20010936 Ver 1_Complete File_20010611

,,. 5TA7E
M?
0 0,
?11
00
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COp`,
401. /S
-E
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR
June 4, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
/ ?.
1010 9 3 0".
ATTENTION: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer h
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Wayne County, Pipe replacement at Bridge Mainterance Site # 95-
2198 on SR 1744, 0.35 miles from NC 55, northeast of Mount
Olive, at unnamed tributary to Northeast Cape Fear River in Cape
Fear River Basin.
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace
the existing corrugated metal pipe arch (CM.PA) located at the unnamed tributary to
Northeast Cape Fear River on SR 1744, near Mount Olive. NCDOT proposes to replace
two 60" diameter CMPA, 40 feet in length, with two CMPA, 87" wide by 63" tall and 60
feet in length with aluminum headwalls. The subject maintenance pipe replacement is
necessary to meet current hydraulic design specifications and to upgrade degraded existing
pipes. The proposed pipes will be slightly realigned to protect an adjacent landowner from
further streambank erosion in close proximity to an existing outbuilding. No impacts to
wetlands or riparian buffers are anticipated as a result of the proposed action. The
existing stream channel will not be widened or significantly altered by the proposed
proj ect.
Temporary dewatering will occur during the pipe replacement activities in order to
allow construction in the stream channel with minimal impacts to water quality. Sheet
metal cofferdams are inserted downstream of the subject pipe or culvert, with an opening
to allow drainage within the work area. Sheet metal cofferdams are then installed
upstream of the subject pipe or culvert, temporarily damming the flow in the stream. The
SECRETARY
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
final piece of sheet metal is then inserted to prevent and disturbed sediments from
- impacting turbidity levels in the stream. The stream flow is diverted by a pump around the
work-site and returned to the channel immediately downstream of the cofferdams. Water
pumped from the dewatered work zone is pumped into a "Silt Bag" or across a vegetated
area prior to allowing entry into the stream channel. Usually, the entire process from
installation to removal is completed within two to five working days. Minimal impacts to
the stream, riparian buffer zone or adjacent wetlands occur as the mechanical equipment
works from the existing roadway, with the sheet metal lowered in place by the excavator
from the roadway. Minimal vegetation is disturbed during this process and when
removed, the sheet metal cofferdams are simply pulled out by the excavator.
The construction of the project involves a road crossing of a stream that is located
in the Cape Fear River Basin and which at the time of this application is not subject to any
Riparian Buffer Rule.
The subject project has been reviewed by the Environmental Officer for the
presence of listed threatened and endangered species. The subject project has been
determined to have no effect on any listed threatened or endangered plant or animal
species.
The construction of the project is authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit
(NWP) 3, Maintenance. Notification for the use of this NWP to the USACE is required
for this project, as the project requires additional riprap to be used to stabilize the stream
banks and channel side slopes. By copy of this letter, courtesy notification to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) for Section 401 Water Quality Certificate
(WQC) No. 3290 is provided for this project. NCDOT will comply with all conditions
associated with this NWP and WQC.
By copy of this letter, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
also requests authorization under Nationwide Permit # 33 to temporarily dewater
jurisdictional waters during the subject maintenance pipe replacement. The subject project
includes the replacement of two 60" diameter CMPA, 40 feet in length, with two CMPA,
87" wide by 63" tall and 60 feet in length with aluminum headwalls. The subject
maintenance pipe replacement is necessary to meet current hydraulic design specifications
and to upgrade degraded existing pipe. The 401 WQC No. 3114 (which corresponds to
NWP 33) does not require written concurrence from the NCDWQ as NCDOT intends to
comply with conditions for the WQC.
Please contact Ms. Robin Little at [phone] if you need additional
information or if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jan es?I. Trogdon, III, P.E.
Di?ti n Engineer
Cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE,Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Creedmoor
Mr. Garland Pardue, USE-WS, Raleigh
Mr. Bryant Bunn, P.E., NCDOT Division Maintenance Engineer
Mr. JimmyMarler, Bridge Superintendent
Mr. Don Goins, P.E., Chief Engineer, Operations
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. Q )
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3, 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ® '
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. James H. Tro!?don III P.E. Division Engineer
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation /Division 4
P.O. Box 3165
Wi I son, NC 27895-3165
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: jtrogdon a, dot. state. ne.us
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ms. Robin M. Little
Company Affiliation: Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation/Division 4
P.O. Box 3165
Wilson. NC 27895-3165
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: rmlittle@. dot. state. nc.us
N-c 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailedsite plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge ## 95-2198, SR 1744
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only);
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: WAYNE Nearest Town: Mount Olive
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): 0.35 mile northeast of NC 55, on
SR 1744.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM orLat/Long): UTM 17 769031E 3899886N
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinctwaterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Rural,
agricultural.
7. Property size (acres): NA
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed tributary to Northeast
Cape Fear River, DWQ ID 9 18-74-(1) C Sw.
9. River Basin: Cape Fear River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available atlittp:/ih2o.eni•.state.nc.us/adminlmai2?/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Replace existing degraded lees with larger
pipes in order to accommodate hydraulic design flows and to realign to reduce streambank
erosion.
Page 4 of 12
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Heavy construction equipment ( back hoc track hoe excavator, dump trick
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Rural residential
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including; all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: NA
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetlaiid***
0 no

