20201051 Ver 1_Delineation Package_20200814

'Hem6y, Bridge
Stallings
Lake
Parrd
�j
1
Unionville
w
f
VAN
M
&M , --
I
�'
Indian Trail
rlmwl
`
t0 o
-_
Welsey�Chapel
-4 Ell
ON
Latitude: 35.038597 d-:
-80.600228
Project ..,
County, NC
ImprovementsUnion
_.
Study .County,

ANN-
ao
kS�F�r �
V
N L J Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
(0��1P
CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �`i Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 - Wetlands Revised:
Figure 2:
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: USGS Map Sheet 1 Of 10 )

►R]
L�
El
ERS RD
4�
N L J Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
CAROLINA Feet = Sheet Limits �`i Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
DECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 -Wetlands Revised:
Figure 2:
((��1
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: USGS Map Sheet 2 of 10 )

ER S RD
-Z.MMW
N
1.l
�(lD:CAROLINA Feet
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200
w
WF
LJ Study Area Intermittent Stream
Sheet Limits Perennial Stream
- Wetlands
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map
Map Date: August 2020
Revised:
Revised:
853W Zone Improvements
Union County, NC
Figure 2:
USGS Map (Sheet 3 of 10)
Revised:

F
Fj
In
N L J Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
CAROLINA Feet = Sheet Limits �`i Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
DECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 -Wetlands Revised:
Figure 2:
((��1
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: USGS Map Sheet 4 of 10 )

JAi►'!,ES HAMI L
WG
N L J Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
CAROLINA Feet = Sheet Limits �`i Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
DECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 -Wetlands Revised:
Figure 2:
((��1
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: USGS Map Sheet 5 of 10 )

650
650
Ef
;n
.4
SIi
SJ
WE-1,09-
ors
N L J Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
(0��1P
CAROLINA Feet = Sheet Limits �`i Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 - Wetlands Revised:
Figure 2:
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological USGS Ma Sheet 6 of 10
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: P

1`0
1101,
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
((��1 CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �`i Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�1:JECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 — Wetlands Revised:
Figure 2:
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological USGS Ma
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: p Sheet 7 of 10 )

0r
SN
N L J Study Area Intermittent Stream
((����:1CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �`i Perennial Stream
�1:JECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 - Wetlands
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map
Map Date: August 2020
Revised:
Revised:
Revised:
853W Zone Improvements
Union County, NC
Figure 2:
USGS Map (Sheet 8 of 10)

50 )
ft�j
1
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
DCAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �`i Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 —Wetlands Revised:
Figure 2:
((��1
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological USGS Ma Sheet 9 of 10
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: P

(Bearskin Creek_(SO),
r)
l�l
650
N L J Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
(0��1P
CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �`i Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 - Wetlands Revised:
Figure 2:
Bakers (2013) and Monroe (2013) US Geological USGS Ma Sheet 10 of 10
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map Revised: P

O
-ff D
h.
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
((��1 CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�1:JECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 1 of 10)

tg l FAX
.. �'
ip
/ A
IN
Pip
4.
1 YLr , k r.� -
IL aa
Ai
yR y
2
�.
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 2 of 10)

N
'Y �',
Sk
4.
_
A
b 4A
A r�
1
r i �.
W-
y r
A`
"
t
} 7
.L
i
1 .. .o J. '�j(}(/.Y A Ar - � �p � it } ��*- ` }� • 1.'h{_ '�1 r
"I 1
•
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 3 of 10)

1 , 4f _
1 T `%
:AP r ►
F /!
TV -
AN
F r
�. 711�
T � 3
` � � :mow '�. � ..,• , �; �,q�`
.A rk. yy IL
y
7.4" T,7,4.i�wf
t i
�i
M y�►��N T
0
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 4 of 10)

t
1 �' � � C_•C' F
N.
N
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised:
�ECOSYSTEMS
0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised:
a
A
853W Zone Improvements
Union County, NC
Figure 3: Aquatic
Resources Map (Sheet 5 of 10)
1

'r
SI
1
to's
. . ....... .. . ....
s
�s
'J'..
�N t
ra�
^_`4'4% k
AL
w ON x
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
DCAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 6 of 10)

F r I
k
r t Y
x ,
6
P
L $+
r
ter,
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS
0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 7 of 10)

4r,
ft
i 4
�y
Not-
'i F
x
,A
4
i
f.
IWA
own
IL
ISOMER— T
f
f
VtX
12
44
it slim..
4 �
C
* h
4 4
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
(0��1P
CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits �� Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 9 of 10)

