need 7 acres of land. If you apply the
sludge to corn at the rate of 125 lbs. of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 18 acres of land. Please be aware that these are
only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements
could vary by 25% depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil
types, realistic yields, and application methods.

Page /I.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate
of the soil at the time of irrigation such that: runoff or ponding
occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content,
soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic
solids. The application amount should not exceed the available
water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor
should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen
needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this
plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation
designer to ensure that: an irrigation system is installed to
properly irrigate the acres shown in tables. Failure to apply the
recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the table may
make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing
application rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Applic
Applic
No.
No.
Type
Rate
Amount
(in/hr)
(inches)
32-59
_ 1
NoA
CoaN
.`Fo
�.35
3-Z- $__._
—I _--
N NO A
W IWA r
. q.o
325 .......
!....__._..
_._AVR
%.QN/
.10
I�?o
3 Z S$....._.
..._.....__-..... __
\Na.l3
NoA
COEN
3L58
NoA
LN RfA-t
. +o
1.7b
96A—
SO aN
_ ,+0
1 .70
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil.
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations the application amount shown cannot be
applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil.
conditions.

Page 5
'
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instances should the volume of the waste be stored
'
in. your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or
one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour
storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
t.
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply
1
the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to
apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the
4
tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste
`
analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of waste
per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the
e
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
COCA WdCAI I SD"i )1S 15 o J A iwa YeA9 IQO Ta 7eu nl
.a
a
11

I Page 6
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: t;VUW8W
1 Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
' approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of
the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Puality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to the surface waters
' of the state from a storm event less severe than the 85-year, E4-
hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
' Name of Facility owner: LYNWOOD SPELL
(Please print)
Signature : Date •
1
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
' Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: Q. Glenn Clifton
(Please print:)
Affiliation: Prestage Farms, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Address: P O Box 438
Clinton NC 28388
Signature:_ ._ _ Date: `f t5 7
Il
I

EXHIBIT A-8
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Z. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on 'Which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be anr)lied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.-
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed t-e soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively crowing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a death that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste shculd also be considered.
Page: - 8

EXHIBIT A-9
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REOUTRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take uo released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than,100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly inton water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste
showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
animal waste management system.
from washdown facilities,
shall not be discharged into the
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. vegetation such as tress, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to area's where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 9

' EXHIBIT A-10
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
' 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a 'closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution -and erosion.
' 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site..
' 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
' animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
t21.
Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
'
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
IC22.
Waste shall be tested within 50 days of utilization and soil
--
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen, shall be the rate - determining
I
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when thes
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
I
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
I
Carolina requlations.
n
Ul
F
1 Page: -10

forth Carolina ,Agricultural Extension Service
Agri -Waste Management
e c
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION'RATES
II. SAMPLE COLLECTION •
1
1
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
James C. Barker
i. Scraped directly from let -into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of
manure from different locations using nonmetallic
collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface
crust avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic
collectors.
D. Liquid Manure Slurry
i. ender -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/20 nonmetallic conduit open on both
ends into manure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a
thumb over end of conduit) trapping manure that
has entered lower end, remove and empty slurry
into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
C. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at
least 1 quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample
container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid
manure chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsample from about 5 pit locations, from
agitator pump or from manure spreader and place in a
plastic bucket.
*Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural
Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC

AttaChment B
Page 2 of-3
1 ce Mix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container..
' C. Lagoon Liquid
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow
pipe to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From Lagoon
' a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on end of
10-15"pole.
' b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
C. Brush away floating scum or debris.
' d. Submerge bottle with 1' of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times- -=
' around lagoon, mix and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic
sample container.
' D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House Litter
' a. Visually 'inspect litter for areas of varying quality
e.g., areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate
percent of floor surface in each area.
' b.• Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations
proportionate to item a. E.g., if 20% of litter
of similar visual quality is around feeders and
waters, take 1 subsample there and the other 4
subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
' C. At each location, collect litter from a 6". by 6"
area down to earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
' d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix
and add about 2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample
container such as a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
' ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18"
' into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs. to nonmetallic sample container and
' seal.
I. -SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed.
residues from container with clean water but do not use
disinfectants, soaps or treat in any other way.
1 -

r
a
Attachment B
Page 3 of 3
B.
Pack sample in ice,
refrigerate, freeze or transfer to -lab -_
quickly.
'
C.
Hand -delivery in the
most reliable way of sample transfer.
D.
If mailed, protect
sample container with packing material such
as newspaper, box or
package with wrapping paper and tape.
E.
Commercial sample containers
and mailers are also available.
Contacts;
i. A&L Eastem Agricultural Lsb. lnc_
iii. Polyfoam Packers •
7621 Wlrts0no Road
2320 S. Foster Ave.
Richnwnd, VA 23237
Whea4ng. IL 60090
Ph; =4I 743-9401
Ph. [phone]
a. Fisher Scientific Co
- iv. NASCO
3315 Winton Road
901 Janesv;Se Ave. _
Ralsigh. NC 27804
Ft Atkinson, VA 63538
F.
Private analytical
labs are also available, but sample analysis
costly.
. -
'
G.
The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address:
North Carolina Department of Agriculture
.
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P. O. Box 27647
'
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
'
Attn: Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4.00 along with the sample.
ifi. Include the
following identification information with
sample:
' a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey
' breaders, brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown
on litter; etc.)
C. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry;
' swine -pit slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -
house litter, stockpile)
iv. Routine analysis performed on all samples: N, P, K, Ca,
Mg, Na, S, Fe,
Mn, Zn, Cu, B
' .v. Additional analysis performed upon request: DM, Mo, Cd,
Ni, Pb

System Calibration
' Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates
change over time as equipment gets older and components wear. In particular,
pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use,
nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter. .
11
fl
1
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the
design will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the
application uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler. nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged
intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating pressure. Operating
below design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity.
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular_basis to
ensure proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every _
three years is recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at
several locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain gauges wort: best because
they already have a graduated sca!e from which to read the application amount
without having to perform additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets,
jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used providers'
the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly i
throughout the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling
guns, sprinklers should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction of
pull. Set out collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both sides of
the gun cart. You should compute the average application rate for all
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation between containers
of more than 30 percent is cause for concern. You should contact your irrigation
dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
*Reprinted for Certification Training for Operations of Anima! Waste Management Systems Manua!
1

United States Natural NC-CPA-1 i
Department of Resources RE , 1, 2-96
QW)
6
Agriculture Conservaticn
Service
WASTE MANAGE;4MNT FACa= SITE EVALUATION
E.`IERAL L`fFORNLATION
IiN'
,a.� 4 1 N w ooD P
jff L L, LOCATION
TELEPHONE c;o1 Pj - 564 - C=6 &S � SIZ` OPERATION
DATA
APreox 2.0 MtcE-
or cDacaseo QN
13go -rPE Ayceiv e:
%b80 WLAn-rEZE7D
DISTANCE FROM NEAR$ST RESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER i S oo FT.
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACN= (srbool, char h. etc) -r o 6 o FT"
iS SITE WrI71N LOG-YE.AR FLOOD PLALY?
If yes, NRCS cannot provide assistance.
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 Fr. FROM A "BLUE LIN]r PERENNIAL STREA,.M?
If no, site must be relocated.
IS SITE WITHIN I MILE ZONING AMSDICTTON OF A MUNICIPALITY?
If yes, landowner should consult with local zoning board about required
permits. Permits must be obtained prior to design approval.
ARE UMUTIT7 ES LN CONSTRUCITON AREA?
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual and follow policy.
(Copies of snaps or other reference materials may be attached to site
evaluation.)
WETLANDS
YES NO ✓
YES ✓ NO
YES NO ✓
YES NO V!
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY NON-CROPL.IND? YES ✓ NO
Ifyes, producer must complete Form NRCS-CPA-38 (Request for Certified
Wetland Determination/Delineation).
WII.L ACTION RESULT IN S WAIWBUS iING7 YES NIO ✓
IF WETLANDS ARE ZrVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSMM= OF THE PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY COR.° OF
ENGINEERS AND THE DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENrTAL MANAGEVik NT TO DETERMINE IF PER an ARE REQUIRED.
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, THE PRODUCER SHOULD NOT CLEAR ANY "%;D UNTIL A WETLAND DELWEATTON
IS \4ADE.
MRCS will provide technical assistance in wetlands only under the following conditions. For natural wetland
inclusions less than one acre in size, NRCS will provide assistance only if the functions and values lost are fully
mitigated. For natural wetlands greater than one acre in size, MRCS will provide assistance only after a
rigorous sequencing process to include avoidance, minimiz,tioa of impacts, and compensatory mitigation is
Carried out in that order of preference.
ODOR CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER.
+ PREDOSUNANT WIND DIRECTION? YES NO
• PRECHARGIIG LAGOON W rT H FRESH WATER TO AT LEAST 112 YES No
OF THE CAP.&.CITYT
• USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT LAN L-LAND APPLICATION YES NO
OF WAS F,7

11
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
NC-CPA-`i 7
REV. 1, 2-96
Page 2
OTHER &NVIR0N1NMNTAL FACTORS
IS ENDANGERED AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT PRESENT?
YES
NO ✓
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED V THE PLANNING .AREA OR
WILL PLANNED ,ACTIONS IIMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA?
YES
NO ✓
IS AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL SITE LOCATED IN THE PLANNED AREA?
YES
NO ✓
ARE THERE PRI.44E, UNIQUT. STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT F.-AR.tiL;.NDS IN THE
YES _
NO ✓
—
OPERATING UNIT?
WII L THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING7
YES _
NO
If the answer to any of the above is ym NRCS will not provide technical
assistance unless agencv oliCy is followed.
WASTE MANAG&M.ENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERTY LAND APPLY ALL WASTE YES ✓ NO
INCLUDING SLUDGE, ALT"rIOUGH SLUDGE MAY ONLY BE APPLIED INF:.tEQUVrMY? —
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES ; IO
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER, CAN PRODUCER GET AGREEiiENT ON LAND YES NO
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE? —
(Attach Waste Udlizatioa Plan to site evaluation.)
SOIL INVESTIGATION - VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION
SHEtl: T ATTAC79M
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON?
YES ✓
NO
IS A LINER REQUIRED?
YES ✓
NO —
TYPE OF LINER TO BE USED:
CLAY ✓ BEVTONTTE SYN-1=11C
IF CLAY LINER IS TO BE USED, IS SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON
YES ✓
NO —
SITE?
IF CLAY IS NOT AVAILABLE ON STIY, DOES LANDOWNER HAVE
YES
NO _
ACCESS TO CLAY?
IS A CORE TRENCH REQUIRED?
YES —
NO ✓
(Attach soil investigstioa sheet to site evaluation.)
IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN TII.E PRE5ENI7
Y cS _
CIO
(If yes, tile must be removed or pluaed)
SITE APPROVED YES NO _ CONDTTTONAL—
COMMENTS
THIS SITE INVESTIGATION IS VALID FOR TWELVE MONTHS FROM THE DATE SHOWN BELOW. IF CONSTRU=. ON
HAS NOT BEEN STARTED Wn-HDN TWELVE MONTHS, A NEW SITE /DrYTSTIGATION WILL BE REQUMED.
SIGNATURE ik t�,, � DATE 3 7 97
1f Changes in the local or ;fate law or changes in the standard could require a new site investigation.

i
1
Col-Nur-ty
9 ■ Complete items i andtor 2 for additional services.
m ■Complete items 3, 4a, and Q.
m maddress on your name and addreon the reverse of Oft lorm so Umat we can return this
card to you.
my ■ Attach this form to the Nord of the mailpam. or on the Dark d space does not
m permit.
m •Write *Rorum Rscefpr RoqueAed' on the tre400m below the article number.
■ The Return Receipt WLCd owto wtXXn the irtide W43 d8WOred and the daze
delivered.
0
3. ArtidB Addressed to: 4a. A-4 kF cwcr
an;c i `) i d -4 Ka.t-p Nei nz
3� a5 1 45;L `
4b. Service Type
0 PO av- 5 r ❑ Registered Sf Certiffed C
u %t❑ Express Mad ❑ Insured
❑ Return Receipt for Merdmclim ❑ COD
7. Date of De
1•
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
Consutt postmaster for fee.
y
5. Received By. (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Address (ONy it requested
If I and fee is paid)
6- nature:
(ftd ar;Age f
r
X
m
:: ....::..::.:.._ _ PS Form 3811, December 1 Domestic Retum Receipt
nt
SENDER:
■Contokno norm 1 wxYor 2 for ad&bonat services.
II also Wsh to receive the
mm
■r ompiete items 3. 4a. and 4b. services (for an
■ Pnm yo,r name and address an the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee):
=nJ to you.
aAuach this form to the frrord of the rra:7pieoe, or on the bark if space does nut 1. [i Addressee's Address
Wnte ■ Rarum Aaceipr Regtreasar on the rrafipae s bekrw the article rrurrtber. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
L,
■Thn Return Reoa# will arrow to whom the artide mras defeverud and the date
c
" -
Consult postnaster for fee.
3. Article Addressed to:
4a_ Article NufMer
ts
.. , me ` ❑
34? a59 43!5-
E
o
Ace Q �•C� �,�-�� •
4b_ Service Type
❑ Registered Certified
❑Express Mad ["�. Insured
❑ PA& Receipt for Momhandise ❑ COD
7_ Date of Delitrey G _ a
5. Received By: (Pnnr Name)
8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested
fee is
4'U
and paid)
`-
6 Si nature: (Addressee W A
r
s
t
PS Fq6A811, Decanter 194
Domestic Rett:m Receipt
1
7
c~
7r - - ----_ --- -.-- _ ..
------ .. - —
SENDER:
- -
mI
'a
.Complete hers 1 andror 2 for addbonW services.
also wish to receive the
.Complete items 3. 4a, and 4b.
following services (for an
:.-� :
. s;.;.:• -..::'.::': ' ::. •'
■ Print your nae and address on e reverse of this form so that we can return this
th
extra )'•
L
y
card tyou-m
■Ana-h this form to the frond of the aWpiece, or on the back if space does not
1. ❑ Addressee's Address -
m
■ WW to tRehrm Roma Requester on the mail below iha article mmrbec
rx �r p�
°
2 ❑ Restricted Delivery rr
C
■ The Return Receipt will show to whom fha article was delivered and the dine
Consult post nester for fee. C
'
•a
3. Article Addressed to-
0.
4a- Artcle Number n
348 a 08
:..
0 G �. N uy toy
-
4b. Service Type
•
y
13 G� � oun�ry C�.�b �n
❑ Registerek ' ,$ Certified ¢
❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured
v
❑ Rerun Receipt for FAesdtartdse ❑COD
'
7. Date of Delivery -c
3.21-
5. R ived By (Print are
8. Addressee's Address (Only ft requested
and lee is paid)
.: (A a6_gnaure: or Agent)
0 X
- Ps Form 3811, December1994

V
SENDER:
sComplete hems 1 and/or 2 for gdffibonW cervcervices.ce
I also wish to receive the
wComplele hems 3, 4a. and 4b.
following services (for an
0 P— your name and address on ft reverse of ft form to that we can rWUM 015 extra fee):
0
card to
a Attach =ffn to the front of ft mawor an Cm back d
spece doesnot 1. El Addressee's Address
af:%.
.2
mWpenniL
nta-Rerurn Receipt Requested'onthe rnagpkme baiow the atticlo number. 2. El Restricted Delivery
gThe Return Receipt wA show to whom the ankle was dahoored and the data
deLivered.
Consult postnmstar for fee.
-o
3. Article Addressed to:
4& Article Number
3
.9
CL
RLCM-SI,<�-
P3 4P Q t-
MC
E
o
rj )rLL OW&AL&L,
4b. Service Type
o Registered ad
jo Cerufi
-
Nc,
0 Express Mal 0 Insured
Za
[I Return for Merchandse 0 COD
7, Data- of Delivery
5. Received By: (Print Narm)
13. Addressee's Addres:s (Or* it requested
and fee is pad)
6. Signature: (Addressee or Agent)
0
>I
X fL�nLz MC 7"��
PS Form 3811, December 1994
Domestic Return Receipt
m SENDER:
I to the
M
sComplate items I andlor 2 for additional vorWoes.
also wish receive
.Complete hems 3. 4a, and 4b.
following services (for an
a PmV your name and address an the reverse of tla tam so OW we can return Na
extra fee):
card to you
OAltach Mo form to the traitof the MMVWM Or On the back it space does not
1. F-1 Addressee's Address
permit.
x Write'Ratum Receipt Requested' on the mmlpieca below the article number.
Z 0 Restricted Delivery
COD
n The Ratutn ReoNpi Va show to whom the argde was delivered and the date
delivered.
Consult postmaster for fee.
3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
4 34
E
4b. Senace Type
�9
o Q
PC) ba 3cl 1
0 Registered j5 Certfied
1;
C*
btur�, Mc,
❑ Express Mad Insured
c5alcrn
0 Return Receipt for MeMN1nCLW 0 COD
7. Date of Delivery
0
5. Received By: (Print Name)
8. Addressee's Address (Ordy d ���od�
Jig
and fee is paid)
6. Signatty)t (Addressee or Agen
0
PS Form 3811, December 1994
SENDER:
a Con-0-me items I 'aFWGr 2 for additional services.
I also wish to receive the
a Complete tern 3, 4a, and 0.
foUowing services (for an
0
0 Prut your mum and address on ft reverse of Un form so Ow we can mum fta
extra fee):
card to yoLL
6 Mach tis form to the tront of the rmu4ie0e. ot on ft back if space does not
1. 0 Addresseo's Address
d
E
pemm,
w Wnte'Retum Rempt Requested' an the ma* Aece below the arade number.
2. [J Restricted Delivery
w'
fj
sTP* Reium Receipt win W10w to whom the afficlo was delivered and the date
r-
Consuft postmaster for fee.
E.
0
a
3. Article Addressed to: v
4a- Article Number
-P3 AS (2--�Cv 0-5,
cc
U
0 X
4b- Service Type
0 Registered 0 Certified
CD
CC
C R N t3 a h
0 Express Mail ❑ Insured
El Return Receipt for Merdha Se 0 COD
S
3
'
r
/
7. Date of Del
IZ/ L-k(
-ciO
5.1

