Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310816_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200715® Division of Water Resources i M 'Facility Number, Q Division of Soil andMater Conservation s '0 Other Agency Type of Visit: Co Hance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance sit: Reason for Vi0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: a : 0 Departure Time: y " County: _Dj1 r1 Region: Farm Name: ae-its, s �^ r�,rrY+s 1 ►aC Owner Email: Owner Name: �cK�i S �i �A�vnS Inc, Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: s 6>/1 Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Design ,Current, Swine'. Capacity ° pop. ° Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish R-3h Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other ` Other Title: Integrator: Phone: Certification Number: I e_)p;f5—( Certification Number: Latitude: Design ' Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Design Current nry Pnnitry ° Canaeity Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Longitude: �.. .Design Current'. Cattle; °_ Capacity , Pop: Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes d. N.rN ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: $ 1 -<A16 I jDate of Irfs ection: —IS -aao\o Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): jCA u� Observed Freeboard (in): 10 �J 1 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes Structure 5 dYN ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 6 ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment 1 threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes a]/No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window C r ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop IIype(s): C,� , S_� 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements 21, poes record keeping need improvement? If yes, check t e appropriate box below ❑ Yes VNO 1o ❑ Yes ❑ Yes E�No ❑ Yes [�No ❑ Other: VdYes ❑ Nc Waste Application [Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers [Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield t�120 Minute Inspections [Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ Yes g ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: 3 - Date of Iiss l ection: '�7-• 1 S-a u D, o 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No EdNA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [1/No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes g/No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D/NE ❑ Yes dNo ❑ Yes ED/No ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). IL�e �;el� inS�ec��c�n WAS comple-,-ec� -rV,)R,fe (-ec.eivQd V"'d c7-'okwOnp-A dyl I—D-o ao Zf a,' S L.'J'ece n oT ivt -h-�e ('e cof J S S%v\c e- June oZO � (2�;��0.1�1 ar�di �Q leve IS �o� a0ad v_�ece o,.1So (ecorolS, anus{" CUY,r� Ma:',nAo"' v\ �ecarAl Vo r %�G� I,'�c( vP Fb � h� C���e v� `f Ise IhS�eC-�i6Y�� e_e,cdrd S mush- be bar IZ12- S j use we&.f IPr- C66ks A.hd in.*,,k M0 m;r, Q hec.k, G WA Vo1- MUR" 0 f-Amvir ejq,(N I"'s o� kc j �lur�n -Ilse ��carci �^,r�l�o� Mc. t M�ss1N ' � Ah� o.l` o� S veer . WA' S Qa� L6 des 13� �� ANC Lagcnn I;IVA Reviewer/Inspector Name: :KO H N �E�2 Y Phone: 010) I —qm- Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:' a� `°� 0 0 Cj Page 3 of 3 21412015