310267_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200818

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 j - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: l 'LO
Arrival Time:
`-6---ham-
Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:
c,,r \n► c�
I P r' )PA,
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Irk '��c�rd
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone: '1- 1 -t ri Z.D ZD-1,.s
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer I I ' --d
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No E2 NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
0 NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
VNo,-D
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
E] No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - b Date of Inspection: i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑�No ❑ NA/ ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [2''NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: V L_ - \/j L_ 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 23
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes O/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? QJYes ❑ Nq ❑ NA ❑ NE
i
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [:3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ❑r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement.
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ea No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[D�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑i'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑i 'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
i
❑'Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:,
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Y s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Applica 'on ❑ W kly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 12]"'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q2rNE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - b Date of Ins ection: 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes C2-No, ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑i'No ❑ NA . ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑i rIA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [�[o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
z
�]' No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
1,
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA ©fi;E
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
i�
[DNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
E� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question # ): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
S o-3
V co v` �u J& i SS- 4-s / crop ` 1 : e) d Y-MIJ
S70 LA'ek t-\j Y-,( co K-d
C,.
5
r� I L) yI w-- V\-c-C
- f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
f
Page 3 of 3
Phone: V �j J �� L
Date: 2 116 I
I
21412015