20201061 Ver 1_D - Protected Species Assessment_20200818

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
March 17, 2020
Mr. Joseph Turner, PE
Gavel & Dorn Engineering, PLLC
6730 Freedom Drive
Charlotte, NC 28214
Subject: Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
Dear Mr. Turner,
Gavel & Dorn Engineering, PLLC has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to
provide a protected species habitat assessment for the Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
site. The Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1) site is an approximately 3,000-foot long,
200-foot wide sewer corridor. The corridor begins just south of Gleneagles Road and extends
north/northwest to just north of Rosemary Lane in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, (Figure
1).
Methods
In -office Desktop Review
To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the
project vicinity and prior to conducting the on -site field investigation, CWS consulted the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Endangered and Threatened Species and Species of
Concern by County for North Carolina online database for Mecklenburg County'. In addition,
CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
Data Explorerz on March 4, 2020 to determine if any record occurrences of federally -listed,
candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat are located within the project
limits.
Typical habitat requirements for listed species was discerned from multiple USFWS3 and
NCNHP4 online resources including, but not limited to, specific USFWS species profiles,
recovery plans, NCNHP's Guide to Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species of
North Carolina, and List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. United States Department
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh Field Office. Accessed March 4, 2020. Endangered and Threatened Species
and Species of Concern by County for North Carolina. https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/mecklenburg.htmi
2 North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer. Accessed March 4, 2020. https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/.
3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant
Species. https://www.fws.gov/southeast/pdf/fact-sheet/north-carolina-optimal-survey-windows-for-at-risk-and-listed-plants.pdf.
Accessed March 4, 2020..
4 Buchanan, M.F. and J.T. Finnegan. 2010. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. NC Natural
Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC. Accessed from https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc—counties.htmi
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 8

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1) March 17, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2020-0046
of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of
Mecklenburg County' and aerial imagery were also reviewed for potential habitat communities
of listed species within the project vicinity (Figures 2 and 3).
Field Survev
CWS scientists Megan Shelton, WPIT6, Project Scientist, and Amie Hoy, Staff Scientist III,
conducted a pedestrian habitat assessment of the project area on March 9, 2020. Potential
habitats for potentially occurring federally -protected species that were identified during the
desktop review were assessed in the field for the quality of physical and/or biological features
essential to the conservation of the applicable species. Additionally, during the pedestrian
habitat assessment, areas were reviewed for applicable federally protected species. However,
formal surveys were not conducted for the occurence of protected species. Identification
references for natural communities include the National Land Cover Database (2011)'.
Results
Based on the NCNHP data explorer review, there are no occurrences of federally protected
species within the project limits or within a one -mile radius of the project limits (Attachment A).
The USFWS lists seven federally protected species for Mecklenburg County (Table 1). An
official species list has not been obtained from the USFWS Asheville Field Office.
Table 1. Unofficial List of Federally -Protected Species Potentially Occurring within the
Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1), Mecklenburg County, NC.
Major Group
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal Status*
Record Status
Plant
Helianthus
Schweinitz's
E
Current
schweinitzii
sunflower
Plant
Echinacea
Smooth coneflower
E
Current
laevigata
Plant
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
Current
Animal
Lasmigona
Carolina heelsplitter
E
Current
decorata
Animal
Bombus affinis
Rusty -patched
E
Historic
bumble bee
Animal
Myotis
Northern -long-eared
T
Current
septentrionalis
bat
Animal
Haliaeetus
Bald eagle
BGPA
Current
leucocephalus
* E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
Three terrestrial community types were identified within the project area during the field survey.
These community types consist of mixed forest, woody wetlands, and maintained grassy areas
(Figure 3). Of the identified on -site community types, the forested areas are considered
potential habitat for federally threatened or endangered species that could potentially occur
United States Department of Agriculture, 2020. Web Soil Survey Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Accessed
03/04/2020.
Source: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
Wetland Professional in Training, The Society of Wetland Scientist Professional Certification Program
MLRC. National Land Cover Database, 2011. https://www.mric.gov/nlcdl1_leg.php
Page 2 of 8

