20020906 Ver 1_Monitoring Report_20090521

0 - 0 Ob
Suck Creek Stream Restoration
Project No. 368
2008 Monitoring Report (Final): Year 5 of 5
40

K .F
S ? 4
t
s

FF ?
t?
? 4•

March 2009 ^"n
G?? ? .?" (BUJ ? ?
Prepared for: NCDENR-EEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared by: Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
9101 Southern Pine Blvd.,
Charlotte, NC 28273
??05
Suite 160
Design Firm: The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
1001 Wade Avenue, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27605
g{ koein
S t { I
i S{ f D`I t t??i
t!•• T
r '

OP
•
?J V
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SECTION 1- PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting ..................................................................................................1-1
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives .......................................................................... 1-1
1.3 Project History and Background ................................................................................ 1-2
1.4 Monitoring Plan View ................................................................................................ 1-4
•
SECTION 2 - PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment .............................................................................................. 2-1
2. 1.1 Soil Data ...................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1.2 Vegetative Current Conditions ................................................................... 2-1
2.1.3 Vegetative Current Condition Plan View ................................................... 2-1
2.1.4 Stem Counts ................................................................................................ 2-2
2.1.5 Vegetation Plot Photos ................................................................................ 2-2
2.2. Stream Assessment ................................................................................................... 2-2
2.2.1 Stream Current Condition Plan View ......................................................... 2-2
2.2.2 Stream Current Condition Table ................................................................. 2-2
2.2.3 Numbered Issues Photo Section .................................................................. 2-3
2.2.4 Fixed Photo Station Photos ......................................................................... 2-3
2.2.5 Stability Assessment ................................................................................... 2-3
2.2.6 Quantitative Measures Tables ..................................................................... 2-5
2.2.7 Hydrologic Criteria ..................................................................................... 2-8
SECTION 3 - METHODOLOGY
3.1 Methodology .............................................................................................................. 3-1
•
SECTION 4 - REFERENCES
SECTION 5 - FIGURES
SECTION 6 - APPENDICES
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
Page ii
Table of Contents
•
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives ........................................................ 1-2
Table 1.2 Project Activity and Reporting History ...............................................................1-3
Table 1.3 Project Contacts ...................................................................................................1-3
Table 1.4 Project Background .............................................................................................. 1-4
Table 2.1 Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment .................................... 2-5
Table 2.2 Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic As-Built Summary .................................... 2-6
Table 2.3 Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary .............................................. 2-7
Table 2.4 Verification of Bankfull Events ........................................................................... 2-9
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Project Location and Watershed Map
Figure 1.2 Monitoring Plan View Map
List of Appendices
•
0
Appendix 1 Vegetation Raw Data
Appendix 2 Geomorphic and Stream Stability Data
Appendix 3 Current Condition Plan View (Integrated)
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
on
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0
•
• Executive Summary
The Suck Creek Stream Restoration Project (Site) is located on the Richardson Farm in Moore
County, North Carolina, immediately west of the Town of Carthage. The stream restoration
project consisted of restoring 3,260 linear feet (10 of Suck Creek, restoring 7.8 acres (ac) of
associated riparian zone, providing controlled cattle crossings, and fencing the riparian corridor
to exclude cattle access. The following goals were established for the Site (The if and ac listed
in the project goals below are not the same as the final as-built if and acreage for stream and
wetland restoration/enhancement work completed).
1. Restore 3,2601f of Suck Creek through geomorphic modification through dimension, pattern,
and profile adjustments, and cattle exclusion.
2. Establish a riparian zone (7.8 ac) surrounding restored sections of Suck Creek.
3. Improve the habitat within the channel and the riparian zone.
4. Provide cattle exclusion fencing and controlled crossings to protect the restoration effort.
5. Provide perpetual protection of the riparian area and stream with a conservation easement.
The Site was restored by relocating approximately 3,260 if of the existing channel to establish a
stable C4 stream type channel (Priority 1). Suck Creek's riparian areas were planted to improve
habitat, stabilize streambanks, and reduce ambient water temperature. A sinuous, stable pattern
with riffle-pool bed features was constructed. Cross vanes, log vanes, root wads, and constructed
• riffles were installed to provide bank stabilization and maintain grade control. Approximately
7.8 ac of riparian buffer were preserved by fencing the entire Site to exclude cattle access and
establish controlled cattle crossings. Riparian areas along the channel were planted with native
grasses and woody stem vegetation. Streambanks were stabilized with geotextile matting, native
grasses, and likestakes. This report serves as the 5th year of the 5 year monitoring plan for the
Site.
The 2008 vegetation plot monitoring results indicate that the Site appears to be meeting
vegetation success criteria. Thick herbaceous growth covers nearly all of the streambanks and
riparian zone. The herbaceous growth is dominated by tall wormwood (Artemisia caudata) and
whorled coreopsis (Coreopsis verticillata). The thickest woody stem growth occurs on the
streambanks. Natural recruited volunteers such as black willow (Salix nigra) and river birch
(Betula nigra) have formed dense, irregular patches along the streambanks. Regeneration from
likestakes also contributes to the higher woody stem densities observed along streambanks. Stem
density rapidly decreases with distance away from the streambanks. Sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis) and sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) are the most common woody plants
outside of the streambanks.
Seven (plots 3-9) of the nine previously established vegetation monitoring plots were monitored
within the riparian buffer for the 2008 monitoring year. The survival rate for the woody
vegetation monitored for 2008 is 50%. The monitoring data indicates an average of 10 stems per
plot. Using the monitoring plots size of 10m x 10m (0.025 ac), the site density is approximately
400 planted stems per acre. The success goal in year 5 for planted woody vegetation is 260
stems per acre. Furthermore, many natural recruitment stems were observed within the seven
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 5 of 5 March 2009
Project No. 368
Page 2
Executive Summary
• plots monitored. If these volunteers were also included in the stem average and site density
calculation, then the number would increase dramatically. The site has satisfied this goal for
monitoring year 5.
Results from the 2008 stream monitoring effort indicate that Suck Creek is maintaining vertical
and lateral stability. A few problem areas were observed, such as moderate bank erosion, in-
stream vegetation, beaver dams, and inundatedibackwater areas. Areas with in-stream vegetation
growth could potentially result in localized areas of aggradation, and lead to lateral and/or
vertical shifts in the stream. These areas will continue to be monitored closely for significant
adjustments in the bed features and the channel thalweg. It is recommended that the beaver
activity and the associated dams should be removed to prevent inundation areas from evolving
and to restore the natural hydrologic flow regime.
Overall, the Site appears to be stable and has met stream and vegetation goals for monitoring
year 5.
•
11
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 5 of 5 March 2009
Project No. 368

SECTION I
PROJECT BACKGROUND
11
0
. SECTION 1
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The background information provided in this report is referenced from the mitigation plan and
previous monitoring reports prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and The Louis
Berger Group.
1.1 Location and Setting
The Site is located on the Richardson Farm in Moore County, North Carolina, immediately west
of the Town of Carthage (Figure 1.1). The stream restoration project consisted of restoring 3,260
If of Suck Creek, restoring 7.8 ac of associated riparian zone, providing controlled cattle
crossings, and fencing the riparian corridor to exclude cattle access.
To access the site from Raleigh, follow US-1 south to US 151501 toward Carthage. When
approaching Carthage, take NC-24/Monroe Street into downtown. Go through the downtown
traffic circle to Dowd Road (SR 1240). Take Dowd Road west away from Carthage for
approximately 1.5 miles. Take a right onto Beulah Hill Church Road / Mt. Carmel Road (SR
1210). After approximately 1.5 miles, turn right onto Richardson Farm Road (SR 1290), which
is a gravel road. Follow Richardson Farm Road to the primary residence and then turn left onto
a gravel road. Follow the gravel road past the cattle nursery and chicken barns. The upper
• section of the project stream is located at the bottom of the hill.
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Suck Creek is located within the Southeastern Plains Physiographic Region. The Suck Creek
site drains a portion of the Deep River Subbasin (HUC 03030003) and the North Carolina
Department of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Subbasin 03-06-10 of the Cape Fear River Basin. Suck
Creek runs through the agricultural property of Bobby Richardson and family. Prior to
restoration, the site was predominantly utilized for cattle grazing. Historically, the land was
cleared to provide pasture land, with access to the stream for cattle watering. Suck Creek
appears to previously have been channelized / straightened. These activities are thought to have
inhibited stream channel stability; therefore, producing an incised, eroded stream. Furthermore,
the channel incision may have caused adjacent hydric soils to become less saturated. The
following goals were established for the Site (The if and ac listed in the project goals below are
not the same as the final as-built if and acreage for restoration work completed).
1. Restore 3,2601f of Suck Creek through geomorphic modification through dimension, pattern,
and profile adjustments, and cattle exclusion.
2. Establish a riparian zone (7.8 ac) surrounding restored sections of Suck Creek.
3. Improve the habitat within the channel and the riparian zone.
4. Provide cattle exclusion fencing and controlled crossings to protect the restoration effort.
• 5. Provide perpetual protection of the riparian area and stream with a conservation easement.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 5 of 5 March 2009
Project No. 368
Paae 1-2
Project Background
The Site was restored by relocating approximately 3,260 if of the existing channel to establish a
stable C4 stream type channel (Priority 1). Suck Creek's riparian areas were planted to improve
habitat, stabilize streambanks, and reduce ambient water temperature. A sinuous, stable pattern,
with riffle-pool bed features was constructed. Cross vanes, log vanes, root wads, and constructed
riffles were installed to provide bank stabilization and maintain grade control. Approximately
7.8 ac of riparian buffer establishment were preserved by fencing in the entire site to exclude
cattle access to Suck Creek and establishing controlled cattle crossings (Table 1.1). Riparian
areas along the channel were planted with native grasses and woody stem vegetation.
Streambanks were stabilized with geotextile matting, native grasses, and likestakes.
Table 1.1
Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Suck Creek/Project No. 368
•
0
Linear Stationing
Segment/Reach Mitigation Type Approach Footage or (ft) Comments
Acres
Channel restoration,
relocation with use of
Main Channel Restoration P1 2
963 if 0+00-29+63
, grade control and bank
protection structures.
Buffer
Riparian area Restoration --- 7.8 ac
Restoration/Replanting
Component Summations
Wetland (ac)
Restoration Level Stream (10 Non- Upland (ac) Buffer (ac) BMP
Riparian Riparian
Restoration (R) 2,963 N/A N/A N/A 7.8 N/A
Enhancement (E) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Enhancement I (E) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Enhancement II (E) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Creation (C) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Preservation (P) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
HQ Preservation (P) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Totals 2,963 N/A N/A N/A 7.8 N/A
t t ne renal linear tootage and acreage listed above is the based on the as-built values constructed on-site.
1.3 Project History and Background
The stream restoration was designed by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Monitoring has been
conducted annually from 2004 to present. This report serves as year 5 of the 5 year monitoring
plan for the Site. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide detailed project activity, history and contact
information for this project. Table 1.4 provides more in-depth watershed/site background for
Suck Creek.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
Page 1-3
Project Background
L'
Table 1.2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Suck Creek/Project No. 368
Activity or Report Data Collection Completed Actual Completion or Delivery
Restoration Plan unknown unknown
Final Design-90% unknown 2002
Construction unknown unknown
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area* unknown unknown
Permanent seed mix applied to reach unknown April 2003
Mitigation Plan/ As-Built (Year 0 Monitoring) unknown July 2004
Year 1 Monitoring June 2005 December 2004
Year 2 Monitoring September 2006 December 2005
Year 3 Monitoring August 2006 November 2006
Year 4 Monitoring August 2007 January 2007
Year 5 Monitoring May 2008 February 2009
*Seed and mulch are added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 1.3
Project Contacts
Suck Creek /Project No. 368
•
•
Mr. Will Wilhelm
Designer Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
PO Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636
Contractor's Name Mr. Bill Wright

Shamrock Environmental Corporation
Planting Contractor PO Box 14987

Seeding Contractor Greensboro, NC 27415
Monitoring Performers
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Year 1 PO Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636
The Louis Berger Group
Year 2-4 1513 Walnut Street, Suite 250
Cary, NC 27511
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 5 9101 Southern Pine Blvd., Suite 160
Charlotte, NC 28273
Stream Monitoring, POC
Kirsten Young, 704-527-4106 ext.246
Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
Page 1-4
Project Background
•
•
•
Table 1.4
Project Background
Suck Creek/Project No. 368
Project County Moore County, North Carolina
Drainage Area (upper reach) 4.7 s q. mi
Drainage Area Lower reach 4.8 s q. mi
Drainage impervious cover estimate <2%
Stream Order 2"
Ph sio ra hic Region Piedmont
Ecore ion Sand Hills
Ros en Classification of As-built C4

Cowardin Classification Riverine Lower Perennial
Unconsolidated Bottom Sand Substrate
R2UB2
Dominant soil types Chewacla silt loam, Tetotum silt loam
Reference site ID Upstream of project site and Richland
Creek
USGS HUC for Project and Reference 03030003
NCDW Sub-basin for Project and Reference 03-06-10
NCDW classification for Project and Reference C
NCDW classification of Reach 1 C
NCDW classification of Reach 2 C
An portion of an project segment 303d list? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed
segment? No
Reason for 303d listing or stressor? N/A
% of project easement fenced? 100%
1.4 Monitoring Plan View
The monitoring plan view map (Figure 1.2) illustrates the location of the longitudinal profile
stations, cross-section stations, vegetation plots, photo points, and gauges. A total of four cross-
sections were previously established within Suck Creek. Approximately 900 if of longitudinal
profile was monitored. Seven of the nine previously established vegetation plots were monitored
in 2008. Photographs were taken upstream and downstream at each cross-section and at existing
photo points.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
•

SECTION 2
C
PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
0
• SECTION 2
PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
The following monitoring results are from the 2008 (year 5 of 5) survey completed in May and
June 2008.
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
JJG conducted the vegetative assessment and vegetative plot analysis June 2008 per the 2006
CVS-EEP Level 2 protocol (Lee et al., 2006). Seven of the nine CVS/EEP plots were surveyed
in 2008 per the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) request (Mac Haupt)
dated February 9, 2008. Success criteria for vegetation were established in July 2004 by
Kimley-Horn and Associates. Planted zones related to the stream restoration consist of the
streambank and the buffer area adjacent to the stream. The riparian zone begins at the top of
bank and proceeds perpendicular to the stream. The planted streambank initiates at base flow
elevation and extends to the top of bank. The overall success of these two particular planted
zones is good. Livestakes and herbaceous species along the streambank are healthy and
abundant. The riparian buffer is dominated by a thick herbaceous layer with numerous shrubs
and saplings throughout. Natural recruitment vegetation appears to be dominant, which is most
likely due to the native seed bank.
• 2.1.1 Soil Data
Suck Creek is situated within an agricultural valley in the Sand Hills EcoRegion of the North
Carolina Piedmont Physiographic region. Based on the Generalized Geologic Map of North
Carolina, the local geology consists of sedimentary rocks, including sand, sandstone, and clay.
Predominant soil types located within the project watershed include Chewacla soils and Tetotum
silt loam. Researchable data indicates that the soils within the project area are those found in
alluvial landforms in this physiographic region; however, grading and filling activities during
construction likely have disturbed the parent soil material.
2.1.2 Vegetative Current Condition
The following general observations were noted regarding the riparian area and associated
vegetation. Please refer to Appendix 1.1 and 1.2 for more details on vegetative current condition
areas and photos.
¦ Herbaceous seeding appears to provide adequate soil cover on both the floodplain and
streambanks.
2.1.3 Vegetative Current Condition Plan View
Please refer to Appendix 3 for location of vegetative current condition areas onsite and Appendix
• 1.2 for representative vegetation current condition photos.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 5 of 5 March 2009
Project No. 368
Page 2-2
Project Condition and Monitoring Results
• 2.1.4 Stem Counts
Thick herbaceous growth covers nearly all of the streambanks and riparian zone. The herbaceous
growth is dominated by tall wormwood (Artemisia caudata) and whorled coreopsis (Coreopsis
verticillata). Natural recruited volunteers such as black willow (Salix nigra) and river birch
(Betula nigra) have formed dense, irregular patches along the streambanks. This has contributed
to the streambanks dense woody stem vegetation growth as well as the regeneration from
likestakes along the streambanks. Stem density rapidly decreases with distance away from the
streambanks. Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) and sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) are the
most common woody plants outside of the streambanks.
The 2008 survival rate for the woody vegetation monitored is 50%. The monitoring data
indicates an average of 10 stems per plot. Using the monitoring plots size of 10m x 10m (0.025
ac), the site density is approximately 400 planted stems per acre. The year 5 success goal as
determined in the 2004 mitigation plan for planted woody vegetation is 260 stems per acre.
Furthermore, many natural recruitment stems were observed within all seven plots. If these
volunteers were also included in the stem average and site density calculation, then the number
would increase dramatically. The site has satisfied this goal for monitoring year 5.
In conclusion, the vegetation throughout the stream and riparian restoration project meets the
success requirements. Although some loss of streambank vegetation has occurred, the overall
• growth of the riparian buffer is good. Per the success criterion for the 2008 monitoring year, the
Site has exceeded the year 5 mitigation goal of 260 stems per acre.
2.1.5 Vegetation Plot Photos
Please refer to Appendix 1.3 for photographs of the monitoring plots.
2.2 Stream Assessment
Stream dimension, pattern, profile, and substrate were evaluated within 900 if of the stream
restoration site. The stream assessment included walking the entire stream reach and monitoring
900 if of longitudinal profile and four (4) pre-established cross-sections. Please refer to Table
2.1 and Appendix 2 for the stability assessment, stream photographs, and raw data, Table 2.2 for
the baseline morphology and hydraulic as-built summary, Table 2.3 for monitoring years 2004-
2008 morphology and hydraulic summary, and Appendix 3 for the current condition plan view
map.
2.2.1 Stream Current Condition Plan View
Please refer to Appendix 3 for location of stream current condition areas onsite.
2.2.2 Stream Current Condition Table
Please refer to Appendix 2.1 for the stream current condition table.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 5 of 5 March 2009
Project No. 368
2-3
Project Condition and Monitoring Results
9 2.2.3 Numbered Issues Photo Section
Please refer to Appendix 2.2 for representative stream current condition photos.
2.2.4 Fixed Photo Station Photos
Please refer to Appendix 2.3 for stream photo station photos and Appendix 2.4 for stream cross-
section photos.
2.2.5 Stability Assessment
Overall, the pattern, profile, and dimension of the restored channel appear to be stable. After
reviewing last year's monitoring report a few bank stability conditions appear to have advanced
since the previous monitoring year. In-stream thalweg conditions appear to have also shifted due
to in-stream vegetation growth and beaver activity. The following general observations were
noted.
¦ In a few outer bends, there are areas of moderate to severe bank erosion. Most of these areas
of bank instability appear to be new conditions, not previously addressed in the 2007
monitoring report. Station 17+62 and 20+70 are the only erosional areas noted in previous
monitoring reports. JJG was not able to determine in the 2008 monitoring year whether or
• not the bank conditions noted in earlier reports have advanced from the previous monitoring
year (2007).
¦ The majority of structures appear to be in good condition; however, moderate to severe
scouring is occurring along the outer arm of one structure. At stationing 17+12, the cross
vane was determined to be stressed, due to severe bank scour around the boulder arms.
¦ Several mid-channel bars have formed throughout the Site (Approximate stationing 4+08,
7+25, 10+65, 11+79, and 19+08). Typically this is due to in-stream vegetation growth
occurring sporadically throughout the entire stream restoration project creating abnormal
flow conditions.
¦ Beaver activity is evident at the lower end of the Site. Approximately at station 28+13 there
is a well established beaver dam which has created inundated conditions upstream
(approximate station from 23+65 through 28+13). Flow is contained within the top of bank
(bankfull) elevation and had not yet backed up onto the floodplain at the time of the stream
survey was conducted.
Upper Reach
Cross-sections 1 and 2 are located within the Upper Reach. No significant changes in channel
dimension were observed that indicate vertical or lateral instability is occurring.
The average water surface slope and the average bankfull slope were very similar for the
surveyed reach, 0.0020 ft/ft and 0.0022 ft/ft, respectively. The surveyed water surface slope was
the same as the proposed 0.0020 ft/ft and also similar to the previous monitoring years surveyed
slopes. The profile appears stable and is not showing significant vertical incision; however, fine
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 5 of 5 March 2009
Project No. 368
Page 2-4
Project Condition and Monitoring Results
silt deposition has impacted the streambed morphology. In-stream vegetation growth and
• abnormal rainfall conditions over the monitoring years are most likely attributing to the increase
in sediment deposition. Several compound pools have developed throughout the reach, most
likely due to the increase of in-stream vegetation growth and sediment deposition.
Lower Reach
Cross-sections 3 and 4 are located within the Lower Reach. Both cross-section 3 and 4 appear to
be stable with minimal erosion occurring. The average water surface slope and the average
bankfull slope were different for the 2008 surveyed reach, 0.0004 ft/ft and 0.0023 ft/ft,
respectively. These differences are most likely due to the inundated conditions occurring in the
lower reach from beaver activities. The surveyed water surface slope was slightly higher than
the proposed 0.0020 ft/ft, but had a lower slope compared to the previous surveyed slopes in
2005. The profile appears stable and is not showing significant shifting in the bed features;
however, results indicate there is a slight change. This change could be due to the abnormal flow
conditions occurring within the channel due to the in-stream vegetation and beaver activity.
In summary, the Upper and Lower Reach stream dimension, pattern, and profile appear stable.
To accurately assess the Suck Creek pattern and profile data, this year's (2008) monitoring data
results and visual assessments were only compared to the monitoring years 1-3 (2004-2006) data
results. The monitoring data provided from the 2007 monitoring year was inconsistent with the
other monitoring years and therefore it was removed from the longitudinal plots and calculations.
The 2007 longitudinal data provided appears to have utilized a different datum elevation than the
other monitoring data. When plotted with the other annual data the 2007 profile data indicated a
significant elevation drop in the channel thalweg, which does not appear to have occurred.
Furthermore, historic drought conditions were occurring statewide during the 2007 monitoring
year that were most likely not conducive to illustrate such a significant drop in the thalweg as
shown in the 2007 data. A few problem areas were observed, such as moderate bank erosion, in-
stream vegetation, beaver dams, and inundated/backwater areas. Areas with in-stream vegetation
growth have provided secondary habitat, but could potentially result in localized areas of
aggradation and lead to lateral and/or vertical shifts in the stream. The channel appears to be
functioning in the areas where beaver activity has not impacted the channel hydrology.
•
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
Year 5 of 5 March 2009
Project No. 368
Page 2-5
Project Condition and Monitoring Results
•
Table 2.1
Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Suck Creek/Project No. 368
Upper Reach MYl
(2004) MY2
(2005) MY3
(2006) MY4
(2007) MY5
(2008)
A. Riffles N/A 88% 88% 88% 88%
B. Pools N/A 88% 88% 88% 88%
C. Thalweg N/A 100% 100% 100% 100%
D. Meanders N/A 100% 100% 100% 100%
E. Bed General N/A 99% 99% 94% 99%
F. Bank N/A 99% 99% 94% 100%
G. Vanes N/A 100% 100% 100% 100%
H. Wads/ Boulders N/A 100% 100% 100% 100%

is
Lower Reach MYl
(2004) MY2
(2005) MY3
(2006) MY4
(2007) MY5
(2008)
A. Riffles N/A 94% 94% 94% 75%
B. Pools N/A 100% 100% 100% 100%
C. Thalwe N/A 100% 100% 100% 100%
D. Meanders N/A 99% 99% 99% 94%
E. Bed General N/A 100% 100% 96% 100%
F. Bank N/A 100% 100% 96% 99%
G. Vanes N/A 85% 85% 84% 95%
H. Wads/ Boulders N/A 96% 96% 96%
1

100%
2.2.6 Quantitative Measures Tables
Tables 2.2 and 2.3 display morphological summary data from all monitoring years. Raw survey
data can be found in Appendix 2.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
N ?
N N
CC
O
cz
C
O
O
U
N
O
R
O
?00
??z
d M
v Z
a ?.
u
U ? L
R
R ?
U
o ,x
o ?
.c °
a `n
s.
0
c
R
W
•

U -0
O
Q
O r?
M
.
N
Q
Q
Q
Q
00
c
C
N O
M
z
M ?
°. O
O
N
z
z
z
z
.--?
N CD
O
oo
--?
oo
p
?i N Q\ \O -- Q ct O rq r C
?"' V N \ r- 00 ' ' O

? M ? p
^? z _ p ?
00 00
00
O
M

0
a
? l
Q
M
N 01
¢
Q
Q
:1
¢ Q
O M
o z N n z z z z
Q Q Q O Q Q
z z z g z z
d O Q O
t? N z m '-' N N z z z z O 00 m ?
4n N Q N --i M
y ' , ,
O ? , , , 00

y p
N
M
N z O
O O
N H
v? N

M
p
,? w N Q ? O? ?p M Q Q Q Q p .
-? M
^y N z O N z z z z

d O

N ?O

? ?D

t?
00
?
Q1
N ?
M
t

Q

Q
N
O
O
. O 000

N

Q:

Q O
O
O

Q
O
?

Q

Q i'r

Q

Q ?D O

O

A
n
cD
0O
M o
p
z
z ?
O d
O ?
N
z
z
A
z
z
z
y
z
z ?
O
N Q
z 7
U
N O n O

O p
y S NO Q N Q Q Q Q Q Q O Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
z 0
0 N O\ M z z -4 ?i
F- ,Zi z N z z z z ? 00
~ y z z z
Q
L 0 00 ? C>
3.
w
6
+
.+ r- M N O M 'T 00 r+ .6.
U ? v? ? O ? ? M Q Q O '? N O? N Q O Q Q? O N •O Q Q ,_,., Q
L N O O O? er cn O z z --? 'n O N z z Z z O z u
QI O O l? M N "" i` tL O
V)
O M
C C o0 00 p C C
?i?
.r , 'n
.--? _
N (?1
N
,--? v1
,-•
,?_,
•-?
Q
Q M
N cn
M N
v)
? cn
N
Q
?
Q
?
[?
00 it O
•? •?•
Q
Q
N p
M
Q
Gt.i
W C? M 00 00 O M 00 kA 4 tf1 z ? z l? ? ~ W C z z O z ?Y
a v N 00 - N
a

> ee
L ?
Q

U ? U
a c
° o

w

a?
..fl
cq
R
R -
m

Q >
R
Q

R
R
cz
'

U
bQ

R
? N ^

i
7
i
R c
c
Q *
CZ1 _ x

0 V t:
µy .
m y • •? ° \ U C
3 ° .c o as o '° d W a)
3 u ? ? a w 3 3 °' ? g H zH w as
rA
W r.
in
x
W ?
°
°
v
o w
w
a
v
o a?
E
E >~
n c? w .,
E ' - - ? a F+

A
as
w
m
as
ca
3
w
3
x
as
a
u
C?
Q
Q
?
a
>
? R
3
a
c
U ? ? L
0
a?
0
iv
w
0
a?
an
0
sR,
Q
U
cC
O
O
O
.O
N
N
7 0
U cC
7 „O ,
j U
? O
>
.?. a3
d bA
7 > O.
O
1 O ? ?
O
? U
J
a o
3
t
U j
?o
:b o
O
O U
ti
U
C
0
b
0
r-a
w
0
x
O
0 00
M
? w o
°z
U k1
a?
v ? 'p
a?
c a
1 ?
N ?
N
C3
a on
Fr
O
O
?i
O
'G
O
U
U
O
Cyr
O
CJJ ?
C
L M
O
oz
r? '? v
N
.0Vr 0
? o
m L
F" "CS a?
? V
by L
.+.I V
O V
SCE .?
Oll ?
O
d
L
O
•
M O O N ^ O
N O O

p ¢ ¢ OOi cq 00 O
t4 z N
d
w

y"o
Q
°
°0
°
d
°
o
¢
0 0
0
N z O ,-. 1
.? M z - z
.- O M

0
U
?
y
O Q 00 ON ¢ ON O ¢ O 0
?
I
N
/
z
O
--
N
m
z
m
--
z
O 0
V?
.
j. o ° ° ° d d o
N N Z N -? (V z z z M

4n
oe r-

v?

v

0

M

O

O

0

N

n

O
"a

?
O
N N z O (-i 00 z O N r
! 00 N O N W) l
-? 0 1 M O r- 00
N -. O /-• C
00 pp
O O ¢ 000 ¢ Om ¢ O N x
cd in --? N N O O
?r
N
z
N
\o
z
m
z
v
N ,
N
0
a1 v1
00
O N
M

C ,
O kf) O
?
Qn
ery
C
a+
O
¢
'?
Q
O
¢
Q
C
.
N

V
0
z
Q\
z
N
O
z
z
z r
N O
4
0 N W? IIn ? 01
N O
m
d
V , N O rG p
l
0
L
U
14 O ¢ O O O ¢ O ¢ O O b 0 V? O Q' M M D O ¢
?r O
01
z
m
(?
z
z DD O V N ,.., O O N O O
N .-. 01 N
O O l?
?0
iG N O 01 m z O

,
y O O 00 ON ¢ Q Q 000 O 0 cd M Q [? n N N M ¢
?r
?
G N
M
z
M
""
N
N
N
z
z
z
O
rr
N
m
""
z
""
N
^'
.
N
M
^'
z ,?
M 00 `p
Z
N
i O ?