Bearskin Creek (S ,
km
if
IL
N Study Area Intermittent Stream Map Date: August 2020 853W Zone Improvements
D(CAROLINA Feet Sheet Limits Perennial Stream Revised: Union County, NC
�ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Revised:
- Wetlands Figure 3: Aquatic
2019 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: Resources Map (Sheet 10 of 10)

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region VCV ,,&
Project/Site: 85-1 VvOli J - L-) A- City/County: D n Sampling Date: 11 0Iq /'/�^
Applicant/Owner: IM0164- 4 vfira_L)�\ State:.. fie- Sampling Point: we 00,
Investigator(s): �,• k ,. C< Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): QW00A Locai relief (concave, convex, none): C-6n.LO, v-e, Slope
,(`%�):_ 0-
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): GRR Imo- 13Io1 Lat: 35, 3(�Long: - 210,E 6 n 1 D Datum:
�I WyS prI
Soil Map Unit Name: C+ - 1,, V�o�n�QT�;► NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? rJ o Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes \/,**' No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes J o Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes / No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A31
— Oxidized r:`^izos^kerns or Livirg Roots (C3)
_ CROSS Trin. Li.^,G:: (515)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_✓Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): -�
Water Table Present? Yes
No = Depth (inches): �.
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -Z No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Trot Rtro}nm /Pint ci,o- o�
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
SaNina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.2') A�;x Lq.(A \ — Z (�LL
2.lr,cC�Qr'IS `at M,inVEa
3. L.q,,7 r-A C_
5.
7
9.
s = Total Cover
50% of total cover:_ 20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
2.3. SC,rPtnS C�oPClnin"� f� ��
t viv11n
6.
7.
8._
10.
11.
95- = Total Cover
50% of total cover:_ 20% of total cover: �?
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3. _
4.
5. ZL
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
Sampling Pointe
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
�j
Species Across All Strata:
oC
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OO
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_V/2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hvdric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to
or co
Sampling Point:VV1 \J,hf "
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color moist % Type I_oc Texture Remarks
7.5-r9
y - Ia `7,5 YRs iP_ L cL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) — Redox Dark Surface (F6) M Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) — Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, — Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surfac (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Flo !ul<ir- Soils (F 19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydr,)logy mist he present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: /
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes I/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Project/Site: 6;
Applicant/Owner:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region \0& vP
city/ QUn : i T 4 Sampling gate: 2-4 tiled 15
State: _,(_ � Sampling Point:, Q,a
Investigator(s): C. H a` p�� . C-f Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): f Local relief (concave, convex, none): �ti(�Q� Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRRA): M9. V�� 13Lat: 35' Q3,(-L, Long: �,C2> 1 Datum:W&.. u
Soil Map Unit Name: R l Q� r, p�f10lT n Ak 601" NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes y _ No , _ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil aT or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? X Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes �^ No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? X (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _. X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No___&_ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Now,_,_,'
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reguired)
Primary- Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
— True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ , Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
„-„ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Linea (816)
Marks (61)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Water
Sediment Deposits (62)
Y Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
T Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D?)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
^_
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):,,,
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes
includes caoilia fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring Well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
i
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Stratm-Wwe scientific names of plants.
------' �- --30 Absolute Dominant inuxcam
Tr4e Stratum (Plot size: J/
Number of Dominant Species
KV
----- —
--|T*aNwnbermDominan
1 Percent ot Dominant Species
Total Cover
%m eomnrtotal �uvwr____
size:SA (Plot
QL=Total Cover
5u%o,total cover: -l-�_uommtotal cover: __L�c�
EgLo. §��u�(Plot size: _____��___)
2.
o
r
`u
Total Cover
Aef �f L
50% of total cover: 20% total cover:
(Plot
1
10 EA(-
~____._____�___._
m
4
«
----- ---------�
Total Cover
50% oftotal cover, _oumutotal cover:__�9=_
photo numnors, here or on
oaL spad*u
x,
pACW spmuiev
v2x__-_____
F*Copeciou
x»~___'
pAcu^peciow
»«=_____-_-
upLspecies;
,o=_______
Prevalence Index =om~
Rapid Test for HydmphyticVegetation
��� Dominance Test w>uO%
»' Prevalence Index isx3.V'
4'Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in nmmunw or on x separate *heel)
Problematic wyompoyUuVegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric &oil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
rnore In diameter at bre.ast height (DBH), regardless of
SaplingiShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. D8H and greater than or equal to �.23 ft (1
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and w(iody plants less than 3.28 ft tall -
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3." ft. In
Hydrophytic
Present? 9 No
US Army Corps mEngineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont, ' Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: YJ C, 0 P
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth _ Matrix
_
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) T%
Color (moist) "% TVRG �L Texture
Remarks
Io0
�I C) 1!l.?f(p..
a eta We
'Type: G- Concentration. D=Qepletion RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location.
PL=_Pore Li11jn r P,1 Matrix.
Hydric Soi; Indicatora:
Indicators
_
for Problorn .tic Hydric Solis3:
R Histosoi (Al)
[lark Surface (S7) —
2 cm Muck (s+1Q) (MLRA 147)
H€stic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvaiue Below Surface (SS) (WRA 147, 148) _
Coast Prairie Rettox (A16)
Black Histic. (A })
Thin Dark Surface (89) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
� Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (AB)
R Depleted Matrix (173)
(11VILRA 136, 147)
— 2 cm Muck (Al Q) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (r 6) � V,
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Qther (Explain; in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
„ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LAR N,
Iron-Mar;ganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 146)
1111'�F€A 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
A Umbric Surface (F1.3) (MLRA 136, 122) 'indicators
of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (P.WRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (86)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or peobiematic.
Restrictive Layer (€,f observed);
TypeT-
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes— No
Remarkrs�� �_
US Army Corps of Engineers E"lern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 ­� E
Date: �3 S
Project/Site:j S 0�
Latitude: , 05 1 7)
Evaluator: CI
1' !
lJ
County: UNO^
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent .� 5-
Stream Detemaination,jcircle one)
E hemeral Intermittent> Perennial
p �rmit !
Other
e. Quad Name:
g
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30* v
-
t_�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 'I • )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
,2 j
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
06D
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1)
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0._
�05
_1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolociv (Subtotal = e� )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1-3>
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
; 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
T
1.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
ges =
C_ Rioloav (Subtotal = `7' 1 -'
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
' 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
�
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
%0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
they_-- U
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: `1 5t�

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S �_
Date: j
Pro ectlSite:gs� Wo�Latitude:
,fp-
s ©q�o
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent I-
Stream Deter I circle one)
Ephemeral. Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30-
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
' 0
-
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B_ Hvdroloov (Subtotal = A 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5)
0
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1',N
_ 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
r` Rinlnrni /G ihtntal = '�, 1_'1'' 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: - t'
r1
Sketch: l CJr^,

-%Tl+ "All l C+Fnrm VPrcinn 4_11 3 }mot
Date: �, ��� (
-
Project/Site:OS3 ��
Latitude:3�
Evaluator:
County: I I P .
Longitude: ' , p
Total Points: ���
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination circle one)
Ephemera Intermittent erennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if > 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
--i1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1.1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
1
3
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
3
14. Leaf litter
5
ig
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No
= 0
LY es = 3

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5 T
Date: I' / a3V I
Project/Site: &5-M
Latitude: �3 S. n-5 (,7
Evaluator: ��, ,{
County: f)'610
Longitude: -80. 60_o
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral mittenitf Perennial
E p Inter�
Other
e. Quad Name:
g
if>_ 19 or perennial if 2: 30*
`-;
� A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = r-
.J)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
- 1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
"' Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discus .ons in manual '-
R Hvdmlaav (Subtotal = 2: 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2'
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
l2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Q
1
-2
3
22. Fish
0,'
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
.0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0;)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
L = 1. Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 l)
Date:
Project/Site: 8 j's 00 Cf Li K
Latitude: 35
Evaluator:
County:
-
Longitude:g
Total Points: �.
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
Stream19 or if _ 30* is at least intermittent (:'
`
Ephemeral , Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1 'y
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
(02
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o _ 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2')
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
(:g
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5 :
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
(1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3 y -
C_ Bioloov (Subtotal = �� 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0_'
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0_1
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
Q, `
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other ='0.
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
_
Notes:
Sketch:
5

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S
Date: I ' aL�
Project/Site:
Latitude: 3y Q
Evaluator: ` W �; ., . ., r
County: ti
Longitude: _ 40 6 f) -�
Total Points: {
Stream is at least intermittent I,
Stream Deterrpination..(circle one)
Ephemeral (intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
-•--
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = V) )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool se uence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
i 2-
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
-- 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = R _< )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5`
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
r 0 5 ';
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
(
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
QYes = 3 ;
C Rininnv (Suhtntal = � . _-� 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
737
2.
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
d
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.757 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: