HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100104 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_200905212 0 1 0 0 1 0 4
TICK CREEK STREAM RESTORATION - NCEEP Project #379
Third Annual Monitoring Report - FINAL
January 2009
Subm
11?,d'%-
',E stem
ill loll 'C'111C'11t
r?kzx.ua..?
iJ1Al'
` , ECJ S'O'S T E
=fVHAN"'EVr--NT rPRO RAj1
itted to:
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
V
PAC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
U
?
X
•
TICK CREEK STREAM RESTORATION - Project # 379
2008 MONITORING REPORT
CONDUCTED FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Table of Contents
E
1. Executive Summary/Project Abstract ..........................................................................1
II. Project Background .................................................................................................... ..2
2.1. Project Objectives ................................................................................................... ..2
2.2. Project Structure, Mitigation Type, and Approach ................................................. ..2
2.3. Location and Setting ............................................................................................... ..2
2.4. History and Background ......................................................................................... ..4
2.5. Monitoring Plan View ............................................................................................ ..7
III. Project Conditions and Monitoring Results ........................................................... ..8
3.1. Vegetation Assessment .......................................................................................... ..8
3.1.1. Vegetation Problem Areas ............................................................................... ..8
3.1.2. Current Conditions Plan View ......................................................................... ..9
3.2. Stream Assessment ................................................................................................. ..9
3.2.1. Procedural Items ............................................................................................. ..9
3.2.2. Stream Problem Areas .................................................................................... 11
3.2.3. Fixed Photo Station Photos ............................................................................. 11
3.2.4. Stability Assessment ......................... ............................ ......................... 11
IV. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 12
4.1. Stream Methodology .............................................................................................. 12
4.2. Vegetation Methodology ........................................................................................ 12
References ......................................................................................................................... 13
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map ...............................
Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View ................
Figure 3. USGS Stream Gage Data ...........
Tables
...3
..8
.11
Exhibit Table I. Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives ..............................................4
Exhibit Table II. Project Activity and Reporting History ................................................... 5
Exhibit Table III. Project Contact Table ............................................................................. 6
Exhibit Table IV. Project Background Table ......................................................................6
Exhibit Table V. Verification of Bankfull Events .............................................................. 10
Exhibit Table VII. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment .................. 11
Tick Creek Stream Restoration
EEP Project # 379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
APPENDICES
Appendix A Vegetation Data
Al. Vegetation Data Tables
Table 1. Vegetation Metadata
Table 2. Vegetation Vigor by Species
Table 3. Damage by Species
Table 4. Damage by Plot
Table 5. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Table 6. Vegetation Problem Areas
A2. Vegetation Problem Area Photos
A3 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix B Geomorphologic Raw Data
B 1. Current Conditions Plan View
B2. Stream Problem Areas Table
B3. Representative Stream Problem Area Photos
B4. Stream Photo-station Photos
B5. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment Table
•
•
Tick Creek Stream Restoration 2008 Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 379 Year 3 of 3
RJG&A
20100 1 0 4
9 1. Executive Summary/Project Abstract
The Tick Creek stream restoration and preservation project is located southeast of Siler
City, in Chatham County, North Carolina, southeast of the intersection of Rives Chapel
Church Road and Jim Moody Road. The project design, completed by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) in 2002, includes preservation of a 114
foot wide buffer along 3,733 feet of Tick creek (immediately downstream of the Rives
Chapel Church Road bridge), and restoration of 2,597 feet of an unnamed tributary to
Tick Creek (UT). The entire project occupies 29 contiguous acres in USGS HUC
03030003070023 (NCDWQ Cape Fear River Subbasin 03-06-12). Construction was
completed on the Tick Creek site on 1 September 2005 and bare rootstock planting was
completed during the week of 6 February 2006. Per the September 2002 Mitigation Plan,
the site is to be monitored for three years. Upon successful completion of three years of
monitoring, the site will be ready of review by the resource agencies (NCDOT 2002).
RJG&A has monitored the site since 2006. In both 2006 and 2007 the project met its
geomorphologic and vegetation goals. Per our contract with NCEEP, 2008 is the last
year that the project will be monitored and no geomorphic quantitative data were
collected.
Average planted woody stem density (excluding live stakes) was 587 live stem per acre
and has exceeded the vegetation success criteria by 83 percent. Dog fennel (Eupatorium
capillofolium) and Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) continue to thrive in portions
of Reach 2. Exotic invasives (Eleaganus umbellate, Albizia julibrissin, Ligustrum
sinense and L. japonicum) are present throughout the restoration.
•
TickCreek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
Page 1
0 II. Project Background
2.1. Project Objectives
According to the 2002 Mitigation Plan written by NCDOT, the Tick Creek Stream
Restoration Project was designed to achieve the following eight goals and objectives:
1. Preserve 3,733 linear feet of Tick Creek (as measured along the thalweg);
2. Restore 2,946 linear feet (349 feet longer than the existing reach of an unnamed
tributary);
3. Provide a minimum of a 200-foot buffer along the Tick Creek reach being
preserved for the protection of freshwater mussels found along the 3,733 linear
foot reach;
4. Provide a stable stream channel for the Unnamed Tributary that neither aggrades
nor degrades while maintaining its dimension, pattern, and profile with the
capacity to transport its watershed's water and sediment load;
5. Improve water quality and reduce erosion by stabilizing the stream banks for both
streams by improving riparian vegetation;
6. Reconnect the Unnamed Tributary to its floodplain;
7. Improve aquatic habitat of the tributary with the use of natural material
stabilization structures such as root wads, rock vanes, woody debris, and a
riparian buffer;
8. Provide aesthetic value, wildlife habitat, and bank stability through the creation or
enhancement of a riparian zone (NCDOT 2002).
2.2. Project Structure, Mitigation Type, and Approach
The Tick Creek Stream Restoration Project involved the preservation of 3,733 linear feet
of Tick Creek and a Priority I restoration of 2,946 linear feet of an unnamed tributary that
flows into Tick Creek. The project involved bedform transformations, channel
dimension adjustments, pattern alterations, structure installation (root wads, rock vanes,
and woody debris), and riparian buffer restoration (woody vegetation planting and stock
exclusion).
2.3. Location and Setting
To get to the Tick Creek restoration site from U.S. 64, turn south on Rives Chapel
Church Road (-0.9 mile east of Siler City), travel 4.4 miles, turn left (east) onto Jim
Moody Road. The upstream boundary of the unnamed tributary restoration site is 0.3
miles east of the intersection, on the right (south) side of the road. The project's western
easement boundary (preservation) begins on the downstream side of the Rives Chapel
Church Road Bridge over Tick Creek (south of the Jim Moody Rd. intersection) (Figure
1).
E
TickCreek Stream Restoration 2008 Monitoring Report
EEP Project #379 Year 3 of 3
RJG&A
Page 2
? 0
•
,)
O
Figure 1. Tick Creek •
Stream Rcstontion - Chatham Courm NC r? -
Feet
Shut CC NCI>t tT Unla Utsu+huh+m - 1 dr ?)t ?Af 1\?\tl'II1
NNW% ncJ++Lnt tl gu I W al tl )IS11 tnn Clkllllalll 0011111/ 0 /
?\ > ++ 2.000 1(
JJ? of 8 r• ?l.? ,>._ ( t ? 1' ? ?? i
TickCreek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
Page 3
The 2002 Tick Creek Restoration Plan describes the site's pre-restoration land use as
cattle pasture that involved agricultural clearing, stream ditching and straightening, and
unrestricted cattle access to the stream. This land use caused bank instability, which
increased sediment load. This caused the direct loss of aquatic habitat and caused the
impairment and degradation of aquatic resources along the restoration project's entire
reach (from the Jim Moody Road culvert, to the confluence with Tick Creek).
2.4. History and Background
The project design was completed by the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) in 2002, and includes preservation of a 114 foot wide buffer along 3,733 feet
of Tick Creek and restoration of 2,597 feet of an unnamed tributary to Tick Creek (UT).
Construction was completed on the Tick Creek site on 1 September 2005 and bare
rootstock planting was completed during the week of 6 February 2006.
is
Exhibit Table I. Mitigation Structure and Objectives (from NCDOT Tick Creek Restoration
Plan Tick Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project #379
bA U V y O . ? ?""'
O
Reach ID w w w v U
Tick Creek 3,733 P 3,733 Protection of high quality aquatic
habitat (rare mussels)
Reach 1
? R P1 300 00-300 Shallow pools, small meanders, and
o, steep riffles
Reach 2 N R P1 1,500 300-1800 Realigned
widened floodplain
Reach 3 R P1 980 1800-2780 ,
Realigned, reconnected to floodplain
TickCreek Stream Restoration 2008 Monitoring Report
EEP Project #379 Year 3 of 3
RJG&A
Page 4
•
•
•
Exhibit Table Il. Activity and Reporting History
Tick Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project #379
Activity or Report Data Collection Completion
Restoration Plan February - May
2002 September 2002
Construction NA September 2005
Temporary S&E mix
applied NA NA
Permanent seed mix
applied NA NA
Bare Root Planting NA February 2006
Mitigation Plan NA NA
As-built March 2006
Year 1 Monitoring November 2006
Vegetation September 2006
Geomorphologic October 2006
Year 2 Monitoring October 2007
Qualitative Evaluation April and October
2007
Vegetation July 2007
Geomorphologic July 2007
Year 3 Monitoring November 2008
Qualitative Evaluation May and November
2008
Vegetation July 2008
Geomorphologic N/A
TickCreek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
Page 5
C
•
•
Exhibit Table III. Project Contacts - Tick Creek Stream Restoration -
EEP Project #379 - Chatham County, NC
Design: Earth Tech
701 Corporation Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Mr. Ron Johnson
(919) 854-6210
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Natural Environment Unit
Natural Environment Engineering Group
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
Mr. Jamie Lancaster, Supervisor
(919) 715-1441
Construction Contractor: Not Provided
Planting Contractor: Not Provided
Seeding Contractor: Not Provided
Seed Mix Sources: Not Provided
Nursery Stock Suppliers: Not Provided
Monitoring Performers Monitoring Performers:
(2006-2008): RJG&A
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27616
Mr. Sean Doig
(919) 872-1174
Exhibit Table IV. Project Back ground - Tick Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project #379
County Chatham
Drainage Area 96 acres (0.15 square miles)
Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate (%) <5%
Stream Order First Order
Physiographic Region Piedmont
Ecoregion Carolina Slate Belt
Rosgen Classification of As-built
Reach 1 B6
Reach 2 C5b
Reach 3 E6
Dominant Soil Types
Reach 1 Georgeville silt loam
Reach 2 Georgeville silt loam
Reach 3 Nanford Badin complex (upper -500 feet),
Riverview (lower -400 feet, to confluence with Tick
Creek)
TickCreek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
Page 6
1]
•
Exhibit Table IV. Project Background - Tick Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project #379
Reference Site ID Spencer Creek (located in Uwharrie National Forest
in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin)
USGS HUC for Project and Reference 03030003070023, 03040103050090
NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project and
Reference 03-06-12, 03-07-09
NCDWQ Classification for Project and
Reference C
Any portion of the project segment 303d
listed? No
Any portion of the project segment
upstream of a 303d listed segment? No - not in NCDWQ 30-06-12
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor NA
% of Project Easement Fenced 0%
2.5. Monitoring Plan View
See Figure 2 for Monitoring Plan View.
TickCreek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
Page 7
rn
a u
0
O p
o
U
o
O
ell D Q
F
aW
4W
1 w
5 ? I
W - a
a?
to 0 0 0- O
a?
a
r`
? (
D
? m
o O
a N N
3 2
bi W
o
(D
'o
m
_
(U m L
19 a)
c
N U
--- CO CO (D CD lrn N O, M O
ti ?-ir M? OD r- V r (9!(D
r- Cf) 0) i,
h d 10
)
o r
O ui
N CA
M
? O
1
- ? (D
C) ( 0)
, O I CM
U
c N 0 OD ?
1 I (D ; CM j N
64,041N N ?Ni r r N ?NN
p O Oj0 Oi 0 0 O 0 0?0
!Z
j ti?tiir
I I
`
€
?
i
?
?
(
f
l
(.0 In
o
cc)
co
M?
1
o
U-) 0 o LO C,4 -,
?
vlrn1? tO? OD? N: OD! ? 0 O d
M CA I CD
0,0 ?f r-
M? I- I
It t
0 OD ! W F--
0
C141 04 N N
N ;
1 N :
N
N j !r,N
N
N N
LU OHO OS
OD 00 OO O
00 ,
O?
OD CAi
co 1 Cfl
co I
0;010,
OD OD
co
r,r r r ?r r r? I
i !
r r r
d r1NjM
I I I
o
oo
.
CL
Q"
Ip VI tO f-! 1
N
o ;
` o
o
?a
Aoo
?a
a
4f f ? .
s
r ?
a?
a?
O LL
O
N
O
LO
O
O
O
LO
O
0 0 0
00
720?
00
4-
N
N
O LL
O
N
O
LO
^ O
r..
O
OD
' r?.O
`
V-- r` O
? N`.rtA!
r` N
N'TIN r`
r` C 1N
cM?6
!
-
o m (61ui?r-
hM
co O ICVjM
M' t
D t- m m
N'
o
?
;
trtp IRTI ?I
M'N N!N C
v) r• M 0:
N;N;
o
t olo?
0
ooioio T- ?e-
o' ono rie-j
0
o
'o of
r-- r-
I I ?
r-
( l j
1(D o
?yi -: i r• 0) 0) ,M1(D
7 I OO LQ I OO M iO,O
M + to ' M oj?l
Oo j o rn
-I O
?1 ? ?plr- MAN
ODIT-i6`
? of ?mD o
M
I
` 03 M 00l
OpIOD
yit?IOOi
o'OI?IN N
9
O'N O
Colo)O)l
W100:00' a) MiMJO
0010D?O M 00) 0) 0)
OD"
CO OD o)!
aD?co m
I
I
i
N
v ?n m i t? ao
I 010 03 of o
O j
V
j
0 rn (2 N M
-?r-I ? .qr
Q CL
0160-
0-
?-
Q ?
w ?
g d
g > WIWI
> > >
O
O
o?
N
r \
i
i
1
\
t
?
\
o ?
0
0 \
\
\
\
\
o \
O ? \
/r 1
r. 1
1
1
1
\
1
i \
1 \
i ?
\
1
i
?
a % co
OX:
?L?
O
N
0
0
N
Cl
0
rn
O ?i ly
al
C l
r-
°° 1?
? 00 OC,
cq O
m
N
C
r?ry .+
? V
N E
o
2
? o
co
O
?
c? O
Cl, c
o
2 (.)
9 .
o
w Q
H
L
w i
y d °° .!R
°
0 o
a
o
o
CL
a
CO 15
m
E
pp 1 O ^?p "'
y ?
a N
- Ill
U?
ca
(D
U- E
w m
m
m
rn
CL .
J? C'i (D
a? U
?
'
On U +
+
1
III. Project Conditions and Monitoring Results
The first qualitative project evaluation in monitoring year 3 was conducted on 15 May
2008. Third annual quantitative vegetation data were collected during July 2008. The
site was again qualitatively assessed on 11 November 2008.
Flowing water was observed in the channel in 2008 during the May and November site
visits. No water was observed during the July site visit. Several geomorphologic
problem areas were observed during the May and November evaluations.
3.1. Vegetation Assessment
In 2008, the average density for all reaches was 587 live stems per acre, exceeding the
required stem density (320 live stems per acre) by 83 percent. Twelve woody stem
species were originally planted at Tick Creek. Quercus alba, Platanus occidentalis,
Fraxinus pennsylvanica, and Salix nigra had the highest stem density (Appendix A:
Table 5). A total of 37 stems recorded in 2007 were missing or dead in 2008, resulting in
a mortality rate of 23 percent (Appendix A: Table 2). Summary vegetation monitoring
data and plot photos for Monitoring Year 2 can be found in Appendix A.
0 3.1.1. Vegetation Problem Areas
Vegetation problem areas at the Tick Creek restoration site include sparse planting,
invasive herbaceous cover, and relatively low planting success (Figures B.1.1. and
B.1.2.). Reach 1 woody stem planting density was an issue in the areas furthest from the
stream banks (Appendix A3-VP1). Natural succession of perennials, primarily
blackberry (Rubus argutus) has begun throughout Reach 1. This type of early
sucessional herbaceous density is common in recently disturbed areas and can be
beneficial to the planted stems by prolonging soil moisture in upland areas and reducing
early evapotranspiration.
In Reach 2, dog fennel (Eupatorium capillofolium), and Chinese lespedeza's (Lespedeza
cuneata) continue to be a problem (Appendix A.3.-VP2). The planted woody stem
success under these invasive herbaceous stands is relatively high, so, continued
observation, without remedial action, is appropriate.
Reach 3 continues to have relatively minimal invasive species problems. Rubus argutus
has become more widespread around monitoring plot 8. Plot 6 continues to suffer from a
lower success rate than the remaining plots in the restoration (Appendix A.3.-VP3). As
noted in previous years, suspected cause is substrate compaction. The Restoration
Design Plan View map indicates that a relatively large staging area was located here
during construction. Because of the adequate live planted stem density in plot 6, no
remedial action is recommended at this time.
TickCreek Stream Restoration 2008 Monitoring Report
EEP Project #379 Year 3 of 3
RJG&A
Page 8
3.1.2. Current Conditions Plan View
See Figures B.1.1 and B.1.2. in Appendix B for the Current Conditions Plan View.
3.2. Stream Assessment
3.2.1. Procedural Items
3.2.1.1. Morphometric Criteria
RJG&A staff qualitatively evaluated the condition and success of the Tick Creek Stream
Restoration project during May, July, and November 2008. Overall, the site appears to be
maintaining its as-built dimension, pattern, and profile. Based on guidance from EEP,
RJG&A did not collect any geomorphologic data. Photographs were taken at 14
permanent photo locations (established by NCDOT during February 2006) during the
May survey.
3.1.1.2. Hydrologic Criteria
No crest gauges are installed on the Tick Creek site and on-site quantitative hydrologic
evaluation is therefore not possible. As reported in the spring 2008 Initial Assessment,
on-site qualitative evidence of at least one bankfull event (rack and drift lines and
downed vegetation/stems above the bankfull elevation) was observed on 15 May 2008 at
several cross vanes and on the inside of meanders. The previous site visit/observation
was October 2007.
The USGS stream gauge on Tick Creek near Mount Vernon Springs (USGS 02101800) is
located approximately three miles upstream from the restoration's confluence with Tick
Creek. It has a drainage of 15.5 square miles. Bankfull discharge at this gage is 655.2
cubic feet per second (cfs) (Harmen 1999). Data from this gage from September 2005,
when construction was completed, to December 2008 appears in Figure 3 (USGS 2009)
and demonstrates that bankfull events likely occurred in November and December of
2006, April and May of 2007, and March and September 2008. The graph also highlights
the drought that affected the area for much of 2007 into the first few months of 2008.
Heavy precipitation on 4 March and 6-7 September confirms the likelihood of bankfull
events at the restoration site (NC CRONOS 2009).
•
TickCreek Stream Restoration 2008 Monitoring Report
EEP Project #379 Year 3 of 3
RJG&A
Page 9
•
•
•
Figure 3. USGS Stream gauge data for Tick Creek upstream of US 421 - Tick
Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project #379
USGS 02101840 TICK CREEK NEAR MOUNT VERNON SPRINGS, NC
c 2096
0
1506
a
4J
as
a?