?y C O r) ON C) M M ¢

N
N O 00 p 01 G1 .m-i O 00 0 01
CJ

O 000 01 Q O P 0 o ¢ N ""' O ¢ m

/
N

N

z

O

N

z

V 00

O

z

10

N
..:
M

z
m
'
p
N
^;

z

O

O
a1
M
N
. O m O
O
O
a

O
O O
M 00
O
X

V
N
O
z
0
m
z
O
z
O
O
m
z
W)
'40
M ?
{
?'•:
N
M
z
N
M
0o0
a
i /-. M O / O

H
c f.
L
U
W)
?"
¢
0
0O0 C>
¢
000
¢
O
¢
?
b
Q
01
G
N
z
O
z
O
z
m
l?
N
z
N
?,
0
0
i
O
m
O
z
N
N M O O

O 0 CD
O
O

N N z O O N z z z O M z O O m N O M ¢ 00 0 0 l-
O

kn 0-0

N

-

O

O

00
?'

r

M

m

0

N

1

x

0 lin

N

-

O

¢

M

?r

G N
M
--?

-'

V
O

N
\O
M

M
O
""

?p

N m

m

?0 10

O O

N M

a0
i N vl M N N O

O O

m O
SO

O

O O

N O O _ O
C)
00
N N z N N z N z O m N
O
w

a
o o ¢ 00
IN
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
b
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢
¢

N

z

N

^"'

N

N

z z

N

-

z z

z z

z z

z

z z

z z

z z

z

z

z

z z z z z z z z z

Gn
y
O
L
V
Cq C
N
¢
C)
O
O
O
¢
OM
O
<
000
O V
N
O
00
a
?
O

N
N
z
M
'
z N
z
?r
N cC
" 0,
01 01
N N
d.
O
N
l? c
d 01
01 01
1p ?
N ¢

p 00

N
N c
V N m z ~ z
O O

?
+ O O mO 00 p 000 '" O Q 0Oi O C." ... N Q O O O 7 ^-? 0 ¢ O
?
r
I-. N
N
z
M
N
N
z
z
z
l?
N
'
N
M
z
O
N
'?••
N N
M
M
Z O
O O
N 7
M O F O
N..yy
W
R!
L

y v
Z N Q
ro G] v ° ro y v w ro
Q 3 o a
i aoi ? F. 3 > b C v 3 > b
v7 3 o U a R
= ' u a d 3 W c C °o a?i ? w Sad 3 W CL °

z
a
Q ?
x
i
i
d
°' °
c
a
x ?
a a CIL o
b a F L w °
? m F a c ? ?" v a?
ro ca c -a ? v d I
cc
m W)
Q oo
Q a ai o d
tn U x " a°
. .
qw

?b••A a,
.a ?
.b o
N
O ?
O U
vi
U
O
ti
ti
w
O
CL
N
.a
O
O 00
M
N W) O
oz
U W)
a? 0
??Ci
N
•
n
ti
bA
O
O
b
O
b
O
U
O
c?
O
bA ?
i M
O
?oz
??II
V iC y
N ? Fr
U
b ?
C?
O
0
a
0
8 M

0 0 0
0
N ?
? U

.. .-.
N O
O N
O
.
?
.
rJ.... -It v, 0 0
0 0

00
kn 00
a M O O
0 0 0
0
N kf)
U

a, r, 00
N O O
o c

a
?o
°O
00
°
0
0 W)
0
?l_, r
i v o 0
C O O
O
W)
c?? U

N o
O
O
V) 0 0
0 0
o
'D 00 kj)
O
a M O O
O O O

N U

x N o 0
v, O o
0 0
0
N Q Q Q ? ? vi
z z z z z

gn.
?w' o
y a?
°
oW °q ro

r N
?¢a > U 3 -
W W

a) ?
O
O
a) ? v?

O ?

U U
'?
cG

• CC

a)

? N O

H ?

Q
?

U
O •? O
O O ?
c w)"
"C
00 --
O

cz
cl
?b

? w
b
O N

a?
?
o
Q

CIS 0

03
?. a)

to

O
.?
U o O 00
a'
U
O
w

N y O
V)
a
a
•
•
O
bA
O
rO
'C3
C
c?
C
O
'O
C
O
U
U
O
O
P?
h
a o0
F> M
O
z
w?
H C ?
ea
U
V

w
.C

? Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
= z z z z z z z z z z z z z

0
s
A,
c

oq
o a4
? on
o en
0 en
0 oq
0 on ?
ti on
o nn
0 oq
0 oq
0 oA

s ct
v C*
0
0
C7
C7
C7
V
v°J
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
Q

cd 00 00
0
y 00 00 00 O
? 0 0 0 0 0 3 N N
e
,? p N
C N N N M L 00
N
cu
? . .C
? N M M ? 7 Val ? cc a
?i ?
¢ ¢ y

C O
-0 O

? Q Q Q Q Q
' Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
w z z z z z z 'z §? z z zz z z

b
cc
A

on o?
?o
O 'C
vi
O
Q
.ti
O
ti
w
0
a
a?
on
0
O 00
M
y ? O
is O z
U W)
U ? 'p
N
V] ?" CL
SECTION 3
METHODOLOGY
0
0
•
•
n
U
SECTION 3
3.1 Methodology
METHODOLOGY
Methods employed for the Site were a combination of those established by standard regulatory
guidance and procedures documents and as well as previous monitoring reports completed by
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and The Louis Berger Group. Geomorphic and stream
assessments were performed following guidelines outlined in the Stream Channel Reference
Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream
Restoration a Natural Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al, 2003). Vegetation assessments
were performed following the Carolina Vegetation Survey-NCEEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al.,
2006). JJG used the Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas by Albert R. Radford, Harry
E. Ahles, and C. Ritchie Bell as the taxonomic standard for vegetation nomenclature for this
report.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
0 a
SECTION 4
REFERENCES
11
0
•

•
SECTION 4
REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E.,
2003. Stream Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, Cheryl C; Rawlins, C.L.; Potyondy, John P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. 61 p.
Kimley-Horn, and Associates, Inc. 2004. Mitigation Report (Suck Creek Stream Restoration).
Raleigh, NC.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2004. Annual Monitoring Report (Year 1 of 5) (Suck Creek
Stream Restoration). Raleigh, NC.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. (2006). CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Version 4.0. Retrieved from
http://www.nceep.net/business/monitoring/veg/datasheets.htm.
Rosgen, D L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs,
CO.
The Louis Berger Group 2005-2007. Annual Monitoring Report (Year 2, 3, and 4 of 5) (Suck
Creek Stream Restoration). Raleigh, NC.
Weakley, A.S. 2008. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, Northern Florida, and
Surrounding Areas (Draft April 2008). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Chapel Hill,
NC.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
0 a
SECTION 5
FIGURES
0
0
A

v?
*/0 G
a
Q
U
FIRE

?6
,.;J
i l osWe ll
la&?
Legend
0 Stream Restoration
Suck Creek Watershed
m
0 ' 2,2V0 X00 l 9
Figure 1.1 Project Location and Watershed Map
Suck Creek Stream Restoration
Moore County, NC
Year 5of5
Project No. 368
February 2009
CY)
LLI
O
s
Q? C,4 CO
y m to
...r--
k ,
. ?? r .. O W
eat y? y ?. W
n (n LL-
r
O
CL
0O W
s x
'At
r ? >? ?? ?k?? ? ? Lij Vim/
Y' wad r? ?a I_7 ~ M LJJZ Q LL
LLJ
x Z Z
Y LL- O
r. 11J
K x ' i
LLJ
r v $ $ y _. 0
4
WOW
e•
. r? 3 . a^ ? t "• € ?`qua ?? $"' ?t? ? x r„ ?k'b' a:? ^ '?- °"'.. ^? ? s: € ???'? _,...
? ? ? . ?'? bob. ?? +'??,v?`• rF .? <?i a .
r .
?
., a k?r s
LL.
,. 4
{ pr
Ail.
?r
w
;vr
. ?s
kk.
?? ..:,? • NON
.
v `l
fol)
d j ? ry3q nk. F I ? y;? (Q Q
c; z t
0 LO
0
LLJ
O af Q
d Z ??-
.
rk
. s saa? ?t ?+s '.fit t? ? 9 =i
a . +t? fir,. r ';- f ^'1??.?hy ?yW
r, ti?'. 8 f
"
F,
r
s
a_
'p Fg? "" fir. W
? x
y r
p Y
re?vl
x rx ?,?: ?.
Q C) d
r F f W
k *;
F- Ch
,a
r
u.
inkw H Z
W V)
2 i
1FlP r
LLJ LL) Y as n t y 4 9 Y
ry*
LLJ
r
y?
sP J
F- U w & + Q
r
r
,r
,
F,
i
.
.
`. .' ! J . ? ,"???i ?" ?'S ^. .0.F r? ?i • ,y ?+ 1
OFt
3"r
o
O
N
LL.
,A1N(100 32100W - >13380 NO(15, 031111N3 O O
'ONI 'S31tl10055tl ONtl N8OH-A31WIM N ?-
A8 SNtlld N9IS30 NO 03SY8 H18ON O
Q . O
D O O
L O
m 0
II
_
li O
O
w Z
w J w

o N O
(
Q
X
// \ + 7 f\\ N w O O
// i \\ n Q
elf 0
W (O O Ld
ti 11 \ U W I-
,0 z >
V)
1 ?, x z w w
Z
ll? N
0 C)
Z< LLJ?
9100 \\ i' x L..J Z 6
Z F- :D Z
LL) Cf) 0 Of
:?E Y LL- 0
w F- W
ry pb? wd3U15 ?+ 1 > U Q
p?Oj/`?N155 " Q Y
0
?X' II 1 w D
U
x x1 (n
I r\ x °o
x
X \ x
Q I I 11 \\?
Z_ a x I / I
? w
a l I
H a O / m I
X O I I 'c
O w I ? m ? I m I
I
JLJ-iU x I i I k
1 I
I m I I'
00<
Z a w I I
w a a I I I x
x I I I I
1 m I
1 I 1
I m 1 x
x 1
I I ~ I 1
i
O

H
C)
N
(n

V)
O O
H
U
V)

N

0 w

U

Z

Z

O

a

O

a U

O D
Q
H C7
U -(
z O
U- -(
li O
O
m w (n
O W
> U
x
x

Q

Of
w ¢
C 3
Y O

LLI
=

z

m
L,

w

(n

V
LL

D w
w z
z >
a
> Y
(n O
o NO w O
3 W U Z I
Q ?
D U
(
n o
(j' ?L,J o-
F-
I
m O
O U
fr m ly- Q'