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Protected Species Assessment Report
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
within the project limits. A brief description of each species habitat requirements and
determination of effect findings are listed below by species.
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinit-7ja
Habitat Description:
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb with yellow rays and yellow centers. They
can reach heights of five feet. Populations are limited to the piedmont of North and
South Carolina. It has been listed as an Endangered species under the ESA since
1991.$ The typical habitat for this plant includes roadsides, old pastures, transmission
line right-of-ways, open areas, either natural or human -maintained habitats, or edges of
upland woods. Major characteristics of soils associated with suitable Schweinitz's
sunflower habitat include thin soils, soils on upland interstream flats or gentle slopes,
soils that are clay like in both composition and texture (and often with substantial rock
fragments), soils that have a high shrinkage swell capacity, and those which vary over
the course of the year from very wet to very dry.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits or within a one -mile radius of the project. A desktop
review of the site was conducted on March 4, 2020, and determined that the Wilkes soil
series that is associated with Schweinitz's sunflower habitat are found on -site throughout
the entirety of the project limits. However, these areas are either forested, or too
intensively maintained through the practices of mowing to be considered supportive
habitat (Photographs 1-5). No Schweinitz's sunflower or other Helianthus species were
observed during the site visit. Due to lack of supportive habitat within the study area
and lack of known occurrences in the project vicinity, CWS concludes that this
project will have no effect on the Schweinitz's sunflower.
Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata)
Habitat Description:
Smooth coneflower is a tall, perennial herbaceous plant found in areas with abundant
sunlight where competition in the herbaceous layer is minimal. It has been federally
listed as Endangered under the ESA since 1992.9 Typical habitat for this plant includes
meadows, open woodlands, the ecotonal regions between meadows and woodlands,
cedar barrens, dry limestone bluffs, clear cuts, and roadside and utility rights -of -way. In
North Carolina, the species normally grows in magnesium- and calcium- rich soils
associated with gabbro and diabase parent material, and typically occurs in Iredell,
Misenheimer, and Picture soil series. It grows best where there is abundant sunlight,
little competition in the herbaceous layer, and periodic disturbances (e.g., regular fire
regime, well-timed mowing, careful clearing) that prevents encroachment of
shade -producing woody shrubs and trees. On sites where woody succession is held in
check, it is characterized by a number of species with prairie affinities.
x United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1991. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Helianthus schweinitzii
(Schweinitz's sunflower) Determined to be Endangered. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/frl852.pdf.
B United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1992. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Echinacea laevigata (Smooth
Coneflower) Determined to be Endangered. http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr2l4O.pdf.
Page 3 of 8

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Protected Species Assessment Report
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
The majority of the project limits are forested, which does not provide the abundant
sunlight the smooth coneflower requires. The open areas within the project limits are
highly maintained lawn areas, which do not provide habitat for the smooth coneflower.
In addition, Iredell, Misenheimer, and Picture soil series commonly associated with the
smooth coneflower are not found within the project limits.1' Due to the lack of habitat
and known occurrences, CWS concludes that this project will have no effect on
smooth coneflower.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michaux@
Habitat Description:
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous shrub. It is densely hairy with compound leaves
exhibiting evenly -serrated leaflets. Flowers are small, greenish to white, in terminal
clusters. Fruits are red drupes produced from August to October. It has been listed as
an Endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) since 1989." It is
found on the coastal plains of Virginia to Florida, with most populations occurring in
North Carolina. It prefers sandy or rocky open woods with basic soils, as well as,
highway right-of-ways, roadsides, or edges of artificially -maintained clearings.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
Disturbed open areas conducive to early -succession species are not present in the
project area. The Wilkes soil series that covers the entire site is too acidic to provide
suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac. Additionally, there are no current records of this
species within Mecklenburg County". Due to the lack of habitat and known
occurrences, CWS concludes that this project will have no effect on Michaux's
sumac.
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata)
Habitat Description:
The Carolina heelsplitter was historically known from several locations within the
Catawba and Pee Dee River systems in North Carolina and the Pee Dee and Savannah
River systems, and possibly the Saluda River system in South Carolina. In North
Carolina, the species is now known only from a handful of streams in the Pee Dee and
Catawba River systems. The species exists in very low abundances, usually within 6 feet
of shorelines, throughout its known range. The general habitat requirements for the
Carolina heelsplitter are shaded areas in large rivers to small streams, often burrowed
into clay banks between the root systems of trees, or in runs along steep banks with
moderate current. Recently, the Carolina heelsplitter has been found in sections of
0 United States Department of Agriculture, 2020. Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Accessed
03/04/2020. Source: https:/twebsoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1989. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered
Status for Rhus michauxii (Michaux's sumac). http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/frl601.pdf.
Z USFWS Michaux's Sumac Recovery Plan; https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/930430.pdf
Page 4 of 8

