20020994 Ver 1_Complete File_20020620

F WAIF Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O,4 RQG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
co r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
>_ ,I Division of Water Quality
O `C
July 3, 2002
Bladen County
DWQ Project No. 020994
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Terry R. Gibson, P.E
NCDOT, Division 6
PO Box 1150
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Dear Mr. Gibson:
Division Engineer
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in
0.04 acres of wetlands for the purpose of providing agricultural access at Bridge 132 (SR 1178) in Bladen County.
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated June 14, 2002. After reviewing your
application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3375. This
certification corresponds to the Nationwide Permit 14 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should
acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire
with the accompanying 404 permit, unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1.) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.

N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748
otO? \ NA
T ?RpG
r/
tJ
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
Sincerely,
C??? /'
a79-an W. Klimek, P.E.
7/vol?
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
c:\ncdot\TIP B-2920\wqc\020994wgc.doc
01
020994
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY W. LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 14, 2002
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 0 g
ATTN: Mr. Richard Spencer
? 20
NCDOT Coordinator 2 ! j
WCTtA'NDS mop
Dear Sir: 11 SECTION
--
Subject: Notification for Nationwide Permit 14
Agricultural Access Drive at Bridge 132 (SR 1178) / Bladen County
TIP # B-2920
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to install an Agricultural
Access at Bridge #132 along SR 1178 in Bladen County. Bridge #132 was replaced under TIP
B-2920. No accommodations were made in the planning process to connect the existing
agricultural access drive with the access point shown on the plans. The guardrail was installed
to the minimum length, i.e. 75-foot. The proposed agricultural access drive has been designed to
avoid wetland impacts as much as possible.
The drive was designed with two 90° bends that cut along the edge of the wetlands. This was
discussed with the property owner, and, he was agreeable to the design. A more efficient design,
from a design standpoint, would have lessened the degree of curve, which would have bisected
the wetlands. Greater wetland impacts would have been expected with the efficient design
scenario, though the impacts would still be less than 0.05 acre. Tucking the agricultural access
drive as close as possible to SR 1178 yielded the least environmentally damaging alternative.
The project was approved by the Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit #31 (Action ID
200100807 and NCDENR DWQ Certification 01-0646. The Contractor had installed the stub for
the agricultural access drive when the NCDOT Inspector noted that the extension of the drive to
connect to the existing drive could potentially impact jurisdictional wetlands. The Division 6
Environmental Officer delineated the wetlands in the corridor of the proposed agricultural access
drive and has determined that a permit was necessary. This project would have been treated as a
?'! ?'I i ;: I l a f
11 0. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28102-1 150 - Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone]