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Innpactine lude, but are not limited to: nicclianized clewing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditclring/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both stricture and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains ac identified flirougli die Federal EmergenLy Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain naps. Ivlaps are available through the FENIA Map Service Ccnter at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at Inthn:/iw??w.fema.eoc
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater mash, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing tivetlands on the property: NA
Total area of wetland impact proposed: NA
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 2 x 87" x 63"
CMPA 60 UT to Nottlicasl Cape
Fear River 23 Perennial

" List each impact separately and identify temporary Impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and assoclate6p-rap,
daiiis (sepa-ately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), rclocatron (Include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles sliowing the linear footprint for both fine original and relocated str-eanis mist be included.
Stream nannes can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstreauu named stream into %vlnicll it flows. USGS maps are available fluougli the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
y.yytii__usgs ;;o y. Several intennct sites also allow direct do\Nnload and printing of USGS neaps (e.g., y}_%y_iy_,toi)o oti eon
uest.coietc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 60
Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Iinpact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Namc of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bav. ocean. etc.)

* List each impact sepaately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, buM- ieads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
Page 6 of 12
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
All wetlands or surface waters not affected by the project wll be protected from unnecessary
encroachment. No staffing of construction equipment will be allowed in or near wetlands or
waters of the U.S. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Management
Practices for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during project
Coll Structi 011.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 21-1 .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
Page 7 of 12
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold 'as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
13t112://h2o.enr_state.nc_us/ncwetl ,nds%strin?ide.htm_1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at h(tp:hl??o.erestate.nc.us;ti?n?%in?le?.htn?. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Ll. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call tile SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No V1
Page 8 of 12
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Y. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 0 3 0
2 0 1.5 0
Total 0 0
Gone 1 extends out jU tect perpendicular Irom nem, bank of cttmwel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0260.
1I. Stortnwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Temporary dewaterim, and_allappropriate best mannement practices for sediment and erosion
control will be implemented during, pipe replacement.
Page 9 of 12
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater venerated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
1III. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violationof DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
tvl(,
AppIicartt/Agent's Signature Datcl
(A gent's?si??ature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage

Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Amy Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabams Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] CataN0a Henderson Nlecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durla.`am Johnston Rockingl>inl Wilson
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleglaany Edgeconabe Lee Stokes Yadkin
608 Falls of the Neuse Road Aslic Franklin Nash Sun),
Suite 120 Cas«ell Forsyth Norlhampton Vance
Page 10 of 12

Cl)

'
p ;} _ u 3 / LI •:?? ` ?I a ''
?p L #

:tl

CO

e ? III ? • ?' PI 'ii , ,i,, ?,' . ? •I ? - ? v - I

1.0

O _

//ff 11r
r.
9
N
-i
10
CIO

co Do

•'
`
AC ;
-
°? _ \ , ??_ i ,
?-?
i rl
-
?
_ _
_
L
ai `ymr.
e`
V 1
?!r!t . Cp@
u
I? e
a u
v ?
vIC
N
1
z ?-
U n
N
ry
S) J 1
/
s
?? i
? K
a ? r

t.
? i..
I w ,1 ? Y

u CV - / \
I

r-- i

?
" 1
\
\ N
f?