9E-NDEFt-.-
.0
sCamplaw stwe I and/or 2 for Seryke&
I also wish to receive ft
mConVkft' 1 3,4a. and 4b.
t&MN Ser*W (tw an
Pdrd your rams and addrau on Ow mwam of Ift km so dud we Can raftrn Oft
cam to YML
jkXtra fee):
Anach Mfg brm to the front of the ma4mcm6 or an re bads 6 spare dose not
1. El -Addressee's Addrew
peffdL
2-0
aThe Ratum Receipt d6aw
Restricted Odmry
WW to wtkwn to agIdo was ddveW and Om daft
'
0
v C
dOBVWEKL Consut posbrAtsw fbr too, ,
3. Article Addressed to: i 4a- Arifide R=r
E
4b- Service Typerg
CL
E
(,84r] )'�Ua VI
4ci 4
-PwL4Vcj 3
0 Express Mal
0 Insured
tucli
[I ReftnP;eoWfor
Mmdw&e E3 COD
at Delivery
0
5. R ived By- (Print Name)
8. Addbs6aWS-Address
(Only d mquasted
C
771 r?
and lw Is paid)
6.'Slgr-k-dur8:pOUA*sw or Agent)
0
PS Form 3811, Damtfdw i99 . Cj Domestic RE
I
v i

� � fi' � � � � � � fib � I� � � t� i! � i♦ Il♦
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
�ttrmitorad
• Swino production
Cl
Vegetative or wooded bufrcrs;
D
Recommended best management practices;
❑
Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces
• Dirty manure -covered animals
❑
Dry floors
Floor surfaces
• Wet manure -covered floors
0
Slotted floors;
0 Waterers located over slotted floors;
0 feeders at high end of solid floors;
❑ Scrape manure buildup from floors;
0 Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits
• urine;
0
Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• Partial microbial decomposition
or scrape;
O
Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans
• Volatile gases;
C]
ran maintenance;
Dust
0
Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces
• Dust
0
Washdown between groups of animals;
0
Feed additives;
CO
Feeder covers;
❑
Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
❑
Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
la
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
vents
Flush alleys • Agitation during wastewater CI Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
Pit recharge points • Agitation of recycled lagoon CI Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits
liquid while pits are filling with anti•siplion vents
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
Filling and drawdown
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
orjunction boxes conveyance

Source Cause RMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
End ordrainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑ Minimum agitation when,pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler
0
High pressure agitation;
❑
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles
•
wind drill
❑
Minimum recommended operating pressure;
❑
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑
Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin
•
Partial microbial decomposition;
❑
Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface
.
Mixing while filling;
❑
Tank covers;
0
Agitation when emptying
❑
Basin surface mats of solids;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface
•
Partial microbial decomposition;
❑
Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
level;
Agitation when emptying
❑
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge
e
Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets
.
Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,
0
Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 49 hrs.;
surfaces
❑
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals
•
Carcass decomposition
❑
Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal
•
Carcass decomposition
O
Complete coveriuib of carcasses in burial pits;
pits
❑
Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators
•
Incomplete combustion
❑
Secondary stack burners
AMOC 6ember 11, 1996, Page 4 •
r• ili■ tlltl� illltl• 1• � Il, ii i r � Ili � l� i� � r � �

OEM sip M M s r M M M MIM M� m r Ml M
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Sptclfic Practices
Standing water around • Improper drainage; iG Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away Gam facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads ❑ Farm access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
Additional Information : Available From :
Swine Manure Management; 0200 RuWBMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU -BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment , EBAE 128-88 NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88 NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAE reel Sheet NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33 NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual NC Pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management; Odors and Flies ; JIRO107, 1995 Corirercnce Proceedings Florida Cooperutivu Exlrnsiun
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5

rli w�llr - � s � � liiill� a■� � � l� l� � l� � l� � _r �
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause HMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters + Accumulation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids 0 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative + Decaying vegetation ❑ Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
nrs
Feeders Feed Spillage © Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g., T
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
❑ Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day Interval
during winter).
Feed Storage Accumulations of feed residues 0 Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
❑ [nspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
AMiC - November 11, 1996, Page I

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
❑ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

� r r r r r r r� �■�r r r �■r r r �■■i r r r

el—
e1wem W
FO•roi 4AVE.ry`? q•
W
"A
CLINTO A4F AV
Q111
0 6ye."T • u/x. 1 .ad, q4,
JEL
spi—, ... ....
IJ'O
Iw-
/00"
4f
it
C-4 104
,earl7 .0e. PYA vq Ap.
44� $a —
M-W
Ip
tf
ft. Mdk..
tw
KIP
lip
T
PAG,I .... ...
'i.. L a
14
0—
iik A
.... .... '1314 a
I.0 Ls
0000" yu IS,
41
it V-D
IN

JA
�0.0
1'
�� /
rk
�, y Cs
—: •
�/ )� �1 , ;fr 1 I
.
l�l _
��`�\,l
?
BIN
Ai
Cal
IS
�i�///
,l� lid •�`.
rr
'�. �`;�'".�`l \
� �` m ��
�' ` � ��r � �' � )�'
° � `,
�,.J�-��.�.:::.✓
�� �_"•� (�
'�—elf— , 1�.. .��
� �
_ ,
•i �� r;�
- - .�
Ij

V;•' y. �• �� �t�•rtWt `��'�`�r-:i.. `'*, ..ram" �•r• r ''4
/ �W r � LAB 7t �r-- •�`F '. .e �F. 4.ii ���tj` J �.:••,'7.. ' r' irk" r
�Ydi' .. �1 ;.f Tr�•ViY� •SY+�kI. _ � YT•�%�,�-
�, .:FYI'[; ' - ti ., �j: , ; f �' ._ • s: •' • � - I'y � �R
_��.�/f. ,F'T3r7:� __; r.:+ ' =mot`-� .r`•_• :;s��.� ��~r _ 7,.• -
-»
z We
WZI
',i. - _ ,: ~.!_x,.1 :..� .;: Cis'. . •�� :t i, � '� R
VN .i i _ - `fit'_ r� _--- ,•,,�+3. 3 �N.y,� ��r ..'L.•R-`�. � ►-.q ! _ •�.•!4 - �
TP
•41 � - � � : `r`.:rsi:g"�� M3^ � h�=:���ii �:f "?�;6t r."r!t y'i� "• �r?_ yG�� 3r:'�' � `�.
T•_' .- +rs' _ dAls'�•...a .��C �i,3,5 ! �� _�t�� 1 � � �'�-�w �. a yu� Y
• \ � ��dl: eF" J. �.. a 4: � _R t M:a..•�_ a .��, a "': \
Zi- s'. • C�.��L � his .. {'" n-_ :. � � } F .�+ - - y
-
f +y - � r� -r. � �Vi����"Z'`r '- . .• �'3. - '.-"+i.i ��.�`: -- _*Y? �•,rC irk
.•- _ - ,'. s' [�'�`.+;1• hr... - ••<, Fy,•- ••',�S ti t.L. M Y. - r. csr'. .. - + -
' - •~yam :fir. - +'�•a >�• _y._ "r�`ti�F� •�•-
:' - �A< ;�l.r�'i :: -_ice rir. .":��V•. "'�.': ,•rs3�-'�' �" _ ! _
ti •'4 r `At `art+ + .r' P-:-. '£'
i` ... i �ti � �14�?,-i~y�•-+�_rR_y:��`� �;,,,n'=��';� Z `� •��•T� ,�:F'��-.�4 .L r y'- _:rY, ""-"-'" 1j �1 _ 'i
�.is .: - - .�7?"!!'' �"3�'�;;;r ;:.-=��,;r"b.•'�� ��t�.•�.:.'� _ 1 "�" :�:F�»•t-.:73i��:-.,;.- ••s'•-= _'`! _ :�
yi...• rx---'s :�i� :+�rr.� -tom
••��:!-'�-_ _ '3�• ��L� � �R �f }�+ `y�,,� � n- :� '� .tip 't -
r , 'fix •- _ �.Cr �` w •- •S ~-�'v-�5��'y�"_�a :.� - s3� - �-=- � y
r.-".-:.re.tC: j.v v-; rrs-,-.c. .- _ _ = ai •3s�.:�' s... �,�,- --
r it• ,h„ r1.4 ks _ _;: ,,•
~�_-^��~••-y �• _ _'.ri. �r�...-.s. __ 'LY _ _. .. +sue �1 ..fe •Z 7 -. '%�w� .w''�• -

..............
........ . - . ... .......
. ........
.............
...........
..............
............ 4k Ld
4 L�,(
------ -----
4
*1 m

' USDA -SOIL CONERVATION SERVICE UNITED STATES
303-D EAST ROWAN STREET DEPARTMENT OF
CLINTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28328 AGRICULTURE
PHONE [phone]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
' April 8, 1997
Herman P. Royal
11800 W. Laporte Dr.
Charlotte,. NC 28216-1136
Dear Mr. Royal:
' Please find attached Form SCS-CPA-026 and SCS-CPA-026A continuation sheet (if
needed) for the tracts you reported to ASCS when you completed a Highly
f" Erodible Land and Wetland Conservation Certification. Wetland determination
' may be incomplete in wooded areas and unnumbered fields. Before clearing,
draining or altering these areas for any use, contact ASCS and complete a new
Form AD-1026. Failure to do so could result in loss of eligibility for USDA
I
benefits for all the land you farm. Each field has a symbol on it which
represents its classification. The following symbols apply to your farm:
W - Wetlands--clearning, draining or altering these areas to make
possible the planting of a commodity crop will result in wetland
conversion which would make you ineligible for most USDA
programs.
PC - Prior Converted Wetlands --can be cropped and are not affected
by the wetland conservation provisions as long as the field is
not abandoned (not cropped for 5 successive years).
' CW - Converted Wetlands ---areas of hydric soils that do not have a
cropping history between 1981-1985 and/or were converted since
December 23, 1985. Growing annually planted crops on this land
' will result in a loss of USDA program benefits. If this land
was cropped between 1981-1985, you must establish a crop history
with ASCS to remain eligible for USDA program benefits.
' CWNA - Converted Wetland--Non-Agricultural Use -Wetlands converted after
Nov. 28, 1990 for non-agricultural purposes. These tracts will
be reviewed annually and will lose their exemption if the non-
agricultural activity ra;is or land becomes idle.
' 4-NW - Not Wetland --areas that do not contain wetland.
N - Not Wetland --or-- Highly Erodible
UN - Un Numbered
We have made every effort to make this determination as fair as possible, but
if you feel the determination is incorrect, you have the right to appeal. The
appeal must be in writing and must state the reasons why you believe your
fields have been incorrectly determined. The appeal must be made within 45
' days of receipt of this determination.
SinceNon
�
C. Wien
' District Conse tionist
I

U.S.D.A. ' SCS-CPA- M
Soil Conservation Service (.ine91)
HIGHLY ERODIBLE LAND AND WETLAND
CONSERVATION DETERKINATiON
I _ Nam and Address, of Person 2- Date of Req_;est
Name of USDA Agency or Perm ReqLKsft DeUmmina ion Fr f Farm No, and Tract No. • . , _ - ,rye: R;
SECTION#-#A13HILT0300IKELAMD
— ------
--t iDNO.J&)- -
.TOTALA0iiE5-
ls soil survey now avaaaWe for ma" a higtdy erode W d deMrnrnalki n? Yes[ No
Are there highly erodible soB map units an this trim? Yes 13'- No ❑
-: , " f
.* '� ..vs
$ List highly erodible fields tflat, acoonmfrng to ASCS records, were used to pro* an amgrir Aural o m oft h1 wV • .
` �`
crop year during 1981-19115.
List highly erode fineWs that have been or wN be converted forthe pm ductiorn d agFkxd tral comnxxfifies and.
according to ASCS records, were not used for tlrs propose inail► crap year drying 1901-1985. and were not
enrolled in a USDA set -aside or diversion program
Q This H' h Erodible land detemeatioe was in the_ or=e Field ❑
s m...r.. = rr.■ arw
=�F;tr•
-- -- - -- —
FtELD NO.(s)
TOTAL ACRES
I. Are there hydnc soils on this farm? Yes d -No 1] -. _ ._ _ ._.. _. - . --
7
2 Wetlands (1iv), mckKEng abandoned weft or Fanned Wedands R( V4 err Fammcmd W edwils Pasnue (FWP)_
wetlands may be farmed minder natural conditions. Fanned Viledands and Farmed Wedarrds Pasture may be
farmed and maintained in the same maraca as they was prior to Daowdxr 23,19B5, as long as they are not
abandoned.
3. Prior Converted Cropland (PC)_ Wedanids d= were amwerted pior to Demmber 23, 1SM. The use. rmat>agemeM
^ Si
_;:•;��:
drainage, and alteration of prior converted aoptand (PC) are not sid*ctlo the wetland eonsmvaton pro vk*xms uAless
.. .
the area reverts m wetland as a result of abandormrenu _ . _
- --• .
_ _ _..�— �.. -__.
4. Artificial Wetlands (AW). Artificial wetlands inctrides lr gasipr vrP H;n I Thesewetlauds are not subject
to the wetland conservation provisions --
Is_ Minimal Effect Wetlands (MM. These wetlands are to fiefmr. amadigtothe ramnma�apeementsigrmed
at the time the minimal -effect detern*xahan rras made_
- . `i� • =,
56. Mitigation Wetlands iMIW). Wetlands on wtmid a person is aclyvely r9 a bagaenmtly capped area or a wetland
converted between December 23. 1985 and November 7$1919Q
;� r
Restoration with 1/ioiation (RVW-year)_ A rered vredand that was in vicdatioo as a resuft of =74ersion after.
»
November 28, 1990, or the planting cf an aWicultu al cornmmoaty or farape cn*L
. -
16. Restoration wittnut Violation (fiSM. A gestated weft convected betoreern Daoember 23 1985 and
3
November 28, 1990, on which an agrirutrsal cornmority has not been pkmfta
. Replacement Wetlands. (RPW)_ Wedgy whiidi are converted forother than to' prodwfi >.
where the wetland values are being replaced at a second silo
`
20. Good Faith Wetlands (GFW+year)_ Wetlands on whkh ASCS has deoernttred avialation to be in goad faith and the
wetland has been restored_
-i
Converted Wetlands (CW). Wet arils converted after Decw6w ZX 19M amd prior to Novenmtter 20, 1990. Iry any
,moo( N
year that an agricultural onmmodity is planted an these Converted Wedlards, you wA be ineligible for USDA beneffts_
Converted Wetland (CW+year)- Wetlands converted after Novesnllbes 29,191EtQ You wS be mule for USDA
program benefits until this welland its restored_
Converted Wetland Non -Agricultural use (CINNA). Wedamds that are converted for bees, fish p ckxlwin, shrubs,
cranberries, vineyards or buri and road corusmxdorr_
Converted WetiandTechrk2lError (CWtl). Welfitand per converintasares4A of him. elctdet t
try SCS_
25. The planned alteration measures on wed in f ds are consaidermjd mairaenan6e and are in compeance
with FSA.
The planned alteration measures on wetlands in feWs are ngta radered to be maintenance and if
installed will cause the area to become a Garmetiod Welted (mil- Sewrilain 22lpwsirsarmaban are GW+yet
27. The wetland deterndnation was cmpleimed in the cd'toe fib and ryas delvered[] to the person on _
Remaft. rl et-0 l!V! r 2 fiGYI f"S� VV Af, . � / ;-,��lit //tip .�t/U'/t/-;�ii/
��l'� �. i- fir' �/`•� � � �ULi: ��i-y4i�7�1 �..•e��'�� • � t� ...+i� �"�`�e ... _- • . ...- .
1 certify that thr above derennbu im is correct and aderpart for nvr u 3M Bona u e d SCS C.c�Serwa�Ont� : � 31-� D81E�•t.=�
eligihiliryfor USDA proar�rr b6uf:u, and d+w wezAamd ��obU. k lrk sods a d
hydrophync vegerad— under normal cirrrmarmarrs czar mVasnas amvlraed 4m
Wirriands. Farmed Work ndr and Farmed Wedandy Pas wr_
J&Wb raM aItile color, s err harm
Person Copy

}}17
a lt' y a r anil- : r%,• nlf r �i' S+ay�+ .i. y\1fe �• ° lib'�`I ;.1t,°ai}� "'^r
t7 rr rjiy � .r' , •r � �-�r}. �t� (c Sef Ma r r}flh it;� p �dt�7. �a F� a✓ �i►'i er"all
yt t ei y ,�.-: * '�. ♦ {q.'..
}'. r♦ ", c .� r', ar,, r t) i 1 r:♦ ♦ d i � Iv i 1 t !
l wr`la+�+ t •It v+t f y t J lit '. ��rA , Q 6 v it `r417 i.r rI t.
t
i r. - r t of + `L. +rttr J Ir •a% I' i V rt ), t ii"f '4t 'Ai2 CQ I371
r .r t)1 ., •. F r. o ♦ �ita��i ray 15,�1,�5
y !V F rr i�yv \ � ♦ 'v r r t ,. r Ir p� � � r t 7h�r7'i 'W. r r '?`r� i.. ..,�.
`'`. ..).. ' ri, f•Yu M ;'�•i Y y� , ,r.. .ant ,
r)11 rr �ilti hYY + a 1'r { q li ! py 1'rM1r }1 n7 it'i i� r r4 f 'r♦ GwrFra.3 ifl,4tj .xr��y� �.
' r1 5 ) 1 Ji� i� Ir wU, 'R fY>' I'1� ♦ t t'ii ( r YI hr trt
are N'Ir.f
r Y4µ Y,t ;i I r .. rr 1 r. lls. _t�- ,a�• �� 'iy�y r i �^..
i s a•ri i �}y+rr-a: It :S r� � t�:r+ I - r ff lr_a f dr1 ,t. iil��,fa. r ntl}lrr' ,
�Y 'r+ A ` •„ 1& 1 a r r <( i . ` e i. r ) ` ` lyt 1 t+'r y '
,spr Q 4 y l r 4.
tF�fS dMti",si;�•,. 'TS +�.,� .1 r;"' a,. 7',. ` iy FhY'if1 }, r I t �1.—._ ''ry°
y�R�
�f ykZKrK �t,,f It .tip � ��ld ! r '• i .1 �': n1. ro- t F�r/.pt - �Ai �r S �r'i
� YY CJ. r � � y 4.. jl-IJ rite { >> } i.. 'i t � 2 ♦. ,
t'trJFJ� lr J 1� r1� ( r a• i ' 41e II ,1141,
K •1 4 / YI I Al • �.
• n .� tar i ,r � t y► t i r , i s r
if
�a��?�•l� I+ } '�. i i ' r r, � �.n � LjiIi
rrp"R6`5 c yrl' I - '{" 7
i d.Yr ) r r E .•r I ` v 1 �� +r 4 rp Lrz tl u. i rl� i+ l .r`�..
� rlit♦ t> )�.: :. 7 •. t 11� y.—4tE"r-1 w. � tyl�' dd�4 2' f
rai.nt vi" t J: F • � It1'1 �,r$,- el+,\+y, ,xlv a i �i ly _ rr) v a 6 / .r (x'� - rtIT �u
„ 1;.. 1 .V �,(''6'}i'�t�gl•, i� t -, c7�a f) ��@lr'];,�r'�', � }=.�es 14. r ilp ,r tve"„It�f"r �,a}F•i:
vll. Ar St,. t. .• Iljlr YW4i`.S7Ii 7�Y52,rlll t ter+y t ,i.
41 ,t.
,W r - ♦ r ry.J^-FT�+�I A •ii♦ g,' it et + K a S}r m 1 - H. r Ja !
a8 r .• 7 f }•r r - f .t S: �r` e . ra S;�f ri'•'
ro ti , Fj '- r r Z1�a c).L t' r y\ ' • t t d3 tFt 1 rf , - :k' Cte
y,
t Fr q,ra ♦ i i 'a'fi✓I y{ �`- yam,,,; r ,r
r iS �I( l.re➢ 1 .� � i.l Y �`rF"' �?, �"�; r i. 1 ,y r r. r• ) a,rrot' .,.t, rt
u ,
}�•�d Ivl4r'ir�}lra.!j�r, p"fa-c 1 r i1'iOI
>,•♦
1 I {i rS r_ A. Z • r r `i. ; 'fY'✓"Nir ,��\ p _L rl r. .�.Vri t - t itt "Lr ,. *� r aI 1
4r,'�+,rieS�l'a• 1� 1 il,: r 2 j.. j C 1 S-�iN • .�' 1 i sso
1 t l.Y.r .uf, 5 t 1. °; + r � .rA )tN ' � (. 1 Jr � J ;1 Y f. � yJr.• 1; --1�
1.
Ap
Y v< r ' 1 r ♦ ' V .,I - r.r' ! pi1r1 r •7 V' u
7I-A
Y s � r ! 1 .Y "i [ ti t }}ram w ly •.
- "f.i, � I,1 a.rl ' r. t rr%.1 Ilj / ^-'�• yl" Jrr
1 t ,1'"1f� ♦ t r x 1 a r r �. r 1 rrvS t h u' tkl' ry !+ h. t r +..
PI
to .r4f.Y4.,Y. r r,: r r ♦ I t � 1 � 1 tea 1 1 r 7 r 1 i t
1]• ' 1%. r t ♦ f •f 4 1 •' }'� i i• r Y 4.'^?R1{ NN i 4 t. J Y+r:
f; 1 , d1a +� �. ..+.1.. ray M:.. �i rf l� IvrJ'S etf`.S.
r J J 1 r l

/ IRRIGATION DESIGN
LYNWOOD SPELL
SCALE: I" = 400'
RECEIVED
JUN 2 4 1997
FE�Y}s`: f P

I
v
i
F6'10' . 1-r- - —
OAK
Woot
' V�v
2

Existine or
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
ezvj or Expanded (Wease circle
General _Information:
PECEI V D
JUN
REG. OFFICE
Name of Farm: _ 'T_L An!; yy% „ — _ Facility No: --
Owner(s) Name: 1-- N une,,© SPt;trL Phone No:9 to - Std1+- (Q5C5
Mailing Address: 9 :g $ A Ss 1" A Kr. Rua E go go M c- 2=a Aa 2-
Farm Location County Farm is located in: `aA M PSod _ =
Latitude and Longitude: ,J7 -9 * do," 1 790 2-7' 06
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): 2.0 _ wt i t..E5 Nok7K w67s7 00_Cont eetD (Klyw L! j
Qperation Description:
Type of Suine No. of Animals
Wean to Feeder GCc 60
* Feeder to Finish
* Farrow to Wean
* Farrow to Feeder
* Farrow to Finish
Type of Poultry No. of Animols
ZI Layer
0 Pullets
Other Tipe of Livestock:
Type of Cattle No. ofAnirmis
❑ Dairy
* Beef
Number of Animals;
Expanding Qpe'rj2tYon Only
Previous Design Capacit)7: AddI Design,CapaczV:
Total Design Ca acit)':
Acreage Available for Application: 1 {o Required Acreage: ! ID • 5
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds : I Total Capacity: `{-La�90 4- Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES* or (S) (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
' O«mer f Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm aamed above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste' treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using'technical
standards developed by the natural Resources Conservation Service" The approved plan will be fled at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District" I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DE A or a new certification (if the approved plan is chanced) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner: A '=
Signature: jo. Date:_
Name of Alanager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:.
2—L
AAVC -- January 1. 1997 1

Technical Specialist. Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
manavernent plats that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)(
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H_0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. Ile
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, Sl, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent. .. . . .
II. Certification of Design
A) QQllection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the. appropriate box.
D Existina facilit w't bout rrtrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity"; storage capability consisfent with waste utilization
requirements.
Ue"' Iiew—expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum iWd�# Vad ifications.
\� P j
♦ CA R
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
r r
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): s 1 E Phone No.:
Signature: /� �Q ��,gT�r .FQ:�Iro' g .`' Date: 4-1 ttT ,
�O'Y`POp.`",**
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations(buffers); adegOata amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): G • 6 L.6 nl t.%
Affiliation: PRES7 6E i4RtK5 7..rc..
Address(Agency): P. 0 , IE)o x $-3a aIN To nl N e. 2937,V Phone No.9 It) -!59Z -_S'-11
Signature: _ i'o•►.�-- C_e•-� C•.- Date:_ +1) 5197
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior
l.ots
Check the appropriate box
jQl Facility without e2iterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This.facility does not contain any exterior lots.
:1 Facility with exterior lois (RC)
Methods to minimize the runoff of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): G . E pJ ?4 t FTe>N
�P.E TAbE T f -A
ffiliation: Qr2+'� ��� _ -_ _
Address(Aaencv): P.D. 8r,^, ¢36 OCI NTow, 4C. "3L9 Phone No.�Rlo - 92.--%7-Jl
Signature: 151g • am.'� OAZvv - Date: 4- i 51 s
A1A'C -- January 1, 1997 2

11). Application and Handling. F4uipment
Check the approprivre box
Existing or expandirig. facili1y with existing waste application e4uipment (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
New, exnanded, or existine facility without existine waste annlicatiotz cQomvtnent fo
irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
O ew, expanded. e7jis'ng-facifity without existing waste alien ion a u' en[ o
spreading not usingspray irrigation. (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can coves the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing"of
applications has been established; required buffers caq,Irwhtained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
vn
contained as part of the plan)_ `H CgROr�ri,.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Pri
Affiliation: M. F,(,,.,A ",
Address(Agency):
Signature:
YD A
E) Odor Control Insect Control, Iv lity'Iana``�ft't'�NT' rid Emergengy Artion flan D
SI NNW RC or I
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control CheckliiL an Insect Control
Checkist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Flan. Sources of both odors and insects
have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Manasernent Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Morality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print): A, G L e7 H tJ C ` I Fro d
Affiliation: f*eE'5TA6C F�+�+'tti�►_. Z..► c .
Address(Agency): A 0• 4&D Y, y-36 CLI uToni 14L M3?_'9 one No_:9r16 -%9'Z-- 5 1 z t
Signature: _ A. GL'j L --t Date: f 5 9-'7
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding S-wine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after ,hate
21,1996. If the facility vas built before June 21,1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
1(we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located acioss a public road, street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farrrL The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 10 -805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Dame of Land Owner
Signature:
h'a`9 F'VRM 9v LYMwo
Date: G - Z.
Name of hlanager(if different from owner):
Signature Date:
AIVC -- January 1,1997 3
XL

t
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Sto-rage, Ireatment Installation
Mew expanded of retrofitted facility (SI) �
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) L—and ARRlicatiOn Site (FYUP)
Check the appropriate box
❑ The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan_ by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate
for compliance with the wasteafilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can'nbi be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of.this certification, the owner has committed to.establish an intkrim crop for erosion control;
Fame of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Ageney): Phone No.:
Signature:, - Date:
This follom ing signature block is only to -be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked:
I (we) certify that I (ws) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate t.o estiblish the interim crop far erosion control, -and cull! submit to DEM a Vcritication bf completion from a
Technical. Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the cgtlditional certification. I.(we) realize that
failure to submit this vcrification is a violation of the waste management plate acid will sublet ritc (us) to'an mforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature; Date:
AWC -- .lanuary 1,1997 4

x
14. . ft
To: BE-Ly a, e.
1170 714E PVEnt1E
CLiAJT_0tJ NC, 7_832-0
From: _ Ly f% w ac D APE t-c-
_2,913S BASS LAKE I-D
ose3aQb NC. 17-68z
Date: 31 zo l 97
As required by North Carolina GS 106-805, I am notifying you of my intention ,to con-
struct a nl lj"a P.Y swine farm with an animal waste management system
design capacity of. &,o s n
For your information, the technical specialist preparing the -waste management plan is:
Cam . 6L t--M M C I- I P 70 A/
P.D. Box "L38
47'y L i AJ To Q N G. z e'3 Z8
and the local Soil and Water Conservation District office address. is:
SAm1S'o4 5Zl'- S WAT&P
+JT� ComPI_ Q�
CLi rj-roN NC_ ;2.e32d3
Written comments may be submitted to: -
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
P.Q. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
copy: G_ CWton
notioe.tat

V \ rlri .,ri '
rpep
I .6y �f �., 1,0. i.•J
C 1RI nA `•,,
C l 'ice .+�,.I•.v ', ~ � MAW � Y 4f i' t[., i trr� + � r
Ir ¢pi . •It,! u.� v „rl n,r a., L., r,ri. ' ,.:, !Fi$ ,,Y'
L- - •t , .fit J+"[ _ s�j a ww .i�..au ,.r,r.•, , 1 �1
nu «n{, .}•y y':''' ifri0 SMr,
%i. j f , wu ,rSIM:i; � r«�� ..., ,L{ j .,r..,, •, it, t"'
•Otr[',dot
�
.sad ea, L'f V ✓ .y,'y?�
r sir iM
*list '97i" �' Yi�r%q N ,ir nala . 1«,/ ,a tr.i ,• '•
.�. Ary, ._ • uxt r".ie • `i d i i' ,«� N]►imt E I.n� r� '«` `,�'• i °
,r[, V.`\ )¢
6 ' rrwrr 1•tr' y��.,rit' \ a'y1 t „t. at
• Y 1 mr flrtiY wn [� Rh �r "i"n ,n. a '
"tIbI
rrer �� r rt r i + r[ wr,�1��M '•��+ f • � j ..r. ' tr,, �x
'•[+.Qti+ I,Ir / iru � tq ,. Y yr •,k%Yi
w'+r, w .tor. 'F„r�;itxr,r�r� L a •r""
` nli ' \ ' .ti4 .ay S6� rrt'Ist, `,t, i „f.,, A'�y :: 7o.nrs U>, +• ��' Llyp �'a `ttP �,..p'
110,
. 'V +RI' •wr r.ei�` nr� ` 'e •i? r,.,
a.a'4
it i[7 i ut, a = '/ =...
Iyi � 1 � Illy �
! [� rys'J 1r r[r @ � xtivst .. r 'i3�T.;J s �a, 'S ,.,,,,o � ,•� .� •' ,�'
pr[iA if'Yi �•� ,,r.alah•r�: '13 rt��"•}ti ,,,rr o .. ..�ti1-r` r) r
¢yiv ! n,¢� 9 �� �+ , � �s�. vu .�:�9� reery ,� «n .rr, � . r r.n , .., •• L..Mo �{
lY,«r
wo. h rµ, •t,� .,r� ...w� 1{ "w ` ' r ,� a .nyp r..
p4�•
� �+� + �'' r xe�, .,N. 1 e�r,9�^' a „r «• Vy " FOIi 1` � r«. 'iy�� ,� S :,.
� fJ y.r> 'oy ' , � y) d ram] � •.r li[, [itr �a4 •L� �•. E y] 9 .0{
la '� .ice' i� ,' ur. r u^� ,t,r �r.0 .,-'�, (} :+•r..r ...,q` ., S ....
ti 1,[ r JT 7r2 tr[,
•yL
t A� � I
1!IMr ,�� •i Siu ,up�wa. �]
Y f�' r.[rl +N 11[r riri r e tl[i „t� .r[°•J, . . 4 .,, ,, •• .qr
,1li
rt ` -Jt+ . ay¢rar•+ -�• •°)r. , .< +� t•..r�, a QYe ,
„ • tr . M „u „Ir awr � [^r'p wee ' [[ - l4 ' a[. ti P} " �' . ....�„r . fi� ,.-.
,YYO �, ,,, r �•� �� ` 'ei 1 w[.
�rrru atil r,�: •x`.'3 � .Oi "ey .a[. aH� i, lu,' .. HYry+w ilu' .w. a f�
wu
I � �'� +/M r�..,lwr].i ` +ir7Alt► rt .��„ \. lt i� �' N 1[[, � �' , [ t .� •�.wl] 'I � Mrl ,r1,
of.
S• x 31,Y �3=J\" N Tr :r r �� ru, g, '• }{ 'a �... �:«r� 1..,�-'~,rM1 .
rrt, 1«� ri p rrl`� yW.1;' .�". II• ' V1' ,ram' •, i .' 1 .
J'yI ! +t,i ri�i e t •tw [rut aw, {J ••`.� ,.e, Iw,w] '7r' •• �i' �' SCj
t 1� V2f r,liilJ .Ikt..J..• nt� _ • s ' \ , �r � •.wl '++ .~ Jry
u IM, d YYWI •., ,
Gr � ii
.,, '\ «" I !' � 'y�� •ui r Yli Npr 1� � . � t � Hi c.i. ,, Ht nrr a ye.,, /
crnt) ,,, ''� Gt .. ct'r .,.,.,./ ..,, 'It" ,.. ,,n r.ti ,. •+ r.. 1 '�-

1 9z-70G
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health. and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality RECEIVED
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) j Ufa 2 1997
General Permit - Liquid Anhual Waste 4peratjv ;-F_ V.-_U,i
FiEG. o�r='C-
This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions 65 t o
Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) certification form, Part H, must be included
with this application prior to the application being accepted as complete. _
Application Date: ZZ)
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST,
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials m the space provided neat t6 rach z: =�5
item. ry
1. One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for Genets] Permit -
Animal Waste Operations; LJ
2. Three copies of a general location trap indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and'
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Three copies of pages 1-3 of the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) Certification Form,
including Part Ii (Certification of Design Items A-F). If the facility does not have Part R of the
AWMP completed, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for J p
animal waste operations. L , I ,
4- Three copies of the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) used for facility design. • ! • J -
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Farm's name;. . :r L NoG FARM
2. Print Land Owner's naMe, L N v4 oob SP E c. i_
3. Mailing address: a935 BA -Ss L_AtcE RD, _
City: _f%�r3aRo T State: Nc. Zjp: .tS381-
Telephone Number. ( 9 10 ) 5 b4 - 65to5
4. County where farm is locatrd: S P.►,% Psom
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include 5R numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): 2. C M, i a c, blva -t .+ a a: 14 yvj N L-
A4 v,/ SR 1346 (T.4E AVCNOE)
b. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owper):
7. Lessee's / tegrators tram if applicable; please circle which type is lisod): E'.'�,rAGC 1✓raf�AA
FORM: AWO-G-NE 3/21/97 Page 1 of 3

i
III. OPERATION INFORMATION:
1. Farm No..
(county number); (facility number).
2. Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No. of Animals"
should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed
♦ Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals Tvne o� f Pouinv No Qf Animals
tposo 01Ayer
0 Non -Layer
0 Tudzy
1= of Cattle No. o mda
0 Dairy
0 Beef
Other Type of Livestock on the farms o. of Animals:
3: Aar -age cleared and available for application: l G : Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP):
4. Number of Lagoons: ; Total Capacity: 4&0904- Cubic Feet (ft3)
Number of Storage Ponds: J�JJA ; Total Capacity: 1416 Cubic Feet (ft3)
5. Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the proposed application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the proposed lagoon? YES or NO (please circle one)
7. Does this facility meet the siting requiren2= in Senate Bill 1217? (Swine Only) YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? 31 -?1 c) 7
What was the date that this facility's land application areas was sited? 41 i o 1') 7
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
L -1-N n wOa &'-L :, _ (Land Owner's name listed in question II.2), attest that
this application for 5 L H a G t` A R M . ' (Farm name listed in question EL I)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application Package
will be returned to me as u,e � • a incomplete. /
Signats` _ Date
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complex oaly if diffemnt from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question H.6), attest that this
application for (Farm note listed in question Il.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS.
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS_
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-OS35
FORM: AWO-G-NE 3/21197 Page 2 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 23, 1997
"4
C >EHNR
MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
To: Tommy Stevens, Regional Supervisor
sUN2e1991
From: Mike Lewandowski, Environmental Enginee M T 9
State Engineering Review Group FAY—trTEViU-a
Subject: Permits Applications for New facilities
REG.()rtf:�=
Attached is a copy of the General Permit for Liquid Animal Waste Operations application package
for a new facility. This information is being provided so you may review the packages prior to
permit issuance. Please provide your comments by July 14, 1997. If no comments are received
by that date, we will assume that there are no objections, and permit issuance will proceed.
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone] ext. 362, or
nukelew @dem.ehnr.state.nc.us.

�L. _ RECEIVED
J U N 2 4 1997
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. Car-r—;CE
5IRRIGATION
-r
N3
,3DESIGN
CERTIFICATION
F
FOR
LYNWOOD SPELL
JL HOG FARM
6080 WEAN TO FEEDER
June 19, 1997
I certify that this Plan has been prepared under my direct
supervision and meets the applicable regulations of
NRCS, DEM, and all other State and Local Regulations
to the best of my,;To &e* belief.
'�.
` ASS/ 9
�l
�•.. Eye;:
•,''�.,c� OYD
'�1eJn11111%�

SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR MR. LYNWOOD SPELL OF JL HOG FARM,
THE OPERATION PLANNED IS A WEAN -FEEDER OPERATION,
IN SAMPSON COUNTY
CONTRACTOR FOR: PRESTAGE FARMS, INC of CLINTON, NC.
According to the data furnished by the owner Lynwood Spell and Prestage Farms, Inc., this is an
operation that contains four wean to feeder buildings with 6080 capacity and one primary storage
lagoon. The annual PAN (Plant Available Nitrogen) produced by this particular operation will be
2918 pounds.
Soil type on this farm in the area where wastewater will be applied is Norfolk and Wagram. The
Norfolk series is a well to moderately well drained Coastal Plain and terrace soil with sandy surface
layers and friable loamy subsoil's. The Wagram series is a well drained, Coastal Plain and terrace
soils, with thick sandy surface layers .and friable loamy subsoil's. The permeability rate is between
2.0" and 6.0" per hour in the top twenty inches and between .6" and 2.0" per hour in the top 20 or
80 inches. The design precipitation rate is .4" per hour on Norfolk and .6" per hour on the Wagram
soils, with the proposed cover crops in the waste management plan. There are three field locations
where the wastewater will be applied.
The Nutrient Management Plan, developed by Prestage Farms, Inc., include a cropping system of
Bermudagrass-grazed, corn, small grain, wheat and soybeans. Refer to the waste management plan
for times on when to apply wastewater to a each particular cover, and fora rotation schedule. the
total.acreage required in the waste management plan for all of the above crops is 21, but since the
crops will be rotated in the same fields the actual acres needed are 10.5. The actual effective
irrigated area as calculated by the Irrigation Plan designer is approximately 11.33 acres. The area at
the ends and on the sides of the pulls will not receive uniform coverage during application. The area
of the sides that is receiving effective irrigation is considered approximately 70 percent of the throw
diameter of the chosen sprinkler. Since 2918 lbs of PAN will be generated annually, the 11.33 acres
of pasture that can be effectively irrigated will be more than adequate.
Refer to the waste management plan for loading rates for each of the crops stated above. There
should be adequate storage to allow time for application of the wastewater. After the system is in
place and application becomes necessary, the manger needs to follow the waste management plan as it
is written. The total amount of wastewater that needs to be removed from the lagoon will be based
on the yearly rainfall amounts. Years where there is an unusually high rainfall amount, more water
will need to be pumped and sprayed on the pasture land. The amount of wastewater produced by the
animals is 1,167,360 gallons. It is a good idea for the operators of this system to be familiar with
average rainfalls for their particular regions. This can help in the scheduling of their land
applications. These can be obtained at local extension offices or at NC State university. There are a
number of places but these are two well known locations.

LAND APPLICATION SYSTEM:
With our recommendation and the wants of the customer we have decided to use the Atnadas Hobbs
Reel Rain Hard Hose Traveler. The machine is equipped with 850' of 2.5" poly hose, a Nelson 100
end gun with a .812" and .712" ring nozzle. This will take approximately 164 hours of pumping, which
can be broken down into 20.5 eight hour days, to remove the wastewater produced by the animals. The
arc angle setting of the sprinkler will be 270' on the proposed cover. This arc angle is set to achieve
specified application rates, the guns can be run at larger angles, but it is not recommended to exceed
270'. These settings do not exceed the NRCS's recommended precipitation rate. The wetted diameter
of the .812" ring nozzle is 260', the gpm is 118 and the wetted diameter of the .712" ring nozzle is 245',
the gpm is 88, the pressure at the sprinkler is 70psi, and the effective diameter of the sprinkler throw is
182' for the .812" ring nozzle and 171.5' for the .712" ring nozzle.
PRECIPITATION RATE:
(calculations)
Precipitation Rate (PR) = 96.3 x Q x 360
3.14 (.9 x r)2 W
GPM
= 118gpm
r (Radius)
= 130'
w (Arc)
W 270"
GPM
= 88 gpm
r (Radius)
= 122.5'
w (Arc)
= 210"
Gb with Fescue -Grazed Cover
= 96.3 x 118 x 360
3.14 (.9 x 130)2 270
PR = .35iph
PR = 3
The travel lane spacing is 70 percent of the wetted diameter. Under different testing systems, 70 percent
has been proven to be the best figure to use for the most uniform coverage. The travel lane spacing for
this design is 260' x .70 = 182' . The risers will be set 180 feet apart to accommodate for the joints of
PVC pipe. The system should not be operated when wind conditions are 10mph or more. The best time
to run is when winds are less than 5mph.
The maximum precipitation rate of the irrigation equipment is not to exceed application rates stated earlier
in this plan, and to achieve this rate th0raveler should be run at the following speed.

TRAVELER SPEED:
(calculations)
Speed _ 1.605 x Q x 360
d x w arc
S = Traveler Speed
1.605 -- Constant
Q = Gallons Per Minute
d — Application depth
w = Lane spacing
Pulls 1 a - 3a
S = 1.605 x 118 x 360
Pulls 3b
5" x 180 270
= 2.79 fr/min
S = 1.605 x 88 x 360
.5" x 180 210
= 2.69 ff/min
A total of three hydrants will be required on the farm. The longest effective length is 711' and the
shortest is 441'. When the system is first started at the beginning of the travel lane, the cart should be
allowed to remain in a stationary spot for a period of approximately 25 minutes to allow for complete
coverage at the end of the travel lane. This time may have to be adjusted in accordance with the days
conditions. When the soil already has a higher moisture content than normal, then the time should be
decreased. At all times the operator should be present with the machine during these time periods to
prevent any run off or ponding of wastewater. Table 5 gives the times for each travel lane, and 25
minutes has already been added to the time to cover for the total period.
A pump which has a capacity of 118 gpm and can maintain a pressure of 115.78 psi (267.46 feet of head)
will be needed. A diesel power unit with a centrifugal pump is our recommendation for this site. This
gives the customer all of the specifications he needs with the reliability, ease of use, and mobility. The
pump that we recommend is the Berkeley B2EHH. Due to the higher pressure the system will be
operating at, the efficiency of pump drops from approximately 70 % down to about 55 %. This loss in
efficiency will increase the fuel consumption, but the Iower cost of the complete unit out -weighs the
added fuel cost. The operating range for the diesel engine is between 2800 and 3200 rpm. The engine
that will be used in this application is a John Deere 4020D, which has been used in similar applications
and has proven to operate within all of the operators expectations.

There is a f5 feet of elevation on the property, approximately 2% slope.
Approximately 740' of bell and gasketed 4" class 2001PS PVC pipe will be needed for the underground
system supply line. All supply lines will be 4". The hydrants will be constructed out of sch 80 fittings
and class 200 pipe, this is to withstand any high water hammer. The top of the hydrants will be equipped
with 4" ceramic butterfly valves, between two flanges and a 4" aluminum male circle lock adapter on top
of the hydrant. Each eridriser will be equipped with 2" sweep and 2"air relief valve to allow any air in
the line to escape without causing any damage to the line.
The pump shall be attached to the underground mainline with a 15' flex assembly, consisting of 15' of
4" lay flat flex hose and two 4" circle lock fittings. The end that hooks to the pump will have a male
end, so that it can attach to the 4" female on the pumping unit. The end going into the ground -will have
a female end to attach to the male side of a 4" aluminum 40 deg elbow which is locked onto the top of
the hydrant which is made like the field end riser, including male circle lock top, butterfly valve, 2"
sweep, sch 80 pressure fittings, 2" air relief, 2" adjustable pressure relief, and a 0-200 isolated pressure
gauge. A similar gauge will be at the traveler so the operator will, be able to read the pressure at the
pump as well as at the irrigator.
The pipe will be installed with a minimum of 36" of cover over the pipe. This will prevent the pipeline
from being struck by any agricultural equipment. When trenching the PVC pipe all manufacturers
recommendations should be observed. Concrete thrust blocks should be poured at all tees, ells, gate
valves, and end risers in the system. See table 4 for thrust block sizes and see attached specs for thrust
block designs.
At the pump there will be a Berkeley 3" x 4" discharge priming valve. This swing type valve will allow
the operator to shutdown the system without the water draining back through the pump. The back
pressure of the water in the line will operate the valve. There will be a diaphragm valve on the suction
side of the pump to fill the pump and suction line when the operator starts up the system. At startup the
underground line should not be filled any faster than 40 gpm. There is a 4" butterfly valve on the entry
at the ground which will allow the operator to remove the pump from the site after shutdown and the
valve will prevent the water in the line from draining out.

x
TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD:
(calculations)
NOTE: To account fo rhte Total Dynamic Heart the friction loss in the mainline as well
as the traveler hose must be accounted for (see the below calculations)
Fl = [.2083(100)t.ss2( Q 1.852 )( L )1.433
c D 4.86% 100
FI = Friction Loss
Q = Gallons Per Minute
D = Pipe Size
L = Length of Line
c — Pipe Coefficient
Mainline Calculations
Traveler Hose Calculations:
F1 = [.2083(100 )1-&52(1181 ss2)(660 )].433
150 44•86M 100
[5.341.433
= 2.31 psi loss
FI =[.?A83(100)tas2(1181.gn)(850)1.433
150 2..) 100
[67. 661.433
29.30 psi loss
TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAT] FOR THE COMPLETE SYSTEM:
70psi (spk pressure) + 29.30 (traveler hose loss) = 99.30 PSI (traveler pressure)
99.30 x 2.31 =
229.38'
Mainline Loss -
5.34'
Elevation Within Field —
5.00'
Suction Lift =
10.00'
Fitting Loss =
5.00'
5 ;lo Factor =
12.74'
TDH =
267.46'
Pump PSI 257.46/2.31 =
111.45' PSI

APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER
The run time to apply .5" of wastewater is given in Table 5. The length of the travel lane will
determine the length of time required. Another application of wastewater should not be applied until
the Iast amount of wastewater has been used up through Evaptranspiration, (ET). If no rainfall
occurs, that will normally range from three to five days. This may vary depending on the climate.
The total amount of wastewater to be applied to the pastures should not exceed the nutrient (plant
available nitrogen -PAN) requirements of the crop based on soil type. Each application of wastewater
should be limited to a maximum rate per hour and no more than .5" per irrigation cycle. It is our
recommendation that this is the maximum amount per cycle for Bermudagrass-grazed, and small
grain -grazed. During times of excessive rainfall the amount that needs to be applied may be
dramatically increased, due to added water in the lagoon.
Accurate records should be maintained on the operating time for each traveler. The pressure at the
pump, at the traveler, and at the gun should also be recorded to maintain accurate application rates.
Forms for recording data can be found in the North Carolina Certification Training for Operators of
Animal Waste Systems Manual, that each applicant received when they took part in the certification
training.
Pumping should occur as much as possible during the daylight hours. Running at night should be
avoided, when possible. Again it is very important not to run the systems when winds are more than
10 mph. At the beginning of each operation the pressures need to be checked against the parameters
as laid out in this design. If by some chance they do not match up, shutdown the system and make
the proper adjustments. The specifications must be followed exactly to prevent potential runoff and
ponding. Pumping should never occur during rainy periods or when the ground is saturated. The
operator will be held responsible for choosing the proper times to irrigate. Refer to the attached spec
sheet on when to irrigate. The operator should be on site when the system is running.
It is also highly recommended to conduct annual calibrations of your equipment. With the data
recorded at each operation and information provided in this design the operator can take a few easy
steps to ensure that the system is operating as it was originally designed.
PIPE INSTALLATION:
All of the pipe will be bell and gasket Class 200, IPS, PVC plastic pipe and the fittings will be
gasketed as like the ones manufactured by Harco. The hydrants will be made out of sch 80 slip
fittings, with class 200 PVC Pipe. Again as stated earlier, the pipe will have a minimum of 36" of
cover to prevent the pipeline from any damage. Concrete Thrust blocks will be poured at ells, tees,
and end hydrants (See attached material for specifications and design.) The thrust blocks are poured
in place to prevent the line from separating at any of the joints. It is very important that the thrust
blocks be poured in undistrubed earth this will prevent the pressure on the line from moving the
thrust block itself. After the line has been laid it should be covered up and compacted to prevent any
runoff of cover dirt and soft spots above the line.

MAINTENANCE:
There should be no land application of wastewater during freezing temperatures. The pump, the
above ground portion of the discharge pipe and the suction line should be drained daring freezing
temperatures, to avoid ruptures. The risers should be drained to approximately one foot below the
surface during freezing temperatures. Any liquid in the underground pipe should be protected from
freezing. Check all valves, pressure relieves, gauges, and hydrant tops at least two to three times a
year to make sure they are operating properly. Make sure none of these are leaking or have any
malfunctioning parts. The pump should be well maintained and greased properly, (refer to the
operators manual for basic pump maintenance,) The engine must be serviced regularly with oil,
coolant, and lubrication (refer to the engine operators manual for instructions). The traveler also
needs regular maintenance. Inspection of the traveler and all of it's moving parts needs to be made
before each startup. (Refer to the traveler operators manual for proper maintenance.) It is a good
idea to wash the traveler and pump down periodically to reduce corrosion. When the pump is
removed from the system, make sure the butterfly valve on the system is closed to prevent anything
from getting into the pipeline. At every startup check for leaks and make sure the line holds a
constant pressure. 1f a leak is found, shut the system down and do not operate again until it can be
repaired. When any of the equipment is not in use, try to store it out of the direct sunlight, especially
the traveling gun, because the sun can cause damage to the poly pipe over a long period of time.
TABLE 1-FIELD SPECIFICATIONS
)F'IELI3##
I SLP
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
APP
RATE
MAX APP
PER CYC
IRR
ACRES
TRCT 3258
Fid ##1
1 2%
NoA
Corn, Wheat, and Soybeans
0A
1.7
3.5
TRCT 3258
Fld ##2 1 2%
WaB
Bermudagrass and Small Grain
0.6
0.96
5
TRCT 3258
Fld ##3
2 %
NoA
Corn, Wheat, and Soybeans
0.4
1.7
2
Landowner/Operator: Mr_ Lynwood Spell
County: Sampson County

TABLE 2-IRRIGATION LAYOUT
APPLYING IRRIGATION
FIELD #
Hyd#
Trv1er
Speed
PR
Rate
lift
Width
Fff
Lgnth
Wetted
Dia
Nozzle
size
PSI ®
Gun
PSI ®
Reel
Art
Reel
Wetted
Acres
TRGT 3258
Zone 1
a
2.79
0.35
180
711
260
0.812
70
99.30
270
2.94
b
2.79
0.35
I80
601
260
0.8I2
70
99.30
270
2.48
Zane 2
a
2.79
0.35
180
641
260
0.812
70
99.30
270
2.65
Zone 3
a
2.79
0.35
180
581
260
0.812
70
99.30
270
2.40
b
2.69 1
0.38
86
436
245
0.712
70
99.30
210
.86
rOT-AL. 11.33
BRAKE HORSEPOWER
(Calculations)
BHP = Q x TDH
3960 x EFF
118x 267.46
3960 x .55
= 14.49 HP

TABLE 3 - TRAVELING GUN SETTINGS
TRAVELING GUN SETTING
Solid -Set Irrigation
FLOW RATE OF SPRINKLER (gpm)
118
OPERATING PSI AT PUMP
111.45
DESIGN PRECIPITATION RATE
0.35 & 0.38
HOSE LENGTH
850
SPEED COMPENSATION
MECHANICAL
PUMP TYPE
ENGINE
IL HORSE POWER REQ'D
14.49
CONCRETE THRUSTBLOCKS:
(calculations)
90 deg elbow
23 x
150 =
3450/ 1500
= 2.30 sq ft
45 deg elbow
12.4 x
150 =
1860/1500
= 1.24 sq ft
Tee/Dead end
16.2 x
150 =
2430/1500
= 1.62 sq ft
Gate Vlve
16.2 x
150 —
2430/1500
= 1.62 sq ft
Grnd Entry
29.9 x
150 —
4485/1500
= 2.99 sq ft

TABLE 4 - THRUST BLOCK SPECIFICATIONS
LOCATION
THRUST BLOCK AREA (sq/fc)
90 DEG ELBOW
2.30
DEAD END TEE
1.62
TEE
1.62
45 DEG ELBOW
1.24
GATE VALVE
1.62
GROUND ENTRY
2.99
TRAVEL TIME PER PULL:
(calculations)
620' Pull = (520 ,F 25) / 60
2.79
= 247.22 / 60
= 4.12 hrs
TABLE 5 - TIME PERIOD TO APPLY WATER PER LANE:
LANE
LANE LENGTH
HRS
la
620
4.12
lb
510
3.47
2a
550
3.71
2b
490
3.35
3b
351
2.59

VELOCITY IN PVC PIPE:
The manufacturers of PVC pipe recommend that the velocity of the water traveling through the pipe
remain less than or equal to 5 ft/sec. In this design the velocity is 3.01 ft/sec. This is a safe velocity
to operate the system.
VELOCITY:
(calculations)
V = Q x .408
Dz
Q — GPM
V — Velocity
D = Diameter Of Pipe
V _ 118 x .408
42
V = 3.01 Ft/min
*NOTE: The design is based on information obtained from the Owner, Revelle Agri -Products and
Prestage Farms, INC. the design is subject to any changes made in the foal permitting of the site.
a

WASTE UTILIZATION FLAN
----------------------
Producer ------ :LYNWOOD SPELL County:SAMPSON
Name of Farm-: L7" r- NOG FAitrn
Location-----:2935 SASS LAKE RD
ROSEPORO NC 2832B
F°hone---------- : 910- 564-6565
Type Operation-------- -----:WEAN-FEED
Number of Animal ----------- . 6080
Storage Structure ---------- :Anaerobic Lagoon
Method of application ------ :Irrigation
Amount of waste produced per year --------------- 2567 tons/year
Amount of plant available N (PAN) produced/year-: 2918 lbs./year
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
Specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant. nutrients in the animal waste should be use
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the
crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting
nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle.
Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs or the crop to be grown
and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
.3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at more
than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tuns per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or
when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may
in runoff to the surface waters which is not allowed under DWO
regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoild drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and
to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be
applied to a growing crop or applied not more than .30 days
prior, to planting a crap or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to chanoe methods in the futu-re, you need to revise
this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based or, the waste analysis report from
yo'.ir- waste management facility. in some cases you may want to have

Rage 2
plant analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be
applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content
and the crop type. Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the
optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if Carried out, meets the
requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC ::H .0217 adopted by the
Environmental Management Commission.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Yield
Lbs. N
Acres
Lbs. N
Month to
No.
No.
Type
Code
/Acre
/Unit
Used
Apply
3258
1
NoA
D
lie
1.25
3.15
481
MAR-JULY
3258
1
Nog
W
60
2.40
4 3. 5
504
S-APR I L
3258
1
NoA
S
33
4.00
3.5
462
JUNE-OCT
3258
2
WaB
B
4.7
50. 00
3.0
1 175
MAR-OCT
3258
2
WaB
K
N/A
50.00
3.0
250
S--APRIL
3258
.3
NoA
D
110
1.25
2.0
275
MAR-JULY
3258
3
NoA
W
60
2.40
� 2.0
288
5-Ap'RIL
3258
.3
NoA
S
3.3
4.00
2.0
264
JUNE-OCT
Total
21.0
a699
Available
Nitrogen
(includes commercial)
2918
Surplus Or
Deficit
-781
Crop codes: Crop -unit
A=Barley-bu.
B=Bermudagrass (graze) -tons
C=Bermudagrass(hay)-tons
D=Corn (grain)-bu.
E=Corn (s i lage) --tons
F=Cot t on-1 bs. lint
G=Fescue(graze)-tons
H=Fescue (hay) -tons
I=Oats—bu.
J=Rye-bra«
K =Small grain ( graze) -acre
L=Small grain(hay) -acre
M=Sorghum ( grain) -cwt.
W=Wheat-bu.
S=Soybeans-bu.
Z=Bermudagrass (pasture) -tons
Applying the above amount of waste is a big ,job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
runner.

Page
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied.while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require
farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in
bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing, hay and/or
silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they reach a
height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants
are .grazed to a height of four inches. In fields where small grain
etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care should be exercised
not to to let small grain to reach maturity, especially late in
the season (i.e. April or May). Shading may result if small grain
gets too high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermUdagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and
less nitrogen being utilized. rather than cutting small grain for
hay or silage .just before heading as is the normal situation, you
are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the
season, depending on time small grain is planted in the fall„
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September
or early October. Drilling is recommended over broadcasting.
8ermudagrass should be grazed or vowed to a height of about two
inches before drilling for best results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer annuals
under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning may occur in
livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is
recommended.
Acres shown in the tables are considered to be the usable acres
excluding required buffers , filter strips along ditches, odd
areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to eq,4ipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the field listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization
of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provision for periodic
land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production
facility will produce approximately 436 lbs. of plant available
nitrogen per year in the sludge.
If you remove sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately
2189 lbs. of PAN to utilize, assuming you apply this PAN to
hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 lbs. of nitrogen
per acre, you will need 7 acres of land. If you apply the
Sludge to corn at the rate of 112"1 lbs. of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 18 acres of land. Please be aware that these are
only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements
could vary by 25% depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil
types, realistic yields, and application methods.

Page 4
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate
of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding
occurs. This rate is limited by initial. soil moisture content,
soil stri-tcture, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic
solids. The application amount should not exceed the available
water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor
should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen
needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this
plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation
designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to
properly irrigate the acres shown in tables. Failure to apply the
recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the table may
make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing
application rates and amounts.
Tract Field Soil Crop Applic
No. No. Type Rate
(inlhr)
3259 1 NoA CDaw .46
3?Z& 1 Mc A ayeg&5 .�#a
3 ZSa z w-L3 Cd-Guu- ('0
Applic
Am oltnt
(inches)
2.35
1.7o
.96
25$ Z h1a $ a, g .1 o .9 41
Z58 _ NoA Coe .40 Z-35
3a58 ;j_ No A LN AEAT -1-a
37-Sp,_ 3 life A So�LA6 . +0
1.76
1 -7 G
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied_ In many situations the application amount shown cannot be
applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.

Page 5
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. in no instances should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hoer stoma storage or
one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour
storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply
the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to
apply the recommended rates and amounts of, nitrogen shown in the
tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste
an report for, assistance in determining the amount of waste
per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste_
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
C04N HEA7 I 50V3e-AM5 15 o fd Q r eva 6-Art Ro TA 71a vt

Page 6
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of
the waste treatment and storage system or construction of :new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stacked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to the surface waters
of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-
hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District and will be available for review by NCDWU upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: LYNWOOD SPELL
(Please print)
Signature- LDate:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Alan: G. Glenn Clifton
(Ple-a:.se print:)
Affiliation: Prestage Farms, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Address: P 0 Box 438
Clinton NC E8328
5�97 Signature: �. f'.... Date: SF��

Av­
r s flJ.lcwjl• Al is Ti _ . f'� +Y
5{ f
f r S
i �• ' �A {' !� � .�i+�"a�A �ii, 1P x'kif�yr ftK ..�f: '�$„iC_
Y
;bur`
.k T
.. t� �`xt arr -� tt K"� \18'a• pp "r r •,p
A +(
{ ifr'd A
1 Y aye. -4 L'' I •r '.:{ F`�/ `�
r I
r.
t i
t
{ y t
•, r w' fr a 4n t { f +Si,��"�'' }>> A at ,,'?"i {{{a. _ r :. � '�
17yt`'_rl� r� n.;rY 1'Q'341T�>?45Ymii, 4 .i..•
' •;� rr�'rr� t hrt � 1 sr fr� � „
(d x ^p ltta\. r1�4 ara"`s :, tt• �i'tlf. R` ^. !
..Y`al' V�l1.k .fir. .� •

AMJMO�M
I
1
Le
, eb
PAi
I'W
or

FILLD WORKSHEET
-Date:_ 5- 20 - q 7
�ame:r
kddress:,•7Xr
'hone: �• �'„ ^s
ax:
,ontact Person:
OBTAIN IMAPS:
.Cale: ( ) 330 [ ] 660 ( ] other.Loa
''roperty Lines ["yes [ no
,arid Clearing: [ ] now (j future
ELEVATIONS;
iunp to Pivot(or highest rser):�
ivot Point to highest elevation
ithin the pivot s
iction Lift Z '
PUMP LOCATION:
larked with a(X)
:scrip of pump site:
wer for Pump
jym t I 1phse Oc. [) 3phse
diesel
TYPE of IRRIGATION
Center Pvt
ver: Marked with a (P)
I phs [) 3 phs [) Genset
scrip.
)-r Oorions:
SprinklerPackage:-
[X] Traveler
Sixe:a• s
[ Gas [ Turbine
Solid Set
5023 (1 7025 [ ] 8025 [ B gn
7) LOOK FOR E
r wet spots (✓ mouses or wells
o bridges woods or Wtlnd
[kA light lines mainline area
obsmetions joa gas lines
[JJ ditches
8) TYPE OF RISERS
[ ] Brown Style [✓f Std Alu lop
9) WASTE WATER INFO.
Number of Animals
Type of Animals
Acres Required
Cost Share: r) yes [ ] no
Type of crops
Type of crops
Type of crops
Slope of fields %
Soil Type _
[ I Grower [ j Contractor
Contract For
County NRCS
10) TYPICAL IRRIGATION:
Crops: --
Crops:
Crops:
)if Type:
fiches of H2O per yr
vg corn yield
vg cotton yield
PRICNG:
Traveler
Pump
Generator
Labor
Labor
# per foot
ost of Map
NHSC
NOTES: • -LIN _
/ Y

•�46V ' .• .• •,�'•�.r,, � (ram .,,,� �[.—'•„ ....
'''
�• •jp ,U� %..
✓F `
� O A. j
• 1
ky
• � �� 'ram . ;'
,•>tA`f Y n V�. +
let
Op
• �� � ! +�+ �,+� tip s y
• +�l a y ''' _ _ '
. r
'►If
VZ
IK—
YSS ddV� `/•^
� r •aA! • .. T, .. a. � `.:,ram' � . ' Y .
r..

Improved Design Provides Greater Operator Control
Greater control ... more accurate application of both clean and
wastewater. Simpler to operate ... the smooth operation of the six
speed gearbox eliminates
the need for multiple belts
and pulleys while providing
a full range of operating
speeds. Within a high and
low range there are three
speeds for increased preci-
sion and accuracy in con-
trolling application rates.
Knowing and controlling
your application rates have
become crucial wastewater Six speed gearbox
management tools when
trying to adhere to ever increasing regulations. Each model is
available with the standard 5.5 HP Honda engine or the efficient
Pelton Wheel slurry
Pelton Wheel slurry turbine
turbine. The Pelton
Wheel turbine is the
ideal drive system for
applying wastewater
or slurry from holding
areas such as tanks
and/or lagoons. The
Pelton Wheel turbine
can be mechanically
compensated for
accurate applications
or equipped with the
optional Irrigation
Computer -
This improved design
only starts with the drive system. Other enhancements include:
- A constant pressure automatic braking system which
increases tension when the hose is being pulled out but reverts to
lighter tension as the hose is being retrieved.
- A positive action lock down. When engaged, this simple
brake will lock the reel in place when shifting the gearbox to neutral,
as well as secure the reel for transport when desired.
- A miswind sensor. Should a miswind irregularity ever occur,
this sensor will automatically disengage the drive, protecting the
Reel Rain from damage.
• Large selection of models. In an effort to offer customers
the proper system for their irrigation needs, Reel Rain models are
available in 29 different hose size / drive platform configurations.
- - Increased
speed range.
From .5 feet per
minute to 12-5
feet per minute,
you have the abil-
ity to control the
application rate.
With Reel Rain
Irrigation equip-
ment from
AMADAS
INDUSTRIES,
you and your
Dealer receive
Reel Rain Model 1375
special attention from our fully equipped Service Department.
Each Service Technician is trained by the AMADAS staff engineer
who designed your Reel Rain. The 1000 Series offers only 5 of
I
I-
STANDARD
FEATURES
STANDARD
• 6 Speed Gearbox
• P.T.O. Rewind
• Automatic Hose Retrieve
Stop
• Rugged Frame Design
• Turntable
Reel Speed Compensator
• Safety Shielding
• Galvanized Fittings
• Galvanized Gun Cart
• Mechanical Hose Guide
• Three Year Warranty
• Miswind Sensor
many dependable mode
Reel Rain Travelers. Ask
your Dealer to show. you
other models that might
meet your needs. Reel
Rain Travelers are avail-
able in models which will
efficiently irrigate from 35 to
400 acres per week.
061a"HOBBS..
IR RMW1011V SYSTEM
f
Model
Number
Hose Length
Feet
Hose I.D.
Inches
Lane Spacing
Feet
No. of Acres
Covered in'
One Pull
Flow Rate
(G.P.M.)
One Pull, Applying 1"
of Water (Hrs.)
Nelson Gun
and Pressure
Turbine Gas
Turbine Gas
1025
850
2.5
180
3.80
167 181
10-33 10.65
SR100/80 PSI
1030
965
3.0
240
5.84
260 280
10.2 9A
SRISOISO PSI
1033
850
3.3
260
5.68
360 400
7.1 6.4
SR150180 PSI
1325
1250
3.2
240
7.41
266 290
12.6 11.6
SIR 150/80 PSI
1375 1
1100 1
3.6
280
7.78 1
382 418
9.2 8.4 1
SR150/80 PSI
1100 Holland Rd. - P.O. Box 1833 • Sutfolk. VA 23439-1833 '� `_ _ j 1701 Samth Stappey Blvd- • P.Q. Box 3687 Albany, GA 31706
Phone [phone] • Fax t80dt 934-3264 "- "� "�� Phone [phone] • Fax t912)439-9343

DIA.
4' .65'
GPM MA. G.DU4ft-ft. GPM DM,
.7- 75' 1• !'Mam
GPY DIA. GPM D111 flPE1 Ow GPY Wl
GPM OIA
KOK-Z'6f
Y
u3 t43m Y Lis 113m Y
US Wm Y1
213'
tt
2a 91 271T
103 340' 119
MW
752 767
a,
t0A 593 3,73 1j,462A 4a3 15J6 W-i S.D916.3166A21"74223
97
2]3tW 245
115 296' 1 W
266•
tp 260'
t--
204 2W'
20 2m 143
1p Air
224 316•7p
4A
40 t21 MA .� IS3 67A $.M ILO 712 SA621.1 74 E
60 ffi'
/S 236• 66
230'
Im
26>• 120 714
tSl ?1<!' 7S6
7 310
24] >i'
9.0
1!13,6WA 4,7217.0TL7 5A920.1 76.i 936aA W260
64 235'
79 248• 94
260'
,to
777' 136 716'
l46 2w TW
30Q
270 325•
256 354'
OA
171SA 71,4 5.1d t6377A k1222.16p.7 7,7925! 65A24'tl25C270'17t]S
30Y lii
37S
m 235'
274 ]62'
1W 72 2S'
67 266• I.
260'
123
2tl• 143 305'
153 31W 165
M 21Z 33r Z35 346•
260 372•
►A
t6A 77A 5}279A 61A AI Z]166.0 7,752►,966,39
110 7o 266• 62 276' ttt
Y66'
t29
MY Ilia 3"
171 324• "Is
33W 722 344• 2R >SS'
30+ ]60'
6A
17A■1,7 $Ad 21,0 MT 7.072yS 99,3 6>5�,7 90.1 g
4
NOZZLE
DiAYETEA
0.112`
ta,cp,-
0 16a- - c
19.5mm 20.6- 2t Emm 22 1
_
PRESSURE
P51. GPM D7A
GPM DI.
Du
GPM DIA
GPM CIA
GPM DIA
GAf1
K""2'
L5' M3M' Y'
7J5 E13M u L75 Yarn Y LS 01n Y L3 4n
50 74 Z20"
88 225•
IW
230
115 Mr
129 250
Ilia 255"
167 26G•
7.3
466 16.7 67.0
S.56 20.0 fi9,0
6.36 222 70.0
714 26.1 73.0
0.10 2S
60 61 235'
96 240'
110
245'
725 260'
141 271
161 275•
183 280•
4p
4.W ,7.9 70.6
5.96 21.4 i26
6.60 24.5 716
7.74 27.9 77.3
666 3,
iL.&IL
1D4 250••
136 275'
152 290•
177 295'
198 300'
60 94 255'
111 265"
127
275"
145 265'
163 300'
189 305'
211 3TS'
S.0
5-57 20A MA
5.66 24.0 75.7
7.W 27.4 79 F
6.65 31.2 644
9.69 31
90 99 265'
117 275" '
134
285'
154 295'
173 330'
201 315'
224 325'
6.0
6.10 71.1 79.7
1.30 201 31.7
A33 30.0 85.T
9.48 3aA Ed
+06 3c
100 105 270•
124 280"
142
?%'
162 306,
182 320'
212 325'
236 335'
7D
6,59 Z3.7 Win
7,66 26.3 85.0
900 323 90,0
10,2 35:93.0
,1.5 .,
110 110 275'
130 290'
149
305'
17D 315'
191 325'
222 335•
248 345'
60
7A4 25-3 W.9
6.43 303 893
962 346 943
nA 3997,3
u.3 .a
NOZ7iE
0.97'
f 06'
1. t8
+ 26
lltp
Rp
R+10
Rnq INAMEIEA
21A,I.II
74.6-
27amm
30Omm
32.OR
US' Y3M• Y•
VS M3m Y
L-s Y3M Y
L,5 Y -n Y
L3 Y
to
DIA GAY p1A GPM DtA
t If
GPM DIA
1 26_
GPM GIA.
E ]4 1a1" PRESSURE
GPM DIA. OPM DIA_Ky�ml•
245" 130 265' 165 Z85
205 300'
255 32T
300 335' 350 350•• 15
641 mt 75.0
8.32 3D.0 1110
105 37.9 67.0
136 .68 91A
75.9 S7
2W I43 280' ] 82 300
225 315"
275 335'
330 .350' 365 385' ..0
5.45 24.7 Ma
6-09 32.0 6.0
tIA 405 900
13.9 500 95.0
170 61
270' 155 290" 197245
fl135
]3D'
295 350'
5.0
3SS 365' n5 3s0'280"
766
35! 66.4
13a 453
1O,
170
,9A 66.
165 3W' 210 320"
260 340,
315 380'
3s0 30V 445 395•
290. 175 310' 223 330'
275 350'
335 377
405 39W 475 4p560
302 M.a
a]9 ]D2 66.7
iog
,09 791 93.7
IM
,]6 44.7 ,W
61.3
170 6,.] e06
?D6 7a a
300' 185 320' 235 34W
290 360'
315 380'
425 400• 509 415• 70
906 32.5 91.5
114 424 "*1
I49 536 IN
,6a 66.2 IM
22.5 60310'
195 330" 247 350'
305 37W
370 390•
445 430• SM 425' 60
269 3•.4 g5.a
,26 45.3-e0t
I59 573 tW
191 70.6 114
24.0 06'
315' 204 335' 256 360'
32D 3OD'
3d5 400'
486 42W 545 43S' 9.0
10.3 37.0 97
t3-2 46.0 ,03 1
+69 6o.6 III 1
20.9 75 t .19
25.5 9,.7
P 91
GPY 01A
I 1GPY DIA
I GPM DIA
GM1 DIA
I GAY DIA-.
•GPY DIA
i •GPY DIA
RIESSUPE
3r1.•
Y M'
u5 Y lrl.12:1
M 3rv1 Y
Li5Y3m Y
3�•
us MR7[m".L15"
25
3
-
350 370'
410 39D'
470 405'
535 420'
640 43Y
3.5
1.5 52.3 99
t6.9 68, 1600
113
756 92.7 119
30.1105
60
250 340
330
370'
38s 390'
445 aria"
sty a25'
S65 440'
695 4S5'70
+17
27.5 99.I ,23
37.7 nE
270 355'
355
385�
ats 405•
460 425'
555 440'
630 455'
755 475''pU3
55.9 t0]
2fl.7 77! +SSS
80
Z90 370'
310 380'
3W
405
4DU
475
i45 420
475- 435
515 440'
545 455'
590 455"
625 470'
675 470•
715 4S5'
S06 490•
055 504
50
60
t74 62,5 rW
[phone]
226 614 1956
7+B 1N, +105
124
pt
]0.6 1100 13F
337 121 137
3b.0 1�90
39. 112
00
325 J9C'
ia75
475'
500 4a5'
SJ5 a65
660 40D'
755 500'
1 900 52I1'
70
20.5 7.0 ,19
2fi7 96l ln]
11fi
36.a 71 lag
42.5 nlID
340 400
355
4a5
435 1
S25 455
605 475'
j 695 490'
725
79C 510'
945 535'
do
72.0 79+ t2]
2B6 +O7 .iie
1.0
]9.0 +46 ufi
a55 164:20
414)
465aa5545
465
630 485'
50D'
W5 520'
I 905 545'I
113
n3 ua 1.9
ae1+30
i
370 475
165
45C
565 47fl
655 A90'
755 505'
860 525'
f025 S50'
90
233 63.9 +77
]0 3 +09 +.t+70
-�+n OIh (,I IA}. ...,.r-'-..
,..�,
1-._
�...� L...... ..+.r •1 :.. n.7
i.nrin. :deaf
tncl rnn.a:t:..nc
pnrF ... �.. ., .. ,�. ...-�..1..
_u...-....+
�.. .. ......
.. ..... r...r7.ni d:r nm.a nro

BERKELEY PUMPS CURVE 4117
DATE 1-27-89
CTYPE "B" RATING CURVES PAGE 0.51
ENGINE DRIVE SUPERSEDES
2(
10
5
1
o Cur" 4117 Noe ozi I
Dated 9 -1 -W I
c— 1— C.I. PwLn& L-1026 Nooks& L-1026 VARIOUS AVAL
more.: mww C.I. vwLmw K-1802 amwem, M-1802 m& 9" full TAm4.ftr**0.mw&6
L�— — --- �O=Z
I loom
m- MIT m
WTI 2m- aw MAGIV
N A I im
a
NEW%
MZ—�
&==WON
=074 Pro =we,
I-MRW4
won
A "IM, IF. m
scom
-IMF,
n-s-
Jim
.ME=
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
CAP$AXrV W IL& QALL� M UAWIM
C-8610 &-- T-1355 sw..ow C-8576 now 4-17-80 0. 8-18-80 mcoaKzom
10"
w
m:
coot ok"" C.I. PmLahL L-3482 ummiew L-3482 WRIOU1111 ar-a— comes
ammewt mi C.I. PwLm& W-5059 sk.L&L M-6915 niL 10-7/16" full
Hairf rm 20
PSI "go
Mom
MOM
00
==mom
r rat
9wo,
17
gVE441ow.
Lvam�
Buono
Mm��"
mm
mmaAm!
eri�ieesa�;�wi,
%
1�4i
■■■�
mom
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
cApAcrry c" U.& QAuAw Pm momm
C-8573 a-- T-3753 C-8513 D.r 7-31-79 . 12-S-S0 fA00[1BZE0HH

MANUFACTUREWS CERTIFICATION
CASKET — JOINT
PR200, PR160s PR125 and PR100 PVC PIPE 40
This la to ainVy tha f V19 010duW9 herein referred to and manufactured by NORTH AMERICAN PIPE CORPORATION
meet or exoeed ttm requirarrwnts of the PerWmrrt standWds and regulating agencies as iadl4afed:
MATERIALS —PVC malWaft used in pFMW, PR16D. Pft125, and PR100 pipe manufactured by
NORTH AMERICAN PIPE CORPORATIOR comply with Age Standard D-1784 and are approved by National
Sanitation Foundatim for potable water use. P"rpe is trade from a virgin P%rC cvntpou nd with a calf ciassgIcalion of
12454-8; the estatAsned hydre E;tatit deli s CHDBD m ing is 4,000 psi at 73AwF. {23°C� TM Standard
Thermoplastic Pipe Material Designation code is PVC 1120_
PIPE —Physical dmensions and tolemr►ce_9 of PR200, PR160. PR125 and PF1100 pipe, manufactured by
NORTH AMERICAN PIPE CORMRATION, are within the requirements of ASTM Standard D-2241, i'roduct
Standard PS-22-70 and the National Sanitation Foundation Standard 14. Belled -end PFnW, Piii60, PR125, and
P8100 pipe made for gasket Joints by NCMTH AMERICAN PIPF CORPORATION, meats the above specstfications
including ASTM D-3139. White is the standard color with blue optional.
GASKETS AN D LU BRI CANTS -- Gaskets and LuWvants are compatible with the plastic
matettal in NORTH AMERICAN PIPE CORPORATION pips and in combination with them will not adversely affect
"Potadble reties of Ups water. Each ga" is frulory irataded In belt-en4 tripe. Gaskets and joints meetAil
regWrements for performar4e a* epeoitiad in ASTM D-3139 and F-4T7. All NORTH AMERICAN PIPE CORPORA-
TION gaskets arefactory ry installed and have a steel reinforarrg dog. (Locked -in)
I= I TT I N GS — Gaskated fittings, supplied by NORTH AMERICAN PIPE CORPORATION, meet the require-
ments or ASTM Standards, D-3139. Sale fittings are approved by the NSiionai Sanitation Foundation for potable
crater enG have woridnp pressures 0 200 PSI at 73.4F Unless othaiWse rioted
MARKING -- PR200, PR1 ft PR725, and PR100 pipe, are marked as prescribed In ASTM Standard
D-2241 i.e. nominal pipe siz* type of piasttc pipe nrateria pliers itmension ratio pressure rafirt% A51M specdfreation
designation number, rnanufactuWz name and coda, and the Nstlonal Sanitation Foundation s" for potable Water,
I N PLAINT TES►TI NG --- Per ASTM D-2241:
1.Pipeshallbehomogeneous through+autandtreefromvisiblecracks,halo, foreign indLmAoM and other defocts.
2. Wall Thk*ness, ChAslde 01ameter, and Ovefiiy - Once per hour. Method- ASTM €?-2122.
3.. WICK EXJRST - Every eight hours Methoct ASTM D-1599.
4. FLATTENING - Every eight hours. Method: ASTIM 0-2241 6.5.
5. IMPACT- Every eight hours Method ASTM 0-2444.
S. EXTRUSION Qt1ALTTY- Every eight toours. Methoit ASTM a-2152
7. SUSTAINED PRESSURE - Twice per year. Method: ASTM 1}1 Sea
0
Page

IPS CLASSES -- PVC GASKET PIPE
ASTM M2241
(Quant>ity figured on 20 ft. lengths
PR 100
iSDR 41
ac#aB
WokjM
NOW
surw m
Tn
Sirs
DLVWCW
WA1
PO; Fao1
IBe1d9
Tnicidaa0
Piecbs
2%"
ZSTS
076
A02
19s
12
44,64c3
3"
3 Sa(}
"5
SW
12-S
12
i
9b 000
d"
4,a0b
IN
two
76
ix
912
i$ 4
6"
&6m
25
12628
392
7AQ
.161
2.175
14
4014
.210
azsi
24
4024
242
4,W
18
24918
4020
15
2015
1D'
VO.M4
292
5.759
12
t2
144
12"
12-M
s 10
8.134
8
98
1 a6a
4
204
s
209
PR 126 SSA 3Z
Oetfa
W�.14
i i' kxm
aalt8as
z"acaaa
siaB
DERawter
wan
Per Foot
&mdSe
Triie=mcw
P*Das
P"
2-WS
M
.346
m
12
SlDa
B2.18a
2 iFr"
2.875
.098
_ .500
186
12
21M
44,64O
3"
3.SDO
.108
.TV
125
12
1.500
30.6w
4"
4�5W
.138
1.246
76
12
912
12,240
6"
MO
28
12023
582
7,840
.203
2.720
14
4014
.2645
4.514
24
4024
242
4, M
18
2016
20
4022
16
20i5
1G"
12"
fQ.TvO
t275t3
390
36t2
7.225
10.182
12
12
144
2,880
1,D60
i
4
204
S
�
S
2@3
RR 160
SOR 26
OWi ide
WaiBM
Pin=
WAU ies
TnkidOad
5iza
Ukkoatw
wad
Per Fact
ewxft
TFUcl
piece" e
1 ti"
1.9w
274
24
4.8T2
8i.444
2MS
.091
.4.28
2%
12
%w$
82+1BO
214"
2.m
.1ia
827
105
12
22w
44.840
3"
3-sm
_ w
a3a
1:25
12
1,sm
30
4"
4.i54O
179
1.549
76
28
12
12&29
s12
39?
18.240
-7 0w
6"
S625
256
3.371 �
14
I 8"
OL-625
332
5.731
?:
4024
242
4iz
j
19
Palo
1
20
ac"
15
9015
is
14.7a0
_413
$_9d0
12
12
144
i 2-
12.7w
.420
12 621
9
BOB
98
1,860
4
204
Page 4 ti* &flora 4Ots also ap* cv cYWas 315 WWaFM lb* Wus' Thkk and AWOUS Per FOW

URGE DIAMETER IRON -PIPE STANDARD G. D. PVC PIPE
• NAPM is expsrugrig Ns One of IPS O.D PVC pipes 0 Backed by HAPM experience in largo diameter
to 14 1 V, & 18'. - PVC supply Ones. f0MG mOnr., erigation *-sterna
• NAPGO PVC Pressure Pipes with press rating of • The deep be Ile of the NAPCO pipe joint with tadce6
200 PSI (3DR21k 160 PSl (SDR2% 126 PSI (SDR in gaskets provide unmatched perfprwKxk proven
32-6) and 100 PSI (SDR 41 � in years of large diwaa r pipe service.
• N.S.F listed compound and pipe for potable water
application& IPS CLASSES - PVC GASKET PIPE
ASTM D-2241
(Quantity figured on 20 tt. lengths)
I.P.S. O.D. PVC PIPE
SDR 21
Size
Outside
Diameter
Wadi
Weight
Per Fbot
Feet Per
8uadle
Feet Per
Tn ckload
14"
14.000
.067
18.770
12ir
18"
'I8.000
.762
24.W6
120', 80', 60', & 40';!
1,200'
16"
18.000
.867
31.424
120', 80'. 60'. & 40'
1,000,
SDR 26
size
Outside
Diameter
Wall
Weight
Per Foot
Feet Per
Bundle
Feet P8r
Trvcldoad
14"
14.000
AM
15.315
120,
1 "w.
16"
MOOD
.615
20.248
120', 80', 60', & 40'
1,000,
18"
18.000
.693
25.831
120', 8W, 60', & 40
1,000'
SDR 32.5
Site
Outside
Diameler
Vlfati
Weight
Per Four
Feet Per
Bundle
Feet Per
TnickJoad
14"
14.000
.431
12.344
Im.
1.440'
1
15.000
.492
16.335
120'. 80', W, & 40'
1.000'
18"
18.000
.554
20.®92
120', 80', 60', & 40'
1,000,
SDR 41
Size
Outside
l?I,smeter
Wall
weight
Per Foot
Fbet Per
Bundle
Feet Per
Truddoad
14"
14.000
.341
9.857
120'
1,440'
16"
16-WO
.390
13-03B
120', 801, 60`, & 40'
1,D00'
t 8"
18.000
.439
16.510
120', 80', 60', 8 a 0, i
1,000'
Paw a

4" EL . X 4" MCL ALUMINUM ADPT
4" CERAMIC BUTTERFLY VALVE
4" SCH 80 PVC FLANGE
4" 200 CLASS PVC PIPE
91
SCH 80 4X4X4 PVC TEE (SXSXS)

DAVID D. DAMS and ASSOCIATES
H
Safe Filling Rates .For Mainline Pipe
It is very important when filling an empty or near empty mainline not to.
exceed velocities of 0.5 to 1.0 feet per second. Filling a mainline
faster than 1.0 fps may not allow the air in the pipe to be properly
evacuated. Therefore the following chart indicates the approximate
maximum f';11 rate (GPM) for most PVC, AC and ductile iron pipe lines.
Nominal
Maximum
Diameter-
Fill Rate -
Inches
(gpm)
2
11
21
15
3
24
4
40
6
8a
8
150
10
250
12
350
14
475
16
620
18
780
20
980
24
1400
Pump Stations should be selected that will allow the trill rate to be
adjusted accordingly. The fill rate can be increased at a rate of
one (1) gpm every two or three seconds. This amounts to an average
increase of 30 gpm every minute during a refill operation.
It is necessary to use a "refill procedure" anytime a mainline has
drained down by 10% 04 its volume capacity.
0

