310209_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200730

° (9Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division.of So" O'aud Water Conservation
:. . 0 Other Agency
(Type of Visit: d 70utine
Hance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 — Arrival Time: Departure Time: ° aw, County: a) i Y�
Farm Name: La W ►e.c )S Nv-scr4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: tAy r4)g !4 214 1JS LLC Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: kllzr Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: � j ya a
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design
Swine Capacity
a Current
Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
o o
q 5
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
:Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region: �``i'�
Certification Number: 1 G03 � 9 q
Certification Number:
Longitude:
= Design Cu"r"rent°Design - Current'
Wei Poultry Capacity.. PopCattle � „ ` Capacity,
Layer
Non -Layer
Desimi 'Current
lnry 1Pnnitrv_ C'anneity Pnn. °
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy _
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ElNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
VNNo
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3l - O Date of Inspection: -3 0— d Cd G
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Eyl�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): u� S
Observed Freeboard (in): 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ KO ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes U'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Auulication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [](No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C, D 13 , W
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes •. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [2Zo
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E5Zo
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes <� ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes LJZo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application . ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ;Z/
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: -), O 11 Date of Inspection: -3 0 -a0-0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes d o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes VN,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.'Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No EdNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ✓ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [fNE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[)No ❑ NA ❑ NE
✓[� ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinss of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Wal[ RIU@S—T U1./R1m"+ �Lol I kYoVv' iN6)�
— LI Ke AS PECamm c N%iED, PN ;S 0-f Li, ► ,
Reviewer/InspectorName: "I Phone:rq/q (a��-����
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � - Date: 3- - -5 c) --a(0'6
Page 3 of 3 21412015