,
j

i
a _

o ?o
y ? .
U-? Q
a
v
1 N
U
z ,
a III V
Cn N

C,
11
.:Cem s
861 1651 ? BM 154

;: --.
•W •` -?lIU e ' Cem ---- ----- - ?,
? _
0
?
L? i
1
77:
i66
s

M
ount Olive
Municipal Airport__
.B
•
°
?
--8" 164 ?
= Emmanuel Ch
i
- °? Northeast q
i
i
Ch.
/6/ --
•
' \\ -??l ntJ `c y ` Cem -
lndus sal Waste
'
•
-
? -Pon 1,933
??!
`
Radio owe
Armory (WDiS) - _ ? J? !.
_- °) . o - . -- _
o _ ?- ' 7 I ?/7 Cem'.
A -r / I7

- ! Trailer "
t Par Cem
/6/...
Salem Ch_ 48--

\
,cod

n
/
1
e

..
/f
1= Cem vrage Disposal
S
°
F CC_
-
char
?

ST • -- -, - I ?.
Cem
i
1 4 i

N enc I,
"USGS TOPOQUAD MAP"
SCALE 1= 2bc'o' '
S (,lame) (Date) ,?`: or-a•"`??'
J
1ti Ra Goj y ? Go Y L Ra NoC3 - -- --
\ ?'tia /Ra Dr
- y N -
0 1.
I'a
N
h
ort
e
asf c,
y!
Ch
h
urc
j r F
_m t ???
-? Ra
Dr `
' a
( R
\ LY
+ c r
'
.t r
a
N}
Ly
` Bb E X Ha . Ex Y[ z?. "t cap' }: r11ti?
Ba
INt NoA ;..!^tE• L \ Non
_..
' / AvA Ra
< A
A
r
r
Go
j
L
.
Ra
:
Y
s
v?
Non
.
t
N
D2
I4
-
\
r
?
-.
• ":. ¦
yAY©2• Na Na AyE3 \
J G
J
E. / J
? Ke ks'ds? NoA NOP W. F1 o Go
•+; ;stab R'14?a
G
W
?
'
`
o
_ •
?1/ 2AyA RuA
?
aB rB<
r
:. 1y..
N
? AYA > c t\ .\\L'
?l
wq, P-
::•
I
V
-•
?
Y „?
I
Ra
G Ko e w f y[ RuB.- r?. =o NoA y LY \ =o
j
'a,.T
Go b?
....
\ ?
/ . •
r
r
...,
Go
,r
4`
?o
jr
?
N i ` ; W tgA
NoA o
f;e aAs
QoaROw prrb i ;t ?F .1
- ?T L`. . . i '>`. ,,` r p Go `{ ? \II G4 r .-ate., ° ,r3 rs
a
6Y
o R
N
r
a r•
'Nob
.
?'
4
?`s No
' ?
V
?,
?
B
Non Ra r Dr;? 'rcNan 7
Wan
EIt
¦
NoC Wa B?-F f Ra. NoA
"
f
'
Got
<
NOC Ko ''t
„ ?, W ' S5
\
\2
a `
R
F
N Run \
x`
.
j
\
c
r
?
.
? •
t
, .,
.tyy t Ra RuA NoA = Ly RuB Ra ,. r. , ti 9 t
1/
\ _ ©+?• 2
Ra ?jt
+. t
??
?
\
Y,.)1..-` CrY2 NN '?ib
4C^.rt
GO Dr God' ?.
0\\
R.
\\
G \
02 Go i -? N
Pa ._ R
A
'
y
,.NO
{
o
t.= aB
NOA W
N?BJ NoB t Ha~ F = NoA
^
2 LY NoA
` Ra ?i1 O ??3Q t,
NoA
;Ry02 \ Dr
U
" O
RuA
;b r t
ol
CfG?2-,
a??? r
`
i
!
1
+a
?,1., f j t P' !? RuB w'. ?° JaSt Jo` WaB
. # a x•
Chy ,?r?? ?`, '?1• lM C'" ? ?y?r? L ?f x-J1S.X 'I,,? , , `t /'R' ?t r :- r?K RuA ? ll?t
ti q, ?tl? Wo tM1fo : y ;bill 7rr y R R ,
/
Y 2
] r
w E1?
` V }LY OI 4Y f1 . )
Lt
.
w°
tl G
f
Y
t ?p i
7? r ?
r, 4f
y, r .r
?a[3
t 1 f' 6b L'
Nr[32 C[CZ?
1 r Y~Z.r.? alb , ayJ•1' 7 _ .i ?.. Y -•?[y1.i' A O .1 ??
J
1 7
i
'
"
.
s
.
b r
13h.
Y82 w r
•?
t7 r??.,+7,t r -y ? '?•-`',? ?'" e` , a ?? .+ t .yr•y??• K? :,':?.?, it
ar') r •/'' .?. 't t ^ Y -^??. ?rf
•
L ?'a. `
,k.,,,. iSS.'Y fu:?'.f"'.'* t ,?.-.' f 333 { #
/Y4? e I ° ? . trl• ?. •?w? r?? r.} s d.. Y? .e? +`, Ar f :'r^`
-. yT ? . r k
i .(?
?' ,,,
4
1
i• ['yam
e
?
,
z t
?
?.?
4
} ?
''7]'F.
rv ?..rr 4
u
,71 CT 1
fro,
((
1
(loins lower right) 2 300 000 FEET