?
Z
I
I /* V
LLI

w
J
m

I
N
Cn x
X I
(n
X
II 11 ('71 CD I
r 1 I--m 1\ x
N I 11O Z I I I
o?I m= 01 I
°- a/ m x
Q
I / I
I I I
I ®:0 I I / x
m
I I CD
I - I I x
m
I m I
I I I
I I I I
I m I l i '?
\ I I 6
\ 1 (
m 1 81 ? i I
0 \ I
k \ m I
cn \ I
I
CD ? I
x
\ I
\
v O Nx
CD
I r ~
x 1 I F Q Z
m Ox
I I
aal
Q I I
x O 1, I
l
+ TD(
/
m I
??, ? I I I
I 1
/ I I
I
x Ir i I
1 `- m \
_ x
I I
/ m
X, / x
? tim ? I I
? `I x
^, m I
I
I
0,
Q OZ
Z 20
C) Ias
? \
_w
C? n a
z O 1 /
J LLJ
Z li U
w a w
maw x
x
JX
l ?
?X
?X
00 Q
t? Z
Z Q In
OOQZ o
1-UU-
U Q (n
w
D Ch
00ofZQ
Q? O O O w
Q- :2 Z :E >-
0-w
w
U
Z
?w
~
m
Q
0 ;?
w X
00
>ll?
Oa
Q? a
aQ
Q w
Q
Q
oN
? O
Cn 1-
Q
J U
Q
a
w
z J
P 0 LLJ
<
0
v
w v m Z N
oNro
NM C.
oau
"
J C
y
- Q 0M m
0 a j
,Z.- u
W 0 C N C '0 ???......11^
N ? N U ,0
i-1Qrr Q4
0 W 75.2 i- ?Il peyM
>o-z o.- u
cr.0 D J-- r ? r
»l o u
?O a o
-X Li 0
.cc 2 y
O ?

0 pry
0
o LL.
.AlN110O 32100th - )133210 )1OnS. 031111N3 o
"ONI 'S3IVIOOSSv ONV NNOH-A31P1)1 N dO
AB SNVId NOIS30 NO 03SVS H18ON 0
,y of \ moo N
\
1 ' u o
m 1 o
w
r- Z
?, p I
LLI Q w
I, X Q U 0 =
0 V) V)
m / \\ 1 ?4 z
'\ I w ° Z a
o ` m
\ a W C 0 W
W H
(n
X \` m \\\ 1 W II z >
\ ?\ to X xr z w w Z
O
\ \ , re,,` \ Q'I Q w W
\ X Z ~ D Z
X m \\ i m °n W V)
1 m I \ Y LL. O
W W I-
X I \ _ I \ ~ W
o (n ly- Z
m m U Q
NOY
/ f / LjJ D
Z 0 X I II m / ?~ Cl)
O v m \ i / I U
U w F-- 1 m I I z
N (n of X i I I / I e
V) O Z Z 1 II I /
0
O w O O
ft U LL H r \ / /
u <
C) J J O w
Z o O 0
X \\ // /0L
X ?.
I °X' I
x \
\ X
? r
I `
x 1 7Z* I / \
V / ? \ X
X ? m \ \
x I X ` m
^rv \ / \
/ m \ \ k
00 Q
W z
w z >
~ > X ?m Z p Ln CE < w Q Z J to 0 O I k °OQZ?-
C 3 m O O O w X % / H U U O
Y O w w ?r w U Q m k W Ll I= p
~ Qi
r -? Of F-
con 0 a o o D U 0 U ? ?--\O \ \ \\ / p O? Z Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 / , \+ \ \ Q? OOOw
C4, w f- m Of M W- J W a z
hm I _ , \ m
I / ,. 1 \ k
I p I I k
I ® / (L I I /
Z ® Jr a i m
W m / m I k
I v
w 'o n
a co cm
k Im ?/ \ rim /} w-n o
/ m cl I v c Ld
I ' / J
\ r // roZ "j07 E' W
'D ft cq C CV
d Z
NM2N_U-a LLl
he TD Z o <
I / r } N O W , 1-
\
c3,?-L
N
X r 'n ? )
I ?X r } ^0 v o W X
/ ?r X• o ci E 0_ O
X h? X? X- Orn Z N ? of
I / o O a-
Or--
I
ING/FORD a- Q
STREAM GROSS X? Q LLI
?X Q
\ k Q
? N
k
W Z
f \ r F- O
> I (n ?
Q U
?+ vN? Z
LLJ J
?1??t w
I- U Q
O
Z -? N
O't6
0 0 9

,A1NI100 3800" - N33210 NOI15. 0311I1N3
'
' K---x
?x x
ONI
S3IYIOOSSY ONY N80H-A3lWIM
AB SNYId NOIS30 NO 03SYB H18ON

\ \
_N` \
Yd M
w U,
¢ M
B1-_ -91, f
I
\ =<
II
I
X
0 O .
M It ':
N
J
I
J
l
7t'
co i \ W Q ?
m Q' W
?81
x
?? I ? 1
ti0 / k
c
I
i
X Oh ti/ ti0

X /

X

X 1 1 k
I I m /
m 1
X I 11 k
I O 1
I 1
/'4' I O hm k

/+ /
m ? m

f

CL
v
V-
.
?Za
QWM
\ ? CT0
?
\ ?? F X
L) W \m
Lb z W „c ?) ?e
\ P
f X X ?P //+ m
1 / m
I CD I /
x \ I
I 1
x ?
I '
X
' k\
\
x
J =I
Q U ,c
W \
J X
(-D LL. LLJ
oz0?;:
ZOa-O \
W J a- J
I
\ 1
%
1
?! 1
m
4 p
l _ 1
x
x /
I /
0
} I? / I- Z
w
U
Z
w
Ii
x
x
x
I-4
N

J
?
E- O
CD
? W
? II

x z ,?

M
0
O
ID

O O

F= U
LLJ F
W N O
d

V) ?
~
Z_
O ? O O
Q? U
U
LLJ O
~
J J
O O 0
a_ a
w >

0- k Of
N

Lr) m /
/ Y w V)
F-
? 11 k
?
1 w Q Z
m J
O m
/
d a Y O
_
/ U O O
} / 7

/
} _ T9 -'
( m
f /
I
1 r
1 ?
f 1
? ?~ 0
\
/ o ~ z
?? / vvv 0
Y 1
f \ 1
\ \ 1
f \ m
1 1
m
1
? 1
N
X ?
+1 1
co
0 001
0 0 ?c a
W 01 Q
YU?
?1'
\ 1
1
Q W M \
a \

Z
II
U J j '`

\

.
81
mz W ' \\l ?...
f ....

' OQ O w J
/ 0

C, w
x O O

F- m
X I

J j I
m
I ©®
I
}
z
z
I
} w m
Ld I

x
x x
Q U
?x
E I W
}
D J
U Z 0 3 k

M J d J
W O 0

1
\ 1
1 / 1 X
a v
V ul
a VI OD J
0) O «
m d I U C
J y
M N
NC) C N C'OO
N ?NU'O
N W 7
o
NZ O._
L
7 WU' W O U
^O? a O
o?U v
c E
Z N
O
O
O
N
O
Q O
D 0 O
G? O O
m
^II o
LLJ
0
L Q Z
Q U Co
0 Cf)
Q
Of z
CD 0
O f=
0? Q
0- Q?
?0
Z ~
(n
W
:2?
W
Ug
Z
Q W
2
Z
W
:2 Y
? W
W
Lr) of
Cn
Y
O
U
Z
M
LL
0

I-
W
w
In
W
N Z
?J
W a_
m0
_0 of
LL. O
I-
Z
00 Q
Z
?J
z 0 L17
z 0 Q Z O
F-UU?
w 0 Lf)
LLI F-
Ch
00 ZQ
X000,,.,
Q- :E z:E >-
m
W
W
U
Z
W
m~
Q
0 :?i
00
> Q?
O a-
cif Q
Q W
Q
Q
D ?
LLI_ O_
In H
Q
-F U
Q
O
Of
W
z LLJ
J
F- <
O
Z.-N
O? 6
w
Z
W
0 0
3 W U
F- Y
0 D C)
O O O
(if m CE
w
z
Q
Y
O
O
w z
Y
0 C)
-I Of
1 0 V/ i
0 0 0
•
SECTION 6
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 - Vegetation Raw Data
Appendix 2 - Geomorphic and Stream Stability Data
Appendix 3 -Current Condition Plan View (Integrated)
•
0
LJ
A
APPENDIX I
C
•
1. Vegetation Survey Data Tables*
2. Representative Vegetation Current Condition Photos
3. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
*Raw data tables have been provided electronically.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
VEGETATION RAW DATA
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
•
•
C,
M
N_
N
U
U

A

o -?
0
z
a
0

U

O £i
U .?

d

rn ?
rn
v
? a
0
U
RS
N

h
qu O O 00 lG M d'
t

z 00

to
M
0
V)
?

o

o

4

'
o 0 ? °O r
N o
It 0 w) oo
+ + f + + I-
91

0
w
y ?
I
H ?
?