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Protected Species Assessment Report
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
streams containing bedrock with perpendicular crevices filled with sand and gravel, and
with wide riparian buffers.13
Biological Analysis:
There are three perennial streams on -site, but Stream C has moderately incised banks
and Stream A and Stream B bottoms are heavily embedded with silt, which is not
suitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter. All of the streams are connected to downstream
waters via culverts, which is also not conducive for Carolina heelsplitter (Photographs
6-8). The site is located within an urban watershed and it flows directly into McMullen
Creek. McMullen Creek is on the 303d list as an impaired stream.14 Additionally, the
NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences for this
species within the project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project (Attachment A).
Therefore, CWS concludes that this project will have no effect on the Carolina
heelsplitter.
Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis)
The Rusty patched bumble bee was listed as Endangered under the ESA in January 2016.15
Rusty patched bumble bees once occupied grasslands and tallgrass prairies of the Upper
Midwest and Northeast, but most grasslands and prairies have been lost, degraded, or
fragmented by conversion to other uses. According to USFWS guidance, "the rusty patched
bumble bee population has declined by approximately 90% or more. There are currently
records of Bombus affinis in isolated places within 13 states and 1 providence since 2000. In
these areas, surveys should only be completed by qualified biologists under the guidance of the
federal recovery/scientific permit under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. These surveyors must
also meet all applicable state permitting and reporting requirements. The presence of Bombus
affinis has been broken down into three zones. A high potential zone provides a reasonable
basis for describing where the species is likely to be present and where federal agencies and
others should consult with Fish and Wildlife Services to evaluate the potential effects of their
actions. A low potential zone buffers a high potential zone and are much less likely to support
existing populations. Scientists are hopeful that some of these low potential areas may contain
the bee, and they recommend that surveyors obtain a scientific recovery permit. The third zone
is the unoccupied zone. Scientists believe that the likelihood of finding the species in these
areas is so low that they do not recommend scientific recovery permits, unless a Bombus affinis
may have accidentally been collected.16 According to USFWS' Rusty Patched Bumble Bee
Interactive Map, Mecklenburg County is located within an unoccupied zone. Therefore, the
proposed project will have no effect on the Rusty -patched bumble bee.
3 NCDOT TE Animal Habitat Descriptions. 2015.
https://con nect. ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Compliance°/o20Guides%20and%20Procedures/TE%20Animal%20Habitat%
20Descriptions%20Mar_6 2015.pdf
'" City of Charlotte, NC Storm Water Services. Accessed March 4, 2020. Surface Water Quality: Watershed Planning; 303(d).
https://charlotte nc.gov/StormWater/S u rfaceWaterQuality/PagesANatershed Plan n i ng.aspx
" United States Fish and Wildlife Services.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/enda ng a red/insects/rpbb/pdf/Su rvey_Protocols_RPBB_12April2019.pdf
United States Fish and Wildlife Services. https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/index.htmi
Page 5 of 8

