20190287 Ver 2_Riparian Buffer Authorization_20200820

State of North Carolina
/� Department of Environment and Natural Resources
D" Irrision of Water Resources Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02B .0233 (8)(b), .0243 (8)(b), .0250 (11)(b), .0259 (8)(b), .0267 (11)(c), .0607 (e)(2) - Buffer Authorization
FORM: BA 10-2013
A. Applicant Riparian Buffer Authorization Form Information
1. Project Information
la. Name of project:
Stallings Residence -Access Bridge
1 b. County:
Wake
1c. Nearest municipality:
Raleigh
1d. Subdivision name:
NIA
le. Is the project located in any of North Carolina's
twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer if below.
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is the project located within a NC Division of Coastal
Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name on Recorded Deed:
David M and Cortney H Stallings
2b. Deed Book and Page No.
15464 pg 1951
2c. Map Book and Page No.
(include a copy of the recorded
map that indicates when the lot
was created):
15464 pg 1951
2d. Responsible Party
(for Corporations):
NIA
2e. Street address.
2207 Oxford Road
2f. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27608
2g. Telephone no.:
919-618-2060
2h. Fax no.:
2i. Email address:
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
3b. Name:
3c. Business name
(if applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
4. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
4a. Name:
4b. Business name
(if applicable):
4c. Street address:
4d. City, state, zip:
4e. Telephone no.:
4f. Fax no.:
4g. Email address:
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 1 of 4

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
la.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1705600178
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35 48 37
Longitude: 78 38 30.6
1 c.
Property size:
.65 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Crabtree Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving
water:
C.NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
Semi Wooded, Vegetated, Single Family Home
3b.
Attach an 8'% x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location
of the site.
3c.
Attach an 8 Y x 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey Map
depicting the project site
3d.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
130 LF Perennial
3e.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Build a bridge for access to primary residence
3f.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A mini excavator and crane used to set the bridge.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/ Consultant Company:
Other:
4c.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach
documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain and detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 2 of 4

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Buffer Impacts
la. Project is in which protected
basin?
® Neuse
❑ Randleman
❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek
1b. Individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of
this form.
Buffer impact
number—
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
Reason for
impact
Type of impact
(exempt, allowable,
allowable w/
mitigation)
Stream name
Buffer
mitigation
required?
Zone 1
impact
(sq ft)
Zone 2
impact
(sq ft)
B1 ® P ❑ T
Bridge Install
Allowable
Crabtree Creek
❑ Yes ❑ No
900
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes ❑ No
B3 El El
❑Yes [I No__
B4 ❑ P ❑ T
I ❑ Yes ❑ No
B5 ❑ P ❑ T
I ❑ Yes ❑ No
B6 ❑ P ❑ T
I ❑ Yes ❑ No
Total buffer impacts
1c. Comments:
D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
la.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques.
2.
Buffer Mitigation
2a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
mitigation?
❑ Yes ®No
2b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation and
calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
(square feet
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
2c.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a
mitigation bank or NC EEP proposed?
❑Yes El No
2d.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC EEP.
2e.
If no, then discuss what type of mitigation is proposed.
2f.
Comments:
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 3 of 4

E. Diffuse Flow Plan
All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of
® Diffuse flow
stormwater treatment. Include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flow will be
❑ Other BMP
maintained. If a Level Spreader is proposed, attach a Level Spreader Supplement Form.
If due to site constraints, a BMP other than a level spreader is proposed, please provide a
plan for stormwater treatment as outlined in Chapter S of the NC Stormwater BMP
Manual and attach a BMP Supplement Form.
F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (fed erallstatellocal) funds or the use
❑ Yes ® No
of public (federallstate) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes ® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North
Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document been finalized by the State
❑ Yes ® No
Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWR Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 02H .0500), Isolated Wetland
❑ Yes ® No
Rules (15A NCAC 02H .1300), DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the
violation(s):
The bridge was permitted through Raleigh, but I was unaware of the additional permit requirements.
David Stallings
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name 8/19/20
�" icantlAg ` 's Signature Date
(Agent `s signature is valid o )q i€aa4u±odzon letter from the applicant is provided.)
Send 3 complete sets of this form and accompanying documents to the following:
For government transportation projects sent
by First Class Mail via the US Postal Service:
NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, INC 27699 - 1617
For all other projects sent by First Class Mail
via the US Postal Service
Karen Higgins
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1617
For government transportation projects sent by
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc):
OR NC DWR, Transportation Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
For all other projects sent by delivery service
(UPS, FedEx, etc):
OR Karen Higgins
NCDWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, INC. 27604
FORM: BA 10-2013 Page 4 of 4

U$GSU.S.OEFMTM GF THt lR RIOR MMCH WM QVADRAH4LC
GS O.S.GEGLOWCALSHRYEY ►;; US Topa xORlN uxp�Nn. wRx£Cpmx,Y
l swxul{ f[RIES
vs use �a '--F p! p � A 09 Ip II II t3 I: � Ivtso
0' M
1 14
s,
RALLIGH - ee
ILI
puce _ i' ;
ns
mu
orm�e h�umuaswesrwelwRN sumr SCRLE I�Ta Opp a°i°
...� .a �•--i._ ._ �—m„ .��,p4 pox
MIEIGH WE5T, MC
i
i0s9

USDA United States
r Department of
_ Agriculture
MRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wake County,
North Carolina
Stallings Residence