Permit Modification, but the Contractor had demobilized from the site. Richard Spencer of the
Corps of Engineers determined that a new Pre-Construction Notification be submitted.
RESOURCE STATUS
A Wetland Delineation / Natural Resource Inventory was conducted within the proposed corridor
of the agricultural access drive. Along the entire length of SR 1178, there is a drainage ditch that
conveys road runoff to Bryant Swamp. Sidecast material from previous ditch cleanouts was
observed. At the outside edge of the sidecast wetland conditions were observed. The area was
mapped as Johnston series, but the thick mucky A horizon was not observed along the wetland
boundary. The area does possess hydric soils characteristics though, i.e. low chroma 10YR 3/2.
Further into the wetland area another soil pit was excavated. That pit yielded a mucky loam with
a hue/value/chroma of 10YR 2/1. Within minutes of opening the pit, it filled to the surface.
There was ample evidence of wetland hydrology. Roots at the surface, morphological
adaptations, blackened leaves, inundation and saturation to name a few. Red maple, black willow,
privet and poison ivy were the dominant hydrophytic vegetation.
In general, there will be minor impacts proposed with the connection of the existing agricultural
access drive to the driveway access point. Approximately 0.04 acre of wetland impacts is
expected. A Nationwide Permit #14 is required for the project due to the placement of clean fill
material into 0.04 acre of jurisdictional wetlands.
Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or
Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of February 27, 2001, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
lists six federally protected species for Bladen County.
Federally Protected Species for Bladen County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Acipenser brevirostrum Shortnose sturgeon E
Alligator mississippiensis American alligator T (S /A)
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded
woodpecker E
Gindera melissifolia Pondberry E
Lysimachia asperulaefolia Rough-leaved
loosestrife E
Schwalbea americana American chaffseed E
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range).
T(S/A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened
Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its
Protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and
Are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
r
A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for all species during the May 16, 2002
survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general habitat
for each species identified.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 14 as required by
the above-described activities. Wetland impacts have been identified, avoided and minimized,
and, wetland mitigation is not required.
If you should have any questions, or, need additional information please contact James J. Rerko,
PWS at [phone].
cerely
,tea, 5
JD es . Rerko, PWS
ision 6 Environmental Of
ATTACFNENTS
o` We?tlana
U`0-,A
A N
sws
-n
P/°;?; 000772
4a%24/ Wetla?a??
CC: John Henessey (DWQ)
NCDOT Coordinator (FWS)
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 020994
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP#14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Terry R Gibson, P.E. /NCDOT/Div 6/Division Engineer
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1150
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Telephone Number: 910-486-1493 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: tgibson dot state nc us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: James J. Rerko, PWS
Company Affiliation: NCDOT/Div 6/ Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: Same
Telephone Number: 910-486-1792 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: ijrerko dot state nc us
Page I of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge # 132 Agricultural Access Drive
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-2920
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Bladen Nearest Town: Bladenboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): 0.2 mile north of the
intersection of SR 1176 along SR 1178
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):34°32'07"N 78°49'21"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): less than 0.10 acre
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Bryant Swamp
8. River Basin: Lumber River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at Impp//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Undisturbed site conditions- agricultural /pine
plantation/ rural land use surrounding project
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Project
consists of connecting recently installed driveway access to the existing agricultural
access drive that runs parallel along the Bryant Swamp canal. Clean fill material will
be brought in via dump trucks and placed with a front end loader. The existing
roadway draina a ditch will be enclosed with 80 linear feet of 24 inch RCP to reduce
wetland impacts and keep the agricultural access drive as close to SR 1178 as possible.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Provide the sole means of access to a
property owner that is basically cutoff from his lands. The agricultural access drive's
impacts were not realized at the permitting stage of the project, i.e. COE NWP#31.
Wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized vielding a total impact of 0.04
acres.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
COE NWP #31 / Action ID 200100807 & NCDENR DWO # 01-0646
Project would have been treated as a permit modification, but, the Contractor had
demobilized.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work.
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 3 of 8
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts Place clean fill material
within a 0.04 acre jurisdictional wetland in order to provide an agricultural access to
adjoining property owner.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
WET-1 Fill 0.04 ac Yes > 50 Of PF01A

* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. impacts include, out ale not ntnrtc-u tu: III "Iniuzcu . ??? s•u..•••b ••••,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FUUv ), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
onlineatlittt):/hvww.t'L-tna.gov.
**' List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 10 Ac +/-?
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04 acre
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed. plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
?\tw.usss."uv. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., ,?aa topozone.cont,
\tiaw.iiiaxtucst_com. etc.).
Page 4 of 8
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 0 LF
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
* Area of
t
I Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
sound
estuary
pond
(lake
Site Number Type of Impact mpac
(acres) (if applicable) ,
,
,
,
ocean, etc.)
bay
(indicate on map) ,
N/A
- A._A-
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts tnciuae, out are nut urnrtcu w: uu, cxcavauvu, wau?u?,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The installation of guardrail at bridge abutments is a general safety issue. Many lives
are saved under this premise The installation of the guardrail on this proiect eliminated
the a ricultural access drive connection, and, the relocation of the drive was necessitated.
The minimum len h of guardrail was installed by statute. Wetlands were identified
between the existing agricultural access drive and the existing drive location. The wetlands
were avoided and the impacts minimized by designing the drive as close as possible to SR
1178, thus, nipping the wetland edge The proiect could have been closed out and the
property owner would have oust installed the fill within the wetlands without even knowing
of the situation The bridge inspector noted that the access point was directed at a
suspicious area, i.e. wetlands, and the DEO was contacted. NCDOT has realized this error
and is permitting the proiect to ensure compliance of the proiect
Page 5 of 8
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Wetland mitigation is not required for this nroiect due to the limited impact
proposed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wtp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0 LF
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0 LF
Page 6 of 8
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 LF
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 LF
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0 LF
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular trom near oanK of enannet; Lone / extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
An erosion and sedimentation control plan will be incorporated into the construction plan
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The only circumstance that needs to be mentioned is the denial of access to the property
owner. I had discussed the inability of accessing the property with the owner and he has
accepted that he will be delayed access, he has made provisions.
`Applicant/Agent's Signature 'Date!
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