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1) March 17, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2020-0046
Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis)
The northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the
white -nose syndrome disease. Summer habitat (roosting habitat) of the NLEB includes forests
and woodlots containing live trees and/or dead snags greater than three inches diameter at
breast height with cavities or crevices. Winter habitat (hibernacula) of the NLEB includes caves,
mines, rocky areas, or structures that mimic similar conditions such as culverts greater than
48-inch in diameter." The NLEB was listed as Threatened (T) on April 2, 2015.
The forested areas within the property are potential habitats for the NLEB. A Standard Local
Operating Procedure for Endangered Species Act Compliance (SLOPES) was established for
NLEB between the USFWS Asheville and Raleigh Ecological Offices and the United States
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wilmington District, on January 31, 2017.18 This SLOPES
defines how the USACE will make determinations of effect to the NLEB on projects in which the
USACE is the lead federal agency. Alternative Local Procedure 2 (ALP 2) applies for the
Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1) project as the action area is within range of the NLEB,
"the action area is located outside of a red 12-digit HUC as defined by the Asheville Ecological
Services Field Office 2' and consultation by the USACE is required on other listed species or
critical habitat.
The final 4(d) rule exempts incidental take of NLEB associated with activities that occur greater
than 0.25 miles from a known hibernaculum site and greater than 150 feet from a known,
occupied maternity roost from June 1-July 31. In accordance with ALP 2 and the final 4(d) rule
(effective as of February 16, 2016), any incidental take that may result from associated activities
is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Therefore, this project is exempt under the 4(d) rule.
Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act,21 enacted in 1940, prohibits anyone without a permit
issued, from "taking" bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs. Habitat for the bald
eagle includes cliffs and forested areas typically within 1.0 mile of estuaries, large lakes,
reservoirs, rivers, seacoast, and as they become more abundant, stands of undisturbed forest.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as, the area within a 1 mile radius
of the project limits, was performed on March 4, 2020 using 2020 color aerials. Quail Hollow
Country Club Lake, is located within 1 mile of the southern portion of the project limits and is a
water body large enough to be considered a potential feeding source. Foraging habitat exists
within the review area and the site contains big trees that would be suitable for roosting or
nesting. However, no bald eagles or bald eagle nests were observed within the suitable bald
eagle habitat areas. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database on March 4, 2020 revealed
no known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Due to the lack
of observations during the site assessment on March 9, 2020 and known occurrences, CWS
concludes that this project will have no effect on this species.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. 4(d) Rule for the Northern Long -Eared Bat; Final rule.
https://www.g po.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-01-14/pdf/2016-00617.pdf
$ USACE http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
9 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/pdfANNSZone.pdf
2° The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. Northern Long -Eared Bat.
2' https://www.fws.gov/midwest/MidwestBird/eaglepermits/bagepa.htmi
Page 6 of 8

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1) March 17, 2020
Protected Species Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2020-0046
Summary
Based on the literature search and the results of the on -site assessment for suitable habitat of
federally -protected endangered, and threatened species, suitable habitat was not observed
within the project limits for Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth coneflower, Michaux's sumac, or
Carolina heelsplitter. Foraging habitat was observed for bald eagle but no bald eagles were
observed. The project area is not located within the currently occupied range of the
rusty -patched bumble bee. CWS has concluded that activities within the project area will not
directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued existence of Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth
coneflower, Michaux's sumac, bald eagle, rusty -patched bumble bee, and Carolina heelsplitter.
Additionally, based on the project area location, no tree removal activities will occur within a
150-foot radius of a known, occupied NLEB maternity roost from June 1-July 31 and no trees
will be removed within 0.25 miles of a known hibernaculum at any time of year. Therefore, any
incidental take on NLEB that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule
and notifications will follow the SLOPES agreement22. Biological determinations requirements
for federally protected species are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Biological Determination Requirements Summary Table for Federally Protected Species
Federal
Effect on Listed
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status*
Species
Determination
Required
Helianthus schweinitzii
Schweinitz's sunflower
E
No Effect
No
Echinacea laevigata
Smooth coneflower
E
No Effect
No
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
No Effect
No
Lasmigona decorata
Carolina heelsplitter
E
No Effect
No
Bombus affinis
Rusty -patched bumble bee
E
No Effect
No
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern -long-eared bat
T
Exempt
Yes**
Haliaeetus
Bald eagle
BGPA
No Effect
No
leucocephalus
* E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
** - Required in accordance with SLOPES, ALP 2 agreement.
A biological assessment was not conducted for this project. All biological determinations of
effect represent the best professional opinion of CWS and are not official determinations of
effect. It is the responsibility of the lead federal agency to render an official determination of
effect. Should the lead federal agency agree with CWS initial findings of no effect, then no
USFWS consultation is required to comply with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
Should the lead federal agency's determination of effect differ from the findings of CWS, formal
or informal consultation with USFWS may be required.
22 http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.htmi
Page 7 of 8