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
350 40' 40" N
350 48' 35' N
713000 713010 7130D 713MO 713W 7190`_0 713050 713010
m Map Scale: 1:741 if printed on A portrait (S.S" x 11") sheet
Meters
N
N 0 10 20 40 60
a, V
0 35 70 140 210 Map projecHom Web Mercator Cemermordinates: WGSB4 Edge tics: UM Zane 17N WGS84
9
713060 7130M 713100
350 48' 4T N
o_
35° 48' 35' N
713110
3
ry
M

O
O
N
2
L
O
N�
L.L
0
cn
C
O
0
7
U
.o w
ro
U
O
m
3 N
CD
2 N N
CD r 1° 0
N
N
N -6
3 C 0
m
U? O
Q
m
U
2 r0 U O
-0
01
N
o
N 0' C
c
m
CL
u`� o
E
E
a�
'-
m
m
N
=sE
- 0 m
Z
m
rn
= U m
p
ni _�
0) 03 7
0
_
T
co E
N-0 O
O
E
m
n Co 0 co
t
L
rh
c m m 3 m
N
U7
c
0
a
p
m N
N
N C
3
L
0
01 Ci
o L 01
N
Z
o
Co N
0
'L-' 5 Q1
U E N ,i1
_
= p-
W -p ImA l4
Q
U N
O
y
.>" P N
N
E
c°) W
m 2o2
❑
CO
rE ai
m
X-
3 mom
c�LD CL
0 ID
U
y O_
N
7
Z C
N
IG
O a1 Q 7+
O
�+
--
{A N
N
Q1
m - O
O
01
« p
'
N
Q
01
0
Q � t(1
o. E
N
j
0 0 01
— C
_
Ol
T N C U
'O N
9
C O
C
N
O
E ?,m
0 E
Z
.❑
m -00 t
N
i
N
0
0
m
Q
,N
N
N�
E
C
T-0 N
io
N
y
_0J�
co N g�
'6 �
Ol N
��
�
�
� �
a
W
��E0
�cp 0
mN
-0
co
t� o
ry
(6
E
O Ol m
-0
m d'
N Q 0
ID N
m
O)
o N o
E �1 F Vl
>,
� .c 0 � -iu
OI m
io �
m 61
E
0 .m �0 =
N
O� C•6
=�
QO)
�L l6 io
NY7
`7�
¢m
O� Q
Z
o
w0N
ov
gaU)
3 mm
o
'Em
f6
t am
N
Cl)
0NErn
U y
T
E
2
_tea;
0 -0
��c10i
E c11
0
��
N
�2
2 Q
�o
Q O
o
m
QmcnE
0
-O b
N d
pl
_
-E
Q1
-, m N
p1 C d N
2
7
N
lit C
` U) p
0 W 0) am„
- U
U C
O 7
O- 01
T
rfl 01
m O
E O
y O
r 65
0 •Q y C
(D
G
N Ol C m
= ._
N
m m
OS N
10 0
0 Qf 0
N
d N m ED U
m O N �_
�
L
—
0 7
— Q
O
N
m
01 E
I- r
}y
C O U
w E_ U N
IL E
00 U
U
2 Q -a Q m
F o
U) U)
U7 r
❑
F m
Ca
a
y
N y
co
N f
LL
Q
4
73
N OC1.,
C
m
y m
N O
Q
a
J
o y
o m E
o
o
0� LL
O C
N N
In
CE o
75 l4
O
u1 U)
N LCL
O u1 cn
a 0
5 Z)
6 ¢
Z
�➢
4 LL
a
Q
c
m
�.+
0
�
H
CD
W
J
N
IL
y
a
a
1
a
c o
a
y
Q
v
y
m.
EL
—
J CL
— .-. W
y
Q1 +O
E
t6
ql
tZ
N
O
C
C
C C d
f1
p Q
}
CL
O
Q O
a
t6
d Q
N 1V pl
d
CL
❑ d �,
03 N
r` LL L
Ili
rnLd
O
T
N
QI
O OO
Q
m
LL
3
t T
m> y
v m
)
>
Q
aom0
ram
CO
�
in
i i
m
rn
m
a
m
1
Q
IA

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Cfc
Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to
10 percent slopes
1.1
38.0%
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
1.3
46.7%
PbD
Pacolet-Urban land complex, 10
to 15 percent slopes
0.4
15.3%
Totals for Area of Interest
2.8
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, It was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

c�
mmr-
{7 0
OF-- D (7CmZ
_()F Z DV D
0 Z bid D/ Z r N f'l STALUNGS RESIDENCE
fSrin�{7C tj -zD
fTl
fT1 u D d L-) D D
M
0 3 td - fTl W � ®O • bd O
�dtC d —, -ci 7d
�S� H WO0co
m Z r
D F- Gl Z S m
OdH '�WfllM--,-,
z 10 0 D
D0V) ti CD .= 0
D
DZr F-- O��Wf� > M77
Gl c D —
do 0 0 M_
a a D
SD z ODOZ O
Z t7 (7C7(7Gl O Qp M
tj
O s� OMB
O O z r-
rtd�
Z7 m 0 td
0 m m
0 (�
0 O ® D 3
(�
bd Z ® ® • D O
OtdZ ® • • ®®® �d
�t7� • O
D �0
= • O • • S
F-
O •
Z7 70 _ • • O ®®
nm 0
Z ( 7
M Gl 7 •
V)
pi
I
® ® ®®® ® ®® ® ® ® ® ®
OXFORD MAO
y M �
STALLINGS RESIDENCE BRIDGE
2205 OXFORD RD RIPARIAN BUFFER RES❑RATI❑N PLAN
RALEIGH, NC BY: CURTIS GAUTIER
27608-1636

l