c;a
t?
i
?i
?r
i
kv
ti
i
lid I
a
I a'
T?

C

V

Lr
cn ,, 0 t

-
- v
I Q
ICI \
I ?1= _-'_"

v
N
0
U
h
r?
Q
ti

I - -- -- J- ---- -----------
?

- N
O•
C
f" 1 r
0
Z O
'O W Z
0 5 °o
Z
Z
GZ0u
-1 D 1=
of 0 aC
t ?.
Y .r
J ?
r1 •?
?i
T .
p
M
Y
I
1
I
i
I
x I
O I
?• I
v I
r ? I
ti
I.,
I
I
`. I
? r. ,-
r-. I
nti?2- LU
'I \ ? I
\? P
n
d m 4 '
11,
1 Iu - - ?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
0 987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ?R i n6E ?/3 L 46 1# gd,5 c y /2D - _ Date: L
Applicant/Owner: D,19 County:
Investigator: =A zr E/ .?vS State: Q,
tt??v
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No. Community ID: Z4A
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(lf needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. . /r er f b / ? .•? C ? 1-'A6. 9.
2. Q Pri-w S /A 10.
3. , <Q 1;.e )2 i G/ ?t e r r 11.
4. c / ire ?v 12.
13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC ?00
(excluding FAC-11.
j"i Q o f E?J w ?7 y C /!r
Remarks:
ll// r Cr/ t S G o a e
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Strewn, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
No Recorded Onto Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water. -^ (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: _(in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks: D J i' 3 3 • ,t ' ?4) rn
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3-3
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series grid Phase): T6.t? ?s Ttj
Drainage Class: t/ PD
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): d rM ! U Confirm Mapped Type? Yes o
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colon Mottle Texture, Concretions.

Structure,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast
L wa/. Lea l&i
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_
_ Hist(c Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfkfio Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyad or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: In 5 idleI M/000/5 ei e_ s Jr6 t '4 - 7fv.,1ire! /n 4XW jj
?
ToAifs AOn C!C!/'QGf?r i7?/c? a I1Q? /?<<C `1'/?L!1 l?/?/??/
.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
FH?dfic 7Hy?drology Present) No (Circle) (Circle)
sent? !y No
No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? fe No
i 77 ? -
Remarks: X
Approveo oy H U A 2192
3-4

Ln o?qo
Vj;..•,
'
Wo NoA
Ce BuA

Ra
•Ln

Co 1118
Q
qA •O ? T

• 1
GbA

r ?

q Fo .

'•i.T ' r?,. F
' NoA GbA - C? ? r Ra
?.
'
" NoA ?.
Pe ? uq fo ''i tl;
Co
GbA w.,

A .