L U
>
O

w
?To

t
c
CQ
0
a
0
H
W
O
E-
0
W
1"r
O
O
Q
bq
C
O
O ?
,O
r
CO U
? o
? U
N Yr
o
b
O ?
O ?
? O
? y
tU F+
? u
N
a?
E?
o
Q
O
O
C
N
oon
U
N
Q
E
11
•
•
Table 1. Vegetation Metadata
Report Prepared B Kirsten Young
Date Prepared 7/30/2008 10:45
database name Ber er-2008-A-VMD-en tool-v2.2.5.mdb
database location C:\Documents and Settin s\k oun \Local Settin s\Tem
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata This worksheet, which is a summa of the project and the project data.
Plots List of lots surveyed.
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes.
Vigor bS Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed b species.
Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent
Damage b S Damage values tallied b e for each species.
Damage b Plot 'Damage values tallied b e for each lot.
Stem Count b Plot and S Count of living stems of each species for each lot; dead and missing stems
PROJECT SUMMARY-----------------------------------
Project Code 79
project Name Suck Creek
Description Stream Restoration
length(ft)
stream-to-edge width (ft)
area (s m)
,Required Plots (calculated)
Sam led Plots 7
Appendix 1.1 Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Suck Creek Stream Restoration
Year 5 of 5
•
•
•
Table 2. Vegetation Vigor by Species
Species 4 3 2 1 10 1 Missing Unknown
Alnus serrulata 2 1
Betula ni ra 31 1
Celtis occidentalis 1 1
Cornus amomum 1 1
Dios ros vir iniana 1
Fraxinus enns lvanica 4 3 1
Li uidambar s raci ua 1
Pinus taeda 3 1 2
uercus hellos 1 1
Salix ni ra 8 1 8
Platanus occidentalis 5 1
Acer rubrum 1 3
TOT: 12 55 10 5 14
Appendix 1.1 Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Suck Creek Stream Restoration
Year 5 of 5
E
•
C`
Table 3. Vegetation Damage by Species
p c
Acer rubrum 4 4
Alnus serrulata 4 4
Celtis occidentalis 2
Cornus amomum 2 2
Pinustaeda 6 6
Platanus occidentalis 6 6
Salix ni ra 17 17
TOT: 12 85 85
Appendix 1.1 Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Suck Creek Stream Restoration
Year 5 of 5
•
E
•
Table 4. Vegetation Damage by Plot
co
79-1-3- ear:5 13 13
79-1-4- ear:5 9 9
79-1-5-year:5 7 7
79-1-6- ear:5 26 26
79-1-7- ear:5 18 18
79-1-8- ear:5 11 11
79-1-9- ear:5 1 1
TOT: 7 R5 R5
Appendix 1.1 Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Suck Creek Stream Restoration
Year 5 of 5
•
Table 5. Stem Count by Plot and Species
ct* A: IV
44*
5
ti ti ti ti ti ti ti
'?? ~° ? o o'` 0 0 0 0 0
?° ?4 ? 4 Q a o 0 0 0
•
•
Acer rubrum 4 2 2 3 1
Alnus serrulata 2 2 1 1 1
Betula ni ra 32 4 8 1 9 13 9
Celtis occidentalis 1 1 1 1
Cornus amomum 1 1 1 1
Dios yros vir iniana 1 1 1 1
Fraxinus enns lvanica 7 4 2 1 3 2 1
Liquidambar s raciua 1 1 1 1
Pinus taeda 4 3 1 1 2 1
Platanus occidentalis 6 2 3 1 5
uercus hellos 2 2 1 1 1
Salix nigra 9 4 2 1 1 6 1
TOT: 12 70 12 2 5 8 6 23 17 11 0
Appendix 1.1 Vegetation Survey Data Tables
Suck Creek Stream Restoration
Year 5 of 5
C, 00
O ?c
O ri
N

ra,x "t

y.
111
00
O
O
N
lI'1
3
a,
U
a)
as
a)
N
^
00
O
0
N
O
03
Q
bA
ci
a)
1

O
LL.
O
z
U
a) ?
Q 0.
O
? o
a?
a?
U
0
0
O
a
c
0
'Cf
C."
O
U
?r
U
as
Qa
a,
O.
a,
?-i
iC
C
C=,
Q
v L
w? , a ,w y es;
a,
3..
mss' 'a''«•t
Ir ?

:ter

1,
4k; 'r .
1

6

'
S S ?
'
+
),
7N

.
s
"1
3,

00
O
O
N
O
Q,
W
,O
il
O

oc
O
O
N
M
^^O
F?
O
O

44" N-4-

z
oar
a 4",T .a h.
iw x
_wA? 9 r

rn ?
o ?o
O M
N
cC
O
w
O
z
O
O
N Q P,

O

4!J
.
.1
r
3-I
O

O r.+

i-1
O
•?
.r
O

C?

Q)
U ti

1
?1

^^
?I

00
O
N
N
Q
O
0 ?
a
z ? fiM1 '«

I--,
00
O
O
N
00
_O
bA
O
?O+
00
O
O
N
O
bA
O
O
O

F 1$

a

o ?o
C) M
N
az
Gi..
0
z
U
N ?
? O
Q f1.
O
O
.L

O
a
? c

O
O
O O
? C
O
N N
p? ? O O
N

tn O
U

o u r?

C% "LS
r-W
ill
is
0
Ls.
f ?
•

APPENDIX 2
GEOMORPHIC AND STREAM STABILITY DATA
0 9. Stream Gauge Plot and Raw Data Tables*

1. Stream Current Condition Table
2. Representative Stream Current Condition Photos
3. Stream Photo Station Photos
4. Stream Cross-Section Photos
5. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
6. Cross-Section Plots and Raw Data Tables*
7. Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables*
8. Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables*

*Raw data tables have been provided electronically.
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
•
•

M
D1
N_
N
U
U
it
A
N M kr) ?c r
O
.C
fir

N ca

U w F"

? x x
c
C13 m

03
o
'

0 0 0 ? " ?
is
U ¢ d
v i

L
M
.G N r- V)
O 00
O 00 +
7
00
ti
0
+
00
W')
+
+
+
+
c?
+
¢
0
0

C + 01
[?
?'
O
N
Z tA

C W)
+ kn
+ r
+ ?
+
i+ 00 O O M
i --? N N N
N
ro

U ^ ? y U O
L
p ? CC
+-
?
>

RS
GTi
O
Ci7

7
b
A
Q >
>
O

cd

U
CQ
Ll,
O
H
0.1
H
vi
x
O
cd
Oa
O
Qa
a1
a?
0
Q
0
? o
? o
bA
? O
Q? U
r
? U
rn e.,
O
O N
N
? .x
-v
o ?
o ?
O
Qa y
05
U s-,
N
N
H
0 .^
0 O
b ?
0 0
U
a?
? w
co
V?
_ U
N U
X ?
N
L1,
Q
r]
a, 00
C) IC
O M
y r'
ex •a..
an
g

r y{

'
X xk
} F TY,IY
00
O
O
N
-b
U
N
00
O
O
N
a,
.Q
i-y
Q
W
1M
w
NTT
L."
Li.

O
O
N
?n O
z
?

c? • o
c°
0
O
? O

O
U
o sue.
o U
cx ?n ?
k
?. 44
U WD
U C'r
N
0000 N
O
YS
N ?
n y
N
U
W ?
o ?o
o rn
N

cli
w
zl
00
O
0
N
N
U

00
O
O
N
Q
N
cd
N
4
tf?
n
0
0
00
N ? O
O C%? cd
? U
U
is
fi
.p 1
s.
a?
a.
a
h
0
O
a
O
^C
G
O
U
c
s.
x.
U
.>r
sue.
CL
W
N
N
YC
tL

O\ 00
C) ?10
O M
N

00
0
0
N
a?
0
3
0
Q
3
N
O
w
0
0
a
00
O
O
N
Ep
cd
U
3
0
Q
'o
a
O
O
1-\
00
O
0
N
0
Q
3
O
a
0
0
a
00
O
O
N
N
M
'o
a
0
O
N
LL
O
z
V
J-+ •0
O a
0
4-
cd
0
? o
a?
a?
a?
U
U
0
LL.
? j
Ll.
N
C1,
O
0
a
0
e?
0
0
X
a
M
N
YC
L7

o. ?
o ?o
O M
N

a

0
0
N
G
cd
a)
O
O
O
.
/?'
S
1O
oc
N
c?
a)
3
0
Q
a)
'o
a
0
0
a
N
w
0
z
U
N N
o
co
Q a
O
O
.C
0.0
w
O ?
N ?
O ?
U N
14
NM
1^^

o
w c,
r.
C?
nU.
C? 00
o ?o
O M
00
O
N
N
3-!
^O
1--I
,rl
i-I
O
U
N
O
U
f?
,Y d r.y, ? ?tiv:
eW
;F
ell
fi '?,? v? 1 A a M? *?
N
_ N
00
z
U
N
ca O
1--1
N?.y
i?
O
..ti
U
N ?
? O
r%j O
O ?
U
00
N
??I
3
N
U
U
I
O
i~
0 0
yy U
O ?
N ?
O
00
N
1•-1
?I
3
U
N
1
Con
U

w
r
?
1 ??f
r.

?vl.` 4 Y".ri
?Mx
?? ? 4•i
?
Y
A ''QQ a 1.
i 4 7,

U
v ?
? N
U ?
Vl a.yV

O
-p !
a.
v
a
rn 00
CD '4D
O M
N
00
O
O
N
03
03
a?
4-
n?
M
O
•U
U
rA
O
U
00
O
O
N
N
3
0
U
N
C/]
O
U

a+'l ter v Xlft

YG•r -
`
as
M

r }

00
0
O
N
a?
O
U
U
i
O
U
n
00
O
O
N
M
N
3
0
U
U
O
U
N
w
O
z
U
N N
Q a

O
O
tn
O
a?
b ?
a?
a?
U
U
C/]
O
w
O
.C
O
U
U
h
O
it
U
N
YS
..r
C"r
U

WM
•
C
•
(1) ? L.
co 00000 00000 °o o° o0 oc oc

?
,
° 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0

] O
a V 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 0
0
00 00
00 0
0
00
0
0
0
0
0
0 00
0
0
0
z 0
O 0
O O
O
CC
•a U
o

O N
c Q Q Q Q N Q
?
Z
2, ti z z z z r4 O O z z
4
cz Q

(6, 00 00 00 [- [- I- r-
ti
z

z
z

z
OJ
?U "a
Cd
? (D r ¢ -
=
v) w
z r r- r- r- r- r- w w r- r- r- r z r- r- r-
?z
a, m
Cl.
bQ
.Y

U

N
O
bl)
?
a

° S U
?• Q
b

N CO
-C.

C• O ?

U -0 cl.
.U+ 'A
O y cd co
m

O
y,
O r-L
O ?
w
? b p
N ? cci

C'

N TJ
N U
b
N O
U

O

5

b

?