1866
cs
508
(D
as
I?
.?
6
..,
°
}
J
-580
° Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan Jul Jan
2606 2008 2007 2067 2008 2888 2609
- Daily naxinun discharge Period of approved data
- Daily nininun discharge ^- Period of provisional data
---- - Daily nean discharge
Exhibit Table V. Verification of Bankfull Events - Tick Creek Stream Restoration -
EEP Project #379
Date of Data
Collection Date of Occurrence
(mm/dd/yy) Method CFS
NA 11/26/06 Proximal USGS gauge resource 1,390
NA 12/25/06 Proximal USGS gauge resource 832
NA 4/15/07 Proximal USGS gauge resource 670
NA 4/16/07 Proximal USGS gauge resource 704
NA 5/2/07 Proximal USGS gauge resource 919
NA 3/4/08 Proximal USGS gauge resource 880
15 May 2008 4 March 2008 Wrack and drift lines NA
NA 9/7/08 Proximal USGS gauge resource 1700
TickCreek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
Page 10
0
•
•
3.2.2. Stream Problem Areas
Headcuts and piping around some of the cross vanes in Reaches 2 and 3 continue to be a
problem. The headcuts and piping at stations 2050 and 2568 continue to be the most
severe and should be monitored. Additionally, low flow during the 2007 drought allowed
fescue and other herbaceous cover to grow in the stream channel (Appendix B.3). This
has negatively affected the bank stability and pattern of the channel and in several places
the thalweg is unidentifiable. It is assumed, however, that if normal rainfall patterns
return and stream distcharge increases that herbaceous cover will die back and the creek
will re-establish a sediment discharge regime.
3.2.3. Fixed Photo Station Photos
Appendix B4 contains the 16 photo station photos.
3.2.4. Stability Assessment
Exhibit Table VII. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability
Assessment Tick Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project #379
Reach 1(300 feet
Feature Initial* MY-01 MY-02 MY-03
A. Riffles 100% 100% 100% 100%
B. Pools 100% 100% 100% 100%
C.Thalweg 100% 100% 100% 100%
D. Meanders 100% 100% 100% 100%
E. Bed General 100% 100% 100% 100%
F. Bank 100% 100% 100% 100%
G. Vanes/J Hooks, etc. 100% 100% 100% 100%
H. Wads and Boulders NA NA NA NA
Reach 2 (1,500 feet)
A. Riffles 100% 100% 100% 92%
B. Pools 100% 100% 100% 90%
C. Thalweg 100% 100% 82% 91%
D. Meanders 100% 100% 100% 100%
E. Bed General 100% 100% 100% 99%
F. Bank 100% 100% 100% 100%
F. Vanes/J Hooks, etc. 100% 93% 95% 100%
G. Wads and Boulders 100% 100% 99% 97%
*These percentages are assumed. Neither the As-built Monitoring Report nor the First
Year Monitoring Report contained any visual stability assessment data.
TickCreek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
Page 11
Exhibit Table VII. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability
Assessment Tick Creek Stream Restoration - EEP Project #379
Reach 3 980 feet
A. Riffles 100% 100% 100% 96%
B. Pools 100% 99% 100% 94%
C.Thalweg 100% 100% 100% 100%
D. Meanders 100% 100% 100% 100%
E. Bed General 100% 100% 100% 97%
F. Bank 100% 100% 100% 97%
G. Vanes/J Hooks, etc. 100% 92% 92% 85%
H. Wads and Boulders 100% 100% 100% 96%
IV. Methodology
Monitoring methodologies follow the current EEP-provided templates and guidelines
(Lee et al 2006). Photographs were taken digitally. A Trimble Geo XT handheld
mapping-grade unit was used to collect problem area locations.
4.1. Stream Methodology
Following guidance from NCEEP, RJG&A did not collect any geomorphologic data in
2008. Qualitative assessments of the stream restoration were done during May, July, and
November using the criteria specified in the Mitigation Plan, the First Annual Monitoring
Report, and standard regulatory guidance and procedures documents.
4.2. Vegetation Methodology
•
Eight representative vegetation survey plots were selected and installed in reaches 1, 2,
and 3 during September 2006, pursuant to the EEP/CVS vegetation monitoring protocol
(Lee et al 2006). All plots measure 100 square meters and are either 10 meters by 10
meters, or five meters by 20 meters. Pursuant to the guidelines, the four corners of each
plot (0,0; 0,10; 10,0; and 10,10) were marked with 18 inch long one half inch diameter
galvanized steel conduit.
Level 1 (planted woody stems) and Level 2 (volunteer woody stems) data collection was
performed in all plots, pursuant to the most recent CVS/EEP protocol (Lee et al 2006).
Within each plot, each planted woody stem location (x and y) was recorded, and height
and live stem diameter were recorded for each stem location. All planted stems were
identified with pink flagging. Vegetation was identified using Weakley (Weakley 2007).
Photos were taken of each vegetation plot from the 0,0 corner.
Tables 1 through 5 in Appendix A contain the data from the vegetation monitoring.
Monitoring plot photos can also be found in Appendix A.
TickCreek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
Page 12
•
•
1]
References
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. L. Rawlins, and John Potpondy. (1994). Stream Channel
Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. USDA, Forest Service.
General Technical Report RM-245.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. (2006).
CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.0. Retrieved October 30, 2006,
from: http://www.nceep.net/business/monitoring/veg/datasheets.htm.
NC CRONOS (2009). North Carolina Climate Retrival and Observations Network of the
Southeast Database COOP Weather Station 317924, Siler City, NC. Retrieved January
21, 2009 from: http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/cronos/?station=317924&temporal=daily
NCDOT (2002). Stream Mitigation Plan, Tick Creek, Condoret Property, Chatham
County, North Carolina. NCDOT, September 22, 2002.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell (1968). Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC.
Rosgen, D L (1996) Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, CO.
Rosgen, DL. (1997). "A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers.
In Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel
Incision, ed. S.S.Y. Wang, E.J. Langendoen and F.B. Shields, Jr. University of
Mississippi Press, Oxford, MS.
USACOE (2003) Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACOE, USEPA, NCWRC,
NCDENR-DWQ
Weakley, Alan (2007). Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding
Areas. Retrieved March 27, 2007 from: http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/flora.htm.