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Protected Species Assessment Report
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Megan Bollero at 757-576-6433 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
11141�xv 6)&-F�O
Megan Bollero, WPIT
Project Scientist
Christine A. Geist, PWS, CE
Principal Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2: USDA-NRCS Web Soil Map of Mecklenburg County
Figure 3: Aerial Map
Attachment A: NCNHP Data Review Report
Attachment B: Representative Photographs (1-8)
Page 8 of 8

�w
-. p
-
p
R
_ Dyt
rr a
l•YAMATH
Gq
F'U rNlgrUf [] [- Ui(-HIN DR
�
CHAM -"-
r PAr4tJ�57
t
h h t
O,-
L ❑ .�:, - -
5[
—AA 4
AsH1
�
'1, wr�F "� "" IlI�,iISdALl•SI
F ,: r,�'
SQ�i
ON
R
LN, S vy �17
riN
I
t' 4I.y
ell
Y
4
[lf
4Mf7f7 ,.y -_
SFf1r L�n�Uta 1-o"
f
Fh v+
f_ c
SHARt7y
�
�i Mid Sdi
�-----_
q
F-
Qua it Hollow v �
Country Club Lake orGyn�
r wry
t _ F DG ti
? Srm hf eld r• C� 0 (J+NrqNMI
'�. •
5 Mcdclen6ivg ri5 11t�`
Sdi .?.. t7� .... - - — ' ae -F 4 .
ACkfS��d� ��.• Ste✓.
'�FFn
Y
~�
1 ?L
µ r
- —1
,,' yA, ❑Gty ` liItyfJlyQrJp �
,�
1.,r11JRST TR<-e
�, w .
-
1 2
tR•v7
� �,, 1
t
vIS A ir,
F��4grr1% ¢_�`
��Rye`F°RFs�C, raRFsr°p
Legend
,
1�
Project Limits (13.5 ac.)
VGA
2,000 1,000 O 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE :USGS7.5MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE(S):WEDDINGTON,2018
p4
_
F
SCALE:
1 inch = 2,000 feet
DATE:
3/16/2020
USGS Topographic Map
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
2020-0046
ALH
Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
L; A R O L I N A
Mecklenburg County
35.120146,-80.840163
CAG
WETI-AIV❑ SERVICES
Charlotte, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0046 McMullen Creek at Quail Hollow\PETS\ArcGIS\Figurel_USGS.mxd