O ct
G 4.
() C N

p
CL
rn
Cl. 0 3 N
r-L U
co bi
o O
ro 'A CO
o C-•
a? "ti N " - c
3 C-•
co
U 0
U (? I"

0 4.
"b
?
y
?"

r.+ +?+ b N
r
+
Q c0 i
U
.fl
y U

cd

b

C
EL ° cd
N p y .
y U .U 0 C O C

r.
OL N O
sue,

a

Q co

w

?g

9,
ti

A
Q,
O
Q
:5
O
4
-5
cu
0)'
i
V
°a.'
O
. C O Q v) C7 U Q w x Q w w w
^? N M I ? n .? N M ? N --? N M ' ter •? N ?' --? N M I .? N

N

3
a = 3
w >

aS v Q w w x
C-
tf)
n
00
U
?i
i
CL

E
N
y
Q
A
a?
cC
N
>
N
.ro
a
N
'd
N
a
°
Cd
O
N
°
LN ?
V] y
N
YU.
U
U
Q
•

0

Q: o
4. o
o
Q 0
CD 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 °
0 o o c o
\ 0 0
?
\ 0
¢ 0
m 0 0
D
o
Z
CD
CD
0
0
0 O
O O
O (
O
? b
o CD
o b
0 C
rn C)
o a
O kr)r,
Z o o
a o N C, a,
o "" U

io ? • ? ? ;;
Q
Q
Q
Q o 00
Q
Q
[? 4N H z z z z M
M O M z z
F. O
L. d
H?? N? ? N N N N ? N
z

?
?? ?p ? N Z N O N N N N N N •--? N N N ? ? N N

Q O U
Cl' O
? w O
R
N 4? 11.1 ? N N
C? C l. _ p C cyC
r-L CL CL (.C.,3
G s, A O

'n N U .

0 ° Cd

(U

s
r-L
r-L

C-.

° b ° E
En
"a CC .
O

?
N N O D U t o
O
•?
p U v?
r
+ ro ?+

CL U
CL 4,
a?
(5
-v
'
a
o
s
-v
o
°
v
3
0
C
-v
:a
o
O
a? > O b G, cct v 14
Y Y Q ~

O
y
a? (?
? ^
°
al
O
y 4y
° -
4: t,
O 4.
O
U ?" y 44= ? y
y
a i
°
?
i
a 1
v
a
v
U
(D
G) O
°
Q c ? ? Ca 0 0 0 ? c7 , ?
N ri ?t ?n N M N N ri ?h N N M N

N
? ue' N O
U (U s
.
y w o ? ? b '? o
ca > 3

Q W U Q W GI. C7 x
4.
O
N
3
O
a
N
ti
? .s
o
> N
cl U
ax
U
tr,
N COO
X
"O
N
D.
Q
•
•
1x11
u
0

w
Y
cl
O
w

v
m
3
o
0
N

O
O I
a

U N
?C
U
In
O
U
C)
0
0
N
W
O
N
O
O

O p
N
O

O
O N c ? ? in ?O I?
(Ge jl?gaL,-g) U011VAOIg

?I

F
C,3 O
110 V)
Q O
? O
Lyr ?
N
a Cj O
O
N
U
o Y
U u
N
k
N
C?.
C1.
Q
0
•
•
0

w
a
W
0
v
U
W
N
cd
3
o
0
0
N
7
E.
I
?i
44
N
i.
o
' o0
!Zl
'4
U
cC

O
R
U
CD
0
0
N
00
O
N
O
O
N
rn
i
C>
O
O N
O

O
O ? N M ? ? n ? O l ?
(, zi vjjigiu-j) UOIJUADlg
H
cC
Q
b
as
O
a
O
U
N
0
U
N
k
b
N
O.
O

s.
O
E O
N
14 >?
N
N
U
U
a
Q
•

u
0

o x
A
?

U
W
7
GJ
R
3
0
In

0 00
O
^
W ?
1
U M ??
? I
U . o °?r o
U y
C/1 ? o
rn
O ?
N
U

O
M ?p
O
O
N
00

O
O
N
O
N

O

I I
(,Cauijlqjv-jj) UOI,LAOIR
N
I?
_o
GL
G
O
N
N
ti
i.
N
X
b
N
?1r
z
O
N
E o
N
N
N
U
U
Q
•
•
E
O

? ?F
X
ro
O
U
W
7

R
3

o '

W
Cl
0
N
7
I

? O
O
N
N ? O O ?

x U
U Q?
C
V
o Cl
°
3.r
U N
00
I
O
N
?
O
N

R
Cl
O
N
O
O

O
O N M ? V 1 ` p [ ?
(( xreaj?giv-jj) UOIJVAalg
ro
Q
"d
O
f.
O
U
U
0
U
N
k
b
N
S].
a.
1..
O
N
f? kr)
O
?++ C3
N
? r
I
U
U
Q
J
•

0
v
o '
0 0
rn U
v

0
0 W
0
0
N

U

o
0 ?

M
O
O

° N
w
'^ x
M

O
O CO
O
O

N
O

O
O
kf)
It
N 00
CD
O
N
?
r
1
3
H

O
O I
V1
O?
O
O

u 3
+ O
u ?
a+ N M
Q' N +
?
L 00 Q'
y 00
CJ
p
6 N
O
i N
L O p O
O
Q/ .L p kn

V
v 0
= o
a ? 0 ro R o
N
C/? r7 N 0] 3 O o
O
O o O o 0 o O ? F
? V d' ^'
M M M M M M M

E

r
e
a
ti

03
M N
? 0
-d O
O
?r N vl
? C/1 y
i-+ N
?U
N
X
b
S;
N
G1.
t1.
Q
•
r?
L
•

C
°
o
O
O V
V
?
M
N
O
(.1
00
O
N_
O cn
O W
O
N ?

N ?
U

CG
F

O
O 00
O
Cl
O
O N

N ?
0]

0
.. o
CD v
O vz

o +•
N

0
0
N

F
O

0 I
0
0
rn
0

? 0
N
?
s ?d
M o0

+ 00
W
' N F
Q
O
M
+
O N
? p ? o
O
o
y O V
* 00 O
L ?+ N
O
Cl

L C ? ?
Q' •
? o

?

F
L
? ? ? o II
C ai
L ? O H w

V C p ={ ::
O O O ? cQ
O O
N
V? a N W 3 O
O
O

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
o O
?
3
F

M M M M M M M M M M
( u.ae.a;!q .ie-jj) UOIJUA013

L

F

1 ?

f`f

i? f
_N
ro
E..r
Q
O
-O O
a ? o
?U
U
N
X
O
Q
0
u
•

I -

-
I

I

00

..
1

- 0?

Y ?
U U
td
..
Y
U p,
? A. c
N
?
?
? a.

1
I
?o

T F
i
o
C e
O o
m 0
n 0
?
luaaJ 0
.n
ad an o
d'
rleln e
m
um3 o a
N -J o
C ?00

Oim
I l?
dr
O?

9s
2
O??
I
Ors.
}
60
i
t
sA
}
Ile i

x
IV

i i

£2r E
`
U
R ti i
9I ?
7 ¦
a
?i

I d'
?,r

? r
A
I
r
?
sb
s`?o
?
o
c900

p a
C o
? 0
o 0
O 0
O o
O e
O o
O e e
O o
lu aaJad ss I D lenp lnlpu l
N
Q
i O
L
b O
c0 y
? o
U N
? L
? U
(]y U
00
N
k
;.d
N
i1.
Q
•
•
0

OO
I

!
4
a
OI

i

F

W !
!
V
3
? o !
t
?,
I 0.

!
9
1
t
9
- - Io

0
o o
rn e
x a
°
l a
?
ua2J o
°
ad an e
a
qujn e
°
um3 e
N e
o c IOO

96
00
d
?d
Or
dr
O
I
S
f
9Sr
OBI
8I
o,T
I
d9

Sd }
I
n

2f c r
?
? ?
V v •
?
0
0 -

a
f?I

` d
r
I
1 .n
0
SrO
4

W M",
c9OO

0
o o
0
rn e
? e
0 e
0
e e
0 o
0
v
0
0
rv

-
0
lu anJad mD [unp lnipu I
3
?G
0
173
0
G.
C
0
0
U C
? O
N C? ?n
k 4.
O
?U
'O U
ro rA
y
_O
a.
7
0
U
00
?i
x
b
n.
a
Q
•
•
•
(ui) uogrl!dt33a
0 0 0 0
o n o
N N ---- d
0
v
O
0
o
O
30-Sep-08
23-Sep-08
16-Sep-08
9-Sep-08
2-Sep-08
26-Aug-08
19-Aug-08
12-Aug-08 °

5-Aug-08 Q
29-Jul-08
22-Jul-08 a
15-Jul-08
8-Jul-08
1-Jul-08
24-Jun-08
17-Jun-08 °

Q cu
10-Jun-08 >
W
U 3-Jun-08
y p ?
27-May-08 q2

V 20-May-08
co V)
13-May-08 C)
6-May-08 3
V] 29-Apr-08 I
22-Apr-08
15-Apr-08
8-Apr-08
l-Apr-08 0

25-Mar-08 M
>
18-Mar-08 U
W
11-Mar-08
4-Mar-08
26-Feb-08 m
19-Feb-08 I
12-Feb-08
5-Feb-08
29-Jan-08
22-Jan-08
15-Jan-08
8-Jan-08
1-Jan-08
o ° o ? o 0 0 0 0
0
? ri ri N N -- --O O
(Imilgpa-}j) uo[lle Aa[g
a?
.o
Q
3
b
0
a
U
03
C7
ca
rn
N
x
b
a
a.
Q
0
.ro
0
? o

p
u
U
a
•
PC
APPENDIX 3
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW (INTEGRATED)
•
LJ
1. Current Condition Plan View Map (Integrated)
Suck Creek Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 5 of 5
Project No. 368
Jordan, Jones, & Goulding
March 2009
0 0
0