12-91
FIGURE 3: Coefficient of Flow
Pipe C-Value
Old Steel 100
Aluminum with couplers 120
Cement Asbestos 140
Plastic 150
As you can see, this formula is quite complicated. Figure 4 is a chart showing pressure losses and
velocity for various pipe sizes at various gallonages (NOTE: Chart is for class 160 PVC with a C Value
Of 150).
EXAMPLE:
Pipe = PVC (Class 160)
Size = 10"
GPM = 1000 GPM
Length of Mainline = 1300'
From the chart, we find the PSI loss per 100' = .21 x 1300' = 2.73 PSI over 1300' of run
100
Head = 2.73 x 2.31 = 6.28' of head over 1300' of run
Velocity M = 4.15 ftlsecond
We can use the chart along with the conversion factors list on Figure 4 to determine friction loss
for steel, aluminum and asbestos cement.
EXAMPLE:
Pipe = Steel
Size = 10"
GPM = 1000
Length = 1300'
Friction loss in 1300' PVC
Factor for steel
Friction loss for 1300' of steel
= 2.73 PSI = 6.30' head
x2.12 x2.12
= 5.78 PSI or 13.36' head
Velocity M = 4.157sec. (same as PVC in previous example)
A RainBird slide rule makes this determination very rapidly without need for calculation.
After obtaining the friction loss per 100 foot of pipe and multiplying this by the feet of pipe divid-
ed by 100, the total pipeline friction loss is known and can be used in the total head determina-
tion as well as compared economically for proper pipe size.
You may incur instances where either the chart in Figure 4 or the RainBird slide rule cannot
be used. it will then be necessary to calculate the friction loss and velocity. To do this, use the
formula in Figure 5.
2-8

12-91
MAINLINE REQUIREMENTS'
The connecting link between the pump and the irrigation system is the mainline. Mainline material
is normally steel, aluminum with couplers, cement asbestos or plastic. Sizes can range from 5" to 48''
Plus. The following information may be used as a guide. Please consult with manufacturer for specific
design and installation information.
Generally with center pivot, a water source at the pivot is most convenient. When Water is unavail-
able at the pivot, a mainline pipe is often used to connect the pivot to the water supply. To avoid in-
terference with farm operations and drive unit crossing, the mainline is generally buried.
The proper size of mainline is a decision of economics. Whenever the yearly cost of owning a larger
pipe size is greater than the yearly pumping cost for pumping through the next smaller pipe size; then
one should use the smaller size pipe. A good rule of thumb would be not to exceed a velocity of water
in the pipe of five (5) feet per second. Water velocity in feet per second in a pipe can be determined
by the following formula:
Mainline Water Velocity
V = (0.408) (GPM)
D2
Where V = velocity in feet per second, GPM = gallons per minute, and D = inside diameter of circular
conduit in inches'.
Pipe thickness or class should be selected to handle the highest pressures likely to be encountered.
Because of the variable pressure operation of the corner system, the mainline pipe should be designed
to operate at a pressure of 30-40 PSI greater than the selected pivot pressure. The selection of flat
Pump curves will be helpful in reducing the pressure fluctuations with the corner system.
FRICTION LOSS IN PIPE
Water flowing in a pipeline is always accompanied by a loss of pressure due to friction. The
degree or amount of loss depends on the smoothness of the inside of the pipe wails, the
diameter of the pipe, the velocity, the quantity of water flowing in the pipe.
Friction factors of pipe are determined by experiments. Every type of material pipe is made
from (steel, PVC, etc.) has different friction loss characteristics.
The Hazen and Williams formula is the basis for many friction loss calculations. Friction
loss (F) is in units of "feet per 100 foot of pipe." Dividing by 2.31, friction loss is converted to
"PSI per 100 foot of pipe."
1.85
F
.2083(1A0) Q1.85
C
04.8655
Where:
C' = friction factor for various pipes (Figure 3)
Q = GPM of flow
D = pipe diameter in inches
F = feet of head per 100 foot of pipe
'Irrigation Short Course 1976 'Coefficient of Flow
Bob Mulliner
Irrigation Consultant
Hastings, Nebraska
2-7

Water Hammer
Size A V Q Q Water Hammer
sq.ft_ _ft./sec. C.F.S. _ G.P.M. PSI-1.000'-1sec.
2" 0.0262 5 0.131 59 350
4" 0.0941 5 0.471 211 350
6" 0.2039 5 1.020 457 350
8" 0.3457 5 1.729 774 350
10" 0.5372 5 2.686 1.203 350
12" 0.7556 5 3.778 1,693 350.
15" 1.1547 5 5.773 2,586 350
where: P = Pressure Rise (PSI) above static pressure
V = Velocity (ft./sec.
L = Length of pipe ahead of the valve causing the hammer (ft.)
T = Time required to close the valve (sec.)
P = 0.070 VL/T
P = 0.070 5(l .000)/1
P = 350 psi above static pressure
1
Water Hammer vs. Velocity
izsg ft V t/sec. 0 c s Q g= Water a e
6" 0.2039 l
0.2039
91
70
2
0.4078
183
140
3
0.6117
274
210
4
0.8156
365
280
5
1.0195
457
350
6
1.2234
548
420
7
1.4273
639
490
8
1.6312
73I
560
9
1.8351
822
630
10
2.0390
913
700
7

INSTALLATION
Table 4. I)ESCFlrnon (IF F.N"DRIE.NT MATERIAL CLAS.WICATitlN(
4,biamond Agricultural PVC Pipe should be assembled and
installed with uniform and continuous support from a firm
base in accordance with the installation procedures provided
in ASTM D2321, and the Installation Guide for PVC Water
Pipe (a "pocket -sized" edition is available from your
representative or from Diamond Plastics Corporation.)
Embedment materials are to be in accordance with soil
classifications Iisted under Unified Soil Classification
System, ASTM D2487 and ASTM D2489.
Te assemble, clean mating surfaces of the bell, spigot, and
gasket. Apply gasket lubricant (furnished by Diamond
Plastics Corporation) to the entire spigot end up to the
reference mark. Also, apply lubricant to the contact surface
of the gasket.
With the pipe in straight alignment, push the spigot into
the bell up to the insertion line. If a pry bar is used to
apply force, the pipe should be protected by placing a board
between the bar and the pipe.
If normal fotrce does not complete the joint, disassemble the
joint and examine the parts to make certian they are free of
obstructions. Visually inspect the completed joint to insure
the gasket has not been dislodged.
Table 5.
APPROXIMATE GUIDE FOR ESTIMATED RANGE OF DEGREE
OF C:ONIPA[TIO%, VERSES EMBEDMENT CLASS AND METHOD
OF PLACEMENT AS PERCEST OF STANDARD PROCTOR
DENSITY OR RELATIVE DENSITY"
FOR GRANULAR MATERIALS IN PARENTHESIS**
CLASS OF EMBEDMENT
1
11
IIt
IV
MWAd r..d
VArER1AL DESCRIPrIM-4
Gr>..j.
Sad.4G..d
►Slsad • Cnw
F—Grar.
NI1a'I2b
Suds-C1nr
Sab
sod.
opumwo tlw.atue comm FIW
9.12
9.19
Iwwt x or dry aequ
sal calwAuLiuoa xtrow
4 or PrWUr 11tr aaf.p 1 !?Inlay Ra11r
co -purl by P—C. Wva
9S-1p0
95-100
9S-IM
96100
a ra UM=
(7S_I(M
tm (IM
I—)br parrapk
IIif93
WL"
scl S"
rdkMl.e
t66751
0610
Cmlmadalc by =WM.O.
1095
HEM
166751
1661Ll11
Had pthm
6DR0
IA441I1
Head rmp
6L11t13
C4%P
1
tali
(SOfd31
O—P
60w
f&W
66110
0675
(46601
t3(s-H1l
. Rdxrtr r dcawy O OO,ca m parcn omi,
SOIL
SOIL
OCKRIMON OF -
CLASS
TV"
MATERIAL CLASSIFTCAl7O.%
cu. I S.J.•
M—dwt.r w W. p-1. o.a.alL IN r I Ir er.r. 1* *. y1 —1 aan. r•
ekd.l .euh h -•*d .T--a+ rl.,rra..re 1 . r, J d n iL �. .
Claw lI S.W.
aw
well-S;4d.d P—ch t d pw.t ..d.,a..ra ldr w a. Irn Y.4 w awrc ■
e..■rkL,c..an�«ti+arL.e. Il.e r. v5t a.,----.. ta. �u.r.,e
t?
Pourtr pail S r a d ra..t "W a11,.rM[l I.t w .r, E.e, ar.(..e . .(
*cr 4 . . M_ a — ea4 r..a>tI w !rw !iIl ..atie
C—
Sw
Wel. paid r.W ary pwrll.—dk, hhh, w .. t..l. 14— .Lu. M14 d n...e
rran� yea. K. d .tee 14 r. ('k_
sr
Ib+try pold ..b dd F-0. +.'.rt t dr a.. I..n 1*+• t1.1 !uV wl ..nr
fi.ee.n. Isq. Mw. a a..e V+.e d1.. W14
Claw lit S.rk• ••
[iA
S.Iry pweK Pa'"1 a..J ab w..uera .tat w .w.e d aar.r tr�..r rarael.r Iw
H. a r.r.r, M.r r. r.e .n.,.ed .. K.:11n .«.r
SM
S.hy w.Ma_p....-.
INA- %- .la{ -I
rC
Cl"
..e.r. tAe,r .wa +rK ",teat w rt. 'XIp ..,..
Clau IV Swl.
ML
h.a.Iaw.r Ills .ew Ie.r .+K r ri fLw...4, I..ry.l lr,*
5dlf. «Ie... S/a w.a.ee Pr•c. fr.. A.1 ..r.r.
a
I.wT: dw. d h...,e.►w Iir..... p�ra..I... ..I .1......4..t....
ka. ctar. L I-d Iw 4K .r 1r... .tlr'i .e ares P•-'•� �. to ..r.r
MH
Ial.rlaw. dl� wrta+s,r..w a..r.waw..
lrwla pew r. SOG.
cm
1-1l d"I 41d ho sin..... t. IU, t."W In.r rra.er dwe Mel V K r
alwe l�•r iia. �sr+.
Elul v S..k
rl Elalel.. .,k.....{r ..ti •test ed W Il.tre. E.,e.I tr.. a•: w k..
IH i*I.we elan d ea l..n ul .t.p rw,..dr. Laryd 1.." per+ d—
pr reel .- and .0— la(hh -I— a.d.
• Sail. a.c .. a ford .. ASiM U Ia17...cegl (r C1a.a t a,..o.Y ."a► ...Lrf..n1 M A.erat Il :•. I
• • In aetae„r..a ASiM U I+147. I... �4 pa..
••• !a a. d-cr ..S ASTM U 2117. N.I..+h Yi .e 124F "—F %w :141 — 1,11 .. a Ae,l.wlrlr
.Ia.ulicu..M ,h. n eM,f rhwar.ern,r (0.10 a-.J C7*w III.
The haunching area is most important to the support of
PVC pipe. For good support. the haunching area should be
compacted to the densities given in the Long Term
Deflection Chart.
Figure 2.
!.let....,.
i
-------------��.
yaa4
srL.r•tt
.star.¢
I
•• TNI ubk ICftr{ U an IPPM%1`Z`W ruldi dermal ire'ripc Planar cll t,LKS A amcd am—stl r]fM,ua
ds methoof sad t:01uot4dxl M dlllncw Clan" of "I. The Labk n awmile,d Id Pw wk [u'l""Q 2 d 0
h. rern:. ArROW dnagn aaiva Srmld be dereb+pcd by Lew engino T (Of fl'«Irc
tplt 2114wa1w m( Va ronlrn.
3

THAUSTBLOCKS3
12-01
Thrust blocking prevents main line from moving when the pressure load is applied. In ef-
fect, the thrust block transfers the load from the pipe to a wider load bearing surface. Thrust
blocks are required where fittings are used to change the direction (i.e., at all ties, elbows, wyes,
caps, valves, hydrants and reducers) of the pipeline. The thrust backing must be formed against
a solid trench wall and these fitting areas must be excavated by hand because mechanical
equipment will damage the bearing surface of the trench wall.
The size and type of thrust block depends on pipe size, line pressure, type of fitting, degree
of bend and type of soil. In most cases, the size and type of thrust block will be determined by
the engineer. Thrust block size may be calculated by the procedures shown:
STEP 1. Multiply the pipe pressure by the appropriate value shown in the following table to get pounds
thrust per psi working pressure.
Pipe Line
Dead End
or Tee
901,
Elbow
450
Elbow
22% °
Elbow
1 V2 "
2.94
4.16
2.25
1.15
2
4.56
6.45
3.50
1.78
21/2 "
6.65
9.40
5.10
2.60
3 ''
9.80
13.9
7.51
3.82
31h"
12.8
18.1
9.81
4.99
4
16.2
23.0 .
12.4
6.31
5
24.7
35.0
18.9
9.63
6
34.8
49.2
26.7
13.6
8
59.0
83.5
45.2
23.0
10
91.5
130.0
70.0
35.8
12
129.0
182.0
98.5
50.3
STEP 2. Determine the bearing strength of the soil from the table below:
Soils and Safe Bearing Loads Lbs. Sq. Ft.
Sound Shale 16,000
Cemented Gravel and Sand
difficult to pick 4,000
Coarse and fine compact Sand 3,000
Medium Clay - Can be spaded 2,000
Soft Clay 1,000
Muck 0
STEP 3. Divide the total thrust obtained in Step 1 by the bearing strength of the soil; this gives
the square feet of area needed.
3Certain Teed and Installation
Code 40-22-16H
511175
2-15

CONSTRUCTION OF THRUST BLOCKS
Thrust blocks are anchors placed between pipe or fittings and the solid trench wail. They
can be constructed from available lumber if braced properly.
However, the recommended blocking is concrete which is calculated to have a compres-
sion strength of 2,000 pounds per square inch. The mixture is one part cement, two parts washed
sand and five parts gravel.
Thrust blocks should be constructed so the bearing surface is in direct line with the major
force created by the pipe or fitting. See diagram. The earth bearing surface should be undis-
turbed. Only the simplest of forms is required. Typical thrust block installations are shown In
Figure 8.
FIGURE 8
/I
2-16

Animal Waste Management Systems
r:.wa a+. aria.
Stag anttlat s+o.�.. of ttttpuw �,p �►
emu" atgwa rot .aft dlar.attt.ratt
Evskafttam or
•ems• P" *VOL
aw tlQMraO M, I a ,
9t011101P of tl N VfiM IN tsars of OPPOCZdan
jFr"-aM Ain 251—.
241tmr stmmj
r IS
Ota tap0at M tsast 1 *M Pa► VW. W
� motes Mutt M or weM , - - I wR
. +OYnt�a7 f I rmraM VAHa4lutaiff.
Yaa
4 0» a9P ��hlaR tha tprya[ `
gtvarg tr,rvt�t 30 170 Nct Irriggte Y11s PiFttsrrfa6ls t.aopstt
Oe � P rsta b tsaP nt an
wpm? i
Yes
to we WMM
saftma 0 Cr nett
ISO taeraq Ir
Fig. 5.1. Nutrient management and irrigation scbeduling decision -making fkw Bart.
Basic Soil -Water Relationships
Before attempting to measure or estimate soil -water content, you should
understand some basic soil -water relationships. Important terms you should be
fA-J
Neon Cs.ofi"a SLOW Unitxrsiry

•
Chapter ): Proper Application of -Liquid Animal Waste --Type A
Table 5-4- Use of the checkbook method for irritation schedulint {iWcizh location).
PAW ' in
Water Additions
Water Losses
soil
Date
at start of
Daily itainAll Irrigation (Drainage)
at the end of the day
Storage
Comments
day
PET
inches % of
inches
inches % of PAW
inches
PAW
5-01
-
_
Don'c know initial
conditions at this time
5-02
5-03
- 15 0.1
1.40 100
0.00
Am=e FC reached at
end of day after rain
5-04
1.40 100
0.16 -
1.24 89
0.16
5-05
1.24 89
0.16
1.08 77
0.32
5-06
I-02 77
U6 - -
0.92 66
0.49
5-07
0-92 66
0.16 - -
0-76 54
am
OK to ir4are
5438
096 S4
0.16 - 0.64
1-24 89
0.I6
Irrigated 0.64 inc$es
5.09
114 89
0.16 -
1.08 77
0.32
5-10
1.08 77
016 0:.75 - 0-27
1.40 too
am
Rain =omded storage
so had 0.27 inch of
drainage or seepage
5-11
1.40
100
0.16 -
1.24
89
0.16
5-12
1-24
89
0.16 - -
1.08
77
0.32
5.13
1.08
77
0.16 -
0.92
66
0-48
!..goon marker
indicares need to
irrigate
5-14
0-92
66
0.16 - 0.48
1.24
89
0.16
Irrigated storage u
start of day (0.48 in)
5-I5
1.24
89
0.16 -
1.08
77
0.32
5-16
1.08
77
0.16 0.11
1.14
81
0.26
5-17
1.14
81
0.16
0.99
70
0.42
5-I8
0.99
70
0.16 -
0.92
59
058
Would like to iniszw
5-19
0.82
58
0.16 050
1.16
83
0.24
Irrigated 05 inch
5-20
1.16
83
0.16 0.63 0-23
1.40
100
0.00
Bain eueeded Storage
so land 0.13 incases of
drainage or seepage
5-21
1.40
100
0.16 -
114
89
0.16
5-22
114
89
0.16 - -
1.09
77
032
5-23
1.09
77
0.16 -
0.92
66
0.49
5-24
0.92
66
0.16 0.08
0.94
60
036
Lagoon marker
indicates cued to '
irrigate
5-25
0.84
60
0.16 - 036
1.24
89
0-16
Irrigated 056 inches
5-26
1.24
89
'0.16 - -
1.08
77
032
5-27
1-09
77
0.16 -
0.92
66
0.48
5-28
0.92
66
0.16 132 0.68
1.40
100
0.00
Rain w/0.68 in
drainage
5.29
1.40
100
0.16
1.24
89
0.16
5-30
1.24
89
0.16
1.08
77
032
5-31
1.08
77
0.16 -
0.92
66
0.48
lagoon marker
indite need to
irri to
$.sod on a mnrtmum PlIM available w2wr Come= of the ezamFir'Cell Of 1.4 usches
Sail swrate at end of day is amount Of plant available water depleted- It is computed as:
Soil Srortre rend cfday) - PA R7hun ofdar) + PET- roar" -irrigation
+ drainer
3A-IA
North Gralin. Coaper-arsix F.r.,.'inrs Service