aE CuD
o
uB Riverbentl Cu Rtl �a��P �,
C Ria earn
M�n�9ue s000tCt CuD G\e Me
�
HeathSteaaP 9eCt E
took , Sherbroo q/q
B2
Ce Gt kepr ti//p`
Hieathr, yI& Heath
�eCCeb Bramwyck Dr Qa
Squarew s/off Valley Rd c•
M o'sota�r
0eed�,Gv
` e<
d
e`p
lexandra �
CeD\Alley
/j; SG,ry eB
D
�° os
Pa E
�'/ � h•
Me
N
p/ ��
��,
e<�� m
U` �
Greened
Magnolia
d
yVk E St/e as Ri aron
°i
rO � v � n o
hsoh co
MeB
d '� •L�j�.
D c
r
° Penaai !h
IuB
pro
W a
e a E
/�
WkB ee Gel U
Ra
PaE
R
m �3 N5e�a�
c�
Canoebrook
NN �co�\raSPt
WkB
�o
U
w O Bar Harbor Ln
Rd
MeD
o
c
0
G/eneagtes
�0� W
\�
�
��
Q\ Ra
�j�c`e c m
o
IrB 5r�\\\�� 0
ed//e
S g
eB
IrB 07
aye
Wkg (luail
Glenn Ct
e Cp
Seminole C �°
t � �
UJ
IIJB
Waller Wy
WkE
I B
WkB
WkB
s°G
m o
0
WkD
B
E s
WkB
� °
I B i:, 00,
M0
W 0 be/%
u
3 pr
Wk
Q
Wu
c �
e
pp �a9e
WkE
pr
0
s wkE
IrB ��
Legend
h
Soil Unit Name and Description Hydric Coverage (%)
�
C Project Limits (13.5 ac.)
WkB Wilkes loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes No 5.7
U
m
WkD Wilkes loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes No 49.5
o
Roads
WkE Wilkes loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes No 44.8 Qt Wk Car
Total Coverage: 100 \�dst�0
1, 000 500 0 1,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY, INC, DATED 2020. Wkg
SCALE:
1 inch = 1,000 feet
DATE:
3/11/2020
USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey
of Mecklenburg County
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
2020-0046
ALH
L; A R O L I N A
Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Mecklenburg County
2-1
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
35.120146,-80.840163
CAG
WETLAIV❑ SERVICES
Charlotte, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0046 McMullen Creek at Quail Hollow\PETS\ArcGIS\Figure2_CurrentSoils.mxd

G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0046 McMullen Creek at Quail Hollow\PETS\ArcGIS\Figure3_Aerial.mxd

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Attachments
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
ATTACHMENT A:
NCNHP Data Review Report

ray Ray Cooper. Governor
•� 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF Susl Hamilton, Secretary
ma,,RN NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
M now Walter Clark. Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-11577
March 4. 2020
Arnie Hoy
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
RE: McMullen Creek; 2020-0046
Dear Arnie Hoy:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.aov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler(c ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7MEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESCVRCES
{t 121 w JONES STREET. R ALEIG3 4. NC 27603 , ICI NIAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH- NC ?7699
DPC 91;1.70?1 j120 • f-AX 9M 707 5121

0
« a
m
}
0
/
m
>
\ \2
\
2
\
\
/
/
E
\
\
/
E
,
j
/
■
\
M.
§
\
/

V
I

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Attachments
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
ATTACHMENT B:
Photopage (Photographs 1-8)

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Attachment B - Photopage
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
Photograph 1. View of unsuitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth coneflower, and
Michaux's sumac, facing south.
Photograph 2. View of unsuitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth coneflower, and
Michaux's sumac, facing southeast.
Photopage 1 of 4

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Attachment B - Photopage
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
Photograph 3. View of unsuitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth coneflower, and
Michaux's sumac, facing west-northwest.
Photograph 4. View of unsuitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth coneflower, and
Michaux's sumac, facing northwest.
Photopage 2 of 4

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Attachment B - Photopage
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
Photograph 5. View of unsuitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth coneflower, and
Michaux's sumac, facing northwest.
_W X
_ rl I' � '
M.
_ t
• ti Y+ Y
s
Photograph 6. View of unsuitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter, facing northeast.
Photopage 3 of 4

Rosemary/Sharon Hills (Amendment #1)
Attachment B - Photopage
March 17, 2020
CWS Project No. 2020-0046
Photograph 7. View of unsuitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter, facing northeast.
Photograph 8. View of unsuitable habitat for Carolina heelsplitter, facing south-southwest.
Photopage 4 of 4