TickCreek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
RJG&A
2008 Monitoring Report
Year 3 of 3
Page 13
Appendix A Vegetation Data
Al. Vegetation Data Tables
Table 1. Vegetation Metadata
Table 2. Vegetation Vigor by Species
Table 3. Damage by Species
Table 4. Damage by Plot
Table 5. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Table 6. Vegetation Problem Areas
A2. Vegetation Problem Area Photos
A3. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
0
V) _o
U
a) 0
C a)
O U "^a
CL m m
_
Y m d C_
E
M w E
U V5 Y U E U
> O
p N
6 N ,>
C "a= u)
U C
? 7
O
m U :3 U)
U
E 0
O >
X
?m
U
E
C
a) m
a
O N C a) E :3
L
uJ
C
? a) m
d C
L
L-:
p M
cu
C C
a) m m
m >' m rn N
E U >.
E m L E
a) U ?-
m
( O U uJ U
d
u) `- m
O
a) (D O 3 -
m > a U
d -a a) O ui
= O
O O
a
E w m U
m m U
m o a)
- a)
° Q
ui CO
(1) L)
(1) M
a a a
cn
2:1 a) w
U
C
N>
N V CD
Lu) E a (u
5-- >+
E 0
_ U)
a'cm
0
O Y a) m 0
E N a) )
C:
= a) O O
°o Y 3 a) N° 'N 3 r c E
w in
O
U U
r- 4)
m
U U
N
a
J m Ch u
)
w U m m
y a) a) a)
a
w? ?g? o??
U U mooc' ?
+_•• d O
U 0 0 0
E .
" a) () ?
(D
a)
dO u) N
N O 0.2)
CL CL
0
) .5 m
N
m
N L L V) -C
E >+ ?O
cn = =
Q)
3 0 0
3 m L L ,?
a
°
a)
° u)
E
m
0 --000
r a
)a
i a
i
0
C
?
"
m
"
m - 4) z ;
? M
CD
O co
M 0
N m v
i
u
i
cu -0
> Z •c 'c :3
6 y y U rn
c
O Y co .N .N O CO
N
a) a) a) a)
U
a' co U E a 0, m m o v v o>>
0? ?c
U Q o o c Q c c E N N x c
m
C
04
a) w
O
U L L
O
O m m N
) p
a Q a) m cu C .- N N in m m E aa))
fns M0 (U ?ww m -i u.ti J??Q a
N
H
W
m W ,
-a N a
r Y ? w
g O °
o m c w W o
m (D
"a 0
0) m Og U) Qo a
Q o) rL
E m 0=
0 V
0
H a
U) a
O .. v?
a. w
a. c
E
?a m m mm a O
.0 mom y
a? o. «; m ca a
oo c `
.N o o
0 m m
E
E
E
?
CL m a) m 0
o w
m ° .?
°°
c
c a
c a
a
Q H w? m 10 V a? M. a a s » 0 0? Q
C
O
N
O
E U- 0)
O Y N Q? M
U m C))- Lo N0000
M
r
a)
'0 0 ) Y 0
m °
UVZ= m ° D•0-a
w Sm ? H a
O o o w> rnd m vE
c .. m
t aoR m N v?U)
Appendix A.I.
Table 2. Veqetation Vigor by Saecies
Species 4 3 2 1 0 Missing Unknown
Betula ni ra 8 2
Cornus amomum 2
Fraxinus enns Ivanica 12 7 5 2 2
Quercus alba 8 9 4 2 6
Quercus falcata 1
Quercus ni ra 3 1
Quercus phellos 2
Salix ni ra 19 6 1 7 2
Quercus rubra 7 2 1
Liriodendron tulipifera 9 2 1 10 1
Platanus occidentalis 33 1 2
TOT: 11 104 27 12 23 14
•
r?
r?
•
•
Appendix A.1.
Table 3. Veael
s
Co
d
Off`
0?1
+ti
Va
rte ,mac
? O?y
Q Q ?
`
?
y
Betula ni ra 10 10
Cornus amomum 2 2
Fraxinus penns Ivanica 28 23 2 1 2
Liriodendron tuli ifera 23 23
Platanus occidentalis 36 21 14 1
Quercus alba 30 30
Quercus falcata 1 1
Quercus ni ra 4 4
Quercus hellos 2 2
Quercus rubra 10 10
Salix ni ra 37 37
TOT: 11 183 163 14 2 2 F72
0
Appendix A.1.
Table 4. Damaqe by Plot
Oy
ff`
O
V a
m ? a
?? ,?F
?? aye ? ?
Q Q a
?
?
? y ;r
O?y
O `c
379-w s-0003- ear:2 21 20 1
379-w s-0004- ear:2 12 12
379-w's-0005- ear:2 31 30 1
379-w's-0006- ear:2 18 18
379-w s-0007- ear:2 42 28 14
379-wjs-0008- ear:2 23 22 1 1 1
379-wis-tck1-vear:2 17 171 1
I 1 379-wjs-tckwjs2-year:2 1 191 161 1 11 1 21
TOT: 8 183 163 14 21 21 21
E
0
•
•
•
E
d?
xco
c ?
c. ?
a?
QM
Appendix A.I.
Table 6. Vegetation Problem Areas - Tick Creek Stream Restoration
EEP Project #379
Feature/Issue Station/Range Probable Cause Photo #
No/Limited planting 30 - 290 Planting oversight VPl
Dense herbaceous Abundant
invasives 550- 1530 groundwater VP2
Lower planted Soil compaction
woody stem success during construction
(relative to Reaches
1 and 2) 2340 - 2575 VP3
•
•
0
•
1/ ,1
u
O
M
V
O
L.
CL
CL
W
W_
C
O
r
L
O
NN?
LIB
E
L
cn
Y
d
d
L
V
Y
V
O
O
O
N
r
r
L
d
O
V
N
7
O
d
V
t0
.a
L
d
t
cn
N
a
O
O
O
N
r
r
N
N
d
V
V
7
CD
w
N
O
O
3
d
w
C
O
Q
L
O
J
M
a
is
•
C
O
L
O
NNQ?
LPL
G
m
L
cn
Y
d
d
L
U
Y
V
H
co
0
0
N
06
ti
O
O
N
N
is
s
a
m
L
co
O
w+
O
s
IL
O
a
a?
c
L
O
C
O
2
c
O
d
O
Q
M
Q
x
c
a?
a
fl.
Q
ti
O
O
N
M
r
N
co
7
Q
r
y.+
O
m
co
O
O
N
M
N
N
O
a
O
N
M
r
81
7
Q
N
O
a
•
lE
5
1 ?
? R
AN
W
L
N
Y
d
L
V
Y
F-
1
0
o
0
N
1? J
N
1
CL
m
L
0
O o•,
a
0
a
O
O
d i
>
P
Q
CL s
Q
co
O
O
N
M
N`
M
0
a
T P.
"
£x. N
Y
r
44,
.q Alt < ?..?
