310060_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200821

U Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Reason for Visit: G,"Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Den
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: /0 County:
Farm Name: ,n5ulzf/,J f /iw-o Owner Email:
Owner Name: /Y , G, A 'I P' j�'It/j5 LLC Phone:
r�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
OGI,II�� f Onsite Representative: 111'lc sl, -11
Certified Operator: t ��
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
to Finish
to Feeder
rto Finish
v to Wean
vto Feeder
Other
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
I Access
Region: kk6
Certification Number: QLq 71�t
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
GI INon-Layer
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Cow
—Dairy
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes ®'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
DAo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
`1 -
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 1.,
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ql/,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[4-K/o ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
E!No ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Egl<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
©.No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
mNFtf ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
®NO ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
�(
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
i o NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
F2 'Co ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
nNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
2<0_ ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ro ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
EQ,1go ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
621. D s record keeping need improvement? If yes, check theappropriate box below. es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Zaste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E;_4�tr ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: 3 1- i7 Date of Inspection: F61tT=
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
of facility to better explain
1�CC6,I(U)0.�
any YES answers anil/or any atltlr
situations (use additional panes as
NXv��,
,t It
WA L�oH
7hslao ) 39 1,20
Izlz��(i 3,7q �,9G p/
yl�al►9 a,31
�Ct,l�lvrc>r�io�S ��17�
slud�e 5udvey
so�1s;
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
a,37
M- 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
D_1V0❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes DKo ❑ NpJ ❑ NE
❑ Yes [—]No L 'V�'IA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [b.j"'" ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [J,W ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EY111O ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
recommendations or any other comments.
Sid ASLw rRRas
C �Cco.(cu�ci�-c c�,'fa
CkDA, (A0"l,C oca )r. Q
a - Au ekaep w'4
3
4,r 33,9
Zr 90(z 1r1Cla
TD"'e 6)41-e- fnd of—aODC
Phone:
Date: R /11 AA
21412015
Page 3 of 3