310088_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200811

(3 Division of Water Resources ,
.Facility Number ° ®- ® ODivision.of Soil and Water Conservation'
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 7Routine
pliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: --® Arrival Time: 0c) Departure Time: °� County: V 11 Region: ! Ko
Farm Name: C7 P—1 r7z1 y p'�' xm$ , Inc. -F �fi j Owner Email:
Owner Name: ap_i-FF'S M'tLms 111r. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: i e F- & P.1 F/` 1 A/
Certified Operator: 'qd4
Back-up Operator: Z
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: L�Ags—
Certification Number:
Longitude:
.Design . Current Design Current., � . � Design,, Current '
° .Swine Capacity pop. Wet -Poultry Capacity k'. Cattle ° Capacity -'Pop.. -
OP `
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
(o ®
4E 46
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
(Other °
Other
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
"Drv.Pnultry Canacity , Pon.' -
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
—.Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
9To
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
Ea"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
✓
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): , `-
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
M/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
""No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[:]Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[21&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 1/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 60' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): , �c•—�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes UNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ;/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes WV❑
NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes Noo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 10
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [E] Now ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes []°No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - ?, "�, Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Fg4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes K�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ® NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
/No
❑ Yes
v
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
2/NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
[]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
r- , � 4d �e �X­ky 5urn
Si�1'1. ('o��n �C�`�,l:Q?f✓ llsrx°1ie'.r, nC,dw°)
t�,Wlr� lwfio;�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1n;4 W
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: i i
Date: f — ��y� o
21412015