?? r{ + f t c Wap / Go 0
Y
r s ` $
j
'?
2.1
F
t},ti c. } k T jjo rWe
( Wa
.
,:? r T
., r JS`
y
_
`? ^1,??{lr? . 33. t,
r ;;Ja?,ts _
`,F .? 'r,
'
t' f :
k
?
1
;
•
F ,s tt ?srF a uj f'. r . -Js? h

r .a 1 r

USDA/NRCS SOIL SURVEY -
COUNTY vjAvt C SHEET # ?7 ? a
Q.
SCALE ha 1.20 000 Al-It L ?r?'(a1 r
z - s (Vatne) ~(Date) •'r ar .+"\1
M&,y,

U)
W
W
S

?
Q
f-
O
f-

-
F-

ZD
O
U
W
Z
?-
a
z
o
z

w r-
w

U?
C/)
z
0
w
z

o cn
z N
0
Cl-
W 0
0 Ln

z
O ii

0-
0 x W
U J
V) a
W U
o 1 IL/)
v
ti
?r
? j
X.LIg •?j 09
H0d3 .?9 Z a350d0238
Sld3??(10 a3?0'8?1
i
P
T { ml U
y a, <, r !
i
... ..
C
t t,i
rn vi
?. W ;. ?..
L,
Lli
. i
U_
N .c..
V) p
Q N.
r?
r

t
Os

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
Govcrvoit
March 21, 2001
COUNTY: Wayne
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. T. M. Little, PE
District Engineer
FROM: J. L. Lindsey, PE
Hydraulics Man• ger of Maintenance Studies
SUBJECT: Drainage Structure Recommendation for
SR 1744 +/- 1600' north of NC 55
LY,,,DO Twi,Err
SECRETARY
Pursuant to the request by Mr. Chris Pendergraph of your staff, for pipe size recommendation at
subject site, the following is offered.
Drainage area = 1.2 square miles
Existing structure reported as 2 @ 54"
Recommended pipe size is 2 @ 87" X 63" CMPA with headwall
This recommendation is made from an office review only. Specific site conditions or
limitations may dictate the use of an alternate structure. If such conditions are noted, please
contact this office for further analysis.
JLL
cc: Mr. J. H. Trogdon, III, PE
Mr. Jimmy Marler
MAILING ADDRESS:
H,::R _ :s Una-
1???h1 SL'pi: 'l,--uTER
Rzo -+ NC 27699-159o
FAX =°J •C3

LOCATION:
C_'.T_? C.VPLE\
iC_0 S ?c, R nE D-31?E
RALE?GH NC