.
yHP 4?
k
f .,
O
C
N
?e .xQ
>r, ?
•
O
c?
L
O
N
O
w
E
O
d
L
a+
Cl)
Y
d
d
L
V
V
0
0
0
N
ad
ti
O
O
N
• N
t
a
c?
L
O
O
t
a
O
a
O
C
O
G
_
w?a
W
d
M
x
A=
W
CL
a
•
¦
A!M
i r
ale
w.
tilt
'Ar
co
O
O
N
M
N
v
O
a
ti
O
O
N
M
N
3
Q
co
4.0
O
a
•
c
O
O
L-
0
N
d
E
m
d
L
cn
Y
O
O
L
U
Y
p
00
0
0
N
ca
ti
O
O
N
• N
t
CL
m
L
tm
O
O
a
O
a
?L
O
C
O
2
C
O
R
O
O
d
M
Q
x
a
Q
,sR n ?t
All I?i?
?. p
y:? a J b? ?;.r
'.y
rI ??`? °rry?> ??
¦
co
O
O
N
M
N
7
co
r
O
IL
ti
O
N
M
r
7
Q
Op
O
a
•
Appendix B Geomorphologic Raw Data
Figure B1. Current Conditions Plan View
B2. Stream Problem Areas Table
B3. Representative Stream Problem Area Photos
B4. Stream Photo-station Photos
B5. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment Table
•
0
...
0 _
co
c °?
W Z
_- o
a
Y
? N c
N
L 40
N
L 0
N m o
0
m
co
c_
? L C
C N Co tp?tp
m s U °
C
V O O
a
At
N af H
k
O Z 0 :
1
)
il w3
U z U - a
CY
pp N v O
Z N uj
;.? 00 O ep
O ` m V _
O N ?
a ?
a a
£
?, c
O
a
:
,
a (0)
2 c
v W
N W E
m rn d
O c
m y
t j
z
N to y
uJ
C
o
o n L
a
a (D
N
' C
o
run CL ca cu E -M
a? y E
p
Ua
:°
m
E 2! w
L
gy
.. _ CO
U
Z
NZ
j \
G 4
O
e-
? j
VN?' I
o?
.f
Q
`? ao
a
? N
,
,
,
,
,
,
` O
,
,
?
,
?
V<
N
N
O U-
0
O
LO
T-
O
O
O
LO
O
0 is 0
k@r
a
r
r? r?+
?y
(D
O U-
0
N
O
LO
0
0
r-
O
to
C:) 0
I&
c?
f
0
0
(O
N
m
°o
LO
N
y
O
O
It
N
l()
I ?
t
4
1
t
t
1
t
1
1
1
T
x
t ?
6y
O
?O
O
O
ti
T
?I
JI
h'
o°
t
t
! t
t
t
t
1
?ry L
1
r 1
1
1
1
tco
t
11:
Utz
l0 t?
?t
1
1
T
O
O
N
O
O
O
T
M
1 I\
?
? £
N 1
:OK - c
11
Y
C
e
?
L
N O
L ?
m
N C
t ?
r m m
O
L
i L d l1
l0 Q V U ? (? OO fl.
a ? M
? m
o _? m
0 a m
o
? ?'
w
1
o
Z 0
Z a 27 5?
00 y
?0 to 7,
?cva
1 0.
L
E
7EL
C
c E
d fl. c Vi O NO InNU WN
O
U m '+?
O c
IL O. 4)
O 8 d
m
3 8
-
0
L.
O
N N L
a
E
v
O
++
y
° `
C
l6 LL
rn
N c6 w
E
L N
m
N
_ = y c
(? i d CO ° a U
a>
w¢v?
?
I
Appendix B.2. Stream Problem Areas Table - Year 3 - 2008 - Tick Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project
#379)
Feature/Issue Station Suspected Cause Photo #
Reach 2
Low flows have allowed vegetation to
No clear channel 790 establish itself in the channel SP1
Low flows, poor sediment transport, lack of
Backcut and piping 1580 coarse backfill SP2 & SP3
Reach 3
Low flows, poor sediment transport, lack of
Backcut and piping 2051 coarse backfill SP2 & SP3
Low flows, poor sediment transport, lack of
Backcut and piping 2398 coarse backfill SP2 & SP3
Low flows, poor sediment transport, lack of
Backcut and piping 2465 coarse backfill SP2 & SP3
Low flows, poor sediment transport, lack of
Backcut and piping 2568 coarse backfill SP2 & SP3
Low flows, poor sediment transport, lack of
Backcut and piping 2748 coarse backfill SP2 & SP3
s
0
•
Q1
M
V
N
O
L-
0.
IL
w
w
O
O
f/J
d
E
?o
m
L
co
Y
d
d
Y
v
F-
co
O
O
N
M
I -
m
a)
W
O
O
t
a
E
m
O
L-
a.
E
?o
m
L
co
a1
r
O
C
d
d
L
CL
a)
m
• M
m
co
O
O
N
r
T
T
tm
c
.Q
.Q
c
ca
Y
V
l9
co
N
a
co
G
O
O
N
T
T
d
c
ea
t
as
c
w
m
O
Y
V
t0
J
CL
cn
O
O
N
T
T
rn
.Q
CL
.c
c
m
V
Y
V
O
m
Cl)
a -
M
ti
M
V
4)
.O
a
a
w
w
Y
4)
L
Y
I--
O
o ,
O
N
ti
O
O
N
N
s
M
O
L
O
r
O
s
a
C
O
0.
O
4.0
O
s
a
C
m
c
m
E
L
d
a
m
x
c
as
a
a
4
.:p'
J
YAr*
y:
r,u ,?.?y7
Y iy tit
ti
0
M
N
co
O
E
m
d
L
N
CL
Y
O
O
J
r
a
a
ti
O
LO
LO
O
E
L
Q
C
Y
O
O
J
a
a
•
•
O
d t 4?
a
w
W
U
Y
_V
co
O r` ,
N ,,pw
ti
0
0
N tL
fn „?'a".'-mss:
O ?a L
0
OZt
a
'o
a `.
0
" 4l
d ,
L { z.
K s
Aa
¦
ki
r ?ti a
,,
xti V
co
0
LO
LO
O
E
m
L
1Fa
N
CL
Y
O
O
J
M
a
IL
ti
0
ti
co
O
eEa
L
i+
N
Q
n
Y
O
O
J 'M
a
a
>?a ? ti g
h Ri ? ? ? - c k ? x t-CT
L R + ??