.ALNnOO 3800W - M3380 MGM. 031111N3
'ONI 'S31VIOOSSV ONV N8OH-A31WIM
AB SNVId NOIS30 NO 03SV8 HIWN
X-x
AZ
1!
w
a
w z
z 0 o DO O
m a
u a
w N O w I ~ w a
V) J t 0! m
Fn z
N O > w
Z a 0 Z LLJ LLI U a. O OU (h 0 a Q
0_ a
F-
O O Y Z U
F- U Y >
li C.7 Z Z N a Z 0
a- > N m m m z z
?? ? 4

f

w w
w z

Z ;
Y
Li
a
z N
J >
Fn O
0
U
L, m U
ct D
< 0 w Y-
Of
U Z I Q
O
Y O
w

O

0
w
3
a
w
0 >

w
U

-
(n
0 C0
O CL
F- O O O U O U
0 Z
w W
C4j w
I
I m 0_ M X
-1 0_ l
i U
m
I

m®

1 X

X
Z
W m m®
i

J I
pp 1
/
1
1
x
m
0.603/0146sollo Wd3?is
x? I
C?o
x
I I
1
m
A? I L/.', m
I
?
J I ?
\
Q I I I I
??
o w m m
S a-

I I
/
F- a-
C) I
x O
I
I 1

Z I
I ? %
/ I
I
LL
O J= I
x
m
wU x I I
I I
O O Q I m I I

ZQ? w
I
I
I I I I
W a- Q? x I I 1 x
I
N
(n
x
N
x
1 r I
~ I m I I
I
II m 1 11 x
1 1 I 1
1 _ 1 F'71 m I
- 1 O0 F-m 1 x
III IlO Z l II I
m= O / I
a 11 a- 0-I I x
I m I
I I
m •. I m /
~ I ~ I
I I I x
K I ??• I I I
I I '?' : mr I I
I CD
I ,..r.. I I x
m
I I I 1
i t- I m I
I I I ??
I m I I ?
x \ '`d I I 0
I 1 , 1 l \?\
i
i
O
J ?
Q OZ
Z =O
a- a
w
Z /
O 1 I
J w
U
Z E U
0OQ
ma-E k
h
x
J<
x!
x?
o.?
1 \
1 \
x -?
1 ?
x
I ?+
I
x
?+ 1
x
r x
m
1 \
1 m
1 y ` N
m \ O
y I ~O z
1 m d ?
QI I
O 1
N / I I
m / I
I 'I I
I
I
I I
m,
m I
Y
? hm I
I
I x

' 'm I
\ ?\ x

I
I
0
O
N

LL.
r O
O
a O
D O 0
x (D (D
Lm II 0
li O
O
w Z F-
F- a W
C
0
V V)
W iE
Q
3.1
y
r
Z W

N
U
+F
V.. '
'
V
^
O
O F_ -
;
^
E- O Q? Q
a- Ch
z
CO '_ O J
U Z o

z
w LLJ -
X
°
(o Ug O
Q FQ Z H
W 0
Z IL Z
° w U) CL O
Q U
:?i Y
LLj w

o ~ w Z
U ?

O `s w
wD
U
U)
U

o
10 Z
00
(D Q
? Z
J
O D ? Q
ZOQZ p
F-UUf
ww=Oln
3 Of F- ~ Of
0Oof z<
C)f OOOw
Q- :E Z :2 >-
a
W
w
U
Z
Ld
~
m
Q
O :?i

C) O
'a
O
a-
Ir
a
Q w
F- Q
Q
D V)

F- O
(n ?
Q
J U
Q
O
?
w
V) Z J
LLJ W J
v
>, PC)Q
O
w v y
1
0 Z N
c
.0
!2 '
0

C
U J C
N

d
M
o j
o< 00.
o.
Ua O O
w p c c
..y...+
?

mM.C? N _UU _
Q„1F

W?y L r
of ?? ^ G

l ?
4) u

„v o a
Viol ?
?
-a W Lj (U
G
.? Z m
O
0 0
0
rn M
0
0
,A1NnoD 3HOOW - N3383 MOnS, 031111N3 0 CV LL
'ONI 'S3IVIOOSStl ONtl N210H-A3lWIH N } O
AB SNVld NOIS30 NO 03SV9 H1NON 0
Of ° c°o N
m _ II °
\ W ? o
\\p w Z
P I Lj JQ W
I
_ m w
-mom i 1 o N N
co "A
w
?? I I 1 Q
\ m / I Z W
N
I CD 1 O I-
% Z \\\ co 1 % w O
C3 <
a0 \\ I 1 E- O Cr- Z
m I I % W ?° O Q
co I\ 1 44 II Z f- J
\ cf)
o` / m 'A F5 ) W W M
r. W X Z
to M
re,,, \ 0.'I Q W Z
\ `I \ \ Z 0- Z
m `? m
M W cn 0- O
\ I f
- I ? W
W
'` I \ 0 cr- Z
U
m m / LLI
/ U
a w U
(h I I m / ?? (f)
LLJ z zo ° z \ m I / I U
o I m I
LLJ O
~ N :2
U Q I I I , I o
F- V) < Of to
IU (L I O W I F- W Q f I I I ?~ LLJ
J 0! U
!n ~
Q- z W Q
U) I I 1 /
N ar o > J m / /
(N O Z Z w :D V Q ° Z
a- Of <
x
O L, O U w z z Q !n z I O ?? X
d x d > N m m m z
? x
I \
I ry \ ?` \
I / I
/ m \ \ k
D
/ J
w x ?m Z O tf)
Y Of Vl > > I I / ODU Z O
Y
w Q z J (n 0 U W W =0t17
m U ° o w OT Q O r~ ry
Y p W Of 3 w w Q ? ?\1 \ \ 0:?0 0 0w
// I \ Z
Z) w ° - ° Y > Y U U)
U1 U 0- =) O 0 U 0 U Z
° 0 0 0 O O O O w 0_ t 1 m
C.31 w m Of m of J of U- U
I x / o I I
m / z I I %
a I m
, I
/ m
10 rl
113 A-
va-' ° o W
W
C0Q p00, U
., 91? U,0ZN O O Z
E
N o C CID
m2.2Nav W
U) LLJ 75.1? F-
I / 40 } ?.ci -Z o t- m c Q
Q5 p- 11 0
I /6X Nom vo W X
X? o?U E 00
X ?m 4b X? a_ z E j
I O
o
[if
CROSSING/FORD ?
gTREAM X?
W
?X ~ Q
k Q
\ 0 (n
k
W Z
\+ \ r H O
I N F-
+ Q
Q U
W
W Z J LLJ
P?Q
O
Z.-N
r-?
l L
L
ovi
0 0 9
,ALNnOO 31100n - )13380 H0f1S, 031111N3 x -x x--? x
'0N1 'S31V100SSV ONV NNOH-A3lWIM ?
AB SNVId NOIS30 NO 03SVG H18ON / MM,?
f
LLJ -00
X / \ Yd W M
QNWM
I \ 81_-'---81?\
x DO ...? ` k. r. \ z N w
I (D 'f W Q J
Of \ m?W
91 ' I k 1 /\)
X 81 ?? I ? I
ti0 N7? /
X , jpr{
X / }
i
k
/
/
x s \
I`
I I m /
co 1 LL1
x I 11 k <a
C) 1 w
z
1
°
+ li+O tim k ? 0 o
(10 a
w I w
/ Al F- ?
V?z
Q >
w N
() ° a

/

H
0 \
a.
w r`
?za
\
M
Z
V J > \
W Q J
M Z W f

R \ to w Q w
Z) Y Y > F-
\ a a w
0 m m m ?
x?X
X?
4-
I ?O

O
N

O +1
r \ N y,.

E- O
W c0
U W

O
ry iO .?
V
0
a
w a
cr m
a J
° w
z
z
a a
° U
D I
z °
z t?
\ 91 \F? X

Liar ?\ i
rye/ /
I m
\ / m
x 1 1
I 1\ \
x
' k\
x
x
\ J
I a U x
0 W \
?J? X
Dz0O3
ZOa-O \
W J W J
t
i \11 9°I
N\ 1
I /
AIZ
I /
S p
L
0 ?
/} O Z x
N C =O / Lr)
tm 11 a-
} O Z m I
W d ? _
e
\ m
f I /
1
I \\ m ?
~O _Z
\ \ 1
\
\ co
7L
\ \ 1
? CD 11
f 1
N +1 1
o \ X 001 m
ao f a ? 1
w rn a 1
YUri \ It
\
Q W M d \
?z II f ` 81
?QJ \ \, ?\
mew
f I % S?/•,c n
l
k
k
In /
X
J x
J T-
< U
z i w
H J
C3ZO3?:
W O of O
mJIZJ
\
MATC;HUNE SEE SHEET 2
rY

z O

F U

N (n O

- CL ?
N O Z
Z m
Z a
O o o a °
? U d H 0

U -i -I w (/) >
O Ll O

x
a rc

w
w z
w z >
O a
w Q z (f) O
U m U D NO w O
Y p Li w w U z I
U O 0 ° >
N U d D O :D U () U
U
UJ °L, I M W M O_ -i 0_
I
I
I
m

I ®®
? I
W m 00
1
?
V
W
I
A
x
k
? v
a
0) v
v
C,
ulM :
J y
M
OQ OO.0 7
30 CN C'OO
N 2N'Ov
ow 5.2
0 T z O._
v N ] L «
`?'
d O U
NOS U O
o?U O
c E
Z N
O ?
rn
O
O
N LL.
r O
O
a O P7
D O O
? O O
m II C
LLI
Iy ? O
O
W Z I-
W J W
1- a m w
Q N 0 ?
ii
Q 3.1
(Y z
0 O w
O?7- 1
Q
Z O J
w w r7
? x _O
zzw ~
2 C', W 0
Z c~n 11 CL Z
O
:E Q U
LLI w
I- w Z
U LJJ
O U Iz
w?
U U
z
0
0 Q
Qc)
n Z
0 Lo
O of
U
Z O Q Z p
U U
W 0 L0
LLI
) Of
000_ZQ
?OOOW
m
W
W
U
Z
W
m~
Q
0 :E
W X
0O
> Q'
00-
of 0-
a- Q
Q W
Of
QQ
D (n
1- O
Cn ?
a
J ()
Q
O
O
W
&i z J
P?Q
O
Z - N
4
?a
E
,A a V/ i