310478_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200819

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency ::1
'Type of \`isiC 0 Compliance Inspection Operation Iteciew Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 40 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: iFJ7r lrr''l (,__vllI Arrival Time: ® Departure Time: ® County: \ 1 7 11111
Farm Name:T`fyj?1(r 1��aS��IfYYI Owner Email:
Owner Name: 14x I^L 1 1 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: -Ali Iq
Certified Operator: I , Z �1(A rDf) jVyA
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wer a
Other
Other
Phone:
Region: Ul&
Integrator: MI Alit .-t-4n�70A
Certification Number:
/Cjeertifiication Number: �J �� / rrJJ
Latitude: /-1 •"1 "1ign4 Longitude: �'1•�;i'011 I
Design Current Design Carront
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La cr
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other 9 �d
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
e. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Da
Beef Stocker
BeefFeeder
Reef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 67(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
E?f No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Gs rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E(rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: ) Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stow storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. Ifyes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
El Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats in the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
03'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any par[ of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
CONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pawling ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate
Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crap Type(s):
13. Soil Typc(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
/
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
V
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
E3No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a min gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on iffigation equipment?
❑ Yes
to
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of
214120I5 Continued

Facili Number: Dare of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating noncompliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [-]Yes [�(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 horns and/or document
❑ Yes
[5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose am odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[.(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Stomge Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
l� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question q): Explain any YES answers and/or any ad re)-nscndadons or any other comments.
Use drawings of facilityto better explain situations use additional a a.
pjlUd� `mac 12]�]l�j �th ewnQss= q-5 C@1I A(D
Lo -T
a� IS off 112120 N:2. coil D5�1�o�2O1�
ocajj 1��2o tJ = l.l�l-rti L�mA =©•3
112o�2o�R N.2,�12 Cutd�n loop
treeboa�c� c (Lalti (ofvple4e d eci"Voj wl lcoaton
Meld: com0ek ✓
ReviewerAnspector Name: �-s Phone: -hngp/o-:�
ReviewerAnspector Signature: Date: g(]' IU-_V
Page 3 of 1/4/1015