1 a ?.
w
o
I co
LO
Ln
O
E
m
i+
0
Y
O
O
J
a
a
ti
O
ti
E
L
3
O
•
•
•
'11 v` I i'
a ?... J;
W 7Yr?yr. '? '?i tF;
W
Y V J??I .s ,•? ?K
?y
N~ '?' p+ k r
N . Ah- ,
O
SQspL` ` 'r`-Y{ sa
O Z
C
r +?L
W
:. J .,.
a..-,
NMI
41,
t. --.. 1w
,
r
r
o
~?R W
C
?trj
O
J
?a
0
ti
00
0
E
ev
L
w
C
O
D
C
Y
O
O
J
O
a
a
154 N
1.
'.:1? i4NA 1.
S T?
SAS , '`? t' .•
cg
y T w.
:
,K
W
O
r
Ln
O_
E
m
L
r
N
0
0
O
O
J
?O
CL
IL
0
ti
00
0
E
m
L
y
C
O
0
am
c
O
O
J
O
a
a
•
ti
M
wV
W
.O
a
IL
W
W
Y
d
i
Y
r
co
0
0
N
08
N
M
Q.
L
co
O
4.0
O
s
a
.r
c
.0.
O
w
O
s
IL
c
m
E
d
d:
m
'G
c
d
00.
CL
Q
.yF?4 4^7 I i'?
"RR
1
,t s
'
? ?
?
:
Y
- • +
?
v
ail .?
•1i1:. w .
4 t
Y
co
O
LCD
LCD
E
L
4)
N
O
C
Y
O
rJ
CL
a
O
ti
co
0
G
m
L
c
0
C
Y
O
O
J
a
a
E
•
M
r.+
t)
d
•O
CL
CL
W
W
Y
d
d
L
Y
H
co
O
0
N
06
0
0
N
N
s
CL
R
L
cm
O
w+
O
r
IL
'o
CL
0
O
t
a
C
m
c
ea
E
L
0
a
m
x
m
a
C.
Q
f
A
r ? 4
t
V? .
W O
LO
LO
O
E PM'y
LC yzNF`
IJO
3 k x
0
C t
.Y
O
CL
ti
O
ti
Go
0
E
m
O
L
i+
C
3
0
0
a?
Y
0
0
J
O
a
a
co
O
Ln
Li
O
m
a>
L
N
C
O
am
O
O
J
O
a
a
•
-t
n?. "i cr
Y
.O ?. ?. h t,r
wws
` , ~
?x ` ,JA
,
C1 ..?
L •
? ?
F
W - {a
r
Jr,
{^ < „,
Q !`:? Lr
r
N b
T?? tr
06
?
00 }
.'r
$%- t
N i} r
` " ?7
L EMt
4
J
W
: "2
C * ay
a
? tdaR
}r ?} ?? .'
'?
L Sr
vyS
(Yi Y• v-?1.
4i *KK
CL
CL
I
yN
:?? `
.
Q (t
?
e h?' y \ _-'-'yam
tA,
I
s
W
C
LCD
LO
Q
m
a)
O
}0
VI
c
Y
O
O
J
N
a
a
?`i?•''? Ra••y f? O
e 'M` ++
??"cc p • C
. 'Tt ' 4'
d O
T
C
X
.•
r,
r'? O
O
04
N
•
10
r
O!
M
r
V
.O
a
a
W
W
Y
O
d
L
Y
V
H
co
O
O
N
atf
0
0
N
(A
t
CL
O
L
O
AW
O
L
a
C
O
Q.
O
..,
O
Z
a
d
m
E
L
m
a
m
x
'O
as
a
CL
Q
---.:.
W ' y t ` yam "'
:gay=
ti
O
O
N
co
O
E
d
L
U)
C
O
0
Y
O
O
J
M
r
a
IL
0
/
LO
r
Ln
O
E
as
L
W+
N
O
O
C
O
O
J
a
a
ti
O
O
N
co
O
E
R
d
L
N
C
3
O
0
c
O
O
J
r
a
CL
L-?m
° ° °
°
°
°
°
Q
c
o o o o o
o
T o Z
,? T r
d
a
a) E 00000 000 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0000 as
U a 5 0 0 0 0
N O U) T T T T T 0 0 0
r r [? 0 0 0
T 0 0 0
T T T 0 0 0
T T 0 0 0 0
T T T T ?J-J
``
a (D c 0
a
LA
M a)
?aaaaa
V aaa Q a a aaa o 0 C) CD 0 o aaaa as
zzzzz z z z z z z z z z o o O z z z z zz
?
(D U)
""
o z
ZD
a`
m U) _
L) .m. a< NNNNN
o E
:3
."
"
MMCO
N
N
N
NN
a a <
titititi
as
a) ?
"
T ?
T T ?
o :3 a)
Z a T T T T T T Z Z Z N N N N Z Z
a
C _ a
m •c:
(?0 NNNNN
E MMM N N N NN a a Q
O e T T T T T
0 r T T T r T Z Z Z N N N N Z Z
Z
a m
Ew
0
J9 0
` r C CO U
c
L) L 0 w
.X m
C _
m
E 0
0 d
~ a)
s
O LT
C
C a) C
a)
° co
m
N Y
N
fl O C
C
E C ? O -a C N V - a)
U) -
w 75 U
a)
u d)
0 m . ?
4- m "
'r- :3
(D co a) O
)
C N
a =
°
N
L
a = - C
o ? 0 ia
m m m a)
` cl
m
N a) a
a)
C - a) 0 (n p (0 U
.0 a) :5
!0 O cn c L a) w
r.+ N N E )
_0 U 0 V
U
cl 0 c
m O w
U
m
-p N?
>.
0 m
a ? 0
N 3 m
k
C
-0 m
4) 'a m co
t
E
a)
lA m m a) C . 3 a)
C O U m L1 m m E 0 ' t N N a)
O O C
a a) Q)
E
O V) C_
3 a) a)
C .` E O
0 °
CL -0 O m a)
4) 'a - a)
a O`
E C "O
O
O U O c
m -0 _0
Y O O C
` " a)
3 .0
4 Q M -O > a
m m
m
>, Cl
-
m
T
a)
a) °
U C T
U
O ._
m
c
U m
?+
N
_
m
C` M c m
C N C 0 0 C C
to a) a) m N _ c
4-- m N
w-
Y
!a a m O N
E w
Q) U N L O M U
C:
a) C 7
0 Z
a) N 0
.
U) N
7
n (D
. r-
? C U
L O
e N a) a) Q O O w (D )
-0 U NZD C" " O
> aaLL?J aU1J D 0 0 0aU) 0U m a Li2aLL LL LL
N M IT L N m - N r N co r N L c- N M rt N
m 12
25 U)
Z' O H cm
cu
3 "o
a) i N '
y
C O -
O c
m
v ,?