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates
change over time as equipment gets older and components wear. In particular,
pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use,
nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the
design will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the
application uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged
intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating pressure. Operating
below design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter and application
uniformity.
For' the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to
ensure proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every
three years is recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at
several locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain gauges work best because
they already have a graduated scale from which to read the application amount
without having to perform additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets,
jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used provided
the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly
throughout the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling
guns, sprinklers should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction
of pull. Set out collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both
sides of the gun cart. You should compute the average application rate for all
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation between containers
of more than 30 percent is cause for concern. You should contact your irrigation
dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
•Reprinted for Cei ficarion Training for Operations of Anima! Waste Management Systems MamW

Held Calibration Procedures for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
HARD ROSE AND CABLE TOW TRAVELER EMGATiON SYSTEMS
R.O. Evans J.C. Barker I.T. Smith R.E. Sheffield
Land application equipment used on animal production farms must be field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables according to State Rules that
went into effect September 1, 1996. Technical Specialist certifying waste management plans
after September 1, .1996 must also certify that operators have been provided calibration and
adjustment guidance for all land application equipment The rules apply to irrigation systems
as well as all other types of liquid, slurry, or solid application equipment.
Information presented in manufacturers charts are based on average operating conditions for
relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates change over time as
equipment ages and components wear. As a result, equipment should be field calibrated on a
regular basis to ensure that application rates and uniformity are consistent with values used
during the system design and given in manufacturers specifications. Field calibration involves
collection and measurement of the material being applied at several locations in the
application area. This publication contains step by step guidelines for field calibration of hard
hose and cable tow traveler irrigation systems.
General Guidelines
Operating an irrigation system differenfly than assumed in the design will alter the
application rate, uniformity of coverage, and subsequently the application uniformity.
Operating with excessive pressure results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift, and
accelerates wear of the sprinkler nozzle. Pump wear tends to reduce operating pressure and
flow. With continued use, nozzle wear results in an increase in the nozzle opening which will
increase the discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter. Clogging of nozzles or
crystallization of mainlines can result in pressure increase and reduced flow. Plugged intal=
will reduce operating pressure. An operating pressure below design pressure greatly reduces
the coverage diameter and application uniformity. Field calibration helps ensure that nutrients
from animal.waste are applied uniformly and at proper rates.
The calibration of a hard hose or cable tow system involves setting out collection containers,
operating the system, measuring the amount of wastewater collected in each container, then
computing the average application volume and application uniformity.
An in -line flow meter installed in the main irrigation line provides a good "estimate" of the
total volume pumped from the lagoon during each irrigation cycle. 'The average application
depth can be determined by dividing the pumped volume by the application area. The
average application depth is computed from the formula:
Average application depth (inches) =
Volume Pumped (gallons)
27,154 (gal/ac-in) X Application area (acres)

The average application depth is the average amount applied throughout the field.
Unfortunately, sprinklers do not apply the same depth of water throughout their wetted
diameter. Under normal operating conditions, application depth decreases towards the outer
perimeter of the wetted diameter. Big gun sprinkler systems typically have overlap based on
a design sprinkler spacing of 70 to 80 percent of the wetted sprinkler diameter to compensate
for the declining application along the outer perimeter. When operated at the design pressure,
this overlap results in acceptable application uniformity. But, when operated improperly, well
designed systems will not provide acceptable application uniformity_ For example, if the
pressure is too low, the application depth will be several times higher near the center of
sprinkler and water will not be thrown as far from the sprinkler as indicated in manufacturers
charts. Even through the average application depth may be acceptable, some areas receive
excessively high application while others receive no application at all. When applying
wastewater high in nutrients, it is important to determine the application uniformity.
Collection containers distributed throughout the application area must be used to evaluate
application uniformity.
Many types of containers can be used to collect flow and determine the application
uniformity. Standard rain gauges work best and are recommended because they already have
a graduated scale from which to read the application depth without having to perform
mathematical conversions.
Pans, plastic buckets, jars, or anything with a uniform opening and cross section can be used
provided the container is deep enough to prevent splash (at least 4 inches deep), excessive
evaporation, and the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled container for
measuring. All containers should be the same size and shape to simplify application depth
computations.
All collection containers should be set up at the same height relative to the height of
sprinkler discharge elevation (nozzle). Normally, the top of each container should be no
more than 36 inches above the ground. Collectors should be located so that there is no
interference from the crop. The crop canopy should be trimmed to preclude interference or
splash into the collection container.
Calibration should be performed during periods of low evaporation. Best times are before 10
am or after 4 pm on days with light wind (less than 5 NTH). On cool, cloudy days the
calibration can be performed anytime during the day when wind velocity is low.
The volume collected during calibration should be read soon after the sprinkler gun cart has
moved one wetted radius past the collection gauges to minims evaporation from the rain
gauge. Where a procedure must be performed more than once, containers should be read and
values recorded immediately after each set up.
Calibration set-up for Hard Hose and Cable Tow Traveling Guns
Hard hose and cable tow traveling guns are calibrated by placing a row (=sect) of
collection containers or gauges perpendicular to the direction of travel, Figure 1. The outer
2

IRRIGATION SYSTEM CALIBRATION DATA SHEET FOR
•
HARD HOSE TRAVELER .IRRIGATION SYSTEM
DATE: Land Owner
Farm No.
a_
Manufacturers Specifications: Gun Model
Type
Nozzle Dia. Pressure (Gun)
Reel
Wetted diameter ft Effective Spacing
ft Flow GPM
Hose Size: Length ft Diameter
in
b.
Spacing between collection containers (diameter
(ft) / 16) = ft
C.
wetted diameter (ft)
Number of gauges = _
—
gauge qmcmg (ft)
rr
Now
d.
Start of irrigation event
'—r :::::::
rw�
• ; ..::::.
e.
End of Irrigation event
:..
f.
Duration (e-d) min
r�
r rrr
g.
Travel distance feet
a�rrwr
h.
Operate the system and collect data
Gauge Distance Volume Overlap Corrected
Deviation
NO.
from center Collected Adjustment Volume
from average
feet inches inches inches
inches
L1
L2
U
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10

71
• ROW Csrt--fl
wI„d
Left Right
Tr`mm" of D B 7 E a 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 B
iisupe• r e a
D8 '..p0 0 0 0 a a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0
Our
cant
Dk ctbn
of Traw
At Iwo cane
wafted Diameter Wetted Diameter
ream Fred of Fiem
i. sum of all etches inches
j . average catch (i/number of gauges) inches
distance traveled (ft)
k. average travel speed = =
time: (min)
1. sum of all deviations from the average catch
M. average deviation from average catch
n. Uniformity coefficient
G) - (m)
U,= X100=
G)
Interpret the calibration data and make necessary adjustments.
For travelers with proper overlap and operated in light wind, an application uniformity
coefficient greaten than 80 is common.
Application uniformity between 60 to 80 is in the "good" range and is acceptable for
wastewater application.
Generally, an application uniformity below 60 is considered unacceptable for wastewater
irrigation using travelers. If the computed U, is less than 60, system adjustments are
required. Contact your irrigation dealer or Certified Technical Specialist for assistance.

a - w a
IRRIGATION DESIGN
LYNWOOD SPELL
SCALE: I" = 400'
to flli
LEGEND
X RISER LOCATION
° PUMP LOCATION
4" PVC MAIN LINE
• THRUST BLOCK LOCATION
1) THRUST BLOaUNG SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL BENDS, TEES, DEAD
ENDS AND OTHER SPECIAL FITTINGS WHICH REQUIRE REM RAIJMG.
2) MAINLINE PIPE SHALL BE 4' PVC CLASS 2M SHAM BE BURIED TO HAVE
AT LEAS' 3 FEET OF COVER,
3) ZONE 3B SHALL HAVE A .712 RING NOZZLE.
4) ALL OTHER ZONES SHALL HAVE A .812 RING N0771 E,
��i►llYltltttdl�/r
CAPO
a P
a i•
73 �
Prepared by: M. Floyd Adams. P.E_
Date: "WY-2--

Waste Utilization Plan
Producer:
Lynwood Spell
Name of Farm:
J&L Hog Farm
Location:
2935 Bass Lake Rd.
Roseboro, N.C. 28382
Phone:
(914)-564-6565
Type of Operation:
Wean -Feeder
Number of Animal:
6080
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Lagoon
Method of Application,
Irrigation
Amount of waste produced per year. -
Amount of plant available N (PAN) produced/year:
County: Sampson
2567 tordyear
2918 Ibs.lyear
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste
should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied.
RECEIVED I DENR 1 DWQ
Aquifer PrnterAion Sectpn
APR 07 2009
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in the implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally
safe manner.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are
established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils , when it is raining, or when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may in runoff to the surface waters which is not
allowed under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems_
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crops production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than ail days
prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will
conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different applications methods are
not the same_ -
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
your waste management facility. in some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which

, J&L Hog Farm
Page 2
could allow additional waste to be applied_ Provisions shall be made for the area receiving
waste to be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and the crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This
waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H _0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
YOUR WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
Tract No.
Field No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
YieldlAc
Lbs. N
unit
Acres
Lbs N I
Used
Month to
Apply
Lbs. N
Per Ac.
3258
1
WaB
CB
4.1
50 '
4.81
986
Mar -Oct
205
3258
1
WaB
5G
1
50
4.81
241
Sep!:Lkpr
50
3258
2
NoA
CB
4.6
50
8.35
1923
Mar -Oct
230
3258
2
NoA
I SG
1
50
8.361
418L
Sept -Apr
50
Total . 13.17 3568lbs.
Available Nitrogen 2918 lbs.
Surplus or deficit -650 lbs.
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply
the waste in a timely manner_

J&L Hog Farm Page 3
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future,
regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that
addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen_
In interpianted fields (i.e_ small grain, etc. interseeded in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through
grazing, hay and for silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they reach a height of six to nine
inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four inches. In fields where small grain
etc. is to be removed for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small grain to reach materity,
especially late in the season ( i.e. April or May) Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will
definitely interfere with the stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less
nitrogen being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is the normal
situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or silage
two to three times during the season, depending on the time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc. is late September or early October, Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a height of about two inches before drilling for best
results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is recommended.
Acres shown in the tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding required buffers, filters strips along
ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving full application rates due to
equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the field listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres
shown in the tables_
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION. -
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates.
The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients
or other elements. Your production facility will produce approximately 438 lbs. of plant available
nitrogen per year in the sludge.
If you remove sludge every 5 years you will have approximately 2189 lbs. of PAN to utilize. Assuming
you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 lbs/acre you will need 7
acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at the rate of 125 lbs. of nitrogen per acre you will need 18
acres of land. Please be aware that these are only estmates of the PAN and the land needed. Actual
requirements could vary by 25% depending on the sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
application methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that
runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water
droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity

J&L Hog Farm
Page 4
of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of
the crop_
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and
irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is'installed to properly irrrigate the acres shown in tables.
Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts_
Tract No.
Field No.
Soil Type
Crop
Code
Applic.
Rate inlhr
Applic.
Amount
3258
1
WaB
CB
0.5
1
3258
1
WaB
SG
0.5
1
3258
2
NoA
CB
0.5
1
3258
2
NoA
SG
0.5
1

J&L Hog Farm
Page 5
This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the
crop is not over applied. In many situations the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the
nitrogen limitations. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the
average of once every 6 months. In no instances should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure
be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of.freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour
storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and the waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated
properly to apply the correct rates shown in the tables. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of
nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you have receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to appling the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This plan has been reviewed and rewritten to incorporate new waste plan format.

•JSL Nog Farm
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Page 6
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1 _ Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste , he/she shall provide a copy of
an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the
use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level
of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per
year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG
standard 393 - Filter Strip).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season
prone to flooding_ (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate that runoff
does not occur offsite or to the surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potentual for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residenrial property boundary
and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).

-,1&L Hog Farm
Page 7
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned
by he landowner_
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by aver -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegtation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation_ Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidences of
erosion, leakage or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illigal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetation and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste
during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and the bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds_
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metal approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.

Page 8
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: J&L Hog Farm
Owner/Manager Agreement Lynwood Spell
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance proce-
dures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I -(we) know that any
expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to the surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24 hour
storm.The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Lynyvood Spell
Signature:
Name of Manager (If different from owner)
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: Randall N. Barefoot
Affiliation: Prestage Farms, Inc.
Address: P.O. Box 438
Clinton, NC 28329
Signature:
Phone: [phone]
Date: 3- !S- O4
Date:
WN
IM . 1
M

,�:,:.-,..,r
:;:;.
ihL ,... .:>t

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P_ E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004 RECEIVED
Lynwood Spell OCT 15 2034
JL Hog Farm
2935 Bass Lake Road ply[R-FAYET(NLLEREGIONAL URGE
Roseboro NC 28382
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820706
JL Hog Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Sampson County
Dear Lynwood Spell:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28)_
In accordance with your application received on May 12, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Lynwood
Spell, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWGI00000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS820706 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the JL Hog Farm, located in Sampson County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 6080 Wean to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009_ Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and,
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record kegpin
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 276Wlfi38
Phone: [phone] I FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
i::� .
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Sampson County Health Department
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS820706
APS Central Files

ANIMAL, WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:) L HOG FARM
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: LYNWOOD SPELL
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner) :
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Randall N. Barefoot
Affiliation:Prestage Farms Inc. Phone No. 5V-_,5-77/
Address (Agency): P.O. Box 438
Clinton NC 28329
Signature: Date: 6zlAp,
Page: 11

I
M Mwim-A
4 Mil,
L "Alid. NO
L t4�1

Swine Farm Waste Management Odvr Control Chteekiist
Source
Cause
• .. BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Parmrttcad
Swine production
W
Vegetative or wooded buffers;
M-
Recommended best management practices;
❑'
Good Judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces
• Dirty manure -covered animals
p'
Dry' floors
Floor surfaces
• Wet manure -covered floors
13
Slotted floors;
9 Waterers located over slotted floors;
❑ Feeders at high end of solid floors;
a Scrape manure buildup from floors;
0 Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits Urine; . . (R Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• Partial microbial decomposition or scrape;
© Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; a ran inaintenance;
Dust GY Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces
• Dust
IR-
Washdown between groups of animals;
2'
Feed additives;
❑
Feeder covers;
IT
Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers ,
Flush tanks
Agitation of recycled lagoon
❑
Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
©
Extend fill lines to news bottom of tanks with
anti siphon vents
Flush alleys
Agitation during wastewater
❑
Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
*„
Pit recharge points
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits
liquid while pits are filling
with anti•siphun vents
Lift stations
0 Agitation during sump tank
❑
Sump taiik covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance

r•. wrrr_�rw.www�..r+.�.i. r-wwwwww..�rwrr�ww�
Source Cause _ BHPs to Minimize Oddr Site Specific Prs ss
End of drainpipes at • -Agitation during wastewater�ya Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions; Cdf Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
0 Biological mixing; Gr Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation Q' Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
l r Minimum agitation when•pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • Nigh pressure agitation; W Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles 0 Wind drill '
GIt' Minimum recommended operating pressure;
&* Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin 0 Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface • Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers;
Agitation when emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface
Partial microbial decomposition;
❑
Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling;
level;
•
Agitation when emptying
❑
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge •
Agitation when spreading;
Q
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets 9
Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, 0
Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hrs,;
surfaces
❑
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals •
Carcass decomposition
13-' Proper disposillon of carcasses
Dead animal disposal a
Carcass -decomposition
❑
Complcie coverittg of carcasses in burial pits;
pits
❑
Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators •
Incomplete combustion
O
Secondary stack burners
AMOC -,November 11, 1996, Page 4 '"1

r '
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor- Site Speclric F tees
'bLanding water around •-. Improper drainage; F1 Grape and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure backed onto • Poorly malnialrled Access roads lY Farm access road maintenance
public roads from rarm
access
Additional Information: Available From:
Swine Manure Management ; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 128-88 NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129.88 NCSU - BAC-
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EBAE 103-83 NCSU-BAE
Calibration or Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33 NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual NC pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor ; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Agri Commun'rcaiions
Nulsance Concerns in Animal Man ure,Managemcnl: Odors and Flies ; 1'ROI07,-1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative EXICIISiWl
AMOC -November 11, 1996, Page 5

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source
Cause
13MP5 to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters
• Accumulation of solids
Gr Flush system is designed and operated -
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
Gt' Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits
Crusted Solids
iYMainlain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative
• Decaying vegetation
GKMaintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter .
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter,
Feeders • Feed Spillage ❑ Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage.
❑ Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e,g., 7 - 10
clay interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Feed Storage Accumulations of feed residues ❑ Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
0 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page I

{
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death_ The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached) .
December 18, 1996