310816_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200715

® Division of Water Resources i M
'Facility Number, Q Division of Soil andMater Conservation s
'0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Co
Hance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
sit:
Reason for Vi0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: a : 0 Departure Time: y " County: _Dj1 r1 Region:
Farm Name: ae-its, s �^ r�,rrY+s 1 ►aC Owner Email:
Owner Name: �cK�i S �i �A�vnS Inc, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: s 6>/1
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design ,Current,
Swine'. Capacity ° pop. °
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish R-3h
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other `
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: I e_)p;f5—(
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design ' Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
nry Pnnitry ° Canaeity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
�.. .Design Current'.
Cattle; °_ Capacity , Pop:
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
d. N.rN
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0 NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: $ 1 -<A16 I jDate of Irfs ection: —IS -aao\o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): jCA u�
Observed Freeboard (in): 10 �J 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
dYN
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment 1 threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes a]/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window C r ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop IIype(s): C,� , S_�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21, poes record keeping need improvement? If yes, check t e appropriate box below
❑ Yes VNO
1o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes E�No
❑ Yes [�No
❑ Other:
VdYes ❑ Nc
Waste Application [Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
[Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield t�120 Minute Inspections [Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes g ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 - Date of Iiss l ection: '�7-• 1 S-a u D, o
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No EdNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [1/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes g/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D/NE
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes ED/No
❑ Yes ffNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
IL�e �;el� inS�ec��c�n WAS comple-,-ec� -rV,)R,fe
(-ec.eivQd V"'d c7-'okwOnp-A dyl I—D-o ao
Zf a,' S L.'J'ece n oT ivt -h-�e ('e cof J S S%v\c e- June oZO � (2�;��0.1�1 ar�di �Q leve IS
�o� a0ad v_�ece o,.1So (ecorolS, anus{" CUY,r�
Ma:',nAo"' v\ �ecarAl Vo r %�G� I,'�c( vP Fb � h� C���e v� `f Ise
IhS�eC-�i6Y�� e_e,cdrd S mush- be
bar IZ12- S j use we&.f IPr- C66ks A.hd in.*,,k M0 m;r, Q hec.k,
G WA Vo1- MUR" 0 f-Amvir ejq,(N I"'s o� kc j �lur�n -Ilse ��carci �^,r�l�o� Mc. t
M�ss1N ' �
Ah� o.l` o� S veer . WA' S Qa� L6 des 13� �� ANC
Lagcnn I;IVA
Reviewer/Inspector Name: :KO H N �E�2 Y Phone: 010) I —qm-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:' a� `°� 0 0 Cj
Page 3 of 3 21412015