D` C
d
CL
?'
m +. a H m a) `° m
co
> '°
=
O
of m
Q Li U Q m U G 111 S Li (j 2 m
•
rn?
4) c o
R 0 ,co
LL
ty
a
c O 0
m ? N
a) 0
a) V
a
o tU c
a a) c U
'
CL
w
M Q)
N Y
:3 U)
"-
p
L Z
D
.
a
v <'53 rn Cn a
C H O O M M r
Z a
a
c
o
N
°
c
? c
Co
LO
M
r Cn 7 e c: co co
CD
Z
w a
E ++
M d
d w
r o
U) o
Y LO
d T_
N
U L
Y V
C) ?
C
4)
G
N
U) C
U) N
In N
In
a a)
L)
(L
m m s
cc
N Q) `u.
A C 1
a
?
O O C
.
O
L •5
n C
a
CL
L. N
Q M Q) CL
T
CO
_
OS O C
O
O C
3
tl)
CS
C
Q Q
C
'
CL 11
m
x w
C
i O d
4)
Q +O+ G)
4 4) M
LLU
a
N Cl) T
M ao (n
rn rn
z z
a) 0)
Cl) Cl)
IMI
M
rn
a
Z
v
0
CO
Q
Z
It
O
co
?I
C
c
a
f
a
C
c
C
a
C
.C
z
c
a
2
a
f
1 ?
a
> £
c
f
0
a
j C
1 -
t
c
f
1
F
o O
0 0
z z
NIO
M
I I
co
C
C
c
N
E
N
o aD c
N N 0
U •C a) •C
CS O`
a c
O C
N C 0
-C C O 1
() 'a C
C C 3 C
?J aco d
cr L N C'
_N
O
O
a
m
C
C
. a
1 C
a
C
i C
C
i
C
a
C
la
:z
a
i f
f 0
a
1
c
I ?
0
a
) u
f
L c
)C
C,
n
i C
O
Cl)
O
N
i ?
N
i -
O
C
V
E
i O
m
(?9
U)
i C
i ?
1 C
N
i ?
N
1 O
I ?
m
C
!D
47
S
c
c
c
4
C,
r
r
c
c
c
>c
>c
. c
I C,
Ir
C,
I
o
o
r
0
O
I z
i
z
a
a
a
a
r
n
d
a
Z
a
z
0
Cn
C
C 3
O C
m 3
E -6
O Cn
w C
(C6 to
n C
CD
u
cu
N O
O Ca
- N
?CU
C
O O
U N
(D n CU
N N
C 'O
C .O
CO a)
U -0 C
? C
? C
E CU C
4) _c
C7 U a
? N t
'a m
d =
co
N
ui
, o
T
0
0
r
0
O
Z
a
z
0
0
z
r•
N
r-
N
Y
C
f0
C
E
7
0
0
C U
N N
3 E
m
t..
C O
O U
9 m
O
N
a)
U i
1 Q LL
r r
U)
? C
C
m >
ii 6
c
c
c
c
c
a
2
r
Cs
rn
z
I Cl)
t M
a
Z
c
c
c
a
Z
d
7 ?
U m
to to
O C
a)
+
a) 0
LL LL
-IN
m •
-a dN
= °
P_.?
d ?
) `o
LL. m
CL
? •r a) o
V E-
a O O fl- 0
O O
` O U) C 00 O
T T T
CL Q) c 0
'
a
w
M N
? (D .C 0 ()
49 f6
Q Q Q Q
0 o E a)y ZZZZ
i
a -
:3 c
p z D
CL
'
V a)
O Q
T T T T
d O E E . 3 rMco MM
O Z
a
c _ a
?
0 a) •
a
0 (d E T T? T
rr ? O O C M M N M
0) Z
It a- co
E?
o
U)
Y ?
d ?
` M
U v
Y t0
_U
C
a)
E v)
a)
4'! C
1
O 4) C
U) m C
H L
a a)
C
z, L)
c
_
a
() a) a
L
R
ar c0
N E
A a N
i M O
O w a) a)
o .7 Cl
C
a) aa) a
O Q m m a)
d ` m
O 0 E
MO) (L) E u c
>
?
a`QLT
N M ?t
tl')
m
k
c 0 c m
a 4? 0)
na r
m
Q Li U Q
0
o?
O
Q
Z
O
O
T
Q
Z
N
M
CO
00
00
Z
N
M
o)
m
O
Z
N
Cl)
O
O
Q
Z
O
co
0
O
T
O
O
Q
Z
O
co
O
O
T
Z
O
M
C
C
Q
Z
O
M
O
O
T
Q
Z
O
M
NI MINIMI cool cool MOIC)IM
C
C
a) '
? a) C
a) ? O
U a) cn
U O
C
O C N
U ° (1)
(1) L)
O
C r?
C C
C
` O U
a
a a)
C
a
m o
a) a) : a) °?
'
An ED E t?
a) o cn
0 a)
0
0
0 c
c
Q
C
E m
Q a
r
a3 a3 M
' t)
U C
c cn
a) `= c w 3 w
J a cn -j n o O
L6 T N M T N r
?
O
w? 3 °
C
O 0 ca
a.
m U ?
C
0
E
O
f0
L
_C
O
a
C
O
U
C
O
U
3
O
C
a
O
a)
0
w
O
w
O
0
0
T-
O
O
T
Q
Z
O
M
V- ti
w a)
rn rn rn IT
LO C)
Q
T
T N TN Z
Z Z Z CV)
Z Z Z N
`O
0)
c
C O
O C
m 0
Ea
O O
` C
L Y
C
,n U L
cu C
m O C
O N E
O ` V)
a a)
m O
C j
c6 = C U
a m N
m
L 3 E
N co
C a C 00
V L a) 0 L)
tm a7
.C O L
c0 C N O
C N U > a)
C7 U cu Q li
T N L T T 1
A N
a `m c ?
m a) m >
W (0 ci (7
N
.O
a
C
c0
N
O
O U
U
I O
C c
.ia
3a
U 0
m[_-O
m a)
c`p ' U
Qlfn
M cr
N
91) w
00 0)
00
Q
Z
M
LO
N
N
O
n
c6
C
m
L
V
T t- V
00 00 O
Z Z Z
T T
M M M
LO r-
N N M
(L) (1)
c0 ?
O
N 7
U
a)
cn
ca
L
a) O
a)
O 0
O C 3
_
a • U
C - cn
O
m O O
CD a)
c a) m
Q LL a
N
a
3
r-
O
Q
Z
'gr
M
M
M
m
.a
a)
N
C
0
O
LL
N
O
7
O
m