GbA GbA
73

U

r
NoA No A
BuA
Ln G b 1179
! T GbA
r BuA B uA / Nu
.•',
Q Ra z
n
?,, . y
P
C
y U
GbA
a Gb
Lrf•
Ln
•. r y
-
s, NoA W
GbA o `
NuB Nu
Gb?r
B
A i
B eP t
C
w « Wo GbA ` u
N
G b ^ '
't A
Ra
GbA d,.r
'i oP v
C ry4e
? SrSrf•Ir N.
Ve A St
?1u13
??
n ! N o A
i ?.. l n : K ?
' Rp} + G d A •f'

,
' Wo VVaB r NoA GbA No Ln U d dq oB GdA
KY
ep... .., t?,
h

?
WaB

A
A GbA

GbA Y
r
GbA
N?oA "NoB

?-
guP .. ° y u
NoA' -!J ?fi S+FS. rY? we
Au- 411
Tr W e
,
NoA . k,
.
' No0 NoA
a
? aH 9
0? p
N Y
t- n r NoB
/ nr Y'GbA C'bq Ln
;
.
N OA
??,
? GbA Ra Gy Ln r
G6 NO9
..
o Ln
= Ot, P
r
. ? i Gpq NoA
Co Ra NoA ) NoA _

NoA GbA
Ln
NnB
NuB t
Oc R ' ,i
t hA r?
G NoA Ln
NoA +
>6
NoA
?'S
? `
soP No G
d rlo GbA
P .
J ?9 -
Ra
No

GbA

'
•

Ra
L
o
Z

Nt

y
-r.
,
o c t 9
3 GeP C
: .
„L;

No
NoA
NoA
1 AuA
NoA 242
410

BuA

GdA

G
1?. w
• aw, o"
U LOB] WaH NoA
-
q •? ?q? -"?=•
f3uA
131
ti Z
NoA N°P
Wa NoB
, _
Noq NoA

i l
„ ? Fo C _ GbA
rr
F
`=A
t+
? 4 NoA _ Fo
St w
e8 w?f
' n
' ?
•f,^r? ,?•4?
1 ,? C.
•r{
' ' il'? rP Fo

BuA is
d w
•? r? - a
i 4 GbA [L7 1]
r l NoA Fo
BuA
?? „ ?? ? •? .• Ct?-? ?' era
_
U ?
*? NoA Ra GbA
t

u
6
!fir
r
" NoB
.
Q
LaB
.
y ao
_
?•
Ra
?Yl Cfl y ???. ?
?y
?7i r .. NnA ar
NoA Ra In Ra
NoA
GbA NoA
?? _
LaB a21??: GbA o c
\t r NoA
NoA
GbA
V K. Ce- Ir• _,- "r 42 . ,^ ., +t Gon
0 ?" h fix`.
Las N'S
Utl GbA ?yd ,?• h . R a a ,, v? :1??. n. N?' Co . 1a
IM6
J Ce Ln .n.•_ GbA •?? GbA ,rr.?`'r _•r;?t!_„-, - N{„ ;BXK'• } fah ExA .:.r.4't? •?
Ud - NoA GbA `^a-:- ? Ne P Na ?"`s
x
Trv o GbA Na
2 (loins sheet 13)
TopoZone - The Web's 7bpograph?c map
10 0 11 Z-0 .com
..? n Target
is 34°
meters
miles
Wy3IWyg://JWHLL7://WWW.N7PVlwAff..%Ay FPIUR-M Zf llmii uc.s '.+ v-"' -- -

a t._
1
1-1
1 of 1 6/10/02 10:19 AM
?-u - ?fid 32 ,1224171wu
401
_ POND
s
2120 - . iw? -- - 1
? - Lu I' I i??'!
1127 7 i 1120
110 ) e -? N r-? ? `? ?
1120 •s
ills 1
C R"? r ?'-) ?. M1 L? ;\ I 1120 ` r •,'-
?, rio
?l ¦ ??) ? > > 04 .
FrvW Uvw+n-
a
I /
AJ - j
Bridge #132
• I
rim
rrr
J o6 ? -
4f Bran,;
r ,
7 4 .
1002 ° ?? d • ' - 1102 .,`
ormewooft
?O 't1N ? -- <
lop 6
we, If

a
m

oq

t f
T?
4 3
FF 8